Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWater_70_PA-2011-01555 CITY OF December 19,2011 City of Ashland/Russell Lawrence 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 RE: Planning Action#2011-01555 Notice of Final Decision On December 19,2011,the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved your request for the following: PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01555 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 70 Water Street APPLICANT: Russell Lawrence/StreamFix/City of Ashland DESCRIPTION: A request for a Limited Activity and Use Permit and a Physical and Environmental (P&E) Permit to perform in-stream work within Ashland Creek. The project is to mitigate flood passage and improve aquatic habit underneath the Water Street Bridge. The project also involves removing dead and hazardous trees within the Riparian Corridor. The project work area will be from just south of the creek crossing underneath the bridge,to just past the Million Ditch diversion point adjacent to 70 Water Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09BB; TAX LOTS: 400, 15800, 16400. The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Prior to the final decision date,anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in the ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application,by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue,precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. If you have any questions regarding this decision,please contact the Community Development Department between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm,Monday through Friday at(541)488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel:541488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax:541-552-2050 Ashland,Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 FRI www,ashland.orms Ima I ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01555 . SUBJECT PROPERTY: 70 Water Street APPLICANT: Russell Lawrence /City of Ashland DESCRIPTION: A request for a Limited Activity and Use Permit and a Physical and Environmental (P&E) Permit to perform in-stream work within Ashland Creek. The project is to mitigate flood passage and improve aquatic habit underneath the Water Street Bridge. The project also involves removing dead and hazardous trees within the Riparian Corridor. The project work area will be from just south of the creek crossing underneath the bridge, to just past the Million Ditch diversion point adjacent to 70 Water Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09BB; TAX LOTS: 400, 15800, 16400 SUBMITTAL DATE: November 01, 2011 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: November 23, 2011 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: December 19, 2011 APPEAL DEADLINE DATE: January 03,2012 FINAL DECISION DATE: January 04, 2012 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: January 04, 2012 DECISION The project is located along Ashland Creek between North Main Street and Central Avenue. In addition to the Water Street right-of-way, there are 3 parcels involved with this application; the Plaza Hotel (tax lot 400) and Ashland Creek Inn (tax lot 16400) has the Ashland Creek riparian corridor passing through the property boundaries; and 5 B Street (tax lot 1588) which the work will be conducted from. The 1997 flood caused the previous Water Street Bridge to fail causing damage to the surrounding area. The present bridge was constructed in 2005, however over time sediment deposited under the bridge has reduced the opening to approximately 197 square feet, and continued sediment collection will further compromise the culvert's ability to pass sediment loads and raise flood levels above the bridge. The issue is lack of depth and/or gradient to maintain the creek's ability to pass sediment load. This problem is directly related to an existing irrigation diversion dam approximately 150 feet downstream of the bridge. The request is for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit and a Limited Use and Activity Permit for restoration work to be performed within Ashland Creek. The applicants findings state the goal of the project is "to mitigate existing hazards and improve sediment and flood passage while improving aquatic habitat [by] removing in-stream flow impediments". This is to be accomplished by re-establishing the necessary gradient to pass the creek's sediment load over time while better accommodating flow; and by removing an existing low fish passage barrier and replace with six porous weirs, or-vanes, to be installed within Ashland Creek. The vanes will be made of large angular stone with wood root-wads incorporated into them. They will each have an intermediate step to maintain fish passage during low flows, while being PA#2011-01555 70 Water Street/NW Page 1 sufficiently robust to withstand anticipated flood flows. The function of the in-stream weirs will minimize the near bank shear stress, reduce bank erosion, ensure sediment transport, and maximize stability of the proposed area. This.restoration project does not involve development or the creation of impervious surfaces, but does require in-stream work that will occur completely within the riparian corridor to achieve the project goals. In order to minimize downstream aquatic impacts, the project area will be "de- watered" during construction, which means constructing a dam at the upper end of the project and piping the water downstream. As the water is removed, a qualified fish biologist will electro- shock the creek bed to find and remove all aquatic life from the project area. The dewatering plan will be reviewed and approved by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) prior to installation and closely followed during the construction process. Access to the project area will be above the creels from atop of the Water Street Bridge and from tax lot 15800. All utilities are either attached to the bridge structure or in the street right-of-way. No utilities will be disturbed in the proposed project work area. The project will likely require the bridge on Water St. to be closed to accommodate construction activities such as delivering materials and removal of excess excavation. Since there is no parking available between the bridge and B St. now, local businesses will not be impacted. All on-street construction parking can be accommodated in that area. The project contractor shall prepare and submit for approval, a traffic re-routing plan for implementation during the project construction period. The project is anticipated to disturb approximately 8,785 square feet of area. Work will include approximately 1,350 cubic yards of excavation and 580 cubic yards of fill, including stone. Approximately 260 cubic yards of stone will used for the vanes, and approximately 100 cubic yards of top soil will be imported to replace the pre-existing construction debris across from the hotel. The low-head damn constitutes another 15 cubic yards of concrete plus 3.5 cubic yards of concrete debris located upstream of the bridge will also be removed from the creek during the project process. Slopes currently exceed 25 percent south of the Water Street Bridge on the left side, and north of the bridge on the right side. When the project is complete, the same slopes are likely to remain with heavily planted native vegetation that will quickly develop a stabilizing root system. Additionally, the in-stream weirs proposed assist in maintaining slope stability by substantially reducing near bank shear stress and accompanying bank erosion. An erosion and sediment control plan has been submitted with the application. All conditions of these plans shall be implemented and in place per recommendations of Harris Stream Services and the applicant. The application requests to remove several trees along the creek banks as part of the restoration of the riparian habitat. One cluster located near the upstream side of the bridge includes an 8- inch big Leaf Maple, an 8-inch Sequoia, and a 30-inch White Alder. The applicant stated these removals are necessary to accommodate the required cross-sectional configuration that is needed to achieve the project goals. Findings state that the trees are either dead, growing on an undercut bank and will likely fail in the future, or must be removed to accommodate the stable bank required to achieve the desired gradient.An additional small cluster of dead White Alders near the hotel have been requested to be removed by the property owner for safety reasons. The Tree Commission did not have a quorum for their December 8th 2011 meeting, therefore no comments were give for the request. However staff and Anne Thayer, the Parks Department Horticulturist, PA#2011-01555 70 Water Street/W Page 2 conducted site visits. Staff noted that the trees appear to be necessary to be removed as described in their application materials. All removal will conform to the necessary steps required for utilizing heavy machinery within the riparian corridor, and in accordance with the planting and landscape plan. All mitigation will comprise of native trees and shrubs as indicated on the submitted landscape plan. In accordance with AMC 18.61.084, mitigation trees are required for trees not considered to be a hazard. The applicant has stated that the planting plan submitted exceeds this requirement not only in the immediate vicinity of the removed trees, but also through blackberry removal and re-vegetation with a variety of native species. Mitigation requirements*for this project include restoration plantings to be installed at a 1:1.5 ratio. Because of the in-stream work performed, the "disturbance area" is disproportional to the amount of disturbed area out of water. However the applicant is proposing to remove non-native vegetation such as Himalayan Blackberries and English Ivy, re-grade the banks to meet project goals, and importing native top soil to enhance plant growth. The enhancement area includes 780 square feet of riparian planting and 2,135 square feet of upland planting for a total of 2,885 square feet of mitigation plantings. All restoration vegetation will be planted between October 1 and November 15 immediately following construction. The end result of this project will ultimately be a positive environmental benefit and contribute to the overall health of the riparian corridor. Flood passage will be improved, sediment transport will be balanced, and aquatic habitat will be greatly enhanced. Therefore the application is deemed to meet and exceed the regulatory statures of both the Physical and Environmental Constraints and Water Resource Protection ordinance. Two (2)copies of written findings addressing the following criteria from Chapter 18.63.070.D;WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION A Water Resource Permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the following: 1. All activities shall be located as far away from streams and wetlands as practicable, designed to minimize intrusion into the Water Resources Protection Zone and disturb as little of the surface area of the Water Resource Protection Zone as practicable. 2. The proposed activity shall be designed, located and-constructed to minimize excavation, grading, area of impervious surfaces,.1oss of native vegetation, erosion, and other adverse impacts on Water Resources, 3. On stream beds or banks within.the bank full stage, in wetlands, and on slopes of 25% or greater in a Water Resource Protection Zone, excavation, grading, installation of impervious surfaces, and.removal of native vegetation shall be avoided except where no practicable alternative exists, or where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. 4. Water, storm drain and sewer systems shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid exposure to floodwaters, and to avoid accidental discharges to streams and wetlands. 5. Stream channel repair and enhancement, riparian habitat restoration and enhancement and wetland restoration and enhancement will be restored through the implementation of a mitigation plan prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements in Section 18.63.120, 6 Long term conservation, management and maintenance of the Water Resource Protection Zone shall be ensured through preparation and recordation of a management plan as described in Section 18.63.120.C, except a management plan is not required for residentially zoned lots occupied only by a single-family dwelling and accessory structures. (Ord 3000,Added, 1211512009) ' b Two(2)copies of written findings addressing the following criteria from Chapter 18.62.040.1; PHYSICAL&ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS A Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the PA#2011-01555 70 Water Street/W Page 3 following: 1. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. 2. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. 3. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum permitted development permitted by the Land Use Ordinance. (ORD 2808, 1997;ORD 2834, 1998;ORD 2951, 2008) Two(2)copies of written findings addressing the following criteria from Chapter 18.61.080; TREE REMOVAL ' An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit. A. Hazard Tree:The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal. 1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning. 2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. B. Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard if the applicant demonstrates all of the following: 1. . The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application;and 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters,protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks;and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities,sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. 4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. (ORD 2951, 2008;ORD 2883, 2002) Planning Action 2011-01555 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever,then Planning Action 2011-01555 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: PA#2011-01555 70 Water Street/NIP Page 4 i 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. 2) That the project contractor shall prepare and submit for approval, a traffic re-routing plan for implementation during the project construction period. 3) The dewatering plan will be reviewed and approved by ODFW prior to installation and closely followed during the construction process. 4) That confirmation of approval from State and Federal authorities to be filed with the Planning Division so as to approval to the file. 5) That the tree protection and erosion control plan in accordance with submitted plans be in place and inspected by the Planning Division prior to any on-site construction or site disturbances. 6) That tree removal within the Ashland Creek protection zone will conform to the requirements of using power-assisted machinery within the riparian corridor in accordance with 18.63.060.1.i G, �6 2,6 fBill Molnar, Director Date Departure t of Community Development I i i i I i i PA#2011-01555 70 Water StreetfMP Page 5 s Easy Peel(Labels A Bend along line to. i ® AWRY@ 5260Tm Use P,very®Template 51600 Feed Paper expose Pop-Up EdgeTM PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11500 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 80002 —' PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16400 171 OAK STREET LLC 88 NORTH MAIN LLC ASHLAND CREEK HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 1169 96 MAIN ST STE 202 70 WATER ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5100 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 7300 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 3901 BAKER BARRY A/MICHELLE A BARD'S INN LIMITED PTNSHIP BARHAM GAIL P TRUSTEE FBO 122 HELMAN ST 1120 PROSPECT ST 117 N MAIN ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 90002 PA-2011-01555 391E09,BB 16100 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 90003 BERNARD RICHARD A TRUSTEE ET AL BLAIZE JOHN FRANK/MARY S BOULIANE ANNE 71 WATER ST 103 239 OAK ST 776 NOE ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94114 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 4501 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 10100 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5000 CAPP BRUCE TRUSTEE ET AL CLAYCOMB GORDON E TRSTE FBO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC 115 N MAIN ST 105 CHRISTY-COURT 246 FOURTH ST ASHLAND OR 97520 PHOENIX OR 97535 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5901 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 15600 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4600 CONSERVANCY LLC EDWARDS OREN E FOSSTER JOY TRUSTEE ET AL P 0 BOX 146 219 N MOUNTAIN AVE 116 CENTRAL AVE BOULDER CO 80306 ASHLAND OR.97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5200 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 9700 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5500 GEARY EDWARD A TRUST ET AL GINSBURG JUDITH R TRUSTEE ET AL GRIFFITHS MICHAEL TRUSTEE ET AL 476 MAIN ST 96 MAIN ST 202 . 1219 WEDGEWOOD DR ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 PA-2011-01555 391E091313 16200 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 100 PA-2011-01555 391E0913B 11200 GUNTER DANNY RAY/LISA HAINES LLOYD M TRUSTEE ET AL HAYES MERRILL E 247 OAK ST 96 MAIN ST 202 191 OAK ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E091313 16300 PA-2011-01555 391E09813 3900 PA-2011-01555 391E0913B 15900 HIBBERT JAMES F/E JANE LACHMUND ROBERT H JR TRSTEE LAURSEN ERIC TRUSTEE ET AL 263 OAK ST 125 N MAIN ST 550 ASHLAND LOOP RD ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E0913B 11000 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11100 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16700 LOVETT RICHARD P TRUSTEE MATHER CHARLENE M TRUSTEE ET AL OAKY DOAKY LLC PO BOX 427 14 B ST 1085 DEER VISTA LN ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E091313 11600 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16801 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 400 PAGE JOSEPH PECKHAM FRANCIS B JR PLAZA HOSPITALITY LLC 1 LOUDON LN 303 OAK ST 98 CENTRAL AVE LOUDONVILLE NY 12211 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 Etiquettes faciles b peter i Repliez a la hachure afin de; www.avery.com � chargement Utilisez le abarit AVERY®5160® i Sens de reveler le rebord Po p•U p TM 1-800-GO-AVERY g l � f -d a s jUaMbAegh f 09 WA all a sy peel. -®'J°008-L I � n I al�ang Iln® �uas I � vse Avery® & I Pap-Up Edg a I � . P44011 0 555;39 E09BB 1 6399 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5900 `—, PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 90001 POWEI i i ni IS /MICR Ei RUBIN MARGARET NASH SELBY KAREN TRUSTEE ET AL NO,� ADD--S 323 OAK ST 71 WATER ST 101 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520-1867 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 7500 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4900 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 2000 SHIELDS JOAN DARLENE SOMMERS ALAN/PHYLLIS NORRIS SOS PLUMBING & DRAIN SERVICE INC 123 CENTRAL AVE 117 HELMAN ST 206 PACIFIC HWY ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 5600 PA-2011-01555-391E04CC 5801 PA-201-1-01- 55-5391E09131311300 SPRAGUE FAMILY TRUST STERLING LINDA RAMSEY TRUSTEE SWINFORD RUBY LORENE PO BOX 1258 337 OAK ST 108 MACE RD ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 MEDFORD OR 97501 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 90002 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5800 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16800 . VAIL LUCINDA M TRUSTEE ET AL VAN AUSDALL JOHN MICHAEL VAN DER ZWAN CLAIRE S ET AL 1425 PACIFIC AVE- 40 VAN NESS AVE 642.8 WILSON LN SANTA ROSA CA 95404 ASHLAND OR 97520 CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5700 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 1200 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 7400 VARNEY MARIANNE WARREN FAMILY LTD PARTNERSP WARREN REBECCA P 0 BOX 744 132 N MAIN ST 75 HELMAN ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4500 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4800 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 15800, WILLSTATTER ALFRED TRUSTEE ET AL WINTERS CHERYL ANN/JEFF YOUNG MICHAEL H TRUSTEE ET AL 128 CENTRAL AVE 1205 DEER CREEK RD PO BOX 276 , @ASHLAND OR 97520 SELMA OR 97538 JACKSONVILLE OR 97530 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16400 PA-2011-01555 PA-2011-0.1555 City of Ashland—Public Works StrearnFix Michael &Jacquelyn Young, 51 Winburn Way Russell Lawrence, Engineer P 0 Box 276 Ashland OR 97520 19478 S Starview Ln Jacksonville OR 97530 Oregon City OR 97045 51 � I 70 Water St j i i I i pluettes fades a peler ; T a 3 dn-do8 p la � a� Y , �y 1®IGaAV 8b6 U ir��@p Y 00 j c�a yer OVII 6UOlq r Is r p-Up j 1-800-�O°A (mlead R 13 `\ Planning Department,51 WinL_. VVay,Ashland,Oregon 97520 C 1 T y 0 F 541-488-5305 Fax:541-552-2050 www.ashland.or,us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01555 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 70 Water Street OWN ERIAPPLI CANT: Russell Lawrence/StreamFix/City ofAshland DESCRIPTION: A request for a Limited Activity and Use Permit and a Physical and Environmental(P&E) Permit to perform in-stream work within Ashland Creek. The project is to mitigate flood passage and improve aquatic habit underneath the Water Street Bridge. The project also involves removing dead and hazardous trees within the Riparian Corridor. The project work area will be from just south of the creek crossing underneath the bridge, to just past the Million Ditch diversion point adjacent to 70 Water Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment,ZONING:E-1;ASSESSOR'S MAP:391E 09BB; TAX LOTS:400, 15800, 16400 NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on December 8,2011 at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Development and Engineering Services building(Siskiyou Room)located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 23, 2011 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: December 7, 2011 ,b ,os% at ,247 %. 230 f i r <lry�y t ! 221 it SUBJECT PROPERTIES: T !A 70 Water Street (39 1 E 09BB 18400) 0;' q 7 , 5 B Street (39 1 E 09BB 15800) 98 Central Ave (39 1E 09BB 400) O 25 50 100 Feet The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter,or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue,precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals(LUBA)on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building,51 Winburn Way,Ashland,Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request,please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. GAcomm-dev\planningWotices Mailed\2011\2011-01555.docx PHYSICAL& ENVIRONMENTAL CONST^HINTS 18.62.040,1 Criteria for Approval A Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the following; 1. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. 2. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. 3, That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum permitted development permitted by the Land Use Ordinance. (ORD 2808, 1997; ORD 2834, 1998; ORD 2951, 2008), LIMITED ACTIVITIES&USES WITHIN WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION ZONES 18.63.070.D Criteria for Approval 1. All activities shall be located as far away from streams and wetlands as practicable, designed to minimize intrusion into the Water Resources Protection Zone and disturb as little of the surface area of the Water Resource Protection Zone as practicable. 2. The proposed activity shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize excavation, grading, area of impervious surfaces, loss of native vegetation, erosion, and other adverse impacts on Water Resources. 3. On stream beds or banks within the bank full stage, in wetlands, and on slopes of 25% or greater in a Water Resource Protection Zone, excavation, grading, installation of impervious surfaces, and removal of native vegetation shall be avoided except where no practicable alternative exists, or where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. 4. Water, storm drain and sewer systems shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid exposure to floodwaters, and to avoid accidental discharges to streams and wetlands. 5. Stream channel repair and enhancement, riparian habitat restoration and enhancement and wetland restoration and enhancement will be restored through the implementation of a mitigation plan prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements in Section 18.63.120. 6. Long term conservation, management and maintenance of the Water Resource Protection Zone shall be ensured through preparation and recordation of a management plan as described in Section 18.63.120.C, except a management plan is not required for residentially zoned lots occupied only by a single-family dwelling and accessory structures. (Ord 3000,Added,1211512009) GAcomm-dev\planning\Notices Mailed\2011\2011-01555.docx i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On Wednesday November 23, 2011, 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2011-01555, 70 Water Street. Signatui6 of Employee Gtomm-devlplanningTons&HandoutslAffidavit of Mailing—Planning Action Notice.doc I PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11500 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 80002 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16400 171 OAK STREET LLC 88 NORTH MAIN LLC ASHLAND CREEK HOLDINGS LLC PO BOX 1169 96 MAIN ST STE 202 70 WATER ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5100 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 7300 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 3901 BAKER BARRY A/MICHELLE A BARD'S INN LIMITED PTNSHIP BARHAM GAIL P TRUSTEE FBO 122 HELMAN ST 1120 PROSPECT ST 117 N MAIN ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 90002 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16100 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 90003 BERNARD RICHARD A TRUSTEE ET AL BLAIZE JOHN FRANK/MARY S BOULIANE ANNE 71 WATER ST 103 239 OAK ST 776 NOE ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94114 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 4501 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 10100 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5000 CAPP BRUCE TRUSTEE ET AL CLAYCOMB GORDON E TRSTE FBO COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER INC 115 N MAIN ST 105 CHRISTY COURT 246 FOURTH ST ASHLAND OR 97520 PHOENIX OR 97535 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5901 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 15600 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4600 CONSERVANCY LLC EDWARDS OREN E FOSSTER JOY TRUSTEE ET AL P 0 BOX 146 219 N MOUNTAIN AVE 116 CENTRAL AVE BOULDER CO 80306 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5200 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 9700 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5500 GEARY EDWARD A TRUST ET AL GINSBURG JUDITH R TRUSTEE ET AL GRIFFITHS MICHAEL TRUSTEE ET AL 476 MAIN ST 96 MAIN ST 202 1219 WEDGEWOOD DR ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16200 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 100 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11200 GUNTER DANNY RAY/LISA HAINES LLOYD M TRUSTEE ET AL HAYES MERRILL E 247 OAK ST 96 MAIN ST 202 191 OAK ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16300 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 3900 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 15900 HIBBERT JAMES F/E JANE LACHMUND ROBERT H JR TRSTEE LAURSEN ERIC TRUSTEE ET AL 263 OAK ST 125 N MAIN ST 550 ASHLAND LOOP RD ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11000 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11100 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16700 LOVETT RICHARD P TRUSTEE MATHER CHARLENE M TRUSTEE ET AL OAKY DOAKY LLC PO BOX 427 14 B ST 1085 DEER VISTA LN j ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 i PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11600 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16801 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 400 ! PAGE JOSEPH PECKHAM FRANCIS B JR PLAZA HOSPITALITY LLC 1 LOUDON LN 303 OAK ST 98 CENTRAL AVE LOUDONVILLE NY 12211 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 I T A213AV-09-008-L f wjdn-dod pjogaj al j819A9j luawabjey' ( 09LG AH3AV 114ege6 al zasopn u10'AADAW ap up aan g' 4 e e 1 q zal da ap sues i I td salad q sall'e}saanbl 14 PA 2011 01555 391E09BB 16399 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5900 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 90001 D(1WE i i O IS /MICR E' RUBIN MARGARET NASH SELBY KAREN TRUSTEE ET AL NO ", &S 323 OAK ST 71 WATER ST 101 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520-1867 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 7500 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4900 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 2000 SHIELDS JOAN DARLENE SOMMERS ALAN/PHYLLIS NORRIS SOS PLUMBING & DRAIN SERVICE INC 123 CENTRAL AVE 117 HELMAN ST 206 PACIFIC HWY ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 5600 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5801 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 11300 SPRAGUE FAMILY TRUST STERLING LINDA RAMSEY TRUSTEE SWINFORD RUBY LORENE PO BOX 1258 337 OAK ST 108 MACE RD ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 MEDFORD OR 97501 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 90002 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5800 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16800 . VAIL LUCINDA M TRUSTEE ET AL VAN AUSDALL JOHN MICHAEL VAN DER ZWAN CLAIRE S ET AL 1425 PACIFIC AVE 40 VAN NESS AVE 6428 WILSON LN SANTA ROSA CA 95404 ASHLAND OR 97520 CENTRAL POINT OR 97502 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 5700 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 1200 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 7400 VARNEY MARIANNE WARREN FAMILY LTD PARTNERSP WARREN REBECCA P 0 BOX 744 132 N MAIN ST 75 HELMAN ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4500 PA-2011-01555 391E04CC 4800 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 15800 WILLSTATTER ALFRED TRUSTEE ET AL WINTERS CHERYL ANN/JEFF YOUNG MICHAEL H TRUSTEE ET AL 128 CENTRAL AVE 1205 DEER CREEK RD PO BOX 276 . ASHLAND OR 97520 SELMA OR 97538 JACKSONVILLE OR 97530 PA-2011-01555 391E09BB 16400 PA-2011-01555 PA-2011-01555 City of Ashland— Public Works StreamFix Michael &Jacquelyn Young 51 Winburn Way Russell Lawrence, Engineer P 0 Box 276 Ashland OR 97520 19478 S Starview Ln Jacksonville OR 97530 Oregon City OR 97045 51 11-22-2011 70 Water St T w186P3 dn-dod esodxe jaded paaA T 009LS ajeldwal @fjaAV asn ws09Z5 QAH9fiV 04 null 6uole puee slagel®lead Ase3 ' • ``� ,r.y,gy, i INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY .c'S' {` `�' Map Maker �. >{� ,.� '` ti+� , � Application Property Data Online Legend �y"` , � �• +err Selected Features kii}4k" r 7r � k 1 X41 Tax Lot Outlines +a r r kn Tax Lot Numbers ° , fj ' Vernal Pools 4f + x Wetlands lift O wotland fp e4 jar ® upland r r w r 1 = 2 � Streams and Ditches Applegate,Rogue,Boar } Rivers and Major Streams Named Streams '',`'mot �`{` ;• -•s. ' 7 7f� r- ,f Minor Streams 'wt,,,-" ," a F,• Inlermittent Streams +� T, r r f' Underground Streams 4 Lanais 01 ` _ r Canals•Tunnels/ r71 Siphons •������ gar �� �� �� �� � ' r} rM Y t Y a Mobile Home Parks Apartments ti , x, <r 4 r f Buildings F7f f , 4 r , l5, ti 4./ a N. ti 14 1 5 � 1 t, .9 r �r 1 , �g ,fir '�'� � �� � ���• �-� �! � far � •'� I•^,, % {{ �r,�rrr,�� t ,y z 7 - IT , r JACKSON r • COUNTY . �yr Thls ma is based on a digital database r °"'- "` , compiled by Jackson County From a variety f k' 141 { `• ��T"� �iirr,r`� cf sources.Jackson County cannot accept responsibily for errors,omissions or positional accu There are no expressed or Implied. Please recycle with colored office grade paper Created with MapMaker Map created on 1112212011 9:23:55 AM using web.iacksoncounty.org i' Zimbra Page 1 of 1 Zimbra pinam @ashland.orm, + Font size- Ashland Creek application: From :Russ Lawrence<russ @streamfix.com> Mon,Nov 21,201108:21 AM Subject:Ashland Creek application: PA-2011-01555 To:michael pina <michael.pina @ashland.or.us> Cc:Morgan Wayman <waymanm @ashland.or.us>,Jim Olson <olsonj @ashland.or.us> Hello Mike There is a relatively minor change in the design. We will be pulling an 8"pipe inside(through)the existing 10"steel diversion pipe instead of removing the existing 10"and installing new pipe where the 10"steel presently exists. There is sufficient capacity to deliver the water right quantity with this modification. The advantage of this change is we can minimize disturbing existing vegetation and total avoid touching tree root systems all together through the area of the existing pipe. Please note this change in the application documentation and give the change appropriate consideration in your deliberations. Please feel free to call should you have questions. Thank you Russ Lawrence,P.E.,M.Sc. Fluvial Geomorphologist StreamFix 19478 S.Starview Ln Oregon City,97045 o&f.•503.631.8184 c.•503.781.4885 ...................................I................... Let your stream and wetland problems be our problems i I I I i https:Hzimbra.ashland.or.us/zimbra/h/,nrintmessage?id=12645 11/21/2011 Michael H. &Jacquelyn J. Young P.O. Box 276 Jacksonville, OR 97530 Phone: (541) 899-4012 November 8, 2011 City of Ashland Planning Division 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 ATTENTION: Mike Pina RE: Zoning Permit Application File#PA-2011-01555 Dear Mr. Pina, We have received a copy of the City of Ashland's zoning permit application, as referenced above, from Russ Lawrence, of Stream Fix, who is the Engineer named on the application. He has informed me that as a property owner, I need to sign the application in order for the City's work on the Ashland Creek Riparian Bank Restoration Project to proceed. This is due to the fact that the project will involve our property and access thereto. Upon reviewing the application, we found that the street address shown in the Description of Property portion of the application is not the correct address of our property. It is shown as 70 Water Street and the correct address is actually 5 B Street. However, the Assessor's Map Number and Tax Lot information appear to be shown correctly. I spoke to Russ Lawrence about the error and he stated that the Water Street address was used for the purpose of identifying the property in the Map records and that I may note the correct property address on the application and go ahead and sign it. Therefore, I have done so and have noted the correct Property address of 5 B Street (circled) on the application. I wanted to make the City aware of this detail. As instructed by Mr. Lawrence, I have signed the application and am returning it herewith directly to you. Sincerely, Michael H. Young Enclosure I i i � .. Fr Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization N , Findings of fact Criteria Compliance: There are several sections of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance that must be satisfactorily addressed within the content of this application. Specifically criteria from Chapters 18.63.070.D; 18.62.040.I; 18.61.080; 18.62.040.H; 18.63.110;18.61.200; and applicable sections of chapter 15.10, Flood Damage Prevention Regulations. The response to the various criteria of these sections will be made using the following format: The requirements of the criteria will be written in italicized format. The response to that requirement will be written in non-italicized format immediately following the requirement. Chapter 18.63.070.D Water Resource Protection A water resource permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the following: 1. All Activities shall be located as far away from the streams and wetlands as practicable, designed to minimize intrusion into the Water Resources Protection Zone as practicable. This project requires in-stream work and will occur completely within the Water Resources Protection Zone. To accomplish the goals and objectives of the project, this intrusion cannot be practicably avoided. I 2. The proposed activity shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize excavation, grading, area of impervious surfaces, loss of native vegetation, erosion and other adverse impacts on Water Resources. The design of the j project avoids creation of impervious surfaces in its entirety. An erosion control plan has been prepared by a Certified Erosion Control Specialist for implementation during the construction of the project and to protect the project area until such time as the plantings can provide stable, natural protection. There is not a practicable way to avoid the removal of several native and planted trees in the project. These trees have been clearly identified in the tree removal plan. Several of the trees upstream of the water street bridge that will be removed presently exist in an undercut condition, i.e., the stream has undercut the banks where they presently grow. It will simply be a matter of time before these trees naturally tip in the direction of the creek in a manner that will likely impact traffic movement and any overhead utilities on Water Street until removed. The end result of this project will not have long term adverse impacts on the Water Resources. In fact, aquatic habitat will be enhanced through the creation of six pool riffle complexes where only two exist today and the removal of a low flow juvenile fish passage barrier. 3. On Stream beds or banks within the bank full stage, in wetlands, and on slopes of 25% or greater in a Water Resource Protection Zone, excavation, grading, i i I installation of impervious surfaces, and removal of native vegetation shall be avoided except where no practicable alternative exists, or where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. A 25% slope can also be described as a 4 foot vertical to 1 foot horizontal (4:1) slope. All of the slopes above the Water Street bridge on the left side of the creek, and the slope on stream right(looking downstream)just below the bridge exceed this gradient. When the project is completed, those same slope gradients are likely to exist, however, they will be heavily planted in native vegetation that will quickly develop a stabilizing root system. The plans for the planting may be found on the planting sheet of the submitted plans. The nature of the in-stream structures proposed for this project assist in maintaining slope stability by substantially reducing near bank shear stress and accompanying bank erosion. No new impervious area will be created by this project. 4. Water, storm drain and sewer systems shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid exposure to floodwaters, and to avoid accidental discharges to streams and wetlands. All water, storm water and sanitary sewer systems within the scope of the proposed work exist at this time. The only exposure these systems may have is their present location between the existing bridge girders above the stream. S. Stream channel repair and enhancement will be restored through the implementation of a mitigation plan prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements in Section 18.63.120. The mitigation plan called for under 18.63.120 has been prepared and is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part hereof. Chapter 18.62.040.I Physical and Environmental Constraints A Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the following: i I I 1. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. At this time the ability of the Water Street Bridge to pass its flood waters has been compromised by the accumulation of sediment. The sediment accumulation has reduced to bridge opening to approximately 197 square feet (s.f.). As time passes, unless addressed the sediment accumulation is likely to continue (your attention is invited to Technical Memorandum 1 attached here to as Exhibit B, and by this reference made a part hereof). The continued sediment collection will further compromise the ability of the bridge to pass its sediment load and raise flood levels above the bridge. The function of the in-stream structures proposed will minimize the near bank shear stress, reduce bank erosion, ensure sediment transport competence, and maximize the stability of the area within the proposed construction activities area. By restoring the ability of the stream to pass its sediment loads over the near and long term, the proposed project will at a minimum restore the ability of the bridge to pass the design floods and will likely increase that capacity. 2. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. The goals and objective of this project is to mitigate existing hazards and improve sediment and flood passage while improving aquatic habitat. The proposed in-stream structure accomplishes these goals and objectives while removing in-stream flow impediments, i.e., a low head dam in the vicinity of the Ashland Creek Inn. This dam also creates a low flow fish passage blockage for juvenile fish. 3. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum permitted development permitted by the Land Use Ordinance. (ORD 2808, 1997; ORD 2834, 1998; O RD 2951, 2008). This application proposes no development. The actions proposed will, for all practical purposes,be irreversible. However, the results of these actions are positive for the environment within the project area as well as up and down stream of the project site. Flood passage will be improved, sediment transport will be balanced, i.e., as much sediment leaving the project area as is arriving, aquatic habitat features improved three fold and a low flow juvenile fish passage barrier removed. Chapter 18.61.080 Tree Removal An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit. A. Hazard Tree: The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal. 1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning. The trees identified on the sheet of the plans for removal have been so identified for the following reasons: 1. The trees are dead as evidenced by sloughing bark and lack of leaf production; or 2. The trees are growing on an undercut bank and likely to fall in the future as they reach maturity; or 3. The trees must be removed to accommodate creation of a stable bank required by in-stream modification. The tree removal plan will show the reason associated with each tree with the reasons included irri legend of the plan. kv �.. A.,� .rk' n 05 K' i 2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. B. Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard if the applicant demonstrates all of the following: 1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; and 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability,flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. The trees proposed for removal meet the above criteria. The associated building footprint is shown on the tree removal plan sheet. 4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree j granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084 Such mitigation requirements shall be a conditions of approval of the permit. (ORD 2951, 2008; ORD 2883, 2002) AMC 18.61.084 requires the following: A. Replanting on site. The applicant shall plant either a minimum I I/a-inch caliper healthy and well-branched deciduous tree or a 5-6 foot tall evergreen tree for each tree removed. The replanted tree shall be of a species that will eventually equal or exceed the removed tree in size if appropriate for the new location. Larger trees may be required where the mitigation is intended, in part, to replace a visual screen between land uses. "Suitable"species means the tree' s growth habits and environmental requirements are conducive to the site, given the existing topography, soils, other vegetation, exposure to wind and sun, nearby structures, overhead wires, etc. The tree shall be planted and maintained according to the specifications in the City Tree Planting and Maintenance j Guidelines as approved by the City Council. The planting plan submitted f with this application exceeds these requirements not only in the immediate vicinity of where the trees are proposed to be removed, but also through I the removal of the blackberry patch and re-vegetation with a variety of native species on the right side of the stream below the bridge. i i i Chapter 18.62.040H Plans Required for Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit Plans as required by this chapter have been submitted with the application. 1. Additional plans and studies as required in Sections 18.62.070, 18.62.080, 18.62.090 and 18.62.100 of this chapter. • Section 18.62.070 No activities set forth in this section are proposed by this application • Section 18.62.080 There are no Hillside Lands within the scope of this application • Section 18.62.090 There are no Wildfire Lands within the scope of this application • Section 18.62.100 There are no Severe Constraint Lands within the scope of this application. Chapter 18.63.110 Plans Required for Water Resources Permit The following plans and information shall be submitted with the application for activities and uses in the Water Resource Protection Zone which are required to be processed under a Type I or Type II land use procedure including Limited Activities and Uses, Water Resource Protection Zone Reductions and Variances. 1. A narrative description of all proposed activities and uses including the extent to which any Water Resource Protection Zone is proposed to be altered or affected as a result of the proposed development activity or use (in terms of both square footage of surface disturbance and cubic yards of overall disturbance). Narrative f 1 Background: Ashland Creek is a volatile stream through the City of Ashland. During the late 1990's a double 11' culvert,passing Ashland Creek under Water St., failed causing local flood damage. In 2005 +/- the culverts were removed and the present bridge constructed. Since that time sufficient sediment has deposited under, and in the vicinity of, the bridge to compromise its ability to successfully pass floods as desired. i The proposed project addresses that problem by re-establishing the cross-sectional configuration and gradient necessary to pass the streams sediment load over time while better accommodating flood passage (reducing flood levels) than exists today. The project also removes a low flow fish passage barrier and creates 6 pool riffle complexes where 2 exist today. I The problem associated with the bridge is discussed in depth in Technical Memorandum 1, attached hereto (Exhibit B). In brief this memorandum has identified the underlying problem that is resulting in the noted sediment accumulation and alternatives todes ',F that problem. Alternatives: The problem is essentially one of lack of depth or gradient to maintain the ability of the stream to pass its sediment load (this is defined as sediment competence). This problem is directly connected to an existing irrigation diversion dam approximately 150 feet downstream of the bridge. The alternatives available to address the problem is to: a) substantially deepen the stream channel through the bridge (by 3 to 4 feet) and leave the channel at its present gradient, or b) remove the dam and restore the reach to a gradient more in keeping with naturally sustained upstream and downstream reaches. Both alternatives will require the installation of stabilizing in-stream structure. The first alternative, a), results in a problem with flood passage. If the present gradient is maintained, additional fill will be required to elevate the present stream banks to develop sufficient depth to move the stream's sediment load through the reach. Doing this under the Water St. bridge would effectively remove the ability of that bridge to pass any floods greater than an approximately 5 or 10 year recurrence interval flood. Since one of the project goals and objectives is to improve flood passage capacity, and this alternative would reduce that capacity, this alternative has been rejected without further analysis. Alternative b) addresses the problem of passing the sediment load while improving flood passage. This is done through the removal of the diversion dam and relocation of the Million Ditch irrigation water right diversion point. The new diversion point will be incorporated into a stone stream stabilization structure (described below) with a 1 or 2 j inch screen protected valve so the diversion can be shut off during non-irrigation periods (through winter flooding). There are several habitat improvements that will be associated with that move. Those include removal of a low flow fish passage barrier (the existing diversion dam), increased variety and quantities of desired habitat(several pool/riffle sequences), and installation of a state designed fish screen that will prevent fish from becoming trapped in the irrigation system. i i In-stream work: This alternative will be accomplished through the installation of 6 porous weirs, aka vanes. These structures will be made of large angular stone with wood incorporated into them, usually through the footer layer. A typical detail can be found among the accompanying plans and profiles. These vanes will each have an intermediate step in them to maintain acceptable fish passage (maximum 6 inch vertical jump) during low flows, while being sufficiently robust to withstand anticipated flood flows. i Vanes provide several positive hydraulic elements to the sustainability of a stable stream with enhanced habitat features. They are configured so near bank shear stresses (bank eroding stream flows) are redirected back toward the center of the stream channel resulting in calmer water along the banks. The re-directed flows assume a plunging vector as they pass over the arm, thus they do not extend across the stream. This results in maintenance of a deep pool that tails out into a riffle. There is also increased through- gravel (hyporehic) flow through the sediment that accumulates behind the arms of the vane and in the glide section of the pool that leads up to the riffle. These areas are prime salmonid species (in this case Steelhead and Coho salmon) spawning areas. The arms of the vanes, while re-directing the shear stresses, have the characteristic of extending those reduced shear stresses a distance of 2 to 3 times the arm length along the stream bank. This distinguishes these types of structures from other types of in-stream structure which either transmit the shear to the end of the structure, e.g., rip-rap armoring, or have only a local impact, e.g., groins and barbs that often result in eddy erosion of the banks in the immediate vicinity of the structure. Vanes are constructed through the careful placement of individual stones in a manner that prevents loss from undercutting, through the use of footer stones, and ensuring joints between layers do not match up, much like stacking hay. As the sediment material is removed for the placement of the stones, that material will be set aside, in the immediate vicinity of the work, and used as backfill around the vane material as construction proceeds. Excess sediment material will be removed from the site and disposed of at an approved upland site. Excavation work will include digging the pools within the in- stream structures. With the sediment load this stream experiences, it is logical to create the pools during construction rather than relying on a slower, and somewhat uncertain, natural pool creation process. Once created, the cascading elements of stream hydraulics over the in-stream structures will likely maintain the pool and riffle sequence. When completed, the in-stream structures will regularly redirect flow into the pool areas as the flow encounters the structure arms. This is a normal and natural flow phenomenon. In the process of being redirected, near bank shear stress is reduced and the pool riffle sequence is maintained. I The wood incorporated into these structures will be in the form of coniferous rootwads with attached boles set at elevations that will assure they are substantially underwater during all of the local fish life history, i.e., provide habitat/cover when they are rearing and passage shelter and resting areas when migrating. As noted above, these structures also maintain a pool/riffle configuration that is conducive to successful salmonid species i spawning and rearing. I There are no utilities that will be disturbed in the proposed project work area. They are all overhead in the bridge structure or street right of way. The project will likely require the bridge on Water St. to be closed to accommodate construction activities such ;", delivering materials and removal of excess excavation. Since there is no parking ` ',] i UH f 1' available between the bridge and B St. now, local business parking will not be impacted. All on-street construction associated parking will be accommodated in that area. The project contractor shall prepare and submit for approval, a traffic re-routing plan for implementation during the project construction period. Machinery access, track excavators and track front end loaders, above the bridge is anticipated from Water St between the bridge and B St. There are no trees growing in this area, only a healthy blackberry patch. Downstream of the bridge access is anticipated through properties at the down- stream end of the project or through a commercial equipment storage property near the bridge across from the Ashland Creek Inn. In order to minimize downstream aquatic impacts, the project will be de-watered during construction. The dewatering process is envisioned as constructing a dam at the upper end of the project and piping ( 12" or 15"ADS N-12 recommended) the water to the lower end. As the water is removed from the project area, the area will be electroshocked, by a qualified fish biologist, to find and remove all aquatic life from the project area. c E The construction is anticipated to begin at one end of the project (upper or lower) with de-watering removed as the elements of the work are completed and clear flow can be safely restored. The dewatering plan will be reviewed and approved by ODFW prior to installation and closely followed during the construction process. The end result will be a re-constructed reach of Ashland Creek that will: I i 1. Improve present flood passage capacity under the Water St. bridge, 2. Maintain long term sediment movement through the reach, 3. Improve reach aquatic habitat (create 6 pool/riffle complexes where only 2 exist today) 4. Remove a low flow fish passage barrier(existing diversion dam) j 5. Install an irrigation diversion fish screen where none exists today 6. Re-establish a vibrant riparian corridor in areas where none exists today. Vegetation issues: We anticipate the removal of a three stemmed 8" Big Leaf Maple that is growing from an old stump in the immediate vicinity of the upstream side of the bridge, together with an 8" Sequoia and a 30" Red alder. These removals are necessary to accommodate a stream cross sectional configuration that will accommodate flood passage and to prevent possible slides into the stream from undercut, over-steepened banks. All are on a bank that is under cut 3 to 4 feet and only being held in place by English Ivy root mass. To help compensate for this tree loss, the exposed bank will be replanted in appropriate native shrubs and trees. There are dead alder in the clumps in the lower (downstream) I end of the project that the owner is requesting be removed (for safety reasons) during the project construction. These are shown in the planting plan sheets. There is a pile of large stone on the hotel side of the stream immediately downstream of the bridge. Across the stream from the stone/hotel is a large patch of blackberries. A part of this project will be the use of some of the large stone in the project, or removal for use elsewhere in the City, followed by planting the area with an approved selection of native species (see planting plan sheet). The blackberries across the creek are growing on a pile of reportedly construction debris accumulated over the years. This debris may include broken concrete, asphalt and other such materials. At least the upper two feet of this accumulation will be removed and replaced with topsoil and planted with an appropriate selection of native species. ODFW is recommending a relative fast growing selection of trees in the upper elevations of that bank that will enhance shade and stream cooling for this portion of the project. There will likely be an extension of the Ashland Creek Inn irrigation system extended across the creek during construction to these areas to ensure sufficient water is available to help ensure these plantings become well established. This extension will take the form of a hose connection on the Inn side of the creek with a hose bib on the other. This should not require a plumbing permit as it will not be directly connected to the potable water system except through a removable hose. The owner of the Inn has agreed to water and maintain those plantings. As noted above, the owner of the Inn has requested some dead trees in a clusters of Red alder near the end of the project and next to the Inn deck be removed as a safety matter. All bank areas will receive a treatment of fast growing, high density root creating riparian shrubs such as locally sourced native willow and/or red osier dogwood (see attached planting plan). Regulatory Issues: This project has been submitted for State (DSL) or Federal (Corps/NMFS)permitting. We have either met with, or discussed the attached plans with representatives of both agencies who are indicating a favorable review. Our approach in these types of projects is to ensure we have met local requirements as the project moves to more regional permitting. We are confident we can meet state and Federal permit requirements. The two permitting processes are on a parallel track based on the results of the local permitting pre-application conference. It appears the local planning requirements are sufficiently straight forward to avoid conflicting with anticipated Federal and State permit requirements. I Excavation/Fill Material Quantities: The project is anticipated to involve disturbance of approximately 8785 sf. The work will involve approximately 1350 cubic yards of excavation and 580 cubic yards of fill (including stone). Approximately 260 cubic yards of stone will be imported for use in the vane construction. Approximately 100 cubic yards of top soil is anticipated to be imported for replacing the reported construction debris for riparian vegetation establishment across from the hotel. There will be approximately 15 cubic yards of concrete removed that presently constitutes a low head dam. This dam is located approximately 150 feet downstream from the Water street bridge. There are also approximately 3.5 cubic yards of concrete debris located upstream of the bridge in the form of 5 rectangular elements in the stream bed banks. These elements will also be removed from the stream during the construction process. 2. Written findings of fact addressing all applicable development standards and approval criteria Findings of fact addressing all applicable development standards and approval criteria are made and supported within this application and attached plans. 3. Site development plans (13 criteria) Project plans, addressing all 13 criteria, have been integrated with the plans required for Physical and Environmental Constraints permitting. These plans are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. 4. Mitigation Plan prepared in accordance with the requirements described in section 18.63.120. The Mitigation Plan called for under 18.63.120 has been prepared and is attached hereto as Exhibit A, and by this reference made a part hereof. 5. Management Plan prepared in accordance with the requirements described in section 18.63.120.C... The Management Plan called for under 18.63.120.0 has been prepared and is included in Exhibit A. Chapter 18.61.200 Tree Protection Plan A. Tree Protection Plan required 1. A Tree Protection Plan approved by the Staff Advisor shall be required prior to conducting any development activities including, but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, or demolition work on a property or site, which requires a planning action or building permit. 2. In order to obtain approval of a Tree Protection Plan; an applicant shall submit a plan to the City, which clearly depicts all trees to be preserved and/or removed on the site. The plan must be drawn to scale and include the following: A Tree Protection Plan, written and graphic, including the 9 elements identified in this paragraph, has been prepared and attached hereto as Exhibit C and is by this reference made a part hereof. i 3. For development requiring a planning action, the Tree Preservation Plan shall include an inventory of all trees on site, their health or hazard condition, and recommendations for treatment for each tree. This inventory and recommendations are a part of Exhibit C referenced above. B. Tree Protection Measures Required: Applicant acknowledges the tree protection requirements described in this section and agrees to comply with them to the extent practicable. Any deviation from these practices will be brought to the Staff Advisor and the Staff Advisor recommendations shall be followed. C. Inspection. The applicant shall not proceed with any construction activity, except installation of erosion control measures, until the City has inspected and approved the installation of the required tree protection measures and a building and/or grading permit has been issued by the City. Applicant acknowledges the tree protection requirements described in this section and agrees to comply with them. } 15.10 Flood Damage Prevention Regulations 15.10.40 Methods of Reducing Flood Losses In order to accomplish its purpose, this section includes methods and provisions for: C. Controlling the alteration of natural flood plains, stream channels, and natural protective barriers, which help accommodate or channel flood waters; 15.10.050 Definitions I. Development means any man-made change to improved or unimproved real estate, including but not limited to, buildings or other structures, mining, dredging,filling, grading,paving, excavation or drilling operations located within the area of special flood hazard. The proposed project will require fill and dredge work. U. Structures as it pertains to the provisions of this Chapter is a walled and roofed building, including a gas or liquid storage tank that is principally above ground. No structures as defined herein are proposed in this project. 15.10.070 Administration A. Establishment of Development Permit. A development permit shall be obtained before construction or development begins within any area of special flood hazard established in Section]5.1 0.060(8). The permit shall be for all structures including manufactured homes, as set forth in the Definitions, and for all other development including fill and other activities, also set forth in Definitions. Application for a development permit shall be made on forms furnished by the Building I Official and may include, but not be limited to,plans in duplicate drawn to scale showing the nature, location, dimensions and elevations of the area in question; existing or proposed structures,fill, storage of materials, drainage facilities; and the location of the foregoing. Specifically, the following information is required.• 1. Elevation in relation to mean sea level, of the lowest floor (including basement) of all structures; There are no structures as defined by this chapter proposed for this project. 2. Elevation in relation to mean sea level to which any structure has been floodproofed; No floodproofmg is proposed in this project. 3. Certification by a registered professional engineer or architect that the floodproofing methods for any nonresidential structure meet the flood proofing criteria in Section 1 5.10.090(8)(2);No floodproofing is proposed in this project. 4. Description of the extent to which any watercourse will be altered or relocated as a result ofproposed development. The alteration of the watercourse is shown in the attached plans. 15.10.080 Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection �I C. Flood-ways: Located within areas of special flood hazard established in Section 15.10.060(B) are areas designated as flood-ways. Since the flood-way is an extremely hazardous area due to the velocity offlood waters which carry debris,potential projectiles, and erosion potential, the following provisions apply: 1. Prohibit encroachments, including fill, new construction, substantial improvements, and other development unless certification by a registered professional engineer or architect is provided demonstrating that encroachments shall not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge. Said certification has been prepared and is attached as Exhibit D. and by this reference made a part hereof. 2. If Section 15.1 0.080(C)(1) above is satisfied, all new construction, and substantial improvements shall comply with all applicable flood hazard reduction provisions of Section 15.10.080, 'Provisions for Flood Hazard Protection". These provisions are complied with upon submittal of Development Permit application. BEC-RAS modeling has been completed with a Technical Memorandum(TM-2) discussing the results. TM-2 has been attached as Exhibit E and is by this reference made a pant hereof. i i Exhibit Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization Code Section 18.63.120 �I t I 'sCd to 18.63.120 Mitigation Requirements A. Vegetation Preservation and Construction Staging. The following standards shall be addressed in mitigation plans to protect vegetation identified for preservation and water resources from sedimentation when construction activity is proposed within a Water Resources Protection Zone. 1. Work areas on the immediate site shall be identified and marked to reduce damage to trees and vegetation. Temporary construction fencing shall be placed at the drip line of trees bordering the work area. No equipment maneuvering, staging or stockpiling shall occur outside of designated work areas. All construction areas shall be clearly marked. Where excavation and clearing may be required,those areas shall be limited by means of temporary orange construction fencing. Construction fencing at the drip line of trees is not practicable in this application as there are construction activities that must occur with-in the trees drip lines,i.e.,the tree's drip lines overhang the stream where construction activities must occur. At the owner's request,this fencing shall not be used along the creek in the vicinity of the Ashland Creek Inn. Instead,the limits of the in-stream work shall be clearly indicated via less obtrusive means such as periodic staking or flagging placed immediately before construction activities. Equipment servicing and staging shall occur outside the project area. 2. Trees shall not be used as anchors for stabilizing equipment. No external equipment stabilization shall be required for this work. 3. Stockpiling of soil, or soil mixed with vegetation, shall not be permitted in Water Resource Protection Areas on a permanent basis. Temporary storage shall employ erosion control measures to ensure sediments are not transported to adjacent surface waters. No permanent stock piling of soils shall result from this project. Any temporary soil stockpiling shall receive appropriate Erosion Control measures. 4. Temporary erosion control measures shall be installed to prevent encroachment and flow of runoff, material or other debris into the Water Resource. These measures shall be installed prior to the commencement of excavation, grading, site clearing, construction or similar site work resulting in changes to the land. Access roads, staging areas, storage areas and other areas of temporary disturbance necessary to complete the proposed activity shall be restored as soon as possible, but not more than 90 days after authorized land disturbance. Erosion control measures shall be in place concurrently with construction or establishment of the proposed activity. Temporary measures used for initial erosion control shall not be left in place permanently. The proposed erosion control plan for this project are shown on the Erosion Control sheet of the submitted plans. With the exception of the rehabilitation of the black berry patch across from the Ashland Creek Inn, all the proposed work is in or near the stream itself. To place erosion control measures (silt fencing)to prevent run-off from surrounding more elevated,undisturbed areas will provide no benefit to the project. Therefore,the erosion control plan does not contemplate such measures. Post construction erosion control measures are clearly shown in the attached erosion control plans. R. Options for Satisfying Restoration and Enhancement Requirements in Mitigation Plans. Mitigation plans are required to meet the standards in either the Prescriptive Option or Alternative Option as follows. 1. Prescriptive Option The mitigation plan shall meet the following standards. a. Re planting Timeline. Re planting shall occur within 90 days of authorized land disturbance. The timeline for planting all restoration vegetation is planned to be between October 1 and November 15 immediately following construction. b. Restoration Area Ratio. Disturbed areas shall be re planted and an additional area restored, re planted and enhanced at a one square foot to one and a half square feet (1:1.5) ratio (e.g. if 100 square feet of surface area is disturbed, 150 square feet shall be restored, re planted and enhanced). The"disturbance areas"for the project includes work within the active stream channel of Ashland Creek below the bankfull elevation. The project also includes disturbance of adjacent riparian and upland areas. These areas includes removal of non-native vegetation such as Himalayan blackberry and English ivy, grading to improve planting surfaces, and importing native top soil to enhance plant growth. The enhancement area includes 780 square feet of riparian planting and 2,135 square feet of upland planting for a total of 2,885 square feet of re-planting. c. Local Native Plant Species Coverage. The Stream Bank Protection Zone shall be a minimum of 50%plant coverage in local native plant species with the installation of new trees only to consist of native trees (Figures 8, 9 and 10). The stream bank protection zone is being planted with 100%plant coverage in local native plant species including native trees. The Wetland Protection Zone shall be 100%plant coverage in local native plant species and in accordance with local, state and federal approved management plans. The project area does not include a wetland protection zone. Local native plant species for stream bank and wetland applications are identified on the City of Ashland's Local Native Plant Species List. The use of noxious and invasive plants on the City of Ashland's Prohibited Plant List in Water Resource Protection Zones is prohibited. Noxious and invasive plants are not included in the project planting plan. Figure 8:Native Plant Requirements for Riparian Corridor Streams (see attachments under this chapter) Figure 9:Native Plant Requirements for Local Streams (see attachments under this chapter) Figure 10:Native Plant Requirements for Intermittent and Ephemeral Streams (see attachments under this chapter) t p { d. Re planting Priorities. L Priority shall be given to removal of noxious and invasive vegetation and planting of local native plant species. A blackberry patch covering approximately a 1,320 square foot area on the stream right bank is being removed. The grading of the bank above the bridge results in the removal of approximately 700 square feet of English Ivy. One hundred percent of these areas are being planted with trees, shrubs, and grasses selected from the local native plant species list(Figures 8 &9). ii. Plant materials shall be located in such a manner as to maximize enhancement and restoration of the Water Resource Protection Zone, with particular emphasis on temperature reduction of watercourses, erosion control, bank stabilization and wildlife habitat enhancement. Project plant materials are placed in locations suited to the light and water preferences of each species. Plant species are also placed in locations that enhance the natural functions of the water resource protection zone. For example,bankfull flood prone areas on both side of the creek are being planted with emergent wetland vegetation and red alder. The shade loving slough sedge is planted in shaded areas. The more sun tolerant small-fruited bull rush is planted in sunny areas. The red alder is just above the bankfull line. These plants will function to provide bank stability,temperature reducing shade, and food for wildlife. Upland areas are planted with a variety of appropriate shade or sun tolerant species that provide enhancement to water resource natural functions. iii. Nearby riparian plant communities should be used as a guide for developing a re- vegetation plan. The riparian plant communities on Ashland Creek below Lithia Park and below the project site were used as a guide for developing the planting plan. e. Shrub and Tree Requirements. Re-planting shall include shrubs and tree canopy layers in accordance with the following coverage and spacing requirements. i. Shrubs Shrubs shall be planted and maintained to provide a minimum of 50%total coverage of the restored area within a five year period. The planting plan and specifications are prepared with the goal of achieving the above coverage standard. The minimum planting size shall be one gallon. The planting plan specifies one-gallon container size for all shrubs. Restoration areas that have existing vegetated under-story consisting of healthy riparian shrubs that covers at least 50%of the restoration area are considered compliant with the restoration standards for under-story plantings. i i i ii. Canopy trees Canopy trees shall be planted at 20 foot intervals. Canopy trees include big-leaf maples, Western red cedar, and red alder. The big-leaf maples are planted at 10 to 15-foot interval. The Western red cedars and red alders are planted on average at 10-feet intervals. The minimum planting size shall be one-inch caliper. The planting plan specifies one- inch size for all canopy trees. Canopy trees include big-leaf maples, Western red cedar, and red alder. All new trees shall be staked and protected by deer/rodent proof fencing. The planting specifications require deer/rodent-proof fencing for all new trees. Restoration areas that have an existing vegetated tree canopy consisting of healthy trees at least four inches d.b.h. and at an average spacing of 20 feet on--center are considered compliant with the restoration standards for trees. f. Erosion Control. Erosion control material such as mulch, hay,jute netting, or comparable material shall be applied to protect disturbed, re planted areas. The planting erosion and sediment control plans and plant specifications require a uniform 2-inch layer of mulch or and erosion control blanket over all areas disturbed by clearing and construction activities. Disturbed areas shall be replanted so that landscaping shall obtain 50%coverage after one year and 90%coverage after five years. The planting plan and specifications are prepared with the goal of achieving the above coverage standard. g. Irrigation. New plantings shall be irrigated for a period of five years to ensure establishment. The hotel property owner is providing irrigation of the planting areas. h. Performance. Local native plant species that do not survive the first two years after planting shall be replaced. The owner of the project(City of Ashland) shall be the responsible parry for complying with this requirement. i. Landscape and Irrigation Plans. A mitigation plan shall include landscape and irrigation plans, with details addressing the proposed plant species, variety, size of plant materials, number of plants, timing of plantings,plant spacing and installation methods. The planting plans and specification address the conditions in this requirement. i Q., .. The landscape plan shall address the plant coverage by local native plant species after five years. The goals of planting plan and specifications are to establish the self- sustaining required plant coverage of local native plant species that exceed five year. Measures taken to meet these goals include placing selecting local native plant species in locations suited to their sun and water tolerance needs,preparing planting bed with added top soil amendment as needed, fertilizing with liquid colloidal fertilizer that provides complete nutritional support and inoculates the root zone with beneficial fungus called Mycorrhizae, and irrigation. C.Management Plan. The applicant shall implement a management plan for the Water Resource Protection Zone and resource areas under the applicant's ownership or control, including the areas restored and enhanced to assure long term conservation and maintenance. The management plan shall detail proposed monitoring and maintenance, and shall include a schedule delineating how completed projects will be monitored and reported to the StaffAdvisor. The managementplan shall contain the following requirements. The following management plan for the Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization project addresses properties within and outside of the applicant's jurisdiction or control. The adjoining property owners have, by their signature to the application as underlying landowners, agreed to allow the described work and the following specific stream corridor management activities to be performed by the City at no cost to them. 1. The approved mitigation plan. See mitigation plan above 2. Identification of Water Resources and Water Resource Protection Zone management practices to be conducted and proposed intervals. The following allowed activities are proposed during the ODFW allowed in-water work period of 2012. "18.63.070.8. Additional Limited Activities and Uses within Stream Bank Protection Zones. In addition to the Limited Activities and Uses in section 18.63.070.A,the following activities and uses with the Stream Bank Protection Zones are allowed under a Type I land use procedure provided the activities or uses comply with the approval standards set forth in section 18.63.070.D. 1. Stream Restoration and Enhancement—Restoration and enhancement projects resulting in a net gain in stream bank corridor functions unless otherwise exempted in section 18.63.060.B.2. Restoration and enhancement activities not otherwise associated with development involving building, grading or paving are encouraged, and planning application fees associated with reviewing these activities for compliance with applicable land use standards may be waived by the Staff Advisor." 3. The following statements. a. "There shall be no alteration of the Water Resource Protection Zones as delineated and shown on the attached plan"(attach reduced plan). Accepted as a condition of planning approval by the applicant b. "There shall be no alteration of the size, shape or design of an approved Water Resource Protection Zone withoutprior approval by the City ofAshland". Accepted as a condition of planning approval by the applicant C. "There shall be no amendment or change to this Management Plan without prior approval of the City ofAshland". Accepted as a condition of planning approval by the applicant 4. Provisions for the ongoing removal and management of noxious or invasive vegetation and debris. The underlying land owner downstream of the Water Street bridge has offered to accept responsibility to maintain the plantings in that area as well as suppress noxious or invasive vegetation and debris. The area above the bridge shall be maintained by City Staff. 5. Provisions for the protection ofprotected plant and animal species in accordance with recommendations from applicable state and federal agencies. Except for ESA listed fisheries, no known protected plant or animal species are known to occupy the project area. The fisheries habitat is improved and enhanced by this project. State and federal agencies are supportive of the removal of the low flow fish passage barrier and enhancement of in-stream habitat opportunities. 6 Specific provisions for city enforcement of the management plan. The City, as the applicant, shall be responsible for the enforcement of this management plan 7. Any additional measures deemed necessary to protect and maintain the structures,functions and values of the Water Resource Protection Zone (e.g. signage delineating preservation boundaries). None are deemed necessary as the project is completely on privately owned property or under a city bridge. There is no anticipation of access to the general public across these private lands. 8. Provisions for the perpetual protection and maintenance of the Water Resource and Water Resource Protection Zone including but not limited to the following. This section has several unresolved questions associated with it in regards to this project. This is a City project being proposed on private and public property. The property owners are not the applicant. As the applicant the City cannot commit the private property owners to the conditions of this section. The Project is primarily for the convenience of the City. The question of how this code section applies to this project application has been referred to City Counsel. As direction is received from City Counsel,this section of the application shall be amended. a. Recordation of a conservation easement or Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which prescribe the conditions and restrictions set forth in the approved planning application, development permit, building permit, or proposed public facilities plans, and any imposed by state or federal permits. b. Transfer of the ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the area to a willing public agency, non-profit association or private conservation organization with a recorded conservation easement prescribing the conditions and restrictions set forth in the approved planning application, development permit, building permit, or proposed public facilities plans, and any imposed by state or federal permits. c. Other mechanisms addressing long-term protection, maintenance and mitigation consistent with the purposes and requirements of this ordinance as deemed appropriate and acceptable by the approval authority. r I i i j i V -( Exhibit B � Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization , Technical Memorandum 1 (TM-1) Sediment Competence r ' ti � FyY� C (3 i .. ` OUR,)GaS'u' 2� F � 4 . "\ V a T mFix REA + ,J? Stream and Wetland Rehabilitation Specialists August 19, 2010 a Water St. Bridge over Ashland Creek R Ashland, Oregon Technical Memorandum #1 Data Based on the topography developed from our survey work in late June, 2010 and sediment sampling performed during that same period,we have developed the following grades and associated required sediment transport competency depths (Table 1). Table 1. Showing existing conditions of Ashland Cr.in vicinity of Water St.Bridge together with existing and required bankfu.11 depths to achieve sediment transport competence (Comp). Profile Grades Grade Above br. Below br Existing Depth Comp. Comp. Req. (Under Bridge) Req. depth Depth Existing 1+32 to 0.96% 2.8 3.2 0.6' dam Potential 0+70 to 0.61% 5.00 0.6' dam Sustainable 2.34% 1.15 1.3 0.6' Grade 0+70 to Dam The differences between the above and below bridge competency requirements are explained by the difference in Dso sediment size between the two locations (125 mm above the bridge and 143mm below). This is not unusual and as you will note there is not a great deal of difference (approximately 0.4 feet)between the depths required for sediment transport competency. In either case, it is significantly more than the 0.6 feet presently available. The existing profile data(Figure 1) is taken through the project investigation length. The sediment transport area of concern is from the lower end of the accumulation of sediment under the bridge to the low head diversion dam (sta 2+35). We are only able to generate a slope of 0.96%from that point. We also ran a slope from the beginning of the deposition under the bridge (sta 0+70) to the dam. This slope came out at 0.61%. Table 1 shows a bankfull depth of 5 feet would be required to maintain sediment transport competence. The deposition under the bridge is close to level for about 50 feet(sta 0+82 to 1+32). This accumulation is the result of the lack of sediment transport competence depth previously noted. WATER ST.BRIDGE DIVERSION DAM CREST 1651.6± Ifo MAXIMUM GRADE STREAM BOTTOM PROFILE W/DIVERSION DAM WD 0.96% SUSTAINABLE GRADE 2.34% �o W/o DIVERSION DAM 1174a 33 aw Iwo ano Figure 1. Existing profile of project area in Ashland Cr. The profile shows existing grades as constrained by the existing diversion dam. A possible sustainable grade is also show. Note the approximately 50 feet of nearly level sediment accumulation beginning at the upper end of the bridge. The sustainable grade assumes dam removal and was developed from the thalweg just above the bridge (0+70, upstream bridge stinger) to a point below the influence of the low head diversion dam (sta. 2+64). Analysis The difference between what is needed to achieve sediment transport competency and what the present channel configuration is providing, i.e.,nearly 2.5 feet of depth at bankfull flow under the bridge, is a most significant element. The limiting factor here is an irrigation diversion dam (sta 2+35, Fig. 1). Until we are able to design a stream profile that will provide the needed sediment transport competency, any work performed above the dam will simply once again fill in over time returning the stream to its present condition in the vicinity of the bridge. We can perform some preliminary modeling to see if we can change the configuration of the channel under the bridge to see if that configuration will pass the design flood (3100 cfs). However,we do not believe that will be necessary at this point in the design. The grade cannot be increased without alteration to the diversion dam. A configuration change, to develop bankfull sediment transport competence without changes to the diversion dam,which would require reducing the overall cross sectional area under the bridge,would be problematic for design flood passage. Without modeling, we can look at flooding under existing conditions in the area. We developed a good cross section of the stream above the bridge and below the survey monument tied near the intersection of B St. and Water St. This section(sta 0+06, Figure 2) indicates an incised channel,Rosgen classification A3,with a cross sectional area of 143.5 SF. Using the design flood flow of 3100 cfs, and staying within the channel banks,would require an average velocity of 21.6 fps. Assuming a velocity of 15 to 17 fps as a more likely maximum average velocity, we can see that at this flow, the creek is out of the channel and on its flood plain to the north side of the creek. We also developed a section through the middle of the bridge span (Figure 2). This section is vertically constrained by the bridge girders and laterally by the bridge foundation. This enclosed section provides an area of approximately 197.5 SF. This area would require an average velocity of 15.7 fps to pass the design flood. This does not appear to be an unreasonable average velocity. These findings suggest the present configuration of the bridge should be able to pass the design flood. However,it does not have the competence to move the streams sediment load. Therefore,we suggest the bridge will continue tc accumulate sediment which, in turn, will reduce its flood passage capacity. FLOODPLAIN WATER ST BRIDGE ACCESS STRINGER 1880 1880 143.5 SF 197.5 SF DATUM ELEV 1850 DATUM ELE'V 1650.00 1850.00 n ® cn M m c4 m ® m m o+oo SECTION 0`0 SECTION UNDER BRIDGE 0+06 Figure 2. This figure shows the existing cross-sectional areas of Ashland Creek at project station 0+06 and at a point approximately mid-way through the bridge. The area of these sections is also shown. The channel above the bridge does not appear to be able to pass the design flood in its present configuration. Reconfiguring this channel reach is within the scope of the current contract. However,we are concerned the channel configuration above the scope of this project is also incapable of passing the design flood within its banks. Alternatives The data and analysis suggests that until we deal with the sediment passage competence issue, any efforts made to increase the flood capacity in the vicinity of the Water St.bridge will be doomed to fail over time. This failure would be the result of channel cross sectional loss from further sediment accumulation. The only option to develop that competence we see available would be removal, or at least serious modification, of the existing low head diversion dam next to the hotel. We have given this question a preliminary investigation and see three alternatives to what exists today. 1. Combine the SMR diversion with the present Helman diversion above the project area (above the bridge), 2. Install an in-gravel screen system similar to what is being done on the Illinois river near Cave Junction, or 3. Install a cross vane in the vicinity of the upstream end of the Hotel that will be configured to accommodate a modest relocation of the divrso intake. f " Each has their advantages and disadvantages. ». p f: Alternative one would entail tapping into the Helman diversion at some point where it crosses Water St.below the hotel, crossing Ashland Creek and tapping into the Smith-Meyer-Roper (SMR) irrigation system. Each of these systems have about 1 cfs water rights. We may need to reconfigure the fish screen and conveyance system of the Heiman system to accommodate 2.2 cfs flow to where the two systems split. The current water right holders/users of both diversion would need to agree to this change. This will obviously require working with the diversion users. The advantage of this alternative is it is a one time deal. Once complete, there should be no further City responsibilities for maintenance or operation. The disadvantage is construction would be expensive and require work in Water Street and across Ashland Creek in the vicinity of known bedrock. There is a potential of work in the vicinity of sanitary and water systems in the street. Obtaining easements for the pipe and construction activities across the creek is likely to be fairly easy as the land owner has indicated they would like to see the dam, and associated pipe, removed. There is also stream widening, attributable to the dam, occurring just down stream of the dam. Alternative 2 would consist of installing a series of under gravel screened chambers (infiltration chambers) that would provide a total of 1.2 cfs flow into the present SMR irrigation system. Sizing the intake chambers and their installation could easily be a part of the overall design of the project. This work would be relatively in-expensive and not require disruption to the street and associated public infra-structure (water and sewer) The down side of these systems is they must receive annual maintenance to properly function. At the least, they must be backwashed every spring to i dislodge accumulated fine sediments to allow proper infiltration. This type of system has been in place in the Rogue River,Illinois River (Cave Junction) and on the John Day River (John Day)for nearly a decade or more. Unfortunately, several of these systems are in the process of being removed as the operators cannot keep them from being silted in during winter flows. This appears to be the result of no water is being withdrawn during that time. We should be able to accomplish Alternative 3 through vane design and construction. Besides the vane, we understand a fish screening system would also be required. ODFW apparently may have funding available to assist in removal of the fish barrier (diversion dam) and construction/installation of a functional fish screen. To ensure long term function of the diversion, it would need a gate system to prevent winter flooding from plugging the diversion with sediment. That system would need to be operated each fall and spring. There could also be some manual sediment removal required during the spring operation. It is our understanding there are few active water right users on the SMR system. Established in 1864, this diversion has a right to divert 1.19 cfs. However, over time,most of the folks who have water rights,have ceased to use them as permitted. Therefore,we should only have a couple of holders to deal with. The local water-master tells us Betty Jo Reynolds (541) 482-5921 is the most active user at this time. Perhaps she would be able to lead us to others using their water rights on this system. Recommendations Before proceeding further with this work,we strongly recommend working with the water right holders on the SMR, or SMR and Helman, diversion(s) to develop an alternate diversion to their irrigation system. i . _. X11 . Exhibit � . � 14 Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization Tree Protection Plan 18.61.200.2. In order to obtain approval of a Tree Protection Plan; an applicant shall submit a plan to the City, which clearly depicts all trees to be preserved andlor removed on the site. The plan must be drawn to scale and include the following: a. Location, species, and diameter of each tree on site and within 15 feet of the site; This is graphically shown on the planting plan and/or proposed topography-grading plans b. Location of the drip line of each tree; The drip lines for these trees are not shown as they are not germane to the project. Work is proposed within the drip line of nearly all of the trees within the project boundaries as the all overhang the creek where work is proposed. c. Location of existing and proposed roads, water, sanitary and storm sewer, irrigation, and other utility lineslfacilities and easements; The roads and all utilities are within the right of way and in the bridge superstructure. There are no known easements within the project area. d. Location of dry wells, drain lines and soakage trenches; There are no known dry wells, drain lines or soakage trenches within the limits of the proposed project. e. Location of proposed and existing structures; There are no proposed structures in this project. The only existing structures (Ashland Creek Inn and the concrete parking/storage across the creek) are shown on the plans. f. Grade change or cut and fill during or after construction; Existing and proposed finished grades,profiles and topography are shown in the project plans. g. Existing and proposed impervious surfaces; Existing impervious surfaces are the public road/bridge structure, adjacent concrete storage yard and Ashland Creek Inn buildings. No new impervious areas are proposed. h. Identification of a contact person andlor arborist who will be responsible far implementing and maintaining the approved tree protection plan; Russell Lawrence, Consulting Project Engineer shall be responsible for implementing and maintaining the approved tree protection plan. L Location and type of tree protection measures to be installed per AMC 18.61.230. This section of the code could not be found. Tree protection measures anticipated to be installed consist of Orange construction fencing around the drip line of all trees in the project area and within 15 feet of the project limits that are not scheduled for removal or to have work performed within their drip line. I � Exhibit Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization Engineer's Flood Certification i .. i .J,- TREAm F- ix S?e,e3tt3 r t?c/ (1�.*rl��f?t; h' ltr3(�t111,3!!t>t� '?ci i,1j�.>l°• October 19, 2011 Building Official City of Ashland 51 Winburn Ave. Ashland, OR 97520 Re: Flood elevation certification, Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization project. Dear Building Official: Per the requirements of Ashland Development Code 15.10.080.C.1 I am certifying the cited project will not result in any increase in flood levels during the occurrence of the base flood discharge (3,100 cfs). Technical Memorandum 2 explaining how this was determine is attached hereto, and by this reference made a part hereof. Sincerely /r- �9 /gy�pp��,1.r f Y a:r`"St �*'G f fr•_ orY s 'd )f i:,. Russell A. Lawrence, P.E. fl e " J= ' LA N .k r i Ashland Creek Bank Stabilization Technical Memorandum 2 (TM-2) Flood Modeling Results ° I X43 i ,iF �l , \ TREAm_-Fj..,JY1 3 ro � ' - � r' lt1t, , � 1pF'.t,�,�f?t�i a '� Fes„ t, ! Er s . July 20, 2011 Water St. Bridge over Ashland Creek Ashland, Oregon Technical Memorandum#2 Purpose The purpose of the technical memorandum is to detail the methodologies used for the design of in-stream alterations to Ashland Creek in the immediate vicinity of the Water St.Bridge. In particular this memorandum will provide the results of hydraulic modeling applications used to determine the impacts the proposed project is likely to have on the passage of flood waters under that bridge. Background In 2005 the City replaced two arch culverts with a single span bridge where Water St. passes over Ashland Cr. Since that time it has become apparent excessive sediment accumulation has been occurring in the immediate vicinity of the bridge. The root causes of that accumulation have been address in Technical Memorandum No. 1, attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Those causes are directly connected to the existence of a low head dam approximately 150 feet downstream of the bridge. This dam was apparently overlooked in the original modeling and design work connected with the development of the bridge design. During that work a hydraulic model for Ashland Creek was developed by OTAK and the results of that work reported in their technical memorandum"Water Street Bridge Hydraulics Technical Memorandum"published June 10, 2003. That report was based on a HEC-RAS model developed by OTAK for that purpose. That model has been obtained and is used in the analysis reported in this memorandum. Application of the OTAK model The OTAK model was calibrated from the impacts of the 1997 flood event experienced along Ashland Creek in the City of Ashland. For the present analysis,the model was adjusted to reflect current conditions found during the 2010 topographic survey of the site under this contract. The adjustments consisted of revising existing cross sections found in the model to reflect 2010 conditions and the addition of two stream cross sections to reflect hydraulic conditions associated with the low head dam and the stream section immediately below that dam. The model adjustment has also included inserting the existing information of the bridge structure that was not available at the time the original OTAK model was developed. The flood events offered by OTAK were then processed using that adjusted model. The results of that model run provided current flood elevation conditions. The model was then adjusted to reflect the cross section configurations anticipated as the result of the stream alterations proposed under this contract. This provides post-project flood elevation predictions. The results of the two model runs are reflected in Table 1. Table 1 The results of the OTAK BEC-RAS model adjusted to reflect current stream and bridge cross section data and the likely flood elevations(water surface)at the upstream end of the Water St.Bridge for the same flows after the designed restoration/stabilization work has been completed. Flood Event 2010 Conditions Projected Post Difference Construction Conditions 25 yr flood(2,450 1861.83' 1859.14' -2.69' cfs.) 1997 flood( 2,430 1861.78' 1859.14' -2.64' cfs) 100 yr flood(3,100 1863.35' 1861.75' -1.60' cfs) The 2003 OTAK memorandum suggests any flood elevations less than 1862.21 will remain within the physical stream flood corridor so long as all constraining elevations near the creek are above that elevation. The adjusted 2010 model shows anticipated existing flood elevations are exceeding that elevation. The post project model predicts flood elevations as being below the critical elevation of 1862.21 feet. Our field survey data shows the lowest point in the vicinity of the bridge (ground at end of wall on Condo property)to be elevation 1862.35 feet. Our survey data shows the existing ground and bridge structure conditions in the vicinity of the northern end of the Water Street bridge are above the projected flood elevations associated with a post project 3,100 cfs flood at that site. Conclusion: The OTAK HEC-RAS model, adjusted to reflect present conditions, indicates that after the proposed in-stream work is completed,the bridge stream section will pass the design flood(3,100 cfs)with no flow out of existing adopted flood corridor areas above the bridge. ....--- ------.----. - � ---------I- . .. -..-.—.----..--- -----------.------ . ----------- �---------- — N) E � O e�� (n � LLJ U) 1-1� ' a -� uj 2 QQ%, :z�t () 1= Q z z id CL a LZ '4�N,It - z I j 0) �- cc 4) n� — AL A--.a 2 lw :z �: � L'i 5 5 5 0 N El:'Q IL (L a. T,- w�) z CD O 0 Em q;� S: I - z z Z% z a Lu, '1�N:; 5 � 2 ®® C m % ;�t-�O I � .5 oo � (n u �-1 "Q - CD O 0 ISO% �l ZQ),lt:r�'3 Q) 9 M� = 2 'tt z,- N F ,,O'i�I 0)� ,6 0. z 4 I Cj N w � !� - m Oz9 9 2 c 0--N z -111 2 zzzzCO —� � u z w O O "'I' "'n Q SOOF— i— z —jz C",— !�- - " . r��11,- F,11�� d � '(OcnZ it �,�,,,l .111, ,-- T 6 f-�--� 2 r- L ❑ J�11, �11 "". z Z3 LO I 11.1� 11 , — ,�� — "" 5 � � 7 ;-, 4�, j -.7 � �r , i-,� . . �-,i� . .". ..:. ...�I.. �.. ..:..,. I ... .. ��',')�-,' -' : 1� ;."..: -:I, �'.I V �f,:�i�I�,:..I�� ,,, , .��',� J ,��,, ! a)�. , ,...,..,.,.'. I . . . ,,�, I' .. - , ,,.1 :1 1 � - ,. , �. , -:,., I. ... ., I I ".,;v ,,, I _ ...,...". ,,.. .1, ...,: ., .I -, ��. -I .,...� :,�`�-, ,,,,. - ". ��,�. fi:�:�J :. .. -., ..".., ­ sk' -;.. .. �v , � , . � , '. .����,�,.��. - ).' . � . . . . . . .. - ,. . , 6 ,-',-, ,': . . ,� ��-,.. . L v 44 - . y ;I��.,, I�.�.�,?:��::�',I,.,..,,,. 1'�;L.�� ��: -..,:;:�.�� �: :�:..�'!, "],,�,'�,�..�,r �, "':'. " ,,"-, . -,� i ')11",l;.�� . I � ,.� � ��. �.11, I - T'l I "�,.� - I , , I ,, 1��.!- � ,� ��.�����,.�l",� �,�� .�,-.1'I, �.-.�,. ),L,., �,.-.,., � !N, V 1, , , . ,., ! .! ` �n:�L, '. �-��,,' pr" 1.'��-,. , 1,:, ," ,: , .: I I �, . �., � . I ,. :;�%.1"."i, . , , � .I,;, " : �l ,!�."�,.'!" . . . �,� :r,.,�'.,:.��, �..�. ., -,�,�-­- .. � � .. 1� �'.�J ' I I,�,.:z,� . --l- -P(Rl§(- �� ��'��:,�L�,�,�����,�, 1,' �",., . . - .1. . �, , -t i" -- ,,, �4�­k, :�-'- --��"L, . .1 . _,,�'%,�,;,� '� � - I. I �, , .. 0:I!..,..., .. �l ,� ,,_ _, ,.�.' L I I.,. ,� : " .. ,� 4',�., ­ , - � . , I . .. ," , .�14 ..�.":. .".. .,,,�..-. , ��,, ,�, ,g �,- . �.... , - � ,: ,,, . � ,..� , I, - J , , . . , :� I - -,, ,;,-:,:;.,,"'.,�,�: �� �,:,:,i�., ,,!L" � , . t 4�".�,,�,�� �� .�.".'�:L"".,� �, . . . I " ..,., . "."' - I I '.,. ,1. ILI, � , 1, ,.-'.7�,--X'�- I' -�;,- ,- -, -!,.', 11 �, � -i , I 17 , �' � ", �... i. 1. -, ,�,l .". , , i . , .. .�, I .1-1.", � l ,;. � � .6.11 1 .� ,. ., .-..,I . ­ Y- - .;,: ..,e &;,�: . .. I. i I...1 ,.- .1 -11, . -1h, ,,, :,� :,.. ' I > . .. , � '..� ,:..��-',�, , . ,.�, ��.-��L"..�-��, ,, ,� I 0� ',���, .�� .� I - "I ' <'.�� 'O . I , � - -,� . . , -I-`;.5�l . .�;�, -,0 . , � . . .1 I ,, ". �.�',,1:1, " ,,.:,,.]:,,; :4�". .,�'J,:� -1 I I , .�0�1� .; . . . ., . I.. ,,,-1,1, ".6, .�,� -- , , I ,! ,.,� � �, ":,,,- ",.,,"e�, . ,: .4.1 ; , . -j",. � . 'T4,- , I - I•�'�,-, , . ,� �. ., :;; : �. L.'r � -,�-.L� , , . . :- :1........;.. �..�.,,.!:j���"; . . il "I It., � I ' - .1 . . . , .,- .. �. -lt I , "�i-�'--'.��,E `,�y I ., .. . I : �1,1" "',.,-��.,�7� .. .�. � ,,,�,�:�:o:'�,�:�,��","j ,� ✓ ., � , `�I" - , ;-�,�: f , . - 1, ,���'I �-��;' , , -- - ,-�". - , ,� . � I , I " - ,� j I -1�1,�,,'�,�� i1i,-. �.�� , T . , ,,�':,'l" ,� 0, - � ���:�," , �',, , �."- 1711' I '' � 11, . " -, -.i ,, , 'E��,� I �,,.,. ,.�-,�-.,,,.�;, �..,: �.'! �i� , %".� � I R ,.,. �1�, �:�� � ,i, .� � I I . Qj'�",..' , - - ,.-!- I � . I � �' 'L:m:� ,. j.,,_.,�­"'I ,� I., 1, ... � F......�, �,,�.,;.... I�.�..,..� I `-��� ,mi,�T��t:�:�,'.,�,. :�e� ;. ..,�I j­,��'. .1, Y -I -T,. " I .� . ". .� ''I'l.�' '�,.�, ,�.,z ,� .,.,. ,L,, ,. ,-,:.:,.,!�!.,�� �, - 1� �11, -- ...1 P.:I.J.?1: '.I, �.- _,0 I" . , f� I r "I �:, ..�.1. � .. Z-,, W'=." -�.I -.� � �', ­ - �r � . .. - , ,,, -,- -::� WN, . ... ." � ,,. I ; ,, ; . IC-' %,) ,I 1,L--,'L,,�^�,'!�I � ­�.�'�' ,.�, . � I" ",.��, �,-��--,�,5��',.��.'�.I�' -�,�,�. , � �I ,.,.�,. _, �,j"' jg-.,,_,.,,,",I�,, L'',I 11 . . ,����", --.'� 1, , , . ll-,... - . -���,�,.��.,;,",..'�T,������� . j� . �, . , :���'L "'A'j, ,. - , ,�: ... - �- ,-,� ;.---,; �i:��,, ,,..'I' d, � ,- �, �-�i�,J�::-�I ."�.,.:,.--,,, --,, ","' "A . . et � �. �l ,� ,,., , ... .-��. ..�Ljk ., a, . ,,..; -11��,. . ,.�­.:,,1. ,. , v - ,. , ,>'!, k r-. .,.. ,", I..., . �,�.-"��� - ,, I lj p.�" �l 11, ."'..., ��,..*"..I A r --��.---,�,� .�,,,c , ,......�.`�'..', 1 . , ., I �,. �-, , , r��---,, fv ".. � , !��..` kL-� k �u , I�.5� .I ", , r . . . , �. .. 6,. ` "' ,,, , . ���. '!��"I�I ";`,� , �,�,-.�-", ?�,.:i. ,�, .�t j;,' �' , .":t� , .1.I'. . ... V- ., , i., -, . , . , .I , ,; . . . ,�-�,.. �" , ,-.,-,,-'.5�,�,,�.1�. .... .. , ,!i, , .� ,�......e, . O . .. ,�'.I., . , , 6 1 ,��:-�,.�'',""-t_ ..'-:�.�, ,, ., 11 . ,,, .. , ,- - .i 1.1. I , - I I , �'.... ... ,,..j.�.j., - ---�,: f A,*�� , . ., I -, .��, .. .�. . :5�. "I , ;.-.,.,..,-... " , - � .�, ;z I,- �10 - "1; I , - - . . . � 0", ,," z . " , -. ,1; , 4-� -�',, -;" � � , . .'.��,1 h �'e I':�L�� ,','��,�:,1"`'L"�""' , . , ..I", ,. ,�,' ��,,"ki��,� ,(.,�r j,',';,.��:, : . . . I. 4. I: I I ,,. "�:;.�� , ; � 'I-,ml`l::�-�ll I., ,,, , :7"', Ll , " ", L"I' ,, -, - :" I " , ��- .. ,�P4.,,,", I j�.., �% -, - . . � , " .� . , .,, �"C�, , . , ,". �,-,�,�, v .. �1; , ,�,:: ,,,� �, �,.,� ,l " �� - it �. , .�:� 1'�:1,�': ��.,,� �,�., �!,� O', , . , , .. . .. .7' ; �,�� ;,�,,:,:� 0 "51 " . . I. .-., .11". ,��:. �j�.�'�.��'. ffi;., "I�, �.��,,��-,,, .1.�'�", ,-�'L ,�,i;';.t�p,�, .1 ,..", �; ,,..:�:��;, ,i��?.� ,..- �11,I 1-. .. I " m �-�, . , . ,I I I� . �, 'I; �, , :��', ��.�� . . 'T 1..1 ;; ;::4 �,!�,'�-�7,,_ ,-"�i ; � I�. . -- I ,?-d ; "�."I".. `� 1�1 1, I" I I l,.-'­- ,,..,. � �, 13, . ..�'..�,..-' ­�;V � .. . . .. 6 : r.. . ; , � .1. - ll��.:. -` , , ,:." , , ,- .,� , I 11 I � , ..,.I-'.j,,,��,''. � "I,I I �' --.� ,-, . '.�:Z - V .,- .,� .4 ,., @ j I` .I.-I e a, - ..�. , .:,�,�"-,i .- �l .�, - �. "" ly - . ':,:�" I .-�O ,,. .-.��l .11;. - I � !, ,�;,�:�,�, .I 1 '... "L!l ,v�[,,, �1-- .. .. �1�1..- 4i... : �, i � ... $'A '- AL I'll�. I �" " � -- - - I - � . I., , ,t4 � i�.,.:- . .1. � . I 1. , I .1 r "".., .. . r , � --�v _.,,." ., ` - " ,;I,�,,!,���'! ,.,I - - 11 11 I ,,.- _ - � , ,�� " " . �,;,�_.', , , .11.�. :,:, ".,:.- :i, �. � .�.,��.,!,���p:�- Y L': :;��.�. -,, ... " .. ,". 1,�,l 11 , '.� .... .� ,,-; ,, ." '... -'��.L ., , ­-- F-1 ---�,- .'! " .' '�-Z,,-, " 01 . � e ,"I'.i �- " .. , ,1.­. Q- L­j , I., ,'.'.�q ;'_;.�� 11"I�, ' '." -4- , . -� . . . � ,I .. . -" , ,�,,.',,!:.�.. . ,. L I .. 4, .��... ..11,-, �� . .. ,, ;�,�;�,,,,�'. ✓ . , . . I . . I.. � . 'l.--,;L t, � L��'': ., �......�� :.� if Ill, I -� . . �,,, s": ,. -.�:, .�&"� �,�,� ,,�-,, (� - , 411� ... � .. ,� ,!�t . , ,,��t�� ,.4 " �'� -,�i��(I'L",�,,�.�.�,.�q,w.""��,� , O'N' 5 tl, . , . , , I,gy� J, ..., 1. � 0 1 , m,�,-." ,-�-- , , . � L ,e r , �'l ;, L- -. I L - ., , -111,'� .- ..", ,.,,"I , W, ��l" I, .,�� -.,:�', %� ,7 �J-�i2;, "I 1- -- � . - . ,0,ZR,PlM,;"A �11,;, ,,_ 1,.!�. ,�"­ q .. ,�I �.� ... . t . . -�'l . �11 -'.I-1 !, , �!��,111,_', '­ L, r.'r..',.r.�,,,�, �� ,,;. ,,,."..:��', "' ,C,'�'�, "I '. L�, -g , , �'. .: . -g '-,'� ..� 1 -, - .1 L 11 .�. ..7 ','��." It.- . I .1 .. .1 - E 1��- .:, .. -11L,I� '�. , '. ...� .Z. -....';,�'4.. -e � I � , " .- �, , --I��`R 1 Rh"�4�P, . ' I . , . , , .��". ,� _:'�'.. ` '-' .L ",'. � , 3� ed ,� , -'�j..'�' "1:L.1��`�.,. .1. lll�,%.�-- �, . ., - ,,, I�l . . . , ; , - I �,� ._ , � , . l "PL I�11.1 , . . �.1 �, I 1.�I 1-�,�,, .�.< � , 11.11�'I,�� ll.- � , ..,.� ... . , I . ,,, , I .1",�;,.,��Y�.-I 1, , , ., 2�1 I 77'7' .. .'N., . , ,, . P � k, . 't,,1. -� .... : *I '.l �":' I �,��,I, . , � I I ..,:,� , .. , ; �-, ; 11 ,". ..�..�.�""ll-,,"I., " . . ,,�� , 1. I J�I .. , .. . .' I, r,�,_ ,,;. _.,,�,'-,�,� ... ..., , -''A,,� I. - �," ,6- 1,�,' � . : . 3. - &.L,, , "_ -,- .. I ..:, I . ,� "i;l-. I . -1 11 U �"I I � I ... " �%."�, -,I�,-,� :�, �� 4 I I . ir�.i � I I. , . , A e.,.,� "",.. 1 I" i �-,�r_� ,-� . , ,%.'�,.��", ,:: , , "'�IL . ��A�,.-� :���:.,i�,�,�!�lox;�,� I g.�,:.,,,�:'�- , 0 .. � eo"I'll�,�';L,: -, ... ll,�. , '' , I- .1. I , .�I� . �, , 1.. , . ... �,- I.-- . "- , , _'.,-I " � � ,�,'I".�;. . - -,�-: '.. ,-, '.��-,.�:.: I. "I I I-1-1 , . ",��`-"-,��,4j.�' ,�,., .... ,",.,.,..I� .►I 1�1 I 11_ . . . , .�,�':! -� . �.".. �� 94�,":I , . �,�,��,.,,i ,�,!.� ,�.�, : ' I '�"�"..�'.�:., ,S:I" /.,I.-I.... � " 1. "Fl- " i�l, J, , ,,, ,. ,�,, '. ,�,.':-" f,I.,,r,, ,�... I'. 49; W, ,.:� . . ,, , , . ,��-' , ,�.0 , �"� X, .- I , . . � I �., . :1," �.- ��Z. 6 ,r�6 ! "I, �:'' . . ''. -n ..�. ,��:�I,".,L, : "", -,. -,,��, ., 4� - . -1 � . ztlr�- -ti . , " . 19".':.. - . . I.. ,� " ',.� U. .,�,�. , , , 1. I - ��-,�44(1�'j` ,�'��,,�,L',�,1.1..,:,-,',L , ��' ,e":�,� ,,�`,n.1". , ,, ."..;I� I 1, I �'.. ,'' I,', l �L I '.�'., .�,. �,-�... 1, - - �,.. ,,, " ' , . , � .,,�...I , ",.� � . �, 4, , L",�, . ) ".�. �-" ,��)" .�..., � ,I, �'-."�, -,�: ,�,.", : ."�� ,;L �q . . _t .- "! l.'�.� " " .; � . , ,_ ,�.,j, . � - " � 1, "4,M�.,i,�: � ✓ . '� -'. ,.11..,.;�l ,`�'�' : ' `� 1�'rl r`01 I ., , .1. ''I 1- . .r ,- ,,��`:.� ." ,., ,;,�,..,,, - ,, :��j� : �` ,.- M. ",�� I�' �. � , ,F -- �:,,,. .��,�:.2 - . I �,- ► . , , , %, ,�X ,�.. , . . I .. " - '��� �0 -, 4, , ..- . , :-, '-' ,-�' -, ,,,,��l llli�� ,. , 4� , ���.�:,�,�'�.' ..I.. . ".,.�. . ,.� ,,, ����'I��,,: " .1�. � ,, �, i'll . .,., , ... '.11 . , , ;� 1: i I 11 ,:.': ,�� 11 �, , `.-1 I'1� I � . V, ...!�,�......I", .� ;v_lj, I . 1 '' I I -C. �1, 'I � 1-j. "I,.,�, � .-L- .I:,.: ,,,..,..�:��, ., l-.:...l,:.. . 11 I,- .. . - � -111f?,I -�,,!��.,.�.....,.r ". ...';r'�:..�.-',,, , � �-"., ­ ��� �, , �,- , , ... 11 I�. I�.�",�, , ,�,.:'�,:! ,;!�-,-,:i��.l I :..��;:!.. ,,�� .,�,", -­j. . I� -,I�'.1�I," I.,-. � ;,;, ,',� , ,- .1.� I ,* -, ,;� ,,,� . 1"'. ZR-� , 112, IL ,� :.(k 11,11, . �; ,� . - I . .�',"� , ,.-., . r. , ,,�-.,-,., �N, '. - i �4,vl , .',-:��: '�� 4��= ,". 4',, . .�:,..�..11. . 1� 1. ,".," " .1�, . . ,. g$'-'. '''.,-.�,.� L' :,, ,�-, ..". .. , �,-,, 1,�, .". . . I = . �l - I i�,:'I,,- . " �:" . '' - , , . �L -.��'.., ,. "- ,-'' - ,, , .. . I , , ���� " .�: �;. .p 4 , , ,.�, ''. I , ,� , . . � ::I";' I�-� " "I L'' ,," ';- '�l "' ,"'ZI�",. . - C.14U. I I ., ,k�l ., � I , --�.l�:�' �:��. , I . ��,�,� :..� ,-,a-,� il- , .21 ,� .,., -...,. t 2. '.., �: ,.? I ," . ., ..- 1,. L�`�I . � " .. �1.�., ;z ­,� "" � , .I. '! ,�,� 0 y ,, . ,.,�. ,e: f: .� L' ,,4&,� I , , � � -�,­. :.,,., ,- . , .'.L�.�'. � Ol I .01 -, - �'. . ... , I ,.r �';'.',.I.� - i ,. ,�, . �, ,I._� ;q­.. ".'I. 111. .� _ I "t,g , � .1��- ,,�- "I. . .."p"... "' "" f ; ,0 - , 11.�--. 'Ir z , ,.. . ., ,". , ,�.,C., I 4 1 1 ,,.,j; - ,.. 1. i'.I I, . , C . - -...,,,�,,,,,,,,, , , .. :�,� I '.'-() " I I - -.1 1. �. . . . . -7, ", , . , . . -:1 . ..�..., ,>�.I-, ;. �.- . 1-- �), ,,. - ...�. . .1 .." .�\ I 1,, . " � ,� 0,"I I k, '.. : ...I...1 I I., ,�- - . 5 - ,. �.��l ..., z ^ � 1 4� , . .1, ��: (?"Q '. i , .,.:�':, ,-I " k- �. . .. I ,,,� 6-� - ;m,; '... , ... --- , -,� `,...- '. ..I 'L,' .',.I'[, . .. v, ,,I, , ..I .. ,V., 1,. ..,j,, li; . .. ,.�, � ,,� ,, "r .1,,� ': '., .".I ,�IL , , , ,, ,,..;., F 14 -��"' ,, "' �j - ,�-,, , . "�,,�,V , , . . ll� , . . 1 , .,� O 1 4�,, .:" J�, ", ,'.O�qly d..�, I,,,.,.� fl� ,,,, l , � , , . S11 ,,,r,. -11 ,�� I , . - . , ��1�,1. . . "��,i;.,"I j ,.,: ., , Z! , � ,.Q! U-- .-�. ,��,, ,�q , 11--.1 1.:,.'.,�: "'.-_. � �I'. ., .". ­.. 11 I . - ::,.,. X/-%,�,�,'� . - ,, 11'"...1.1 . I ,.",::"�,. ,:, ",:. v I , .' �:, �':�,� ,:� , -0 ',I."�,� , 4r, , I - -, �1.I,I'l.., ,�.., , - 01'� -.k.,.r , ., f� '.-I' ':!,� 1:��. 4�"..ll� , �, fl, �drIt.4.41t,.�."",.13 &, 'k I ,.;� ... -�-� , ,.. .1�.;.� I I ... ...'. . O� q�,� OL, 11" � .. � I �11. , I.,, .,m� .�, -lz,I I� � ' , �1-11-- .�. lil��. "I E �� _ ._L I --.��..' . �11 " . t�-11�1. '.,.,, ,,. _ _r I �::i,.� . .i ,., 1, 1� :,"', .1 I I,:.�:, '. -, . - . IE - T� ,. ,;,� , A . I . T-1 la"L, . . .11� 2-!��`.` -�---1 I . I I .1 1 .1, � �111. I 1" I � 7f., '��,, ,,�, -,r; . �� t,,',1� ,,,,�%'r.","',,� ' � , ,�- A,,� � - - ; , f X,,- ,!,-,� : A �,,,� , r . - "" 'I . I r.... :�1:�L �'��-" &­� : '.'.:.'..,I. I � 'I ,'T I.,,"I L�... :,.'., . �;, - P �- . �_,,� . �� '. � ,;,_.,', ., ,::I'I, .!, .. 'IL,, '':,�r , . .7i 10�, "... v ,,� I :1-.1 -I "I Q .M,W,I, . .. J1, 4, - ,� �-,, ' L..�' I� ...,. 'I �l -.�. .1. � I' ,,.,. .; ,v "I -', -.�:�,,�V,� "'I .I " � fi ' ' . '.L' �'1,,, , I 11.1 .i"i I .1 I - l , art.' . .. , -� , tr, �. I 13 I� ' ,� � ,, . ' - 1. "'� -',q,7-'-���1H'��IIL'I'j�,?� : I . ., , ' , � ✓� " .,I";ls"� , 1, , "I.,I C� 4�,*, :, , . 4� . -�-,�.-� :�..�.. ',; 'L'.'.�" ,l ��," '' , ", . ::_, � C, � ,I,,� �L,,,1 41"�. .�,'. "T" .:, ". L . 'Cp! ,, "i I � . -1 , . �.!�, r'��' ' ..' _'��'L - ��, �� ., :1. r -1,1' 12 Y&I.T15"', I ., �, �� :11� s " A. A� I,. ,�.,r.., �III% ,J�j.r , f"I`004� 4-, "'i ..... ­.j I,, ,.,r,. -1-11.1�I,.. ,., .1, .1." :. - ..� .1.'.1 I� I., '. . � .1'...- " . ., .. i V"L"'� ,l , , . 4 ,"., I .I , �L. "A. ��,,�l- ". '... . .I ";L", y , , .x .. I I , 111,,I , . , - ,I ,- ,�,$O'g -,� I-,? ,I I i lb"... ,. "..".., I Ak;4 .,�."'�A a- Y� , .. -L, ,;,v , ".,- .1 - , , , g! ,I ',� -- , I -,I .1'.1 --.-, �, , N11 k I ,. ." 42 ,I :1 I'; :I.;,." . , I ..,,. '��', .,.,..- .. I E,m,�..,,r,,,,, , , " , , I.;. , I to'� - I.-'- ,,I L.. ,� �1'I.1�..� I 1. j... -.1 pf �,� �..-�-,--;�R ,, . " ,", ���� �'-,�",�,'-, �l.. �,).l,..-.,l .L, '- '� �` . .1 ;' ' 'L `I I 1:�.�. ., ,,"�21 . .I . . ,, � .,;L -I'.,- ' I , � .- -,,,,� j, r . . r,� I ;,, 1. . ...�j, A-Y..,;.�,.�, ,,,:.: -1.. ,. .,, . .. I . .,I�-',I.1;,. , . r I , .� I : , . '--.��� I' r., ll��. I,. .,�.,.�. . . ..I... ::j.�I . L�'""'r-, . � �`, .. 7.,, , , �p ." �, , ,. .I .9�k1l rl �� I. . , �,�, , !Y "',.., 'I 9M',j".4 '.�,, �q,',_"L 'I.�.�..:I,:,�.,., " .", "' 1� �,,I , , ,I i� ­,, ., " .1.1, , l l,. . .. A _ , '. , I I I - 'Ll 5�-I , , ,''r�' : '1;� 1.,�,, lk,I ��.".- I L�-'� " '.1 - ,, 4- , 0.. � '.,,",c �!,,�I" ,�. " rl , , -,I :." " X , -..-,�, .1,,1..,...M �r , -,� 11 . . ', ,n�!;-i." I.. � ...�� , . , '.. 11., , : LC� -.,... ,�-,:. - :-,.�-.",. . , . ��, ., �l, !,, , . 1. .. - Ill ,� �, �,� . :" . ,.�.��'; I I ,,, 1". ,, -,.,� ;!L-L,-"[%-� I` F.:.�i,,.�:'.. I . � ,;� ,,., ," . -.: 1,4�-�,�.-;l'.I I. '. v I-1.. I. I ,I- S ;-� I-� ��, .S '.',,�.!�. ,I,", '��" ''r.,,y4i,, � ��I� I 1, ��j.I-': � I �. ...�,.,.. '.r'-�",L`11�.L�- . , . ,� , 1W I.11. ". . I 011 , ",-, : -".�,` ,:, ,, :,�'. 11,I ,.- .1 .. . ,'� ,�� �,, , �4"..���,..,� -:�i,:1.�-,�! s': ,:--� O' T.. ,," ,,,;.,. -.." ;; 11 . .-; I'—Ot -,� . ! � " . � 10 I,.. -.,.,. r.,� , .!)1% ".�. . ,�-.'�;?�,,:�".,,,..;I .. 'g, -`11 -. . .1 I .w,.-,,�,:�I.�Q ... . ,-I A ' '� �'�L,�',, "L.- , S , 7. , .. � . � . . ��'L-� ? '� I. . �7 , I-,,,!.-,, 1, .i.�... , 1:,�,L.. r! I�,.. V..I.1�l .... - Ij " -'- . .1 11 ,.I , .. , 1, � �, !, -, . .;" . . . I.. ,I ,. " ,1,�"4, 'L,�_, ��. ..-, ..'s ,.. -" ..� :. .�..,,,r,,;, - I , :, . �, r . - �, I, . . " ", -,.�� . .1. ,1. I .�.. . ., 4. " , -� �'- ,�_ '��. :_, I , �0 I' . L� ' , " .11;b,�.�":....,:,,.1�'.,!,..� ,,���. ,,,�, ." 4.� �k-1 _ .. ,. , ,; ., � , . �. �I, . ', �� ip _ _ . -� ". ,,r ' ,'_.'. '�', ..'- i %!.,�, , -,: ?�,,.­` .,,,".'r .0 P. . . ��!, I _--., . . '. -� � ... kN - ...I,-, �,...�- -e . I , L - M J9 CC a ' , 0 M Et / c x LLI m m (b� � � ' o �- <Z3 � d 4 w /l� d l 00 `" LLI Mi 2 O7 ! x a uo oo Q PIP r 1 ' 4 �} d f I / tl. v I' }'J {' �V"d k. LA Ell LLU n u: x ©� r j LS_ WG:1 cn X 11m � C-02 L' Vol NO 0 Z- 0 L" R- LLj LJ C.) < 0 Ld L', 85 n --i 1 n o m CL LZ Ln LLJ LLJ go= up 00 mom < TIM< CL C 0) 8 La 4F L� � N, zw N, ge ap (0) w z EL oc Vd CN CNI Ld CO) m w pC —1 $g ZI 1 / /� L.Lf :3 g 0 W 0 z de (, Q z IL a 2 6 . 0 z 8 z 0 Ea 8 Y 0 A' o o o w 7 ui 3: z z z Ic Li R X F- z 0, LU -i J . l 3 > < <--J Ci- 7 gym? 1 In V) RZ w M LLI lu cc Ell 0 cc 4 > , .;. LL JI k.; < W co � LLJ uj qi LLI Mo LLJ La CL CO Q <D CD LL OF i CL F Z 3 IM r 1\ 1 / 0 CL � . now OD z o LPN C CL CL -.� W W Lo �7 O V �}' F� N oa m cc m Da w � z q� l0 W (D 0 (O (0 5lJ Z +J N O CY) Vy U w � to Lo (i l 1f} t U W co co m 0 m Q � 5 � II 9 In - oD 'Eu LU I A: cr cc l w z w Lb a,V z z z Qzti _ h U- Im r Q '§d' N CL CL J d' b ®r \\\ i ct Lo CO IL c9 1 z N / N jj OP Lo 1 I \\ i Lo �. Lbj � l i i 9t ' �LU uj bg CL y C� U �1 p p ii C7 Z9 z 9 5� 5�5�� 41 i� 4l itl z z z y 1 'J J co t G7 1 1 I . i Lu O LJ s LL, 0. U I ewelr _ Ui U Y'" O a 104 N cc I ECL4B� o p6 Z C) C4 r� L) m w�I 7 If + .� U. ? N� LL, LZ z a, I�j CAL-U LLJ Lij Li y0 w LL Cly CL cz—_ Ol cc co rc" II I C) LN3mney n0o OR ID MHO . . ........ Z 0 bb LU C) to uj m W, o L �j-------- MHG 0 LO 0 LO C-0 �o LO LO uamnsTONOO Lf) 0 LLO CD LO co 00 co OD Ln LC) Lr� 00 CC) '' Jill 4 LU J 0 -7 � ° W LZ C'3 i fof W Q� Q �Q). CL W LU 11 \ tU Z 0 N 1 z = Z 4J O r n � � cv UI) Q n z >LU \ CLU CL U r v� O 1 v ! LLI LL LL ui 'i C cc / Ljj too. cr � M m i C. g- a m LL 0 0 a z , w _ z Z coz 4 o r � ®LOL FF ® COD �Ul n w � � z � � � Q CL Co LLI o� c� LLJo z LU 0, 14) AL 0 z m Q) < LL z Fu < LU CL C w co 0 I= � CL CF) IP- 2 0 Q uj I= Q LL z < < 0 ---j => b - n D En N > I> LLI > > (7) > > > a LA O LU CD r3 z z CDt Z > Z, LU 0 Z LL. 0 L) II dz Z0;? ZOM Lu LL LL, LLI Z 0 cc � \ f LLI CY z 0 LL LIJ co Aj I M: U Cb LL w co M T z ,Q ,- c P 0 tl&4' w 'LLI IL oj w Z 0 C CO co IL 7: LU C V so Lu FL MCI, 9 0 z cr < 0.to Lu 0 P Jwr L• Q O w WLO o �z o z w IM m c � C7\. m�- LL a N w � Z a 0 � O 1 b � p T T VJ D U7 H � c0 Z O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a o 0 0 i s & 9m z QQ as w r� H w 410 to m yW w m M an co w u. c c C C c c 0 00 W 0 o 0 c0� a o a C7 0 G C9 C7 W v0 0 F i- 6d! Cil CAl 0! a m a c0 ED u ..I Z- CL ca N 'm tV [�B r r r T r w r r 5 V LU LL w LU r O d M h QD Cti GD h N Ct d 5+7 sh a.S6J =Z LLI CL FQ, W LL LL LaL LL Lei. ® co QJJ a LL LU 0 Z !L LU �� m0 .� I E two m LU TD' m E E o _ Wo c ; n0a m CL k� v m CL 0 E , IM° o CL o CL ® °em u°?, g z ®' ` q rn cL a e c M co it DD PD DP DD > D P D bP OM% 0 Q) mw w �z co Q) ROD C. 0 oOO N LLI � r FL \ ! b � II P. z L] aG k9g 1 ." XX X�,Y,• 5 � 5 LU \$ Rimm v <0 G' RE O u �( n r��i '�v 0 Yo➢1 ®L Was) E ziz c O I 04 10 s CLOlt 6 lz cj M m J LL Z Z: y JQN w LL \ a x ,`� a_ 0 C� t� M a ¢ n co °°oo LLI Z � d V? O v J Q V) J w ° Li ❑ d o 0 p ¢ w 0 0 r3 �-• � O i � � d � p V] 00 �� V� V) d31S. �' � J`GF a " " • � 7 C--<-i v' L-U O W z i F � n. Or e W 4J � � O Q - (~IJ W s, Z x O p LLJ U O m O.-J f— LC O CL LL p O z rL U Zt'- .• v v —J w LL]W J w co O< �f1/ J LJ ZQ(N w ¢O a-w F L.,J w z J m z �~LwL10 z Q d O F ¢ Ln a ¢�D O ba ¢ O 11S O Z O ii.l O '-� 0- O wM—C3 p d Z ".P p l z L.. w Ln q L- d4 ,a 00C, 00p LL W LL a L i 0 0 ¢ J 0�Q O O LTJ C� w T— ,� °¢ o 0 m z a z Q o �n Q a w w a Ln .a LLJ w w $LL Ln V n p< r CKww �^ LLJ v w W H T h Q W ❑. z LL o ID w LO � 4 � W LJ o '' 4 �o� z �mz } J Ln ZE LL m0 ` a. Q O qwz Lj d 5¢gw�Z w J e • Lil ' < a, z Z O O D� og Uw Oy U 2 rcn n Ld J Z r >- Y z I .e'. LL 0 0O Z¢ D. LYdN~ < QZ ! J� QZ gAO� O� a �ww . .e _ m0 W02 ww1... wLJ 1x10 Nm�--k •' r."d =Z ":eF vj ¢Jl.a Qm0 ¢C QIL� �(0 Cf 06 ,�,. ., 7 �JU j w �� �U N JVn �J(n Lzm G9 N� ;ten v � Li§=Zm I! p Lu 6 ea mom LL 0 Co lz P LL g 0 Z z H ca ui Planning Division ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION C1 T v ®F 51 Winburn Way,Ashland OR 97520 FILE# ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT f ',�-�"l%✓ A 94iA 4. ✓ (t ., DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED®Certification? ❑YES ❑NO Street Address _`,�, 1A1 A-r ry� Assessor's Map No.391 E K-,) Cz Tax Lot(s) Zoning Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT n Name y y A4 Lie- VC/dAk-SPhone E-Mail Address��/ �,e,b`d/ 1�sl � City,6_';/ a Zip 7�� PROPERTY OWNER Name� � C Phone ' E-Mail Address �O t&& !f City j (7/1— Zip_ 7 ze, SURVEYOR,ENGINEER,ARCHITECT,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER Title kJ6/ /;5 ,L° Name � d!;_ 1 °NC" Phone 3' /0-3 E-Mail Address 44 oAc4 W l,;l/ City woe` Zip 9-764L IV I f Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip f l hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application,including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact,are in all respects, true and correct /understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their i location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. l further understand that if this request is subsequently contested,the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that/produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request- 2) that the findings of fact furnishedjusti6es the granting of the request,• 3) that the findings of fact fumished by me are adequate,and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result o Clikely in not only the request being set aside,but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be rem'pVed at my expense. if ve any doubts,/am advised to seek competent professiona d&7 and assistance. A' I' "s Sig at Date As wner ofMe pr ert}yi lved in t s re ve read and understood the complete application a d its consequences to me as a property owrr`e. (It Property OW eture(required) Date fro be completed by City Staff) J�/� !f �f � / Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee$ OVER 0* i Wcomm-de0planningTocros&Handouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc ZONING PERMIT APPI.19�ATIQN WRY Planning Division I clyy Of 51 Winburn Way,Ashland OR 97520 FILE 0 ,ASHLAND 541-488-53305 Fax 541-498-6006 DESCRIPTION-OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEE DO Certificalion? DYES NO Street Address Assessofs Map ft 391 E r Tax L9 0 ................................ Lot(s), Zoning Crimp Plan Designation APPLICANT ul 2 Name_ %`_ ..`.s h o n e E-Mail ........... Address City Zip 9 7 PROPERTY OWNER Name__. Phone E-Mail Address city Zip SURVEYOR ENGINEER AARCgHUffg-"glILA6NffDRS!CgAAP!EgAASRC1tiTE T OTIi R Phone Address i,74 C40 zip Title Name Phone E-Mail Address- CRY Zip dings of to,am in alf respeds I hereby certify that the statemmts and inbirahm contained in this apphNOw.including the&Wbsed drawfts and the required fir frVeandm7wi. I Underdawthat alt property pins must bo slvwri on the drefts and visible upon the go impaction In the ownt the pins are ndshown or their kwhon wrid to be incorrud.the owner essums full MP04SW# I filt1har ulxlarshind that it this request is subsequentry coi#8stod,the burden mp he on ire 10 astabloh. I (hell prodoced suffrient factual evidence at the hearng to support this mquesl,, 2) that the findings of lad tumislWfustifies the granting of into request 3) That ft findings of lect fumistWby rag are adequate;ad further 4.) that all strixtures or improvo are propeo 1 e on the ground. Failure in this rogaini will result inost likely in not o*11w tOQuftt being set aside,but also possibly in my structures being built in refter"t being required to bo Tarr wilatinyexpense If I ham any doubts,l ant edtitedto seek competent prof et advice assdsfer Applicant's Signature Date As owneroft Veved in this request,I have read and understood the complete application and its con sailuences to me as a property ­_ AW Prop 4hyoWner's Sign ur e(required) date Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee OVER P* Planning Division ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 51 W inburn Way,Ashland OR 97520 C,IT y 0 r FILE#,2— 0 A-5,<6 -ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 7X DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY rAg.j3c- Pursuing LEEDO Certification? 0 YES 0 NO Street Address '7 6�1 ✓ ­3 T .................. Assessor's Map No.39 1E Tax Lot(s) Zoning Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name t'4*WCj___Phone E-Mail Address City Zip PROPERTY OWNER Nam e/yt t' "fir hone &Mail Address_,W'/s�-nw 1z' 2- City zip SURVEYOR,ENGINEER,ARCHITECT,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,OTHER Title _Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip Title —_--Narrie Phone E-Mail Address ------- City Zip /herobj,ceaify that the statements and information contained In this application,including the enclosed drawings and the required rindings of fact,are in all respects, tare and correct. l understand that all propeltypitis trust be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. It/the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect,the owner assumes full resoonslblAy,/further understand that if this request is subsequently contested the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the heating to support this request; 4 that the findings of fact furnishediust1fles the granting of the request- 3) that the findings of factfurnished by me are adequate,•and further 4) that a#structures or improvements are properly located on the ground Failure in this regard will resuir most llkeyin not only the request being set aside,but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed alffyexpense, ff Move any doubts lam advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. O/V Applicant's Signature Date As owner of the property involved in 1171s request,/have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner, ? M 13 E-K Proft y dWn'er'sSignature (required,-z%:r-'--P' Date fro be COMPIetbd by City Staff) Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee$ OVER 0 &HandoutsVonii%Vormit Application.&W. >c i', rs'�'a. �' ,s,. '"�.-'°-�"s as�r,.��`Bdvs'�' .. ,""'✓ .%�+'�,u",- �i`c, ,>r :�,s, x ss c,.r. r e<. �" '"a�i�' „?.sF���y ��� x'r��, � ,d ��rr-�'' " '.e y� -,s �>;-� �,.,�, -�z "f ,✓l���'' 3 ��:_ ,� ^" ' ,�' Job Address: 70 WATER ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: A C 1 Owner's Name: ASHLAND CREEK INN LLC 0 Phone: Customer#: 06258 N State Lic No: P STREAMFIX T City Lic No: Applicant: 19478 S STARVIEW LN R Address: OREGON CITY OR 97045 A!' C & Sub-Contractor: A Phone: (503) 631-8184 Address: T N" Applied: 11/01/2011 Issued: Expires: 04/29/2012 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E04CC6300 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Applicant is City of Ashland P & E and water resources VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MEONANIGAL =ELECTRICAL IFSTRUCTURAL PERMIT,FEE DETAIL ; Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Physical Constraints Permit 963.00 Other Type 1 planning review 963.00 C9NDITIt7NS QF=APPRO VA_ L . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland,OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF