Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-1012 Study Session PACKET City of Ashland Parks and Recreation Commission / City Council Special Meeting Tuesday, October 12, 1999 @ 7:OOpm Hunter Park Senior Building CALLE GUANAJUATO RESTORATION PROJECT AGENDA 1. Call to order — jo*x-4.L * Preview of work * Introduction and review of agenda 2. Presentation by Consultant 3. Council/Commission questions 4. Public Comment 5. Council/Commission comments 6. Adjourn to Commission meeting 7. Adjourn to council meeting. 8. Adjournment CAMERON • MCCARTHY• GILBERT L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S L L P 160 East Broadway Fax: 541-485-7389 Eugene Omgon 97401 ® Phone: 541-485-7385 MASTER PLAN(existing north main bridge& 100 yr.Flood upper/25 yr.Flood lower) CALLE GUANAJUATO-RESTORATION PROJECT CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST 10/12/99 ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS SITE IMPROVEMENTS Creek Beds Boulder Placement 8850 sf 4 $35,400 $35,400 Creek Banks Stepped Bank&Planting 155 cy 500 $77,500 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Grouted) 265 cy 80 $21,200 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 740 cy 60 $44,400 Bio-engineered Bank 2850 sf 12 $34,200 $177,300 Bank Edges Decorative Railing-East 125 if 80 $10,000 Decorative Railing-West Wing Wall 75 if 80 $6,000 Decorative Railing-West Upper Wall 135 if 80 $10,800 Flood Wall(height varies) 100 cy 750 $75,000 $101,800 Pedestrian Bridges 40 feet x 10 feet w/decorative rails 400 sf 150 $60,000 18 feet x 5 feet w/minimal rails 90 sf 90 $8,100 $68,100 Pedestrian Stairs Concrete 220 if 25 $5,500 Cheek Walls 280 if 150 $42,000 Decorative Railing 85 if 80 $6,800 $54,300 Concrete at Garden Stair 700 if 25 $17,500 Cheek Walls at Garden Stair 200 if 150 $30,000 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 125 cy 55 $6,875 Decorative Railing at Garden Stair 240 if 80 $19,200 $73,575 Pedestrian Terraces Colored Concrete Paving-West 1700 sf 7 $11,900 Concrete Paving-West 2275 sf 5 $11,375 Decorative Paving-East 15000 sf 13 $195,000 Concrete Paving-East 4000 sf 5 $20,000 Eco Paving 575 sf 13 $7,475 $245,750 Granite Street Slopes Earthwork 4500 cy 10 $45,000 Stepped Bank&Planting 45 cy 500 $22,500 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 190 cy 55 $10,450 Sitting Walls 100 If 150 $15,000 Existing Wall Refurbish 1 allow 4000 $4,000 $96,950 Landscaping Trees-Large 25 ea 400 $10,000 Trees-Coniferous 10 ea 200 $2,000 Trees-Small 15 ea 200 $3,000 Planting 13150 sf 3 $39,450 Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate • • • Page 1 ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS Irrigation 13150 sf 3 $39,450 $93,900 Lighting Pedestrian Lights 16 ea 2000 $32,000 $32,000 Furnishings Benches,Tables,Litter Recept,Signs I allow 15000 $15,000 $15,000 Utilities Relocate,extend 1 allow 45000 $45,000 $45,000 Direct Construction Costs $1,039,075 Indirect Costs @ 20% $207,815 Total Construction Cost $1,246,890 Contingencies @25% $311,723 Total Construction Budget $1,558,613 Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate Page 2 CAMERON • MCCARTHY• GILBERT L A N D 5 C A P E A P C H I T E C T 5 L L P 160 East Broadway Fez: 541-485-7389 Eugene Oregon 97401 ® Phone: 541-485-7385 MASTER PLAN (existing north main bridge& 100 yr.Flood upper/25 yr.Flood lower) CALLE GUANAJUATO-RESTORATION PROJECT Conceptual Construction Cost and Funding Strategy 10/12/99 ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS SITE IMPROVEMENTS-PHASE ONE BID AND CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE Creek Beds Boulder Placement 8850 sf 4 $35,400 $35,400 Creek Banks Stepped Bank&Planting 155 cy 500 $77,500 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Grouted) 265 cy 80 $21,200 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 740 cy 60 $44,400 Bio-engineered Bank 2850 sf 12 $34,200 Cheek Walls @ Pedestrian Stairs 280 if 150 $42,000 $219,300 Bank Edges Decorative Railing-East 125 If 80 $10,000 Decorative Railing-West 75 If 80 $6,000 Flood Wall (height varies) 100 cy 750 $75,000 $91,000 Granite Street Slopes Earthwork 4500 cy 10 $45,000 Stepped Bank&Planting 45 cy 500 $22,500 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 190 cy 55 $10,450 Sitting Walls 100 If 150 $15,000 Existing Wall Refurbish 1 allow 4000 $4,000 $96,950 Direct Construction Costs $442,650 Indirect Costs @ 20% $88,530 Total Construction Costs $531,180 Contingencies @ 25% $132,795 Total Construction Budget $663,975 Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate • • • Page 1 ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS ALTERNATES OR FUTURE PHASES Design elements recommended as Additive Alternates for Phase One Construction Bid Package or as future construction phases. Funding through annual construction by the City of Ashland for five consecutive years. PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES 40 feet x 10 feet w/decorative rails 400 sf 150 $60,000 18 feet x 5 feet w/minimal rails 90 sf 90 $8,100 $68,100 Direct Construction Costs $68,100 Indirect Costs @ 20% $13,620 Total Construction Costs $81,720 Contingencies @ 25% $20,430 Total Construction Budget $102,150 WEST SIDE PEDESTRIAN STAIRS AND TERRACES Pedestrian Stairs Concrete 220 if 25 $5,500 Hand Rails 85 If 20 $1,700 $7,200 Pedestrian Terraces Colored Concrete Paving-West 1700 sf 7 $11,900 Concrete Paving-West 2275 sf 5 $11,375 $23,275 Direct Construction Costs $30,475 Indirect Costs @ 20% $6,095 Total Construction Costs $36,570 Contingencies @ 25% $9,143 Total Construction Budget $45,713 GARDEN STAIRS FROM GRANITE Concrete at Garden Stair 700 if 25 $17,500 Cheek Walls at Garden Stair 200 if 150 $30,000 Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 125 cy 55 $6,875 Decorative Railing at Garden Stair 240 if 80 $19,200 $73,575 Direct Construction Costs $73,575 Indirect Costs @ 20% $14,715 Total Construction Costs $88,290 Contingencies @ 25% $22,073 Total Construction Budget $110,363 Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate Page 2 ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS CALLE PAVING ENHANCEMENT Decorative Paving-East 15000 sf 13 $195,000 Concrete Paving-East 4000 sf 5 $20,000 $215,000 Direct Construction Costs $215,000 Indirect Costs @ 20% $43,000 Total Construction Costs $258,000 Contingencies @ 25% $64,500 Total Construction Budget $322,500 PICNIC AREA PAVING Eco Paving 575 sf 13 $7,475 $7,475 Direct Construction Costs $7,475 Indirect Costs @ 20% $1,495 Total Construction Costs $8,970 Contingencies @ 25% $2,243 Total Construction Budget $11,213 EXISTING UPPER WEST SIDE WALL Decorative Railing 135 if 80 $10,800 $10,800 Direct Construction Costs $10,800 Indirect Costs @ 20% $2,160 Total Construction Costs $12,960 Contingencies @ 25% $3,240 Total Construction Budget $16,200 Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate • • • Page 3 ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS FORCE ACCOUNT ITEMS-Implemented by the City of Ashland Design elements recommended to be completed by City Departments through force account efforts. LANDSCAPING-Parks Department Trees-Large 25 ea 400 $10,000 Trees-Coniferous 10 ea 200 $2,000 Trees-Small 15 ea 200 $3,000 Planting 13150 sf 3 $39,450 Irrigation 13150 sf 3 $39,450 Direct Construction Costs $93,900 Indirect Costs @ 20% $18,780 Total Construction Costs $112,680 Contingencies @ 25% $28,170 Total Construction Budget $140,850 LIGHTING and UTILITIES-Electric Department Pedestrian Lights 16 ea 2000 $32,000 Relocate,extend electric systems 1 allow 45000 $45,000 Direct Construction Costs $77,000 Indirect Costs @ 20% $15,400 Total Construction Costs $92,400 Contingencies @ 25% $23,100 Total Construction Budget $115,500 DIRECT INVOICE ITEMS-Implemented by the City of Ashland Design elements recommended to be purchased by direct invoice. FURNISHINGS Benches,Tables,Litter Recept,Signs 1 allow 15000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate Page 4 Project Budget Breakdown October 12, 1999 Calle Guanajuato Restoration Project Master Planning A preliminary working project budget for Phase One construction was tentatively approved at a joint work session held by members of the City Council and the Parks Commission on June 26, 1999. Funding sources for the Phase One - Project Budget include $600,000 remaining in government flood restoration funds and $400,000 jointly supplied by the City and the Parks Commission in equal amounts from their next budget cycle. Phase One includes all work to be completed by the 'in water' work period ending September 15, 2001. Phase One - Project Budget $1,000,000 Direct Construction Costs(contractor cost) $ 420,300 Indirect Construction Costs @ 20% (gr,b&i,gc o&p,p,i) $ 84,100 Total Construction Cost(construction bid) $ 504,400 Contingencies @ 25% (design&construction) $ 126.100 Total Construction Budget $630,500 (construction bid + contingencies) Design Fees @ 21% $ 130,000 Permitting Consultation $ 15,000 Construction Testing $ 10,000 Total Construction, Design, and Permitting Costs $ 785,500 Additional Owner Costs: • Restroom Facilities n120,OOO •Recycling Facilities•Topographic Surveys.• Preconstruction Testing•Public Input and Master Planning Services Phase One -Project Budget // $ 1,000,000 I • l� / . 95 fQ,rna,�iV Es 1 5f-ef ) .Ta'fS Operational Project Goals Calle Guanajuato Restoration Project JUNE 30, 1999 The following is a list of operational project goals approved and prioritized during a joint study session of the City Council and the Parks Commission held June 29, 1999. The prioritization process ranked goals individually, in a relative fashion. Goals are now arrayed in three different levels; Level 1 goals are considered most important. All goals will be incorporated in design alternatives. Rankings will only be used as a means of making design decisions when one goal appears to require precedence over another. Operational Project Goals take into account prior work by the Park Commission including the Criteria for Restoration Plan adopted November 17, 1997. The goals are intended to help maintain focus on the three major design spheres the Master Plan will address:providing additional flood control and/or hazard reduction', protecting and enhancing the stream corridor functions and values, and providing attractive and vital urban spaces while maintaining existing uses. Opportunities for comment and re proioritization of the goals will occur during further stages of the master plan process. Level 1 • To protect human lives and structural integrity of the buildings in the Plaza during a severe flood event. (relative score 72) • To enhance the natural setting and environmental functions and values of Ashland Creek in Calle Guanajuato. (relative score 50) • To greatly reduce damage to public infrastructure during a severe flood event. (relative score 44) Level 2 • To greatly reduce damage to private property during a severe flood event. (relative score 32) • To establish interesting and attractive urban spaces on Calle Guanajuato. (relative score 29) • Blend new Calle Guanajuato design elements with the Plaza/Downtown area and with Lithia Park. (relative score 22) • To maintain existing uses in Calle Guanajuato. (relative score 21) Level 3 • To allow for interaction between pedestrians and Ashland Creek on Calle Guanajuato area. (relative score 16) • To restore and enhance the Calle Guanajuato as a part of the heart and soul of Ashland. (relative score 9) ' Operational goals assume floodwater will be contained, to the maximum extent practicable, within the Calle Guanajuato area downstream of the new Winburn Way Bridge. It is also assumed that floodwaters will be prevented from being directed toward the Plaza area, to the maximum extent practicable, by activities and structures upstream of the Winburn Way Bridge. These goals were incorporated in earlier work on Ashland Creek by the City and their consultants,OTAK, and are not to be revisited in the scope of this project. V F ♦ ' u g , WIWI it /`� ` Nib ��7-f •� � FA .y� _� � S �Illlllllllllpll�I �N r .� , `�y .�•;� . .1,> III 0,,.x,1• , , . x.11 �.,���, WEI it �' auu �� � �.• l WIA Iy�`��gr�a .� '• ?. �:. / •� • ; t� I I mo ffil Iu� \� I ` I I 4 fh'. i a WWF , w { � �II��IIIIY%11 1W R_M��hlmwAw=11O �l1lumBmYi�l�l®C — _ {g1�ii1tl�111t31YO'111Y1�I1NY'�IIY_ . fr i i to IS a M1I� �f0�xf + � ju + J a. II`� f_ j M 4r yx �- ����' J�+ "�. yPLf t�✓ 7 ��%��f[�r��y. "'•I Y s+ ri ' T 3 i11 t\ 1 Y�yT4 �. ♦ �. 5 .� S < ."fk. .,� � � �.� N�` ri ; � : �',� � \', ' ' ��d f= —,: -. ; rya ;` ► - �'XY.$Y3` '°.i.P �r ��.r�i 151�Ja .�'� : , � +i -. � x^.+y,"��n.►'��,! „� � I �� .�.� ' For :�. � ' ��� .'„ pti' 5..' >�� r�; Plx �!~�,� �a'Ta��f T'Qf:�a�•r t O. - Jpw� + a' �i���/'.rf - '�.' ,q '�` r/ i..�+'/l��i ��,� �:J� 'P /f"�\iWhl. JN7 ■ i+�g � r . uti, uzl�� Al q-4♦ 3 ti ia. sir 1 + WIFAI f) �y Te tt f }' a- �---d Vii° • }�/ " /; i17j1�1i - �� 1I 1 �[bs,�-�:�� �`►1/� p��fl� '��a:.1 ���'+'lV^w C; �rq�u ��� ; Na,l ,�,� MET �' �. >. ►\ '� ', MUM MEN i •. ASHLAND CALLE GUANAJUATO Public Meeting 10/27/97 - A Summary of Suggested Items QUALITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS FACILITIES NEEDED blend paving - cobblestone (or something) paving access to Granite Street Calle is an outdoor room(public square) all-year,high bridge cohesive design (comprehensive) bathrooms remain Elizabethan theme bicycle rack(s) enhance visual character (east side buildings, etc.) create appealing entrances keep multi-use character creative walls keep park-like quality of west define entries maintain natural character- function/values drinking fountains maintain vehicular accessability larger level dining area make it safe lengthen market area(zone) more diversity/habitat in stream channel link spiral stage with low water/removable bridge real live creek (not a water attraction) maintain parking replace trees more festive lighting summer shade more fire hydrants more parking ACTIVITIES DESIRED more restaurant seating bicycle access more sitting places casual meeting places public art murals children's activity - places/things recycling composting opportunities replace pedestrian bridge cultural events - music, plays, performances round boulders dog control (canine circulation access) second footbridge(connect restrooms & garbage) education/interpretation stage games along the way spiral stage water access- big at west side, small at east side increase west side activity zones stormwater filtration (oil separators) maintain access to west side upgrade garbage facilities water-access west side pockets-tables, benches, etc. west side pathways & accessability widen Calle at Plaza Caf6 +Preferred Option Parks Commissioner's Meeting Calle Guanajuato Restoration Project SEPTEMBER 20 1999 The Ashland Parks Commissioners held a meeting Wednesday, September 15, 1999, to adopt the proposed Preferred Option. Throughout the course of the meeting, the Parks Commissioners reviewed the proposed plan and discussed areas for revision or further review in accordance to adopting the Preferred Option. The following hollered items are a list of the design elements composed during the Parks Commission meeting for further consideration in the final master plan. The items are listed in no particular order and were placed into groups by the design team in respect to the Operational Design Goals provided by the Parks Commission on June 29, 1999. Please review attachment for the complete list of Operational Project Goals. Level 1 To protect human lives and structural integrity of the buildings in the Plaza during a severe flood event. (relative score 72) Maximize high bridge ability to pass debris; consider big trees in-stream To enhance the natural setting and environmental functions and values of Ashland Creek in Calle Guanajuato. (relative score 50) • Use stacked system for structural base on area upstream of main pedestrian bridge; add boulders where possible; place large riparian trees in this area; maintain some access, perhaps limit access for first few years to allow riparian vegetation to establish • More riparian trees on east side • As much vegetation along the creek as possible To greatly reduce damage to public infrastructure during a severe flood event. • Better protection of transformers in reference to Level 1 goals • Consider moving lower transformer- leave wall area; remove seating aspect Level 2 To establish interesting and attractive urban spaces on Calle Guanajuato. • We should look for dead space in east side where benches, flowers, and other amenities could be placed either now or in final design phase • Light Trespass - use lights that stay on site • More development of connection to new alley through Masonic Hall • Emphasize trees over seating - seating where it works within design parameters Level 3 To restore and enhance the Calle Guanajuato as a part of the heart and soul of Ashland. (relative Parks Commissioner's Meeting Summary Page 2 score 9) • Guanajuato design features - remember this is Ashland, use an echo of features (wrought iron or cantera rock) Miscellaneous • Remember it is an alley - obtain local antedotal information; insure it and other functional aspects are included in the design • Just indicate picnic area- do not show tables • Four problem trees in Calle - continue depicting on plans, address later in traffic flow study