Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
East Main_212_PA-2012-00242
i i C., t 'I' Y OF ASHLAND March 30, 2012 Mike Unger - T-Mobile -6224 SE 18`h Ave Portland OR 97202 RE: Planning Action #2012-00242 Notice of FWal Decision On March 28, 2012, the Staff Advisor for the Ashland Planning Division administratively approved your request for the following: PLANNING ACTION: 2012-00242 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 E. Main Street APPLICANT: T-Mobile DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval for the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of a new radio cabinet to the existing platform on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. The proposal is to upgrade the existing wireless communication facilities to include 3G wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and parapet. The Staff Advisor's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13`h day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice Of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action by the Staff Advisor as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in the ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). An appeal may not be made directly to the Land Use Board of Appeals. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion'the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. . The' application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at no cost at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Wiiiburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of-Ashland copy fee schedule. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact the Community Development Department between the hours of 8:00 am and 4:30 pm, Monday through Friday at (541) 488-5305. cc: Doug Neuman Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tol: 541-488-5305 = 51 WinbumWay Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wmv.ashland.or.us E I ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: 2012-00242 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 E. Main St. APPLICANT: T-Mobile DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval for the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of a new radio cabinet to the existing platform on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. The proposal is to upgrade the existing wireless communications facilities to include `3G' wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and its parapet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 BC; TAX LOT: 100 SUBMITTAL DATE: February 24, 2012 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: March 7, 2012 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: Match 28, 2012 FINAL DECISION DATE: April 13, 2012 APPEAL DEADLINE: April 12, 2012 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: April 13, 2013 DECISION The subject property, located at 212 East Main Street, is the site of the Ashland Springs Hotel. Originally known as the Lithia Springs Hotel and later the Mark Antony, the ninc-story gothic bearing masonry structure was constructed in 1925 and was for a long time the tallest structure between Portland and San Francisco. The building is a primary contributing resource in Ashland's Downtown Historic District and was individually listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1977. A complete certified rehabilitation was completed after the building was purchased by the current owners for unpaid taxes in 1998. Several wireless communication facilities already exist on the building, including those for Nextel, Verizon Wireless, Voice Stream (now T-Mobile), Master Towers/Sprint, Washington Oregon Wireless (WOW)/U.S. Cellular; and AT&T. The antennas and related wireless equipment are entirely integrated into and concealed by the architecture of the National Register-listed historic building, and each installation has been reviewed and approved by both the City of Ashland and the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Within the C-1-D (Downtown) zoning district, the installation of wireless communication facilities on existing structures is subject to Conditional Use Permit approval as described in AMC 18.72.180.D. Subsequent additions of antennas by a provider are subject only to a'building permit review provided that the modifications do not increase the height of the installation by more than ten feet, that they do not alter the way the installation or the building itself relates to the applicable standards and approvals, and that they do not involve exterior changes to a National Register-listed building or contributing historic resource. In this instance, the addition of a new radio cabinet on the rooftop is considered an exterior modification to a National Register-listed historic building requiring a building permit, and as such the proposal is subject to Site Review approval as required in AMC 18.108.040.A.l.c.viii. The primary considerations for the application have to do with mitigating any adverse impacts of the new cabinet placement on the primary contributing historic building through the cabinet's placement, treatment and screening. PA #2012-00242 212 E Main/dds Page 1 As noted above, the application is a request for Site Review approval to allow the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of a new radio cabinet to the existing platform on the roof, The proposal is intended to upgrade the existing facilities to include `3G' wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building architecture and behind its parapet. The proposed replacement antennas are to be in the same location as the existing antennas and will utilize the existing camouflaging. The application emphasizes that the antennas are not to be visible from surrounding public areas. This application modifies the previously approved Conditional Use Permit (42001-101) for Voice Stream, which was renamed T-Mobile in 2002. The application notes that as part of required federal permitting, the applicants have completed a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Review filing for the proposed site modification which yielded a finding that the proposal met federal standards. The application includes a copy of these findings as Exhibit #3, The application further notes that the facilities are to be installed and maintained according to the requirements of the Building Code, and that .at the time of building permit application, written statements from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Aeronautics Section of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) shall be provided to demonstrate that the proposal complies, or is exempt from, each agency's regulations. The material provided with the application include notice fiom the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) concurred with the applicants finding as part of their NEPA Review that the proposal would have no adverse effect either directly to the existing resource or in its visual appearance. A condition has been included below to require the applicants provide evidence of approval directly from SHPO, including any conditions placed upon the installation, prior to the issuance of a building permit. With regard to the proposed equipment cabinet installation, the application explains that the cabinet is to be located on an existing ten-foot by nine-foot platform on the fourth floor roof which holds T-Mobile's existing equipment and which was designed to accommodate a future cabinet. The new cabinet is described being 61- ,inches by 30-inches by 30-inches and having minimal visual impact, and a photo-simulation of the cabinet as it would appear when viewed from the adjacent public right-of-way is provided as the applicant's Exhibit #4. The cabinet appears to blend almost entirely with existing rooftop equipment due to its size, placement in a location designed for its eventual installation, and treatment with a color selected to blend with the hotel's existing exterior finish. The application also emphasizes that no increase in height of the installation or the building is proposed, and that no additional signage is proposed with the upgrade. The existing signage is noted as being limited to a contact sign consistent with the applicable WCF design standards. In considering the application, staff finds that the proposal remains is in keeping with the applicable city ordinances and the Site Review Chapter, and complies with the both the Site Design and Use Standards and the Development Standards for Wireless Communication Facilities found in AMC 18.72.180. Adequate capacity of city facilities is in place to serve the existing building and the approved wireless communication facility installation and will continue to serve the proposed replacement equipment. As such, it is staff s determination that the applicants have met the criteria for Site Review approval. Staff further finds that because the wireless communications facility installation will remain screened from view through the existing camouflaging measures and through the placement and treatment of the new equipment cabinet, that the proposal will not negatively impact either the Ashland Springs Hotel or the surrounding Downtown district. With the proposals of the applicant and the conditions attached to the approval detailed below, staff finds that the proposal complies with all applicable City ordinances. PA #2012-00242 212 E Mainldds Page 2 i The criteria for Site Review Apps oval are described in AMC Chapter 1..72.070, as follows: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities far water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. Planning Action 2012-00245 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2012-00245 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein, including but not limited to the proposed replacement antennas being located in place of existing antennas and continuing to utilize the camouflaging measures already approved and in place and that the equipment cabinet be as depicted in the applicants submittals including its size, placement and treatment. 2. That all requirements of the initial Conditional Use Permit approval (PA #2001-101) shall remain in effect unless otherwise modified herein. 3. That the applicants shall obtain a building permit. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicants shall provide written statements from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Aeronautics Section of the Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT), and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to demonstrate that the proposal complies with, or is exempt fi•om, each agency's regulations. 4. The applicants shall provide a confirmation letter demonstrating that the proposal has been approved by the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO). Prior to final inspection approval or use of the replacement wireless communication facilities, all SHPO requirements shall be met. March 28th, 2012 MaAa Harris, Planning Division Manager Date Department of Community Development PA #2012-00242 212 E Main/dds Page 3 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 11000 PA-2032-00242 391E09BC 5800 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 5300 145 MAIN STREET LLC ANDERSON ANDRE ASHLAND HISTORIC PROPERTY LLC 24 CROCKER ST PO BOX 3577 437 WILEY ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4400 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 600 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10300 ASHLAND LODGE #944/13 P 0 E BANKE THEODORE H/LOIS E BROWN ERIK/NORTH JAMIE P 0 BOX 569 150 E MAIN 15 N FIRST ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5900 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 700 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5600 BUFFINGTON JANE N CONNOLLY ALLEN CONSERVANCY LLC 1800 SE 10TH AVE SUITE 400 142 E MAIN ST 104 FIRST ST FT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5700 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4500 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5400 CONSERVANCY LLC CRATER NATL BANK OF MEDFORD EDWARDS OREN R 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 PO BOX 810490 219 N MOUNTAIN AVE TALENT OR 97540 DALLAS TX 75381 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10500 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 16500 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5700 GARLAND GERALD G TRUSTEE HARMS ELISA R KELL GEORGE 921 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS CIR 244 HARGADINE ST 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10600 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 100 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4600 KEY BANK OF OREGON MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC NEUMAN PROPERTIES & DEV LLC PO BOX 560807 951 EMIGRANT CREEK RD 951 EMIGRANT CREEK RD DALLAS TX 73556 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E0913C 6201 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4700 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 500 OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSN SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E SCHWEIGER JOHN C TRUSTE FBO PO BOX 158 2773 BUSH ST 1644 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 6000 PA-2012-00242 391F09BA 10900 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4900 SHAW ROGER A TRUSTEE ET AL TEITELBAUM ALBERT TRUSTEE TEITELBAUM JULI F TRUSTEE ET AL 104 FIRST ST 2310 QUAIL POINT CIR 237 ALMOND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 MEDFORD OR 97504 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5000 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 200 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10400 THORMAHLEN PHILIP A TRUSTEE ET AL WILLIAMS FAMILY LLC YAMAOKA RONALD/CARRIE 96 FORK ST 5500 COLVER RD 2422 33RD AVE ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 PA-2012-00242 PA-2012-00242 29 Mike Unger T-Mobile GSS Inc. 3-30-12 6224 SE 18tH Ave 3311 109th St 212 E Main T-Mobile NOD Portland OR 97202 Urbandale, IA 50322 CITY OF Planning Department, 51 Winuum Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland,or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2012.00242 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 292 E. Main Street APPLICANT: T-Mobile DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval for the replacement of three existing antennas with three new antennas, and the addition of a new radio cabinet to the existing platform on the roof of the Ashland Springs Hotel for the property located at 212 East Main Street. The proposal is to upgrade the existing wireless communication facilities to include 3G wireless technology. The total number of antennas is not proposed to increase, and the antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and parapet. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1- D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 09 BC; TAX LOT: 100 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 7, 2012 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 21, 2012 PA #2012-00245 ' qI '212 E MAIN ST t SUBJECT PROPERTY 41 N Prrpeny ii.:es arelrr mlerenee oety. not sratea6re 0 1530 60 Feel The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of renal decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide suffic€ent:specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:kornm-da~~p4ann ng Plann ng ACFion54\otiCing Fa!d2rl~failed Notices & SignsU01252012-90242 docx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.72.070 Criteria for Approval The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A, All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. I 1 1 I Qkamm-doiAplanningTianning ActionsWolicing FAdcr\Maifed Notices & Signs\201212012-00242 dots E, AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 57520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On March 7, 2012 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2012-0024, 212 E Main Street. f Signature of Employee E i i Gkomm-dWplanningTorms & HandoutMffldavit of Mailing_f fanning Action Noke.doc 1 C~ 12, Ic7 CO . / J ®C' LLj % N LLI i' 04 CM I i i h f' l r 14800 IN FOwuanoxTecHNOLOGY `A{}Q ~~i' rr. "iG~00 r, 14000 ii3i~wi3~1 ~14#s00,: ,150 r #i'> F{ Map Maker t r f, 4' r to 2 5 40 d,~ f Application S rr i i l d10 fr l rr Property Data Online Logo rid r • 14001 300/ °'i{ •"~i~ ; f Highlighted Featuro 47 13400 120U ' r i ~•U4#AU r~ilfk~i 1450! 134!~i(! iho8uiter 11 y~ -11300 i r-` / r [ r °Y { i ;r _ t r< {j} i(1 t the8ulferTar et ji3o ri4141 tit + #iU' rr~3i ' ; ;i60fj' t Tax LotOuIJ Ines frf 5 fi~~~~ -11000 - rat 11~tF(1~#2400. ~ 6+'- r ~ - 1f i 1r 7 11 Tax Lot Numbers ;22~l1. r 1 - { ' 1 f. ' } .,10100 40 ' ' I 1 ~s0b r 2U4kU. l rr I F`~~r' f 1 i iOO6 aJII 'i0d041 ~ifl00rr 4260 ;~r r 115410 ,r~i~at~ I .s r - _ 1.- i 14204 10100 ' S760 I +ll~r r`' 13000 75 r' r fi 7441 S1Qi}.-~ f'' 1'. _~✓~jy `',r ' !D 141041, ' - ~ i4~4~ >.ii~U~►r ~-010#1 t y~ ' ~i Q1 3(~3i 00 f 14 r t13{Ml ' s r f < '1000 44001",- C z, 50 4 jioo,~ 4(r i ,1#ff41 .20 ' 1801' r , r r 4,1tie • rqr 800 281 r' 1 3700 l~a..-.. t 00 43041 100 ° r iUll 104 4W)D 42 F <i f 360 } I 54}1? 470 00, r i ~ ~ tlG ti I 1 ; `4804). I} ~J 5 ~i t f i k 24 ;r4 04 5404 %of) r~, - ' arY'v F 7 1 r4200,:d i 7Ut1 Stt{1{) ~40 61$1;x'.. r k,tti i4i41fi40 r3a4t{}{l 0lQ4t ' 834 pi f~' t ! 1G54Q 57041 ' 841 814N) 1630" 58 41 I `k I` .7 6201 164th , 3001 x8041 ,i 3' 7005 f410 78412, 1 ? i02f]ti _ ! 6700 a 70 700 l' 744141 l 07 101 i{12410}~.`t 770 501 , . i S80k1-,.. J 10300 i ! r r iSS} ir0d}41.__ I i•. !SH} - 30:- ' 15A0U- a.. " s I 151410 _ ~ i 1501. 1 ( J i2 400 r 840 14 14D r F ~1i001 , I1 L 47 i~r 1 I fI I, 1 0a0 440 I1 300 fib } ! i46~ ` +~0 700 120 Q 54 120d1.r` e r i i 800 10 341 I 14 u0 ' f300, JACKSON l 1 s' 1140,0 10401. 6 01~ COUNTY r T I 79041 454}(1 o r e g o ll 4Y4Fi~ , - ' ~ r 1p110 _ ~ I 1P ! 301 9410 0200 U's ' r 1T of 15 3031` 1154 3 iU34H3 ' ~ .y'JAiAi canp~d by based co etyfromava cr t}1U41h' vortex. Jackson Caicnywnnot accept L o surcev7yfor cksoor,c '.ssbns,or ~~F ~I `r post nalacwracy.Trw ereno v,anan€es, expressed or Iwp5ed. Ple axe recycle x4h cclwed ef`a yra~e paper Cree!ed v.S!h Nap?Jaker Nap vea'.ed on 3:'Gr2012 f20617 PM us'nB nab Jacksonc0uny,org _ PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 11000 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5800 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 5300 145 MAIN STREET LLC ANDERSON ANDRE ASHLAND HISTORIC PROPERTY LLC 24 CROCKER ST PO BOX 3577 437 WILEY ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E098D 4400 PA-2012-00242 391E096C 600 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10300 ASHLAND LODGE #944/8 P 0 E BANKS THEODORE H/LOIS E BROWN ERIK/NORTH JAMIE P 0 BOX 569 150 E MAIN 15 N FIRST ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5900 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 700 PA-2012-00242 391EO98C 5600 BUFFINGTON JANE N CONNOLLYALLEN CONSERVANCY LLC 1800 SE 10TH AVE SUITE 400 142 E MAIN ST 104 FIRST ST FT LAUDERDALE FL 33316 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5700 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4500 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5400 CONSERVANCY LLC CRATER NATL BANK OF MEDFORD EDWARDS OREN R 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 PO BOX 810490 219 N MOUNTAIN AVE TALENT OR 97540 DALLAS TX 75381 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E0913A 10500 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 16500 PA-2012-00242 391E096C 5700 GARLAND GERALD G TRUSTEE HARMS ELISA R KELL GEORGE 921 MOUNTAIN MEADOWS CIR 244 HARGADINE ST 333 MOUNTAIN VIEW ESTS 78 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10600 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 100 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4600 KEY BANK OF OREGON MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC NEUMAN PROPERTIES & DEV LLC PO BOX 560807 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD DALLAS TX 73556 ASHLAND OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 6201 PA-2012-00242 391E09BD 4700 PA-2012-00242 391EO93C 500 OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL ASSN SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E SCHWEIGER JOHN C TRUSTE FBO PO BOX 158 2773 BUSH ST 1644 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94115 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 6000 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10900 PA-2012-00242 391E096D 4900 SHAW ROGER A TRUSTEE ET AL TEITELBAUM ALBERTTRUSTEE TEITELBAUM JULI F TRUSTEE ET AL 104 FIRST ST 2310 QUAIL POINT CIR 237 ALMOND ST ASHLAND OR 97520 MEDFORD OR 97504 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 5000 PA-2012-00242 391E09BC 200 PA-2012-00242 391E09BA 10400 THORMAHLEN PHILIP A TRUSTEE ET AL WILLIAMS FAMILY LLC YAMAOKA RONALD/CARRIE 96 FORK ST 5500 COLVER RD 2422 33RD AVE ASHLAND OR 97520 TALENT OR 97540 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94116 27 3-6-12 212 E Main T-Mobile NOC FA'q1 (obilk I February 21, 2012 Derek Severson, Associate Planner City of Ashland, Department of Community Development c/o 20 East Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 Subject: Site Plan Review Application at 212 East Main Street Dear Mr. Severson, Please accept the attached request for a site plan review. I have attached the following- • Completed and signed application form • Required $1,013 fee • Site and elevation plan (2 copies) • Findings of fact (2 copies) • Photo of the proposed equipment (2 copies) • SHPO/NEPA report (2 copies) • Photosimulation of the proposed installation (2 copies) • Pre-app conference notes (2 copies) Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information. Thank you for your assistance. Regards, Mike Un Tr 6224 SE8t"Avenue u Portland, OR 97202 206-604-5538 FFIB) i. E E r 1f.1 I ~m ,1Mle Proposal T-Mobile proposes to upgrade its existing wireless site to include 3G wireless technology. The upgrade involves replacing three existing antennas with three new antennas. The total number of antennas will not increase. In addition, a new radio cabinet will be added to the existing platform on the roof. Plans depicting the proposed site design are provided as Exhibit 1 The antennas will continue to be completely camouflaged within the building and parapet. The proposed replacement antennas will be in the same location as the existing antennas and utilize the existing camouflaging. The replacement antennas will not be visible to surrounding public areas. An additional radio cabinet will be added on the roof. The cabinet is 61" tall by 30" wide by 30" deep. A picture of the cabinet is provided as Exhibit 2. 18.72.070 Criteria for Approval The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. Section 18.72.180(D) provides the design standard for wireless communication facilities. Below are findings related to the proposal's consistency with city requirements. 1. General Provisions a. All facilities shall be installed and maintained in compliance with the requirements of the Building Code. At the time of building permit application, written statements from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the Aeronautics Section of the Oregon Department of Transportation, and the Federal Communication Commission that the proposed wireless communication facility complies with regulations administered by that agency, or that the facility is exempt from regulation. Findings: T-Mobile will be filing for a building permit. T-Mobile underwent a new NEPA frling for the proposed site modification. The NEPA filing concluded that proposal meets federal standard. The NEPA report is attached as Exhibit 3. Therefore, the criteria are met. b. All associated transmittal equipment must be housed in a building, above or below ground level, which must be designed and landscaped to achieve minimal visual impact with the SUrrounding environment. Findings: The proposed equipment cabinet will be located on the roof of the building on an existing platform that is holding T-Mobile's existing equipment. The new cabinet will have a very minimal visual impact. A photosimulation showing the proposed cabinet from the public right-of-way is attached as Exhibit 4. Therefore, the criteria are met. Site NnnibeTY003744A Site Name: Ashland Springs Findings of Fact i c, Wireless communication facilities shall be exempted from height limitations imposed in each zoning district. Findings: Wireless facilities are exempted from the height limit of the zone. Nevertheless, T-Mobile's equipment will not increase the height of the existing building. Therefore, the criteria are rnet. d. WCF shall be installed at the minimum height and mass necessary for its intended use. A submittal verifying the proposed height and mass shall be prepared by a licensed engineer. Findings: T-Mobile will continue to use its existing camouflaged antenna location. The equipment will be placed on the existing platform that was designed to accommodate a future cabinet. Therefore, the criteria are met. e. Signage for wireless communication facilities shall consist of a maximum of two non-illuminated signs, with a maximum of two square feet each stating the name of the facility operator and a contact phone number. Findings: T-Mobile current has a "con tact sign" consistent with city standards. No additional signage is proposed, Therefore, the criteria are rnet f Applicant is required to remove all equipment and structures from the site and return the site to its original condition, or condition as approved by the Staff Advisor, if the facility is abandoned for a period greater than six months. Removal and restoration must occur within 90 days of the end of the six month period. Findings: T-Mobile will comply with the removal requirement. Therefore, the criteria are met. 2. Preferred Designs a. Where possible, the use of existing WCF sites for new installations shall be encouraged. Collocation of new facilities on existing facilities shall be the preferred option. b. If (a) above is not feasible, WCF shall be attached to pre-existing structures, when feasible. c. If (a) or (b) above are not feasible, alternative structures shall he used with design features that conceal, camouflage or mitigate the visual impacts created by the proposed WCF. d. If (a), (b), or (c) listed above are not feasible, a monopole design shall be used with the attached antennas positioned in a vertical manner to lessens the visual impact compared to the antennas in a platform design. Platform designs shall be used only if it is shown that the use of an alternate attached antenna design is not feasible. e. Lattice towers are prohibited as freestanding wireless communication support structures. - Findings: T-Mobile will continue its existing camouflaged design, Therefore, the criteria are met-. Site Number. PO037ddA Site None: Ashland Springs Findings off act 3. Landscaping. The following standards apply to all WCF with any primary or accessory equipment located on the ground and visible from a residential use or the public right-of-way a. Vegetation and materials shall be selected and sited to produce a drought resistant landscaped area. b. The perimeter of the WCF shall be enclosed with a security fence or wall. Such barriers shall be landscaped in a manner that provides a natural sight obscuring screen around the barrier to a ininimum height of six feet. c. The outer perimeter of the WCF shall have a 10 foot landscaped buffer zone. d. The landscaped area shall be irrigated and maintained to provide for proper growth and health of the vegetation. e. One tree shall be required per 20 feet of the landscape buffer zone to provide a continuous canopy around the perimeter of the WCF. Each tree shall have a caliper of 2 inches, measured at breast height, at the time of planting. Findings: All of T-Mobile's wireless facility is located on top or within the building. Landscape screening is not required. Therefore, the criteria are rnet. 4. Visual Impacts a. Antennas, if attached to a pre-existing or alternative structure shall be integrated into the existing building architecturally and, to the greatest extent possible, shall not exceed the height of the pre-existing or alternative structure. b. Wireless communication facilities shall be located in the area of minimal visual impact within the site which will allow the facility to function consistent with its purpose. c. Antennas, if attached to a pre-existing or alternative structure shall have a non- reflective finish and color that blends with the color and design of the structure to which it is attached. d. WCF, in any zone, must be set back from any residential zone a distance equal to twice its overall height. The setback requirement may be reduced if, as determined by the Hearing Authority, it can be demonstrated through findings of fact that increased mitigation of visual impact can be achieved within of the setback area. Underground accessory equipment is not subject to the setback requirement. e. Exterior lighting for a WCF is permitted only when required by a federal or state authority. f. All wireless communication support structures must have a non-reflective finish and color that will mitigate visual impact, unless otherwise required by other government agencies. g. Should it be deemed necessary by the Hearing Authority for the mitigation of visual impact of the WCF, additional design measures may be required. These May iactude, Site Nuntkr:P003744A Site Name: Ashland Springs Findings ofFacl ' but are not limited to: additional camouflage materials and designs, facades, specific colors and materials, masking, Findings: T-Mobile will continue its antenna camouflage. The proposed radio cabinet will be located on the existing rooftop platform. A photosimulation of the installation is attached as Exhibit 4. The equipment cabinet that is 61"x 30" X30" will have a very minimal visual impact from the public right- of-way. Therefore, the criteria are met. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will he met. Findings: As discussed above, T-Mobile's proposed site modification is in conformance with the city's wireless communication facilities. This demonstrates conformance with the city's site design requirements. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. Findings: T-Mobile conducted a pre-application conference with the city. Notes from the conference are attached as Exhibit 5. T-Mobile is not aware of additional site design standards not previously discussed. Therefore, the criteria are met. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. (Ord. 2655, 1991; Ord 2836 S6,1999) Findings: T-Mobile's installation does not require water or sewer. Access to the facility is available through the building. Therefore, the criteria are rnet Exhibits 1. Zoning drawings/site plan 2. Picture of the equipment cabinet 3. SHPO/NEPA report 4. Photosimulation of the building 5. Pre-app conference notes it I Site NuntberP003744A Site Name: Ashland Springs Findings of Fact Exhibit Z Photo of Proposed Cabinet 1 r ~ ~.S7Y `Avi3t, {FFilA3 i Ww ,A~k! F ! - .slaw i~~xi F ~ d. fff ~ I r. 3 df. S' 7 r Y tom" LL - ~ ~~I 1 1" 6 i r'rRR~~ [ of y 9s_ t Y T Fj -Wlk T ~ a j IS j .q =r :3 t o 3 A-A X~Yl ~i Sr i d , t ~I 0 tb a p y ~ j S I 1€ 44 l 1. f ~s7 ~ , „~C1~• `~r r,~,~ , ~ t 0 "lot tjr tit rr~ 3s PP, a ~ - i ~ ~ Ll1 ppq p{ co so VVV= :K W Imo. 0 T, III CD o F -u's 02 NCD cL FL 9 SZ, i 10, h ~ 5 N v 1 a i a t "A 5 1 t 4 I I r1 ie-•~ yea ` - y _ ,vest= ~ "~+3 ! it N1 t k.r o a P Yfi m _ 4 U3 -E 0 jZE ,4 0 n +o o+n CL co. t ~tny Ilt a f Axe y 1 I a to yi a fo l E r m 'I '3 3 0 _ 'ffo o 0 0 A 'A N " VI p tell S{' Q it v+g U. T M 1 . } ! 3 o U =1 CL 41 .04 yT ~Q w L a ~ f : h N Q~, If Kill F I PRE J(E} J.~;~~ kh - 1, k{ N § rf ~j / ! j ' mac: r MAI, ti '~`~_~~~~~1 ~rti 1 Ii. 1 ii S ~s trt ty~' r l i-1 lit-F-1 1 , v) } r-ll i ~ ~ ~ v I ~ K I ~ 1 ~ 1 1 arr.. i ~ 'S ~s ~ , t t 1 is 1 1,` i • t 1 It gg ~e f 1 f ~ i I o °v y tts tn r) 0 . I% Zi Q ~Wj ~ o th w 9.0 tic ~'^f ~ ~ I ir4 y tr' { 01 E it {mss ~ ~ 1 ~ 1 „ - r i c3 a {O) -0 ~ i a MZ6 2i0'ONVIHSV '133UJ.S NFM 3 ZIZ Y w'"x a' ~XXw po o a ryx~x ~x S1Wn - SE)NIbIdS CINVIHSV zO }},,5}ll~~ s „ tla~.,nos m sl L soda s 3 a mx °N~ g ~x~.~aa ~F~ Sinn - V"LE00d -o 2m I 5 o mov'~3~a-2u'4anu'mmm 1£ES-LSE (fOS) abG-eGt (os) xe! Q Lu ( 3 `o kiiL6No `POONod Y9i a,!.s aOs mlBmgaeM 35 LOT ZfZ<o 0--4NOO.. E o- olNV NOHdUaod W m Zm F caam,Sn3 Two 0£S 3 m '12UTS 9 Ml 3'N OZSI Lu m P ~ sa>c!aoxw 3uTq-:) wo C7 O z . ollqoW _ _ a ° U- W J ° O g W Wz Q W' W > Q <i > m XW Z OR oz= o ° a o ¢ ? ° oM w v~ ZOO Lw m M N ¢ > ~p Ld z w Jw w w W w J w co > z z z J ~m - z o 0 0 "~m~ Q o= Z C, cc ~O ° z z z i'OQ° N ol_ 'O wpQ - z~ z o 0 o z~ ~ f... ~ 0 0, p O O' p z z ~ ° W Of F-C.~ S W tY~ ~J :2i Or 2 W g W= W W `LW Jz N OKZ CD W O Z Z Z.- Z U C7 F-> W U ZF-,_ W C' dQ>plr WY~(r of ~1- Z Ntr ptr pK x <y6 L V W 2 Q . Z C Z C7 U V Z V W WIZ W Q p W U W W P ; cc r v u i 6 r< od o o N (n ❑ W I I I a a m I o _ N O W v N M W o - N S ~6y w o W @~ z = ' N Q Q ~WY Z M IL 1_ Y Y 2 m I.Y O 0) N g E g K ~ I~ V ` K W z n ® U Z lY = ~ V - ¢ Z z ~ s U CU 5 w ° L ® ON o ® U p O a_ W Z H Lo oo w ao C5 w W ~ z w ~ tf) M cD M Z J U a O i Q U z VJt6q ? ¢ J N oz rl O O W W W I d WW W Z O Z U ~s~ I,J co U+ J m U ° U W 1 C3' W Lld W I z vJ I- Z~ c'N zc°p F- z~ Z Q Z/' O¢ ovo o= so a O°znzp~ O Z CC S ~ Q ~ ~ Y O m 0 Y O N J O H Q U Q Q. O Q L-j ~L W U N g O' ¢ W V7 Q (nJU x 0 ~L (n vl O ocn~ j U ID Z L, <W O C0 LU wY ¢ a z O o 0 0 a- z<TW JO Z ® L k-- C O Z z U > > Q LLJ Z I- cl) U U! Lj (0- C3 W ~ CL W mZ U p Z° W U _j U Q I..L Z O W Jr ~°~Z Z Z W J O :2V) V)Qp JJ y ~OO O O W O (L' I X ~ 7) O X Ir Z Q aU N U N W W W m WILW IL Q o C w z ¢ x U Z ~ W Z Q w Z Z N Q ¢ < O T U v$ W- m Z cn °x F C%j ~ J w t- ~ zIw-w Q o 0:~ o g N z < gw [n L~jN N:2 - "W- W IY o W= o o p N Z d- N U r W W Z Q H O z N ~7- m W O iv ^ c~ N 1L W V) W = O ~cn wj ZO S = ow (D o Z c)f(n¢ ? W Q w U U) Q ¢Z D m } tZ Z w O F= U - S So z ° In w Z O - U U L J I- Z Q F-- cn ¢ Z q < ~,j w I- L_ I- z _ c.~ V Q o O ~o d. h w mv>~ U U Q L'-¢ Z Z Q Z Z v Lil o Z Z o C.~Z O° W Z W O U W W 4i 'Z Z¢ Z W LJ I~ C, W ° o z U W W¢ U W ¢ C7 L- g L,J g w r O s 5 z! z w Y o o 13 z a- n O H N Nv F- p = NNN O l o= O U G ~ o (r I-Z O W cc n¢ N Q L Q N¢ N U O U Ud O n- W g 0 0 7 N M a Y O J m Z W 5 ~ a Z < 33 g w ~ ~ o t I I i _l z N CL fl O ¢ J °W o W Z x z w z < o w w F- CL o W W ? W Z C ti v 6 w C6 OZ91.6 HO'(3NtlIHSV'133HIS NIVIN 3 ZIZ w °a ,"r ~a O ,o -d,, ' I,w ~a I I.e S1Wf1 - SUNIHdS ®NVIHSV Sim - v"Lsood Jg $ g 4 voa soa-smm . ICES-LSC(Sos) >w£-xi xd 4Q a vo ° b1ZLb TIO`Va^I1.u•d'S9Z afi^5'+a°pS aNSa!9.M 7 ZCZG6 N003NS L01 -lrO2(£0ccaOStO) NVNai- Y ll210d W W U elaam80g INO 0£5 UIS'JMW ON 1 3N 009t > F ollqoW m N \ w / \ o o w ~ ~ ^_I o o!, d N 0 ~il- C Q \ / II Q~\ ~ w I gpre W F Z p ° J a / G w W 0 ~ 9 a w p O W O' , K~K °~LL \ xj ~z ¢WF¢tnJ Qw FO ¢ZWU u w Z ~0;. /I p x 3 V j o \ owo o. oz6 wazx: waw°° y '-'o azo ° azo°z ,~w, <iZCn o w p f 1 = Jz °ooo U 00 o wZU wN-w00 mw CW?ry x 'O~ / / g J K J w0_,yw ova owm~zN®®®o u 0¢ V Z 0. ~C w O 0 o U U g W° Z O U g W O< N g Q ~a zJ z Ij zz U~a° FU~„NC p °g ° zl- 0 0 • Nw F 3 N 3a~~Ww 3a~¢zp 3yyW\y~ FQ F~ / / wlwo pJ® g fA f- / / Qlgz W¢/W ZH.- ZK g Z L ~Fw ® W W~ W~\ WK Wg X1' M I MO Z IYp • -Gi~E3 \ O w ~ 100 ®e \ \ T ® \ U \ \ ~o.ZOZ Q \ OU°p, ?vZ Q Z O / Q ' . ' _ocnw ~ 3~m W O:z zm~~ti .Ug X04. JOGaJO IL z N \ Km SNw / n~ \ \N J N \ / r N \ o Jo Nz ZIP oi°o°o \ \ ¢ U V O \ \ \all / / \ \ ( Z J \ \ / Zoe NW Z Z Z Z \ W W of OWywj o OZI Otn 0o O OiwWOWw OZ S~.Z~, G Fw SQ 2O=Q °Ofn GK FU NWZNSOm NWQ hQONO_ NZ !-J O~ 4gF-QF~Z Z~UZ HWJW° N FWSW ~z F Z ].O ¢O ~Z V~°=w2WU° / \ \ zr azw Kw ~<n G~-z ~z J~rn ~y mz z3 Z a a a F-p F v~- rczrw-o F- OZZ z3 z= zy iNO?w zW o~ .Z < ~`nx s1,1 -'11v°-, "'zz zN z 'zosz a~ ¢F Z¢ W °awo~zcsiw'- 4aci ¢ a a~ awg¢N~ y4 a F 1o GZ °wSO \ \ \ Z W>IwGW6W° ~y~.IQa W~¢QKQSI'AQ ~KQ N~Z >I°iKW ~NYCOUOL-~W W \ S Q¢,KO_0:~ Q F >'o~-OO OI- ol- p~-NOI-°~.Icol-o~°W oz3°w~i¢o~a ® zp \ gW- oI-", av zG-za^zQ za° Go a ¢ z oFw wzcn~ zrt-emu °Z 0: ~zzfn 'O~°FO:a~°zUN°VZaz- Z 'o N ~.~o41w~°zw~aw~£c~z,~4°z<~w °0_F~~~yf[F ¢-ZZI-Iy-ZaWl-~ Uw ¢ W 6 a W Z Q W a w 0_Q w K a W I- Q W K a W° G w N U Q fG U Z G Q 0 0 N N U w ~w ~o~LLa~"~w~W W~wwmw~w z~m~W W a~i @ O IC W o N W O W w 0 O W O O w 0 0 W O J W O O w O O a Z O W W N W N O W 7- O N 58 01. 9 a~°_aF°¢ °u~_¢~°¢(r o°aw = .'-<a~m X.o 1= O arc W n m m ^ li a WgLs UO UNVIHStl'133211S NFVW'3 ZIZ S1Wf1 - SON18dS ONV7HStl .w .~zros o,".o a saw sI anti ~~x~ ~sl"I a:~ SiWfl-tl4VLE00d OFZ § sy~ moo.eva-su~g--. tLESLaE(Eos) ooos°f-Cie~(cos))aNOHa Qg ¢Lu a ~o blZfb NO `P-I110d'S9Z S']a~➢$ o -!g~TM 3S LOI Z£ZL6 N043b0 QNNFHI ry Q Q V o s>.z -3 IwD m uns *mm b w 3'N OOSI 'yy J Ill axeumw Su.TgmD uocl E W Q c, ._.at® ~mP - M i '1111 1 - I- I N I I I I I I I I I I II I I II I ~'I I z I I I ¢ UZw ' VZ Z xZ } I I= _ ¢o¢owJ rz rC az - a ,I. = ZOO_ZW Z¢ ¢ < FZ I-H KW co Q QzXOaWa hw ¢w ~w Imaz FO¢' ag~W o~wQ LL zwzz~a w~ do: WD: a.z w z W~zozo_ azl x~ ow O oFN o 00 0 °O ¢ 00~ ¢O ISO O > o Z Z `o . - I- F- o: l- o z co - o:l- D i- o I,. O¢¢g o¢c ¢ ~ X fA . I ~VI ~¢Z-WI V! -N Zy Q J F III ¢ ¢ ~ N~ oz ~~,.'°-M 1 I;z z II vFiw OC ~ow~s ~Q ° w ~W¢ 9¢ Z W Fr 1. azl ..FZ F w¢ O LN z mn wa zJ NZ z w° I o ~z y O ¢ m III XU w¢ U¢F w¢ _ LL I 111 LW w S W o f- CV n j, zo II_ o.s, 0 w ° aWZN w ¢ ¢ ICI oz oQ o~ Fz TFQ z ~z wz~z li ow Nr zQO. o< o =o ZZm I I I, Urc F o goo xJ NQo° ~ ZZI, a z¢aa ur I F I w ~ I Z I I I I I I cc I I O I '3 J ' I ! LL y I.- LO Z O y W U Z i z¢ F ~ ¢zw boo a za Z X cg ~W °UOU °-~VO WZ wz N~ .N OFD O~aZ Om O2 w~a O~NZ O U- Om OZ O II p001- gU EQ JOOU 6$IQO LLOI- ww ~Z D: Z ZQZ ZWZ FWxW 3Nm !ZW Z I~ VU F~F- y N Q FV¢ ZwZ zo Z~ NO "Ld x'oo x.lw¢ 5- 5, w¢o¢ ~o~ 'xm xao aK a U I Q _ I Z _ Vh I CL JO a ¢ F 111 D: W zzz Na Cl) LII Ill m O Z o~ a < CL ° a vP 0 O ~ h a ¢ o LL /pp~J O W cw°i o o °Q '41). I" O a Q ¢ar- „¢z w y LL o°oa z g zzz zwo _1 F Z W OZS16 80'®NVIHSV'133KS Nrow 3 ZLZ a3 z o H a„m a slwn - sJNlads UNVIHSV h o o aw moo„ s siwn - V"LSOOd z $ S o woa' 3oa-3mgsnP'.whx, I££S'LS£(EOS) 0 9(£0 ))3NOHd O e o tlZL6 )40 'P=rvod'S92 Dims-s uol2m.g MHs LO[ y Z£ZLB 0 i Q V 'N mtl saie,0os'a~8 Iwo Oft 3LD53.2llS O 'NMI 3 7N DNI q °<4~7 aoQ ' ~ J ~ ollqoW ~W ~m N m 00 o w ~ ~ ~ bboo ryo ~ ¢ a ~ 'o y i~o° ziwww by%y~~ yzy~o v,aazi J ¢TKF~ zTO3 ~~0 ~Npaz W I... Q`~ ~OUa2 ouwiaaaz" ~ N Q 0 Qw w'? W N W a aJ w~ rn o zQ¢d F mw w<n o Um¢d mzm"' <az <z- O.z p O F z 3r Fw J zawz it m N w \ Z \ ¢ + V ' I' W 2 ~ Z a Z V D=¢ wa ¢ 0000 00 w'n 0,1 / C a®m® Q CO F W OpN 0.N n X O - co W Z p O W~ =O:. w O w~ Q oaQz lL gu also 00 zw~O zooo Z ZO ~O F ZI wU G Z O Z W 2 J W V z 1 OQ~OONG U¢ O 4 Z Z Z O N ¢ w f U? Z O a K OV Z xQirc izzLZZO Fio n.m m~ nom.¢ v m Z moz~ Q i¢~i-' ¢o.c~m °m of ~o~ w a o o ~`cw~ zw zc6r-lnz F~a _zac> ¢FN awz ~z o Q rnzWai> W Z J¢ _ x z,,!., g O K O F J i<~K pw~FN~, W W 'amozFm oz oa wa z W I. y o ~~o .z o F F o zr-mo W 3a 3n.wow3 z - F ~ ~X O. z~i~omoo F W 3 rn PA 3~ Q z w z w W r=wz~ i SHPO and TCNS REVIEW CHECKLIST 4 Site Number: P003744A Site Name: Ashland Springs Site Address: Rooftop Installation at 212 E Main Street, Ashland, OR 97520 Potential Federal Communications Commission Im act NEPA Category Yes No 1. Will the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archeology, engineering or, culture that are listed, or potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places? 2. Will the facility affect Indian religious sites? ✓ 3. If not categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RF exposure, would the proposed facility potentially cause human exposure to ✓ levels of RF radiation in excess of the limits specified in the FCC's rules? Based on the "No" responses to all of the above categories, it is not necessary to prepare and file an Environmental Assessment with the Federal Communications Commission for the proposed undertaking. Preparer's Signature: Preparer's Name (Printed): Lindsay Mico Preparer's Title: Senior Environmental Scientist Company Name: Adapt Engineering, Inc. Date: January 25, 2012 Adapt Engineering, Inc. 101725 5W Barbur Blvd., Ste, 200 r Portland, Oregon 97219 Tel(503)892-2346 Fax (503) 892-2348 `.•a ? ] ; www.adaptengr.com January 25, 2012 i>1 Adapt Project No. OR11-17532-NEPA_ T-Mobile 1500 NE Irving Street Suite 530 Portland, Oregon 97232 Attention: Laura Carvajal Subject: National Environmental Policy Act Review Proposed Cellular Rooftop Antenna Collocation P003744AIAshland Springs 212 E Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 Dear Ms. Carvajal: Adapt Engineering, Inc. (Adapt) is pleased to present the results of the NEPA Review for the above-referenced T-Mobile project. Authorization to perform this project was given in the form of the T-Mobile Corporation purchase order number 4550767908. The NEPA review addresses whether the "facility" may have a significant environmental effect on eight actions or categories as outlined in the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) NEPA Rules [47 CFR Part I, Subpart 1, 1.1307 (a) (1) through (8)]. The eight actions include: wilderness areas; wildlife preserves; threatened-endangered species and critical habitats; historical properties; Indian religious sites; flood plains; surface features including wetlands deforestation, and water diversion; and high intensity white lights. The FCC NEPA Rules, however, categorically excludes from environmental processing projects where antennas will be mounted or collocated on an existing building or tower. The exclusion (47 CFR Part 1, Subpart 1, Section 1.1306 Note 1) reads as follows: The provisions of §1.1307(x) of this part requiring the preparation of Environmental Assessments (EAs) do not encompass the mounting of antenna(s) on an existing building or antenna tower unless §1.1307(a)(4) of this part is applicable. Such antennas are subject to §1.1307(b) of this part and require EAs if their construction would result in human exposure to radiofrequency radiation in excess of the applicable health and safety guidelines cited in §1,1307(b) of this part. The provisions of §1.1307 (a) and (b) of this part do not encompass the installation of aerial wire or cable over existing aerial corridors of prior or permitted use or the underground installation of wire or cable along existing underground corridors of prior or permitted use, established by the applicant or others. The use of existing buildings, towers or corridors is an environmentally desirable T-{Mobile P003744AIAshland Springs January 23, 2012 Adapt Project No. OR11-17532-NEPA Page 2 Ida pt Engineering, Inc. alternative to the construction of new facilities and is encouraged. The provisions of §1.1307(a) and (b) of this part do not encompass the construction of new submarine cable systems. In addition, according to the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement For The Collocation Of Wireless Antennas (Collocation Agreement), dated March 16, 2001, antenna collocations on rooftops may occur without review under the consultation process set forth under subpart B of 36 CFR Part 800 if the building or structure is not over 45 years old, not registered as a national historic landmark or located within 250-feet of a historical district and the collocation licensee or tower owner has not received written notification of a public complaint turned into the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO), or the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (the Council). With respect to the conditions listed above, Adapt has determined that the host property building is 87 years old and is listed in the National Register of Historic Places. Since the project involves the collocation of antennas and equipment on an existing building known to be listed in the National Register of Historic Places, the proposed action requires section 106 assessment and form 621 submittal was triggered. These require consideration of the following NEPA issues: historical properties; Indian religious sites; and human exposure to radiofrequency radiation. 1.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at 212 E Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 and is a roof top installation within downtown Ashland on the Ashland Springs Hotel. The Ashland Springs Hotel is a nine- story tower located in downtown Ashland. When it opened to the public in 1925, the hotel was known as the Lithia Springs Hotel. In 1961, the name was changed to The Mark Antony to capitalize on the success of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. A 3998 renewal resulted in the name change to the Ashland Springs Hotel. At just over 120 feet in height, the Ashland Springs Hotel is the tallest structure in town. According to construction drawings (dated 10112111) the project is to replace three stealth antennas on the Ashland Springs Hotel. The original rehabilitation of the hotel was done with the intention of providing accommodation for cellular antennas; therefore, the antenna housings are invisible from the street. The replacement antennas would go in the existing antenna housings. Also proposed is an additional equipment cabinet to be added_ to an,._exi ng- equipment platform on the rooftop of the west wing. The ground elevation is 1940' AMI~+`,L' ahd- the height of tallest antenna is 119' (agl). (Appendix A-Project Location Maps; Appendix F Construction Drawings) 2.0 NEPA REVIEW ACTIONS G 1. May the facility affect districts, sites, buildings, structures, or objects significant in American history, architecture, archaeology, engineering or culture that are listed or are eligible to be listed in the National Register of Historic Places? No. Adapt completed a Section 106 Review of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1996 and 36 CFR 800 to assess whether the proposed facility will have an effect on properties listed on, or eligible for listing on, the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). The review included the submittal of an FCC Form 621 and cover report to the Oregon State T-Mobile P003744AIAshland Springs January 23, 2012 Adapt Project No. ORI 1-1 7532-NEPA Page 2 Adapt En ineerin inc. Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) that addressed the effect of the proposed undertaking on historic properties within direct and visual Areas of Potential Effect (APE). The review concluded there would be no adverse effect to historic properties within the APE for direct effects or visual effects. Adapt forwarded an FCC Form 621 (dated December 15, 2011) to SHPO with those conclusions. Julie Osborne (Historic Preservation Specialist) responded with a January 12, 2012 TCNS notice concurring with the conclusion that the proposed project would have "No Adverse Effect" on historic properties, eligible historic properties, or potentially eligible historic properties. As the project would not require ground disturbance, no archeological assessment was required or conducted. Additionally, no comment was received from Oregon SHPO archeologists within the standard 30 day response window. (Appendix B---SHPO Submittal & Response; Appendix C---Public Notice) 2. May the facility affect Indian religious sites? No. Section IV of the Nationwide Programmatic Agreement for Review of Effects on Historic Properties for Certain Undertakings Approved by the FCC (Nationwide Agreement) addresses the responsibility to carry out consultation with any Indian tribe that attaches religious and cultural significance to an historic property if the property may be affected by an FCC undertaking. On behalf of T-Mobile, Adapt notified the following tribes of the proposed rooftop antenna installation on November 25, 2011 (TCNS # 81052): 1. Fallon Paiute-Shoshone Tribe 2. Confederated Tribes of the John Day 3. Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians F L ^ I-i 1 4. Siletz Tribe 5. Burns-Paiute 6. Klamath Tribes 7. Yakama Nation Six of the seven Indian tribes provided a reply via TCNS and email, or the tribe has a TCNS exclusion that has been satisfied. The Umpqua and Siletz tribes did not reply to the initial TCNS notification or to a second notification sent via U.S. Postal Service. Both tribes were subsequently referred to the FCC for government-to-government consultation in accordance with FCC-TCNS protocol. The Umpqua tribe followed up with a response of "no interest"via TCNS. The Siletz tribe did not provide a statement of interest to Adapt or the FCC within 20 calendar days of the government-to-government consultation and therefore T-Mobile has fulfilled its responsibility under Section IV of the Nationwide Agreement to carry out consultation with Indian tribes concerning the proposed undertaking. It should be noted that SHPO requires that during construction activities, if archaeological or historic materials are discovered, work in the immediate area must be discontinued, the area secured, and the appropriate Indian tribe(s) and SHPO notified. (Appendix D-Tribal Consultation) 3. If not categorically excluded from routine environmental evaluation for RIF exposure, would the proposed facility potentially cause human exposure to levels of RF radiation in excess of the limits specified in the FCC's rules? T-Mobile P003744A/Ashland Springs January 23, 2012 Adapt Project No. ORi 1-17532-NEPA Page 3 E Adapt Engineering, Inc. No. Based on the T-Mobile report "Site Analysis of Radio Frequency Electromagnetic Fields, Site Number: P003744K the proposed facility will not cause human exposure to levels of RF radiation in excess of the limits specified in the FCC's rules. (Appendix G--Site RF Analysis) 3.0 CONCLUSIONS In conclusion, it is Adapt's opinion the proposed T-Mobile facility will have no significant effect on above-ground or below-ground historical resources. Tribal consultation has been completed and none of the contacted tribes have requested further archaeological work be conducted at the site. As such, Section 106 requirements for the proposed T-Mobile site have been satisfied. 4.0 LIMITATIONS The Section 106 Review and tribal consultation is intended to satisfy T-Mobile's specific requests regarding scope of work and should not be solely relied upon to satisfy federal, state, or local permitting requirements. Further, the review questions apply only to the "facility" defined as the areas of the host parcel that T-Mobile will lease and develop such as a tower compound. This letter has been prepared for the exclusive use of T-Mobile and their agents for specific application to the project site. Use or reliance upon this report by a third is at their own risk. Adapt does not make any representation or warranty, express or implied, to such other parties as to the accuracy or completeness of this report or the suitability of its use by such other parties for any purpose whatever, known or unknown, to Adapt. Adapt appreciates the opportunity to be of service to you on this project. Should you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any way, please contact us at (503) 892-2346. Respectfully Submitted, Adapt Engineering, Inc. s Lindsay Mico MS Senior Environmental Scientist Attachments: Appendix A Location Maps Appendix B Oregon State Historic Preservation Office Submittal and Response Appendix C Public Notice Appendix D Tribal Consultation Appendix E Preparer Qualifications Appendix F Construction Drawings Appendix G RF Exposure Study ~[3 d,u 4 T'-Mobile P003744AIAshiand Springs January 23, 2012 Adapt Project No. OR11-17532-NEPA Page 4 { Ada .t Engineering, Inc, 'a APPENDIX A LOCATION DAPS L ` w } - 41' 5 ra 4' 'x ..'1l - Em ORMH - - l fit V . e m - ~x D W Gam. yS~ U U 4 C } 201 of n -Nv F L 1 Q ff 4~i 111 ~ ~~~~JJJy f • ~ 1 } ~ c4 {L Fe+ f ~ _r Yl ~ O 9 w C i F• 6, Lb 1 t, Z7 ! Qa yy~ F 73 I4 fu- _V Fs :R ~ po, m~ CL C ~ n n~9t m a ' L3 O Adapt F-ngJneerfng, Ina. 12 Y APPENDIX OREGON STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE SUBMITTAL & RESPONSE E I i I i I Lindsay Mico Frorn: towernotifyinfo@fcc.gov Sent: Thursday January 12, 2012 8:45 AM To: Lindsay Mico Subject: Section 106 Notification of SHPO/THPO Concurrence- Email t0 #226130 This is to notify you that the Lead SHPO/THPO has concurred with the following filing: Date of Action; 01/12/2012 - Direct Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE Visual Effect: No Adverse Effect on Historic properties in APE Comment Text: None P,i]$ Number: 0004991236 Purpose: Collocation Submission Pacicet Notification Date; 7AM EST 12/15/2011 Applicant: T-Mobile USA Consultant: Adapt Engineering Site Name; Ashland Springs Site Address: To be located on an existing building at 212 E Maim St Site Coordinates: 42-11-45.3 N, 1224246.4 W City: Ashland County: JACKSON State;OR Lead SHPO/THPO: Oregon State Historic Preservation Office NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, A13M, OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to faoilitato consultation under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act and may contain information that is confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be taken with respoet to any trtisuse of the system. E fl 2 l l Adapt Engineering, inc. December 15, 2011 Adapt Project No. OR11-17532-NEPA Julie Osbourne & Dennis Griffin B ` 4 ~ 1 Oregon State Historic Preservation Office r,. 725 Summer Street NE Salem, OR 97301-1271 RE: Section 106 Review Rooftop Installation P003744A/Ash1and Springs Roof of 212 E Main St Ashland, OR 97520 Dear Ms. Osboume & Dr. Griffin: Adapt Engineering, Inc., on behalf of T Mobile, is submitting information relating to construction of a telecommunications facility at the above referenced location. For the purposes of this submlttal, Adapt subcontracted a historical preservation specialist (Dave Pinyerd, Historic Preservation Northwest) to review historical and/or potentially historical resources in the vicinity of the project location for potential adverse effects. The following information has been provided for your reference: Project Description Project Type: Rooftop Antenna Installation Project Height: 119 feet (agl) County: Jackgon Host Property Address: 212 E Matn Street Ashland, OR 97520 Latitude, Longltude: 42.195911. -122.712886 (NA083) Host Property Use: Existing Ashland Springs Hotel (Originally known as the Othia Springs Hotel) Within the Area of Potential Effect (APE), Mr. Pinyerd identified one historic resource listed In the National Register. * Lithia Springs Hotel (now known as the Ashland Springs Hotel); 212 E Main Street, Ashland, OR 97520; National Register Listed; No adverse effect As it was determined that this property would not he adversely affected by the project, Adapt proposes a no adverse effect determination for this proposed telecommunications project, As there will be no ground dlsturbance, no archaeological file review or pedestrian survey was required. T•Mohlle - Ashland Springs Po 03774A December 15, 2011 Adapt Protest No. OR1 1-1 7532-NEPA Adapt Engineering, Inc. This information is being submitted as per the Oregon State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) Guidelines for Section 106 Review for the purpose of fulfilling Federal National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements. We have included a completed copy of the FCC Form 621 along with the necessary attachments. The project was electronically submitted to the FCC under file number 0004991236, If you have any questions regarding the submitted information or if you desire any additional information that would help in your review process, please contact the undersigned at (603) 892-2346. Sincerely, Adapt Engineering, Inc, Lindsa homas Mico Senior Environmental Scientist Attachments Section 106 Review FCC Form 621 r 7•MobitQ - Ashland Springs PO 03774A t]ecebsr 15, 2Q11 Ad pt Pioiect Na. OR11-17532-N1=PA FCC Form 621 FCC Wireless Telecommunications Bureau Approyed by OMS Collocation ("CO") Submission Packet 3o6a- 1o39 Notification Date: $ ~ See instructions far File Number: O~biic burden eshmales General Information 1) (Select only one) ( NE ) NE - New UA Update of Application WD Withdrawal of Application 2) If this application is for an Update or Withdrawal, enter the file number of the pending application File Number: currently on file. Applicant Information 3) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0018712776 4) Name: T-Mobile USA Contact Name 5) First Name: Lindsay 6) Mt: 7) last Name: MICO 8) Suffix: 9) TIUe: Contact Information i0) P.O. Box: /Ad 11) Street Address: 10725 SW Barber Blvd #200 12) City: Portland 13) State: OR 14) Zip Code: 97219 15) Telephone Number: (503)692-2346 16) Fax Number: 17) E-mail Address: lindsay.mlco@adeptengr.com Consultant Information 18) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 0020765590 19) Name: Adapt Engineering Principal Investigator 20) First Name: nave 21) MI: 22) Last Name: Pinyerd 23) suffix: 24) Title: Principal investigator Contact Information 25) P.O. Box: And 26) Street Address: 10725 SW Barber Blvd #200 27) City: Portland 26) State: OR 29) Zip Code: 97219 3O) Telephone Number: (503)892-2346 31) Fax Number: (503)692-2348 32) E-mail Address: lindsay.m(co@adaptengr.corn I of 14 FCC Form 621 September 2008 Professional Qualification 33) Hoes the Principal Investigator satisfy tho Secretary of the Interior's, Prafq"Iona) Quallficatton Standards? (x }Yes ( ) ~(o 34)Areas of Professional Qualification: ( ) Archaeologist (x ) Architectural Historian ( } Historian ( ) Architect ( } Other (Specify) Additional Staff 35} Are there other staff involved who mast the professfona[ Qualification Standards of the Secretary of the Interior? ( ) Yes ( X) AJo - _ . if "Y S," complete the following: 36) First Name: 37) MI: 38) Last Name; 39) Suffix: 40) Title: 41) Areas of Professional QgatlficaIlan: ( ) Archaeologist ( ) Architectural Historian ( ) Historian ( ) Architect ( } Other (Specify) t. I E of 14 l'CC t`c!lq 011 swomtvf 009 $lte information Tower Construction Notification stem 1) TCNS Noilficallon Number: 61052 . site Information 2) Site Name: Ashland Springs 3)Site Address: To be located on an existing building at?t2 E Main St 4) City: Ashland 5) State: OR =ZIP 97520 ?)Counly/Boroughfflarlsh: JACKSON B) Nearest Crossroads: Main and 1St 9) NAP 83 Latitude (00-MM•SS.S): 42.11«45.3 ( X )NO(( ) $ 10) NAP E13 Longitude (DD-MM-SS S): 122-42-.46.4 { } ~ or { X ) ~ Collocation Information 11) Antennas will be located on (Select One): { ) Communications Tower (Select One): ( ) Guyed Lattice Tower ( j Self-supporting Lattice ( ) Monopole ( j Other (Describe): ( X } Non-Tower Structure (Describe Structure): Building with an antenna 12) Tower freight above ground level (including top-mounted attachments such as lightning rods) 36,3 ( ) Feel ( X )Meters 13) Description of Antennas to be collocated (e.g. number, type, shape, dimensions, color): The project Is to replace three antennas hidden on the Ashland Springs Hotel. The original rehat?ilifation of the hotel was done with the intention of providing accammodatlon for cellular antennas; therefore, the antenna housings are Invisible from the s 14) Will the Antennas be placed at multiple levels on the structure? ( X ) Yes ( )No If 'Yes', describe placement: One will be. replaced on the 5th floor; two will be replaced on the 8th floor. All antennas will be hidden from view. If 'No', specify the height of collocation above ground: ( ) Feel ( ) Meters 15) Structure Completion Year: 1925 (yyyY) ( ) Check here If your year provided is app(oxtmaW 16) Has the Communications Tower or Non-Tower Structure been the subject of SHPOITHPO review? ( )yes ( X ) No If !Yes', specify the following: Company that made the submission: Date submitted: SHPOCFHPO Reference Number: 17) Is the Communicalions Tower or Non-Tower Structure eligible for listing on the National Register? ( ) Yes ( x )No 3 of 14 FCC Fonn 621 Septantber 2008 j CQ110cation Eitotus 18) Current Collacation Status (select one): ( X } Construction andfor installation has not yet commenced ( ) Construction andlorinstallation has commenced, bulls not completed Construction andfor installation commenced on: { ) Construction has been completed Construction aridlor installation commenced on: Conslntclian andfor tnstallallon completed on:...T Oetorm(nation of Effect 19) Direct Effects (Select One): ( } No Historic Propedies in Area of Palontlal Effects (APE) ( } No Effect on Historic Properties in APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties In APE { ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic Properties in APP 20) Visual Effects (Select One): ( ) No Historic Properties in Area of Potential Effects (APE) ( ) No Effect on Historic Properties In APE { X ) No Adverse Effect on Historic Properties in APE { ) Adverse Effect on one or more Historic, Properties In APE E t f f1 FE B n 4 or 14 FSt' Faml 621 SepletnNr NW. Tribal/NHO Involvement 1) Have ndian Tribes or Native Haveaiian Organizarlons (NI-10s) been identified ihaf may a(ladi religious and cultural significance to historlc properties which maybe affected by the undertaking within the AV Ea for direct and visual ( x ) Yos ( ) ~o effects? 2a) Tflbes/NHOs contacted through TCNS Notification Number: ~1Q5Z Number of TribeslNHOs 2b) TflbeslNHOs contacted through on alternate system: Number of TfibesfNHOS: TrilJelNHO Contacted Through TONS 3) TrlbelNHO FRN: 4) TOWNHO Name: Burns Paiute Tribe, General Council Contact Name 5) First Name: Barbara fi) MI: 7) last Name: Satre t3)'Suffix: 9) Title: Tribal Chair Oates 4 Response 10) Dale Contacted 111241201 i 11) Date Replied [ x } No Reply ( ) RepifedlNo Interest { ) RepiiedlHave Interest ( ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contnted Throy h TCNS 3) Tribe/NHO FRN; 4) TribelNHO Name: Confederated Tribes of the (;rand Ronde Community of pregnn Contact Name 5) First Name, David S) MI: 7) last Name: Harrelson 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Cultural Resources Specialist Dates & Response . 10) Date Contacted 11/2412011 11) date Replied 11I2ef2E111 { ) No Reply [ ) Replledit Interest [ ) Repiled/Have Interest ( x ) RepliedlOther EPI 5 of 14 FCC Form 621 5cptonber 2008 TOWINHO InVolVement 1) Have lnciian lrihes or Native Naivaiiail Oryani/ativns (NffOs) been 3deniffied that may attach"religious and euilural significance to historic properties which may be affected by the undertaking within the APES for direct and vlsudl } Yes { ) No effects? 84052 2a TribeslNHOs contacted through TONS Notification Number: Number of TdbeslNHOs: 7 2b) TribesINHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of TribeslNHOs: 9 Tribe/NHR Contacted Tltrou h TCNS 3) TdbelNHO FRN: 4) Tribe)NHO Name: Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians Contact Name 5) First Name: Jessie 6) Ml 7) Last Name: Pltloord 8}Suffix: 9) Title: Archaeologist Dates & Response _ 10) gate Contacted 1112312011 41) Date Replied { X ) No Reply { ) ReplledlNo Interest { ) RepliedlHave Interest ( ) RepliedlOlher Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TONS 3) TribeINHO FRN: 4)Tdbe/NHO Name: Fallon Palcite•Shoshone Tribe Contact Name 5) First Name: Ray 61 MI: 7) fast Name: Stands 0) Suffix: 9) Title: Cultural Coordinator Dates & Response 40) Dale Contacted 1112412044 11) Date Replied ( X } No Reply ( ) RepliedlNo Interest 6 { } Replied/Have Interest ( ) ReplledlOther 6 or 14 FCC Funrs 621 September 2008 TOWINHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NHOO been identified that may aSltach religious and cultural significance to historic properties which may be affecled by the undertaking within the APES for direct and visual ( X } Y_es ( ) he effects? 2a) Tribes/NHOs contacted through TON$ Noliflr-0Qn Nttmbor: 81062 Number of TribeslNlios: 7 2b) Tribes/NHOs contacted through an alterna:lp system: Ntlmber of Tr1N-e 1NHQs: U Tribe/NHO Contacted Throe h TCNS 3) TribelNHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Klamath Tribes Contact Name 5) First Name: Perry 6) k11: 7) Last Name: Crho4ktoot 8) Suffix: 9) Tilte: Cuiture & Heritage Director Dates 8s Res once 11124/2011 10) Oale Contacted 11) Palo Replied { X } No Reply { } RepliedlNo Interest ( ) Re.plledlHave Interest ( ) Replied/Other Tribe/NHO Contacted Through TENS 3) Tdbe/NHO FRN: 4) Tribe/NHO Name: Siletz Tribal Counoll Contact Name 5) First Name: Delores 61 M1: EY) as,t Name: Plosley 6) Suffix: 9) Tise: Chairman Dates Response 101 Date Contacted 11/24/2011 11 t _ ) Pate Replied ( X ) No Reply 4 12 ( j Replied/No Interest t( } RepliedlHave Interest { ) Replied/Other 7 of 14 FCC I'ortp 621 S01f1~101wa 2ON TribaIMHO Involvement 1) Have Indian Tribes or Native Hawaiian Organizations (NI-40s) been identified that may attach religious and cultural significance to historic properties whtch may be affected by the undertaking within the APFs for direel and visual { ) Yes { } No effects? 2a) T(ibesINHOs contacted through TENS Notific,10on Numbar. Nttrnbe( of TribeslNHOs: 7 2b) UbeslNHOs contacted through an alternate system: Number of Trlt>es1NHQs: 0 Tribe/NHO Contacted Thratt h TONS 3) TdbeiNHO FRN: 4) Tdbe/NHO Name- YOOma Nation Contact Name 5) First Name; Johnson 6) MI: 7) Last Name: Meniniak 8) Suffix: 9) Title: Guijurol Resources pire.oter Dates & Response 10) Date Conlacted 1~?412017 11) pate Repliad 4 X ) No Reply { ) RepliedlNo Interest ) RepllecifHave Interest { ) Replied/Other 9 of 14 FCC Form 621 Sup(elrlbsr 2008 E Qttler TribeS/NHOs CQntagted 7ribelNHQ Information 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Contact Name 3) First Name: 41 M(: 5)! as[ Name fi) Suffix: , 7) Title: taontact Infar anon 8) P.D. Box: Ind 9) street Address: 110) City: t1) 814[a: 12) Zfp code: 13) Telephone Number. 1L 4) Fax Number: 15) E-mail Address: 16) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E-mail { ) letter ( ) Both dates & I?es ,Onge 17) Dale Contacted 18) Date Replied { ) No Reply { } Replied/No Interest ( ) Replied/Have Interest { ) Replied/Other 9 or 14 FCC Fenn 621 $et>iember 2008 Historic PropeMes properties Identified 1) Have any historic properties been identified within the APES for direct and visual effect? { X ) Yes ( ) No . 2 Has the identi11cation Process located afchaeolo~ eat materials that would tie directly affected, or sites that are of { }fires (X NO cultural or religious sipnifleance to TribeslNHOs 3) Are there more than 10 historic properties within the APEs for direct and visual affect? { If (X )Flo If'Yes you are required to attach: a Cultural Resources Report In lieu of adding the Historic Properly below, Historic Pro earl 4) Property Name: Lithia Springs Hotel 5) SHPO Site Number: Pro ert Address 8} Street Address: 217 E Main St 7) City: Ashlaind F0)8 la le; OR 9) Zip Code: 97520 10) CountylSoroughlParish: JACKSON Status & Eligibility 11) Is this property listed on the National Register? f X) yes ( ) too Source: Pinyerd 2011._ 12) is this property eligible for listing on the National Regis(er? ( )x" i x )ND Source: 13) is this property a National Historic Landmark? ( ) Yes { X) No 14) Direct Effects (Select One): { ) No Effect on this Historic Property In APE ( X ) No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property In APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Histofto Property in APE 15) Visual Effects (Select One): ( } No Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( X } No Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE ( ) Adverse Effect on this Historic Property in APE~ 10 of 14 rCC 1`01.1p 021 5epta!?I~F 2ttRs ! I Local Government Involvement Local Government Agency 1) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 2) Name: Ashland Historic Committee Contact Name 3) First Name: Bill 4) CAI: L5) Last Name: Molnar sysufrx: 7) Tilie• Contact lnforMifflon e) P o gor J cord 9) street Address: 2p E Maln $t lpJ Oily: Ashland 11) Slate: pR 12J Zip Code: 8752U 13) Telephone Number: (441)552-2042 14) Fax Numhef: IN IFtmaif Address: molnarb@ashland.or.us 16) Preferfed means of opmmifniretlon- ( ) E-ma11 { X J LotMer { )Bath Dates $ Res .once . 17) Date Contacted i t123l2011 1a) pale Replied 1113012011 ( J No Reply { ) ReplledlNo. Interest { X ) RepfledlHave Interest ( J Replied/Olher Additionaf Information ! 19) Information on local government's role or Interest (gptioffal): `t°H I t 1 nt I4 FCC rood 611 'Swrl l or 2Qt1h Other Qonsultirto Parties Other Consulting Parties Contacted 1) Has any other agency been contacted and Invited to become a consulting party? { X ) Yes ( )No Consulting Party 2) FCC Registration Number (FRN): 3) Name: City of Ashland Planning peportmW Contact Name 4) First Name: Bill 5) hAl: 6) last Name: Molnar 7) suffix: 8) Title: Contact Infgrmation . 9) P C?. Box: AAOnd 10) Street Address; 20 Iz Maln St 11) City: Ashland 1Z) Stale: 01i 13) zip Coda: 97520 14) Telephone Number. (541)552-2042 15) Fax Number: 16) E-mail Address: molnar4@ashland.or.Ws 17) Preferred means of communication: ( ) E=mall ( X } Letter { ) Both Dates & Response 18) Dale Contacted 11/2312011 19) Date Replied 1115412011 ( ) No Reply ( ) Replied/No Interest ( X ) RepliedlFlave Interest t` ( ) Reptledf0ther Additional I nformaition 20) information on other consulting parties' role or Interest (optional): Tho City, of Ashland Planning Pepartmont and Historic Commission halve recelved your notices about the upcoming upgradelinstallation for T-MoWle on the Ashland Sprin94 Hotel. and would like to recolvo a copy of your $action 106 Reviaw report when complete. 12 or 14 FCC' Form 521 $gw3riber 2008 Resignatien of 9HPQITHPO 1)Deslgnate the Lead State HtstoricPreservahanOffic_er (SHPO) orTri4al Hislofic Pre§qn+a4h?nOfficsr(THPO)based on the localtonof the towerlcclloca Lion, SHPOfTHPO Name: Oregon State Historic Preservation Office 2) You may atso designate up to three addllional 5HF'Qsft kiPOs II the APES Incftide rttulltpie Slates. If the AP-Ca include other countries, enter the name of the Natlonat Historic Preaervallon Agency and any siple and provinclal HIMarig Prowyallon Agency SHP0/THP0 Name: SHP01THPO Name: SHPOITHPO Name: Gertifioatfatt I certify that all representations on this FCC Form 621 Submission Packet anti the acsompanying attachments are true, correct, and complete. Party Authorized to Sign First Name: MI. Last Name: A r Suffix: i..tv~f sill "~1 L6 Signature: i t 1 FAILURE TO SIGN THIS APPLICATION MAY RESULT IN DISMI$$AL OF THE APPLICATION AND FORFi±iTVRt~ OF ANY FteES PAID. - WILLFUL. FALSE STATEMENTS MADE ON THIS FORM ON ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE PVNISHAOLE BY FINE ANpfOR IMPRISONMENT (U.S. Code, Title 18, Section 1001) ANDIOR REVOCATION OF ANY STATION MQEN$E OR CONSTRUCTION PFRMIT (U.S. Cade, Title 47, Section 312(x)(1)), AND/OR FORFEITURE (U.S. Code, Title 47, Section $03). E EB la of w FCC' Fore, 621 sot}ictobcr tool i a Aiiachtr~etlt~ Type pescription pale Entered Other #3ist al R uree eaori 12/14/2011 ResompsNilae See Hislpr } s©€iree ReR 1 211 4120 1 1 Maps Se Hislar lResaur e ReooFt 12.114011 Am of Polenllal F-ffecls See ii Wriwl Resource RmO W1141901 1211412011 TO . PlINHO Involvernenl e TON Lgcal Ouvernment Invpfvomot eLQ Letter 1211412011 Public Involvement bran of Qubllc notice 1211412011 Hislorip Properties far Vistol Effecla See Hisl~ oFical RB Ufee RVPQ i 1R/141?.Ql1 Hisltlric Properties for RireGtffe,ci 5ltnrreat 1493020 tesoc12I1A12011 Pholporaphs q Q. _ist ri ! ResgWrA Roo 1211 12411 FF0 14 of t4 FCC' Fppti 621 Semel 1wr 108 David Pinyerd, Principal Historic Preservation Northwest 1116 11th Ave SW Albany OR 97321 541-791-9199 (office) pinyerd@hp-nw.com EDUCATIONAL HISTORY M.S. in Historic Preservation, University of Oregon, June 2000. Thesis title, "The Preservation of Pre-World War II Coast Guard Architecture in Oregon." B.S. in Business Administration with a concentration in Financial Services, Oregon State University, August 1985. Minor in Computer Science. WORK HISTORY Jan 2001 - present Historic Preservation NW Oregon and Washington Established a group of consultants as Historic Preservation Northwest. We do everything from historic building survey to National Register Nominations. Primarily we perform Section 106 documentation for new cell towers and co-locates in Oregon and Washington for several providers. Apr 2002 - present Adjunct Professor University of Oregon Teach the Historic Building Survey and Inventory class once a year at the University of Oregon as an adjunct professor. Nov 1994 - Dec 2000 Historic Preservation Consultant Eugene, OR Performed historic building surveys as an independent consultant while I worked on my master's degree. Also analyzed historic structures and ran preservation field schools. (COMPLETE RESUME ON FILE AT THE OREGON STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE) Bernadette Niederer, Historic Preservationist Historic Preservation Northwest 1116 11th Ave SW Albany OR 97321 541-791-9199 (office) niederer@hp-nw.com EDUCATIONAL HISTORY a, M.S. in Historic Preservation, University of Oregon, June 2006. Thesis title, "Oregon's Cast-iron Storefronts." B.A. in Anthropology, University of California, Santa Barbara, 1991. WORK HISTORY Jan 2001 - present Historic Preservation NW Oregon and Washington Joined Historic Preservation Northwest as one of the initial partner consultants. Have worked on everything from historic building survey to National Register Nominations. Primarily assist on Section 106 documentation for new cell towers and co-locates in Oregon and Washington for several providers. Jul 2007 - Jan 2008 Parametrix Corvallis, Oregon On-call consulting for the Columbia River Crossings project. Primary work involved a historic resource survey of approximately 900 properties in Vancouver, WA. f. • '01 NMI mm The project (Adapt #OR1 1-1 7532-NEPA) is to replace cellular antennas on a building in Ashland, Oregon, as shown in Figures 1 through 3. The proposal is to replace three antennas hidden on the Ashland Springs Hotel. The original rehabilitation of the hotel was done with the intention of providing accommodation for cellular antennas; therefore, the antenna housings are invisible from the street. The replacement antennas would go in the existing antenna housings. Also proposed is an additional equipment cabinet to be added to an existing equipment platform on the rooftop of the west wing. A check of the Oregon Historic Sites Database for any resources in the area was performed on November 21, 2011, and there are hundreds of resources found within the half-mile vicinity. The building on which the antenna replacement is proposed is listed on the National Register. The Oregon SHPO requests a limited reconnaissance survey of the area to locate resources eligible for the National Register in addition to a check of the Oregon Historic Sites Database. A limited reconnaissance survey was therefore carried out by David Pinyerd, with the assistance of Bernadette Niederer, on November 22, 2011 We walked the APE to seek out any additional historic resources eligible for the National Register and the extent of the proposed project's visibility. Sample views were photographed towards the proposed project from throughout the APE and the photo locations are plotted on Figure 4. The antennas and equipment cabinet are shown in each photo with a red arrow pointing toward them (or a blue arrow if they are not visible). The APE was then constricted to just the building on which the project is proposed and the rear parking lot as the antennas would not be visible from the exterior and the equipment cabinet would not be visible due to other buildings and topography throughout most of the standard APE (Figure 5). The antenna replacement is proposed for downtown Ashland on the Ashland Springs Hotel. The project site is bounded by East Main Street on the north, South 1st Street on the east, Hargadine Street on the south, and South Pioneer Street on the west. All of the surrounding blocks are commercial, particularly along Main Street, with historic construction dating primarily to the 1920s. The Oregon Shakespeare Festival complex begins approximately 200 feet to the west. Topography slopes steeply from south to north. At approximately 120 feet in height, the Ashland Springs Hotel is the tallest structure in town. IF" 113 12'. MIZ ~IT 111;11! 1010, r i •I + Map number: 1 Name: Lithia Springs Hotel Street: 212 E Main St City State ZIP: Ashland OR 97520 NR findings: National Register listed Map number: 1 Name: Lithia Springs Hotel Street: 212 E Main St City State ZIP: Ashland OR 97520 NR findings: National Register listed ij~ Map number: 1 Name: Lithia Springs Hotel Street: 212 E Main St City State ZIP: Ashland OR 97520 FE NR findings: National Register listed Effect findings: No historic properties adversely affected Effect: The Ashland Springs Hotel is a nine-story tower located in downtown Ashland. When it opened to the public in 1925, the hotel was known as the Lithia Springs Hotel. In 1961, the name was changed to the Mark Antony to capitalize on the success of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. A 1998 renewal resulted in the name change to the Ashland Springs Hotel. The building was designed by architects Tourtellotte and Hummell entirely of reinforced concrete in an eclectic style that could be described as Art Deco, with elements of Romanesque, English Tudor, Gothic, and Neo-Classical Revival. It was intended to be the tallest building between Portland and San Francisco. Typical of some of J.E. Tourtellotte's later designs, such as the Boise Hotel (1930) and the Baker Hotel (1929), the Lithia Springs Hotel has a nine-story central tower with two short wings. The main entry is arched with inset windows, covered by a large canopy, and flanked by two round arches. The stucco of the first and second floors is scribed to resemble lightly rusticated cut stone. A strong belt course breaks the lower block from the remaining room floors. An elaborate parapet caps the building. Other decorative details include plaster eagles perched on pilasters to either side of the main entry, pronounced keystones, and flower roundels in the spandrels. Leaded stained glass is used in the upper windows and in the three arched openings along First Street. The most significant alteration to the building is the addition of a highly incompatible concrete and glass elevator shaft on the right side of the building c.1980. A mechanical court was added to the rear. The front canopy is also new, though compatible with the 1925 structure. Several of the ground floor doors are new, including a utility door separating the main tower portion from the right wing, a newer front door, and a remodeled entry on the left side. The Lithia Springs/Mark Antony/Ashland Springs Hotel was listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1978. The proposal is to replace three antennas hidden on the building. The northeast antenna and the southeast antenna are hidden behind the parapet wall on the ninth floor. The northwest antenna is hidden behind a window of the fifth floor of the incongruous stair tower. The original rehabilitation of the hotel starting in 1998 was done with the intention of providing accommodation for cellular antennas; therefore, the antenna housings are invisible from the street. The replacement antennas would go in the existing antenna housings. They also propose to add a second equipment cabinet to an existing equipment platform on the rooftop of the west wing. All new conduit and cabling would be limited to the rooftops. Since this hotel is listed on the National Register, the building will only allow the most camouflaged cellular installations. This project conforms to that requirement and to the specifications within the December 2001 MOA. The OF 1 l~ ► 11 Jj I PEI proposed installation will have no adverse effect on the National Register-listed building. Sources: "Ashland Springs Hotel," http://www.ashlandspringshote1.com/history.shtm1, as of 6125/02. "National Register Travel," http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/travel/ashIand/mah.htm, as of 6/25/02. 201 r Mill y' i -li + ~I~~~1iFS3 , W i' 3 - - L f - View: 1 ( toward the installation) Photographer: Bernadette Niederer Approx. distance: 317 ft. Date recorded: 11122/2011 Direction: northeast Focal length: 7mm C~ .~;~tts lp' 1 r a' kk C y J~ l I ,j P~ ~p ~Ct View: 2 (toward the installation) Photographer: Bernadette Nlederer Approx. distance: 264 ft. Date recorded: 11/2212011 Direction: east Focal length: 7mm A • 1 . • i 7~ sE Fr r y 1~ View: 3 (toward the Installation) Photographer: Bernadette Niederer Approx, distance: 370 ft. Date recorded: 11/22/2011 Direction: southeast Focal length: 7mm f tM.a iri 7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ya H, f View: 4 { toward the Installation) Photographer: Bernadette Niederer Approx. distance: 158 ft. Date recorded: 1112212011 Direction: southeast Focal length: 7mm i i View. 5 (toward the Installation) Photographer; Bernadette Nloderer Approx. distance: 158 ft. Date recorded: 11/2212011 Direction: west Focal length: 7mm - + r 1 ~ 1 1 / • / 1 1 1 / MCA - • ~ Photo of Resource. 141f f TI l I { {.,l 1 vu Number on Resource Map: 1 Photographer: Bernadette Niederer Date recorded: 11122/2011 Focal length: 7mm Photo Towards Installation: j Ir -1 Approximate distance to Installation: 0 R. Photographer. Bernadette Niederer Direction from resource to installation: NA Date recorded: 11/2212011 Focal length: 7mm INS IN I ® 1 1 1 r~ f 122°46'00" W 122°44'00" W 122°42'00" W WGS84 122°39'00" W r c l -v,. l 11 C7 73 ~r Z jt4~f f iii J* ~ r ' 45 r Ilk i Y~ ~Il. J '49 IN I ~~G--~ _ ~ ~,S f X17 - ! ~ f ~y 760 44 . L r r _ F S 64 66 W ' J_. o f c] i ' -4, o DFF 122°46'00" W 122°44'00" W 1221142'00" W WGS84 122°39'00" W NATIONAL TN MN OA 0.5 1,0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 urges 15Y2 GEOGRAPHIC ©..,1. ) , 2,, , . 3 .4. , k't 5 .Ikm 11120111 Figure 01. USGS map showing the location within the region of the proposed equipment on the roof of a building in Ashland. • r 122044'40" W 1221143'00" W WGS64 1221142'00" W f ~ rig t a?f •IWAfftf 38 • ~~..ti,., 1._ ~I ry,~ 'I Tanks f l ,ms`s ISS II ' ff v.• irw J i 1 ~ _ _ a (![t ~ i (l, ~ CC if h 7{~ r~~~~ ,`I , • • •`S ` ~ ~ ~1 . z 42 Y J' h d KE i~~fy~17 Ij 1-"; + d i -A, _jj a 11 _ ~~~~~`-tig_' ~ `;y~~ ~~.sEFF• ~ } ~ ~ ~ ! j ``,/''a~~.: '1 .qua 8DD ~ ~ i~ I ~ 1~ ~ ~ti '~i~ \ 7r~~ ~ ~ per' y ~ ~ +E 122°44'00" W 122043'00" W WGS64 122042'00" W TN Mfg NATIONAL 0.0 015 1.0 mles 1SY2 GEOGRAPHIC OA 0.5 110 '1.-5 'km 11/20{11 Figure 02. Ashland, OR 7.5 minute quad map (197811996) showing the standard 0.5 mile APE for the proposed equipment on the roof of a building in Ashland. t YO T, M"I 'I 7 i**~~r ; G ~s~' " r rte' ~~~F r,` 5. gf#~ ~ } ~ ~j i ~rTTT- t1, }~~Y%" }4 1 y f _ I E? Ila A, s F { IkFF t . 1, y. ' ~ z5~ k r~~.,.,• 1 J ~ ~ II 55 L ~ A~ pr~kq W i t k~ r r Et E,(l - f 1 ! i, r~ z' .dun f..; 11~,~`' I M n' r q~ ~r 1 i1 ~~t'I~' t l A rr rS : ! ~X1 "iF iij! 3-1 144 } 1 r ~ }-I ' ! ~ ~ ~1.t r ~ by a"" . l c ~ _ ~ ~ 'i r_-'' 1, W-111 - f a 4 T tr r 53 a tia # ~e Y r'~f.aCGSy3 * y, ' { i - + #._p- R F fi. `s=ue i#' Figure 03. Current aerial of the vicinity of the proposed equipment on the roof of a building in Ashland. • • WOW • 1 r r p, r ~ `7, ~73 f~ . , ` 7 .rya ~ f 17 i 1 'AW i ri I t~ 11 _ ; j-I j r _ - fit ( L 7Figure 04. Current aerial of the vicinity for the proposed equipment on the roof of a building in Ashland with labels corresponding to sample views. i ! W1 FJ S1 4: 7W z'llt 4 `F e p e1C7C.°1/ ..,F a;r` llt+k! 16 fir! Ir Ertl at a.. ~1•iCf 1 ~3~ t~ e7 p" J k 4 d ~ xlal' I..~ ~f '4w.\,7 . ~•y 4~ b r 11 Cy" I 99 91 k g ~ •;~r y ~~s ( y ~ i ~ 14 ~ r ` wr O ` ~ ~-r,~~ r r J'r{ r ~ . L 7 ~ } a } F Fx t r n") F ° ~fi~t Fs ! 1 ~ ~F , ,~L `tl ~r~~~~ -rF~ ~1Yr` t!!77[ 1 yr`a ~,rA~ I IN- 1 r , I I I Figure 05. Current aerial showing the modified APE in pink for the proposed equipment on the roof of a building in Ashland with labels corresponding to sample views. f 4 rt.r Mia ~ [ t' i 9 ~a, f ~t, ~ f ~ y f ~ r 3 I I~ , s { l~ r rt i r , 1 ,r Figure 06. Current aerial showing the modified APE in pink for the proposed equipment on the roof of a building in Ashland with labels corresponding to inventoried resources. ORL jON FCC SECTION 106 SURVL- i FORM Rev. &05 Agency/Project: FCC - Adapt Engineering, Inc.1 Ashland Springs UMTS #13003744A Address: 212 E Main St City Ashland ZIP Code: 87520 Name: Llthla Springs Hotel County: Jackson Built: 1924 Historic Use: Commerce - hotel Current Use: Commerce - hotel Alterations: Incompatible stair tower on right side; mechanical court on back side; service door on fron Integrity: Excellent Photo of Resource: Number on Resource Map: 1 Taken on: 11122/2011 1 _ Focal length: 7mm Jill t l; l f 3111 lig! Preliminary National V National Register listed Potentially Eligible: ❑ Individually [ ] As part of District Register Findings: ❑ Not Eligible: f.] But reversible ❑ Irretrievable ❑ Lacks distinction ❑ Not 50 years old i Photo Towards Installation: Taken on: 11122]2011 Focal length: 7mm I f Approximate 0 ft c} ( distance to ,J r 1 j resource: l Ej!_~°" t rti : I Direction from NA resource to I - installation: r I i No adverse effect [,)Adverse effect Preliminary Effect Findings: ❑ No effect W Surveyor: Dave Pinyerd 1 Historic Preservation Northwest Date recorded: 1112212011 I f Lindsay Mlco From: towernotifyinfQ@fce.gov Sent; Wednesday, December 28, 201111:30 AM To: Undsay Mico Subject: Section 106 Notification of SHPO/THPO Request for information- Email 10 #223230 This is to notify you that the Lead SHPO/THPO has requested additional information on the following filing: Source: Oregon State Historic Preservation 4ff.ce Date of Action: 12/28/2011 Comment Text: Although the photo simulations provide some visual information regarding the. proposed new cabinet, it would be helpful to have a copy of the drawing that T-Mobile will use for installation purposes that shows the size {footprint and height} and location of the stew feature. Nile Number: 0004991236 Purpose: Collocation Submission Packet Notification Date: 7AM EST 12/15/2011 Applicant: T-Mobile USA Consultant: Adapt Engineering Site Name: Ashland Springs Site Address, To be located on an existing building at 212 E Main St Site Coordinates: 42-11-45.3 N, 122-42-46,4 W City: Ashland County: JACKSON State:OR Lead SHPO/THPO: Oregon State Historic Presprvatioo Office Please note that you must respond to this request within 60 days or this filing will be at risk of closure. To ensure that your response to this request is accurately recorded, your response must be uploaded as a documont oftypo'Response to SHPO/THPO Request for Information'. NOTICE OF FRAUDULENT USE OF SYSTEM, ABUSE OF PASSWORD AND RELATED MISUSE Use of the Section 106 system is intended to facilitate consultation under Section 106 of die National Historic; Preservation Act and may contain in formation that is confidential, priv€leged or otherwise protected fratr► disclosure under applicable laws. Any person having access to Section 106 information shall use it only for its intended purpose. Appropriate action will be takers with respect to any misuse of the system. i f r Adapt Engineering, Inc, January 3, 2011 Adapt Project No. OR11-17532-NIEPA Julie Osboorne Oregon State Historic preservation Office 725 Summer Street N Salem, OR 97301-1271 RE.. Section 105 Review Rooftop Installation F003744A/AshWnd Springs Roof of 212 E Main $t Ashland, OR 97520 Dear Ms. Osbourne: Please find attached the construction information requested in your group's comment uploaded to TONS on 12128111. If you have any questions regarding the submitted information or if you desire any additional information that would help in your review process, please contact the undersigned at {503} 892-2346. Sincerely, Adapt Engineering, Inc, Lindsay Thomas Mico Senior Environmental Scientist Attachments Cons.Imtion Drawings TCNS Comment Notification T-Mobile - Ashland springs PO 03774A peeem er 15, 2011 Adapt Project No. CRI1-17532-NEPA Adapt Enolneering,.I.ne. APPENDIX C PUBLIC [NOTICE ADAPT ENGINEERING INC 71.0335 10725 SW BARBUR BLVD STE 350 PORTLAND OR 97219 Affidavit of Publication State Of Oregon County of Jackson 1 , being first duly sworn, depose and say of Medford Maid. Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation , as defined by ORS 193,010 and 7.93.020; printed at Medford in the aforesaid county and state; that the 0 12 iG Tic a printed copy of which is hereto annexed., was published in the entire issue of said newspaper for successive and cQnsec+4tive 1%~~~~•tarJ in the following issues c c~~-r~r- A/, ~?G// (HE"RR SET FORTH D, \TES OF ISSUES) Subscribed and sworn to before me this day o 20 N 7yvo UBLIC FOR My Commission e,pires ~i 1/` , 2p f np 11la~~JJFA ic~yA[ sCAAL4 j Y~Ql41~f! ~ 1;~~~FTIR~~F! REQ0"uu f No~TAR PUL,C-4 MY CO i $(ONl X iReS No FMB€R 11,'2 19 PUBLICATION EXPIRE DATE AD CAPTION # TIMES AMOUNT ASHLAND DAILY TIDINGS 12/14/11 PUBLIC NOTICEAN 1 24.26 START DATE: 12/14/11END DATE: 12/14/1:1 P0014Q NQTl9€ An FGG 11cep4ed wireless communigot(on aPIEN M ar- MY N to tte In§lalw on the roaftpp of 212 E Win Streat, Ashland, Jackson C43ulty, Oregon. The FCC (q seaking pyplio comment on tha proposed prolpql as port of the reVfaW ptogess by !ha Qr. on State HIA1 lie Pfes- erV10on 0(f(ae. P-(e4 56 re- spond Within 39 day§ of th(9 p0lipation to: Aciapl Epgi< nearing Ine.. 19725 SW tier- bur BIYct•, ~Oto 2w. PPIt- land. OR 97219 Alta:ORI1= 17532-NE-PA Oecempet 14, 2011 MAIL TRIBUNB RECEIPT Bccclpt No; Customer: ADAPT ENQINEERINQ INC Ad Number; 600369 Sys No: 11817 Acct No: 710335 Prone; 61038822346 Insertion: Start_Oate -12!14/2011 End-Date -12/14/2011 Class: 6817 size: ! x 20.00 Net Price: 24.26 Payment Method: Iii Check No: 0 Amount Paid; 0 Amount Owed: 24.26 Credit Card: Printed By: MMTDEK4EKK Date: 12115/2011 u 1 2( 1 3 ` Planning Division ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION c a r v o r 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 SHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE # t DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Replace 3 existing antennas and add 1 radio cabinet DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO Street Address 212 E Main Street, Ashland Assessor's Map No. 391 E ..~9RA Tax Lot(s) 100 Zoning C-1-D Comp Plan Designation Commercial APPLICANT Name Mike Unger 1 T-Mobile Phone _20-604-5538 E-Mail munger@odelia.com Address 6224 SE 18th Ave City Portland Zip 97202 PROPERTY OWNER Name c hone a E-Mail z ¢t Address Eil P j r City Zip l SURVEYOR, ENGINEER. ARCHITECT, D'RCHITEC7, OTHER Don@ Title Name Don Cushing Phone 503-387-5331 E-Mail Cushing-engr,com Address 4677 SE Pinehurst Avenue City Milwaukie, OR Zip 97267 Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request, 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expense. If I have any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. 827/11 Applica is Signature' Date As owner of the property involved in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. ell, Property Owner's- ignature (required) ate Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ OVER 11 G^tomm-dav'planning~Forms R ff3ndoutslZOning Permit Applitation.dos f137J'i i s ~i_; Job Address: 212 P MAIN ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C A Owner's Name: MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC Phone: P N State Lie No: ~ Customer 06662 L T-MOB[LE T City Lie No: Applicant: 6224 SE 18TH AVE R I Address: PORTLAND OR 97202 A C G Sub-Contractor: A Phone: (206) 604-5538 T Address: N Applied: 02/24/2012 T Issued: R Expires: 08/22/2012 Phone: State Lie No: Maplot: City Lie No: DESCRIPTION: Conditional Use Permit & Site Review Approval to replace three existing antennas and add one radio cabinet VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: IF- MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL - - STRI)CTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Commercial Site Review 1,013.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wvnv.ashland.or.us CITY Request Line: 541-552-2080 O F -As H LAN I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 I 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: (180 days). $ 0.00 $ 4.00 i 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 1,013.00 $ 1,013.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 1,013.00 Fees Paid: $ 1,013.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800.735-2900 vohw.ashland.or.us C Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 I T Y ® F -AS H LA N