Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRoca_710_PA-2014-01803 CITY _ November 10, 2014 Notice of Final Decision On November 10, 2014, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: 2014-01803 Subject Property: 710 Roca Applicant: Andrew Kuzmitz Description: A request for tree topping permit approval to remove the top of two approximate 24-inch DBH Cottonwoods located in the back yard of 710 Roca. The trees are within the Riparian Protection Zone of Roca Creek, and have a severe lean towards the neighboring property. The request to top the trees are in order to provide habitat snags for wildlife. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5;ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 15BB TAX LOTS: 7100 I The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of one year and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. i The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact, Michael Pina in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 % Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 is 1. r t SECTION 18.108.070(B)2 Effective Date of Decision and Appeals. B. Actions subject to appeal: 2. Type I Planning Actions. a. Effective Date of Decision. The final decision of the City for planning actions resulting from the Type I Planning Procedure shall be the Staff Advisor decision, effective on the 1311' day after notice of the decision is mailed unless reconsideration of the action is approved by the Staff Advisor or appealed to the Commission as provided in section 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). b. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider Type I planning actions as set forth below. i. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City Agency may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the staff advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. ii. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five (5) days of mailing. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three (3) days whether to reconsider the matter. iii. If the Planning Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw, the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten (10) days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The Staff Advisor shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. iv. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. c. Appeal. i. Within twelve (12) days of the date of the mailing of the Staff Advisor's final decision, including any approved reconsideration request, the decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any party entitled to receive notice of the planning action. The appeal shall be submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary on a form approved by the City Administrator, be accompanied by a fee established pursuant to City Council action, and be received by the city no later than 4:30 p.m. on the 12th day after the notice of decision is mailed. ii. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the city and whose boundaries include the site. iii. The appeal shall be considered at the next regular Planning Commission or Hearings Board meeting. The appeal shall be a de novo hearing and shall be considered the initial evidentiary hearing required under ALUO 18.108.050 and ORS 197.763 as the basis for an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals. The Planning Commission or Hearings Board decision on appeal shall be effective 13 days after the findings adopted by the Commission or Board are signed by the Chair of the Commission or Board and mailed to the parties. iv. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the city as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-088-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 k ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01803 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 710 Roca APPLICANT: Andrew Kuzmitz DESCRIPTION: A request for Tree Topping Permit approval to remove the top of two approximate 24-inch DBH Cottonwoods located in the back yard of 710 Roca. The trees are within the Riparian Protection Zone of Roca Creek, and have a severe lean towards the neighboring property. The request to top the trees are in order to provide habitat snags for wildlife. . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 15BB TAX LOTS: 7100 SUBMITTAL DATE: October 15, 2014 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: October 24, 2014 STAFF DECISION DATE: November 10, 2014 APPEAL DEADLINE: November 24, 2014 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: November 25, 2015 i DECISION The subject property is located on the east side of Roca Street, approximately 90 feet north of Prospect, and south (uphill) of Southern Oregon University. The approximate 41,300 square foot parcel is zoned R-1-7.5, and contains a 1,504 square foot home placed near the street. The remaining portion of the lot is in. a natural state as Roca Creek traverses through half of the property. Roca Street is improved with curbs and gutters, but lacks sidewalks along the property's frontage. The application proposes to remove the top of two approximate 24-inch DBH Cottonwoods located in the back yard of the property, and is severely leaning towards the neighboring property to the north. The applicant's findings state that one of the trees has a vertical opening in the bole with extensive decay at the base of the tree. Being cottonwoods, removing the top of the trees will accomplish three goals; to preserve the riparian corridor as bank stabilization and allow smaller saplings to become established, to preserve the life of the tree and provide for wildlife habitat, and to eliminate the potential hazard of the tree falling onto the subject property. Before the Tree Commission could review the application, the applicant had informed staff that Mother Nature had already "taken care of the trees" as the top of one came down in a wind storm, resulting in the need for the applicant to go ahead and top the other before it failed. In staff's opinion, removal of the tree's tops preserves the riparian corridor, while protecting property from the potential to fail onto the applicant's property. Staff believes removal will not have a negative impact on erosion, soil stability, or surface flow, as the remaining root structure will hold a significant amount of bank in place. Nor will removal have a negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity since there are numerous tree species established along the stream corridor. Therefore, staff believes that the tree-topping request meets the criteria of the ordinance and is approved to be removed following the conditions below. Mitigation shall not be required. PA-2014-01803 710 Roca SUMP Page 1 The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.61.080, as follows: An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The StaffAdvisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit. A. Hazard Tree; The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal. 1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning. 2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Planning Action 2014-01803 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2014- 01803 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. `l ~ D . Zd 1 P i 1 M lnar, Director Date Dep ment of Community Development PA-2014-01803 710 Roca St./W Page 2 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On November 10, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-01803, 710 Roca. *Z~reoftm-pldyee Mumentl W712014 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6401 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6200 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6700 BERGSTROM BRUCE C/MARY S CAMPBELL BRUCE L/GEARON CIANI JUDITH E 705 ROCA ST IDA R PO BOX 960 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P O BOX 1080 INVERNESS, CA 94937 JACKSONVILLE, OR 97530 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6100 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6000 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7200 DEVORE DOUGLAS D/RUTH T ELLIOTT M A/LORNA LOUISE FRIEDMAN STEPHANIE 1459 BITTERN DR P,O BOX 415 730 ROCA ST SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 1203 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7000 PA-2014-01803 391 E1513C 1211 GOLDSTEIN DENNIS A TRUSTEE GRIZZARD JEANNINE A HAMILTON C/MARY ET AL 698 ROCA ST, STEINBERGS 766 ROCA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 151 MAX LOOP ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 5900 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7100 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6300 HISAMOTO ROBERT KUZMITZ ANDREW A/KATHLEEN LAUGHLIN ALISON DIANA PO BOX 3186 R 717 ROCA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 710 ROCA ST ASHLAND; OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7300 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7600 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 8400 MARX MELANIE J MATTOS RICHARD A ET AL MC BAINE ROBERT V/MARSHA J 2305-C ASHLAND ST 215 687 LEONARD ST 1300 OREGON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 I PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 900 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 1212 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6900 MURPHY ELIZABETH A REV LIV OLSEN LORRAINE I OREGON STATE OF TRUST 750 ROCA ST 1250 SISKIYOU BLVD 550 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7500 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7700 PA-2014-01803 391 E1513C 1000 PITTMAN GARTH M TRUSTEE ET PRAY JUDITH K SANDLER ALLAN F TRUSTEE AL 1036 KRISTEN DR FBO 709 LEONARD ST MEDFORD, OR 97504 1260 PROSPECT ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 8300 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6600 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7400 SATLER SERGIO O SCHAAL BARBARA NATASHA SEEVERS ROBERT E/JOAN 684 LEONARD TRUSTEE ET AL IRENE ASHLAND, OR 97520 679 ROCA ST 725 LEONARD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-018'03 391E1513C 1300 PA-2014-01803 391El5BB 6500 PA-2014-01803 391E15BB 5800 THRESHER SCOTT/RENEE WHITENER VIRGINIA LOUISE ZASLOW DAVID B/DEBRA 195 BROOKVINE CIR 693 ROCA ST GORDON CHICO, CA 95973 ASHLAND, OR 97520 692 ELKADER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 710 Roca 11/10/2014 NOD 27 CITY F ASHLAND TREE COMMISSION MINUTES November 6, 2014 CALL TO ORDER - Ashland Tree Commission meeting was called to order at 6:00 p.m. on November 6, 2014 in the Siskiyou Room in the Community Development and Engineering Services Building located at 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon. I Commissioners Present Council Liaison Ken Schmidt - Absent Carol Voisin Gregg Trunnell - Absent Staff Russ Neff Michael Pina, Planning liaison Casey Roland Christopher John APPROVAL OF MINUTES Russ motioned, and John seconded, to approve the October 9, 2014 regular meeting minutes. The motion carried unanimously. WELCOME GUESTS & PUBLIC FORUM The Commission welcomed two guests to the meeting, both of whom expressed interest in joining the Commission. PLANNING ACTION REVIEW PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01751 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 175-185 Brooks Ln. CO-APPLICANTS: Fred and Cynthia Grewe and Barbara Evans DESCRIPTION: A Tree Removal Permit request to remove two trees within 50 feet of a Locally Significant Wetland, for the property located at 175 and 185 Brooks Lane. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Suburban Residential; ZONING: R-1-3.5 All commissioners visited the site. No ex parte contacts declared with the exception of Roland, who was hired by the applicant to remove the trees. Roland then excused himself and left the room. In reviewing the application, the commission agreed the Birch Beatle has been causing significant damage in rapid numbers all across the valley, and these trees are no exception. Therefore, the Commission recommended approving the application as submitted. John motioned, Neff seconded, that the application to remove two Birch trees be approved as submitted. The motion carried unanimously. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01873 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2370 Blue Sky Ln. APPLICANT: Robert Grisso DESCRIPTION: A Tree Removal Permit request to remove three trees - a ten-inch Norway Maple, an eight-inch Redbud, and a 13-inch Modesto Ash - that were retained as part of the original subdivision approval, located at 2370 Blue Sky. The submitted arborist report noted that the trees are in poor health, likely due to construction, and removal would allow for the remaining existing trees to have a net gain in canopy coverage for long-term health and survival. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 23BA TAX LOT: 502 All commissioners visited the site, however were not able to access the rear yard for a closer look at the subject trees. No ex parte contacts declared with the exception of John, who was hired by the applicant to remove the trees. John then excused himself and left the room. Pina presented the staff report saying this action is somewhat different from the typical tree removal request, as the subject trees were retained as a buffer in part of a Performance Standards Subdivision. In reviewing the applicant's findings, the Commission agreed with the arborist in that removal of these three trees will allow the adjacent trees to thrive in their new environment. Furthermore, the commission discussed that the proposed trees are close to a building on an adjacent lot, and therefore will not negatively impact the screening of adjacent properties. Roland motioned, Neff seconded, that the application to remove three trees that were originally retained. The motion carried unanimously. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01875 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 515 Poplar APPLICANT: Jane Slater DESCRIPTION: A Tree Removal request to remove a hazardous Willow tree placed on the property line of the subject property line and a subdivision open space, adjacent to Mook (Clear) Creek, located at 515 Poplar. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IE 04CD TAX LOTS: 407 All commissioners visited the site. No ex paste contacts declared. Pina presented a staff report declaring that this tree looks to be in significant decline, and should be removed immediately. John agreed with staff in that this tree has is clearly a hazard, and need to be removed. Although they advised to limit the amount of bank disturbance, as this may constitute to erosion of the established stream corridor. Russ motioned, Roland seconded, that the willow tree be removed with special attention to protect the stream bank. The motion carried unanimously. DISCUSSION ITEMS In regards to the "haircut" the two street trees located at 25 North Main received, Roland expressed a strong disappointment that the City had allowed the trees to effectively be topped, when the permit did not allow this. He continued that this has set a precedent for other business owners, and that the city should take action on the property owner. Staff is aware of the issue, and it is being discussed internally. Roland also talked about his visit to the Chanticleer Gardens in Wayne, Pennsylvania. He was amazed how the pathways and other additions to the gardens are designed around the trees, not the other way around. In addition, was thoroughly impressed with their rubber sidewalks, which were made in-house and used exclusively within the garden, expanded over tree roots providing a smooth transition. Roland continued to say that the use of rubber sidewalks in urban areas would reap more benefits to the natural environment than concrete or asphalt. 17 2 LIAISON REPORTS None given. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Meeting adjourned at 7:47 p.m. Respectively submitted by Assistant Planner Michael Pina 3 2-12050 Ashland, Oregon TTY 97520 541-488 Planning -5Department, 305 Fax• 451 1-551 Y m 6 IL . Li.~, NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2014-01803 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 710 Roca OWNER/APPLICANT: Andrew Kuzmitz DESCRIPTION: A request for tree topping permit approval to remove the top of two approximate 24- inch DBH Cottonwoods located in the back yard of 710 Roca. The trees are within the Riparian Protection Zone of Roca Creek, and have a severe lean towards the neighboring property. The request to top the trees are in order to provide habitat snags for wildlife. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; .ZONING: R-1-7.5;ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 15BB TAX LOTS: 7100 NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, November 6, 2014 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room) located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 24, 2014 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: November 7, 2014 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 710 Roca cos 39 1 E 15BB 7100 y ]10 O i ]a5 r _.PLR PECT ST Aso i fteo I 012.E 50 Feet Property linos eraft- rc:Ji~renee only, not ~crrieub(e i The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner, or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. ocX TREE REMOVAL 18.61.080 Criteria for Issuance of Tree Removal - Staff Permit An applicant for a Tree Removal Permit shall demonstrate that the following criteria are satisfied. The Staff Advisor may require an arborist's report to substantiate the criteria for a permit. A. Hazard Tree: The Staff Advisor shall issue a tree removal permit for a hazard tree if the applicant demonstrates that a tree is a hazard and warrants removal. 1. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear that it is likely to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within public rights of way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated or the damage alleviated. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment or pruning. 2. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. B. Tree that is Not a Hazard: The City shall issue a tree removal permit for a tree that is not a hazard if the applicant demonstrates all of the following: 1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Ashland Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Design and Use Standards and Physical and Environmental Constraints. The Staff Advisor may require the building footprint of the development to be staked to allow for accurate verification of the permit application; and 2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks; and 3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures or alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with other provisions of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. 4. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to AMC 18.61.084. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. (ORD 2951, 2008; ORD 2883, 2002) ~I G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2014\PA-2014-01803.doex AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On October 24, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-01803, 710 Roca. Ion Sig re of mployee i I I I I DocumenQ 1012412014 PA-2014-01803 391E15BB 6401 PA-2014-01803 391E15BB 6200 PA-2014-01803 391E15BB 6700 BERGSTROM BRUCE C/MARY S CAMPBELL BRUCE L/GEARON CIANI JUDITH E 705 ROCA ST IDA R PO BOX 960 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P O BOX 1080 INVERNESS, CA 94937 JACKSONVILLE, OR 97530 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6100 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6000 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7200 DEVORE DOUGLAS D/RUTH T ELLIOTT M A/LORNA LOUISE FRIEDMAN STEPHANIE 1459 BITTERN DR P O BOX 415 730 ROCA ST SUNNYVALE, CA 94087 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 1203 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7000 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 1211 GOLDSTEIN DENNIS A TRUSTEE GRIZZARD JEANNINE A HAMILTON C/MARY ET AL 698 ROCA ST STEINBERGS 766 ROCA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 151 MAX LOOP ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 5900 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7100 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6300 HISAMOTO ROBERT KUZMITZ ANDREW A/KATHLEEN LAUGHLIN ALISON DIANA PO BOX 3186 R 717 ROCA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 710 ROCA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7300 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7600 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 8400 MARX MELANIE J MATTOS RICHARD A ET AL MC BAINE ROBERT V/MARSHA J 2305-C ASHLAND ST 215 687 LEONARD ST 1300 OREGON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 900 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 1212 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6900 MURPHY ELIZABETH A REV LIV OLSEN LORRAINE I OREGON STATE OF TRUST 750 ROCA ST 1250 SISKIYOU BLVD 550 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7500 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7700 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 1000 PITTMAN GARTH M TRUSTEE ET PRAY JUDITH K SANDLER ALLAN F TRUSTEE AL 1036 KRISTEN DR FBO 709 LEONARD. ST MEDFORD, OR 97504 1260 PROSPECT ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 8300 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6600 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 7400 SATLER SERGIO O SCHAAL BARBARA NATASHA SEEVERS ROBERT E/JOAN 684 LEONARD TRUSTEE ET AL IRENE ASHLAND, OR 97520 679 ROCA ST 725 LEONARD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BC 1300 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 6500 PA-2014-01803 391 E15BB 5800 THRESHER SCOTT/RENEE WHITENER VIRGINIA LOUISE ZASLOW DAVID B/DEBRA 195 BROOKVINE CIR 693 ROCA ST GORDON CHICO, CA 95973 ASHLAND, OR 97520 692 ELKADER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 710 Roca 10/24/2014 NOC 27 E, ! i; f € g 7T M j Dun town Won M1 t- am 7609 a3 Tj ';S 591D 6401 841 log 51 G &.2' k 1212 11 'f rl I 3 1203 ; e p k r "C 20 m 6 J J L d 77 i, 1 G J J F f IM u z i Tj 1 jigs 700 to I 2111 IOU! 1209, I NO : a L _ _ E .i!,• i F f F Suz x'],11 an A mm ~ 6,~, s ~ va 7 " v~~~ v~~ i j I I OCT 23 2014 J~►r an D ny) ~o< (00 e, L~ / 4 Air,/ &-ejer< 'eco locuea J (0/0 4?-r C, d r~ W(2j do,~ t~ n~ otiho" c c , 0 uppe r r u w' t a a c sw~ W ;9r i ZZ! aaR ~ iR 7tl « a - ' yes _ P . „ w a x y 3b ? s 4 et, t z _Z4 61 eye x t a x• ilffi; „ i _4~ SF 869 5 s f>. TIT, MIA s w _ M. 14 = ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Planning Division 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 CITY OF 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE # ASHLAND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO Street Address ~I I © 4 f Assessor's Map No. 391E S (3 r5 Tax Lot(s) Zoning Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT r Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip PROPERTY OWNER Name .~~~~w Phone ~s Yr~ y_ z 1 E-Mail Q t~ , r fl =h_ Address 7 c v f' ®v sf City b t z zip -l 5 -L v SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct, 1 understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility, 1 further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to . establish: 1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request, 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are. adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground, Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed of my expense, If I have any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. Applicant's Signature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, l have read and understood the complete application and its consequences tome as a property owner. Property Owner's Signature (required) Date ITo be completed by City SK Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ OVER 0 G:lcomet-dnv plemming)Focros & HAndourtslZoning Permit Apphcation doc Job Address: Contractor: Address: C A P Owner's Name: KUZMITZ ANDREW A/KATHLEEN R O Phone: Customer 07993 N State Lic No: L T' City Lic No: P KUZMITZ ANDREWA/KATHLEEN R Applicant: 710 ROCA ST R Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 10/15/2014 0 T Issued: R Expires: 04/13/2015 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E15BB7100 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: tree removal VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount. Fee Description Amount Tree Removal/Verification 28.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF LAN