HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999-1012 Study Session PACKET City of Ashland
Parks and Recreation Commission / City Council
Special Meeting
Tuesday, October 12, 1999 @ 7:OOpm
Hunter Park Senior Building
CALLE GUANAJUATO RESTORATION PROJECT
AGENDA
1. Call to order — jo*x-4.L
* Preview of work
* Introduction and review of agenda
2. Presentation by Consultant
3. Council/Commission questions
4. Public Comment
5. Council/Commission comments
6. Adjourn to Commission meeting
7. Adjourn to council meeting.
8. Adjournment
CAMERON • MCCARTHY• GILBERT
L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T S L L P
160 East Broadway Fax: 541-485-7389
Eugene Omgon 97401 ® Phone: 541-485-7385
MASTER PLAN(existing north main bridge& 100 yr.Flood upper/25 yr.Flood lower)
CALLE GUANAJUATO-RESTORATION PROJECT
CONCEPTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST 10/12/99
ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
Creek Beds
Boulder Placement 8850 sf 4 $35,400 $35,400
Creek Banks
Stepped Bank&Planting 155 cy 500 $77,500
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Grouted) 265 cy 80 $21,200
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 740 cy 60 $44,400
Bio-engineered Bank 2850 sf 12 $34,200 $177,300
Bank Edges
Decorative Railing-East 125 if 80 $10,000
Decorative Railing-West Wing Wall 75 if 80 $6,000
Decorative Railing-West Upper Wall 135 if 80 $10,800
Flood Wall(height varies) 100 cy 750 $75,000 $101,800
Pedestrian Bridges
40 feet x 10 feet w/decorative rails 400 sf 150 $60,000
18 feet x 5 feet w/minimal rails 90 sf 90 $8,100 $68,100
Pedestrian Stairs
Concrete 220 if 25 $5,500
Cheek Walls 280 if 150 $42,000
Decorative Railing 85 if 80 $6,800 $54,300
Concrete at Garden Stair 700 if 25 $17,500
Cheek Walls at Garden Stair 200 if 150 $30,000
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 125 cy 55 $6,875
Decorative Railing at Garden Stair 240 if 80 $19,200 $73,575
Pedestrian Terraces
Colored Concrete Paving-West 1700 sf 7 $11,900
Concrete Paving-West 2275 sf 5 $11,375
Decorative Paving-East 15000 sf 13 $195,000
Concrete Paving-East 4000 sf 5 $20,000
Eco Paving 575 sf 13 $7,475 $245,750
Granite Street Slopes
Earthwork 4500 cy 10 $45,000
Stepped Bank&Planting 45 cy 500 $22,500
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 190 cy 55 $10,450
Sitting Walls 100 If 150 $15,000
Existing Wall Refurbish 1 allow 4000 $4,000 $96,950
Landscaping
Trees-Large 25 ea 400 $10,000
Trees-Coniferous 10 ea 200 $2,000
Trees-Small 15 ea 200 $3,000
Planting 13150 sf 3 $39,450
Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate • • • Page 1
ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS
Irrigation 13150 sf 3 $39,450 $93,900
Lighting
Pedestrian Lights 16 ea 2000 $32,000 $32,000
Furnishings
Benches,Tables,Litter Recept,Signs I allow 15000 $15,000 $15,000
Utilities
Relocate,extend 1 allow 45000 $45,000 $45,000
Direct Construction Costs $1,039,075
Indirect Costs @ 20% $207,815
Total Construction Cost $1,246,890
Contingencies @25% $311,723
Total Construction Budget $1,558,613
Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate Page 2
CAMERON • MCCARTHY• GILBERT
L A N D 5 C A P E A P C H I T E C T 5 L L P
160 East Broadway Fez: 541-485-7389
Eugene Oregon 97401 ® Phone: 541-485-7385
MASTER PLAN (existing north main bridge& 100 yr.Flood upper/25 yr.Flood lower)
CALLE GUANAJUATO-RESTORATION PROJECT
Conceptual Construction Cost and Funding Strategy 10/12/99
ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS
SITE IMPROVEMENTS-PHASE ONE BID AND CONSTRUCTION PACKAGE
Creek Beds
Boulder Placement 8850 sf 4 $35,400 $35,400
Creek Banks
Stepped Bank&Planting 155 cy 500 $77,500
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Grouted) 265 cy 80 $21,200
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 740 cy 60 $44,400
Bio-engineered Bank 2850 sf 12 $34,200
Cheek Walls @ Pedestrian Stairs 280 if 150 $42,000 $219,300
Bank Edges
Decorative Railing-East 125 If 80 $10,000
Decorative Railing-West 75 If 80 $6,000
Flood Wall (height varies) 100 cy 750 $75,000 $91,000
Granite Street Slopes
Earthwork 4500 cy 10 $45,000
Stepped Bank&Planting 45 cy 500 $22,500
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 190 cy 55 $10,450
Sitting Walls 100 If 150 $15,000
Existing Wall Refurbish 1 allow 4000 $4,000 $96,950
Direct Construction Costs $442,650
Indirect Costs @ 20% $88,530
Total Construction Costs $531,180
Contingencies @ 25% $132,795
Total Construction Budget $663,975
Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate • • • Page 1
ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS
ALTERNATES OR FUTURE PHASES
Design elements recommended as Additive Alternates for Phase One Construction Bid
Package or as future construction phases. Funding through annual construction by the
City of Ashland for five consecutive years.
PEDESTRIAN BRIDGES
40 feet x 10 feet w/decorative rails 400 sf 150 $60,000
18 feet x 5 feet w/minimal rails 90 sf 90 $8,100 $68,100
Direct Construction Costs $68,100
Indirect Costs @ 20% $13,620
Total Construction Costs $81,720
Contingencies @ 25% $20,430
Total Construction Budget $102,150
WEST SIDE PEDESTRIAN STAIRS AND TERRACES
Pedestrian Stairs
Concrete 220 if 25 $5,500
Hand Rails 85 If 20 $1,700 $7,200
Pedestrian Terraces
Colored Concrete Paving-West 1700 sf 7 $11,900
Concrete Paving-West 2275 sf 5 $11,375 $23,275
Direct Construction Costs $30,475
Indirect Costs @ 20% $6,095
Total Construction Costs $36,570
Contingencies @ 25% $9,143
Total Construction Budget $45,713
GARDEN STAIRS FROM GRANITE
Concrete at Garden Stair 700 if 25 $17,500
Cheek Walls at Garden Stair 200 if 150 $30,000
Stacked Boulders&Planting(Loose) 125 cy 55 $6,875
Decorative Railing at Garden Stair 240 if 80 $19,200 $73,575
Direct Construction Costs $73,575
Indirect Costs @ 20% $14,715
Total Construction Costs $88,290
Contingencies @ 25% $22,073
Total Construction Budget $110,363
Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate Page 2
ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS
CALLE PAVING ENHANCEMENT
Decorative Paving-East 15000 sf 13 $195,000
Concrete Paving-East 4000 sf 5 $20,000 $215,000
Direct Construction Costs $215,000
Indirect Costs @ 20% $43,000
Total Construction Costs $258,000
Contingencies @ 25% $64,500
Total Construction Budget $322,500
PICNIC AREA PAVING
Eco Paving 575 sf 13 $7,475 $7,475
Direct Construction Costs $7,475
Indirect Costs @ 20% $1,495
Total Construction Costs $8,970
Contingencies @ 25% $2,243
Total Construction Budget $11,213
EXISTING UPPER WEST SIDE WALL
Decorative Railing 135 if 80 $10,800 $10,800
Direct Construction Costs $10,800
Indirect Costs @ 20% $2,160
Total Construction Costs $12,960
Contingencies @ 25% $3,240
Total Construction Budget $16,200
Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate • • • Page 3
ITEM QUAN UNIT PRICE COST TOTALS
FORCE ACCOUNT ITEMS-Implemented by the City of Ashland
Design elements recommended to be completed by City Departments through
force account efforts.
LANDSCAPING-Parks Department
Trees-Large 25 ea 400 $10,000
Trees-Coniferous 10 ea 200 $2,000
Trees-Small 15 ea 200 $3,000
Planting 13150 sf 3 $39,450
Irrigation 13150 sf 3 $39,450
Direct Construction Costs $93,900
Indirect Costs @ 20% $18,780
Total Construction Costs $112,680
Contingencies @ 25% $28,170
Total Construction Budget $140,850
LIGHTING and UTILITIES-Electric Department
Pedestrian Lights 16 ea 2000 $32,000
Relocate,extend electric systems 1 allow 45000 $45,000
Direct Construction Costs $77,000
Indirect Costs @ 20% $15,400
Total Construction Costs $92,400
Contingencies @ 25% $23,100
Total Construction Budget $115,500
DIRECT INVOICE ITEMS-Implemented by the City of Ashland
Design elements recommended to be purchased by direct invoice.
FURNISHINGS
Benches,Tables,Litter Recept,Signs 1 allow 15000 $15,000 $15,000
$15,000
Calle Guanajuato Cost Estimate Page 4
Project Budget Breakdown October 12, 1999
Calle Guanajuato Restoration Project Master Planning
A preliminary working project budget for Phase One construction was tentatively approved at
a joint work session held by members of the City Council and the Parks Commission on June
26, 1999. Funding sources for the Phase One - Project Budget include $600,000 remaining in
government flood restoration funds and $400,000 jointly supplied by the City and the Parks
Commission in equal amounts from their next budget cycle. Phase One includes all work to
be completed by the 'in water' work period ending September 15, 2001.
Phase One - Project Budget $1,000,000
Direct Construction Costs(contractor cost) $ 420,300
Indirect Construction Costs @ 20% (gr,b&i,gc o&p,p,i) $ 84,100
Total Construction Cost(construction bid) $ 504,400
Contingencies @ 25% (design&construction) $ 126.100
Total Construction Budget $630,500
(construction bid + contingencies)
Design Fees @ 21% $ 130,000
Permitting Consultation $ 15,000
Construction Testing $ 10,000
Total Construction, Design, and Permitting Costs $ 785,500
Additional Owner Costs:
• Restroom Facilities n120,OOO
•Recycling Facilities•Topographic Surveys.• Preconstruction Testing•Public Input and Master Planning Services
Phase One -Project Budget // $ 1,000,000
I • l�
/ .
95
fQ,rna,�iV
Es 1
5f-ef ) .Ta'fS
Operational Project Goals
Calle Guanajuato Restoration Project JUNE 30, 1999
The following is a list of operational project goals approved and prioritized during a joint study session of the City
Council and the Parks Commission held June 29, 1999. The prioritization process ranked goals individually, in a
relative fashion. Goals are now arrayed in three different levels; Level 1 goals are considered most important. All
goals will be incorporated in design alternatives. Rankings will only be used as a means of making design decisions
when one goal appears to require precedence over another. Operational Project Goals take into account prior work by
the Park Commission including the Criteria for Restoration Plan adopted November 17, 1997. The goals are
intended to help maintain focus on the three major design spheres the Master Plan will address:providing additional
flood control and/or hazard reduction', protecting and enhancing the stream corridor functions and values, and
providing attractive and vital urban spaces while maintaining existing uses. Opportunities for comment and re
proioritization of the goals will occur during further stages of the master plan process.
Level 1
• To protect human lives and structural integrity of the buildings in the Plaza during a
severe flood event. (relative score 72)
• To enhance the natural setting and environmental functions and values of Ashland Creek
in Calle Guanajuato. (relative score 50)
• To greatly reduce damage to public infrastructure during a severe flood event.
(relative score 44)
Level 2
• To greatly reduce damage to private property during a severe flood event.
(relative score 32)
• To establish interesting and attractive urban spaces on Calle Guanajuato.
(relative score 29)
• Blend new Calle Guanajuato design elements with the Plaza/Downtown area and with
Lithia Park. (relative score 22)
• To maintain existing uses in Calle Guanajuato. (relative score 21)
Level 3
• To allow for interaction between pedestrians and Ashland Creek on Calle Guanajuato
area. (relative score 16)
• To restore and enhance the Calle Guanajuato as a part of the heart and soul of Ashland.
(relative score 9)
' Operational goals assume floodwater will be contained, to the maximum extent practicable, within the Calle
Guanajuato area downstream of the new Winburn Way Bridge. It is also assumed that floodwaters will be
prevented from being directed toward the Plaza area, to the maximum extent practicable, by activities and
structures upstream of the Winburn Way Bridge. These goals were incorporated in earlier work on Ashland
Creek by the City and their consultants,OTAK, and are not to be revisited in the scope of this project.
V
F
♦ ' u g ,
WIWI
it
/`� ` Nib ��7-f •� � FA
.y� _� � S �Illlllllllllpll�I
�N r
.� , `�y .�•;� . .1,> III
0,,.x,1• , , . x.11 �.,���,
WEI
it
�' auu �� � �.• l
WIA
Iy�`��gr�a
.� '• ?.
�:. / •�
• ;
t� I
I
mo
ffil
Iu� \�
I
` I I
4
fh'.
i
a
WWF , w
{ � �II��IIIIY%11 1W R_M��hlmwAw=11O �l1lumBmYi�l�l®C —
_ {g1�ii1tl�111t31YO'111Y1�I1NY'�IIY_ .
fr i
i
to IS
a
M1I�
�f0�xf
+ � ju + J a. II`� f_ j M 4r yx �- ����' J�+ "�. yPLf t�✓ 7 ��%��f[�r��y. "'•I
Y s+ ri '
T
3
i11 t\ 1 Y�yT4 �. ♦ �. 5 .� S < ."fk. .,� � � �.� N�` ri ; � :
�',� � \', ' ' ��d f= —,: -. ; rya ;` ► -
�'XY.$Y3` '°.i.P �r ��.r�i 151�Ja .�'� : , � +i -. � x^.+y,"��n.►'��,! „� � I �� .�.� '
For
:�. � ' ��� .'„ pti' 5..' >�� r�; Plx �!~�,� �a'Ta��f T'Qf:�a�•r t O. -
Jpw� + a' �i���/'.rf -
'�.' ,q '�` r/ i..�+'/l��i ��,� �:J� 'P /f"�\iWhl. JN7 ■ i+�g � r .
uti, uzl��
Al
q-4♦ 3
ti
ia. sir
1 +
WIFAI
f)
�y Te tt
f }'
a- �---d Vii° • }�/ " /;
i17j1�1i - �� 1I 1 �[bs,�-�:�� �`►1/� p��fl� '��a:.1 ���'+'lV^w
C; �rq�u ��� ; Na,l ,�,�
MET �' �. >.
►\ '� ',
MUM
MEN
i •.
ASHLAND CALLE GUANAJUATO
Public Meeting 10/27/97 - A Summary of Suggested Items
QUALITIES AND CHARACTERISTICS FACILITIES NEEDED
blend paving - cobblestone (or something) paving access to Granite Street
Calle is an outdoor room(public square) all-year,high bridge
cohesive design (comprehensive) bathrooms remain
Elizabethan theme bicycle rack(s)
enhance visual character (east side buildings, etc.) create appealing entrances
keep multi-use character creative walls
keep park-like quality of west define entries
maintain natural character- function/values drinking fountains
maintain vehicular accessability larger level dining area
make it safe lengthen market area(zone)
more diversity/habitat in stream channel link spiral stage with low water/removable bridge
real live creek (not a water attraction) maintain parking
replace trees more festive lighting
summer shade more fire hydrants
more parking
ACTIVITIES DESIRED more restaurant seating
bicycle access more sitting places
casual meeting places public art murals
children's activity - places/things recycling
composting opportunities replace pedestrian bridge
cultural events - music, plays, performances round boulders
dog control (canine circulation access) second footbridge(connect restrooms & garbage)
education/interpretation stage
games along the way spiral stage water access- big at west side, small at east side
increase west side activity zones stormwater filtration (oil separators)
maintain access to west side upgrade garbage facilities
water-access west side pockets-tables, benches, etc.
west side pathways & accessability widen Calle at Plaza Caf6
+Preferred Option
Parks Commissioner's Meeting
Calle Guanajuato Restoration Project SEPTEMBER 20 1999
The Ashland Parks Commissioners held a meeting Wednesday, September 15, 1999, to adopt the proposed
Preferred Option. Throughout the course of the meeting, the Parks Commissioners reviewed the proposed plan and
discussed areas for revision or further review in accordance to adopting the Preferred Option. The following
hollered items are a list of the design elements composed during the Parks Commission meeting for further
consideration in the final master plan. The items are listed in no particular order and were placed into groups by the
design team in respect to the Operational Design Goals provided by the Parks Commission on June 29, 1999.
Please review attachment for the complete list of Operational Project Goals.
Level 1
To protect human lives and structural integrity of the buildings in the Plaza during a severe flood
event. (relative score 72)
Maximize high bridge ability to pass debris; consider big trees in-stream
To enhance the natural setting and environmental functions and values of Ashland Creek in Calle
Guanajuato. (relative score 50)
• Use stacked system for structural base on area upstream of main pedestrian bridge; add
boulders where possible; place large riparian trees in this area; maintain some access,
perhaps limit access for first few years to allow riparian vegetation to establish
• More riparian trees on east side
• As much vegetation along the creek as possible
To greatly reduce damage to public infrastructure during a severe flood event.
• Better protection of transformers in reference to Level 1 goals
• Consider moving lower transformer- leave wall area; remove seating aspect
Level 2
To establish interesting and attractive urban spaces on Calle Guanajuato.
• We should look for dead space in east side where benches, flowers, and other amenities
could be placed either now or in final design phase
• Light Trespass - use lights that stay on site
• More development of connection to new alley through Masonic Hall
• Emphasize trees over seating - seating where it works within design parameters
Level 3
To restore and enhance the Calle Guanajuato as a part of the heart and soul of Ashland. (relative
Parks Commissioner's Meeting Summary Page 2
score 9)
• Guanajuato design features - remember this is Ashland, use an echo of features (wrought
iron or cantera rock)
Miscellaneous
• Remember it is an alley - obtain local antedotal information; insure it and other functional
aspects are included in the design
• Just indicate picnic area- do not show tables
• Four problem trees in Calle - continue depicting on plans, address later in traffic flow
study