HomeMy WebLinkAboutLiberty_280_PA-2014-01880
i
T Y m
d
December 29, 2014
Notice of Final Decision
On December 26, 2014, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
Planning Action: 2014-01880
Subject Property: 280 Liberty
Applicant/Owner: Jason Eaton (Conscious Construction, Inc.)/Joan Kleen
Description: A request for Site Review and Conditional Use Permit approvals to construct a
new approximately 400 square foot accessory residential unit along the alley for the property located at
280 Liberty Street. The application also includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove an
eight-inch diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) maple tree, and for Exception to the Site Design and Use
Standards to allow an three-foot landscape buffer between the proposed parking space and the unit
where an eight-foot buffer would typically be required. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single
Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 09DA; TAX LOT: 4500.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of one year and all conditions of approval
identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO)
18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO
18.108.070(B)(2)(c). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached.
The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Amy Gunter, in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
wN
SECTION 18.108.070(B)2 Effective Date of Decision and Appeals.
B. Actions subject to appeal:
2. Type I Planning Actions.
a. Effective Date of Decision. The final decision of the City for planning actions resulting from
the Type I Planning Procedure shall be the Staff Advisor decision, effective on the 13th day
after notice of the decision is mailed unless reconsideration of the action is approved by the
Staff Advisor or appealed to the Commission as provided in section 18.108.070(B)(2)(c).
b. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider Type I planning actions as set forth
below,
i. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City Agency may request
reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to
the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for
reconsideration, which in the opinion of the staff advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be
raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the
application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue
prior to making a decision.
ii. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five (5) days of mailing. The Staff
Advisor shall decide within three (3) days whether to reconsider the matter.
iii. If the Planning Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the
Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff
Advisor shall decide within ten (10) days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original
decision. The Staff Advisor shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm,
modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action.
iv. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff
Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those
parties that requested reconsideration.
c. Appeal.
i. Within twelve (12) days of the date of the mailing of the Staff Advisor's final decision,
including any approved reconsideration request, the decision may be appealed to the
Planning Commission by any party entitled to receive notice of the planning action. The
appeal shall be submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary on a form approved by
the City Administrator, be accompanied by a fee established pursuant to City Council
action, and be received by the city no later than 4:30 p.m. on the 12th day after the notice
of decision is mailed.
ii. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial
hearing shall be refunded. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals
made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the city and whose
boundaries include the site.
iii. The appeal shall be considered at the next regular Planning Commission or Hearings
Board meeting. The appeal shall be a de novo hearing and shall be considered the initial
evidentiary hearing required under ALUO 18.108.050 and ORS 197.763 as the basis for
an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals. The Planning Commission'or Hearings
Board decision on appeal shall be effective 13 days after the findings adopted by the
Commission or Board are signed by the Chair of the Commission or Board and mailed to
the parties.
iv. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be
considered by the city as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 800-735-2900
TTY:
u. _ rt•.tas ~ '
4
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01880
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 280 Liberty Street
APPLICANT: Jason Eaton (Conscious Construction, Inc.)
OWNER: Joan Kleen
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review and Conditional Use Permit approvals to
construct a new approximately 400 square foot accessory residential unit along the alley for the
property located at 280 Liberty Street. The application also includes a request for a Tree
Removal Permit to remove an eight-inch diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) maple tree, and for
Exception to the Site Design and Use. Standards to allow a three-foot landscape buffer between
the proposed parking space and the unit where an eight-foot buffer would typically be required.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09DA; TAX LOT: 4500
SUBMITTAL DATE: October 29, 2014
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: November 20, 2014
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: December 26, 2014
FINAL DECISION DATE: January 7, 2014
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: January 8, 2015
DECISION
The subject parcel is located on the east side of Liberty Street, south of the Iowa Street
intersection. The property is 10,150 square feet and has an average downward slope of
approximately 12 percent to the northeast. The parcel and immediate surrounding uses are zoned
R-1-7.5, Single-Family Residential. Liberty Street is identified as a Collector and is improved
with curb, gutters and sidewalks. The alley east of Liberty, behind the subject parcel, is 16 feet
wide.
The property currently has only a 2,142 square foot single-family home constructed in 1920. The
proposal is for a 352 square foot Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) located in the rear yard near
the alley. Ashland Municipal Code (AMC) 18.24.030 limits the size of ARUs to 50 percent of
the Gross Habitable Floor Area (GHFA) of the primary residence, and no greater than 1,000
square feet, which the proposed structure complies. Following development there will be two
dwelling units on-site.
The applicant has proposed the unit. to have 12-inch on center cedar board and batten siding with
no corner boards. A 6 / 12 pitch, composition shingle roof to match the existing residence and a
small shed roof porch cover with a galvanized steel roof. The Historic Commission reviewed the
proposal at their December 3, 2014 meeting and recommended approval as submitted.
The property currently has two parking spaces located in the driveway off Liberty Street.
Accessory units in a Single-Family zone require additional parking spaces be in conformance
with the AMC 18.96.030, in which units that are less than 500 square feet requires one additional
PA #2014-01880
280 Liberty St/adg
Page 1
t
parking space. The applicant has proposed to install a single parking space, parallel to the alley
between the unit and the alley. The applicant has requested an Administrative Variance to the
required eight-foot landscape buffer required between parking spaces and residences for the
parallel spaced proposed in the alley and unit. The request is so that the area under the large box
elder tree near the north property line remains undisturbed and the maple tree to the south of the
proposed ARU is able to be retained. The applicant has proposed a three foot buffer between the
parking space and the unit.
There are two trees in the area of development that the applicant has proposed to retain. The Tree
Commission reviewed the application at their December 4, 2014 meeting and recommended
approval as submitted. The applicant has proposed a six-foot chain link fence to be installed
around the construction side of the trees. An eight-inch DBH red maple landscaping tree is
proposed to be removed. It is near where excavation is proposed and the applicant is requesting
mitigation with a longer living species that is more suitable for the location.
Accessory units in single-family zones are subject to a higher degree of review due to their
potential impacts to established neighborhoods. The approval criteria for a Conditional Use
Permit is established to ensure adequate capacity of public facilities are available to serve the use
and that no adverse impacts will affect the surrounding neighborhood. One criterion is "That
adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the
development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be
provided to and through the subject property" (AMC 18.104.050.13).
The applicant has verified there are adequate utilities within the adjacent rights-of-way to serve
both the proposed unit and the primary dwelling. Overhead electric exists on the west side of
Liberty Street which will have a new service installed to serve the new unit. The applicant is also
aware that an additional electric meter is required and has proposed to upgrade both meters.
Water service will be served with the existing meter. Sanitary sewer service is available in
Liberty Street.
A concern was raised regarding the potential increase in traffic generated by the "vacation
rental" and requesting the alley be paved - this application is for an Accessory Residential Unit
and since the property is zoned single family residential, vacation rentals are prohibited by code.
AMC 18.92.080.C.4.c states that if the site is served by an alley, then access for motor vehicles
must be from the alley and not from the street frontage. In a similar request for an Accessory
Unit accessed from an alley, (Planning Action #2008-00801) the City Council found that "paved
access to and through the site" refers to the primary access of the lot, which in this case would be
i
Liberty Street, which is fully paved. Moreover, the criterion does not require, nor is it interpreted
to require that all accesses to the subject property be paved. Adequate transportation facilities are
available, or could be made available, in the adjacent rights-of-way to serve both the existing and
proposed unit.
A trash and recycling enclosure will be required to be installed in accordance with screening
standards of the Site Design and Use Standards;'bicycle parking will need to be provided for the
ARU. A condition requiring these to be addressed on the building permit submittals has been
added.
PA #2014-01880
280 Liberty St/adg
Page 2
The final criterion is that the proposed unit is to have no greater adverse material effect on the
livability of the impact area compared to the target use of the zone (18.104.030.C). In this case
the target use is residential uses and the impact area is the surrounding neighborhood. The
property is an oversized parcel being 10,150 square feet with the minimum lot size in this zone
(R-1-7.5) being 7,500 square feet. The property is well connected by way of Liberty Street and
Iowa Street to the north, centrally located between Downtown, Southern Oregon University, and
an uniquely eclectic Ashland neighborhood, which makes walking, bicycling and transit viable
options for residents of the accessory residential unit, and easily accessible to a variety of
establishments and services. In Staff s opinion, the proposed accessory residential unit will have
no greater adverse affect on the livability of the neighborhood than the target use of the property.
Therefore, with the added conditions below, staff finds that the proposed unit would be in
conformance with the standards of the R-1-7.5 zone, the minimum requirements of the
Conditional Use and Site Review chapter of the Ashland Municipal Code.
The criteria for a Conditional Use approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070, as
follows:
A. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is
proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not
implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program.
8. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the
development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to
and through the subject property.
C. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area
when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone. When evaluating
the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area
shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone:
1. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage.
2. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass
'transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities.
3. Architectural compatibility with the impact area.
4. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants.
5. Generation of noise, light, and glare.
6. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan.
7. Other factors found to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review of the proposed use.
The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.20.030.1-1, as
follows:
H. Accessory residential units, subject to the Type I procedure and criteria, and the following additional
criteria:
1. The proposal must conform with the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of
the underlying zone.
2. The maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed 2 per lot.
PA #2014-01880
280 Liberty St/adg
Page 3
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not
exceed 50% of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1000 sq. ft.
GHFA.
4. Additional parking shall be in conformance with the off-street Parking provisions for single-family
dwellings of this Title.
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Planning Action 2012-01880 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or
more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then
Planning Action 2012-01880 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to
the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified
here.
2) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with
those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are
not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application
to modify this Conditional Use Permit approval shall be submitted and approved prior to
issuance of a building permit.
3) That any new or proposed fencing obtain a separate fence permit in accordance with
18.68.010
4) That building permit submittals shall include:
a) That the requirements relating to fire hydrant distance, fire flow and fire apparatus access
shall be satisfactorily addressed in the building permit plan submittals for review and
approval of the Building Official.
b) That all necessary building permits, including permits for the new electrical service to the
accessory residential unit, and system development charges for water, sewer, storm
water, parks, and transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
c) Exterior lighting details demonstrating that the lights are appropriately shrouded, so there
is no direct illumination of adjacent properties.
d) A shared trash and recycling enclosure shall be provided for on-site. Demonstration of
the proposed location and screening in accordance with the standards of the Site Design
and Use Standards.
e) The location and dimensions and proposed covering for the required bicycle parking
spaced shall be shown on the building permit submittals. The bicycle parking shall
comply with the standards from AMC 18.92.
f) The proposed storm drainage improvements shall be submitted for review and approval
to the City of Ashland Engineering Department. All construction within the public right.
of way require a separate Public Works permit which will be required before any work in
the right of way begins.
PA #2014-01880
280 Liberty St/adg
Page 4
g) That a six-foot chain link fence shall be installed and inspected before construction
commences in accordance with the proposed Tree,Protection and Preservation Plan.
5) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be
installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements prior to issuance
of the certificate of occupancy.
b) All required parking areas are to be paved with concrete, asphaltic, pervious paving, or
comparable surfacing, constructed to standards on file in the office of the City Engineer.
c) An approved footpath without obstructions, accessed from Liberty Street to the unit.
d) That a separate address for the accessory residential units shall be applied for approved
by the City of Ashland Engineering Division.
e) Addressing shall meet the requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible
from the Public Right-of Way.
f) A trash and recycling enclosure shall be installed in accordance with screening standards
of the Site Design and Use Standards.
i
g) The bicycle parking facilities shall be installed on site.
C'Z7 L"' i
f
~2 . r17Z
Bil~vlolnar,l,Director Date
epartmen f Community Development
PA #2014-01880
280 Liberty St/adg
Page 5
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 11600 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 12200 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 4800
BENSON JOANNE CLARK OWEN E TRUSTEE ET AL CROUCH EDDIE TRUSTEE
830 IOWA ST 310 MORTON ST 308 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 5500 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 5900 PA-2014-01880 391 E09 DA 5700
EGERT JANINE EVE FARMER RODNEY L GRANTHAM RALIEGH J
PO BOX 3272 196 NUTLEY ST 271 BEACH ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 4900 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 5400 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 90001
HOLLEY NANCY HONEYCUTT JOHN F/MAUREEN R JACKSON GABRIEL TRUSTEE
324 LIBERTY ST 303 BEACH ST 359 KEARNEY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 4700 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 4400 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 4500
JONES LAWRENCE D JOYER JANET/H W SCHROEDER KLEEN DAVID W/JOAN E
1600 ASHLAND MINE RD 278 LIBERTY STREET 280 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
" I
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 11500 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 90004 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 11700
KNAPP THOMAS A LOPEZ RICHARD L MICKETTI J M/JANE CHANDLER
820 IOWA ST 1074 N JASMINE 279 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 CLOVIS, CA 93611 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 11800 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 5600 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 12100
MORTON CATHY MARIE MOSCARITOLO IGNAZIA M TRUSTEE NIEHAUS LINDA S/HAGEN BRADLEY
270 MORTON ST 340 A ST 112 289 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 12300 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 12000 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 90003
NISKANEN KATHLEEN A REHN STEVE/MELINDA RICH ANNE C
2599 PIONEER RD 43287 ROAD 409 905 LARKIN LN
MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDOCINO, CA 95460 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 4600 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 90002 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DB 11900
SALCEDO CAROL A TRUSTEE FBO SCHMIDGALL JANIS SHAFFER CAROLINE ET AL
256 N PIONEER RD 1511 RESACA BLVD 288 MORTON ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 AUSTIN, TX 78738 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 4300 PA-2014-01880 391 E09DA 5800 PA-2014-01880
THERKELSEN ROBERT LYNN TRUSTEE ET THERKELSEN ROBERT LYNN TRUSTEE ET JASON EATON, CCI
872 IOWA ST 900 IOWA ST
OR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHBOXLAND, , 3205
OR
ASH 97520
PA-2014-01880
280 Liberty RALIEGH GRANTHAM
12/29/2014 NOD 271 BEACH STREET
28 ASHLAND, OR 97520
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On December 29, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-01880, 280 Liberty.
i
I
Signature of Employee
Documend 12129/2014
i
i
CITY
ASHLAND
TREE COMMISSION
Minutes December 4, 2014
CALL TO ORDER - Vice Chair Ken Schmidt called the meeting of the Ashland Tree Commission to order at 6:00 p.m. on
December 4, 2014 in the Siskiyou Room in the Community Development and Engineering Services Building located at 51
Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon.
COmmissionel's Council Liaison
Ken Schmidt- Vice Chair Carol Voisin - absent
Gregg Trunnell - Absent Staff
Russ Neff Derek Severson, Associate Planner
Casey Roland Carolyn Schwendener, Admin
Christopher John - Absent
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Neff/Roland mis to approve the minutes of the November 6, 2014 Ashland Tree Commission meeting. Voice Vote: All Ayes, minutes were
approved as presented.
WELCOME GUESTS & PUBLIC FORUM
John Galbraith, Landscape Architect and Mark Knox, Urban Planner.was present to answer questions regarding the Planning Action for
175 Lithia Way.
Commissioner Schmidt made a change to the agenda moving the Planning Action for 175 Lithia Way to the top of the agenda.
PLANNING ACTION REVIEW
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01956
SUBJECT PROPERTIES: First Place Subdivision, corner of Lithia Way & First Street
APPLICANTS: First Place Partners, LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review approval to construct the second and third phases of the First Place
Subdivision for the property located at the corner of Lithia Way and First Street.
• Phase Two is a request for Site Review approval to construct a new mixed use building (Plaza Central East) on Lots #2 and #3
at the corner of Lithia Way and First Street. The proposal includes consolidation of the two lots and construction of a 32,191
square foot, three-story mixed-use building consisting of basement parking, ground floor commercial, and 15 residential units
distributed between the ground, second and third floors. The application includes requests to modify the common area
landscaping and parking configuration to better accommodate the proposal, and Exceptions to the Site Design and Use
Standards' Downtown Design Standards to allow for balconies on the front of the building and to allow windows that are more
horizontal than vertical.
• Phase Three is a request for Site Review approval to construct a new mixed use building (Plaza North) on Lots #4 and #5 at the
northeast corner of the site, on First Street, The proposal includes consolidation of the two lots and construction of a 9,607
square foot, three-story mixed-use building including ground floor commercial space and four residential units. The application
includes requests to modify the common area landscaping and parking configuration to better accommodate the proposal, and
two requests for Exceptions to the Site Design and Use Standards' Downtown Design Standards to allow for a staggered street
setback and to allow two sets of windows to be more horizontal than vertical.
• (Phase One, a three-story 18,577 square foot mixed-use building (Plaza West) consisting of basement parking, commercial and
residential space on the first floor and residential space on the second and third floors was recently completed at 175 Lithia
Way.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial; ZONING: C-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 09BA; TAX LOTS:
10100, 10102, 10103, 10104 and 10105.
L D
Staff Report - This planning application is a request for a modification of a previously approved Site Review, The first building was
constructed back in 2007 and they are now ready to construct the second building. There are no proposed changes to the landscaping
plan. Severson brought the planning action to the attention of the Commissioners in the event they might have questions or concerns, It
is anticipated to have this building occupied by March of 2015.
The Commissioners did not have any questions or concerns.
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01925
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 265 Fourth Street
APPLICANT: Peerless Hotel
DESCRIPTION: A Tree Removal request to remove a hazardous 28-inch DBH Maple tree near the Peerless Hotel Restaurant
building located at 265 Fourth Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E
09AB TAX LOTS: 9200.
Staff Report - Severson explained that the Peerless Hotel is proposing to remove a 20" DBH Silver Maple hazard tree that is damaging
the water lines, irrigation system, and building foundation. Applicants would like to mitigate if they can find a place on the site where the
damage won't happen again. The Commissioners agreed that the tree is disastrous.
Due to the loss of canopy from the tree being removed the Commissioners recommended mitigating a 4" DBH or two 2" DBH on site.
DISCUSSION ITEMS
Severson will be taking over the Tree City USA application.
Severson said that it appears the winner of Tree of The Year is most likely the Maple Tree at SOU, Severson attributed the large amount
of votes to the 123 on line votes it got at the end.
The Commissioners confirmed that when looking at planning actions they would just like to review the landscape plans and not the entire
packet.
Russell commented that the new tree in the Plaza area looks very nice but wondered if the Parks Department could come up with
something more attractive to protect the bark. Currently there is white plastic. Roland said he has some black plastic which would
probably be a better look and the tree needs to be protected for the next couple of years. Severson will check with Michael Black, Parks
Director, to see what he could do.
COMMISSIONER REPORTS
Russ Neff will not be able to attend the Jan or February meeting.
Meeting adjourned at 6:35p.m.
Respectively submitted by Carolyn Schwendener
~y
3
t t
ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
December 3, 2014
Community Development/Engineering Services Building - 51 Winburn Way -
Siskiyou Room
REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER 6;05,p.m. - SISKIYOU ROOM in the
Community Development/Engineering Services Building, located at 51 Winburn
Way
Historic Commissioners Present: Mr. Giordano, Ms. Renwick, Mr. Whitford, Mr.
Shostrom, Mr. Skibby, Mr. Swink, Mr. Ladygo
Commission Members Absent: Ms. Kencairn (U), Mr. Emery(E)
Council Liaison : Mike Morris
Staff Present: Staff Liaison: Amy Gunter, Clerk: Regan Trapp
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Mr. Whitford motioned that the minutes be approved
from November 5, 2014. Mr. Swink seconded. Mr. Giordano abstained. No one
opposed
PUBLIC FORUM: There was no one in the audience wishing to speak.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: Mr. Morris gave the council liaison report. Mr. Morris
discussed some changes to the land use ordinance and that it went through first
reading with the City Council. Mr. Morris reported that the Normal plan is going back
to the parks, traffic, and planning commissions for further review.
Mr. Skibby read aloud the procedures for public hearings.
PLANNING ACTION REVIEW:
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01880
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 280 Liberty Street
APPLICANT: Jason Eaton (Conscious Construction, Inc.)
OWNER: Joan Kleen
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review and Conditional Use Permit approvals to
construct a new approximately 400 square foot accessory residential unit for the
property located at 280 Liberty Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 09DA;
TAX LOT: 4500
Ms. Gunter gave the staff report on this planning action and she remarked that staff
concerns were the orientation to the alley.
Mr. Skibby opened the public hearing to the applicant.
Jason Eaton, contractor, resides at 865 Henry Street, explained that the property is
not in the local historic district but in the national historic district. Mr. Eaton spoke in
detail about the small accessory residential unit they are adding. Main house has
Plaza East Building
Ms. Gunter gave the staff report on the Plaza East building.
Mr. Skibby opened the public hearing to the applicants.
Mark Knox and Jerome White, project architect discussed the Plaza East building.
The applicants addressed design of the building, including materials and window
selections.
Mr. Skibby closed the public hearing to the applicants and opened to the
commission for comments.
Mr. Knox provided rebuttal to Mr. Swales email by stating that the design is
subjective. They have addressed all the standards and feel they comply with the
criteria for the exceptions. He feels like there has been a commendable effort by the
owner and the architects.
Mr. Whitford motioned to approve PA-2014-01956 with the conditions, regarding
Plaza North that the addition of a lintil would add interest to the entrance at the
intersection of the South and east facades, and the street, and break up the massing
on that recessed entrance. Mr. Shostrom seconded. No one opposed.
OLD BUSINESS: There was no old business to discuss.
NEW ITEMS:
A. Review Board Schedule
B. Project Assignments for planning actions
C. Welcome to Andrew Ladygo. Mr. Ladygo told the commission about his
qualifications and experience and remarked that he is excited about this
opportunity.
DISCUSSION ITEMS: There were no items for discussion.
Review Board Schedule
December 4th Sam, Keith, Allison
December 11 t Allison, Andrew, Bill
December 18t Tom, Andrew, Bill
December 24th Allison, Terry, Dale
December 31 st Dale, Ter
January 8th Sam, Keith, Allison
I
,
[ T '
Planning Department, 51 Win!;Jw,i Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C OF
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900
U 1,
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2014-01880
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 280 Liberty Street
OWNER: Joan Kleen
APPLICANT: Jason Eaton (Conscious Construction, Inc.)
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review and Conditional Use Permit approvals to construct a new approximately 400
square foot accessory residential unit along the alley for the property located at 280 Liberty Street. The application also
includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove an eight-inch diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) maple tree, and for
Exception to the Site Design and Use Standards to allow an three-foot landscape buffer between the proposed parking
space and the unit where an eight-foot buffer would typically be required. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single
Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 09DA; TAX LOT: 4500.
NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday, December 3, 2014 at 6:00 PM in
the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, December 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM in the
Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room) located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 20, 2014
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: December 4, 2014
IOWA ST
4
G -
i
LL-1
f i
ALASKA ST - PA #2014-01880
1280 LIBERTY ST
Ty f ry J _
1 ~ ~ SUBJECT PROPER co
O 1020 40 Feet ~n=*v :n~~ a.el .an« o.,v, nox a~a«na~
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
comm- ev p ammng annmg c ions o lmng o er al e o ices 1gn5- - . oex
ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
18.20.030.H Approval Criteria
H. Accessory residential units, subject to the Type I procedure and criteria, and the following additional criteria:
1. The proposal must conform with the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone.
2. The maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed 2 per lot.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50% of the GHF
of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1000 sq, ft, GHFA.
4. Additional parking shall be in conformance with the off-street Parking provisions for single-family dwellings of this Title.
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.72.070 Criteria for Approval
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter.
D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm
drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the
street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options,
EXCEPTION TO THE SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.72.090
An exception to the requirements of this chapter may be granted with respect to the requirements of the Site Design Standards
adopted under section 18.72.080 if, on the basis of the application, investigation and evidence submitted, all of the following
circumstances are found to exist:
A. There is a demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of the Site Design and Use Standards due to a unique or
unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially
negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Design
and Use Standards; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty; or
B. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that
equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Design and Use Standards.
(Ord 3054, amended 12/16/2011)
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS
18.104.050 Approval Criteria
A conditional use permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the proposed use conforms, or can be made to conform
through the imposition of conditions, with the following approval criteria.
A. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located,
and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or
program.
B. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm
drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property.
C. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the
development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact
area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone:
1. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage.
2. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are
considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities,
3. Architectural compatibility with the impact area.
4. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants.
5. Generation of noise, light, and glare.
6. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan.
7. Other factors found to be relevant by the Hearing Authority for review of the proposed use.
GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing PolderWailed Notices & Signs\2014\PA-2014-01880.docs
TREE REMOVAL
18.61.080 Criteria for Issuance of Tree Removal - Staff Permit
An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The Staff Advisor may require an
arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit.
A. Hazard Tree: The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a
hazard and warrants removal.
1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or
property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing
public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The
applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable
danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment
or pruning.
2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61,084. Such
mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
B. Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard if the applicant demonstrates
all of the following:
1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use
Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical
and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to
allow for accurate verification of the permit application; and
2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of
adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and
3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity
within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree
removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the
zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the
zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate
landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other
provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance.
4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084.
Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
(ORD 2951, 2008; ORD 2883, 2002)
GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2014\PA-2014-01880.docs
- La
r ~
11 7
L
e
a.
HAW
_ - II
I
-
I
0~r
N#N
eft
nA
A;
1'7
r-
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On November 20, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-01880, 280 Liberty St.
Signature of Employee
DocumeW 11/2012014
PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 11600 PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 12200 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 4800
BENSON JOANNE CLARK OWEN E TRUSTEE ET AL CROUCH EDDIE TRUSTEE ET AL
830 IOWA ST 310 MORTON ST 308 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 5500 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 5900 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 5700
EGERT JANINE EVE 1998 REV FARMER RODNEY L GRANTHAM RALIEGH J ET AL
PO BOX 3272 196 NUTLEY ST 271 BEACH ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 4900 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 5400 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 90001
HOLLEY NANCY HONEYCUTT JOHN F/MAUREEN R JACKSON GABRIEL TRUSTEE ET AL
32,4 LIBERTY ST 303 BEACH ST 359 KEARNEY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 4700 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 4400 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 4500
JONES LAWRENCE D JOYER JANET/H W SCHROEDER KLEEN DAVID W/JOAN E
1600 ASHLAND MINE RD 278 LIBERTY STREET 280 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 11500 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 90004 PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 11700
KNAPP THOMAS A LOPEZ RICHARD L ET AL MICKETTI J M/JANE CHANDLER
820 IOWA ST 1074 N JASMINE 279 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 CLOVIS, CA 93611 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 11800 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 5600 PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 12100
MORTON CATHY MARIE MOSCARITOLO IGNAZIA M TRUSTEE NIEHAUS LINDA S/HAGEN BRADLEY
270 MORTON ST 340 A ST 112 289 LIBERTY ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 12300 PA-2014-01880.391E09DB 12000 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 90003
NISKANEN KATHLEEN A REHN STEVE/MELINDA RICH ANNE C
2599 PIONEER RD 43287 ROAD 409 905 LARK IN LN
MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDOCINO, CA 95460 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 4600 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 90002 PA-2014-01880 391E09DB 11900
SALCEDO CAROL A TRUSTEE FBO SCHMIDGALL JANIS SHAFFER CAROLINE ET AL
256 N PIONEER RD 1511 RESACA BLVD 288 MORTON ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 AUSTIN, TX 78738 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 4300 PA-2014-01880 391E09DA 5800
THERKELSEN ROBERT LYNN THERKELSEN ROBERT LYNN PA-2014-01880
TRUSTEE ET AL TRUSTEE ET AL JASON EATON, CC]
872 IOWA ST 900 IOWA ST P.O. BOX 3205
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
z
ARU Conditional Use Permit-Written Findings
October 28, 2014
Applicant:
Conscious Construction, Inc.
Jason Eaton
PO Box 3205
Ashland, OR
541973 8889
Owner:
Joan Kleen OCT 9
280 Liberty Street
Ashland, OR
541292 2500
Overview:
We are requesting that you review our proposal for an approximately 400 sf ARU to be located in the
back portion of map 391E 09 at 280 Liberty Street. The intent for the ARU is to provide housing for
the property owners aging parents. The property is 0.23 acres, has alley access, and is zoned R 1-35 as
are the majority of surrounding properties. We are proposing a single story structure in the south-east
corner of the property that will be tucked behind an existing garage. The proposed ARU will not be
visible from Liberty Street. Access to the ARU will be via the alley that runs north-south from Henry
Street to Iowa Street. This alley also has an additional frontage/outlet to Beach Street. Multiple
properties on both sides of the alley currently have backyard cottages, duplexes, and apartments so
our proposed structure would be consistent with the feel of the neighborhood.
Given the size and location of the existing structures on the site and the orientation and slope of the
property, we are able to meet our solar setback, lot coverage requirements, and parking requirements
while providing ample outdoor space for both the existing residence and the proposed ARU. The ARU
has been designed to complement the existing residence which is a simple cottage style home with a
pitched roof and a front entry porch.
Chapter 18.104.050- Conditional Use Permit
A. The proposed ARU is in conformance with all standards within the zoning district R 1-35, and
in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any
City, State, or Federal law or program.
B. The subject property has adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to
and through the site, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and
will be provided to and through the subject property.
C. The proposed conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of
the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of
the zone. The following factors were considered when evaluating the effect of the proposed
use on the impact area:
1. The proposed ARU will be similar in scale, bulk, and coverage to the existing
residence and garage on the subject property as well as to existing structures on
surrounding properties.
2. Given that the subject property has historically had space for parking off the alley
that will now be used specifically for the ARU, we would argue that there will be a
net zero generation of vehicle traffic. The subject property is less than 1 block
from public transportation and there will be ample storage available for bicycles
on premise.
3. The ARU will be designed to complement the existing residence which is a simple
cottage style home with a pitched roof and a front entry porch. This architectural
style is consistent with the majority of the homes in the impact area.
4. Generation of typical construction dust and odors will occur during construction.
Whenever possible, airborne environmental pollutants will be minimized through
CT 9 ZZ'314 the use of low VOC paints and water-based glues. Impacts to air quality, including
the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants will be non-
existent upon completion of construction.
5. Generation of typical construction noise will occur during construction, however;
light and glare will not since construction will take place during daylight hours
only. Generation of noise, light, and glare once the ARU is inhabited will be
consistent with other ARU's, cottages, apartments, and condos in the impact area.
6. There is no additional development planned for adjacent properties.
Chapter 18.20.030- Accessory Residential Unit
1. The proposed ARU conforms to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback
requirements of zone R 1-35 except for the 8' parking setback address below. A maximum
of 42% of the lot will be covered in impervious surface, a minimum of 67% the lot will be
covered in landscape, and 12% of the lot will be dedicated open space for the ARU.
2. The maximum number of dwellings on the subject property shall be 2.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the ARU will be 352 sq. ft. which is 16%
of the GHFA of the primary residence of the lot.
4. 1 off street parking space is proposed for the 352 sq. ft. ARU. Although the proposed
parking space does not meet the 8' setback from the ARU we feel the location best meets
the approval standards for crime prevention, screening abutting properties, landscaping,
and light and glare. It will also allow us to retain the existing maple at the north-west
corner of the ARU which would otherwise need to be removed. The space proposed is
parallel to the alley and the ARU which will minimize the distance to the dwelling and
maintain visibility from adjacent areas and windows. There will be a 5' landscaped strip
t
t
between the parking space and the property line to the south as well as a 3' planting
buffer between the parking space and the ARU. This location makes the best use of the
lot, allows us to meet the required open space for the ARU, utilizes outdoor lighting
prudently, and provides good circulation through the site. Parallel parking can also a safer
alternative to head in parking where the vehicle must back up blindly onto the alley.
Chapter 18.72- Site Review Approval
A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed ARU.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
C. The proposed ARU complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council
for implementation of this chapter.
Careful design considerations have been made to assure that the proposed
ARU will be compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. The ARU will feature
simple cottage style architecture with a pitched roof and a front entry porch. Exterior
materials will include neutral tones and wood accents.
The ARU landscaping will include a private sitting area for outdoor space as
well as connectivity to the main house and its landscaped areas intended for shared
use. There will be a 5' landscaped strip between the parking space and the property
line to the south which will achieve 100% coverage within 2 years. The 3' planting
buffer between the parking space and the ARU will be planted so that 50% coverage
will be achieved within 2 years and 100% within 4 years. The 5' landscape strip and
the 3' planting buffer consist of 80% of the total parking area. No 'parking lot' tree is
proposed because a large established maple tree sitting on the neighboring property
to the south provides ample shade/canopy effect for the proposed parking space. Due
the restrictions of the site, there is no other feasible place to plant a tree where is
would function as a shade tree. All proposed plant material will be water-wise, fire
resistant, and have irrigation to assure success.
Refuse containers will be kept behind the existing solid wood fence and light
and glare will be minimized with prudent placement of outdoor lighting.
D. The subject property has adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved
access to and through the site, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate
transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All
improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter
18.88, Performance Standards Options.
OCT 29 2014
f ~
~l At ( 11034SH 2020HO -
0
' B76R 5624R 826 m ! 5 62429R
26
o e°
CF)
LO
I N 'f
2688 ~
! f16 -
fl~l
2,: 12:3
Ce)
s o o
00 I ~
@: o
T L
23
I
,f fl. ~ 0 t6
:m 2 _
I 2350SH I 3
< U- G
Ul cfJ
~VOdJ'
~mm~ I
22 N ' o
7
22' in
F
.w 1st Floor N r
r
U) V-
i
OL
114~,a1
z
1112612014
Floor Plan
oa w¢¢bw W W w zcy .n w a
a ``-'aw~a a o¢ sw ww Js`s'
w° m yby..a ¢w>$ ~ o= ~ a ~¢rs zWw hnQ
h K N ~Iq° a b=°'~ waw W d O° ~ j° V I-° w°L° q ZW'L
w ~ OIxF ~ ~ w H 4 aw q ®uZ'. Z d' a Z~`i
~V KO U~T3= C9 a aW OSZ o~.¢~.b "i ° w a~~
w b W¢ O$# ~o ~ w ~ w o y b w K~E ? tl ¢ i w V° d
` wntw tiwI- ¢ I° E w w ° h °aw ~ 2 C h u ¢0q -
W ~ LL N ~ ° W
UU° OOgb c7 r- I- °0 ZUIO as 9SZ
1°`~2K4 O Ua W bUel O wp
In ® c°ei t°D NCD OZ Z~ 5~ w-co p¢j V ~h qb° w
o U ~ q~ 6 d'w° V
WW hh h W
Z I-0'w V K~ i 3 ua Wa~ F J~ V ~ lbw ~ ~ ~
b 2~1-aye a K ~ pe LL F-u' o' y iw O to Z J f.~
2 co (D
o wLLLLC°n wow]-,~ za mz uaa aoww°ws H w Cb
~tiayaz da ¢d ti o'w Is
uw~'uf¢o ° sa nyH- agEO°~ o°an° r=LL 8 ~ iii f' ~ CA
~ ~swsx~ °3w w wa m~° aoohy `~za~ oY I°° ue ~ ~ f°d ~
gw Zow~sH ¢ al? ..Ip-' sczz~ am~z ~ ~ ~ ~ ZM
qW °..N oxF?w~`c ® r-~ iw t=d~ " w as R1 V
b8~~~~ Fa ¢ ao Zilhu
w ~ ~ ts. ~ ua
¢~ahv_r5 g¢ w M ~q Hm' ww~~ LL °¢ro w ~ ~d ~ Is.
oa tyo~o as m N o P> au p>¢~z sect``-" Qd ,
_ ~ ¢w O ~W O<n ° ~ I.- 1 Oi ~ ~~q9 b w=®~ ~ D 9
wa r
y zw¢W r< o c~ ytiLL o° ~w¢
mm a=n'°°zw aq w mw- s bo
w~sa - w _ ~ztis of b n° v 0 ~
_ffi are~y °z`?~`LL~ °w ~ ~ w~ i-eziWa as~owb a~s~` ww pG~ iu
y " www~ ~~°aai= ~°m ~ 6 °¢a¢ ti'N.'°s wp°dws zowo ~ Al®d 0d ®
w a_mwvo a¢ 6c
V V V a U
~ H ¢¢¢s ~za~"3 ~9 ~ ° awh ti°am '~aa~m i°aw¢ e. r1r`ar ~ / \
~ Yd ~ Gxozl~~.,z~ ¢m °w w ads w~m~ ~~3au1~ ~ ~C ~~~pO 1~ /
W w w wcwa°h 3~ ¢d ~ a°z w~,~w oa~ua'.dy ^n (v+ J
r~ a ° ~LLSO`;c o w ¢woo oitt> u ¢R ^IVm
~ h NMV a C wU•r,w 61~ V
o u
° J b
K
1i
np ~q4 Ka
VY 4UIy ft I-IWS ,
x
sof B ;a3~0 d 10I <3> )
~ ~ Q - --s~-~- ~ mac- % '
3DN30 <3>
y
v
- ~ ~j~~
1
~ P
`v I REVISION DATE
3~ 10f<3>
T o d91<3) o
yN,za 'Y qY~ V a
o tw o w " d a LL ¢ DRAWN BY:
I(AE
/
SCALE:
v Nk17 I"=16'-O"
¢ / ~ vv~ v / ~ ~ 24N3b I'=81.011
m x +
w www
s¢F
w
W Meow v c) W
401(3)
M <3> ' w u~a ~s
- ~ 0,
_ i - ,r oo co
m m
^ v L a Cd
w ,
o 8N3d <3> +
w ~ ~ r" IS413NI1 d3a3d08d ~ ~ n ~ o
OCTOBER 28, 2014
°a 1
w
w
n
w
a
E
® ~ d n ~
w
F- = z ~ ~ h IY 6 z Lli
W ~ J = JOy W e( ~ ® ~ ~
to x N yg n c ` ~ P1~
®wmti o.0 W O t$ cen 1,~ 04
Wpb~,q ~N~a bW~ =4v
v ` ~~i 4i~fA
NI ra1 v1 tef 09
zmN r"n®mz mom"` Jyvwi cry rn cw,iycn vwi ~LNy Nh~ ~ ~ M Ob
N P 0 40
oo :D 00 ~N
Nw Vatn- 0~ yNtrvmm inn r,m..NQY iA N.-.m ica -A
~ V G. $ i.lt
w
V CD K Y w
~ CD
V Q ¢S V W K d® m C9 ° Y W
>°7-K~ 'xw6¢ wee, w° w _
04
0 i°h0-vh1J ® v1~ qty,
IL ® Y0j ~N -d g W ~C c=~G9d W ~w LL C~ W
z y,. 01 U N aC.n cD daQ®°• C2~
h W ®W SID SD wy y CD CD <D 4D w W W g 4NN O W
CA&
V W LD 6 N N ~ z Z~J ® 'e-~_'a ~OOO J w J J Z `yO J
0 0 6ry UI-2 V ry OF- f,. E%1N viD 001- zhf- be H Of-
LY 6L' W 000 V k m Q 0 `K. 0.d 0 400 X K
z e. a- ® en JJna O Wi dF- www wd _dh JhF- a wdF-
o:
r
x
s
_ 101(3>~ ibl.3(JI3d183dQbd'
3DR33 <3)
r
0.
U
u W _ ~
4 REVISION DATE:
A.
w v ,.g awa I jy
tzt
w Eal C3)
l01 C3) o
-tj m z
DRAWN BY.
KAE
P.
~ B
~ rL~ ~ by
/ r SCALE:
IINI7 Pl-ib,-0o
24M36 Iwaa'
w
IY U
I
W '
M ! W
C Z W WWW
/ `c f Alb Y W K
3~113d C3) L]. ~°,°Ll- °I ,N~ 0 4 C9 W =
CJ
noa va wh ! Lu
V01<3> ~-z
wa
W
ce - Vol <3> ,
04
LU x
& .0 C4
3MA <3> r9
y 5VI013 AINUO d OCTOBER 28,a014
w
30 MINN 1S3111M
01133815 W083 SITE
~ o-sn
PLAN
i
Uryl
Qv
OCT29201
North West s
Nry~ ~ i,
N ~mm-o
x r
U) U) ca
U)
c~ v 6- Ln
- - - - - - T p
CA <
I
1/4 =1
'
i
1012812014
South East Elevations
E
t
i
c
j 3034SH 2040CAS SE
W3435
-Al 0 ~ O
815R LB24R ~E18R m j B2421R E
SLv Q
N
9 2660
m ~
2
°
N U)
x r- ~
3 , U)
~ °v n
I!
5016AWN I OCT 2 7 201 v N
~ ~ Tp
Q) t!
22'
(L ~N~
114"=1'
10/2912014
Floor Plan
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
Planning Department
t rASHLAND o 51 Winbum Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE # ' A, LQ+ s o,
-541488-5305 Fax-541488-6006
DESCR(PT10N Of PROJECT
DE3CRIPT10Ai OF PROPERYY
Street Address
Assessor's Map No. 391E C _ Tax Lot(s)
Zoning ~ •~"S Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT
C~ (c7. raw +►c~v~ .
Name 0, C;.L)n C C. Phone d 1 1 a3 1 E -Map
Q Ili _ cum
Address -Irws _ City f t lF 6.5A Zip '
PRDPgRTY QMEi2
Name Phone U 1 Z E-Mail
Address city zip 70
SURVEYOR, ENGINEER. ARCHITECT. t.AND APE ARCHITECT. OTH Alt Y ~w-S e jZVN CU-ta,~
. Title Name _ Phone
Address city Zip
G
Title Name Phone _ E-Mail
Address city zip
I'hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this applicatfon, inclaft the enclosed drawings and the rMilred findings of fact, are in ail respects,
true and corred. I understand that all pffady pins must be shown on the drawings and visIb a upon the site Grspechon, In the evert the pins are notshoam or their
Ilion found to be lawrod, the *war assumes full responsitrllliy. d &dhar undsmlarrd that ifthis request Is subsequently conteste4 the burden 0 be on me to
establish:
i) that l produeed sufficient tactual evidence at the heerung to support this m4vast;
2) that the findings of fact tumished justifies the granting of the requost;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that ell structures orlmprovemente are praperlykeated on the ground.
Farilute In this regard 7! result most Likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly In mjr structures being buid in reliance thereon being required to
be re my W have any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional 8" and isiance
App[Icant s Signa re Dale
As owner of the prop to ived in this request, l have read and understood the complate appkation and its con uences to me as a property
k
P arty Own Signature (required) Dale
Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing fee d
OVER 0+
Job Address: 280 LIBERTY ST Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
A C
Owner's Name: JOAN KLEEN O Phone:
P Customer 05144 N State Lic No:
L T City Lic No:
P CONCIOUS CONSTRUCTION
Applicant: R
Address: A
C C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: (541) 973-8889 T Address:
N Applied: 10/29/2014
T Issued: R
Expires: 04/27/2015 Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E09DA4500 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: CUP
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
CUP Accessory Residential 658.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
CITY OF
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080
t
-ASHLAND
t