Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMistletoe_696_PA-2014-01919 CITY F ASHLAND December 12, 2014 Notice of Final Decision On December 12, 2014, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: #2014-01919 Subject Property: 696 Mistletoe Road Applicant: Mark Dirienzo Owner: Ashland South Holdings, LLC & Dorado Investments, LLC Description: A request for a Modification of a previously approved Site Review (PA-2004- 075, 2006-00793 & 2007-01393). The proposal is construct an approximately 6,500 square foot building comprising of a mix of office, retail, warehousing and climate controlled mini storage spaces for the property located at 696 Mistletoe Road. The site is the vacant building pad to the north of 700 Mistletoe Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial; ZONING: M-l; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 14AC; TAX LOT: 1100 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 13th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of one year and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.108.070(B)(2)(b) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Amy Gunter in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 f 1 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 l www.ashland.or.us L. l SECTION 18.108.070(B)2 Effective Date of Decision and Appeals. B. Actions subject to appeal: 2. Type I Planning Actions. a. Effective Date of Decision. The final decision of the City for planning actions resulting from the Type I Planning Procedure shall be the Staff Advisor decision, effective on the 1311' day after notice of the decision is mailed unless reconsideration of the action is approved by the Staff Advisor or appealed to the Commission as provided in section 18.108.070(B)(2)(c). b. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider Type I planning actions as set forth below. i. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City Agency may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the staff advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. ii. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five (5) days of mailing. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three (3) days whether to reconsider the matter. iii. If the Planning Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten (10) days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The Staff Advisor shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. iv. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. c. Appeal. i. Within twelve (12) days of the date of the mailing of the Staff Advisor's final decision, including any approved reconsideration request, the decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission by any party entitled to receive notice of the planning action. The appeal shall be submitted to the Planning Commission Secretary on a form approved by the City Administrator, be accompanied by a fee established pursuant to City Council action, and be received by the city no later than 4:30 p.m, on the 121h day after the notice of decision is mailed. ii. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the city and whose boundaries include the site. iii. The appeal shall be considered at the next regular Planning Commission or Hearings Board meeting. The appeal shall be a de novo hearing and shall be considered the initial evidentiary hearing required under ALUO 18.108.050 and ORS 197.763 as the basis for an appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals. The Plamling Commission or Hearings Board decision on appeal shall be effective 13 days after the findings adopted by the Commission or Board are signed by the Chair of the Commission or Board and mailed to the parties. iv. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the city as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 F - 1 www.ashland.or.us (i"( I' ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01919 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 696 Mistletoe Road APPLICANT: Mark Dirienzo OWNER: Ashland South Holdings, LLC & Dorado Investments, LLC DESCRIPTION: A request for a Modification of a previously approved Site Review (PA- 2004-075, 2006-00793 & 2007-01393). The proposal is construct an approximately 6,500 square foot building comprising of a mix of office, retail, warehousing and climate controlled mini storage spaces for the property located at 696 Mistletoe Road. The site is the vacant building pad to the north of 700 Mistletoe Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial; ZONING: M-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP : 39 lE 14AC; TAX LOT: 1100 SUBMITTAL DATE: November 4, 2014 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: November 19, 2014 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: December 12, 2014 FINAL DECISION DATE: December 25, 2014 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: December 25, 2015 DECISION The subject property is a vacant lot located at 696 Mistletoe Road, on the east side of Mistletoe Road between Siskiyou Boulevard (Highway 99) and Tolman Creek Road. The subject site is part of the approximately four acre parcel that has the mini-storage facility, a two story office building and associated parking, also known as 700 Mistletoe Road. The site is zoned M-1 (Industrial). A new building is under construction at the property due north (650 Mistletoe Rd.) The site was prepared for construction and all utilities and parking areas were installed in conjunction with the 2007 approval and construction of the self-storage facility and adjacent two story office building (Building A). This application is to modify the exterior facade of Building B, the building footprint and setbacks will remain the same. Mistletoe Road was improved in 2007 with park row planting strips, street trees, and sidewalks were installed along the frontage of the site. The proposed and existing public facilities are adequate public serve the proposed development. The Site Review process provides objective criteria and standards for applications to meet landscaping requirements, parking standards, sidewalk locations, and some limited building design standards. These criteria can be found in Chapter 18.72 of the Municipal Code and the Site Design and Use Standards Ordinance. The subject property is zoned M-1 (Industrial), and the applicants propose to construct a new two-story 6,500 square foot, comprised of 3,500 square feet of office space, 700 square feet of retail / showroom PA #2014-01919 696 Mistletoe Rd./adg Page 1 space and 2,300 square feet of industrial area. The proposed building is designed using steel, stick framing and concrete. The exterior fagade is proposed to be a combination of brick, matching the building to the south, stucco and vertical seam metal siding. A pair of three-foot by eight-foot store front doors with a large anodized aluminum window covered by a five foot deep canopy is proposed. The canopied entrance provides a sense of entry. The building is oriented to Mistletoe Road, with access taken directly from the public sidewalk. The required amount of landscaping in the M-1 (Industrial) zoning district is provided between Building A and the subject site. Parking is located to the sides and rear of the proposed building, two parking spaces will be removed and converted to loading zone at the back of the building. Due to changes to the City's parking space requirements, the number of spaces required for office has been reduced allowing for the removal of the spaces without having a negative impact on the provided parking. The applicant has also provided three bicycle parking spaces, two of these are shown as being covered to address the bicycle parking requirements of the Off Street Parking Chapter 18.92. The criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.72.070, as follows: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or° will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subjectproperty. Overall, Planning Staff believe the application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances and satisfies all applicable criteria for a Site Review approval to construct a new two- story 6,500 square foot building comprised of office, manufacturing, retail and industrial uses. Planning Action 2014-01919 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2014- 01919 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval,unless otherwise modified herein. 2) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. PA #2014-01919 696 Mistletoe.Rd./adg Page 2 t 3) That building permit submittals shall include: a) Identification of all easements, including public and private utilities, public bicycle and pedestrian access, and all reciprocal utility, maintenance, and mutual access easements. b) An identification of exterior building materials and paint colors. Materials shall be consistent with those described in the application materials, and sample exterior building colors shall be provided with the building permit submittals for review and approval of the Staff Advisor. c) A comprehensive sign program in accordance with the requirements of Chapter 18.96 for review and approval with the building permit submittals. d) Verification that the bicycle parking spacing and coverage requirements are met in accordance with 18.92.040.1. The inverted U-racks shall be used for the bicycle parking. I 4) That prior to the issuance of a building permit: d) The building permit plan submittals shall include lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas. These plans shall demonstrate that at least 10 percent of the site is surfaced in landscaping, and that at least seven percent of the parking lot area is provided in required parking lot landscaping, as required in the Site Design & Use Standards. f) The applicant shall provide the approved Landscape/Irrigation Plan which addresses the Water Conserving Landscaping Guidelines and Policies of the Site Design and Use Standards, including irrigation controller requirements to allow multiple/flexible calendar programming with the building permit submittals. g) All exterior lighting shall be appropriately shrouded so as not to permit direct illumination of any adjacent land. Lighting details, including a scaled plan and specifications detailing shrouding, shall be submitted to the Staff Advisor for review and approval with the building permit submittals. h) That the bike rack and shelter details shall be submitted for review and approval by the Staff Advisor. The building permit submittals shall verify that the bicycle parking design, spacing, and coverage requirements are met in accordance witl 18.92.040.1. i) Mechanical equipment shall be screened from view from Mistletoe Road. The locations of mechanical equipment and any associated screening shall be shown on the site plan and elevations in the building permit submittals 5) That prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: a) The requirements of the Ashland Fire Department shall be identified on the building plans and complied with, including fire hydrant spacing, flow and clearance; fire PA #2014-01919 696 Mistletoe Rd./adg Page 3 apparatus access; approved addressing; security key box installation; and approved fire department connection (FDC). b) That the screening for the trash and recycling enclosure shall be installed in accordance with the Site Design and Use Standards prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy on Parcel 1. An opportunity to recycle site of equal or greater size than the solid waste receptacle shall be included in the trash enclosure in accordance with 18.72.115.A. c) That the bicycle parking facilities shall be installed in accordance with the design and rack standards in 18.92.040.1 and r prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for Parcel 1. d) That all work in the right-of-way, including the installation. of curbs, gutters, sidewalks and driveway approaches shall be completed with all required permits and inspections from the Public Works Department. 6) That the applicants shall obtain a sign permit prior to the installation of any signage on the site. Signage shall be subject to the requirements of the Sign Regulations found in Chapter 18.96 of the Ashland Municipal Code, and shall be reviewed by the Staff Advisor prior to the issuance of a sign permit. 7) That the windows into the building on the Mistletoe Road facade shall not be tinted in a manner that prevents viewing of the space within. Bill Mol ar, Director Date Depa ent of Community Development PA #2014-01919 696 Mistletoe Rd./adg Page 4 PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 2000 PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 102 PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 1100 ASHLAND WAREHOUSE PARTNRSHP BRAMMO INC DORADO INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL PO BOX 43 300 W VALLEY VIEW RD 700 MISTLETOE RD 106 MEDFORD, OR 97501 TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01919 391E14D 1301 PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 600 ASHLAND SOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC DWAIN & BUD LLC MORRIS ROBERT GENE TRUSTEE ET MARK DIRIENZO 801 AVENUE C PO BOX 850 700 MISTLETOE ROAD #106 WHITE CITY, OR 97503 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01919 PA-2014-01919 PA-2014-01919 POLARIS LAND SURVEY, LLC LAURIE SAGER AND ASSOCIATES MATT SMALL, AIA SHAWN KAMPMANN 700 MISTLETOE #201 66 WATER STREET P.O. BOX 459 ASHLAND, OR 97520 SUITE #101 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01919 PA-2014-01919 MARK KAMRATH ADROIT 132 WEST MAIN STREET CRAIG FUNSTEN MEDFORD, OR 97501 85 MISTLETOE ROAD ASHLAND, OR 97520 696 Mistletoe Rd NOD 12/12/2014 11 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 12/12/2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-01919, 696 Mistletoe Rd. Signature of Employee i Documend 12/12/2014 Staff Report - City of Ashland Associate Planner Derek Severson gave a brief staff report outlining this planning action. Severson explained that in 2012 this project came forth before the Commission as a subdivision and Site Review to build the existing building that has recently been completed at 175 Lithia Way. At that time the Commissioners reviewed the landscaping plan for the entire site and recommended approval with no changes to the plan, The landscaping has been completed and the street trees have been planted. With the proposal of the new building the applicants are proposing small modifications to the landscaping. Severson said that staff is recommending approval to the Planning Commission with some conditions. Historic Commission has also completed their review and is recommending approval. Schmidt acknowledged he did a site visit. The Commissioners discussed the landscaping plan. They agreed the modification appears to be a net gain with the landscaping. Severson acknowledged the City has a bond posted from the applicants to cover the cost of the landscaping that has not yet been completed, Mr. Galbraith brought attention to the fact that the street trees on the property are in approximately three feet of structural soil with good drainage, Neff/Schmidt m/s to accept the revised drawings. Voice Vote; All ayes motion approved. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01880 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 280 Liberty Street APPLICANT: Jason Eaton (Conscious Construction, Inc.) OWNER: Joan Kleen DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Review and Conditional Use Permit approvals to construct a new approximately 400 square foot accessory residential unit along the alley for the property located at 280 Liberty Street. The application also includes a request for a Tree Removal Permit to remove an eight-inch diameter-at-breast-height (d.b.h.) maple tree, and for Exception to the Site Design and Use Standards to allow a three-foot landscape buffer between the proposed parking space and the unit where an eight-foot buffer would typically be required. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP : 391E 09DA; TAX LOT: 4500. Staff Report - Severson explained this application is for an Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) proposed off the alley at 280 Liberty Street. The issue for the Tree Commission is with the construction of the ARU there is a large 8 inch (DBH) Maple tree (#3 on the plan) which is designated to be removed. They applicants have also included a tree protection plan. Commissioner Roland declared that he did have prior contact with the property owner to discuss suggestions regarding the tree. He was not hired by her and did not accept any money for his advice. It was determined he did not need to recuse himself and could make an impartial decision, The Commissioners inquired as to why the applicants are protecting a tree on the neighbor's property. Roland responded that the neighbor actually wanted to cut the tree down but the applicant wanted it saved because of its location along the fence on the south side of their property. Not wanting to damage the roots surrounding the tree they offered to protect it. It's Roland's opinion that the tree should be able to survive the construction. The Commissioners recommended that the applicants mitigate the tree with at least a 1 caliper tree but preferably a 2" caliper. It was also recommended that the applicants mitigate on site. With that recommendation the Commissioners approved the landscaping plan. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01919 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 696 Mistletoe Road APPLICANT: Mark Dirienzo OWNER: Ashland South Holdings, LLC & Dorado Investments, LLC DESCRIPTION: A request for a Modification of a previously approved Site Review (PA-2004-075, 2006-00793 & 2007- 01393). The proposal is construct an approximately 6,500 square foot building comprising of a mix of office, retail, warehousing and climate controlled mini storage spaces for the property located at 696 Mistletoe Road, The site is the vacant building pad to the north of 700 Mistletoe Road. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial; ZONING: M-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP : 39 1E 14AC; TAX LOT: 1100, 2 Staff Report - This planning application is a request for a modification of a previously approved Site Review. The first building was constructed back in 2007 and they are now ready to construct the second building. There are no proposed changes to the landscaping plan. Severson brought the planning action to the attention of the Commissioners in the event they might have questions or concerns. It is anticipated to have this building occupied by March of 2015. The Commissioners did not have any questions or concerns. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2014-01925 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 265 Fourth Street APPLICANT: Peerless Hotel DESCRIPTION: A Tree Removal request to remove a hazardous 28-inch DBH Maple tree near the Peerless Hotel Restaurant building located at 265 Fourth Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 09AB TAX LOTS: 9200. Staff Report - Severson explained that the Peerless Hotel is proposing to remove a 20" DBH Silver Maple hazard tree that is damaging the water lines, irrigation system, and building foundation. Applicants would like to mitigate if they can find a place on the site where the damage won't happen again. The Commissioners agreed that the tree is disastrous. Due to the loss of canopy from the tree being removed the Commissioners recommended mitigating a 4" DBH or two 2" DBH on site. DISCUSSION ITEMS Severson will be taking over the Tree City USA application. Severson said that it appears the winner of Tree of The Year is most likely the Maple Tree at SOU. Severson attributed the large amount of votes to the 123 on line votes it got at the end. The Commissioners confirmed that when looking at planning actions they would just like to review the landscape plans and not the entire packet. Russell commented that the new tree in the Plaza area looks very nice but wondered if the Parks Department could come up with something more attractive to protect the bark. Currently there is white plastic. Roland said he has some black plastic which would probably be a better look and the tree needs to be protected for the next couple of years. Severson will check with Michael Black, Parks Director, to see what he could do. COMMISSIONER REPORTS Russ Neff will not be able to attend the Jan or February meeting. Meeting adjourned at 6:35p.m. Respectively submitted by Carolyn Schwendener 3 Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or,us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2014-01919 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 696 Mistletoe Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Ashland South Holdings, LLC & Dorado Investments, LLC DESCRIPTION: A request for a Modification of a previously approved Site Review (PA-2004-075, 2006-00793 & 2007-01393). The proposal is construct an approximately 6,500 square foot building comprising of a mix of office, retail, warehousing and climate controlled mini storage spaces for the property located at 696 Mistletoe Road. The site is the vacant building pad to the north of 700 Mistletoe Road, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial; ZONING: M-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP : 39 IE 14AC; TAX LOT: 1100. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, December 4, 2014 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room) located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 19, 2014 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: December 3, 2014 NO i 00 I ~ c,. n I 1J B/ECT PROPERTY - MISTLETOE ROAD 1C 14A it 00 o~ `i ~ tr ~ I l h ~ I 1 l I it I \ _ I 1, j 4 i 1 1 O 30 60 120 Feet Pr per[y tines ara jor inference only, not arntenb(e The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. ntl SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.72.070 Criteria for Approval The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. All applicable City ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter, D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. i Document] PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 2000 PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 102 PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 1100 ASHLAND WAREHOUSE PARTNRSHP BRAMMO INC DORADO INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL PO BOX 43 300 W VALLEY VIEW RD 700 MISTLETOE RD 106 MEDFORD, OR 97501 TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 j PA-2014-01919 391E14D 1301 PA-2014-01919 391E14AC 600 ASHLAND SOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC DWAIN & BUD LLC MORRIS ROBERT GENE TRUSTEE ET MARK DIRIENZO 801 AVENUE C - PO BOX 850 700 MISTLETOE ROAD #106 WHITE CITY, OR 97503 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01919 PA-2014-01919 PA-2014-01919 MATT SMALL, AIA POLARIS LAND SURVEY, LLC LAURIE SAGER AND ASSOCIATES 66 WATER STREET SHAWN KAMPMANN 700 MISTLETOE #201 P.O. BOX 459 SUITE #101 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2014-01919 PA-2014-01919 ADROIT MARK KAMRATH CRAIG FUNSTEN 132 WEST MAIN STREET 85 MISTLETOE ROAD MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING i STATE OF OREGON ) I County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On November 19, 2014 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2014-01919, 696 Mistletoe. Signature of Employee DocumeW 11/19/2014 I I Id ~ L e I_ Y Yr I L o u. e~ = LAI '7 C IY°..-I I~ I II I I -a l c, I I~ L•~ L i r I a. f I I ~i r I Y~_ r r I r~ I +~`a I I , I il r; + L: i All I 1 _ + i. Y III Lei L=F1 ~ I _i ' ' I, II I I r i I a i ! , ~ e r ~ + (I t I I I, I ~ i a Ls f Sri - I i p l I- A i r I + a .T I I r I IJ ICY' I ~ t_ I 154.1 + C°l ~ I , I I I II 'I I :.I t I r,_; Fri I i I ~ iC I I aYl ~ ~-I f ~ rr I I I I ` ~ ~_l i i• I,~s I_ ~ ' I f~ I ,II I~~~ L ~ ~ r~; I n °l I ~ I d I r { i I ~ F I I a 995 cry j J 1322 50-C P5158A01 i Y f t f J 1015 3 t S057475 m 1 ~ 1 Q'' co ,v cl~ { ~ I mo, T5157476 qL n'~ { f~ 225 ? i 50-B 70 ~r t P5158450 C 101 I t L 8451 OV 0 4 2014 696 MISTLETOE ROAD 391E 14A 1100 MODIFICATION OF SITE PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT "BUILDING B" SUBMITTED TO CITY OF ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT ASHLAND, OREGON 1 I - i SUBMITTED BY MARK DIRIENZO - OWNER & REPRESENTATIVE OF CO-TENANT OWNERS: ASHLAND SOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC AND DORADO INVESTMENTS, LLC 700 MISTLETOE ROAD SUITE #106 ASHLAND, OR 97520 1. PROJECT INFORMATION: Site Review The proposal is to build out Building B within the footprint of the original Site Plan Approval. The proposed structure differs somewhat in elevation appearance from the original elevations proposed. Staff advised the Applicant that a Site Review application must be made. A Pre-App was submitted and Staff report issued Oct 8th 2014. No changes are proposed for the existing site improvements, which are all installed as of 2007. Previous installation includes, all public improvements, all site infrastructure, landscaping, park row, and existing parking lot. The proposed Building B is an approx. 6,500 sq. ft building to be built within the footprint originally approved in the Site Review and Approval PA-2004-075 (followed by PA2006-00793 and PA 2007-01393). In 2007, the self-storage structure and Building A structure were built out to completion, all per plan. All site work, both public and private, was completed for the self-storage, Building A, and Building B pad. The rock pad for Building B was left in a shovel ready state with utilities stubbed and now the applicant is ready to build Building B within that approved footprint. 1 ADDRESS && LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 696 Mistletoe Road OV ® 4 2014 391E 14A Tax Lots 1100 OWNER: ARCHITECT: Ashland South Holdings,, LLC KSW Mark DiRienzo Matt Small, AIA 700 Mistletoe Rd. #106 66 Water Street Suite 101 Ashland, OR 97520 Ashland, OR 97520 Tel: 541-621-8393 Tel: 541.482-8200 marled@mind.net matt@kistlersmallwhite.com SURVEYOR: CIVIL ENGINEERING Polaris Land Survey, LLC CEC Shawn Kampmann Mark Kamrath P.O. Box 459 132 West Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 Medford, OR 97501 Tel: 482-5009 Tel: 779-5268 x 224 shawn@polarissurvey.com marls@cecengineering.com LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: GENERAL CONTRACTOR Laurie Sager and Assoc. Adroit Landscape Architects, Inc. Craig Funsten 700 Mistletoe Road #201 85 Mistletoe Road Ashland, OR 97520 Ashland, OR 97520 Tel: 541-488-1446 541-482-4098 lauriesager@lauriesager.com craig@adroitbuilt.com COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial with Croman Mill Plan overlay if Rezone is ever requested ZONING DESIGNATION: M-1 (Industrial) LOT AREA: 3.99 acres PROPOSED BUILDING DATA (enclosed space): Approx. 6,500 sq. ft. total, including 3,500sq. ft. footprint BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TYPE: Materials; brick, concrete, wood, steel frame, corrugated metal siding, stucco PARKING: General Office; 1 parking space per 500 sq. ft. Industrial; 1 parking space per 1000 sq. ft. General Retail; 1 parking space per 350 sq. ft APPLICABLE ORDINANCES: MI; 18.52 Site Design & Use Standards, Chapter 18.72, (1992 and Revised 2012) ADJACENT ZONING/USE: WEST: M-l; Industrial EAST: M-1; Industrial (NE, across tracks is M-1/E-1 combination and due East is Croman Mill Plan land SOUTH: Croman Mill Plan 2 NORTH: M-1; Industrial OV 04 2014 SUBJECT SITE: M-1; Industrial b II. SITE DESCRIPTION: The approved Building B footprint has an address of 696 Mistletoe Road (taxlot 1100) along the east side of Mistletoe Road. The approved building pad sits within the existing 3.99 acre parcel (taxlot 1100) that contains Mistletoe Road Self Storage and the 700 Mistletoe Road office building. The site improvements were fully built out in 2007 including parking, etc for all improvements onsite including the future Building B that is the subject of this proposal. The property slopes approximately 5% from south to north and is fairly level east to west. No natural elements such as trees or rock outcroppings exist within the footprint of Building B. History of Site: Pre-2004: This parcel was originally part of a large lumber mill and was then part of a 6 acre parcel split off from the mill land many years ago, Brim Excavation used it vehicle storage. 2004-2006: In 2004, the property was approved for a phased development with the initial phase, consisting of a self-storage facility and office building as well as one building pad for a future office/retail/production area. The overall approval was re-reviewed in 2006 (PA-2006-00793) and re-approved. 2006-2007: Immediately after the re-approval, 70,000 sq. ft. self-storage facility and the 7,000 sq. ft. Office Building "A" were completed along with the building pad and its future parking lot, utility stubs, etc. An underground storm water detention facility built to manage storm water for the entire 6-acre site at full build out was installed then as well. It included capacity for the future Building B. Additionally, per the approval, the applicant dedicated 15 feet of their entire street frontage along Mistletoe Road for the purpose of widening Mistletoe Road and adding to the Right-of-Way. The Applicant improved the public street, Mistletoe Road, by widening it 5.5 ft, added in-street utilities, in street public storm lines, curb, and gutter, sidewalk and park row plantings/irrigation along the majority of frontage. Furthermore, the Applicant granted the City of Ashland 10' pedestrianibicycle easement to the City of Ashland along the entire north property line (the subject parcel for this application's north lot line). All of this is done. 2007 Partitioning: In PA-2007-01393 for financing purposes, the Applicant obtained approval for a 3-lot partition of the property into a 3.99 ac parcel (containing the existing improvements; self- storage, office building and installed parking with shovel ready Building B pad), it also included a .64 vacant parcel to the north and a 1.06 acre parcel on the south side both of which have frontage along the Mistletoe Road. The application at that time also included a site review approval for a 10k sq.ft. building proposed on the northernmost .64 acre parcel. Unfortunately, the intended tenant was unable to obtain financing in 2008 and the building project was scrapped. The partition proceeded and was platted in 2007 and since then a new project was proposed, 650 Mistletoe Rd, on the northernmost parcel, and has been built out with completion scheduled for December 31 2014. 3 2014 Site Review Application: This proposal is to construct Building B on the shovel ready building pad prepared in 2007 when all the site improvements were installed including those required for, Building B. The 6,500 sq. ft. design includes a 2-story office, warehouse, and retail space. Roughly, half of the building is intended for a specific Tenant who has signed a Letter of Intent to lease. The balance of the building will be rental offices built on the speculation of finding tenants, and a minor portion will be interior, climate controlled storage units complementing the service provided by the existing storage business onsite. Boundaries & Surroundings: • West Boundary; Mistletoe Road frontage and across the street is a large industrial/business office building housing multiple businesses including; Hakatai Tile, Lithia School, Mission Candles, Rudy's automotive repair, and Aikido of Ashland. • East Boundmy; the rear property boundary behind the self-storage facility is the Croman Mill property. Northeast across tracks is a combo of M1 and El. • South Boundary; Croman Mill Master planned property beginning at the abandoned security booth where the large commercial topsoil, rock, mulch aggregate business is in operation.. • North Boundary; 650 Mistletoe Road a brand new building constructed by the Applicant scheduled to complete December 31, 2014. Beyond that, the Oregon Pacific Railroad Tracks and undeveloped, Ml/E1 land on Jefferson St. Zoning: The property is within the M-1 Industrial District; Chapter 18.52, which is intended to provide land which encourages sound industrial development in the City of Ashland by providing a protective environment for such development. III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: (2) Site Review Request: To construction a 2-story office, warehouse, retail building within the footprint and envelope approved as Building B in previous land use applications. No change is proposed for the site surrounding the shovel ready, approved pad. All public improvements, parking lot, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, parkrow strips, etc were installed and certificate of occupancy received in 2007. Staff has advised that because the elevations/design of the building differ from the conceptual elevations submitted at the time of the approval a Site Review application is required. The pre-app Staff report was created October 8th, 2014. The applicants currently have a business tenant committed to renting approximately one half of the new building to expand their successful coconut products export/import business. Their operation will include executive offices, product storage, small showroom, and a package prep area. The southern half of the 1" floor will be interior, climate controlled, storage units to complement the existing services provided onsite. The remainder of the 2nd floor facing Mistletoe Rd will be Class A offices available for lease. OV 0 4 2014 4 The applicant anticipates the following rough use allocations. OV 04 2014 Square Footage Breakdown: ® Office: 3,500 sq. ft. • Retail/Showroom 700 sq. ft. • Industrial: 2,300 sq. ft. Building Specifics: See architectural elevations and floorplans. The structure will be designed using steel, stick frame, and concrete construction techniques with contemporary elements such as canopies along the corner fagades to achieve a modern industrial feel along the street frontage. Much of the inspiration for this project was taken from the acclaimed Old Mill Industrial area south of Bend, Oregon, the existing office located at 700 Mistletoe road, and the new building at 650 Mistletoe Rd. The color shown in preliminary plans, grey, golden brick, tan stucco may change somewhat but are intended to complement the adjacent buildings yet create a unique building that can also stand on it's own. The bold orange shown will not be neon in any way, but more of a burnt orange color. The building entrances are oriented toward the street with a "sense of entry" and overhead canopy. Max height will be approximately 26', (40ft. max allowed in M1 zone). The elevations provide a clear understanding of mass and scale, building design, and a general plan for the exterior finishes. Windows shall be aluminum storefront system. There are two loading areas in the rear of the structures, which are served by the existing parking area and an existing paved area that will be painted "loading only". The southern wall is windowless intended as a backdrop for the large landscape planting that will occur between Building A and Building B. Framing system will allow for future doorways and windows should the building be repurposed. Pedestrian Circulation: Public sidewalks, curb, and gutter along Mistletoe Road are completed. See engineering plans for private sidewalks along Building B footprint. Lot coverage: The existing site does not change and meets standards per the existing Site Review approvals, please reference previous approvals for details. Building B will be constructed inside the existing approved building footprint designated for it at the time of the Site Review approval referenced on Pg 1. Setbacks: The applicants have designed this new phase using the setbacks standard approved in the original planning action PA 2004-075 "Section 2 Conclusory Findings" Paragraph 2.4. which stated, the "Planning Commission finds that the project complies with the 25' front yard setback standard in the MI-zone. The commission finds that buildings proposed for Phase 11 will be permitted to base their setback measurement from the dedicated portion of the right-of-way or final curb location All other setbacks meet M1 standards. Street Improvements: As mentioned elsewhere in this and previous applications, the applicant has already dedicated 15 feet of right-of-way and improved this area by widening Mistletoe Road. Furthermore, the applicant has installed storm drain along the entire property frontage along with curb and gutter for the majority of frontage. The sidewalk and park row is installed. All driveway thresholds are installed. Solar Setback: The proposed Building B fits within the existing footprint approved as well as the originally presented elevation dimensions, so no changes apply here. 5 Vehicle Circulation: This entrance and threshold already exist and the existing parking lot is installed along with shared ingress/egress easements Recorded on Plat 2007-70. Landscaping: No changes are proposed to the overall Site's landscape bed layout from the original approval. The original approval contains approved Landscape Plans with layout of beds, all of which was installed in 2007. The only remaining areas to plant are the existing beds for Building B. This was left unfinished to allow construction to occur for Building B. Enclosed with this application is a landscape plan that defines the planting and irrigation plan in and around Building B. All other landscaping is installed and done. The area between the buildings will be planted to screen the south side of Building B as well as to add the required Bioswale, see landscape plans. Utilities: All public utilities associated with the development of this property are accessed from Mistletoe Road. All utilities have been brought onto the property and stubbed under the existing improvements to the footprint of Building B. Dave Tygerson at City of Ashland Electric designed the electric plan in 2007 and revisited the site several times within the last year. See engineering plans for details. No street cuts will be needed at this time since everything is stubbed to the building location. Private storm water detention facilities already exist and had been installed in 2007. This detention system was sized to accommodate full build out of the entire original 6-acre parcel; therefore roof runoff from Building B will be hard piped to the stubbed in system. The preliminary engineering plans depict this existing infrastructure and the new infrastructure required to connect to that system. All related shared-use easements are in place and recorded on Plat 2007-70. Trip Generation Threshold/ Heavy Vehicle Trips: The proposed project will not require a traffic study because it does not exceed the threshold of 50 peals hour trips or 20 heavy vehicle trips daily. The tenants may have 1 heavy vehicle trip every few days. When using the ITE Trip Generation chart in 2012 for the applicant's adjacent parcel, ODOT found that an 8,000 sq. ft. building, built out to office use (ITE 710) would generate 25.4 peak trips, almost 50% less than the threshold for a study. Copy of ODOT letter on file at City of A. No study required to build out Building B. IV. FINDINGS OF FACT: The required findings of fact have been provided below to ensure the proposed project meets Chapter 18.92 Off Street Parking, the Site Design & Use Standards as outlined in the Ashland Municipal Code (AMC), Section 18.72.070 as well as the Site Design & Use Standards (Design Standards Booklet, adopted August 41h, 1992 and revised 2012). For clarity reasons, the following documentation has been formatted in "outline" form with the City's approval criteria noted in BOLD font and the applicant's response in regular font. Also, there are a number of responses that are repeated in order to ensure that the findings of fact are complete. 6 OV 04 2014 CHAPTER 18.92: OFF-STREET PARKING: Off street parking is to be located to the north and south sides and meets all requirements in this section. The site has also been designed to accommodate not only light manufacturing and office uses, but also manufacturing uses needing truck circulation and retail spaces for showroom or food service. The goal of the applicants is to construct a building that can "recycle" into other uses over time if market demands change and to create a space that will serve a variety of business needs with varying job skills. The approximate parking plan based on the rough outline of space breakdowns on the prior page and allocated as per 18.92.030 is shown below: Use: Approx Sq. ft. Required Spaces Office: (1:500) 3500 7.00 Industrial: (1:1000) 2300 2.30 Retail/Showroom (1:350) 700 2.00 Total Estimated Parking 11.30 Plus 10% = 12.43 spaces to be rounded up TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED Off-Street 13.00 incl. ADA (per 18.92.040) Street Parking Credits Requested 0.00 The applicant believes the proposed plan is a minimum amount of parking for this project. Ml zoning allows a wide range of uses and some of those uses are parking intensive. There are two additional existing parking spaces that will be converted to loading-only spaces in the rear of the building. This will allow the proposed users to have adequate space behind the building for loading, see Site Plans for details. 18.92.050: Parking Management Strategies: The amount of required off-street parking may be reduced up to 50% through the application of the following credits. A. On-Street Parking Credit. The amount of off-street parking required shall be reduced by the following credit provided for on-street parking: one off-street parking space credit for every one on-street parking space. No on street parking credits are being requested. B. Alternative Vehicle Parking. Alternative vehicle parking facilities may be substituted for up to 25 percent of the required parking space on site. No alternative vehicle parking substitutions are being requested. C. Mixed Uses. In the event that several users occupy a single structure or parcel of land, the total requirements for off-street automobile parking shall be the sum of the requirements for the several uses computed separately unless it can be shown that the peak parking demands are offset. In such case, the mixed-use credit shall reduce the off-street parking requirement by a percentage equal to the reduced parking demand. 7 OV 04 2014 No Mixed uses credits requested. D. Joint Use of Facilities. Required parking facilities of 2 or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may be satisfied by the same parking facilities used jointly, to the extent that it can be shown by the owners or operators that the need for the facilities does not materially overlap (e.g., uses primarily of a daytime vs. nighttime nature) and provided that such right of joint use is evidenced by a deed, lease, contract, or similar written instrument establishing such joint use. N/A E. Shared Parking. One off-street parking space credit for every space constructed in designated off-site shared parking areas, or through payment of in-lieu-of-parking fees for a common parking. N/A F. TDM Plan Credit. Through implementation of an individual Transportation Demand Management (TDM) plan that demonstrates a reduction of long term parking demand by a percentage equal to the credit requested. No TDM credit requested. G. Transit Facilities Credit. Sites where at least 20 spaces are required, and where at least one lot line abuts a street with transit service may substitute transit-supportive plazas for required parking as follows. No transit credit requested. 18.92.060 Bicycle Parking A. All uses, with the exception of detached single-family residences and uses in the C-1-11) zone, shall provide a minimum of two sheltered bike parking spaces. The proposal includes 3 total space including 2 covered. There are 13 car parking spaces and 1 bike space is required for every 5 parking spaces. Rounding up equates to 3 bike spaces required. B. Every residential use of two units or more per structure, and not containing a garage, shall provide bicycle parking spaces as follows: N/A. This is a commercial project. C. In addition, all uses which require off street parking, except as specifically noted, shall provide one bicycle parking space for every 5 required auto parking spaces. Fractional spaces shall be rounded up to the next whole space. Fifty percent of the bicycle parking spaces required shall be sheltered from the weather. All spaces shall be located in proximity to the uses they are intended to serve. (Ord 2697 Sl, 1993) 8 OV 0 4 2014 With 13 automobile spaces proposed, the required 2.6 bicycle spaces are rounded up to 3.0 spaces, with 50% of spaces covered. The result is 2 covered spaces and 1 uncovered space. All 3 spaces are shown on the Site Plan and will meet the 18.92.060 standards when installed. D. All public and commercial parking lots and parking structures shall provide a minimum of one bicycle parking space for every five auto parking spaces. With 13 automobile spaces proposed, the required 2.6 bicycle spaces are rounded up to 3.0 spaces, with 50% of spaces covered. The result is 2 covered spaces and 1 uncovered space. All 3 spaces are shown on the Site Plan and will meet the 18.92.060 standards. E, F. G. H of this Chapter: Do Not Apply. 1. Bicycle Parking Design Standards OV ®4 2014 Paragraphs 1 thru 11 shall be met or they do not apply. J. Bicycle Parking Rack Standards. Paragraphs 1 and 2 of this Subsection are understood and will be satisfied at installation. 18.92.080 Parking, Access and Circulation Design A. Parking Location. 1. Except for single and two-family dwellings, required automobile parking facilities may be located on another parcel of land, provided said parcel is within 200 feet of the use it is intended to serve. The distance from the parking lot to the use shall be measured in walking distance from the nearest parking space to an access to the building housing the use, along a sidewalk or other pedestrian path separated from street traffic. Such right to use the off-site parking must be evidenced by a deed, lease, easement, or similar written instrument establishing such use, for the duration of the use. Requirement Met, see site plans 2. Except as allowed in the subsection below, automobile parking shall not be located in a required front and side yard setback area abutting a public street, except alleys. All proposed parking is located on the sides of the structure and not abutting Public Street. 3. In all residential zones, all off-street parking of automobiles, trucks, trailers and recreational vehicles in the front yard shall be limited to a contiguous area which is no more than 25% of the area of the front yard, or a contiguous area 25 feet wide and the depth of the front yard, whichever is greater. Since parking in violation of this section is occasional in nature, and is incidental to the primary use of the site, no vested rights are deemed to exist and violations of this section are not subject to the protection of the nonconforming use sections of this ordinance. However, a 24-hour warning notice of violation shall be provided prior to the issuance of a citation to appear in Municipal Court, and it shall be rebuttable presumed that the vehicle was parked with permission of the person in control of the property. Subsequent violations shall not require a warning notice. N/A 9 OV ®4 2014 B. Parking Area Design Required parking areas shall be designed in accordance with following standards and dimensions. 1. Parking spaces shall be a minimum of 9 x 18 feet. Standard met, see Site Plan. 2. Up to 50% of the total automobile parking spaces in a parking lot may be designated for compact cars. Minimum dimensions for compact spaces shall be 8 x 16 feet. Such spaces shall be signed or the space painted with the words "Compact Car Only." No compact spaces proposed. 3. Parking spaces shall have a back-up maneuvering space no less than twenty-two (22) feet, except where parking is angled, and which does not necessitate moving of other vehicles. This standard is met or exceeded, see Site Plan. 4. Parking lots with 50 spaces or more shall be divided into separate areas. Parking areas may be divided into separate areas by a building or group of buildings, landscape areas with walkways at least 10 feet in width, plazas, streets or driveways with street-like features. Street-like features, for the purpose of this section, means a raised sidewalk of at least five feet in width, six-inch curb, accessible curb ramps, street trees in planters or tree wells and pedestrian-oriented lighting. N/A 5. Parking areas shall be designed to minimize the adverse environmental and microclimatic impacts of surface parking through design and material selection. Parking'areas of more than seven parking spaces shall meet the following standards. a. Use at least one of the following strategies for the surface parking area, or put 50% of parking underground. i Use light colored paving materials with a high solar reflectance (Solar Reflective Index (SRI) of at least 29) to reduce heat absorption for a minimum of 50% of the parking area surface. ii. Provide porous solid surfacing or an open grid pavement system that is at least 50% pervious for a minimum of 50% of the parking area surface. iii. Provide at least 50% shade from tree canopy over the parking area surface within five years of project occupancy. iv. Provide at least 50% shade from solar energy generating carports, canopies or trellis structures over the parking area surface. All site improvements are already installed per previous approvals. The proposed building B fits within the existing approved footprint. There are no proposed changes to the approved site - design/layout since all improvements are installed based on previous approval including; parking, landscaping locations and public street, curb, park row, sidewalk improvements are installed. 10 b. Design parking lots and other hard surface areas in a way that captures and treats runoff with landscaped medians and swales. All site improvements are already installed per previous approvals including site detention. The proposed building fits in the existing approved footprint. There are no proposed changes to the approved site design/layout since all improvements surrounding the footprint including the parking, landscaping locations and public street, curb, park row, sidewalk improvements are installed. A bioswale is planned for the area between the existing Building A and the proposed Building B. C. Vehicular Access and Circulation. The intent of this section is to manage access to land uses and on-site circulation, and to preserve the transportation system in terms of safety, capacity and function. 1. Applicability. This section applies to all public streets within the City of Ashland and to all j properties that abut these streets. The standards apply when developments are subject to a planning action (e.g. Site Review, Conditional Use Permit, Land Partition, Performance Standards Subdivision). 2. Site Circulation. New development shall be required to provide a circulation system that accommodates expected traffic on the site. All on-site circulation systems shall incorporate street-like features as described in Section 18.92.090.A.3.c. Pedestrian connections on the site, including connections through large sites, and connections between sites and adjacent sidewalks must conform to the provisions of Section 18.92.090. Pedestrian connections are included on the site plan and meet the standards in this section. 3. Intersection and Driveway Separation. The distance from a street intersection to a driveway, or from a driveway to another driveway shall meet the minimum spacing requirements for the street' s classification in the Ashland Transportation System Plan (TSP). a. In no case shall driveways be closer than 24 feet as measured from the bottom of the existing or proposed apron wings of the driveway approach. N/A. b. Any partitioning or subdivision of property located in an R-2, R-3, C-1, E-1, CM or M-1 zone shall meet the controlled access standards set forth below. If applicable, cross access easements shall be required so that access to all properties created by the land division can be made from one or more points. Cross access and maintenance easements for ingress, egress and storm system usage are recorded in Jackson County per Recorded Plat 2007-70 signed by City Planner and City Surveyor, see plat. c. Street and driveway access points in an R-2, R-3, C-1, E-1 or M-1 zone shall be limited to the following: 1. Distance between driveways. on arterial streets -100 feet; on collector streets - 75 feet; on residential streets - 50 feet. NOV ®4 ~Q14 11 - The thresholds are already installed per previous approvals and meet or exceed the minimum separation distances. 2. Distance from intersections. ®4 ~01~1 on arterial streets - 100 feet; NOV on collector streets - 50 feet; on residential streets - 35 feet. The closest intersection is at Tolman Creek Road more than 1000 feet away from the subject parcel. d. Street and driveway access points in the CM zone are subject to the requirements of the Croman Mill District Standards. (Ord 3036, added, 08/17/2010) i Subject parcel is not zoned CM. e. Access Requirements for Multi-family Developments. N/A. 4. Shared Use of Driveways and Curb Cuts. a. Plans submitted for developments subject to a planning action shall indicate how driveway intersections with streets have been minimized through the use of shared driveways and shall indicate all necessary access easements. Where necessary from traffic safety and access management purposes, the City may require joint access and/or shared driveways in the following situations. L For shared parking areas; ii. For adjacent developments, where access onto an arterial is limited; and iii For multi-family developments, and developments on multiple lots. b. Developments subject to a planning action shall remove all curb cuts and driveway approaches not shown to be necessary for existing improvements or the proposed development. Cuts and approaches shall be replaced with standard curb, gutter or sidewalk as appropriate. All replacement shall be done under permit of the Engineering Division. c. If the site is served by a shared access or alley, access for motor vehicles must be from the shared access or alley and not from the street frontage. Cross access and maintenance easements for ingress, egress and storm system usage are recorded in Jackson County per Recorded Plat 2007-70 signed by City Planner and City Surveyor, see plat. D. Driveways and Turn-Arounds Design. Driveways and turn-arounds providing access to parking areas shall conform to the following provisions: 1. A driveway for a single dwelling shall have a minimum width of nine feet, and a shared driveway serving two units shall have a width of 12 feet. 2. Parking areas of more than seven parking spaces per lot shall be provided with adequate aisles or turn-around areas so that all vehicles may enter the street in a forward manner. 3. Parking areas of more than seven parking spaces shall be served by a driveway 20 feet in 12 c i width and constructed to facilitate the flow of traffic on or off the site, with due regard to pedestrian and vehicle safety, and shall be clearly and permanently marked and defined. Parking areas of seven spaces or less shall be served by a driveway 12 feet in width. 4. Vertical Clearances. Driveways, aisles, turn-around areas and ramps shall have a minimum vertical clearance of 13'6" for their entire length and width. 5. Vision Clearance. No obstructions may be placed in the vision clearance area except as set forth in Section 18.68.020. The project meets or exceeds these standards. i E. Parking and Access Construction and Maintenance. The development and maintenance as provided below, shall apply in all cases, except single-family dwellings. 1. Paving. All required parking areas, aisles, turn-arounds and driveways shall be paved with concrete, asphaltic, pervious paving, or comparable surfacing, constructed to standards on file in the office of the City Engineer. The project meets this standard. 2. Drainage. All required parking areas, aisles and turn-arounds shall have provisions made for the on-site collection of drainage waters to eliminate sheet flow of such waters onto sidewalks, public rights-of-way, and abutting private property. Private storm water detention facilities already exist and had been installed during Phase 1. This detention system was sized to accommodate full build out of the entire original 6-acre parcel; therefore the roof runoff will be hard piped to the existing system stubbed to the building footprint. See draft civil engineering plans. All related shared-use easements are in place and recorded. 3. Driveway approaches. Approaches shall be paved with concrete surfacing constructed to standards on file in the office of the City Engineer. Driveway approach already exists and was installed in 2007 with previous approvals. 4. Marking. Parking lots of more than seven spaces shall have all spaces permanently and clearly marked. The parking lot is installed, paved, with all spaces marked. 5. Wheel stops. Wheel stops shall be a minimum of four inches in height and width and six feet in length. They shall be firmly attached to the ground and so constructed as to withstand normal wear. Wheel stops shall be provided where appropriate for all spaces abutting property lines, buildings, landscaping, and no vehicle shall overhang a public right-of-way. The parking lot is installed with wheel stops.QU o 201 6. Walls and Hedges. a. Where parking abuts upon a street, a decorative masonry wall or evergreen hedge 13 screen of 30-42 inches in height and a minimum of 12" in width shall be established parallel to and not nearer than two feet from the right-of-way line. Screen planting shall be of such size and number to provide the required screening within 12 months after installation. The area between the wall or hedge and street line shall be landscaped. All vegetation shall be adequately maintained by a permanent irrigation system, and said wall or hedge shall be maintained in good condition. The required wall or screening shall be designed to allow for free access to the site and sidewalk by pedestrians. b. In all zones, except single-family zones, where parking facilities or driveways are located adjacent to residential or agricultural zones, school yards, or like institutions, a sight-obscuring fence, wall, or evergreen hedge not less than five feet, nor more than six feet high shall be provided on the property line as measured from the high grade side. Said wall, fence or hedge shall be reduced to 30 inches within required setback area, or within 10 feet of street property lines, and shall be maintained in good condition. Screen plantings shall be of such size and number to provide the required l screening within 12 months after installation. Adequate provisions shall be made to protect walls, fences or plant materials from being damaged by vehicles using said parking areas. No Screening required. 7. Landscaping. In all zones, all parking facilities shall include landscaping to cover not less than 7% of the area devoted to outdoor parking facilities, including the landscaping required in subdivision 6(a) above. Said landscaping shall be uniformly distributed throughout the parking area, be provided with irrigation facilities and protective curbs or raised wood headers. It may consist of trees, plus shrubs, ground cover or related material. A minimum of one tree per seven parking spaces is required. The existing site design and landscaping layouts throughout the site do not change. See previous approvals referenced on Page 1 of this application, which contain the entire landscaping layout and design plans. These improvements were all installed per the approved Site Plan. This application contains planting plans and irrigation plans solely for landscape beds surrounding Building B footprint. These were left unplanted in 2007 to allow contractors the space to build Building B. 8. Lighting of parking areas within 100 feet of property in residential zones shall be directed into or on the site and away from property lines such that the light element shall not be directly visible from abutting residential property. (Ord 2951, amended, 07/01/2008) No residential property is within 100 ft of the subject parcel. 18.92.090 Pedestrian Access and Circulation. The previously approved site plan was installed in 2007, (see previous approvals referenced on Pg 1 herein). No changes are proposed and the existing improvements provide pedestrian access and circulation. Some areas specific to the Building B construction will get new sidewalks, see plans. 14 OV 04 2014 0 4 2014 CHAPTER 18.72.070 SITE DESIGN & USE STANDARDS: A. All applicable City Ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development. The applicants are not requesting any exceptions or variances. B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met. As noted below, all requirements listed in the Site Review Chapter (18.72) have or will be complied with. Specifically, the landscaping will be irrigated and maintained, the trash/recycling area already exists and is screened and light and glare concerns will be addressed with down lighting and screening where necessary. C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for implementation of this Chapter. No changes to the previously approved and installed site are proposed. D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of-way shall comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options. All public utilities associated with the development of this property are accessed from Mistletoe Road. Adequate public facilities are available within the adjacent rights-of-way. All utilities are currently in place within the site and stubbed to Building B footprint. No new connections are required in the Public right of way. Sewer, water, power, data, phone are already onsite and stubbed to the footprint of Building B. The applicant installed Private stormwater detention facilities in 2007. This system was designed to accommodate stormwater from the entire 6-acre site when fully developed, therefore Building B roof runoff will be hard piped to the stubbed stormline at the footprint See the previously approved engineering plans and the engineering plans attached herein for reference. The project team, architect, civil engineer, structural engineer and landscape architect indicate that there appears to be no issues preventing the construction of Building B on the approved footprint. Applicants have addressed or will address, at the time of the building permit, all code issues relating to the Ashland Building Department, Public Works/Engineering Department, and/or Fire Department. Please reference previous approvals for engineering plans relating to the entire site. Section 18.72.110 Landscaping Standards: MI : 10% of total developed lot area No changes are proposed to the original Site approval including existing/approved landscaping beds. The proposed building fits within the approved footprint. Therefore, no changes have been made to the % landscaping, which exceeded 10% at the time of approval and will continue that way. i Section 18.72.115: Recycling Requirements All commercial and multi-family developments, requiring a site review as indicated in 15 18.72.040, shall provide an opportunity-to-recycle site for use of the project occupants. A. Commercial. Commercial developments having a solid waste receptacle shall provide a site of equal or greater size adjacent to or with access comparable to the solid waste receptacle to accommodate materials collected by the local solid waste franchisee under its on-route collection program for purposes of recycling. Both the opportunity-to-recycle site and the common solid waste receptacle shall be screened by fencing or landscaping such as to limit the view from adjacent properties or public rights-of-way. Screened and gated Waste & Recycling area is installed already per the previous approval. 18.72.140 Light and Glare Performance Standards There shall be no direct illumination of any residential zone from a lighting standard in any other residential lot, C-1, E-1 or M-1, SO, or HC lot. Any lighting will be building mounted with downward cast light. No residential zones are in proximity to the subject parcel. 18.72.150 Review by Conservation Coordinator A. Upon receiving an application for a Site Review, the Staff Advisor shall refer the application to the Conservation Coordinator for comment. B. Prior to final approval of a site plan, the Conservation Coordinator shall file an oral or written report to be entered into the record of the proceedings consisting of: 1. An assessment of the energy use estimates by the applicant. 2. An assessment of the applicant's energy use strategies. 3. Recommendations to the applicant of cost-effective methods to further reduce energy consumption, if any exist. See architectural and civil engineer plans for details. SITE REVIEW & USE STANDARDS 18.72.080 (1992 and Revised 2012) SECTION II-A ORDINANCE LANDSCAPING REQUIREMMENTS This section requires 10% landscaping in this M-1 zone. No changes are proposed to the original Site design approvals referenced on Pg 1. No changes are proposed to the size or layout of all the Site landscape beds. Attached with this application are a planting, irrigation, and bioswale plan for those beds directly adjacent to the Building B footprint. These were the only beds left unplanted in 2007 to allow for construction activity of Building B. SECTION 11-B NOV 0 4 2014 MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT N/A SECTION II-C COMMERCIAL, EMPLOYMENT, & INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT; BASIC SITE REVIEW STANDARDS 16 f C-1a)Orientation and Scale 1) Buildings shall have their primary orientation toward the street rather than the parking area. Building entrances shall be oriented toward the street and shall be accessed from a public sidewalk. Where buildings are located on a corner lot, the entrance shall be oriented toward the higher order street or to the lot corner at the intersection of the streets. Public sidewalks shall be provided adjacent to a public street along the street frontage. Buildings shall be located as close to the intersection corner as practicable. (Amended September 23, 2003 Ordinance #2900) 2) Building entrances shall be located within 20 feet of the public right of way to which they are required to be oriented. Exceptions may be granted for topographic constraints, lot configuration, designs where a greater setback results in an improved access or for sites with multiple buildings, such as shopping centers, where this standard is met by other buildings. Automobile circulation or parking shall not be allowed between the building and the right- of-way. The entrance shall be designed to be clearly visible, functional, and shall be open to the public during all business hours. (Amended September 23, 2003 Ordinance #2900) 3) These requirements may be waived if the building is not accessed by pedestrians, such as warehouses and industrial buildings without attached offices, and automotive service stations. (Amended September 23, 2003 Ordinance #2900) The submitted building elevations show the building oriented towards Mistletoe Road. There are attractive and functional main entrances with sidewalks leading to these main entrances from the street and with connections to the parking areas. The applicants have designed this new building using the setbacks standard approved in the original planning action PA 2004-075 "Section 2 Conclusory Findings" Paragraph 2.4. which stated, the "Planning Commission finds that the project complies with the 25 front yard setback standard in the MI -zone. The commission finds that buildings proposed for Phase II will be permitted to base their setback measurement from the dedicated portion of the right-of-way or final curb location". No change to the footprint of Building B is proposed. All other M1 setback standards are met. C-1-b) Streetscape 1) One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of frontage for that portion of the development fronting the street. i Street trees are proposed along the frontage of Mistletoe Road are already installed along with the park row itself. C-1-c) Landscaping 1. Landscaping shall be designed so that 50% coverage occurs after one year and 90% coverage occurs after 5 years. 17 V 0 4 2014 t 2. Landscaping design shall utilize a variety of low water use and deciduous and evergreen trees and shrubs and flowering plant species. 3. Buildings adjacent to streets shall be buffered by landscaped areas at least 10 feet in width, except in the Ashland Historic District and Detail Site Review Zone. Outdoor storage areas shall be screened from view from adjacent public rights-of-way, except in M-1 zones. Loading facilities shall be screened and buffered when adjacent to residentially zoned land. 4. Irrigation systems shall be installed to assure landscaping success. 5. Efforts shall be made to save as many existing healthy trees and shrubs on the site as possible. Laurie Sager, Landscape Architect, designed the planting, irrigation, and bioswale plans for those beds surrounding Building B footprint. All other beds were installed per previously approved plan in 2007. A professional landscape company will install improvements. The submitted plans comply with the above standards, as will any necessary detail drawings at building permit stage. C-1-d) Parking 1) Parking areas shall be located behind buildings or on one or both sides. 2) Parking areas shall be shaded by deciduous trees, buffered from adjacent non- residential uses and screened from non-residential uses. Parking is located to the sides and rear of the structure; the parking lot is installed already with parking lot trees. There are no adjacent residential zones, which would trigger additional screening or buffering standards. The closest residential zone is approximately 400 feet away with several buildings in between. C-1-e) Designated Creek Protection 1) Designated creek protection areas shall be considered design elements and incorporated in the overall design of a given project. 2) Native riparian plant materials shall be planted in the adjacent to the creek to enhance the creek habitat. Not applicable. There is no creek associated with the subject property. V 04 2014 C-14) Noise and Glare 1) Special attention to glare (AMC18.72.110) and noise (AMC9.08.170(c) & AMC 9.08.175) shall be considered in the project design to insure compliance with these Standards. 4 The proposed uses permitted in this zone will not generate noise beyond what is legally permitted. The loading areas are in the rear. Regarding glare, the applicant is proposing wall-mounted lights 18 t for the project directed downward to avoid direct impact on neighboring properties. There are no adjacent residential zones, which would trigger additional screening or buffering standards. C-1-g) Expansions of Existing Sites and Buildings 1) For sites which do not conform to these requirements, an equal percentage of the site must be made to comply with these standards as the percentage of building expansion, e.g., if the building area is to expand by 25%, then 25% of the site must be brought up to the standards required by. this document. No expansion or change to the site is proposed. No building is being expanded. The proposed new Building B fits within the originally approved footprint and will not exceed max heights in the zone. In the event Staff interprets this new building as an expansion (although it was approved in original approval) the proposed 6,500sf building represents approximately 12% more structures on the site when calculated against the existing 70,000 sf of self storage and 7,000 sf office building. C-2; DETAILED SITE REVIEW N/A to this project since project is not located in the detailed site review zone. C-3; ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR LARGE SCALE PROJECTS N/A to this project since project is not in downtown or the detailed site review zones. D; PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING & SCREENING STANDARDS All parking lots, which for purposes of this section include areas of vehicle maneuvering, parking, and loading, shall be landscaped and screened as follows: D-1) Screening at Required Yards 1) Parking abutting a required landscaped front or exterior yard shall incorporate a sight obscuring hedge screen into the required landscaped yard. 2) The screen shall grow to be at least 36 inches higher than the finished grade of the parking area, except for required vision clearance areas. 3) The screen height may be achieved by a combination of earth mounding and plant materials. 4) Elevated parkinglots shall screen both the parking lot and retaining wall. No parking lot screening is required on this project. V 0 4 D-2) Screening Abutting Property Lines Parking abutting a property line shall be screened by a 5' landscaped strip. Where a buffer between zones is required, the screening shall be incorporated into the required buffer strip and will not be an additional requirement. The property lines between the subject parcel and taxlot 1200 is located in the middle of the shared parking lot drive alley, which is fully paved along these east/west property line. There are landscaping planters buffering the buildings between parking lots and the structures themselves as well as throughout the parking areas and street frontage. All per the approved plans. 19 D-3) Landscape Standards: 1) Parking lot landscaping shall consist of a minimum of 7% of the total parking area plus a ratio of 1 tree for each seven parking spaces to create a canopy effect. All Parking lot landscaping are installed per approved plans in 2007. See the previous approvals referenced in Pg 1 and associated landscape plans. This application is not to modify the parking site at all, and therefore contains planting plans and irrigation plans only for those landscape beds directly adjacent to the footprint of Building B. These beds exist already but have not yet been planted to allow contractors space to construct'Building B. 2) The tree species shall be an appropriate large canopied shade tree and shall be selected from the street tree list to avoid root damage to pavement and utilities, and damage from droppings to parked cars and pedestrians. i The parking lot trees are already installed per previously approved plans. All trees planted were from the City's adopted street tree list, which includes a variety of tree species and those recommended for parking lots. 3) The tree shall be planted in a landscaped area such that the tree bole is a least 2 feet from any curb or paved area. All trees are planted with a setback at least 2' from hardscape. 4) The landscaped area shall be planted with shrubs and/or living ground cover to assure 50% coverage within 1 year and 90% within 5 years. The landscaping throughout the site is installed per previously approved plans, with the exception of those beds immediately adjacent to Building B. The planting and irrigation plans for those beds are attached with this application. The bed layout does not change from the previous approval. 5) Landscaped areas shall be evenly distributed throughout the parking area and parking perimeter at the required ratio. See previously approved site plan. All landscaping layout does not change from that approved plan. 6) That portion of a required landscaped yard, buffer strip or screening strip abutting parking stalls may be counted toward required parking lot landscaping but only for those stalls abutting landscaping as long as the tree species, living plant material, coverage and placement distribution criteria are also met. Front or exterior yard landscaping may not be substituted for the interior landscaping required for interior parking stalls. No change to the previously approved landscaping bed layout or parking landscaping is proposed. D-4) Residential Screening: N/A - no adjacent residential areas. D-5) Hedge Screening: N/A. No Hedge screening required. OV 04 2011 20 D-6) Other Screening 1) Other screening and buffering shall be provided as follows: Refuse Container Screen: Refuse containers or disposable areas shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood fence or masonry wall from five to eight feet in height. All refuse materials shall be contained within the refuse area. The project's refuse area is located in the rear of the property in close proximity to the western edge of the northernmost self storage building constructed in phase 1 and will be screened with a wood or masonry wall that will be at least five feet in height. Service Corridor Screen: When adjacent to residential uses, commercial and industrial service corridors shall be screened. Siting and design of such service areas shall reduce the adverse effects of noise, odor and visual clutter upon adjacent residential uses. No service corridors are proposed with this application. Light and Glare Screen: Artificial lighting shall be so arranged and constructed as to not produce direct glare on adjacent residential properties or streets. The applicant is proposing wall-mounted lights for the project. OV 04 20111 E STREET TREE STANDARDS: All development fronting on public or private streets shall be required to plant stmt trees in accordance with the following standards and chosen from the recommended list of street trees found in this section. E-1) Location for Street Trees Street trees shall be located behind the sidewalk except in cases where there is a designated planting strip in the right of-way, or the sidewalk is greater shall include irrigation, root barriers, and generally conform to the standard established by the Department of Community Development. All Street tress are installed per previously approved landscape plans. E-2) Spacing, Placement, and Pruning of Street Trees All tree spacing may be made subject to special site conditions, which may, for reasons such as safety, affect the decision. Any such proposed special condition shall be subject to the Staff Advisor's review and approval. The placement, spacing, and pruning of street trees shall be as follows: a) Street trees shall be placed the rate of one tree for every 30 feet of street frontage. Trees shall be evenly spaced, with variations to the spacing permitted for specific site limitations, such as driveway approaches. All Street tress are installed per previously approved landscape plans. b) Trees shall not be planted closer than 25 feet from the curb line of intersections of streets or alleys, and not closer than 10 feet from private driveways (measured at the back edge of the 21 t sidewalk), fire hydrants, or utility poles. All trees are installed per previously approved landscape plans. See Landscape plans within this application for new trees located between Building B and previously construction Building A. c) Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards. Except for public safety, no new light standard location shall be positioned closer than 10 feet to any existing street tree, and preferably such locations will be at least 20 feet distant. The proposed buildings will have light fixtures on the fagade of the building. It is the applicant's contention the proposed lights will provide for a safe and comfortable pedestrian environment. d) Trees shall not be planted closer than 21/ feet from the face of the curb except at intersections where it shall be 5 feet from the curb, in a curb return area. All trees to be planted on-site will be at least 21/2 feet from the face of curb. The street trees are already installed per previous approvals. e) Where there are overhead powerlines, tree species are to be chosen that will not interfere with those lines. The applicants has and will choose trees from the Street Tree List that have not going to interfere with any overhead power lines or any other type of overhead utility. Please note that the utilities along the applicant's entire street frontage have been installed by the applicant and are located underground, within the site and are currently stubbed underground to the footprint of Building B. f) Trees shall not be planted within 2 feet of any permanent hard surface paving or walkway. Sidewalk cuts in concrete for trees shall be at least 25 square feet, however, larger cuts are encouraged because they allow additional air and water into the root system and add to the health of the tree. Tree wells shall be covered by tree grates in accordance with city specifications. All trees where planted per previously approved plans. Any new trees in the bed between Building B and Building A will meet this standard, see attach planting plan for Building B. No grated tree installations are proposed. g) Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least 8 feet of clearance above sidewalks and 12 feet above street roadway surfaces. The existing trees per previous approved plans are installed. Any proposed trees and their placement have been chosen by a professional landscape architect with the intent to provide a nicely landscaped site that also complies with the above standard. The applicants intend to have the landscaping periodically maintained by a professional landscape company. h) Existing trees may be used as street trees if there will be no damage from the development which will kill or weaken the tree. Sidewalks of variable width and elevation may be utilized to save existing street trees, subject to approval by the Staff Advisor. 22 Nov 0 4 2014 Existing street trees exist and will not be affected by the construction since they are protected by the existing 5' sidewalk in place onsite. E-3) Replacement of Street Trees 1) Existing street trees removed by development projects shall be replaced by the developer with those from the approved street tree list. The replacement trees shall be of size and species similar to the trees that are approved by the Staff Advisor. No tree exists on the site that is proposed for removal. E-4) Recommended Street Trees 1) Street trees shall conform to the street tree list approved by the Ashland Tree Commission. The applicants have chosen the street trees from the adopted Street Tree List so that they do not interfere with overhead power lines or any other type of overhead utility. The tree chosen is appropriate to the urban environment of the area. Section III WATER CONSERVING LANDSCAPING GUIDELINES AND POLICIES The applicant and the applicant professional landscape designer understand the Advice and Recommendations area of this Section. The landscape plan incorporates as much of this area as possible. Mandatory Policies: General & Miscellaneous: The combined turf or water areas (i.e. pools, ponds and fountains) shall be limited to 20% of the landscaped areas. Turf limitations do not apply to public parks, private common open space, required outdoor recreation areas, golf courses, cemeteries and school recreation areas. No Turf, pools or ponds are proposed. A minimum of two inches of mulch (neither large nuggets nor fine bark may be used) shall be added in non-turf areas to the soil surface after planting. The applicants understand and agree with the above requirement. Non-porous material shall not be placed under the mulch. The applicants understand and agree with the above requirement. All fountains shall be designed to recycle their water. N/A Turf is restricted to slopes less than 10% grade. N/A NOV, 0 4 2011f 23 Plants At least 90% of plants in the non-turf areas are to be listed as drought tolerant in the Sunset Western Garden book, or be similarly well suited for this climate of region as determined by the Staff Advisor. Up to 10% of the plants may be of a non-drought tolerant variety or species as long as they are grouped together and can be irrigated separately from the drought tolerant plants. Screening hedges must be planted to attain 50% coverage after two years. Water conserving designs are not required to meet the standard of 50% coverage within one year. However, they must meet the coverage standard for plantings of 90% after 5 years. The entire site was planted in 2007 per approved plans, except those specific beds laid out around the footprint of Building B. The attached Landscape plans show planting and irrigation plans for those existing beds surrounding Building B and will meet this standard. Irrigation Irrigation systems shall be designed so that overspray is minimized. For sprinkler-irrigated areas, perimeter sprinklers must be included in the irrigation pattern. Sprinkler heads with a precipitation rate of .85 inches per hour or less shall be used on slopes exceeding 15% to minimize run-off, or when slope exceeds 10% within 10 feet of hardscape. Precipitation rates are to be matched for all irrigation heads for each circuit. The same type of irrigation heads shall be used for each circuit. Valves and circuits shall be separated based on water use. Drip irrigation systems are required for trees unless within lawn areas. Serviceable check valves (or pressure compensating emitters for drip systems) are required where an elevation difference greater than 20 feet exists on any circuit. Sprinkler head spacing shall be designed for head-to-head coverage. The system shall be designed to minimize runoff and overspray to non-irrigated areas. All irrigation systems shall be equipped with a controller capable of dual or multiple programming. Controllers must have multiple cycle start capacity and a flexible calendar program. Controllers must allow seven day or greater timing cycles. See attached Landscape plans for details. Topography No more than 5% of landscaped area of any lot or project may be berms or raised beds higher than one foot unless there is demonstrated need for sound or safety barrier. All plantings on berms one foot or greater in height must be drought tolerant. Only drip irrigation is allowed on berms more than 1 foot in height. If allowed, berms must be no taller than 1/6 of their width. See Landscape plans for details, no berms are proposed. Landscape Plans are required that include, in addition to the. Standard plan requirements, the following: The area irrigated (in square feet). Precipitation rates for each valve circuit. Monthly irrigation schedule for the plant establishment period (6-12 months) and for the firs year thereafter. A watering schedule for each circuit from the plan must be posted inside the corresponding controller. A grading plan with sufficient contours so that slope may be measured. For lots with less than 5,000 square feet of landscaped area no grading plan is required. See the Landscape and Site plans submitted with the application. 24 OV 04 2011 Exhibits Attached: • Architectural Site plan for the area surrounding Building B. The overall site was previously approved and no changes are proposed to those original site plan approvals referenced on Pg 1. • Civil Engineering Site Plan incl. improvements, topo, public and private utilities for Building B pad. All infrastructure is installed and stubbed to Building B footprint. See previously approved engineering plans in applications referenced on Pg 1. • Landscape Planting & Irrigation Plan for Building B beds. All other landscaping plans are contained in previous approvals referenced on Pg 1. • Architectural Elevations and Floorplans to depict that that the building fits within the existing approved footprint for Building B but has a difference design appearance from the previously approved concept for Building B. • ALTA survey exists and was submitted to Staff for reference during the Pre-App. W V 04 2014 25 NOTIFICgT/p rc 'Y MISTLETOE BUSINESS PARK s a 0' 696 MISTLETOE ROAD PRELIMINARY UTILITY, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN CAU- 48 HOURS BEFOfE YOU M PROJECCT~LcG.4FlLW 8m mm Z. "T oN I ~ II~ I I / a ~ ~ w so I P9 j -I zo h H q~- I plll I t ~~~~Im----•. ~ ~ 1R ~ ~OF W z Am EXISnG FlRf NORTH _ - HYDRANT I 1119 _ _1- 9 1 _ I rF NOT TO SCALE 991:'I~I ~~7r I ~A a r-j~ I NT/Q If, z b ~m ~XISL NG ELEC. VICINITY MAP ? w o EX ELECLINE o 4~J00"E 135.60' N86 1 PROPERTY LINE nosy EX. SD INLET z r I ~ I EXI571NG`FARiE CO Cn Q III / / 0 0 9 y / to ~K•/,~ 0.24 EX 0.~4% --2% ~~29> Ems- Ifl / / h I 0 0 0 0 0 0 E o f - l a EXISTING STORM DRAIN EXISTING SANITARY I I " ADA 15 SEWER SERVICE I iI EG I'ol / PROPOSED BUILDING I 7 SERVICE LINE w I G Ex. ss sRVdl~ 5L65 696 MISTLETOE I G5 FG 2061-65 FIN. FLR EXISTING 3 I sPis ~,II Eq~e/YlII ELECTRICAL CONDUIT GARAGE SERVICE LINE I / r I ry DOOR I II / / ml PI Q I m $ E 5R 61.65 AC PVVT, TRANSIRON II I~ I / / m l I I FG FOR GARAGE ACCESS I x ilk / I o51.57 '.'~~1_- ~I VI / ryI I EcN PROPOSED 2Y EXISTING FIRE SERVICE LINE m a~~ll f' I BIO-SWALE ~I IIII / ti~~ / e o_ I l III L 511 9 EXISTING WATER METER I II EXIS77NG 10' P.U.E. _ I III N I EXISTING SIDEV'IALK SD SRVC.-1 ~I / ~m / I m a W l III o ~ ~ II m _ Ad / I NOTES: II QW~~G~ ryl o Ilu Iy __a / / I o ~i e e e e I II n EXlSDNG )OP.U.E I. PLEASE REFERENCE ALL PREVIOUS APPROVALS AND II III ~v IA I ~II / / I ENGINEERING PLANS FOR ENTIRE SITE DESIGNS, THIS DESIGN IS PRP{jx" Or SPECIFIC TO BUILDING "B" CONSRUCTION PROJECT. ml I / / I 2. STORM DRAIN DETENTION: ~ !I I it d / HYDRANT /R i THE STORM DRAIN DETENTION SYSTEM CONSTRUCTED WITH P, Q It vc) hl m l p / MISTLETOE MINI STORAGE PHASE WAS SIZED, CITY APPROVED w p AND INSTALLED FOR ALL PHASES OF THE MISTLETOE ROAD ~ra l pl_ II I BUSINESS PARK. ass ea o 'a ~EXIsTING PARKINEXI5nNC RRE VERIFY SCALES!!! ``"~-A- C fRVICE VAULT EX ~ ILIA TER MAIN NO. RfVSICN DATE BY 3 faa. I l I I nl P NOV 44 201 ®RTH I II y4 ~ q~ EXISTING PARKING ~~P 7 CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS, INC, GRAPHIC SCALE MISTLETOE ROAD BUSINESS PARK I I ` - b ~ _ - - - ExisnNC ENCLOSED caeeACE / 696 MISTLETOE ROAD BUILDING Zo o to m eo aJ I I I & RECYCLING CENTER / l I PRELIMINARY UTILITY, GRADING _ - / AND DRAINAGE PLAN I ) 1 OF 1 IN FEET I Inch = 20 It NAUG 9R-vpnM-e9Qaro -c no-m- np/t. a STUCCO r T.D. PARAPET -25.60') _ EL 25'1D' -(25 BY 68 WATER STREET a 2ND. FL GILD. ASHLAND,OR EL.2V-0-(23W) ~~ll sTo TEL.: 541.488.8200 PRELIMINARY 5 If Iv I ~ - THES NOT BE E DRAWINGS USED FOR: 3 _ BIDDING k III III I~k.~ Ii .Ill, - 111 - CONSTRUCTION RECORDATION I Ik 111111, kTl' IIIIi L II .,j SECOND FLOOR CONVEYANCE 1 T.O. FIN. n ISSUANCE OFA PERMIT I fr III ) k i~l~ II G ' I 3 I I I I t I I I I ELW-0•(14.BD) Is T.FILa SCHEMATIC I IkL l Ir I ~ - ~ - ~ 11 ~ _ II II I~~II'11~ it ~ ~i' 1 ~IIIII ' I I - - Eu ~•'1z.oo m f t Ii r G I ki III k ~ I I ~-III~II II~1 I I kI 11 II ~ I 'I k I. ti w METAL SIDING TO MATCH (N)ADJACENf I,, I 111 I 11 I i 1 ''qtr( T t 8 BUILDING, COLOR TO BE SELECTED. k I~ I 1 11i'I it 1 ir1I 1 1II ' IIk I IkI II I I Ilil 1~ I~I; 7 ~II~ 1 T k 17 1 k 1 Ikll.. Il I I I I '1 ' 1 1 r ,k~' I I I I ri l I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I'I~ I 1 1~ :'.r` 9 ~ ) ~ II Ik ,'ll II I Ill, I! ~11 ~ I I ~ f _ ~ I I°I II 1 11. II I ) 11 h Ijk II II ~ I 1111111 ii ~il 1 I ~ L - ~ - FIRST FLOOR • EL.0 W(0. GRICK "I'll HATCHED, TYP, MATCH (EX) BRICK AT ADJACENT BUILDING CONCRETE STEM WALLIBASE, TYP. N NORTH ELEVATION. m 4 is m a SHEET METAL PARAPET M CAP AND FLASHING TO W MATCH CLEAR ANODIZED FINISH,TYP. T.O. PARAPET n Z EL. 25 ,0'(25.BY) EL Za NO. FI eL V m t i-i i 1 ) 1 r Y 1 ,,f- - - - - - - - - - - - '•0•23.oo) ' Zm 0 f i~ n ° 1 ik I lplll II~ ACCENTBAND SHOWN HATCHED, TYP METAL SIDING TO MATCH (N) ADJACENT BUILDING. COLOR TO BE 1 I 1 I~Ik III 2 SELECTED. W 2 _ I ' I 1 i~ I~ ~1i111~ m „ = III~~ III ~III~ I' I'.w w~ W W 0 d CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM Z U) -1 1 ~II I I I ~I1 f If W SYSTEM,TYP. STOREFRONT WNOOWIDOOR 1~ I lI, I I I SECOND FLOOR a I~~~t 1k k~ ! L~ I IU I' I~~I III [1). LO.FIN. 0Y EL.14'-0"(14.00') ~ ' P 1ST. FLCLG, ` W Y - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EL. ,121 BRICKSHOVJNDASHED, T1'P. MATCH (E%)QADJAGE6 °'.SLDINO 696 x PPAIR FY-WXB'-0' STOREFRONT 2(.0 02 DOORS m_ REVISIONS NOV 04 2014 E I_ a_ 1 ~ FIRST FLOOR ~ - T.O. FIN, y EXTERIOR 9 STANDARD THREE COAT ELEVATIONS STUCCO SYSTEM, TYP. e PROJECT: 14-021 ISSUE DATE: 0948-14 3 E WEST ELEVATION. SHEET: v N 14 '-0A6.9 Y a N O Q T.O. PARAPET P EL. 25 10° (25.83')-~l E 66 WATER STREET E _ 2ND, FL CLG.-. n ASHLAND, OR 4 r~ - EL 23'-0•(23.00')23.00') 97620 i TEL.: 541,488.8200 I I ij, I 1 I I ~ I it ~ II~ ( i i ~ I l I I7 I i I 2 I I ~ I I I I~ I I I t I' I J ~j ' I I ! i PRELIMINARY I II D 'll THESE DRAWINGS SHALL I I1 NOT BE USED FOR: BIDDING RECORDATION METAL SIDING TO MATCH (N) ADJACENT SECOND FLOOR o (tl I) I ( ..I CONVEYANCE BUILDING, COLOR TO BE SELECTED C r. T.O. FIN. ISSUANCE OFAPERMIT Q SCHEMATIC , 1z1ST. FL CLC. - oi - - 2.00 ti 4n 6 6 STANDARD THREE COAT STUCCO " u SYSTEM,TYP.q Ii _ FIRST FLOOR m BRICK SHOWN HATCHED, TYP. A'ATCH(EX) BRICK AT ADJACENT BUILDING Q r 3 SOUTH ELEVATION. N 114 1-0`m Y n 'WFT T.R. PARAPET Z EL 25'-10° (25.83') Q J /jk II i?iiiI 2NO.FLac. (D i i IiI_T IA J I I R J j1 I~„ 1 1 I `-7~ I i c - I VIII jll EL23'-O'(23.W)" z f I I l f ! CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM Q I E STOREFRONT WINDOW SYSTEM, TYP. J ~ I L II I ' I. _ W 0 i.l I I.i C _ r I~ I I ~I ail I ,ail m r METAL BIDING TO MATCH(N)ADJACENT W J BUILDING, COLOR TOBE SELECTED. SECOND LOON :D U) =jir TTTT 17 EL.14'-0'(14 ry Y 2 L I~~ I J I' { 1 $ ~ III IJt~ 1&T.FLCLO. J Z _ I r~ 1, EL 12'-0'(12.ar) BCD ~ FRAMED CANOPY WISHEET METAL FINISH, TYP OF (3). LI _ f l I' l l l i REVISIONS a (I 114 it III i ~i Ili I Iii STANDARD THREE COAT STUCCO 1 ~i SYSTEM,TYP, - 1 . - I t('- STEEL COIL UPDOOR y1 I: 1, ;I 1 u ~ I I FIRST FLOOR _ _ n T.O.FIN. 04 2014 -E L. 0 ~I EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS PROJECT: 14-021 E ISSUE DATE: 09.1844 SA EAST ELEVATION. SHEET: N 1]4.1-0 A6.10 a N U Z r U F PUE C Q Q N co ® w FF- O ( a i~ o Z 0 01 ~ P(E)LANDSCAPE Nom" E- W (E)LANDSCAPE W Q d. w I Z' U LU 9 t- N 0V) 1 (P) SIDEWALK S SLV O = lv DRIP/SHRUBS _ = Z O N 36PSI - III - IRRIGATION LEGEND NOTES GENERAL: Mainline- I"Schedule4O PVC: Locations of mainline, laterals, and valves are diagmmatie only. Locate - - - - - - - - - -I-{r ( i I Lateral line- 34" Schedule 40 PVC, except as noted these in planting areas where feasible. Do not locate valve boxes under r I LI dripline of trees, Avoid locating in herdscape areas. z ( 1) 1 Dripline - Netafim 24" Spacing Lateral lines shall be buried at a depth of 12" minimum. Mainline shall be (E) LANDSCAPE P.O.C Point of connection burled at a depth of 18" minimum. P> eulLmNc © Existing Controller- RainbirdESPModular Connect irrigation into existing mainline afterBacknowPreventerfor700 ~i Mistletoe. RainBird PGA Series Connect irrigation into existing RainblydESP Modular Controller for 700 Shut-Off Valve Mistletoe. SLEEVING: ( "V - (Controller-Zone Number) 1 Use Type Contractor shall verify sleeving locations and coordinate with general ( 1+ Q (Valve size) Pressure (PSI) contractor. Sleeves shall be installed under all hardscape areas for irrigation DRIpISNRUas 2 CIS ThW 1" at a min. depth of 12 35 PSI STATE of d -Zones identified by color _ I OREGON 3 / RF[ 4''- F (E) Water Meter and Backflow Prevenler I o 9 U auna baeer o±eam sleeve-2' Schedule 40 PVC a d~ CAPE AEG o + I I I I II DRIP IRRIGATION NOTES Q 4" clear from adjacent hardscape GENERAL; Finish grade/top of mulch of ~~l I Revision Dale: W _ 1.Dltubing shall tersinstalled PVC SCH 40 Tee ( I IL_ _ _ _ ear from Buried Lateral parallel along planters ( (as shown) and Netafim inllne drip tubing 0 , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - ~adjacenthartlscape Line shall be Drip tubing capped attheends. J 3 - - - Drip tubing shall be installed at4 - ~ - ~ 24"max. 2. p g PVC SCH 40 nipple I F o - - from adjacent hardscape at _ spacing perpendicular or parallel relationships PVC SCH 40 oil Netafm In-Line Swing Joint l and on top of the topsoil but below PVC SCH 40 street ell ' ~ _ NOTES; _ 1IX17Scele:l'=16'-0" ~r~~~mg,orequal Tubing connection; mulch. Funny pipe DRIwsHRUSS 3 _ _ _ _ See Detail 3. Drip lines shall be spaced at 24" (length as required) ss PSI 1„ (E) LANDSCAPE 24X36 Scale: I' = 8'-0" _ -BIOSWAL€ - -1 PRINT IN COLOR O.C. maximum and route to avoid any PVC lateral pipe - 1. Triangulate drip tubing emitters and stake in place, utilities. 8 ( I - - - 2.Use 4. Connect all tubing to laterals using elbows where necessary, PVC SCH 40slreetell (p)sHIrTOFFVALVE 1 ( - - - - - - - ~ I 3.Cover tubing with 3" of mulch fallowing installation. connection. POINT OF CONNECTION _ -O,i _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ \ _ \ _ _ _ - _ - ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ + - - - = as L I _ _ _ _ J - - - - 3 i 4. Follow manufadurersspecifications. (E)SIDEWALK 1 LANDSCAPE IN-LINE DRIP 2 SWING JOINT TUBING DETAIL - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I (E) WATER METER FOR 700 MISTLETOE I 1 1 7 1 a (E) BACKFLOW FOR O 700 MISTLETOE 1 0 E) LANDSCAPE w Z (E)SIDEWALN (E) SIDEWALK - O 0 1.- 0 C J 0 + ( ~ z (E) CONTROLLER FOR 700 MISTLETOE 10 '0 Q (E) BUILDING 700 MISTLETOE 700 NOTE: November 4, 2014 LOCATION OF MAINLINE AND VALVES DIAGRAMMATIC. ALL IRRIGATION MAIN LINE 0 B 1e 24 AND VALVES TO BE PLACED 6" FROM SIDEWALK EDGE IN PLANTING AREAS. IN 1 IRRIGATION PLAN Lm2,0 U Z N H U W r PLANT LEGEND PUE U p TREES Symbol SdenGSo Name Co.- Neme Size N FRAX FRAXINUS OXYCARPA RAYWOODASH 1-j'CAL 0 PINO PINUS N. 'OREGON GREEN OREGON GREEN COMPACT AUSTRIAN PINE 4'TALL -,11/' X111/I 0 SHRUBS AND GROUNCOVER5 - / ❑ Q` Symbol Sdem[r. Name Common Neme Size ~ Z Q BERC BERBERIS'CRIMSON PYGMY' CRIMSON PYGMY BARBERRY IGAL / Z CALK CALAMAGROSTIS'KARL FOERSTER' KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS iGAL i/ GENP GENISTAPILOSA YELLOW BROOM 1GALQ5'-0'OC + N C9 2GAL F W W LIGT LIGUSTRUM TEXANUM TEXANUM PRIVET MAHR MAHONIAREPENS CREEPING OREGON GRAPE 1GAL (E)WdDSCAPE 3-VIED BIKE t'ARKING (E)LANDSCAPE p°. Q Lu PENP PENNISETUM'PIGLET' PIGLET FOUNTAIN GRASS 1GAL SEESITE PLAN W W 0 NBO VIBURNUM DAVIDII DAVIDII VIBURNUM 2GAL % 2-LIGT U F- p 3-cr Q 0 ~ '9EEDETAIL 3FOR BIOBWALEWETZONE PLANT MATERIAL AND COUNT u 00 y Z NOTES _ W Q ~ g 1. INSTALL AUTOMATED IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN ALL PLANTING AREAS. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ~..1. (P) SIDEWALK QCL ~ Q 0 SHALL PROVIDE A DETAILED IRRIGATION PLAN PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. z a N 2. REMOVEGRAVELAND DEBRIS FROM ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED AND DISPOSE OFF OF SITE. a J TILL COAIPACTEDSUBGRADE TO DEPTH OF V N B B V V V V V V V 3. IMPORT COMPOSTITOPSOIL BLEND FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS, AFTER SAMPLE APPROVAL BY OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. FILL PLANTING AREAS TO 3" BELOW FINISH GRADE. 4. INSTALL SOIL IN W LIFTS AND TILL THOROUGHLY TO BLEND WITH EXISTING SOIL, w 5. PLANT ALL TREES AND SHRUBS PER DETAILS 283./ - 7 6. MULCH ALL PLANTING AREAS AFTER PLANTING W! 3' MULTI BARK AVAILABLE AT HILTON FUEL. 7. WRAP TREE TRUNKS WITH'TREE WRAW AVAILABLEATTHE GRANGE COOP, OR EQUAL, TO ` B 3-LIGT ,l 7( PREVENT SUN SCALD, REMOVE AFTER FIRST YEAR IN FALL. 8-BERC ((I w - B-GENP 6-CALK / IL11' z L 1-PING b-CALK 1 4'oad~ I PH-Hsxa aoc5-fLk. iaMOmYle atQredbn olLA Ridbdndl'deeP Pea ererell.a 4.V8D FrM 1, aI,tbn b de appmedM Plan Vlexl atbawmafhbsualo (E) LANDSCAPE w 01-Repres Wo. 2'4'COSNa-o3-,g Pee a Graveton 6beva'. Mdesbp. 6-CALK (P) BUILDING ~ ---d--- - a, e Q ~Ox e W L o 3H:1VI4ax Side Skpe , ,0i - mev,9lrmdo=~' 4 3°mr Ik'cNanflwraDan W Q fdheWnnk.9 PROFILE VIEW ~.t MdthMS-J. ~ J STP'PL' N.T.S. 6isWg sebgrsda te-.p ,edl (p BB d 7-Beat STATE OF ET- Edge ofbf-!, OREGOTq y Ham G-,,Ng PI-9moplgs&RN Roo B 1-FIND R~ 527 -U t,_ I andanyHSVrae. I B 5-BERC ❑ 7.,~ L I 11 1; 1" , 1 11-GENP a / / ~~}aune Sayer _L 8-CALK T I + 5-MAHR 6-AAHR ~ d ~gnldlm 1~ RIbW-f 1-PING L (I Pea G-1 al 12-PEP 4-FRAX ~k bosom oftto-le \ - \ 7-D L Revision Date: .iyaidN 12-16'- 1-PING 2W cobble typ G 7-CALK Edge a I ~I ~ yli 8 ® PLANVIE'N slaswAL ALE PLANrs ~i N.T.B. MWel Zones (19apon Hants, grupadH3or4t; Jmm.a paleena, carer mMau, Ha esara' O B B M B B B A), At, AIA 1 4•BERC TotalWel2one PientCwnt(35) B M M - M M M M ~C Drawn By: M > M M M cJ1e`Je M 5-AAHR 11X17Scale: l'-16'0' 1 BIOSWALE WITH GRAVEL MIX DETAIL ~lo (E) LANDSCAPE 24X36 Scale: I'= 8'0' ,.I B B B B BI EDETAIL/ B B B M 7-M R M B SEE DETAIL 41 B B 8•CALK SECURINGTIESUSE - - B B B 7F ~:~D (E) SIDEWALK RUBBER HOSE AT BARK '8° min 3- P 7-PENP 1VIi M M M M (E) LANDSCAPE r '0- np,al'o~, M M M M M M M ❑ [ THINBRANCHES BYY3 RETAINING 1X4 BRACING ^n /F c 10-BERC 0 I NORMAL PLANT SHAPE. 2"WOODSTAKES(3) B (BERC W SHRUBS SHALL BE SLIGHTLY 8•CALK 10-PENP ( W Z SET ft00T CROWN 2°AEOVE FINISH GRADE 13 - MAHR HIGHER IN RELATION TO (E)SIDEWALK p 1014 FINISHED GRADE ROREMOVE PES AT TOP Y3 TOP 1/ OF OF BALL BURLAP. SHALL NONBE- CUT. ( EWALK p0 o`S /1 ( T91'1 MULCH eMIN BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL SHALL BE F, 0 TOTALLY REMOVED. N - PRUNE DAMAGED OR DESICCATED ROOTS MULCH: 2' MIN. GENTLY COMPACTED SOIL MIX SOIL SAUCER: USE PREPARED SOIL Z SCARIFY PIT BOTTOM 150mm `0 S (6MIN. PREPARED MIX OF SOIL a (E) BUILDING N 2 COMPACTED EXISTING SOIL ULWI I+ aY aua mti ux. _ 2 SHRUB PLANTING 3 TREE PLANTING 0 e 16 24 NovembaT4,2014 PLANTING PLAN L-i. i f Planning Division PERMIT ZONING APPLICATION - 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 ASHLAND C 17 Y a 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE _ DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Modification of Site Review Approval DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? ® YES NO Street Address 696 Mistletoe Road Assessor's Map No. 391 E 14AC Tax Lot(s) 1100 Zoning M-1 Comp Plan Designation Industrial with CM Overlay APPLICANT Name Mark DiRienzo - Owner Phone 541-621-6393 E-Mail markdQmind.net Address 700 Mistletoe Road #106 City Ashland Zip 97520 PROPERTY OWNER Name Dorado Inv, LLC & Ashland South Hldg, LLC Phone 541-621-6393 E-Mail markdQmind.net Address 700 Mistletoe Road #106 City Ashland Zip 97520 SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER Title Name Phone E-Mail Address SEE APPLICATION FOR FULL LIST OF PROFESSIONALS City Zip Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. /understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility, I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish; 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that ail structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure In this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expe If I have any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. November 4 2014 Applicant's igna re Date As owner of the property involved in this request, l have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property o er - November 4, 2014 Property Owner's ' nature (xe uired) Date [To be conVfeled by City Staff] Date Received ' Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ OVER i® GAcomm-dev\planningTorms & HandoulsmZoning Permit Application.doc Job Address: 700 MISTLETOE RD Contractor: #106 Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 C A Owner's Name: ASHLAND SOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC 0 Phone: P Customer 07837 N State Lic No: P ASHLAND SOUTH HOLDINGS, LLC T City Lic No: L Applicant: 700 MISTLETOE RD R I Address: 106 A C ASHLAND OR 97520 C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 11/04/2014 0 T Issued: Expires: 05/03/2015 R Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Address is 696 Mistletoe Site Review- VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description i Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Commercial Site Review (type1) 1,012.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us CITY Request Line: 541-552-2080 OF ASHLAND