HomeMy WebLinkAboutEast Main_212_PA-2011-01529 P�oMra�h r Federal Communications Commission
f Washington, DC 20554
Icy,��AtMISS\0
Informational Notice of Section 106 Filings
Date: 12/21/2011
Reference Number: 703606
Bill Molnar
Ashland Historic Committee
20 E Main St
Ashland,OR 97520
The following new Section 106 filing has been submitted:
FILE NUMBER: 0004991236
Purpose: Collocation Submission Packet
Notification Date: 7AM EST 12/15/2011
Applicant: T-Mobile USA
i
Consultant: Adapt Engineering
Site Name:Ashland Springs
Site Address: To be located on an existing building at 212 E Main St
Site Coordinates: 42-11-45.3 N, 122-42-46.4 W
City: Ashland
County:JACKSON
State: OR �,.
Lead SHPO/THPO: Oregon State Historic Preservation Office
,f
Consultant Contact Information:
Name:Dave Pinyerd
Title: a ;
PO Box:
Address: 10725 SW Barber Blvd#200
City:Portland
State: OR
Zip: 97219
Phone: (503) 892-2346
Fax: (503) 892-2348
Email: lindsay.mico@adaptengr.com
I
I
NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE
Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and
may contain information that is confidential,privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws.Any person
having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respect to
any misuse of the system.
Page 1 of 1 FCC 813
September 2008
I
i,
ITT OF
ASHLAND
December A 2011
Technology Associates
15618 SW 72nd Ave
Portland, OR 97224
RE: Planning Action#2011-01529
Notice of Final Decision
On December 22,2011,the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved
your request for the following:
A Conditional Use Permit and Site Review approval for the installation of a new antenna and upgrade of an existing
unmanned wireless communications facility on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212
East Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-1);
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 BC;TAX LOT: 100
The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13"'day after the Notice of Final
Decision is mailed.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance
(ALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in
the ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). G
i
An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to
raise an objection concerning this application,by letter,or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford
the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue,precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that
issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of
appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to
proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the
issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. .
The application,all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available
for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
i
If you have any questions regarding this decision,please contact the Community Development
Department between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm,Monday through Friday at(541)488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
I
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel;541488-5305
51 Winbum Way Fax:541-552-2050
Ashland,Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 FAA
www.ashland.orms
i
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01529
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 E. Main Street
APPLICANT: Technology Associates
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Review approval for the installation
new antenna and upgrade of an existing unmanned wireless communications facility on the roof of the
Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 BC; TAX LOT:.100
SUBMITTAL DATE: October 27, 2011
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: November 23,2011
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: December 22, 2011
FINAL DECISION DATE: January 4, 2012
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: January 4, 2013
DECISION
The application is to upgrade existing facilities and to install an additional unmanned wireless
communication facility on the rooftop and in the elevator shaft of the Ashland Spring Hotel. This
application is a modification of a previously approved installation for Verizon Wireless from 2002
(PA2002-111).
Several wireless communication facilities already exist on-site after recent planning approvals including:
PA#204-155 for Nextel; PA#2002-111 for Verizon Wireless; PA#2001-101 for Voice Stream; PA
#2001-084 for Master Towers (Sprint), Washington Oregon Wireless (WOW) and U.S. Cellular; and PA
#1999-127 for AT&T.
The proposal is to upgrade the existing cellular antennas on the building's west side. The existing antenna
will be replaced behind the tinted windows in the elevator shaft.On the north side,two cellular antennas will
be built into the existing parapet behind the louvers. Once fitted,the antennas will have a Radio Frequency
(RF)permeable canvas type material covering the antenna which will mimic the architecture of the existing
louvers. This material will not only be painted to match the existing building's color, but will also be
designed to appear as matching construction.The applicant will utilize the existing co-axle cable trays to run
the cables to the existing generators already on the roof of the buildings.
The intent of the applicant and the State Historic Preservation Office is to have the cellular antennas blend in
with the building's architecture and make them unnoticeable from the public's view. The State Historic
Preservation Office has not completed their review of the proposal. The applicants have provided an email
from SHPO indicating that they will review the application,however,prior to issuance of a building permit;
staff will need to receive written confirmation of SHPO approval. This application and the related building
permit are approved pending SHPOs concurrence with the findings that the additional antenna and the
modifications to the historic structure are similar in scale and will not have any discernable architectural
PA#2011-01529
212 E Main/adg
Page 1
I
impacts that compromise this important historic structure.
Overall it is staff's opinion the applicants have met the criteria of the municipal code for co-locating the
antennas.Their efforts will not negatively affect the Ashland Springs Hotel.With the submittals and written
findings submitted by the applicants, staff believes the application with the attached conditions complies
with all applicable City ordinances.
The criteria for a Conditional Use Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.104.050, as follows:
A. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the
use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies
that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program.
B. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer,paved access to and through the
development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be
provided to and through the subject property.
C. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the
impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone.
When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of
livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone:
1. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage.
2. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and
mass transit use.are considered beneficial regardless of capacity offacilities.
3. Architectural compatibility with the impact area.
4. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants.
5. Generation of noise, light, and glare.
6. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan.
7. Other factors found to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review of the proposed use.
The criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070; as follows:
A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
i
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for
implementation of this Chapter.
D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer,paved access to and through the
development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be
i
provided to and through the subject property.
i
PA#2011-01529 j
212 E Main/adg
Page 2
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Planning Action 2011-01529 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of
the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever,then Planning Action 2011-
01529 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here.
2) That prior to the issuance of a building permit:
a) That prior to issuance of a building permit, a confirmation letter approving the proposal from
the State Historic Preservation Office shall be submitted to the City.
3) That prior to use of the cellular antennas,the applicants shall paint or otherwise finish all exposed/visible
surfaces of the proposed facilities with non-reflective paint of a color that will match with the color and
design of the structure to which it is attached.All surface finishes on the parapet shall match the existing
surface design.
4) That prior to use of the cellular antennas,all requirements of the State Historic Preservation Office shall
be met.
5) That prior to use of the cellular antennas,any modified windows shall be tinted to match the remaining
windows.No back lighting, exposing the cellular antennas shall be used.
Maria Harris, Planning Division Manager Date
Department of Community Development
I
i
i
I
I
PA#2011-01529
212 E Main/adg
Page 3
CITY OF
ASHLAND
November 30, 2011
ADAPT Engineering, Inc.
Attn: Lindsay Mico, Senior Environmental Scientist
10725 SW Barbur Boulevard, Suite 200
Portland, OR 97219
RE: Proposed Telecommunications Installation
P003744A/Ashland Springs
212 E Main Street, Ashland, Oregon
Lindsay,
We've received your notice of the proposed T-Mobile upgrade installation on the Ashland Springs
Hotel, and of the Section 106 review now in progress. We would like to receive a copy of the
Section 106 Review report when complete.
Under our municipal code, this project may be regulated and require land use approval either as a
wireless communication facility installation under our AMC 18.72.180 or more generally under our
Site Review requirements if there are any exterior modifications to a nationally or locally-listed
historic building (the Ashland Springs Hotel is both) which trigger building permit review, as
wireless communication facilities and associated screening on existing buildings typically do. A
similar upgrade and expansion project underway on the Ashland Springs for Verizon Wireless is
going through the land use approval process now, but to my knowledge we haven't seen anything
from T-Mobile. With that in mind, it would likely be worthwhile for you or your clients to provide
some additional detail on the proposed installation, particularly with regard to any exterior changes
to the building that will be involved, to avoid unexpected delays relating to our land use
requirements down the road. The primary concerns on a collocation site where the applicants
already have facilities in place would be exterior modifications that alter the way the building relates
to applicable standards or to the Site Review and Conditional Use Permit approvals already in
place.
If you need further information or have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me at 541-
552-2040 or via email to derek.severson Rash land.or.us.
Sincerely,
�'
°�,�%`�''�-C' �°-''
Derek Severson,Associate Planner
Department of Community Development Tel:541-552-2040
51 Winburn Way Fax:541-552-2050
Ashland,Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us derek.severson @ashIand.or.us ME
ADAPT Engineering, Inc.
10725 SW Barbur Boulevard, Suite 200
Portland, Oregon 97219
Tel (503)892-2346
® ® Fax (503)892-2348
www.adaptengr.com
November 23, 2011
City of Ashland Planning Department RECEIVED
20 E Main St
Ashland, OR 97520 2011
Subject: Proposed Telecommunications Installation
P003744A/Ashland Springs
212 E Main Street, Ashland, Oregon
Mr. Bill Molnar:
The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has requested that we notify the local
government of any telecommunication project that requires a Section 106 Review.
We are contacting you on behalf of our client, T-Mobile, which has proposed to upgrade
an FCC licensed wireless communication antenna array is to be installed on the rooftop
of 212 E Main Street, Ashland, Oregon. A preliminary site plan has been included with
this letter.
A Section 106 Review is in the process of being completed. Please let me know if your
office requires a copy of the report.
With this letter, Adapt Engineering, Inc. respectfully invites the City of Ashland to
comment further on the proposed project.
Please do not hesitate to contact me by telephone at 503-892-2346 or by email at
lindsay.mico @adaptengr.com if you have any further questions.
Sincerely,
Lindsay Mico
Senior Environmental Scientist
Planning Department,51 Winb�_ i Way,Ashland,Oregon 97520 CITY OF
541-488-5305 Fax:541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2011-01529
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 E Main Street
OWNER/APPLICANT: Technology Association
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Review approval for the installation of a new
antenna and upgrade of an existing unmanned wireless communications facility on the roof of the Ashland Springs
Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown
Commercial,ZONING: C-1-D;ASSESSOR'S MAP:391E 09 BC; TAX LOT: 100
NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on December 7,2011 at 6:00 PM in the
Community Development and Engineering Services building(Siskiyou Room),located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 23, 2011
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: December 7, 2011
�rxr ,�� � a°
�✓; lA,� f^ �''4 - .� \ �,/SV&IECT PROP
n9ry ERRTTY *.
< :Ma W
./..-�-
1E Mac I oo
T L
Flt
Aeperty tines we jor n,,6rrrea Doty,Mat scatcabta
0 20 40 80 Feet
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way,Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m.on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals(LUBA)on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application,all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division,Community Development&Engineering Services
Building,51 Winburn Way,Ashland,Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request,please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
Wcomm-dev\planning\Notices Mailed\2011\2011-01529.docx
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
18.104.050 Approval Criteria
A conditional use permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the proposed use conforms, or can be made to conform
through the imposition of conditions, with the following approval criteria.
A. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located,
and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or
program.
B. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm
drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property.
C. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the
development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact
area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone:
1. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage.
2. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are
considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities.
3. Architectural compatibility with the impact area.
4. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants.
5. Generation of noise, light, and glare.
6. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan.
7. Other factors found to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review of the proposed use.
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.72.070 Criteria for Approval
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter.
D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm
drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the
street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options.
(ORD 2655, 1991; ORD 2836, 1999)
GAcomm-dev\planning\Notices Mailed\2011\2011-01529.docx
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On Wednesday November 23, 2011, 1 caused to be mailed, by regular
mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning
action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set
forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2011-01529, 212 E
Main Street.
Signafi` re of Employee
i
I
i
i
G:lcomm-devlplanningTorms&HandouWAffidavit of Mailing—Planning Action Notice.doc
i
PA-2011-01529 391E09BA 11000 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5800 PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 5300
145 MAIN STREET LLC ANDERSON ANDRE ASHLAND HISTORIC PROPERTY LLC
24 CROCKER ST PO BOX 3577 437 WILEY ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 4400 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 600 PA-2011-01529 391E09BA 10300
ASHLAND LODGE#944/B P 0 E BANKE THEODORE H/LOIS E BROWN ERIK/NORTH JAMIE
P 0 BOX 569 150 E MAIN 15 N FIRST ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5900 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 700 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5600
BUFFINGTON JANE N CONNOLLY ALLEN CONSERVANCY LLC
1800 SE 10TH AVE SUITE 400 142 E MAIN ST P 0 BOX 146
FT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 ASHLAND OR 97520 BOULDER CO 80306
PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5700 PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 4500 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5400
CONSERVANCY LLC CRATER NATL BANK OF MEDFORD EDWARDS OREN R
333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 PO BOX 810490 219 N MOUNTAIN AVE
TALENT OR 97540 DALLAS TX 75381 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5500 PA-2011-01529 391E09BA 10500 PA-2011-01529 391E096D 16500
EDWARDS OREN RALPH JR GARLAND GERALD G TRUSTEE HARMS ELISA R
219 N MOUNTAIN 921 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS CIR 244 HARGADINE ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5700 PA-2011-01529 391E09BA 10600 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 100
KELL GEORGE KEY BANK OF OREGON MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC
333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 PO BOX 560807 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD
TALENT OR 97540 DALLAS TX 73556 ASHLAND OR 97520
PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 4600 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 6201 PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 4700
NEUMAN PROPERTIES& DEV LLC OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSN SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E
953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD PO BOX 158 2773 BUSH ST
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115
PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 500 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 6000 PA-2011-01529 391E09BA 10900
SCHWEIGER JOHN C TRUSTE FBO SHAW ROGER A TRUSTEE ET AL TEITELBAUM ALBERT TRUSTEE
1644 ASHLAND ST 104 FIRST ST 2310 QUAIL POINT CIR
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 MEDFORD OR 97504
PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 4900 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 5000 PA-2011-01529 391E09BC 200
TEITELBAUM JULI F TRUSTEE ET AL THORMAHLEN PHILIP A TRUSTEE ET AL WILLIAMS FAMILY LLC
237 ALMOND ST 96 FORK ST 5500 COLVER RD
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540
PA-2011-01529 391E09BA 10400
YAMAOKA RONALD/CARRIE 11-23-11
2422 33RD AVE 212 E Main
SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 28
PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 5300 PA-2011-01529 391E09BD 5300
COLIN SWALES CATE HARTZELL
1438 TH STREET 892 GARDEN WAY
ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520
E
i
i
i
j
i
i
I
I
i
I
I
i
I
i
i
Amy Gunter
From: Julie Osborne Dulie.osborne @state.or.us]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 11:24 AM
To: Paul Bean
Cc: ryan.flanagan @taic.net
Subject: Re: 212 E Main Street, Ashland, Oregon
Yes, we will review the submittal package when received.
Julie Osborne
Preservation Specialist
Oregon SHPO
725 Summer St NE
Salem OR 97301
503-986-0661
>>> "Bean, Paul" <paul.bean(aftetratech.com> 11/18/2011 11:13 AM >>>
Hi Julie,
We are currently working on a submittal package to send to your offices for a proposed collocation
modification project located at 212 E. Main Street, in Ashland, Oregon. We performed consultation
with your offices back in
2003 for the original installation of equipment and I have attached this correspondence for your
reference. Verizon Wireless is currently proposing some modifications that will require review from
your offices.
i
I will be sending the submittal package in the near future; however, would it be possible for you to
respond to this e-mail letting me know that your offices will review the submittal package? Verizon
is also going through the planning process with the City of Ashland and the City is requesting
confirmation that SHPO will review the submittal.
Thanks and please let me know if you know if you any questions or need any additional
information.
Paul Bean
i
Tetra Tech, Inc.
425-482-7811
i
i
i
i
i
i
I
Amy Gunter
From: Ryan Flanagan [ryan.flanagan @taic.net]
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2011 11:30 AM
To: 'Amy Gunter'
Subject: RE: CUP for 212 E Main St Ashland OR
Attachments: Re: 212 E Main Street, Ashland, Oregon (2.17 KB)
Amy,
SHPO has acknowledged they will review the Verizon proposal at the Ashland Spring Hotel. The environmental
consultant is still working on the SHPO application package but we received correspondence today from SHPO.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you,
Ryan Flanagan
503.679.4689
From: Amy Gunter [mailto:guntera(a)ashland.or.us]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 20114:21 PM
To: ryan.flanagan@taic.net
Cc: 'Amy Gunter'
Subject: CUP for 212 E Main St Ashland OR
Hello Ryan,
In my review of the application at 212 E. Main Street it appears that some additional information is'
necessary.
Since there will be exterior modifications (however minimal) and the building is listed individually
on the National Register of Historic Places the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is required
to provide comment.
Have they been notified of the proposal? If so have they provided you with any comment and could
we get a copy of any correspondence?
i
At this point since the application is subject Historic Review we cannot notice it as complete until
November 23, 2011 in order for it to be on the December 7, 2011 Historic Commission agenda.
i
That should give you some time to get the documents from SHPO. As long as they can acknowledge
they will review it, their specific findings can come in prior to the building permit issuance.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
I
Amy D. Gunter, Assistant Planner j
City of Ashland, Dept. of Community Development
20 E Main Street Ashland, OR 97520
phone: (541) 552-2044
fax: (541) 552-2050
TTY: (800) 735-2900
1
Amy Gunter
From: Amy Gunter[guntera @ash land.or.us]
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 4:21 PM
To: ryan.flanagan @taic.net
Cc: 'Amy Gunter'
Subject: CUP for 212 E Main St Ashland OR
Hello Ryan,
In my review of the application at 212 E. Main Street it appears that some additional information is
necessary.
Since there will-be exterior modifications (however minimal) and the building is listed individually
on the National Register of Historic Places the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) is required
to provide comment.
Have they been notified of the proposal? If so have they provided you with any comment and could
we get a copy of any correspondence?
At this point since the application is subject Historic Review we cannot notice it as complete until
November 23, 2011 in order for it to be on the December 7, 2011 Historic Commission agenda.
That should give you some time to get the documents from SHPO. As long as they can acknowledge
they will review it, their specific findings can come in prior to the building permit issuance.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Amy D. Gunter, Assistant Planner
City of Ashland, Dept. of Community Development
20 E Main Street Ashland, OR 97520
phone: (541) 552-2044
fax: (541) 552-2050
TTY: (800) 735-2900
This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland,and it is subject to Oregon Public Records law for disclosure and
retention.Ifyou have received this message in error,please contact me at(541)552-2044. Thankyou.
i
TechnologyVAssociates
International Corporation
Agent for Verizon Wireless
15618 SW 72nd Ave.
Portland,OR 97224
503.549.0001
October 25, 2011
Ashland Planning Department
20 East Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
(541)488-5305
This application is a request for a modification of an existing wireless facility for Verizon
Wireless, located on the Ashland Springs Hotel, originally permitted under PA 2002-111.
Pursuant to the pre-application conference with City staff, this modification shall be processed as
Type I Planning Application for a Modification of the Existing Conditional Use Permit.
Location: 212 East Main Street Ashland, OR
Applicant: RCC Atlantic d/b/a Verizon Wireless
Attn: Real Estate Specialist,MDF ASHLAND
5430 NE 122,d Ave.
Portland, OR 97230
Agent: Ryan Flanagan
Tecluiology Associates International Corp.
15618 SW 72nd Ave
Portland,OR 97224
503.679.4689 (mobile)
ryan.flanaizan@taic.net
Property Owner: Mark Anthony Historic Properties LLC
Summary of existing and proposed conditions:
Verizon's existing wireless site consists of an equipment shelter on the third floor which is
incorporated into the building design. Verizon's existing antennas are located on both the sixth
floor and at the rooftop level.
The antenna on the six floor is located on the northwest side of the building, behind a tinted
window. The two antennas located at the rooftop level have been incorporated into the building
wall on both the north east and south east sides of the building. Those antennas are covered by
RF permeable material, and they are not visible from the exterior. Verizon's coax follows a cable
ladder through the interior of the building and is not noticeable from the exterior.
Site Reference: MDF ASHLAND
Page 1 of 4
Verizon is proposing to add a total of three antennas, two at the rooftop level and one on the sixth
floor level. The antenna proposed at the sixth floor level shall be placed behind tinted glass and
shall not be noticeable from the exterior.
The two proposed antennas on the rooftop level shall be located behind existing louvers on the
north east and south east sides of the building. Both louvers shall be replaced with RF permeable
material designed to match the existing louvers. A small portion of the wall below the louvers
shall also be replaced with RF permeable material due to the length of the antenna. There will be
no change to the building noticeable from the exterior. Verizon is proposing to replace an
architectural feature of the building with material that matches existing conditions. Please refer
to the site plans and the photos for additional detail on Verizon's design and antenna location.
The location of the proposed antennas was driven by a number of factors. As this is a historic
building,Verizon's goal was to minimize the visual impact, and minimize the physical changes to
the building. It is Verizon's position that locating the antennas behind the louvers will result in
the least impact to the building, and shall have minimal if any visual impacts to any surrounding
property.
The building had been designed for future antennas at the rooftop level, similar to the location of
Verizon's existing antennas. A photo from the exterior of the building showing the antenna
placement before the RF permeable material is included with this application. Verizon initially
considered locating its new antennas in those available slots, but determined that the size of the
antenna was too large to fit into that space without removing additional building material on the
exterior of the building. Verizon considered different, smaller antennas but was unable to utilize
one that was small enough to fit into that space
Expanding the size of the available antenna spaces quickly became an unfeasible option as both
the width and the depth of the antenna would require removal of large sections of the parapet
wall,not just a minor expansion of the antenna space. From an engineering perspective, and from
the anticipated perspective of the State Historic Preservation Officer, the impact on the building
was too great to consider. Verizon then looked at other available locations on the building.
The next logical solution was to place the antenna on the interior of the rooftop wall behind the
louver, and to replace the louver with RF permeable material. A small portion of the wall below
the louver shall also be replaced by RF permeable material. Verizon Wireless has filed its
application with the State Historic Preservation Officer, and is expecting a determination of non
significance. At the time of this application, SHPO has not yet approved that application. A copy
of that decision shall be provided to the City of Ashland building department prior to obtaining
any permits, and Verizon accepts this as a condition of approval for its modification.
Verizon must connect its radio equipment to the proposed antennas via coaxial cable. Verizon
initially considered following the existing cable ladder through the building, but determined that
following its existing route would require expansion of that conduit within the building. Verizon
considered routing additional coax along the exterior of the building, and adding a stealth aspect
to conceal that coax, but decided there may be a visual impact that either the building owner or
the SHPO officer may not approve due to the impact on the exterior of the building. Verizon has
opted to reuse the existing coax for its antennas.
Verizon has been working with the building owner, the wireless site management company
(Verizon's landlord), the A&E firm employed by the building owner and Verizon's A&E firm,
and the owner's general contractor who coordinated all of the wireless installations for the
MDF ASHLAND
Page 2 of 4
building owner. The proposed design represents the most minimal impact on the for adding
antennas at the rooftop level. There will be no noticeable change to the exterior of the building.
Verizon is not considering adding any mechanical equipment that will be visible from the exterior
of the building.
General Code Criteria:
As a formality, modifying Verizon's existing permit is a collocation on an existing structure and
not a new facility on an existing structure, or a new structure.
Verizon is not proposing any additional landscaping on the property, as no additional ground
space required for the proposed changes. The existing building does have adequate landscaping
to cover the landscaping requirements noted in the pre-application notes.
Verizon does not require additional parking for this modification, and the building has adequate
parking for its use. Verizon requires approximately one trip per month for maintenance, and the
available parking at the site is adequate. This modification shall not reduce any available parking
spaces at the site.
Verizon is not proposing any signage at this site.
Approval Criteria for a Conditional Use
Two copies of the site plans are required for the modification of Verizon's conditional use permit,
pursuant to 18.14.040. The site plans address the requirements outlined in the Ashland land use
code.
As wireless facilities are allowed as a conditional use in the C-1-D district, and as Verizon
Wireless proposes to modify its existing conditional use permit, this use is in conformance with
the standards of the zoning district and the comprehensive plan.
This is an accessory use to an existing building,where the building is an operating hotel. The site
has adequate facilities for water, sewer, paved access to the hotel, electricity, urban storm
drainage, and adequate access to transportation. Verizon's use of this site only requires access
and electricity,both of which services are existing and adequate for its use.
As addressed in this narrative, the proposed modification to the existing conditional use will have
no greater material effect on the surrounding area than the existing Verizon facility. Great effort
and expense has been undertaken to ensure there is no visible change from the exterior of the
building. The proposed installation will very likely require scaffolding and safety measures when
removing and installing the replacement louvers, but no more than the maintenance of any
portion of the exterior of the building might. An installation like this is typically completed in
under one week, minimizing the impact to foot traffic on the sidewalk. The air quality of the site
won't be affected by this modification, and it will not generate noise, light or glare to any
adjacent property. No adjacent properties will be negatively affected by this change.
18.72 Site Design Review
Based on the pre-application conference, it was not determined if a Site Design review would be
required for this change as there won't be any exterior additions or modifications that would
change the appearance of the building. Should the City of Ashland require a site design review in
MDF ASHLAND
Page 3 of 4
addition to the conditional use modification, Verizon shall hold a public meeting to discuss its
proposal.
To generally address the criteria in Section 18.72, Verizon is proposing a collocation on an
existing building. The height of the existing building shall not change, and as such this
modification does not require FAA notification. A copy of the TOW AIR decision is included
with this application.
In summary, Verizon is proposing to add antennas in a manner that requires the least amount of
changes to the existing structure, and these antennas shall not be visible from the exterior of the
building, maintaining the stealth design of the wireless facilities located on this rooftop. Please
address any questions, conmients, or requests for additional information to applicant's agent.
Respectfully,
Ryan Flanagan
Agent for Verizon Wireless
(503)679-4689
I
i
I
MDF ASHLAND
Page 4 of 4
i
M . R. RICHARDt CHGimr..F.Rime INC 1
100 WEST I3th AVENUE SUITE 21 O EUGENE OR 97401 r r
541-687-0129 WWW.MRRICHiARDS.COM
Structural Feasibility Report
Ashland Springs Hotel,Ashland, Oregon
Verizon Antenna Installation 1
Summary:
M. R. Richards Engineering has performed a structural evaluation of the feasibility of installing two
antennas at the upper roof level of Ashland Springs Hotel in Ashland Oregon. It has been determined that
the installation is feasible and that the overall impact to the structure is minor.
Description:
Ashland Springs Hotel was originally constructed circa 1925. The primary construction material is
reinforced concrete. The main tower of the structure has seven floors above the street level plus the roof
for an overall height of approximately 91'-6". The roof parapet consists of a decorative concrete wall with
cornices, fluting, louvers and medallions.
The building has been renovated at various times; of significance to this project is a 1999 renovation that
included restoration of the parapet and structural bracing of the parapet walls.
Scope of Work:
This evaluation is based on review of the original construction drawings, drawings for the 1999 renovation
and preliminary project drawings by GPA Architects. No calculations or specific design work has been
performed.
Findings:
The parapet walls in the areas of the new antennas are 4"thick concrete with minimal reinforcing steel.
The 1999 renovation project included concrete patching to repair deterioration from weather and the
installation of a steel bracing system to stabilize the parapet.
The proposed antenna installation will involve cutting an opening in the wall and infill with RF transparent
material. One or more members of the existing steel bracing system will be impacted by the installation.
Conclusion:
The proposed antenna installation is feasible and constructible. Sawcutting of the existing concrete should
be done with caution because of the condition of the old concrete. It is recommended that the street and
sidewalk below be closed during any cutting or concrete drilling operations for safety.
Modifications to the existing steel parapet bracing system will be required. A horizontal angle brace in the
area of the antennas could possibly be lowered and re-attached to the vertical stanchions and concrete
wall. The existing steel can be used to connect support brackets for the antennas and any other
equipment. It is recommended that any steel used be hot-dip galvanized for corrosion protection.
Structural engineering will be required to design any modifications to the bracing system.
This proposed project is feasible and can be built with relatively ordinary construction methods. Special
care should be taken to avoid damage to the existing decorative concrete parapet.
1 FCC Home I Search I Updates I E-Filinct I Initiatives I For Consumers ( Find People
Antenna Structure Regitr do
ACC > tNTB >FSF2 > Online Systems>TOWAIR FCC Site Mari
TOWAIR Determination ReI 0? HELP
New Search Printable Page
** NOTICE
TOWAIR's findings are not definitive or binding, and we cannot guarantee that the data in
TOWAIR are fully current and accurate. In some instances, TOWAIR may yield results that differ
from application of the criteria set out in 47 C.F.R. Section 17.7 and 14 C.F.R. Section 77.13. A
positive finding by TOWAIR recommending notification should be given considerable weight. On
the other hand, a finding by TOWAIR recommending either for or against notification is not
conclusive. It is the responsibility of each ASR participant to exercise due diligence to determine
if it must coordinate its structure with the FAA. TOWAIR is only one tool designed to assist ASR
participants in exercising this due diligence, and further investigation may be necessary to
determine if FAA coordination is appropriate.
DETERMINATION Results
Structure does not require registration. The structure meets the 6.10-meter
(20-foot) Rule criteria.
Your Specifications
NAD83 Coordinates
Latitude 42-11-45.1 north
Longitude 122-42-46.0 west
Measurements (Meters)
Overall Structure Height (AGL) 615.7
Support Structure Height (AGL) 615.7
Site Elevation (AMSL) 591.3
Structure Type
B - Building
Tower Construction Notifications
Notify Tribes and Historic Preservation Officers of your plans to build a tower.
i
I
ASR Help ASR License Glossary - FAA - Online_t-iele- Documentation -Technical Support
ASR Online TOWAIR- CORE=S -ASR Online Filing -A�� iicatEon Search- Registration Search
About ASR P ivacy Statement-About ASR -ASR Horne,
,y
Q
co
N Gq
ry
w
s
r �
w Q
r
m+:
r
® ,r
+
� tl
Ail t4 av
c 3 a�� _
c9 d m
-------------- �
l
ti
a OL
v �
h
YJ O 0
LL.
� w
W a�
O.
uvia aiiS
3o 13 d ZIgIHxa
i
i
A
rli"to
, u
� I I
I
b
. yo1�•d�N',aq, .
. .. N
b ® z 3 v ars 1
o
1 11 ILL
0
J v �
o t q o
�J
_ ®
tsi
W kF
YY b.
~ m7
9 yon .
. o
5i
mEld a�xg
b 30 ON llf[IHXH
EXHIBIT A(4 of 4)
Site Plan
/ash/anal SMir�vS M®tom/ �2-3.0/
an --
71.
PU'El 13
PfOf15�.[� Va.r�a.o.� Shs.(ia.r Loe..ir�en _ ..
U H ELEV TION
vBQAL.E V 18'�ru0
I
I
T -
v �<�No M31A3a 8 F
Cm o vrvi3 az H31n38
pf �,w qqq u. oz anssiaa ozp
E` ae 09 ae
d was P u/ei/otu/zi/mii/so/t as= LL= ujw
LU
0
CL
Ad
a
~ a Q
Ld
&F £ a
H
st z m
F- -------"±d- V
LLI
O�U UJ
mRs 00 EX0 'g La
V) W t2 US ° a
z
0
N
•� �°� W w a N Z !A
J J o J
O 'pwaap w ?W J Z
� w= u a N U
F - w
w r, ' W a d
N w d Q
v'^ z Q
1 fy-1 k=
W �s
>-G9
_ W z F
F M!'a
rc o 0� zp M N
rR
LLI
a =m —� ""�Ilua � a=� m� c~iG
~ FF —ozl a� pmzm a °°� 0�
z a ° pip= a a
3 5�
t en�ey as
rt o h x
Nb9
s� a Q
o n
rs Y�i.anY:ri �o°p Z
W
my� z
xa
e0, 1A3a 8 F F
3 d U a rj IVNU OZ M31A3a q 8 ° ° Li fZ1 Y
OZ 3r]SS13a OZ
Z aa_ ►C�7"�,ot W�/py' v 08 08 OB o ma ¢
a/21/01 WZI/011l/8O/coa a _-o�m�° cvzi m>g
Ras
z� e-
R^
i1
•
,� �• ��� ' ��ti�' iii,
���` ��� � •� ����� ��� ��� ��h�� �� ,ICI, i,p,,���1
1111 Ng V1I 9�7
0,
\ , I a l \
I/ oz Xo \
fl�,
--_
z
J
IL
w
r
r
r
w
0
1131n3a
o "_� Y•Ci VN az M31A38
oz 3nssou az 6 o Z G Q
ae as ae
ry? „Z L y
=os a LU
�w
S�
o,
WE;'
ap 3da�p3¢ 3
w a3zx wa
¢c� —
i Zrwa�� z G-i5
w� wa
� _ a
3Nn ALa3do8d
33
i- ---
rnz ---
I z�
I 1
w3z3¢ w
I
Ii a3
II
11 �J
I I zlwz
I. Ij
Z'
VNN31NV
1
I I _
1
I oQ
I ��
� I
i
�1 I
w3� I I
I I
}G
-w I 1
I- I
I
1
-----------------------
1 I
I
,I
al
Z
a
LL.
O
o �
w
a 1
J
Z
w
I
I,
ND e o U) N
M3in3a
�'�i IVNU oz M31n38 8 6 t„ z
az anSSM a o G G O Q
08 OB 081
►U�s{ ��0 .5� Li/si/olt[/zl/oiil/eo/t 5cai w
LU
FT
Ell E
N
X C
o
0
EU
EM
0 LLJII Mil
Ell EII Ell
z
o
N 0 WU *w * Q
vpWO
.066
W
wUN
v>d UUW Nr
{L
O
z
r
,P P
jo
ss
w �❑
o❑
a ® O❑
a a❑
F. rT Ell
Mil ETII
UEM
EM ETI
Ffl
w .I
0
o❑
0
r--
_ z
O
® 1-
s ® L-1-111 LEA
Q
® >
W
J
W
H
y
Q
W
13
ivnIJ az m31n38 m B B 8 A wa z
OZ 3 S513M OZ p 42,
41 .1
48 88 88 d T = J 4 5� a/e1/o1u/zt/o111/eo/mo _ os` o U.
aWa
" gQ Z; „w
r
55
U
� Q Q
Z
w 1 LL`I
Z io O N
Q m K m
EE Eu M m Er
®®EM CLJJJ LjJ1 [_Ell
amm C-111 ET-111 ET-111 EEIII
I
o
W
J
W
O
N I
I
i
I
, $ .
k& f«)m}:` !i�! ►�§Rr' %ƒ&_ ,§6 ,mm.wam�a\\\ e! f/},{ !/\\`/9/./}j/) {; § \
!'m§�
� ) §^ ( w G
,w. . %® / cm
r E | & §�
«
A z
\ \
�
>>
(} 2
)® j
&~ _
Li i ( -
G - E
W ,
z §
r, &0
. . IL
�
E
}\
§\
I El
Elli
EE]
FR E:H
�
§
_ §
0.
u
> /
1
z9 )\[)E \k§ L
o �
w ;
. . �
r�
r w „ S
�.� ':rte „/'��" !' ✓- ,- �, a
Y
µ f 41 �5
na
'
Ow
�r
j
7
k y .�--'gin,.,--r' s ,✓- ^- -` ecf
r
limit
If
Ao
two
VOW
lot v?
Lot it HBO
r �
" a
r
x
> t
I`
LL CID
42 000,"S
WS
� O
"
v
y
l
a
Mw
Vo
gilt
Jk IN
51 luf Ft,
y
;� N
4 .
PON
i
loot A
us-
Fro
CL
0 4
'tic
ww",
UJ
.................................
cn
MASTAWT,
Onto
4,
Ny
00
c
0
ca
w
0
e
k F
s
-
" Inn
cu
O 2 —
Q. o > W
+-: D —
L o C C �
c
9�3
L 4
r
l
f f
Proposed anterina
,a
pa4ited to match
exterior
Proposed IOUver
and p rt�e� of waH
to be r p9 c d with
F permeable
4 material to retch
exterior of building
rtE
t
5 M.
y 8 �
i
r
3
4$
dv.
i
A
1
S
y
r r
r
} _ 9
i M
f`
r
r
w
I
J
Y
�y
�x
C
N
a
Cf
mm.
vim
!n Q !n ao
(6
O Q.. C
N
N
(6 f6
3
'° 0 �.
�..�:.
MDA3�J
0
w 3nSS138 81gi'% IVNIA OZ M31A38
z
oz az in z
uj
LU
LuU.
tf
ix
uj LU
CL LU
Fo ui
Z ss, LU
LLJ (L
z mz >�j
X S, F
LU o
z, a L, z 00°og LLJ
nu ou 0 F
z
0
0
C\2
z
o
LO
W Li
uj <
z
j0000 z
0 W r
z
I-- CL Of
(n
W
a_
L:l
z IL
LD
L)
vL Q Z'.
V) D <
0 IL N L)
LL,
z
< M
s 4
z L
z < a M
L)
�2
< IL
<
yg
O
f
Z
z
M]Lld
IVNJ OZ 3fISSI GZ M31A3d 0)
32J (17
ca
IV
Z
LL
uj
/0 �1801LO
=OIL
j
�lj I
4E
US
uj
(1)
LLI
0
0
y$° ` ��`�fi ltlNl3 M3
"3"
3
CZ M31A32J
n S, az
s 38 Q LU
00
<
& z
<
z
LLI CL
1�19
INII A 111021
-------------------
gi
I.
----------------- -
-- - ---------------
z
a.
LL
0
0
w
Z
LU
M3V,3�1 U)
A2�1
z m2llf
'AN IVNI nssn'! oz RES 9 z
OZ 3
cla oel
—j
,.
W211W�L/ZL/0�1u�/80/LO 3 LL X La
A I
LU
Cq
2 R
41
am—
I�"affla
L= cl
LLJ
Z,
,855
o
z
L-1 L—L I I 1 11 IH
LILJII
7�`CEII IELI'l —1:111
uj
fA
_ r
M31A3J
3VNIJ OZ M31A32 \ n Cy
OZ Ilsm QZ m m m m Q ZO
.YVI
y ce
ae as
ae z
• � ° a a
- a
Obi _ Qyo�-� - g C� II/et/ot IE/zE/o�a/eo/�o a o a x w
to n� „w
r
°o N
®� ❑ —❑ ❑ -
®® ( ❑ '❑ ❑❑
1 lu li —❑TTI [71
�j f '
N —
® ^i L 1 C 111 1,11-1 ❑ m !
Eu Ell
.111,111 N� l
III
I 'II
II I ,
�I I
I I
I I
z
O
w
w
a-
O
U)
C*4
p,8S MIA38
z
3
ae
Lu
IL x
to ws vZ
4 NS Lu Lu
C%l
No
XW W=
fo 00
0
z
z
Z<
wa 0-
z
L 0
5W RW
LU
U)
CL
LU
Z- Z LU
�
—Z
LU
Z
LLI
/ (
'
Ryan Flanagan
From: Neuman Properties [npd@�nind.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18. 2011U:43AM
To: ryan.flanagan@taic.net
Subject: From: Doug Neuman
Attachments: Image (17)jpg
Hi Ryan,
Here ix the document signed.
Best,
Doug
- -
_
|
Image (17)
1
4
• :�t+-56346 �p
/V
i BARGAIN AND SALE DEED 9.o s o20
KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS,that
I
MOUNTAIN PARK DEVELOPMENT,L.L.C.,an Oregon limited liability company
i hereinafter called the Grantor,for the consideration hereinafter stated,does hereby grant,bargain,sell and convey unto
E MARK ANTONY HISTORIC PROPERTY,L.L.C.,an Oregon limited liability company
i •
hereinafter called the Grantee,and unto Grantee's successors and assigns all of that certain real property,with the
tenements,hereditament and appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining,situated in the County
of Jackson,State of Oregon,described as follows,to-wit:
SEE EXHIBIT"A"ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
i
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the said Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns forever.
THE TRUE AND ACTUAL CONSIDERATION paid for(his transfer,stated in terms of dollars, is
S 1x600,000.00"
(4 WHERETHE CONTEXT SO REQUIRES,the singular includes the plural and all grammatical changes shall
Sk be h%plied to make the provisions hereof apply equally to individuals and to corporations.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused its name to be signed this Ag day of
NOVEHflZ 1998,by its officers duly authorized(hereto by order of its board of directors.
"THIS INSTRUMENT WILL NOT ALLOW USE OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THIS
INSTRUMENT IN VIOLATION OF APPLICABLE LAND USE LAWS AND REGULATIONS. i
BEFORE SIGNING OR ACCEPTING THIS INSTRUMENT,THE PERSON ACQUIRING FEE
TITLE TO THE PROPERTY SHOULD CHECK WITH THE APPROPRIATE CITY OR COUNTY
PLANNING DEPARTMENT TO VERIFY APPROVED USES,AND TO DETERMINE ANY
LIMITS ON LAWSUITS AGAINST FARMING OR FOREST PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN ORS
30.930:'
MOUNTAIN PARK DEVELOPMENT,L.L.C.
E
BY: .e"t
Dou N en,Manager
State of Oregon ) Tax Statements To:
ss. 4240 Clayton Road
County cfJackson ) Ashland OR 97520
E Subscribed and swom to before me this L of/(� 3888
orr(nAL t r o ary public f r Oregon
PATRICIpp p My commission xpires:
( NOTAAY PUeIiC D-kCA6VpN �
[€ COMMiSSIONNO.OSt54
After record e rn
MY COMMISSION t%PIaE!NNE 27,20rq
1'^` Barry N. Shaw
515 East Main Street
Ashland OR 97520
3
1 �
I
1
I
i
III
' yti- 6396 .
's
EXHI[B1T"A"
Beginning North 35°12'West 686 feet from the southeast corner of
Donation Land Claim No.40 in Township 39 South,of Range I East of the
Willamette Meridian in the City of Ashland,Jackson County,Oregon at a point of
the northeasterly line of Hargadine Street,thence 35°East 5 chains to the
southwesterly line of Main Street,as shown on the official 1888 Map of said City,
thence North 55°West,along said southwesterly line of Main Street,2 chains to
the center of an open alley connecting Main and Hargadine Streets;thence
Southerly along the center line of said alley,South 35°West 5 chains,to
Hargadine Street,thence South 55°East along the northeasterly line of Hargadine
Street,2 chains to the point of beginning.
ALSO,Beginning at a point on the northeasterly line of Hargadine Street in
the City of Ashland,Jackson County,Oregon,from which the southeast corner of
Donation Land Claim No.40 in Township 39 South,Range I East of the
Willamette Meridian,bears South 35° 12'East 686 feet distant;thence North 35°
East 5 Chains to the southwesterly line of Main Street,as shown on the official
1888 Map of said City;thence South 55'East along said southwesterly line of
Main Street,,I foot;thence South 35°West and parallel to the first course of 5
chain to the northeasterly line of Hargadine Street,and thence North 55'West 1
foot to file point of beginning.
Jackson County, Oregon
Recorded
OFFICIAL RECORDS
DEC 04 IN
t 14b&U�N T IC1COK
t /
l -
a
1
f
0.17Ac 6�®
0
0�. '3 Ac s�°o
0 0K
0
0
° 500
/ ^�o 0.17A
0.g9lA c
00
�,, 100 �?s°°
s� 201 0.96 Ac
�® 0.06 Ac 1.00
LS17 o0
23 Ac
300 ASHLAND SPRINGS
0.23 Ac
HOTEL
°
o°
5
r�s
'Oo
pp NW COR.
V233 P358
re,
<��
5800
0.26 be
's
►0 1 5900
Ac 1 �`' o0 0.25 Ac
I -
FILED FOR RECORD AT REQUEST OF
AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
Verizon Wireless
Attn: Real Estate Department-M/S 223
3350 161"Avenue SE
Bellevue,WA 98008
Memorandum of License Agreement
ORIGINIAL
Grantor: MASTER TOWERS,LLC
Grantee: VERIZON WIRELESS(VAW)d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS
Legal Description: Official legal description as Exhibit A
Assessor's Tax Parcel ID#: 391E9BC TL 100 A#1-6711-1
Reference#(if applicable): N/A
\\pdx_zeus\files\5\52051\1344\memorandum.doc
Bellevue/01/31/02
MEMORANDUM OF LICENSE AGREEMENT
This Memorandum of License Agreement is made as of 1v ,2002,by
and between Master Towers,LLC(hereinafter"LICENSOR"),and Verizon Wireless(VAW)LLC d/b/a
Verizon Wireless (hereinafter"LICENSEE"),who agree as follows:
1. Term and Premises. LICENSOR has licensed to LICENSEE,and LICENSEE has licensed
from LICENSOR,pursuant to a License Agreement dated BTU n e- /,-) ,2002(the
"License"),space(the"Premises")as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto,situated on the real property
legally described in Exhibit A,for a term of five(5)years. The provisions of the License are incorporated
herein.
2. Extension Periods. LICENSEE has the right to extend the term of the License for five(5)
additional five(5)year extension periods.
3. Permitted Uses, The Premises may be used by LICENSEE for the installation and
operation of communications equipment and uses incidental thereto.
4. Purpose of Memorandum. This Memorandum is prepared for the purpose of recordation to
give notice of the License. It shall not constitute an amendment or modification of the License.
Executed in duplicate original as of the date first above written.
LICENSO STER TOWERS,LLC
BY
f Meader,Member
LICENSEE: VERIZON IRELESS(VAW)LLC d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS
BY:
Robert F. Swaine
Area Vice President-Network West
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A-Legal Description/Description of Premises
By : 6
Name : D Newma 2"OZ lithr7,4wc/DAM
\\pdx_zeus\6les\5\52051\1344rnemorandum.doe
Portland/1/31102
CALIFORNIA LL- ACKNOWLEDGMENT
c�i=r�r, r�rcr r t c c r�r r c ct �Y efi s� ,tom me eY crercr�c crc�of r8 y,
State of California
County of 6_,Q�� ss,
I-/
N On �3`�� before me, ()-1 Aro LVoJ,,J, te,ISirit, A v 1 R4L(/
Date Name and Title of Officer(e.g.,"Jane owe.No"Pub1W)
personally appeared ��i�er lIwra�lt,�
NName(s)of Signor(s)
y ❑personally known to me
CAR2LYN J,WILSON
4 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
Commission#1264499 z evidence
•,� Notary Public-California y
Orange County to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are '
MycontTt.6cpiras Der-16,2004 subscribed to the within instrument and
h acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed 5
s the same in his/her/their authorized
capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their
signature(s) on the instrument the person(s),or
the entity upon behalf of which the person(s)
acted, executed the instrument.
WITNESS my hand and official seal.
Place Notary Seal Above Signature of Notary Public
OPTIONAL
Though the information below is not required by law,it may prove valuable to persons relying on the document
and could prevent fraudulent removal and reattachment of this form to another document.
Description of Attached Document
s Title or Type of Document:
SDocument Date: Number of Pages:
Signer(s)Offer Than Named Above:
Capacity(ies)Claimed by Signer
Signer's Name: _ s
O Individual •Top of thumb here
❑ Corporate Officer—Title(s):
❑ Partner—❑Limited ❑General
❑ Attorney in Fact
LTrustee Guardian or Conservator
Other:igner Is Representing:
O 1997 National Notary Association•9350 De Soto Ave.,P.O.Box 2402•Chatsworth.CA 91313.2402 Prod.No.5907 Reorder.Call Toll-Fres 1.600-8766627
I
i
I
LICENSOR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF d Kc�oN )
COUNTY OF V� A-5 k tNV nom► )
On this ^day of TANA5 ,2002,before me, a Notary Public in and for the State of
QketeaN ,personally appeared swF M,cx1c0E1A.-,personally known to me(or
proved to be on the basis of satisfactory evidence)to be the person who executed this instrument,
on oath stated that he/she was authorized to execute the instrument,and acknowledged it as the_
qt" ( LAtAvr of to be the free and voluntary act and deed of said
party for the uses and purposes mentioned in the instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF,I have hereunto set my hand official seal the day and year first
above written.
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of DA-,
Residing at T"11-11- Sw CMJ o►J Gt.Ae1L Q0 E
My appointment expires (-A-t°. 1 1-C>0
Print name__.L(A. s
I
i
EXHIBIT A
i of 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
[See Attached]
I
ii
\\pdx_zeus\filesl5\5205 111 3 44\rnemorandu m.doc
Portland/l/31/02
EXHIBIT A
Legal Description
Beginning North 35° 12'West, 686 feet from the Southeast corner of Donation Land claim No.
40, Township 39 South, Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, City of Ashland, Jackson County,
Oregon, at a point on the Northeasterly line of Hargadine Street; thence North 350 East, 5
chains, to the Southwesterly line of Main Street, as shown on the Official 1888 Map of said City;
thence North 550 West, along said Southwesterly line of Main Street, 2 chains, to the center of
an open alley connecting Main and Hargadine Streets; thence Southerly, along the center line of
said alley, South 351 West, 5 chains, to Hargadine Street; thence South 551 East, along the
Northeasterly line of Hargadine Street, 2 chains, to the point of beginning.
ALSO: Beginning at a point on the Northeasterly line of Hargadine Street, in the City of Ashland,
Jackson County, Oregon, from which the Southeast corner of Donation Land Claim No. 40,
Township 39 South, Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon, bars South
350 12' East, 686 feet; thence North 351 East, 5 chains, to the Southwesterly line of Main Street,
as shown on the Official 1888 Map of said City; thence South 551 East, along said
Southwesterly line of Main Street, 1 foot; thence South 350 West, parallel to the first course, 5
chains, to the Northeasterly line of Hargadine Street; thence North 550 West, 1 foot, to the point
of beginning.
it
EXHIBIT A
2of2
DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES
[See Attached]
2
\\pdx_zeus\fi les\5\52051\1344\memoraudum.doe
Bellevue/1/31/02
Planning Division ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
51 Winburn Way,Ashland OR 97520
CITY OF FILE# -2 e)// —
,ASH LAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 01 (z,,
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED@ Certification? ❑YES ❑ NO
Street Address t 111-lks (L we
Assessor's Map No.39 1 E C9 6 C_ Tax Lot(s)
Zoning C D , Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT
f
Name V/U,2"j t4we-e5s Phone E-Mail
Address ��C, ,rte 12,Lo AV City �a,M41jb zip "'I v'2 ;?_-,'f
PROPERTY OWNER
Name /DP W &f— Phone qVV-- 12-10t E-Mail 671):
5�
Address ' ° — Cityfrl — zip fj
SURVEYOR,ENGINEER,ARCHITECT,LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,OTHER 0eLC_
Phone E-Mail
Title C_ Name C,1`6'�Mfx f117 6f .�j
Address 2-76 ( AJ",) v4UC4,1 city �612_-rL,4,JDt , Of— zip q-12-16
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application,including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact,are in all respects,
true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect,the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate;and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure irq
rth1giegard Ifiresult most likely in not only the request being set aside,but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
_
be 71ro'ved I it my expense. If I have any doubts,I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance,
Appliaks ti—g-46lie Date
As owner of the property involved in this request,I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner,
S-IfIle-
Property Owner's Signature(required) Date
Fro be completed by City Staff]
Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee$
OVER 0
G:\cotiiiii-dev\planiiitig\FoTins&Handouts\Zoming Pennit Application.doc
a.
Job Address: 212 EAST MAIN ST Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
A Owner's Name: MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC Phone:
Customer#: 06506 State Lie No:
TECHNOLOGY ASSOC ENGINEERING T I City Lic No:
L. Applicant: 5930 PRIESTLY DR R'
f Address: CARLSBAD CA 92008 A
G Sub-Contractor:
Phone: (503)679-4689 Address:
N Applied: 10/27/2011 {1=
Issued:
Expires: 04/24/2012 R Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E09BC100 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: Modification to CUP for existing Verizon wireless facility located on the Ashland Springs Hotel (PA-2002-111)
Contact: Ryan Flanagan 503-679-4689
UALtJATEON -
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Conditional Use Permit Type 1 963.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland,OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080
CITY OF
n-
r�
I
I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the
best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts
understood and agreed to the following:
Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation
(180 days). Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in
advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00
4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 963.00 $ 938.00
or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the
applicant. Sub-Total: $ 963.00
Fees Paid: $ 938.00
Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 25.00
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland,OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F