Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutSchofield_460_PA-2014-00193 I T:Y F June 25, 2014 Notice of Final Decision On June 25, 2014, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA-2014-00193 Subject Property: 460 Schofield Street Applicant: Kerry KenCairn Description: A request for a Minor Land Partition approval to divide the property located at 460 Schofield Street into two parcels. The new parcel will be accessed via Monte Vista Street. The request also includes a Tree Removal Permit to remove five trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391 E 05BD TAX LOTS: 301 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of one year and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action asset forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Amy Gunter in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft i; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 F www.ashland.or.usJ f t SECTION 18.108.070(B)2 Effective Date of Decision and Appeals. B. Actions subject to appeal: 2. Type I Planning Actions. a. Effective Date of Decision. The final decision of the City for planning actions resulting from the Type I Planning Procedure shall be the Staff Advisor decision, effective on the 13th day after notice of the decision is mailed unless reconsideration of the action is approved by the Staff Advisor or appealed to the Commission as provided in section 18,108.070(B)(2)(c). b. Reconsideration, The Staff Advisor may reconsider Type I planning actions as set forth below. i. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City Agency may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the staff advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. ii. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five (5) days of mailing. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three (3) days whether to reconsider the matter. iii. If the Planning Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes 'of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten (10) days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The Staff Advisor shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. iv. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. C. A eal. I. Within twelve (12) days of the date of the mailing of the Staff Advisor's final decision, including any approved reconsideration request, the decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any party entitled to receive notice of the planning action. The appeal shall be submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary on a form approved by the City Administrator, be accompanied by a fee established pursuant to City Council action, and be received by the city no later than 4:30 p.m. on the 12th day after the notice of decision is mailed. ii. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the city and whose boundaries include the site. iii. The appeal shall be considered at the next regular Planning Commission or Hearings Board meeting. The appeal shall be a de novo hearing and shall be considered the initial evidentiary hearing required under ALUO 18.108.050 and ORS 197.763 as the basis for an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals. The Planning Commission or Hearings Board decision on appeal shall be effective 13 days after the findings adopted by the Commission or Board are signed by the Chair of the Commission or Board and mailed to the parties. iv. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met-or the appeal will be considered by the city as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 i Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us>' t ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-00193 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 460 Schofield Street APPLICANT: Kerry Kencaim OWNER: Denise Gall DESCRIPTION: A request for a Minor Land Partition approval to divide the property located at 460 Schofield Street into two parcels. The new parcel will be accessed via Monte Vista Street. The request also includes a Tree Removal Permit request to remove five trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 05BD TAX LOTS: 301 SUBMITTAL DATE: February 11, 2014 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: May 30, 2014 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: June 25, 2014 APPEAL DEADLINE DATE: July 7, 2014 FINAL DECISION DATE: July 8, 2014 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: July 8, 2015 DECISION The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Schofield and Monte Vista Streets, and zoned R-1-7.5, Single-Family Residential. The subject property is approximately 47,709 square feet, slopes to the east towards Monte Vista Street at approximately 16 percent, with steeper slopes, 25 percent and greater on the north and south sides of the residence. There is an existing single family residence on the site and there are garden areas and lawn with trees throughout the property. Both Schofield and Monte Vista streets were improved to as part of a Local Improvement District, through not to city standards, due to width of Monte Vista, both streets have curb and gutter. The applicant is requesting a minor land partition to divide the property into two separate parcels. Proposed Lot A will be the corner lot, containing the existing residence. The lot is proposed to be 30,969 square feet in area. While proposed Lot B will be 16,740 square feet, Lot B will be accessed off of Monte Vista Street. The R-1-7.5 zoning district has a minimum lot size of 7,500 square feet; the proposed lots exceed to this standard. Adequate capacity within the Schofield and Monte Vista Street right-of-ways is available to serve the new parcels. There is an electric transformer to the south of the proposed lot that will provide electricity to the parcel. An eight-inch sewer lateral, a twelve-inch storm drain line and a six-inch water line existing within the Monte Vista right-of-way, these are adequate to service the new parcel. The applicant has demonstrated that proposed Lot B will comply with Solar Setback Standard A and that a 21-foot tall structure can be constructed on the site and that will not exceed 50 percent of the lots north / south lot dimension. The applicant has also addressed minimum lot width and depth ratios. PA # 2014-00193 460 Schofield / adg Page i l The applicant has requested a tree removal permit to remove five conifer trees. The five trees requested for removal are between six and nine inches in diameter at breast height and are located where the proposed driveway or structures are to be located. There are a number of larger stature trees at the rear of the property upslope from the area of proposed development that are proposed to be preserved. Additionally there are five conifer trees near the front property line which are also proposed to be preserved. A ten-inch peach tree is located on the north, side property line 'between the proposed Lot A and B which is proposed for preservation, the tree. assessment states that the tree is in poor condition and is diseased, this tree is shown as preserved but may not survive the impacts of development. A tree protection and preservation plan has been shown for the trees on the property proposed for preservation. A street tree planting plan has provided with the application. The applicant has proposed to install five street trees along the frontage of Lot A that will be planted prior to the signature of the final survey plat. The two street trees required for proposed Lot B will be planted prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new residence. Staff believes that the future purposes of the lots will not be impeded due to the proposed lot size which is above the minimum requirement for the zone. In addition, the proposal does not impede any adjoining property from developing. Therefore, the proposed Minor Land Partition complies with the minimum requirements in accordance with 18.76, and with the conditions below is hereby approved. The criteria for a Minor Land Partition are described in AMC Chapter 18.76, as follows: A. The future use for urban purposes of the remainder of the tract will not be impeded. 8. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be impeded. C. The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. D. The partitioning is not in conflict with any law, ordinance or resolution applicable to the land. E. The partitioning is in accordance with the design and street standards contained in the Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. (Ord 2836 S8, 1999) F. When there exists adequate public facilities, or proof that such facilities can be provided, as determined by the Public Works Director and specified by City documents, for water, sanitary sewers, storm sewer, and electricity. G. When there exists a 20-foot wide access along the entire street frontage of the parcel to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street, as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Such access shall be improved with an asphaltic concrete pavement designed for the use of the proposed street. The minimum width of the street shall be 20-feet with all work done under permit of the Public Works Department. 1. The Public Works Director may allow an unpaved street for access for a minor land partition when all of the following conditions exist: a. The unpaved street is at least 20-feet wide to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street, b. The centerline grade on any portion of the unpaved street does not exceed ten percent. 2. Should the partition be on an unpaved street and paving is not required, the applicant shall agree to participate in the costs and to waive the rights of the owner of the subject property to remonstrate both with respect to the owners agreeing to participate in the cost of full street PA # 2014-00193 460 Schofield / adg Page 2 i improvements and to not remonstrate to the formation of a local improvement district to cover such improvements and costs thereof. Full street improvements shall include paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and the under grounding of utilities. This requirement shall be precedent to the signing of the final survey plat, and if the owner declines to so agree, then the application shall be denied. H. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition, access may be required to be provided from the alley and prohibited from the street, (amended Ord. 2757, 1995) The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. Planning Action 2014-00193 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2014-00193 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) All proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. 2) That a final survey plat shall be submitted within 12 months and approved by the City of Ashland within 18 months of this approval. Prior to signature of Final Plat: a. That all easements, including those relocated, for public and private utilities, fire apparatus access, and reciprocal utility, maintenance, and access shall be indicated on the final survey plat as required by the Ashland Engineering Division. b. That a final utility plan for the parcels shall be submitted for review and approval by the Planning, Engineering, and Building Divisions prior to signature .of the final survey plat. The utility plan shall include the location of connections to all public facilities including the locations of water lines and meter sizes, fire hydrants, sanitary sewer lines, storm drain lines and electric services. c. That the location and final engineering for all storm drainage improvements associated with the project, shall be submitted for review and approval by the Departments of Public Works, Planning and Building Divisions prior to signature of the final survey plat. d. That the electric service shall be installed underground to serve the Lot B prior to signature of the final survey plat. The electric service plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Ashland Electric Department and Ashland Engineering Division prior to installation. e. That the sanitary sewer laterals and water services including connection with meters at the street shall be installed for Lot B prior to the signature of final survey plat. f. That street trees, 1 per 30 feet of street frontage, shall be installed on the Monte Vista street frontage prior to the signature of the final survey plat. All street trees shall be chosen from the adopted Street Tree List and shall be installed in accordance with the specifications noted in Section E of the Site Design and Use Standards. The street trees shall be irrigated. 3) That Building permit submittals shall include: PA # 2014-00193 460 Schofield / adg Page 3 a. Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with Solar Setback Standard A in the formula [(Height - 6)/(0.445 + Slope) = Required Solar Setback] and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade. b. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 50 percent as required in AMC 18.20 4) That the tree protection fencing shall be installed according to the approved plan prior to any site work, storage of materials or issuance of the building permit. The tree protection shall be inspected and approved by the Ashland Planning Department prior to site work, storage of materials and/or the issuance of a building permit. 5) No construction shall occur within the tree protection zone including dumping or storage of materials such as building supplies, soil, waste, equipment, or parked vehicles. 6) That a Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division prior to site work, building demolition, and/or storage of materials. The Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the tree to be removed and the installation of tree protection fencing for the trees on and adjacent to the site. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.61.200.B. 7) That street trees, 1 per 30 feet of street frontage, shall be installed on the Monte Vista Street frontage prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new single family residence. All street trees shall be chosen from the adopted Street Tree List and shall be installed in accordance with the specifications noted in Section E of the Site Desire and Use Standards. The street trees shall be irrigated. y t Bi k'1Glolnar, irector Date D artmen of Community Development I i i i PA # 2014-00193 460 Schofield / adg Page 4 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On June 25, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed i envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-204-00193, 460 Schofield Street. Signa u e of Employe Documentl 6124/2014 Aa3AV-09-008-6 r ~,dn-dod paogaj 81 a819naa 1uaaaa6aeLP I' I wo:)-AABAe-mmm ep u1}e 9ang3eq el a zaildaa ap sues ®0965 ®Ab3AV }iaege6 al zesIII1n . eased a solpej sa}}9nbi14 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BA 1700 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BA 1802 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BA 1803 BILLINGS JOHN STANNARD JR MCGEE CHRISTOPHER JOHN LITTLETON THERESE M TRUSTEE 465 1140 JACKSON RD 445 SCHOFIELD ST SCHOFIELD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BA 2000 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 201 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 203 DUTTON BRIAN M RAFFELOCK DEAN E/STEPHANIE COTTS STUART ET AL PO BOX 782 434 MONTE VISTA 100 SCHOFIELD ST ASTORIA, OR 97103 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 300 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 301 PA-2014-00193 391 E058D 304 WILLIAMS GALE D JR/STACEY L GALL DENISE BRAYFIELD FRANCES TRSTE FBO 430 MONTE VISTA ST PO BOX 624 400 MONTE VISTA ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 402 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 403 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 405 HALDERMAN MICHAEL J TRUSTEE DICKEY TERRY P TRUSTEE ET AL BAHR MICHAEL C/SUSAN M 445 SHERIDAN ST ; 465 SHERIDAN ST P 0 BOX 1023 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 500 PA-2014-00193 391 E058D 501 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 2304 HENDRICKSON RICHARD H TRUSTEE ET AL BELCASTRO PETE J/CHRISTINE PARKER RONALD A TRUSTEE ET AL 444 MONTE VISTA DR 447 MONTE VISTA DR 501 SCHOFIELD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND; OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 2309 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 2310 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 2311 FORREST ROBERT TROY/HOLLY M DEFAUW MICHAEL S ET AL SHANNON JOSEPH ` 560 SHERIDAN 490 SCHOFIELD ST 470 SCHOFIELD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391 E05BD 2313 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2312 DIAMONTOPOULOS WILLIAM A TRUSTEE PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2314 FRANKS VERNON LOUIS TRUSTEE 535 SHERIDAN ST PAYSEUR CHARLES TRUSTEE ET AL 555 SHERIDAN ST - ASHLAND, OR 97520 515 SHERIDAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2315 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2316 KERRY KENCAIRN SORSOLI WAYNE A TRUSTEE ET AL MORTENSEN SHAUN/SHERRIL 545 A STREET #3 495 SHERIDAN ST 503 LAKOTA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 CARLOS DELGADO POLARIS LAND SURVEYING, LLC 460 SCHOFIELD STREET 217 FOURTH STREET P.O. BOX 459 6/25/2014 NOD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 26 wi®~~8$® ® waa6P3 do-dod asodxa laded peal r ®0966 ajeidwal @AjaAV asn 01awl 6uole puce - - sliegej ®faad Ase3 Rlpualddo93 Planning Department, 51 Winbuh Jay, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY OF 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland,or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -AS 1_1 LAN Lr'J% NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2014-00193 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 460 Schofield Street APPLICANT: Kerry Kencairn OWNER: Denise Gall DESCRIPTION: A request for a Minor Land Partition approval to divide the property located at 460 Schofield Street into two parcels. The new parcel will be accessed via Monte Vista Street. The- Comrnunit-y--DewloPm-ent-Direct-ar-has-determined the-proposed- -development --is not-subject to- the Development Standards-for Hillside-Lands because the slope of the property, based-.on the natural_grade i-s--less-4-han-25%. The applicant has-submitted a slope -analysis establishing the `natural grade of the property isl-ess-tharrr25OX The request also includes a Tree Removal Permit request to remove five trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 05BD TAX LOTS: 301. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 30, 2014 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: June 13, 2014 - i t ~y - Fzo-r SU F3.J ECT PROPERTY 4C SCHOFEILD ST r 1E 05 BD 301 - \ 1 L12 Et 1 l ~ ~ ~ L 1 -1 < -L.. N r-f moo l 1 \ 3( 30 60 120 Foci The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) i The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. ocx MINOR LAND PARTITION CRITERIA Section 18.76.050 Preliminary Approval An application for a preliminary partition shall be approved when the following conditions exist: A. The future use for urban purposes of the remainder of the tract will not be impeded. B. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be impeded. C. The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. D. The partitioning is not in conflict with any law, ordinance or resolution applicable to the land. E. The partitioning in accordance with the design and street standards contained in the Chapter 18,88, Performance Standards Options. (ORD 2836, 1999) F. When there exists adequate public facilities, or proof that such facilities can be provided, as determined by the Public Works Director and specified by City documents, for water, sanitary sewers, storm sewer, and electricity. G. When there exists a 20-foot wide. access along the entire street frontage of the parcel to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street, as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Such access shall be improved with an asphaltic concrete pavement designed for the use of the proposed street. The minimum width of the street shall be 20-feet with all work done under permit of the Public Works Department. 1. The Public Works Director may allow an unpaved street for access for a minor land partition when all of the following conditions exist: a. The unpaved street is at least 20-feet wide to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street. b. The centerline grade on any portion of the unpaved street does not exceed ten percent. 2. Should the partition be on an unpaved street and paving is not required, the applicant shall agree to participate in the costs and to waive the rights of the owner of the subject property to remonstrate both with respect to the owners agreeing to participate in the cost of full street improvements and to not remonstrate to the formation of a local improvement district to cover such improvements and costs thereof. Full street improvements shall include paving, curb, gutter, sidewalks and the under grounding of utilities. This requirement shall be precedent to the signing of the final survey plat, and if the owner declines to so agree, then the application shall be denied. H. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition, access may be required to be provided from the alley and prohibited from the street. (ORD 2951, 2008) PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 18.62.040.1 Criteria for Approval A Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the following: 1. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. 2. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. 3. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions, The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum permitted development permitted by the Land Use Ordinance, (ORD 2808,1997; ORD 2834,1998; ORD 2951, 2008) TREE REMOVAL 18.61.080 Criteria for Issuance of Tree Removal - Staff Permit An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied, The Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit, A. Hazard Tree: The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if.the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal - 1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning, 2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. B. Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard if the applicant demonstrates all of the following: 1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; and 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property!. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone, Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. 4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. (ORD 2951, 2008; ORD 2883, 2002 GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2014\PA-2014-00193.docx AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On May 30, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-00193, 460 Schofield. i Signature of Employee DocumenQ 5/30/2014 EcoFriendiy Easy Peel® Labels i L - Rend along line to i r Y~i Use Avery® Template 61600 °ied Paper _expose Pop-up EdgeT'" L ®4R460 PA-2014-00193 391E05BA 1700 PA-2014-00193 391E0513A 1802 PA-2014-00193 391E05BA 1803 BILLINGS JOHN STANNARD JR MCGEE CHRISTOPHER JOHN LITTLETON THERESE M TRUSTEE ET 1140 JACKSON RD 445 SCHOFIELD ST 465 SCHOFIELD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 39IE05BA 2000 PA-2014-00193 39IE05BD 201 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 203 DUTTON BRIAN M RAFFELOCK DEAN E/STEPHANIE COTTS STUART ET AL PO BOX 782 434 MONTE VISTA 100 SCHOFIELD ST ASTORIA, OR 97103 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 300 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 301 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 304 WILLIAMS GALE D JR/STACEY L GALL DENISE BRAYFIELD FRANCES TRSTE FBO 430 MONTE VISTA ST PO BOX 624 400 MONTE VISTA ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 402 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 403 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 405 HALDERMAN MICHAEL J TRUSTEE DICKEY TERRY P TRUSTEE ET AL BAHR MICHAEL C/SUSAN M 445 SHERIDAN ST 465 SHERIDAN ST P O BOX 1023 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 500 PA-2014-00193 391E0513D 501 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2304 HENDRICKSON RICHARD H BELCASTRO PETE J/CHRISTINE PARKER RONALD A TRUSTEE ET AL TRUSTEE ET AL 447 MONTE VISTA DR 501 SCHOFIELD 444 MONTE VISTA DR - ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND. OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2309 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2310 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2311 FORREST ROBERT TROYMOLLY M_ DEFAUW MICHAEL S ET AL SHANNON JOSEPH 560 SHERIDAN 490 SCHOFIELD ST 470 SCHOFIELD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2313 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2312 DIAMONTOPOULOS WILLIAM A. PA-2014-00193 391E051313 2314 FRANKS VERNON LOUIS TRUSTEE TRUSTEE ET AL PAYSEUR CHARLES TRUSTEE ET AL 555 SHERIDAN ST 535 SHERIDAN ST 515 SHERIDAN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2315 PA-2014-00193 391E05BD 2316 KERRY KENCAIRN SORSOLI WAYNE A TRUSTEE ET AL MORTENSEN SHAUN/SHERRIL 545 A STREET #3 495 SHERIDAN ST 503 LAKOTA WAY AS OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 CARLOS DELGADO POLARIS LAND SURVEYING, LLC , NOC 5/30/2014 217 FOURTH STREET P.O. BOX 459 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 j Etiquettes faciles a peter Sens de Repliez a la hachure afn de www.averycom ~ Utilisez le gabarit AVERYO 5160® j charqement reveler le rebord Pop-upmc ; 1-800-GO-AVERY Application for a Minor Land Partition and Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit Zoning 111- 7.5 P Single Family Residential Lot Size 1.10 acres (47,709 Sq ft) Project Location: Owner: 460 Schofield St Denise Gall Ashland, OR 97520 PO BOX 624 391E05BD LOT 301 Ashland, OR 97520 Surveyor: Polaris Land Surveying, LLC PO Box 459 Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: 541-482-5009 Landscape Architecture/Planning: Kerry KenCairn KenCairn Landscape Architecture 545 A Street, Suite 3 Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: 541-488-3194 Applicable Ordinances Addressed: 18.20 R-1 Single-Family Residential District 18.61 Tree Preservation & Protection 18.62 Physical & Environmental Constraints 18.76 Partitions 18.92 Off Street Parking Plans Provided: Project Cover Sheet - PL 1.0 Site Plan - PL 1.1 Detail site Plan - PL 1.2 Street Tree Plan - PL 1.3 Slope Analysis Plan - PL 2.0 Grading and Drainage Plan - PL 3.0 Erosion Control and Plant Plan - PL 4.0 Average Original Slope Plan - PL 5.0 Tree Inventory and Protection Plan - L1.0 Solar Compliance Exhibit - AS1.0 Preliminary Platt - SV-1 1 18.20 R-1 Single-Family Residential District 18.20.040 General Regulations A. Minimum lot area: Basic minimum lot area in the R-1 zone shall be five thousand (5,000) square feet, except six thousand (6,000) square feet for corner lots. R-1 areas may be designed for seventy-five hundred (7,500), or ten thousand (10,000) square foot minimum lot sizes where slopes or other conditions make larger sizes necessary. Permitted lot sizes shall be indicated by a number following the R-1 notation which represents allowable minimum square footage in thousands of square feet, as follows: The existing lot is 47,709 sq ft. after the proposed partition, the new Lot A will be 30,696 sq. ft. and the new Lot B will be 16,740 sq. ft. (see PL 1.0 and PL 1.1) Complies: The proposed lot sizes comply with these requirements. B. Minimum lot width: Interior Lots 50 feet Corner Lots 60 feet All R-1-7.5 lots 65 feet Lot B has a smaller minimum lot width at the back of the lot. The average lot width is 81'-5" which exceeds the minimum requirement. LOT A Lot area after partition 30,969 sq ft Average Width 163'-7" Average Depth 187'8" Minimum Width 131' Minimum Depth 166' Maximum Width 187' Maximum Depth 210' LOT B Lot area after partition 16,740 sq ft Average Width 811-5" Average Depth 166' Minimum Width 53' Minimum Depth 80.5' Maximum Width 109' Maximum Depth 210' 2 C. Lot Depth: All lots shall have a minimum depth of eighty (80) feet, and a maximum depth of one hundred fifty (150) feet unless lot configuration prevents further development of the back of the lot. Maximum lot depth requirements shall not apply to lots created by minor land partitions. This lot is created by a minor land partition and maximum lot depth requirements do not apply. D. Standard Yard Requirements: Front yards shall be a minimum of, 15 feet excluding garages. Unenclosed porches shall be permitted with a minimum setback of eight feet or the width of any existing public utility easement, whichever is greater, from the front property line. All garages accessed from the front shall have a minimum setback of 20' from the front property line; side yards, six feet; the side yard of a corner lot abutting a public street shall have a ten foot setback; rear yard, ten feet plus ten feet for each story in excess of one story. In addition, the setbacks must comply with Chapter 18.70 which provides for Solar Access. (Ord. 2097 S5, 1980; Ord. 2121 Se, 1981, Ord. 2752, 1995) The Existing Home complies with all set back requirements. Proposed Home Front yard set back is 34'. Side yard set back is 6 feet or greater. Rear yard is greater than 10'. There is no garage, cars are parked in front of home. E. Maximum Building Height: No structure shall be over thirty-five (35) feet or two and one-half (2 1/2) stories in height, whichever is less. Structures within the Historic District shall not exceed a height of 30 feet. Proposed Home Complies: Building height does not exceed 35 feet F. Maximum Coverage: Maximum lot coverage shall be forty-five (45%) percent in an R- 1-7.5. Lot A After the proposed partition will contain 20% Lot B After the proposed partition with the conceptual home as an example of intent will contain 21% Lot Coverage. 18.61 Tree Preservation & Protection 18.61.025 Heritage Trees There are no Heritage Trees adjacent to or on this property. 18.61.035 Exempt Tree Removal Activities F. Removal of trees within the Wildfire Lands area of the City, as defined on adopted maps, for the purposes of wildfire fuel management, and in accord with the requirements of the Physical and Environmental Constraints Chapter- 18.62. The project does not fall in the Wildfire Overlay Zone. 18.61.042 Approval & Permit Required 3 A person who desires to remove a tree, not otherwise exempted in 18.61.035, shall first apply for and receive one of the following tree removal permits before tree removal occurs: A. TREE REMOVAL - EMERGENCY PERMIT: Not Applicable B. TREE REMOVAL - VERIFICATION PERMIT: 1. If a site has received development approval through a planning action consistent with the standards of this chapter, then a Verification Permit shall be required for those trees approved for removal through that process. To obtain a verification permit, an applicant must clearly identify on the property the trees to be removed by tying pink tagging tape around each tree and submitting a site plan indicating the location of the requested trees. Vegetation 4" to 6" DBH that is to be removed shall also be marked with pink tagging tape. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application. The Staff Advisor will then verify that the requested trees match the site plan approved with the planning action. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the original development permit. This project will require a verification permit. The trees are all tagged with an aluminum tag that corresponds to the numbering system ion the tree protection plan (sheet L 1.0). We are proposing the removal of 5 trees, a grouping of evergreens that are where the proposed driveway would be developed. These trees range in size from 6" to 9" and though healthy were planted too close together for ultimate health and size potential. At this time, there are no mitigation trees identified. When the house proposal comes forward for planning approval it is understood that the trees will be removed at that time and the applicant will have to propose mitigation trees as part of the new application. 2. Verification permits shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for the subject property. The application will require a verification permit. 18.61.050 Plans Required A. An application for all Tree Removal and Tree Topping Permits shall be made upon forms prescribed by the City. The application for a Tree Removal Permits shall contain: 4 a.The number, size, species and location of the trees proposed to be removed or topped on a site plan of the property. Sheet L 1.0 has a complete map and inventory of all trees on the property and those trees within 15 feet of the property line. All trees are numbered and identified by size, species, health and preservation or removal intention. Trees to be removed are identified with an X, there are five (5) trees proposed for removal. b. The anticipated date of removal or topping. At this time, the application is for a lot partition only. When the actual house application is approved, a date for tree removal will be determined once approval for the project has been secured. c. A statement of the reason for removal or topping. Any trees identified for removal in this project are either within and/or adjacent to the proposed driveway. d. Information concerning proposed landscaping or planting of new trees to replace the trees to be removed, and When the house proposal comes forward for planning approval it is understood that the trees will be removed at that time and the applicant will have to propose mitigation trees as part of the new application. e. Evidence that the trees proposed for removal or topped have been clearly identified on the property for visual inspection. The trees on this property have metal tags with the same identification numbers that appear on the plans. 18.61.200 Tree Protection Tree Protection as required by this section is applicable to any planning action or building permit. A. Tree Protection Plan Required. 1. A Tree Protection Plan approved by the Staff Advisor shall be required prior to conducting any development activities including, but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, or demolition work on a property or site, which requires a planning action or building permit. 2. In order to obtain approval of a Tree Protection Plan; an applicant shall submit a plan to the City, which clearly depicts all trees to be preserved and/or removed on the site. The plan must be drawn to scale and include the following: A Tree Protection and Removal Plan has been submitted as part of this application, See Sheet L 1.0 B. Tree Protection Measures Required. A Tree protection and removal plan has been submitted as part of this application, See Sheet L 1.0 18.62 Physical & Environmental Constraints 5 In the Pre-application responses it was noted that a Slope analysis could eliminate the need for a P and E. There are 2 drawings submitted that address slope. One is a slope analysis of the current situation, which does contain slopes over 25% (sheet PL 2.0) the second graphic shows the topography overlaid on the existing condition, and shows that the slopes over 25% were (for the most part) created when the pad was formed for the main house. This project contains slopes greater than 25% throughout the project area. However, these slopes are a result of the grading accommodating the construction of the original structure and do not represent the natural grade of the site. The proposed new lot contains very little land over 25 % and even less of land in its natural condition over 25%. This application proposes that the overlay of the Physical and Environmental constraints permit is not required or advisable for this application. i 18.70 Solar Access A Solar Envelope and calculations for the proposed building are attached as sheet AS 1.0. The solar, relationship of the existing home to remain on Lot A is not altered by this application. 18.76 Partitions 18.76.020 Preliminary Step The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a preliminary map of the proposed partition. The preliminary map has been submitted as part of this application. 18.76.030 Preliminary Map Requirements A preliminary map has been provided by Polaris Land Surveying. 18.76.050 Preliminary Approval by the Planning Commission An application for a preliminary partition shall be approved when the following conditions exist: A. The future use for urban purposes of the remainder of the tract will not be impeded. This partition would constitute the final build out of this property. Its creation will not impede future development but allow for infill to this area. B. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be impeded. 6 This partition would constitute the final build out of this property. Its creation will not impede future development but allows for infill to this area. C. The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. This property has not been involved in any planning activity for over 1 year. D. The partitioning is not in conflict with any law, ordinance or resolution applicable to the land. The proposed partition is legal. E. The partitioning is in accordance with the design and street standards contained in the Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. (Ord 2836 S8, 1999) Because of recent LID improvements, the original dimensions of the pre partitioned lot, and the existing ROW widths, the improvements are not to City standards, there are no sidewalks on Monte Vista, and no curb side parking. F. When there exists adequate public facilities, or proof that such facilities can be j provided, as determined by the Public Works Director and specified by City documents, for water, sanitary sewers, storm sewer, and electricity. j This proposed parcel is adjacent to all existing services. All utilities are available from Monte Vista Drive. G. When there exists a 20-foot wide access along the entire street frontage of the parcel to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street, as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Such access shall be improved with an asphaltic concrete pavement designed for the use of the proposed street. The minimum width of the street shall be 20- feet with all work done under permit of the Public Works Department. Because of recent LID improvements, the original dimensions of the pre partitioned lot, and the existing ROW widths, the improvements are not to City standards, there are no sidewalks on Monte Vista, and no curb side parking. H. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition, access maybe required to be provided from the alley and prohibited from the street. There is no alley adjacent to the partition. 7 S CH o FIFL n 9 rx ss r c , E v YWRM m~ SD m m m m m 112,S RM} m Cd o F \ \ I A y \ I I ~ ~ \ 1905 TAX LOT 304 I N~ Vic \ }191 Vl. r I \ \ x \ 91 9 P.p I I R J~\; 1 .01 TAX LOT 300 V V, 3 \ N % I I D I I A \ v( V LA 192 \ n_#- / i \ LO 1 LO 1/r 391EO50D TA LOT 402 TAX LOT 405 4 I I l r l I I \ I ZC PROJECT SITE 1" = 40' LOT A LOT B Lot area after partition 30,969 sq ft Lot area after partition 16,740 sq ft _ j Average Width 163'-7" Average Width 81'-5" Average Depth 187'8:' Average Depth 166' Minimum Width 131' 114, Minimum Width 53' Minimum Depth 166' C~) Q) Minimum Depth 80.5' Maximum Width 187' Maximum Width 109' U) Maximum Depth 210' Maximum Depth 210' / o + STOOM r ~ ' tNii tQi r o ` . 0061 31 ,30 0, o 1 s F 5061 N / / r W D- LOT A y 1 y s W 11~ -77 : F a ~a : zoo a N 210'-1" r . 215 ~t t t a i ; s r. , ♦ 1 i ~ ♦ c. ♦ 'i i \ 2 f r ;\k \ LO S i \ 3 7 .v.+ R 210'-0" i ,39 1 E05BD 'Fc f { , 4 ~ - 4 i t „ f } { tl sr~RM{ ~ ~ sn ~a sr :r t \ Quer - 3 Z ♦ 1920 { F ( Z x I 7 ,925 A : 1955 ti i - i ,z i ° 1930 \ ` ? z z ~ _ I f 4 p , z 191 < x tai Q t 1 Ix ~ } ( ey'~3~.y CF, Z t it b ~2 x E x i = O C zt 3 ? Z~~' ~ ' 191 , 4 12 A \ \ , x _ u ~ t l \ t w 263a 30' 0 o ,Q o 0 0 0 I o ob0o°b°oo q O o 0,0"o o o 0 erfo~'O-O-o q O O p O O O O p O O O O C) O O O O .d b O.. O O d 0 p O" p 0 0 0 O/6 O p b d O O p O g o< b 0 O O .O O O bO O CS 0 0 0 0 0 0 po O d O O° O O O O O 0 0 p O O b O Q O O O O O° O O d O" O O O o 0 0 0 ° 0 0 0 0 O v O O O O° --O O O O O O O 0 O .O' O O' O O O" O O O O:" 'O O O O. O' O b y O O O o g 0 0 0 0 0 q 000QO0OO O 0 O' 0.000 O rn O O b°Ob0000~© 0 Dar / i 4 0 / ~ p P p' `2 / 0000 O / OO"O" 'b.0b:0'0. b o0o a°o°o~'o I o o,,~ O o° 0-0 I q~b Q Qr, ~ t~ ~ °.O Op ilk I Y 'Fy- ~ 6 A / i t r A 4 N N 13u w o 1'~ =i t Y , r. . iii ~ ~ Y k \ A \ \ - 793? 90 , t. • <t \ ` gds. 01 \ 1935 _ NEW CONTOURS WALL DRAINS STORM LINE LANDSCAPE WALL O LANDSCAPE STEPS 4 HYDROSEED AREA TO BE PLANT LIST FOR REVEGETATION TERRACES REVEGETATED WITH NATIVES Acer circinatum STANDARD HYDROSEED MIX Acer palmatum Hard Fescue, Micro Clover, Tall Fescue, Gautheria shallon White Yarrow, w/ wood fiber mulch, Mahonia Repens tackifier, slow-release fertilizer, & mycorrhizal Rubus pentabalous PLANT LIST FOR ORNAMENTAL LANDSCAPE HYDROSEED AREAS TO BE PLANTED Acer circinatum WITH ORNAMENTALS IN FUTURE Acer palmatum STANDARD HYDROSEED MIX Arbutus unedo compacta REGREEN C.eanothus'PoInt Reyes' Gautheria shallon in Lonicera pileata Mahonia Repens Rhododendron spp PERMANENT HYDROSEED AREAS S STANDARD HYDROSEED MIX IRRIGATION NOTES t Hard Fescue, Micro Clover, Tall Fescue, Planting and Irrigation information is provided for future implementation. White Yarrow, w/ wood fiber mulch, Hydroseed species have been selected to tackifier, slow-release fertilizer, & mycorrhizal flourish without supplemental water. Street Trees, Ornamental Landscape, and Revegetation species will be irrigated with a drip system from the SILT FENCE City water supply. See drip irrigation details provided. NJ, AREAS NOT SHOWN AS TREATED WILL NOT BE DISTURBED r~ i 77 > Z I 3 3 I I ` „ t \ ;t I t ; F ~ I z 77 v s o' O o' o O 7O J t C v < L0 =70 c 0-0 0 0 0 O c O•" O O O O O c5 v O 0 O G 0 o' O J O C O G O. O O O 0:•' O O O O C) O d C O C G J O O O C) J n. O C~ J O O O 0 o 0 0 O O C O o 0 O U 0 O_O O o O O oC, C+- rU Q' ~J O~O , U0~00.0 0 G t~ J,,• Cyo0 0 > r;nO~JOrOOpoc7Or.1.~~s ~ J< 00 CiJ O Q' 000J0C~ op C) C} O J p 4l y i / r O O ~4~y0o00 /rte O~ 0 Ile III Ile C / / / oo, lo, 10, .44 lo, 328//%~J S.,2i4 F'fVltl rid' J Ci -O/ 000 J; 01 (o oo, / y~ .t mot' -1 °~~P~$ y N 0 iY J p~f~~° a N"`.. W~O p4 M~ € ip~ HT. OF (N) ROOF: t15'-6" TYPE / SLOPE OF ROOF: 2:12 SLOPE SETBACK STANDARD: TABLE 'A' ray SETBACK PER STANDARD: (1941.33' LESS 1924.0') = 17.33'; 17.33'(-) 61/ (.445 (-.11)) = 33'-10"SSB REQUIRED 44 (1947.0' LESS 19320) = 15'; 15'(-) 6'1 (.445 (-A 1)) = 26'-10" SSB REQUIRED (1941.33' LESS 1932.0') = 9.33'; 9.33'(-) 6'/ (.445 (-.11)) = 9'-11" SSB REQUIRED "AVG. 150' SLOPE TO NORTH IS -17.00'/150'= -.11 "AVG. NORTH /SOUTH LOT DIMENSION = 731+87.501+136.921/ (3) = 99.12' to I I ~ o I °z I ADJ. RESIDENCE 4 N' i PROPERTY LINE _ w . s, I ~ _ t '194134" 1932.00' y I I Z I U \ Z 0 W.~. Z REAR S7K ¢ }J a it ® PROPERTY LINE 209.92' .........e.._e.'' I SIT t~ ~N1 - - r0 rr rrrr / , ' \ f 0 ` 1 `rrr: rrjrj -rrfr'jr''r \ ~ r 's+/1dI /J j1 x I~ r'~'~!\ r -j rrr ;r r°f rr° 61~ 1 rrr r jr! rr rr'z rrr rr r r j rr r _~~..~e... I-'I 1 r/r!r rrr / rrr rjrr rrrrr rrrr/rlrrrrrrAjrrjr / 5rr -r___`.. _ 1 - Irrr rr s /r rr r r-f rr rr r jlj ,r-/ I r°rr rr 'r r r r ...-__w Jm rr rr jr rr ,ejr t J. _ 1 rrrrr rrr i -rr rfrr; r rrrrr ~ r rj 'J`P"6e trr ~ ~J°' I' ~R~ a \ _"y ` Gr r jr r 'jr {.+F~~ r / , it ~ 7`r 1 1 rrr rr r°1Vjrr rr r ri r J r r rms. ~ ~ 1 1 f f/ rrr ,,rrr 4rrr rrr r ~,.r , / r rr j• /J% dj rr r,r rrrrr _ ~ t 1 ! r j J/ a.r - rr r ~rrp \ I I J 1 W .F. ~ f , rr` - r rrJS rrrrj''f , rr f r / I\l - t J 6~r rrrr ~y 1 I f r 9 x ~ 1 ,r jrrr r rrr r \ f/rr ~ l tt ,'rrrrr rrrrr tit ! l 1 1 7' Q O 6 .111 O .j'rA /rrr rrr rr\ ~U;\ fi'r' fJJ I fj 1 t I i ~J I rll e ~ 12 c) \A og~ 27 'j 1 ~ rrr , , . , , ~ 28 rr =rr I , 15 000 ~ ¢ J d/ ~ r Ad \ j %°lr r ~1 r lrrj rj / r f! r/ 1 fry 4' ' 1 % d/ 1J 29 19 1 rj / ,,r j o!l ; ~ i - ~ ~ ~ dj`" /`s /jrr jl r// / i !f i ,d yd `j ~ % t) -.r E_ /`-r jr r ~ ~ l ~ A /If jJf f ~ jr 1 JJ t1J ~1 /t CONCEPTUAL ` 30 26 HOMESITE 1rr1 I / It t DESIGN jr J 1 vJ I ' ; ' f 1 = ✓ ` 36 31 24 23 3 4, ® rr rte` r , 1 ~ rr .''rrr rrr er~ o I 1/r r r'' ` 21 ,r' r° //r r rr frrrj rrrr yJ~ I --t 1 fjrr , rr, 37 r,j jrr _r E` T e ~1 I 1 d .Ij f ~ I~ rr , f✓ r, !j 'rj f r ir. - I r I I l.,- o ~ `I 1 ~ . 1 20 r- - r ' -1 3 ; ° J~ = ~ ;lam-r 22 f 1 j 1 r ti ! s r^ I SPECIFICATIONS FORT I / w S r y ~x 1 s I 1. Before beginning work, ~i y 9 es must be routes I N cedures, access 2. Fences must be ereclec i N chain link panels installed does not allow passage of I-. - r~~' I tree or group of trees. Fer removed without the perms 3. Construction trallers an ..I o Q I 4. All underground utilities ~'I (h I tranverse the protection ar I I 5. No materials, equipmen 'i O I protection zone (fenced an 6. Additional tree pruning r not by construction person 1. Any herbicides placed u 8. If injury should occur to that apporpriate treatment! for, before the project will t 9. The project Landscape, encounter tree roots. 10. All trees shall be Irrigal soil within the tree protecti 11. Erosion control device! prevent siltation and/ or en r t TAX LOT 1700 TAX LOT 1083 S C H O F I E LEGEND - 518 /NCH IRON PIN (FOUND) ' w PROPERTY LINE v' ` e vc O BOUNDARY LINE - - - - CENTERLINE - - - - - EASEMENT LINE \ VA) -~--i WATER LINE / ~F15' 1 9z \ ~xg, ' •~~~K BURIED NATURAL GAS LINE "A BURIED PHONE LINE OAK so STORM DRAIN LINE SAN/TARP SEWER LINE oHF OVERHEAD POWER L/NE ~l 1 NFN uGP BURIED POWER LINE OAK 1V BURIED CABLE N I I e" III < `,6° 391 E05BD ~~-1864~~ CONTOUR LINE TL 2311 0 WM WATER METER I I X ~is~ `c o~ Z WV WATER VALVE I I ` II \ y`,\\ ~g+ FH FIRE HYDRANT ® cI CURB INLET III CEL 1 ss SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE ~1,OD5. O. FT \ O STORM SEWER MANHOLE QT PHONE PEDESTAL 1 \ ' D.R. OFFICIAL RECORDS, JA. CO. RECORDER---' i tot I \ I ~ y k \ 1* OAK 391 EO5BD TAX LOT 23121 NOTES: 6 \ s\\\ 8,~ SUBJECT PROPERTY ZONING DESIGNATION: R-1-7.5 qAK \ TOTAL PROJECT SQUARE FOOTAGE = 47,709 S0. FT. 0' OAK 391 E05B0 ( I \ \ . TAX LOT 23131 I I L~ \ j` ~1= 6 RR ~0. OAK I 15 OAK~_ 1 'B FIR 12" OAKl - I TAX9 LOOT 4 02 / Assessor's Map No. 39 1E 05 80, Tax Lot 301 POLARIS L® CITY ASHLAND March 10, 2014 Kerry KenCairn 545 A Street Ashland, OR 97520 RE: Incompleteness Determination for PA-2014-00193, located at 460 Schofield Street Dear Ms. KenCairn: I have reviewed your application received on February 10, 2014 for a Minor Land Partition to divide 460 Schofield into two parcels. After examining the materials presented, I have determined that the application is incomplete because the submitted application does not meet the requirements for a Minor Land Partition due to the Assignment of Solar Factor requirements. Incomplete applications are subject to delay in accordance with ORS 227.178. The application cannot be further processed and deemed complete until the missing information described below is submitted, or the applicant indicates that the missing information will not be provided. 1. All new lots are required to demonstrate that they can comply with the solar setback requirements. According to the Ashland Municipal Code AMC 18.70.050.A. Assignment of Solar Factor. All land divisions which create new lots shall be designed to permit the location of a twenty-one (21) foot high structure with a setback which does not exceed fifty (50%) percent of the lot's north-south lot dimension. Lots having north facing (negative) slopes of less than fifteen percent (15%) (e.g., 10%), and which are zoned for residential uses, shall have a north-south lot dimension equal to or greater than that calculated by using Formula I. Due to this lot having a specific buildable area the portion of the property where the structure is to be located will have to comply with Solar Setback Standard A. Please provide evidence that the new lot in the area of the can comply with the required solar setbacks.. 2. Trees: Some of the trees that are to be preserved near the driveway look to have more than 50 percent of their root zone disturbed for the construction of the driveway and the retaining walls. Has an arborist evaluated those trees to determine whether they will survive construction? There are also some trees along the South property line which are not shown on all of the plans. Are these proposed for removal or is this an oversight? 3. Street Trees: Street trees, one per 30-feet of street frontage are required at the time of partition. It is reasonable that the new lot could have the street trees planted and irrigated prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy but the primary lot will need to show compliance with the street tree standards. 1 Community Development Dept. Tel: 541488-5305 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541-488.6006 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 OVA& rats www.ashland.or.us Application for a Minor Land Partition and Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit Zoning R1- 7.5 P Single Family Residential Lot Size 1.10 acres (47,709 Sq ft) Project Location: Owner: 460 Schofield St Denise Gall Ashland, OR 97520 PO BOX 624 391E05BD LOT 301 Ashland, OR 97520 Surveyor: Polaris Land Surveying, LLC PO Box 459 Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: 541-482-5009 a 1 tl B Landscape Architecture/Planning: Kerry KenCairn KenCairn Landscape Architecture 545 A Street, Suite 3 Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: 541-488-3194 Applicable Ordinances Addressed: 18.20 R-1 Single-Family Residential District 18.61 Tree Preservation & Protection 18.62 Physical & Environmental Constraints 18.76 Partitions 18.92 Off Street Parking Plans Provided: Project Cover Sheet - PL 1.0 Landscape Site Plan - PL 1.1 Slope Analysis Plan - PL 2.0 Grading and Drainage Plan - PL 3.0 Erosion Control and Plant Plan - PL 4.0 Average Original Slope Plan - PL 5.0 Tree Inventory and Protection Plan - L1.0 Solar Compliance Exhibit - AS1.0 Preliminary Platt - SV-1 1 18.20 R-1 Single-Family Residential District 18.20.040 General Regulations A. Minimum lot area: Basic minimum lot area in the R-I zone shall be five thousand (5,000) square feet, except six thousand (6,000) square feet for corner lots. R-1 areas may be designed for seventy-five hundred (7,500), or ten thousand (10,000) square foot minimum lot sizes where slopes or other conditions make larger sizes necessary. Permitted lot sizes shall be indicated by a number following the R-1 notation which represents allowable minimum square footage in thousands of square feet, as follows: The existing lot is 47,709 sq ft. after the proposed partition, the new Lot A will be 30,696 sq. ft. and the new Lot B will be 16,740 sq. ft. (see PL 1.0 and PL 1.1) Complies: The proposed lot sizes comply with these requirements. I B. Minimum lot width: Interior Lots 50 feet Corner Lots 60 feet All R-1-7.5 lots 65 feet Lot B has a smaller minimum lot width at the back of the lot. The average lot width is 81'-5" which exceeds the minimum requirement. LOT A Lot area after partition 30,969 sq ft Average Width 163'-7" Average Depth 187' 8" Minimum Width 131' Minimum Depth 166' Maximum Width 187' Maximum Depth 210' LOT B Lot area after partition 16,740 sq ft Average Width 811-5" Average Depth 166' Minimum Width 53' Minimum Depth 80.5' Maximum Width 109' Maximum Depth 210' 2 C. Lot Depth: All lots shall have a minimum depth of eighty (80) feet, and a maximum depth of one hundred fifty (150) feet unless lot configuration prevents further development of the back of the lot. Maximum lot depth requirements shall not apply to lots created by minor land partitions. This lot is created by a minor land partition and maximum lot depth requirements do not apply. D. Standard Yard Requirements: Front yards shall be a minimum of, 15 feet excluding garages. Unenclosed porches shall be permitted with a minimum setback of eight feet or the width of any existing public utility easement, whichever is greater, from the front property line. All garages accessed from the front shall have a minimum setback of 20' from the front property line; side yards, six feet; the side yard of a corner lot abutting a public street shall have a ten foot setback; rear yard, ten feet plus ten feet for each story in excess of one story. In addition, the setbacks must comply with Chapter 18.70 which provides for Solar Access. (Ord. 2097 S5, 1980; Ord. 2121 Se, 1981, Ord. 2752, 1995) The Existing Home complies with all set back requirements. Proposed Home Front yard set back is 34. Side yard set back is 6 feet or greater. Rear yard is greater than 10'. There is no garage, cars are parked in front of home. E. Maximum Building Height: No structure shall be over thirty-five (35) feet or two and one-half (2 1/2) stories in height, whichever is less. Structures within the Historic District shall not exceed a height of 30 feet. Proposed Home Complies: Building height does not exceed 35 feet F. Maximum Coverage: Maximum lot coverage shall be forty-five (45%) percent in an R- 1-7.5. Lot A After the proposed partition will contain 20% Lot B After the proposed partition with the conceptual home as an example of intent will contain 21% Lot Coverage. 18.61 Tree Preservation & Protection 18.61.025 Heritage Trees There are no Heritage Trees adjacent to or on this property. 18.61.035 Exempt Tree Removal Activities F. Removal of trees within the Wildfire Lands area of the City, as defined on adopted maps, for the purposes of wildfire fuel management, and in accord with the requirements of the Physical and Environmental Constraints Chapter- 18.62. The project does not fall in the Wildfire Overlay Zone. 18.61.042 Approval & Permit Required 3 A person who desires to remove a tree, not otherwise exempted in 18.61.035, shall first " apply for and receive one of the following tree removal permits before tree removal occurs: A. TREE REMOVAL - EMERGENCY PERMIT: Not Applicable B. TREE REMOVAL - VERIFICATION PERMIT: 1. If a site has received development approval through a planning action consistent with the standards of this chapter, then a Verification Permit shall be required for those trees approved for removal through that process. To obtain a verification permit, an applicant must clearly identify on the property the trees to be removed by tying pink tagging tape around each tree and submitting a site plan indicating the location of the requested trees. Vegetation 4" to 6" DBH that is to be removed shall also be marked with pink tagging tape. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application. The Staff Advisor will then verify that the requested trees match the site plan approved with the planning action. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the original development permit. This project will require a verification permit. The trees are all tagged with an aluminum tag that corresponds to the numbering system ion the tree protection plan (sheet L 1.0). We are proposing the removal of 5 trees, a grouping of evergreens that are where the proposed driveway would be developed. These trees range in size from 6" to 9" and though healthy were planted too close together for ultimate health and size potential. At this time, there are no mitigation trees identified. When the house proposal comes forward for planning approval it is understood that the trees will be removed at that time and the applicant will have to propose mitigation trees as part of the new application. 2. Verification permits shall be required prior to the issuance of a building permit for the subject property. The application will require a verification permit. 18.61.050 Plans Required A. An application for all Tree Removal and Tree Topping Permits shall be made upon forms prescribed by the City. The application for a Tree Removal Permits shall contain: 4 i a.The number, size, species and location of the trees proposed to be removed or topped on a site plan of the property. Sheet L 1.0 has a complete map and inventory of all trees on the property and those trees within 15 feet of the property line. All trees are numbered and identified by size, species, health and preservation or removal intention. Trees to be removed are identified with an X, there are five (5) trees proposed for removal. b. The anticipated date of removal or topping. At this time, the application is for a lot partition only. When the actual house application is approved, a date for tree removal will be determined once approval for the project has been secured. c. A statement of the reason for removal or topping. Any trees identified for removal in this project are either within and/or adjacent to the proposed driveway. d. Information concerning proposed landscaping or planting of new trees to replace the trees to be removed, and When the house proposal comes forward for planning approval it is understood that the trees will be removed at that time and the applicant will have to propose mitigation trees as part of the new application. e. Evidence that the trees proposed for removal or topped have been clearly identified on the property for visual inspection. The trees on this property have metal tags with the same identification numbers that appear on the plans. 18.61.200 Tree Protection Tree Protection as required by this section is applicable to any planning action or building permit. A. Tree Protection Plan Required. 1. A Tree Protection Plan approved by the Staff Advisor shall be required prior to conducting any development activities including, but not limited to clearing, grading, excavation, or demolition work on a property or site, which requires a planning action or building permit. 2. In order to obtain approval of a Tree Protection Plan; an applicant shall submit a plan to the City, which clearly depicts all trees to be preserved and/or removed on the site. The plan must be drawn to scale and include the following: A Tree Protection and Removal Plan has been submitted as part of this application, See Sheet L 1.0 B. Tree Protection Measures Required. A Tree protection and removal plan has been submitted as part of this application, See Sheet L 1.0 18.62 Physical & Environmental Constraints 5 ~E In the Pre-application responses it was noted that a Slope analysis could eliminate the need for a P and E. There are 2 drawings submitted that address slope. One is a slope analysis of the current situation, which does contain slopes over 25% (sheet PL 2.0) the second graphic shows the topography overlaid on the existing condition, and shows that the slopes over 25% were (for the most part) created when the pad was formed for the main house. This project contains slopes greater than 25% throughout the project area. However, these slopes are a result of the grading accommodating the construction of the original structure and do not represent the natural grade of the site. The proposed new lot contains very little land over 25 % and even less of land in its natural condition over 25%. This application proposes that the overlay of the Physical and Environmental constraints permit is not required or advisable for this application. 18.70 Solar Access A Solar Envelope and calculations for the proposed building are attached as sheet AS1.0. The solar relationship of the existing home to remain on Lot A is not altered by this application. 18.76 Partitions 18.76.020 Preliminary Step The applicant shall submit to the Planning Department a preliminary map of the proposed partition. The preliminary map has been submitted as part of this application. 18.76.030 Preliminary Map Requirements A preliminary map has been provided by Polaris Land Surveying. 18.76.050 Preliminary Approval by the Planning Commission An application for a preliminary partition shall be approved when the following conditions exist: A. The future use for urban purposes of the remainder of the tract will not be impeded. This partition would constitute the final build out of this property. Its creation will not impede future development but allow for infill to this area. i B. The development of the remainder of any adjoining land or access thereto will not be impeded. 6 This partition would constitute the final build out of this property. Its creation will not impede future development but allows for infill to this area. C. The tract of land has not been partitioned for 12 months. This property has not been involved in any planning activity for over 1 year. D. The partitioning is not in conflict with any law, ordinance or resolution applicable to the land. The proposed partition is legal. E. The partitioning is in accordance with the design and street standards contained in the Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. (Ord 2836 S8, 1999) Because of recent LID improvements, the original dimensions of the pre partitioned lot, and the existing ROW widths, the improvements are not to City standards, there are no sidewalks on Monte Vista, and no curb side parking. F. When there exists adequate public facilities, or proof that such facilities can be provided, as determined by the Public Works Director and specified by City documents, for water, sanitary sewers, storm sewer, and electricity. This proposed parcel is adjacent to all existing services. All utilities are available from Monte Vista Drive. I G. When there exists a 20-foot wide access along the entire street frontage of the parcel to the nearest fully improved collector or arterial street, as designated in the Comprehensive Plan. Such access shall be improved with an asphaltic concrete pavement designed for the use of the proposed street. The minimum width of the street shall be 20- feet with all work done under permit of the Public Works Department. Because of recent LID improvements, the original dimensions of the pre partitioned lot, and the existing ROW widths, the improvements are not to City standards, there are no sidewalks on Monte Vista, and no curb side parking. H. Where an alley exists adjacent to the partition, access may be required to be provided from the alley and prohibited from the street. There is no alley adjacent to the partition. 7 r°~-0-~ S C X O F t E L D S T R S S T C 8, Pvc `{..::E.. ~Fo 77- - 1 m 7~RM' am m m m m m 1 x:12 S RM' C-7- °z t`I\ to 192o~./°T~` e 1/'..~°,°p'~ ` 1905 391058D TAX LOT 304 I I ~ i t ~ -7950- ~ \ \ \ , N \ I I 1 ,i 4 \ ~ S{\ \ \ VIC I I t \t \ t \ i T191 i V.. 1 ~a \ \ \ ` y~ \ F t ,t \ Y \ \ A4 191 W I A'. A ~i \ \ O~ 23f~j i i \ \ \ X391 EO,5 D 13- %T AX LOT 300 L 192 \ iaD 1 \ \ \ PL Io \4 \ . IT- LC 391 E€35Bt? I \ 1 LC ~ 39 1E05BD ~ l IT TAX LOT 402 ~ TAX LET 405 ~ ~ \ Z( PROJECT SITE 1" = 40' LOT A LOT B J0, y, Lot area after partition 30,969 sq ft Lot area after partition 16,740 sq ft _ E Average Width 163'-7" Average Width 811-5" Average Depth 187'8" Average Depth 166' Minimum Width 131' Minimum Width 53' Minimum Depth 166' Minimum Depth 80.5' Maximum Width 187'S Maximum Width 109' Maximum Depth 210' Maximum Depth 210' / LN C) / q 5 : ~Srp~M -s681 12 ~ ~ UG 1A2 11., r/ r r f t o ` C G) ~fi 165 11" F ' .006! t t• jj8#./ 4 ~ , f gr3 ~ 1r F 5061 LOT A 5o I' N ~l < 1 1901-0" cD JJJJ~ • tL }S m { e 955, f 1 I ~ ' .r i 00 a 207'-8';, CD w t. _ Tom. 210'-l" v a t 23,5 ° Q) 23.5 r~ e C = 4 \ l Si , CD 't'z t i \ t t \ `Z t 11 Y \ a. or) ~IQ : , a 77, 77, v j 2101-0" J91E05BD 0 00000° q o 0 o0 0 0 0 0 O q d .0. D ° ..d d d . ° d 'O 0 p O O C) O 0 0 0 0 0 O .O d: O O' 0 0 0 0~p q O p 0 0 0 O/0 O Q O 0 0 O' O p O 0 g o b 0 O t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0O O O O O O O O O' O. O QO . 0 0 O p O O 0' 0 0 Q O 00 O Q O O OS 1 0 0 O' O' O O O O O Q~O O 0 O 0.,0 0 O O 0 0 0O :O O o O' O O O' .O" O' O O O O O o O O. O d 0 0 O O y~~t 0 p 0 0 0 d o 0 q O 'O O / OO°°O O O~g0999O O'. I Q 90 0°o00 = \ 0 0o / 000 / °0 'a o °O°~~~ % 9°900 O ~ 00.00, O o o° o~d.0 I 00q 0°°°_°o'0 0 O ° .0 0 I 00 0 cry 9 °.0' 9. 6,91 / IS tt ' q e, / `i z \ \ 79 t ' \ '936\ \ 1935- _ NEW CONTOURS WALL DRAINS STORM LINE LANDSCAPE WALL O LANDSCAPE STEPS HYDROSEED AREA TO BE PLANT LIST FOR REVEGETATION TERRACES REVEGETATED WITH NATIVES Acer circinatum STANDARD HYDROSEED MIX Acer palmatum Hard Fescue, Micro Clover, Tall Fescue, Gautheria shallon White Yarrow, w/ wood fiber mulch, Mahonia Repens tackifier, slow-release fertilizer, & mycorrhizal Rubus pentabalous PLANT LIST FOR ORNAMENTAL LANDSCAPE HYDROSEED AREAS TO BE PLANTED Acer circinatum WITH ORNAMENTALS IN FUTURE Acer palmatum STANDARD HYDROSEED MIX Arbutus unedo compacta REGREEN Ceanothus'Point Reyes' Gautheria shallon in Lonicera pileata Mahonia Repens Rhododendron spp PERMANENT HYDROSEED AREAS S STANDARD HYDROSEED MIX IRRIGATION NOTES I Hard Fescue, Micro Clover, Tall Fescue, Planting and Irrigation information is provided for future implementation. White Yarrow, w/ wood fiber mulch, Hydroseed species have been selected to tackifier, slow-release fertilizer, & mycorrhizal flourish without supplemental water, Street Trees, Ornamental Landscape, and Revegetation species will be irrigated with a drip system from the City water supply. SILT FENCE See drip irrigation details provided. AREAS NOT SHOWN AS TREATED WILL NOT BE DISTURBED f f 15 r l \ `i4 l \ ♦ \ 4 , , , \ \ \ , l \ ~ \ t \ s r ` I L) `,z 0 0 0 0 0 6% o c v o 0 o''b c o c> o 0 o G o c C~' O O O G O z7 vL ~C ~'J, C C G v 0 O V C ` O G O. O O O O,' O O O O, O O° `r C V ✓ O O O O Ll n t7 U,n~o/i00JOG0 O O O V 0 v, J , O J O' O O 0 O O O G ~ c~ O O O ~ J 1 O Cy t~ v O~O UOOO U/,,•: C 000 > G O 0 0 0 0 1. ,O CR `JOOCOOOOOc,~'o~1'~O-✓~_0~0~6~ CyJ 41 Li GPG ~lln_\/ G O J O i VII 'oe CYO / / / / lo, lo lo, lo, ce z PM7 lo, r 328 °oKT--y l1 ~ ~"Y loo i n CID m e ~ e uw67eu4~rooPsrgeasoue~oim SSE /O,~ zosszss't>s S yj DZSLD 110 P-eNW • 1-a S W-A LIZ u9 ~ ~ ~311H~2Itl ~fSj~ a, P ople ja1 Cl sol.TeD 3LVO NOUdIHOS i ri I, 7-77 ----------1---- I t ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Planning Division C I T Y OF 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE # - ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT - Ty DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO Street Address 4 Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E~ Tax Lot(s) Zoning i? Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name t r b? d Phone E Mail Address City Zip PROPERTY OWNER Name C i t Phone C l i f A E -Mail Address f~ d City ift Z SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title p Name Z 1, In ; i k,' Phone jf-/E -Mail Address j City t 21p c Title f Name . Phone E-Mail' Address t` `rte L % C t city-; I, -f-x ; zip ~ . s' I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed dra14ngs and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. /understand that all property pins must be shotnn on the dra wings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not sho tnn or their location found to be incorrect the oKner assumes full responsibility. 1 further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden 1411 be on me to establish: 1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished jusfifies the granfing of the request,• 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this. ,regard 1411 result st likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be remo e t my expense. If ve,any~doubts, t am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. App icant's Signature Date As ovrnerof th ro nvolved in this request, have read nd nderstood the complete ap lication and its consequences to me as a property ovlner. Property Owner's Signature (required) Date [To be completed by City Staff] Date Received ' Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ if a ~F` OVER GAconttdeNAplanningT,o= & Handouts\Zoning Peanut Application.doe I P~ L7, Job Address: 460 SCHOFIELD ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C P Owner's Name: GALL DENISE P Phone: Customer 04621 N State Lic No: P L KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARC T City Lic No: Applicant: 545 A ST R Address: #3 A C ASHLAND OR 97520 C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 02/10/2014 O T Issued: R Expires: 08/09/2014 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E05BD301 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Land Partition i I VALUATION i Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Land Partition (type 1) 1,130.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.onus CITY OF Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 ASHLAND. i