HomeMy WebLinkAboutMorton-Ivy_PA-2014-02045
/I
CITY 10, F
ASHLAND
t
February 12, 2015
Notice of Final Decision
On February 10, 2015 the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
Planning Action:. 2014-02045
Subject Property: Morton Street to West Ivy Lane
C
Applicant: Hardey Engineering & Associates/City of Ashland
Description: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for Hillside
Land to facilitate the construction of an approximately 300-foot section of a 12-inch water line that
extends from Ivy Lane to Morton Street. The area of disturbance subject to the review is just west of the
West Ivy Lane right-of-way. The request includes Severe Constraints Review because portions of the
property are greater than 35 percent slopes. The application also includes a request for a Tree'Removal
Permit to remove 19 trees between 6-inches DBH to 18-inches DBH. The trees proposed for removal
include madrone, scrub oak and fir trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Residential
and Woodland Residential; ZONING: RR-.5 & WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 16AC; TAX LOT: 300.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13`h day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of one year and all conditions of
approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at '51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO)
18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO
18.108.070(B)(2)(c). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached.
The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Amy Gunter in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
SECTION 18.108.070(B)2 Effective Date of Decision and Appeals.
B. Actions subject to appeal:
2. Type I Planning Actions.
a. Effective Date of Decision. The final decision of the City for planning actions resulting from the
Type I Planning Procedure shall be the Staff Advisor decision, effective. on the 13& day after
notice of the decision is mailed unless reconsideration of the action is approved by the Staff
Advisor or appealed to the Commission as provided in section 18.108.070(B)(2)(c).
b. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider Type I planning actions as set forth below.
i. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City Agency may request
reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the
Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for
reconsideration, which in the opinion of the staff advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be
raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application
sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a
decision.
ii. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five (5) days of mailing. The Staff Advisor
shall decide within three (3) days whether to reconsider the matter.
iii. If the Planning Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the
Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor
shall decide within ten (10) days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The Staff
Advisor shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
iv. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff
Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to *those parties
that requested reconsideration.
c. Appeal.
i. Within twelve (12)- days of the date of the mailing. of the Staff Advisor's final decision,
including any approved reconsideration request, the decision may be appealed to the Planning,.
Commission by any party entitled to receive notice of the planning action. The appeal shall be
submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary on a form approved by the City
Administrator, be accompanied by a fee established pursuant to City Council action, and be
received by the city no later than 4:30 p.m. on the 12t' day after the notice of decision is
mailed.
ii. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing
shall be refunded. The fee required in this section shall not apply to, appeals made by
neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the city and whose boundaries
include the site.
iii. The appeal shall be considered at the next regular Planning Commission or Hearings Board
meeting. The appeal shall be a de novo hearing and shall be considered the initial evidentiary
hearing required under ALUO 18.108.050 and ORS 197.763 as the basis for an appeal to the
Land Use Board of Appeals. The Planning Commission or Hearings Board decision on appeal
shall be effective 13 days after the findings adopted by the Commission Or Board are signed
by the Chair of the Commission or Board and mailed to the parties.
iv. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by
the city as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-02045
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 39 lE 16AC #300
Morton Street to West Ivy Lane
APPLICANT: Hardey Engineering & Associates / City of Ashland
OWNER: D & S Ventures LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for
Hillside Land to facilitate the construction of an approximately 300-foot section of a 12-inch water line
that extends from Ivy Lane to Morton Street. The area of disturbance subject to the review is just west
of the West Ivy Lane right-of-way. The request includes Severe Constraints Review because portions
of the property are greater than 35 percent slopes. The application also includes a request for a Tree
Removal Permit to remove 19 trees between 6-inches DBH to 18.-inches DBH. The trees proposed for
removal include madrone, scrub oak and fir trees.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Residential and Woodland Residential;
ZONING: RR-.5 & WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 16AC; TAX LOT: 300
SUBMITTAL DATE: November 26, 2014
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: December 22, 2014
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: February 10, 2015
FINAL DECISION DATE: February 22, 2015
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: February 22, 2016
DECISION
The project site is within a public utility easement that traverses 39 1E 16AC #300 from the southern
boundary of where Ivy Lane dead ends into the west side of subject property, downhill to the north.
There are existing waterlines extending to the east from where Waterline Road right-of-way deadends
into the property at the north east side of the property. The proposed waterline extension connects the
waterline that ends on Ivy with the waterlines that end near Waterline Rd. right-of-way.
A Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for Sever Constraints Land is required
because the new waterline extending downhill from Ivy Lane to the waterline on the north end of the
property exceeds 35 percent slopes. The•proposed waterline meets the definition of development on
severe constraints land because the amount of site disturbance exceed 1,000 square feet and more than
20 cu yards of fill are require to be removed for the trench. As addressed by the language in the section
of code refers to building structures, the intent of that section of code was for the construction of
structure and to require engineering to verify that the "structure" will protect the aesthetic qualities of
the land and protects adjacent properties from erosion, sedimentation and slope failure. ,
The applicant's findings state that the waterline project is part of the City's Water Distribution Master
Plan and is intended to provide a "water loop" between the waterlines in South Mountain, Ivy Lane
and Morton Street. The water line loop will increase water pressures, eliminate dead ended water
systems and reduce the reliance on water pumping stations. The project is a trench to install a 12-inch
waterline. The pipe will be placed in six-inches of 3/4 minus crush rock with additional crushed rock
around the pipe. The trench will then be backfilled with native materials. Rock check dams and wattles
PA #2014-02045
Morton / Ivy waterline /adg
Page 1
will be placed across the excavation area in 25-foot intervals. Based on the materials presented the
applicant has addressed the criteria from AMC 18.62 and that measures have been taken with the
project to minimize the potential adverse impacts have been minimized through the installation of
drainage rock within the trench and rock check dams and wattles over the excavated area. Additionally,
the potential hazards have been addressed with the installation of hydroseeding.
There are 17 trees in the vicinity of the new waterline that will be impacted by the proposal. Seven of
the trees proposed for removal are greater than six-inches in diameter at breast height; including the ten
trees that are six inches in diameter at breast height; approximately five percent of the sites tree canopy
will be removed. The City of Ashland Tree Commission reviewed the proposed at their January 8
meeting and requested that a revised tree inventory and tree protection plan that identifies the trees to
be removed by number and location on the plan rather than by a station number. The commission
requested that tree protection fencing shall be installed in the vicinity of the waterline site work area to
protect the remaining trees. The commission did find that due to the severe slopes in project area that
an alternative means of fencing such as orange construction fencing instead of the six-foot chain link
panels typically required by the land use ordinance. The commission is supportive of the applicant's
request to not mitigate the removed trees due to the large number of trees on the property that the tree
removals will reduce fire fuels. Conditions regarding the Tree Commissions recommendations have
been added.
I
One written comment was received during the public comment period by a neighboring property
owner that expressed concerns regarding erosion control and disturbance to her property located at 911
Beach Street. The primary concerns were dust during the construction period. Staff recommended that
silt fencing be placed along the project route in the vicinity of 911 Beach Street to prevent erosion.
Dust is more difficult to contain but if work is occurring during dry months where dust is created, the
applicants will be required to employ dust suppression methods.
The criteria for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit are described in the
Physical and Environmental Constraints Chapter, 18.62.040.1, as follows:
1. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to
the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been
minimized.
2. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and
implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development.
3. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the
environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions.
The StaffAdvisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the
surrounding area, and the maximum permitted development permitted by the Land Use
Ordinance.
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Therefore, Planning Action 2014-02045 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one
or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning
Action 2014-02045 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here.
PA #2014-02045
Morton / Ivy -waterline /adg
Page 2
2) That all erosion controls measures proposed shall be installed and inspected on site prior to any site
disturbance. The proposed hydro-seeding post construction shall be installed on site in accordance
with the supplier's specifications.
3) That the recommendations from the Tree Commissions January 8, 2014 meeting shall be complied
with. More specifically, the trees proposed for removal shall be marked with spray paint for
Staff Advisory inspection prior to removal. The boundaries of the construction work zone shall be
delineated on site. Tree protection in the form of orange construction fencing or field fence posts
and flagging tape shall be used to delineate that protection zones for the trees adjacent to the
construction zone. The tree protection delineation shall be completed on site and inspected by the
staff advisor prior to the commencement of construction. Any modifications shall be approved by
the staff advisor.
_ tom- ( ~a 1
B~ll "Moln'a , Director Date
Coi~zmuizity Development Department
I
PA 42014-02045
Morton / Ivy waterline /adg
Page 3
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On February 12, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
i
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
1
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-02045, Morton to West Ivy Lane,
NOD.
Signature of Employee
Documentl 2/1212016
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 100 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 411 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 406
BAXTER JOHN R. ET AL BIJON JEAN-PIERRE A TRUSTEE ET AL BUCCINA JUNE
831 LIBERTY ST 1447 HIGHCREST DR 784 LISA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AD 5800 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AC 200 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 420
BURNHAM R 0/MILDRED I NARUM CITY OF ASHLAND CONNER JUDY F TRUSTEE ET AL
809 BEACH ST 20 MAIN ST E 880 MORTON ST
,ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 300 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AC 421 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AD 5201
D & S VENTURES LLC DAWSON WILLIAM G TRUSTEE ET AL DIMITRE THOMAS N TRUSTEE
11000 N NORTHLAKE WAY 133 6401 NW 54TH WAY 901 BEACH ST
SEATTLE, WA 98103 GAINESVILLE, FL 32653 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AC 440 PA-2014-02045 391 E16 1000 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AC 400
DUGGAN PATRICIA A FADER CLARA L FISCHER GUERIN A TRUSTEE ET AL
925 MORTON ST 338 HOLLY 836 MORTON ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045391 El6AC 424 PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 426 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 201
FRISTROM DIANNE K TRSTE FBO ET AL HERSH MICHAEL S ET AL JUAREZ JAMES
1555 LAKESIDE DR 171 932 MORTON ST 468 PARKRIDGE PL
OAKLAND, CA 94612 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 419 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5109 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 405
KNOROSKI JOHN J TRUSTEE LAMORE THOMAS J/LINDA E LEWIS DAVID R
864 MORTON ST 784 OAK ST 800 LISA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AD 5200 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AD 5500 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6 200
MERRITT DEBORAH C NICKELS JAC PALEN KENNETH R/MARGARET K
PO BOX 34 821 BEACH ST 2665 ALVARADO TERR S
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 SALEM, OR 97302
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5601 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 404 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5108
PHILIPPS FRANK J III/NANCY SHERIDAN JAMES D SILVERBERG SHELDON H/PAULA
813 BEACH ST 825 WATERLINE RD 170 PIEDMONT DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 425 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 422 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AC 441
SMITH ROBERT G/CATHERINE R SPARKES CHARLES JNERONICA STOCKING HOLLY/JON
922 MORTON STREET 910 MORTON ST 1421 BRUCE AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 GLENDALE, CA 91202
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 202 PA-2014702045 391 El6AD 5700 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AC 418
SUNCREST HOMES LLC TEKER SUNI S ET AL THOMAS MICHAEL DORSEY TRUSTEE
PO BOX 1313 811 BEACH ST 828 WATERLINE RD
TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5300 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 403 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5107
THUSIUS DARWIN/ANGELIKA -VAN ALLEN PETER WELLES RANDAL
897 BEACH ST PO BOX 3374 260 SHERIDAN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 PA-2014-02045
HARDEY ENGINEERING & ASSOC. JIM OLSON
PO BOX 1675 PO BOX 1625
MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDFORD, OR 97501
IVY/MORTON WATERLINE
NOD 2/12/2015
ASHLAND COMMISSION
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
December 8, 2014
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-02045
SUBJECT PROPERTY: Morton St. to W. Ivy Ln.
APPLICANT: Hardey Engineering & Associates for City of Ashland
OWNER: D & S Ventures LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review
Permit for Hillside Land to facilitate the construction of an approximately 300-foot section of a
12-inch water line that extends from Ivy Lane to Morton Street. The area of disturbance subject
to the review is just west of the West Ivy Lane right-of-way. The request includes Severe
Constraints Review because portions of the property are greater than 35 percent slopes. The
application also includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove 19 trees between 6-
inches DBH to 18-inches DBH. The trees proposed for removal include madrone, scrub oak and
fir trees.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Residential and Woodland Residential; ZONING: RR-.5 &
WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 16AC; TAX LOT: 300
4
The Tree Commission recommends approving the application with the recommendations below:
1) That the applicants provide a revised Tree Inventory and Tree Protection Plan for the review and
approval of the Staff Advisor prior to the commencement of site work, staging or storage of
materials. This plan shall include identification of trees to be removed by number and location on
the plan, rather than by station number, within the limits of the area of disturbance, and shall
identify the location of the placement of tree protection fencing to clearly delineate the limits of
the area of disturbance. The Commission is supportive of the use of alternative means of fencing
such as orange construction fencing rather than chain link panels given the scope and topography
of the project area, although there should be some protection provided for individual trees when
work is occurring inside the construction fencing area.
2) That the trees to be removed shall be numbered and tagged with tape or paint on site, and that a
Tree Verification inspection to verify the trees identified for removal as consistent with the
approved plans shall occur prior to any tree removals.
3) That the Tree Commission concurs that the removals proposed may be beneficial to the site both
in terms of removing some competing trees and in serving to reduce fire fuels, and is supportive
of the request to not mitigate the proposed removals.
4) The Tree Commission asks that the property owner be advised to contact the Fire Department to
determine whether there is grant money or other assistance available to facilitate fire fuel
reduction on the site.
(NOTE: The neighboring property owner to the south, Clara Fader, spoke at the Tree
Commission and expressed concern that her property not be used for access or staging without
her permission and has been advised that the city or its agent would not enter her property)
without permission or easement access.)
Department of Community Development Tel: 541-088-5350 CITY OF
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ASHLAND
i
Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y F
J 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or,us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 7 AND
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-02045
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 39 1 E 16AC #300, Morton Street to West Ivy Lane
APPLICANT: Hardey Engineering & Associates / City of Ashland
OWNER: D & S Ventures LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for Hillside Land to
facilitate the construction of an approximately 300-foot section of a 12-inch water line that extends from Ivy Lane to Morton
Street. The area of disturbance subject to the review is just west of the West Ivy Lane right-of-way. The request includes
Severe Constraints Review because portions of the property are greater than 35 percent slopes. The application also
includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove 19 trees between 6-inches DBH to 18-inches DBH. The trees
proposed for removal include madrone, scrub oak and fir trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural
Residential and Woodland Residential; ZONING: RR-.5 & WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 16AC; TAX LOT: 300.
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the
Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room) located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 7, 2015
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: January 21, 2015
A
7 T ~i': ~ _ n 50
r
,r
a
i
j ~
SUBJECT PRO PERTV ® _~.t--(tom-_~/_s r-~~-
397E'16AC 300 L]v
eea ~"1~ n~v`o The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. 0CX
PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONST3
18.62.040.1 Criteria for Approval
A Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the following:
1. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been
considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized.
2. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the
potential hazards caused by the development.
3. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered
more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the
surrounding area, and the maximum permitted development permitted by the Land Use Ordinance.
(ORD 2808, 1997; ORD 2834,1998; ORD 2951, 2008)
GAcomm-de0planning0anning Actions\Noticing PolderWailed Notices & Signs\2014TA-2014-02045.docx
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 100 PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 411 PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 406
BAXTER JOHN R ET AL BIJON JEAN-PIERRE A TRUSTEE ET AL BUCCINA JUNE
831 LIBERTY ST 1447 HIGHCREST DR 784 LISA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AD 5800 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 200 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 420
BURNHAM R O/MILDRED I NARUM CITY OF ASHLAND CONNER JUDY F TRUSTEE ET AL
809 BEACH ST 20 MAIN ST E 880 MORTON ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 300 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AC 421 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5201
D & S VENTURES LLC DAWSON WILLIAM G TRUSTEE ET AL DIMITRE THOMAS N TRUSTEE
1000 N NORTHLAKE WAY 133 6401 NW 54TH WAY 901 BEACH ST
SEATTLE, WA 98103 GAINESVILLE, FL 32653 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 440 PA-2014-02045 391 El61000 PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 400
DUGGAN PATRICIA A FADER CLARA L FISCHER GUERIN A TRUSTEE ET AL
925 MORTON ST 338 HOLLY 836 MORTON ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 424 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 426 PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 201
FRISTROM DIANNE K TRSTE FBO ET AL HERSH MICHAEL S ET AL JUAREZ JAMES
1555 LAKESIDE DR 171 932 MORTON ST 468 PARKRIDGE PL
OAKLAND, CA 94612 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 419 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5109 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 405
KNOROSKI JOHN J TRUSTEE LAMORE THOMAS J/LINDA E LEWIS DAVID R
864 MORTON ST 784 OAK ST 800 LISA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AD 5200 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5500 PA-2014-02045 391 E16 200
MERRITT DEBORAH C NICKELS JAC PALEN KENNETH R/MARGARET K
PO BOX 34 821 BEACH ST 2665 ALVARADO TERR S
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 SALEM, OR 97302
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5601 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 404 PA-2014-02045 391 El 6AD 5108
PHILIPPS FRANK J III/NANCY SHERIDAN JAMES D SILVERBERG SHELDON H/PAULA
813 BEACH ST 825 WATERLINE RD 170 PIEDMONT DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 425 PA-2014-02045 391 El6AC 422 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 441
SMITH ROBERT G/CATHERINE R SPARKES CHARLES JNERONICA STOCKING HOLLYMON
922 MORTON STREET 910 MORTON ST 1421 BRUCE AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 GLENDALE, CA 91202
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 202 PA-2014-02045 391 El6AD 5700 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 418
SUNCREST HOMES LLC TEKER SUNI S ET AL THOMAS MICHAEL DORSEY TRUSTEE
PO BOX 1313 811 BEACH ST ET AL
TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 828 WATERLINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391El6AD 5300 PA-2014-02045 391E16AC 403 PA-2014-02045 391E16AD 5107
THUSIUS DARWIN/ANGELIKA VAN ALLEN PETER WELLES RANDAL
897 BEACH ST PO BOX 3374 260 SHERIDAN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 PA-2014-02045
HARDEY ENGINEERING & ASSOC, JIM OLSON
PO BOX 1675 PO BOX 1625
MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDFORD, OR 97501
IVY/MORTON WATERLINE
NOC ' 1/7/2015
Corrected notice - original notice did not get
a sign put up on the property
i
AFFIDAVIT OF FAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On January 7, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-02045, Morton St. to Ivy Lane I
corrected notice. (Original notice never had a sign posted on the property)
Signature of Employee
I.
Documentl 1/812015
Deborah Merritt 541-488-8208 p.1
OW JAN 0 2015
~--JOB - c~ ~0 Z5
/19
"r 17
~ f-~~ '
Deborah Merritt 541-488-8208 p.1
C/ .
L-4
n 051504;47p Deborah Merritt 541-488-8208 p,1
r~
zz~
r
r
r
.
-
n 051504:49p Deborah Merritt 541-488-8208 p.1
p:
C -
-
Planning Department, 51 Winbuim VVay, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y F
l ' 541-488-5305 Fax; 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900
ASHLAND
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-02045
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 391 E 16AC #300, Morton Street to West Ivy Lane
APPLICANT: Hardey Engineering & Associates / City of Ashland
OWNER: D & S Ventures LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for Hillside Land to
facilitate the construction of an approximately 300-foot section of a 12-inch water line that extends from Ivy Lane to Morton
Street. The area of disturbance subject to the review is just west of the West Ivy Lane right-of-way. The request includes
Severe Constraints Review because portions of the property are greater than 35 percent slopes. The application also
includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove 19 trees between 6-inches DBH to 18-inches DBH. The trees
proposed for removal include madrone, scrub oak and fir trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural
Residential and Woodland Residential; ZONING: RR-.5 & WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391 E 16AC; TAX LOT: 300.
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, January 8, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the
Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room) located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 22, 2014
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: January 5, 2014
I Li
t
o
•'Rlp~ C C~~
t J
i
s,alECraaoaearv AN--_.~
i)9 W I6T 300
-
z I 2:tl
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2014\PA-2014-02045.doex
PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAII 'I
18.62.040.1 Criteria for Approval \
A Physical Constraints Review Permit shall be issued by the Staff Advisor when the Applicant demonstrates the following:
1. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been
considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized.
2. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the
potential hazards caused by the development.
3. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered
more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the
surrounding area, and the maximum permitted development permitted by the Land Use Ordinance.
(ORD 2808, 1997; ORD 2834,1998; ORD 2951, 2008)
i
i
Wcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWalled Notices R Signs\2014\PA-2014-02045.docx
f
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 100 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 411 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 406
BAXTER JOHN R ET AL BIJON JEAN-PIERRE A TRUSTEE ET AL BUCCINA JUNE
831 LIBERTY ST 1447 HIGHCREST DR 784 LISA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5800 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 200 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 420
BURNHAM R 0/MILDRED I NARUM CITY OF ASHLAND CONNER"JUDY F'TRUSTEE ET AL
809 BEACH ST 20 MAIN ST E 880 MORTON ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND,'OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 300 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 421 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5201
D & S VENTURES LLC DAWSON WILLIAM G TRUSTEE ET AL DIMITRE THOMAS N TRUSTEE
1000 N NORTHLAKE WAY 133 6401 NW 54TH WAY 901 BEACH ST
SEATTLE, WA 98103 GAINESVILLE, FL 32653 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 440 PA-2014-02045 391 E161000 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 400
DUGGAN PATRICIA A FADER CLARA L FISCHER GUERIN A TRUSTEE ET AL
925 MORTON ST 338 HOLLY 836 MORTON ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 424 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 426 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 201
FRISTROM DIANNE K TRSTE FBO ET AL HERSH MICHAEL S ET AL JUAREZ JAMES
1555 LAKESIDE DR 171 932 MORTON ST 468 PARKRIDGE PL
OAKLAND, CA 94612 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 419 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5109 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 405
KNOROSKI JOHN J TRUSTEE LAMORE THOMAS J/LINDA E LEWIS DAVID R
864 MORTON ST 784 OAK ST 800 LISA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5200 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5500 PA-2014-02045 391 E16 200
MERRITT DEBORAH C NICKELS JAC PALEN KENNETH R/MARGARET K
PO BOX 34 821 BEACH ST 2665 ALVARADO TERR S
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 SALEM, OR 97302
PA-2014-02045 391E 16AD 5601 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 404 PA-2014-02045 391 E 16AD 5108
PHILIPPS FRANK J III/NANCY SHERIDAN JAMES D SILVERBERG SHELDON H/PAULA
813 BEACH ST 825 WATERLINE RD 170 PIEDMONT DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 425 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 422 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 441
SMITH ROBERT G/CATHERINE R SPARKES CHARLES JNERONICA STOCKING HOLLY/JON
922 MORTON STREET 910 MORTON ST 1421 BRUCE AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 GLENDALE, CA 91202
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 202 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5700 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 418
SUNCREST HOMES LLC TEKER SUN] S ET AL THOMAS MICHAEL DORSEY TRUSTEE
PO BOX 1313 811 BEACH ST ET AL
TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 828 WATERLINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5300 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AC 403 PA-2014-02045 391 E16AD 5107
THUSIUS DARWIN/ANGELIKA VAN ALLEN PETER WELLES RANDAL
897 BEACH ST PO BOX 3374 260 SHERIDAN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2014-02045 PA-2014-02045
HARDEY ENGINEERING & ASSOC. JIM OLSON
PO BOX 1675 PO BOX 1625
MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDFORD, OR 97501
IVY/MORTON WATERLINE
NOC 12/22/14
35
i
t
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On December 22, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-02045, Ivy/Morton Waterline
(16AC/300).
Signature of Employee
DocumenB 12122/2014
i
00 Emu AHD' 3N) t . ar3b. 400;0 AND 2uil~~Q'U'll'
H11' ~3~ 6510 Ottll 3H`ut~
dib,
J' lJ 11 , , r~PM1!'YY
t Ji~13 ~'l~~ 5•~'~~.~raJl~ ~}~1 ~2~~ ~~~'1]' -E i6z Oi t • ~~'tl~~ 5~'~.~1 f1 3~1'1~F, ~
10,~~1 i 5~1'i~ °5 i!!Jl . r
I L)%4
inch No its 1-0I0
410j
t l zi
"JUDD AD 12*. ~J'J7 (l i~ 6 ~d_-b g 7~ ~1 o I ~li~l 1 !
t TAU:Gi Sao
22,
x 22.1 D ~ 110:11
'702 zol
707 to 011 illy ~a~J [k b fl 1p ~ ~ a~ ~ ~
006 22
'1~~ ~Z~~~ ~dF~~s, 1}~~ il~~' I ~ e 3~~}lk ~tdldk `~a~1iG ~ ~a~l~
Imp t l 1. , i~us wan 3106 Ohio NO , 1
, 3tie _°53F
1121 Idol :j02 iii 24 ~ 3 3 itb ~ 5,~~ s 4
21 s3i1o!
.s
44", too ~'.3 O A U It ' •
X1(1
i+d A 115 i~2 42 41 t 4f 44-1 TF a'~1 iF
a
X33~3 b ,g 40 , 92
oil
f~~~>1 it ih~
10)431 :A4 ~ A-SHO to a o- 13~ i -
2d14. 1 ,651 8 I
20 Z 404. 4400 MOO Aff
a- 16, fl fr~drdk j i.
' ~
71}D 44P,420 ~.7>+ y:~a[lfl~ ~ ~ 21I,~1>'°a
I y l It 420
0 ,
.41k l r ` i dlfi
i70
AT" 2303
1140 0
VON 424;
2 i 4
alai sill SIS lao
-
Bilt~ 131
I AID
iii
- 104
v}I!~
i !
n = ~
4-
" I AN"
s ~l I I
t
I
- - to---- of
MOMMEMENEVANNOM
r,.
co C:
rn w
Lo X
1 - \
~ ~ ray ~
T
J
i*lpw,wAo voy Zq
i
{ C
® f ~
r ,1 f r- o
r - s =
r
r L - -
~
S Pl
or w
ASHLAND COMMISSION
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
December 8, 2014
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-02045
SUBJECT PROPERTY: Morton St. to W. Ivy Ln.
APPLICANT: Hardey Engineering & Associates for City of Ashland
OWNER: D & S Ventures LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review
Permit for Hillside Land to facilitate the construction of an approximately 300-foot section of a
12-inch water line that extends from Ivy Lane to Morton Street. The area of disturbance subject
to the review is just west of the West Ivy Lane right-of-way. The request includes Severe
Constraints Review because portions of the property are greater than 35 percent slopes. The
application also includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove 19 trees between 6-
inches DBH to 18-inches DBH. The trees proposed for removal include madrone, scrub oak and
fir trees.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Residential and Woodland Residential; ZONING: RR-.5 &
WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 16AC; TAX LOT: 300
The Tree Commission recommends approving the application with the recommendations below:
1) That the applicants provide a revised Tree Inventory and Tree Protection Plan for the review and
approval of the Staff Advisor prior to the commencement of site work, staging or storage of
materials. This plan shall include identification of trees to be removed by number and location on
the plan, rather than by station number, within the limits of the area of disturbance, and shall
identify the location of the placement of tree protection fencing to clearly delineate the limits of
the area of disturbance. The Commission is supportive of the use of alternative means of fencing
such as orange construction fencing rather than chain link panels given the scope and topography
of the project area, although there should be some protection provided for individual trees when
work is occurring inside the construction fencing area.
2) That the trees to be removed shall be numbered and tagged with tape or paint on site, and that a
Tree Verification inspection to verify the trees identified for removal as consistent with the
approved plans shall occur prior to any tree removals.
3) That the Tree Commission concurs that the removals proposed may be beneficial to the site both
in terms of removing some competing trees and in serving to reduce fire fuels, and is supportive
of the request to not mitigate the proposed removals.
4) The Tree Commission asks that the property owner be advised to contact the Fire Department to
determine whether there is grant money or other assistance available to facilitate fire fuel
reduction on the site.
(NOTE: The neighboring property owner to the south, Clara Fader, spoke at the Tree
Commission and expressed concern that her propert}) not be used for access or staging without
her permission and has been advised that the city or its agent tihould not enter her property
ivithout permission or easement access.)
Department of Community Development Tel: 541488-5350 CITY OF
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 'Ry
Ashland; Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
tf I - f c^~ 7 I
Vol
rll ~
x ar ti
'z 2_2
lips
1 '~a c 1 f Y ;+r r t ' 4 f Y' " 1
`y.. e 4 I 41 '+b k 2
t I Pie A^r '1~- L i
Y h
1 ~ iI J F I .y~ ~ ~ s.. 4 ¢1 ' mss. c/,: ~ x~xy~•'.•~ '1 ta'
_ V 'ir
> I I fsi mil, a~ s` Q L T xt r' N
evil
' r1_
co t
~
row
"
/t t e a Y
ji,
t \ l ~I r ~ 3 ^R ~ !vy rid
R
L-c
J ~ .ssF F
.~;f" .per a,1 y E f; S X'
MINA k
~•~i~~„~F~1 n? a~ ~ rs~"- F':~f,~~F~T~ & ''4= y fr~~
tWIT
JS nA
TWO
F s
t a• fit, - w ti r .._:a
a `t r rr "`y fly J •Y`'e`3'
'143 / Lly^`7~~ ~Y ~~n, ~.{'x qv ~F{~~°`' yt 1 ~ ~ ~i r``
f: 1 L e( N iTXk~r ' ~"FC`Y~ ~i, Cy - J ITT'.3 ss. i t
L' J F i
LUC)
.yr..
vu. r" o
ai
i - 1
O O C Q >
co co , N '
41
F
ic~
L N - C',
LO
HII 0)
tut i-
-
F, J 12,
7
v
Fj.
C) Ll
00
M r
j co 0)
Co1 ` 00 J O
0
00
t
00
~ o
Lr)
'
N 7
S_M
r.
~t CO
J
t„ J
CID
y L
C-DJ
r
o
CID
- o
co
CO
N
l
_ 11
\ N 0
Co- 0
OD
N
o r \ 7
N O
-
1 -
m
E
CJ
W, N W
W
o }
01
1. 5
C"i
I N
i
~ -
o11
r .(.C)~ 'I
co
„ m
CD
, - o
~
co r
W~
I I CC) co
i )ICI( ~1 ti'
J•
l
C ,
4 CD
U~II 1~1 Y~ t GU
00,
I., l
l-
N) C) 11 0} , \ o, I
7 v -
y
C) W
wi o
°n I' r 1
Morton/Ivy Waterline Project No. 2014-04
Findings of Fact
Compliance Criteria:
The Morton/Ivy Waterline project is an approved segment of the current Ashland Water
Distribution Master Plan. It is intended to provide a water loop between South Mountain
Avenue, via West Ivy Lane and Morton Street to increase water pressures, to eliminate an
existing dead ended water system and to reduce the reliance on existing water pumping
stations. A three hundred foot section of pipeline, located just west of the West Ivy Lane
right of way, will be situated on private property on lands with a slope in excess of 35%.
This application will demonstrate compliance with AMC Chapter 18.62 Physical and
Environmental Constraints, and Chapter 18.100 Development Standards for Secure
Constraints Lands. While this waterline construction project meets the requirements of a
"development" as defined in Chapter 18.62.030 it is not a housing or other residential
development and is limited in it's applicability to a Standard Physical and Environmental
Constraints application.
This application will further demonstrate that the project will occur in such a manner as
to protect the natural and topographic character of the area, environmental resources,
aesthetic qualities of the land, and the public health, safety and general welfare by
insuring that the development does not create soil erosion, sedimentation of lower slopes,
slide damage, flooding problems and severe cutting or scarring, to allow for reasonable
use that complements the natural and visual character of the City.
18.62.080 Development Standards for Hillside Lands
I
A. General Requirements. The following general requirements shall apply in
Hillside Lands;
1. All development shall occur on lands defined as having buildable area. Slopes
greater than 35% shall be considered unbuildable except as allowed below.
Variances may be granted to this requirement only as provided in section
18.62.080.H.
Response- The development within this easement corridor is limited to an underground
12 inch ductile iron water pipeline. The pipeline will be constructed in a straight line
down the slope and will require no constructed landings, staging areas or extensive
clearings. The project is located upon an existing established lot (39 lE 16AC-TL 300)
containing 17.79 acres. Other than the creation of a 20 foot wide waterline easement to
support the waterline no further lot divisions will be required.
1
. All newly created lots either by subdivision or partition shall contain a
building envelope with a slope of 35% or less.
Response- This requirement does not apply.
3. New streets, flag drives, and driveways shall be constructed on lands of less
than or equal to 35% slope with the following exceptions.
Response- No driveways or access ways will be constructed under this project. All
disturbed construction ways will be re-established to their pre-construction condition with
the exception of the placement of erosion control devices. No permanent access way will
be established over this section of the pipeline corridor.
4. Geotechnical Studies. For all applications on Hillside Lands involving
subdivisions or partitions, the following additional information is required:
A geotechnical study prepared by a geotechnical expert indicating that the site is
stable for the purposed use and development.
Response- This requirement does not apply.
B. Hillside Grading and Erosion Control. All development on lands classified as
hillside shall provide plans conforming to the following items:
1. All grading, retaining wall design, drainage, and erosion control plans for
development on Hillside Lands shall be designed by a geotechnical expert.
Response- This project does not incorporate any structural cuts or fills. A single 2 foot
wide by 4.5 foot deep trench will be excavated by tracked excavator. The 12 inch ductile
iron pipe will be placed in 6" of 3/4" minus crushed rock in the trench bottom as pipe
bedding. Additional 3/4" minus crushed rock will be placed around the pipe zone to a
depth of 6 inches over the pipe top. The remainder of the trench will be backfilled with
select native excavated material in an effort to establish a condition as close to the
original site as possible. Backfill material will be compacted to 95% density to prevent
settling of the trench proper. The trench area and all other disturbed areas will be re-
seeded by hydro seeding with a mixture of grass seed, fertilizer and a tackifier to hold the
mixture in place on the steep grade. Rock check dams and wattles will also be placed at
approx 25 foot intervals across the excavated areas to prevent erosion resulting from
surface run-off. Erosion control details are shown in greater detail on the attached plans.
2. For development other than single family homes on individual lots, all
grading, drainage improvements, or other land disturbances shall only occur
from May 1 to October 31.
NO'! 2, 20V:
2
Y
response- The Ashland Public Works Department has indicated a start date for this
project of early July 2015, with a completion date of October 1, 2015. The project start
date is dependent upon budget availability after July 1, 2015 however if a budget is
identified prior to that date an ideal start date would be in early to mid-May. A May or
June start date might avoid potential wildfire requirements that might be faced with a
later start date.
3. Retention in natural state. On all projects on Hillside Lands involving
partitions and subdivisions, and existing lots with an area greater then one-half
acre, an area equal to 25% of the total project area, plus the percentage figure
of the average slope of the total project area, shall be retained in natural state.
Response- The subject parcel is 17.79 acres or 774,932 square feet in size. The
construction area is approximately 6,000 square feet or less than I% of the total area.
Most of the 17.79 acre parcel is undisturbed lower elevation woodlands with predominant
species being oaks and madrones with a few scattered conifers. The tree canopy is open
enough to allow a variety of grasses among the trees. The project will re-establish a
similar growth of grass and will maintain an appearance similar to that prior to the
construction; however no trees will be planted within 10 feet of either side of the
waterline to provide for future pipeline access.
4. Grading -Cuts
Response- There are no cuts proposed for this project.
5. Grading - Fills
Response- There are no fills proposed for this project.
6. Revegetation requirements. Where required by this chapter, all required
revegetation of cut and fill slopes shall be installed prior to the issuance of a
certificate of occupancy, signature of a required survey plat, or other time as
determined by the hearing authority. Vegetation shall be installed in such a
manner as to be substantially established within one year of installation.
Response- Since there are no cuts or fills associated with this project, revegetation
requirements do not apply. See the following section for revegetations plans for other
disturbed areas.
7. Maintenance, Security, and Penalties for Erosion Control Measures.
a. Maintenance. All measures installed for the purpose of long-term erosion
control, including but not limited to vegetative cover, rock walls, and landscaping,
shall be maintained in perpetuity on all areas which have been disturbed,
V 26 2014
3
including public right-of-way. The applicant shall provide evidence indicating the
mechanisms in place to ensure maintenance of measures.
b. Security. Except for individual lots existing prior to January 1, 1998, after an
Erosion Control Plan is approved by the hearing authority and prior to
construction, the applicant shall provide a performance bond or other financial
guarantees in the amount of 120% of the value of the erosion control measures
necessary to stabilize the site. Any financial guarantee instrument proposed other
than a performance bond shall be approved by the City Attorney. The financial
guarantee instrument shall be in effect for a period of at least one year, and shall
be released when the Planning Director and Public Works Director determine,
jointly, that the site has been stabilized. All or a portion of the security retained by
the City may be withheld for a period up to five years beyond the one year
maintenance period if it has been determined by the City that the site has not been
sufficiently stabilized against erosion.
Response- Erosion control measures for this project consist of hydro seeding to re-
establish a natural grass ground cover similar to what presently exists. Due to the rural
and severe nature of the site the grass cover will be left to naturally propagate without
benefit of irrigation or other cultivation.
Rock check dams will also be constructed using 4 inch minus angular rock. The dams
will be approximately 12 inches high and spaced 50 to 75 feet apart alternately angled
(see attached plans) to prevent water from concentrating in any single location. Rock
dams will be constructed of durable basaltic rock to ensure their longevity.
In addition to the permanent rock check dams, two wattles will be placed at equal spacing
between the rock dams. The wattles will be securely staked in place and remain in place
as a semi-permanent feature. The wattles will eventually bio-degrade after the grass and
ground cover have been established.
Although this parcel was created prior to January 1, 1998 and is not subject to a financial
guarantee for the erosion control measures, it will be subject to periodic inspection and
maintenance by the Ashland Public Works Department.
i
8. Site Grading. The grading of a site on Hillside Lands shall be reviewed considering
the following factors:
a. No terracing shall be allowed except for the purpose of developing a level
building pad and for providing vehicular access to the pad.
b. Avoid hazardous or unstable portions of the site. (Ord 2834, S2 1998)
C. Avoid hazardous or unstable portions of the site.
NO'S 2 6 1
4
d. Building pads should be of minimum size to accommodate the structure and a
reasonable amount of yard space. Pads for tennis courts, swimming pools and
large lawns are discouraged. As much of the remaining lot area as possible should
be kept in the natural state of the original slope.
Response- As this project is not a housing or residential project no terracing, building
pads, level areas or vehicular access will be constructed. There are no hazardous or
unstable areas within the pipeline construction area.
9. Inspections and Final Report. Prior to the acceptance of a subdivision by the City,
signature of the final survey plat on partitions, or issuance of a certificate of occupancy
for individual structures, the project geotechnical expert shall provide a final report
indicating that the approved grading, drainage, and erosion control measures were
installed as per the approved plans, and that all scheduled inspections, as per
18.62.080.A4.j were conducted by the project geotechnical expert periodically
throughout the project.
Response- Although this project is not a residential development or subject to a
certificate of occupancy, it is subject to submittal of "as constructed documentation by
the Engineer and acceptance by the City Engineer. The "as built" drawings and
documentation will indicate that the project was built according to the approved
engineering drawings or indicate any changes that might have been necessary during the
course of construction.
C. Surface and Groundwater Drainage. All development on Hillside Lands shall
conform to the following standards:
i
1. All facilities for the collection of stormwater run-off shall be required to
be constructed on the site and according to the following requirements:
a. Stormwater facilities shall include storm drain systems
associated with street construction, facilities for accommodating
drainage from driveways, parking areas and other impervious
surfaces, and roof drainage systems.
b. Stormwater facilities, when part of the overall site
improvements, shall be, to the greatest extent feasible, the first
improvements constructed on the development site.
c. Stormwater facilities shall be designed to divert surface water
away from cut faces or sloping surfaces of a fill.
d. Existing natural drainage systems shall be utilized, as much as
possible, in their natural state, recognizing the erosion potential
from increased storm drainage...
W112 6 0V1
5
t
e. Flow-retarding devices, such as detention ponds and recharge
berms, shall be used where practical to minimize increases in
runoff volume and peak flow rate due to development. Each
facility shall consider the needs for an emergency overflow
system to safely carry any overflow water to an acceptable
disposal point.
L Stormwater facilities shall be designed, constructed and
maintained in a manner that will avoid erosion on-site and to
adjacent and downstream properties.
g. Alternate stormwater systems, such as dry well systems,
detention ponds, and leach fields, shall be designed by a
registered engineer or geotechnical expert and approved by the
City's Public Works Department or City Building Official.
Response- This project will create no impervious surfaces or areas that will require
constructed drainage facilities to move storm run-off from the site. By the use of
permanent check dams, wattles and hydroseeding of all disturbed areas a permeable
condition will be created to minimize any possible run-off.
D. Tree Conservation, Protection and Removal. All development on Hillside Lands
shall conform to the following requirements:
1. Inventory of Existing Trees. A tree survey at the same scale as the project
Site plan shall be prepared, which locates all trees greater than six inches
d.b.h., identified by d.b.h., species, approximate extent of tree canopy. In
addition, for areas proposed to be disturbed, existing tree base elevations
shall be provided. Dead or diseased trees shall be identified. Groups of
trees in close proximity (i.e. those within five feet of each other) may be
designated as a clump of trees, with the predominant species, estimated
number and average diameter indicated. All tree surveys shall have an
accuracy of plus or minus two feet. The name, signature, and address of
the site surveyor responsible for the accuracy of the survey shall be
provided on the tree survey.
Portions of the lot or project area not proposed to be disturbelJ1~
development need not be included in the inventory.
Response- There are 17 trees to be removed within the construction area ranging in
size from 6 inches to 14 inches. Due to the complexity and scale of the drawings a tree
removal schedule is attached which more clearly shows the location, size and type of
each tree scheduled for removal. The schedule is labeled Exhibit A. There are two firs
6
(10 inch and 18 inch) and a clump of three madrones that are dead and will be removed
as well. These do not show on Exhibit A, but are located at station 2+29 (Madrones) and
1+58 (18" Fir) and 1+11 (10" Fir). All trees will be entirely removed from the site
including stumps.
2. Evaluation of Suitability for Conservation. All trees indicated on the
inventory of existing trees shall be identified as to their suitability for
conservation. When required by the hearing authority, the evaluation shall
be conducted by a landscape professional. Factors included in this
determination shall include:
a. Tree Health. Healthy trees can better withstand the rigors of
development than non-vigorous trees.
b. Tree Structure. Trees with severe decay or substantial defects
are more likely to result in damage to people and property.
c. Species. Species vary in their ability to tolerate impacts and
damage to their environment.
d. Potential Longevity.
e. Variety. A variety of native tree species and ages.
f. Size. Large trees provide a greater protection for erosion and
shade than smaller trees.
Response- The parent property upon which the pipeline will be constructed is 17.79
acres with a fairly uniform cover of mostly Oak and Madrone trees with a scattering of
Fir trees. The property is uniformly steep with a south sloping grade of 15 to 35 percent.
The 17 trees to be removed represent approximately 0.5 percent of the existing tree
canopy and is not a significant reduction in the tree population. There may, in fact, be a
slight benefit in wild fire fuels reduction resulting from the tree removals especially that
the tree removals are all located along the easterly boundary of the property, providing a
minor wildfire buffer area.
Due to the need for possible future waterline maintenance it is not practical to replant
trees where the 17 trees are to be removed. The remaining property has a dense enough
tree population that additional tree planting would not be warranted.
i
3. Tree Conservation in Project Design. Significant trees (2' d.b.h. or greater
conifers and 1' d.b.h. or greater broadleaf) shall be protected and
incorporated into the project design whenever possible.
a. Streets, driveways, buildings, utilities, parking areas, and other
site disturbances shall be located such that the maximum
NOV 2 6 201~~
7
number of existing trees on the site are preserved, while
recognizing and following the standards for fuel reduction if
the development is located in Wildfire Lands.
b. Building envelopes shall be located and sized to preserve the
maximum number of trees on site while recognizing an
following the standards for fuel reduction if the development is
located in Wildfire Lands.
c. Layout of the project sit utility and grading plan shall avoid
disturbance of tree protection areas.
Response- Other than the 17 trees listed for removal there are no significant trees
within the construction area. The construction corridor is located in a 20 foot wide
easement adjacent to the easterly boundary of the D & S Ventures LLC property. This
also is the most practical location for the pipeline placement and resulting tree removals
for the following reasons:
a. The straight alignment limits the number of trees encountered.
b. The area is void of any significant trees.
c. The tree removals provide a wildfire buffer zone between residential
properties to the east.
d. There are no cuts or fills to create and maintain since the excavation
will follow the existing slope perpendicular to the contour.
4. Tree Protection. On all properties where trees are required to be preserved during the
course of development, the developer shall follow the following tree protection standards:
a. All trees designated for conservation shall be clearly marked on the
project site. Prior to the start of any clearing, stripping, stockpiling,
trenching, grading, compaction, paving or change in ground elevation,
the applicant shall install fencing at the drip line of all trees to be
preserved adjacent at the perimeter of the drip line. Prior to grading or
issuance of any permits, the fences may be inspected and their
location approved by the Staff Advisor. (See 18.61.200)
b. Construction site activities, including but not limited to parking,
material storage, soil compaction and concrete washout, shall be
arranged so as not to prevent disturbances within tree protection areas.
c. No grading, stripping, compaction, or significant change in ground
elevation shall be permitted within the drip line of trees designated for
® 26 201
8
conservation unless indicated on grading plans, as approved by the
City, and landscape professional. If grading or construction is
approved within the drip line, a landscape professional may be
required to be present during grading operations, and shall have
authority to require protective measures to protect the roots.
d. Changes in soil hydrology and site drainage within tree protection
areas shall be minimized. Excessive site run-off shall be directed to
appropriate storm drain facilities away from trees designated for
construction.
e. Should encroachment into a tree protected area occur which causes
irreparable damage, as determined by a landscape professional, to
trees, the project plan shall be revised to compensate for the loss.
Under no circumstances shall the developer be relieved of
responsibility for compliance with the provisions of this chapter.
Response- The proposed construction will be very limited in its width due primarily to
the steep grade of the property. The site does not provide any convenient locations to
stock pile imported materials, crushed rock or pipe materials. The grade of the property
dictates that all necessary material be stock piled to the east of the project site on the Ivy
Lane right of way or to the northwest of the site on the existing waterline road access
way. The slope of the property is a self-limiting factor in the construction of the waterline
and ensures that the disturbed area will be as narrow as possible.
In ordinary residential construction it would be necessary to more closely follow the
lands contours to reduce the grade of driveways, access ways and building sites. By
choosing to construct the pipeline in a straight line in the shortest route possible the
impact to existing adjacent trees is negated and the need to protect significant adjacent
trees is greatly reduced.
5. Tree Removal. Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum
number of trees on a site. The development shall follow the standards for fuel reduction if
the development is located in Wildfire Lands. When justified by findings of fact, the
hearing authority may approve the removal of trees for one or more of the following
conditions: (Ord 2834 S3, 1998)
a. The tree is located within the building envelope.
b. The tree is located within proposed street, driveway, or parking area.
c. The tree is located within a water, sewer, or other public utility
easement.
d. The tree is determined by a landscape professional to be dead or
diseased, or it constitutes an unacceptable hazard to life or property
when evaluated by the standards in 18.62.080.D.2.
x,90 2 6 2 o
9
Response- The tree removals are limited strictly to those within the 20 foot wide
waterline easement.
6. Tree Replacement. Trees approved for removal, with the exception of trees
removed because they were determined to be diseased, dead, or a hazard, shall be
replaced in compliance with the following standards:
a. Replacement trees shall be indicated on a tree replanting plan. The
replanting plan shall include all locations for replacement trees, and
shall also indicate tree planting details. (Ord 2834 S4, 1998)
b. Replacement trees shall be planted such that the trees will in time
result in canopy equal to or greater than the tree canopy present prior
to development of the property. The canopy shall be designed to
mitigate of the impact of paved and developed areas, reduce surface
erosion and increase slope stability... Replacement tree locations shall
consider impact on the wildfire prevention and control panel. The
hearing authority shall have the discretion to adjust the proposed
replacement tree canopy based upon site-specific evidence and
testimony.
c. Maintenance of replacement trees shall be the responsibility of the
property owner. Required replacement trees shall be continuously
maintained in a healthy manner. Trees that die within the first five
years after initial planting must be replaced in kind, after which a new
five year replacement period shall begin. Replanting must occur within
30 days of notification unless otherwise noted. (Ord 2834 S5, 1998)
Response- The applicant requests that a variance to the requirement to replace trees
removed during construction for the following reasons:
a. The parent property is already densely forested with trees similar to
those to be removed.
b. To plant trees within the construction corridor would inhibit the City's
ability to maintain the waterline in future years.
c. The tree removal constitutes only a 0.5 percent reduction in the total
number of trees on the property.
d. The removal of the trees in the construction area creates a wildfire
buffer zone between residential properties to the east.
7. Enforcement.
Nov
10
a. All tree removal shall be done in accord with the approved tree
removal and replacement plan. No trees designated for conservation
shall be removed without prior approval of the City of Ashland.
b. Should the developer or developer's agent remove or destroy any tree
that has been designated for conservation, the developer may be fined
up to three times the current appraised value of the replacement trees
and cost of replacement or up to three times the current market value,
as established by a professional arborist, whichever is greater.
c. Should the developer or developer's agent damage any tree that has
been designated for protection and conservation, the developer shall be
penalized $50.00 per scar. If necessary, a professional arborist's
report, prepared at the developer's expense, may be required to
determine the extent of the damage. Should the damage result in loss
of appraised value greater than determined above, the higher of the
two values shall be used.
Response- The applicant and City of Ashland acknowledge this section.
E. Building Location and Design Standards. All buildings and buildable areas
proposed for Hillside Lands shall be designed and constructed in compliance with
the following standards:
1. Building envelopes. All newly created lots, either by subdivision or
partition, shall contain building envelopes conforming to the following
standards:
i
i
a. The building envelope shall contain a buildable area with a
slope of 35% or less.
b. Building envelopes and lot design shall address the retention of
a percentage of the lot in a natural state as required in
18.62.080.B.3
c. Building envelopes shall be designed and located to maximize
tree conservation as required in 18.62.080.D.3 while
recognizing and following the standards for fuel reduction if
the development is located in Wildfire Lands.
d. It is recommended that building envelope locations should be
located to avoid ridgeline exposures, and designed such that the
roofline of a building within the envelope does not project
above the ridgeline.
V 2 (3
r
c
11
2. Building Design. To reduce hillside disturbance through the use of slope
responsive design techniques, buildings on Hillside Lands, except those
lands within the designated Historic District, shall incorporate the
following into the building design and indicate features on required
building permits:
a. Hillside Building Height. The height of all structures shall be
measured vertically from the natural grade to the uppermost
point of the roof edge or peak, wall, parapet, mansard, or other
feature perpendicular to that grade. Maximum Hillside
Building Height shall be 35 feet. (graphics available on original
ordinance)
b. Cut buildings into hillsides to reduce effective visual bulk.
1. Split pad or stepped footings shall be incorporated into
building design to allow the structure to more closely follow
the slope.
2. Reduce building mass by utilizing below grade rooms cut
into the natural slope.
e. A building stepback shall be required on all downhill building
walls greater than 20 feet in height, as measured above natural
grade. Stepbacks shall be a minimum of six feet. No vertical
walls on the downhill elevations of new buildings shall exceed
a maximum height of 20 feet above natural grade. ( see graphic
file attached)
d. Continuous horizontal building shall not exceed a maximum
length of 36 feet. Planes longer than 36 feet shall include a
minimum offset of six feet. (graphic available on original
ordinance)
e. It is recommended that roof forms and roof lines for new
structures be broken into a series of smaller building
components to reflect the irregular forms of the surrounding
hillside. Long, linear unbroken rooflines are discouraged.
Large gable ends on downhill elevations should be avoided,
however smaller gables may be permitted. (graphic available
on original ordinance)
E It is recommended that roofs of lower floor levels be used to
provide deck or outdoor space for upper levels. The use of
overhanging decks with vertical supports in excess of 12 feet
on downhill elevations should be avoided.
NOV 26214
12
g. It is recommended that color selection for new structures be
coordinated with the predominant colors of the surrounding
landscape to minimize contrast between the structure and the
natural environment.
F. All structures on Hillside Lands shall have foundations which have been designed by
an engineer or architect with demonstrable geotechnical design experience. A designer,
as defined, shall not complete working drawings without having foundations designed by
an engineer.
G. All newly created lots or lots modified by a lot line adjustment must include a
building envelope on all lots that contains a buildable area less than 35% slope of
sufficient size to accommodate the uses permitted in the underlying zone, unless
the division or lot line adjustment is for open space or conversion.
H. Administrative Variance Form Development Standards for Hillside Lands -
18.62.080. A variance under this section is not subject to the variance requirements of
section 18.100 and may be granted with respect to the development standards for
Hillside Lands if all of the following circumstances are found to exist:
1. There is demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of this
chapter due to a unique or unusual aspect of the site or proposed use of the site;
2. The variance will result in equal or greater protection of the resources protected
under this chapter;
3. The variance is the minimum necessary to alleviate the difficulty; and
4. The variance is consistent with the stated Proposed and Intent of the Physical and
Environmental Constraints Chapter and section 18.62.080.
Appeals of decisions involving administrative variances shall be processed as
outlined in 18.108.070.
Response- Since this project is not a building or residential project the previous few
sections do not apply to this project.
Closing- The applicant, Hardey Engineering & Associates, Inc. respectfully submit
these findings in the hope that this project might be approved as shown on the various
plans and exhibits, and that the requested variance to plant additional trees may be
granted.
END F FINDINGS OF FACT,
M 6 20111
13
EXHIBIT A
No. Station Distance Might or Left of Pipe Tree Tree Description
Centerline Size
1 1+92 4.0' Lt. 12" Oak
2 & 3 2+19 7.5' Rt. 12" Twin Madrones (Common Stump)
4 2+90 3.0' Lt. 6" Oak
5 3+11 2.0' Lt. 14" Madrone
6 3+16 2.0' Lt. 8" Madrone
7 3+16 1.0' Rt. 6" Fir
8 3+18 3.0' Lt. 7" Madrone
9 3+21 6.0' Lt. 6" Fir
10 3+28 4.0' Lt. 6" Fir
11 3+39 3.0' Lt. 6" Oak
12 3+56 3.0' Rt. 8" Madrone
13&14 3+58 2.5' Lt. 6" Twin Oaks (Common Stump)
15 4+07 4.0' Rt. 6" Unknown Deciduous
16 4+22 1.0' Lt. 6" Oak
17 4+59 6.0' Rt. 7" Oak
Notes
® All trees are within a 20 foot wide waterline easement granted by D&S Ventures
LLC.
® Station 1+00 is 10 feet North of the South right of way of Ivy Lane at the
terminus of the existing 8 inch waterline in West Ivy Lane. The beginning of
work within the easement is at station 1+92
® No trees outside the 20 foot easement area will be removed
® Provided by James H. Olson, PLS 1036
MO 26 2014
14
ti
71_.
SITE PHOTOS
I
I
I
15
t._
oil
11,
1-41
y
{ " - ~
g
i
W""W sit
F ~J
y 1
w `
- an
F r i
`-Pty _ . s. - i - - -
No
r ~
F
- s
w
, J '4
'~s J
f~ ll I
- 1W
E
l i 1 t 1 3'- ~ 4~ sY3 .y ~ _~S Z itt•ga, - ~ _
t r
r ~ i I
'i
_i m pt ik ;
t
k 1 k~ r x
'It'-°"
~ a
~i
t ~ / ~ t +1b i
, 4r
^rt_ a I i
I
Q- 17
w 5~ t
noo
firma
-
pilot-,
E ,
avow lot
- r;
V-D
- E s i k ` v e
IY-
-a
s
I
a
A: 02
t I 1
too
Ak~
ills;
f -
f ~ ~ y , : ~s t ~ try ~ E , T~r
60007 Q
a v
NOW
~s ~r t
k j~ ~ 1 ~ ~it_~ I ~ ~ i F, ~ I ~ r
1 -1 - ~ Y, I i .
~ f F ~ f
i ~ ~ ~
~ ;1
~ ,l ' t ` I i, '
1'~ ~ 1 ~ f
~ y, ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ - _
° ~ ~ L ~ _ ~ i
~ ~ ~
- 1'c ~~r `l'r~ ' ~
: i~ 'S'
i 1 rF ~ r-~ ~ fir' ~ i t S 1 i~
~~s ~ r
t ~ ~ t ''6~~
r ? 1,
~ ~ i. 1 ~ 1 ~ ~ ~i ~ F~
i ' _ d ~
~t f.: c ~~t i _ ~1 4 4 .
_ t ~ ~ y~ r~~~~ ~ ~
i- _ ~ _ y ti ~ f ~'`ri '=1
S ~
I - ~ t'yj
- - .,~~vi i~ _ ~ ~ - ~ _ ~
~ 4 ~ t ~ -
1 ~ " a 1 - ~ _
Y
a
~ ,
1 ~ ~ ' ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ h ~t':' f
~ i
} Y~ i' ~ ~ i • y ;
~ ~ ~ _ j ~1~ ' ~
i ~ ~ -
_ 6 ~
1~- _ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ` ti ~
_ I'
~ ! 1 ~ i } c. F' _ ~ i
~ - - - _ _ ~ _ s.t L _ _ ~ y
• t
oil
l ~I
l ~ [ f
f t
l 1 ~
Ap.
I
- rf
_ta
' n
a i
I -Why
=M
t
I w' i l'-` 1 r r
' ; m t-
EXHIBIT C
PROJECT PLANS
i
i
i
OV2
16
,t _ . LFF. Y
W v
L.Fm F NO °'mnc
LEGEND
° PROPERTY CORNER P£ CENTER LANE TWA 6 E ROA~ l - F . W N o~
OM BENCH NARK PL PROPERTY LINE r y,'~, ~J (D .6
AC ASPHALT CONCRETE LP LIGHT POLE. AREA LIGHT Z cc s-5~
D/1Y DRIVEWAY PP POWER POLE IQ a
R/14 RIGHT OF WAY TLPOLE TRAFFIC LIGHT POLE - - 39 IE 16 AC TL 5200
SW SIDE WALL( 0 TELEPHONE RISER
GB GRADE BREAK CUYW GUIDE WIRE 1 F
FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEV. OP OVER HEAD POWER igr ' G~9 ~YRGINF~
FG FINISH GRADE 0 SDMH STORM DRAIN MANHOLE 83894PE
Fs FINISH SURFACE ®ssuH SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE DIGITAL SIGNATURE
(00.00) EXISTING ELEV. UTEL UNDER GROUND TELEPHONE E'rOlJO
00.00 FINISH ELEV. GRAIL GUARDRAIL pp~~°120,
CF CURB FACE V''N 1LG
- ~ K. W
SIGNS (TRAFFIC, INFORMATION)
IC TOP OF CURB RCP REINFORCE CONCRETE PIPE
GL GUTTER LINE RNTML DATC 6(30)t01b
RC8 REINFORCE CONCRETE BOX CULVERT
FL FLOW LINE CLIP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE
OSLD WATER LINE
OB DITCH BOTTOM Q PLUG
® CB CATCH BASIN ❑ METER 0
CI CURB INLET 4t TEE _
I HYD FIRE HYDRANT 7 Z
HYD EX. FIRE HYDRANT G/S GAS SERVICE (SHOW IN PROFILE)
0 TB THRUST BLOCK W/S WATER SERVICE (SHOVA4 IN PROFILE) I ryv.--_ _ ALTS I g
GV GATE VALVE
381E 16 AC TL 5108
LINES 39 HE 15 AC n 300 (LOT 3 PINEMEW EST, SUB.) Q
EXIST GAS EX- GAS___________ Di5 VENTURES LLC
EXIST. SEWER EX. SS___________
EXIST. STORM DRAIN -----------EX. SO----------- _ Z7 Z7 ~z
EXIST. WATER EX. Y1TA----------- L- W
EXIST UTIUtt UTEL_______-___ _ /
FENCE X_____
1
OVERHEAD POWER LINES pHp____________
=-•,h 1 1
OVERHEAD TELEPHONE LINES ------------DINT
11
PROPOSED GAS G LLd
PROPOSED SEWER
PROPOSED STORM DRAIN J' ^ a ivr _ E >A1/ ~ U) _
~ LJ
~n
PROPOSED WATER
-e7L _ ~l \ _r
PROPERTY OR R-D-W
__--e.»-~_ LL
EXISTING CONTOUR -----1398-----
PROPOSED CONTOUR 1398 N.T.S. w
®a
GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES SHEET INDEX VICINITY MAP z
0 0
1. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO THE STANDARDS AND SPECIFICATIONS OF 18, PIPE BEDDING AND PIPE ZONE MATERIAL SHALL BE 3/4'-0 CRUSHED ROCK. PIPE BEDDING AND PIPE ZONE
~/~r
THE 0007/APWA 2008 OREGON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION AS MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM UFTS OF 6' (SIX INCHES) AND SHALL BE COMPACTED BY
6T. Z
AMENDED BY THE CITY, THE UNIFORM PLUMBING CODE, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANCAL MEANS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM RELATIVE DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CI COVER
SHEET 0
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY AND OREGON HEALTH DIVISION. PASHTO T-99 METHOD D. PROCEDURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF 100% RELATIVE MAMMON DENSITY OF (1)
2. THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES BROWN ARE FROM RECORD ONLY. GRANULAR MATERIALS 001 WATER PLAN 0
THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITIES IN POTENTIAL CONVICT AREAS PRIOR TO 19. ASPHALTIC CONCRETE PATCHES SHALL BE CLASS 'C*. MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP SHALL BE AS
SPECIFIED D1 DETAILS 3 Q
CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY CONFLICTS OCCUR SECTION OD745 OF THE 'OREGON STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION'. INSTALLATION
n
SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 00745.40-.60 AND TO THE GRADES, CROSS-SECTION
3. All CONCRETE SHALL BE 3300 PSI AT ZB DAYS UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
AND AT THE LOCATIONS INDICATED BY THE ENGINEER
4. ALL SERVICES SHALL BE PLUGGED TO ADEQUATELY ENSURE THAN NO FOREIGN MATERIALS 20. ANY MATERIAL REMAINING AFTER BACKFIWNG OPERATIONS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED SHALL BE DISPOSED
OF d Tt atl
ENTER THE LINE BY THE CONTRACTOR, IN THE MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER OR CITY OF ASHLAND ENGINEERING OWNER
5. CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL APPUCABLE PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. DEPARTMENT. 3 vH4 Ik';
H
6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CLEAN AND/OR MAINTAIN EXISTING PUBLIC STREETS 21, APPROVED PLANS AND SPECIFlCATONS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT SITE OF CONSTRUCTION AT ALL
TIMES t
SI SOIL OR OTHER DEBRIS DEPOSITED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS AND REPAIR ALL DURING CONSTRUCTION OF WATER FACRITIE& CITY OFASHLAND - -
STREETS DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS IN A TIMELY MANNER TO AVID 51 WINBUflNWAY
INCONIENIENCES OR HAZARDS TO THE PUBLIC. 22. THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SPACING BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND STORM SEWERS, GAS ONES, AND OTHER ASHLAND , OREGON 97520
11~
7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE ENGINEER WITH THE SIZE, TYPE DEPTH OF MAT I, OF UIDERGRWND UTILITIES, EXCEPTING SANITARY SEWERS. SHALL BE THREE (3) HORIZONTALLY, TRENCH
WALL
PHONE: (541) 4885347
I'
ON AT NNW, INSTALLATION DATE, LOCAIIDN TO 1REHOI WALL THE MINIMUM VERTICAL SPACING, AS NOTED ABOVE, SHALL BE SIX (6) INCHES j .9' ) o 0
LATERAL AT PIPE TERMINUS TYPE OF CONNECTI
VERTICALLY OUTSIDE OF WATER MAN TO OUTSIDE OF UTILITY. IN SOME CASES, DEPENDING ON SIZE AND
AND SKETCH OF LOCATION, TYPE OF FACIUTY, CONCRETE BRIDGING PIERS OR SUPPORTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SPAN THE WATER A °
8. ALL PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTERLINE OF STRUCTURE TO CENTTRUNE OF FALIUTY. T w III
STRUCTUR OR MALL B AS SHOWN. r- 1 o
LCI:TION
23, 1HE CONTRACTOR MUST ARRANGE A PRECONSTRUCDOV MEETING AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE START PHO-LCT
BENCHMARK DATA
9. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY 70 SET ALL EXISTING AND NEW MANHOLE OF CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN HIMSELF, THE ENGINEER, & THE CITY OF ASHLAND ENGINEERING DIVISION,
COVENS, VALVE CANS ETC. TO HHISIi GRADE AFTER PINING, N ACCORDANCE WITH CITY
a
WATER QUALITY OMSION, AND ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
O ASHLAND ENGNEFRINC DEPARTMENT. Cp 2000
24. IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ARRANGE FOR INSPECTIONS PRIOR TO BACKFIWNG
ID. GRADING OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO UNIFORM BOLDING CODE FOUND BRASS DISC CENTER TINE NY LANE
I
OPERATIONS. BRASS DISC MARKED YS 20V I
4
CHAPTER 33, CONTACT CITY OF ASHLAND BULGING DEPARTMENT 25. WORK ACTIVITIES ON WATER PROJECTS SHALL BE CONFINED TO NORMAL WORKING HOURS ELEV: 2470.84 CITY OFPSHIANO
DATUM
II. COMPACTION TESTS OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO THE UNIFORM (7; DO A.M. TO 4:3D P.M. - MONDAY THROUGH FRIDAY). _ _ TL w ff~'
BUILDING CODE, CONTACT CITY OF ASHLAND BUILDING DEPARTMENT.
12. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE PATH CITY OF ASHLAND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 26. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE CITY OF ASHLAND ENGINEERING
f
FOR ALL ON-SITE INSPECTIONS REQUIRED OUTSIDE OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. DEPARTMENT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF A DESIRED FINAL INSPECTION
13. ALL REFERENCE TO ENGINEER MEANS: 27. ALL UTILITY WORK SHALL CONFORM TO UTILITY COMPANIES STANDARDS. UTILITY INFORMATION
HARDEY ENGINEERING & ASSOC., INC. 28. ALL SURVEY MONUMENTS SHALL BE PROTECTED IN PLACE, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED.
2870 HANSEN DRIVE 29, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY HARDEY ENGINEERING AND THE CITY ENGINEERING DIVISION CITY OF ASHLAND: FIRE DISTRICT: GAS COMPANY:
NEDFORD, OR 9750-0124 IMMEDIATELY UPON IDENTIFYING POTENTIAL PROBLEMS OR DISCREPANCIES WITH PUNS STAKING BRAD BARBER JOHN KARNS, CHIEF MIKE SMITH
(541) 772-6880 LOCATION/ELEVATION, CR 07HER DESIGN ELEMENTS 20 E. MAIN STREET ASHLAND FIRE AND RESCUE AVISTA (i
14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE FOLLOWING 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ANY WORK; ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 455 SSKIYOU BOULEVARD P.O. BOX 1709 NTS
(541) 488-5347 ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 MEDFORD, OREGON 97501
CITY OF ASHLAND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (541) 488-5347 (541) 552-2217 (541) 858-4728 E
HARDEN ENGINEERING -(541)772-APPROVED BY 6880 Ott OF
OREGON UTILITIES COORDINATING COUNCIL (800) 332-2344 S
15, ALL BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE OBTAINED FROM A SOURCE PRE CITY OF ASHLAND: ELECTRIC COMPANY: o d
ASHLAND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THE PROJECT ENGINEER. MATERIAL SOURCE SHALL SCOTT FLEURY JESSE PHILUPS
No7 VARY THROUGHOUT THE oe CONSTRUCTION. NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 5N WINBURN j AY MANAGER 925 PACIFIC SOUTH GRAPE
16. CLASS 'B' BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE 3/4'-0 CRUSHED ROCK PER ODOT STANDARD ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 MEDFORD, OREGON 97501
SPECIFICATION SECTION 02630 FOR ALL AREAS UNDER PAVEMENT OR N RIGHT-OF-WAY. CONTRACTOR TO SUBMIT PHASING AND CONSTRUCTION PLAN TOTHE (541) 552-2412 (541) 776-6992
~
BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM LIFTS OF B' (EIGHT INCHES) AND SHALL BE ENGINEER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ENGINEER AND OWNER WILL o
COMPACTED BY MECHANICAL MEANS To 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPROVE PLAN PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. THE PLAN SHOULD CITY OF ASHLAND: OREGON DEPT.
OF TELEPHONE COMPANY: U ~
ASTM D-698 PROCEDURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF 1009 RELATIVE MAXIMUM DENSITY OF CONTAIN THE FOLLOWING ITEMS: STEVEN WALKER ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY: JIM MARTIN
i
GRANULAR MATERIALS. WATER SUPERVISOR 811 SW 6TH AVE. QWEST I
v. CLASS 'A' BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE APPROVED NATIVE MATERIAL FOR ALL AREAS ouMDE 90 N. MOUNTAIN AVE. PORTLAND, OREGON 97204-1390 132 WEST FOURTH STREET I°
u U
THE RIOIT-DF-wav. BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE PLACED IN MAXIMUM LETS of e' (EIGHT i) PHASING OF CONSTRUCTION INCLUDING TIMING OF PAVING ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 (503)
229-5876 MEDFORD, OREGON 97501 o o a
INCHES) AND SHALL BE COMPACTED BY MECHANICAL MEANS TO 95% OF MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY N 2) TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN (541) 552-2326 (541) 776-82686' 2 ;
N
ACCORDANCE WITH ASTM D-698 PROCEDURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF 1005 RELATIVE 3) PLAN SHOWING HOW ALL PIPE WILL BE FLUSHED, DISINFECTED, AND y "
MAXIMUM DENSITY OF GRANULAR MATERIALS. SEE OREGON STD DWG NO RD300 FOR TRENCHES. WI18NB~Iv d
PA
ESSURETESTED NOTES: BEFORE ANY CONSTRUCTION STARTS, CONTRACTORS MUST NOTIFY 4) EROSION CONTROL PLAN THE UTILITY COMPANYS A80VE. THIS SHOULD BE DONE 48
HOURS II yOIIdIO. o PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION (18003324344) a =n
m~G
ID
myg
19d p IM
z m w Oita
~ T w m< u.11111w
GRAPHIC SCALEF
- o x a a Ox51 ~INF~~x
M 0 I
DIGITAL SIGNATURE
( IN FM OREGON
I Inch - 20 FL 0
I hoh . 40 A. (IIX17)
~N K. \N\\-
NOTES: CONSTRUCTION NOTES < PDkWk TIAC6 O D1E
E J'-D' CRUSHED N
STA. EV WITH BOND 4+77.06 INSTALL IINSTALLE THE ALL CITY OF ASHWORKS SHALL BE DONE IN LAND STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS. LACE WITH THE CURRENT REQUIREMENTS Of O
RPIPE OCKBCOMPACTED D TO 95% OF OPTIMUM DENSITY.
STA: 4+82.06 IN6TAll 12' 06TE + A THRUST BLOCK NORTH ALAI EAST
EX III?, IER b 2. COVER OVER EXISTING MAINS SHALL NOT BE CHANGED WTHWT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION O INSTALL CONCRETE ANCHOR BLOCK$ AT 75 FOOT INTERVALS Y41MW
or THE qtt OF ASHLAND. THE EASEMENT. (GEE DETAIL SHEET)
Z m 4 TRENCH BACKFIL SHALL BE CLEAN CLASS A SELECT NATIVE MATERIAL
/
STk 4 6 BA 3, NEW MAINS ARECTERIOLOGICALLY SATO BE FE E PRIOR TO PRESSURE PLACING TESTED, NEW MAINS DISINFECTED IN AND SERVICE BY PROVEN TH T HE BE CITY OF
COMPACTED TO 95% OF OPTIMUM DENSITY,
~
1 1
NITR V I - / _ ASHLAND. O COYER ALL DISTURBED AREAS WITHIN THE EASEMENT WITH HYDROSEEDED
Ex WTR / / , MIXTURE OF NATIVE GRASS SEED, FERTILIZER AND TACRIFlER. LE
STANDAND ARD FIRE HYDRANT
EX / /2 i ACCORIALRDANCE CE WITH WITHL TO THE TOP CITY Of OF WATER N ASHLAND MAINS
SPECIFICATIONS CATI0N5 RUNS FOR SHALL CONBE W O TREE REMOVAL SCHEDULE FOR A LISTING Of ALL TREES, 6 INCH DBN z
ACSTR UCTION
SEE
WATERLINE ROAD FOR TRENCH EXCAVATION AND BACKFLL. OR BACKFILL MATERIAL AND COMPACTKIN SHALL AND LARGER, THAT ARE TO BE REMOVED WITHIN THE EASEMENT AREA.
MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CONTROLLING AGENCY,
O INSTALL 12' DUCTILE IRON PIPE (CLASS 52). RESTRAIN ALL JOINTS
5. WATER MAINS AND FIRE HYDRANTS ARE TO BE INSTALLED WITH REFERENCE TO ALIGNMENT BACKFLL PER PWh STANDARD DWG C0302 WITH CLASS A BACKFlLL.
/ /CIE BOUNDARY BY AGREEMENT
/ ~ZOTS / INST. N0. 7D-D8O88 AND GRADE STATUS AND ONLY UPON NOTIFICATION OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND INSPECTOR. LM
L
6. APPROVED PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT SITE DF CONSTRUCTION AT SHOWN ON P PLAILANN. (SEE
O CONSTRUCT A (SEED A DETAIL IL EEECK DAM. SLOPE THE DIRECTION w ET) ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION OF WATER FACILITIES. INSTALL TWO STRAW
WATTLES EVENLY SPACED BETWEEN EACH ROCK
7, THE MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SPACING BETWEEN WATER MAINS AND STORM SEWERS, GAS CHECK N DAM. IL SHEET)
J
38 1E 16 AC TI
/ . 5200 LINES AND OTHER UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, EXCEPTING SANITARY SEWERS, SHALL BE THREE (SEE DETAIL SHEET) (3) FEET A8 NOTED HORIZONTALLY, ABOVE, SHALL
BE SIX (6) INCHES VELAR ICALWALL THE MINIMUM VERTICAL LY OUTSIDE OF WATER MAIN TO SPACING, LEGEND.
OUTSIDE OF UTILITY. N SOME CASES, DEPENDING ON SIZE AND TYPE OF FACILITY, CONCRETE
BRIDGING PIERS OR SUPPORTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO SPAN THE WATER FACILITY. AC - ASPHALT CONCRETE SW - SIDEWALK Lw
E, CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST ALL MH, VALVE CANS AND UTILITY BOXES TO GRADE. THE OCT - CONCRETE GND - GROUND ELEVATION (FINAL) ®
/ LOCATION AND ELEVATION W ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ARE FROM RECORD ONLY. THE VJ
CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL UTILITIES IN POTENTIAL CONFLICT AREAS PRIOR TO EXISTING ELEVATION
( ) ~ - CONTROL POINT (CP) r
CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ANY CONFLICTS OCCUR. TOG - TOP OF GRATE
RIM _ IIANHWE FRAME/COVER
i / A D B. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ARRANGE A PRECONSTRVCTION MEETING AT LEAST 48 HOURS CO - CLEAN OUT FS - FINISH SURFACE ED
~STA'4+DG PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION BETWEEN HIMSELF, THE ENGINEER, AND THE CITY OF
ASHLAND ENGINEERING DNSKW, WATER WAUTY DIVISION, AND ASHLAND PLANNING TOE _ TOE OF SLOPE TOIL - TOP OF BANK '3° W
i /
j , flOPERTY LINE DEPARTMENT. IE - INVERT ELEVATION J® c^ 7
10 WATER FACILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED W STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH THE PLANS AND EX GAS V J L
SPEgFlCATIONS. EXIST. GAS /
39 1E 16 AC TL 300 W61. SEVER Ex SS C~
D+S VENTURES LLC 11. THE CITY OF ASHLAND ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT SHALL BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48
~0' WIDE WA.IEft~ EASEMENT- J. / HOURS IN ADVANCE OF CONSTRUCTION START UP. EXIST. STORM DRAIN Ex SD
i 2^D / 12. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR WILL NOTIFY THE CITY OF WSE WATER EX VJTR LL
i ASHLAND 40 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF A DESIRED FINAL INSPECTION. EXIST. U71UW EX TELE
13. WATERLINE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE (CUSS 51) WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS FENCE
OYIINEId POWER LINES EX OHP
_ , ~2go5- - I 14. ALL FITTINGS MUST BE RESTRAINED VAIN EBAA WON MEGALUG RESTRAINTS
OVERHEAD TEIEPIIgR LINES EX ~ a
i
y~ 15. ALL WATERLINE WITHIN RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT HAS LESS THAN 2' OF COVER SHALL BE OAS
BACKFILLED VATH 3 SACK CEMENT SAND SLURRY UNLESS 07HFRMSE NOTED. 6' AND PROPOSED GAS
/ - BACKFILL OVER PIPE PROPOSED SEWER
16. FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE KENNEDY K81-D (YELLOW) OR APPROVED EQUAL. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
STA. 3+35 I PROPOSED WATER
I GATE VALVES, VALS SHALL BE KENNEDY OR MUELLER (OR APPROVED EQUAL) RESILIENT SAT EXISTING CONTOUR - - -fig°5- - -
50 VIDE CONSTRUCTION EASEML?!T~
\ll'~ _ ADPEATY LINE LL
--2x25- I
F1~ cr
_2430-t - - 39 1E 16 AC TL. 5108 n¢,
- (LOT 3 PINEVIEW ESL SUB.)
20' W. L.
- -2435- EASEMENT'
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN TRAIL
-2J4D- _ Fa
- - _ W _
0 o 0
-2445- - I (6
- TA. 2+60 404 W _ W
o
2
50' CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT_ W
w
e 65= = 1 m g o3
` _ _ - ~PROPFAtt LINE EXISTING AIR RELEASE VALVE ~ \ 0
405 IN MANHOLE r ,~'LV y
L \ STA fi00 BEGIN PROJECT T N
``4> = ` = _ - _ = lyb5- IVY LANE REMOVE EXISTING THRUST BLOCK AND FLANGE,
J '1 AND INSTALL L A A B'X12' INCREASER.
sr +T * xz
* CAUTION
N CONTACT THE
,CONTACT PRIOR TO REMOVAL ON THRUST BLOCK.
ELEVATION OF
LEE ! S I THE CONTRACTOR N SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND
CITY OF ASHLAND c WATER N QUALITY / V `1, I a EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS
;INSTALL 112'X12'%12'
N9TALL 12'%6' REDUCER (WEST)
/I\ UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE U pu
INSTALL 6' GATE VALVE AND. %
RAE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY- 0 INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELLD ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE, THE CONTRACTOR
- - MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY M
EXCAVATION, TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE t a
~ Q~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PUNS (1-800-332-2344) CONTRACTOR IS @ p
Know - ` _ _ _ - _ - / when Aft 6G RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WTIi OWNER & CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE
- - - ego- \ Ctull you dlg. ALL UTILITIES. o o a
I Z
'ua
EXISTING PEDESTRIAN TRAIL Uj ppt
IDfi dxmnenl, wd Neos ontl deign, Fm oletl krzh w m O G ~ W
wI +e o- ~,ea m .ne: a ti coH +w ~r ~n<, ryrye,e .M1w~ u. a x o o N
.mI« P,+noao+m, er Ira.
Re
y C E; E
26 2014 GAF:; .m mmnv
I IM
r CON o
TNRD4F.0CNM Tm p ~
5e¢. r f Z
m0'!¢
N
CdMAEiB1HflARf COtf81E&OIXVAiFM 1, t _ID LE
n BEOCONB OpRa 14 0.N(]r (1'FAIIK~V09 O
S
.sa a~ °emr"°'W m u.'r~n^'u.,aa ~p ~ ~,w mgr. ti a m F! 1~~ ~
I/~ TFA awu emmle:~ \vR`~
Y J ~ did ~6~ e~ 1 I`U/ Ir-fl~ll _ _ ~ ~T ~ I
jG ° ; VV \ 83894PE
DIGITAL SIGNATURE
s OREGON
9 &!a
TABIEA ~w CORN SCOTCH" oq. K. y
~~wM.mae, ,m F NNNl19A@6J31j1N6
,4
a .~?I m.w,wm mma OkIMtNl4lrpN~iHMiSTEtaG(B~AR,YOAREA . ,
-,.m-I .wv.w.+.m+eenm.awuwma m_n°"wmw wmw ,y,.
2nW
`:Y rye~.4m"'°°.~e~.~."n`4.. relnuNranvaWwbebb.rw ~r~`.'w"a"m atm. hhsra r„1 w'd+'.8r
m .d d II :
VERTK`A. 1E d
m r 1 n "Da...dm..wgn ,u+yA`.~a
..m.'_______..
mw.a o,°m arNn "mcrr~ (1)(-~~) PROFILE
[RaeUn Pnla Arm 1, 1011•Xmvm4rfgblA ANOO PMe&r YY Fmt%Mpw.mMrAN 1011 Pa80 HxlhrhWJUVdr M11•Nermnkri5fBf1 F01W5 ui
1-7
Tr ui
i1N. oRApS ~ry
i TRENCH VJ
VIALL
MIN. A MIN. Y e,
En
File-
Y ,T
i 4 BARS
AY Cn Z
FA WAY
kM,
oC
12' 12"
BAR
UNDISTURBED
UTW Sot.
HNRVDAS,tE1fdY ~ h~~~~~~~ ~~'~C~ ° ,I, SIT ~'..'~~a:•
A
PrsTAU, J' BTFP HOLES AT
BOTTOM TREIMH WITH °tl I~ P w.~rw /1
IOU TREAM END
w«w I -L Elevation Section A-A
a
NOTE,
h
i. ANCHOR BLOCK SHALL ALWAYS BE N BARREL SECTION NO. DATE INITIAL REVISIONS
OF PIPE, AND SHALL INCORPORATE PART OF THE SEAL.
mc.mew,wm4a
r.4 m.+r.v..pae.vm.nu wea
m YAr~>mnnmer.so-awsv'~rrwQi°wnw
ON W ANCHOR TO BE POURED INTO
uam.nr,.ermaa. 2. 'WINGS*
MONO . wbhewwr,rr.wampc G UNDISTURBED GROUND. Awmm mu
- - - -
.m. u~.e4ro.,r++~.. w am a ? a CONCRETE ANaroR WALLS (CLASS woo) S- BE KEA Z
maw rlrrxw.wmmmkmwmn au CONSTRUCTED USMG FOAMS WHOI WATER ONES, Gk
u++e ~H>muane smm. _ AND OrNFR PIPOUNES ARE CONSTRUCTED WDH SLOPES 20 ENGINEERING DEPT, z F p m
g ° rte. m>a,r.w>ars..,.b,n - PER off DR cAFArER. REUmrt FORMS, PLaDA TO PIPE ;E[LUi
g I11LNrAlAG TRENCH 2 T
ANCHOR BLOCK DEFAL W 2
scut: NONE OA C. No. 308 R o R~
Fn+.IMwM}m I, Ph11•pmmJsrlgf011 ADi;A i ~ ~3
f ~ F
p
6 mA>tl
T * CAUTION' € @Fst
C ,,N Y W THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF 3 Eb
„ EDSRNG U71UTIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS
UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE
INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RETIED ON AS BONG EXACT OR COMPLETE THE CONTRACTOR
MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE ANY CO
EXCAVATION, TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE d Z
J y~~~g~ .gT~ PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. (1-800-3J2-2344) CONTRACTOR IS n
RIF1lgBwh~.C18 RESPONSIBLE TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WITH OWNER k CONTRACTOR TO LOCATE ;xe
p , 8
V®II hBfBPeYCIUdlg. ALL UTILITIES.
p V®
2 m
1W F.unmtP<N e,d be bwf W deN}r. Fmgabq Ydn m m
NNU, b wmJ emka h IYa prymry e1 K.A he and h @ ~ppp
rp/f rMtm wWh Umbel MA Itiml. M TRY dh. Papm hAdW U rq .
e
I
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
L ~ PlauninR Oivivion
c i IV o t 51 Winbum Wad, Ashland OR 9'!5?U
-ASHLAND 541488-530 Fax 541-488-6Gffi FILE 8
US-MIN OF PROJECT
DESCRIPTON OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEEW Cerlikabon? DYES ONO
StrewtAddress Libel SJr&eA.As-hland OR - -
Assessa'sMapNo.3g1E Taxlot(s).~0~_.-_
Zoning RR-.5 Comp Plan Designation L01N Nn$Ity RgSldgnt181/WOOdland-
APPLICAN
Name Hardee Engine_ grins $ ;gciat L TZ,2~98n E•fAailj~a c1e eaync~com
Adlress PA-Box 1675 cdy Medford,OR . rP _9715-1_
PROS
Nam mil-and a Ventures LLQ_ Phone _ _ _ _ E•tean _ _ _
Address 10-10 NNPlorfhlak_ a WaY 133___ D Beatfq q _ zip 96103
&tA-MR ENGINEER ARCHITECT L4NOSCAPG6RCHITECT OTHER
rt~FC4j. Qe smo.,l~mes.,~t(son.-__ P~ 541-772-6660E ~~Ijo~4 -inc Gym
Address,P.O.Box 1625 c,,yMedford,OR _ zp9T501 -
Title
Phone
Adirese- - city - Zip
! Arrcey ra7/ytNa Mw 9utcmerNS end i~amtalal conP~s'rkd b~ ttia »PPkriD'a+ ixtrd~xj Nro crnlosedtknaxrosaxt ttw r »d
#tV Af l rartW I mxW..WW lA;aYBN rX r ' prlarf, me i» allmspn'!r,
ixati-rrAxNKltefK'lr4arfer,dit'OhS7er0,XY0'Pb7srf~rlLSp'f,7 % GndX5~ rmClie 'IRYoe~IyNdh6C~QlYtglXtpF7~~ ~Q'NdEYlWikv~ i9
CSl92i1r<A.
1% Jxtll ~ 5~- PBtd#h@al»~1051~71MIlACS IFQtR~SI' i
1i uwrrAe x+stheyanlligWmerii
3i hurtAr»6,~CC✓lartrwroSti doymeernarkwra; red rtrvxY
that»T atrrxAVesaaryvoremerxsarepq~eiylcrarcyrr,doyrourd
AvPre in tiffs relpud wrrrrem* »wst A"- #1 to orgy the ripest lx by gy»vzly Ma also passesy in my SAr rhve5 br+9y WA in fekv a pxrear berg regiia to
`be re~ewoedarmyer{rzrse. lI/hArehA
y !»madvisedlasi~ekca~rirxrtyabxraavaevk~and»sstu~re
APPIlcant's Signature - Date
ha Well 01dl6 !s ! readardlaX/ vsYrxxllhecrxrKdelo a 'af err ruxlas canseq,rcvxrs to nre as a p crperfy
r .kx
Properly OW Owner's Signatur eutredj y- Date
Dolo Rooeivod Zoning Permit Type _ _ . w Fiing Fee $
OVER rB
V 2 G 2014
l
Job Address: 0 TBA Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
C
A Owner's Name: CITY OF ASHLAND C Phone:
P Customer 08041 N State Lic No:
L. T City Lic No:
P CITY OF ASHLAND
Applicant: R
Address: A
C C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: T Address:
N Applied: 11/26/2014 O
T Issued: R
Expires: 05/25/2015 Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: Physical & Environmental Constraints Permit
Ivy/Morton Waterline Construction
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Physical Constraints Permit 1,012.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311.
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY ® F
-ASH LA N