Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFirst_30_PA-2014-00251 December 17, 2014 City of Ashland Planning Division 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 A R 9DEHC ,.oE.IER HITEit TURE W W VJ. OR W A R C H IT E C T E RE. C OM 2950 EAST RA R N ETT ROAD 11 E D R 0 R D OR 9] 5 0 4 P 5 J J 9 5 2 F 5 4 1)) 2 0 4) 2 Derek, As the exterior of the building is largely being left intact, there are few materials to review. Shown on the attached palette is: ® The new storefront and folding window wall aligned with the face of the exterior concrete, will both be black. The gutters and down spouts will be painted or pre-finished in black as well. ® The window replacement is providing new metal clad windows. We are designing to comply with the originally submitted window section. I have included a color sample of the black on the pallet. ® The existing building concrete is being re-painted and I have included the colors on the pallet as well. ® The roof material has already been reviewed and approved by the Historic committee. ® Attached are also the submitted cut sheets for the exterior lamps required by the building safety department. Please contact us if you have any questions regarding the above. Thanks you, Dave Stevens xl 3 ® ® Catalog L J1-LED-20C-530-50K-T3S-120-PE-DDBXD 0-Series Size 1 ( Number LED Wall Luminaire Notes OSF REHEARSAL HALL 1` ligh~l47g Type Z r.,camv.~.e" facts FAIaJDtY Introduction d"series The D-Series Wall luminaire is a stylish, fully integrated LED solution for building-mount Specifications applications. It features a sleek, modern design Luminaire Back Box (11313W, ELCW) and is carefully engineered to provide long-lasting, Width: 13-3/4" Weight: 12 Ibs Width: 13-3/4" E3BW 5lbs energy-efficient lighting with a variety of optical (34.9 cm) (5.4 kg) (34.9 cm) Weight: (2.3 kg) 10" 4" ELCW 10 Ibs and control options for customized performance. Depth: (25.4 cm) Depth: (102 cm) Weight: (4.5 kg) With an expected service life of over 20 years of Weight: 16218) Height: 162/8) nighttime use and up to 74% in energy savings over comparable 250W metal halide luminaires, _ ° ° W the D-Series Wall is a reliable, low-maintenance ! H H ® lighting solution that produces sites that are exceptionally illuminated. For 3/4" NPT side-entry conduit (BBW only) ~'ad'1='i~laiq) Ili~it~lrl at 1i1'~11i EXAMPLE: DSXW1 LED 20C 1000 40K T3M MVOLT DDBTXD DSXW1 LED 20C 530 50K T3S 120 PE DDBXD Y9ir~~ 11!~IA l~l( ~,illr iti llbl(III I(111 ~I.II,II ubinilflifl ~~~U~L19uil,tl,)1bLh, ~~rTli:-II4t~i(GhF 1141~1t1nu-grpcrll lic, DSXW1 LED 10C 10 LEDs 350 350 mA 30K 3000K US Type II MVOLT' Shipped included Shipped Installed Shipped installed DDBXD Dark (one engine) 530 530mA 40K 4000K Short 1201 (blank) Surface PE Photoelectric SF Single fuse bronze 20C 20 LEDs 700 700 mA 50K 5000K T21M Type II 2081 mounting cell, button (120, 277V) e DBLXD Black (twoengines) 1000 1000mA(IA) Medium 2401 bracket type OF Double fuse DNAXD Natural BBW Surface- DMG 0-10V a aluminum T3S Type IT 277 dimming driver (208, 240V) Short back box mounted (no controls) HS House-side DWHXD White T3M Type III (for(onduit PIR 180' motion/ shield' DSSXD Sandstone Medium entry)'- ambient light SPD Separatesurge DDBTXD Textured T4M Type IV sensor, 615' protection1, dark mtg ht bronze Medium PIRH 180' motion/ Shipped se aratel TFTM Forward ambient light Y DBLBXD Textured Throw sensor, l5-30' BSW Bird-deterrent eterrent black Medium mtght' ' DNATXD Textured ELCW Emergency WG WHeguard9 natural battery backup VG Vandal guard aluminum (includes DWHGXD Textured external white component DSSTXD Textured enclosure) sandstone NOTES Accessories 1 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). Specify 120, 208, 240 or 277 options only when ordering with fusing (SF, DF options), or photocontrol (PE option). as ~~d shippod _cpa;ala!p 2 Back box ships installed on fixture. Cannot be field installed. Cannot be ordered as an accessory. 3 Photocontrol (PE) requires 120, 208, 240 or 277 voltage option. Not available with motion/ambient light sensors (PIR or PIRH). DSXWHSU House-sideshleld (aneperlightengine) 4 Specifies the Sensor Switch SBGR-IO-ODP control; see Motion Sensor Guide for details. Includes ambient light sensor. Not available with "P E" option (button DSX11135W U Bird-deterrent spikes type photocell). Dimming driver standard. DSXWIWGU Mire guard accessory 5 Specifies the Sensor Switch SBGR-6-ODP control; see Motion Sensor Guide for details. Includes ambient light sensor. Not available with "PE" option (button DSXWIVG U Vandal guard accessory type photocell). Dimming driver standard. 6 Not available with 20 LED/1000 mA configuration (DSXWi LED 20C 1000). 7 Cold weather (-20C) rated. Not compatible with conduit entry applications. Not available with BBW mounting option. Not available with fusing. Emergency components located in back box housing. Emergency mode IES files located on product page at wvAv.Hthonia.com 8 Single fuse (SF) requires 120 or 277 voltage option. Double fuse (DF) requires 208 or 240 voltage option. Not available with ELCW. 9 Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. 10 See the electrical section on page 2 for more details. One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • Fax: 770.918.1209 www.lithonia.com 0 2013-2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. ~-1nlC~lilasl.lrlY<t~llh~ati~l Lumen Output Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Lumen values are from photometric tests performed in accordance with IESNA LM-79-08. Data is considered to be representative Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures of the configurations shown, within the tolerances allowed by Lighting Facts. Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user from 0.40°C (32-104°F). environment and application. Actual wattage may differ by+/-8% when operating between 120-480V 10%. Contact factory l~~ l n It ld l i Gi h., , j for performance data on any configurations not shown here. I , , Ilu } Oni "41~ pl 0'C 32°F 1.02 I j { I;r n IIIlI lII4' t /714ii1Ili~ I I bA~ I it iln nI ~ ~ r {iii it I tiy(~I I I 10°C 50°F 1.01 I ~L@- 20°C 68°F 1.00 T2S 724 i u I 86 1,801 1 0 1 90 25°C 777 1.00 12M 1,729 1 0 1 86 1,812 1 0 1 91 30°C 86°F 1.00 530 10C5304 20W T3S 1,709 1 0 1 85 1,792 1 0 1 90 40°C 104T 0.98 T3M 1,753 1 0 1 88 1,838 1 0 1 92 r4M 17s3 1 0 1 88 1,837 1 0 1 92 Projected LED Lumen Maintenance TFTM 1,766 1 0 1 88 1851 1 0 1 93 Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the DSXW1 LED 20C 1000 T2S 2,234 1 0 1 83 2,341 1 0 1 87 platform in a 2VC ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM- 10C 7121VI 2,241 1 0 1 83 2,349 1 0 1 87 80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11), 700 10C 700 4 27W _ T3S 21216 1 ' 0 1 82 2322 1 - 0 1 86 T3M 2,272 1 0 1 84 2,381 1 0 1 88 To calculate LLF use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number (10LEDs) TV - 2,272 1 0 1 84 2,381 1 "0 1 : 88 - of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. TFTM 2,289 1 0 1 ` `85 2,399 1 -'0 1 89 T2S 2,992 1 0 1 75 3,136 1 0 1 78 0 25,000 s0,e00 wo,no0 T2M 3 001 1 0 1 7s 3146 1 0 1 79 ? T3S 2,967 1 0 1 74 3110 1 0 1 78 1000 10[1000--K 40W ~I, 1..r n I nro I rr~r~~~ T3M 0 1.0 0.05 0.e3 Ms 3 043 1 1 76 3,189 1 0 1 80 , i TV 3,043 1 0 1 76 3,189 1 0 1 80 TFTM 3 066 1 0 1 77 3 213 1 0 1 80 12S 3,545 1 %0 1 98 3,715 1 0 1 103 ` Electrical Load __2M 3556 1 0 t 99 3727- 1 0 1 104 nlrlrl 1'.VI 530 20( 530--K 36W T3S 3 515 1 0 1 98 3,685 1 D 1 102 T3M 3,606 t 0 2 100 3,779 1 0 2 105' 277 347 'No 1 N,111- ~ I. 20k3 740 T4M 3 605 1 0 1 100 3,779 1 -0 1 105 f _ TFTM 3 632 1 0 1 ' 101 3 807'' 1 -0 1 106 ' 350 14W 0.13 0.07 0.06 0.06 - T2S 4,357 1 0 1 93 4566 1 0 1 97 530 20W 0.19 0.11 0.09 0.08 20C T2M 4,370 1 0 1 93 4 580 1 0 1 97 1 oC 700 27W 0.25 0.14 0.13 0.11 700 200700--K 47W TM 4320 1 0 1 92 4,529 1 0 1 96 1000 40W 0.37 0.21 0.19 0.16 T3M 4,431 1 0 2 94 4,644 1 0 2 99 350 25W 0.23 0.13 0.12 0.10 (20 LEDs) T4M 4,430 1 0 1 94 4,644 1 0 2 99 530 36W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 TFTM 4 464 1 0 1 95 4 678 1 0 1 100 20C 700 47W 0.44 0.25 0.22 0.19 T2S 5,745 2 0 2 77 6 020 2 -0 2 80 _..LM 6763 f`- 0 2 77 6039 '2 0 2' 81 1000 75W 0.69 0.40 0.35 0.30 1000 20C 1000 --K 751V T35 5,697 1 0 1 ` 76 5 970 1 ` 0 2 CO T3M 5,843 1 ` 0 2 78 6123 2 0 2 < 82 TV 5 843 1 0 2` 78 6,123 1' 0 2 82 TFTM 5 887 1 0 2 T 6169 1 0 2 82 1 n i , 1 s t A ' F~ f IOJ r • 1 a { 1= To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Lithonia Lighting's D-Series Wall Size 1 homepage. Isofootcandle plots for the DSXW1 LED 20C 100040K. Distances are in units of mounting height (15'). Distribution overlay comparison to 25OW metal halide. LEGEND 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 3 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 i 4 3 z 1 0 1 2 3 4 £ LEGEND 4 4 V 4 0.1 fc DSXWt, 3 3 0.5 fc 0.Sfc 2 5 2 o _ - 1.0 fc 1 f e y 1 1 ( e! i I 0.5 fc - 1 J m 1 1 f 0? 0 0 , m 10' W Sidewalk Los: 1 . o° ~ q a o TWF2=0.72 .2 - .2 .2 N DSXW1 =0.95 TNF2: DSXW7: 3 e .3 6 5 ,3 - 291 W 75W T21A z z T3M z z T3S -4 v~ ~w ,4 -7 DSXW1 LED 20C 40K 1000T3M, TWF2 250M Pulse, 15' Mounting Ht FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS Light engine(s) consist of 10 high-efficacy LEDs mounted to ametal-core circuit board to INTENDED USE maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (L88/100,000 hrs at 25°C). Class 1 electronic The energy savings, long life and easy-to-install design of the D-Series Wall Size 1 make it the smart drivers have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and a minimum 2.5KV surge rating. When choice for building-mounted doorway and pathway illumination for nearly any facility. ordering the SPD option, a separate surge protection device is installed within the luminaire CONSTRUCTION which meets a minimum Category C Low (per ANSI/IEEE C62.41.2). Two-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management INSTALLATION through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance. The LED Included universal mounting bracket attaches securely to any 4" round or square outlet box driver is mounted to the doorto thermally isolate itfrom the light engines for low operating temperature for quick and easy installation. Luminaire has a slotted gasket wireway and attaches to the and long life. Housing is completely sealed againstmoisture and environmental contaminants (IP65). mounting bracket via corrosion-resistant screws. FINISH LISTINGS Exterior parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate DesignLights Consortium@ (DLC) qualified product. Not all versions of this product may changes without cracking or peeling. Available in textured and non-textured finishes. be DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at www.designlights.org to confirm which versions are qualified. OPTICS Precision-molded proprietary acrylic lenses provide multiple photometric distributions tailored WARRANTY specifically to building mounted applications. Light engines are available in 3000K (80 min. CRI), Five year limited warranty. Full warranty terms located at w v.acuitybrands.com/ 4000K (70 min. CRI) or 5000K (65 min. CRI) configurations. CustomerResources/Terms-and_conditions.aspx. ELECTRICAL Note: Specifications subject to change without notice. e One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 Fax: 770.918.1209 www.lithonia.com DSXW1-LED © 2013-2014 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 6/03/14 KenCairn Tel: 541,488,3194 545 A Street Fax: 541.552,9512 Ashland, OR 97520 _J Landscape Architecture Cell: 541.601.5559 kerry@kencairnlandscape.com vnv v.KenCairdandscape.com Date: August 22, 2014 Regarding: OSF Rehearsal Center Tree Mitigation and Landscape Site Design Review Standards I The Shakespeare Festival is proposing mechanical renovations to the back of The Rehearsal Center at 30 South First Street. Previous submittals for this project were reviewed and it was made clear that tree mitigation and site design review level of landscape planning would be required. This short narrative addresses these two issues specifically. The current plan for the renovation of the back area of the rehearsal center requires the removal of four trees. The plan includes the planting of two new trees as partial mitigation (2 Norway Maples) for removal, and the applicant would like to apply "Payment in Lieu" for the other two trees. 18.61.084 Mitigation Required An applicant shall be required to provide mitigation for any tree approved for removal. The mitigation requirement shall be satisfied by one or more of the following: A. Replanting on site. The applicant shall plant either a minimum 1 V2-inch caliper healthy and well-branched deciduous tree or a 5-6 foot tall evergreen tree for each tree removed. The replanted tree shall be of a species that will eventually equal or exceed the removed tree in size if appropriate for the new location. Larger trees may be required where the mitigation is intended, in part, to replace a visual screen between land uses. "Suitable" species means the tree' s growth habits and environmental requirements are conducive to the site, given the existing topography, soils, other vegetation, exposure to wind and sun, nearby structures, overhead wires, etc. The tree shall be planted and maintained according to the specifications in the City Tree Planting and Maintenance Guidelines as approved by the City Council. C. Payment in lieu of planting. If in the City's determination no feasible alternative exists to plant the required mitigation, the applicant shall pay into the tree account an amount as established by resolution of the City Council. r Site Design and Use Standards ' D. Parking Lot Landscaping and Screening Standards APPROVAL STANDARDS All parking lots, which for purposes of this section include areas of vehicle maneuvering, parking, and loading, shall be landscaped and screened as follows: I II-D-1 Landscape Standards 1. Parking lot landscaping shall consist of a minimum of 7% of the total parking area plus a ratio of I tree for each 7 parking spaces to create a canopy effect. Project Area is 3.878 square feet, Landscape Area is 490 square feet, the landscape percentage equals 12.6 percent. 490 / 3,878 = 12.6% There are two shade trees for a total of five parking spaces. 2. The tree species shall be an appropriate large canopied shade tree and shall be selected from the street tree list to avoid root damage to pavement and utilities, and damage from droppings to parked cars and pedestrians. Acer platanoides is an approved street tree. 3. The tree shall be planted in a landscaped area such that the tree bole is at least 2 feet from any curb or paved area. Trees are more than 2 feet from any hardscape. 4. The landscaped area shall be planted with shrubs and/or living ground cover to assure 50% coverage within 1 year and 90% within 5 years. The landscape plan is adequate to achieve 50% coverage in one year and 90% coverage in 5 years. 5. The landscaped area shall be distributed throughout the parking area and parking perimeter at the required ratio. It is not possible to extend landscape to the perimeter as that is the access to the lot. The landscape runs the length of the lot and is used to hide retaining walls and mechanical equipment through the use of tall shrubs and screening vines. 6. That portion of a required landscaped yard, buffer strip or screening strip abutting parking stalls may be counted toward required parking lot landscaping but only for those stalls abutting landscaping as long as the tree species, living plant material coverage and placement distribution criteria are also met. Front or exterior yard landscaping may not be substituted for the interior landscaping required for interior parking stall ITT F ASHLAND April 24, 2014 Notice of Final Decision On April 24, 2014, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: 2014-00251 Subject Property: 30 South First Street Applicant: Oregon Shakespeare Festival Description:. A 'request for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing OSF Scene Production Facility, a historic contributing building at 30 South First Street, into a Rehearsal Center. Also included is a request for a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.)COMPREBENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IE 09131); TAX LOTS: 5200. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of one year and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18,108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact-Derek Severson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. Cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us SECTION 18.108.070(B)2 Effective Date of Decision and Appeals. B. Actions subject to appeal: 2. Type I Planning Actions. a. Effective Date of Decision. The final decision of the City for planning actions resulting from the Type I Planning Procedure shall be the Staff Advisor decision, effective on the 13c' day after notice of the decision is mailed unless reconsideration of the action is approved by the Staff Advisor or appealed to the Commission as provided in section 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). b. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider Type I planning actions as set forth below. i. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City Agency may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the staff advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during.the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. ii. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five (5) days of mailing. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three (3) days whether to reconsider the matter. iii. If the Planning Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten (10) days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The Staff Advisor shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. iv. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. c. Appeal. i. Within twelve (12) days of the date of the mailing of the Staff Advisor's final decision, including any approved reconsideration request, the decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any party entitled to receive notice of the planning action. The appeal shall be submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary on a form approved by the City Administrator, be accompanied by a fee established pursuant to City Council action, and be received by the city no later than 4:30 p.m. on the 12fl' day after the notice of decision is mailed. ii. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the city and whose boundaries include the site. iii. The appeal shall be considered at the neat regular Planning Commission or Hearings Board meeting. The appeal shall be a de novo hearing and shall be considered the initial evidentiary hearing required under ALUO 18.108.050 and ORS 197.763 as the basis for an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals. The Planning Commission or Hearings Board decision on appeal shall be effective 13 days after the findings adopted by the Commission or Board are signed by the Chair of the Commission or Board and mailed to the parties. iv. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the city as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.onus ti ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-00 251 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 30 South First Street APPLICANT: Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing OSF Scene Production Facility, a historic contributing building at 30 South First Street, into a Rehearsal Center. Also included is a request for a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09BD; TAX LOTS: 5200 SUBMITTAL DATE: February 21, 2014 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: March 14, 2014 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: April 24, 2014 APPEAL DEADLINE: May 6, 2014 FINAL DECISION DATE: May 7, 2014 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: May 7, 2015 DECISION: The subject property is an irregularly shaped parcel approximately 0.37 acres in area and located on the east side of First Street between Hargadine Street and East Main Street, just south of Enders Alley. The property is zoned C-1-D (Downtown Commercial) and is also within the Ashland Downtown Historic District. The property contains the Lithia Springs Garage Building, a Primary Contributing Historic Resource within the Downtown Historic District. The historic survey document for the district notes, "This large two-story concrete structure was erected in 1925 as one of Ashland's largest auto storage garages. The developers hoped to provide secure and covered parking for the patrons of the new Lithia Springs Hotel, across First Street, but the garage was not actually a part of the hotel development plan.... The building provided 24, 000 square feet of floor space for storage and repair work..." The building later served as a Plymouth-Chrysler dealership; the Ashland Recreation Center providing bowling, billiards, a fountain and skating; an automotive radiator and repair shop; and a Honda motorcycle company. In the 1970's and early 1980's, the building was used as an art school prior to its purchase by the Oregon Shakespeare Festival Association, which remodeled the building to its most recent use as the Festival's scene shop. In discussing the building, the survey document concludes that, "although compromised by the construction of a large, exposed standing seam metal roof during conversion to its present use, the basic industrial character of the Lithia Springs Garage remains in its stucco exterior, multi paned windows and massive volume. The Lithia Springs Garage retains sufficient integrity to relate to its historic character during the period of signif cance." The current request is for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing building from the scene shop to a rehearsal center. The proposal involves an extensive interior renovation to create a rehearsal center which will allow for observation of rehearsals as a classroom activity or seminar, but will not be a venue for ticketed performances. The rehearsal center is expected to PA 42014-00251 30 South First Street/dds Page 1 support the existing theater by providing a central location where directors, performers and staff can rehearse and work in proximity to the theaters, and staffing is expected to be up to 100 employees at a time. The application notes that rehearsals typically run from 1:00 p.m. until 6:00 p.m. and from 7:00 p.m. until midnight, six days a week during theater season which runs from January through October, with stage management staff and actor support staff working beyond these hours. The application also requests a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over, six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.). Site Review The proposed renovation will affect the exterior of the building by: ® Replacing the hodgepodge of windows, AC units and storefront with a more historical, and energy efficient product while leaving the concrete finish of the building intact and unmodified. The window replacements are to. allow for increasing the thermal performance of the exterior envelope by replacing the existing single pane, metal framed windows with metal-clad, wood-framed, insulated glass units with visible exterior mullions. ® Replace the existing metal panel gables with a board and batten fagade. ® Provide a new exterior paint scheme. ® Replace the existing northwest corner CMU and storefront, which faces First Street, with a new folding glass door and complimentary storefront. The proposal involves exterior changes requiring building permits for a historic contributing resource, and as such Site Review approval is required. However, because the building and site improvements are existing and not proposed for alteration, the Site Review is largely limited to consideration of the proposed exterior changes as they relate to the applicable Site Review criteria and applicable design standards, including the Historic District Design Standards. The application notes that the entrance on South First Street is to be recessed into the building to create an alcove, and that an awning will be added to provide an area for protection of pedestrians from sun and rain to improve the building's sense of entry. The Enders Alley entrance is also to be recessed to create an alcove; no awning is proposed here given the limited alley width and the need to accommodate vehicular circulation. The northwest corner of the building is also proposed to be modified to restore the building's historic "garage entrance" look by removing the existing CW block on the north elevation and introducing large folding glass doors and on the west elevation removing the existing storefront entrance and replacing it with a full height storefront. The altered entrance on the north elevation replaces the existing hollow metal door with new, more historically-compatible glazed windows and creates a new entrance further down the alley, in proportion to the adjacent glazing features. The application also explains that the proposed window glazing is more historically accurate; will replace the existing hodgepodge of windows, AC units and storefront; and seeks to make the building more compatible with its original character. The applicants also propose to replace the metal panels in the gable with a vertical board and batten fagade which seek to restore a more historic look and feel. They suggest that the proposed design maintains the existing features while also upgrading the vertical plane of the gable to a more historical, paneled elevation. PA 42014-00251 30 South First Street/dds Page 2 After reviewing the application at its regular meeting in April of 2014, the Historic Commission recommended approval with a single design recommendation. The Commission asked that the applicants explore alternative roofing materials such as composition shingle or metal roofing in cooler colors, as they felt that an alternate treatment would minimize visual impacts of the large expanse of roof area visible from the intersection of First and Hargadine Street to the southwest. The Commission indicated that the white or tan TPO roofing proposed would tend to emphasize the scale and mass of the building by highlighting the roof which was an element specifically noted as compromising the historic integrity of the structure in the district survey document. Tree Removal There are eight existing trees on the southeast side of the existing building which are likely to require removal, including: three 20-inch junipers; a 12-inch juniper; an 18-inch juniper; a 14- inch fir; and two ten-inch walnuts. While the applicants desire to retain all of the site's trees, the locations of these trees relative to the existing building and mechanical equipment mean that the proposed exterior renovations and energy upgrades are likely to necessitate their removal. The intent of the renovations and energy improvements is to repuipose the building to better support the Oregon Shakespeare Festival's downtown theater campus, an outright permitted use in the district and a key economic driver for the city, and to remove the hodgepodge of inefficient and mismatched windows, air conditioning units, louvers and storefronts and render the building more in keeping with its historic character while also seeking to achieve a greater measure of energy efficiency despite the intensification of use for the building over its previous use as a scene shop. The applicants are accordingly requesting Tree Removal Permits to authorize the removal of these eight trees, although as building permit and utility plans are finalized the applicants will endeavor to preserve as many of these eight trees as practical in achieving the desired upgrades. The existing trees are somewhat isolated by the topography and building placement and thus provide little benefit as a windbreak. Given that the location is within the downtown overlay, which has no outright landscaping requirement, and that the subject properties are largely developed and paved within the city's urban core, the trees provide little in the way of erosion control, soil stability, or the protection of adjacent trees, and their removal would not negatively impact these features or the flow of surface waters. In addition, junipers, particularly in such close proximity to buildings, are often a concern for the potential increase in fire risk they can pose. After reviewing the application at its April 2014 regular meeting, the Tree Commission recommended approving the application as submitted, but provided to recommendations for conditions of approval: 1) that mitigation for the trees removed shall be in accordance with AMC 18.61.084; and 2) that a revised landscape and irrigation plan be submitted with building permit materials, specifically indicating which trees are to be removed and how mitigation is to be addressed. Planning staff have advised the applicants that because the trees are adjacent to a parking area, if they are ultimately removed, the planting of at least one parking lot tree and the installation of associated parking lot perimeter landscaping consistent with the Site Design and Use Standard's Parking Lot Landscaping and Screening Standards would be needed even if other removals were proposed to be mitigated off-site or through in-lieu payments. Conditions reflecting the Tree Commission recommendations, and the need to address parking landscaping and tree requirements in the final landscape plan, have been included below. PA #2014-00251 30 South First Street/dds Page 3 The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070 as follows: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. 8. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit to remove a tree that is not a hazard are described in AMC Chapter 18.61.080.13 as follows: 1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; and 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternative to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. 4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. The intent of the renovations and energy improvements is to repurpose the building to better support the Oregon Shakespeare Festival's downtown theater campus, an outright permitted use in the district and a key economic driver for the city, and to remove the existing hodgepodge of inefficient and mismatched windows, air conditioning units, louvers and storefronts that have been installed over the years and render the building more in keeping with its historic character while also seeking to achieve a greater measure of energy efficiency despite the intensification of use for the building over its previous use as a scene shop. Planning Action #2014-00251 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then PA #2014-00251 30 South First Street/dds Page 4 Planning Action #2014-00251 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicants including but not limited to that the use proposed will allow for classroom and seminar use in conjunction with rehearsals but will not involve ticketed theater performances, shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2) That the recommendations of the Historic Commission from their April 2, 2014 meeting that the applicants explore alternative roofing material treatments (i. e. composition shingles, metal, etc.) in cooler colors in order to minimize the visual impacts of the roof as viewed from the intersection of First and Hargadine Streets to the southwest, and thus reduce the perceived mass and scale that would result from use of the proposed white or tan TPO membrane roofing, shall be addressed in the building permit submittal materials for review by the Historic Commission's weekly Review Board. 3) That the recommendations of the Tree Commission from their April 3, 2014 meeting that the applicants: 1) Provide for mitigation of the proposed tree removals in accordance with AMC 18.61.084 by replanting on-site, replanting off-site or providing payment-in-lieu of mitigation to support planting elsewhere; 2) Provide a revised landscape and irrigation plan with building permit materials, specifically identifying which trees are .to be removed and where and how mitigation will occur, shall be conditions of the approval. The revised landscape and irrigation plan shall also address placement of any new mechanical equipment, and identify requisite parking lot trees and landscaping for the parking area if the existing trees are removed. 4) That all requirements of the Building Department shall be satisfactorily addressed prior to change of occupancy or commencement of the use, including but not limited to addressing applicable requirements for the occupancy type, occupant load, fire sprinklers, disabled access, and windows. 5) That all requirements of the Fire Department shall be satisfactorily addressed prior to occupancy or commencement of the use, including approved addressing and provisions for adequate fire flow, fire department connection and a key box. 6)* That prior to the issuance of a building permit: a) The plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. b) Any new exterior lighting shall be shown on the building permit submittals and appropriately shrouded so there is no direct illumination of surrounding properties. Y) April 24, 2014 B 11 Mo ar, Director Date Departent of Community Development PA #2014-00251 30 South First Street/dds Page 5 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On April 24, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-00251, 30 South First Street. Signature of Employee Documentl 4/24/2014 ( A113l1d-09-008-6 ,v,dn-dod paogaa al aalanaa 4uawa6aeq) ~ 096S ®AH3AV 41aege6 al zaslil;n i ap sues wo' Aaane!NMW ap ulle aan4)e4 el a zaildaH waled a sall'el sa anblq PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 5800 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 5300 PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 5900 ANDERSON ANDRE ASHLAND HISTORIC PROPERTY LLC BUFFINGTON JANE N PO BOX 3577 437 WILEY ST 1800 SE 10TH AVE SUITE 400 ASHLAND, OR 97520, ASHLAND, OR 97520 FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 90007 PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 5600 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16100 BURNS E SHEILA TRUSTEE ET AL CONSERVANCY LLC DEBOER SHARON 275 GRANDVIEW DR 104 S FIRST ST 2640 E BARNETT RD E-130 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16300 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 90008 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 6100 DELUCA RONALD L TRUSTEE DRESCHER ALLEN G TRUSTEE ET AL GOLDEN-FIELDS PROPERTY 725 ROYAL AVE P O BOX 760 845 OAK ST MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 i i PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16500 PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 100 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 5600 HARMS ELISA R MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC MPM INVESTMENTS, LLC 244 HARGADINE ST 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD 35 S SECOND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 4600 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16400 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 5900 NEUMAN PROPERTIES & DEV LLC OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL PILOT ROCK PEAK LLC 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD ATTN; PAUL NICHOLSON 38950 SW LAURELWOOD RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PO BOX 158 GASTON, OR 97119 ASHLAND, OR 97520 I I PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 4700 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 4690 SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E TEITELBAUM JULI F TRUSTEE ET AL 2773 BUSH ST 237 ALMOND ST SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00251 NOD 4/24/2014 DAVID WILKERSON, II 2950 E BARNETf RD MEDFORD, OR 97504 T wl86p3 do-dod a§odxa waded paaj 00965 aleldwaj ofaaw asn .0096S p 1 of Dull 6uole puss ® ; slageq @lead Ase3 l L ASHLAND TREE COMMISSION PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET April 4, 2014 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-00 251 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 30 South First Street APPLICANT: Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing OSF Scene Production Facility, a historic contributing building at 30 South First Street, into a Rehearsal Center. Also included is a request for a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C- 1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09BD; TAX LOTS: 5200 Recommendation: t` The Tree Commission recommends approving the application as submitted along with specific` recommendations below: 1) That mitigation shall be in accordance with AMC 18.61.084. 2) That A revised landscape and irrigation plan be submitted with building permit materials, specifically indicating which trees are to be removed, with final approval from staff advisor. Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5350 CITY OF 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 -AS H L A N, D' "A tivwwashtand.onus HISTORIC COMMISSION Meeting of April 2, 2014 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-00 251 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 30 South First Street APPLICANT: Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing OSF Scene Production Facility, a historic contributing building at 30 South First Street, into a Rehearsal Center. Also included is a request for a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 0913D; TAX LOTS: 5200 Recommendation to Staff Advisor: i i Recommend approval of the proposed plans with the following design recommendations: 1) The applicant's should explore alternative roofing materials (composition shingles, metal, etc.) in cool roof colors due to the monolithic roof visible from the southwest at the intersection of First and Hargadine in order to reduce the scale and mass presented by white or tan TPO. I i c c c i Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 e /vv.ashland.ar,us i- t - \J NIPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Section Number: 7 Page: 74 Ashland Downtown Historic District, Ashland, OR ID 83.0 sarvey #320 LITHIA SPRINGS GARAGE 1925 30 FIRST ST S 391E09BD 5200 Architect: Lamb, A. L. [Designer] Builder: Lamb, A. L. Other: Industrial Primary Contributing This large two-story concrete structure was erected in 1925 as one of Ashland's largest auto storage garages. The developers hoped to provide secured and covered parking for the patrons of the new Lithia Springs Hotel, across First Street, but the garage was not actually a part of the hotel development plan. Work was started yesterday on a two story reinforced concrete building on First Street, on lots 14 and 15 of the Enders Addition, by A. L. Lamb, local contractor. The building is to cost in the neighborhood of $36,000...It is believe the building is to be used as a garage. The plans... indicate a such a structure... being 100 by 120 feet and containing 24,000 square feet of floor space... The building is to be directly across from the rear of the Lithia Springs Hotel and if, as it is believed, is operated as a garage, will have one of the finest locations in the city. (Tidings, 19-Sept-1925, 1:3) Construction proceeded rapidly and the new garage was largely completed by mid- November 1925. Ever since the completion of the Lithia Springs hotel, the construction of a new, up- to-date, garage in the vicinity has been agitated... (Tidings, 12-Nov-1925) The new Lithia Springs Garage opened on schedule in mid-December 1925 and was hailed as "...one of the finest of its kind in southern Oregon." The building provided 24,000 square feet of floor space for storage and repair work. "It is strictly modern and fireproof and is steam heated, having one of the best plants to be found in any storage garage in Oregon." (Tidings, 1-Dec-1925, 1:5) By the late 1930s the building was occupied by Leever Motors, a Dodge and Plymouth dealer, when Walter Leverrette, the new owner of the Lithia Springs Hotel, purchased the property with the intent of using it to provide additional parking for the hotel use. (Tidings, 30-Jun-1937, 3:1) In the early 1940s the building was occupied by Lithia Motors, a Plymouth-Chrysler dealer owned by Walt DeBoer which relocated in 1946.48 In 1947 reports that the "former Lithia Springs Garage Building" was to be remodeled for use by Safeway grocery were printed in the local paper. (Tidings, 2-Apr-1947, 1:4) Safeway's plans fell through, however, and by the following year the building was in use as the "Ashland Recreation Center" as well as "Ole's Radiator and Repair Shop," according to city 48 See Site 36.000. NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior ( National Park Service National Register Historic Continuation t Section Number: 7 Page: 75 Ashland Downtown Historic District, Ashland, OR directories.49 The Recreation Center provided bowling, billiards and a fountain according to period advertisements. By 1964 the building housed the Ashland Honda Motorcycle company and the recreation use continued as "Ashland Skateway," managed by John Grubb. In the 1970s and early 1980s the building was used as a arts school, prior to its purchase by the Oregon Shakespearean Festival Association,_ which remodeled the building to its current use as that organization's scene shop. Although compromised by the construction of a large, exposed, standing seam metal roof during conversion to the present use, the basic industrial character of the Lithia Springs Garage remains in its stucco exterior, multi-paned windows and massive volume. The Lithia Springs Garage retains sufficient integrity to relate its historic character during the period of significance. ID# 84.0 Survey #311 FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH 19111-, 241 HARGADINE ST 391E09BD 5300 Architect: Clark, Frank Chamberlain [Attributed] Builder: Sheldon, Miles M. Historic Period: California Mission Primary Contributing [NR-Listedl Possibly designed by noted southern Oregon architect Frank Chamberlain Clark and built by Miles Sheldon, the two-story stucco-clad First Baptist Church was dedicated in September 1911 and remained in use by the Baptist congregation until 1970, following construction of a new building. Sold to a private owner, the building was repainted in what according to local legend was intended to be a reddish-brown consistent with adobe and the building's Spanish- influenced style but instead was a fairly bright pink. Long known as "the old pink church," the structure fell in serious decay after the bankruptcy of a an owner who intended to use it as a conference facility in conjunction with the Lithia Springs [Mark Antony] Hotel. Vandalized, missing its original stained glass windows, and in very poor condition, the building was individually listed on the National Register in 1978. The present owner acquired the property in 1980 via a bankruptcy sale and after a Certified Rehabilitation program reopened the church as a dinner theater under the name "Oregon Cabaret Theater," which remains the present use of the building with a related restaurant facility occupying the daylight basement. ID# 85.0 Survey #311 ENDERS H.G. HOUSE 1896 31 SECOND ST N 391E09BD 5500 Eclectic Styles: Queen Anne Primary Contributing I Originally constructed at the SE corner of East Main and Second Street in 1896 for area pioneer Jesse McCall, in 1907 the Henry G. Enders House was purchased by that 49 See Tidings, 12-April-1947, 1:3 for the report on Safeway's changed plans. I I i , E I f! ' ~ r 1 t 1 n N 0 r O I (fl ~Q I~ L,, E c I f C; I _ 77-7-1 ~i y, Vi fit. t ~ t c C1, ~Li LL Cf) a r , - 1 C-j ~ I r- ~ i eP r o IL O I 4,1 Aid g Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y F 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashland,or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -AS H 2 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2014-00251 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 30 South First Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing OSF Scene Production Facility, a historic contributing building at 30 South First Street, into a Rehearsal Center. Also included is a request for a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h,)COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 0913D; TAX LOTS: 5200. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday, April 2, 2014 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, April 3, 2014 at 6:00 p.m. in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Lithia Room) located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 14, 2014 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 28, 2014 _ s PA #20.14-0025.1 CX__ 30 S FIRST S-r SUBJECT PfZC)PERTY f \ / / i C__ z " / r~ - . , - z r N ao / i O 1020 40 Feet Froparry zt,.es a>e,f : rren~e o..zy, nor so4z~aaze The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. . . ocx AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On March 14, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-00251, 30 S First Street. Signature of Employee Documentl 3/14/2014 pa en c ELz2z. -4 . r r ~ < w ~a b ®s ~ r cn ha c~ p ~ ~ C4 N ;a G~ r4 41 ~ 1YY s~ :.i~' m~ 4 e y i c 1 4 , I , s~ i -09-008-L ,wdnAN pjogej Gl J919Aaj au°tut$"Ae4' T Aa3AV @096S @A1l3AV i!jege6 al zas!I!;n t,uoa*,AaaAL3'MMM ap ulle 9jn43e4 el a zalldaa ap suag , salad a salpel sauanb144 PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 5800 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 5300 r-A-2014-00251 391E09BC 5900 ANDERSON ANDRE ASHLAND HISTORIC PROPERTY LLC BUFFINGTON JANE N PO BOX 3577 437 WILEY ST 1800 SE 10TH AVE SUITE 400 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 FT LAUDERDALE, FL 33316 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 90007 PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 5600 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16100 BURNS E SHEILA TRUSTEE ET AL CONSERVANCY LLC DEBOER SHARON 275 GRANDVIEW DR 104 S FIRST ST 2640 E BARNETT RD E-130 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16300 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 90008 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 6100 DELUCA RONALD L TRUSTEE DRESCHER ALLEN G TRUSTEE ET AL GOLDEN-FIELDS PROPERTY 725 ROYAL AVE P 0 BOX 760 845 OAK ST MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16500 PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 100 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 5600 HARMS ELISA R. MARK ANTONY HIST PROP LLC MPM INVESTMENTS, LLC 244 HARGADINE ST 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD 35 S SECOND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 4600 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 16400 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 5900 NEUMAN PROPERTIES & DEV LLC OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL PILOT ROCK PEAK LLC 953 EMIGRANT CREEK RD ATTN; PAUL NICHOLSON 38950 SW LAURELWOOD RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PO BOX 158 GASTON, OR 97119 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-00251 391E09BC 300 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 4700 PA-2014-00251 391E09BD 4690 POTTER EARL SAVAGE K LYNN/ORELL GAIL E TEITELBAUM JULI F TRUSTEE ET AL CITY HALL 2773 BUSH ST 237 ALMOND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94115 ASHLAND, OR 97520 :'A-2014-00251 DAVID WILKERSON, II 2950 E BARNETT RD MEDFORD, OR 97504 w,86P3 do-dod asodxe jaded paaj r ®0965 aleldwal oAjaAy asn { r~0965 p ® , 0~ eull 0uole puae sIagel®Iasd Ase3 ♦ , t ASHLAND TREE COMMISSION PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET April 4, 2014 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-00 251 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 30 South First Street APPLICANT: Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing OSF Scene Production Facility, a historic contributing building at 30 South First Street, into a Rehearsal Center. Also included is a request for a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C- 1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 0911D; TAX LOTS: 5200 Recommendation: The Tree Commission recommends approving the application as submitted subject to the specific recommendations below: 1) That mitigation shall be in accordance with AMC 18.61.084. 2) That a revised landscape and irrigation plan be submitted with building permit materials, specifically indicating which trees are to be removed, with final approval from staff advisor. Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5305 CITY OF 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 'ff AND Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -ASHL www.ashland.or.us t HISTORIC COMMISSION Meeting of April , 2014 PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-00 251 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 30 South First Street APPLICANT: Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to allow renovation of the existing OSF Scene Production Facility, a historic contributing building at 30 South First Street, into a Rehearsal Center. Also included is a request for a Tree Removal Permit to allow the removal of eight trees over six-inches in diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09BD; TAX LOTS: 5200 Recommendation to Staff Advisor: Recommend approval of the proposed plans with the following design recommendations: 1) The applicant's should explore alternative roofing materials (composition shingles, metal, etc.) in cool roof colors due to the monolithic roof visible from the southwest at the intersection of First and Hargadine in order to reduce the scale and mass presented by white or tan TPO. Department of Community Development Tel: 541488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-552-2050 ( r Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 4 www.ashland.ar.us f_-- III CITY OF ASHLAND Planning Department 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 ! u_ 541-488-5305 M ~Iii' ~i~~ul,; I V1, Ashland Historic Commission Design Review Form Applicant Date `~7r=~, cr a l~ Address Proposed Action Commercial ® Residential O New Construction M-C ranges to Existing Structure Historic Review Board Comments: In the spirit of protecting the historic design and compatibility of your project, if you wish to amend your building plan in order to apply any recommendations of the Historic Review Board, we encourage you to prepare an addendum and resubmit it to the Building Department. Applicant Signature Historic Review Board ature Gtomm-devtplanning\Gommisslons & CommilteeslHistorlc CommissionWisc Admin-FORMSOesign Review Form.doc 12/1312007 1 L L;f tiF i t I{ 1 i 1 LS~~i K~ z i }?1 }~--s~~ 'f4 f j T-~~rn~~ „4+T~ t L j The perfect combination of The Duro-Last Shingle-Ply System is ideal for commercial applications where building appearance is important, but conventional shingles are not practical because the - - roof's slope may not provide good water runoff or the - - - ' roof has other limitations. The Shingle-Ply membrane ! provides a shingle look and the watertight performance and long-term durability of a thermoplastic, single-ply roofing system. Our Shingle-Ply product is made from the same durable membrane as the Duro-Last roofing system, a proven performer since 1978. The shingle design is printed g onto the membrane, then a special polymer coating f k is applied to help protect the finish from marring, fading, and dirt accumulation. Shingle-Ply rolls are delivered to the job site ready to be unrolled, positioned, and installed by an authorized Duro-Last contractor. Each piece is aligned with the installed adjacent piece and mechanically attached to the roof deck. Overlapping edges are heat-welded together, forming a watertight, monolithic covering. v r. Flashings for penetrations and other transition areas are - precision-fabricated in a Duro-Last facility; there is no on-site assembly of these components. The Duro-Last Shingle-Ply system is complete, with all fasteners, flashings, edge details, and other materials delivered to the job site.* -zoo *Consider overall building aesthetics when ordering flashings in Shingle-Ply material. h ~,,Fh hi Cf~a?~i LT 4ij ,?,yl t'._t ~r t4 ).-i x' a .F 3'-. t As ti•t sil''! `kf i] fi i r ie i z -I L A -2-} ~tL,e .,Si`• ~ :iv} Y, v'~f~ti,. " t'h IC}y 3- i F i 11iy ^ 1.1 t Historic Commission Review Checklist ❑ Walls - Surface materials (siding to be used); Profile (width, thickness of siding); Finish (rough, smooth, paint stain) Roof - Pitch; Height; Form/Type (mansard, hip, gable) and Materials (shake, comp) ❑ Windows - Materials (wood, metal, clad); Type (double hung, casement, fixed, bay); Style (Queen Anne, Palladian); Trim (Shutters, molding, sills, pediments); Sizes (Window schedule); Glass (clear, frosted decorative); Arrangement and number of windows ❑ Doors and Main Entry - Materials (wood, metal, clad); Style; Trim (framing, sidelights); Sizes; Hardware Chimneys - Material (brick, faced with siding); Height/width; Functional or decorative; Style ❑ Porches, Decks, Stairs - Materials; Dimensions; Scale in relation to structure; Supports (posts, columns); Trim (railings, brackets, balustrades) ❑ Foundation - Exposed; Material ❑ Color - Paint, stain, natural ❑ Orientation of Structure to Site - Height; Scale; Symmetry/Harmony; Relationship/Compatibility to neighborhood and adjoining/surrounding buildings ❑ Other Design Details - Signage (materials, type, illumination); Fences, Walls; Exterior Lighting; Outbuildings (gazebos, garages, guesthouses); Driveways, sidewalks, Parking Area Aesthetics; Miscellaneous (columns, domes, quoins, ornamental trim); Landscaping; Setback of structure (relationship to neighboring buildings); Orientation of Main Entrance ❑ Historical Precedents - Architectural style and period of structure/facade; Reference to existing or previous'Ashland buildings; Removal or change of historical elements ❑ Meter Placement - Size, location The purpose of the following guidelines is to ensure the proper use of materials and details within the Historic District: • Be sure the remodeled portion's exterior wall finish matches the existing or original material. • Design window additions to duplicate existing or original windows. • Design the roof on additions or remodels to have the same pitch as the original roof. Extend the ridge lines where possible. On one-story rear additions, shed roofs are acceptable. • Match the style of any porch or entry addition at the front of the structure to the original or existing style. • Match colors of any additions to the colors used on the existing exterior. • Try to rehabilitate and restore as many features as possible. • Sawn shingle and, for economy, composition roofs are preferred. Asphalt shingles, which match existing color and texture, are acceptable. Shake shingles, tile and metal roofs are not compatible with most architectural styles in Ashland's historic districts. • Diagonal and vertical siding is not compatible in most cases. • Imitative materials such as asphalt siding, wood textured aluminum siding or artificial stones are not compatible. • Any detached structures should be compatible with the existing building and conform to the above guidelines. • Styles of other eras or locales, such as Tudor and Western style, are to be avoided. GAcomm-de4lanninglCommissions & CommitteesWistodc CommissionNisc Admin-FORMSIDesign Review Form.doc 12113/2007 r>~' ~}-~_R. ot--C - t ♦ Ar 4} ~r'n, ~ tk z'' 6'^C, y i~ rty j .5'. r t~ ~ -s s 4 ~5 k,,r~c1 ~x 1T: The Duro-Last Shingle-Ply roofing system 15-year warranty. It's transferable, has no can be ordered in Slate Gray or Sandstone exclusions for ponding water, and provides in 50-mil thickness only. coverage against consequential damages that result from defects in the Duro-Last material The Shingle-Ply roofing system is protected and/or installation workmanship. Duro-Last by the best warranty in the roofing industry. also has 20-year limited warranties available. Commercial projects receive our comprehensive Test Description Test Method Metric Results U.S. Standard Results Thickness-Nominal ASTM D 751 1.25 mm. 50 mils - Type III Breaking Strength ASTM D 751 - Grab Method 1948 x 1734 N 438 x 390 Ibf. Elongation at Break ASTM D 751 - Grab Method 31% Heat Aging ASTM 3045, 56 days @ 176°F 90% of control - no cracking, chipping or crazing Factory Seam Strength ASTM D 751 - Grab Method 1854 N 417 Ibf. Tearing Strength ASTM D 751 - Procedure B 587 x 725 N 132 x 163 Ibf. Low Temperature Bend ASTM D 2136 Pass Accelerated Weathering ASTM G 154 (Formerly G53) No cracking, checking, crazing or erosion E at 5,000 hours of exposure. I Linear Dimensional Change ASTM D 1204 - 6 hrs. @ 176`F -0.4% Water Absorption ASTM D 570 - 166 hrs. @ 158'F 1.7% Static Puncture ASTM D 5602 25 kg. 56 lb. Dynamic Puncture ASTM D 5635 20 J 474 pol-ft. Test Description Test Method Metric Results U.S. Standard Results Fungi Resistance ASTM G 21 No sustained growth or discoloration Solar Reflectance ASTM C 1549 (Mean) Slate Gray 35%; Sandstone 20% Thermal Ernittance ASTM C 1371 (Mean) Slate Gray 87%; Sandstone 85% Weight ASTM D 751 1.4 kg per ml 29 lb. per ft' Underwriters Laboratories UL-790 Classes A, B & C approved Factory Mutual Research ASTM E 108; FM 4450 Rated 1-60, 1-75, 1-90, 1-105, 1-120, 1-135, 1-150, 1-165, & FM 4470 1-195, 1-210, 1-240, 1-270, 1-345, 1-435 & 1-495 Shingle-Ply Sheet-VI-5.29.14 - M#DL14-0014 C L 6 pSSlpjo 48. Made in the The Duro-Last Roofing FM MIAM6®UNTY U cR4 C S System proudly U$ manufactured in n ~rt APPAOVEO J CRARHR ® the United States esA-1660 R10120 M[MR[R ofAmerica. NIRIi. w(o)l?R./Dr„ JO Owl 8630-24 -02"'0 -48 www.duro-last.com Ir I FAMILY Y A~ L, _0WNED & OPh RATFD OSF REHEARSAL CENTER RENOVATION - PROPOSED ROOFING n 4 qty _ ?_I some Figure 3 - SHINGLE-PLY IMAGE PAGE 2 AWL yv F~ 1 Oi 1' c x.,t ~ id ` All[i t e iff r kv _ T ~_..:33''"~) t - r - r film _ S C I.z t ~ Ai R ~ c y1~ ,dsg j an Y - , zee - W kc. nail'2+eU ~v L .y b- 'NIA 47 - - ~ r MUM mm - i fl - ~k aK N. =a. *x c e ..111010 • - r _ r " 4 (4 1 ~y4 h i u loom n - i m 1 fl~ll r; r r - ice = t i k J r ro,: Tree Removal Requirements - Deferred Scope This application is for an interior remodel, with some expected impact on the existing site and landscaping. The impact on existing trees will not be known until the design has progressed. On confirmation of the quantity of tree removal, the following ordinances will apply: Site Design and Use Standards; Basic Site Review Standards; II-C-1 c Landscaping (P. 7 8) 1. Landscaping shall be designed so that 50% coverage occurs after one year and 90% coverage occurs after 5 years. 2. Landscaping design shall utilize a variety of low water use and deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and flowering plant species. 3. Buildings adjacent to streets shall be buffered by landscaped areas at least 70 feet in width, except in the Ashland Historic District. Outdoor storage areas shall be screened from view from adjacent public rights-of-way, except in M-1 zones. Loading facilities shall be screened and buffered when adjacent to residentially zoned land. 4. Irrigation systems shall be installed to assure landscaping success. 5. Efforts shall be made to save as many existing healthy trees and shrubs on the site as possible Finding: If no trees are removed, this ordinance does not apply. Finding: Trees indicated on the planning site plan may be removed to accommodate new mechanical equipment or renovation. Conclusion: The scope of the Work to the east landscaped area, adjacent to the off street/un- named alley will be determined as the project progresses. In the instance where tree removal is required, the following ordinances sections shall be complied with prior to pulling permits: ® 18.61.050 Submittal Requirements ® 18.61.080 Criteria for Issuance of Tree Removal Permit ® 18.61.084 Mitigation Required Efforts will be made to save as many existing healthy trees and shrubs on the site as possible. Ashland Planning Department will be notified on determination of tree removal for coordination of ordinances. There are eight existing trees on the southeast side of the existing building which are likely to require removal, including: three 20-inch junipers; a 12-inch juniper; an 18-inch juniper; a 14-inch fir, and two ten-inch walnuts. 1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; and While the applicants desire to retain all of the site's trees, the locations of these trees relative to the existing building and mechanical equipment mean that the proposed exterior renovations and energy upgrades are likely to necessitate their removal. The intent of the renovations and energy improvements is to repurpose the building to better support the Oregon Shakespeare Festival's downtown theater campus, an outright permitted use in the district and a key economic driver for the city, and to remove the hodgepodge of inefficient and mismatched windows, air conditioning units, louvers and storefronts and render the building more in keeping with its historic character while also seeking to achieve a greater measure of energy efficiency despite the intensification of use for the building over its previous use as a scene shop. The applicants are accordingly requesting Tree Removal Permits to authorize the removal of these eight trees, although as building permit and utility plans are finalized the applicants will endeavor to preserve as many of these eight trees as practical in achieving the desired upgrades. 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and The existing trees are somewhat isolated by the topography and building placement and thus provide little benefit as a windbreak. Given that the location is within the downtown overlay, which has no outright landscaping requirement, and that the subject properties are largely developed and paved within the city's urban core, the trees provide little in the way of erosion control, soil stability, or the protection of adjacent trees, and their removal would not negatively impact these features or the flow of surface waters. Junipers, particularly in such close proximity to buildings, are often a concern for the potential increase in fire risk they can pose. 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. While the applicants desire to retain all of the site's trees, the locations of these trees relative to the existing building and mechanical equipment mean that the proposed exterior renovations and energy upgrades are likely to necessitate their removal. The intent of the renovations and energy improvements is to repurpose the building to better support the Oregon Shakespeare Festival's downtown theater campus, an outright permitted use in the district and a key economic driver for the city, and to remove the hodgepodge of inefficient and mismatched windows, air conditioning units, louvers and storefronts and render the building more in keeping with its historic character while also seeking to achieve a greater measure of energy efficiency despite the intensification of use for the building over its previous use as a scene shop. The applicants are accordingly requesting Tree Removal Permits to authorize the removal of these eight trees, although as building permit and utility plans are finalized the applicants will endeavor to preserve as many of these eight trees as practical in achieving the desired upgrades. 4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. The applicants recognize that mitigation of the trees removed on a one-for-one replacement basis will be a requirement of the removal permit's approval, and that they will be required to provide mitigation plantings on-site, off-site or pay a fee in lieu of mitigation. Planning staff have advised the applicants that in the event all of the trees are ultimately removed, the planting of at least one parking lot tree and the installation of associated parking lot perimeter landscaping consistent with the Site Design and Use Standard's Parking Lot Landscaping and Screening Standards would be necessary even if other removals were mitigated off-site or through in-lieu payments. -w W 1 N / \ V 1Z Y /i ~ \ Z1 c CD f~ I U tp CD 1 o I_ z o o r ) \ I I r i 1 0-T"79 + 'El - 0 0 0 LLLJ ca v / z j" l /I r 4~ O ~ I I / )5-u f-„- 1 ; I f _ ~0 1 ~ DPIY1 1 s? I - - J f I 1 I ~ I x I I \ ~ O I \ j 1 1 6 i I I ~ 1 5 O I ~ ~ V) u~ I /I Cc w LL ¢ e v ~ I 11 Q (Lw~ J ~ 111 i / Z I I f a V r 1 w I W m m J V J) Q Z I I I ( 1 ZwZ 4._ w cn L U w 1 w F V - m K 0 LI I V / p I N 5\ LL' N Q Z L. ~ 1 J w I !r II / N (6 n p Z w I 1 II C4 YV \ S u- U..I M wl O7 \ 1- ~ 11 ~ 11 ~tL \ I , I \ ( ~ O ~O 11 O O ~p \ r r r 1S 1S L S r ~ r V ° I -°o C ,L O K N i o + + w Q / < z~ i U Z O Z o O ~ v) I V (Y z z rr I I Q I ❑M I z o w m V w O L Z O z J u) o z J zs, (D p a f lg°N2 it Z W z M w rr F' p z m w J p a c d z w O Q w ¢ m m ? Q C¢j Z ~~>VV//4 1 or o Q x n w z z w p ¢ w z u~i z C) pU ~ 2 N - z p < p p U u „s~ O w z w= n z w z w O J z "K/ PL l~ a F- z a J z g z o a -LLI = v, :S - f\ J - to S F co 'r fn w w IWL W w ~ ¢ '"y~, ¢ CC m o Z z.~ z z U z z p m Z z ? a W¢ r='w 1= H Z 1= 1= w p ¢ ¢ o u~ F Z r cn cn a cn rn cn LO w r- w w - w 0 o O x x :0 X X ¢ x x ¢ [If x co z z ¢ w m w tY F- is A,lo~ w w J w w r- w w d w w 3: LL w U w w C7 i w < <n a e H z"1 O < ¢ U W N M d' CO l~ W 6J O (V V ~O CO I~ - w ° b' ✓ i'' J g F- Q Y O O 'O O O O O O O_ o o" cri o v Oregon Shakespeare Festival Rehearsal Center Renovation Planning Application Project Findings February 21, 2014 ARCHITECTURE RWARCHITEC ROM T TT E EAASST T OARN ETT ROAD City of Ashland 295~'1W W.O AD f' M E O E O R O OR 9 J 5 0 L Planning Division P S L JJ J 9 5 2 3 J I J 2 9 4 J 2 51 Winburn Way F S L Ashland, OR 97520 Project Identification Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF) Site Address: 30 First St, Ashland, OR 97520 Map 391 E09BD Tax Lot: 5200 Zoning: C-1-D (Commercial, with Downtown overlay) ORW Architecture 1234-02 Purpose: These findings are intended to serve as the guiding document that will allow the City of Ashland to review and make its determinations regarding the planned renovations of an existing OSF Scene Production Facility into a Rehearsal Center. It will explain and demonstrate how the planned work will be acceptable within the Ashland Municipal Code. Project Goals: Building and Site The Oregon Shakespeare Festival building described above will undergo an extensive interior renovation to create the Hay / Patton Rehearsal Center. The rehearsal center will provide a space for OSF operations detailed below, and is not intended to be, or should be construed by extension, as a venue for theater previews or performances open to the public or special private viewings. There will be allowances in the design for the observation of rehearsals as a classroom activity, and other ticketed seminar type events. These goals will trigger a Change of Use, for the existing F- 1/S Occupancy to an A-3 Occupancy. The change of occupancy will require an upgrade of the egress system to the east side of the building near the loading docks, exiting towards the alley. The renovation of the building will affect the exterior by: ® Replacing the hodgepodge of windows, AC units and storefront with a more historical, and energy efficient product, while leaving the concrete finish of the building intact and unmodified. The window replacement allows for increasing the thermal performance of r the exterior envelope by replacing the existing single pane, metal framed windows with metal clad wood framed, insulated glass units, with visible exterior mullions over the glass. ® Replace the existing metal panel gables with a board and batten facade. ® Provide a new exterior paint scheme. ® Replace the existing northwest corner CMU and storefront, which faces the main street, with new Folding Glass Door and complimentary Storefront. Operations: The OSF Rehearsal Center's operation is expected to: 1. Support the existing theaters in the area by providing a central location by which directors, performers and staff can rehearse and work in proximity to the theaters. Staffing in this building is expected to be up to 100 employees at any one time. Rehearsals typically run form 1.00 pm until 6.00 pm and from 7.00 pm until midnight, six days a week during the OSF theater season. Stage management staff and actor support staff will work beyond those hours. Rehearsals will start at the beginning of each year and continue into October. 2. Create a focused environment for the current rehearsal departments, which are already operating in various rehearsal halls in nearby buildings. 3. Facilitate the rehearsal staff, equipment, materials, storage space needed to maintain existing training and practice needs. Municipal Codes: The existing building will be renovated under the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) Chapter 18 Land Use Standard development codes as follows: 1. C-1 Retail Commercial District,18.32 a. "D" Downtown Overlay District, 18.32.050 2. Site Design and Use Standards, 18.72.055,: a. Basic Site Review Standards for Commercial Development, pp. 17-19 b. Detail Site Review Standards, pp. 20-21 c. Historic District Design Standards, pp. 41-47 d. Downtown Design Standards, pp. 53-61 3. Street Standards, Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options and requirements for adequate capacity for services. i t Commercial Summary: Development Area The renovated project has no new development area. Structural Site Coverage The renovated project will not affect the building envelope square footage. Therefore the building footprint will remain at 11,672.30 SF. The site is .037 acres (16,1 17.20 SF) which results in a building footprint coverage of approximately 72.4 percent. Impervious Surface Coverage The renovated project has approximately 3,339.41 SF of existing asphalt and concrete, and has no new development area. Parking Spaces The project has 4 existing parking stalls, which will not be affected by the scope of this work. Landscaped Area The renovated project has approximately 2,489.75 SF of existing landscaped area adjacent to an alley access. This area will only be impacted by the addition of mechanical units required for the new use. Energy Requirements: Gas Current annual usage 8,078 Therms. The renovation is expected to reduce this usage by about 10-15%, as space heating will not be using this resource. Electricity Current annual usage 236,357 KWH. The renovation is expected to slightly increase usage, as it is now will be used for heating and powering an elevator. What is saved in by the building not used as a production facility and the replacement of older equipment will be offset by increased electrical power requirements for heat pump heating. Water and Sewer Current annual usage 244,435 Cubic Feet. The renovation is not expected to impact this usage. The number of building occupants will be slightly higher, but usage may drop somewhat due to more stringent water conserving fixtures. Storm Water The exterior of the building is remaining the same, which will not add capacity into the Ashland storm water system. Waste: All waste is carefully controlled by OSF in accordance with OSHA and local regulation for waste disposal. Landfill (1) 10 cubic yard trash dumpster is currently used at the existing location and it is expected that this number will remain the same. Recyclables There are also (4) comingled recyclable paper/cans/glass wheelie bins and one 2 yard cardboard container used outside the building, which require 'curb side' pick up. Site Lighting' Exterior lighting may be added based on code requirements., Air Pollution There is no expected addition to the local air pollution. Hazards There are no hazardous substances introduced by the change in occupancy. E C-1 Retail Commercial District Requirements This application is for Work to an existing building. The pertinent guidelines of this section are include: 18.32.010 Purpose I This district is designed to stabilize, improve and protect the characteristics of those areas i providing commercial commodities and services. 18.32.020 Permitted Uses The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted outright: A. Professional, financial, business and medical offices, and personal service establishments such as beauty and barber shops, launderette, and clothes and laundry pick-up stations. B. Stores, shops and offices supplying commodities or performing services, such as a department store, antique shop, artists supply store, and including a regional shopping center or element of such center, such as a major department store. C. Restaurants. (Ord 2812, S2 1998) D. Theaters, but not including a drive-in. E. Manufacture or assembly of items sold in a permitted use, provided such manufacturing or assembly occupies six hundred (600) square feet or less, and is contiguous to the permitted retail outlet. F. Mortuaries and crematoriums. G. Printing, publishing, lithography, xerography, copy centers. H. Temporary tree sales, from November 1 to January 1. I. Public and quasi-public utility and service buildings, and public parking lots, but excluding electrical substations. J. Kennels and veterinary clinics, with all animals housed within structures. Nightclubs and Bars. Except as provided in 18.32.030, however, no nightclub or bar is permitted within the Historic Interest Area unless it is located in the "D" Downtown Overlay District. (Ord 2812, S2 1998) Finding: The proposed use of the renovation is to serve as an accessory use to the item 'D Theaters' Conclusion: The proposed use complies with this requirement. 18.32.025 Special Permitted Uses The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted outright subject to the requirements of this section and the requirements of Chapter 18.72, Site Design and Use Standards. A. Commercial laundry, cleaning and dyeing establishments. ti B. Bowling alleys, auditoriums, skating rinks, and miniature golf courses. If parking areas are located within 200' of a residential' district, they shall be shielded from residences by a fence or solid vegetative screen a minimum of 4' in height. C. Automobile fuel sales, and automobile and truck repair facilities. These uses may only be located in the Freeway Overlay District as shown on the official zoning map. D. Residential uses. E. Drive-up uses as defined and regulated as follows: F. Kennel and veterinary clinics where animals are housed outside, provided the use is not located (ORD 2951, 2008; Ord 3074 2012 Finding: The proposed use of the renovation is not is not any of the listed Special Permitted uses. Conclusion: The proposed use of the renovation is not defined as a Special Permitted use. The . proposed project does not have to comply with this requirement. 18.32.030 Conditional Uses The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted when authorized in accordance with the chapter on Conditional Use Permits: A. Electrical substations. B. Automobile fuel sales, and automobile and truck repair facilities, except as allowed as a special permitted use in 18.32.025. C. New and used car sales, boat, trailer, and recreational vehicles sales and storage areas, except within the Historic Interest Area as defined in the Comprehensive Plan. D. Hotels and motels. E. Temporary uses. F. Outdoor storage of commodities associated with a permitted, special permitted or conditional use. G. Hostels, provided that the facility be subject to an annual Type 1 review for at least the first three years, after which time the Planning Commission may approve, under a Type II procedure, a permanent permit for the facility. H. Building material sales yards, but not including concrete or asphalt batch or mixing plants. 1. Churches or similar religious institutions. J. Wireless Communication Facilities not permitted outright and authorized pursuant to Section 18.72.180. K. Structures which are greater than forty (40) feet in height, but less than fifty-five (55) feet, in the "D" Downtown Overlay District. (ORS 2951, 2008) f I Finding: The building height is less than 40 feet. Modifying the existing building height is not within the scope of this project. Conclusion: The proposed use of the renovation is not defined as a Conditional Use. The proposed project does not have to comply with this requirement. 18.32.040 General Regulations A. Area, Width, Yard Requirements. There shall be no lot area, width, coverage, front yard, side yard, or rear yard, except as required under the Off-Street Parking and Solar Access Chapters; where required or increased for conditional uses; where required by the Site Review Chapter or where abutting a residential district, where such setback shall be maintained at ten feet per story for rear yards and ten feet for side yards. (Ord 2859 S 1, 2000) B. Maximum Building Height. No structure shall be greater than 40 feet in height. Finding: The building is located in a Downtown Overlay district. Finding: The building is not abutting a residential district. Finding: The building height is less than 40 feet. Modifying the existing building height is not within the scope of this project. Conclusion: The Downtown Overlay ordinance supersedes these requirements. 18.32.050 "D" Downtown Overlay District A. In all areas within the "D" Downtown Overlay District, all uses are not required to provide off- street parking or loading areas, except for hotel, motel, or hostel uses. All parking areas provided shall comply with the Off-Street Parking chapter and the Site Review chapter. B. Structures which are greater than 40 feet in height, but less than 55 feet, may be permitted as a conditional use. C. The solar access setback does not apply in the "D" Overlay district." (Ord. 2688-1992) Finding: The proposed use is not a hotel, motel or hostel. Finding: Off-street is not required, but is provided and will comply with the Off-Street chapter. Finding: The building height is less than 40 feet. Modifying the existing building height is not within the scope of this project. Conclusion: The proposed renovation complies with this requirement. i 20 i/ Site Design and Use Standards Requirements Basic Site Review Standards This application is for Work to an existing building and site. The guidelines of this section are as foI lows: II-C- Ia) Orientation and Scale (P. 17) II-C-1 b) Streetscape (P. 18) ll-C-1 c) Landscapinq(P. 18) II-C-Id) Parking(P. 181 II-C- Ie) Designated Creek Protection (P. 18) II-C-If) Noise and Glare(P. 18) /I-C-7,q) Expansions of Existing Sites and Buildings(P. 19) Finding: The scope of the Work to the building is an interior renovation and energy upgrade. Work to landscaped areas is limited to off-street/alley access side of the building. Conclusion: The guidance in this section is not applicable. Detail Site Review This application is for Work to an existing building. The guidelines of this section are largely not applicable. Key items include: II-C-2a) Orientation and Scale (P. 201 6) Buildings shall incorporate arcades, roofs, alcoves, porticoes, and awnings that protect pedestrians from the rain and sun. Finding: The entrance on South First Street has been recessed into the building to create an alcove. An awning has been included to protect pedestrians. Finding: The main entrance is located on Enders Alley. This entrance has been recessed into the building to create an alcove. An awning located at a low level required to protect pedestrians would interfere with the alley use for deliveries and other commercial vehicles. Conclusion: The proposed design modifies the existing structure to accommodate alcoves and awnings to comply with this requirement. Historic District Design Standards This application is for Work to an existing building and site. The guidelines of this section are as fol lows: IV-C-7 Height IV-C-2 Scale IV-C-3 Massing IV-C-4 Setback IV-C-5 Roof Shapes IV-C-6 Rhythm of Openings IV-C-7 Platforms IV-C-8 Directional Expression IV-C-9 Sense of Entry IV-C-10 Imitations Finding: The scope of the Work to the building is an interior renovation and energy upgrade. No changes to the building which affects the guidelines of this section are included in the scope of the Work. Conclusion: The guidance in this section is not applicable. Downtown Design Standards This application is for Work to an existing building. The guidelines of this section are largely not applicable due to the building not facing a Downtown street. However, key items include: VI-B) Setback (P. 53) 2) Ground level entries are encouraged to be recessed from the public right-of-way to create a "sense of entry " through design or use of materials. Finding: The entrance on South First Street has been recessed to create a sense of entry. Finding: The main entrance on Enders Alley has been recessed to create a sense of entry. Conclusion: The proposed design modifies the existing structure to accommodate recesses to comply with this requirement. VI-D) Openings (P. 54) 7) Ground level elevations facing a street shall maintain a consistent proportion of transparency (i.e., windows) compatible with the pattern found in the downtown area. Finding: The proposed elevations provide a more historically accurate glazing window, replacing the existing hodgepodge of windows, AC units and storefront. rf Conclusion: The proposed design maintains the existing historical transparency. 2) Scale and proportion of altered or added building elements, such as the size and relationship of new windows, doors, entrances, columns and other building features shall be visually compatible with the original architectural character of the building. Finding: The north west corner is altered to restore the historical 'garage entrance' look. This is achieved by removing the existing CMU block on the north elevation and introducing large, thermally broken, folding glass doors and on the west elevations, removing the existing storefront entrance and replacing it with full height storefront. Finding: The altered entrance on the north elevation replaces the existing hollow metal door with new, historic looking, glazed windows, and creates a new entrance further down the alley, in proportion to the adjacent glazing features. Conclusion: The proposed elevations restore the historical features to make the building more compatible with its original character. 5) Ground level entry doors shall be primarily transparent. Finding: Full height glazed storefront aluminum doors are featured at the entry doors. Conclusion: The proposed design includes primarily transparent doors to comply with this requirement. 6) Windows and other features of interest to pedestrians such as decorative columns or decorative corbelling shall be provided adjacent to the sidewalk. Finding: Ground level features are part of the existing historic building and are not in the scope of the alteration. Conclusion: The existing window placement and features are being maintained to comply with this requirement. VI-E Horizontal Rhythms (P. 55) 1. Prominent horizontal lines at similar levels along the street's street front shall be maintained (Illustration: Recommend 1, 5, 6 & 10; Avoid 4 & 8). 2. A clear visual division shall be maintained between ground level floor and upper floors (Illustration: Recommend 1, 5, 6 & 10). Finding: The horizontal rhythms are part of the existing historic building and are not in the scope of the alteration. Conclusion: The existing horizontal lines are being maintained to comply with this requirement. VI-F Vertical Rhythms (P. 55) 2. Storefront remodeling or upper story additions shall reflect the traditional structural system of the volume by matching the spacing and rhythm of historic openings and surface detailing (Illustration: Recommend 6; Avoid 4 & 9). Finding: The vertical rhythms are part of the existing historic building and are not in the scope of the alteration. Conclusion: The existing vertical rhythms are being maintained to comply with this requirement. VI-H Materials (P.57) 2. In order to add visual interest, buildings are encouraged to incorporate complex "paneled" exteriors with columns, framed bays, transoms and windows to create multiple surface levels (Illustration: Recommend 1, 5 & 10; Avoid 7, 8 & 9). Finding: The existing board formed concrete is part of the existing historic building and is not in the scope of the alteration. Finding: The gable replacement material is proposed as a vertical board and batten facade, which restores the building to a more historical look and feel than the current metal panels. Conclusion: The proposed design maintains the existing features while also upgrading the vertical plane of the gable to a more historical, paneled elevation, to comply with this requirement. VI-I Awnings Marquees or Similar Pedestrian Shelters (P.57) 1. Awnings, marquee or similar pedestrian shelters shall be proportionate to the building and shall not obscure the building's architectural details. If mezzanine or transom windows exist, awning placement shall be placed below the mezzanine or transom windows where feasible (Illustration: Recommend 1, 5, 6 & 10; Avoid 4 & 9). 2. Except for marquees - similar pedestrian shelters such as awnings shall be placed between pilasters (Illustration: Recommend 1 & 5; Avoid 9). 3. Storefronts with prominent horizontal lines at similar levels along the street's storefront shall be maintained by their respective sidewalk coverings (Illustration: Recommend 5; Avoid 8). Finding: The South First Street entrance awning is positioned to align with the existing architectural features and details. Finding: There are no prominent storefront lines on South First Street or Enders Alley. Conclusion: The proposed design adds awnings where practically allowed and maintains the prominent horizontal lines where the new storefront is included, to comply with these requirements. VI-J Other-(E.57 ) 2. Visual integrity of the original building shall be maintained when altering or adding building elements. This shall include such features as the vertical lines of columns, piers, the horizontal definition of spandrels and cornices, and other primary structural and decorative elements (Illustration: Recommend 6; Avoid 4 & 9). Finding: The exterior walls of this historic building remain unmodified. The vertical columns and horizontal themes are being maintained. Finding: The window replacement for energy efficiency removes all of the non-historic windows, replacing them with more historically accurate looking windows. Finding: The gable replacement material is proposed as a vertical board and batten facade, which restores the building to a more historical look and feel than the current metal panels. Conclusion: The existing historical building elements are being maintained to comply with this requirement 3. Restoration, rehabilitation or remodeling projects shall incorporate, whenever possible, original design elements that were previously removed, remodeled or covered over (Illustration: Recommend 6; Avoid 4 & 9). Finding: The original openings on the north east corner are being opened up and restored in a manner consistent with the building's original garage use. The large full height folding doors and storefront represent 'garage doors', albeit with a modern thermal performance. Finding: The metal gables are replaced with a board and batten look that is more consistent with the early 20" century than the existing metal panels. Conclusion: The proposed design incorporates design elements which restore the visual integrity and rehabilitation of the building. Performance Standards Options Requirements Street Right-of-Way Improvements This application is for Work to an existing building and site. The guidelines of this section are as follows: 18.88.010 Purpose and Intent 18.88.020 Definitions 18.88.030 Procedure for Approval 18 88 040 Performance Standards for Residential Developments 18.88.050 Street Standards 18.88.060 Parkinq. Standards 18.88.070 Setbacks 18.88.080 PSO-Overlay 18.88.090 Performance Standards Guidelines 18.88. 100 Applicability of Other Sections of the Land Use Development Ordinance Finding: The scope of the Work to the building is an interior renovation and energy upgrade with, exterior restoration improvements. Finding: Based on a change in occupancy from the existing use, to the new use, the existing services and utilities are not expected to be expanded significantly. Conclusion: The guidance in only applicable if where improvements to services in the right-of- Way are required. Any Work in the public Right-of-Way must comply with state code and will comply with the Street Standards. i i !QJn~- C= I 1 I F ) I ~ ii ~ _ z (z zZ oN I I M .°o 3 II o ~ Uz I ~ r~~ i~ ~ c - N I ~ K r Q ( / , s _ nai I I Q ~ 11O III a 1 QO I o , ~ e® o Lu L2 I- m U r\ U M I ~J 3 <L !I tJ U 111 v ' v Y N 1 '2 ' zaz O O w / _ - =O Z LLS / O ❑ N I J N Q 1 I :y„=.. \ Q Q LD r OQj \ SS .L II rU tN U~.. N ~ I \ I rep 1 \ I ~ \ i O N 1`I O O N ~t / C) CD C) ° I C o cN Y rn ~ w L % = o zO~ I Z L) Z 3z \ w Ndo Z: Q O 0 Q i Z ° U 7) I Q I I I ~ z w y W U Z U) a) O J N Z a a a O Tj~l d o w o O a o a f , Z W 2 p z ca m Z N LL z w W U Q O cg~ Z z N m 2 x ~ M w~ o < F w < z < wz tiOO co u w z O x z w ~-0 an m N U W uj w U F- K Q Z N 0~ ~ > Z Lo, } -J ❑ p z of O O N OF O ¢ OU w U C C~ N Z o uS m x w x z w z w J w Z O ¢ w w a w❑' a'° mo ' ox Q¢ a v) Z = r x x z Q R w z z w Q 7 H co a7 F- co IL- W Q d' LWL S W w ~O Q 3 v=i - ❑ w O 0 C7 C7 U' O O O w U m U U Z Z g N Q< % Q mom z z z z Z z z z x z z a Q ae w O o r o O Q F F H Y I= - H W 1- O a2' W ° = H° 9 co co U) U) Z v~ v~ I- w L/) t~ 0 w w ~n ' Z o p o x x x x ¢ x x Q x U z z a m w. Z - m p w w J w w w w a w w LL w O w w t7 u. v~ ° LL F z P U Q¢ V w N M V' ui CO I~ M O O N M V CO I~ C./7 " Q Q O O O O O O O O O g Q~a g , ~.u V LUM 1 0 M w~ w0 ~ wz zw z0 O ¢ O = U = p o a ¢ ¢ = a ~ z ~C7 30 2w co a U ¢ a ,J LLI of ow J a- > a F tL W u- U in o O m Q Z Q 2 p Z - C7 Qa <O H Z CD W a 20 OU m p ¢ Q O O p m ro r T, i U Z Q U U O LLl ww 00 U F W F a Q i _ W > > J L U ~2 N U J~ Z W W Z W x w X O U) z z co z W W LLJ Y z LUw 9 co U 0 Z _ W w o z 1) o al 71- /J Q ! L L!J ui w - _I a p1 J a ,l: a O U U) w a - a Iz_-Z 0~~ O~ HZ w~ O ; (D U) HZ w 7ZZ Zp LLo~ pwzw za v wpw ~J ~a ¢F_ pZ U` ¢S m4 U p LLJ~ O ww z ~F ¢ W LL J p O w J Z J d Q Q 0 Z W U Q c W Q m ¢ H Z [If < CD 0- o U F- K ~ U¢ (7 U) K :E J w a U) p z z O W J p Z zw CO ao w za w 0 z w LLI p U 2 w Q LU 0 w ¢a w ~ J ~ a 02 J cD co U x w w < Z 0 J O w (D 4 w J co m Q U.J N W W W Z w Q 3 Z O co U) z X Z J) Z U z UJ O LL w U J 0 Q Z Cn Q Q W F W F- U- J3 mo® zo ~ Z oLLI o~a wo > z ar r J Z m a Z Of - co W CC W WSJ WQ °W w 0 m F ¢ w~ Q U O 02 ~ < wmU) W z= ~U io 0 a o c7 d O = O r Wow n¢ z= n Z - a ww w =3 z w¢ 0- °a w a X°w r Qm JZ • w Q ° C2 W a r w - ~ - w w U _ K z K ou to Z o ~n J= ZZ r ? W W N J ~ aco~ I U W a zw - ¢ Un =4 Uw W ~ 4 i W z c z W 1] _ ' Oa C Z O w w v U W IL J U W , d Ewa- o ! m a m aJ W c_ LL t o v a z~'~ - ~ r 7 + Uj r ~pt}'Iei LU i " LJ u J J ` _LL9 r ui , S' 2 W T W r Z U r ° J Q I.L Q_' Q Of LL, ° m w U W z O F-- Z 2 1-- O g ~ 0 0U U U a. X O z p w W O Y (Z~ L X U U z Z o a v W W a g O ° 3 Oo Z o 0 w a 0) 2' W LL LLL W J ~ O J ° Z p = J o la- Q = 4 Cl) a' W Z W no U LLJ m Z W W af CD (D - UJ z F- F- U) z z w Z z Z N ~ w d I- w w w w W z w z u o ~o Qz LU U-1 o $ LL- -=N~m w0°sm w Y= I I I ~N r I - I - T ijJll I III 5~ _ iIII II } I I a I - E I a A I I III _ ~ ppY IH' V P III F; Il C I F I I 111P I 'I I III ~ ~ ._I'I I r _ - o v - sCU I I i I li . Y lilill I _ 1 I toe - y I I f-- Z w 1 c Z W O Z ~ U .c ° z Qa w woo F-L F-? o ~ li m o ~ o c I :r W w N O II 7 CJ W J Q U o c~ i I 1 E O w ~ C ~w W Ca o - I- U rs a 'cu 110 - Q m,u, ~o -1 F- N ® II M ICJ W Z Fes- ~ ~ O Q r O Z LL! 01 w oW ~Z M LU 0 r00 Zw rm0 LU V 0 ~ ? w Q LJJ ~o c ~N¢x 3z LL cG o ~ C/') IL m >.O°oa z o a Z ~ L w O z_ O z c ° J z z U,' tJ-i ® d, w ~ O Z Z M 2 Z Z z ° = z TE O J =z Z LLw U p W Z N O J~ LL o W :2 j J J ~ C, VJ co - O Z o C7 cn O 0 ° 0J Z <O W 00 O ul 0 Z 0 0 H d~ 0 O L- az a 7 a ~r L ~o F z r w¢ w U ~ z~ z Q LU 13 cr- ..T£ O ..l .t£ _ - . _ U) Z z J J Z W Ur O J J O U) N ED Lu W Z w z co W J_ ❑ Z J Z Z Z - cn Z C7 C7 [ ' g 00 a Jo O ®ee c Lij P: _ w z z U C u ® d z d z a z cn N ® 5< R CD 'r O f- (n O H W W Z A..L ® [d1 LL.. a LLI ,s „gol CV nlm M M H Z Z O' Z z O Z 0 Z O ~ V) Z) Z 2 gg CO Z (D W Z) ~ LLI ¢ z Z = J o z Z z Z 2 a z O U ❑ w' z w F- z z z cn N :2 W ❑ ® Z M ? W ZO ®L J _O w a ❑ Z O w :2 J _ d J O (f) z C7 J H ❑ z O O w z a Ili IL Cf) O a w a W LU O LLJ a u W d Nm V Z H ZO v d m Z J Z CD O J ~ U~ W> x Q Z CC W M cn = Q W ="'<s W v~ o O F ~ < 8 0 , i ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION I t ~ i I'I1iLllt7rt tYl~lt'~I7 Winbum Wjy, 1,hlarSd 0# 975 c t ~rt x r FILE 9 4 8-60(10 DESCRIPT1ONOF PROJECT l~ircl:~tl h~1~;e r~ECaEo Fes0vol Rehearsal Cer iei Renovai nn D58CRIPTION OF PROPERTY NO A, a ~310 First -Street S; Ashland, OR 9757f}_ - ~trryal , d;ir~, s Zo Ulg - 0,1-D Corn rhercial DuV WLUVU'n GCr1tp;Pl~ l is sJgn llic'n _L-~rnr,lcrcial APPLICANT Name Pcul I'1 rl~lr S F 1 ) 4L,,G, - I I ryName - ' Phone I J r Gk=.•:Ii~ill r r0~ll _ l i] 111C7 f 11 JYC~ fiiJi~r <<, P. O. Br 4 158, ;y hl2nci %Jp; OiS{ PROPERTY OWNER ' Nam Oregon 13hake-speare Festival Phpne I'~~ 1 40 2111 . puLllnC~~:sfc~sltlar~d_~rcl, ' F-Mail A dtess-'F. n, Moak 1 8 C4 As-hlarid . 97520' StJRVRYD , ENGINEER AR NIT€ T, LANDSCAPE RCNtT T OTtfbR T l,~ Architect Name, 06'04 II ~ Ro'ne (~411 779-923 kI~{}E_h~tail oi~trarcfr.coril ,Addr s4 29,90 r. Barnett Rd, City Medford Tip '~75~LL Tille Cuntr c=f«r _Nai le b tvta ycrs - e hlior:e (541) 482AU96 E,Mail' bob@ droithuilt.urrni Add-k!s ist) i"%1'rstlotuc Astil rld 97520; tr Zip i h6ro ll,sog;4fiha# f/4'' u', I! itl(~ i'If:_ qN, 5~ i t.:!~~ r_ J fr7'1 r ~.r~, !iGt,lvii ~'i~~h 1ri the fTkyi S ' fd vt°It ti i ri. t y ~i 1, p 74 c~ aY~'f1,7,1'i9~~f-F(:n, r. ~r,r r !f4\ ir, iiJB dfitf"rytr~C~. ~ ~71j~~?~~l~~~I,~(~sal~s~tl~d?rd)' j~!i!.~ i771 ~'bE St`?O~Vl~~'!~ ~'~~E~ Ct~f)~bi'1:1d r"1I1~i~li~1L~ j1~Gf1 ~sl~.:IrH 4 !(IIl Iii ~hB~"1~~7 ~~2£,(JIf1S~(f !'nf ;1i0~5f )rih'af est t rrrUtird tcl be I iwm G(, rrla 6XIlet= 8Sc "1 5 f l; iaSJ3UN~f r`iti~- I twi,i ; 'Jflt,r.,':{ 1t1U l+h t! ~r1i5 ; S± S Si bg gl Fltlfyr ~i(t~Sr (1 1 li 'I _'1 ~4 !i 'JG f7 PA,1 11 hci~ljJi~~i ~t1,1~~~'irlklGlllrrrrh i't•r!C(i F;i 4r7e~'uri;tl~~1u u:'U~ r hi,: i~zi(rtSl f f thermdlrvos fa urn,~,i4 i rEr1~ - : rJ~~~ ,~ra~hirn ~lfd~a rep, a si s3~ iF~;1 tM~ ;ttf;tl^ C(~s3Cc'.k1ffL~s~l~t!'!,1 i ~i.~ rt ~rie'1!,dt~; ii ~i hirtl:er - ~f 1;1#i,v6vcwuo' ,r,(!operh 6a_,a ac thec ru'~ ~2~; ~(!!L 'i1 (r'~S rt 4~` l I i~ i:) t hh".ly~ !17 (;of aL4 f31~f Si1L+ Ut6 il&~f ra hz~t~t -1.n r H~ I~ {rt C rn ~Frl yi ttOUllBQ.{0 l- Applicant's Signature Crate ry~> > l4}'l('! L!t 1J7ii ~J1~~r7C?I ly fli 4~:'i4i''L1 rCr rii(S rl [Ill S(, i ti,1 G'~: rQ{!d r.1G(~ Z117i ~t?f:~l(li)f/ Eiji,! I,i )I i'ij)~ f , J~J~1l'C~1I1uil ul~:111, "hIJrT f~,tt`i1P2 f 076 as (i ~l; flJ)(5,~)r. Propslly QWnor's Signature (,required) Date II-;'.,]rrr+'dI, I:gr'I,'] Date Rereived "or:ng Permit Type ~iIi iq F: s:iVEF~ ~F r Job Address: 30 FIRST ST S Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C A Owner's Name: OREGON SHAKESPEAREAN 0 Phone: P Customer 00052 N State Lic No: L ADROIT CONSTRUCTION T City Lic No: L Applicant: R Address: A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 02/21/2014 0 T Issued: Expires: 08/20/2014 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E09BD5200 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Site Review - OSF Rehearsal Center Renovation VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ' Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F i { i I I I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 (180 days). 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 0 Fees Paid: $ 0 Total Amount Due: $ 0 Applicant Date COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F 0 Is