HomeMy WebLinkAboutA_868_PA-2015-01163
CITY F
ASHLAND
July 23, 2015
Notice of Final Decision
On July 21, 2015, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
iPlanning Action: PA-2015-01163
i
Subject Property: 868 A Street
Applicant: Integrity Building
Owner: Linda Millemann, Steven & Harriet Saturen
Description: A request for a Site Design Review to add a covered front porch to the structure
at 868 A Street. The structure is a residence in the Employment (E-1) zone. In the E-1 zone, additions to
existing structure are subject to Site Design Review regardless of the use of the structure.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39
lE 09AA; TAX LOT: 6800
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12fl' day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of
approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F)
and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The
ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be
made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Marl-, Schexnayder in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Linda Millemann, Steven & Harriet Saturen; Property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 `
www.ashland.or.us
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision,
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.B.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of
this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the
hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Tinge for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of
decision is mailed,
c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall
contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before
the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other
documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other
relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument
concerning any relevant ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 ( ' r
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 `
www.ashland.or.us _
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01163
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 868 A Street
APPLICANT: Mark Lackey
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to add a covered front
porch to the dwelling located at 868 A Street.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09AA; TAX LOTS: 6800
SUBMITTAL DATE: June 16, 2015
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: June 23, 2015
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: July 21, 2015
FINAL DECISION DATE: August 4, 2015
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: December 4, 2016
DECISION:
The application is a request for a Site Design Review approval to add approximately 160 square
feet to the front porch of the existing dwelling for the property located at 868 A Street. No
additional modifications to the site beyond the proposal are being considered with this
application, and any fixture development or modification of the site would require a separate Site
Design Review application.,
The subject property is located on A Street, within the Railroad Addition Historic District. The
lot comprises approximately 6,707 square feet in area. The site is relatively flat and has no
significant natural features. The site contains an existing dwelling oriented toward "A" Street.
The structure has previously served as a residence, salon, traveler's accommodation, and is
considered "historic contributing" in the Railroad Addition Historic District inventory document.
This, building was originally constructed in 1906 with only minor changes; the house retains
sufficient integrity to relate its historic period of development. A second residential unit
approximately 500 square feet in size is located at the rear of the property in a separate detached
structure and was approved in September 1991 (PA-91-123).
The proposal is to add a front porch extension of approximately 160 square feet to the north side
of the existing building. The existing front porch will be extended across the fagade of the
building to the north. The applicant has proposed to construct the porch extension with the same
materials including siding, window and door materials that match the existing structure. A Street
is classified as an Avenue or Collector Street and is paved, with curbs and gutters in place in the
vicinity of the subject property. Sidewalks are installed along the property's frontages. Utilities
including water, sanitary sewer, storm drainage, and electric are in place on the property and in
the adjacent rights-of-way to serve the project. There will be no additional demands or needed
capacity of City utilities and streets since the proposed addition is a front porch comprised of
unheated outdoor space.
PA #2015-01163
868 A Street/mms
Page 1
4
There are three (3) off-street parking spaces located at the rear of the property. Vehicular access
to the parking lot is from an alley located to the South of the property between Seventh and
Eighth Streets. Pedestrian access from the parking area is a sidewalk extending from the rear of
the dwelling.
The property is located in the Employment (E-1) zone and as a result there are no required yard
areas or lot coverage limitations that are applicable to the proposal. The existing dwelling is a
one-story structure and the proposed porch addition is similar in height. As a result, the proposed
addition is well below the maximum building height of 40 feet.
The existing home is a single-story wood frame dwelling in the bungalow style. There is a porch
situated under the gable end on the western half of the front fagade. The existing porch is
approximately eight (8) feet deep by 12 %2 feet wide. The proposed porch addition will extend the
porch another six (6) feet in depth and extend across the length of the house at approximately 26
%2 feet. The front fagade will retain a gable end facing the street, the existing roof line, and
include the original knee-braces under the eaves. The porch rail will be comprised of siding. The
applicant indicated at the Historic Commission meeting that the existing siding is not original
and is aluminum. The applicant indicated the aluminum siding will be replaced with wood lap
siding. The size and shape of the window openings will remain the saine as the existing house
and the windows will be replaced with vinyl windows. The leaded glass element of the front
window has been retained and will be affixed to the new front window.
The height, width, and massing of the proposed porch is compatible with the existing home. The
subject property is located on a block face that contains an eclectic assortment of structures
including single-family residences, several light industrial buildings (e.g. a cabinet shop and
former dance studio), and a residence repurposed as a tea garden and spa. As a result, the front
yards and front facades of the buildings are not located in a consistent plane because some
buildings are closer to the street and some buildings are located further back from the street. The
proposed porch addition will be approximately 25 feet from the front property line which is
within the range of the other front yards of the other buildings on the block. The roof shape and
pitch will remain that of the existing residence with the front facing gable end being extended
towards the street. The window and door openings will remain the same as that of the existing
house. The proposed porch will include a clearly defined base consistent with the existing home
and the front door remains a well-defined primary entrance. The proposed addition complies
with the Site Design Review chapter and the Site Design and Use Standards including the
Historic District Development Standards.
The Historic Commission considered the request at their July 8, 2015 meeting. Commissioners
noted the applicant's efforts working with the Historic Review Board. The Commission
recommended approval of the request.
The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070 as follows:
A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed
development.
PA #2015-01163
868 A Street/mms
Page 2
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been rnet or will be met.
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City
Council for implementation of this Chapter.
D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and
through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate
transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property.
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Planning Action #2015-01163 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or
more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then
Planning Action #2015-01163 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached
to the approval:
i
1) That all proposals of the applicants shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified
herein.
2) That prior to the issuance of a building permit:
a) The plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance
with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the
building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of
this application, an application to modify the Site Review shall be submitted and
approved prior to issuance of a building pen-nit.
3) That all recommendations of the Ashland Historic Commission, where consistent with the
applicable ordinances and standards and with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall be
-=-A ise modified herein.
Zl /Oct
r D to
irecto
Bill JInar
D paCommunity Development
PA #2015-01163
868 A Street
Page 3
PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 6900 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7200 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 8500
ADLEMAN ALAN R AUBIN-ADDICOTT SUZANNE TRUSTEE COLE MARY ELLEN/JOHN C
886 A ST ET AL 286 8TH ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 115 BROOKS LN ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7700 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 2215 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 8400
DANLEY WILLIAM E JR TRUSTEE ET AL DOUGLAS JAMES R TRUSTEE ET AL FENWICK STEPHEN C
871 B ST 2120 CALAVERAS AVE PO BOX 338
ASHLAND, OR 97520 DAVIS, CA 95616 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7300 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7800 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 8200
GREENE DAVID E TRUSTEE KPLAN-STANTON ALENE H/STANTON LARMORE JANET/JOHN T STRONG
367 OXFORD ST JOHN M JR 248 EIGHTH ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 885 B ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 2201 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7000 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7500
LUZ GEORGE A/SHELDON H MCCULLOH KENNETH S/STAYCE E MKH PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
4910 CROWSON AVE 271 N MOUNTAIN AVE COMPANY LLC
BATCHELOR, MD 21212 ASHLAND, OR 97520 2022 CRESTVIEW DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 6700 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7600 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 6600
MUNROE ROBERT W RAGEN DANIEL A JR RUBINSTEIN ILENE K
864 A ST 855 B ST 854 A ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 6800 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 7100 PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 2216
SATUREN STEVEN L ET AL SCHAAF NED TRUSTEE ET AL SMITH ALFORD R JR TRUSTEE
265 STEINMAN DR 175 NEIL CREEK RD PO BOX 833
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 391 E09AA 6200 PA-2015-01163 PA-2015-01163
UNION PACIFIC RR CO PROPERTY TAX MARK LACKEY INTEGRITY BUILDERS STEVEN & HARRIET SATUREN
DEPARTMENT PO BOX 225 868 A STREET
1400 DOUGLAS - STOP 1640 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
OMAHA, NE 68179
868 A Street
NOD 7/23/2015
21
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
i
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On July 23, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-01163, 868 A Street.
Signature of Employee
Document6 7/23/2015
ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Planning Application Review
July 8, 2015
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01163
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 868 A Street
APPLICANT: Mark Lackey
OWNER: Linda Millemann, Steven and Harriet Saturen
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to add a covered front porch to the
structure at 868 A Street. The structure is a residence in the Employment (E-1) zone. In the E-
1 zone, additions to existing structures are subject to Site Design Review regardless of the use
of the structure.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 09AA; TAX LOTS: 6800
Recommendation:
The Historic Commission recommends approving the application as submitted subject to the
specific recommendations below:
Include the following revisions in the building permit submittals.
1) Delete original porch column on west side of porch, closest to the front fagade of the house.
2) Add vent in gable end of street facing elevation.
3) Add porch drains.
4) Use 1" x 3" tongue and grove floor for porch addition.
5) Retain original corbels.
i
i
i
Department of Community Development Tel: 541488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us '
r;
lie
r_
"
Q
i
NPS Form 10-900-A OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86)
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet
Amended-March 2002 I
Section Number: 7 Page: 66 Ashland Railroad Addition Historic District, Ashland, OR
$500. A family member, E. N. Butler built several bungalows in Ashland in the 1920s and
likely built this one. Butler sold the property to Peter Murray in 1923. In 1948 the house was
occupied by P. C. Woods and in 1964 it was owned and occupied by SP employee Merced
Chacon and his wife Ventura. The Butler House retains sufficient integrity to relate its historic
period of development.
ID # 216.0
THE CABINET WORKS 1985c
864 A STREET 391E09AB 1600
Other: Utilitarian Non-Historic, Non-Contributing
This large wood-frame building, long used as a cabinet shop, was probably built shortly prior to
the 1989 split of this tax lot from that of the Herbig House 01) #217.0), to the east.
ID # 217.0 survey #23
HERBIG, THOMAS AND M. L. HOUSE 0
868 A STREET 391E09AB 1601
Arts & Crafts: Bungalow Historic Contributing
A single-story wood frame dwelling in the bungalow style, this structure was probably built
shortly after M. L. Swab and Thomas Herbig were married in 1906. The couple sold the house
to Louis H. Wyant in 1909, who retained ownership until 1925. There is no listing for the
Herbig House in 1948 but the 1964 city directory show Mike Taylor as the owner and occupant.
By 1991 the Herbig House was converted for use a hair salon. With only minor changes, the
house retains sufficient integrity to relate its historic period of development.
ID # 218.0 Survey #24
DEWS, OLIVER RENTAL HOUSE 1903c
854 A STREET 391E09AB 1700
Other: Vernacular Historic Contributing
A small single-story wood-frame hipped-roof vernacular cottage, the Dews Rental House was
built in 1903 after the land was sold to Oliver and Hattie Dews, who resided next door. Dews,
who operated a drayage business, kept this house for rental purposes. Hattie Dews sold the
property, to M. A. Walker in 1909 and the following year it was being rented by Joseph Bailey, a
hostler for the railroad. M. C. Weber lived here in 1948 and in 1964 Frank H. Breaszeale was
the tenant. The Dews Rental House retains sufficient integrity to relate its historic period of
development.
ID # 219.0
WALT ANDERS AUTO REPAIR 1976
842 A STREET 391E09AB 1800
Other: Utilitarian Non-Historic, Non-Contributing
This utilitarian concrete volume was apparently built in 1976 and the following year is listed as
the site of the Walt Anders Auto Repair Shop which occupied the site for many years.
ID # 220.0 survey #25
DEWS, OLIVER HOUSE 1902c
832 A STREET 391E09AB 1900
Other: Vernacular Historic Contributing
This single-story wood-frame vernacular ell was probably built sometime after Oliver B. and
Hattie Dews purchased the property in 1902 from E. McNair Holmes. Dews, who operated a
drayage business at the time this house was built, was later employed by the railroad as a car
repairer. In 1910 Hattie and her two step-children Edmund and glen lived here. The house
remained in family ownership form many years and was a rented to George and Anna Graham
Nzt*~ 000
...bi -tom
I
r
z/a 3 i y .
"Ji
Ina,
i
3u
I ! 6Y
I
p _
t•~
{ #219.000
1\842 A ST
I
i
a
7771
1
I'
r - . _ -
nuln
per 1,
Agar
Uwe
- L x INTE(
BUILDING C(
Custom Homes ® R
541-8 90-
2
am
WWWINTEGR[TYBUILDINGCON
'Y O
Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 t I T F
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland,or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900
"7 LAND
ffi
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2015-01163
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 868 A Street
OWNER: Linda Millemann, Steven & Harriet Saturen
APPLICANT: Mark Lackey
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to add a covered front porch to the structure at 868 A
Street. The structure is a residence in the Employment (E-1) zone. In the E-1 zone, additions to existing
structures are subject to Site Design Review regardless of the use of the structure. COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-l; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09AA; TAX LOT:
6800,
NOTE:The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday, July 8, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the
Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 23, 2015
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: July 7, 2015
Sr
~
11t ECTPROFERTY I~ \
r3 ML
L
tE .AAA 6800
_ i
i
J
i
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
GAcomm-de0planning0anning Actions\Noticing Folder-Wailed Notices & Signs\2015\PA-2015-01163.docx
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.5.2.050 Approval Criteria
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including
but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height,
building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design
Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate
capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property
and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site
Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards
due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the
exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent
with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which
would alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a
design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards.
GAcomm-de0planning0anning Actions\Noticing POlderWailed Notices & Signs\2015\PA-2015-01163.docx
PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 6900 PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7200 PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 8500
ADLEMAN ALAN R AUBIN-ADDICOTT SUZANNE COLE MARY ELLEN/JOHN C
886 A ST 115 BROOKS LN 286 8TH ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
„i
PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7700 PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 2215 ! PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 8400
DANLEY WILLIAM E JR TRUSTEE ET DOUGLAS JAMES R TRUSTEE ET AL FENWICK STEPHEN C
871 B ST 2120 CALAVERAS AVE TO BOX 338
ASHLAND, OR 97520 DAMS, CA 95616 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7800
PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7300 KAPLAN-STANTON ALENE PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 8300
GREENE DAVID E TRUSTEE H/STANTON JOHN M JR 'LARMORE JANETUGHN T STRONG
885 B ST 248 EIGHTH ST
367 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ('ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-01163 39IE09AA 2201 { PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7000 PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7500
LUZ GEORGE A/SHELDON H MCCULLOH KENNETH S/STAYCE E MKII PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
4910 CROWSON AVE 271 N MOUNTAIN AVE COMPANY LLC
BATCHELOR, MD 21212 ASHLAND, OR 97520 12022 CRESTVIEW DR
ASHLAND- OR 97520
I
PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 6700 PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7600 !IPA-2015-01163 391E09AA 6500
MUNROE ROBERT W RAGEN DANIEL A JR IRUBINSTEIN ILENE
864 A ST 855 B ST 1854 A ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ! !ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 6800 PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 7100 IPA-2015-01163 391E09AA 2216
SATUREN STEVEN L ET AL ~SCHAAF NED TRUSTEE ET AL SMITH ALFORD RJR TRUSTEE
265 STEINMAN DR 175 NEIL CREEK RD 'PO BOX 833
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
I,
PA-2015-01163 PA-2015-01163
PA-2015-01163 391E09AA 6200 r MARK LACKEY 'STEVEN & HARRIET SATUREN
UNION PACIFIC RR CO INTEGRITY BUILDERS 1868 A STREET
1400 DOUGLAS - STOP 1640 P.O. BOX 225 'ASHLAND, OR 97520
OMAHA, NE 68179 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
III ~
AFFIDAVIT OF TRAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
i
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On June 23, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-01163, 868 A Street.
Signature of Employee
DocumeW 6/23/2015
6300
N+
k
u~l i l
f' Fe
221`
2a-2
a
7100
r I~
22.3
r
840
I L 22$31
A IMI
L- Y)wl,
Igo
' 2AI
i41~ fdaAH~~1lh 'i1,P
INTEGRITY
BUILDING CONTRACTORS
4VW VANITeC+p1"(y474)It.UIVGCC1idT)?AC7UtU.C[764 11HOW+ 544-390-2371
VO 3 X S A,SHfAgiP, 0RF130N 4,520 54-1--488-749li
6/15/15
Ashland Planning Division
51 Windburn Way
Ashland Oregon 97520
Application for porch extension at 868 A. Street Ashland, OR 97520
Findings of Fact: Applicable Land Use Ordinances to review in this request:
Land Use Ordinance:
Findings Of Fact:
18.5.2.050. Approval Criteria:
A. The proposal of a porch addition to the residence at 868 A Street meets requirements of the
underlying zone. Though a non-conforming use, residences are expectable and existing the E1
commercial zone. B. Overlay zone. Non-applicable. C. City Facilities. All utilities, parking, and access to
remain as existing and meeting current city criteria. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design
Standards. No exceptions are required under the current proposal. All standards are to be me per
preapproved plans.
18.4.2.050 Historic District Development:
The proposed porch addition does meet Historic District Standards and plans have been preapproved in
meetings with the Ashland Historic District Commission. Historic Design Standards are to be met per
plans approved by the Commission. 18.4.2.050 Part B: Entrances to remain the same as historic
architecture. Imitation of Historic Features to be met with siding, trim, and craftsman detailing
remaining the same as the original structure. Additions: Standards to be met include the replication of
roof line and wall systems towards the front of house. No obtrusive lines or features are to be created
as per plans. Part C: Rehabilitation Standards. To be met using historic architectural style and features.
To include horizontal siding, craftsman detailing, imitative materials, same roof pitch and form. The new
porch shall be compatible with the historic character of the building.
Mark W. Lackey
Integrity Building Contractors
L
JNTEGRITY
'BUILDING CONTRACTORS
tV%"V.INT[k RITYBUIIDINGCONTRACTOItS.COM NION6'S41-390-2371
110BOX 22.S Milt AND, ORCGON 97520 FAX: 541.438-7436
6/15/15
Ashland Planning Division
51 Windburn Way
Ashland Oregon 97520
Application for porch extension at 868 A. Street Ashland, OR 97520
Findings of Fact: Applicable Land Use Ordinances to review in this request:
Land Use Ordinance:
18.1.2.020 Purpose The purpose of the Land Use Ordinance is to encourage the most appropriate and
efficient use of land; to accommodate orderly growth; to provide adequate open space for light and air;
to conserve and stabilize the value of property; to protect and improve the aesthetic and visual qualities
of the living environment; to aid in securing safety from fire and other dangers; to facilitate adequate
provisions for maintaining sanitary conditions; to provide for adequate access to and through property;
and in general to promote the public health, safety, and the general welfare, all of which is in
accordance with and in implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Race, color, religion, sexual
orientation, gender identity, national origin, or disability shall not be an adverse consideration in making
any decision under this ordinance. Met. Extension of front porch at 868 A Street is consistent with
purpose of Land Use Ordinance 18.12.2.020.
18.1.4.010 Purpose and Applicability Chapter 18.1.4 contains standards and procedures for the
continuation of uses, structures, developments and lots that are lawfully established but do not comply
with current ordinance standards ("nonconforming situations"). The chapter is intended to protect
public health, safety, and general welfare, while allowing reasonable use of private property.
Nonconforming situations are not necessarily considered a negative influence on a neighborhood; rather
the benefits of continuing a nonconformity should be weighed against impacts to the neighborhood.
The chapter contains four sections as follows:
A. Nonconforming uses (e.g., commercial use in a residential zone) are subject to section 18.1.4.020; B.
Nonconforming structures (e.g., structure does not meet setback standards) are subject to section
18.1.4.030; C. Nonconforming developments (e.g., site does not meet landscaping standards) are
subject to section 18.1.4.040; D. Nonconforming lots (e.g., lot smaller than minimum area standard) are
subject to section 18.1.4.050. The only one of these four sections contained within the Non-conforming
definitions is number (A), which defines the non-conforming use as commercial use in a residential zone.
In this particular case we have the opposite, a residence in a commercial zone. This dwelling is currently
used as a residence in the E1 zone and lived in by the property owners.
18.2.3.120 Dwelling in Historic District Overlay Dwellings in the Historic District Overlay subject to all of
the following requirements. Table: States residential use in an E1 zone is permitted with Special Use
Standards.
Special Use Standards:
18.2.2.120: Dwelling in Historic District Overlay Dwellings in the Historic District Overlay subject to all of
the following requirements. Table: States residential use in an E1 zone is permitted with Special Use
Standards.
Applicable:
B. Dwellings shall conform to ti naximum permitted floor area standards( ection 18.2.5.070, except
that dwellings exceeding the maximum permitted floor area are allowed subject to approval of a
Conditional Use Permit under chapter 18.5.4. Met.
C. Notwithstanding the height standards of the R-1 zone, structures within the Historic Overlay shall not
exceed a height of 30 feet. Met.
18.2.3.130 Dwelling in Non-Residential Zone
Applicable:
3. Residential uses shall be subject to the same setback, landscaping, and design standards as for
permitted uses in the underlying zone. Met.
18.2.4.030 Arterial Street Setback. Met
18.2.4.040 Vision Clearance Area. Met
18.3.12.050 Historic District Overlay A. The Historic District Overlay, also referred to as the Historic
Interest Area, is that area defined in the Historic Districts map. B. Development in the Historic District
Overlay is subject to section 18.4.2.050 Historic District Standards in addition to all other applicable
sections of this ordinance. Met. Historic Commission has given pre-approval for proposal.. 6/11/2015.
18.4.2.050 Historic District Development. Consistent. Historic Commission has given pre-approval for
proposal. 6/11/2015.
Chapter 18.4.5-Tree Preservation and Protection
18.4.5.010 Purpose Chapter 18.4.5 contains requirements for tree preservation and protection. The
regulations are intended to reduce development impacts by preserving healthy trees for soil stability,
noise buffering, wind protection, temperature mitigation, and wildlife habitat, as well as for the
contribution to the character and beauty of Ashland. Met. No trees at or greater that 6" DBH will be
removed or altered in the front porch extension.
Chapter 18.4.8 -Solar Access
18.4.8.010 Purpose The purpose of this chapter is to provide protection of a reasonable amount of
sunlight from shade from structures and vegetation whenever feasible to all parcels in the City to
preserve the economic value of solar radiation failing on structures, investments in solar energy
systems, and the options for future uses of solar energy. Met. Proposed porch addition falls within the
guidelines set forth in 18.4.8.020
Summary: Proposed front porch as designed and pre-approved by the Ashland Historic Commission is
consistent with the Ashland Land Use Ordinance and will enhance the enjoyment of the property by the
property owners while maintaining the historic integrity of Ashland and abiding by applicable ordinances
with respect to neighboring properties.
Mark W. Lackey
Integrity Building Contractors
_
_ - _ -
f
j
-i
- i I Q
i
I I Il ~ m
- -os I I I -
Kftth. ~W,g
m DECK z
I
o
27W' x 17' 7"
Parking PORCH
i I r,"w 5 ~ OP I o
f~
m
N r
- - - - - - - - - - - - -
i'- t Z
i- Masln BeLOOm)
Zq•9.._.......-.__.._.....,tl 'tU6
Q SEMnq'SNCy U~irg 6' 21q•
1
a
2 2Z-4' Mh1 Cn Q 0
k 97915116•
V U
i f i td nl
8'~ 1516" i ~ ~i h
Existing Cottage I TI- - - + 0 0 0
f --------7- - - bQ z
f++ bbO
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
6G.I•........ T - + ~
+ f ~ Tf 4
LIVING AREA
1572 sq it
I
N I
' U
C: O
I
h
LIVING AREA I 0 b
591 sq It
III
Site Plan ~ rol
868 A Street d
Ashland OR 97520
1St FIOOC s•,;
-
n
F] 11
- - - - - - DATE:
6/9/2015 j
j SCALE: i
JUN 16 7.015
/ SHEET:
-
o
m I
I
Z
o I
ja
_ U
w
b
16'-915116"
xcaoi ------------1
r-
- fi- ---13'•2" I 0
e
I 090 N - I r~ G a
q
" Kitchen 00 " ( I I Oop
m U
Z
L _ M a 0Z
8 6'-5112" g,-g" bQ
Dining H 7
PORCH b
1.3" x 5.2 Pantry
_
o a
o I _ N m
m I - 10'•91/8" = 1
~-•6''5112" - I
O N _
o I I ( j I N
12'-7 3/8"
Master Bedroom N
10'-2" ( ( 4
ro I ` N
a o Porowa-yN Sewing/Study a I 'n
10'-8"
~0 - 7 IT N N m a ~ I ~ ~ 0 ~ G-,
I aw2''8" ° Bath1 C`C
1 j Living 0
v I I
00 a
4-4
6'-7" P-5"- _ j 0
I - - - -I- - ~
ysa
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
rt 3.8114"~, M ~ 4'-0 518" m
w
LIVING AREA
I
1629 s9 it
i
---....._....--56'-1. _....._....---T-..-
W s ~
q o
I Remodeled Main Floor W
G
f
I
I
DATE:
1st Floor 1 ~j -
UN 16 2015 6/9/2015
J
SCALE:
j
I ~
SHEET:
A-3
j
_ _
0
m
~a
F1 F-71 w
Cl
f
0
W7
I•~d O X O
U~Q
J
North Elevation West Elevation
a ❑o
a ~~b
ELA
r
N
- i w s
f $o
EMS
ZR
i
W
G
V1
DATE:
JUN r < 16/9/2015
Elevation 82
16 201 SCALE: -
.
East Elevation South Elevation
I ;SHEET:
(A-4
1
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
Planning Division
51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520
C I T Y O -ASHLAND FILE #
541-488-5305 Fax 541488-6006 ~
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT - Front porch expansion
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED®Certification? DYES ❑NO
Street Address 868 A Street Ashland OR 97520
Assessor's Map No. 391 E 09 AA Tax Lot(s) 6800
Zoning E-1 Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT
Name Mark W Lackey Phone 541-890-2371 E-Mail reverbmark@gmail.com
Address PO Box 225 City Ashland Zip 97520
PROPERTY OWNER
Name Steven & Harriet Saturen Phone 541482-4740 E-Mail steve.saturen@gmail.com
Address 868 A. Street City Ashland, OR Zip 97520
SURVEYOR ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER
Title Managing Member Name Integrity Building Contractors LLC Phone 541-890-2371 -E-Mail reverbmark@gmail,com
Address PO Box 225 City Ashland. OR Zip 97520
Title Name Phone -E-Mail
Address City Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection, In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request,•
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be removed atmyexpense. If/ have any doubts, l am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance.
.
Applicant's Signature Date
As ownerof the propertyinvo e~! in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner. , p
S
Property Owner's Signature (required) D to
[ro be completed by City Staff]
Date Received- Zoning PermitType Filing Fee $
OVER
Wcomm-dev\planning\Porms & HandoutsVoning Permit Application.doc
Job Address: 868 A ST Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
C
A Owner's Name: SATUREN STEVEN L 0 Phone:
P Customer 04584 N State Lic No:
P INTEGRITY BUILDING LLC T City Lic No:
L Applicant: R
I Address: A
C C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: (541) 890-2371 T Address:
N Applied: 06/16/2015 0
T Issued: R
Expires: 12/13/2015 Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E09AB1601 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: Type 1 site reviewfor front porch expansion. Per Bill Molnar fees are 335.00
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Residential Site Review 335.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
CITY O F
'Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 LA
r