HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008-015 PO - Ogden Roemer Wilkerson
CITY RECORDER
Page 1 / 1
CITY OF
ASHLAND
20 E MAIN ST.
ASHLAND, OR 97520
(541) 488-5300
2/4/2008
08090
VENDOR: 013014
OGDEN ROEMER WILKERSON ARCHITE
2950 EAST BARNETT ROAD
MEDFORD, OR 97504
SHIP TO: Ashland Public Works
(541) 488-5587
51 WINBURN WAY
ASHLAND, OR 97520
FOB Point:
Terms: Net
Req. Del. Date:
Speciallnst:
Req. No.:
Dept.: PUBLIC WORKS
Contact: Jim Olson
Confirming? No
Architectural review of the City
facilities and space needs analysis.
Per attached proposal dated October 16,
2007.
49,500.00
RFP
EnQineerinQ services contract:
11/15/2007
BeQinninQ date: 11/15/2007
Completion date: 06/30/2008
Insurance reQuired/On file
BILL TO: Account Payable
20 EAST MAIN ST
541-552-2028
ASHLAND, OR 97520
SUBTOTAL
TAX
FREIGHT
TOTAL
49 5 0.00
0.00
0.00
49,500.00
~ ~S. t.
onZ8 Igna ure
VENDOR COpy
CITY OF
ASHLAND
PROJECT ACCOUNTING WORKSHEET
PROJECT NUMBER (YEAR ~
PROJECT TITLE
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Department
Project Manager
Department Head
BUDGET IN FORMAnON
Identify fiscal year I potential splits
Identify Funding Codes
and Funding Code names
DESIGN .100
Engineer Name
PO
COST
Change Orders
CONSTRUCTION .120
contractor name
PO
budget estimate
bid I contract total
changes
total $
CONSTRUCTION .120
contractor name
PO
budget estimate
bid I contract total
changes
total $
PERMIT COSTS (Building Dept) .170
budget estimate
final costs
2007181 .
~FACILITIES MASTER PLAN & SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
Update the Space Need. Analysis; evaluate current and future facilities and space utilization locations
t/ith respect to proximity to other departments. Evaluate the physical location of all City Facilities with
egard to their current and potential best use, and recommend options for relOcation if necessary.
Evaluate duplication of services and identify pros/cons and recommendations for combined uses.
Public Works - Engineering
Michael Morrison Jr.
Paula Brown
IFY08
1410.08.24.00.604100
ORW Architecture
pending
$ 49.500.00
1
2
3
4
$
49,500.00
Miscelaneous Costs:
~.l'
G:Pub-wrkslengldept-adminlengineerlprojec7-18 FacIities Proj Acct Worksheet.xls
.-r~...- -
~_.\ ~
CITY OF
ASHLAND
REQillSITION
No. PW - FY 2008
Department PUBLIC WORKS
Vendor OGDENROEMERWILKERSON ARC]
2950 E. BARNElT ROAD
MEDFORD OR 97504
Account No. 410.08.24.00.604100
Date November 8, 2007
Requested Delivery Date ASAP
Deliver To PAULA BROWN
Via DAWN LAMB
(* Note: Please allow approximately two(2) weeks for delivery on items not
generally caried in stored, and approximately two (2) months on printing jobs.)
Item No. Quantity Unit Description Use of Purchasing Office Only
Unit Price Total Price PO No.
Architectural review of the City Facilities & Space
needs analysis
Per attached proposal $ 49,500.00
for Karl:
BID IRFP I EXEMPT: RFP
Contract.Start.Date: lS-Nov-07
ContractContpletionDate 6/30/2008
Insurance>on file:.IYES>. .INO
ProjectNo: 2007-18.100
Job No.
Unit No.
I hereby certify that the above items are necessary for the operation
of this department and are budgeted
Issued By
Date
Received By
~~,
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07 -.18 ORW Facility Req 11 07.xls
CERTIFICATIONS OF REPRESENTATION
Contractor, under penalty of perjury, certifies that:
(a) The number shown on this form is its correct taxpayer ID (or is waiting for the number to be issued to it; and
(b) Contractor is not subject to backup withholding because (i) it is exempt from backup withholding or (ii) it has not
been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that it is subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to
report all interest or dividends, or (iii) the IRS has notified it that it is no longer subject to backup withholding.
Contractor further represents and warrants to City that (a) it has the power and authority to enter into and perform the
work, (b) the Contract, when executed and delivered, shall be a valid and binding obligation of Contractor enforceable
in accordance with its terms, and
(c) The work under the Contract shall be performed in accordance with the highest professional standards, and
(d) Contractor is qualified, professionally competent and duly licensed to perform t~e work. Contractor also certifies
under penalty of perjury that ~s business is not in violation of any Oregon tax laws, and ~ is a corporation authorized to
act on behalf of the entity designated above and authorized to do business in Oregon or is an independent contractor
as defined in the contract documents, and has checked four or more of the following criteria:
,/ (1) I carry out the labor or services at a location separate from my residence or is in a specific portion of my
residence, set aside as the location of the business.
\/' (2) Commercial advertising or business cards or a trade association membership are purchased for the
business.
X (3) Telephone listing is used for the business separate from the personal residence listing.
~ (4) Labor or services are performed only pursuant to written contracts.
~(5) Labor or services are performed for two or more different persons within a period of one year.
./' (6) I assume financial responsibility for defective workmanship or for service not provided as evidenced by the
ownership of performance bonds, warranties, errors and omission insurance or liability insurance relating to the labor
or services to be provided. ---
~,,~
Contractor
--11,U"~J
Date
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
ACORDTN CERTIFICA TE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE I DATE (MMlDDNVYY)
11/27/2007
PRODUCER (541)772-1111 FAX: (541)772-3785 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
JBL&K Insurance Agency ONL Y AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
707 Murphy Rd AL TER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
Medford OR 97504 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC #
INSURED INSURER A: Transportation Insurance 20494C
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture,AIA INSURER B: Continental Insurance 35289C
2950 East Barnett Road INSURER C: Landmark American
INSURER D:
Medford OR 97504 INSURER E:
THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO TI-lE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITI-lSTANDING ANY
REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITlON OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN,
THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITlONS OF SUCH POLICIES.
AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS.
INSR ADD'L ~k+~1:~~8~1 ~~lfJ(~~tJ~N LIMITS
LTR IINSRD TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER
GENERAL LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000
~ ~~~~~~9E~~J~~nce\
X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY $ 100,000
~ ~ CLAIMS MADE ~ OCCUR 5/2/2008
A B1068419303 5/2/2007 MED EXP (Anv one oerson) $ 10,000
-
PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ N/A
-
GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000
- N/A
GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $
Xl POLICY n ~~8T n LOC
AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT 1,000,000
~ (Ea accident) $
ANY AUTO
~ 5/2/2007 5/2/2008
B ALL O'v\tNED AUTOS B2097220715 BODILY INJURY
- (Per person) $
SCHEDULED AUTOS
-
~ HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY $
X NON-O'v\tNED AUTOS (Per accident)
-
- PROPERTY DAMAGE $
(Per accident)
GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONL Y - EA ACCIDENT $
~ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA ACC $
AUTO ONL Y: AGG $
EXCESSlUMBRELLA LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $
~ OCCUR D CLAIMS MADE AGGREGATE $
$
R DEDUCTIBLE $
RETENTION $ $
WORKERS COMPENSATION AND I we STATU- T IOTH-
TORY LIMITS ER
EMPLOYERS'L1ABILITY
ANY PROPRI ETORlPARTNERlEXECUTIVE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $
OFFICERlMEMBER EXCLUDED? E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $
If yes, describe under $
SPFCIAl PROVISIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT
C OTHER ProfessionaJ. LHR807282 5/2/2007 5/2/2008 Limi t : 2,000,000
Liability Deductible: 5,000
DESCRIPTION OF OPERA TIONSlLOCA TIONSlVEHICLESlEXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS
Verification of Insurance. Subject to policy terms, conditions and exclusions.
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
CANCELLATION
ACORD 25 (2001/08)
INS025 (0108).08a
SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE
EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL
10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT
-
FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE
INSURER. ITS AG ENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES.
AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE c:::::::::- -........... ~ J.//
S WilsonJ AAIJ AIC/SU ~<<"- ,....J. ~~
@ ACORD CORPORATION 1988
Page 1 of 2
Form W-9
Request for Taxpayer
Identification Number and Certification
Give form to the
requester. Do not
send to the IRS.
(Rev. January 2(03)
Depanment of the Treasury
IIUmII RewnJe Service
N Name
.
Business name. if different from above
&
IndividuaV
Check appropriate box: D Sole proprietor ~ Corporation
Address (number. street. and apt. or suite no.)
,.
o Partnership 0 Other ~ u u u". __ u u uu_
D Exempt from backup
withholding
Requester's name and address (optiona~
A-
IN)
Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. For individuals. this is yoax social secooty number (SSN).
However, for a resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the Part I instructions on
page 3. For other entities. it is YOtl employer identification number (EIN). If you do not have a nlMllber.
see How to get a TIN on page 3.
Note: "the account is in more than one name. see the chart on page 4 for guidelines on whose number
to enter.
I Soc:i8I security lUmber
I I -I- I -I- I
or
CertifICation
Under penaltieS of perjury. I certify that:
1. The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or I am waiting for a number to be issued to me). and
2. I am not subject to backup withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup withholding. or (b) I have not been notif"1ed by the Internal
Revenue Service PRS) that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a fail...-e to report an interest or dividends. or (c) the IRS has
notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding. and
3. I am a U.S. person Oncluding a U.S. resident alien).
Certification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are cooently subject to backup
withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax ret...-n. For real estate transactions. item 2 does not apply.
For mortgage interest paid. acquisition or abandonment of secured property. cancellation of debt contributions to an individual retirement
arrangement PRAl. and generaly. payments other than interest and dividends. you are not required to sign the Certification. but you must
~=:N.:~~onpa~ ~
~I u.s. person ~ . \'L _~ DOt ~ " .1.(..
Purpose of Form Nonresident alien who becomes a resident alien.
Generally, only a nonresident alien individual may use the
A person who is required to file an information return with terms of a tax treaty to reduce or eliminate U.S. tax on
the I RS, must obtain your correct taxpayer identification certain types of income. However. most tax treaties contain a
number (TIN) to report, for example, income paid to you. real provision known as a "saving clause." Exceptions specified
estate transactions, mortgage interest you paid. acquisition in the saving clause may permit an exemption from tax to
or abandonment of secured property. cancellation of debt. or continue for certain types of income even after the recipient
contributions you made to an IRA. has otherwise become a U.S. resident alien for tax purposes.
U.S. person. Use Form W.9 only if you are a U.S. person If you are a U.S. resident alien who is relying on an
(including a resident alien). to provide your correct TIN to the exception contained In the saving clause of a tax treaty to
person requesting it (the requester) and, when applicable, to: claim an exemption from U.S. tax on certain types of income.
1. Certify that the TIN you are giving is correct (or you are you must attach a statement that specifies the following five
waiting for a number to be issued). items:
2. Certify that you are not subject to backup withholding. 1. The treaty country. Generally. this must be the same
or treaty under which you claimed exemption from tax as a
3. Claim exemption from backup withholding if you are a nonresident alien.
U.S. exempt payee. 2. The treaty article addressing the income.
Note: If a requester gives you a form other than Form W-9 3. The article number (or location) in the tax treaty that
to request your TIN, you must use the requester's form if it is contains the saving clause and its exceptions.
substantially similar to this Form W-9. 4. The type and amount of income that qualifies for the
Foreign person. If you are a foreign person. use the exemption from tax.
appropriate Form W-8 (see Pub. 515, Withholding of Tax on 5. SuffICient facts to justify the exemption from tax under
Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Entities). the terms of the treaty article.
Cat. No. 10231 X
Form W-9 (Rev. 1-2003)
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT
Consultant services contract made on the date specified below in Recital A between the City and Consultant as
follows:
Recitals:
A. The following information applies to this contract:
CITY: CITY OF ASHLAND Consultant:
City Hall Address:
20 E. Main St. '
Ashland, Oregon 97520
(541) 488-6002 Telephone:
FAX: (541) 488-5311 FAX:
OGDENROEMERWILKERSON ARCHITECTURE
2950 EAST BARNETT ROAD
MEDFORD OR 97504
541 n79-5237
541n72-8472
Date of this agreement:
NOVEMBER 15, 2007
~ B: RFP date: SEPTEMBER 20, 2007
Proposal date: OCTOBER 16,2007
~2.2. Contracting officer: PAULA C. BROWN, PE
~2.4. Project: CITY FACILITY MASTER PLAN & SPACE NEEDS ANALYSIS
~6. Consultant1s representative: DAVID WILKERSON, AlA
~8.3. Maximum contract amount: NTE $49,500.00
B. On the date noted above, City issued a request for proposals (RFP) for consulting services needed by City for the
project described above. Consultant submitted a proposal in response to the RFP on the date noted above.
C. After reviewing Consultanfs proposal and proposals submitted by other offerors, City selected Consultant to provide
the services covered by the RFP.
City and Consultant agree as follows:
1. Relationshio between City and Consultant:
Consultant accepts the relationship of trust and confidence established between Consultant and City by this contract.
Consultant covenants with the City to perform services and duties in conformance to and consistent with the standards
generally recognized as being employed by professionals of consultant1s caliber in the locality of the project.
Consultant further covenants to cooperate with City, City1s representatives, contractors, and other interested parties in
furthering the interests of City with respect to the project. In order to promote successful completion of the project in an
expeditious and economical manner, Consultant shal~ provide professional consulting serVices for City in all phases of
the project to which this contract applies, serve as City1s professional consulting representative for the project, and give
professional consultation and advice during the term of this contract. Consultant acknowledges that City is relying on
consultant to provide professional consulting services in a manner that is consistent with the interests of City.
2. Definitions:
Generally words, terms and phrases used in this contract shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the construction
industry, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. As used in this contract:
2.1. "City. means the City of Ashland, Oregon.
2.2. "Contracting officer" means the person specified in Recital A above or that personls designee.
2.3. "Project" means the project described in Recital A.
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
2.4. "WorkH or "Services" shall mean all labor, materials, plans, specifications, opinions, reports, and other
consulting services and products which Consultant is required to provide under this contract.
3. Term: The term of this contract shall commence on the date specified in Recital A above and end on completion of
all services required by this contract unless sooner terminated as provided in this contract.
4. Authoritv of Contractina Officer: The contracting officer shall have the authority to act on behalf of City in the
administration and interpretation of this contract. The contracting officer shall have complete authority to authorize
services, transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define City1s policies and make other decisions with
respect to Consultanfs services.
5.' Consultina Services: Consultant shall provide services to City that are described in the RFP.
5.1. In connection with the services described in the RFP, Consultant shall:
5.1.1. Consult appropriate representatives of City to clarify and define City1s requirements
relative to the services.
5.1.2. Review available data relative to the services.
5.1.3. Identify data which is not available and is needed to fulfill the services, and act as
City1s representative in obtaining such data.
5.1.4. Prepare monthly progress reports to the contracting Officer on the status of services.
5.1.5. Cooperate with other consultants retained by City in the exchange of information
needed for completion of the services and the project.
5.2. Consultant shall commence performance of services within five days after receiving written authorization
from the contracting officer for work described in the RFP. Consultant shall perform the services as expeditiously as is
consistent with professional skill and care and the orderly progress of the project.. Upon request of City, Consultant
shall submit for CitYs approval, a schedule for the performance of work elements described in the RFP. Each schedule
shall include allowance for periods of time required for City1s review and approval of Consultant1s services. Each
schedule, approved by City, shall become a part of this contract.
5.3. Consultant shall perform the services as an independent contractor in accordance with generally
accepted standards in Consultant1s profession. Consultant shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical
accuracy and the coordination of all services performed by Consultant. Consultant shall, without additional
compensation, correct or revise any error or deficiencies in the services that are caused by Consultant1s negligence.
CitYs review, approval, acceptance of, or payment for, any of the services shall not be construed to waive any of City1s
rights under this contract or of any cause of action arising out of Consultant1s services. In the event of any breach of
this contract by Consultant or negligent performance of any of the services, City1s cause of action against Consultant
shall not be deemed to accrue until City discovers such breach or negligence, or should have, with reasonable
diligence, discovered such breach or negligence. The preceding sentence shall not be construed, however, to allow
City to prosecute an action against Consultant beyond the maximum time limitation provided by Oregon law.
6. Assianment of Consultant1s Personnel:
6.1. The services covered by this contract shall be rendered by, or under the supervision of the person
specified in Recital A above, who shall act as Consultant1s representative in, all communications and transactions with
City .
6.2. Consultant will endeavor to honor reasonable specific requests of City with regard to assignment of
Consultant1s employees to perform services if the requests are consistent with sound business and professional
practices.
7. Resoonsibilities of City:
7.1. City will cooperate fully with Consultant to achieve the objectives of this contract.
7.2. City will provide information, documents, materials and services that are within the possession or control
of City and are required by Consultant for performance of the services.
7.3. City will arrange for access to, and make all provisions for Consultant to enter upon, public and private
property as required for Consultant to perform the services.
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
7.4. City will provide all permits necessary for completion of the project.
7.5. The contracting officer will act as liaison between City, Consultant, public agencies, and others involved in
the project.
8. Pavrnent:
8.1. City shall pay Consultant for services and reimburse Consultant for expenses incurred by Consultant in
performance of services in accordance with a payment schedule to be submitted by Consultant and accepted by City.
No reimbursement will be made for expenses that are not specifically itemized in this payment schedule without prior
approval by the contracting officer.
8.2. Consultant shall submit monthly invoices to City for Consultant's services within ten days after the end of
the month covered by the invoice.
8.3. Total payments under this contract or any amendments shall not exceed the sum specified in Recital A
above.
9. Comoliance with Law:
9.1. This contract will be governed by and construed in accordance with laws of the State of Oregon.
Consultant shall promptly observe and comply with all present and future laws, orders, regulations, rules and
ordinances of federal, state, City and city governments with respect to the services including, but not limited to,
provisions of ORS 279C.505, 279C.515, 279C.520 and 279C.530.
9.2. Pursuant to ORS 279C.520(2) any person employed by Consultant who performs work under this contract
shall be paid at least time and a half pay for all overtime in excess of 40 hours in anyone week, except for persons
who are excluded or exempt from overtime pay under ORS 653.010 to 653.261 or under 29 U.S.C. Sections 201 to
209.
9.3. Consultant is a Isubject employerl as defined in ORS 656.005 and shall comply with ORS 656.017. Prior
to commencing any work, Consultant shall certify to City that Consultant has workers' compensation coverage required
by ORS Chapter 656. If Consultant is a carrier insured employer, Consultant shall provide City with a certificate of
insurance. If Consultant is a self-insured employer, Consultant shall provide City with a certification from the Oregon
Department of Insurance and Finance as evidence of Consultant's status.
9.4. If the amount of this contract is $17,342.00 or more, Consultant is required to comply with chapter 3.12
of the Ashland Municipal Code by paying a living wage, as defined in this chapter, to all employees performing work
under this contract and to any subcontractor who performs 50% or more of the service work under this contract.
Consultant is also required to post the attached notice predominantly in areas where it will be seen by all employees.
10. Ownershio of Documents:
All documents prepared by Consultant pursuant to this contract shall be the property of City. To the extent permitted by
law, City shall, within the limits of the Oregon Tort Claims Act, defend, indemnify and hold harmless Consultant, its
consultants, agents and employees against all damages, claims, expenses and losses arising out of any reuse of
plans, specifications and other documents prepared by Consultant without prior written authorization of Consultant.
11. Records:
11.1. Consultant shall develop and maintain complete books of account and other records on the services
which are adequate for evaluating Consultant's performance. Consultant shall maintain records in such a manner as to
provide a clear distinction between the expenditures and revenues related to the project and the expenditures and
revenues related to Consultant's other business.
11.2. Consultant's books and records shall be made available for inspection by City at reasonable times, to
verify Consultant's compliance with this contract. City shall have the right to request an audit of Consultant's books and
records by a certified public accountant retained by City.
12. Indemnification:
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and save City, its officers, agents, and employees harmless from any and all
claims, actions, costs, judgments, damages or other expenses resulting from injury to any person (including injury
resulting in death), or damage to property (including loss or destruction), of whatsoever nature arising out of or incident
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
to the negligent performance of this contract by Consultant (including but not limited to, the negligent acts or omissions
of Consultant1s employees, agents, and others designated by Consultant to perform work or services attendant to this
contract). Consultant shall not be held responsible for any claims, actions, costs, judgments, damages or other
expenses, directly and proximately caused by the negligence of City.
13. Insurance:
13.1. Consultant shall, at its own expense, at all times during the term of this contract, maintain in force:
13.1.1. A comprehensive general liability policy including coverage for contractual liability for
obligations assumed under this contract, blanket contractual liability , products and completed
operations and owners and contractor1s protective insurance;
13.1.2. A professional errors and omissions liability policy; and
13.1.3. A comprehensive automobile liability policy including owned and non-owned
automobiles.
13.2. The coverage under each liability insurance policy shall be equal to or greater than the limits for claims
made under the Oregon Tort Claims Act with minimum coverage of $500,000 per occurrence (combined single .limit for
bodily injury and property damage claims) or $500,000 per occurrence for bodily injury and $100,000 per occurrence
for property damage.
13.3. Liability coverage shall be provided on an .occurrenceH basis. IIClaims madell coverage will not be
acceptable, except for the coverage required by subsection 13.1.2.
13.4. Contractor shall submit certificates of insurance acceptable to the City with the signed contract prior to
the commencement of any work under this agreement. Each certificate shall state that coverage afforded under the
policy cannot be cancelled or reduced in coverage cannot be made until at least 30 days prior written notice has been
given to City. A certificate which states merely that the issuing company .will endeavor to mail. written notice is
unacceptable.
14. Default:
14.1. There shall be a default under this contract if either party fails to perform any act or obligation required
by this contract within ten days after the other party gives written notice specifying the nature of the breach with
reasonable particularity. If the breach specified in the notice is of such a nature that n cannot be completely cured
within the ten day period, no default shall occur if the party receiving the notice begins performance of the act or
obligation wnhin the ten day period and thereafter proceeds with reasonable diligence and in good faith to effect the
remedy as soon as practicable.
14.2. Notwithstanding subsection 14.1, either party may declare a default by written notice to the other party,
without allowing an opportunity to cure, if the other party repeatedly breaches the terms of this contract.
14.3. If a default occurs, the party injured by the default may elect to terminate this contract and pursue any
equitable or legal rights and remedies available under Oregon law. All remedies shall be cumulative.
14.4. Any litigation arising out of this contract shall be conducted in Circuit Court of the State of Oregon for
Jackson County.
15. Termination:
15.1 Mutual consent. This contract may be terminated at any time by mutual consent of both parties.
15.2 City's Convenience. This contract may be terminated at any time by City upon 30 days' notice in
writing and delivered by certified mail or in person.
15.3 For Cause. City may terminate or modify this contract, in whole or in part, effective upon delivery
of written notice to Contractor, or at such later date as may be established by City under any of the following
conditions:
a. If City funding from federal, state, county, or other sources is not obtained and continued at
levels sufficient to allow for the purchase of the indicated quantity of services;
b. If federal or state regulations or guidelines are modified, changed or interpreted in such a way
that the services are no longer allowable or appropriate for purchase under this contract or are no longer
eligible for the funding proposed for payments authorized by this contract; or
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
c. If any license or certificate required by law or regulation to be held by Contractor to provide the
services required by this contract for any reason denied, revoked, suspended, or not renewed.
15.4 For Default or Breach.
a. Either City or Contractor may terminate this contract in the event of a breach of the contract by
the other. Prior to such termination the party seeking termination shall give to the other party written
notice of the breach and intent to terminate.: If the party committing the breach has not entirely cured the
breach within 15 days of the date of the notice, or within such other period as the party giving notice may
authorize or require, then the contract may be terminated at any time thereafter by a written notice of
termination by the party giving notice.
b. Time is of the essence for Contractor's performance of each and every obligation and duty
under this contract. City by written notice to Contractor of default or breach, may at any time terminate
the whole or any part of this contract if Contractor fails to provide services called for by this contract within
the time specified herein or in any extension thereof.
c. The rights and remedies of City provided in this subsection (15.4) are not exclusive and are in
addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law or under this contract.
15.5 Obliaation/Liabilitv of Parties: Termination or modification of this contract pursuant to
subsections 15.1, 15.2, 15.3 and 15.4 above shall be without prejudice to any obligations or liabilities or either party
already accrued prior to such termination or modification. However, upon receiving a notice of termination (regardless
whether such notice is given pursuant to subsections 15.1, 15.2, 15.3 and 15.4 of this section, Contractor shall
immediately ceased all activities under this contract, unless expressly directed otherwise by City in notice of
termination. Further, upon termination, Contractor shall deliver to City all contract documents, information, works-in-
progress and other property that are or would be deliverables had the contract been completed. City shall pay
Contractor for work performed prior to the termination date if such work was performed in accordance with the
Contract.
16. Funds Available and Authorized: City has sufficient funds currently available and authorized for expenditure to
finance the costs of this contract within the City's fiscal year budget. Consultant understands and agrees that City's
payment of amounts under this contract attributable to work performed after the last day of the current fiscal year is
contingent on City appropriations, or other expenditure authority sufficient to allow City in the exercise of its reasonable
administrative discretion, to continue to make payments under this contract. In the event City has insufficient
appropriations, limitations or other expenditure authority, City may terminate this contract without penalty or liability to
City, effective upon the delivery of written notice to Consultants, with no further liability to Consultants.
17. Notices:
Any notice required to be given under this contract or any notice required to be given by law shall be in writing and may
be given by personal delivery or by registered or certified mail, or by any other manner prescribed by law.
17.1. Notices to City shall be addressed to the contracting officer at the address provided for the City in Recital
A above.
17.2. Notices to Consultant shall be addressed to the Consultanfs representative at the address provided for
the Consultant in Recital A above.
18. Assianment:
City and Consultant and the respective successors, administrators, assigns and legal representatives of each are
bound by this contract to the other party and to the partners, successors, administrators, assigns and legal
representatives of the other party. Consultant shall not assign or subcontract Consultant1s rights or obligations under
this contract without prior written consent of City. Except as stated in this section, nothing in this contract shall be
construed to give any rights or benefits to anyone other than City and Consultant.
19. Governina Law: Jurisdiction: Venue: This contract shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of
the State of Oregon without resort to any jurisdiction's conflict of laws, rules or doctrines. Any claim, action, suit or
proceeding (collectively, Ithe claiml) between the City (and/or any other or department of the State of Oregon) and the
Contractor that arises from or relates to this contract shall be brought and conducted solely and exclusively within the
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
Circuit Court of Jackson County for the State of Oregon. If, however, the claim must be brought in a federal forum,
then it shall be brought and conducted solely and exclusively within the United States District Court for the District of
Oregon filed in Jackson County, Oregon. Contractor, by the signature herein of its authorized representative, hereby
consents to the in personam jurisdiction of said courts. In no event shall this section be construed as a waiver by City
of any form of defense or immunity, based on the Eleventh Amendment to the United States Constitution, or otherwise,
from any claim or from the jurisdiction.,
20. MERGER CLAUSE: THIS CONTRACT AND ATTACHED EXHIBITS CONSTITUTE THE ENTIRE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES. NO WAIVER, CONSENT, MODIFICATION OR CHANGE OF TERMS OF
THIS CONTRACT SHALL BIND EITHER PARTY UNLESS IN WRITING AND SIGNED BY BOTH PARTIES. SUCH
WAIVER, CONSENT, MODIFICATION OR CHANGE, IF MADE, SHALL BE EFFECTIVE ONLY IN THE SPECIFIC
INSTANCE AND FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE GIVEN. THERE ARE NO UNDERSTANDINGS, AGREEMENTS,
OR R'EPRESENTATIONS, ORAL OR WRITTEN, NOT SPECIFIED HEREIN REGARDING THIS CONTRACT.
CONTRACTOR, BY SIGNATURE OF ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, HEREBY ACKNOWLEDGES THAT
HE/SHE HAS READ THIS CONTRACT, UNDERSTANDS IT, AND AGREES TO BE BOUND BY ITS TERMS AND
CONDITIONS.
21. Modification:
No modification of this contract shall be valid unless in writing and signed by the parties.
CONSULTANT -~Q.~ ~~,"t'Y~
By: J:n~~
Signature
J .b~"ln 't(l~a.s~N 1r:.
Printed Name
Its: ~"c,\ ,,~\..-
Fed 10# q 1> · \ ~t;)I'S"' 0
CITY OF ASHLAND
By: ~~-?
Lee Tuneberg
Finance Director
00Y
By:
Legal Department
REVIEWED AS TO CONTENT:
U--
Date: IJI4/0~
By:
Coding:
(For City use only)
G:\pub-wrks\eng\dept-admin\ENGINEER\PROJECT\2007\07-18 ORW Contract Docs 11 07.doc
=t
~.
~...
=-
=-
=-
=-
:3
=-
;=-
=-
3
>>
=-
>>
a
a
3
>>
:3
~.'..,.'.
.,..
3
..
..,
.
~.I"
..
II
:I
11
II
II
.
:I
.
Proposina Services For
City of Ashland
Facilities Master Plan and
Updated Space Needs Analysis
Presented By
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture, AlA
,-,
table of contents
description & understanding 1
capabilities & resources 2
calendar & commitments 3
references 4
cost of services 5
append~ 6
October 16, 2007
Paula C. Brown, PE
Public Works Director/City Engineer
City of Ashland
20 East Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Re: City Facilities Master Plan & Updated Space Needs Analysis
Dear Paula:
We are pleased to provide you with this information about OgdenRoemerWilkerson
Architecture. ORW has a wealth of experience in Master Planning and Facilities
Assessment projects similar to this one. In June 2006, we completed a Facility
Study, Assessment and Long-Range Plan for the Medford 549c School District,
which included 18 school campuses as well as five administration and support
buildings. Also in 2006, the Ashland School District retained ORW Architecture
to develop a facility analysis and master plan for Ashland High School.
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture is the largest architecture firm in Southern
Oregon. Each member of our staff of architects offers a specialized area of
expertise, from assessment and planning to code review and compliance, and all
of these talents will be available to the City of Ashland for this project. A team of
support staff will be developed to complete the work efficiently and expeditiously.
We have a hands-on approach to architecture, which means that a principal is
closely involved in each project from conception to completion.
Our local presence will allow us to streamline the information-gathering phase.
Our experience in facility analysis makes us the responsible choice for this scope
of project, and we look forward to the opportunity to work with the City of Ashland
in developing this updated Master Plan.
JDPw~
J. David Wilkerson II, AlA
Principal
LEED Accredited Professional
OldenRoemerWilkerson Architecture, AlA Collaborative Approach Honest Desl~!:r
:3
~3
:3
~3
~.~
~..~
~a
;-:1
:=-
~.:t
~3
~~
~.
:......
'- .
~.
-.
:D
a
.
it
a
>>
.
>>
)I
>>
>>
>>
:8
:D
a
:D
understanding of the project
ORW Architecture has completed a number of Facility Assessment Studies similar to
this project. As a case in point, Siskiyou County is a cl ient of our firm whose need for a
facility study was similar to yours. They had over 100 facilities county-wide that needed
documentation, assessment, and recommendations to provide for more efficient and
effective space utilization. We interviewed the department heads and user groups to
determine how the facilities met their needs. We then collected current employment
counts, space utilization data, and projected growth rates. This data was translated into
a visual document to verify that the facilities were capable of- meeting their future
growth needs. The condition and expected life span of the buildings also were
evaluated. "Next we developed suggestions for maintenance, expansion, or abandonment
and relocation as needed for each facility. More often than not, a simple re-organization
of workstation layouts accommodated both current requirements and future growth,
without the need for expansion and relocation.
We have found in many of our facility studies that the need to address deferred
maintenance issues is critical. The problems created by an aging infrastructure are
exacerbated by ongoing budget constraints that prevent proper maintenance on a regular
basis. A I ist of priorities can be developed to address the most critical needs. The
remaining needs are then categorized into scopes of work that can be addressed
logically to prevent the need for "back tracking" and re-doing work that has recently
been completed.
As part of our approach to the City of Ashland's City Facilities Master Plan and Updated
Space Needs Analysis, we will visit each site, document the existing conditions, assess
the structural conditions, evaluate both interior and exterior finishes, review the
mechanical and electrical systems, and determine the building's expected life span and
it's potential for extended life span. Department heads will be interviewed to document
current employment counts and conditions, and define future growth expectations.
At that point, proposed space plans for each facil ity will be developed in an electronic
(AutoCAD) format, written findings will be developed and supplemented with photos to
convey critical needs or assessments. Preliminary cost estimates for various scopes of
work will be provided along with a recommended timeline for implementation
Glden Roemer Wilkerson Architecture, AlA Collaborative Approach - Honest Design
,
:3
3
-'3
:)
-.'--.'-~'
-....
3
-3
-3
~3
~3
~3
3
:~3
~3
:3
~'3
:3
~3
~-3
~3
~3
~-3
~3
~3
~.JI
:3
~.
::3
~
~3
~.':a
scope of services
phase 1 PrOject Planning
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture (ORW) begins each project by carefully
assembling a Design Team, consisting of the best architects to plan and guide the
unique elements of your venture. Our team works closely with your organization to
understand your strategic goals and objectives. It is ORW's priority to provide you with
all the support, structure, resources, and strategies you need for successful, cost-
effective completion.
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture is a leader in providing quality architectural
planning and project management services. We excel in helping groups define their
priorities and achieve consensus. Our goal is to make the process as streamlined as
possible for our clients. We've developed an interview process that allows us to fully
understand your specific needs and preferences. During the first organizational
meetings, our Design Team will discuss the scope of project with all your key groups to
reach agreement on the project process.
phase 2 I nforrnatlon Gathering
The team will visit each City facility to review, catalog and assess the existing
conditions. Meetings will be scheduled with key personnel to further discuss how their
facil ity is or is not working for them and what challenges are presented to them. The
department's operational philosophies are discussed and the future growth potential is
defined. We then present a series of alternatives and possibilities to resolve specific
issues and obtain the feedback of cl ient and user groups.
phase 3 Report Generation
During this phase information that has been compiled is formatted in a way the
information is easily understood by the reader and it accurately represents the
conditions of each facility. ORW has developed a matrix that addresses most of the
components typically found in aging buildings. Recommendations for modernizations,
modifications, expansion or relocation are made. These findings are once again
reviewed with the key department leaders for additional input which will be integrated
into the final report. Budget and sequencing of construction for necessary
improvements are addressed at this stage.
phase 4 Final Presentations
ORW will consolidate all the available information and input, and prepare a
presentation to the key working committee and I or city council to explain the process,
discoveries, and recommendations. It is our intent the document prepared will be a
living document, and formatted in such a way the contents are easily understood and
the recommendations and conclusions are easily implemented.
conclusion OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture is a firm known for our honesty, innovation, and
collaborative approach. We pride ourselves on our attention to detail and ongoing
involvement in each project, from planning to construction, and beyond. Our
systematic approach to each phase and our meticulous follow-through assures your
project is effectively completed within the budget and in accordance to the planned
schedule.
a clear understanding
I:
[ -
~
[:8
[:It
(
f=-
[:8
[
[:It
r
3
~:a
::tt
-.-.-a.'.l.'
--
:a
It
=-
:8
"3
3
=-
3
3
:)
:)
:)
:)
:)
:)
facilities analysis &
master planning projects
relevant projects
Each project begins with imagin~tion. It is born and shaped
from the space within. Innovative blueprints lead to a
completed form that uniquely responds to the client and the
place for which it was created. OgdenRoemerWilkerson
experience encompasses a wide range of projects that are
varied in structure, materials, and location. We place a high
degree of importance on excellence in design and fostering a
collaborative approach with each cl ient.
Ashland High School
2005 Master Plan & Facility Study
14 campus buildings
Medford School District 549C
2005 Facility Study & Long Range Plan
18 ca,mpus analysis, 5 district
administration & support facilities
. 2001 New Middle School Campus
Siskiyou County Facility Analysis and Master City of Grants Pass Public Safety Dept.
Plan 2005 Feasibility Study for New Fire &
Over 100 buildings countywide Police Stations.
Kaufman Crossi ng
2004 Mixed Use Development
Ashland South Development
2004 Brammo Motors
2004 Endangered Species Chocolate
2004 Douglas Engineering
Southern Oregon University . .
2003 Madrone Street Student Housi ng
State of Oregon
2004 Welcome Center Prototype Design
Southern Oregon Regional Communications
2003 911 Dispatch Center
Yreka Family YMCA
2002 Facility Remodel & Additions
Temple Emek Shalom (2000)
2000 Master Plan
2000 New Facility
Ashland Medical Plaza
2003 Ash land Surgery Center
2003 Siskiyou Eye Center Addition
2003 Advanced Pain Management
Mountain Meadows Retirement Community
1999 Courtyard Condominiums
1999 Parkside IV
Westminster Presbyterian Church
2002 Church Campus
Josephine County Human Services
2000 Health Department Relocation
Project
Josephine County Public Works Department
Space Needs Analysis
Rogue River Schools
1997 District wide facility analysis
& Long Range Plan
City of Medford
1998 City Hall
OrdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture, AlA Collaborative Approach _. Honest Design
~
r .
pet
I
F8
I
~
r
I
r3
r
t~
~3
~
~D
~3
~:B
~
..3
~JI
:-3
~.
=-
:1)
..
>>
a
3
:t
:D
3
-3
:)
:D
:D
:)
3
:)
firm organization
firm history
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture, AlA, Inc. is Southern Oregon's largest architectu~al firm,
offering a full range of architectural and planning services throughout the 'State of Jefferson.'
The firm is registered in Oregon as an S Corporation and is a member of the American Institute
of Architects with licenses in Oregon, Washington and California.
The firm was originally established in 1968 as the_ partnership of Afseth, Jacobs & Schmitz.
Ken Ogden joined the firm in 1994 when he relocated his practice of ten years from California
to the Rogue Valley. Following the retirement of two of the founding partners, Ken became a
partner in Ogden Schmitz & Associates in 1999. The firm became Ogden Kistler Architecture
in 2001, following Peter's retirement from full-time practice.
In 2005, associates James Roemer and David Wilkerson were elevated to full partnership status.
With this change came a renewed commitment to the firm's core values of excellence in client
service, award-winning design, and unrivaled technical proficiency. The wide range of
experience and depth of staff provided by the ORW team allows us to respond to the unique
goals and needs of -each client. ORW emphasizes a collaborative approach and honest design
with a client-focused outcome that ensures a responsible product is achieved on every project.
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture, AlA carries professional liability insurance of $1,000,000
with a maximum deductible of 10,000.
J. David Wilkerson is the Principal Architect assigned to The City of Ashland's Facilities Master
Plan Project and Peter D. Schmitz wi II be the Project Manager. .
The following roster indicates our firm's wide range of resources and experience.
staff roster
Name
Title! Position
Exoerience
(years)
Ken neth J.. Ogden, A I A Principal! Project Architect 25
James C. Roemer, AlA Principal! Project Architect 23
J. David Wilkerson, " AlA Principal! Project Architect 21
Peter D. Schmitz, AlA Special Projects Consultant 39
Project Manager
Jeffrey J. Bender, AlA Design Associate 15-
Karl B. Krauskopf Senior Technical Staff 34
Victoria Suppo Job Captain! CAD Manager 19
Jason Zook I ntern Arch itect
Joshua Sizemore Job Captain 4
Donna Root Office Manager/Marketing 15
R honda Gressett Marketi nglCI ient Relations 20
TOTAL 190
Dlden Roemer Wilkerson Architecture. AlA Coilaboratl'I/e Approach - Honest Design
Re2istration Tenure
(years, states) (with fi rm)
19 13
OR, CA, WA
20 11
OR,CA
17 5
OR, NY, VA
39 39
OR,CA, NE
7 5
OR
18 6
10
4 mos
4
6 mos
4
116 90
r
b.
6-
[
i=-
1,:tI
~=-
l3
f
r:a
=,--;a
~ ..-,
~3
~=-
~3
:=-
=-
JI
-3
a
a
JI
3
'3
J)
j)
D
J)
J)
D
D
G)
-
=
-cs
CD
.c
CJ
en
...
u
CD
. ....
a
...
A.
-a
CD
en
a
c.
a
...
A.
r-
o
o
N
CD
o
o
N
c:
::s
-,
~
co
~
~
a.
<(
~
co
~
.0
Q)
lJ..
c
co
-,
u
Q)
c
>
o
Z
+-'
U
o
-0 c: .r::. ==
c:O +-'ro
ro ~ "i 1;)
c: U en >-
~ (1) (1) ~
....-)( en u
u (1) ~
(1) +-' ro
(1) U c:
U) ~ <C
+-' +-' en
~ 5 -0
-; U ~
en Z
c: Cl)
o u
t.) ro
a.
en
en
::s
o
os;
Q)
....
a.
Q)
+-'
ro
-c
a.
::s
-c
c:
ro
~
Cl)
's;
Q)
0:::
Cl) en
DO .~
~ E
::s Q)
Cl) )(
U e
ro a.
0.-0
en c:
.s ctJ
-0
....
ctJ
DO
Cl)
....
.s::.
+-'
"i
en
Q)
~
u
n:s
'+-
>-
~
t.)
ctJ
Cl)
~
ctJ
::s
ctJ
>
L.IJ
o en
+-' -0
.,......-., cu
+-' Cl)
~ c:
E (1)
~ ~
~~
~ ~
>-::s
B:i
'+-
J!!-c
Cl) c:
Cl) ctJ
.r::.~
en c:
~ Cl)
.... ....
o ....
~ B
bO>-
c:,+-
E+-'
E ~
ro-o
....
bO
o
....
a.
Cl)
....
ctJ
C.
Cl)
....
a.
-cCl)
Cl) DO
+-' ~
ctJ 0
g1;)
1-0
o c:
u ro
.... en
o Cl)
-c u
Cl) ro
.... a.
ctJ en
.s::.bO
en c:
Q):;:; c:
..c cu ::s
-c cu E
::s E E
o DO 0
U c: t.)
.r::.-o
u ::s
.r::. u
~ c:
en
Q)
en
::s
>-
'+-
~
c:
cu
-c
.
.
.
~~
(5 c:
en
o~
+-' c:
en ::s
~E
:;:; E
Cl) 0
cu u
::E
>-
~
........
en
(1)
en
::s
o
:I:
c:
Cl)
a.
o
~
u
::s
-c
c:
o
t.)
-
QOen
c: a.
"in ~
::s en
c: en
co ::s
a: .2
>
.... Q)
cu ....
1;)Q.
ro c:
::E-c
-c cu
c: ....
ctJ Cl)
.r::.
.~ 10
~DO
co c:
c: .2
<C1O
~ E
~~
z c:
Cl)
u
ctJ
a.
en
Cl)
....
('Q
a.
(1)
....
a.
-0 cu
c:~
ro~
== E
.B E
en 0
~u
0- c:
u co
50:
"i Q)
c:+-'
ctJ ~
O::E
.... en
~ Q)
en:;:;
ctJ
:E U
oCS~
.~ ~
en~
~c:
- ::s
~ E
<C E
~ 0
cut.)
os;
cu
0:::
.
.
. _. ;':.~:.-:i
f <,';'~,:i> ',,";'
C:+-'
o ::s
c.
-c c:
Q,)
en Q)
ro Q,)
eO+-,
~
~ E
a. E
~ 0
cut.)
~
en c:
ro ctJ
:Eo.
~ Q)
.~ t)
en ctJ
~~
ctJ
c:-c
<C c:
en t'O
-O'+-
Q,)'+-
Q,)l9
z en
Cl)
u
ctJ
c.
en
Cl)
fJ)
's;
Cl)
0:::
.
~c:
.- 0
u:;:;
o ctJ
+--t:
c: Q)
ctJ E
a. Q,)
....0.
~ E
en "-
ctJ ....
:E~
~ ~
en 0
. in :;:;
~ro
- -c
ctJ c:
c: Q,)
<( E
~ E
Q) 0
Cl) U
Z ~
~~
~ oi
en_
+-' u
c: c:
~ ::s
Cl) 0
ttu
-
.
c: c:
ro 0
a:+:i
U
.... Q)
Q) ....
t)-c
co
:E .0
~ 5
"~ 8
en
>-c:
(ij 0
C:-c
<( Q)
CI) en
-c ro
Q,)eO
Q)
Z
cu
U
co
c.
en
o
+-'
en
c:
o
'in
"s;
Cl)
....
-c c:
Q) ctJ
rtia:
-0 ....
Q.cu
::St)
'+- C'O
o~
c:
Oc<S
:;:;U)
C. 0-
o ~
-0 _
ctJ ctJ
c:
~<C
LL~
Q)
Q)
Z
Q)
u
co
a.
en
ro
c:
i.L:
In I
Ashland School District
City of Grants Pass
Public Safety Office
Temple Emek Shalom
~
r-
13
I
[3
I=-
b.
L..
~--
S&B James Construction
The All iance
Cave Junction
City of Medford
Ashland Family YMCA
Remodel & Pool Addition
~3
~3
~3
~3
3
3
"
"3
"3
3
:>>
:>>
3
:t
:)
:)
:>>
D
Craterian
Ginger Rogers Theater
Jackson County
Crater High School
Siskiyou County
Juli Dichiro, , Superintendent 541 482.2811
885 Siskiyou Boulevard, Ashland, OR 97520
Chief Joe Henner, Director of Public Safety 541 474.6320
101 NW UA" Street, Grants Pass, OR 97526
Rabbi Marc Sirinsky, 541.488.2909
1800 E. Mat.n Street, Ashland, OR 97520
Mark Von Holle, Vice President 541 826.5668
8425 Agate Road, White City, OR 97503
Chris Mallette, Director, 541 592.5332
535 E. River Street, Cave Junction, OR 97523
Cathie Davis, Deputy City Manager, 541 774.2000
411 W. 8th Street, Medford, OR 97503
Lisa Molnar, Executive Director 541 482.9622
540 YMCA Way, Ashland, OR 97520
Steve McCandless 541 779.8195
23 S. Central Avenue, Medford, OR 97501
Rick Isner, Superintendent of Facilities Maintenance 541 774.6972
10 South Oakdale, Room 501, Medford, OR 97501
Samantha Steele, Director of Education 541 494.6237
451 N Second Street, Central Point, OR 97502
Cheryl Trent, Assistant County Administrator, 530 842.5751
PO Box 750, Yreka, CA 96097
OedenRoemerWilkerson Architecture. AlA Collaborative Approach "- Honest DesIgn
fee structure
b.
L..
I
l:re
[=-
[
r3
r
l3
tee breakdown
...--......
--...,
~3
~.=-
~~
:=-
'3
:t
.3
'3
:)
',3
=>>
:)
:)
~
:l
.~
j
j
j
:>
hourly rate schedule
retmbursahle expenses
Based on our understanding of the scope of services required
for the City Facilities Master Plan & Space Needs Analysis, and
in order to provide the City of Ashland with the best possible
value for these services, we are pleased to offer the followi ng:
Maximum Fee for all services required to complete the tasks
included in the Scope of Work:
$49,500.00
The Maximum Fee shall be allocated to the following tasks:
Time Commitment:
· Review and update previous Space Needs Analyses with
city staff
· Evaluate all City facilities with regard to space usage and
proxemics
· Prepare programming worksheets (by department) to
identify current and future space needs
· Identify uses which could be shared or co-located
· Conduct Open Houses I Community Meetings to solicit
community input
· Prepare Space Needs Analysis and Master Plan usi ng
information gathered in previous steps
· Review Analysis & Master Plan with city staff and
Community Facilities Master Plan Committee
· Revise Space Needs Analysis & Master Plan based on staff
and committee input
· Present Space Needs Analysis & Master Plan to City
Council, with recommendations for implementation
20 h rs
80 h rs
40 hrs
20 hrs
30 h rs
80 hrs
30 h rs
40 h rs
40 hrs
All services will be provided on an Hourly Basis according to the
following Rate Schedule:
Principal
Special Project Coordinator
Senior Technical Staff
Arch itect I
Arch itect II
Production I
Production II
Administration I
Administration"
$125
$115
$95
$80
$60
$75
$65
$65
$40
The following reimbursable expenses are included in the
Maximum Fee:
· Long distance telephone calls I fax charges
· Printing I copies
· Postage / UPS
· Travel within Jackson, Josephine and Klamath Counties
· Master Plan & Space Needs Analysis materials
Olden Roemer Wilkerson Architecture, AlA CollaboratIve Approach Horest Design
I
~
I
t=-
~
=-
=-
:8
~=-
~>>
:>>
~.>>
:.>>
~>>
~.
.=.
david wilkerson
pr;;:C!Dai
prOjects
Stewart Meadows Village
Master Plan
Kids Unlimited
Community Center
City of Grants Pass
Parkway Public Safety Center
City of Grants Pass
Redwood Public Safety Station
Ash land Surgery Center
St. Marks Episcopal Church -
Alterations & Add ition
:.
'.
.
>>
.
.
>>
>>
.
>>
>>
I)
.
It
.
.
.
"
Lofts as Ashland Springs
the principals
David Wilkerson brings a collaborative. client-focused approach
to every project. Architecture has been David's lifelong passion
since the age of five, when he was presented with his first set
of Li ncol n Logs. Later that same year, he bu i It a tree house
with friends, using cast-off construction materials, ingenuity,
and a firm belief that nothing is impossible. That belief
continues today, and is reflected in his enthusiasm for finding
the best solution to every design problem.
A strong communicator, David is able to capture the vision of
the client's needs, and to translate that vision into a built
prOduct through careful coordination of the design process
from concept to completion. His experience encompasses a
wide range of project types, including churches, financial
institutions, government agencies, entertainment facilities, and
corporate offices. With over twenty years of varied experience,
including practice in Virginia and New York City, David brings a
strong grasp of every aspect of professional practice, from
programming through design to construction administration.
A firm believer that architecture should "give something back"
to the community, David is active in many professional and
civic organizations, and as a LEED accredited professional is a
strong proponent of environmentally sustainable design and
development.
OedenRoemerWilkerson, AlA CollaboratIve Approach - Horest Design
Education University of Virginia, 1985,
Bachelor of Science in Architecture, Minor in
Architectural History
New York University, Graduate Coursework in
Real Estate Development & Finance
Professional Affiliations
LEED Accredited Professional, U.S. Green
Building Council
President, Long Island Chapter I American
Institute of Architects
Founder, Virginia Chapter, Architects I
Designers I Planners for Social
Responsibility
Instructor, Hofstra University, Saturday
Morning Program for Young People
fit
~
kenneth ogden
onnc!pai
~>>
>>
:.
:.
...
-.
.
-.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
a
t
t
prOjects
Medford School District 549c,
long range plan
Hedrick, MGLoughlin Middle
School Modernizations
Craterian Ginger Rogers Theater
Rogue River Schools
Modern izations
Southern Oregon University
Elderhostel design
Rogue Valley Country Club
New Synagogue,
Temple Emek Shalom
;
t
t
~
the principals
Kenneth J. Ogden emphasizes a collaborative approach with,
honest design. Each client's needs and values dictate the
evolution of a building from planning to completion. A team
player and a skilled communicator, Ken believes design is a
group process with everyone involved as a valuable contributor.
He leads the architectural team and consultants during all
phases of a' project, adeptly guiding the process in the
direction it needs to go. Ken's creativity, experience, and talent
allow him to anticipate and resolve complex issues associated
with project design. As an art student, Ken had a singular
passion for, drawing and the composition of space. His
transition from fine artist to architect was a natural fit for his
skills, insight. and interests. For each new project, Ken spends
time contemplating the site to ensure each building element
and form come together in harmony with the surrounding
environment. He has worked in the field of architecture for 22
years. Ken's specialty areas of expertise are in the
programming and design of medical and educational facilities
and high-end custom residences. Other areas of experience
include civic and government projects, recreation and
entertainment facilities, senior housing and multi-family
dwellings.' He is active in many professional and civic
organ izations.
OadenRoemerWHkerson, AlA Collaborative Approach- Honest Design
Education Southern California I nstitute of
Architecture, 1983, Bachelor of Architecture
Architectul1ll Rllistrations
Oregon: #3705
California: C-19068
Washington: #7467
ProfessionallCommunity Affiliations
Board of Directors, Ashland Rotary
Past President, Ashland Family YMCA
Advisory Board, Scienceworks Museum
Past President, American Institute of
Architects, Oregon State Chapter
Past President, Southern Oregon Chapter.
American Institute of Architects
Member, Ashland Schools Citizens Advisory
Committee
~
~
~
~.
~.
~.
~-.
~..
~.
~.
.
0'.
:.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
a
a
t
t
&
james roemer
prlnC(pa~
or01Pcts
Dorris Elementary School
Mercy Medical Center,
Mt. Shasta Emergency Room
Fairchild Medical Center
Emergency Room
Hedrick and McLoughlin
Middle School Modernizations
Butte Valley High School
Modern izations
Southern Oregon University
Madrone Street Housing
~
~
the principals
Jim Roemer excels at designing technically demanding projects
requiring the integration of complex client needs with stringent
siting, scheduling, and code constraints, all while enriching the
relationship between the natural and built environments. He
applies an astute understanding of innovative design,
sustainable materials and meticulous detailing to maximize
each building's value, durability and functional flexibility. Jim
takes pride in completing each project phase on schedule and
within budget, while fostering a spirit of unity and cooperation
among all parties involved with the realization of a design. His
ability to stay abreast of the myriad building, accessibility and
firellife safety codes is well known within the design and
construction communities, and his code expertise is often
sought by local developers, contractors and public officials.
An avid outdoorsman and traveler, Jim looks to regional
building forms and the environment for design inspiration,
striving to craft suitably proportioned projects that rest lightly
on the landscape. With over 25 years of professional
experience, he has managed a wide range of project types
including civic centers, health care institutions and educational
faci I ities.
OadenRoemerWilkerson, AlA Collaborative Approach- Honest Design
Education Cornell University, 1983,
Bachelor of Architecture
Architectul'l' Reaistrltions
Oregon: #4066
California: C-18821
Professional Affiliations
Vice President. Southern Oregon Chapter,
American Institute of Architects
Southern Oregon Representative, AlA Code
Committee
Member, International Code Council
Member, Southern Oregon Historical Society
Member, National Trust for Historic
Preservation
.
.
-.
~.
~.
~.
:'.
~.
...
~-.
~.
-.
..
--.
-..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
peter schmitz. aia
jeffrey bender, aia
victoria suppo
kart krauskopf
josh sizemore
jason look
adam miller
rhonda gressett
donna root
Peter Schmitz is the Special Projects Consultant at OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture. A
founding partner in 1968, Peter brings more than 40 years of professional experience to
the firm. He is an expert at conducting needs assessments, writing project specifications,
and supervising construction. Peter is a meticulous coordfnator with the ability to organize
large multi-disciplinary teams and facilitate the planning process to best meet each
client's needs. -
A talented and creative arch itect with more than 15 years of experience, Jeff's work makes
tangible the spirit of place and phenomena of life through the craft and science of
construction. With each project, he seeks to enrich our experience - drawing inspiration
from the poetry and power of the natural world and the possibility of modern building
technique. Jeff brings to ORW a great variety of project experience ranging from large
airport, museum, and educational work with complex programs and certification
requirements (including LEED), to work on smaller commercial and residential projects.
Having lived in a variety of environments and climates before moving to Oregon, Jeff
believes strongly in the need for a sensitive and sustainable architecture; healthy, inspiring
environments that use resources wisely and minimize environmental impact.
Victoria is a senior member of our production staff, and brings over 20 years experience
with CAD (Computer Aided Design) to our team. Her knowledge of architecture and
construction and her attention to detai I and qual ity control are some of her greatest assets
and help to maintain the high-level of quality we expect in all of our projects. In addition
to her project responsibilities Victoria is our CAD Manager. Her responsibilities include
creating and preserving documentation standards and, as well as maintaining our firm's
various information technology systems.
Karl brings over 30 years of diverse experience to OgdenRoemerWilkerson. His superior
technical abilities and an eye for detail help to maintain the integrity of design concepts in
the real world of nuts, bolts and splice plates. He is involved in all stages of project
documentation, including the preparation and coordination of drawings and specifications.
His rigorous attention to detail and quality control assures successful projects.
Josh is skilled and enthusiastic and brings more than 5 years of progressively responsible
experience to our project team. Josh joined our organization as a junior drafter and has
grown to be an experienced document technician with a great interest in architecture and
construction and a desire to learn and grow in the profession.
Jason is an accomplished Intern Architect who believes in the importance of building
responsible and sustainable environments. His enthusiasm for creating buildings for a
brighter, greener future is genuine and reflected in his work in the community. A
background in film and theatre as well as construction also provides a wealth of experience
to draw upon in his design projects.
Adam is a talented and eager intern who has joined us in our office from the University of
Oregon for the last few summers. He brings 18 years of fine carpentry and cabinetmaking
experience, and has taken on a number of project and office responsibilities becoming a
valuable member of our team. We all look forward to next summer when he will jOin us as
a intern architect and begin his formal internShip and road to professional licensure.
Rhonda has more than 20 years of business administration and client service experience
and is our marketing coordinator. She brings a great deal of business acumen to our office
and makes sure that our organization functions effectively for our team and our clients.
Donna recently Joined our firm in the role of Office Manager and Bookkeeper. She has
over 15 years experience in accounting, tax preparation and office administration. In
addition she possesses a strong proficiency in the computer programs we use on a daily
basis to prepare reports and mon itor our cl ient's projects.
OldenRoemerWilkerson Architecture. AlA Collaborative Approach Honest Design