The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEast Main_212_PA-2012-00702 CITY OF J F June 20, 2012 Scott Littell Faulk & Foster/US Cellular 1026 South 57t` Street West Allis, WI 53214 RE: Planning Action #2012-00702 Notice of Final Decision On June 20, 2012, the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved your request for the following: A request for Site Review approval for the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of two new cabinets to the existing platform on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. The proposal is to upgrade the existing wireless communication facilities to include 4G wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and parapet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 BC; TAX LOT: 100 The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13d' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance QALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in the ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact the Community Development Department between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wmashland,or.us ( j ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: 2012-00702 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 E. Main Street APPLICANT: US Cellular DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval for the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of two new cabinets to the existing platform on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. The proposal is to upgrade the existing wireless communication facilities to include 4G wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and parapet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-1); ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 09 BC; TAX LOT: 100 . SUBMITTAL DATE: May 24, 2012 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: May 25; 2012 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: June 20, 2012 APPEAL DEADLINE: July 2, 2012 FINAL DECISION DATE: July 3, 2012 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: July 3, 2013 DECISION The subject property, located at 212 East Main Street, is the site of the Ashland Springs Hotel. Originally known as the Lithia Springs Hotel and later the Mark Antony, the nine-story gothic bearing masonry structure was constructed in 1925 and was for a long time the tallest structure between Portland and San Francisco. The building is a primary contributing resource in Ashland's Downtown Historic District and was individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1977. A complete certified rehabilitation was completed after the building was purchased by the current owners for unpaid taxes in 1998. Several wireless communication facilities already exist on the building, including those for Nextel, Verizon Wireless, Voice Stream (now T-Mobile), Master Towers/Sprint, Washington Oregon Wireless (WOW)/U.S. Cellular; and AT&T. The antennas and related wireless equipment are entirely integrated into and concealed by the architecture of the National Register- listed historic building, and each installation has been reviewed and approved by both the City of Ashland and the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Within the C-1-D (Downtown) zoning district, the installation of wireless communication facilities on existing structures is subject to Conditional Use Permit approval as described in AMC 18.72.180.D. Subsequent additions of antennas by a provider are subject only to a building permit review provided that the modifications do not increase the height of the installation by more than ten feet, that they do not alter the way the installation or the building itself relates to the applicable standards and approvals, and that they do not involve exterior changes to a National Register- listed building or contributing historic resource. In this instance, the addition of two new radio cabinets on the rooftop is considered an exterior modification to a National Register-listed PA #2012-00702 212 E MafiiW Page 1 historic building requiring a building permit, and as such, the proposal is subject to Site Review approval as required in AMC 18.108.040.A.l.c.viii. The primary considerations for the application have to do with mitigating any adverse impacts of the new cabinet placement, on the primary contributing historic building through the cabinet's placement, treatment and screening. As noted above, the application is a request for Site.Review approval to allow the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of two new radio cabinets to the existing platform on the roof. The proposal is intended to upgrade the existing facilities to include `4G' wireless technology. The total number of antennas will not increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely hidden within the building's architecture and behind it's parapet. The proposed replacement antennas are to be in the same location as the existing antennas and will utilize the existing camouflaging. The application emphasizes that the antennas are not to be visible from surrounding public areas. This application modifies the previously approved Conditional Use Permit (PA-2001-084) for Master Towers; who was representing U.S. Cellular. The application notes that as part of required federal permitting, the applicants have completed a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review filing for the.proposed site modification which yielded a fmding that the proposal met federal standards. The application includes a copy of these findings. The application also contains preliminary written approvals from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Aeronautics Section of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) stating that the proposal complies, or is exempt from, each agency's regulations. The applicant has also stated that installation and maintenance will be according to the requirements of the Building Code and will obtain necessary building permits. The material provided with the application include notice from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with the applicants finding as part of their NEPA Review that the proposal would have no adverse effect either directly to the existing resource or in its visual appearance. A condition has been included below to require the applicants provide evidence of approval directly from SHPO, including any conditions placed upon the installation, prior to the issuance of a building permit. With regard to the proposed equipment cabinet installation, the application explains that an existing reinforced steel platform on the ninth floor roof that holds existing equipment was designed to accommodate future cabinets. The new 4G Technology requires its own equipment cabinet and is smaller than the existing ones. And an even smaller 2' by 2' fiber optic cabinet is also needed to stream large amounts of data associated wit the 4G technology, and will also be installed on the existing steel platform. Both cabinets have been shown to have a minimal visual impact, and a photo-simulation of the cabinet as it would appear when viewed from the adjacent public right-of-way is provided. Both cabinets will blend entirely with existing rooftop equipment due to its smaller size, placement in a location designed for its eventual installation, and treatment with a color selected to blend with the hotel's existing exterior finish and concealed by the existing parapet walls. The application also emphasizes that no increase in height of the installation or the building is proposed, and that no signage additional signage is proposed with the upgrade. PA #2012-00702 212 E Maui/NIP Page 2 Staff received one letter from a resident raising concern over the potential health impacts of wireless communication facilities. However the Telecommunications Act 'of 1996 expressly preempts local governments from regulating the placement, construction, and modification of personal wireless service facilities purely on the basis of environmental effects of radio frequency emissions to the extent that such facilities comply with the FCC's regulations concerning such emissions [47 U.S.C: §332(c)(7)(B)(iv)]. The letter submitted did not address the approval criteria in how the proposal does or does not comply with the standards for placement and screening, therefore is not applicable in making a.decision for this action. In considering the application, staff finds that the proposal remains is in keeping with the applicable city ordinances and the Site Review Chapter, and complies with the both the Site Design and Use Standards and the Development Standards for Wireless Communication Facilities found in AMC 18.72.180. Adequate capacity of city facilities is in place to serve the existing building and the approved wireless communication facility installation and will continue to serve the proposed replacement equipment. As such, it is staff's determination that the applicants have met the criteria for Site Review approval. Staff further finds that because the wireless communications facility installation will remain screened from view through the existing camouflaging measures and through the placement and treatment of the new equipment cabinet, that the proposal will not negatively impact either the Ashland Springs Hotel, the surrounding Downtown district, nor the uphill residential district tot the south. With the proposals of the applicant and the conditions of approval attached below, staff finds that the proposal complies with all applicable City ordinances. The criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070, as follows: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. Planning Action 2012-00702 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2012-00702 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein, including but not limited to the proposed replacement antennas being located in place of existing antennas and continuing to utilize the camouflaging measures already approved and in place and that the equipment cabinet be as depicted in the applicants submittals including its size, placement and treatment. PA #2012-00702 212 E Main/MP Page 3 2. That all requirements of the initial Conditional Use Permit approval (PA-2001-084) shall remain in effect unless otherwise modified herein. 3. That the applicants shall obtain a building permit. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicants shall provide written statements from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Aeronautics Section of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to demonstrate that the proposal complies with, or is exempt from, each agency's regulations. 4. The applicants shall provide a confirmation letter demonstrating that the proposal has been approved by the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Prior to final inspection approval or use of the replacement wireless communication facilities, all SHPO requirements shall be met. 5. The applicant shall coordinate the installation of the antenna and cabinetry with the property owner before the issuance of the building permit. r June 20, 2012 ill Mol~iar, Director- v Date Dep ment of Community Development PA 92012-00702 212 E MaaW Page 4 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 11000 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5800 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 800 145 MAIN STREET LLC ANDERSON ANDRE Scott Littell 24 CROCKER ST PO BOX 3577 Fault & Foster ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 1026S57 th Street West Allis, WI 53214 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 5300 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 4400 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 600 ASHLAND HISTORIC PROPERTY ASHLAND LODGE #944/13 P 0 E BANKE THEODORE H/LOIS E LLC P 0 BOX 569 150 E MAIN 437 WILEY ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10300 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5900 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 700 BROWN ERIK/NORTH JAMIE BUFFINGTON JANE N CONNOLLY ALLEN 15 N FIRST ST 1800 SE 10TH AVE SUITE 400 142 E MAIN ST ASHLAND OR 97520 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5600 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5700 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 4500 CONSERVANCY LLC CONSERVANCY LLC CRATER NATL BANK OF 104 FIRST ST 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 MEDFORD ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 PO BOX 810490 DALLAS TX 75381 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5400 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5500 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10500 EDWARDS OREN R EDWARDS OREN RALPH JR GARLAND GERALD G TRUSTEE 219 N MOUNTAIN AVE 219 N MOUNTAIN 921 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS CIR ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 16500 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5700 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10600 HARMS ELISA R KELL GEORGE KEY BANK OF OREGON 244 HARGADINE ST 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 PO BOX 560807 ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 DALLAS TX 73556 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 100 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 4600 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 6201 MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC NEUMAN PROPERTIES OREGON SHAKESPEARE 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD 4240 CLAYTON ROAD FESTIVAL ASSN ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PO BOX 158 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 4700 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 500 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 6000 SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E SCHWEIGER JOHN C TRUSTS SHAW ROGER A TRUSTEE ET AL 2773 BUSH ST FBO 104 FIRST ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 1644 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10900 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5000 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 200 TEITELBAUM ALBERT TRUSTEE THORMAHLEN PHILIP A WILLIAMS FAMILY LLC 2310 QUAIL POINT CIR TRUSTEE ET AL 5500 COLVER RD MEDFORD OR 97504 96 FORK ST TALENT OR 97540 ASHLAND OR 97520 i PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10400 Chad Tuttle Candace Johnson YAMAOKA RONALD/CARRIE B & T Engineering, Inc. Integrated Environmental Solutions 2422 33RD AVE 1717 S Boulder, Suite 300 3311 109th Street SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 Tulsa, OK 74119 Urbandale, Iowa 50322 Jason Allen, M.A. Oregon Dept of Aviation Historic Preservation Specialist Sandra Larsen 725 Summer St. NE, Ste C 304025 th Street, SE „/OD Salem, OR 97301-1266 Salem, OR 97302-1125 < v I • 0Z5L6 2J0 'PU8ILIsV 90C X08 Od 0Z9L6 puelysv uos:pegod euu ns :utjy 90C X08 Od C# t" uleW 89 07 taa S uleW 3 89 - 09 OZ X10 'pUelgsv Z90£ X08 Od D awls uieW 3.89 - 09 OZ9L6 ?10 'pUelys`d 90X08 0& uos}aago uuesns :u}jv taaatS ulevq 3 89 I I CITY OF -ASHLAND ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Meeting Minutes June 6, 2012 Community Development/Engineering Services Building - 51 Winburn Way - Siskiyou Room CALL TO ORDER - REGULAR MEETING, 6:07 pm Historic Commissioners Present: Dale Shostrom, Keith Swink, Tom Giordano, Ally Phelps, Sam Whitford, Allison Renwick, Terry Skibby, Victoria Law, Kerry KenCairn Commission Members Absent: Tom Giordano (e), Council Liaison: Greg Lemhouse, absent High School Liaison: None Appointed SOU Liaison: None Appointed Staff Present: Planner: Amy Gunter APPROVAL OF MINUTES PUBLIC FORUM: No one in the audience wished to speak, COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: None PUBLIC HEARING: A. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2012-00642 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 614 Siskiyou Blvd, APPLICANT: Nola O'Hara DESCRIPTION: A request for a Conditional Use Permit for a three-unit Travelers Accommodation including the owners unit at 614 and 616 Siskiyou Blvd; and a Conditional Use Permit to modify a legal non-conforming site. The business-owner resides on-site in the upstairs unit of the primary dwelling, and the 680 square foot downstairs unit plus the 575 square foot accessory structure in the rear will be the accommodation units. Ms. Gunter explained the proposal, and that the non-conformity is in regards to the number of parking spaces which historically were required. The property is in good condition and has been well cared for. Staff has no concerns. Mr. Witford moved to approve. The motion was seconded by Ms. Ken Cairn and was approved unanimously. B. PLANNING ACTION: 2012-00702 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 E. Main Street APPLICANT: US Cellular DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval for the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of two new cabinets to the existing platform on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. The proposal is to upgrade the existing wireless communication facilities to include 4G wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and parapet. Ms. Gunter explained the proposal and discussed the camouflage of the radio frequency permeable panels and as with previous applications the replacement panels will be required to match the original building, There was Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 1/4/2013 CITY OF -ASHLAND no owner or representative present and there was no one in the audience wishing to speak. The public hearing was closed. Mr. Shostrom made a motion to recommend approval of the project. Mr. Swink seconded the motion and it passed unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS: A. Certified Local Government Grant (CLG) The Commission discussed the goals of the educational aspects of the brochures, handouts and display boards that are to be completed in the 2012 CLG grant cycle. Primary focus is a comprehensive historical education. Focus on historic preservation and not so much on the history of Ashland. The audience is the property owners, contractors, plumbers, electricians, the lumber yards and material sales places, realtors, building designers and architects. The commission wants the documents to demonstrate that history provides a connection to your community and to personalize the history. Ideas for who to get assistance from were Western Oregon University, U of 0, Historic Preservation League of Oregon, Comprehensive Plan Policy and existing Chamber of Commerce documents. Commission also discussed if any grant money remains to create a Walking Tour brochure and a brochure on the history of Chinese in Ashland. The commission discussed a recent finding about Wa Chung, a prominent Chinese Railroad Agent and that he had eel ponds where the natatorium / Twin Plunges and now Umpqua Bank and the Co-Op sit. OLD BUSINESS; A. Review Board Schedule June 7th Terry, Keith, All June 14th Terry, Victoria, Ker j June 21St Terry, Allison, All June 28th Terry, Tom, Sam July 5th Terry, Allison, Victoria B. Project Assignments for Planning Actions BD-2011-00436 426 A St (Sidney Brown) Mixed Use Bldg (permit issued 5-18-11)) Giordano BD-2011-01029 400 Allison Robin Biermann New SFR (Ready to issue) Whitford/Renwick BD-2011-01079 134 Terrace Allman New SFR (issued 2-17-12) Whitford BD-2011-00621 89 Oak St Amorotico New fa ade on building under construction Shostrom PL-2012-00434 843 B St Holzshu ARU Renwick PL-2012-00440 27 N Main McKechnie Comm Site Review Shostrom I ADJOURNMENT: It was the unanimous decision of the Commission to adjourn the meeting at 7:30 p.m. Ashland Historic Commission Minutes 1/4/2013 PrFmall Planning Department, 51 W ,-n Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY F 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashland.or.us TTY; 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2012-00702 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 E Main St. OWNER/APPLICANT: U.S. Cellular DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval for the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of two new cabinets to the existing platform on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. The proposal is to upgrade the existing wireless communication facilities to include 4G wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and parapet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial, ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 09 BC; TAX LOT: 100 NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on June 6, 2012 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 25, 2012 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: June 8, 2012 / S U BJ E C-T P F20 P E F2TY: 21 2 E ast M a i r-i Street 39 I E 09 BC 1 00 y"q ci> a fTTTTTt-T"1 ` Property 2in~s arEZ for r~fc~r'ence orz1~not scaZeabZe 0'1020 40 Feet The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m, on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for 'a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18,108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this, application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA'onthat criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520, If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2012\2012-00702.doex SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.72.070 Criteria for Approval The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application; A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. I I i i i Wcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2012\2012-00702.docx T A213AV-09-000-1 wadn-dod pjogaj al jalgAgj 4u8wa6Ae4:) @09bs ®AH3AV apege6 al zasimn ap sues w03-fJ8Ae'MMM ap use amtl3eg el q zalidaa salad a solpel sa:aanbl}? PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 11000 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5800 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 800 145 MAIN STREET LLC ANDERSON ANDRE ASHLAND CITY OF 24 CROCKER ST PO BOX 3577 CITY HALL ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 5300 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 4400 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 600 ASHLAND HISTORIC PROPERTY ASHLAND LODGE #944/B P O E BANKE THEODORE H/LOTS E LLC P O BOX 569 150 E MAIN 437 WILEY ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND,OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10300 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5900 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 700 BROWN ERIK/NORTH JAMIE BUFFINGTON JANE N CONNOLLY ALLEN 15 N FIRST ST 1800 SE 10TH AVE SUITE 400 142 E MAIN ST ASHLAND OR 97520 FT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5600 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5700 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 4500 CONSERVANCY LLC CONSERVANCY LLC CRATER NATL BANK OF 104 FIRST ST 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 MEDFORD ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 PO BOX 810490 DALLAS TX 75381 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5400 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5500 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10500 EDWARDS OREN R EDWARDS OREN RALPH JR GARLAND GERALD G TRUSTEE 219 N MOUNTAIN AVE 219 N MOUNTAIN 921 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS CIR ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 16500 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5700 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10600 HARMS ELISA R KELL GEORGE KEY BANK OF OREGON 244 HARGADINE ST 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 PO BOX 560807 ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 DALLAS TX 73556 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 100 PA-2012-00702 391 E096D 4600 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 6201 MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC NEUMAN PROPERTIES & DEV OREGON SHAKESPEARE 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD LLC FESTIVAL ASSN ASHLAND OR 97520 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD PO BOX 158 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BD 4700 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 500 PA-2012-00702 3,91 E09BC 6000 SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E SCHWEIGER JOHN C TRUSTE SHAW ROGER A TRUSTEE ET AL 2773 BUSH ST FBO 104 FIRST ST SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 1644 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10900 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 5000 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BC 200 TEITELBAUM ALBERT TRUSTEE THORMAHLEN PHILIP A WILLIAMS FAMILY LLC 2310 QUAIL POINT CIR TRUSTEE ET AL 5500 COLVER RD MEDFORD OR 97504 96 FORK ST TALENT OR 97540 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00702 391 E09BA 10400 28 YAMAOKA RONALD/CARRIE 212 E Main 2422 33RD AVE 5-25-2012 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 T T wi86p3 dn-dod asodxe jaded paaj T ®09LS ajeldwaj ®IGaAV asn wa09zs @AM3AV ® %Gull 6uole puss s1age°' 4pad Ase3 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 2012-00575 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2012-00575, 1155 East Main St. Signature of Employee r Wcomm-devlplanningTorms & Handouts\Affidavit of Mailing-Planning Action Notice.doc 410U" rg Ionu tS U1) qu'UU0 3tilk i'~ ism 140-01 - H R'~1U iA '4 ' 00 1 li`UUU~F ~ 1"Map Maker 1102-ft INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY A lication 91511U t ~IU Y pp Pro rt Data Online Le end ~ ;i 1249n v A 0 D Highlighted Feature . 925U6 ulm11 2HD lheBuffer 50U J UUU t20a 3`ll,,,~ I UmBufferTarget 5 aU $20 a tk : Mau u U ~ (Tax Lot Outlines ~t9Uil 11ik Tax Lot Numbers l rUD , f. 1ttuU a' # ale b a7'~i U i r } 1" 01 8 I loft 1114 a 7zuU 95011 I ! ~4i~tlt4 ttflit ~U # t 5t1IY 11n41 ,,uUa,U 4JUU ~J6U{M ;'f 1 3& x_, 11241 1118U13'klt~ll9ti4 9~91t} t 9li} U .i M91U t9~i4t c;~ 9l1Ufl! 1~ HIM 311U HIM '1a~~~lU~ t9l~s '694391(4 sx U~1uU 119y i4 " - .>r 9 11 1040 3 '$'U C4 T9194 '694x9134 ~ 1 st4 ~l~'Ut4 Vill 4VV-D a 38-04. t ODD` i` +30 ~♦E a ' ~ ~ 19]94 49)0lf 11 i'9 4 f ° i/ yaa ~y ~ri ,de1.r',~r. ° 6•._ i ~ .~"yn yg` a'°~ ~ J U {4 55- 94 47* 4 499194 Y "ft f rr G r 00 oil r, dJ91UU"J. 62411 si] '320a -4 00 k 51i,80 DI 4 J'UU14 ~UUUU &3094 9d1$F 21J U it," 4HU ~~94~+ ~19iir ~T9J94 ~E9919} ~~9191 'iSUU ,~a t~1441.-' z 1 iAl L 9] 294 $lk - ° 'tom 4414 . #1 a9 U L4 ~t91i4 ` td•3U . 591 U. t'lij ~1 ~~~5 s + ~Flb` 9a~'9kt ~di~9ltk ~ _.f iizu U: X7 1' 1~YF'IIL R, ° d"' 9494 ` ` "k5'' . dJ L U 'Su 0100, g 99114 ov V UUt11131][ 11000 , 94'U3 a'494U t~91UU dJ it i91t91U 69} 9ti41 10 Of t2UUi4 I B tHu ~~a~zrtu 91101 '~r,~• d,.. ~ 91U 13,1t1n1170D gU0t 7110" Ion "s t I' ''1., 1111 135,uu '90 err U . -a~;~u 1t~~UUUI 9'U 1Ut4 1610 1!4" p 400 r tea{ 1400 JACKSON i, l@945it' ~~~alrI1 COUNTY 30 t9l i[4 joy s{ a t e i - Ip l~ !'U'd tl tt This map is based on a digital database 6 f 100 compiled by Jackson County From a variety of sources. Jackson Countycannot accept ~ yy f & d ~~'y', r~ '94 respansibity for errors, emissions, or Sri ~y la { ey € ~d 11 rr l positional accuracy. There are no $ 66"s 6°!d ~~~ttt i warranties, expressed or Implied. Please recycle with colored office grade paper Created with MapMaker Map created on 5/24/2012 12:47:01 PM using web.lacksoncounty.org e U May 22, 2012 Site 349332 Site Name: Ashland DT City of Ashland Department of Community Development Michael Pina Assistant Planner RE: US Cellular's being on the Historic Commissions' agenda for the updating of the antennas on the existing roof top Wireless Communications Facility (WCF) located at the Ashland Springs Hotel on 212 East Main Street, Ashland, OR. Mr. Pina, This application is to continue the process for a proposed modification of the existing WCF for US Cellular (USC), located on the Ashland Springs Hotel. This WCF was originally permitted under a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), as Planning action 2001-084 on August 3, 2001. US Cellular's WCF is in compliance with the original CUP's seven (7) conditions of PA2001-084. Based on conversations with City Staff, this proposal is sought as a Type I Planning Application for a Modification of the Existing Conditional Use Permit. Per our recent Pre-Application Zoning Conference on May 16, 2012, additional information was added to this narrative for the Historic Commission per staff comments. SUMMARY OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED EQUIPMENT CONFIGUARTIONS US Cellular's existing wireless communications facility consists of three equipment cabinets placed on an existing platform. Coaxial cables running from the cabinets inside existing and extensive coax trays to panel antennas mounted on 3 separate brackets on 3 different sides of the building. PROPOSED OLDER ANTENNA MODEL REPLACEMENT US Cellular's existing antennas on the existing bracket mounts are to be replaced with newer model panel antennas. These current antennas are located on the north, east and west elevations of the eight story historic Ashland Springs Hotel. All three of the older TDMA ar-' ~nnas will be replaced with 3 newer ' G models and will reuse the existing "fluted masort.. cut outs" with painted to match rad, frequency permeable material and current bracketing systems at all three sectors. The replacing of antennas or "swapping them out" will have a minimal impact on the historic building's facade. By reusing the existing bracketing systems, there will not be any physical changes to the building and there will be no change in visual impact. Everything required for this collocation of the newer model antennas on an existing WCF, is currently in place. All three antennas are currently behind parapet or decorative walls. The newer model antennas will go in the same "fluted masonry cut outs", and will continue to be screened from view by the existing painted to match radio frequency permeable material. ANTENNA REPLACEMENT DETAILS The north elevation panel antenna is mounted to a steel bracing system behind the decorative parapet exterior facade at the roofline on the eighth floor. This antenna is attached to brackets that hold it inside a hollowed out portion of the parapet facade. The brackets are in turn attached to the existing steel bracing. The removal of the older TDMA model and the installation of the newer 4G model will not affect the exterior of the building at all. As the attached photo-sim shows, this "swap-out" will remove the older model antenna and install the newer model where the old antenna was in the previously constructed notch behind painted to match radio frequency permeable material. Thus no physical alterations to the exterior of the building will occur for this or any sector's antenna replacement. The visual impact will be zero as well because no change will be visible from the ground or adjacent buildings. The East elevation's older model panel antenna is also attached to the existing parapet wall with a metal bracket and is placed in a "fluted masonry cut out". This antenna will be replaced with a newer model using the existing brackets and previously constructed stealth notch. The West elevation's older antenna is also attached to a metal bracket that sits in another "fluted masonry cut out" in a sixth floor janitor's closet. This older model will also be replaced using the existing brackets and reusing the previous stealth insert. All three existing antenna sectors will have the existing antennas replaced with the proposed newer models antennas using the existing bracketing systems. At all three elevations, no physical changes will occur to the building. In addition, no visual impacts will occur with the "like for like swap out". All three antennas are currently behind parapet or decorative walls and these "fluted masonry cut outs" will continue to be used. NEW OUTDOOR EQUIPMENT CABINETS Since the new 4G technology antennas will require their own outdoor equipment cabinet, a new one is proposed to be installed on the existing reinforced steel platform on the roof of the building. The new outdoor equipment 4G cabinet is smaller than the existing ones and will accommodate the newer model of antenna transmitting and receiving capabilities. A smaller 2' x 2' fiber optic cable cabinet with also be needed as a receptacle for the fiber optic cable. This service is required to stream large amounts of data with the new technology. It will be placed in US Cellular's existing lease area and will use the existing reinforced steel platform to attach to. Because the existing reinforr-I steel platform is used, no physical 'teration to the Ashland Springs Hotel building itself wifi _,;cur. No visual impact will occur with the new equipment from the right-of-way of the front and side elevations of the subject as the parapet walls conceal them from the view from the ground. As for the rear of the building, there is a higher elevation residential area along Hargadine Street and other neighborhood streets behind the hotel. Although at a few hundred feet higher elevation than the subject and looking "downward", no significant visual impact will occur with the addition of the new equipment cabinets on the roof. This is due to several reasons. The distance from the residences to the hotel of this view will help mitigate any noticeable visual impact. This combined with the neutral colors of the 4G equipment cabinet and the fiber optic cable vault will blend in with the existing cabinets. The existing Ashland Hotel rooftop equipment for operations such as HVAC units, air conditioning units and exhaust vents also help mitigate any impact. Finally the architectural features such as parapet walls, penthouses and stairwells help as well to lessen any visual impact. US Cellular has no plans in this proposal for additional lighting or signage at this WCF. SPECIFIC CODE APPROVAL CRITERIA MET WITH EXISTING WCF AND PROPOSAL The Wireless Communications Facility (WCF) for US Cellular (USC) was originally permitted under a Conditional Use Permit (CUP), as Planning action 2001-084 on August 3, 2001. US Cellular's WCF is in compliance with the original CUP's seven (7) conditions of PA2001-084. It was approved per the Municipal Code of the City of Ashland under Chapter 18, Land Use. Section 104 relates to Conditional Use Permits and sub-section 050 relates to Approval Criteria. Per 18.104.050, the approval was granted by the authority as it found the proposed use conformed As wireless facilities are allowed as a conditional use in the C-1-D district, and as US Cellular proposes to modify its existing conditional use permit, this use is in conformance with the standards of the zoning district and the comprehensive zoning plan. In addition, US Cellular is currently in compliance with the CUP and will continue to be in compliance if the proposal is approved. CRITERIA MET FROM CHAPTER 18.04 FOR CONITIONAL USE APPROVAL The modification of USC's CUP for the WCF will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area than the original design. The new replacement antennas and equipment cabinets are similar in size and scale to the existing equipment. They are the same approximate bulk and cover the same approximate area as the other equipment. No new traffic is generated but existing pedestrian, vehicular and mass transit traffic will benefit from the new 4G technology. Great effort has been put forth to maintain the architectural compatibility with the historic subject building as well as the surrounding commercial district. i The WCF's equipment does r ` generate dust, odors, or other envi-nmental pollutants nor do they effect the air quality. Th6 equipment does not generate any n'' ..e that can be heard within the building or off premises. The WCF generates no light pollution as it has no illumination. It does not generate glare as the equipment is painted in flat neutral colors. There are adequate capacities for City facilities such as utilities, transportation, water & sewer for this site. The back parking lot and surrounding streets are paved. Plenty of parking exists for the technician's occasional visits. The site is near Public Transportation in the Downtown Commercial District. The Ashland Hotel is a developed site with access to adequate city facilities such as urban storm drainage, water and sewer services. The existing 440 amp electric service that currently is connected to the WCF is an adequate capacity to meet USC's needs for this replacement and addition of its equipment. CRITERIA MET FROM CHAPTER 18.72 FOR SITE REVIEW APPROVAL All applicable City ordinances have been met in the past and will be met with this proposal per the Site Review criteria from Chapter 18.72. USCs WCF original CUP was approved in accordance with Section 18.72.040 and meets the Criteria for Approval in Section 18.72.070. The proposed alteration of the WCF will also meet these criterions. Per Section 18.72.18 of the Site Review Chapter, Development Standards for WCFs, all requirements have been met in the past and continue to be met in the future. The original CUP was approved as a conditional use in the C-1 Downtown Zoning Designation and Historic District. The proposed modification to the WCF by USC falls under Section 18.72.180C5 pertaining to Collocation Standards. The new Directional Panel Antennas will go at the existing height and USC will obtain the required Building Permit(s) per Sections 18.72.030 (A) (1) (h,I & j) of the Site Design Standards Code, after the Zoning Process is complete. (ORD 2802, S3 1997: ORD 2951, 2008: ORD 3036, 2010). The WCF located at 212 E. Main Street on the Ashland Springs Hotel also meets the sections of the Site Design and Use Standards indicated by the Planning Staff's Pre Application Conference Comment Sheet dated May 16, 2012. Specifically, Section II (C)(1) and (C)(2); Section II (D); Section II (E); Section III; Section IV (A) and Section VI. As previously noted, there are adequate capacities for City facilities such as utilities, transportation, water & sewer for this site. The back parking lot and surrounding streets are paved. Plenty of parking exists for the technician's occasional visits. The site is near Public Transportation in the Downtown Commercial District. Since no improvements are proposed in j the right-of-way, this proposed WCF modification would not pertain to Chapter 18.88 of the Street Standards of the Performance Standards Options. As a matter of record, modifying US Cellular's existing permit is a collocation on an existing structure and not a new facility on an existing structure, or a new structure. The new antenna (replacement) installation will occur at the same height as the existing antennas and as such this modification per the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) notification pursuant to 14 CR Part 77, 69 FR 22732 "Collocation Void Clause", "where additional (or replacement) antennas are added to existing structures that have a "no hazard" determination and where the additional (or replacement) antennas do not increase the overall structure height, notice to the FAA for a new aeronautical study is not required." per the Oregon Department of Aviation. In addition the State Historic Preservation Office of the State of Oregon has issued an Approval Letter pursuant to the conclusion of "the requirements for consultation with our office under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (per 36 CFR Part 800) for above ground resources". As previously addressed in this narrative, the proposed modification to the existing CUP will have no significant visual impact and no significant physical impact on the building. Great effort and expense has been undertaken to ensure there are no visible changes to the exterior of the historic building. US Cellular's proposal is reusing these previously constructed stealth architectural features for this proposed modification project. In conclusion, US Cellular is proposing to "swap out" existing antennas for newer "like for like" antenna models using the existing decorative stealth architectural features. Additional outdoor equipment will not be able to be seen from the ground on the three right-of ways that surround the historic structure. There will be no significant visible impact from view from the higher elevations to the rear of the building. There will be no physical impact of this proposed modification to the Ashland Hotel building. Please refer to the site plans, the other information provided as well as the photo-Sims in our submittal package for additional detail on US Cellular's design and antenna location. Please call me with any questions, comments or concerns. Thank you, Scott Littell Project Manager Faulk & Foster (414) 607-3770 3311 109'', at ~ tirl owe 50322 'I'FBI; 515,331.2103 Fax: 515,331,1728 April 24, 2012 GSS V11571 Mr. Scott Littell Project Manager Faulk & Faster 1026 South 57th Street Vilest Allis, W1 53214 RE: U. S. CELLULAR ASFI ND DT SIT" J4 ~ w- !-77F _ -~,"D, CCU On April 9, 2012 GSS submitted FCC Form 621 through the FCC's E106 system as well as a paper copy to the Oregon SHPO. On April 12, 2012 the Oregon SHPO concurred with our "No Adverse Effect" determination through the FCC's E106 system (see attached). Their concurrence was based on drawings dated April 4, 2012. GSS Is In the process of preparing an addendum to the Oregon SHPO to reflect revised: drawings dated April 23, 2012 that we received on April 25, 2022. Yours truly, GSS, Inc. Candace J. Johnson Enclosure I II Secti on 106 Fi I i ngs Page 1 of 1 eC-Aon 106 Filings I FCC > Wireless ) Section 106 Flings Logged In: 0013391816 (Log Out) Help I Technical Support My Filings I Now Filing I TCN8 FS(0 Number: 0005 1 5369x4 Notification Date: Current Status: Completed Filer must close by: Form 621: Original Filing 04/ 09/ 2012 Received On: 041 061 2012 05114/ 2012, 11:59 PM Update I Withdraw ! Close Email Filing Overview Transaction Log Comments Documents ! History View Submission Packet Common Questions Return to Nly Filings FCC FORM 621 - COLLOCATION SUBMISSION YOU ARE CURRENTLY VIEWING: View Submission Packet ' Original Filing 04/09/2012 DETERMINATION OF EFFECTS < FI LI NG I NFORMATI ON Visual Direct GP Applicant Name: United States Cellular Corporation GSS, Inc. 3311 109th Street Urbandale, IA 50311 516-331-2103 Attn: Filer: Consultant Name: Stephen J. Blazenko (gss@gssmidwest.com) or Eugene J. Blazenko Lead 5HP0/THPO: Site Name: Ashland DT- Site #349332 FCC Inst: n/a n/a City: Ashland County: JACKSON RECOMMENDATIONS TO State: Oregon DETERMINATION OF EFFECTS Site Coordinates: 42° 11' 44.9" N, 122° 42' 46.0" W There is no Recommendation UTM Coordinates: 10T, 523714.00 E, 4671556.58 N +Add Recommendations Received Offline TCNS Notification Number: 83225 EMTS Tracking Number: n/a PARTIES INVOLVED View Additional Consulting Parties Lead SHPO/THPO : Oregon State Historic Preservation Office SHPO/THPO 2: None SHPO/THPO 3: None SHPO/THPO 4: None FCC: No ACHP: No SHP01Th'FOs marled ' 7 are not partlcipabng online Federal Commi.mications Commission Phone: 1-877-480-3201 445 12th Street SW %Nashington, DC 20,554 Submit t Help Requequest - t i I i https.,//wi rel .fco.gov/ 106/i ndex.htm?modul mi n& pageTy detail & eppl d=6732949& pl nfo=ov... 4/26/2012 Secti on 106 R I i ngs Page 1 of 1 .(;Jon 106 Filings FCC) Wireless Section 106 Flings Logged in: 0013391516 (hog Out) Help Technical Support My Filings 1 New Filing I T CNS Fill; P!ltfl ber: 00053 53598 Notification Date: Current Status: Completed i Filer must close by: Form 621 : Original Filing 04/ 09/ 2012 Received On: 04/ 06/ 201 2 05/ 141 2012, 11 :59 PM Update Withdraw + Close Email Filing Overview Transaction Log Comments Documents History View Submission Packet Common Questions Return to Iviy Filings Showing 1 to 4 of 4 1 Show 10 per page (1 pages) Date Description Source 04/12/2012 A Reviewer concurred with the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office filing 04/11/2012 Individual Informational Notice System 0411112012 Consolidated Informational System Notice 04100/2012 A new filing was submitted GSS, Inc. 3311 109th Street Urbandale, IA 50311 515-331-2103 Attn: Stephen J. Biazenko (gss@gssmidwest.com) or Eugene J. Biazenko Federal Con) mumralions Commission Phone: 1-877-480-3201 445 12th Street SW lnlashington, DC 20554 TTY: 1-717-338-2824 Submit Help Request https://wiry .fcc.gov/ 106/index.htm?module=admin&p Type=detdl&appid=6732949&appinfo=his... 4/26/2012 /n i n = Pants and Recreation DepartmenC 5liltr Hfi;;lo>>r Prc eiviltioti Office ~ 1£359y 'ITThn A. I<itzhabcr, A-II)Governor 725 Stm,unc r St N[ Ste Salem, OR 97301-1266 (503) 986-0671 May 8, 2012 1`ax (503) 986-0793 ~wtwvVMresgonheriUlge.org Mr. Stephen Blazenko - /~TRErri, A'a(raGSS Inc { HISTORY 33 11 109th St Urbandale, IA 50311 RE: SI-1P0 Case No. 12-0498 Ashland D'I' Site 3493322 FOE/collocation on existing bldg GSS Inc/United States Cellular Corp/AA/FCC 212 E Main, Ashland, Jackson County Dear Mr. Blazenko: We have reviewed the revised materials submitted on the project referenced above, and we concur with the finding of no adverse effect for the proposed project, as revised by drawings dated April 25, 2012. Unless there are changes to the project, this concludes the requirement for consultation with our office under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (per 36 CFR Part 800) for above-ground historic resources. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions, comments or need additional assistance. Sincerely,. Jason Allen, M.A. Historic Preservation Specialist (503) 986-0579 jason.allen@state.or.us OREGON HPO CLEARANCE FO `~NNIR .:V Use this form for projects subject to Oregon SHPO review under 36 CPR 800 (Section 106) or ORS 358.653 Fill all blanks completely and attach listed items on page 2. Use additional sheets if needed. Do not write in shaded areas. Address: 212 East Main Street Property or Project Name, if applicable: Lithia Springs Hotel Owner: Private Local Gov D State Gov ❑ Federal Gov ❑ Other if no street address, include Township, Range, and Section, cross streets, or other address description Are there one or more buildings or structures? & YES ❑ NO, If no, skip to Section 4 and append photo Is the property listed in the National Register of ❑ YES - Individually 0 YES w- In a district Skip to Section 2 if listed Historic Places? If yes, the property IS HISTORIC. ❑ NO DON'T KNOW Is the property over 50 years old? ❑ YES E] NO E] DON'T KNOW Construction date: [J Check box if date is estimated Has the property been physically altered or changed? No Changes ❑ Few Changes ❑ Major 1 Many Changes Describe the existing alterations (including replacement siding or windows). Attach additional sheets or drawings as needed. See attachment ' GI II I: Chack= ".ri'"'rite box r ? < ; Z3 t . PILL„ CAt!E-TT~~ . pl?_.., Z The property IS ELIGIBLE for listing in the National Register because it is 50 years old and has no or few changes, was determined eligible in a previous study, or is already LISTED IN THE NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES, C] The property IS NOT ELIGIBLE for listing in the National Register because it is not yet 50 years old and / or major / many changes have been made. Be sure to describe these changes in Section 1 - use additional sheets if needed. to t~' =G <t X O '~pL ~ 'A -T-.,.. S~CTIf:1A1,~~~. N ~R ' E] The project has NO EFFECT on a historic property, either because there is no eligible historic property Involved or the historic property will not be impacted physically or visually. The project will have only a minor impact on the historic property, therefore there is NO ADVERSE EFFECT to the historic property. Minor impacts include replacement of some, not all, siding or windows, new vents, etc. Q The project will have a major impact on the historic property, therefore there is an ADVERSE EFFECT to the historic property. Major impacts include full or partial demolition, complete residing, full window replacement, etc. - _ . , . fw ERV . ~h N fl :.FICE~~.C . M Eligibility. Concur with the eligibility determination above. 0 Do not concur with the eligibility determination above. 503-986-0579 ~0`Concur with the effect determination above. Effect' ❑ Do not concur with the effect determination above. JaSOn.Altn nrsfate.arr.:: Signed:""`' . ~G+- Date: Comments: Oregon State Historic Preservation Office Page 1 of 2 Revised 0612009 OREGON S PO CLEA ANG FORM Describe what work will be done, including what materials will be used and how they will be installed. Specifically identify what historic materials will be retained, restored, replaced, or covered. Include drawings, photos, cut sheets (product descriptions), and other materials as necessary. For vacant lots, please describe the use. See attachment REQUIRED Z 3 4, color, 4 x 5 photographs of the subject property, digital or print, One photo is sufficient for vacant property AS NEEDED Z Project area map, for projects including more than one tax lot Contact SHPO staff with questions Additional drawings, reports, or other relevant materials a .....:....:........::-v ..:..4.:1. n-..: c:,.: .:.4:a:.,•. r. i:.<:?:..:..a=...v_......4.....:--_.;...w. , r:..:.::......... - ~ :fit. Federal, State, or Local Agency Name: Federal Communications Commission Contact Name and Title: Chairman Julius Genachowski Address: 445 12th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20554 Phone: 1-888-225-5322 Email: Jullus.Genachowski@fee.gov Oregon State Historic Preservation Office Page 2 of 2 Revised 06/2009 DEPARTMENT OF John A. {<itzhaber, MD, Governor 3040 25th Street, SE Salem, OR 97302-1125 Phone: (503) 378-4880 Toll Free: (800) 874-0102 FAX: (503) 373-1688 May 17, 2012 Scott Litteli Faulk & Foster 1026 South 57"' Street West Allis, Wisconsin 53214 Subject: Antenna Collocation on Existing Antenna Tower Located at 212 E. Main Street, Ashland, Oregon The Oregon Department of Aviation (ODA) defaults to Federal regulations regarding collocation of antennas. According to Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), 14 CFR Part 77, 69 FR 22732, "Collocation Void Clause," where additional antennas are added to existing structures that have a "no hazard" determination and where the additional antennas do not increase the overall structure height, notice to the FAA for a new aeronautical study is not required. In response to any development, ODA recommends adherence to ORS 836.600 through 836.630, which allow for the future use and growth of Oregon airports, as well as to OAR 660-013-0010 through 660-013-0160, known as the Airport Planning Rule. G The referenced statutes and rules allow for the future use and growth of Oregon airports. These rules require local jurisdictions to provide for the protection of airport imaginary surfaces, aviation-related uses, airport growth, and from incompatible land uses where applicable. Thank you for providing ODA the opportunity to comment on this structure. Sincerely, \1 L/ , Sandra Larsen Aviation Planning Analyst I i i i I { @J _7 I j I i i I i i i I N i i J i i i I _ I I N M i n~ i ; i i ; I i 1 G 1 j a j i ~ I ; ; I I 1 i ~I [A~ _ _ I k l ~ ~ I i i I ~aa~ I ~~'-9 I i i E. 4 all fi t r_ I i 1 Y Vw 1' fu* Fj i ® I I LL 3 I Y I F ^ a I a I I i i I i eU r H L Qut~J-M^~r%~ a~ : 1 ' ' d. a. i b i Structural is 100' Rooftop Jackson County, OR Prepared For: U.S. Cellular Site Name: Ashland DT Site ID: 349332 B&T Project Number: 83657.087 May 1, 2012 ET Engineering, Inc. k& T 1717 S. Boulder, Suite 300 Tulsa, OK 74119 -ERING (918) 587-4630 Phone (918) 295-0265 Fax May 1, 2092 100 Ft Rooftop Structural Analysis Report Site No. 349332 Project Number 83657.087, Ashland DT 'f t Page 9 'EJ's EERING May 1, 2012 { Mr. Nate Kuhns B&T Engineering, Inc. US Cellular 1717 S. Boulder, Suite 300 2 International Way Tulsa, OK 74119 Longview, WA 98632 (918) 587-4630 (360)751-7556 ctuttle@btengineering.corn Subject: Structural Analysis Report US Cellular Designation: Site Number: 349332 Site Name: Ashland DT Engineering Firm Designation: B&T Engineering, Inc. Project Number: 83657.087 Site Data: Ashland, OR, Jackson County Latitude 42° 11'44", Longitude -922° 42'46" 100 Foot - Rooftop Dear Mr. Kuhns, B&T Engineering. Inc. is pleased to submit this "Structural Analysis Report" to determine the structural integrity of the above mentioned rooftop supported telecommunications site. The purpose of the analysis is to determine acceptability of the building to sufficiently support the telecornmunications equipment presented in this report. Based on our analysis we have determined the suitability for the structure and foundation, under the following load case, to be: Existing + Reserved + Proposed Equipment Sufficient Capacity Note: See Table 1 and Table 2 for the proposed and existing/reserved loading, respectively. The structure has been assessed in accordance with the ASCE 7 standard and the IBC 2009 based upon a wind speed of 90 mph 3-second gust and seismic parameters of Ss = 0.568 and S1 = 0.250. All equipment proposed in this report shall be installed in accordance with the drawings for the determined available structural capacity to be effective. We at B&T Engineering, Inc. appreciate the opportunity of providing our continuing professional services to you and US Cellular. If you have any questions or need further assistance on this or any other projects please give us a call. Respectfully submitted by: r. r Ri o i t ?,plrahun ua~John Kelly Chad E. Tuttle, P.E. Project Engineer President May 1, 2012 100 Ft Rooftop Structural Analysis Report Site No. 349332 Project Number 83657.087, Ashland DT Page 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1) INTRODUCTION 2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information 3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE Table 3 - Documents Provided 3.1) Analysis Method 3.2) Assumptions 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS 4.1) Recommendations I i i I I~ i r k €I I S i II I C i I i i May 1, 2012 100 Ft Rooftop Structural Analysis Report Site No. 349332 Project Number 83657.087, Ashland DT Page 3 1) INTRODUCTION The telecommunications equipment is located on the rooftop of an 8-story building. The Proposed LTE equipment cabinet will be installed on an equipment platform located on the roof of the building. There are existing telecommunications antennas located on the roof supported by pipes integrated into the parapet system. The (2) proposed antennas will be supported by the existing pipe mounts on the parapet walls, and (1) antenna will be supported by a pipe mount in the janitor's closet on the 6th floor. An equipment cabinet will be installed on the equipment platform on the roof. 2) ANALYSIS CRITERIA The structural analysis was performed for this structure in accordance with the 2006/2009 International Building Codes and the ASCE 7-05 Design Standard. The TIA-222-F and TIA-222-G apply to telecommunications towers. Although telecommunications equipment is present, this structure is primarily a building and is more appropriately assessed with the ASCE 7 Standard. The design wind speed for this location is 90 MPH 3-second gust. The seismic parameters are Ss = 0.568 and S1 = 0.250 which results in a seismic force of approximately 45 lbs. per antenna, which is miniscule compared to the overall seismic force required for a structure of this magnitude. Table 1 - Proposed Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna Level (ft) Elevation of Manufacturer Antenna Model of Feed Line Note (ft) Antennas Lines Size (in) 100 I 2 KMW !AM X CW 14 65 OOT RET _ ; 2 Ericsson KRC 115 032/2 6 U I Use ER st ng 7/8 j SC 100 ( 85 1 ` KMW AM X CW 14-65-OOT-RET E ) LTE 1 Ericsson I KRC 115 032/2 ( E e Table 2 - Existing and Reserved Antenna and Cable Information Center Number Number Feed Mounting Line Antenna Level (ft) Elevation of Manufacturer Antenna Model of Feed Line Note (ft) Antennas Lines Size (in) 1 _ Kathrein AP13- ; i - 100 880/065D/DT12/XP 100 L ! *Existing 1 Kathrein i 739632 6 7/8 USCC 1 85 1 Kathrein E _ 739632 i *Equipment to be removed 3) ANALYSIS PROCEDURE j Table 3 - Documents Provided Document Remarks Reference Source Tower Audit Report j Site Audit by Legacy Wireless DatelM/2011 j MG Docs Drawings by Washington Oregon Previous Telecom Installation Date: 11/16/2001 MG Docs Wireless 3.1) Analysis Method I This building is a substantial structure and currently supports rooftop antennas and an equipment platform. The additional antennas weigh approximately 70 lbs. each, and produce a seismic load of approximately 45 lbs. each. The total gravity load added to the building is approximately 600 lbs. and i May 1, 2012 100 Ft Rooftop Structural Analysis Report Site No. 349332 Project Number 83657.087, Ashland DT Page 4 the total seismic load added to the building is approximately 390 lbs. These increases are insignificant to the structural design demand for a building of this type. The equipment cabinet weighs approximately 315 lbs. and has a footprint of 4 square feet. The equipment platform was designed to support equipment loads in excess of this weight. 3.2) Assumptions 1) The structure was built in accordance with the designer's specifications. 2) The structure has been maintained and is free of damage. 3) The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances are as specified in Tables 1 and 2 and the referenced drawings. 4) When applicable, transmission cables are considered as structural components for calculating wind loads. 5) Mount areas and weights are assumed based on photographs or mapping data provided. This analysis may be affected if any assumptions are not valid or have been made in error. B&T Engineering, Inc. should be notified to determine the effect on the structural integrity of the structure. 4) ANALYSIS RESULTS 4.1) Recommendations i 1) The antennas shall be installed on the existing antenna mount pipes within the parapet wall screening system in accordance with the installation drawings by B&T Engineering. 2) The equipment cabinet shall be installed on the equipment platform located on the roof. Proper € anchorage to resist wind and seismic loading shall be provided. i i I t G I I I I I ' ~ ~ 86 3 & b ~24`. 5~ u d w r I 11 9 c~ n 1` s- ~ Z CV LL' u9 ;c LLI x o z ! _ .M ` W c€i z o J = sa LLI Q r a~a - ~ w5 1 ~ ~ ♦~e~~ "eo WAk~ Poe ~..,zewl4Blu ~~3 < =N s. g , ieiyea CSJ , . gy - LU J H ~ _ aoa N t _ a Z ira N' 4 r- L ' :gnd 9t 3'd - f ~ ~Ft LU tS g L®L 'Sc e< j r erv®~ (ate oAt ur z Sags =s- Na ; aorr Q ='+5-4pc'~tser~ ~ a UJ ' 3~ L sFO rcd 2 i in s G 'I. 5f! I ~s~y¢ i wc~ I uv c~3e •1 ti 5 n owG~~ =a _ i~oKn 9 9 ® T CC) F r g - _ t} a 03 - U ~ r. _ G _ I N 8 wP:y~ - L:O. SL ~dV - :~c;w. 'act - t-1 :ac4~ - a+P'10 GcoIVW-If[G~C GPO;G'IC5 Ell V 4 I ee ~ I 131.~ V u ZV tl it J O a { f U = if Z rv ~ W - `i 'i i .j _a •O it ° 4 0 4 < r ~I u n ~ r AI r 1 c a ,a "i o 1 J C T U U I~ k4 ~ ~ ~ ~ C W Ll f i 2 U U 3~~ o < ~I Y - G~ ~!f NNN31NV J J Avai aN11,six3 op ¢rq "cl"iaM aU ~a R i cam I T w ci w~ I w z w ^ ~ 4AJ U; °w ;I ~ a _EI < - LLJ t L`i cn a304V1 I I p B n.y ~w i z ° z l- n Ya VNN131NV 1 -D-7 - LIOZ 'SZ ,ep - iasa.w u4s(i - -~~aau -Gupta Guol4 l-~£EbbE"L20'v'SE9 G ~ I u 6 LL i CL C N yp9 ~ N C } 1d C I L ~ $ z S9 =m V s w< ~ G 9 1~ \ - p w 2 o WI. 0 2E Ljj LUIQ LU o W o Q o ° zdo ~ v G> ~ a x° w N wm %o N z i s N A-H cEl r it _ Ik I I I z ca Na l7 ) a a Wiu w gig j 11 o~3pG~_ ~ ~ r- g, i w"+GS Z - ZICL 'SL ~4V - icraxw Jeo'fM Z-~:ww,.. - !7iG Pu~l~=tl-y{^.54E-'L80'L;5fu B 9 wr i - I 33 r a 'r z y~ - Z z ~ z C L7 ~ F va O 1 I s _----13dvaea aNUSlx3 _ - - - - 5JNN31W I 'Yal Teyo 8NIISIXI I U i Jr~Q ww w`w J } rl ~ R r JJ~d OJ G~ J4u. f W is z x - y\ w 5 Sm ~ ~ a ~LL np O n W iQ u x a7 W ' x z w I ss3oov a3aob~ ~i ~ Q LLJ "05 ~ i ~r Z - aw p o goo ° Fi, a i 3 n o rd` a YNN31Ntl wd:>:Z - ZIOZ._.SZ +~4' - Wca"•„ :acct ~-~',~o 6MO'A(touoWnr ZE£94E'L&l"rcggg l rl~ E~ Gg& ~t t EH ~tJE!a - n ro d F c! N e a ? .d r Wiy z~ c r2_ x rw~~ ¢ O VC ~ ~ J _ a w 4' 0 3 C cC[S~>.. ` T w+ i w r UjU 022 Q \U x W F U f/f ~ I r r ~ ~ ~ f LLJ Z n LLJ U ;m° C~ ` o m LO ?tea v,z ~ o -zi~~ox~ tn;.p. \ w wpm osN [°w i! wzv~ pOxdpN ma Z Z lV} C ONS NC ¢ (DI 1 v- 6x o C ~ 1 W ~ r__ z = >ai ~l~ nl \ 00 J a w w u d o _o 0 ~,ay g` 5w W ~x O W z~ °~w n_oW ~ _ 2 a'7 C rp X 1- - p=C 1 T a r w F i„ C o U $m~ ~q Q Q f3 < O w srioUMlJl37d:. F r =oaw a;d awl ar ~ ~1'a 4W ~ Jai Q f- r _ r ~n s ~ p~~ a Ott, wLL p..G ~ Z 'g~ 4ps x .jy. x .y a j 0 _ r ~ '.f W zzl- [v Iw E G, i a v N y 4 °i a ¢ zi, Z ~ p q [t.• S w' L r W ~ 2 c9) ~ ti tK9 _ c: o n ~ C J ~ Uw UYyWW d v~l'] _ [4 ° .t ~ N ril 1~ ~ IwYt F O G C W 4 Q J ' F LL' y V Y _ EL CD U) w x U g ~3>~2 - L~4L 's[ ~tlq - la~..xw ~~.il - t-'~~=84$ - tM4.14 O~u;Bay_~{{BaC-LBOLiBFB << Planning Division ZONING MIT APPLICATION 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE CITY OF ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT r,, _ YU DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO Street Address t / Assessor's Map No. 391 E Tax Lot(s) s Zoning d ) f Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT e S i t r""" t f F. r° F b _ 0 Name k . Phone g E-Mail Address r city 44 Zip tL- PROPERTY OWNER t Name NkAe-,~_ Oil °x o i l c~ ~ uudOWl",j Phone x It G' E-Mail Address r. City - - Zipr " SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title Name 1v'4 r.`) l ti l o- Phone`. f Y Y 0, E-Mail 71 ri c:e _ Address t i-7 - City _ Zip Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip 1 hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. 1 understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. 1 further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request, x 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will rrrsult most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my exparj;.e. Ifl have a90oubts, I an) advisedto seek competent professional advice and assis ance. Applicant's Signature Date As owner of the propertv involved in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property an _ Propert per's Signature (required) Date 7771- leted by City Staff) Date Received t $ ,yam Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ OVER GAcomm-dev\plnnningWorms & Handouts\Zoning Pemiit Application.doc L/ Job Address: 212 E MAIN ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C P Owner's Name: MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC ® Phone: P Customer 06785 N State Lie No: L FAULK & FOSTER REAL ESTATE T ~ City Lie No: Applicant: PO BOX 2568 R Address: MONROE LA 71207 A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: (318) 325-4666 -T Address: N Applied: 05/24/2012 O T Issued: R Expires: 11/20/2012 Phone: State Lie No: Maplot: 391 E09BC100 City Lie No: DESCRIPTION: Commercial Site Review Approval to replace three existing U S Cellular antennas and add one radio cabinet. Contact Scott Littell, 414-232-6496, 1026 S 57th St, West Allis, WI 53214. litteliscott@hot VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: i r MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL I PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Commercial Site Review 1,038.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL i i i i COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 T F ASHLAND L 1 i i G i I i I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the ! i best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation (180 days). Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 j 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00- $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 1,038.00 $ 1,038.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 1,038.00 Fees Paid: $ 1,038.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us I Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CTY OF -ASHLAN17__,