HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-1215 Council Agenda PACKET
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Important: Any citizen may orally address the Council on non-agenda items during the Public Forum. Any citizen may submit written
comments to the Council on any item on the Agenda, unless it is the subject of a public hearing and the record is closed. Time permitting, the
Presiding Officer may allow oral testimony. If you wish to speak, please fill out the Speaker Request form located near the entrance to the Council
Chambers. The chair will recognize you and inform you as to the amount of time allotted to you, if any. The time granted will be dependent to
some extent on the nature of the item under discussion, the number of people who wish to speak, and the length of the agenda.
AGENDA FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
December 15, 2015
Council Chambers
1175 E. Main Street
Note: Items on the Agenda not considered due to time constraints are automatically continued to the next
regularly scheduled Council meeting [AMC 2.04.030.E.]
7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER
II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
IV. MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Study Session of November 30, 2015
2. Executive Session of December 1, 2015
2. Business Meeting of December 1, 2015
VI. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS
None
VII. PUBLIC FORUM Business from the audience not included on the agenda. (Total time
allowed for Public Forum is 15 minutes. The Mayor will set time limits to enable all
people wishing to speak to complete their testimony.) [95 minutes maximum]
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes of boards, commissions, and committees
2. Contract specific special procurement from Tyler Technologies
3. Approval of a change order in excess of 25% for consulting services to the Ashland
Transportation System capital projects
4. Approval of a resolution titled, "A resolution clarifying language in Resolution 2015-
29 (adopting a supplemental budget increasing appropriations' within the 2015-17
biennium budget), Resolution 2015-29 is repealed"
IX. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Persons wishing to speak are to submit a "speaker request form"
prior to the commencement of the public hearing. Public hearings shall conclude at 9:00
COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CHANNEL 9, OR ON CHARTER CABLE
CHANNEL 180. VISIT THE CITY OF ASHLAND'S WEB SITE AT WWW.ASHLAND.OR.US
p.m. and be continued to a future date to be set by the Council, unless the Council, by a
two-thirds vote of those present, extends the hearing(s) until up to 10:30 p.m. at which
time the Council shall set a date for continuance and shall proceed with the balance of
the agenda.)
1. Public Hearing and first reading of an ordinance titled, "An ordinance amending
Chapters 18.2.2, 18.2.3, 18.2.5, 18.3.2, 18.3.3, 18.3.5 and 18.6.1 of the Ashland
Land Use Ordinance relating to homegrown marijuana cultivation and marijuana-
related businesses including production, processing, retail sales, testing, and
wholesale and declaring an emergency"
X. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
None
Xi. NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
1. Recommendation from the Public Art Commission for Gateway Island public art
2. City Council support for lifting the statewide pre-emption on inclusionary zoning
XII. ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS
1. Second readings of an ordinance titled, "An ordinance amending the City of Ashland
Comprehensive Plan to add a Normal Neighborhood plan designation to Chapter II
[Introduction and Definitions], add the Normal Neighborhood land categories to
Chapter IV [Housing Element], change the Comprehensive Plan map designation for
approximately 94 acres of land within the City of Ashland urban growth boundary
from single family residential and suburban residential to the Normal Neighborhood
plan designation, and adopt the Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework as a
supporting document to the City of Ashland Comprehensive Plan"
and
"An ordinance amending the Street Dedication map, Planned Intersection and
Roadway Improvement map, and the Planned Bikeway Network map of the Ashland
Transportation System plan for the Normal Neighborhood plan area and amending
street design standards within the Ashland Municipal Code Chapter 18.4.6 to add a
new shared street classification"
and
"An ordinance amending the Ashland Municipal Code creating a new Chapter 18.3.4
Normal Neighborhood District, amending Chapter 18.2.1.020 to add a Normal
Neighborhood zoning classification, and amending Chapter 18.2.1.040 to add a
Normal Neighborhood Special District."
XIII. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS/REPORTS FROM COUNCIL
LIAISONS
XIV. ADJOURNMENT OF BUSINESS MEETING
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the City Administrator's office at (541) 488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72
hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the
meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
COUNCIL MEETINGS ARE BROADCAST LIVE ON CHANNEL 9, OR ON CIJARTER CABLE
CHANNEL 180. VISIT THE CITY OF ASHLAND'S WEB SITE AT WWW.ASHLAND.OR.US
City Council Study Session
November 30, 2015
Page I of 5
MINUTES FOR THE STUDY SESSION
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
Monday, November 30, 2015
Council Chambers
1175 E Main Street
Mayor Stromberg called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers.
Councilor Voisin, Morris, Lemhouse, Rosenthal, and Marsh were present. Councilor Seffinger was absent.
1. Public Input
Bruce Bayard/621 A Street/Addressed concerns the Historic Commission had with the Gateway art piece
"Gather-" and explained the placement, scale, and mass of the art piece would not hinder the view of the
historic hotel. The location was not in the downtown district but at the confluence of three historic districts
and was a transitional place. The selection process was ten _years in the planning. Council approved the site
of the Gateway project after many study groups, public input meetings, a master plan, City ordinances all
under the guidance of multiple council liaisons to the Public Arts Commission. "Gather" expressed the
intensely focused creative energy representative of Ashland in its emerging status as a contemporary creative
vortex.
Amy Blossom/140 Susan Lane/Participated on the selection committee for the art piece as a regular citizen.
The committee adhered to the guidelines and the selection was unanimous. She worked at the library and
was proud of the choice. She was an historian but felt "Gather" was a contemporary piece that fit into
Ashland.
Christian Burchard/777 Pompadour Drive/Also participated on the selection committee and an artist for
almost forty years. Public art was always a problem. It used public money and the selection would never
satisfy everyone. "Gather" created a beautiful place in the location. It created a triangle with two historical
pieces and was a wonderful addition to the City. He supported Council in whatever decision they made. He
understood the decision was difficult especially if a small group of people tried to derail the process.
John Barton/245 Piedmont/Addressed the selection process for the Gateway art piece. It was unclear how
many people supported "Gather" or opposed the art piece. The Mayor appointed commissions to represent
the public will. Opening the process to a vote would be messy and expensive. Not all public policy was set
by popular vote. Using public commissions was more efficient. He supported the process.
Joseph Kauth/1 Corral/Questioned whether community represented compassion, mercy, or did they
represent the dark side that was a show of force. He used the greenhouse and church down by the dog park
as an example of the dark side. People would go to church then stop by the greenhouse. Once the
greenhouse closed, people stopped attending church and it closed. The church was the light side and
development the dark side. He noted how the Ashland Forest Resiliency cut affected the weather.
2. Look Ahead review
City Administrator Dave Kanner reviewed items on the Look Ahead.
3. Review of codified public art selection process
City Administrator Dave Kanner clarified the $100,000 for public art was money from the Transient
Occupancy Tax (TOT) and restricted by state law under ORS 3.28. City Attorney Dave Lohman addressed
comments regarding selection of a local artist. Oregon statutes can favor Oregon contractors only if the bids
were equal in terms of quality and more. The City had a provision in its contracting code stating the City
would use local suppliers whenever practical and feasible while seeking to obtain the lowest and best
responsible proposal.
City Council Study Session
November 30, 2015
Page 2 of 5
Public Arts Commission Chair Margaret Carrington introduced Public Arts Commissioners Sandra Friend,
Dana Bussell, Laurel Merchant, and Richard Newman, and shared their backgrounds and expertise.
The Public Art Master Plan began in 2006. The Public Arts Commission worked with the community for six
months, distributed 2,500 questionnaires, posted on the City website, and included notices in the Ashland
Chamber of Commerce newsletter. Citizens completed 359 surveys. The Commission made presentations to
local service clubs, two public forums, and two focus group sessions and published the Master Plan in 2007.
Management Analyst Ann Seltzer addressed Ashland Municipal Code Chapter 2.29 Public Art. The
Commission posted a notice on the Americans for the Arts website asking for public art master plans and
ordinances. The city attorney at that time reviewed public art ordinances from other cities. Council adopted
the resolution October 2008 and the ordinance in January 2009.
Chair Garrington explained the Public Arts Commission developed the Gateway Request for Qualification
(RFQ) over a series of meetings 2011 through 2013. In May 2013, the Commission chair informed Council
about the intent to post a Gateway RFQ and use TOT funds for the project. In October 2013, Council was
informed that the Public Arts Commission planned to publish the RFQ. The criteria in the RFQ called for a
signature installation that had a contemporary context, was a visual landmark, and strengthened economic
development in tourism. The installation needed to be iconic, create excitement and interest, challenge the
viewer's perspective, enhance the experience of entering the downtown core, and encourage reflection on the
larger world community. Applicants submitted a letter of interest, an artist statement, resume, references,
and images of pertinent work. The City received 63 artist submissions that met the minimum requirements.
Ten were local artists. The Public Arts Commission narrowed the applicants to five. Selection criteria for
artists included professional qualifications, proven artistic merit, body of work, experience with the public
process, demonstrated skill fabricating and installing large outdoor artwork, artistic excellence, and proven
ability to create and deliver high quality, easily maintained durable large-scale art on time within budget.
The Public Arts Commission relied on the ordinance and the Public Art Master Plan for the selection
process. The final four applicants had several months to create art concepts based on information in the
RFQ, citizen input word clouds, and visiting Ashland. Public outreach efforts involved letters to the editor in
the Sneak Preview newspaper, distributing handouts with a commission presence at the Plaza for two First
Friday events, announcements through the Ashland Art and Galley Association, and the Chamber of
Commerce, and the City utility billing newsletters. The Commission utilized Open City Hall and had a table
in the library regarding the Gateway art project. The Public Arts Commission received 70 citizen responses
for each of the four questions posed along with importance.
In March 2015, the four finalists submitted artistic concepts. Three finalists remained in the process and
presented their concepts at the library twice. The following day the selection panel reviewed the criteria and
selected "Gather."
Ms. Seltzer addressed the selection panel and explained the Commission sent out a request for qualifications
for participants. The panel consisted of art professionals and enthusiasts, residents near the proposed site,
community members and City administrators. They evaluated the proposals and made a recommendation.
AMC 2.29 stated the selection panel was chosen after an advertisement went to the newspapers, postcards
sent to property owners within 300-feet of the proposed site and a notice went on the City website. The
Public Arts Commission did not place an ad in the newspaper or post a notice on the website. Past actions
indicated ads and website notices were ineffective in generating responses from candidates willing to serve
on the selection panel. However, postcards to neighbors were successful. She listed the selection panel
participants. The panel relied on the Public Art Master Plan and code to make their recommendation.
City Council Study Session
November 30, 2015
Page 3 of 5
The Commission thought the request for qualification benefited the process. For narrowing applicants, the
Public Arts Commission took the criteria in the RFQ and requirements in the ordinance to create a matrix
then ranked all the artists through seven meetings. Public art was an industry within an industry and the
Gateway piece required an engineer and a fabricator. For the scale and location, it was important to ensure
the artist was qualified and experienced. The Commission called all the references provided.
The Public Arts Commission clarified Historic Commission member Allison Renwick participated on the
selection panel as a professor of art. The Public Arts Commission had not heard any of the concerns and
ol?jections the Historic Commission had regarding the art piece until the newspaper article a month before
and were surprised. There were several opportunities to hear negative comments fi-om the Historic
Commission or other commissions regarding the project and the Public Arts Commission heard nothing.
Council suggested having the finalists possibly submit multiple concepts. Chair Garrington explained the
PAC paid for the artists to develop their concepts. Requesting multiple concepts would cost the City more
money. Alternately, not paying the artists for their concepts could result in lesser quality of work.
Ms. Seltzer further explained the Commission worked on the RFQ and language over a three-year period.
The ordinance did not require a review by other commissions.
The Public Arts Commission explained contemporary was anything done by an artist living today.
Requesting contemporary art left the options open. Including information that the location was within the
historic district was not a requirement for the RFQ.
Councilor Voisin asked how the Public Arts Commission saw their relationship to the Historic Commission
regarding artwork in the historic district. Councilor Lemhouse raised a point of order and explained
questions should pertain to the selection process and not the relationship between commissions. Mayor
Stromberg ruled with Councilor Lemhouse.
Council comments agreed the Public Arts Commission followed policy and suggested including the Historic
Commission and the Community Development Department in the review process for RFQs in the future.
Councilor Voisin read AMC Chapter 2.29.130 Guidelines for Recommendation by the Commission, A,
Selection Guidelines for Works of Public Art, 3 History and Context and wanted to know how the Public
Arts Commission considered history and context when they wrote the RFQ. Chair Garrington responded
they wrote the location in the RFQ as a gateway site for the City along with a description of Ashland.
Commissioners gave the artists a tour- of Ashland. Ms. Seltzer added history and context was used to
evaluate the proposals that came forward. City Attorney Dave Lohman clarified 2.29.130 (A)(3) History and
Context referred to the site, not the project. History was being used in two different ways.
The Public Arts Commission wanted to bring something forward that started a dialogue about art. The piece
would have detractors and lovers. There would always be differences of opinion about art.
Mr. Kanner explained Council would make their decision by applying their best personal judgment, value
regarding the piece, and vote accordingly. Mr. Lohman added the ordinance laid out specific guidelines.
Council could not vote against the piece because the artist was not local. The code was detailed so Council
could rely on a group of experts and not make aesthetic decisions.
Ms. Seltzer addressed the cost and estimated of the $100,000, $60,000 would go to fabrication, $12,000 for
transportation, $5,000 to the artist's fee, $10,000 contingency, and the rest would cover installation that
included renting a crane and pouring the pad. Exact amounts would be available at the December 15, 2015
Council meeting. Commissioner Newman added public art was a large industry with a small group of artists.
City Council Study Session
November 30, 2015
Page 4 of 5
The amount allocated was very reasonable. The Public Arts Commission started saving for the Gateway art
project in 2008, allocating $12,000 to $14,000 annually and would reach the $100,000 goal in 2016.
The Commission was confident that they should determine recommendations for Council versus submitting 3
to 4 options for Council to select. The selection panel were not only experts but represented the public in
Ashland.
The Historic Commission voted unanimously the selection process needed changes. Council suggested
adding language to the RFQ that included input from the Historic Commission regarding a project.
Councilor Lemhouse thought a study group consisting of people from the Public Arts Commission, the
Historic Commission and the community review the current process.
Councilor Voisin read suggestions from the Historic Commission had on working with the Public Arts
Commission that included a joint study session to review the process when a selection related to historic
districts, and commission liaisons that would attend meetings to prevent a disconnect in the future.
Councilor Lemhouse raised a point of order explaining comments made by Councilor Voisin to the Public
Arts Commission were not appropriate. Council established liaisons, not a commission. Alternately, the
Public Arts Commission was always open to input and he did not want the inference they were not.
Councilor Voisin raised a point of order regarding Councilor Lemhouse's comments. She thought it was
derogatory to her comments and taken out of context. Mayor Stro►nbe.rg ruled in favor of Councilor
Lemhouse and thought the comments spoke to whether the recommendation implied a decision by the Public
Arts Commission.
Council majority directed staff to bring a proposal for an ad hoc working group to review the selection
process to a fixture Council meeting.
4. Discussion of Land Use Ordinance Amendments for Homegrown Marijuana and Marijuana-
Related Businesses
Community Development Director Bill Molnar explained the Planning Commission thought the original
draft limiting indoor production on a commercial level to 10,000 square feet (sq. ft.) building was too large.
There were employee density and job growth concerns as well. The Planning Commission reduced building
size to 5,000 sq. ft. due to energy and water consumption. Planning Manager Maria Harris added the state
adopted rules limiting the size of indoor commercial growing and production based on energy and water use
from 5,000 sq. ft. to 10,000 sq. ft. The draft ordinance coordinated with state rules regarding size.
City Administrator Dave Kanner added the energy concern was peak hour use and suggested an ordinance
that would allow the City to enter into purchase agreements with large electric consumers that encouraged
them through incentives not to use electricity during peak hours. Off peak use would not push the City to
Tier 2 and was straight revenue.
Ms. Harris clarified the maximum allowed for outdoor recreational marijuana was four plants. The Planning
Commission was trying to balance allowing people to exercise their rights under Measure-91 while being
mindful of close housing and keeping size and scale away from adjoining residences due to the odor issue.
The 10-foot height limitation and number of plants kept the size and scale compatible with the residential
environment. House Bill 3400 specifically allowed local governments to adopt time, place, and manner
restrictions on marijuana growing.
The Planning Commission thought there should be some allowances to grow outside to take advantage of
sunlight and natural precipitation. State law allowed six mature plants for medical marijuana and under the
new regulations, 12 plants per site. State law did not address the amount outdoor or indoor except for the
commercial production piece. In the draft ordinance it did not matter if it was personal or commercial, four
City Council Study Session
November 30, 2015
Page 5 of 5
plants outside was the rule.
Per state law, plants could not be viewed from a public street or public place that included commonly owned
open space or places that operated like a public right of way. Setback regulations primarily addressed odor.
The City code compliance officer determined through complaints that more than four plants became
odoriferous. Most of the complaints involved properties with 10 to 96 plants. Four plants produced a
tolerable odor for a reasonable person. City Attorney Dave Lohman clarified the nuisance ordinance was
still in place. If four plants created an odor a reasonable person would find obnoxious, the City could have
the owner cut down some or all four plants even though they were allowed. Ms. Harris added the Planning
Commission looked at land use control to address nuisances.
The draft ordinance included medical and recreational marijuana sales. The Planning Commission carried
forward existing rules. Medical and recreational marijuana sales were allowed as a special use in the
commercial zone if located on a boulevard street. It was a conditional use if located 200-feet from a
residential zone. The Commission included a stipulation that retail sales were 1,000 feet from each other and
schools. State law required medical marijuana dispensaries be 1,000 feet from schools and each other.
Recreational was 1,000 feet from schools but not each other. The Planning Commission decided initially the
City should be conservative and relax regulations later. Ashland currently had four existing dispensaries.
The state would start taking applications for commercial sales January 2016. To date there were no police
calls regarding the dispensaries.
Mr. Lohman spoke to the City of Denver's assistant city attorney responsible for marijuana regulations.
They reviewed their ordinances every few months due to discovering new things. Another issue was
commercial operations affecting industrial land. In Colorado, industrial space was no longer available due to
commercial grows. The City of Denver's assistant city attorney recommended leaving space for non-
marijuana grows.
Councilor Voisin left the meeting at 7:45 p.m.
Mr. Kanner added Denver had not imposed rules on commercial indoor grows and that resulted in large-scale
operations the used tremendous amounts of energy and very few employees. The state of Oregon put rules in
place to prevent that from happening here.
Ms Harris confirmed resident growers could grow indoors in residential zones as long as the house was the
operator's primary home and they lived there. One standard stated the majority of the home could not be
used to grow marijuana. The initial draft allowed a maximum of twelve plants per property with four
outside. However, the ability to enforce that number for indoor grows was not feasible.
The Planning Commission applied the 200-feet from a residential zone to commercial grows, processing and
labs. They wanted to start at a more conservative level and relax standards over time. Mr. Molnar added it
was an unknown in terns of potential security issues and attractive nuisances.
Council Lemhouse was concerned allowing grows in R-l zones and allowing too much industrial growing in
town.
Meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.
Dana Smith
Assistant to the City Recorder
City Council Business Meeting
December 1, 2015
Page 1 of 7
MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
December 1, 2015
Council Chambers
1175 E. Main Street
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Stromberg called the meeting to order at the Civic Center Council Chambers at 7:03 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Councilor Voisin, Morris, Lemhouse, Seffinger, Rosenthal, and Marsh were present.
MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Stromberg announced vacancies on the Forest Lands, Housing & Human Services, Public Arts,
and Transportation Commissions.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Councilor Morris made a correction to the November 17, 2015 minutes, page 5 of 7 regarding the
discussion following the motion to approve Ordinance 43112 as amended. The correction changed
"disrespect" to "respect" in the following sentence, "Councilor Morris thought this was another common
sense rule and spoke to a lack of respect people had for each other lately." City Attorney Dave Lohman
noted a clarification in the November 16, 2015 Study Session minutes on page 4, third paragraph, second
sentence, "However, a councilor could attend the meeting of a commission for which the councilor is not
the council liaison." The minutes of the Study Session of November 16, 2015 and Business Meeting of
November 17, 2015 were approved as clarified and amended.
SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS
1. Report on Ashland Community Resource Center
Ashland Community Resource Center Manager Leigh Madsen explained the Resource Center had served
1,323 since inception. He shared three individual's stories describing how the Resource Center helped
them. He went to provide a presentation on the past two years of costs that included:
Expenses
• $153,000 Operation costs covered rents, Leigh Madsen's salary, Utilities, Repair and
maintenance
• $31,334.67 Family Emergency Fund helped 100 families
o Eviction prevention
o Utility shutoff prevention
o Housing support
o Home repair
o 1. D.
o Job barrier removal
• $9,053 Tina Stevens Jobs specialist and Navigator (case manager) salary
• $193,387.67 Total cost
• $19,500 Shower trailer, laundry and tow vehicle donated to the Center
• $61,288 "In the Warn" - donations of shoes, boots, sleeping bag, etc.
• $274,175.67 Total Value
Income
• $100,000 from CoA
• $95,500 in Grants already received
0 $83,047.43 Local Cash Donations
City Council Business Meeting
December I, 2015
Page 2 of 7
• $71,288 Goods Donated
• $349,835.43 Total income
There was enough money to operate the Resource Center through 2017 and maintain all services.
Professional Services
• $20,525 Veterans services ACCESS Easter Seals, etal 821 hours $25/hr
• $13,970 Mental Health JCMH 33 hrs $25, Mike Thor, Frederic Kay 352 $35/hr
• $1,250 Maslow Projects 50 hours $25/hr
• $76,250 Attorney Dennis Goldstein gave 300 hours $250/hr
• 7,100 volunteer hours at the Resource Centers $25/hr
Jackson County Mental Health (JCMH) sent a Community Outreach manager to the Resource Center for
six months. In order for JCMI-I to be paid, they had to do a complete intake of the client and that was
difficult in the Resource Center due to security issues. The other issue was the client had to be on the
Oregon Health Plan (OHP). Mr. Madsen ended up contacting three professionals who volunteered their
time instead. City Administrator Dave Kanner added JCMH was planning to open a mental health
satellite office in Ashland that would eventually staff 21 employees. They would start with limited
services January 2016 and over time develop a south county office.
Mr. Madsen addressed the flood of travelers Ashland experienced over the summer. He distributed
clothing the Resource Center would have normally donated elsewhere to the travelers as needed. Of the
800 homeless people served he estimated 250-300 were homeless on a regular basis and the rest traveled
through the area. The Resource Center did not discriminate and worked to maintain an environment that
made people feel safe and comfortable. They received food from The Food Angels.
Financial support from the City was 50% for the first two years, approximately 30% for the next two
years and would continue to decline over time. Tracking jobs was difficult because often one client
would go through several jobs. The Resource Center starting using an online Ashland Jobs service to
track employment. Regarding behavior issues, the Resource Center had an intention that everyone would
be safe and comfortable and act accordingly. They used a warning system for enforcement that could
result in expulsion from the Center for up to 30 days. Currently they were working on people sleeping in
the parking lot and bushes around the Resource Center.
Mr. Madsen thought having an extra ten hours of administration weekly and a volunteer coordinator
would benefit the Resource Center. Another benefit was strengthening the Center's relationship with
Good Will Industries for job development services. The Resource Center was also looking into
developing an advisory board. He reaffirmed ACCESS' role with the Resource Center.
Councilor Marsh noted that January 21 and 22, 2016 representatives from the Palo Alto Downtown
Streets Program would come to Ashland to discuss their program, tour Ashland's services, and meet with
the community.
2. Ashland Police Department launch of drug amnesty/treatment center placement program
Police Chief Tighe O'Meara explained the Ashland Police Department (APD) would soon launch a new
program regarding the destruction of illegal drugs and treatment facility placement for those seeking help.
In 2013, over 8,000 people died nationwide from heroin overdoses. Ashland had three fatal heroin
overdoses in 2013 during a 3-4 week period. In 2014, Ashland Fire and Rescue (AFR) responded to 42
calls regarding drug overdose and administered Naloxone, an anti opioid eighteen times.
City Council Business Meeting
December 1, 2015
Page 3 of 7
A new program modeled after the Police Assisted Addiction and Recovery Initiative would allow anyone
to walk into the Ashland Police Department and drop off illegal substances anonymously. The second
service was in collaboration with OnTrack and Asante Community Hospital. Anyone needing help to
resolve addiction issues could walk into the police station, have drug amnesty, and connect with a
caseworker and treatment center immediately. The Police Department would facilitate the process.
However, if that person had a warrant they would have to take care of that prior to treatment. The drug
amnesty portion could only occur at the police station. APD would advertise both programs and use
social media and press releases.
PUBLIC FORUM
John Chmelir/3743 Calle Vista/Medford, OR/Ran Alzheimer's Centers and wanted to build one in
Ashland in the urban growth boundary (UGB). Over the next 30 years, the population of people with
Alzheimer's would double. He asked for a fire connection to connect the sprinkler system in the building
to the City water pump station that existed as an easement on his property.
Barbara Comnes/444 Park Ridge Place/Encouraged Council to add a pedestrian railroad crossing just
north of A Street. The tracks between Oak Street and -North Mountain Avenue ran three quarters of a
mile without a crossing. Having a pedestrian crossing in that area would decrease pedestrian travel time
up to nine blocks. She read from documents submitted into the record.
City Attorney Dave Lohman would meet with Ms. Comnes regarding the crossing and railroad
regulations.
Joseph Kauth/I Corral/Noted the Founder's tree and a Maple tree were no longer in the Plaza. Other
comments included lights for aggressive deer, endangered species in the area, dorm structures, the
Ashland Forest Resiliency (AFR) cut, the Plaza project, Road Diet, the Welcome Center, small houses,
the chicken ordinance, the Ashland Greenhouse, and a church near that had closed because the
greenhouse shut down. Forty-three year old Oregon land use bills needed a greater environmental impact
statement with a longer public comment time. He thought the AFR cut somehow contributed to global
weather events and earthquakes.
City Administrator Dave Kanner explained Mr. Chmelir's request for sprinkler system connection would
come before Council December 14, 2015.
CONSENT AGENDA
1. Minutes of boards, commissions, and committees
2. Approval of a liquor license application for Josh Hamik dba Boulevard Coffee/Stratford Inn
3. Approval of a liquor license application for Merrill Smith dba La Baguette Bakery
4. Approval of a resolution titled, "A resolution adopting a supplemental budget increasing
appropriations within the 2015-2017 biennium budget"
5. Acceptance of FY2014-2015 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
Councilor Voisin/Seffinger m/s to approve Consent Agenda items. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion
passed.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing on an Ordinance Amending Title 18 Land Use of the Ashland Municipal Code
for Homegrown Marijuana and Marijuana-Related Businesses
Community Development Director Bill Molnar explained the draft code amendments addressed personal
use of marijuana and the establishment of marijuana related businesses. It also addressed homegrown
marijuana on individual tax lots in residential areas as well as commercial and employment areas that
City Council Business Meeting
December 1, 2015
Page 4 of 7
allowed mixed use or residential on the property. The ordinance limited the number of plants based on lot
and not number of homes or buildings on the parcel.
The second part of the ordinance addressed marijuana related businesses in the commercial employment
and industrial zones and included retail sales, laboratory testing, processing, production and wholesale all
limited to indoor. The ordinance prohibited outdoor cultivation of marijuana as a related business in a
commercial, employment, or industrial zone. The ordinance did not distinguish between medical or
recreational marijuana.
Prior to the Study Session, staff discussed the impact production and wholesale might have on the City's
inventory of employment lands. The City was a participant in the Regional Bear Creek plan that was a
50-year plan and looked at accommodating growth at an urban level of development over the next 50
years. The plan would identify adjustments or additions to the urban growth boundary (UGB) and
included residential and employment growth. Ashland had approximately a 25-30 year supply within the
UGB instead of a 50-year supply and needed to evaluate ways to accommodate more employment within
the existing UGB. The City was looking at flexible parking requirements and height increases for
employment buildings. If Council concurred staff would come back with a few suggestions.
Indoor production was limited to a 5,000 square foot (sq. ft.) building but that did not preclude someone
from having multiple 5,000 sq. ft. buildings on an employment site.
Planning Manager Maria Harris explained the proposed standards for homegrown marijuana allowed up
to four plants outside. The 50 sq. ft. Of cultivation area had to be 10 feet from property lines and 20 feet
from dwellings and adjoining properties. The grow area had to be close to the resident growers home. .
Maximum plant height was 10 feet. The grow area could not be visible from a public place or street and
not in a front yard. Any related activities had to happen indoors. The grow area needed to be screened
and have secure access at all times. The resident grower had to live on the property and it had to be their
primary residence. Electrical and plumbing equipment had to adhere to building code and required a
building permit. Light and glare from light systems had to be confined to the interior of the structure. A
grower could not use vacant or uninhabited dwelling units for marijuana cultivation nor could a dwelling
unit be primarily a place to cultivate marijuana.
The state law was more permissive in number of plants allowed for a residential dwelling unit. One
dwelling unit could have four recreational plants per household or 12 medical plants per address totaling
16 plants. Two dwellings units could have eight recreational plants per household and 24 medical plants
per address for 32 plants. Three dwelling units could have 12 recreational plants per household and 36
medical plants per address for 48 plants. The Planning Commission was trying to balance state law
allowances with impacts to residential neighborhoods in terms of nuisances.
Apartment buildings would have to get permission from the property manager to grow and would require
a 24-hour contact. The draft ordinance was more conservative than the state and based the number of
plants allowed per lot, not households. Only four plants outdoors per lot regardless of how many
apartments or dwelling units existed on the parcel.
The Planning Commission wanted people to be able to grow some plants outside for personal use in the
interest of energy and water conservation. Another issue discussed was maintaining residential as
primarily residential. Townhomes would not meet the setback requirements for outside grows. The
Commission stressed the need for the buffer to mitigate odor.
Eligible locations for marijuana related business included commercially zoned properties, E-1, C-1, and
M-1 adjacent to a boulevard. E-1 and C-1 zones further than 200 feet from residentially zoned property
City Council Business Meeting
December 1, 2015
Page 5 of 7
required a Conditional Use Permit. Currently, the City did not allow agriculture in the commercial zones.
There were enough areas for 5-6 more retail sites in Ashland. Marijuana outlets had to be 1000 feet from
a school. Other exclusion areas included the Downtown Design Standards Overlay, commercially zoned
property within 1,000 feet of a school or existing dispensary, 1,000 feet from a licensed dispensary, or
commercially zoned lands within 200 feet of residentially zoned property. This applied to medical
marijuana dispensaries as well. The ordinance did not distinguish between medical or recreational.
Laboratories, processing and production facilities required a 200-foot buffer from residential zones.
Production was limited to 5,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area.
Jackson County Medical Marijuana Dispensaries did not correlate with population. There were 16
dispensaries in Jackson County, Medford and Ashland each had four. The City did not use minimal
employment densities. The Comprehensive Plan goal was a minimum of 10 employees per acre, citywide
it was approximately 17-18 employees per acre with more downtown.
Councilor Rosenthal/Marsh m/s to extend Public Hearing to 10:30 p.m. Voice Vote: ALL AYES.
Motion passed.
The Planning Commission looked at Washington and Colorado who started retail sales during 2014.
Washington did not allow homegrown marijuana. Both states had the option of prohibiting marijuana
related businesses. For Oregon, in a county like Jackson County where 55% of the population voted for
marijuana, the jurisdiction had to put a prohibitive ordinance out to vote. In Colorado, 70% of their cities
and 66% of the counties prohibited marijuana related businesses. In Oregon, 19% of the cities and 36%
of the counties were opting to prohibit marijuana related businesses.
Colorado prohibited outdoor growing and in some cases. they prohibited growing in sheds. Oregon law
included standards regarding packaging, security on the premises, ventilation, and lighting. The Planning
Commission looked at Siskiyou and Shasta counties and the City of Phoenix regarding setbacks. The City
of Denver took a free market approach resulting in having a third of the marijuana retail stores located in
Denver. There were more cannabis outlets and dispensaries in Denver than Starbucks and McDonalds
combined. Denver found 50% of sales were out of state. Resort communities had 90% out of state sales.
Other issues Denver experienced was low employment generation and inflated warehouse market prices
out of congruence with other business markets. Colorado based enforcement on nuisance and the
reasonable person's standard for light, glare, and odor.
Mr. Kanner explained Council might want to discuss whether to carry over all the time, place, and manner
restrictions in the medical marijuana ordinance to the proposed ordinance given the actual experience
with dispensaries.
Public Hearing Opened: 9:10 p.m.
PUBLIC TESTAMONY
Shayne Christen/285 Upper Powell/Williams, OR/Explained lie was the on the Board of Directors for
the Oregon SunGrown Growers Guild. He clarified the state had not determined co-location of medical
or recreational marijuana rules yet. He shared his experience growing medical marijuana, speaking
before the state house, and the Oregon Liquor Control Commission (01-CC). He questioned how
compassionate it was using land use laws to restrict people from their medicine and cautioned potential
push back on the state level if counties used land use laws. The plant numbers presented were not
accurate. The state would restrict the number of medical marijuana plants allowed within city limits
statewide to 12 for two patients. The state was also considering requiring 25% renewable energy to offset
the carbon footprint for industrial operations. In addition, collocating medical and recreational stores
would produce a hefty tax check for the City.
City Council Business Meeting
December 1, 2015
Page 6 of 7
Andrea Adams/310 North Main Street /Phoenix, OR/Fornnerly ran a dispensary called The Greenery
in Ashland 2011 through 2013 prior to moving to Phoenix. She spoke on behalf of the people who
needed medical marijuana as medicine. She addressed the amount of marijuana it took to produce
cannabis concentrates. A cancer patient could go through the equivalent of a pound a month using
concentrates. One plant could barely produce a pound. Restricting patient grows to four plants instead of
six was not enough for people to grow for themselves or someone else. The state will license medical and
recreational outlets separately even if collocation was permissible. This will create a conflict with the
City's 1,000-foot buffer requirement.
Ms. Adams further explained indoor growing was difficult. It cost more money, space, and expertise.
Tests results also showed outdoor sun grown medicine was stronger and contained more of the medicinal
properties.
Mr. Christen confirmed that 3 to 4 weeks out of the year marijuana was odorous. Ms. Adams added some
people found it very offensive but it was not harmful. She questioned the balance of having 3-4 weeks of
odor with the year round medical benefit for a patient. Mr. Christen noted people smoking marijuana
would produce an odor yearlong and wondered if some of the City's constituents were complaining about
that smell or the plant itself.
Generally, the odor was at its strongest mid September to mid October, or the fill month of October
depending on location and strains.
Jay Barry/2237 South Columbus/Medford, OR/Shared personal history living and working in Ashland.
She currently managed several rental properties and supported a tenant's right to grow medical marijuana.
Tere Knight/2237 South Columbus Ave/Medford OR/Grew medical marijuana in Medford for one
patient and now that was in jeopardy. She was concerned people were undereducated on the values of
medical marijuana and potential onerous regulations now that recreational marijuana was legal. Six
plants were not enough for a cancer patient. She urged Council to take the information they had heard
into consideration.
Public HearinII Closed: 9:33 p.m.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS - None
NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
1. Annual Appointment to the Citizen Budget Committee
City Administrator Dave Kanner explained a current member of the Budget Committee, Shaun Moran,
was interested in reappointment. City Recorder Barbara Christensen had advertised the vacancy and
received no applications.
Councilor Voisin/Rosenthal m/s to reappoint Shaun Moran to the Citizen Budget Committee with a
term ending December 31, 2019. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion passed.
2. Annual Appointment of Citizen Audit Commission and Council Liaison
City Administrator Dave Kanner explained Council appointed a liaison annually to the Audit
Commission. Councilor Rosenthal was the liaison for the past year. A current member of the Audit
Commission, Thomas Hepford, was interested in reappointment. City Recorder Barbara Christensen had
advertised the vacancy and received no applications.
City Council Business Meeting
December 1, 2015
Page 7 of 7
Councilor Marsh/Lemhouse m/s to reappoint Councilor Rosenthal as Liaison and Thomas Hepford
to the Citizen Audit Commission with a term ending December 31, 2016 for Councilor Rosenthal
and December 31, 2018 for Mr. Hepford. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion Passed.
ORDINANCES, RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS - None
OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS/REPORTS FROM COUNCIL LIAISONS
Councilor Voisin thanked Ashland Fire and Rescue for the Thanksgiving dinner they had for over one
hundred senior citizens. Senior Program Manager Chris Dodson did a wonderful job getting everything
ready for the event. Secondly, she hoped everyone was hoping and praying for Mt. Ashland ski resort to
open on December 12, 2015 for recreation. Finally, she thanked the volunteers who worked at the
emergency winter shelter over the holiday weekend and expressed her appreciation for Heidi Parker and
John Wieczorek.
Councilor Lemhouse recognized Ashland High School sports and noted the importance of athletics for
education. Sports taught young people responsibility, how to deal controversy, adverse conditions, and
persevere.
Councilor Seffinger thanked Councilor Lemhouse for the article he wrote supporting local businesses.
ADJOURNMENT OF BUSINESS MEETING
Meeting adjourned at 9:40 p.m.
Dana Smith, Assistant to the City Recorder John Stromberg, Mayor
Minutes for the Ashland City Recorder Position ad hoc Committee
November 4, 2015
Page 1 of 4
MINUTES FOR THE ASHLAND CITY RECORDER POSITION ad hoc COMMITTEE
Wednesday, November 4, 2015
City Hall, 20 E. Main Street
1. Call to Order
Chair Stefani Seffinger called the meeting to order at 2:04 p.m. in the finance conference room in
City Hall.
Committee members Bryan Almquist, Pam Lucas, Barbara Christensen, and Dave Kanner were
present.
2. Approval of Minutes
Minutes of October 28, 2015, were approved by the group as presented.
3. Public Forum
None.
4. Departure of Committee Member
Christensen stated that after the first meeting it became clear to her that it probably wasn't
appropriate for her to continue to be a member of this committee. The process makes her too
uncomfortable and she finds it difficult to be unbiased. She would hate for a decision to be made
based on her desires rather than what is best for the community. She stated she is happy to assist
the committee in any way they may need. She believes the committee will come up with a good
recommendation for Council, but she is going to step down as a member.
Almquist stated that Christensen's input has been valuable, but he understands her reluctance to
remain on the committee. He believes it is important to run any recommendation from the group
by her to get her thoughts before taking it to Council.
Group thanked her for her assistance.
Christensen departed the meeting at 2:1Op. m.
5. Discussion of Pros and Cons
Group discussed what changes would need to be made to the Charter and/or the Municipal Code
(AMC) if the position were to remain elected. The point of this process is to set qualifications
for the position. Group expressed concerns that if there were AMC changes, but no Charter
changes, they wouldn't be binding. In other words, someone could meet the minimum
qualifications set forth in the Charter, but not meet the updated requirements in the AMC and
could legally challenge the City in order to get the position, despite not being qualified.
Group discussed why it would be negative to also put too many details or requirements in the
Charter. Charter changes are difficult, and reduce the ability to be flexible as times and
technologies change.
Group discussed appointed versus elected recorder positions throughout Oregon. Only two, in
considerably smaller cities than Ashland, have elected recorder, so clearly there is success in
having this as an appointed position. Group discussed concerns with the financial requirements
Minutes for the Ashland City Recorder Position ad hoc Committee
November 4. 2015
Page 2 of 4
in the Charter. The Finance Director informed Kanner that he believes current staff can take on
the finance duties that the Recorder does or those she currently doesn't do (due to technology or
process changes) which are listed in either the Charter and Code. Group determined that,
regardless of whether it's appointed or elected, with all the technology and department changes
over the years the Charter needs to be updated to reflect those changes.
Seffinger asked group if anyone felt it was important that the position remain elected. Group was
unanimous that the position should be appointed. An appointed position is what would best
protect the community due to the fiduciary responsibilities, knowledge, professionalism, and
attention to detail required for the position. These are traits you hire for, not things you elect.
Positions which make political (policy-making) decisions should be elected, but this position
makes no political (policy) decisions and therefore should be appointed.
Group discussed what a typical hiring process would be for a position of this type. As it is not a
department head level position, there is no need for Council approval, rather it would be solely
appointed by the City Administrator. This process may be complicated by the fact that we still
have a Mayor and Council form of government, unlike most of the rest of the cities in Oregon. In
most cities, all appointments of department head level and below go through the City
Administrator, as all channels go through that position, but that is not always the process here.
Department head level position hiring frequently go through Council here. Group discussed
whether, despite this clearly not being a department head level position, it would be easier for the
community and Council to accept the change from elected to appointed if it were appointed by
the Mayor and Council. Almquist stated that ultimately, it should be appointed by the City
Administrator but keeping it with the Mayor and Council may be a good interim solution. Group
wondered if the best process would be to have an administrative hiring process (i.e. no
involvement or interviews by Council) with a recommendation to Mayor and Council by the City
Administrator for final approval. The only challenge to this model is that the City Administrator
would be doing the day-to-day supervision of this position but would not have authority in hiring
or firing due to Council's authority in the process. Lucas wondered if this is a problem, as this
position is technically the clerk of the Council. Kanner stated that the Council would only deal
with this position for a few hours a month at meetings but staff has to work with them for the rest
of the regular working hours. He agreed to come up with some language regarding why having
the position appointed by the City Administrator would be valuable.
Group discussed whether this position would be a separate department or part of another
department. They determined that with the proposed job duties central to this position it's more
likely that this will become a one-person job with no need for additional personnel and therefore,
no need for it to be a separate department. Seffinger stated this is also another reason why an
elected position is not good - it is more difficult to have an elected official integrated into staff.
If it is appointed, it can be integrated into the entire staff group.
Group discussed whether they need to develop a job description. It was determined that the
group should review the job description previously created to determine that the skill levels and
qualifications match with the discussions of this group. Additionally, they would like to see the
salary set in a range not too different from current levels, to make the transition easier for
Council and the community to accept.
Group determined they need one more meeting to look at all the recommendations they have
Minutes for the Ashland City Recorder Position ad hoc Committee
November 4, 2015
Page 3 of 4
worked on and make any adjustments.
Group discussed whether there should be a secondary recommendation, in case the proposed
Charter changes fail in an election. They agreed that regardless of whether Charter changes are
approved, the AMC needs to be amended to bring the job into the 21" century. The two difficult
points are that both the salary formula and financial duties are set by Charter, which makes the
ability to bring the position into this century more challenging. There is no way to guarantee this
position, which requires accuracy and professionalism, would be filled appropriately by a person
elected. There is no way to guarantee protection of the City's interests if the Charter update is not
approved.
Group requested that Kanner and Seffinger come up with a draft recommendation for review by
the group. They agreed to do so.
Group reiterated that this is in no way a reflection of who is currently in the position, and the
work that they do, but this is only a way to provide the best structure for the City's future.
Group determined that a clear explanation, maybe in spreadsheet form, of all changes to duties in
both the Charter and AMC something like:
Current AMC/Charter Recommended Update Reason for Change
Group discussed whether other parts of the AMC should be amended in relation to this position,
such as who handles taxicab licensing. They determined that the whole AMC should be
reviewed, but Council can make changes over time, there is no need to do it all at once.
Group discussed what election would be best to put these changes before the voters. They
preferred either May or November of 2016. There was concern about other major measures
being on the November ballot and there was also concern about how little time there is to get
information out into the community for the May ballot.
Group discussed what would constitute a reason for firing in this type of position if appointed.
Kanner stated there are HR policies in place which would apply to this and all city positions.
Appointed positions are required to follow a strong code of ethics (from both city and State) and
follow all City policies. This is an additional reason why having this position be appointed alight
be important.
Group discussed whether having a preamble to explain all the qualifications necessary for a
person holding this office would be important. They determined that any clarification couldn't
hurt.
Group discussed concerns regarding there being no requirement for an elected official holding
this position to hold regular office hours, or even ever be in the office. The Group agreed that
having no requirement to be on duty and yet still earn a substantial paycheck with benefits from
the City is another reason the position should be appointed.
The Group agreed that the general recommendation should include the following:
Minutes for the Ashland City Recorder Position ad hoc Committee
November 4, 2015
Page 4 of 4
• position should be appointed
• process for appointment
• outline of the duties of the office
• salary range
• timeline for election
• rationale for the proposed changes
• Charter language recommendations
6. Future Meetings Schedule
The next meeting will be On December 9t" at 3:00 p.m.
7. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 3:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Diana Shiplet
Executive Assistant
Minutes for the Climate and Energy Action Plan ad hoc Committee
October 21, 2015
Page 1 of 3
MINUTES FOR THE CLIMATE & ENERGY ACTION PLAN ad hoc COMMITTEE
Wednesday, October 21, 2015
Siskiyou Room, 51 Winburn Way
1. Call to Order
Chair Rich Rosenthal called the meeting to order at 2:01 p.m. in the Siskiyou Room.
Committee members Stuart Green, Greg Jones, James McGinnis, Roxanne Beigel-Coryell, and
Bryan Sohl were present. Staff member Adam Hanks was present. Committee member Louise
Shawkat was absent.
2. Approval of Minutes
Beigel-Coryell/McGinnis m/s to approve the minutes of September 30, 2015, as presented.
Voice Vote: All Ayes. Motion Passes.
Rosenthal informed the group that at the previous night's Council meeting, the appointment of
Claudia Alick to the committee was approved. The Mayor is working on appointing one
additional member and some ex-officio members.
3. Climate Plan Kick Off Event
Rosenthal invited Marm Koopman to give an update to the group regarding the current event
plans. She gave a review of the planning progress to date. She informed the group that some of
the dates listed on the flyer in the packet are incorrect, but have been corrected on the final
version. Koopman reviewed the events planned for the week prior and gave a run-down of the
schedule for the November 15t" event. She informed the group the planning group is in need of
volunteers, most particularly for setting up the event and for running the kids' activity area.
McGinnis gave an overview of the plans for the information gathering process. He described
some of the ways he would like to increase interactions between all event participants. He
believes the most important things to ask participants is, `what are you willing to personally do'
and `what should our community do'.
Jones expressed concerns that all the events occur in the lead-up to the kick-off event, but no
events are planned for after the kick-off. It seems backward to him. Group discussed how the
planning came about, and the challenges with calendar and timing. They also discussed some of
the events they hope will occur throughout this action plan creation process.
Group discussed ways to encourage kids to the kick-off event, as well as how to get them
involved throughout the efforts of this group.
Group asked Koopman about the event marketing plan. She informed the group what has been
done thus-far. She encouraged the group to help spread the word. Also stated they are still
looking for sponsors. To-date they have received lots of in-kind support, but very little in the
way of financial support.
Group discussed what questions will be asked as part of the First Friday polling. Rosenthal
requested that Koopman bring the exact list of proposed questions to the next committee meeting
Minutes for the Climate and Energy /Action Plan ad hoc Committee
October 21, 2015
Page 2 of 3
for further discussion and approval.
Rosenthal expressed concerns regarding the wording of the announcement of the November 9`►'
event at the Ashland School Board meeting. He requested that the word, "proposal" be changed
to, "presentation," as the Council and City have not endorsed this effort (it might be good, but it
has not been vetted by the City). We don't want people to assume this is endorsed by the City
Without Council approval.
Group discussed the panel members and topics covered at the November 15"' event. Hanks
agreed to represent the City. Additional Conservation Division staff will be manning the City's
booth. Group requested that Rosenthal participate in the event by doing a "summary" of what
was discussed at the end of the event. He agreed to participate. Group discussed which member
would do the 10 minute presentation regarding the action plan process. Sohl volunteered, so long
as he has assistance from staff in writing the speech. Hanks agreed to assist Sohl in writing. The
presentation will be an overview of how we got to this point in the action plan process and what
we hope will occur during the process.
Koopman stated that one of the presenters, Dr. Denning from Ft. Collins, will be in-town on
Saturday, November 14`x' and is willing to meet with this group, if they would like to. Group
agreed that they would like to meet informally with hire at noon, location to be determined.
Rosenthal thanked Koopman for her time.
4. Public Forum
Barry Thalden - commented on what a great event this seems to be turning into. He wanted the
group to be sure to keep looking at the big picture, that the objective of this process is to make
change happen. He stated that this will take getting action into ordinance form. Suggested the
group make sure decision makers get involved, as ownership over the project is necessary for
approval down the line and to keep this from being a plan that sits on a shelf. He stated that it is
important to get both staff and Councilors involved. Gave examples of previous events in which
Councilors participated but no key staff were involved, so progress wasn't made. Encouraged the
group to get youth in the community involved as they will inherit these environmental problems.
Asked that the group to consider getting someone who represents the business community on the
committee. He believes the business community will need to take ownership over any
ordinances.
Sohl thanked Thalden for his information and reiterated his desire to have kids involved in the
kick-off event.
Huelz Gutchen - expressed excitement for the event. He stated that we should have done this two
years ago. He handed out information to commissioners and stated that he understands his
information is "techie" and hard to understand but it is important.
5. Climate and Energy Action Plan RFP
McGinnis stated he would like the contractor to identify and qualify "hidden" externalities and
their impacts. Group discussed whether this is beyond the expertise we're looking for and if it
Minutes for the Climate and Energy Action Plan ad hoc Committee
October 21, 2015
]'age 3 of 3
would cause an increase in costs. Group was concerned that asking for lots of focus on hidden
externalities isn't as useful as spending that focus and time on creating an achievable plan. They
determined that many externalities will be identified through the process and so the RFP does not
need to include this request.
Hanks explained that the points allocation regarding cost review typically isn't weighted as
heavily as the group requested at the last meeting. The scoring related to costs is separate from the
scoring related to all other aspects and is not based on low-bid amounts, but rather how clearly the
responder states or clarifies all their costs.
Group agreed to the following scoring totals:
Understanding of requested service = 10 points
Proposer's capabilities = 20 points
Project team and qualifications = 25 points
Resources = 20 points
Response time = 15 points
Cost of service = 10 points
Group discussed where the RFP will be posted or advertised. Hanks requested that if group has
additional posting locations they should let hirn know.
Green/Sohl m/s to approve the RFP as amended. Voice Vote. All Ayes. Motion Passes.
6. Schedule and Agenda for Upcoming Meetings
The group agreed to continue meeting on the 1" and the 3rd Wednesdays at 2:00 p.m., with the
understanding that some dates will need to be changed due to holidays or lack of agenda.
In the November 4th meeting they want to discuss 1) the final preparations for the November 15th
Kick-off meeting (including what will be each committee member's role in the event and what
questions will be asked on First Friday), 2) which committee members will participate on the RFP
scoring sub-committee, and 3) an update on the Greenhouse Gas Inventory process.
On November 14th at noon, those members interested will join Scott Denning from Fort Collins to
discuss the Fort Collins action plan process. Location to be determined.
Group is considering canceling the November 18t" meeting. If it is held, they will have a debrief
on the Kick-off event.
7. Adjournment
Meeting adjourned at 3:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Diana Shiplet
Executive Assistant
AD-HOC CLIMATE ACTION
AND ENERGY PLAN COMMITTEE
Meeting Minutes
November 4, 2015 - 2:00 PM
Fire Station 41
455 Siskiyou By
Call to Order
Chair Rosenthal called the meeting to order at 2:02. Committee members Alick, Green, Sohl,
Biegel-Coryell, Shawkat were present. Hanks was present as staff. McGinnis arrived at 2:15.
Approval of Minutes
The minutes of the October 7° 2015 meeting were motioned and approved unanimously. Hanks
noted that the October 21'2015 minutes were not included in the packet as they were not yet
complete and would be provided for committee review/approval at the next meeting.
Public Form
Heulz Gutcheon spoke to the Committee about his plan for the Ashland Renewable Energy
Acquisition Department concept and discussed the importance of the upcoming smart grid.
Chair Rosenthal introduced the newest member of the committee, Claudia Alick. Alick provided
a brief summary of her background and current work with the Oregon Shakespeare Festival and
her personal interest in the community and the climate. The group went around the room with
committee member introductions and welcomes to Claudia.
Climate Plan Kick Off Event
Hanna Sohl, Executive Director of Rogue Climate and a partner in the Ashland Climate
Challenge provided the committee with a final update on the Kick off week programs and events,
going over the most current calendar and expectations of the final event on Sunday the 15th. The
group asked some clarifying questions and Rosenthal offered a suggestion on the wording on the
promotion of one of the week's events. Sohl stated she would update the wording accordingly.
Rosenthal reminded the committee of the scheduled meeting with Dr Scott Denning, the kick-
off event keynote speaker on November 10' at noon. Hanks noted that a meeting location
hadn't yet been selected. Green offered the Food Co-op classroom and Hanks offered to
organize a City funded lunch for the committee and Dr. Denning. All approved of both ideas
Climate & Energy Action Plan RFP
Rosenthal asked Hanks to inform the committee of the RFP review and scoring committee
selection and responsibilities. Hanks noted that the process is confidential throughout the
duration of the process and becomes public record after the appeal period is complete, which is
seven days after the Council approved notice of intent to award.
CITY OF
S H LAS N D
Hanks and the committee discussed the conflict of interest rules and clarified several examples to
ensure the committee understood. The Committee discussed which members would be
interested in participating and asked Hanks some questions about process, time commitment, etc.
The group narrowed the field of interested members and decided to make a final decision at the
next Committee meeting.
Update on GHG Inventory project
Hanks provided an update to the committee on the ongoing Greenhouse Gas Inventory project
and stated that the data collection is roughly 80% complete, with the community scope
transportation data being the toughest to compile. Hanks and the consultant, Good Company, are
working with the transportation modeling planners at ODOT to get Ashland only data from the
regional data modeling software used.
The project is on track for a completed inventory report in mid-January.
Schedule and Agenda for Upcoming Meetings
The group discussed upcoming meetings and decided that a meeting immediately after the kick-
off may be too soon and decided to have the next meeting on Wednesday, December 2°d at 2:00
back in the Siskiyou Room at the Community Development building.
Rosenthal adjourned the meeting at 3:30.
ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Meeting Minutes
November 4, 2015
Community Development/Engineering Services Building - 51 Winburn Way - Siskiyou Room
REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER 6:04p.m. - SISKIYOU ROOM in the Community
Development/Engineering Services Building, located at 51 Winburn Way
Historic Commissioners Present: Mr. Skibby, Ms. Kencairn, Ms. Renwick, Mr. Emery, Mr. Ladygo,
Mr. Shostrom, Mr. Giordano
Commission Members Absent: Mr. Swink (E), Mr. Whitford (E)
Council Liaison : Carol Voisin
Staff Present: Staff Liaison: Mark Schexnayder; Clerk: Regan Trapp
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Ms. Kencairn motioned to approve minutes from October 7, 2015. Mr. Ladygo seconded. No one
opposed.
PUBLIC FORUM:
There was no one in the audience wishing to speak.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT:
Ms. Voisin gave the Council Liaison report.
OLD BUSINESS:
Public Arts Commission, Gateway Island proposal. Public input and Commission recommendations
on the proposal will happen during this time.
Mr. Skibby opened the discussion by reading a statement from Bill Molnar in regards to the Gateway
Island Proposal and what their focus needs to be during this discussion time.
Mr. Skibby asked if there was conflict of interest or ex parte contact. Ms. Renwick brought to the
attention of the Commission that she was selected for the Arts Commission review panel as a
modern art historian and went on to say that was she was not appointed as a representative from the
Historic Commission. Ms. Renwick stated that she does not beleive she has a conflict of interest or
financial gain in this project.
Mr. Schexnayder reminded the Historic Commission that unless a Commissioner has financial
conflict, they are not required to recuse themselves. Mr. Schexnayder emphasized that if a
Commissioner has a pre-disposition likely to affect their objectivity they should disclose it now.
Mr. Skibby opened the discussion for comment from the public regarding "Gather".
George Kramer of 326 N. Laurel, Ashland, OR addressed the Commission and read his letter to the
Historic Commission into record regarding the "Gather" sculpture. See exhibit A, attached. Mr.
Kramer stated that he opposed the scale of the sculpture and the process by which it was chosen.
He stressed that he does not agree with the Public Arts Commission's broken process and
encourages the Historic Commission to protect the downtown by making a clear and strong
statement to City Council.
David Powell of 875 Beswick Way, Ashland, OR addressed the Commission regarding the "Gather"
sculpture. Mr. Powell does not like the scale, massing and location of the sculpture and stated that it
does not fit in with what he pictures Ashland to be. Mr. Powell feels that the City should be promoting
the Historic character of the town in such a public place.
Alice Mallory of 438 Taylor, Ashland OR addressed the Commission regarding the "Gather"
sculpture. Ms. Mallory stated that she represents the thoughts of many citizens of Ashland and
would like to ask the City Council to please reconsider the placement of the "Gather" sculpture. Ms.
Mallory feels that this large, expansive and expensive, contemporary sculpture would best be suited
for the grounds of the City Government offices on East Main Street. A large piece of art like this
would complement the Contemporary architectural style of the City offices and could become a
symbolic invitation welcoming people to the civic center, the "gathering place" of our local
government. This location would provide a home for the "Gather" sculpture, in harmony with its
theme and its size while expanding Ashland's reputation as an art community beyond the downtown
periphery. The Historic core should be preserved as an area apart from the contemporary and urban
areas of town. She is one of many that would like to see a vigorous recruitment of artists from the
Rogue Valley. She asks that the City Council slow the pace of this process and plan a public
listening meeting so that all voices may be heard.
Mr. Skibby closed public input and opened to the Commissioners for comments regarding "Gather".
Mr. Giordano stated that he was impressed with the public comment and could not add more to what
was said.
Ms. Renwick remarked that an attack on the Public Arts Commission is inappropriate. Having been a
part of this process, they were in no way any of the things mentioned in George Kramer's letter.
They were rigorous in their selections and the issue about local artists is that they are, for the most
part, not capable of handling an installation of this scale. She emphasized that locals do not pay the
Transient Occupancy Tax (Hotels/Motels) which paid for the "Gather" sculpture. She stressed that
according to the City website it is not the job of the Public Art Commission to bring art to the Historic
Commission nor is it the Historic Commission's job to comment on it. Ms. Renwick went on to say
that an ADHOC committee with both Historic and Public Arts representative's should be formed to
change the flawed process. As a member of the Public Arts Commission selection committee, each
member had to write a letter to the City Council. Ms. Renwick read aloud her letter addressed to the
City Council stating she is in favor of the sculpture.
There was some discussion by the Commission on the size, scale and measurements of the "Gather"
sculpture.
Ms. Renwick read aloud the charters of both the Ashland Historic Commission and the Public Arts
Commission. Ms. Renwick stated that the descriptions are vague but the point is that we need to
address the process. She went on to say that the "Gather" piece has been chosen and that the
Historic Commission has known about this for at least 3 years. Ms. Renwick declared that the
process going forward needs to be addressed.
Ms. Voisin impressed upon the importance that the Historic Commission make some
recommendations to the City Council on location, placement, size and materials of the "Gather"
sculpture.
Ms. Kencairn thinks the "Gather" sculpture is appropriate but says the process is flawed.
Mr. Emery thinks the "Gather" sculpture is appropriate but says the process is flawed.
Mr. Skibby thinks the art is inappropriate for the area. He stated that it would be more suitable in
another location. He commented that it competes with the surroundings and is not compatible with
the Historic District.
Mr. Kramer interrupted the Commission review and stated that the fact that Ms. Renwick is testifying
for the Public Arts Commission when she is a Commissioner on the Historic Commission is totally
inappropriate. Mr. Kramer requested a rebuttal once the Commission is done with their comments.
Mr. Skibby allowed rebuttal.
Mr. Shostrom is most concerned about the process. He added that the "Gather" sculpture is out of
scale and character for the area.
Mr. Giordano stated that art is very subjective and knows there are specific things they are supposed
to comment on but is unable to comment because, in his opinion, the artist made "Gather" for that
location. He agrees that the process is flawed.
Mr. Ladygo added that he too feels the process is flawed. He went on to say that someone from both
the Public Arts Commission and the Historic Commission needs to represent at the Commission
meetings. Mr. Ladygo stated that, of the 3 finalists, "Gather" was the most appropriate for the
location. Mr. Ladygo is unsure that anything better could have resulted from the process that was in
place at the time.
Mr. Swink was absent from the meeting but submitted a letter to the Historic Commission in regards
to the "Gather" sculpture. Ms. Trapp noted this letter for the record. See attached exhibit B.
Mr. Skibby allowed rebuttal time from the public.
Mr. Kramer referenced the duties and responsibilities of the Historic and Arts Commission charter in
section 18 which lays out the responsibilities of design review. He declared that the Historic
Commission needs to treat this as though the Public Arts Commission was any other applicant. He
pointed out that the "Gather" sculpture was made to be a landmark and that this landmark will impede
the view of the Ashland Springs Hotel "by design". Mr. Kramer went on to say that that the Public
Arts Commission did not consider these issues when they wrote the criteria for the RFP. He stressed
that the Historic Commission should not allow a failed process to create an incompatible product that
will take over a major part of the Downtown area.
Ms. Mallory mentioned that she was a tourist in Ashland for many years and was brought here by
Ashland's unique character. She noted that tourist's pay for the art but are not asked what they
would like to see in Ashland. She went on to say that the residents of Ashland need to be made
aware of these projects and that the Commissions need to do a better job of getting the word out.
She pointed out that there are voices out there that would like to be heard and would appreciate
being notified about public input sessions.
Mr. Powell was surprised that the downtown art project would not be reviewed by the Historic
Commission and that all future projects in this area should go through their review.
Mr. Schexnayder gave the Historic Commission direction on what needed to be done to send a clear
message to the City Council.
After review the Historic Commission was unanimous in their opinion that the process used to select
public artwork is flawed. Furthermore, they believe that any Public Arts Commission project proposed
to be located within Ashland's Nationally Registered Historic District should require a
recommendation by the Historic Commission to the City Council. In this instance, they find that the
Public Arts Commission Master Plan and the Gateway Island Project RFP are inconsistent. In
regards to the artwork selected by the Public Arts Commission for the Gateway Island Project the
Historic Commission's opinion was divided. The following is a tally of votes in favor and against four
aspects of the project that affect historic compatibility:
Location and Placement - 4 in favor vs. 3 against
Scale and Massing - 4 in favor vs. 3 against
Materials - 4 in favor vs. 3 against
Overall Process used for Selection of the Artwork - 0 in favor vs. 7 against
It should be noted that Mr. Giordano abstained from the voting.
PLANNING ACTION REVIEW:
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01517
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 209 Oak St., 221 Oak St., 225 Oak St. and 11 B St.
OWNER/APPLICANT: Spartan Ashland Natalie Real Estate, LLC
AGENTS: Kistler, Small & White, Architects
DESCRIPTION: A request for Outline Plan, Final Plan and Site Design Review approvals
for the properties at 209 Oak Street, 221 Oak Street, 225 Oak Street and 11 B Street. The
proposal includes the renovation of two existing, historic homes; the construction of six
townhouses along B Street; and the construction a new, detached residential cottage.
Also included are requests for a Variance to allow a 15-foot wide, one-way driveway where
a 20-foot driveway width would typically be required; two Conditional Use Permits to allow
a 25 percent increase in the Maximum Permitted Floor Area, and to allow a commercial
use within an existing, historic residential building; and an Exception to the Street
Standards to allow a curbside sidewalk along B Street where a planting strip would
typically be required between the curb and sidewalk. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION: Low Density Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S
MAP: 391 E 09613; TAX LOTS: 15600, 15700, 15900 and 16000
Mr. Schexnayder gave the staff report on PA-2015-01517
Mr. Skibby opened the public hearing to the applicant.
Ray Kistler of Kistler, Small, White addressed the Commission in regards to the final plan for a type
two site review for the renovation of the two historic houses, construction of six townhouses and a
residential cottage.
Leslie Gore of Kistler, Small, White, elaborated on the concerns and issues, brought up at the
October Historic Commission meeting.
Mr. Skibby closed the public hearing and opened to the Commission.
Mr. Giordano motioned to approve PA-2015-01517 with below conditions and recommendations.
Mr. Ladygo seconded. No one opposed.
The Historic Commission recommends approving the application as submitted subject to the
specific recommendations below:
1. The Historic Commission recommends composition shingle roofs for the Mickelson-Chapman
House and Smith-Elliot House because this treatment is historically compatible. Metal roof is
appropriate for the new cottage.
2. The Historic Commission would prefer the Mickelson-Chapman House remain a residential use
because this house is a historical residence.
3. The Historic Commission recommends that the porch and dormers be restored and that siding
be replaced in kind where necessary.
4. The Historic Commission supports the Exception to Street Standards to allow the continuation
of the existing curbside sidewalk pattern established with the Winston Building at the corner of
Water and B Streets because this design would allow for larger porches and retains the historic
location of the sidewalk.
NEW ITEMS:
Review board schedule
Project assignments for planning actions
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Email from David Sherr. Mr. Skibby requested that this be tabled until the next regular meeting.
COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA:
There were no items to discuss.
Review Board Schedule
November 12th Terry, Kerry, Bill
November 19th Terry, Sam, Tom
November 25th (Weds) Terry, Allison, Andrew
December 3rd Terry, Sam, Keith
Project Assignments for Planninq Actions
PA-2014-01956 Lithia & First All
PA-2014-00710/711 _ 14_3/135 Nutley- - - Swink & Whitford
PA-2014-01283 172 Skidmore Shostrom
PA-2014-00251 30 S. First St Whitford
BD-2013-00813 374 Hargadine _ Swink
PA-2013-01828 310 Oak St. (Thompson) Shostrom
PA-2014-02206 485 A Street Renwick
PA-2015-00178 156 Van Ness Ave _ Kencairn
PA -2015-00374 160 Lithia Way Eme
PA-2015-00541 345 Lithia Way Giordano & Renwick
PA-2015-00493 _ 37 N. Main _ Skibby
PA-2015-00878 _ 35 S. Pioneer Ladygo
PA-2015-01163 868 A' Street Kencairn
PA-2015-00980 637 B' Street Shostrom
PA-2015-00797 266 Third Ladygo
PA-2015-01115 34 S. Pioneer Ladygo _
PA-2015-01496 35 S. Second-Winchester Inn Shostrom
PA-2015-01512 198 Hillcrest Swink
PA-2015-01695_ 399 Beach Skibb
PA-2015-01769 860 C Renwick
PA-2015-01517 209 Oak Shostrom
ANNOUNCEMENTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
Next meeting is scheduled for December 2, 2015 at 6:00 pm.
There being no other items to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 8:25pm
Respectfully submitted by Regan Trapp
r n ,
t
Testimony of George Kramer, 386 N Laurel, Ashland
As presented to the Ashland Historic Conuni.ssion, 4-Nov-2015 j
"Old Business, PAC Gateway Island Proposal
Eliminating the AHC from this process by choice, in my opinion invalidates the ENTIRE process.
As a result the Gateway Island Project from the beginning has been mis-guided, ill-conceived and
counter to the character of downtown. Gather may be a nice piece but it is too big, too tall, and
visually incompatible with the character of downtown precisely because that is what the PAC ask
for. The right response to the wrong question is still wrong. This process was flawed from the
start, Gatlwr is the entirely predictable result.
i
I encourage this Commission to do its job and in protecting downtown. I encourage you to make a
clear and strong statement to City Council that a work like Gather, while perhaps attractive, is
nevertheless wrong and incompatible with the character of downtown that you are bound to
protect. The process the PAC has followed did not allow your input in a timely manner and, had it,
we might have avoided this controversy,
This is not about "Art." It is not about contemporary or what I like or you like. This is about '
location and scale. The PAC should either move Gather to a spot where its scale is appropriate or
they should go back to the drawing board. And this time they should follow the same standards
that everyone else does, and have their proposals for Downtown reviewed by the Ashland Historic a
Commssion before they get to the point of reconunending a preferred design to City Council. And
we should fix this problem before any future project, including the $75K downtown beautification
project that Council has alrady funded for installation between Starbucks and the old Fortmiller's
building.
While Gather should be stopped, this isn't about Gather. Its about the broken process that allowed it
to proceed and that process needs to be fixed. I would encourage the AHC to put that in your
recommendation to Council too. If not, I fully expect we'll all be here doing this again in the future.
Respectfully Submitted,
i
George Kramer
386 North Laurel
Ashland, OR
george@preserveoregon.co
m
i
Page 2 of 2
i
f
Keith Swink
Eagle Harbor Designs
524 Granite St,
Ashland, Oregon 97520 CCB#134824
(541) 482-1133 LBPR#134824
(541) 482-8857 (fax) CSLB#500745 B HIC
November 2, 2015
Dear fellow Historic Commission members,
Since I will not be present for the November 4`r' commission meeting, I wanted to
comment in writing a few of my concerns about the PAC gateway sculpture discussion
that I will be missing.
Firstly, I want to emphasize that I feel that public art is important in all communities. I
However..... I believe that the current way that the Historic Commission and Arts l
Commission constantly run at odds in their respective missions has an ongoing and
and frustrating history that needs to be rectified now.
t
As a member of the Historic Commission 1 feel that any public artwork that is considered
for the installation in any historic district needs to be approved by the Historic
Commission. Period!
i
The Arts Commission needs to submit their intentions to our commission just as anyone
that has building projects that would impact the historic character of our designated
historic districts would. Especially for an installation that will have such a significant
visual effect on our historic downtown corridor as the currently proposed Gateway
sculpture. I believe that the currently proposed sculpture is completely inappropriate to
represent our community in any way. To me, it is in no way historically compatible with
our downtown street scape. It seems to be a sculpture more compatible in a more
contemporary large open space park setting.
3
I think it is all well and good that the Arts Commission noticed meetings over the past
year or more for the public for comment, however, they should have been coming to the
scheduled Historic Commission meetings for our feedback and approval before making
unilateral decisions about such an important piece of artwork that should represent our
community.
It is way past time that this situation, where our commissions continually work at cross
purpose be rectified by the city council and I support any direction the commission
deems appropriate to help rectify this currently flawed process we are regularly
struggling with.
Sincerely,
Keith Swi
CITY OF
ASHLAND
ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
OCTOBER 27, 2015
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Melanie Mindlin called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 East Main Street.
Commissioners Present: Staff Present:
Troy J. Brown, Jr. Bill Molnar, Community Development Director
Michael Dawkins Maria Harris, Planning Manager
Debbie Miller April Lucas, Administrative Supervisor
Melanie Mindlin
Haywood Norton
Roger Pearce
Lynn Thompson
Absent Members: Council Liaison:
None Greg Lemhouse, absent
ANNOUNCEMENTS & AD HOC COMMITTEE UPDATES
Community Development Director Bill Molnar updated the commission on the Normal Neighborhood Plan. He stated the City
Council has held two meetings and approved first reading of two of the three ordinances. The Council made a minor
amendment to reduce the size of the neighborhood commercial overlay and the ordinances have been continued to
November 17, 2015. Mr. Molnar requested the commission check their holiday schedules and stated it is likely either the
November or December study session will be cancelled.
PUBLIC FORUM
No one came forward to speak.
LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARING
A. PLANNING ACTION: PL-2015-01677
DESCRIPTION: An ordinance amending chapters 18.2.2, 18.2.3, 18.2.5, 18.3.3, 18.3.5 and 18.6.1 of the Ashland
Land Use Ordinance relating to homegrown marijuana cultivation and marijuana- related businesses including
production, processing, retail sales, testing, and wholesale.
Planning Manager Maria Harris reviewed the draft ordinance and noted the ordinance addresses both homegrown
marijuana and marijuana related businesses. She explained the following changes have been made to the ordinance since
the commission's last review:
• Laboratories were added as an eligible use in the E-1 and M-1 zones.
• Marijuana related businesses were added to the list of prohibited uses for a home occupation.
• The limitation on the number of indoor plants was deleted.
• Removed the sliding scale for number of plants allowed on larger lots.
• Removed language prohibiting homemade marijuana extracts.
• Added language to ensure outdoor grows are secured at all times.
• Added 1,000 ft. separation requirement for retail outlets.
• Added language that prohibits vacant dwelling units for being use for marijuana cultivation.
Ashland Planning Commission
October 27, 2095
Page 1 of 4
Ms. Harris identified the following items for commission deliberations:
Cultivation Area Location
Ms. Harris stated the draft ordinance includes a requirement for residents to locate the cultivation area closer to their primary
residence than to dwellings on adjoining properties or to dwellings in the same multifamily development. However, staff has
some concerns about this. Ms. Harris explained this would be a fairly complicated standard for a resident grower to figure
out and would likely require review of aerial maps to determine distances. This requirement would also be more difficult for
staff to administer and enforce.
Maximum Plant Height
Ms. Harris stated the current draft sets a 10 ft. maximum height, however staff has suggested coordinating this with the 6.5
ft. maximum fence height.
Setbacks
Ms. Harris stated the draft ordinance establishes a 10 ft. setback from property lines and 20 ft. from residences. If the
commission changed this to 20 ft. from property lines and 30 ft. from residences it would adversely impact many of the
homes in the R-1.5 zoning district, as well as smaller lots and townhouses throughout town. Ms. Harris stated on larger lots
the setback is not an issue, but smaller lots would not have an area eligible for outdoor growing.
Southern Oregon University & Croman Mill Districts
Ms. Harris clarified the need to add a provision for homegrown marijuana in the Southern Oregon University and Croman
Mill zoning districts. She noted this was an oversight and should have been included in the original draft.
Questions of Staff
Commissioner Dawkins expressed concern with the cultivation space requirements and stated he is not clear why this
limitation is needed or whether 50 sq.ft. is enough space. He also recommended the measurement of the setback be taken
from the center of the plant's base. Comment was made that the restrictions are there to limit odor. Dawkins countered that
residents are already limited to four plants. Community Development Director Bill Molnar explained the intent was to limit the
size of the planting area and associated odor, and stated a single marijuana plant can grow to 25 sq.ft.
Commissioner Thompson suggested the ordinance include a reference to the limitations set by the state law. Ms. Harris
stated staff did discuss this with the city's attorney and came to the conclusion to not reference all of the state's laws and
rules since they are constantly evolving. Commission Thompson requested the ordinance include a statement similar to '%n
addition to the requirements contained in... "so that people are aware that there are other requirements that apply.
Commissioner Pearce commented on section 18.2.3.190.A.3 and asked how this ordinance would apply to someone who
owned multiple lots. Ms. Harris stated if someone owns multiple lots on a contiguous piece of property staff would treat this
as a single lot; however, she stated she would look into this further.
Request was made to amend the Homegrown Marijuana definition (pg. 36) to read: for personal consumption, whether
for medical or non-medica/purposes, orfora medical mar#uana cardholder. "Amendment request was also made to
change 18.2.3.190.4.131a to read: 'Outdoormar#uana cultivation orstorage of merchandise, rawmaterials, orother
material associated with the business is prohibited. "A typo was noted at the top of page 36; it should be corrected to read:
cultivation of fragile or out-of-season pl ants for personal enjoyment or for subsequent use. "
Staff was asked whether limiting the height would reduce odors. Ms. Harris explained the 6.5 ft. height limitation was
suggested to address visibility issues from other residences as well as security concerns. She stated if people can't see it
hopefully they won't try to access it. Comment was made that using the fence height is an easy marker for homeowners to
know where they need to top their plants.
Comment was made expressing concern with the term "limiting view" and it was questioned if the ordinance should say
"prohibit view" instead. Ms. Harris stated you can't completely limit the view from a two-story residence, but if you go with the
fence height limitation neighbors won't be able to see the plants from yard level.
Ashland Planning Commission
October 27. 2015
Page 2 of 4
Staff was asked how the noise created by fans will be addressed. Ms. Harris clarified the legal department will be updating
the nuisance section of the municipal code to address this.
Staff was asked if a minimum setback would present the same problems as requiring residents to locate grow areas closer
to their residence than adjacent residences. Ms. Harris stated the setback is a bit more manageable because it is a set
figure that applies to everyone.
Staff was asked why the plant height would be limited if they are not visually unappealing and it was noted other plants
(tomatoes, etc.) do not have a height limitation. Ms. Harris explained staff has received concerns from residents with
children who live next door to grows and this would limit the potential for children to access the plants.
Staff was asked to explain the removal of the indoor growing limitation. Ms. Harris stated the city cannot legally enter a
person's home and therefore any city limitation on the number of indoor plants would be unenforceable. It was noted,
however, that the state does limit the total number of plants allowed. If you have four or less plants total, you are not subject
to the state's licensing requirements, but if you have more than four plants you must adhere to the state's regulations.
Commissioner Dawkins noted that retail establishments cannot be both medical and recreational; they have to be registered
as one or the other under state law.
Commission Deliberations
Commissioner Mindlin stated she is not in favor of limiting height and stated marijuana is now legal and people's attitudes
will eventually change about seeing it. She added limiting the height could create a hardship for someone attempting to grow
a plant and could kill it. However, she stated she is very concerned with odor and voiced support for the restriction on the
size of the cultivation area, even if this means people can't grow four large plants outdoors.
Commissioner Norton voiced support for Dawkins' idea to use the base of the plant when measuring where it sits in the 50
ft. cultivation area.
Commissioner Brown stated he would prefer to be more restrictive starting out and agreed that the community's attitude will
change over time. He voiced support for the 6.5 height limit and stated this will help with security. He added if down the road
they find 6.5 ft. is not working it can be increased. The setbacks could also be changed to be more lenient in the future if it's
deemed appropriate.
Commissioner Pearce voiced support for the larger setbacks and keeping the language that states the cultivation area
needs to be closer to the residence than neighboring residences. Commissioner Miller disagreed and sated this is too
subjective. She added the city has setbacks for chickens, and goats, and everything else and believes this would work fine.
She noted she is also in favor of the larger setbacks, even though this won't work for townhouses and smaller lots.
Commissioner Dawkins stated he is not in favor of the cultivation area. He stated growing marijuana is a big job and most
people won't find satisfaction in it. And by legalizing it, there will be a much wider selection available at retail stores. He
added if the ordinance is too restrictive it will push people to grow indoors and people should be allowed to use our climate
for this.
The commission discussed reducing commercial sites from 10,000 sq.ft to a maximum of 5,000 sq.ft. Comment was made
that they should not be encouraging commercial sites in the city and these should be located in agricultural areas instead.
Statement was made that if the maximum size was reduced this would push these uses out to where they really belong.
General agreement was voiced to lower the maximum commercial site size to 5,000 sq.ft.
Commissioners Dawkins/Thompson m/s to restrict commercial sites to 5,000 sq.ft. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion
passed unanimously.
Commissioners Brown/Dawkins m/s to include the Southern Oregon University and Croman Mill zoning districts to
the ordinance. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion passed unanimously.
Ashland Planning Commission
October 27; 2015
Page 3 of 4
Ms. Harris clarified she would correct the minor word-smithing items raised during deliberations and would include a
reference in the homegrown section to the state law requirements.
Commissioners PearcelDawkins m/s to recommend approval of PL-2015-01677 as amended. Roll Call Vote:
Commissioners Dawkins, Thompson, Brown, Norton, Miller, Pearce, and Mindlin. Roll Call Vote: all AYES. Motion
passed unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:25 p.m.
Submitted by,
April Lucas, Administrative Supervisor
Ashland Planning Commission
October 27, 2095
Page 4 of 4
CITY OF
-ASHLAND
ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING
MINUTES
NOVEMBER 10, 2015
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Melanie Mindlin called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 East Main Street.
Commissioners Present: Staff Present:
Troy J. Brown, Jr. Bill Molnar, Community Development Director
Michael Dawkins Derek Severson, Associate Planner
Debbie Miller April Lucas, Administrative Supervisor
Melanie Mindlin
Haywood Norton
Roger Pearce
Lynn Thompson
Absent Members: Council Liaison:
None Greg Lemhouse
ANNOUNCEMENTS
Community Development Director announced the first reading of the final of the three ordinances for the Normal
Neighborhood Plan will go before the City Council next week, and the public hearing for the marijuana ordinance is scheduled
for December 1. Council Liaison Greg Lemhouse added the Council will also be conducting second reading of the ordinances
on downtown behavior at their next meeting.
AD HOC COMMITTEE UPDATES
Commissioner Thompson provided an update on the Downtown Parking Management and Circulation Committee. She
explained there will be a phased approach and the consultant's draft parking plan is available on the City's website. Details
include hiring a city parking manager, negotiating shared use agreements with the owners of private parking lots, and
potentially paid parking and residential permits. Thompson stated the first phase will last 18 months and the plan will go before
the City Council for approval early next year with a potential start date of July 1, 2016.
CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of Minutes
1. October 13, 2015 Regular Meeting.
Commissioners Thompson/Miller m/s to approve the Consent Agenda. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion passed
unanimously.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Adoption of Findings for PA-2015-00797, 266 Third Street.
No ex parte contact was reported.
Commissioners Miller/Brown m/s to approve the Findings for PA-2015-00797. Voice Vote: all AYES. Motion passed
unanimously.
Ashland Planning Commission
November 10, 2015
Page 1 of 6
TYPE II PUBLIC HEARING
A. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01517
SUBJECT PROPERTIES: 209 Oak St., 221 Oak St., 225 Oak St. and 11 B St. (And shared drivewaypartiallyon
237-239 Oak St.)
OWNER/APPLICANT: Spartan Ashland Natalie Real Estate, LLC
AGENTS: Kistler, Small & White, Architects
DESCRIPTION: A request for Outline Plan, Final Plan and Site Design Review approvals for the properties at 209
Oak Street, 221 Oak Street, 225 Oak Street and 11 B Street. The proposal includes the renovation of two existing,
historic homes; the construction of six townhouses along B Street; and the construction a new, detached
residential cottage. Also included are requests for a Variance to allow a 15-foot wide, one-way driveway where a
20-foot driveway width would typically be required; two Conditional Use Permits to allow a 25 percent increase in
the Maximum Permitted Floor Area, and to allow a commercial use within an existing, historic residential
building; an Exception to the Street Standards to allow a curbside sidewalk along B Street where a planting strip
would typically be required between the curb and the sidewalk; an Exception to the Site Development and Design
Standards to allow the placement of a new residence on proposed Lot #9 to be placed behind the setback line of
adjacent historic buildings; and a Tree Removal Permit to remove two trees which are within the footprints of
proposed buildings. (The proposal involves use of the existing driveway which is partially located on the
ad. jacent property to the north at 237-239 Oak Street- this property's owner has signed to allow the application to
move forward using the shared driveway.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multi-Family
Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391 E 0966; TAX LOTS: 15600, 15700, 15900 and 16000.
(Continued from October 13, 2015 Planning Commission Meeting.)
Commissioner Mindlin read aloud the public hearing procedures for land use hearings.
Staff Report
Associate Planner Derek Severson provided an overview of the proposal, the applicant's new submittals, and outlined the
issues from the October meeting as follows:
1) Number of Residential Units. The current submittals have eight residential units, with six townhomes, one cottage,
and one residential unit in the Smith-Elliot house, and a commercial office use proposed in the Mickelson-Chapman
house.
2) Entry Fire Separation. The current submittals have not changed the treatment of the slanted partitions providing the
required separation between the units. The Historic Commission has recommended approval as submitted.
3) Metal Roofs. The Historic Commission has stated metal roofs are inappropriate for the two historic homes being
restored, and that composition shingles are the most historically appropriate treatment. They are supportive of metal
roofing for the new cottage and while their recommendations do not speak specifically to the townhomes, they have
recommended approval as submitted.
4) Commercial Use of the Historic Home. The Historic Commission has recommended against a conditional use permit
for the commercial use.
5) Compatibility of Townhomes. At the last meeting it was questioned whether a pitched roof design would be a more
historically-compatible treatment for the residential units, however the Historic Commission did not have concerns
with the proposed roof design.
6) B Street Streetscape. The applicants have requested an exception to the Street Standards to continue the existing
sidewalk pattern and the Historic Commission expressed support for this request noting that it would accommodate
deeper front porches while retaining the historic location of the sidewalk. However, staff believes that a full city
standard 7 ft. parkrow and 6 ft. sidewalk would be preferable, but should the commission grant an exception, staff
strongly recommends a minimum 6 ft. sidewalk with trees planted behind the sidewalk at one tree per 30 ft. to
achieve canopy coverage.
7) Driveways & On-Site Circulation. The current submittals do not include any widening of the driveway as discussed in
October, but the applicants have added a pedestrian walkway within the 15 ft, driveway from the recreational space
to B Street.
Mr. Severson read aloud the recommendations from the Historic and Tree Commissions, and reviewed staff's recommended
conditions for approval.
Ashland Planning Commission
November 10, 2015
Page 2 of 6
Questions of Staff
Mr. Severson stated the application complies with the City's setback requirements; clarified the application shows a 10 ft.
setback to the start of the bay windows; and commented on the potential use of structural soil for trees in a narrower parkrow.
Concern was expressed that trash facilities are not listed on the site plan. Mr. Severson clarified the applicants will need to
meet the City's standards and will also need to work with Recology on the placement of trash facilities.
Mr. Severson clarified as proposed, the applicants meet the parking demand on-site and there is no need for an on-street
parking credit.
Regarding the ADA parking space, Mr. Severson stated it is his understanding that the one space can serve both the
residences and the office space.
Applicant's Presentation
Ray Kistler/Stated there is no standard for one-way driveways and does not believe access to the site warrants two-way
traffic. He also clarified the proposed pedestrian path would be flush with the driveway but a different material would be used.
He stated there is room for a 20 ft. wide driveway but does not believe this serves a purpose or looks as nice. Mr. Kistler
commented on the City's parkrow and sidewalk requirements and stated it is up to the commission on what they would like to
see here. He stated they could make the sidewalk compliant with the standard but this would take 7 ft. from the property
frontage and would negatively impact the people who live in these units. He suggested a compromise be reached on the
parkrow. Regarding the firewall separation, Mr. Kistler stated their intent was to tie this element to the Winston building next
door.
Questions of the Applicant
The applicants were asked to comment on their solution for the trash. Leslie Gore responded that they have met with
Recology and they recommended individual cans picked up at the curb. Comment was made expressing concern with the
number of cans that would be placed on the street for pickup, especially since B Street is already fairly narrow. Mr. Kistler
stated there is space behind the Mickelson house and they could potentially add a screened enclosure at this location. Mr.
Severson noted Recology conducted pickups on the street for the units that are there now.
The applicants were asked if there is an opportunity to push the porches and townhomes back a little so they wouldn't be as
close to the sidewalk and parkrow. Mr. Kistler stated the private outdoor space in the back of each unit in addition to the
garage space for each unit would make this difficult to accomplish.
The applicants were asked if they meet the backup space requirements and Mr. Kistler responded that they have 2 ft. more
than the minimum.
Questions of Staff
Staff was asked to clarify the roofing material standard. Mr. Severson explained the design standards specifically say wood
and metal are to be avoided, and stated the Historic Commission recommended composition shingles for this project. Staff
was asked if the commission decided to not follow this standard, would they have to justify their decision with specific criteria,
and could they consider the City's sustainability goals. Mr. Molnar clarified AMC 18.4.2.050.13 states for projects located at the
boundary between zones or overlays, different treatments may be considered to address compatibility. Comment was made
that if they allow the metal roof this gets ahead of the curve of where the City is heading, but it may make it difficult for other
applicants if they do not know what the commission is wanting. Comment was made that there is a difference between
requiring a different material versus allowing the applicant to do what they have asked for.
Applicants Rebuttal
Leslie Gore clarified the proposed metal roofs are a recyclable material. She also clarified the historic housing units are just 2
bedrooms and 1 bath each, and do not lend themselves to be multifamily units.
Commissioner Mindlin closed the record and the hearing at 8:75 p.m.
Ashland Planning Commission
November 10. 2015
Page 3 of 6
Deliberations & Decision
The commission identified the key issues for deliberation:
Conditional Use Permit
Commissioner Norton commented that the office space is the element that is causing issues for the site. He stated if the office
goes away, the ADA parking issue goes away, they won't need to put a pathway in, and the extra space can be used to solve
the garbage issue. It would also allow for better landscaping and provide a better transition to the new building. Commissioner
Brown stated he is comfortable with an office on the corner. He added a commercial use would work better than a residential
unit due to what is already occurring on that corner, and stated as long as the building maintains its character he is
comfortable with granting the CUP. Commissioner Pearce stated the office use meets the criteria for a CUP and it would not
be a greater impact than other uses in the zone. He added the code does not regulate historic uses and stated he would
support a commercial use. Commissioners Thompson, Dawkins, and Mindlin agreed with Pearce, and Dawkins noted this
building has had commercial uses in the past. Commissioner Miller stated she would prefer to keep this residential but would
not fight this issue.
Sidewalk/Parkrow
Commissioner Dawkins voiced support for widening the sidewalk and agrees with the Historic Commission recommendation
to maintain the larger patios. He stated this would allow a landscaped area above the trees and would provide a better
transition to the building on the corner. Commissioner Miller agreed and stated the parkrow would be problematic.
Commissioner Thompson noted there are a number of historic areas in the city with no parkrows and does not think this would
be an oddity. Commissioner Brown stated widening the sidewalk and installing trees along the building side is the right
approach and would provide shade for the sidewalk and units. Commissioner Pearce agreed and stated adding another 7 ft. to
the project for the parkrow would make it very problematic for the townhouses to work, and voiced support for a 6 ft. sidewalk
with no parkrow. Commissioner Mindlin stated she is interested in a narrower parkrow, but will not go against the group.
Roofing Material
Commissioner Dawkins stated it is appropriate to allow the metal roof. He stated they need to look at this from a sustainable
approach and stated the applicant can put a roof on that looks the way the Historic Commission prefers without using asphalt
material. Commissioner Thompson voiced concern with going against the Historic Commission's recommendation without
having a broader discussion about revising the historic district standards. Commissioner Miller stated she would support metal
over composition if these are their only choices, and stated she is more concerned about the pitch of the roof than the
material. Commissioner Mindlin stated the value of metal roofing is high (rainwater runoff, fireproofing, etc.) and stated wood
shingles are the most historically compatible material but these would not be allowed for fire reasons. She stated composite
roofs are not as good and do not look the same as wood, and voiced support for taking this up with the Historic Commission.
Mindlin voiced her opinion that they have sufficient grounds to allow the applicant to do what they have proposed, and stated
this is different than setting a new standard. Commissioner Pearce agreed with Thompson and stated he is hesitant, but
stated he will not say no to metal. Commissioner Miller recommended they make it clear the metal roof should be darker in
color and not shiny or reflective.
Driveway
Commissioner Pearce commented that there are no special or unique circumstances to justify the variance to the driveway on
B Street. He noted the applicant's statement that there is room for a 20 ft. driveway and stated this would allow for two-way
traffic off B St. He stated this project will add quite a bit of traffic to the site, and with Oak being the busier street it is important
to have an alternate access. Commissioner Brown gave his opinion that the proposed traffic patterns work for the site and
noted that B Street is very narrow. He stated he is okay with the variance and with the proposed 15 ft. width. Commissioner
Thompson commented that because of the constriction at one end she is okay with the 15 ft. driveway onto B Street and
stated it seems to work well with the site plan. Commissioners Norton, Mindlin and Dawkins also voiced their support for the
proposed 15 ft. driveway width. Concern was expressed regarding vision clearance at the B Street driveway and Mr. Severson
stated they can include a condition that requires a wider apron width, no parking within 10 ft. on either side, and trees selected
and placed to ensure the vision clearance standards are met.
Ashland Planning Commission
November 90, 2095
Page 4 of 6
Proposed Staff Conditions
Based on the commissions discussions, Mr. Severson stated they will want to remove the Historic Commission
recommendations for the composition shingle roof and a residential use only in the Mickelson-Chapman house, and edit
condition #9L to state 'Pedestrian circulation shall not reduce the driveway width below the proposed 75-ft, width but may
include a materially distinct pedestrian path within the driveway "Recommendation was made to modify condition #9M to state
"Building permit submittals are to include the identification of the placement of the trash enclosure, if any. "M r. Severson
questioned whether there was any interest in tying the restoration of the historic homes to the construction of the townhomes
and if so, suggested a condition that would state prior to the issuance of the fourth occupancy permit, the restoration of one of
the historic homes should be completed and before the completion of the last townhome or cottage the second restoration
shall be completed. Commissioner Pearce commented that until they know how the financing for this project will work he is
reluctant to include such a condition. Commissioner Dawkins noted they have had issues in the past with affordable units
never getting built and gave his opinion that it is reasonable to include a condition that addresses this. Commissioners Brown
and Mindlin supported a condition to address the timing, and Mindlin noted this is the only tool they have to ensure this gets
done. Commissioner Norton commented that if the houses are not improved the applicants will have a difficult time selling the
townhouses and he is not sure this condition is necessary.
Commissioners Brown/Dawkins m/s to approve PA-2015-01517 with the modifications and staff recommendations for
conditions #3, #4 ,#9J, #9L, #9M (including adding "if any" to the end), #11A, and conditions as stated by staff
addressing the timing and the vision clearance along B Street. DISCUSSION: Commissioner Norton stated he can't
support the motion and stated the full 25% bonus plus the office space is too much for the site. Commissioner Pearce stated
he is uneasy about the timing condition, but he will support the motion. Commissioner Miller stated she reluctantly supports
the motion and stated her preference would be for the units to look more residential. Commissioner Mindlin voiced support for
the motion and believes they have addressed all the issues. Roll Call Vote: Commissioners Brown, Thompson, Miller,
Pearce, Dawkins, and Mindlin, YES. Commissioner Norton, NO. Motion passed 6-1.
B. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01284
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 474 Russell Street
OWNER/APPLICANT: Laz Ayala/Ayala Properties, LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to construct two mixed-use buildings for the property
located at 474 Russell Street. "Building A" will be a two-story, mixed use 8,688 square foot building consisting
of commercial space and garages on the ground floor, and four residential condominiums on the second floor;
"Building B" will be a two-story 12,617 feet commercial building consisting of commercial space with six
residential condominiums on the second floor. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING:
E-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 09AA; TAX LOTS: 2805.
Ex Parte Contact
Commissioners Pearce, Norton, Mindlin, Brown, and Miller conducted site visits; no ex parte communication was reported.
Staff Report
Associate Planner Derek Severson reviewed the application to construct two mixed use buildings at 474 Russell Drive. He
noted the bulk of the infrastructure is already installed, including the parking lots, streetscape, and pedestrian connection. He
reviewed the site plan, Tree Commission recommendations, landscape plan, floor plans, and elevations. He commented on
the commercial/residential split requirements (AMC 18.2.3.130.B.1) and provided a detailed overview of the parking
calculations. Mr. Severson explained the applicant's have illustrated how the parking will work as the commercial space
develops and provided a summary of their parking management strategy. He stated in evaluating the request staff believes
there is reasonable assumption that the residential and commercial parking demand will be offset and staff is recommending
approval of the parking management strategy and requiring 28 on-site spaces with 4 on-street credits and a 12.8% reduction.
Mr. Severson commented that it difficult to tell from the submittal how wide the entryways are and whether they would provide
adequate protection from sun and rain, and noted staff has recommended a condition of approval to address this. He also
commented on the fenestration standard and suggested the commission consider the number and placement of windows to
ensure large masses are divided into a more human scale. Mr. Severson concluded his presentation and stated staff is
recommending approval with the conditions as presented.
Ashland Planning Commission
November 10. 2015
Page 5 of 6
Applicant's Presentation
Mark Knox/604 Fair Oaks/Mr. Knox introduced Laurie Sager, Laz Ayala, Cindy Dwyer, and Gary Caperna. He thanked staff
for the thorough presentation and stated they have no issues with the recommendations of the Tree Commission. He
commented briefly on the parking and stated he would let the project architect comment on the number and placement of
windows. Mr. Caperna addressed the commission and stated he understands staff's concern, but some of the window
placement is restricted by what's happening internally in the building. He stated they could potentially add some high windows
and noted some of the window locations suggested by staff are on walls where you would normally place a bed. He stated
staff's suggestion might be more aggressive than what they can feasibly incorporate, and noted engineering issues need to be
considered. Regarding the overhang at the entries, Mr. Caperna stated they could address staff's concerns by recessing the
doors a little more and extend the canopy to satisfy whatever conditions the Planning Commission adopts.
Questions of the Applicant
Mr. Knox clarified there are 10 units proposed and each unit will have its own garage space. Regarding the west elevation, he
explained this side of the building faces the undeveloped railroad property and if the commission requires additional windows
on this frontage they should serve a purpose. Landscape Architect Laurie Sager addressed the commission and suggested
trees or plant materials be considered as part of the solution.
Commissioner Mindlin closed the record and the hearing at 9:45 pm.
Deliberations & Decision
Commissioner Brown voiced support for the site plan and parking, but stated if the fenestration requirements are going to be
addressed with plantings the applicants need to provide a revised landscape plan that shows this. Commissioner Dawkins
voiced support for windows on the east side and questioned covering the walls with plants. Commissioner Mindlin stated this
is a small element of the proposal and believes they could condition this and leave it up to staff to make sure it is met.
Commissioner Pearce agreed and stated if the applicants can work with staff on the east wall he is fine with moving this
forward. Mr. Severson read aloud the proposed staff recommendation to address this issue (Condition #9K) and stated if the
commission is not concerned about the west side and the walls adjacent to the plaza space the condition could be revised to
just state the east end. Recommendation was made for an additional modification that would change the condition to read
'additional windows, or other design treatments"so that staff is not limited to approving only windows.
Commissioners Dawkins/Pearce m/s to approve PA-2015-01284 with the addition of condition #9K as discussed. Roll
Call Vote: Commissioners Brown, Dawkins, Pearce, Miller, Thompson, Norton, and Mindlin, YES. Motion passed
unanimously.
ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 10:00 p.m.
Submitted by,
April Lucas, Administrative Supervisor
Ashland Planning Commission
November 10, 2015
Page 6 of 6
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Council Communication
December 15, 2015, Business Meeting
Contract Specific-Special Procurement - Tyler Technologies
FROM
Lee Tuneberg, Administrative Service Director, Lee.Tuneberg@ashland.or.us
SUMMARY
This Contract Specific-Special Procurement (sourcing method) is being used to seek an exemption
from the competitive bid process. It will allow the City's Administrative Services Department to
award a contract to Tyler Technologies for financial software, conversion and migration services
effective January 1, 2016.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
A Special Procurement is used for the purpose of seeking an exemption from the competitive bid
process, custom designing a contracting approach, or the direct selection or award of a public contract
or for a series of contracts. The attached and completed special procurement, approval request form is
attached for your review and consideration.
AMC 2.50.090 Exemptions from Formal Competitive Selection Procedures
All Public Contracts shall be based upon Competitive Sealed Bidding (Invitation to Bid) or
Competitive Sealed Proposals (Request for Proposal) pursuant to ORS 279A - 279C and the Model
Rules except for the following:
G. Special Procurements - a public contract for a class special procurement, a contract specific
procurement or both, based upon a contracting procedure that differs from procedures
described in ORS 27913.055, 27913.060, 27913.065, 27913.070. The contracting approach may be
custom designed to meet the procurement needs.
1. Special procurements shall be awarded in accordance with ORS 27913.085 and all other
applicable provisions of law.
This contract award is consistent with the Council discussions at the October 19, 2015, Study Session
and the December 1, 2015, Business Meeting. In this case it was found that a migration from one
software package to another within the same vendor's family of software provides for significant
savings over a bid process which would either result in:
a. a complete conversion to a new provider at an estimated significant higher cost, or
b. a migration consistent with the current proposal for migration but at a higher cost and a delay in
implementation.
COUNCIL GOALS SUPPORTED:
Administration and Governance Goal
Page 1 of 2
I`,
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Provide high quality, effective, and efficient city services and governance in an accessible,
collaborative, and fiscally responsible manner.
Objectives
40. Ensure on-going fiscal ability to provide desired and required services at an acceptable level.
42. Provide modern and innovative equipment and facilities for city functions.
43. Ensure the security and integrity of City data.
44. Utilize proven technology to enhance efficiencies and customer satisfaction.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
These funds are budgeted for FY 2015-2017 per the supplemental budget Resolution 2015-29
approved December 1, 2016, including an interfund loan from the Equipment Fund and use of excess
working capital carryover from the prior year in both the Equipment and the Central Service funds, if
needed.
The prior documentation estimated the amount of the commitment for this biennium to be $725,500
including annual, recurring costs. The amount of the contract has further been reduced by removing
redundant recurring fees as described at the October 19, 2016, study session. The new amount is
$608,045. The contract's Exhibit A pages 12 - 21 are not disclosed and are being treated as
confidential information for proprietary purposes at the request of Tyler Technologies. They are
available to Council under those conditions upon request.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends that the "Contract Specific-Special Procurement" be approved.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
The Council, acting as the Local Contract Review Board, moves to approve the "Contract Specific-
Special Procurement".
ATTACHMENTS:
Form ff9, Special Procurement, Request for Approval
'Tyler Agreement
October 19, 2015, Study Session Council Communication
Page 2 of 2
CITY OF
FORM #9 ASHLAND
SPECIAL PROCUREMENT
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL
To: City Council, Local Contract Review Board
From: Lee Tuneberg, Administrative Services/Finance Director
Date: December 15, 2015
Subject: REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL PROCUREMENT
In accordance with ORS27913.085, this request for approval of a Special Procurement is being presented
to the City Council for approval. This written request for approval describes the proposed contracting
procedure and the goods or services or the class of goods or services to be acquired through the special
procurement and the circumstances that justify the use of a special procurement under the standards set
forth ORS 279B.085(4).
1. Requesting Department Name: Administrative Services Department
2. Department Contact Name: Lee Tuneberg
3. Type of Request: Class Special Procurement X Contract-specific Special Procurement
4. Time Period Requested: From: January 1, 2016 To: June' 0, 2017
5. Total Estimated Cost: $608,045.00
6. Short title of the Procurement: Financial software purchase & migration serveies
Supplies and/or Services or class of Supplies and/or Services to be acquired:
This entails paying for licensing applicable software applications, converting data, migrating
information, customization, training and licensing use of software during the biennium or untl such
time that all applications are implemented.
7. Background and Proposed Contracting Procedure: Provide a description of what has been done
in the past and the proposed procedure. The Agency may, but is not required to, also include the
following types of documents: Notice/Advertising, Solicitation(s), Bid/Proposal Forms(s), Contract
Form(s), and any other documents or forms to be used in the proposed contracting procedure. Attach
additional sheets as needed.
Background: See attached documentation presented to Council on October 19, 2015. A
supplemental budget facilitating the change was approved December, 1, 2015.
Proposed procedure: Follow the proposed timeline incorporated in the proposal submitted by Tyler
Technologies.
Form #9 - Special Procurement- Request for Approval, Page 1 of 3,12/9/2015
8. Justification for use of Special Procurement: Describe the circumstances that justify the use of a
Special Procurement. Attach relevant documentation.
See attached documentation. Migrating between software packages within the same company is
expected to be considerably cheaper and more efficient than bidding services and converting to
another, unknown package. Peer companies have already done the research and proven this to be true.
9. Findings to Satisfy the Required Standards: This proposed special procurement:
X (a) will be unlikely to encourage favoritism in the awarding of public contracts or to
substantially diminish competition for public contracts because:
See the attached documents.
(Please provide specific information that demonstrates how the proposed Special procurement meets this requirement.): and
X (b)(i) will result in substantial cost savings to the contracting agency or to the public
because:
See the attached documents.
(Please provide the total estimate cost savings to be gained and the rationale for determining the cost savings); or
X (b)(ii) will otherwise substantially promote the public interest in a manner that could not
practicably be realized by complying with the requirements of ORS 279B.055, 27913.060, 27913.065,
or 27913.070, or any rules adopted thereunder because:
See the attached documents.
(Please provide specific information that demonstrates how the proposed Special procurement meets this requirement.)
Form #9 - Special Procurement - Request for Approval, Page 2 of 3,12/9/2015
Public Notice:
Pursuant to ORS 279B.085(5) and OAR 137-047-0285(2), a Contracting Agency shall give public
notice of the Contract Review Authority's approval of a Special Procurement in the same manner as a
public notice of competitive sealed Bids under ORS 279B.055(4) and OAR 137-047-0300. The public
notice shall describe the Goods or Services or class of Goods or Services to be acquired through the
Special Procurement and shall give such public notice of the approval of a Special Procurement at
least seven (7) Days before Award of the Contract.
After the Special Procurement has been approved by the City Council, the following public notice will
be posted on the City's website to allow for the seven (7) day protest period.
Date Public Notice first appeared on www.ashland.or.us - [Enter dale]
PUBLIC NOTICE
Approval of a Special Procurement
First date of publication: [Enter date]
A request for approval of a Special Procurement was presented to and approved by the
City Council, acting as the Local Contract Review Board, on [Enter date].
[Describe the goods and services -or- class of goods and services include whether or
not its " Contraci- specific special procurement " or a "class.special procureittent cost,
terms, etc. brief explanation of procurement]
[Describe the alternative contracting procedure - include the time period requested]
It has been determined based on written findings that the Special Procurement will be
unlikely to encourage favoritism in the awarding of public contracts or to substantially
diminish competition for public contracts, and result in substantial cost savings or
substantially promote the public interest in a manner that could not be realized by
complying with the requirements that are applicable in ORS 27913.055, 27913.060,
27913.065, or 27913.070.
An affected person may protest the request for approval of a Special Procurement in
accordance with ORS 27913.400 and OAR 137-047-0300. A written protest shall be
delivered to the following address: City of Ashland, [Enter department name, Contact
name, and complete address]. The seven (7) protest period will expire at 5:00pm on
[Enter date-semen calendar days from first date of'publicalion]
This public notice is being published on the City's Internet World Wide Web site at least
seven days prior to the award of a public contract resulting from this request for approval
of a Special Procurement.
Form #9 - Special Procurement- Request for Approval, Page 3 of 3,12/9/2015
tyler
LICENSE AND SERVICES AGREEMENT
This License and Services Agreement is made between Tyler Technologies, Inc. and Client.
WHEREAS, Client previously contracted for a license to
professional, maintenance and support services; and
s and EnerGov software modules, and requires related
professional, maintenance and support services; and
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and of the mutual covenants and promises set forth in this
Agreement, Tyler and Client agree as follows:
• "Agreement" means this License and Services Agreement.
• means our business travel policy. A copy of our current Business Travel Policy
is attached as Schedule 1 to Exhibit B.
• "Client
means a failure of the Tyler Software to substantially conform to the functional descriptions
set forth in our written proposal to you, or their functional equivalent. Future functionality may be
updated, modified, or otherwise enhanced through our maintenance and support services, and the
governing functional descriptions for such future functionality will be set forth in our then-current
Documentation.
• means a third party who owns the intellectual property rights to Third Party Software.
• "Documentation" means any online or written documentation related to the use or functionality of
the Tyler Software that we provide or otherwise make available to you, including instructions, user
guides, manuals and other training or self-help documentation.
means the date on which your authorized representative signs the Agreement.
• means an event beyond the reasonable control of you or us, including, without
limitation, governmental action, war, riot or civil commotion, fire, natural disaster, or any other cause
that could not with reasonable diligence be foreseen or prevented by you or us.
• means the agreed upon cost proposal for the software, products, and services
attached as Exhibit A.
means the invoicing and payment policy. A copy of our current
Invoicing and Payment Policy is attached as Exhibit B.
means the terms and conditions governing the provision of
maintenance and support services to all of our customers. A copy of our current Maintenance and
b4 tyler
A
1
Support Agreement is attached as Exhibit C.
• means the support call process applicable to all of our customers who have
licensed the Tyler Software. A copy of our current Munis Support Call Process is attached as Schedule
1 to Exhibit C. A copy of our current EnerGov Support Call Process is attached as Schedule 2 to Exhibit
C.
means the end user license agreement for the Third
Party Software, attached as Exhibit D.
means the third party hardware identified in the Investment Summary.
means the Third Party Software and Third Party Hardware.
• Processing module set forth in the Investment Summary.
• means Tyler Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation.
• means our proprietary software and related interfaces identified in the Investment
Summary and licensed to you through this Agreement.
• and similar terms mean Tyler.
• "you" and similar terms mean Client.
1. License Grant and Restrictions.
1.1 We grant to you a license to use the Tyler Software for your internal business purposes only. You may
make copies of the Tyler Software for backup and testing purposes, so long as such copies are not used
in production and the testing is for internal use only. Your rights to use the Tyler Software are
perpetual but may be revoked if you do not comply with the terms of this Agreement.
1.2 The Documentation is licensed to you and may be used and copied by your employees for internal,
non-commercial reference purposes only.
1.3 You may not: (a) transfer or assign the Tyler Software to a third party; (b) reverse engineer, decompile,
or disassemble the Tyler Software; (c) rent, lease, lend, or provide commercial hosting services with
the Tyler Software; or (d) publish or otherwise disclose the Tyler Software or Documentation to third
parties.
1.4 The license terms in this Agreement apply to updates and enhancements we may provide to you or
make available to you through the applicable Maintenance and Support Agreement.
1.5 The right to transfer the Tyler Software to a replacement hardware system is included in your license.
You will give us advance written notice of any such transfer and will pay us for any required or
requested technical assistance associated with such transfer.
1.6 We reserve all rights not expressly granted to you in this Agreement. The Tyler Software and
Documentation are protected by copyright and other intellectual property laws and treaties. We own
the title, copyright, and other intellectual property rights in the Tyler Software and the
Documentation. The Tyler Software is licensed, not sold.
1.7 The EnerGov modules identified in the Investment Summary are limited to thirty (30) users. In the
.eQtl tyier
i
2
event you choose to use the MyGovPay/VirtualPay functionality for payment processing, the terms set
forth in Exhibit E will apply.
2. License Fees. You agree to pay us the license fees in the amounts set forth in the Investment Summary.
Those amounts are payable in accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy.
3. Escrow. We maintain escrow agreements with a third party under which we place the source code for
each major release of the Tyler Software. You may be added as a beneficiary to the escrow agreements by
completing a standard beneficiary enrollment form and paying the annual beneficiary fees. You will be
responsible for maintaining your ongoing status as a beneficiary, including payment of the then-current
annual beneficiary fees. Release of source code for the Tyler Software is strictly governed by the terms of
the applicable escrow agreement.
4. Limited Warranty. We warrant that the Tyler Software will be without Defect(s) as long as you have an
applicable Maintenance and Support Agreement in effect. If the Tyler Software does not perform as
warranted, we will use all reasonable efforts, consistent with industry standards, to cure the Defect as set
forth in the applicable Maintenance and Support Agreement.
1. Services. We will provide you the various implementation-related services itemized in the Investment
Summary. You will receive those services according to our industry-standard implementation plan, which
outlines roles and responsibilities in calendar and project documentation. We will finalize that
documentation with you upon execution of this Agreement.
2. Professional Services Fees. You agree to pay us the professional services fees in the amounts set forth in
the Investment Summary. You acknowledge that the fees stated in the Investment Summary are good-
faith estimates of the amount of time and materials required for your implementation. We will bill you the
actual fees incurred based on the in-scope services provided to you. Those amounts are payable in
accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy.
3. Additional Services. The Investment Summary contains the scope of services and related costs (including
programming and/or interface estimates) required for the project based on our understanding of the
specifications you supplied. If additional work is required, or if you use or request additional services, we
will provide you with an addendum or change order, as applicable, outlining the costs for the additional
work. The price quotes in the addendum or change order will be valid for thirty (30) days.
4. Cancellation. We make all reasonable efforts to schedule our personnel for travel, including arranging
travel reservations, at least two (2) weeks in advance of commitments. Therefore, if you cancel services
less than two (2) weeks in advance (other than for Force Majeure or breach by us), you will be liable for all
(a) non-refundable expenses incurred by us on your behalf, and (b) daily fees associated with cancelled
professional services if we are unable to reassign our personnel. We will make all reasonable efforts to
reassign personnel in the event you cancel within two (2) weeks of scheduled commitments.
5. Services Warranty. We will perform the services in a professional, workmanlike manner, consistent with
industry standards. In the event we provide services that do not conform to this warranty, we will re-
perform such services at no additional cost to you.
tl~0003, t V ■
O /
3
6. Site Access and Requirements. You agree to provide us with full and free access to your personnel,
facilities, and equipment as may be reasonably necessary for us to provide implementation services,
subject to any reasonable security protocols or other written policies provided to us. You further agree to
provide a reasonably suitable environment, location, and space for the installation of the Tyler Software
and Third Party Products, including, without limitation, sufficient electrical circuits, cables, and other
reasonably necessary items required for the installation and operation of the Tyler Software and Third
Party Products.
7. Client Assistance. You acknowledge that the implementation of the Tyler Software is a cooperative
process requiring the time and resources of your personnel. You agree to use all reasonable efforts to
cooperate with and assist us as may be reasonably required to meet the agreed upon project deadlines
and other milestones for implementation. This cooperation includes at least working with us to schedule
the implementation-related services you have contracted for. We will not be liable for failure to meet any
deadlines and milestones when such failure is due to Force Majeure or to the failure by your personnel to
provide such cooperation and assistance (either through action or omission).
We will provide you with maintenance and support services for the Tyler Software under the terms of our
standard Maintenance and Support Agreement. You agree to pay us the applicable annual maintenance
and support fees in accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy.
1. Third Party Hardware. We will sell, deliver, and install onsite the Third Party Hardware, if you have
purchased any, for the price set forth in the Investment Summary. Those amounts are payable in
accordance with our Invoicing and Payment Policy.
2. Third Party Software. Upon payment in full of the Third Party Software license fees, you will receive a non-
transferable license to use the Third Party Software and related documentation for internal business
purposes only. Your license rights to the Third Party Software will be governed by the Third Party End User
License Agreement(s).
2.1 We will install onsite the Third Party Software. The installation cost is included in the installation fee in
the Investment Summary, if any.
2.2 If the Developer charges a fee for future updates, releases, or other enhancements to the Third Party
Software, you will be required to pay such additional future fee.
2.3 The right to transfer the Third Party Software to a replacement hardware system is governed by the
Developer. You will give us advance written notice of any such transfer and will pay us for any
required or requested technical assistance associated with such transfer.
3. Third Party Products Warranties.
3.1 We are authorized by each Developer to grant or transfer the licenses to the Third Party Software.
3.2 The Third Party Hardware will be new and unused, and upon payment in full, you will receive free and
l
~•peye, Wyly.!
4
clear title to the Third Party Hardware.
3.3 You acknowledge that we are not the manufacturer of the Third Party Products. We do not warrant or
guarantee the performance of the Third Party Products. However, we grant and pass through to you
any warranty that we may receive from the Developer or supplier of the Third Party Products.
4. Maintenance. If you have a Maintenance and Support Agreement in effect, you may report defects and
other issues related to the Third Party Software directly to us, and we will (a) directly address the defect or
issue, to the extent it relates to our interface with the Third Party Software; and/or (b) facilitate resolution
with the Developer, unless that Developer requires that you have a separate, direct maintenance
agreement in effect with that Developer. In all events, if you do not have a Maintenance and Support
Agreement in effect with Tyler, you will be responsible for resolving defects and other issues related to the
Third Party Software directly with the Developer.
1. Invoicing and Payment. We will invoice you the fees for the license(s), products, and services in the
Investment Summary per our Invoicing and Payment Policy, subject to Section F(2).
2. Invoice Disputes. If you believe any delivered product or service does not conform to the warranties in this
Agreement, you will provide us with written notice within fifteen (15) days of your receipt of the applicable
invoice. The written notice must contain sufficient detail of the issues you contend are in dispute. We will
provide a written response to you that will include either a justification of the invoice, an adjustment to
the invoice, or a proposal addressing the issues presented in your notice. We will work together as may be
necessary to develop an action plan that outlines reasonable steps to be taken by each of us to resolve any
issues presented in your notice. You may only withhold payment of the amount(s) actually in dispute until
we complete the action items outlined in the plan. If we are unable to complete the action items outlined
in the action plan because of your failure to complete the items agreed to be done by you, then you will
remit full payment of the invoice. We reserve the right to suspend delivery of all services, including
maintenance and support services, if you fail to pay an invoice not disputed as described above.
1. For Cause. You may terminate this Agreement for ca
agreeable action plan to address, a material breach of this Agreement within forty-five (45) days of
receiving a written notice of the alleged breach. You agree to comply with Section 1(3), Dispute Resolution,
prior to termination. In the event of termination for cause, you will pay us for all undisputed fees and
expenses related to the software, products, and/or services you have received, or we have incurred or
delivered, prior to the effective date of termination.
2. Lack of Appropriations. If you should not appropriate or otherwise make available funds sufficient to
purchase, lease, operate, or maintain the products or services set forth in this Agreement, you may
unilaterally terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to us. In the event of
termination due to a lack of appropriations, you will pay us for all undisputed fees and expenses related to
the software, products, and/or services you have received, or we have incurred or delivered, prior to the
effective date of termination. You will not be entitled to a refund or offset of previously paid license and
• tyler
O
5
other fees. You agree not to use termination for lack of appropriations as a substitute for termination for
convenience.
3. Force Majeure. Either party has the right to terminate this Agreement if a Force Majeure event suspends
performance of scheduled tasks for a period of forty-five (45) days or more. In the event of termination
due to Force Majeure, you will pay us for all undisputed fees and expenses related to the software,
products, and/or services you have received, or we have incurred or delivered, prior to the effective date
of termination. You will not be entitled to a refund or offset of previously paid license and other fees.
1. Intellectual Property Infringement Indemnification.
1.1 We will defend you against any third party claim(s) th
patent, copyright, or trademark, or misappropriates its trade secrets, and will pay the amount of any
resulting adverse final judgment (or settlement to which we consent). You must notify us promptly in
writing of the claim and give us sole control over its defense or settlement. You agree to provide us
with reasonable assistance, cooperation, and information in defending the claim at our expense.
1.2 Our obligations under this Section H(1) will not apply to the extent the claim or adverse final judgment
is based on your: (a) use of a previous version of the Tyler Software and the claim would have been
avoided had you installed and used the current version of the Tyler Software; (b) combining the Tyler
Software with any product or device not provided, contemplated, or approved by us; (c) altering or
modifying the Tyler Software, including any modification by third parties at your direction or otherwise
permitted by you; (d) use of the Tyler Software in contradiction of this Agreement, including with non-
licensed third parties; or (e) willful infringement, including use of the Tyler Software after we notify
you to discontinue use due to such a claim.
1.3 If we receive information concerning an infringement or misappropriation claim related to the Tyler
Software, we may, at our expense and without obligation to do so, either: (a) procure for you the right
to continue its use; (b) modify it to make it non-infringing; or (c) replace it with a functional equivalent,
in which case you will stop running the allegedly infringing Tyler Software immediately.
1.4 If, as a result of an infringement or misappropriation claim, your use of the Tyler Software is enjoined
by a court of competent jurisdiction, in addition to paying any adverse final judgment (or settlement to
which we consent), we will, at our option, either: (a) procure the right to continue its use; (b) modify it
to make it non-infringing; (c) replace it with a functional equivalent; or (d) terminate your license and
refund the license fees paid for the infringing Tyler Software. This section provides your exclusive
remedy for third party copyright, patent, or trademark infringement and trade secret misappropriation
claims.
2. Property Damage and Personal Injury Indemnification.
2.1 We will indemnify and hold harmless you and your agents, officials, and employees from and against
any and all direct claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs, and expenses (including reasonable
attorney's fees and costs) for personal injury or property damage to the extent caused by our
negligence or willful misconduct.
.r4 tyler
6
2.2 To the extent permitted by applicable law, you will indemnify and hold harmless us and our agents,
officials, and employees from and against any and all direct claims, losses, liabilities, damages, costs,
and expenses (including reasonable attorney's fees and costs) for personal injury or property damage
to the extent caused by your negligence or willful misconduct.
3. DISCLAIMER. EXCEPT FOR THE EXPRESS WARRANTIES PROVIDED IN THIS AGREEMENT AND TO THE
MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, WE HEREBY DISCLAIM ALL OTHER WARRANTIES
AND CONDITIONS, WHETHER EXPRESS, IMPLIED, OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES, DUTIES, OR CONDITIONS OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
4. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY. EXCEPT AS OTHERWISE EXPRESSLY SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, OUR
LIABILITY FOR DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER BASED ON A THEORY OF
CONTRACT OR TORT, INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE AND STRICT LIABILITY, SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE LESSER
OF (A) YOUR ACTUAL DIRECT DAMAGES OR (B) THE AMOUNTS PAID BY YOU UNDER THIS AGREEMENT.
THE PRICES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT ARE SET IN RELIANCE UPON THIS LIMITATION OF LIABILITY.
THE FOREGOING LIMITATION OF LIABILITY SHALL NOT APPLY TO CLAIMS THAT ARE SUBJECT TO
SECTIONS H(1) AND H(2).
5. EXCLUSION OF CERTAIN DAMAGES. TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO
EVENT SHALL WE BE LIABLE FOR ANY SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, PUNITIVE, INDIRECT, OR CONSEQUENTIAL
DAMAGES WHATSOEVER, EVEN IF WE HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES.
6. Insurance. During the course of performing services under this Agreement, we agree to maintain the
following levels of insurance: (a) Commercial General Liability of at least $2,000,000; (b) Automobile
Liability of at least $1,000,000; (c) Professional Liability of at least $1,000,000; and (d) Workers
Compensation complying with applicable statutory requirements. You agree that we may satisfy these
limits using our excess/umbrella liability coverage, as necessary. We will add you as an additional insured
and provide you with copies of certificates of insurance upon written request.
1. Additional Products and Services. You may purchase additional products and services at the rates set forth
in the Investment Summary for twelve (12) months from the Effective Date, and thereafter at our then-
current list price, by executing a mutually agreed addendum. The terms of this Agreement will control any
such additional purchase(s), unless otherwise specifically provided in the addendum.
2. Optional Items. Pricing for any listed optional products and services in the Investment Summary will be
valid for twelve (12) months from the Effective Date.
3. Dispute Resolution. You agree to provide us with written notice within thirty (30) days of becoming aware
of a dispute. You agree to cooperate with us in trying to reasonably resolve all disputes, including, if
requested by either party, appointing a senior representative to meet and engage in good faith
negotiations with our appointed senior representative. Senior representatives will meet within thirty (30)
days of the written dispute notice, unless otherwise agreed. All meetings and discussions between senior
representatives will be deemed confidential settlement discussions not subject to disclosure under Federal
tyler
7
Rule of Evidence 408 or any similar applicable state rule. If we fail to resolve the dispute, either of us may
assert our respective rights and remedies in a court of competent jurisdiction. Nothing in this section shall
prevent you or us from seeking necessary injunctive relief during the dispute resolution procedures.
4. Taxes. The fees in the Investment Summary do not include any taxes, including, without limitation, sales,
use, or excise tax. If you are a tax-exempt entity, you agree to provide us with a tax-exempt certificate.
Otherwise, we will pay all applicable taxes to the proper authorities and you will reimburse us for such
taxes. If you have a valid direct-pay permit, you agree to provide us with a copy. For clarity, we are
responsible for paying our income taxes arising from our performance of this Agreement.
5. Nondiscrimination. We will not discriminate against any person employed or applying for employment
concerning the performance of our responsibilities under this Agreement. This discrimination prohibition
will apply to all matters of initial employment, tenure, and terms of employment, or otherwise with
respect to any matter directly or indirectly relating to employment concerning race, color, religion,
national origin, age, sex, sexual orientation, ancestry, disability that is unrelated to the individual's ability
to perform the duties of a particular job or position, height, weight, marital status, or political affiliation.
We will post, where appropriate, all notices related to nondiscrimination as may be required by applicable
law.
6. E-Verify. We have complied, and will comply, with the E-Verify procedures administered by the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services Verification Division for all of our employees assigned to your project.
7. Subcontractors. We will not subcontract any services under this Agreement without your prior written
consent, not to be unreasonably withheld.
8. No Assignment. Neither party may assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other
party; provided, however, that your consent is not required in the event we have a change of control.
9. Force Majeure. Neither party will be liable for delays in performing its obligations under this Agreement to
the extent that the delay is caused by Force Majeure; provided, however, that within ten (10) business
days of the Force Majeure event, the party whose performance is delayed provides the other party with
written notice explaining the cause and extent thereof, as well as a request for a reasonable time
extension equal to the estimated duration of the Force Majeure event.
10. No Intended Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is entered into solely for the benefit of you and us.
No third party will be deemed a beneficiary of this Agreement, and no third party will have the right to
make any claim or assert any right under this Agreement. This provision does not affect the rights of third
parties under any Third Party End User License Agreement(s).
11. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement represents the entire agreement between you and us
with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any prior agreements, understandings, and
representations, whether written, oral, expressed, implied, or statutory. This Agreement may only be
modified by a written amendment signed by an authorized representative of each party.
12. SeverabilitV. If any term or provision of this Agreement is held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of
this Agreement will be considered valid and enforceable to the fullest extent permitted by law.
fr tyler
8
13. No Waiver. In the event that the terms and conditions of this Agreement are not strictly enforced by
either party, such non-enforcement will not act as or be deemed to act as a waiver or modification of this
Agreement, nor will such non-enforcement prevent such party from enforcing each and every term of this
Agreement thereafter.
14. Independent Contractor. We are an independent contractor for all purposes under this Agreement.
15. Notices. All notices or communications required or permitted as a part of this Agreement must be in
writing and will be deemed delivered upon the earlier of the following: (a) actual receipt by the receiving
party; (b) upon receipt by sender of a certified mail, return receipt signed by an employee or agent of the
receiving party; (c) upon receipt by sender of proof of email delivery; or (d) if not actually received, five (5)
days after deposit with the United States Postal Service authorized mail center with proper postage
(certified mail, return receipt requested) affixed and addressed to the other party at the address set forth
on the signature page hereto or such other address as the party may have designated by proper notice.
The consequences for the failure to receive a notice due to improper notification by the intended receiving
party of a change in address will be borne by the intended receiving party.
16. Client Lists. You agree that we may identify you by name in client lists, marketing presentations, and
promotional materials.
17. Confidentiality. Both parties recognize that their respective employees and agents, in the course of
performance of this Agreement, may be exposed to confidential information and that disclosure of such
information could violate rights to private individuals and entities, including the parties. Confidential
information is nonpublic information that a reasonable person would believe to be confidential and
includes, without limitation, personal identifying information (e.g., social security numbers) and trade
secrets, each as defined by applicable state law. Each party agrees that it will not disclose any confidential
information of the other party and further agrees to take all reasonable and appropriate action to prevent
such disclosure by its employees or agents. The confidentiality covenants contained herein will survive the
termination or cancellation of this Agreement. This obligation of confidentiality will not apply to
information that:
(a) is in the public domain, either at the time of disclosure or afterwards, except by breach of this
Agreement by a party or its employees or agents;
(b) a party can establish by reasonable proof was in that party's possession at the time of initial
disclosure;
(c) a party receives from a third party who has a right to disclose it to the receiving party; or
(d) is the subject of a legitimate disclosure request under the open records laws or similar applicable
public disclosure laws governing this Agreement; provided, however, that in the event you receive
an open records or other similar applicable request, you will give us prompt notice and otherwise
perform the functions required by applicable law.
18. Business License. By the time we begin providing professional services under this Agreement, we will have
submitted a business registration application with the City, in the form you have made available, and
received the corresponding business license, to the extent receipt within such timeframe is within our
control.
19. Governing Law. This Agreement will be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of your
t,,4< Eyler
9
state of domicile.
20. Multiple Originals and Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in multiple originals, any of which will
be independently treated as an original document. Any electronic, faxed, scanned, photocopied, or
similarly reproduced signature on this Agreement or any amendment hereto will be deemed an original
signature and will be fully enforceable as if an original signature.
21. Contract Documents. This Agreement includes the following exhibits:
Exhibit A Investment Summary
Exhibit B Invoicing and Payment Policy
Schedule 1: Business Travel Policy
Exhibit C Maintenance and Support Agreement
Schedule 1: Munis Support Call Process
Schedule 2: EnerGov Support Call Process
Exhibit D Third Party End User License Agreement
Exhibit E MyGovPay/VirtualPay
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, a duly authorized representative of each party has executed this Agreement as of the
date(s) set forth below.
Tyler Technologies, Inc. City of Ashland, OR
ERP and Schools Division
By: By:
Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Address for Notices: Address for Notices:
Tyler Technologies, Inc. City of Ashland
One Tyler Drive 20 East Main Street
Yarmouth, ME 04096 Ashland, OR 97520
Attention: Associate General Counsel [INSERT CLIENT TITLE]
w
10
tyler
Exhibit A
Investment Summary
The following Investment Summary details the software, products, and services to be delivered by us to
you under the Agreement. This Investment Summary is effective as of the Effective Date. Capitalized
terms not otherwise defined will have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
00" tyler
fiZ1 '0. tyler
19
4000
Exhibit B
Invoicing and Payment Policy
We will provide you with the software, products, and services set forth in the Investment Summary.
Capitalized terms not otherwise defined will have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
Invoicing: We will invoice you for the applicable license fees, products, and services in the Investment
Summary as set forth below. Your rights to dispute any invoice are set forth in the Agreement.
1. Tyler Software.
1.1 : License fees are invoiced as follows: (a) 25% on the Effective Date; (b) 50% on the
date when we make the applicable Tyler Software
days after the Available Download Date.
1.2 : The first year maintenance and support fees ($101,164) for the
one (1) year period commencing on the Available Download Date are waived. Subsequent
maintenance and support fees are invoiced annually in advance at our then-current rates on each
anniversary of the Available Download Date. On the 1-year anniversary of the Available Download
Date, you will no longer be responsible for your Eden maintenance and support fees.
2. Professional Services.
2.1 : Project planning services ($9,000) are invoiced upon delivery of the
Implementation Planning Document.
2.2 : Consulting services, if any, are invoiced 50% upon commencement of the
service and 50% upon completion of the service, by product.
2.3 : Data conversion services, if any, are invoiced 50% upon initial delivery of
converted data, by conversion option, and 50% upon Client acceptance to load converted data into
live environment, by conversion option.
2.4 : Implementation and other professional services
are billed and invoiced as delivered.
2.5 : Any requested modifications to Tyler Software are
invoiced 50% upon delivery of specifications and 50% upon delivery of the applicable modification.
You must report any failure of the modification to conform to the specifications within thirty (30)
days of delivery; otherwise, the modification will be deemed to be in compliance with the
tyler
22
specifications after the 30-day window has passed.
3. Other Services and Fees
3.1 : OS/DBA Services ($23,469) are invoiced on
the Available Download Date. OS/DBA Services will renew automatically for additional one (1)
year terms at our then-current OS/DBA fee, unless terminated in writing by either party at least
thirty (30) days prior to the end of the then-current term.
3.2 : Disaster Recovery Services ($23,469) are invoiced annually in advance
upon our receipt of your data. Disaster Recovery services will renew automatically for additional
one (1) year terms at our then-current Disaster Recovery fee, unless terminated in writing by
either party at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the then-current term.
4. Third Party Products.
4.1 : Third Party Hardware costs ($3,992) are invoiced upon delivery.
5. Expenses The service rates in the Investment Summary do not include travel expenses. Expenses will
be billed as incurred and only in accordance with our then-current Business Travel Policy. Our current
Business Travel Policy is attached to this Exhibit B at Schedule 1. Copies of receipts will be provided on
an exception basis at no charge. You will incur an administrative fee if you request receipts for all non-
per diem expenses. Receipts for miscellaneous items less than twenty-five dollars and mileage logs are
not available.
Payment. Payment for undisputed invoices is due within forty-five (4S) days of the invoice date. Maintenance
and support fees are due on each anniversary of the Available Download Date. We prefer to receive payments
electronically. Our electronic payment information is:
Bank: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
420 Montgomery
San Francisco, CA 94104
ABA: 121000248
Account: 4124302472
tyler
23
010 . tyler
Exhibit B
Schedule 1
Business Travel Policy
1. Air Travel
A. Reservations & Tickets
y (TMQ will provide an employee with a direct flight within two
hours before or after the requested departure time, assuming that flight does not add more than three
duration and the fare is within $100 (each way) of the lowest logical
fare. If a net savings of $200 or more (each way) is possible through a connecting flight that is within
two hours before or after the requested departure time and that does not add more than three hours
duration, the connecting flight should be accepted.
Employees are encouraged to make advanced reservations to take full advantage of discount
opportunities. Employees should use all reasonable efforts to make travel arrangements at least two (2)
weeks in advance of commitments. A seven day advance booking requirement is mandatory. When
booking less than seven days in advance, management approval will be required.
Except in the case of international travel where a segment of continuous air travel is scheduled to exceed
six hours, only economy or coach class seating is reimbursable.
B. Baggage Fees
Reimbursement of personal baggage charges are based on trip duration as follows:
• Up to five days = one checked bag
• Six or more days = two checked bags
Baggage fees for sports equipment are not reimbursable.
2. Ground Transportation
A. Private Automobile
IRS allowable rate, plus out of pocket costs for tolls and parking. Mileage will be calculated by using the
employee's office as the starting and ending point, in compliance with IRS regulations. Employees who
have been designated a home office should calculate miles from their home.
tyler
24
B. Rental Car
Employees are authorized to rent cars only in conjunction with air travel when cost, convenience, and the
specific situation reasonably require their use. When renting a car for Tyler business, employees should
are traveling together. Tyler carries leased vehicle coverage for business car rentals; additional insurance
on the rental agreement should be declined.
C. Public Transportation
Taxi or airport limousine services may be considered when traveling in and around cities or to and from
airports when less expensive means of transportation are unavailable or impractical. The actual fare plus
a reasonable tip (15-18%) are reimbursable. In the case of a free hotel shuttle to the airport, tips are
included in the per diem rates and will not be reimbursed separately.
D. Parking & Tolls
When parking at the airport, employees must use longer term parking areas that are measured in days as
opposed to hours. Park and fly options located near some airports may also be used. For extended trips
that would result in excessive parking charges, public transportation to/from the airport should be
considered. Tolls will be reimbursed when receipts are presented.
3. Lodging
in relation to the traveler's work assignment. Typical hotel chains include Courtyard, Fairfield Inn,
Hampton Inn, and Holiday Inn Express. If the employee has a discount rate with a local hotel, the hotel
reservation should note that discount and the employee should confirm the lower rate with the hotel
upon arrival. Employee memberships in travel clubs such as AAA should be noted in their travel profiles
so that the employee can take advantage of any lower club rates.
cancellation policy.
Tips for maids and other hotel staff are included in the per diem rate and are not reimbursed separately.
4. Meals and Incidental Expenses
Employee meals and incidental expenses while on travel status are in accordance with the federal per
diem rates published by the General Services Administration. Incidental expenses include tips to maids,
hotel staff, and shuttle drivers and other minor travel expenses. Per diem rates are available at
www.gsa.gov/perdiem.
. tyler
25
A. Overnight Travel
For each full day of travel, all three meals are reimbursable. Per diems on the first and last day of a trip
are governed as set forth below.
Departure Day
Depart before 12:00 noon Lunch and dinner
Depart after 12:00 noon Dinner
Return Day
Return before 12:00 noon Breakfast
Return between 12:00 noon & 7:00 p.m. Breakfast and lunch
Return after 7:00 p.m.* Breakfast, lunch and dinner
*7:00 p.m. is defined as direct travel time and does not include time taken to stop for dinner
The reimbursement rates for individual meals are calculated as a percentage of the full day per diem as
follows:
• Breakfast 15%
• Lunch 25%
• Dinner 60%
B. Same Day Travel
Employees traveling at least 100 miles to a site and returning in the same day are eligible to claim lunch on
an expense report. Employees on same day travel status are eligible to claim dinner in the event they
return home after 7:00 p.m.*
*7:00 p.m. is defined as direct travel time and does not include time taken to stop for dinner
Employees who travel may need to access their e-mail at night. Many hotels provide free high speed
internet access and Tyler employees are encouraged to use such hotels whenever possible. If an
access at airports are not reimbursable.
tyler
26
®ay
i tyler
Exhibit C
Maintenance and Support Agreement
We will provide you with the following maintenance and support services for the Tyler Software licensed to
you. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined will have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Agreement.
1. Term. We provide maintenance and support services on an annual basis. The initial term commences on
the date when we make the applicable Tyler Software available to you for down
one (1) year terms at our then-current maintenance and support fees, unless terminated in writing by
either party at least thirty (30) days prior to the end of the then-current term.
2. Maintenance and Support Fees. The maintenance and support fees for the Tyler Software licensed to you
are listed in the Investment Summary. Those amounts are payable in accordance with our Invoicing and
Payment Policy. We reserve the right to suspend maintenance and support services if you fail to pay
undisputed maintenance and support fees within sixty (60) days of the due date. We will reinstate
maintenance and support services only if you pay all past due maintenance and support fees, including all
fees for the periods during which services were suspended.
3. Maintenance and Support Services. As long as you timely pay your maintenance and support fees, we will,
consistent with our then-current Support Call Process:
3.1 perform our maintenance and support obligations in a professional, good, and workmanlike manner,
consistent with industry standards, to conform the Tyler Software to the warranty set forth in your
Agreement; provided, however, that if you modify the Tyler Software without our consent, our
obligation to provide maintenance and support services on and warrant the Tyler Software will be
void;
3.2 provide telephone support during our established support hours;
3.3 maintain personnel that are sufficiently trained to be familiar with the Tyler Software and Third Party
Software in order to provide maintenance and support services;
3.4 provide you with a copy of all releases to the Tyler Software (including updates and enhancements)
that we make generally available without additional charge to customers who have a maintenance and
support agreement in effect; and
3.5 support prior releases of the Tyler Software in accordance with our then-current release life cycle
policy.
4
tyler
27
4. Client Responsibilities. We will use all reasonable efforts to perform any maintenance and support
services remotely. Therefore, you agree to maintain a high-speed internet connection capable of
connecting us to your PCs and server(s). You agree to provide us with a login account and local
administrative privileges as we may reasonably require to perform remote services. We will, at our option,
use the secure connection to assist with proper diagnosis and resolution, subject to any reasonably
onsite services. In such event, you agree to provide us with full and free access to the Tyler Software,
working space, adequate facilities within a reasonable distance from the equipment, and use of machines,
attachments, features, or other equipment reasonably necessary for us to provide the maintenance and
support services, all at no charge to us. We strongly recommend that you also maintain a VPN for backup
connectivity purposes.
5. Excluded Services. Maintenance and support fees do not include fees for the following services: (a) initial
installation or implementation of the Tyler Software; (b) onsite maintenance and support (unless Tyler
cannot remotely correct a defect in the Tyler Software); (c) application design; (d) other consulting
services; (e) maintenance and support of an operating system or hardware; (f) support outside our normal
business hours as listed in our then-current Support Call Process; or (g) installation, training services, or
third party product costs related to a new release. Requested maintenance and support services beyond
those outlined in this section will be billed to you at our then current rates.
6. Current Support Call Process. Our current Support Call Process is attached to this Exhibit C at Schedule 1.
'•;xx tyler
28
.0 tylpr
Exhibit C
Schedule 1
Munis Support Call Process
Tyler Technical Support Department for Munis°
Goal:
Contact Us
support request online through the Tyler Client Portal
www.tylertech.com).
Support Organization
multiple teams: Financials; Payroll/HR/Pension; Tax/Other Revenue and Collections; Utility Billing and
Collections; OS/DBA (Operating System and Database Administration); and TylerForms and Reporting Services.
specialists assigned to each team handle calls quickly and accurately.
Each team consists of a Munis Support Product Manager, Support Analysts, and Technical Support Specialists.
The Support Product Manager is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the team and ensures we
provide exceptional technical support to our clients. The Support Analysts are responsible for assisting the
aining. Technical Support Specialists are responsible for
diagnosing and resolving client issues in a timely and courteous manner.
Standard Support Hours
Applications Hours
Financials 8:00am-9:00pm EST Monday-Friday
Payroll/HR/Pension 8:00am-9:00pm EST Monday-Friday
Tax/Other Revenue & Collections 8:00am-6:00pm EST Monday-Friday
Utility Billing & Collections 8:00am-8:00pm EST Monday-Friday
OS/DBA 8:00am-9:00pm EST Monday-Friday
TylerForms, Reporting Services and TCM 8:00am-9:00pm EST Monday-Friday
4~0049: 6 1 l V r
29
Focus on Incoming Rate
When you call Technical Support, your call is answered by a Support Technician, or is transferred into the
Support voice mail. which means you will often
start working with a Support Specialist immediately upon calling Tyler.
Leaving Messages for Support
When leaving a message on the Support voice mail, ensure the following information is contained within the
message:
• your full name (first name, last name) and the site you are calling for/from;
• a phone number where you can be reached;
• the details of the issue or question you have
• the priority of the issue (1, 2, 3, or 4); and
• when you will be available for a return call (often Support will call back within an hour of receiving
your message).
Paging
All client questions are important to us. There may be times when you are experiencing a priority 1 critical
issue and all technicians for the requested team are on the line assisting clients. In this circumstance, it is
ator. The operator will page the team you need to
contact. We ask that you reserve this function for those times when Munis is down, or a mission critical
application is down and you are not able to reach a technician immediately.
Online Support
www.tylertech.com
Portal (TCP) allows you to log an incident to Technical Support anytime from any Internet connection. All TCP
account, incident, and survey data is available in real-time.
Your existing contact information defaults when you add a new Support incident. You will be asked for
required information including Incident Description, Priority, Product Group, and Product Module. Unlimited
work-note text is available for you to describe the question or problem in detail, plus you can attach files or
screenshots that may be helpful to Support.
When a new incident is added, the incident number is presented on the screen, and you will receive an
automated email response that includes the incident number. The new incident is routed to the appropriate
Technical Support Team queue for response. They will review your incident, research the item, and respond
via email according to the priority of the incident.
Customer Relationship Management System
Every call or email from you is logged into our Customer Relationship Management System and given a unique
call number. This system tracks the history of each incident, including the person calling, time of the call,
priority of the call, description of the problem, support recommendations, client feedback, and resolution. For
www.tylertech.com), a list of calls is available real-time under the
Tyler Client Portal (TCP).
.,4 tyler
30
Call Numbers
will be responded to that day. If you are not available when we call back, we will leave a message with the
open call number on your voice mail or with a person in your office. When you call back, you can reference this
call number so you do not have to re-explain the issue.
An open call number is also given to you once an initial contact has been made with Support and it has been
and reference specific open issues with Support.
Call Response Goals
Support will use all reasonable efforts to address open calls as follows:
Open Maximum number of days a Support managers and analysts
call support call is open review open calls
Priority
1 Less than a day Daily
2 10 Days or less Every other day
3 30 Days or less Weekly_
4 60 Days or less Weekly
Call Priorities
A call escalation system is in place where, each day, Support Analysts and Product Support Managers review
open calls in their focus area to monitor progress.
Each call logged is given a priority (1, 2, 3, and 4) acco
structure is to clearly understand the importance of the issue and assign the priority for closure. The client is
responsible for setting the priority of the call. Tyler Support for Munis tracks responsiveness to priority 1, 2,
and 3 calls each week. This measurement allows us to better evaluate overall client satisfaction.
Priority 1 Call
Priority 2 Call
Priority 3 Call
Priority 4 Call
permits.
Following Up on Open Calls
Some issues will not be resolved during the initial call with a Support Technician. If the call remains open, the
technician will give you an open call number to reference, and will confirm the priority of the incident.
If you want to follow up on an open call, simply call the appropriate Support Team and reference the call
number to the Technician who answers or leave this information in your message. Referencing the open call
tyler
31
number allows anyone in support to quickly follow up on the issue. You can also update the incident through
www.tylertech.com) and add a note requesting follow-up.
Escalating a Support Call
If the situation to be addressed by your open call has changed and you need to have the call priority adjusted,
please call the appropriate Support Team and ask to be connected to the assigned technician. If that technician
is unavailable, another technician on the team may be able to assist you, or will transfer you to the Product
Support Team Manager. If you feel you are not receiving the service you need, please call the appropriate
Product Manager and provide them with the open call number for which you need assistance. The Product
Manager will follow up on your open issue and determine the necessary action to meet your needs.
Technical Support Product Managers:
Brian Gilman Peggy Wintle Installation
Support Product Manager - Purchasing SupportPioductManager - UtilityBilling Dean Wilber
brian.gilmanWertech.com (X4436) peggy.wintle@tylertecli.com (X4567) installation Manager
dean.wilberatylertech.com (X4730)
Evan Smith Parker LaChance OSIDBA Team
Support Product Manager-- Budget and General Ledger Support Product Manager - Revenue Ben King
evan.smith"lertech.com (X4621) parker.lachance0tylertech.com (X4257) Senior Support Product Manager
ben. kingOtylertech.com (X4867)
Holly LaRou Steven Jones TylerForms, Reporting Services & TCM
Support Product Manager-Equipment Senior Support Product Manager Michele Brown
holly.larou*tylertech.com (X4482) steven.jones@tylertech.com (X4255) Support Product Manager
michele.brown"tertech.com (X4381)
Tracy Silva `pia
Support Product Manager-Payroll Patience Stetson
tracy.silvaOtylertech.com (X4433) Product Supervisor _Payroll State Reporting
patience.stetsonftlertech.com (X4165)
Ed Haggerty Ryan Blair
Support Product Manager - Human Resources Development Product Manager
ed.haggertyCotylertech.com (X4464) ryan.blair*tylertech.com (X4579)
Sonja Johnson
Senior Support Product Manager
sonja.johnsonOtylertech.com (X4157)
C1 McCarron
Vice President of Technical Support
cj.mccarronOtylertech.com (X4124)
ci. mccarron@tyiertech.com).
Resources
A number of additional resources are available to you to provide a comprehensive and complete support
experience..
• Managed Internet Update (MIU): Allows you to download and install critical and high priority fixes as
soon as they become available.
eve7• Lyle
O
32
• Release Admin Console: Allows you to monitor and track the availability of all development activity for
a particular release directly from Munis.
• KnowledgeBase: A fully searchable depository of thousands of documents related to Munis
processing, procedures, release info, helpful hints, etc.
Remote Support Tool
Some Support calls may require further analysis of your database or setup to diagnose a problem or to assist
you with a question. GoToAssist® shares your desktop via the Internet to provide you with virtual on-site
support. The GoToAssist tool from Citrix (www.citrix.com) provides a highly secure connection with 128-bit,
diagnose problems, or assist you with screen navigation.
At the end of each GoToAssist session, there is a quick survey you should complete so we have accurate and
up-to-date feedback on your Support experiences. We review the survey data in order to continually improve
our Support services.
Email Registration
these groups to inform clients of issues, and to distribute helpful technical tips and updated technical
documentation. The survey information allows you to update your registration at any time, and you may
unregister for one or more distribution lists at any time.
Tyler Web site
www.tylertech.com), you have access to
line documentation, user forums, group training
schedule/sign-up, and annual user conference updates/registration.
Timely TCP Progress Updates
Our technicians are committed to providing you timely updates on the progress of your open support incidents
via the Tyler Client Portal. The frequency of these updates is determined by issue priority.
Priority 1 Incidents e contact is not possible)
Priority 2 Incidents
Priority 3 Incidents
Priority 4 Incidents
Updates will also be provided for any issue, regardless of priority, when action items have been completed or
when there is pertinent information to share.
tyler
P
33
t yl, e r
Exhibit C
Schedule 2
EnerGov Support Call Process
Support Channels
We provide the following channels of EnerGov software support:
(1)
support.
(2) unlimited emails directly to the software support
group. Email will be used for responses.
(3) sed questions, users may create unlimited support
incidents through the customer relationship management portal available at the Tyler Technologies
website.
(4)
current maintenance agreements to support one another, share best practices and resources, and
access documentation.
representatives will provide the most current toll-free telephone number and email address for submitting
support incidents, based on the software licensed.
Support Availability
Our established software support hours are Monday thro
Thanksgiving Day
Memorial Day Day after Thanksgiving
Independence Day Christmas Eve
Labor Day Christmas Day
Issue Handling
When a support incident cannot be resolved during its initiation, the client receives an incident tracking
number for that issue. The incident tracking number is used to track and reference open issues when clients
tyler
34
contact support.
(1)
(2)
Analysts and take on escalated issues
(3) day-to-day supervision of Analysts and Advisors
and may assist in incident escalations
(4) onsible for the management of support teams for either a single
product or a product group
on occasion, the priority or immediacy of a software support incident may change after initiation. Tyler
encourages clients to communicate the level of urgency or priority of software support issues so that we
can respond appropriately. A software support incident can be escalated by any of the following methods:
(1)
escalate an issue through management channels as described above.
(2) t in order to escalate the priority of an issue
(3) the client incident portal and referencing the
appropriate incident tracking number, clients can modify the priority of an issue.
is responsible for reasonably setting the priority of the incident per the below chart. The goal of this structure
is to clearly understand and communicate the importance of the issue and to describe expected responses
and resolutions.
Issue Priorities & Resolutions
Priority Characteristics of Support Resolution Targets Development
Level Incident Actions
Support incident that causes (a) Tyler shall provide an initial response to
complete application failure or Priority Level 1 incidents within one (1)
application unavailability; (b) business hour of receipt of the support
application failure or incident. Tyler shall use commercially Hot Fix
1 unavailability in one or more of reasonable efforts to resolve such support Emergency patch
incidents or provide a circumvention to software as
(c) systemic loss of multiple procedure within one (1) business soon as possible
essential system functions. day.
corrupted data is limited to assisting the
client in restoring its last available database.
t y I e r
3S
Issue Priorities & Resolutions
Priority Characteristics of Support Development
Level Incident Resolution Targets
Actions
Support incident that causes (a) Tyler shall provide an initial response to
repeated, consistent failure of Priority Level 2 incidents within four (4)
essential functionality affecting business hours of receipt of the support
more than one user or (b) loss incident. Tyler shall use commercially
Bi-week
2 or corruption of data. reasonable efforts to resolve such support regularly-
incidents or provide a circumvention scheduled patch
procedures within five (5) business
days.
corrupted data is limited to assisting the
client in restoring its last available database.
Priority Level 1 incident with an Tyler shall provide an initial response to
existing circumvention Priority Level 3 incidents within one (1)
procedure, or a Priority Level 2 business day of receipt of the support
incident that affects only one incident. Tyler shall use commercially
user or for which there is an reasonable efforts to resolve such support Next Release
3 existing circumvention incidents without the need for a Scheduled for the
procedure. circumvention procedure with the next next major
published maintenance update or service release
pack, which shall occur at least
quarterly.
corrupted data is limited to assisting the
client in restoring its last available database.
Support incident that causes Tyler shall provide an initial response to
failure of non-essential Priority Level 4 incidents within two (2)
functionality or a cosmetic or business days. Tyler shall use commercially Future release
4 other issue that does not qualify reasonable efforts to resolve such support not scheduled;
as any other Priority Level. incidents within two version release cycles reviewed at next
and a cosmetic or other support incident planning stage
that does not qualify as any other Priority
Level incident with a future version release.
Hardware and Other Systems
if in the process of diagnosing a software support issue it is discovered that a peripheral system or its
software is the cause of the issue, we will notify the client so that the client may contact the support agency
for that peripheral system. We cannot support or maintain third-party software or hardware.
In order for us to provide the highest level of software support, the client bears the following responsibility
t y I e r
36
related to hardware and software:
(1) All infrastructure executing Tyler software shall be managed by the client.
(2) Support contracts for all third-party software (ex: operating systems, database management systems)
associated with Tyler software shall be maintained. Tyler does not support these third-party products.
(3) Daily database backups must be performed; client shall verify the backups are successful.
tyler
37
t y e r
Exhibit D
DocOrigin End User License Agreement
REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
tyier
38
ATTENTION: THE SOFTWARE PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS BEING LICENSED TO YOU BY
OF SOFTWARE LTD. AND IS NOT BEING SOLD. THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED UNDER THE FOLLOWING
AGREEMENT THAT SPECIFIES WHAT YOU MAY DO WITH THE SOFTWARE AND CONTAINS IMPORTANT
LIMITATIONS ON REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES, CONDITIONS, REMEDIES, AND LIABILITIES.
DocOrigin
SOFTWARE LICENSE
IMPORTANT-READ CAREFULLY: This End-User License Agreement ("Agreement" or ' EULA") is a legal
agreement between you (either an individual person or a single legal entity, who will be referred to in this EULA as
"You") and OF Software Ltd. for the DocOrigin software product that accompanies this EULA, including any
associated media, printed materials and electronic documentation (the "Software"). The Software also encompasses
any software updates, add-on components, web services and/or supplements that may be provided to you or made
available to you after the date you obtain the initial copy of the Software to the extent that such items are not
accompanied by a separate license agreement or terms of use. If you receive the Software under separate terms
from your distributor, those terms will take precedence over any conflicting terms of this EULA.
By installing, copying, downloading, accessing or otherwise using the Software, you agree to be bound by the terms
of this EULA. If you do not agree to the terms of this EULA, do not install, access or use the Software; instead, you
should remove the Software from all systems and receive a full refund.
IF YOU ARE AN AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF ANOTHER ENTITY YOU REPRESENT AND WARRANT THAT (1)
THE INDIVIDUAL ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT IS DULY AUTHORIZED TO ACCEPT THIS AGREEMENT ON
SUCH ENTITY'S BEHALF AND TO BIND SUCH ENTITY, AND (II) SUCH ENTITY HAS FULL POWER,
CORPORATE OR OTHERWISE, TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT AND PERFORM ITS OBLIGATIONS
HEREUNDER.
1. LICENSE TERMS
1.1 In this Agreement a "License Key" means any license key, activation code, or similar installation, access or
usage control codes, including serial numbers digitally created and or provided by OF Software Ltd.,
designed to provide unlocked access to the Software and its functionality.
1.2 Evaluation License. Subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, OF Software Ltd. grants
You a limited, royalty-free, non-exclusive, non-transferable license to download and install a copy of the
Software from www.docorigin.com on a single machine and use it on a royalty-free basis for no more than
120 days from the date of installation (the `Evaluation Period"). You may use the Software during the
Evaluation Period solely for the purpose of testing and evaluating it to determine if You wish to obtain a
commercial, production license for the Software. This evaluation license grant will automatically end on
expiry of the Evaluation Period and you acknowledge and agree that OF Software Ltd. will be under no
obligation to renew or extend the Evaluation Period. If you wish to continue using the Software You may, on
payment of the applicable fees, upgrade to a full license (as further described in section 1.3 below) on the
terms of this Agreement and will be issued with a License Key for the same. If you do not wish to continue
to license the Software after expiry of the Evaluation Period, then You agree to comply with the termination
obligations set out in section [7.3] of this Agreement. For greater certainty, any document generated by you
under an evaluation license will have a 'spoiler' or watermark on the output document. Documents
generated by DocOrigin software that has a valid license key file also installed will not have the 'spoiler'
produced. You are not permitted to remove the watermark or 'spoiler' from documents generated using the
software under an evaluation license.
1.3 Development and Testing Licenses. Development and testing licenses are available for purchase through
authorized distributors and resellers of OF Software Ltd. only. Subject to all of the terms and conditions of
this Agreement, OF Software Ltd. grants You, a perpetual (subject to termination by OF Software Ltd. due to
your breach of the terms of this Agreement), non-exclusive, non-transferable, worldwide non-sublicenseable
license to download and install a copy of the Software from w4wv.docorigin.com on a single machine and
* e ° iper
39
use for development and testing to create collateral deployable to Your production system(s). You are not
entitled to use a development and testing license for live production purposes.
1.4 Production Licenses. Production licenses are available for purchase through authorized distributors and
reseliers of OF Software Ltd. only. Subject to all of the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
OF Software Ltd. grants You, a perpetual (subject to termination by OF Software Ltd. due to your breach of
the terms of this Agreement), non-exclusive, non-transferable, worldwide non-sublicenseabie license to use
the Software in accordance with the license type purchased by you as set out on your purchase order as
further described below. For greater certainty, unless otherwise agreed in a purchase order concluded with
an approved distributor of the Software, and approved by OF Software, the default license to the Software is
a per-CPU license as described in A. below:
A. Per-CPU. The total number of CPUs on a computer used to operate the Software may not exceed
the licensed quantity of CPUs. For purposes of this license metric: (a) CPUs may contain more
than one processing core, each group of two (2) processing cores is consider one (1) CPU., and
any remaining unpaired processing core, will be deemed a CPU. (b) all CPUs on a computer on
which the Software is installed shall be deemed to operate the Software unless You configure that
computer (using a reliable and verifiable means of hardware or software partitioning) such that the
total number of CPUs that actually operate the Software is less than the total number on that
computer.
B. Per-Document. This is defined as a fee per document based on the total number of documents
generated annually by merging data with a template created by the Software. The combined data
and template produce documents of one or more pages. A document may contain 1 or more
pages. For instance a batch of invoices for 250 customers may contain 1,000 pages, this will be
counted as 250 documents which should correspond to 250 invoices.
C. Per-Surface. This is defined as a fee per surface based on the total number of surfaces generated
annually by merging data with a template created by the Software. The combined data and
template produce documents of one or more pages, the pages may be printed one side (one
surface) or duplexed (2 surfaces). The documents may be rendered to a computer file (i.e. PDF),
each page placed in the file is considered a surface. A document may contain 1 or more surfaces.
For instance a batch of invoices for 250 customers may contain 500 pages duplexed, this will be
counted as 1000 surfaces.
1.5 Disaster Recovery License. You may request a Disaster Recovery license of the Software for each
production license You have purchased as a failover in the event of loss of use of the production server(s).
This license is for disaster recovery purposes only and under no circumstance may the disaster recovery
license be used for production simultaneously with a production license with which it is paired.
1.6 Backup Copies. After installation of the Software pursuant to this EULA, you may store a copy of the
installation files for the Software solely for backup or archival purposes. Except as expressly provided in this
EULA, you may not otherwise make copies of the Software or the printed materials accompanying the
Software.
1.7 Third-Party Software License Rights. If a separate license agreement pertaining to an item of third-party
software is: delivered to You with the Software, included in the Software download package, or referenced in
any material that is provided with the Software, then such separate license agreement shall govern Your use
of that item or version of Third-Party Software. Your rights in respect to any third-party software, third-party
data, third-party software or other third-party content provided with the Software shall be limited to those
rights necessary to operate the Software as permitted by this Agreement. No other rights in the Software or
third-party software are granted to You.
N tyler
O
40
2. LICENSE RESTRICTIONS
Any copies of the Software shall include all trademarks, copyright notices, restricted rights legends, proprietary
markings and the like exactly as they appear on the copy of the Software originally provided to You. You may
not remove or alter any copyright, trademark and/or proprietary notices marked on any part of the Software or
related documentation and must reproduce all such notices on all authorized copies of the Software and related
documentation. You shall not sublicense, distribute or otherwise make the Software available to any third party
(including, without limitation, any contractor, franchisee, agent or dealer) without first obtaining the written
agreement of (a) OF Software Ltd. to that use, and (b) such third party to comply with this Agreement. You
further agree not to (i) rent, lease, sell, sublicense, assign, or otherwise transfer the Software to anyone else; (ii)
directly or indirectly use the Software or any information about the Software in the development of any software
that is competitive with the Software, or (iii) use the Software to operate or as a part of a time-sharing service,
outsourcing service, service bureau, application service provider or managed service provider offering. You
further agree not to reverse engineer, decompile, or disassemble the Software.
3. UPDATES, MAINTENANCE AND SUPPORT
3.1 During the validity period of Your License Key, You will be entitled to download the latest version of the Software
from the DocOrigin website www.docorigin.com. Use of any updates provided to You shall be governed by the
terms and conditions of this Agreement. OF Software Ltd. reserves the right at any time to not release or to
discontinue release of any Software and to alter prices, features, specifications, capabilities, functions, licensing
terms, release dates, general availability or other characteristics of the Software.
3.2 On expiry of your maintenance and support contract, you will have the right to continue using the current
version(s) of the Software which you downloaded prior to the date of expiry of your License Key. However, you
will need to renew maintenance and support in order to receive a new License Key that will unlock the more
current version(s) of the Software. For greater certainty, if you attempt to use an expired License Key to
download the latest version of the Software, the Software will revert to being a locked, evaluation copy of that
version of the Software.
4. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS.
This EULA does not grant you any rights in connection with any trademarks or service marks of OF Software Ltd.
or DocOrigin. All title and intellectual property rights in and to the Software, the accompanying printed materials,
and any copies of the Software are owned by OF Software Ltd. or its suppliers. All title and intellectual property
rights in and to the content that is not contained in the Software, but may be accessed through use of the
Software, is the property of the respective content owners and may be protected by applicable copyright or other
intellectual property laws and treaties. This EULA grants you no rights to use such content. If this Software
contains documentation that is provided only in electronic form, you may print one copy of such electronic
documentation.
5. DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTIES.
TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE LICENSED SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL
SUPPORT PROVIDED BY OF SOFTWARE LTD. HEREUNDER ARE PROVIDED ON AN "AS IS" BASIS AND
THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES, REPRESENTATIONS OR CONDITIONS, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WRITTEN
OR ORAL, ARISING BY STATUTE, OPERATION OF LAW, COURSE OF DEALING, USAGE OF TRADE OR
OTHERWISE, REGARDING THEM OR ANY OTHER PRODUCT OR SERVICE PROVIDED UNDER THIS
AGREEMENT OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT BY OF SOFTWARE LTD.
OF SOFTWARE LTD. DISCLAIM ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF QUALITY,
MERCHANTABILITY, MERCHANTABLE QUALITY, DURABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
AND NON-INFRINGEMENT. OF SOFTWARE LTD. DOES NOT REPRESENT OR WARRANT THAT THE
SOFTWARE SHALL MEET ANY OR ALL OF YOUR PARTICULAR REQUIREMENTS, THAT THE SOFTWARE
WILL OPERATE ERROR-FREE OR UNINTERRUPTED OR THAT ALL ERRORS OR DEFECTS IN THE
SOFTWARE CAN BE FOUND OR CORRECTED.
In certain jurisdictions some or all of the provisions in this Section may not be effective or the applicable law may
mandate a more extensive warranty in which case the applicable law will prevail over this Agreement.
41
6. LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY.
6.1 TO THE GREATEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, IN NO EVENT SHALL
OF SOFTWARE LTD. BE LIABLE TO YOU OR ANY OTHER PERSON FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT,
INCIDENTAL. SPECIAL, PUNITIVE, EXEMPLARY OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES WHATSOEVER,
INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, LEGAL EXPENSES, LOSS OF BUSINESS, LOSS OF PROFITS, LOSS
OF REVENUE, LOST OR DAMAGED DATA, LOSS OF COMPUTER TIME, COST OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS
OR SERVICES, OR FAILURE TO REALIZE EXPECTED SAVINGS OR ANY OTHER COMMERCIAL OR
ECONOMIC LOSSES ARISING OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT, EVEN IF
OF SOFTWARE LTD. HAS BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH LOSS OR DAMAGES, OR
SUCH LOSSES OR DAMAGES ARE FORESEEABLE.
6.2 THE ENTIRE LIABILITY OF OF SOFTWARE LTD. AND YOUR EXCLUSIVE REMEDY WITH RESPECT TO
THE SOFTWARE AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT AND ANY OTHER PRODUCTS OR SERVICES SUPPLIED BY
OF SOFTWARE LTD. IN CONNECTION WITH THIS AGREEMENT FOR DAMAGES FOR ANY CAUSE AND
REGARDLESS OF THE CAUSE OF ACTION, WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR IN TORT, INCLUDING
FUNDAMENTAL BREACH OR NEGLIGENCE, WILL BE LIMITED IN THE AGGREGATE TO THE AMOUNTS
PAID BY YOU FOR THE SOFTWARE, TECHNICAL SUPPORT OR SERVICES GIVING RISE TO THE CLAIM.
6.3 THE DISCLAIMER OF REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS AND LIMITATION OF
LIABILITY CONSTITUTE AN ESSENTIAL PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. YOU ACKNOWLEDGE THAT BUT
FOR THE DISCLAIMER OF REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES AND CONDITIONS AND LIMITATION OF
LIABILITY, NEITHER OF SOFTWARE LTD. NOR ANY OF ITS LICENSORS OR SUPPLIERS WOULD GRANT
THE RIGHTS GRANTED IN THIS AGREEMENT.
7. TERM AND TERMINATION
7.1 The term of this Agreement will begin on download of the Software and, in respect of an Evaluation License,
shall continue for the Evaluation Period, and in respect of all other license types defined in Section 1, shall
continue for as long as You use the Software, unless earlier terminated sooner under this section 7.
7.2 OF Software Ltd. may terminate this Agreement in the event of any breach by You if such breach has not been
cured within five (5) days of notice to You. No termination of this Agreement will entitle You to a refund of any
amounts paid by You to OF Software Ltd. or its applicable distributor or reseller or affect any obligations You
may have to pay any outstanding amounts owing to OF Software Ltd. or its distributor.
7.3 Your rights to use the Software will immediately terminate upon termination or expiration of this Agreement.
Within five (5) days of termination or expiration of this Agreement, You shall purge all Software and all copies
thereof from all computer systems and storage devices on which it was stored, and certify such to
OF Software Ltd.
8. GENERAL PROVISIONS
81 No Waiver. No delay or failure in exercising any right under this Agreement, or any partial or single exercise of
any right, will constitute a waiver of that right or any other rights under this Agreement. No consent to a breach
of any express or implied term set out in this Agreement constitutes consent to any subsequent breach, whether
of the same or any other provision.
8.2 Severability. If any provision of this Agreement is, or becomes, unenforceable, it will be severed from this
Agreement and the remainder of this Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
8.3 Assignment. You may not transfer or assign this Agreement (whether voluntarily, by operation of law, or
otherwise) without OF Software Ltd.'s prior written consent. OF Software Ltd. may assign this Agreement at any
time without notice. This Agreement is binding upon and will inure to the benefit of both parties, and their
respective successors and permitted assigns.
8.4 Governing Law and Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the Province of Ontario. No
choice of laws rules of any jurisdiction shall apply to this Agreement. You consent and agree that the courts of
the Province of Ontario shall have jurisdiction over any legal action or proceeding brought by You arising out of
or relating to this Agreement, and You consent to the jurisdiction of such courts for any such action or
proceeding.
tyler
O
42
8.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement is the entire understanding and agreement between You and
OF Software Ltd. with respect to the subject matter hereof, and it supersedes all prior negotiations, commitments
and understandings, verbal or written, and purchase order issued by You. This Agreement may be amended or
otherwise modified by OF Software Ltd. from time to time and the most recent version of the Agreement will be
available on the OF Software website www.docorigin.com.
Last Updated: [July 18 2013]
..r , t y I e r
43
ty"i-er",
Exhibit E
MyGovPay/VirtualPay and IVR
1. MyGovPay/VirtualPay Licensing. Access to MyGovPay and/or Virtual Pay is hereby granted if Customer elects
to use MyGovPay or VirtualPay, products of Tyler Technologies designed for Citizen Users
to use for processing online payments.
(a) Special MyGovPay/VirtualPay Definitions.
means the agreement between Customer and Persolvent that provides for the
Merchant Fees.
means direct costs levied by Visa/Mastercard/Discover or other payment card
companies for Interchange Fees, Dues, Assessments and Occurrence Fees, over which Tyler Technologies
has no authority.
"MyGovPay" means the Product of Tyler Technologies that allows members of the public to pay for
"Persolvent" means Persolvent, formerly BankCard Services Worldwide, a Payment Card Industry (PCI)
compliant processing agent through which the EnerGov Software passes credit card transactions.
means the Technology Fees, Authorization Fees and Program/Convenience Fees as listed in
.
Use Fees Table in Section 2, titled MyGovPay/VirtualPay.
"VirtualPay" means the Product of Tyler Technologies that allows the Customer to accept and process
(b) Conditions of Use. if customer elects to use MyGovPay and/or VirtualPay the following terms apply:
(1) Customer must apply for and agree to a Merchant Agreement with Persolvent.
(2) Customer agrees that Citizen Users will be subject to Use Fees as listed in Use Fees table in
Section 2.
(3) Customer agrees that Use Fees are separate from and independent of Merchant Fees.
Merchant Agreement with Persolvent.
(5) Customer agrees that Use Fees are for use on the MyGovPay/VirtualPay online system and
will not be deposited or owed to Customer in any way.
Card Associations whose rules may change at anytime and for any reason. If MyGovPay and/or
VirtualPay, for any reason, are unable to process payments using Use Fees, Customer agrees that
MyGovPay/VirtualPay reserves the right to negotiate a new pricing model with Customer for the
continued use of MyGovPay and/or VirtualPay.
2. MyGovPay/VirtualPay Fees. Customer agrees that the Use Fees set forth on the following page will apply if
Customer elects to use MyGovPay/VirtualPay.
tyler
M
44
Use Fees
MyGovPay (Online Payments) MyGovPay (Online
Payments)
Percentage Based Fee +Transaction Fee
Option 1:
Government Entity Paid 2'79% $0.20
Option 2: 3.29% N/A
Patron Paid
VirtualPay (Retail Payments) Virtual Pay (Retail Payments)
Percentage Based Fee +Transaction Fee
Option 1: 2.59% $0.15
Government Entity Paid
Option 2: 2.99% N/A
Patron Paid
additional terms and conditions shall apply of this Agreement:
(a) Network Security. Customer acknowledges that a third-party is used by Tyler Technologies to process IVR
transmitted or stored.
(b) Content. Customer is responsible for the creation, editorial content, control, and all other aspects of
content to be used solely in conjunction with the EnerGov Software.
(c) Lawful Purposes. Customer shall not use the IVR system for any unlawful purpose.
(d) Critical Application. Customer will not use the IVR system for any life-support application or other critical
application where failure or potential failure of the IVR system can cause injury, harm, death, or other grave
problems, including, without limitation, loss of aircraft control, hospital life-support system, and delays in
getting medicate care or other emergency services.
(e) No Harmful Code. Customer represents and warrants that no content designed to delete, disable,
deactivate, interfere with or otherwise harm any aspect of the IVR system now or in the future, shall be
knowingly transmitted by Customer or Users.
(f) IVR WARRANTY. Except as expressly set forth in this Agreement, TYLER TECHNOLOGIES MAKES NO
REPRESENTATION AND EXTENDS NO WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EITHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
WARRANTIES OF TITLE, NON-INFRINGEMENT, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
.,LLU tyler
45
CITY OF
-.SH LAN D
Council Communication
October 19, 2015, Study Session
Discussion of financial software replacement
FROM:
Lee Tuneberg, administrative services/finance services director, tuneberl@ashland.or.us
SUMMARY
The City of Ashland's financial software (EDEN) is a Tyler product and is nearing end of life. Tyler
has submitted an attractive proposal for the city to migrate to its MUNIS product, saving time and
money. This conversion is not budgeted in this biennium but the opportunity and savings are
significant enough that staff recommends it be considered and, if acceptable, a supplemental budget be
adopted to move the proiect up on its timeline.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
Ashland purchased the EDEN software via a bid process in 1999. In response to many operational
issues and to auditor comments on security, the city purchased Springbrook utility billing software in
2010. EDEN software is nearing end of life and will no longer receive upgrades or support.
Springbrook software has been a costly solution including higher than anticipated bank and portal
charges.
Tyler purchased competitor EDEN in 2002 and has offered the MUNIS financial software for years as
the advanced product to migrate to when ready. MUNIS also includes utility billing software that
appears more functional and less costly than Springbrook. Cities of Bend, Forest Grove and Grants
Pass were EDEN users and have chosen to migrate to MUNIS. Tyler has offered MUNIS to the City
of Ashland at an attractive price to promote migration from EDEN to MUNIS, keeping Ashland as a
customer and not having to support EDEN for the City. The cost to migrate to MUNIS is $725,500,
which is offset by saving in licensing and banking charges in future years.
Staff believed Ashland could wait to go through a bid process (using a consultant) in BN 2017-2019
thus reducing pressure on funding for other programs in the BN 2015-2017 process. Tyler's offer
came in too late in the budget process this spring to consider but it is good until January 1, 2016. Staff
sees it as an opportunity to start a conversion earlier, thus saving on a consultant, and RFP process, and
paying higher than acceptable banking charges and licensing fees related to Springbrook software.
See the attached report. The actual proposal from Tyler is omitted because it was extended to the city
under confidential cover.
COUNCIL GOALS SUPPORTED:
Any goal referencing monitoring, costing, funding, financial tools or financing an activity will benefit
from up-to-date financial software.
Administration and Governance goal:
Page 1 of
11FAW&A
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Provide high quality, effective and of cient city services and governance in an accessible,
collaborative and fiscally responsible manner including goals 40 - 51
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
A conversion is not budgeted for BN 2015-2017 however there are certain amounts budgeted that, if a
migration were done, would go toward the new software rather than maintaining the old software.
These include software licensing, customization costs and third-party upgrades that would be absorbed
or not needed in the new software.
The net shortfall between what is budgeted this biennium and what will be spent for the migration is a
minimum of $322,111. In order to do the migration at least that amount would need to be borrowed,
presumably from the Equipment Fund. Only the actual amount needed of a higher amount authorized
would be used for the mi gyration. Initial cash funding for the project should come from the excess
ending fund balance carried forward in the Central Service Fund, shown below reducing the amount
needed to be borrowed.
If the migration is done, the annual net savings per year in utility banking and portal fees and licensing
costs are estimated at $106,000 to $112,000. Depending on the timing of the migration, savings could
be realized during the second half of this biennium. These annual savings would be used to repay the
loan over the following four years (ending no later than FY 2019-2020) resulting in NO increase in
internal charges for this project and operational savings each year after that, in addition to avoiding
consultant costs for selection and conversion in BN 2017-2019. An overview of the budget
implications are as follows:
Software conversion costing
BN 2015-17 BN 2017-19
Year I Year 2 Year I Year 2
Operational Software Budget: Existing Appropriations Projected No conversion
Status Quo Subtotal S 371,845 S 334,440 S 706,285 S 371,124 S 394,658 S 765,782
Less:
Operational Costs Existing/Projected: S 330,165 S 149,687 ~S 479,852 S 161,054 S 173,283 S 334,337
Costs with Proposed Migration: S 360,427 S 365,073 rS 725,500 S 104,141 S 109,348 S 213,489
Appropriations Shortfall:
BN2015-17 S (318,747) S (180,320) S(499,067)
Savings in Appropriations
Available for Payback S 105,929 S 112,027 S 217,956
Carry forward from BN 2013-15 S 176,956 3 - 4 year payback to be
Internal borrowing - minimum S(322,111) complete no late r than F1r21
The new software is expected to last between ten and twenty years if maintained as recommended
through internal licensing charges. All departments and utility customers will benefit from this
migration.
Page 2 of 3
91FAW,
CITY OF
-AS H LA N D
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff requests direction on bringing forth a formal proposal for consideration including the necessary
internal or external funding of the project.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
N/A. This item is for discussion and direction to staff only.
ATTACHMENTS:
Internal memo dated September 21, 2015 from Administration Services/Finance Director
Conversion Costing worksheet
Internal memo dated August 12, 2015 from Finance
Internal memo dated August 15, 2015 from Community Development
Software timeline
Note: confidential information (details) omitted
Page 3 of3
CITY OF
ASHLAND
o
DATE: September 2I. 201
TO: Dane Kanner. City Administrator
FROM: Lee l'uneberg. Finance Director
DEPT: Administrative Services
attachments: Memo from Accounting. Customer Scrvice & ComDcv. Tentative proposal fron7 Tyler
SUBJECT: Software replacement
Daring the budget process last spring we discussed that the existing general ledger soft~.vare and
integrated products used by Ashland are approaching their end-oflife. That means eventually there is
no support from the provider (LDLN) with no updates or improvements. The no updates and
improvements condition occurs first and exists todav. Staff is concerned that our functionality \\111 not
be maintained into the neat biennium as was first thougtht vv hen we discussed whether the replacement
must occur this biennium or could wait until the next due to all the other pressing budget requests.
Even though the I DL softvyare may still be around by the next biennium we believe the city will rcuret
\yaitinz until then to start a selection process or a conversion since it is likely to take several years for it
to be complete. Staff'recotnmends N e take action to convert as soon as is operationally feasible.
The primary reason to consider changing nw,~ even though li sited money has been btidiete.d in 201
2017 is the current potential for a timely n1 ration to a slated software vackauc with little hassle and at
a reasonable cost. Other factors that would contribute to a decision to start the selection and conversion
now are as follows:
1. Funrtitznalih: The basic reason to change sooner is functionality. IfEDIIN was reliable to fix.
customize or improve the existing software there would be less worrv but \vithout any
enhancernents staff will be doing' more `'work-arounds"' as time goes on to accomplish existing
tasks and meet new demands. `phis is lost time and money and does nothinta to extend this
software.
Customer Serwice: As support diminishes our customers. both internal and external. vv*II be
underserved. I:.yen today some things are not possible and anv time, effort and money spent on
fixes or alternate approaches could also be considered waste.
-ware cost: Current customization and related maintenance costs are increasine as much as
S
oft
?9/o a year with no increased functionality. L'DI~N*s limited support will diminish and still cost
ITx1re.
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
D,1. Tuneberg. Director Te! 541485-5300
20 EastMaln Street Fax 541-552-2059 AsNantl.Oregon 97523 7tt'. 8110-735-2900
vpmv-as andALAS
CITY OF
ASHLAND
o
4. Bank/portal fees: Ashland's bank and portal charges are exorbitant and climbing. A change
needs to occur if wye ,want to reduce portal tees and banking charges and to get the process back
under reasonable control.
5. llelavs in advances: Ncvv software brings enhancements and the potential for increased
functionality. \Vaiting to change delays these benefits. accepts inefficiencies and can only cost
more in the long run. An example is online payment processing. The current softwware I'DF,'
does not allow online payments wyith credit cards which negatively impacts mane departments.
Springbrook should be replaced as part of any ncwy GI., systcm so that all the issues mentioned
above are addressed. This would auto the ctu•rent. monthly. manual integration required ,with
5pringbrook.
6. Migration pricing: Tyler has offered a straight-forward migration of all needed applications to
Munis (another TvIcr product) that is reasonable. The pricing is likely to not be there or be
higher in twyo years or if we decide to utilize a full-blowwn hid process to determine our path.
7. Piggybacking/not bleeding edge: Taking this direct selection process is not unheard of or
uncommon. Other, sini lar Oregon agencies have already done the studies or weighed the
options and upgraded. Ashland could -piggyback- off of their work, Ashland ,will benefit from
the foundation work being laid by these other agencies. This benefit may not exist for Ashland
from other software providers.
8. Better use of existing budget: Finally, the BN 2015-17 includes payments for the higher costs
of IJ)F N and Springbrook that will not reduce until a transition is made. Some ofthese funds
would be better spent on the new software instead of maintaining less than optimal software.
Additionally, the Central Service Fund has a larLcr fund balance carry forward (approxiniateIN
`175,000) that anticipated. A1.1, departments and funds wwiil get a benefit fiom an upgrade to
budgeting.. financial reporting. costing etc. so what better use of these funds!
9. Timing: It would be much better to have the general ledger and budgeting applications in place
before the next budget process (Spring 2017) so that staff can be more efficient. accurate and
effective.
Summary
A transition takes time. Started by January 2016 means critical parts will be done by June 2017. Some
lesser parts will carry into the 2017-2019 BN and that budget will require added appropriations f`or tt but
they ,rill be diminished if a migration is done with the lion share occurring before then. If a migration is
not done the city ,will need to budget added amounts for consulting work, purchase and migration costs
in 2017-2019 with carry over into 2019-2021. Starting sooner hedges against future problems and
probable higher costs and has the great potential to use savings from exorbitant bank charges to help pa} off any borrowing and conversion costs.
-
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
D. G. Tuneberg, Director Te! 541-488.5353
20 East Mlam Street Fax: 541-552-2059+
Ashland Oregon '9752.1 TTY 800-735-2900
wmv .ashtand.cr.as
CITY OF
ASHLAND
o
We have a knovzn. current advantage right now. Following closely behind other Oregon goverrnments.
especially those from southern Oregon, xvill provide more clout to Ashland. Oregon's way of doing
things and state-wide. common operational issues and practices will help Ashland get the software
providers attention and create allies when steering the direction and functionality of cornmonly used
software.
Finally. staff is frustrated by software companies that offcr -great products and services only to fall short
ofthe mark leaving little for a single agency to do. This is compounded when the software company
implements proprietary practices that prohibit the customer from seeking alternatives in order to save
moncy. Springbrook has done both of these to the City of Ashland and other agencies. For better or
Nvorse EDEN soft«are is merely aged and old technology. They did not take advantage of the situation
like Springbrook has and it would be good to transition axyav from Springbrook. All software. good or
brad. ages and eventually gets to end-of-life clue to technology changes and competition. l:DFN was
bought out by Tyler years ago and Tyler is oflcring a path away from an aged product. Ashland can
resolve these issues in one fell swoop.
Attached is a budgetary xvorkshcet comparing the costs of doing a migration from FF)I N and
Springybrook to a comprehensive Tyler Mums package in BN 2015-2017 as compared to waiting to 13N
2017-2019 to go throu«h a bidRHI process. It is recommended that a bid process will require outside
help in the form of a consultant and that consulting service may need to extend through the award and
into implementation. The estimated savings from doing a migration sooner than a bid is approximately
5750.000.
Actual savings will be differcnt depending on use of a consultant and tinting but the potential savings
and improved operational efficiencies are such that staff rccommends the city- take action now for
potential efficiency and costs savings sake.
When considering the bud(,ct impact for migration there will be a need to adjust 13N 2015-2017. It is
estimated that up to $350.000 would be needed as an inter-fund loan from the Equipment Fund in
addition to the utilization of the excess carry fo ryv and from 2013-2015 to fund the project. It is possible
the inter-fund loan could be paid off in 2017-2019 with budgetary savings in Central Services.
minimizing the impact to other departments' internal service charges.
Consult the attachment for more details on the city"s use of tltcse products. viable replacement sofmare.
conversion costs and other information related to this recommendation.
- -
ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DEPARTMENT
D. L. TunOerg, Director Tel 541.488-533
20 East ts"ain Street Fax 541-552-2358 WA
2 TTY. 8C^r-7
A.sh'ard. Orecvn 87 1
35-28Q0
wrrw as,land a~.us
Sofm are RF'P Conversion Costing
BN 2015-17 B\ 2017-19
l car 4 l car 2 1 car I l car 2
Existing Budget: E:.isrne AhpropriatiOll, N4ajorcomersion ill }car I
Sofmaic licensine Purchase. inimition s; 900,000
1:[)1ss SLlpport S " 11,8-15 S 82.4-10 S 86.562
Springbrook SupPoll S :0,011(1 + 311.Ii(t(t S 31.So(1
Nevs :ofticare support S 182,000
13flnkin-- Ices (est. at 5197.32o gear I3\ 15-17) S M;'()()Q S I8i_i)0(i $ 214,2112 S 173.283
Consullilw sety cics - e.dmafc S 100.000
Portal Charges S 27,0{)() S 27.00' 1 S 28, 0 S 28.3 50
S( fmare purchase comer,lon-c,;iimale
iVR comer,ion S 5(1.(100 S 10.000 Total S 10,500 S 11,025 Total
'I`otal S 371,845 S 334,440 S 706,285 S 1.371,124 S 394,658 S 1,765,782
Pstimatcd at $650.000 plus 5250.000 tier con%crsion cost etc. Iv be hid_
Estimated at 2891, of software cost.
If consultant needed to ;elect sofmare. %Ia, he nccded through coo ci iwn"' ;add 550.000 in \ Qar 2.
Conversion to IV14 system in 2015-2016 m.Lnlts'tined, not purchased kith stet( >,.~tF~Lare since scstcm alreal+ pill in place.
If SelectionlConcersion approsed I/V2016
Soti~sare licen.1111L Purcha c:
Soft\em: 5uppo>rt 79.545
Softk{aresupport S 26.000
Banking chargc,-c.;limale S 197.320 S 149.65? S 16[.05-4 S 17 .283
Portal charge, ti 17.000
IVR amber;inn Lxistine S S Total
Subtotal S 330.165 S 449,687 S 479,852 S 161.057 S 173.283 S 334,337
Plus:
Proposed Changes to Budget: IIalf down
I icensing purcha:c S 164.315 S 82.155 S 82.158
Annual licen,ing(5°o per Year increa, S 92.916 S 92.916 S 97,562 S 102,440 $ 107.562
1-hind part S 3,992 S 1.996 S 1.996
ImplCmentalion S 243.525 S 121,763 S 121.763
1` ornts'reportill.= dashhlhlyd scalp S 40.000 S 20,000 S 20.000
Data cLmrersion $ 63.300 S 1.650 S 31.651(
('0l1SLl1tl1l1C serclee,
Portal ehargcs
IVR t km%% ,rsion S 19,890 S 9.915 S 9,94 5 Total 5 1.701 S 1,786 l'otal
Subtotal S 627,938 S 360,427 S 365,073 S 725,500 S 104,}41 S 109,348 S 213,489
7 ota1 S 690.592 S 514.760 S 1,205,352 S 265,195 S 282,631 S 547,826
Mi«ration in S\ 215-2017 V. Bid in BA 2017-2019
Biennium Biennium Four Vcar
2015-2017 2017-2019 I otal
Migration in B` 201-5-2017 S 1,205,352 S 547,826 S 1,753,178
Delay to bid it in B\ 2017-2019 S 706,285 S 1,765,782 S 2,472,067
Added cost to ssait mo cears to use consultant to hid softssare: S 718,889
Primar% reasons for differential:
7Nler proNidingsoftmarc discount for migration from I'DI:A to Mullis S 349?50
Consultant costs S IM,1,000
Springbrook banking/portal fees $ 211 A91
I-;stimatedlice nsing)comersion'otbercosts S 5.1J)48
S 718.88`3
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Me
DA-11,: AU(1USt 17. 2015
TG: Lee T'unebera. Finance Director
FROM: Bill Molnar. ('onmmunity Developtment Director
DEPT: Conttnunit- Development Department
RFl: Permitting and Jnspeetion softNyarc upgrades
The Community Development Department be<oan using EDEN Systems Permitting and Inspection
software in 1999 and it remains a core component of our department's daily activities. F.D} N
Permitting is used as the primary means of entering permit review results by all C itv staff with reti-ic yv
responsibilities. The tracking of all planning actions. building permits. Public Forks permits. and the
recording of daily inspection results is conducted through the use of this software. Additionally the
rec-eipting of all revenue associated with permits and fees within the Community Development
Department and Public %Vorks Department is Conducted in EDEN Permitting. alknvin;Z= direct
coordination with the City's general ledger to ensure efficient and accurate collection of payments.
Fden Permitting has not had substantial advancements in the last 15 years and lacks the web based
functionality and GIS integration that has become standard in modern permitting softwarc. Further the
parent organization. Tyler Technologies Inc, acquired another more robust permitting software company
WnerGov) with the intent of offering such technological advancements, making any future
enhancements to LDEIN Permitting unlikely.
The Commtill ity Development Department aims to increase efficiencies as well as provide ready access
to information to our customers and citizens at large. Upgrading Ashland's permitting and inspection
software will serve to improve the clarity, responsiveness and certainty ol'the development review
process. Transitioning to a more cffectivc permitting system, with online e-permitting and electronic
plans review abilities. is expected to increase efficiencies as 1i>llo\',-s:
• Contractors and other applicants call submit permit requests online saving them time and
expense. Mobile capability available in current building permit software options alloys
Community Development Department
!fill Molnar, Director Te` 541-488-53,36
23 East r.'ain Street Fax 5.41-5522050
Ash!an~ 0,egDn 97520 1TY, 803-735-29G
wmv ash!anu "r us
CITY OF
-ASHLAND
Men~o
contractors to use mobile devices to apple fora permit. submit plan addendums, and request
inspections right from the construction site. These functions are increasingly demanded by our
customers.
• The ability for customers to check the status of a permit. or request inspections. via a web-based
interface will create efficiencies for contractors and residents, and our department.
• The City's extensive existing City Geographic information Systems (GIS) data could be
integrated with Permits. This Functionality would help facilitate zoning verification. slope
anaIN'sis. location of floodplains. historic district overlay review. building permit and code
compliance history all kyithin the permitting software,
• City Staff conducting inspections could use mobile tablets to instantly access permit information
remotely.. in the field at construction sites. and instantly record inspection results.
• Utilizing software that creates efficiencies in all steps oftlre process means \ve would be less
likely to experience backlogs when construction ramps tip.
• With a transition to electronic plans review enabled by enhanced permitting software. both
permit intake and inspections can be managed fully within the program. Automatic updates and
scheduled f0ll0V,-1ips ty111 ensure that paper filing systems can be phased out over time.
The Comr'nunity Development Department recognizes that out- existing permit software is becoming
increasingly obsolete after having served the community \\ell for the last 15 years. With Eden Systems
Permitting as it stands, we are unable to meet the expectations of citizens and customers in providing
ready access to information online. and we are unable to begin the transition to a paperless permitting
and inspection Process Which would increase overall efficiency.
NVe have evaluated multiple permitting software options over the last 3 years in anticipation of the
eventual need to upgrade our software. WC found that each pertnittine software package reviewed could
be cont'imired to meet the City's needs, and would constitute a dramatic improvement over the Eden
Perrnittim, software we currently use. In evaluating the Oregon State Accela e-permitting svstem Xve
fecund that to address Ashland's permitting and planning application processes Accela Automation
would need to be acquired and customized. We also evaluated Tyler Technologies newest permittim~.,
software. Fner(iov, which could readily be configured to meet our expectations of having web access
for customers and citizens, mobile access for inspectors. electronic plans review capability. GIS
integration. and gencrat ledger compatibility.
In examining each software package independently vi e found that implementation costs and annual
licensing of these software packages were largely comparable as shown in the table belo~\,. The pant}'
between the competing sol`tt\are packages is largely achieved dire to a discount from Tyler Technologies
Community Development Department
Bill Molnar, Director Tel 541-48Er-53x5
20 East r,:9a!r stree'. Fax 541-552-2050
Ash and, Oregon 97520 TTY 800-735 290'vow ash!ard~o, us
CITY OF
ASHLAND
r o
F nerGoy afforded to existing Eden Systems customers. which offsets the State of Oregon subsidy of the
Aceela softiyare for Building Division related licensing and initiation costs.
Accela Automation Customized EnerGov
(March 2013 estimate) (January 2015 estimate)
Initiation Costs Annual Costs Initiation Costs Annual Costs
Licensing Cost ' 567.063 $21,795 $58,779 S20,796
Totals
Configuration/Setup $107,505 s0 S121,000 So
Cumulative Totals $174,568 $21,795 $179,779 $20,796
Oregon State BCD program subsidizes Building I Includes $45000 Credit toward Licensing I
Notes r Permit software costs only, not Planning, Public j initiation costs for existing Eden Permits and
Works or Code Compliance. Land Management users
In consideration of the Finance Department's evaluation of ` upgrading the City's core financial software
we are supportive of efiurts to coordinate the replacement of Eden permitting, as part of this effort.
Addressing each ofthese City software s%-stems simultaneously should alloy for lower implementation
costs. increased rollout speed. and enhance inter-departmental coordination.
In the event the City elects to hire a consultant to assess the needs of the Cite. the Community
Development department would like to participate on a multi-departmental panel to review proposals-
1-fowever, given the ability to consolidate implementation efturts and realize costs sayings in migrating
from Eden Systems to 1 vieFs upgraded financial and permit tracking software offerings, the
Community Deyelopntent department supports direct discussions with Tyler'l-echnologies regarding
procurement ofthe upgraded soft"are packages.
Community Development Department
Bill Molnar, Director Tel 541.48$-5305
20 Eas, Main Street Fax 541,552-2050
Ashland, Oregcr. 9 520 TTY: 800--35.2K0
vrvr&asrland or us
CITY OF
-ASHLAND
Memo
DAIT:: Atau,~,trst 12.2015
`1-Q: l.ce Tunebere_ Finance Director
FROM: Cindy' Nanks, Accounting Manager
DEPT: Finance Department
RE: `re« software
The Eden financial software. purchased in 1999, is going to sunset in the near future. meaning that the
provider will no longer support the system (exact date to be determined). Eden was purchased by Tyler
Technologies in late 2003. At that point Tylcr had acquired multiple governmental soft-ware companies.
with the goal of eventually merging all to one multi-faceted software system I'm governmental
accounting. Although Tylei- will continue to support the laden software in the near term. no major
updates or enhancements to the system are planned.
'['lie Cit% uses Eden for Financials. Pavroll. Budgeting. Purchasing. Fixed Assets, Inventory. Human
Resources, licensing. Project Accounting and Permitting. These functions are all critical to meeting
state, federal and local requirements. Please note that there are still a fcw features to Eden tht have not
been implemented due to tithing and operational shortfalls. The Eden core software system (operating
svstem) hasn't changed since purchase. While the system is still functioning. the demands placed on
this legacy system for more information, more reports and more functionality drive the need to move to
a more modern software system. Most software providers now offer or are moving to a "cloud-based.
solution. NO such option is available for the current Eden system.
Cloud solutions utilize wela based operations not normally hosted on a city-owned server.
I believe there are two realistic approaches to deal with our end-of=life financial system.
1) Path one is to hire a consultant to assess the needs of the City and each department as they relate
to each component ofthe Eden software and develop an UP for the procurement of a
replacement system. Assutning a reasonable response to the RFP, with the assistance ofthe
consultant, a multi-department panel would be created to review, rant: and recommend the RFP
- - -
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
D. L. Tuneberg, Director Te!: 541-488-530,6 I
20 East Main street Fax ~i 488-5311
Ashia^ Q gin 0,752D TTr 800.735-230v
ww&,_ashiand etas
C I T Y OF
-ASHLAND
Men~o
submittals. On-sight visits may be required. USinE_T a consultant ~rottld require competitively
bidding the service and is estimated to cost at least 550.000 and perhaps in excess of$100.000.
Final bid for a comprehensive package is likely to exceed $1 million in addition to the cost of a
consultant to assess and possible assist along the way.
Path two is to stay with Tyler Technologies and migrate the current Eden software modules it)
another product offered by Tyler. A probable solution is Tyler's very robust system called
Mullis. Tyler is offering the Muni system to existing customers at a reduced price most
assured1v to retain the client and to recognize the simplified approach required to migrate rather
than re.-bid and lose the customer.
Both of the above options have risks to them. There is no software that is perfect and that can meet all
01 '01-11- needs. I-Ioweyer. I believe the best option would be to migrate to the Munis S-,stem. For the cost
and the bclova list of modules it makes the best use of City fiends.
An initial discussion with Tyler regarding an upgrade to their complete. integrated system indicated a
cost of purchase well under $200.000 Nvith conversion and third party fees under $360.000. As with all
software providers there is an annual license for support on the applications and that is estimated to be
approximately $93.0001. Ashland currently budgets and pays $141.000 in annual fees to Eden and
Springbrook so the entire nety package would have $48,000 positive (savings) impact each year beyond
the purchase conversion price.
The total includes the modules listed below as well as data conversion from out- existing Eden Systems
modules. t`se of a consultant by the Cite is optional. - - - - -
Financials (General t.edacr. Budget) Inventor!/Fixed Assets Purchasing
Pa`roll Project and Grant Accounting Account, Receivable
Ujthty Billm0 Human Resources ! Employee Access Portal 01R)
NVork Orders (11 t.lec Operations) i Permits and Inspections ~ F3usinessLicenses
Fleet and Facilities Mgmt Content Manager Citizen Access Portal
User Dashboard Special Assessments Report N titer ~
Some of the features of lvlunis are highlighted below. Much ofthe information described below is not
available to us in our current system.
Financial Core - -[-his is the general ledger, purchasing and accounts payable. These functions
are more streamline with current business practices. they Ieature electronic approvals with each
- - - -
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
D. L. Tuneberg. Director Tel 541-488-53,00 9AVI
20 Eas, mmi Streel Pax 541-488-5:31 s
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY. 800.735-294`9
mvw,ash!and or u:
CITY OF
-ASH LAN D
o
module. They support use of 1' cards which can streamline the purchasing process, providing
efficiencies. 'I'llere is an auto correct feature that corrects all documents within the sub ledgers.
1~or example 11'a PO was issued to an incorrect account number and was paid to that Incorrect
nwnbcr, the single correction is documented in all svstcros and rcadily yievvable by all users.
Dashboard This is a web based tool that allows users to launch programs and other applications
from a single ~Nork area. Web parts (think of apps on your smart phone) can be added to the
dashboard oil a per user basis. It simplifies sharing information and shows critical data such as
workflow approval. notifications and date-based alerts. Collections for Account Receivable.
Track budg,ets atzainst VI D futures.
Tyler Reportin~_, Services - This is for reports and queries in formats that are unique and
customized to the City and helps provides the right information. This service trains staff oil
usiti the standard reports and cI-eating our o',vn. The data is presented in a simplified stI-ueture
for staff to be able to use.
Content Xlanat er - This is product that is similar to Lasertiche. I lowever. this module takes all
system generated processes such as accounts payable checks (Purchasing orders, W2"s) and
links it to the vendor information. Also. it allows scanning of invoices and scanned documents
are linked to the vendor files. It supports query on any of the texts.
Pavroll - A true employee self service web portal %\-here employees can see all their pay data
including bi-N\cckl\- paychecks. they can make changes to their W-4. change dependents.
addresses. etc that integ,rates back to the IIR application. There is a paycheck simulator. where
employees can input data to come up tyith an estimate. This contains a true online tinleslteet
function as well.
I-IR- This provides the ability to produce and track the status of personnel action forms (PAI~'s)
from the system. This also coordinates With NFEOGOV. I I1Z"s Current employment application
processing web app. Other features include the monitoring, of open positions. management of
events such as next perlormance reviews. step increases. etc.
I Itility Billing, Please see attached memo from Customer Services Supervisor Bryn Morrison.
Report writer- Munis offers tree report writing for any reports that take two hours or less of work
to produce.
-
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
D. L. 7uneberg, Director TeF 1 4 & v34~j
20 East Main, Stmt Fax 541-453-5311
Ashland Oregon 9752 TTY: &X-735-2900
vAw, as'"'ard Or US
CITY OF
-ASHLAND
Meo
Permits and Inspections - Please see attached memo from Community Development Departinent
Below is a summary of recent discussions with other jurisdictions in our area regarding their
current software systems, their level of satisfaction. their current or future plans for changes, and
vyhat they are doing liar their software needs.
• Citv of'Grants Pass - Hired a consultant and previewed Tyler and Springbrook.
Thev chose Tvlcr- Munis
• Citv of Medford - I fired a consultant and is in the process of reviewing Tyler-
Mullis and One Solution.
• Citv of Corvallis - Selected One Solution but stopped tnid-implementation and
dropped One Solution.
• Citv of Bend Hired a consultant and Selected TvIer - Alunis
• Cite of forest Grote - Currently evaluating Tyler - Munis
• Benton County - Currently evahating Tyler - Munis
The examples above seem to indicate that in the recent past a consultant approach for similar
organizations has resulted in a M nlis selection in Grants Pass and Bend.. Also. similar sized
organizations with similar complexities like Forest Grove consider \'Iunis as a viable solution.
In my opinion. the City is at a point with the Fden Systems software where the current
deficiencies within Laden are becoming more prevalent_ We cannot implement desired business
changes within our current software. W'e cannot provide necessary reports. We cannot meet
current demands for data requests and many functions require a challenging, amount of`'work-
arounds- or manual effilrt from the Accounting staff and other departments.
It is mti, recommendation that staff consult with the Legal department to determine the
appropriate steps for a software upgrade'rnigration to the Munis suite of softN are packages and,
ifaccepted. the City begin more detailed discussions with Tyler regarding a more format quote
for the "path tyNo" solution.
- - - - - -
FINANCE DEPARTMENT ILA&
0. L. Tuneberg. Director Tel_ 541-486-5300
20 EastYasn 5 reet Fax. 541-438-53!1
Ashiand, Gregor 37523 TTY 8GO-735-293,"
%wiw.asNand or us
Timeline of Key COA Software Milestones - Primarily General Ledger and Utility Billing
1. About 1999 the city bid and awarded a financial software contract to EDEN. Conversion of
applications, as warranted, continued for multiple years. Some applications were never
employed due to timing and staffing direction.
2. Utility billing software remained "home grown" and was not included in the financial package
purchase and conversion.
3. About 2003 EDEN was acquired by Tyler.
4. About 2004 the city acquired Incode Courts software directly from Tyler.
5. During fiscal Years 2005-2012 the home grown utility software failed audit security and control
requirements. Efforts were ongoing to comply but eventually staff and auditors agreed it has to
be replaced by an outside software.
6. In 2010 the city bids utility services and awarded to Springbrook. EDEN bid its utility software
but functionality was stated by them to be lacking... there were things they felt they could not do
Springbrook said they could do the things requested with customization. The other bidder was
COG and its estimate for utility billing alone was well above $500,000.
7. City went live with Springbrook UB in 2012 but the software is clunky, costly to run and not very
efficient. Many of the bid features required customization and that has an ongoing cost. Staff
reviewed options with Legal and found little recourse so implementation and customization
continued.
8. June 2013 Tyler indicated no need to change from EDEN financials in the foreseeable future and
offered migration to Muni as a planned path whenever decided by the customer.
9. January 2015 staff raised the impending financial software conversion but does not budget
replacement due to all other financial demands, thinking that EDEN will last into the next
biennium with preliminary work for replacement being achieved by June 30, 2017.
10. Staff requested information on migration and received an estimate for migration good through
January 1, 2016. However, staff is unsure about functionality of Munis and the benefits of
migrating over going to bid.
11. Accounting staff attended Tyler conference to view Munis software and to discuss with other
users their plans to migrate or bid. Their first impression is that Munis is very viable and many
agencies are taking advantage of Tyler's offer to not charge additional licensing for migration, in
essence to keep pricing with the amounts currently contracted.
12. August 2015 staff submitted report reflecting history, feasibility, peer research and pricing of
migration including confirmation that Tyler is the sole provider/developer/modifier of Munis for
purposes of bidding or migration and/or maintenance.
13. September 2015 staff evaluates the potential of migrating to Tyler Munis sooner than planned
including the replacement of Springbrook due to the considerable customization, related costs
and less-than-efficient operations of the software and Springbrook customer service.
Note:
14. Support of EDEN financial software will eventually cease. The city has to migrate or bid new
software. Investment of additional time and money into EDEN and peripheral software should
be considered unworthy. Some may still be required if conversion is delayed to BN 2017-19.
15. Migration is very viable and perceived to be less costly than bidding and starting from scratch
with anew software provider. Migration within the software held by the same company seems
to be unfettered by the requirement to bid services.
16. Tyler, who owns EDEN has a well-known and perceived to be a very good product called Munis.
Tyler has planned for customers to easily migrate to Munis and offers incentives to do so.
17. Tyler has provided an estimate for migration from EDEN/Springbrook to Munis good to 1/2016.
18. Munis includes many other applications like utility billing that appear to be more comprehensive
than Springbrook.
19. Many similar government agencies in Oregon are in the same spot and already bidding,
negotiating or studying a migration to Tyler Munis . At least one has failed with bids to another
software provider and are considering Munis at this point.
20. Ashland Finance Department recommends the City consider the same migration.
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Council Communication
December 15, 2015, Business Meeting
Approval of a Change Order in Excess of 25% for Consultant Services to Ashland
Transportation System Capital Projects
FROM:
Michael R. Faught, Public Works Director, Public Works, faughtm@ashland.or.us
SUMMARY
Council is asked to approve a change order in excess of 25% for work required to extend a personal
services contract with John Watt & Associates LLC (JWA). This proposed $16,740 contract extension
would allow Al Densmore to proceed with his recommendation to request additional funding for the
East Nevada Street Extension project in the 2016 state legislative process.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
At the November 17, 2015, Council meeting, Al Densmore provided an update on his lobbying efforts
for funding of the East Nevada Street Extension project. At that time, Mr. Densmore outlined his plan
to request additional funding through the state legislative process starting with the 2016 session but
understanding that any real potential funding would likely not be realized until the 2017 session.
This change order would allow Mr. Densmore to continue to lobby for funding options/opportunities
for the East Nevada Street project for an additional six months.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
There are sufficient Street funds available to cover the cost of this personal services contract extension.
COUNCIL GOALS:
• Deliver timely life-cycle capital improvement projects
• Maintain and improve infrastructure that enhances the economic vitality of the community
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of the contract amendment with JWA for an additional $16,740.
SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
I move approval of a contract amendment with JWA for an additional $16,740.
ATTACHMENTS:
Addendum to Contract
Page 1 of ]
ADDENDUM TO CITY OF ASHLAND
CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES LESS THAN $35,000
Addendum made this 15th day of December, 2015, between the City of Ashland ("City")
and John Watt Associates, LLC ("Consultant").
Recitals:
A. On June 11, 20151 City and Consultant entered into a "City of Ashland Contract for
Personal Services Less than $35,000" (further referred to in this addendum as "the
agreement").
B. The parties desire to amend the agreement to extend the date and increase the
compensation to be paid to the Consultant.
City and Consultant agree to amend the agreement in the following manner:
1. The date for completion as specified in Paragraph 4 of the agreement is
extended to July 12, 2016.
2. The maximum price as specified in Paragraph 5 of the original agreement is
increased to $33,480.
3. Except as modified above, the terms of the agreement shall remain in full force
and effect.
CONSULTANT: CITY OF ASHLAND:
By BY
,l n Department Head
Its 1~ SA 0C- hsT Date
DATE -Z.
Purchase Order #12918
Acct. No.:
(For City purposes only)
1- CITY OF ASHLAND, ADDENDUM TO CONTRACT FOR PERSONAL SERVICES
-
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Council Communication
December 15, 2015, Business Meeting
Resolution Repealing and Replacing Resolution 2015-29 (Adopting a Supplemental
Budget Establishing Appropriations within the Biennium 2015-17 Budget) to
Clarify Language
FROM:
Lee Tuneberg, Finance Director, Administrative Services Department tuneberl@ashland.or.us
SUMMARY
Resolution 2015-29, which created a supplemental budget to facilitate the purchase of new financial
software, did not clearly reflect the intent of the supplemental budget as presented in the supporting
documentation. The auditors have recommended a change to the wording to clarify that some
resources to be used for the software migration are from the excess ending fund balances carried over
from the prior year. Repealing and replacing the resolution with a corrected resolution rather than
revising or amending the adopted resolution provides better tracking in city records.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The supporting documentation to the supplemental budget clearly indicated that excess funds from the
prior year carry forward were to be appropriated for the software project. The language in the
approved resolution is not clear and should be replaced.
No other changes are proposed.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends Council approve the proposed resolution.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to adopt a resolution titled, "A resolution clarifying language in Resolution 2015-29 (adopting
a supplemental budget increasing appropriations within the 2015-2017 biennium budget), Resolution
2015-29 is repealed."
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Resolution
Resolution 2015-29
Page 1 of 1
RESOLUTION NO. 2015-
A RESOLUTION CLARIFYING LANGUAGE IN RESOLUTION 2015-29
(ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET INCREASING
APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE 2015-2017 BIENNIUM BUDGET),
RESOLUTION 2015-29 IS REPEALED
Recitals:
ORS 294.480 permits the governing body of a municipal corporation to make a
supplemental budget for the fiscal year for which the regular budget has been prepared under one
or more of the following reasons:
a. An occurrence or condition which had not been ascertained at the time of the
preparation of a budget for the current year which requires a change in financial
planning.
b. A pressing necessity which was not foreseen at the time of the preparation of the
budget for the current year which requires prompt action.
c. Funds were made available by another unit of federal, state or local government and
the availability of such funds could not have been ascertained at the time of the
preparation of the budget for the current year.
d. Other reasons identified per the statutes.
e. Resolution 2015-29 included unclear language and is repealed and corrected as
highlighted below by this resolution.
THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Because of the circumstances stated below, the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Ashland determine that it is necessary to adopt a
supplemental budget, establishing the following additional
appropriations:
General Fund
Appropriation: Police Department $40,155
Resource: Intergovernmental Revenues $40,155
To appropriate funds from You Have Options Program (YHOP). This was collected by city of
Ashland and is now being handled through Jackson County SARI.
Central Service Fund
Appropriation: Administrative Services Department $575,000
Resources: Interfund loan (Revenue) $400,000
Budgeted Carry Forward $175,000
To appropriate for the cost to migrate financial software from Eden to Munis, both a Tyler
Technology product. This requires a capital interfund loan that will be repaid with annual
payments of up to $100,000 (interest calculated on the actual monthly interest earned in the
Page 1 of 3
Local Government Investment Pool and completed no later than fiscal year 2021 per the attached
schedule with no prepayment penalty) and a transfer of excess monies beyond the amount
budgeted for Working Capital Carryover from the prior year.
Equipment Fund
Appropriation: Interfund Loan (Expense) $400,000
Resource: Budgeted Carry Forward $400,000
To appropriate an interfund loan to the Central Services Fund for migrating the financial
software with the terms identified above.
1 015155
S-- j
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 1.0155
SECTION 2. All other provisions of the adopted 2015-2017 BIENNIUM BUDGET not
specifically amended or revised in this Supplemental Budget remain in full force and effect as
stated therein.
SECTION 3. This resolution was duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day of December,
2015, and takes effect upon signing by the Mayor.
Barbara Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this _ day of December, 2015.
John Stromberg, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
David Lohman, City Attorney
Page 2 of 3
Interfund Loan Repayment Schedule
Payment from Central Servcies Fund to Equipment Fund
BN 2015-17 Loan
Loan
Year Principle Est. Int.* Est. Pmt Balance
BN 2015-17 $ 400,000.00
FY2018 $ 100,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 108,000.00 $ 300,000.00
FY2019 $ 100,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 106,000.00 $ 200,000.00
FY2020 $ 100,000.00 $4,000.00 $ 104,000.00 $ 100,000.00
FY2021 $ 100,000.00 $2,000.00 $ 102,000.00 $ -
* Interest estimated at 2%.
Maximum Loan Amount $400,000
Repayment No Later than June 30, 2021
No Early Payment Penalty
Interest based upon LGIP Actual
NOW 3 of 3
RESOLUTION NO. 2015- 2°l
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING A SUPPLEMENTAL BUDGET
INCREASING APPROPRIATIONS WITHIN THE
2015-2017 BIENNIUM BUDGET
Recitals:
ORS 294.480 permits the governing body of a municipal corporation to make a
supplemental budget for the fiscal year for which the regular budget has been prepared under one
or more of the following reasons:
a. An occurrence or condition which had not been ascertained at the time of the
preparation of a budget for the current year which requires a change in financial
planning.
b. A pressing necessity which was not foreseen at the time of the preparation of the
budget for the current year which requires prompt action.
c. Funds were made available by another unit of federal, state or local government and
the availability of such funds could not have been ascertained at the time of the
preparation of the budget for the current year.
d. Other reasons identified per the statutes.
THE CITY OF ASHLAND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Because of the circumstances stated below, the Mayor and City Council
of the City of Ashland determine that it is necessary to adopt a
supplemental budget, establishing the following additional
appropriations:
General Fund
Appropriation: Police Department $40,155
Resource: Intergovernmental Revenues $40,155
To appropriate funds from You Have Options Program (YHOP). This was collected by city of
Ashland and is now being handled through Jackson County SARI.
Central Service Fund
Appropriation: Administrative Services Department $575,000
Resources: Interfund loan (Revenue) $400,000
War4ing-Capit"arryover $175,000
To appropriate for the cost to migrate financial software from Eden to Munis, both a Tyler
Technology product. This requires a capital interfund loan that will be repaid with annual
payments of up to $100,000 (interest calculated on the actual monthly interest earned in the
Local Government Investment Pool and completed no later than fiscal year 2021 per the attached
schedule with no prepayment penalty) and a transfer of excess monies beyond the amount
budgeted for Working Capital Carryover from the prior year.
Page f of 3
Equipment Fund
Appropriation: Interfund Loan (Expense) $400,000
Resource: Fsndftig+un& alanoe $400,000
To appropriate an mterfund loan to the Central Services Fund for migrating the financial
software with the terms identified above.
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 15 155 1 515
SECTION 2. All other provisions of the adopted 2015-2017 BIENNIUM BUDGET not
specifically amended or revised in this Supplemental Budget remain in full force and effect as
stated therein.
SECTION 3. This resolution was duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day of December,
2015, d takes effect upon signing by the Ma or.
Barbara Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this d~ay of December, 2015.
r
hn Stromberg, Mayo
Revi ed as to form:
avid IL an, City Attorney
Page 2 of 3
Interfund Loan Repayment Schedule
Payment from Central Servcies Fund to Equipment Fund
BN 2015-17 Loan
Loan
Year Principle Est. Int.* Est. Pmt Balance
BN 2015-17 $400,000.00
FY2018 $100,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 108,000.00 $ 300,000.00
FY2019 $ 100,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 106,000.00 $ 200,000.00
FY2020 $ 100,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 104,000.00 $ 100,000.00
FY2021 $ 100,000.00 $2,000.00 $ 102,000.00 $ -
* Interest estimated at 2%.
Maximum Loan Amount $400,000
Repayment No Later than June 30, 2021
No Early Payment Penalty
Interest based upon LGIP Actual
Page 3 of 3
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Council Communication
December 15, 2015, Business Meeting
Public Hearing on and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Title 18 Land Use
of the Ashland Municipal Code for Homegrown Marijuana and Marijuana-
Related Businesses and Declaring and Emergency
FROM:
Maria Harris, Planning Manager, harrism@ashland.or.us
SUMMARY:
The proposed land use ordinance amendments create standards for the allowable size, scale, and
location of marijuana grown in conjunction with a residential dwelling unit and for the location and
manner of operation of marijuana-related businesses. Specifically, a residential property would be
allowed up to four plants to be grown outdoors, whether for medical or recreational use. Several
changes were made to the draft ordinance since the December 1, 2015, City Council meeting,
including requiring a 200-foot buffer between residential zones and marijuana wholesale facilities, the
addition of a 1,000-foot separation requirement between marijuana production facilities and between
marijuana wholesale facilities, and the addition of a clarification that medical marijuana sales and
recreational marijuana sales could be co-located in the same building and are not subject to the 1,000-
foot separation requirement.
A continuation of the public hearing and first reading of the ordinance is scheduled for the December
15, 2015 meeting. There appears to be some urgency in adopting the land use regulations for
marijuana-related businesses because State of Oregon representatives recently indicated that the
Oregon Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) will begin processing applications on January 4, 2016,
regardless of whether local jurisdictions have regulations in place. As a result, the ordinance is worded
for an emergency adoption at second reading which is scheduled on January 5, 2016.
BACKGROUND:
Several changes are included in the attached ordinance that were made to the draft since the December
1, 2015 City Council meeting. The changes in the attached ordinance are described below.
• Residential Buffer from Marijuana Wholesale Facilities
page 17, 18.2.3.190.B.2.a
Marijuana wholesale facilities is added to the list of marijuana-related businesses that are
required to locate 200 feet or more from residential zones in the attached ordinance. The
previous draft included a requirement that marijuana laboratories, processing, and
production businesses locate 200 feet or more from residential zones. This 200-foot
residential buffer was carried forward from the existing regulations that require medical
marijuana dispensaries that are not located on a boulevard street to be located 200 feet or
Page I of 4
I`,
CITY OF
ASHLAND
more from residential zones. The buffer requirement was included for the new types of
marijuana businesses because the potential impacts (e.g., number of vehicle trips, safety
issues, odor, noise, energy and water use) of this relatively new industry are largely
unknown. The Planning Commission recommended beginning with a conservative
approach and possibly considering adjusting development standards as local experience is
established. Staff believes the lack of information on impacts from marijuana-related
businesses also applies to the marijuana wholesale use. The 200-foot buffer from residential
zones is shown on the attached map.
• Separation Standards for Production and Wholesale
page 16, 18.2.3.190.B.2.b.ii and 18.2.190.B.2.c
A separation standard of 1,000 feet between marijuana production facilities and 1,000 feet
between marijuana wholesale facilities is included in the attached ordinance. Eligible areas
for marijuana production and wholesale facilities are shown on the attached map. Staff
estimates that approximately four to six of each type of facility, production and wholesale,
could be situated in the eligible areas based on the separation standards.
The Planning Commission raised issues regarding the impact of marijuana production or
commercial indoor marijuana growing on the City's inventory of employment lands and on
energy and water supply. Cities such as Denver, Colorado, have allowed commercial grow
operations in warehouse structures. Reported problems include high square footage needs
with relatively few employees, continuous lighting and high energy use, limited supply of
warehouse space, and inflated light industrial or warehouse rents. A limitation on the size of
building for commercial marijuana production of 5,000 square feet of gross floor area was
included in the ordinance forwarded by the Planning Commission. In addition, 5,000 square
feet is consistent with the limitation in the OLCC's temporary rules for recreational
marijuana production.
The 5,000 square foot gross floor area cap serves to limit the size of individual marijuana
production (indoor commercial growing). However, it does not address the cumulative
impact on building space and employment lands from marijuana production. For example,
the 5,000 gross floor area limitation would allow individual buildings situated on adjacent
lots to be used for marijuana production. The separation standard would require that the
buildings could not be located on adjacent lots and would have more than 1,000 feet
between the buildings. Thus, the spacing standard could control the total amount of
building space and employment land that could be used for marijuana production.
According to the City's 2007 Economic Opportunity Analysis (EOA), approximately 15%
of Ashland's employment is in the industrial or manufacturing sector. The average
employment density for the City's commercial, health care, employment, industrial zones is
17.2 employees per acre. More specifically, there is an average of 9.2 employees per acre in
the E-1 zone and 12.1 in the M-1 zone. Based on the average of 17.2 employees per acre,
the employment land supply is projected to be sufficient through 2027, but begin to
experience some deficits in the 2028-2057 time period.
Page 2 of 4
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Though not definitive , as stated earlier the reports from other states indicate that indoor
marijuana production (indoor commercial growing) uses a large amount of building
space/land and has a relatively low number of employees. Staff suggests the Council also
consider a separation standard for marijuana wholesale facilities because warehouse space
is also generally land intensive with low employment density. The Parking Generation
Manual, P edition, by the Institute of Transportation Engineers includes the following
estimates for the number of employees by building square footage for different industries.
Industry Number of Employees Number of Employees in a
per Building Square 5,000 Square Foot
Footage Building
Warehouse 1 per 4,100 sq. ft. 1
Industrial 1 per 1,200 s q. ft. 4
Light Manufacturing 1 per 1,000 s q. ft. 5
General Office 1 per 300 sq. ft. 17
• Retail Co-location
page 18, 18.2.3.190.B.3.a.iv
The proposed amendments forwarded by the Planning Commission include a 1,000
separation requirement between marijuana retail sales outlets. Marijuana sales are defined
as both medical marijuana sales and recreational marijuana sales. In evaluating the land use
impacts of a retail establishment, the logic was that the impacts to city facilities such as the
street system and to surrounding neighborhoods are likely similar whether medical or
recreational marijuana is sold.
The proposed amendments were not intended to prohibit a store from selling both medical
and recreational marijuana. However, shortly before the Planning Commission public
hearing the State of Oregon passed administrative rules prohibiting any of the recreational
marijuana-businesses licensed by OLCC from locating on the same premises as a medical
marijuana grow site, medical marijuana processing site, medical marijuana dispensary, or a
liquor store. For retail sales, this means under current state rules a medical marijuana
dispensary and recreational marijuana sales outlet cannot be located on the same premises.
When originally developed, Ashland's proposed amendments for marijuana retail sales
were not intended to prohibit medical and recreational sales from being located in the same
building. Language is included in the attached ordinance to clarify that medical and
recreational marijuana sales could be in the same building if in conformance with state
rules. In the event the state rules are amended, this would allow both types of sales to occur
in one building.
• Croman and North Mountain Special Use Standards
pages 21 and 24
Staff included some housekeeping edits in the ordinance. Since the revised land use
ordinance was adopted in 2014, staff has been keeping a running list of minor corrections.
Page 3 of 4
CITY OF
ASHLAND
As a result, staff used this opportunity to edit the special use standards for both the Croman
Mill and North Mountain Neighborhood districts.
The change is in terminology from "special permitted use" to "permitted with special use
standards." This is for consistency with the terminology in the table of uses allowed by
zone in chapter 18.2.2. The manner in which the uses are evaluated and processed does not
change. Uses subject to the special use standards continue to be those uses that are allowed
subject to specific development standards. In addition, in the North Mountain
Neighborhood District several of the commercial uses were mistakenly show as "P" or
permitted in the revised ordinance, but were categorized as "S" or uses subject to special
uses in the original ordinance. This has been corrected in the attached ordinance.
The Planning Commission recommended approval of proposed land use ordinance amendments for
homegrown marijuana and marijuana-related businesses at the October 27, 2015, meeting. The
Planning Commission forwarded a report detailing the Commission's recommendation on the
proposed land use ordinance amendments and the report was included in the December 1, 2015, City
Council meeting packet. The City Council held a study session on the proposed amendments on
November 30, 2015, and the Planning Commission held study sessions during the development of the
proposed amendments on June 23 and August 25, 2015.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of first reading of the amended ordinance as presented.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to approve first reading of an ordinance titled, "An ordinance amending chapters 18.2.2, 18.2.3,
18.3.2, 18.3.3, 183.5 and 18.6.1 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance relating to homegrown marijuana
cultivation and marijuana-related businesses including production, processing, retail sales, testing, and
wholesale and declaring an emergency," and to move the ordinance to second reading.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Proposed Land Use Ordinance Amendments for Homegrown Marijuana and Marijuana-Related
Businesses
2. Draft Map of Eligible Locations for Marijuana Wholesale and Production
Page 4 of 4
1r,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTERS 18.2.2, 18.2.3, 18.2.5, 18.3.2, 18.3.3,
18.3.5 AND 18.6.1 OF THE ASHLAND LAND USE ORDINANCE RELATING TO
HOMEGROWN MARIJUANA CULITVATION AND MARIJUANA-RELATED
BUSINESSES INCLUDING PRODUCTION, PROCESSING, RETAIL SALES,
TESTING, AND WHOLESALE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY
Annotated to show deletions and additions to the code sections being modified. Deletions are bold
lined thr-ou-gh and additions are bold underlined.
WHEREAS, Oregon voters passed Measure 91, known as the Control, Regulation, and Taxation of
Marijuana and Industrial Hemp Act, in November 2014 which allows households with one or more
persons 21 years age and older to have up to four marijuana plants at a household and process, keep, and
store limited amounts of homegrown marijuana and homemade marijuana products. In addition,
Measure 91 requires the Oregon Liquor Control Commission to develop and implement a licensing
process for commercial marijuana facilities including processing, production, wholesale, and retail; and
WHEREAS, the Legislature passed four laws relating to medical and marijuana in the 2015 legislative
session including House Bill 2400 amending the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (OMMA) and Measure
91; and
WHEREAS, Article 2. Section I of the Ashland City Charter provides:
Powers of the City. The City shall have all powers which the constitutions, statutes, and
common law of the United States and of this State expressly or impliedly grant or allow
municipalities, as fully as though this Charter specifically enumerated each of those powers, as
well as all powers not inconsistent with the foregoing; and, in addition thereto, shall possess all
powers hereinafter specifically granted. All the authority thereof shall have perpetual
succession.
WHEREAS, the above referenced grant of power has been interpreted as affording all legislative
powers home rule constitutional provisions reserved to Oregon Cities. City of Beaverton v. International
Ass'n of PirefiVhters Local 1660, Beaverton Shop 20 Or. App. 293; 531 P 2d 730, 734 (1975); and
WHEREAS, under Oregon law, local governments may regulate the operation and location of certain
types of uses within their jurisdiction limits except when such action has been specifically preempted by
state statute; and
WHEREAS, Measure 91 allows cities and counties to adopt reasonable time, place, and manner
regulations of the nuisance aspects of marijuana facilities and specifies that the authority granted to
cities and counties by Measure 91 "is in addition to, and not in lieu of, the authority granted to a city or
county under it charter and the statues and Constitution of the state;" and
Ordinance No. Page 1 of 28
WHEREAS, House Bill 3400 provides that cities may impose reasonable regulations including hours of
operation, manner of operation, public's access to, and location on five types of recreational licenses and
medical marijuana grow sites, processing sites, and dispensaries; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined it is necessary to establish rules and regulations ensuring that
both safe access to marijuana and land use compatibility are maintained; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined there has been an increase in marijuana cultivation,
specifically in residential neighborhoods, because of an increase in medical marijuana grows allowed by
state law; and
WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the increase in marijuana cultivation resulted in an increase in
code compliance complaints regarding odor related to outdoor marijuana cultivation as well as adverse
impacts related to noise from mechanical equipment and lighting related to indoor marijuana cultivation
in accessory structures such as greenhouses; and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined it is necessary to establish rules and regulations for
marijuana cultivation and commercial marijuana facilities, while preserving the peace, safety and
general welfare of residential neighborhoods and neighboring properties; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Ashland conducted a duly advertised public
hearing on the amendments to the Ashland Municipal Code and Land Use Ordinances on October 27,
2015; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland conducted a duly advertised public hearing on the
amendments to the Ashland Municipal Code and Land Use Ordinances on December 1, 2015 and
December 15, 2015; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland, following the close of the public hearing and
record, deliberated and conducted first and second readings approving adoption of the Ordinance in
accordance with Article 10 of the Ashland City Charter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland has determined that in order to protect and benefit
the health, safety and welfare of existing and future residents of the City, it is necessary to amend the
Ashland Municipal Code and Land Use Ordinance in the manner proposed, that an adequate factual base
exists for the amendments, the amendments are consistent with the comprehensive plan and that such
amendments are fully supported by the record of this proceeding.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Chapter 18.2.2 [Base Zones and Allowed Uses] of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance is
hereby amended as follows:
18.2.2.030 Allowed Uses
A. Uses Allowed in Base Zones. Allowed uses include those that are permitted, permitted subject to
special use standards, and allowed subject to approval of a conditional use permit. Where Table
Ordinance No. Page 2 of 28
18.2.2.030 does not list a specific use and chapter 18.6 does not define the use or include it as an
example of an allowed use, the City may find that use is allowed, or is not allowed, following the
procedures of section 18.1.5.040. Uses not listed in Table 18.2.2.030 and not found to be similar to
an allowed use are prohibited. For uses allowed in special districts CM, HC, NM, and SOU, and for
regulations applying to the City's overlays zones, refer to part 18.3.
B. Permitted Uses and Uses Permitted Subject to Special Use Standards. Uses listed as "Permitted
(P)" are allowed. Uses listed as "Permitted Subject to Special Use Standards (S)" are allowed,
provided they conform to chapter 1 8.2.3 Special Use Standards. All uses are subject to the
development standards of zone in which they are located, any applicable overlay zone(s), and the
review procedures of part 18.5. See section 18.5.1.020.
C. Conditional Uses. Uses listed as "Conditional Use Permit Required (CU)" are allowed subject to the
requirements of chapter 18.5.4.
D. Prohibited Uses. Uses not listed in Table 18.2.2.030 and not found to be similar to an allowed use
following the procedures of section 18.1.5.040 are prohibited. Prohibited uses are subject to the
violations, complaints, and penalties sections in 18-1.6.080, 18-1.6.090, and 18-1.6.100.
E. Uses Regulated by Overlay Zones. Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 18.2.2, additional
land use standards or use restrictions apply within overlay zones. An overlay zone may also provide
for exceptions to some standards of the underlying zone. For regulations applying to the City's
overlays zones, please refer to part 18.3.
F. Accessory Uses. Uses identified as "Permitted (P)" are permitted as primary uses and as accessory
uses. For information on other uses that are customarily allowed as accessory, please refer to the
description of the land use categories in part 18.6 Definitions.
G. Mixed-Use. Uses allowed in a zone individually are also allowed in combination with one another,
in the same structure or on the same site, provided all applicable development standards and building
code requirements are met.
H. Temporary Uses. Temporary uses require a Conditional Use Permit under chapter 18.5.4; except as
follows:
1. Short-Term Events. The Staff Advisor may approve through Ministerial review short-term
temporary uses occurring once in a calendar year and lasting not more than 72 hours including
set up and take down. Activities such as races, parades, and festivals that occur on public
property (e.g., street right-of-way, parks, sidewalks, or other public grounds) require a Special
Event Permit pursuant to AMC 13.03.
2. Garage Sales. Garage sales shall have a duration of not more than two days and shall not occur
more than twice within any 365-day period. Such activity shall not be accompanied by any off-
premises advertisement. For the purpose of this ordinance, garage sales meeting the requirements
of this subsection shall not be considered a commercial activity.
3. Temporary Buildings. Temporary occupancy of a manufactured housing unit or similar structure
may be permitted for a period not to exceed 90 calendar days upon the granting of a permit by
the Building Official. Such occupancy may only be allowed in conjunction with construction on
Ordinance No. Page 3 of 28
the site. Said permit shall not be renewable within a six-month period beginning at the first date
of issuance, except with approval of the Staff Advisor.
1. Disclaimer. Property owners are responsible for verifying whether a proposed use or development
meets the applicable standards of this ordinance.
Ordinance No. Page 4 of 28
Table 18.2.2.030 - Uses Allowed by Zone
_ C-1
R-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 RR WR & -1 E-1 M- Special Use
3.5 1-13 1 Standards
A. Agricultural Uses'
Agriculture ^^~'d Farm Us except Keeping Animal sales, feed
of Bees, Livestock and Micro-Livestock, yards, keeping of
Homegrown Marijuana Cultivation, and P P P P P P N N N swine, commercial
Marijuana Production compost, or similar
uses not allowed
Coe Lle...,'.,...,f
Keeping of Bees S S S S S S S N N N and
LaveStOGk and
Keeping of Livestock S N N N S S N N N Bees standards
- Sec. 18.2.3.160
Keeping of Micro-Livestock S S S S S S N N N
Sec. 18.2.3.190
Marijuana Cultivation, Homegrown S S S S S S S S S See General
Industrial,
Marijuana
Production
B. Residential Uses
See Single-Family
standards in Sec.
18.2.5.090
Sec. 18.2.3.130 for
C-1 zone and E-1
Single-Family Dwelling P P P P P P S S N zone
Dwellings and
additions in Historic
District Overlay, see
Sec. 18.2.3.120 and
18.2.5.070
Accessory Residential Unit S S S S S N N N N Sec. 18.2.3.040
Duplex Dwelling S P P P N N S S N Sec. 18.2.3.110
_ Duplex Dwellin
Sec. 18.2.3.170 and
Manufactured Home on Individual Lot S S S S N N N N N not allowed in
Historic District
Overlay
Manufactured Housing Development N S CU+S N N N N N N Sec. 18.2.3.180
Sec. 18.2.3.130 for
C-1 zone and E-1
zone
Multifamily Dwelling N P P P N N S S N
Dwellings and
additions in Historic
District Overlay, see
Sec. 18.2.3.120 and
KEY: P = Permitted Use; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit
Required; N = Not Allowed.
Ordinance No. Page 5 of 28
Table 18.2.2.030 - Uses Allowed by Zone
R-1- C-1 M- Special Use
R-1 3.5 R-2 R-3 RR WR & CD- E-1 1 Standards
18.2.5.070
B. Residential Uses
(continued)
Rental Dwelling Unit Conversion to For- N N S S N N N N N Sec. 18.2.3.200
Purchase Housing
Home Occupation S S S S S S S S N Sec. 18.2.3.150
C. Group Living
See chapter 18.3.3
Nursing Homes, Convalescent Homes CU CU CU CU CU CU N N N Health Care
Services _
Subject to State
Residential Care Home P P P P P P N N N licensing
requirements
Subject to State
Residential Care Facility CU P P P CU CU N N N licensing
requirements
Room and Boarding Facility N P P P N N N N N
D. Public and Institutional Uses
Airport See chapter 18.3.7
Airport Overlay
Cemetery, Mausoleum, Columbarium N N N N CU N N N N
Family Child Care
Home exempt from
planning application
procedure pursuant
to ORS 329A.440,
Child Care Facility CU CU CU CU CU CU P P P see part 18.6 for
definition
Subject to State
licensing
requirements
Club Lodge, Fraternal Organization CU CU CU CU CU CU P CU CU
Community Service, includes Governmental
Offices and Emergency Services (e.g., CU CU N N CU CU P P P
Police, Fire ; excluding Outdoor Storage
Electrical Substation N N N N N N CU CU P
See chapter 18.3.3
Hospitals CU CU CU CU CU N N N N Health Care
Services
D. Public and Institutional Uses
(continued)3
Governmental Offices and Emergency CU CU N N CU CU P P P
Services (e. g., Police, Fire ; excluding
2 KEY: P = Permitted Use; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit
Required; N = Not Allowed.
3 KEY: P = Permitted Use; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit
Required; N = Not Allowed.
Ordinance No. Page 6 of 28
Table 18.2.2.030 - Uses Allowed by Zone
R-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 RR WR & -1 E-1 M- Special Use
3.5 1-D 1 Standards
Outdoor Storage
Mortuary, Crematorium N N N N CU N P P P
Public Park, Open Space, and Recreational
Facility, including playgrounds, trails, nature P P P P P P N N N
preserves, athletic fields, courts, swim
pools, similar uses
Public Parking Facility N N N N N N P N N
Public Works/Utilities Storage Yard;
includes vehicle and equipment, N N N N N N N P P
maintenance, repair _
Not allowed
Recycling Depot N N N N N N N P P within 200 ft of a
residential zone
-i
Religious Institution, Houses of Worship CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU
School, Private (Kindergarten and up) CU CU CU CU CU CU N N N
School, Public (Kindergarten and up) P P P P P CU N N N
School, Private Collegelfradelfechnical N N N N N N N CU P
School
Utility and Service Building, Yard and
Structure, Public and Quasi-Public, CU CU N N CU CU P P P Yards not allowed
excluding underground utilities and electrical in the C-1 zone
substations
P/ P/ P1
Wireless Communication Facility CU CU CU CU CU CU or or or Sec. 18.4.10
CU CU CU
E. Commercial Uses
_ I
Amusement/Entertainment, includes
theater, concert hall, bowling alley, N N N N N N P CU P
miniature golf, arcade; excluding drive-up
uses
Sec. 18.2.3.050
In C-1 zone, fuel
Automotive and Truck Repair, or Service; sales and service
includes fueling station, car wash, tire sales S limited to Freeway
and repair/replacement, painting, and other N N N N N N CUr or P Overlay, see chapter
repair for automobiles, motorcycles, aircraft, CU 18.3.8
boats, RVs, trucks, etc.
In E-1 zone, fuel
sales requires CU
permit
E. Commercial Uses (continued)4
Automotive Sales and Rental, except within Except not allowed
the Historic Interest Area; includes N N N N N N CU CU P within Historic
motorcycles, boats, RVs, and trucks District Overlay
Bakery, except as classified as Food N N N N N N P P P
4 KEY: P = Permitted Use; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit
Required; N = Not Allowed.
Ordinance No. Page 7 of 28
Table 18.2.2.030 - Uses Allowed by Zone
R-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 RR WR & C- E-1 M- Special Use
3.5 1-p 1 Standards
Processing
Commercial Laundry, Cleaning, and Dyeing N N N N N N S S P Sec. 18.2.3.080
Establishment
Commercial Recreation, includes country
club, golf course, swimming club, and tennis
club; excluding intensive uses such as CU CU N N CU CU N N N
driving range, race track, or amusement
ark
In R-2 zone, uses
limited to personal
and professional
services, except see
Sec. 18.2.3.210 for
retail uses allowed in
Railroad Historic
District
Commercial Retail Sales and Services, N N CU+S N N N P S S In E-1 zone, Retail
except Outdoor Sales and Services limited to 20,000 sq
ft of gross leasable
floor space per lot.
In M-1 zone, uses
limited to serving
persons working in
zone
See Marijuana
Retail Sales
Per Sec. 18.2.3.100,
Drive-Up uses are
limited to area east
Drive-Up Use N N N N N N S N of Ashland St at
intersection of
Ashland St/Siskiyou
_ Blvd
*In C-1 zone,
requires annual
Type I review for at
least the first three
years, after which
Hostel N N CU CU N N CU* N N time the Planning
Commission may
approve a
permanent facility
through the Type II
procedure
E. Commercial Uses (continued)5
Hotel (See also Hostel and Traveler's N N N N N N CU CU P
Accommodation
Kennel (See also Veterinary Clinic) N N N N N N S S CU No animals kept
5 KEY: P = Permitted Use; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit
Required; N = Not Allowed.
Ordinance No. Page 8 of 28
Table 18.2.2.030 -Uses Allowed by Zone
R-1- C-1 M- Special Use
R-1 3.5 R-2 R-3 RR WR & CD- E-1 1 Standards
outside within 200
feet of a residential
zone _
Sec. 18.2.2.210 for
Limited Retail Uses in Railroad Historic Retail Uses Allowed
District N CU CU CU N N N N N in Railroad Historic
District
Lumber Yard and Similar Sales of Building
or Contracting Supplies, or Heavy N N N N N N N CU P
Equipment
n
- SPA 182319
Per Sec.
18.2.3.190,
marijuana retail
sales are limited
Medical Marijuana Dispensary-Retail N N N N N N S or or S, to the C-1 and E-1
Sales, includes sale of medical and CU N CU zones and
recreational marijuana located on a
boulevard or 200
feet or more from
any residential
zone, see Sec
18.2.3.190
Not allowed within
Nightclub, Bar N N N N N N S CU P the Historic District
Overlay unless
located in C-1-D
Office (See also Commercial Services) N N CU CU N N P P P
Outdoor Storage of Commodities or N N N N N N CU CU P
Equipment associated with an allowed use
Plant Nursery, Wholesale exce t N N CU CU N N N N N
Marijuana Production _
Self-Service Storage, Commercial (Mini- N N N N N N N CU P
Warehouse
Traveler's Accommodation (See also N N CU+S CU+S N N N N N Sec. 18.2.3.220
Hostels and Hotels
Veterinary Clinic N N N N N N P P P
F. Industrial and Employment Uses
In the E-1 zone,
Cabinet, Carpentry, and Machine Shop, and Sl uses within 200
related Sales, Services, and Repairs N N N N N N N or P feet of a
CU residential zone
re uire CU permit
Commercial Excavation and Removal of
Sand, Gravel, Stone, Loam, Dirty or Other N N N N CU+S N N N N Sec. 18.2.3.070
Earth Products
Ordinance No. Page 9 of 28
Table 18.2.2.030 - Uses Allowed by Zone
R-1- C-1 M- Special Use
R-1 3.5 R-2 R-3 RR WR & CD- E-1 1 Standards
F. Industrial and Employment Uses
(continued) 6
Concrete or Asphalt Batch Plant N N N N N N N N CU
Dwelling for a caretaker or watchman N N N N N N N CU CU
In the C-1 zone,
manufacture or
assembly of items
sold is a
permitted use,
provided such
manufacturing or
Food Products assembly
Manufacture/Processing/Preserving, N N N N N N S S P occupies 600
including canning, bottling, freezing, drying, square feet or
and similar processing and preserving. less, and is
contiguous to the
permitted retail
outlet
In the E-1 zone,
See Sec.
_ 18.2.3.140
In E-1 and M-1
zones,
marijuana
laboratory,
processing, and
production are
Manufacture, General, includes Mariiuana P P N N N N N N N or or subject to the
Laboratory, Processing, and Production S S special use
standards in
Sec. 18.2.3.190
See Mariiuana
Cultivation,
Home rown
Requires
assembly,
fabricating, or
packaging of
products from
previously
Manufacture, Light; excluding saw, planning prepared
or lumber mills, or molding plants. N N N N N N S P P materials such as
cloth, plastic,
paper, cotton, or
wood
In the C-1 zone,
manufacture or
assembly of items
6 KEY: P = Permitted Use; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit
Required; N = Not Allowed.
Ordinance No. Page 10 of 28
Table 18.2.2.030 -Uses Allowed by Zone
R-1- C-1 M- Special Use
R-1 3.5 R-2 R-3 RR WR & CD- E-1 1 Standards
sold in a
permitted use,
provided such
manufacturing or
assembly
occupies 600
square feet or
less, and is
contiguous to the
permitted retail
outlet
Outdoor Storage of Commodities or N N N N N N CU CU P
Equipment associated with an allowed use
Television and Radio Broadcasting Studio N N N N N N N P P
Deliveries and
shipments
limited to 7AM-
9PM within 200
feet of an
residential zone
limited to 9PM-
Wholesale Storage and Distribution, N N N N N N N 14S PS 7AM
includes Marijuana Wholesale - -
In E-1 and M-1
zones,
marijuana
wholesale is
subject to the
special use
standards in
Sec. 18.2.3.190
F. Industrial and Employment Uses
(continued)
Wrecking, Demolition, and Junk Yards N N N N N N N N CU
G. Other Uses
Allowed from
Temporary Tree Sales N N N N N N P N N November 1 to
January 1
Temporary Use CU, except uses lasting less than 72 hours are subject to Ministerial review, per Sec.
18.2.2.030.1-1
SECTION 2. Chapter 18.2.3 [Special Use Standards-Home Occupation] of the Ashland Land Use
Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
7 KEY: P = Permitted Use; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit
Required; N = Not Allowed.
Ordinance No. Page 11 of 28
18.2.3.150 Home Occupation
A. Purpose and Intent. The purpose of this section is to encourage those who are engaged in small
commercial ventures which could not necessarily be sustained if it were necessary to lease
commercial quarters or which, by the nature of the venture are appropriate in scale and impact to be
operated within a residence. Home occupations are recognized for their contribution in reducing the
number of vehicle trips often generated by conventional businesses. It is the intent of this chapter
that home occupations not infringe upon the right of neighboring residents to enjoy the peaceful and
safe occupancy of their homes.
B. Conduct of Home Occupation - Standards. Home occupations are permitted pursuant to the
following standards. Where a home occupation use does not comply with one or more of the
following requirements, the Staff Advisor may find the subject use is no longer permitted.
1. Appearance of Residence.
a. The home occupation shall be restricted to the dwelling unit, accessory structure, or yard area
not visible from the public right-of-way and be conducted in such a manner as not to give an
outward appearance of a business.
b. The home occupation shall not result in any structural alterations or additions to the dwelling
or accessory structure that will change its primary use.
c. No display of products and or equipment produced or used by the home occupation may be
displayed so as to be visible from outside the dwelling or accessory structure.
2. Storage.
a. Outside storage, visible from the public right-of-way, or adjacent properties, is prohibited.
b. On-site storage of hazardous materials (including toxic, explosive, noxious, combustible or
flammable) beyond that normally incidental to residential use is prohibited.
c. Storage of inventory or products and all other equipment, fixtures, and activities associated
with the home occupation shall be allowed in the dwelling or accessory structure.
3. Employees.
a. Other than family members residing within the dwelling located on the home occupation site,
there shall be no more than one full time equivalent employee, and no more than one
employee at any given time. As used in this chapter, the term "home occupation site" means
the lot on which the home occupation is conducted.
b. Additional individuals may be employed by or associated with the home occupation, so long
as they do not report to work at the home.
c. The home occupation site shall not be routinely used as a headquarters for the assembly of
employees for instruction or other purposes, including dispatch to other locations.
4. Advertising and Si ng ale. No signs shall be permitted on a home occupation site.
5. Automobiles, Parking, and Traffic.
a. One commercial automobile associated with the home occupation is allowed at the home
occupation site. Such automobile shall be of a size that would not overhang into the public
right-of-way when parked in the driveway or other location on the home occupation site.
b. There shall be no excessive commercial vehicle deliveries from or to the home occupation
site. Excessive deliveries are defined as more than three per day, during the hours of 7 a.m. to
7 p.m. There shall be no commercial vehicle deliveries during the hours of 7 p.m. to 7 a.m.
c. There shall be no more than one client or customer's automobile at any one time and no more
than eight per day at the home occupation site.
6. Clients or customers are permitted at the home occupation from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. only.
Ordinance No. Page 12 of 28
C. Prohibited Uses. The following uses are prohibited as home occupations.
I . Any activity that produces radio or television interference, noise, glare, vibration, smoke, or odor
beyond allowable levels as determined by local, state, or federal standards.
2. Any activity involving on-site retail sales, except as allowed in the Historic District Overlay or
items that are incidental to the occupational use, such as the sale of beauty products from salons,
lesson books or sheet music for music teachers, or computer software for computer consultants.
3. Any of the following uses, and uses with similar objectionable impacts because of automobile
traffic, noise, glare, odor, dust, smoke, or vibration.
a. Ambulance service.
b. Ammunition or firearm sales.
c. Ammunition reloading business.
d. Animal hospital, veterinary services, kennels, or animal boarding.
e. Auto and other vehicle repair, including auto painting.
f. Repair, reconditioning or storage of motorized vehicles, boats, recreational vehicles, or large
equipment on-site.
g Medical marijuana dispensa , Marijuana-related business.
D. Permit Required - Application
1. No person shall conduct a home occupation without first obtaining a home occupation permit
from the Planning Department and a valid business license as required under AMC title 6.
2. The home occupation permit shall include such information as is necessary to determine the
location and type of business, and the manner in which it will be conducted. If the Staff Advisor
finds that the proposed home occupation complies with the requirements of this chapter, the Staff
Advisor shall issue a permit.
3. The home occupation permit is valid only to the person named on the permit and for the business
to be conducted at the location stated on the permit. The permit is not transferable to another
location or to another applicant.
4. Issuance of a home occupation permit under this chapter shall not relieve the applicant from the
duty and responsibility to comply with all other rules, regulations, ordinances, or other laws
governing the use of the premises and structures thereon, including, but not limited to, the
specialty codes defined in AMC 15.04, the fire code standards defined in AMC 15.28, or any
private restrictions relative to the property.
5. The Staff Advisor may visit and inspect the site of a home occupation permitted in this chapter
periodically to insure compliance with all regulations and conditions to which the permit is
subject, during normal business hours, and with reasonable notice.
SECTION 3. Chapter 18.2.3 [Special Use Standards-Medical Marijuana Dispensary] of the Ashland
Land Use Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.2.3.190 Marijuana-Related Uses.
A. Homegrown Marijuana Cultivation. Where homegrown marijuana cultivation is allowed, it
shall meet all of the following requirements. See definition of homegrown marijuana
cultivation in part 18-6.
1. Primary Residence. The resident grower must live on the property where the cultivation of
homegrown marijuana is located and that same property must be the primary residence of
the resident grower.
Ordinance No. Page 13 of 28
2. Related Activities. Any drying, keeping, storage, or processing of homegrown marijuana
shall be located within the dwelling unit or an accessory structure and shall not be located
outdoors.
3. Homegrown marijuana cultivation and any related activities must meet all applicable
Oregon Revised Statutes and Oregon Administrative Rules.
4. Outdoor Cultivation. Up to four marijuana plants per lot are allowed to be grown
outdoors. Outdoor homegrown marijuana cultivation shall meet all of the following
requirements.
a. Locate marijuana plants so the plants are not visible from a public place, public street
or any area that the general public has access (e.g., schools, playgrounds, parks,
commonly-owned open space, pedestrian and bicycle paths and trails). Marijuana
plants shall not be located in a front yard.
b. Screen marijuana plants to limit view and access from adjacent residential properties
with a solid wood fence or masonry wall. Any access points to the cultivation area must
be secured at all times to prevent unauthorized access. For fence and wall design
requirements, see section 18.4.4.060.
c. Dimensional Standards. Mariiuana plants grown in outdoor cultivation areas shall
meet all of the following dimensional standards including Table 18.2.3.190.c.
L Locate cultivation area closer to the primary residence of the resident grower than
to dwellings on adjoining properties or to dwellings in the same multifamily
development.
ii. Marijuana plants may be located in one cultivation area or in separate cultivation
areas throughout a yard.
Table 18.2.3.190.3.c Outdoor Cultivation Dimensional Standards for Homegrown Mariiuana
Number of Maximum Maximum Minimum Setback from Minimum Setback from
Mariiuana Plants Cultivation Area Mariiuana Plant Any Property Line Dwellings on Adjoining
Allowed Height3 Properties
4 or fewer plants 50 square feet 10 Feet 10 feet 20 feet
Contiguous lots under single ownership shall be considered one lot for the purpose of calculating the dimensional
standards for homegrown marijuana.
2 All parts of a marijuana plants that are visible above the ground level shall be contained with the perimeter of the
cultivation area. Where plants are located separately, the combined total of the individual cultivation areas shall not
exceed the maximum cultivation area.
3Mariiuana plants shall not exceed ten feet in height from the top of the average surrounding grade.
4Mariiuana plants must also be located the setback distance from any multifamily dwelling unit within a multifamily
development.
d. Multi-Family Development. Homegrown marijuana may be cultivated outdoors on a lot
containing multi-family dwellings in conformance with the requirements of subsection
18.2.3.190.A and provided all of the following requirements are met.
L The property owner provides written notification to all residents of the development
and to the City that verifies the cultivation of marijuana plants will comply with the
requirements of subsection 18.2.3.190.A. The written notification shall include the
following information.
1. Property owner, property manager, or home owner association representative
contact information including the name, address, and phone number(s).
Ordinance No. Page 14 of 28
2. Contact information for an onsite resident designated as the primary responsible
party for the marijuana plants and maintenance. Contact information shall
include the name, address, and phone number of the responsible party.
3. The City requirements for the outdoor cultivation of marijuana including the
maximum number of plants per lot and the requirements of subsection
18.2.3.190.A.
5. Indoor Cultivation.
a. Building Code. Any structure, accessory structure, electrical service, plumbing, or
mechanical equipment (e.g., lighting, fans, heating and cooling systems) associated with
marijuana cultivation shall satisfy the Building Code requirements and obtain all
required building permits prior to installation. See section 18.2.5.040 Accessory
Buildings and Structures.
b. Light and Glare. Shield lighting systems and use window coverings to confine light and
glare from light systems associated with indoor cultivation to the interior of the
structure.
c. No dwelling unit shall be used primarily as a place to cultivate marijuana. Vacant or
uninhabited dwelling units shall not be used for marijuana cultivation.
B. Marijuana-Related Businesses.
1. Marijuana-related businesses may require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 or a
Conditional Use Permit under chapter 18.5.4. See Table 18.2.2.030 - Uses Allowed by Zone
for zones where marijuana-related businesses are allowed. See definition of marijuana-
related businesses in part 18.6. Marijuana-related businesses shall meet all of the following
requirements.
a. The business must be located in a permanent building and may not locate in a trailer,
cargo container, or motor vehicle. Outdoor marijuana production, cultivation, and
storage of merchandise, raw materials, or other material associated with the business
are prohibited.
b. Any modifications to the subject site or exterior of a building housing the business must
be consistent with the Site Design Use Standards, and obtain Site Design Review
approval if required by section 18.5.2.020. Security bars or grates on windows and
doors are prohibited.
c. The business must provide for secure disposal of marijuana remnants or by-products;
such remnants or by-products shall not be placed within the business' exterior refuse
containers.
d. Light and Glare. Shield lighting systems and use window coverings to confine light and
glare from light systems associated with indoor cultivation so as to confine light and
glare to the interior of the structure. Grow light systems within a greenhouse are
prohibited.
e. Building Code. Any structure, accessory structure, electrical service, plumbing, or
mechanical equipment (e.g., lighting, fans, heating and cooling systems) associated with
a business shall satisfy the Building Code requirements and obtain all required building
permits prior to installation.
f. Methodology for Measuring Separation Requirements. The following methodology
shall be used for marijuana related- businesses that are required to be separated by a
Ordinance No. Page 15 of 28
specific distance (i.e., marijuana production facility, marijuana wholesale facility,
marijuana retail outlet). For the purposes of determining the distance between a
marijuana related-business and another marijuana-related business, "within 1,000
feet" means a straight line measurement in a radius extending for 1,000 feet or less in
every direction from the closest point anywhere on the premises of an approved
marijuana related- business to the closest point anywhere on the premises of a proposed
marijuana-related business of the same tvpe. If any portion of the premises of a
proposed marijuana related-business is within 1,000 feet of an approved marijuana
related business of the same type, it may not be approved. For the purpose of this
section, premises is all public and private enclosed areas within a building at the
location that are used in the business operation, including offices, kitchens, rest rooms,
and storerooms.
g. The property owner shall record a declaration which waives any claim or right to hold
the City liable for damages they or a tenant may suffer from state or federal
enforcement actions for activities the Citv permits as a result of its approval of the
proposed use or development once such approval is granted. Furthermore, the owner
and tenant agrees not to unreasonably disobey the City's order to halt or suspend
business if state or federal authorities order or otherwise subiect the City to
enforcement to comply with laws in contradiction to the continued operations of the
business as permitted under section 18.2.3.190.
h. A marijuana-related business must obtain an approved license or registration from the
State of Oregon and meet all applicable Oregon Revised Statutes and Oregon
Administrative Rules.
2. Marijuana Laboratories, Processing, Production, and Wholesale. In addition to the
standards described in subsection 18.2.3.190.B.1, above, marijuana laboratories,
processing, production, and wholesale shall meet the following requirements as applicable.
See definition of marijuana processing and production in part 18.6.
a. Marijuana laboratories, processing, production, and wholesale shall be located 200 feet
or more from residential zones.
b. Marijuana Production.
i. Marijuana production shall be limited to 5,000 square feet of gross leasable floor
area per lot.
ii. A marijuana production facility shall be located more than 1,000 feet from another
marijuana production facility. See subsection 18.2.3.190.B.1.f for methodology for
measuring the required distance between marijuana related-businesses.
c. Marijuana Wholesale. A marijuana wholesale facility shall be located more than 1,000
feet from another marijuana wholesale facility. See subsection 18.2.3.190.B.1.f for
methodology for measuring the required distance between marijuana related-
businesses.
3. Marijuana Retail Sales. In addition to the standards described above in subsection
18.2.3.190.B.1, marijuana retail sales shall meet the following requirements. See definition
of marijuana retail sales in part 18.6.
the following design standairds.
Ordinance No. Page 16 of 28
1. The dispensary must be loeated on a propeftywith a boundary line adjaee"t to a
boulevard, exeept that dispensaries are not permitted in the Downtown Design
Standards zone.
2. The dispensary must be loeated in a permanent building and may not loeate in a
trailer, eargo eontainer, or motorvehiele. Outdoor storage of merehandise, raw
materials, or other material assoeiated with the dispensary is- prohibited.
must be eonsistent with the Site Design Use Standards, and obtain Site Review
approval if required by seetion 18.5.2.020. Seeurity bars or grates on windows and
doors are prohibited,
4. The dispensary establishment must not have a drive u,, use.
5. The dispensary must provide Moir seeure disposal of ma nants or by
produets; sueh remnants or by produets shall not be plaeed within the dispensary's
exterior- refuse eontainers.
• The dis is ir gistered the Oregon Health Authority under the vv».~
stem under nnc 475.300 nnc
Orego
475.346, and meets the requirements of OAR Chapter 333 Divisio Medical
B. Other- • ,
18.2.3.190.A, ubje •t to a Conditional U D t l ehapter 18.5.4 and shill
meet all of the following requirements.
1. The dispensary must be loeated 200 feet or more from a residential zone, exeept that
dispensaries are not permitted in the Downtown Design Standards zone.
2. The dispensary must be loeated in a permanent building and may not loeate i
trailer, eargo eontainer, or motor vehiele. Outdoor storage of merehandise, raw
materials, other material assoeiated with the dispensary is prohibited.
3. Any modifleations to the subjeet site or exterior of a building housing the dispensary
must be eonsistentwith the Site Design Use Standards, and obtain Site Review
exterior approval if required- by seetion 18.5.2.020. Seeurity bars or grates on windows
doors are prohibited,
4. The dispensary must not have a drive up use.
5. The dispensary must provide for seeure disposal of m anants or by-
produets; sueh remnants or by produets shall not be vNved-within the dispensary's
refuse eontainers.
6 .7 'th the n.-,.gon He lth Authority under the der the state of
-
_ The dispensary t
Oregon's medien! mar~uana faeility registration system under ORS 475.300 ORS
and meets the requirements of OAR Chapter- 333 Division 8 Medieid
475.346,
~ana F~GiIZClitie .
a. Location.
i Mariiuana retail sales are allowed if located on a property with a boundary line
adjacent to a boulevard.
ii Marijuana retail sales, except as allowed above in subsection 18.2.3.190.B.3.a.i, must
be located 200 feet or more from a residential zone and are subject to a Conditional
Use Permit under chapter 18.5.4 and shall meet all of the following requirements.
iii Mariiuana retail sales are not permitted in the Downtown Design Standards Zones.
iv. A marijuana retail sales outlet shall be located more than 1,000 feet from another
Ordinance No. Page 17 of 28
marijuana retail sales outlet. Medical and recreational marijuana retail sales do not
need to be separated by 1,000 feet if located tollether in one building if the
confilluration meets all applicable Oregon Revised Statutes and Oregon
Administrative Rules. No more than two registrations or licenses issued by the State
of Oregon (e.g., a medical dispensary registration and a recreational sales license)
may be located in one building. See subsection 18.2.3.190.B.1.f for methodology for
measuring the required distance between marijuana related-businesses.
b. Drive-up Use. The marijuana retail sales outlet must not include a drive-up use.
SECTION 4. Chapter 18.2.5 [Standards for Residential Zones] of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance is
hereby amended to read as follows:
18.2.5.040 Accessory Buildings and Structures
Accessory buildings and structures shall comply with all requirements for the principal use, except
where specifically modified by this ordinance, and shall comply with the following limitations:.
A. Setback Yard Exceptions. See subsection 18.2.5.060.B.2.
B. Guesthouse. A guesthouse may be maintained accessory to a single-family dwelling provided there
are no kitchen cooking facilities in the guesthouse.
C. Greenhouse or Hothouse. A greenhouse or hothouse may be maintained accessory to a dwelling in
a residential zone. See section 18.2.3.190 for homegrown marijuana cultivation and production
requirements.
D. Livestock Structures. Except as provided for micro-livestock in subsection 18.2.5.040.E, below,
barns, stables, and other structures shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from any property line, and
structures housing large livestock shall be more than 100 feet from dwellings on adjoining
properties.
E. Micro-Livestock Enclosure. An enclosure housing micro-livestock may be maintained in a
residential district, pursuant to section 18.2.3.160. Enclosures shall be constructed as follows:
1. The structure shall not be located in a required front yard.
2. The structures shall be setback a minimum of ten feet from abutting properties as illustrated in
Figure 18.2.5.040.E.2.
3. The structures shall be at least 20 feet from dwellings on adjoining properties. Within a
multifamily complex, structures must also be located at least 20 feet from any dwelling within
the complex.
4. The structures shall not exceed six feet in height.
5. Chicken coops and rabbit hutches shall not exceed 40 square feet in area, or four square feet per
animal, whichever is greater.
6. Chicken and rabbit runs, as enclosed outdoor structures, shall not exceed 100 square feet in area,
or ten square feet per animal, whichever is greater.
Ordinance No. Page 18 of 28
• ED 0,1 ffS4
Nr~ ,
1 10
Figure 18.2.5.040.E.2
Micro-Livestock Enclosure/Minimum Setback to Property Line
F. Rain Barrels. Rain barrels may be located within required side or rear yards provided such
installation and operation is consistent with other provisions of this ordinance or the Ashland
Municipal Code, and meet the all of the following requirements:
1. Rain barrels shall not exceed six feet in height.
2. Rain barrels shall be located so that a minimum clear width of three feet is provided and
maintained between the barrel and property line.
3. Rain barrels shall be secured and installed on a sturdy and level foundation, or platform,
designed to support the rain barrel's full weight.
4. Every attempt shall be made to place rain barrels so that they are screened from view of adjacent
properties and public streets.
SECTION 5 Chapter 18.3.2 [Croman Mill District] of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance is hereby
amended to read as follows:
18.3.2.040 Allowed Uses
A. Uses Allowed in Croman Mill Zones. Allowed uses include those that are permitted, permitted
subject to special use standards, and allowed subject to a conditional use permit. Where Table
18.3.2.040 does not list a specific use and part 18.6 does not define the use or include it as an
example of an allowed use, the City may find that use is allowed, or is not allowed, following the
procedures of section 18.1.5.040 Similar Uses. Uses not listed in Table 18.2.2.030 and not found to
be similar to an allowed use are prohibited. All uses are subject to the development standards of zone
in which they are located, any applicable overlay zone(s), and the review procedures of part 18.5.
See section 18.5.1.020 Determination of Review Procedure.
B. Uses Regulated by Overlay Zones. Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones,
additional land use standards or use restrictions apply within overlay zones. An overlay zone may
also provide for exceptions to some standards of the underlying zone. For regulations applying to the
City's overlays zones, please refer to part 18.3.
C. Mixed-Use. Uses allowed in a zone individually are also allowed in combination with one another,
in the same structure or on the same site, provided all applicable development standards and building
code requirements are met.
Ordinance No. Page 19 of 28
Table 18.3.2.040 - Croman Mill District Uses Allowed by Zone
Croman Mill District Zones
NC MU OE Cl OS
A. Residential
Residential Uses S S N N N
Agricultural Uses, except Keeping of N N N N N
Livestock
Keeping of Bees, Micro-Livestock and N N N N N
Livestock
Marijuana Cultivation, Homegrown S S N N N
Temporary Employee Housing N N S S N
B. Commercial
Stores, restaurants, and shops less than 3,000
sq. ft., excluding fuel sales, automobile sales P N N N N
and repair
Limited stores, restaurants, and shops,
excluding fuel sales, automobile sales, and N S S S N
repair, including marijuana retail sales
Professional, financial, business, and medical N P P S N
offices
Administrative or research and development N P P P N
establishments
Child or day care centers P S S S N
Fitness, recreations sports, gym or athletic club P N N N N
Ancillary employee services (e.g., cafeteria, N S S S N
fitness area)
Kennels (indoor) and veterinary clinics N N S S N
Motion picture, television or radio broadcasting N P P P N
studios
Temporary uses C C C C C
C. Industrial
Manufacturing, assembly, fabrication or
packaging including manufacturing of food N P S P N
products
Limited manufacturing affiliated with a retail S N N N N
use
Marijuana laboratory, processing, and N S S S N
production
Rail freight loading dock facilities N N N P N
Rail or rapid transit passenger facilities P P P P N
Warehouse and similar storage facilities,. N S S S N
including marijuana wholesale
Limited outdoor storage N S S S N
Wireless communication facilities attached to
an existing structure pursuant to Sec. C C P P N
18.72.180
Freestanding wireless communication support C C C C N
structures pursuant to Sec. 18.72.180
8Key: P = Permitted Uses; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit Required; N = Not Allowed.
9 Zones: NC = Neighborhood Commercial; MU = Mixed Use; OE = Office Employment; Cl = Compatible Industrial, OS = Open Space.
Ordinance No. Page 20 of 28
Table 18.3.2.040 - Croman Mill District Uses Allowed by Zone
Croman Mill District Zones
NC MU OE CI OS
D. Public and Institutional
Public service or community buildings with P C C C P
office or space used directly by the public
Public service or community buildings without C C C C C
office or space used directly by the public
Public and quasi public utility facilities S S S S S
enclosed in a building
Oregon Department of Transportation (ODOT) S N N N N
maintenance facility and yard
Private school, college, trade school, technical
school or similar school C C C C N
Electrical substations N N C C N
'Key: P = Permitted Uses, S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit Required; N = Not Allowed.
ZZones: NC = Neighborhood Commercial; MU = Mixed Use; OE = Office Employment; Cl = Compatible Industrial; OS = Open Space.
D. Special Permitted 7Use Standards. The following uses and their aeeessory uses alre speeial
permitted uses as listed in the Land Use Table and aire subject to the requirements of th
section The uses listed as "Permitted with Special Use Standards (S)" in Table 18.3.2.040,
above, are allowed provided they conform to the requirements of this section and the
requirements of chapter 18.5.2 Site Design Review.
1. Residential Uses. Residential uses provided all of the following standards are met.
a. The ground floor area shall be designated for permitted or special permitted uses, excluding
residential.
b. Residential densities shall not exceed the densities in section Dimensional Regulations. For
the purposes of density calculations, units of less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor
area shall count as 0.75 of a unit.
c. Residential uses shall execute a hold harmless covenant and agreement stating they shall not
protest impacts from commercial and industrial uses within the district.
2 Marijuana Cultivation, Homelzrown. Subject to the standards in subsection 18.2.3.190.A.
23. Temporary Employee Housing. Residential units for use by persons employed within the facility
and their families when all of the following standards are met.
a. Employee housing densities shall not exceed two units per acre. For the purposes of density
calculations, units of less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area shall count as
0.75 of a unit.
b. The employee housing shall be in conjunction with a permitted or special permitted use on
the property.
c. Units shall be restricted by covenant to be occupied by persons employed by a business
operating on the property.
Stores, restaurants, and shops less than 3,000 sq. ft., excluding fuel sales, automobile sales and
repair, includinll marijuana retail sales
34. Limited Commercial Services and Retail. Stores, restaurants, shops, child/day care facilities, and
ancillary employee services, when all of the following standards are met.
a. In the CI,MU, and OE zones, a maximum of 15 percent of the gross floor area in a building
may be used for any or a combination of the following special permitted uses when the
Ordinance No. Page 21 of 28
standards in this section are met: limited stores, restaurants, and shops; child or day care
facilities; and ancillary employee services.
b. Limited Stores', Restaurants and Shops. In the MU zone, the floor area shall be limited to
retail uses in conjunction with a permitted use.
c. Child or Day Care Facilities. Primary program activities are integrated into the interior of
the building.
d. Ancillary Employee Seri~ices. Developments may include ancillary employee services such as
cafeterias, fitness areas, or other supportive services generally intended to support the needs
of employees when the following standards are met.
i. The use is integrated into the interior of the building.
ii. The ancillary employee services shall be in conjunction with a permitted or special
permitted use on the property.
e Marijuana Retail Sales. Marijuana retail sales are subject to the standards a-d in
subsection 18.3.2.040.D.4, above, and the standards for mariiuana-related businesses in
subsection 18.2.3.190.B.
45. Professional Financial, Business and Medical Offices in CI Zone. Developments in the CI zone
may include ancillary office uses to support the operations of a permitted use on-site provided
the maximum floor area dedicated for office uses shall not exceed 50 percent of the ground floor
area.
56. Kennels. Kennels when all of the following standards are met.
a. Kennels shall be located at least 200 feet from the nearest residential dwelling.
b. All animals shall be boarded within a building at all times.
c. No noise or odor shall emanate outside the walls of the building used as a kennel.
d. A disposal management plan shall be provided demonstrating all animal waste will be
disposed of in a sanitary manner.
67. Manufacture Assembly. Fabrication and Packaging in OE Zone. Developments in the OE zone
may include ancillary manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, and packaging uses to support the
operations of a permitted or special permitted use on-site when all of the following standards are
met.
a. The maximum floor area dedicated to manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, and packaging
shall be 50 percent of the ground floor area.
b. No outside space shall be used for the manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, and packaging
processes.
78. Limited Manufacturin{, Affiliated with a Retail Use. Manufacturing, assembly, fabrication, or
packaging contiguous to and associated with a retail space, provided the maximum floor area
dedicated to manufacturing occupies 1,000 square feet, or ten percent of ground floor area,
whichever is less.
9. Marijuana Laboratory, ProcessinI4, and Production.
a Marijuana laboratory, processinI4, and production are subject to the standards for
marijuana-related businesses in subsection 18.2.3.190.B.
b In the OE zone, marijuana laboratory, processing, and production are subject to
subsection 18.3.2.040.D.7, above.
810.Warehouse and Similar Storage Facilities. Warehouse and similar storage facilities when all of
the following standards are met.
a. The maximum floor area dedicated for use as warehouse or similar storage uses in the OE
and MU zones shall be 50 percent of the ground floor area.
Ordinance No. Page 22 of 28
b. Warehouse and storage facilities shall be provided only in conjunction with, and for the
exclusive use by, a permitted or special permitted use on the property.
c. Self-service mini-warehouses are prohibited.
d. No outside space shall be used for storage, unless approved as a limited outdoor storage area.
e Marijuana Wholesale. Marijuana wholesale storage is subject to the standards a-d in
subsection 18.3.2.040.D.10, above, and the standards for marijuana-related businesses
in subsection 18.2.3.190.B.
91I.Limited Outdoor Storage. Limited outdoor storage associated with a permitted or special
permitted use when all of the following standards are met.
a. The maximum area dedicated to outdoor storage shall be 1,000 sq. ft. in the OE and MU
zone; and 2,500 sq. ft. in the C1 zone, or 50 percent of the ground floor area of the building
housing the associated permitted or special permitted use, whichever is greater.
b. The outdoor storage shall be located behind or on the side of buildings, and shall be located
so the outdoor storage is the least visible from the street that is reasonable given the layout of
the site.
c. The outdoor storage shall be screened from view by placement of a solid wood or metal
fence, or a masonry wall from five to eight feet in height.
d. The associated permitted use shall obtain a minimum of 50 percent of the employment
density targets for the Croman Mill District.
4012.Public and Quasi-Public Utility Service Buildings. Public and quasi-public utility service
buildings when all of the following standards are met.
a. Facilities and structures that are accessory to a public park in the OS zone, including but not
limited to maintenance equipment storage, enclosed picnic facilities, and restrooms.
b. Public and quasi-public utility service building relating to receiving and transmitting
antennas and communication towers are subject to the applicable provisions of 18.4.10.
c. Public and quasi-public utility service building shall demonstrate all of the following.
i. The need for the facility, present or future; and how the facility fits into the utility's
master plan.
ii. The facility utilizes the minimum area required for the present and anticipated expansion.
iii. Compatibility of the facility with existing surrounding uses and uses allowed by the plan
designation.
4413.Ore on Department of Transportation Maintenance Facility and Storage Yard. For the Oregon
Department of Transportation Ashland maintenance facility and storage yard located on property
within the NC zone, all the following shall apply.
a. Buildings may be enlarged or replaced subject to Basic Site Review Standards.
b. Are exempt from the Dimensional Regulations per 18.3.2.050 with the exception of
minimum side and rear yard setbacks abutting a residential district and maximum height.
c. Are exempt from the requirements of part 18.4 Site Development and Design Standards, and
the requirements of 18.3.2.060 Croman Mill District Site Development and Design
Standards.
SECTION 6 Chapter 18.3.3 [Health Care Service District] of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance is
hereby amended to read as follows:
18.3.3.030 Permitted Uses
The following uses and their accessory uses are permitted outright.
Ordinance No. Page 23 of 28
A. Residential and agricultural uses, subject to the requirements of the R-2 zone.
B. Home occupations.
C. Offices or clinics for a dentist or doctor or allied health care providers, including, but not limited to,
nurse practitioner, midwives, dieticians, psychologists, opticians, physical and occupational
therapists, substance abuse counselors, chiropractors, and wellness centers, including nutritional
counseling, health maintenance, and rehabilitation services.
D. Ambulance and paramedic service.
E. Medical laboratories.
F. Sales or rentals of durable medical goods.
G. Congregate care facilities, assisted living facilities, residential care facilities, and nursing homes.
H. Any use, located on City owned property, that is specifically allowed by the Ashland Community
Hospital Master Facility Plan adopted by the City by ordinance.
SECTION 7 Chapter 18.3.5 [North Mountain Neighborhood District] of the Ashland Land Use
Ordinance is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.3.5.050 Allowed Uses
A. Uses Allowed in North Mountain Neighborhood Zones. Allowed uses include those that are
permitted, permitted subject to special use standards, and allowed subject to a conditional use
permit. Where Table 18.3.5.050 does not list a specific use and part 18.6 does not define the use or
include it as an example of an allowed use, the City may find that use is allowed, or is not allowed,
following the procedures of section 18.1.5.040 Similar Uses. Uses not listed in Table 18.2.2.030 and
not found to be similar to an allowed use are prohibited. All uses are subject to the development
standards of zone in which they are located, any applicable overlay zone(s), and the review
procedures of part 18.5. See section 18.5.1.020 Determination of Review Procedure.
B. Uses Regulated by Overlay Zones. Notwithstanding the provisions of chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones,
additional land use standards or use restrictions apply within overlay zones. An overlay zone may
also provide for exceptions to some standards of the underlying zone. For regulations applying to the
City's overlays zones, please refer to part 183.
C. Mixed-Use. Uses allowed in a zone individually are also allowed in combination with one another,
in the same structure or on the same site, provided all applicable development standards and building
code requirements are met.
Ordinance No. Page 24 of 28
Table 18.3.5.050 - North Mountain Neighborhood Uses Allowed by Zone' U
North Mountain Neighborhood Zones
NM-R-1-7.5 NM-R-1-5 NM-MF NM-C NM-Civic
A. Residential
Residential Uses, subject to density P P P P N
requirements in Table 18.3.5.050
Accessory Residential Units S S N P N
n ultural Uses P R P P S
Home Occupations P P P P N
Aqricultural Uses, except Keeping of P P P P S
Livestock
Keeping of Micro-Livestock and Bees S S S N S
Keeping of Livestock N N N N N
Marijuana Cultivation, Homegrown S S S S N
B. Public and Institutional Uses
Community Services N S N S P
Parks and Open Spaces P P P P P
Public Parking Lots N N N CU N
Religious Institution, Houses of Worship N N N S N
Utility and Service Building, Public and
Quasi-Public, excluding outdoor storage N N N S N
and electrical substations
B. Commercial
Neighborhood Clinics N N N P S N
Neighborhood Oriented Retail Sales, and N N N 12S N
Services, and Restaurants
Offices, Professional N N N P S N
p s-tac., a-n s IN N Al P ~
Temporary uses N N N CU N
C. Industrial
Manufacturing, Light N N N S N
Key: P = Permitted Uses; S = Permitted with Special Use Standards, CU = Conditional Use Permit Required; N = Not Allowed.
z Zones: NC = Neighborhood Commercial; MU = Mixed Use; OE = Office Employment, Cl = Compatible Industrial, OS = Open
Space.
D. Special Permitted Use Standards. The foliowing uses and their aeeessofy-usts-are
s-peeial permitted uses as listed in the Land Use Table and are subjeet to the
The uses listed as "Permitted with Special Use Standards
(S)" in Table 18.3.5.050, above, are allowed provided they conform to the requirements
of this section and the requirements of chapter 18.5.2 Site Design Review.
1. Accessory Residential Units.
a. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density requirements of the zone and
are not included in the base density calculations.
b. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of
dwelling units must not exceed two per lot.
° Key: P = Permitted Uses, S = Permitted with Special Use Standards; CU = Conditional Use Permit Required; N = Not Allowed.
" Zones: NC = Neighborhood Commercial; MU = Mixed Use; OE = Office Employment; CI = Compatible Industrial; OS = Open
Space.
Ordinance No. Page 25 of 28
c. The proposal must comply with the lot coverage and setback requirements of the
underlying zone.
d. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit
must not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and
must not exceed 750 square feet GHFA, except that second story accessory
residential units constructed above a detached accessory building must not exceed
500 square feet GHFA.
e. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking
provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040.
2. Agricultural Uses.
a. In the NM-Civic zone, agriculture may include community garden space.
3. Keeping of Micro-Livestock and Bees. Subject to the standards in section 18.2.3.160.
4. Marijuana Cultivation, Homegrown. Subject to the standards in subsection
18.2.3.190.A.
3. Community Services.
a. In the NM-R-1-5 zone, each building maybe up to a maximum of 2,500 square feet
of gross floor area.
b. In the NM-C zone, each building may be up to a maximum of 3,500 square feet of
gross floor area.
4. Manufacturing, Li
a. The light manufacturing use shall occupy 600 square feet or less.
b. The light manufacturing use shall be contiguous to the permitted retail outlet that
operates in conjunction with and sells the manufactured items produced by the light
manufacturing use.
5. Neighborhood Clinics. Each building may be up to a maximum of 3,500 square feet of
gross floor area.
6. Neighborhood Oriented Retail Sales,-a-ad Services, and Restaurants. Each building may
be up to a maximum of 3,500 square feet of gross floor area.
7. Offices, Professional. Each building may be up to a maximum of 3,500 square feet of
gross floor area.
8. Religious Institution Houses of Worship. The same use cannot be located on a
contiguous property, and there must be no more than two such uses in a given zone.
9. Utility and Service Building Public and Quasi-Public. Each building may be up to a
maximum of 3,500 square feet of gross floor area
SECTION 8 Chapter 18.6.1 [Definitions] of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance is hereby
amended to read as follows:
Greenhouse A building or structure whose roof and sides are made largely of glass or
other transparent or translucent material and in which the temperature and humidity
can be regulated for the cultivation of fragile or out-of-season plants for personal
enjoyment or for subsequent sale.
Homegrown Marijuana Marijuana plants planted, cultivated, grown, and harvested by a
person 21 years of age or older for personal consumption, whether for medical or non-
medical purposes, or for a medical marijuana card holder. Medical marijuana grow
Ordinance No. Page 26 of 28
sites located in residential zones shall be considered homelzrown marijuana for the
purpose of this ordinance.
Homellrown Marijuana Cultivation The cultivation of homegrown marijuana and related
activities such as processinIz, keepinjz, or storalze of homey_rown marijuana.
- Cultivation Area The area within which marijuana plants are 14rown on a lot. The
cultivation area is the total of the individual areas of the marijuana plants at
maturity. The individual area of a marijuana plant is calculated based on an
imalzinary vertical line extending downward from the outermost tips of the
marijuana plants branches to the ground.
- Resident Grower. An individual enaaped in the cultivation of homegrown
marijuana for personal consumption, whether for medical or non-medical purposes,
or for a medical marijuana card holder.
Marijuana The plant Cannabis, family Cannabaceae, or any part or seed of the plant. It
does not included industrial hemp.
- Medical Marijuana Mariiuana used to mitigate the symptoms or effects of a
medical condition and regulated by the Oregon Medical Marijuana Act (ORS
475 300 - ORS 475 346) Grown and sold by registered persons and facilities with
the Oregon Health Authority (OHA).
- Recreational Marijuana Marijuana used for personal consumption by a person 21
years of age or older.
Marijuana Plant Immature and mature plants of the plant Cannabis family Moracae.
Marijuana-Related Businesses Marijuana-related businesses licensed by the Oregon
Liquor Control Commission (OLCC) or registered by the Oregon Health Authority
(OHA) Marijuana-related businesses are organized into the following catel4ories.
- Laboratory. A laboratory that tests marijuana and marijuana items.
- Processing Processing, compounding, or conversion of marijuana into cannabinoid
products, concentrates, or extracts.
- Production Planting, cultivating, growing, harvesting, or drying marijuana.
Medical marijuana ¢row sites located in non-residential zones that do not meet the
definition of Homegrown Marijuana shall be considered production for the purpose
of this ordinance.
- Retail A business that sells marijuana and marijuana products to the consumer.
- Wholesale An operation that handles and distributes marijuana and marijuana
products for the purpose of resale.
under ORS 475.300 to 475.346 that dispense mar~uana pursuant to ORS 475.314.
SECTION 9. Savings. Notwithstanding this amendment/repeal, the City ordinances in existence
at the time any criminal or civil enforcement actions were commenced, shall remain valid and in
full force and effect for purposes of all cases filed or commenced during the times said
ordinances(s) or portions thereof were operative. This section simply clarifies the existing
Ordinance No. Page 27 of 28
situation that nothing in this Ordinance affects the validity of prosecutions commenced and
continued under the laws in effect at the time the matters were originally filed.
SECTION 10. Severability. The sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses of this ordinance
are severable. The invalidity of one section, subsection, paragraph, or clause shall not affect the
validity of the remaining sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses.
SECTION 11. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City Code
and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section", "chapter" or another
word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided however
that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Sections 6-7) need not be codified and
the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any typographical errors.
SECTION 12. Emergency.
This Ordinance being necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health and
safety, an emergency is declared to exist, and this Ordinance takes effect on its passage.
The foregoing ordinance was first read by title only in accordance with Article X,
Section 2(C) of the City Charter on the day of , 2015,
and duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 2015.
Barbara M. Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of , 2015.
John Stromberg, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
David H. Lohman, City Attorney
Ordinance No. Page 28 of 28
w, Marijuana Wholesale and Production
Nevada St Ir Eligible Locations - Draft
_ ~s L
200ft Residential Buffer
E-1
CM-CI
® M-1 CM-OE
d.
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
erd
r
e
f
r_ Ea n
i 3 f
J i
a
CD
ICI
- h Ashland S
Y
k
f
,
t
j
kt. t`
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Council Communication
December 15, 2015, Business Meeting
Recommendation from the Public Art Commission for Gateway Island Public Art
FROM:
Ann Seltzer, management analyst, seltzera~ashl and. or. us
SUMMARY
The Public Ail Commission (PAC) is pleased to forward the recommendation of the Selection Panel
for public art on the Gateway Island and the selection of the sculpture "Gather." The recommendation
is the culmination of a years-long selection process that included review of more than 60 responses to a
request for artist qualifications and three finalist submissions. Margaret Garrington, chair of the Public
Art Commission will present the recommendation.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
The City of Ashland Public Art Master Plan calls for the installation of a major piece of public art in
the Gateway Island, which is located in Siskiyou Boulevard between the Ashland Library and Fire
Station One. The Public Arts Commission began setting aside money in 2008 in order to accumulate
enough funding to pay for the project, and expects to have $100,000 available in 2016. This funding
comes from transient occupancy tax, and its use is restricted by state law.
At the City Council study session on November 30, the Public Art Commission presented a detailed
report on the process used to arrive at a selection of public art for the Gateway Island. In her report,
Margaret Garrington included a detailed timeline of the process, the development and adoption of the
Public Art Master Plan, the development and adoption of AMC 2.29, how the Gateway RFQ was
developed, public input outreach and results and the criteria used by the Selection Panel to make their
decision on September 22, 2015.
The process to for selecting public art is spelled out in the Ashland Municipal Code, chapter 2.29.
• 2.29. 100 A. General. The Public Art Commission will call for entries by issuing a request for
proposal, a request for qualification or by invitation. The call for entries will include specific
guidelines and criteria for the specific project. Every call for entry must comply with the City's
public contracting rules.
• 2.29. 100 B. Selection Panel. A selection panel, separate from the Pubic Art Commission,
consisting of art professionals and enthusiasts, residents near the proposed site, community
members, and city administrators will be chosen to evaluate the proposals received from artists.
A different selection panel shall be chosen for each project by the Commission.
• 2.29. 100 C. Evaluation of Acquisition Proposals. Proposals which meet the minimum
requirements set forth in the call for entries will be given to the Selection Panel for review.
The proposals for acquisition shall be evaluated based upon criteria set forth in the call for
entries at a public meeting. The Selection Panel will evaluate the proposals and make a
recommendation to the Public Art Commission regarding which proposals to accept. The
Page I of 2
1~,
CITY OF
-ASH LAN D
Commission shall forward that recommendation to the City Council for final selection. This
ordinance does not exclude land use approval processes when required for the use or structure.
The Selection Panel evaluated the three artist concepts selected by the PAC to move forward in the
process. The panel used criteria included in AMC 2.29.130 and criteria included in the Request for
Qualifications. The panel agreed that Beeman's concept was too tall, the narrow leg design was not
appropriate, and the overall piece was out of scale and proportion for the site. Further it did not
provide interest at eye level and the concept was a variation on his previous work and not original to
Ashland. The panel agreed that Stoller's piece was too small in scale for the site, is identical to his
helix form in Carlsbad, CA with different iconography and therefore not original. The panel found
Zoccola's piece with its bulk and height to be the most appropriate in scale for the site; it best
articulates the space, it doesn't tell the viewer what to see but invites the viewers to think and to
imagine what they see. It was noted that Zoccola's design approach is intuitive and site specific. Her
design is original and unlike any of her previous work and the patina of the steel captures the palette of
colors and texture of Ashland and respects the tonal architecture of the City. The panel unanimously
chose Zoecola's "Gather". Selection Panel Gateway Notes.
After Garrington completed her report and the council asked questions of the PAC, Mayor Stromberg
asked for ideas on what the Council should base its decision on. As noted above, AMC 2.29 includes
criteria that are to be used by the Public Arts Commission in making its recommendations for public
art. The attached matrix includes these criteria and considerations for each one. The Council may find
this a useful tool during its discussion and deliberation.
If Council approves the recommendation, the City will enter into a professional services contract with
the artist. The approved scope of services will require the artist to develop construction documents
that include an approved structural engineering design which will be reviewed by the appropriate City
staff prior to fabrication and installation. City staff review or consultant peer review of construction
and engineering documents occur for every City construction project.
COUNCIL GOALS SUPPORTED:
14. Encourage andlor develop public spaces that Intild community and promote interaction.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Transient Occupancy Tax allocated for public art is budgeted and available.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of the Public Art Commission recommendation.
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move approval of the recommendation of the Selection Panel and the Public Art Commission for the
Gateway Island Art Project and direct staff to enter into a contract with the artist.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Factors and Considerations matrix
2. Zoccola's proposal for "Gather"
3. Letters in support
4. Letters in opposition
Pace 2 of 2
~r,
Factors and Considerations in the decision on the Gateway public art project
Decision Factors Considerations
Ordinance criteria • Exceptional quality and enduring value.
• Suitability to Gateway site in terms of scale, texture, materials, colors, existing
architecture and landscaping and the site's historical, geographical and cultural
features and current uses.
• Permanence. Durability. Maintenance difficulty and cost.
• Safety for public.
• Enhancing diversity of Public Art collection (Interesting? Unpredictable?
Unique?).
Current public • Responses have been mixed: some just "liking"; some just "hating"; some
response (including copying email blast templates; some opposed to any high-cost, non-local, non-
Email responses) historical, non-representational, or non-Nature themed piece; some in favor due
to historical resonance, quality, shape; some articulating other specific reasons
for and against.
• Hard to determine public preference from divided fervent opinions and large
majority not expressing any opinion.
Likely public • Hard to predict.
response 10, 20, 50 . Many examples of public art disliked initially and later beloved (Eiffel Tower;
years from now Vietnam War Memorial; Louvre's glass pyramid; Philadelphia "Love" statue;
Redding Sundial Bridge; Seattle "Changing Form" sculpture).
• Original art designed for the site is more likely to become iconic.
Councilor personal • Councilors often rely on opinions of persons with specialized knowledge or
opinion expertise, including members of City commissions.
• Councilors are entrusted to exercise jud ment about public matters.
Opinions of "experts" . The AMC Public Art selection process is designed to defer to the judgment of
in public art "experts"
• The makeup of the Selection Panel met the requirements in AMC and included
experts in the field of visual arts.
Deference to process • The Public Art selection process was followed per AMC and should be honored.
• The Council can exercise its prerogative to override the recommendation.
• If the AMC Public Art selection process is flawed, it should be adjusted by
amending the Code for future projects - not by changing the outcome for a
current project at the end of the process.
• Getting more opinions about a piece of art does not assure higher artistic quality
or greater public consensus and ma 'ust as well have the opposite effect.
Preference for local • Local artists were invited to respond to the Request for Qualifications. In
artists narrowing down the field of 63 respondents (3 from Ashland, 10 from Rogue
Valley) on the basis of written responses, demonstrated artistry in 3-dimensional
media, experience with large public art projects, and extensive reference checks,
the top three finalists turned out to be non-local.
• Limiting "bidders" to locals arbitrarily reduces competitive creativity, presumes
locals cannot compete regionally, invites retaliation from other areas in their
future public art projects, and violates public contracting rules for major projects.
• The pool of local artists with experience in creating large, outdoor public art
feces is small.
1
c
o3
am
0-6
L0
0- a Lo
II U ~ p
O 0-
N 0- < O
c O O N
D-
D i<UvOi
1
yT ~ F J
ca (n
N t6 N Q -p cu i cu O Q
a) >1 a) 0
3 O O UY x '0 N- Ca -O c c co a)L o U
C CU CU CU a) .C p o o c E
1- 3 a) O s C
p o o Q E c p 3 3 N Q f° E L X N N a O
cu pacuaa)) car C °00Zo. N a)tcccaa~aa)) U
a) > o p m m° -O a) a) :n 3 O m N O> o
.fl - Q o 'c O > s ~U •0 -O c 0) 3 a) c
~aa)i >cacccaicB>3E`-° N•vcu oE~•p-a'o0Np o
a) cu s 3 m ° E p E c al-) cu cco c 6 N 0- -a c C a m- oo E
>
a) N Y 3 c° Q Q N ° -a: C C 0 cu 0).0 r- a) N UO
7 w Q Q C C -a 'U o C O Q a) N p Cr U E OO a) O a) 0 E -0
vi o a) x) 0) N 5 ~ co c~ w w CU -p aa)) U o -c c 'a c
3~c->p , c NC~ca cc
C: (D p N L N p) j=- N c u) - O C U c CU CO Q) C- CU O
c c 0 3 c O m~ E a) L- ~ CU a) cn ~ C 0 c - O L c CD CU N 'v)
> p o-'> - a) 7m ~C9 m N m C'm~ o ~'E E c
E o o? a) N a) (D - c C s c a> a0i a a) mo o= p C E
0 0 N m~ 3 o ac) o)= E °)6"' QCCU Q~ ca)) n- o'N ~ Eo
_ a) s a) E U
3 'O N> N v) o o C s Y > N v N vi O rn a) C
a p m- N in a) m ~ a) pc) o 3 cu N o 3 a`) 3 N N~ Q
cu =1 co a) ca N c 'a ` N cc p N N C N cn ui E 0 a) cu y- U
_0 co n C: co 0 (n ~.°.N 0~~ aicw Co N.r E 3 3 c~ C~~ o o m w a) >
a) a) 0 o(D 3 a)~~ aXi x N a m c .0 0 N E c Qom- o
a) a) C2. (n ca 'o ~nm3`)oQ~~oaoC 0a)0" a° 30 in0 a)cU~cc~>
c - N a) ca m E 3 L O 'CZ in a) p c O N N c- a) Q N O
m E m a nom n o o o E m~ a) c 5 o a) a) a,~ V)
cQ E
0ovc~ioaiaNico a)o w0) YCn o °Et--
° E ate) aa)) a)s o m c m= nL °ao a) aa))co >o c ais
-p>,a- r- 0c- E0 op 00NC~ >a)oca"-cu,N
a) p o° m~ m 3 N mL o c o> s a)s Ey 3 m
.Q
a) 0 aoo•0pE a) ~paUiE ~o~cos °osac)UcU-°ca)
a) CN > L°w Nna)acid cOmm
cNoc 4- o~'aE
fU N O' N c m a) a) - 'a cu -cu -Q) . c p p a) a) Q c Q) = p CU N L s
N 3 Nt N 3 o N o
i- o -p a) U CD O o Ca a) N C6 C U U p O-'3 U aj L j cu
C C: 0) Vi p) U ? a) V r- O O U Q a) O a) E U r co o Q a) U c C 3 0 c0 O C: C: C6 c E O ca N U m E 4'
p c U V N O L N L O N N O O
•0 Y E p t ~n N o O N N Q n. o co " w, O O n m E C 'N C Q
E p
o s N- co 0 m o N c o s a) N- a)
c N
n. Q}>,v a) p p cu o o =yam o
CL •a E 3 0 •c cco N U C O Q N a) a) U cp m 3 0 p Cc) a) ~ a te''
N E= tU C o c o N o C Q ~i o E c a) -0 m 0- c j Y-0
o L N CU L°~E~a)-°00 napipp`s-`~pc3~iasco`oc
U
F- 3 a) ' o f ° N S L w c° H 'a D m o ~C- !E H- c N ca ° `m 3 N
V44 Q2
a.; c
O
O
Q N
O.
t L O
7
0
Q tr)
1
r _
r r
UCo
U O
-r- N
c0Oa)
>Q
<Ucai
3
a~
4
L
,r•
E:
1'. 4
N
.I •t'', 7
W
F
z
~7 9 ' ~j 6, h v Lo
r
0 c O
O
x., N~Q
c O O N
~3}Q
cnQU~
?f /jf ~,1 fit,
•
•
•
•
• 1
•
• 1 •
•
•
• 1
• • 1
•
%f
Y
~k
~ i
-k
f i
K
( S, ~ 4 r r~ 1 ~ ~ I
EF (r f ,~.'r . '
k~
CJ
0 C: O
O N
v U C 9
C 0 0 a)
~0
0
Cl)
LL
f
i
E'.
l
r'
e;
u
c
Q ~
Q3
o ~
~ o
2 Lo
a~~r
o0 cm
v 0-
c a)
ouQ~
~E
c 0 0 0
cnQUv~i
a O
6 O
a v
a~
>r ° ~
U
C
O
U
F
f
~ tt; ice.
3 n ~ /Qf A N 1l
f f
' O Q LID
VO zr N ~ O U ~ O
N O Q O c p cV
U O -
J P. ? ~ UO U Q -C a)
Q
Q a D O N L E
O O O C O O N
Q N O N
V) <
i o
16
o
O v
I
X r
X j
IN
- ~ ` Lu
. o
Q a
r a fx rs-r ~y~:i
n ~ f-2 y
<
~ - tvr D
EL 0
v Q Lo
0 p U ~ O
O c p
O O N
S O U N 9
SS N~Q
C O O N
Q U vOi
m
c
70
o 0 o E
F-
0 p `o
c > O N
O
N C p 0-
.C: p>
w 'p
N
N a
c
U ~ p
c
t
LO ~ C N Q N c
U p 0 O
p O N \
C c N 3 p Ln Q Q
O p O O
U o 0 0 0
a ~ a
`pO Q p > p
U c p
c y lo
0 O
0 U O N cN 9 m C14
p O
O O
c c
O o
6 _0
p~ p p c
O
' { C
E
a
{
0-0
N N If
O p
m 6 Q
~ 3 o ~o
a~ 0 0
0 0 co
0c Q N
U s c T
c D
o O
o 0
.n
~ o m o p t~ 0
0 Q pQ pN
c a~ U a U N
p 6 Q
0 0 c: Q o 10
0 0 c E
0 Y oN c E O ro
a oo N ^o p Q
o a- O Oi
L ~ Q a Ana UvOi
co
0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C-) CD
oo °o °o °o °o °o
0
~ o LO r-I C7 0 0
~c 0
b9- b9- ~
c
O
_ v
N
c ~
O
U U
O E
O
C -
O O
O O
C U
O x
~ O
O Q
~ O Q
C U
W U n
H N C - p
U O
0 Q C) °u p 3
O Z •L) O) C
o C
N rn
W O
O _
V) < LL O O
U`
a- O 'E W C) - o (D LO
OG U
Q 0) X co p 5) p n o C7 p p N
N
Z I.- < i u O L
(D LL U a- -
U co O OQ~C
W J rV _ L
J O -I Q C O N
LU O ~ G _
n
0 2:-
O. a F- N
v>QU<n
c
.Q
a) U
•V N
a) ~
C
- it >
R.p, V
CL
U ( E
+DA. = r E
Yy, 3 c
i . N 2
w Q
6Gs v s V E
ooa)
seatt. p N l` N U
Co cn
ryfF ~y~4k 0
U '6 a) Q O N
co 0)
CU C
.t Q. O
f v~`~t O 'O in
tr t' t r .f a) U N fn O O N
yxi
~MW NEWMAIK, a^} m f0 rnm rn
t rn m c
~ E O cn U) m o
a o o m
D i .0
In C p C :.U w
Q 'NO 0- r Q
C O N T
a) C 'd
U) Cl. o r-
U) 0
O` ,n a) L ' ) N d 6)
d C > L v ca
O cn in a) c a :o
6
V) am FC: cn -0 m -pa)c °-'in
ai .a a c a, o > M r)
O
m O Q> U a) m 6) N N C p 0)
N E N N Vi O .p >Q E°o 3 caNi 3~'om° aya)aci 0
E
o wm (n 'Cn
U) - a) a ° ca-Y o a Q3
Q a) ca a) U) a) T -6 N_ a. O C p0 U a) U N (0 L) a)
N v O
L7 C U) aoi 3 N m m O N E cL a m n L c C O
U a- wo of (n E LL (U -0 o cl &
Tm mZ c»
m 0) o o? m -0 o CO (n aa)) m y n m a E p O U1 O
a) fa ° O Q) Z O t' N -6 M s° N p U
> aci ami o o E N O o in CL o ° a) L> N o OU O O cV
U O m E p o c a ai O -r- - c Q U N
F- Z a7 O U' O° a) 6 'p U>> U 3= C N T Y a) rn v U U S1
Q
F- C O O nj E a) (n a) ~ m 00 ? O 0 3 co to C v (6 N - "-M
O c op~~nN~F c N o o c o ~E ° o 6 m C
}
mE > smEEu mU~ya~ >Mo10- 3m O O N
=Cn Q m E Q'~ ~•6)m p p c a?.E ~m a~ m~ 3 a~ E o= a) T= j a)
F`-OF-LL N2UDmCO CO ~~(D-j CCD Uw c Z('~ •623 v)QUcn
Suggested Lightin7gOjp~i n
Susan Zoccola
Artist Proposal
City of Ashland, Gateway Sculpture
September 2015
J
3~EL7 Ingr-ade
o [IP68] IK10 c ~L us
htrnanQs'" grlpgl]uW optlallaw' mlcro&u4gaa(cW
The LS853LED is a full featured, shallow depth ingrade luminaire featuring lumen
output and efficacy exceeding metal halide. This luminaire also features a universal
input driver (120-277 V), and measures only 7.1 inches (180 mm) deep (in direct burial
format). The ability to aim the luminaire ensures the most efficient light delivery can be
set according to the site conditions. r j
Specifications
Lamp source 16 W or 20 W LED []White (4300 K typical)
Warm white (2 900 K typical)
■ Blue (470 nm)
Other colors by request
■ RGB (consult factory for full details)
LS853LED Round Flush Cover
UL classification Suitable for wet locations
Lumen Maintenance 85,000 hrs @ 25 °C (20 W only)
(1.70)
360,.,
Control Protocol 0_10V
(optional, consult factory) RGB via DMX
20° 20°
IP rating IP68
Construction 316 marine grade stainless steel ~a
Installation types Pre-Installation Blockout
Concrete pour, drive-over etc.
Direct Burial
Landscapes, planters etc.
Drive-over With OptiClear'" lens and pre-installation
blockout(LS6052-K orLS6052-K-SP)
Static load rating 9260 lb (4200 kg) with OptiClearT" lens and pre-
installation blockout (LS6052-K or LS6052-K-SP)
Impact rating IK10 with OptiClearTM lens
Standard inclusions Teflon coated cover screws
MicroAntiLeachT" wire entry
Thermal cutout
Ambient operating 20W -22 °F to 122 °F (-30 °C to +50 °C)
temperature 16 W -22 °F to 104 T (-30 °C to +40 °C)
Surface temperature 113 OF (45 °C)
Photometrics www.luniascape.com
Any luminaire can become hot - take care with appropriate use and placement
1.S8531-ED Pre-Installation Blockout Ingrade
VVhy Use LS6052-K Pre-Installation Blockout? Why Use LS6052-t:-SP Pre-Installation Blockout?
The LS6052-K pre-installation kit (order separately) is a key aspect The LS6052-K-SP pre-installation kit (order separately) is ideal for use
of Lumascape's approach to engineering high performance ingrade in applications where maximum flexibility for the type and location of
product. The LS6052-K acts as a blockout, and is intended for branch circuit connections are required or where exact site conditions
installation before the luminaire however it has other special functions. may be unknown. The LS6052-K-SP is also for use with all applications
To simplify the installation, every LS6052-K is supplied complete with requiring a color changing or dimmable lighting scheme. For use with
a 4-way, PVC junction box, inside which the installer can make all the LS6052-K-SP, Lumascape provides the LS853LED complete with
necessary connections, and allows the completion of all wiring even 6.5' of factory-installed hookup wire and a 1/2" NPT adapter (complete
before the luminaire arrives on site. This method also ensures the with a Microantileach seal). This provides the installer with greater
luminaire itself is not damaged during concreting or other site works. flexibility to determine the type and location of the branch circuit
Note: The junction box remains serviceable after installation. To connection. This option is also 100% hard-wired, and does not feature
complete the installation, Lumascape provides an IP68 connector, the IP68 detachable couplings for off-site maintenance. All aspects of
enabling a tool-free final connection from the luminiare to the branch the luminiare itself are still field serviceable.
circuit. In addition, this connector is readily detachable, allowing for
off-site maintenance.
Connp( tion lype 85'for IS6052-K Pie-histall tier, Biockor€t Cc m,!c-t.rm lyp'a'82' for LS6052 K.-SP Pre-I stal.:3tion Blockout
f
I E
IP68 Connector & Junction Box Single Conduit Entry 0.5 inch NPT
The luminaire is fitted with an IP68 connector, which attaches For 0.5 inch conduit installation with MicroAntiLeach"
directly to the cable supplied with LS6052-K, without the use of wire entry.
any tools. The cable is 1.8 ft (0.56 m) in length, and is factory c/w 6.5 ft (2.0 m) hook-up wire.
assembled with a 4 way junction box which remains field
serviceable after installation.
Not suitable for color changing or dimmable applications.
Lens Opti ms Cover Options far Pre-Insta.li ion E:I.ockoul
OptiClear" Glass Flush covers for pre-installation use special
Glass of very high seals and support bushes to ensure static loads c
up to 9 260 lb (4 200 kg) are properly supported. o.
optical purity and load
. Suitable for In order to achieve this drive over rating,
strength
OptiClear'" or GripGlass'" must be used.
drive-over applications.
GripGlass" 010.9 in (262 mm)
OptiClear- glass with
slip reduction glazing E
process. Suitable for
drive-over applications. ! -
Pre-Installation Blockout Round Flush Cover
Borosilicate Glass 07.5 in 1191 mm)
SS316: Polished Brass: Polished
Ideal for general use SS316: Brushed Brass: Brushed
areas. Not suitable for
drive-over application.
I F ',8531_ ED Pre-Installation Blockout Ingrade
Control
Gear
Cable Optical Body & Wire Supply
Product Lamp Lens Cover Entry System Depth Entry Voltage
Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code
LS853LED F-29-1 F (-I I
LAMP i OPTICAL SYSTEM •
Description Wattage Color Code Description Beam Code
LED 16 W White 16W4 Adjustable Narrow 14° N 1"
(4300 Ktyp.) Warm white Adjustable Narrow Medium 25° NM
(2900K NP.) 16H6 Adjustable Medium 30° M
Blue 1664 Adjustable Linear Horizontal 40°x20° LH
1470nm) Adjustable Linear Vertical 20°x40° LV
LED 20W White 20W4 Not available for RGB.
(4300 K typ.) NOTE: See beam orientation diagram.
Warm white 20116
(2900 Ktyp.) BODY DEPTH
Blue 2064
(470 nm) Description Depth Code
RGB 2OM4 Suits pre-install kit 11.0 inches 29
(280 mm)
NOTE: For other body depths consult factory.
LENS
Description Code WIRE ENTRY LOCATION
OptiClear" Very high optical purity A r, Location Code
and load strength
Bottom O
GripGlass'" OptiClear'" with
slip reduction glazing G i"
process SUPPLY VOLTAGE
Borosilicate Ideal for general use Vottage Code l
Glass areas ❑ 120V 60 Hz 4(1)
")Suitable for drive-over. 277V 60 Hz go)
Not suitable for drive-over. 12 V 60 Hz or 12-24 V DC 13 In
"1 Not available for RGB.
COVER 121 For appropriate transformer sizing refer to page 54 - 55
of the Lumascape LEO catalog.
Description Material Finish Code
Round Flush Stainless Polished TK Cover steel Brushed Brass Polished Brushed t;i
1 ~I Ciri of 8L C ,-~S`%
v
f.
L
CONNECTION TYPE OR OR 40
Description Code LS6013 LS688 LS6012
Slatted lower Wall wash lens Cross hatch louver
IP68 Connector & Junction Box lid
Single Conduit Entry 0.5 inch NPT In Not suitable for color changing or dimmable applications.
LS6052-K required - order separately.
17 LS6052-K-SP required - order separately. OR
LS685 LS691
Linear spreader lens Prismatic lens
LED
Other accessory stacking options may be available - consult factory
' 0531 ED Direct Burial (r~qr"~c~e
Why Use Direct Burial
Direct burial installation is ideal for landscaping areas or in locations where the depth is restricted. This type of installation also allows for maximum
heat dissipation. The stainless steel construction of the luminaire performs flawlessly in alkaline and acidic soil types, as well as chemically fertilized
landscapes.
Cable Entry Options for Direct Burial Lens Options
_ OptiClear" Glass
Glass of very high
optical purity and load
strength.
1 GripGlass"
OptiClear" glass with
slip reduction glazing
process.
Armored Cable MC & Splice Box Single Conduit Entry 0.5 inch NPT
Armored cable 2 ft (0.6 m) provides protection For 0.5 inch conduit installation Borosilicate Glass
against damage to cable between luminaire and with MicroAntiLeach'" wire entry. Ideal for general
4 way splice box (included). Allows for loop c/w 6.5 ft (2.0 m) hook-up wire. use areas and areas
in/loop out and flexibility of luminaire placement. without pedestrian
Not suitable for color changing or dimmable applications. traffic.
Side located entry only.
Cover Options for Direct Burial
Use recessed cover for installation in soil, Use flush covers for installation in fine finished surfaces such as granite and
grass, pavers and other uneven surfaces marble. They can also be used in some suspended applications. The flush cover
where no cover overhang is desired. will conceal gaps between the luminaire and the surrounding surf ace.
\4
Recessed Cover Round Flush Cover Square Flush Cover
SS316: Polished SS316: Polished L SS316: Polished
SS316:Brushed SS31 6: Brushed SS316:Brushed
rfi Brass: Polished Brass: Polished Brass: Polished
~ c
0101 in (256 mm) 10.1 in 1256 mm)
09.5 in (240 mm)
~ 09.5 in (240m m) 09.5 in 1240 mml ~ I - ~
u U
7.0 in (178 mm 07.0 ins 078 mm)i 07.0 nor 078 mm
L'I.8531_CD Direct Burial 1ngrad-
Control
Gear
Cable Optical Body & Wire Supply
Product Lamp Lens Cover Entry System Depth Entry Voltage
Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code Code
LS853LED 28
LAMP OPTICAL SYSTEM
Description Wattage Color Code Description Beam Code
LED 16 W White 16W4 Adjustable Narrow 14° N
(4300 K typ.) Warm white Adjustable Narrow Medium 25° NM
(2900Ktyp) 16H6 Adjustable Medium 30° NL,
Blue 1664 Adjustable Linear Horizontal 40° x 20° (470om) Adjustable Linear Vertical 20°x40° LED 20W White 20W4 Not available for RGB.
(4300 Ktyp.) NOTE: See beam orientation diagram.
Warm white 20H6
(2900 Ktyp.) BODY DEPTH
Blue 2064 Description Depth Codel
(470 nm)
RGB 20M4 Direct burial 7.1 inches If 80mm) 28
NOTE: For other body depths consult factory.
LENS WIRE ENTRY LOCATION
Description Code Location Code
OptiClear- Very high optical purity ❑ Side Fli
and load strength Bottom GripGlass'" OptiClear- with
slip reduction glazing G SUPPLY VOLTAGE
process
Voltage Code
Borosilicate Ideal for general use
Glass areas X 120 V 60 Hz 4
277 V 60 Hz 0
12 V 60 Hz or 12-24 V DC 13
COVER
Not available for RGB.
Description Material Finish Code For appropriate transformer sizing refer to page 54-55
Recessed Stainless Polished B of the Lumascape LED catalog.
Cover steel Brushed H
Brass Polished E
Round Flush Stainless Polished PGJ
Co
ver steel Brushed Cj Grde- Oi E COSS
Brass Polished Square Flush Stainless Polished MT External accessory
Cover steel LS636 Use with recessed covers only
Brushed Not suitable for use in traffic areas
Brass Polished Brass grill
3
CONNECTION TYPE
Description Cod
OR 4 OR
Armored Cable MC & Splice Box 81
N LS6013 LS688 LS6012
Single Conduit Entry 0.5 inch NPT 82 Slatted louver Wall wash lens Cross hatch louver
("Not suitable for color changing or dimmable applications.
Side located wire entry only.
OR
}LS685 LS691
Linear spreader lens Prismatic lens
L~ z
Other accessory stacking options may be available - consult factory
LS8531_ED Photometrics Ingrade
Photmiletncs
Photometric data is based on test results from an independent NIST traceable testing lab. IES data is available at www.lumascape.com.
Note: No depreciation factor is applied to the data shown.
Polar Candela Distribution Illuminance at a Distance
LS853LED
nw C 0° C IF C 30° C 45° C 60° C IF C 90-
171Y ft Center Beam fc Beam 0
4300 K 5sez 160° 90° 0 0 0 o a o 0
tsw 5 227.3 2 ft
100° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 Beam Angle 1W
4262 _ 110° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 56.8 4 ft
Power Input 21 W 130° 720° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 25.3 7 ft
Lumens 1265 2841 120° 130° 7 5 5 4 4 6 7
140° 23 25 26 25 23 21 22 25 9.1 11 ft
Efficacy 601mNV n0°
150° 155 148 146 144 145 145 162 30 6.3 13 ft
P1To approximate warm white 1421
data, multiply by 0.84. Refer 160° 1001 987 961 953 961 964 956 40 3.6 18 ft
web site for IES files for all 170° 3573 3543 3518 3498 3475 3475 3493
color temperatures. go, 50 2.3 22ft
180° 5682 5682 5682 5682 5682 5682 5682
■ C-0°
Polar Candela Distribution Illuminance at a Distance
L.S853LED co° c1s° c3o° cas° cso° cis° c9o°
na ft Center Beam fe Beam 0
4300 K 3832 160° 9(0 0 0 0 0 0 0
150° 5 153.3 3 ft
30 Beath ^,tigle ! 100° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
140-
2874 110° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 36.3 5 ft
Power Input 21 W 130° 120° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 17 8ft
Lumens 1137 ; 1916 120° 130° 12 11 9 7 8 9 11
140° 43 46 50 52 52 48 43 25 6.1 13ft
Efficacy 541rtyW t10,
150° 206 204 204 209 210 209 219 30 4.3 16 It
n) To approximate warm white 958
data, multiply by 0.84. Refer toa 160° 881 874 853 849 865 897 923 40 2.4 21 ft
web site for IES files for all 170° 2495 2463 2439 2435 2452 2489 2554
color temperatures.
` 90° 180° 3832 3832 3832 3832 3832 3832 3832 50 1.5 27 ft
■ C-0°
Polar Candela Distribution Illuminance at a Distance
L5853LE0
Center
C o° C 15° C 30° C 45° C 60° C IF C 90° ft Beam W Beam L
4300 K 3510 170 60 90° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Beamfc
r 150° 5 140.4 2 ft 4 ft
k' 1 L c1 it tom 100° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anclly 2633 110° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 35.1 4ft 7ft
130° 120° 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
15 15.6 5ft lift
Power Input 21 W j n55-120° 130° 10 9 8 8 13 21 28
.140° 20 21 26 44 82 132 138 25 5.6 9ft 18ft
Lumens 1126 110'
150° 89 101 130 199 325 479 541 30 3.9 lift 22 ft
Efficacy 541rrvW 878
100° 160° 565 593 697 888 1149 1477 1582 40 22 14ft 29 ft
01 To approximate warm white 170° 2073 2118 2252 2460 2714 2862 2905
data, multiply by 0.84. Refer eo^ ° 50 1.4 18 ft 36 ft
web site for IES files for all C.~ p 180 3510 3510 3510 3510 3510 3510 3510
color temperatures. _
Beam alien>ations
r
Beam Orientation I Beam Orientation \
for the "LV optical for the "LM' optical \
system system
c
I
Support for Gather
Mayor and Council,
I write this opinion piece as a professor emerita in the Creative Arts. I have taught art at the
college level for over thirty years so I do not write this as a layperson but someone who has
engaged in dialogue with persons innocent in the language of the visual arts.
I am writing in support of having the sculpture "Gather" by Susan Zoccola set in the Gateway
island. It is site specific. It brings together culture and nature in a different dynamic. It is thought
provoking. It reaches out to an audience that is broader than a local population. It takes the
dialogue about Art to another level. It requires a different mindset.
Ashland is a particularly word conscious culture-defined in great part by the Oregon Shakespeare
Festival and the eloquence of William Shakespeare. Fluency in the visual language, however, is
not so keen nor straightforward. The words are not so easily defined. words such as "ugly",
"beautiful", "abstract" are thrown about but are never defined. It is assumed they mean the same
thing to every person. Not so.
So let me speak in a more general manner when addressing art questions. Art functions at the
"edge" and edges are always dynamic and fraught with friction. Look at the history of art and
you will find that works we now treasure were vilified and scoffed at with the same vigor and
apprehension I see happening at this moment with this sculpture and this city. It is easier to say
"No" than it is to say "Yes" and naysayers always shout louder. People's first responses are
visceral/emotional before they are conceptual/ intellectual. They are gut driven and while valid
are not complete.
No artwork exists in a vacuum. There are layers of meaning to be peeled back for a fuller
understanding of a work over time. And always there is a mystery at its core, one that can be
experienced by thoughtful engagement but not necessarily explained. A response should be
more than a knee-jerk reaction of "I like it. I don't like it." Or it costs too much---in relation to
what? Or my child could do that. Just glue together a few recycled things and we'll have a
sculpture.
When looking at Art, the first layer is a cultural context-when and for where has the work been
produced? Why has it been created? What is the work's audience? Who has defined the
elements of Ashland's "vibe"? People talk about it, but it as not been defined as far as I have
been able to discern. "Gather" is titled to suggest that Ashland embraces and enfolds a variety of
viewpoints, people, and cultures, not a parochial attitude. Its abstract form suggests multiple
connections, not one small idea. It is meant to provoke dialogue. Dialogue only occurs when the
viewer is open to experience the not- so- simple.
A work of art is an object confined by its frame. The context of a museum or a gallery is a very
different context than an outdoor space. This type of work is not constrained by walls, floor, and
ceiling. It is open to the green landscape around it, the sky above it, and the movement by it. In
order to exist in this type of environment, the work needs to bold, simple, and larger than the
usual. It needs to be viewed from different angles and perspectives. It needs to be experienced
1
by those driving as well as those standing still. It needs to have interest at both these very
different levels. The details can't be too fussy. It also requires skillful engineering and
fabrication, safety considerations, and environmental concerns. It is not built in a day. The artist
has spent at least a year refining and creating the proposal and model. It will take another year to
have it constructed. This all costs money and time. Shouldn't an artist get paid as well as a
plumber, chef, lawyer?
Ashland is not an island. It is part of a state which is part of a region which relates to a coast. To
think that an artist who lives outside the city's boundaries is somehow foreign, alien, and not
worthy to be considered to create art for the city is absurd. Art lives in a much larger context than
``seven square miles". Art is more than pretty. It is an aspect of a person's education. It is part of
the fabric of learning if we are to create a whole cloth of culture.
Sincerely yours,
Rochelle Newman, professor emerita
819 Pavilion Place
Ashland, OR.
Gateway Proposal of Susan Zoecola
One of my favorite things to do in Ashland was to leaf through the Ashland Telephone Directory
every year. Randomly scattered throughout the pages. are historic photographs of the city; a
photo of the plaza with horse drawn carts mixed with turn of the century automobiles; a photo of
the three story hotel and train depot long since demolished down on A Street. To the best of my
knowledge, the oldest known photograph of Ashland is of the Ashland Mills building that stood
at the current entrance to Lithia Park. That mill and others like it that ran sluices off from
Ashland Creek were the power houses that created a sustainable economy and the foundation of
the city. Those mills powered giant nineteenth century steel circular saws and massive millstones
to grind wheat and corn. They all became worn and misshapen and oxidized and eventually
obsolete. Eventually, the city decided to build a hydroelectric power station further up Ashland
Creek in the twentieth century. While no longer part of our power source, the structure still exists
and the copper windings of the electric generator are once again found in Susan's sculpture and
still resemble the round millstones and waterwheels that were their generational predecessors.
Susan Zoccola's proposed Gateway sculpture is not only an abstracted basket as she claims in
her artist statement, but an historic and significant form from our city's founding to the present
day. On the third page of her presentation package she shows a wonderful Shawn Bagshaw
photograph of the City of Ashland in early fall colors with the layered hills behind it and a snow
capped Mount Ashland in the distance. Her fourth page is a photograph of Ashland Creek taken
at the first arched bridge in Lithia Park. Importantly, and instinctively, these two photographs
allude to an even more important element of Ashland: the basic geology of its vast watershed and
the raw geography that still defines it today.
2
On Thursday September 9t" between the noon presentations of the artist's proposals and the 5
o'clock session, I jammed on my hiking boots and grabbed a "Camelbak" full of water and hiked
from the Library through Lithia Park and up the newly improved Bandersnateh Trail. My
destination was the woods above the intersection of Morton Street and Ashland Loop Road.
There, where the pavement turns to dirt, is a collection of amazing large free standing granite
boulders, some as big as a school bus. These glacial erratic stones are the artifacts of our
geological history sitting high above our town on both remote and inhabited hilltops. These
smooth and rounded stones are perfectly represented in the form of Susan's essentially ovoid and
slightly vertical sculpture. With a single intuitive gesture, Susan Zoccola has captured the
dynamic and static nature of Ashland, from its geological past to the the woven basket
technology of the First Americans and eventually through the industrial age and finally up to
today with our interconnected social networks and community.
There are two other points to make about Susan's proposal. One is her intention to apply a fired
patina to the steel to "warm up" the object. Once again Susan has pulled from an intuitive
understanding of the tonal nature of the architectural environment. Ashland is a city of brick and
stone and plaster and painted wood and stucco. For example, one of the closest buildings to the
gateway project is the recently built fire station, a building of clear contemporary sensibility. Yet
the materials are primarily traditional red brick. This sensitivity to the built environment will
make this piece seem as if it had always been there.
The second point I would like to talk about is her recommendation to surround the artwork with
Japanese blood grass and mounting it off-center in the circle. The use of a single type of tall
grass will help soften the park and will create an embracing and welcoming context for the
sculpture and for the Gateway Park itself. It will also reinforce the idea of the ovoid form and
create a sense of nesting and protection.
I have dealt professionally with artists for over 20 years and in that time I have developed a sixth
sense about recognizing a pure artist whose work speaks with a clear and unique world view.
Susan Zoccola has created a singular and heartfelt monument to the nurturing and inclusive
nature of our community and done it with a form that is harmonic to this place and time.
John Davis
Member of the Selection Committee for the Ashland Arts Commission Gateway Project
Dear Ashland City Council,
I was on the selection panel for the final review of three finalists for the Gateway Island. All
three works had merit, and in the end, I am happy to support "Gather" by Susan Zoccola.
3
I was also on the original "study group" that developed the concept of a Public Arts Commission
for the City of Ashland, and served as that body's first Chair. There were many things we were
able to do, even with little funding and few resources. that I am very proud of, and one of them
was to create the space for a large, important piece of art in Ashland's downtown. The Library
and Fire Station seemed to be calling out for something artistic, rather than municipal, that
reflected the astonishing creative forces alive in this town.
Many times I've heard the question "Why is public art important?" The unspoken underlying
statement being, "We shouldn't be spending money on this." I always wonder why anyone
considers art any less important that anything we do as human beings, and my answer is always
that art is possibly the single most important thing.
When it's cut from our schools, students flunk, lose interest, and drop out. Students participating
in art do better than those that don't. Even if they do not become an artist by profession, when
they've learned about art concepts, and participate in art making, it helps them think in new
ways, creative ways, creative problem solving. Society needs art, and needs to celebrate art, and
not just historical pieces, or something that visually resembles the world around us. We need art
that touches a chord, or a nerve, so that we can expand our idea of what it means to be human.
Public art's long history is rife with early, hateful, derogatory statements about the art upon
installation, which turns to pride and glory in its eventual acceptance.
Ashland is a place where people gather. It is a place where people listen. It swirls with creativity.
They come here for theater, for art, and for nature. Ashland is a powerful spot, and this lovely
proposed artwork brings that all into beautiful focus.
I look forward to the installation of this artwork, and fully support you in the process of making
it a reality.
Thank you.
Bruce Bayard
Studio A.B
621 A Street, Ashland Oregon 97520
541-482-2253 1 brucebayard.com
Dear Mayor Stromberg and members of the City Council,
Congratulations to you and the Arts Commission for the progress in selecting and funding a
significant piece of public art for the gateway into Ashland! As you must be aware this is an
exceptional achievement for a city of Ashland's size and represents the culmination of many
4
years of dedicated efforts by many people in the city government and community at large. As
one of the founding members of the Arts Commission I am particularly gratified to find that the
process has been pursued with such integrity and has been clearly open to all members of the
community the entire time. It was with great foresight that the community and city government
set aside the site for precisely this purpose and we see there is an exceptionally interesting and
appropriate sculptural piece now slated for installation there. I strongly urge you to continue to
support this project and in so doing to support the entire community and the long term vision of
Ashland as a true leader in the arts and society.
I'm aware that some voices have raised concerns about the appropriateness of the location and
specific piece selected. To be fair, this process has taken many years and it is not reasonable for
those voices to have remained silent and not contribute to the public arts mandate being pursued
by the Arts Commission until this very late date. The Arts Commission has been open to all and
has consistently and conscientiously invited public participation in the process. If those
individuals who now voice their concerns had done so earlier then their concerns would have
been addressed while allowing the process and progress on the placement of public art in public
spaces to proceed. As it is we hear calls to undo the progress that has been made. Some even
reach so far as to impugn the process as if their failure to participate until now is a sign of the
process was flawed or, even worse, to impugn the motives of the those (council members
included) who have labored so long and conscientiously to bring this extraordinarily beautiful
program to fruition. Please do not allow the naysayers and atavists who resist real progress in
public art to erode the support you have for this noble cause.
The art chosen is exceptional, linking together the past, present and future and will be a great
contribution to Ashland for generations to come. Please join me in giving your full support and
approval to it.
Respectfully submitted, Richard Benson
Corresponding E-Mail: Physicist403ggmail.com
I am writing to voice my support for the Gateway Island public art by Susan Zoccola. I did
attend the community meeting where the three finalists presented their proposals. It is my
understanding that this was a lengthy thoughtful process so I am surprised by the Historic
Commission's criticism. It sounds a bit of "sour grapes" on their part. It seems unnecessary to
attack the Public Art Commission process. 1 understand that everyone has their own view on art.
I do not understand the need to attack the process or why the need to polarize the two
committees. I thank the volunteers who work on both committees for the time they give our city.
As a community member I support the Public Art Commission and the art that was selected for
the Gateway.
Patt Fisher
5
410 Ashland Street
Ashland
Dear Council Members:
I wanted to take this time to contact you in support of the current direction for the Ashland
Gateway: "Gather" by Susan Zoccola. I have been aware that this sculpture selection is the
result of a several-year process of specifying the project, calling for entries, selecting finalists,
and all the while gaining input from the Ashland Citizenry, local area artists, and the Historic
Commission.
I was dismayed to learn that, once a final choice was announced, there would be such a negative
reaction from a vocal minority, but not surprised. I have been involved in various aspects of the
arts and government life for 35 years. I attended the presentation by three of the finalists at
Ashland Library earlier this month. I completely understand how challenging it is to make a
final selection, but I support the process and believe the choice to be a sound one. The apparent
conflict tells me that you are probably on the right track.
The contemporary piece does reflect our community. All one has to realize is that Ashland is on
a world stage now, witness the reactions on various fronts to the standing of the Oregon
Shakespeare Festival. We are much more than a collection of early 20`h century homes set amid
National Forest land.
I took a moment to examine Ms. Zoecola's form and learned there are interesting parallels to the
Torus geometric shape in nature, physics, while evoking Native American basketry. It is a
compelling, though admittedly fairly neutral, shape. It is also totally unexpected, and that is
another reason I like it so much. It says more than "Gather", to me it says, "have courage, live
with traditional and contemporary in harmony, enjoy the patterns and rhythm of the piece."
I ask in closing that you give this dialog and current controversy an "Open Mind" [to borrow
from another piece of public art in Ashland], and understand that, while it is important to let
people voice their concerns, that the process has led us here in a productive way. Supporting this
work is also a support of a long dialog.
Will you ever find a sculpture that everyone would approve of? Probably not. But you have an
excellent choice in "Gather".
Sincerely,
James S. Hutchinson. Ashland, Oregon.
A.B., Master in Fine and Performing Arts
P.S. I do wish it would spin, however!
Mayor Stromberg and Ashland City Council,
I am writing in response to George Kramer's Guest Opinion piece on the "Gateway Project" in
6
the Ashland Daily Tidings of September 19.
Any discussion of Mr. Kramer's input on public policy in Ashland must recognize and applaud
his multiple and valuable contributions to maintaining and enhancing the historic elements of our
city.
However, according to Kramer, the "Gateway Project" suffers from issues of conception,
execution and process. That is Kramer's opinion; the fact that the project emanated from a Public
Arts Commission appointed by the mayor to represent the values of the city at large does not
make the project ipso facto a failure.
By carefully parsing Kramer's logic, one is led to conclude that there is no roo►n for a work of
contemporary art in our "historic downtown core." I'm sure we all agree that "40 years of
diligent public and private effort to support and enhance its (Ashland's) historic character" has
been successful but I do not see why a contemporary piece cannot be incorporated into our
downtown, particularly in the island proposed where there is nothing of an historic character to
conflict with it.
Kramer takes issue with the Public Art Commission's charge to create a "landmark... iconic" to
Ashland, that it was "naive and presumptuous." On the contrary, in our cultu re, whether in
education, in science, in technology and/or in social endeavors, it is only by aiming high that we
achieve superior results.
Also, Kramer emphasizes the importance of context in the placement of public art suggesting
that "overpriced often vapid" contemporary art has no place downtown. Given the location of the
"Gateway Project" interposed between the modern fire station and the equally modern library
addition, one could as well argue that the context here argues for a modern, contemporary piece.
What all the dissonance regarding the "Gateway Project" comes down to is a matter of taste and
opinion. Some of us are fans of modern art (Yrn not one) and thrive on it, some are history buffs
(me) and want to learn from and preserve as much of it as possible, but we are all members of a
democratic community and should respect each other's views and tastes and accept the
consequences of that respect.
John W. Barton
Ashland
I am getting so tired of seeing all the complaining by this group. There are so many and diverse
opinions about the aesthetics of and public art or landscaping or even the bricks. The council has
a tough job and I want you to know that lots of us Ashland citizens frilly support your thoughtful
decisions, even when we're not very vocal.
John Love johnlove(a~mind.net
Richard, I want to thank you for being on the Ashland art committee and for giving us
information as to why the sculpture picked fit the cause better than others.
7
I happen to like the one picked very much. It will be so interesting from all different angles and
the fact that it can withstand some abuse is important. It will look pretty with snow on it and as a
silhouette against the sky. I think it's great. Christmas lights , flags, all sorts of ways to decorate
it for holidays.
Surely the committee knew there would be a lot of people who don't like it, no matter what it is,
there will always be those who dissent. ]'m always amazed when I see public art, knowing what
it took to get it actually agreed upon, constructed, and installed. I want the committee to know
that there is at least one person who thinks their selection is great.
As for the comments about the sculpture not fitting the history of Ashland, I feel pretty strongly
about not wanting Ashland to become a *'historic" community. If it does it will be another
Jacksonville which isn't a vibrant living community, at all, it's just for tourists. I have some
trouble with "historians", for instance at what point in time is a community, town, city, whatever,
supposed to stop changing with the times. Never in my estimation. Harumph.
Sarah Durand
Dear Mayor and City Council:
I wanted to send you all a message regarding the proposed Gather sculpture. I had not seen the
press coverage until my wife pointed out an article in the Mail Tribune from this Wednesday
commenting that criticism of the sculpture had put the project on hold.
I normally don't comment on community art altho ugh generally I favor things that make
communities stand out in positive ways. I missed the articles on this project as I was back East in
Pennsylvania. I was staying in Scranton, which I never thought of as being particularly
remarkable. But actually visiting the city I found many historic buildings, old coal works, and
some nice parks and statues. Upon reflection, this is pretty common in the East but our western
cities, in contrast, are unremarkable. In fact, they all look pretty much the same. What is unique
about the West is the setting, the scenery, not the towns themselves, which have little history or
little art. This is a shame.
How can people value their community if it looks almost exactly the same as every other nearby
city and town?
Diversity and uniqueness are important to our communities. We need places of interest for our
citizens; places where people pause to gaze at art, historic places, and green spaces.
So, I favor the Gather s sculpture and hope that the city moves forward. I applaud your interest in
making Ashland a more vibrant and interesting place to live. We need that in the West, where
8
common strip malls and endless subdivisions occupy our viewsheds.
Thank you for considering this note. Regards, Jack Williams
Jack and Cindy Williams
4393 Pioneer Road
Medford, OR 97501
Karen Hiller
Khiller e,nwlink.com
City Art
We like the piece of art that the Art Committee has selected. It will look good in the location by
the library. Sadly nothing is going to make everyone happy but we would like to see that piece
installed.
I am writing to voice my support for the Gateway Island public art by Susan Zoccola. I did
attend the community meeting where the three finalists presented their proposals. It is my
understanding that this was a lengthy thoughtful process so I am surprised by the Historic
Commission's criticism. It sounds a bit of "sour grapes" on their part. It seems unnecessary to
attack the Public Art Commission process. I understand that everyone has their own view on art.
I do not understand the need to attack the process or why the need to polarize the two
committees. I thank the volunteers who work on both committees for the time they give our city.
As a community member I support the Public Art Commission and the art that was selected for
the Gateway.
Patt Fisher
410 Ashland Street
Ashland
Dear City Councilors and Mayor -
As a long-term previous member of the Public Arts Commission, I wanted to take this
opportunity to offer my input on the recent selection of "Gather" as the public art piece for the
downtown Gateway site. I could not be more thrilled by this choice, nor more impressed by the
hard work of the PAC and the selection committee. When I served on the PAC (from 2004 -
2010), this project was part of our Master Plan for Public Art, and efforts were already being
made to put a significant sculpture there. I am thrilled to see this vision for the city finally
realized, and commend the PAC members for their dedication to this project.
9
But as often happens in many public processes, it seems that only the naysayers and critics are
offering their opinion about the selection of "Gather'". I have seen the same thing happen with
Medford's PAC, and so I guess I shouldn't be surprised to see it happen in our town. Everyone
in Ashland had the opportunity to be involved in the selection process and/or to offer their input
to the PAC along the way, so it seems a little disingenuous to come out with such forceful
criticism after the fact.
I think that after the current brouhaha ends, everyone will be very happy with the results and
"Gather" will be a wonderful addition to our city's growing collection of public art. This is for
the downtown Gateway so a prominent piece of public art that is thought-provoking, eye
catching, contemporary and sensitive to its context is an entirely appropriate choice. Like its
citizens, Ashland is vibrant, alive and full of energy and new ideas. Our downtown core is not
frozen in time, and our public art should not be either.
1 urge the city council to stand behind the members of the Public Arts Commission that you
appointed, and make sure that this project gets completed as planned.
Respectfully,
J. David Wilkerson, II AIA
LEED AP
Principal
OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture
Hello Ashland City Council,
It has been brought to my attention that a piece of sculpture has been chosen for the Gateway
project. This is great news.
I was on the PAC for 4 years, 2 of which I served as Chair. It was a wonderful experience and
acquiring funding for this large and impressive site was one of our priorities. I am so pleased to
see it come to fruition. I understand that there has been some negative feedback regarding the
contemporary design of the sculpture chosen. I personally feel this is the only way to go for this
size and location.
While Ashland's economy is driven by the Oregon Shakespeare Festival and that could be
considered a traditional venue Bill Rausch has been working very hard to bring contemporary
plays, themes and often controversial new plays to the city. Ashland needs to keep up with the
times in which we live. Ashland has a large retired population but there is also a fantastic
University of young people who live and work here. If you look around at art installations in
other cities you will find for the most part these installations are contemporary and modern and
moving into the future. I feel it would be a mistake to delay or prevent this installation and sends
10
the wrong message to the Public Art Commission. I know how hard they work and as you know
they work with the public to help make the decisions with any project they undertake.
If you have any further questions please contact me at the information show below.
Thank you and good luck
Melissa Markell
Erial Ali
erial.ali )zmail.com
Torus sculpture cong to town
Bravo for this choice of art that is in many worthy catatgories simultaneously, and to me the
future of visionary public art. Often the contemporary arts are based in temporary trends and trite
concepts. This choice on the other hand is both ancient, modern, and futuristic. Well crafted and
a boon to this community. It gives me hope and inspir ed confid once.
-Erial Ali Visionary Artist
Dear Mayor Stromberg and Members of the Ashland City Council -
I have great admiration for Mr. George Kramer. I respect and honor the years of contributions he
has made to Ashland. Yet I find the petulant tone of his letter to you (dated 17 - September-
2015) to be unwarranted, and most unbecoming of the gentleman I perceive him to be. His
personal attacks on the Public Art Commission and the Selection Committee are unwarranted
and most unprofessional. Mr. Kramer appears to believe he speaks for the entire city of Ashland
and that he, single-handedly, must protect us from ourselves. Mr. Kramer is certainly entitled to
his opinions. But that is what they are. His opinions.
I've also read comments on Facebook and other social media critical of "Gather." Frankly,
comments like "I don't like it" and "it's gross" are not justifiable, thoughtful critiques of art.
One of the great things about living in Ashland is the community interest in what happens here.
It is also notable that there is always a vocal minority on any issue impacting our city. That is as
it should be, but the emotional reactions of a vocal minority do not speak for the majority. Rather
than emotion, hysteria, or personal attacks, let's speak to the facts.
The PAC is charged with bringing art of our time to Ashland for generations to come. The PAC
is also charged with seeking a diversity of art. Contemporary art requires thoughtful
introspection in order to engage with it. It may mean one thing to me, and something else to
someone else. In fact, one may see something different in it every time they see it, or approach it
from a different angle. The very nature of Ashland is diversity in arts. We do not ask OSF to
11
only stage Shakespeare plays. OSF brings contemporary plays to Ashland and challenges people
to engage with them, to think, to honor the range of diversity in the arts. We are not a one-trick-
pony. I am also guilty of hastily forming an opinion of a piece of art prior to really trying to see it
for what it is: artistic expression.
There are some that believe the proposed public art piece, entitled "Gather," is out of scale with
the location. What they are reacting to is a flat picture printed in the paper of a 3D structure. The
piece is 22 feet tall, three feet taller than the bronzed -We Are Here" sculpture in the downtown.
"We Are Here" is, indeed, in scale with the buildings next to it. If one were to stand in the spot
where "Gather" is to be placed, and were to look across at the library on the hill on one side, and
the monumental fire station #I on the other, the notion that "Gather" is out of scale is unfounded.
As mentioned, "Gather" is not a flat piece but a three-dimensional structure that will take on
different looks from different angles and different light.
There is much handwringing that "Gather" is not in keeping with the historic nature of the
downtown. This argument simply does not hold water on many levels. To begin with, what is
being overlooked is that history begins now. I suppose many would be happy with a large plastic
bust of the Bard: "Welcome to Willy-Town" while Ashland becomes a caricature of itself. With
these criteria, the Angus Bowmer theater would never have been built, much less the
contemporary Thomas theater. "Gather" will be placed between a fire station that is a fairly
contemporary building, as is the addition to the library, and a good distance from the historic
Plaza area.
The pejorative term "plop art" is very much out of line. Many will recall the popular uprising
against the Vietnam Memorial in Washington DC. It was called "plop art" and was condemned
for not maintaining the historic quality of the surrounding monuments. Those critics were wrong.
For those of us who have visited the contemporary sculpture/memorial, it sucks the air from your
lungs and leaves you on your knees weeping. The term "Plop art" was also applied to "Cloud
Gate" (commonly referred to as "The Bean") in Chicago. It is a contemporary piece surrounded
by buildings of truly historic nature. But try to even suggest it be removed and you may well be
tarred and feathered. The same goes for the "Love" sculpture in Philadelphia. It's modernity
lives well within the historic contexts it finds itself in.
Historic sites and modernity live hand in hand around our country and, indeed, around the world.
I've had the luxury of travel and have seen historic sites and modernity complementing one-
another in city after city. 1 am currently in London and am fascinated by how modernity, in the
form of contemporary buildings, structures, and art, co-exist seamlessly with, and do not detract
from the truly historic buildings and sites. This pattern of mixed historic and contemporary art,
structures, and buildings works. This is the nature of art and the evolution of cities.
12
Another interesting and critical point of "Gather" that seems to be overlooked is it will be visible
from a few blocks away. That is an intentional effort to connect downtown with uptown.
Visitors, and locals alike, may see the top of "Gather- from an area where most tourists usually
turn around and head back toward the Plaza. "Gather" might catch their eye and bring a good
number of visitors uptown a few more blocks to investigate. This will result in their interaction
with stores and a section of town they may not have otherwise seen, not to mention the art itself.
There have also been critical comments of the piece placed at fire station 92: "Open Minded."
This contemporary piece of art is a fascinating and complex visual sculpture. From the
comments on social media it appears that many would have been happier with a literal piece: a
sculpture of a fire hydrant? A fire truck? This is kitsch art and is not what the PAC was asked to
bring to our city.
My heart goes out to the City Council and all members of the city Commissions. They can't win.
No matter what they decide, a small, vocal minority will attack their decisions and integrity. But
small-town politics is democracy in one of its purest and most transparent forms. You are elected
and asked to make decisions for what is in the best interest of the community. I know the council
has the wisdom to listen to all sides of the arguments. I hope they have the courage to act for our
future and the history we will leave for those who follow.
Arnold Bleicher
Dear Ashland City Council:
I am writing in support of the recent recommendation by the Ashland Public Arts Commission to
approve Susan Zoccola's "Gather" for the Gateway Project. I have lived In Ashland and taught
Art History at Southern Oregon University since 2000. 1 also served on the Ashland Public Arts
Commission from 2004 to 2009.
During my time on the PAC, I remember taking a professional approach to all projects and
making sure that all procedures were fair and resulted in a "positive" outcome for Ashland and
its citizens. I am proud to walk around Ashland and see visual art that is vibrant, unique, and
adds to the culture of Ashland in the 21st century.
Although I am not on the PAC anymore, I have been impressed with the updates in the City
Newsletter and Ashland Daily Tidings about the "Gateway Project". I also attended the artist
presentations on September 10" and was very impressed with the professionalism of the three
candidates as well as the PAC delegates running the meeting.
13
I truly believe that the PAC has been very thorough and thoughtful in this selection process.
They started with sixty applicants and thoughtfully narrowed the pool down to the most
appropriate entries for the "Gateway" space keeping mindful to Ashland's unique identity. In
the spirit of democratic process, I believe that there was a well rounded selection panel
consisting of: the director of the Ashland Public Library, a member of the Historic
Commission, a member of the Public Works Department, a former gallery owner, a sculptor, a
former PAC commissioner and the former director of the Schneider Museum of Art at SOU.
While this panel had the option to reject all of the proposals, they thoughtfully came to the
conclusion that Ms. Zoecola's piece deserved the prize. Please note that no one on the current
Public Arts Commission had any say on which art was selected. They are merely the conduits
for the selection process and therefore the selection remains transparent and genuine.
I wholeheartedly stand behind the approval of Susan Zoccola's "Gather" for the Gateway
Project. It will be a unique enhancement to our fair city. It will bring dialogue, enhance tourism,
and add to the current and future history of Ashland, Oregon.
Sincerely,
Jennifer Longshore
Citizen of Ashland OR
Sherry Nurre
peacefuloneinashIand2yahoo.com
Art $ spent
Dear City Council,
I personally feel this piece of art is beautiful and mesmerizing but if given a choice of providing
shelters and food for our homeless population. I would pick helping the more indegent
population.
To me this is ART--
https://www.youtube.coiii/watch?v=gQ I 1 f6urLVQ
Giving back to our community is art with hear t,
Sherry
Molly Kreuzman
molly a, coyotetrails.org
sculpture
This plaza design with sculpture looks stellar. I'm a yes!
14
Molly
Dear Margaret Garrington, and the City of Ashland Public Art Commission, Gateway Art
Selection Committee and Ann Seltzer,
While I know that the selection committee met on Friday, September 11, and that public opinion
concerning the selection was not sought, i did attend the Thursday night introduction and would
like to share my opinion about the three pieces under consideration for the Gateway Island.
Thank you for narrowing down the select to three wonderful pieces. I hope the process was
enjoyable and that the conversations were creative. 1 seat on the selection committee for the
sculpture on Lithia way and found the process artistically enlightening.
My personal preference for the Gateway Island would be: the large "interactive" structure, the
soft organic "doughnut" and finally the helix.
The reason Roger White Stoller's helix is last is that it has no staying power with me. I saw the
newspaper article and I already knew what it looked like and how I would interacts with it. Yes,
the imagery is "Ashland" but it is not unique. Yes, it is timeless, but so is a coloring book. The
audience will not have read Mr. Stoller's resume' so the fact that he is Buckminster Fuller's
prodigy is irrelevant.
I enjoyed the Susan Zoccola's organic sculpture, I think it will play beautifully against the
geometric lines of the library, fire station and roadway angles. I love the "peep hole" view one
may get from the library if the sculpture is set up to be viewed from that angle. I am, however,
fearfiil of the maintenance over the long haul. Our community is hard on structures, especially,
along the parade path. I am concerned with the retention of the coloration twenty years from
now.
Pete Beeman's interactive sculpture has the scale I think is necessary for that location. The slight
incline of the road way as it enters down town requires a tall piece. 1 think the movement will
have continued interest. While the support structure may not have huge pedestrian eye level
interest its simplistic lines will work beautifully with the strong horizontal quality of the library
and fire station and easily be enhanced by the landscape to emphasize the refractive qualities of
the glass in the basket element. If Mr. Beeman's maintenance schedule is correct the City will be
able to maintain well into the future.
Thank you for giving me the opportunity to meet, hear and explore the artists and their work.
Please accept my thoughts in the spirit of community involvement already set forth.
Best wishes,
Jay Leighton
206 Cambridge St.
Ashland, Or
541-482-9876
15
Dear Mayor and City Council
I support the Ashland PAC, the Selection Committee, and the vote by the Ashland Historic
Commission in favor of the Gather sculpture. Please do not allow a very vocal minority to sway
your supporting the placement of the sculpture.
Thank you,
Elizabeth Perle
491 Courtney Street
Ashland, Oregon 97520
With the knowledge of the City Council the Public Art Commission has worked for the past
three years on the selection process for the Gateway project. Please do not pull your support at
this crucial point. Support the Gather sculpture.
Patt Fisher
410 Ashland Street
Ashland
Dear Mayor and City Council -
I support the Ashland PAC, the Selection Committee, and the vote by the Ashland Historic
Commission in favor of the Gather sculpture. Please do not allow a very vocal minority to sway
your supporting the placement of the sculpture.
Thank you,
David Landry
1534 Butler Crk. Rd
Ashland, OR 97502
541-890-2662
Please stand up and approve "Gather". It is the result of a careful and well thought out selection
process for Public Art in Ashland. I think it will enhance our community enormously.
Jamie Hutchinson, MA.
Ashland, OR
Dear Mayor and City Council
16
I support the Ashland PAC, the Selection Committee, and the vote by the Ashland Historic
Commission in favor of the Gather sculpture. Please do not allow a very vocal minority to sway
your supporting the placement of the sculpture.
Thank you,
gary ghidinelli
990 e. nevada st.
Dear council- I urge you to approve the Gather sculpture placement. Please do not be misled by a
short sighted but highly vocal minority. Thank you for your commitment to our diverse
community. Francie Ghidinelli
Dear Mayor and City Council,
I support the Ashland PAC, the Selection Committee. and the vote by the Ashland Historic
Commission in favor of the Gather sculpture. Please do not allow a very vocal minority to sway
your supporting the placement of the sculpture.
Thank you,
Ann DiSalvo
621 A St.
Ashland
Dear Mayor Stromberg and Ashland City Council,
I support the PAC, Selection Committee and Historical Commission in favor of the Gather
sculpture. It would be a huge mistake to allow a loud minority to derail this important sculpture.
Thank you,
Leigh Hood
520 Terrace St.
Ashland, OR
Dear Council,
I love the sculpture, Gather. I think the process was well thought out and appropriately done.
Please accept the recommendation for the sculpture. I hate to think that just a few people who
don't like the sculpture will be able to change your minds. You will never get 100% of the people
to agree on a piece of art. This is a wonderful sculpture and is appropriate for the space.
Sincerely, Candy Wooding
17
Dear Mayor of Ashland and City Council:
I have not spent enough time studying all the particulars of the proposed art piece called
"Gather" to make an educated decision regarding its suitability to the Gateway plaza. However,
I trust that the Ashland Public Arts Commission is doing just that, on behalf of us all. Please vet
their work and their decision making process in a fair and just manner that supports their
willingness to serve on such an important commission. If we are going to second guess the work
of our many public commissioners, will anyone of quality be willing to serve in the fixture?
I look forward to seeing the art eventually chosen for this landmark spot in our town.
Sincerely,
.Joan E. Thorndike
369 Granite Street
Ashland, OR 97520-2716
I am in support of the sculpture. People had enough of a chance to express their opinions long
before the piece was chosen and should have taken the time to do so.
Harriet Greene
Posted Sep. 24, 2015 at 12:01 AM
Given the vocal opposition to the Public Arts Commission's choice of a work to be installed on
the Gateway Island, it makes sense for the commission to pause, meet with the City Council and
the public and clear the air before submitting the piece for approval. What doesn't make sense is
to scrap the project entirely or start over.
Public art is always a controversial matter, especially when public money is involved. No two
people will view a work of art in the same way, or agree on whether it represents the community
appropriately.
Our biggest problem with the objections raised so far is the idea that no work of modern art can
possibly be suitable because downtown is a historic district. History for history's sake, one might
say.
18
Opponents have attacked the process of selecting "Gather" - the Public Art Commission's
choice criticized the size of the piece and questioned its placement where it will be seen from
passing cars. A contemporary work of art, they argue, detracts from Ashland's historic character.
Yes, downtown Ashland is historic. It is also a functioning city center in the year 2015.
Historic preservation is valuable, but it is not enough. Times and art change. Today's
contemporary art will be tomorrow's historic art, just as today's historic works were
contemporary in their day.
Ashland needs to look forward, not back. Rejecting art created with Ashland in mind because it
is "modern" doesn't sound like the act of a progressive community.
Supporting 'Gather'
I am in support of the current direction for the Ashland Gateway: "Gather" by Susan Zoccola. This
sculpture selection is the result of a several-year process of specifying the project, calling for entries,
selecting finalists, and all the while gaining input from the Ashland citizenry, local area artists and the
Historic Commission.
The contemporary piece does reflect our community. All one has to realize is that Ashland is on a world
stage now; witness the reactions on various fronts to the standing of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. We
are much more than a collection of early 20th century homes set amid National Forest land.
The artist's design makes interesting parallels to the torus geometric shape in nature and physics, while
evoking Native American basketry. It is a compelling, though admittedly fairly neutral, shape. It is also
totally unexpected, and that is another reason I like it so much. Supporting this work is also a support of a
long dialogue.
Will you ever find a sculpture that everyone would approve of? Probably not. But you have an excellent
choice in "Gather."
P.S. I do wish it would spin, however!
Jamie Hutchinson
Ashland
A matter of taste
I am writing in response to George Kramer's guest opinion piece on the "Gateway Project" in the
Ashland Daily Tidings of Sept. 19.
Any discussion of Mr. Kramer's input on public policy in Ashland must recognize and applaud his
multiple and valuable contributions to maintaining and enhancing the historic elements of our city.
However, according to Kramer the "Gateway Project" suffers from issues of conception, execution and
process. That is Kramer's opinion; the fact that the project emanated from a Public Arts Commission
appointed by the mayor to represent the values of the city at large does not make the project ipso facto a
failure.
By carefully parsing Kramer's logic, one is led to conclude that there is no room for a work of
contemporary art in our "historic downtown core." I'm sure we all agree that "40 years of diligent public
and private effort to support and enhance its (Ashland's) historic character" has been successful but 1 do
19
not see why a contemporary piece cannot be incorporated into our downtown, particularly in the island
proposed where there is nothing of an historic character to conflict with it.
Kramer takes issue with the Public Art Commission's charge to create a "landmark iconic" to Ashland,
that it was "naive and presumptuous." On the contrary, in our Culture, whether in education, in science, in
technology and/or in social endeavors, it is only by aiming high that we achieve superior results.
Also, Kramer emphasizes the importance of context in the placement of public art suggesting that
"overpriced, often vapid" contemporary art has no place downtown. Given the location of the "Gateway
Project" interposed between the modern fire station and the equally modern library addition, one could as
well argue that the context here argues for a modern, contemporary piece.
What all the dissonance regarding the "Gateway Project" comes down to is a matter of taste and opinion.
Some of us are fans of modern art (1'm not one) and thrive on it, some are history buffs (me) and want to
learn from and preserve as much of it as possible, but we are all members of a democratic community and
should respect each other's views and tastes and accept the consequences of that respect.
John W. Barton
Ashland
20
Opposed to Gather
This is my second letter regarding the Public Art installation. As a resident of Ashland for over 4
decades and a graduate from SOU in Fine Art I would like you to know I am strong against the
Sculpture chosen. It speaks nothing about Ashland. I will be VERY dissapointed in the council if
this goes thru. Maureen Sever
If you search on social media, you will see that most people are opposed to the sculpture called
'Gather'. It says nothing of what Ashland is all about. There are many other better choices that
reflect the beauty and cohesiveness of this town. Most everyone prefers a local artist to be
chosen. It makes most sense to advocate for and support a local a rtist. By choosing 'Gather',
which looks like a rat cage, a hamster wheel, the council is choosing to go against the people of
Ashland. This sculpture has nothing to say. It looks like it belongs in Seattle or Singapore. It
looks like Ashland is trying to be something it's not, a modern, metropolitan city. Ashland is
warm and inviting and charming. This sculpture is the opposite of that. Why the city would
choose this while supported an outside artist contradicts the heart of this community. You will
disappoint and lose the respect of SO MANY community members by choosing 'Gather' as the
'gateway' into downtown. If you are going for a modern, cold, uninviting look of a circus wheel,
then I guess this is the sculpture for you, but know that it's for YOU and NOT for the people of
Ashland. As far as I am concerned, and thousands of people on social media agree, Gather is a
total mismatch of a choice. It is so wrong on so many levels. I do hope you will listen to the
people inste ad of the handful of others making this choice. Let the people speak and choose. Let
the artpiece chosen represent the real heart and warmth of Ashland. Gather says, "we are cold,
snobby, and we have no taste."
Just my opinion but that piece of art should not be put ANYWHERE in the city!! Mike Pierce
[mpierce@charter.net]
I am a proponent of public art. Yet, when I remember that our libraries were closed for many
months because of lack of funding, I shudder to think the City might spend a whooping $100,000
on an art installation in front of the library. I vote NO. Thank you, Jessica Sage
Greetings, please consider this suggestion: Please use local artists for this project, keep the funds
in ashland and help its economy. Choose a local artist to create a sculpture that speaks to the
people of the town. The one proposed is not artistically apealing and it doesn't express the feel of
the town. Thank you for your consideration and attention, Have a wonderful day! Kelly Harding.
Kelly Harding
1
To the city council,
There has to be quite a few other things that you could spend that $100,000 on besides new art.
This is a total waste of money. Not to mention that you aren't even going to contract a local
artist. I thought Ashland was in support of local economy, not sending the money to other places.
Maybe you should take th at money and apply it to something that would actually make a
difference, like I don't know maybe education? Justin Brumble
I guess this is a complaint!! 1 was raised in Ashland and am very proud of that lovely little town.
My parents had business' in town My Father also worked for the Daily Tidings for years I was a
singer in the Shakespearean Festival for years & went to SOCE after graduating from AHS in
'55. My parents lived there over 50 years. 1 am not happy with the art project that is being
considered at the Island!! What does it have to do with our City??? PLEASE RE-CONSIDER??
Lee Anne Robertson (Leach)
1 just got back into town and fired up the internet and tuned into the Ashland FB page and
viewed the proposed "Gather" installation. I find it very ugly and unattractive and not-inviting at
our downtown city gate. This would be awesome piece in the park, but here it is lifeless and
looks rusty and worn.
My pre ference, having lived here for nearly 20 years would be either a piece that honors the
native heritage, such as the now bronze totem pole at the north gate. or a bright kinetic sculpture
piece that has artistic elements reflecting our town. Iconic symbols of our entire lineage until
now..the native, the pioneer, the agriculture, the rivers and forests, the theater & arts and the
university. Redmond, OR has something vaguely similar along hwy 97 and Highland Ave. I
won't be able to attend in person tomorrow but I did want to voice my opinion about the
proposed piece and to say that we can do better. Let's not re-do a whole plaza fiasco again! No
hurry let's do it right the first time. Thanks for reading, appreciate your consideration of my
input! Heather Larsen
We are out of town and unable to attend the meeting tonight but I wanted to register a "nay" vote
on installing "Gather" on Gateway Island. I don't feel this particular piece represents our city
Laurie Carter
Note to those involved in choosing public art for Ashland: The chosen piece for the island looks
like the wire forms women used to wrap their hair around to make a neat "bun" at the back of
their heads! It may be abstractly symbolic of the "gathering" theme, but bears no relation to the
environment around it on the selected site. If you must use it, please consider placing it in a
more open space, where it won't clash with everything around it, and will be shown to better
advantage. Charlotte Abernathy, Artist, 30 year resident of Ashland
2
Reasons for My Objections to this Artwork/Site Dr. Arnold Lipkind
Selection Guidelines for Works of Public Art
2. Site. The artwork should enhance the existing character of the site?
but the site has no character. It?s a leftover strip where several streets converge.
--as well as the by taking into account social dynamics of the location.
but the site has no social dynamics. Why would it? It?s a nothing site.
3. History and Context. The artwork should consider the historical, geographical, and cultural
features of the site?
but the only history the site has is that it is a strip left over when arranging those converging
streets.
And the strip has nothing to do with geography. A street strip does not sing out the words
?Oregon I love you? or ?Southern Oregon, my home sweet home!?
And what?s cultural about the strip?
--as well as the relationship to existing architecture?
What architecture? Over there is a fire station, across is the Library, in the corner is a gas station
with access from two of the converging streets?
8. Public Liability. (Safety hazards, liability to city.)
Hard enough to see through that mish-mosh of converging streets and structures when you are
driving?especially early in the morning in fog, rain, darkness. Now this str ucture wo uld make it
even more difficult. And if it?s so wonderful, mightnA a driver pause for a moment to look at it,
leading to a driving mishap?
Guidelines for Site Selection.
4. Pedestrian Accessibility.
It?s hard enough to access those strips just when crossing various roads. Ridiculous to think
people in any number would go out of their way to go to that strip.
Except for our Homeless, and so-called Travelers, who might hang there?perhaps putting some
newspapers up against the structure to ward off the wind, perhaps to climb it, perhaps to use it as
a meeting spot.
5. Circulation. (Obstructing pedestrian or vehicle traffic.)
See # 8 & 4 above.
Dr. Arnold Lipkind
I am writing to respectfully ask that the Gather sculpture NOT be awarded and installed in
Ashland. The scale of the project is inappropriate for this space (i.e. it is just simply too large)
and does not work as a welcoming piece as one enters the downtown area. In addition, I would
like to see a piece that reflects some kind of theme for Ashla nd. And lastly, I would LOVE to
see a piece of art/sculpture that moves; movement reflects the changing nature of life, of our
community, etc. Movement is fun to watch! Gretchen Vos
3
Please say NO to "The Gathering" scuplture
As a twenty-two year resident of Ashland, I support our city's efforts to create and install more
public art however, the piece, entitled "The Gathering" appears to have virtually no public
support with most residents speaking out against installing this particular piece of art. This so
many residents speaking ou t against this piece, the council must vote "No" and direct the Public
Art Commission to start over and look for a work of art with more public support. It would be
better to leave the area as is than push to install this piece. This particular piece might have more
appeal if installed in a more industrial, modern city--but simply doesn't fit with Ashland or the
neighborhood. I would rather have the City of Ashland install a solar panel there--at least the
meaning would be obvious.
I believe Ashlanders would support a piece that was more "natural" --check out this artists' work.
Perhaps Ashland could commission a work along these lines from a local artist.
http://www.boredpanda.com/discarded-wood-sculptures-ia e-hyo-lee/
I've never written an email to the city council before, and may not be well versed enough to
express myself effectively, yet I am compelled to respond to plans to install the "Gather" art
piece between the library and the fire station.
Please don't! My entire being cringes at the thought of seeing such a contemporary piece in th at
locati on. It lacks resonance with the surroundings of that part of town. I am asking, would you
be willing to seriously reconsider this placement?
I consider myself truly blessed to be a resident of The City Beautiful since August, 2011. 1 live in
a 550 square foot home, on a very limited income. I moved here because of the breathtaking
natural beauty of this small town. The warmth and softness of the land embraces everyone living
here or passing through. It is dangerously easy to lose site of this, particularly when we become
surrounded by distractions. When I walk each day, my eyes go to the mountains, to the trees--the
incredible trees--to the sky, to the clouds, to the rolling hills, to the flowers. Please help us all to
nourish our relationship with the blessed land around us rather than forcing into our view an art-
piece that will serve only to distract us from the natural beauty that nourishes us all at levels
often overlook.
Perhaps the c ouncil wo uld like to read the book Wabi Sabi: For Artists, Designers, Poets, and
Philosophers by Leonard Koren. It may serve the council in finding a more suitable piece, should
there still be a "need" to install an art piece at that location. I vote to simply allow our eyes to
soak up the stunning natural art already in place all around us.
Thank you for taking the time to read my input. I am grateful to you and hold you and your
4
efforts in deepest respect.
Signed,
Jane Ellen--An art student inspired most deeply by Ashland's natural beauty.
Jeanne Chouard
This purchase is a mistake. It doesn't fit the space in front of the library well and it doesn't meet
the masterful, high quality creative integrity that has come to be expected of Ashland. I will
always encourage spending on town art but this piece isn't worthy of permane nt public display
here. It reminds me of the Torus, a concept described in the movie Thrive, which is a fine
moving symbol, it just doesn't make for a fine bronze sculpture. Can we please explore other
options.
Thank you.
Lori Lowell
It makes me very sad to think, according to the Dec 2nd letter to the Tidings by George Kramer,
that the sculpture, "Gather" is about to be approved for installation at the entrance of our town.
Let me say that I have no excuse for not being more involved with the project as it unfolded or
voi cing my o pinion earlier. I also appreciate all of the hard work and thought and "process" that
has already occurred. I have nothing against any of the artists or council members.
That said; I do wish to say that my family and I have been residents of Ashland since 1971. 1
have seen many changes take place that have mostly beautified our already NATURALLY
beautiful town. If it adds any weight to my opinion, I have a degree in art and have been a
professional photographer for many years. Other than my personal negative reaction to
"Gather"(and the other possible pieces previously considered) it is this: 1.) The piece is
overbearingly large, 2.) There is no historical or emotional connection to the area or the people
of Ashland. 3.) It represents nothing to us who live here, no matter what "meaning" the artist
wishes to attach to it!
Please, please reconsider this decision. Hopefully it is not too late? Would it hard to oppose and
vote against "expert (artistic) opinion
< br/>I shutter to think of passing by this giant piece of metal every day!
Sincerely,
Kathy Hollis Cooper
5
I grew up in Ashland, attended Ashland schools and the University there. My parents used to
own Helman Baths in the 50's and the Carey Apartments on Siskiyou Blvd. near the Fire
Department. I have seen a picture of the sculpture that is proposed for the entrance to Ashland
and even though I live in Florida now Ashland is still my "home" and I greatly object to
something so horrendous being put there. Please re-consider. There are many of us in the Class
of 1955 who are very outraged about "Gather". Thank you for your time.
Dear City Council,
Please do not approve of the very ugly art installation being called "Gather." The name itself is
nice, but the structure is unsightly, overly expensive, and an affront to the local art community. I
do not approve of the way it looks, the cost, or the process that is being used to decide upon its
install ation. It will be a very poor choice to approve a huge public installation that is so
pervasively unwanted by your own city.
Please do not approve of this.
Sincerely,
Elizabeth Churchill
Please vote no on the proposed art installation. The metal sculpture does not reflect Ashland's
beautiful surroundings. The sculpture in front of the fire station on 66 is also distracting. It would
be better to leave the "Gateway" space empty than place the art piece there. Patricia Turner
This proposed monument is out of place ! Ashland needs something more relevant to its history
I am a grad. of Ashland High, class 1955. 1 really hope you find a better representation ! A
statue of "Old Reelfoot" would be more fitting. He is a stuffed Grizzly bear that was shot many
times and lived. Last 1 heard he was in museum in Jacksonville. Doing a good job otherwise !
Sincerely, Raymond Bailey
People of Ashland: I moved to Ashland in 47 and moved to Talent in 87. I just heard about you
all going to put up a crazy art work by the island in front of the Library.. All I can said, "ARE
YOU NUTS??"
This would be one great reason to stay out of the town of Ashland. I can't believe you would
think of such a thing. God help us all!! Rowdy/Verl e Yates.. .
City Counsel
PLEASE do not spend money on this ugly monstrosity proposed for the front of our library. We
6
like Ashland just like it is and this "Art Work" will not enhance our city image one bit.
Respectfully, Robert Brewer
I am in favor of public Art sculptures in Ashland created by Ashland area artists, of which we are
blessed to have a plethora of. In addition, I feel this supports our local economy, builds
community relations and enhances us as a whole. Especially, if the artwork exudes stories or
traits of our unique and desired culture, which creates more point s of inte rests for us and our
tourism industry.
Though I received information through word of mouth about "conflict of interests" regarding the
process around the "Gather" sculpture and have no direct proof, I plead my interest in truth and
integrity being a high priority.
Please decide in favor of a robustly healthy approach to this item on your agenda, reconsider
your decision and choose local artwork.
Thank you,
Susan Grace
I feel that the Proposed "Gather" sculpture does not communicate well or represent the real
nature of Ashland.
Furthermore, since Ashland is surprisingly deficient in public art as a whole, the proposed
$100,000 would be better spent on a number of smaller sculptures spread throughout the down
town and perhaps on improvements to the Plaza which is our fo cal point as a community.
Also,ln a community as rich in artists as ours is, utilizing a local artist would seem to be very
important for any public art.
The new gate for the Japanese Garden would seem to represent the ideal form for public art in a
community such as ours: relatively inexpensive and displaying values such as local artistry, use
of natural and historic materials and cultural inclusivity.
It has a simple visual grace that complements the feeling and architecture of our town.
Thanks, Will Sears
Mimi Pippel
lepipswifeacharter.net
The Gather art project
This piece of artwork looks like a lawsuit waiting to happen, have you even considered this? Has
the city had their attorney or even their insurance carrier examine it? Am I correct in assuming
that this money must be spent on an art project? If so can it possible be redirected to the Plaza
project? That seems to be a concern to a la get popul ation in this community than adding a piece
7
of art.
Just my opinion.
I'd just like to say "No" to gather. It is boring and lacks imagination. It is also not local. I would
support wholeheartedly a reboot-let's reopen the statue quest but limit it to local Rogue valley
artists. Some one who actually lives in our beautiful valley and who has talent and vision. The
Gather piece doesn't meet those criterion.
thanks, Doug Shipley
Barbara Schack
band fam ,jeffnet.org
No to "Gathering" Art
Dear Council,
There are few, if any, compelling aesthetics connected with the proposed ?Gathering?
sculpture?it appears industrial, sterile, monochromatic, and pedantic. I don?t believe it represents
any of the qualities we submitted for inspiration.
Sincerely,
Barbara Schack
516 Herbert Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Dear Council,
There are few, if any, compelling aesthetics connected with the proposed "Gathering"
sculpture-it appears industrial, sterile, monochromatic, and pedantic. I don't believe it
represents any of the qualities we submitted for inspiration.
Sincerely,
Barbara Schack
516 Herbert Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Judy Blue
Judy ey blue a,gmail.com
Ashland Sculpture Proposal
How exactly does that represent Ashland? Not my Ashland.
Dear Mayor and City Council,
8
I am writing to say the proposed sculpture does not reflect our community and should not be
installed.
Sincerely,
Cathy Egelston
171 W. Nevada St.
Ashland, OR 97520
wil thomson
tflpn2gwhotmail.com
city art ?
Dear Council,
Regarding the proposed $100,000 statue for the library, if you want Ashland to be known as
"junker city" instead of "tree city" go ahead, but here's an idea, take the $100,000 and pay down
some of the sewer bond debt.
Sincerely, Wil Thomson
Mary Hill
hillsAoeffnet.org
sculpture
That is an unattractive and uninteresting sculpture. Sorry that you chose it. I would prefer to see
a giant sequoia there, can the money be used for beautification and preservation? Earth art?
Thanks for your hard work
I'm giving my personal opinion regarding the Gateway Island sculpture proposed by Pete
Beeman, which will be the topic of a study session for the council and mayor on Nov. 30t". I've
attached his proposal for ease of reference.
I've lived in Ashland for 16 years. I feel that the sculpture does not connect to (1) our
community, (2) our environment, nor (3) our culture. First, Our community and its economy are
not industrial. Second, our environment is better represented by trees, streams, wildlife, and
Klamath and Siskiyou hills than by a mechanical,"epic" fantasy of a top-heavy flower. Third,
our culture is intensely interpersonal, promoting humanism, the arts, and care for one another,
whereas a crank - the sculpture's nod to what people can do for one another is merely
formulaic and mechanical.
I want a sculpture that reminds Ashland of what makes it a treasured vacation destination, a
beloved home, and an inspiration for human development. Mr. Beeman's design doesn't
provide that for me.
9
Best -
John Scarborough
131 North Main St.
Ashland'. OR 97520
Pamela ourshalimian
Artofpamelaggmail.com
Art for plaza restoration project
Dear city council:
I love art installations figured in town and appreciate that the city features such works.
Unfortunately, I've seen photos of the new proposed sculpture and encourage the city & arts
council to vote against. (Rumor has it 2 absentee members voted against via email and there vote
was not counted-I hop e this is n't true).
The idea of art that relates to us as a community and reflects the natural environment (a hard task
that is challenging to sometimes define) is important. I'm not sure how the proposed sculpture
represents our community.
These pieces of art will reflect generations and must withstand A timeless quality.
I'd like future generations to be proud of the choices their forefathers made.
I appreciate your consideration and vote against this sculpture.
Pamela ourshalimian
Margaret E McKinsey
margiemckinseyggmail.com
proposed art project
I am opposed to all three designs that were selected to be installed across from the Fire Station
because they are too modern, too large and too distracting. I like the tree that gets decorated
every year. I feel that something more in turn with nature ...deer, fish, nature themed would go
well. The 'face' sculpture across down has alwa ys puzzle d me...thought it was a logo for a
business.
Gary Shaff
grlshfajeffnet.M
Proposed Sculpture
This is looking like another Plaza train wreck. Please reject the "Gather" sculpture, regroup and
make a fresh start. A $100,000 investment should garner widespread citizen support. The current
proposal falls far short of that standard.
10
Dear Council - PLEASE reconsider the sculpture design for this gateway to our lovely, artistic
town! It would be a grand statement to use a local artist or group of artist, and to install
something lovely and recognizable rather than industrial-appearing.
Ours is not a city of industry as it was when I was growing up here; ours is a community of
artists. Isn't that the best message to send?
WE BLEW IT ON THE PLAZA; LET'S NOT FORGET THAT COLASSAL MISTAKE.
LET'S NOT REPEAT IT.
Respectfully,
Priscilla Saul
To the Ashland City Council,
There has been a lot of controversy regarding the design of the proposed sculpture for Gateway
Island. I would like to bring to your attention a very important detail about the proposed design
that has been overlooked. Based on my background in engineering, I can tell you that the
structure depicted in the composite image of the proposed sculpture could never be built. A steel
structure, as depicted in the image, would not have enough strength to hold up its own weight, let
alone the inevitable additional weight of 10 people climbing on it. If this project proceeds as
proposed, it is quite certain that the resulting structure, once fitted with the bracing and support
that will be necessary to stand under its own weight, and the weight of people climbing on it, will
look nothing like what is depicted in the image.
If there is controversy about the design before it is built, there will be outrage after it is built and
either collapses, or looks significantly different, and uglier, than what has been proposed.
I have talked to members of the selection committee about the question of whether engineering
has been done on the proposed structure, and my understanding is that the artist has only
contacted an engineering firm who has agreed that they would be able to provide engineering
services on this project, but that the engineering has not in fact been done. Before moving any
further with this project, I urge you to invest in a structural analysis of the proposed design. It
will most likely render the entire discussion moot.
Dan Fellman
Ashland
Marya Jansen-Gruber
marya a look in glassreview.com
Gather sculpture
I find it extraordinary that the city feels it can put up a sculpture that so many people are apposed
to. I believe the selection process for the sculpture was flawed, and the chosen sculpture neither
11
represents this town nor its people. Why should we have a contemporary piece of art in a town
that has a more 'historic' ambiance? The sc ulpture w ill look out of place and I can guarantee
that many of Ashland's residents will grow to hate it. I urge you to rethink this project and to
give the people of Ashland the opportunity to chose their own community artwork.
Amy Haptonstall
haptonstall.amy(i gmail.com
sculpture
Does the public voice carry anymore? All I have heard is opposition on the sculpture and the
commission still gets away with pushing their own agenda. There are many other ways to spend
OUR money. Due to the high volume of public opposition many as myself were fooled that we
would be heard and the whole idea was out the door. Just wait, here comes mo re nation al news
on a silly Ashland story, this time the debate over display of a giant bingo basket.
Melissa Abbott
abbottmelissa03Agmail.com
Gather Sculpture
Please do not put that sculpture across from the fire station. It looks like a hamster wheel and
does not go with the beauty of down town. And it's not even a local artist. This is disturbing.
Quit ruining Ashland please.
Thanks.
1-11-2015
council@ashland.or.us
I just read the piece in Sneak Preview on the proposed "gateway" artwork to be installed on the
entry to downtown Ashland. I have a great deal of respect for the process that was used to call
for art submissions, but it seems evident that the public did not get enough opportunity to voice
their opinions on the topic.
My initial reaction to the proposed art installation is a gasp. We have a traditional, yet forward
thinking art centered town with a strong sense of community. I don't think a steel mesh torus
elicits the feel we or others have for our community. The abstract torus strikes me as industrial,
sterile and without any of the organic leanings that make up our town.
Please consider going back to the drawing board to find an art piece more immediately heart
warming and organic, that doesn't require an explination by the artist to figure out what it
represents. One look should suffice to make the connection between the Ashland we love and
the art that represents it. One look.
12
Stephen Bosbach
Ashland, OR
gary shaff
band fam jeffnet.org
Gateway art
The City should reject the proposed sculpture. It is incongruous w/ the setting, would conflict w/
the surrounding historic character of the downtown and the Carnegie Library, and would quickly
become an eyesore. Please don't plaza-ize this part of town. Plant a tree and be done with it, or
relocate Iron Mike to this location.
Alice Mallory
amalloryc,dslextreme.com
The Gathering: Full text of remarks delivered at Council Meeting 10/6/2015
I am not a member of any Commission or public lobbying group. I speak as an individual,
although I do represent the thoughts of many with whom I have had conversations over the last
many weeks since the selection of The Gathering for installation at the south(east) gateway.
i woul d like to ask the council to please reconsider the placement of the Gathering installation.
In my view this large contemporary piece might be best situated on East Main, on the grounds of
our city govermnent offices. Here, this work of art would complement the contemporary
architectural style of the city offices, and could become a symbolic invitation, welcoming people
to the civic center the gathering place of our local government. This location would provide a
home for the Gathering in harmony with its theme and size while expanding Ashland's
reputation as an art community beyond the downtown periphery.
Also in my view, the historic core ought to be preserved as an area apart from the contemporary,
urban areas of town (which areas, if extended further into downtown would contribute to making
Ashland look like ANYTOWN USA). I can envision the gateway as a place of departure from
"Anytown", announcing an entrance to the historic core. Accordingly a work of Art at the entr
ance migh t reflect the many things that bring people here from theater, to natural beauty to
big-town amenities-in-a small-town atmosphere, to recreation opportunities and home-grown
local agriculture. At the other end of the historic core is the entrance to Lithia Park and the steps
leading up to the Oregon Shakespeare Festival. Here is the Plaza the other gateway to the
unique character of our town. It is this character that brings people here to visit, and has them
return again and again because they can't get enough of what this unique place offers. It is this
character that I brought a wave of new residents here during the building boom of the 1990's and
13
early 2000's. And it is this distinctive, idiosyncratic, peerless small-town/bigcity atmosphere that
deserves preserving.
I would also like to mention that I am one of many who would like to have seen, for this
partcular project, a vigorous recruitment of (and selection from) the multitudes of local artists
who live, wor k and create in the Rogue Valley and Southern Oregon. Imagine having the work
of a local artist welcoming all who come to this town.
And finally, I would ask the Council to please consider delaying the decision for final placement
of the Gathering, and inviting further input from the Historic Commission. I am aware that the
process was set in motion several years ago. However, given the division of opinion regarding
the recent reccommendation, and the $!00,000 price tag for the project, it is apparent that more
time is needed for input and consideration by individuals and the commissions that represent
them.
Thank you for considering these points of view. Alice Mallory
Sylvia Medeiros
lands Jeffnet.org
Public Art piece
I respectfully want to express my concern about spending $100,000 on a piece of artwork that
was not approved of by us, your taxpayers, plus was not even created by a local artist. Isn't that
what Ashland is all about ...art? So please please ...if the money must be spent on art (instead of
pumping up the poor SOU), go local.
thanks.
Claudia Michelli
michellicl Ayahoo.com
Public Art
Please consider when you are voting tomorrow that the proposed sculpture for the Gateway is
completely out of character with the feel of our town. I also ask that you take in the
recommendations of the Historical Committee in making your decisions.
Thank You,
Claudia Michelli
14
Barbara Hinds
keseydog_gopendoor.com
Gather
I think the Gather sculpture should have had input from the Ashland Historical folks. Besides
that, it seems very unnecessary and expensive. I am more in favor of spending our tax dollars on
the local community and not just having to come up with something to spend it on like this. If
everyone really liked it - then fine, but a lot of people don't like it. Af ter all, it comes from our
tax dollars. I have an art background (degree from an urban college) and i do appreciate the time
the art commission spent on this project but 1 don't agree with the idea that Ashland has to have
something "that we don't understand". Even in Seattle and San Francisco there are plenty of art
projects that reflect the environment and history. This is just another thing that reminds me of
when people have to buy something just because it is in the budget!
Holly Freeman
Dolcespirito1976 a,hotmail.com
New proposed art sculpture
This proposed modern art sculpture is not fitting with the charm of our town. The arts
commission is proposing their own views, not the views of the majority of the people in Ashland.
We need more trees and greenery, not hard metal, cold modern art. Certainly the money can be
more wisely spent than making our plaza cold. Use the mon ey to put in some nice, charming old
brick style pavers that blend with the theatre 's pavers and some big potted trees.
David Sherr
davidsherrnaol.com
Proposed "Gather" sculpture
Re: Tidings IN OUR VIEW: History for history's sake
The issue is not whether any contemporary work of art will suit our Downtown Historic District,
the issue is whether "THIS particular contemporary art is suitable for our Downtown Historic
District. If "contemporary" downtown public art installations are to succeed, they must also emb
ody the s pirit and feeling of our Historic Downtown District. For example, the Calle Walkway
has many contemporary touches, yet it succeeds in beautifully referencing the Historic District.
For too many here, this proposed work does not. Had the Public Arts Commission only deigned
to engage the community and the Historic Commission in a collaborative process with the
collective historic "memory" of our town as a reference in the first place, instead of marching to
15
its own tune, we would likely not be in this community-wide controversy today. The same
mistake was made in the process of our Plaza's design, with the ensuing controversy. Embracing
the future does not mean we must abandon the past. Fault lines in the process of public art and
public works creation have caused these tsunamis.
Paul Steinle
Pau 1. stein leA,,gmail.com
Main Street/library plaza
Why not bring back the OSF menu Board of current productions. It was there for years. It was
functional, it emphasized one of the town's greatest assets, it has historical significance and it
was unobtrusive. Keep it simple.
John Williams
AshlandJohnoa~gmail.com
Gateway Island Sculpture
Hello Mayor and Council,
Most of you know me for my city commission/committee work, but in my non-government work
I'm very involved in the art world. I formerly owned a design firm for 15 years which won
multiple international design awards, have been on the Board of the region's largest and oldest
community arts foundation for 5 ye ars, and still co-own 3 online design software companies,
including MustHaveMenus in Ashland.
I'm writing about my huge disappointment with our Ashland Public Arts Commission over the
past couple years in general, but more specifically their recent recommendation for a $100,000
sculpture for the "Gateway Island" at the intersection of Siskiyou and East Main.
Art is subjective, of course, but only in one dimension. A wide variety of empirical factors
should go into public art. All 3 of the commission's finalists submitted gorgeous sculpture
designs... which would look beautiful in the right context. However, I believe none of them
belong on the streets of Ashland. I believe the commission's values and vision do not reflect the
values and visions of Ashland.
The Project for Public Spaces, a non-profit organization which has helped design over 3,000
public art spaces in the US, suggests 5 criteria for public art in addition to the obvious issue of
structural fea sibility:
16
--Relevance of the piece to the building or city, its values, culture, and people;
--Suitability of the work for outdoor display, including its maintenance and conservation
requirements;
--Relationship of the work to the site and the host community, especially how it serves to
activate or enhance public space;
--Appropriateness of the scale of the artwork;
--How closely the proposed artwork meets the goals set out in the RFP and envisioned by the
community.
Dealing strictly with facts, I think one could easily argue that the final piece recommended by
the Commision, "Gather":
--Does not reflect anything in Ashland's history or culture
--Does not reflect Ashland's natural landscape: trees, rivers, mountains, wildlife
--Does not reflect Ashland's rich architectural heritage
--Does not incorporate Ashland's key community and visitor values: theater, outdoor recreation,
small town living, technology innovation, tourism, and sustainab le living
--Was not created by a local artist
On a strictly artistic level, the piece is more appropriate for an urban, industrialized, cement city
square, or the lobby of a large bank. This sculpture looks completely out of place for Ashland. If
you look around at comparable cities in the U.S., you will find that the well-loved, award-
winning public art installations are those which reflect the values of the town. Many award-
winning public art pieces are very modern, like the Boulder, CO Library, and abstract, such as
"The Wave" which graces Canon Beach's downtown. But they reflect their communities. I would
be happy to send photos to illustrate this point. Ashland has its own examples of excellent,
beloved public art too, with Russell Beebe's "We Are Here" bronze totem sculpture, the gorgeous
river rock wall along the bottom of Lithia Park, and the recently created Pacific Fisher sculpture.
1 have not been involved at all in Ashland's public art: proces s, and ha ve no idea how "Gather"
was chosen or discussed, but 1 would caution the Council against stereotypical artistic
suggestions that Ashland's public art needs to be "modernized" and that people need to be
"challenged" or "shaken up" by public art. These are often euphemisms from people who do not
understand public art, and who have a particular personal agenda or artistic sentiment they, wish
to impose on their community. Public art should be a reflection, enhancement, or hyper
visualization of the Commission's community, values and its visitors, not a controversial, obtuse
"statement".
1 urge you to reject the Public Arts Commission's suggestions for the "Gateway Island" and send
17
them back to the drawing board after significant public engagement. Moreover, the public should
be largely aware of the process before it begins, not after it's completed.
Thanks for everything you do!
Respectfully,
John Williams
Laura Rose
laura.mcveeLa gmail.com
Gather
Riding my bike by the fire station multiple times daily, and having lived in Ashland since a
teenager, I am truly taken back by the design chosen as a centerpiece for the Gateway Island. It
does not look like something that belongs in Ashland, is FAR too expensive and USELESS!
Why don't we put up an intricate sculpture of deer, or something that represents or de Picts Ash
land or the surrounding area? better yet, a functional art piece made by REUSING or
RECYCLING items that would otherwise be thrown away? An item that would demonstrate
creativity as well as sustainability and PROGRESS?
Looking forward to your reply,
Laura
Liz Schmidt
liz cn.r oranicandhealthy com
Metal Sculpture for Gateway Island
Why in the world would a small city such as Ashland spend $100,000 taxpayer dollars on A
GIANT SLINKY? The city's artwork should be congruent with our values and historical context.
It should be reasonably priced, attractive, and created by a local artist. The sculpture chosen by
the Public Arts Commission is none of these. Pleas e do not approve this project.
I am so glad the commission backed off of it's gateway island recommendation. Gather is
entirely too large for the space and is lacking in meaning or context. The piece that is placed
there should have a thematic connection to the the town of Ashland. There is plenty of
inspiration in Ashland and the Roque Valley. Gather draws from nothing and, for me, would be
an eyesore. I am suspicious that one strong personality on the arts commission rammed Gather
through with their ears plugged against disagreement.
How about a piece that draws on railroad district or pear industry history or the American Indian
communities in the area. (By the way, I am stilled miffed that the county chose to rename Dead
18
Indian Rd., Dead Indian Memorial Rd. What idiots. It should go back to what it was known as
before dead indians became an issue; Indian Market Rd. )
End of rant. But please include the populous in any further decisions about this important piece.
Publish entries in the Tidings and let the readers respond.
Oak Hill Berl & Breakfast
Tom
Holly Freeman
DolcespiritoI976(ci).hotmail.com
New proposed art sculpture
This proposed modern art sculpture is not fitting with the charm of our town. The arts
commission is proposing their own views, not the views of the majority of the people in Ashland.
We need more trees and greenery, not hard metal, cold modern art. Certainly the money can be
more wisely spent than making our plaza cold. Use the mon ey to put in some nice, charming old
brick style pavers that blend with the theatre 's pavers and some big potted trees.
September 22, 2015
Dear Public Art Commission:
Just finished reading the article in the Daily Tidings regarding your Committee's work on the
large art piece you had commissioned for $100,000. 1 am really sorry for your Committee.
You've been saving this TOT money for years for this purchase. I can imagine the artistic fever
to find the right artist and the right process....
But you know what..... This showy display has left your town folks very uncomfortable, more
like unnerved.
1) $100, 000 commissioned for this art? Ughhhh
2) $100,000 commissioned to someone in Seattle? Really?? No artist in the Rogue Valley
could meet your standard and enjoy this benefit?
3) Such a waste of generous resource. There are so many possibilities for this money that
could actually impact and help families in our wonderful community! AND YES! Spend
it within the City's "tourist industry" guidelines!
4) Why would you, as representatives of our town, have us believe this is the right way to
spend $100,000 when we already own broken art we want fixed.
What of the historical or current art that is in need of repair?..... The Fountains, the Plaza, Lithia
Park, Lincoln, Iron Mike, and a handful more. Should I go on?
19
I am sorry, but this project is really wrong and needlessly expensive. I do not support it, and I
find it very unfortunate that this Committee didn't take the money and apply to our current
broken art.....
You guys would have ROCKED!! You could have been Our Town heroes! Everyone would
have cheered you on! But instead, we have this.
Sincerely and with friendly intent,
Marcia Frey
Rare Earth
ronald smith
servsafeguy@yahoo.com
poor choice in art
I'm sure I have nothing different to say than most who number one thing that that piece of art is
crap and w you need to get a vote out on stuff like this. Anyone remember when we tried to
make the plaza Italian. Just as ridiculous and just as unscrupulously done
Jeff LaLande
imaxlalande @gmail.com
Public Arts Commission selection and its selection process for the "Gateway Project"
Dear Mayor Stromberg and Members of the Ashland City Council:
I just read George Kramer's September 19 opinion piece in the Tidings concerning the process
(or lack thereof?) that the Public Arts Commission used to arrive at the selection of the Gateway
Project's piece o f art, ti tled "Gather."
In hopes of making my letter briefer than it otherwise would be, I want to state that Mr. Kramer's
letter is right on target, and that 1 fully agree with each of his very cogently written points.
In addition, my very sincere hope is that the re-visiting of this decision is not simply the PAC's
way of letting "the controversy die down and go away," and then returning later to reinstate the
original decision. That is because the Commission's approach to this Gateway project has been
unfortunate and ill-considered in various ways. These include the PAC holding an open house
for those of the public who'd heard about it and then making its decision the following morning,
as well as specifically cutting other public entities - the City's Historic Commission - out of any
20
role in the selection/decision process, even if that role was simply advisory. This approach would
indicate a somewhat (and, one would hope, unintentionally) elitist, "we know best" phi losophy.
Such approaches can often backfire - as I believe has happened in this case.
Certainly, in the realm of public art, any selection process is fraught with pitfalls, and many such
decisions are met with controversy and disagreement. This is often unavoidable simply because
we human beings have so many differing and conflicting opinions about what kind of art might
be proper for a particular site. In that regard, almost any PAC's job is an unenviable one. And,
yes, a community's public arts commission by definition as an appointed commission must
have expertise and perspective that often are not shared by the bulk of a town's population.
That's to be expected.
Please understand that I'm not writing this as some "aesthetically challenged philistine," one
who might have preferred selection of, say, either a clearly recognizable human figure as a
sculpture or nothing at all. (1 have several pieces of original, non-objective/non-representation al
artwor k hanging in my living room. I love much of what people back in the day used to call
"abstract" art.)
However much I hesitate to sound harsh, this particular piece of non-objective art at least for
Ashland and for this location seems to me very much out-of-scale, ostentatious, even
bombastic. Speaking personally, I believe it's an inappropriate and unfortunate choice. But then,
that's simply my own opinion.
I suggest that the Ashland Public Arts Commission, other than having the word "public" in its
title, has not really considered the wider public in its decision. I urge that it be directed to back
up to the starting point and do its due diligence, part of which means including the Historic
Commission in the process.
Thank you for your time and your consideration.
Sincerely,
/S/
Jeff LaLande
495 Chestnut St. 48, Ashland
Carole Julyan
carole jul an ,gmail.com
Hideous sculpture
21
Please have a heart for Ashland and its people. You already gave us an ugly plaza makeover.
Now give us a resounding NO, NO, NO to this hideous sculpture!
Donni Lockridge
kind ergarden.medford(a~gmail.com
sculprure choice
my first impression is not a positive one for Ashland. Sadly, it looks like a giant desk fan.
Linda Novak
leenalumind.net a gmail.com
Spiral donut across from fire station.
Please don't do it!
Thanks!
Linda
Teresa Arcangel
tarcangel(,gmail.com
Zoccola Art at Gateway Island
I was born and raised in Ashland. I don't live there right now, so maybe my opinion doesn't
matter, but I do hope to come home to live and teach in Ashland soon. The sculpture by Susan
Zoccola, which is intended for Gateway Island, is an interesting work of art, but in my opinion it
will be very much out of place in that setting. Someth ing that represents the history of Ashland
(or the Shastas of pre-Ashland) or even some lovely trees would be much nicer.
Ivan Collver
ivane.565agmail.com
Proposed Atr Project.
Your two proposed designs do not fit in Ashland. I would rather see a 35 foot Wigwam Burner
than any of the proposed designs. At least it would be something relating to Ashland. This sorely
needs to be put back into committee. Even a pair of those waving tubes driven with a fan at the
bottom and designed to look like a Redwood Tree would be b etter tha n the slinky looking fan
cage.
22
Joanie Keller-Hand
ikellerhand(?gmail.com
Please do not approve the Public Arts Commission's Recommendation
Dear City Council Members,
After reading the article in the September 15, 2015 Medford Mail Tribune about the 20-foot wire
sculpture that the Public Arts Commission is recommending for placement in the Gateway
Island, I am writing to express my concern.
With all due respect to t he artist and her process, why would the Ashland Public Arts
Commission select an artist from Seattle when we have a valley full of talented artist? Artists
who live here, work here, and understand the heart and soul of Ashland! Being "crazy about
Ashland" and taking a bunch of photos can not possibly capture the pulse of our community, as
evidenced by the proposed sculpture. How does a futuristic bingo ball cage represent our unique
and historic community?
While serving on the Friends of the Ashland Library Board during the library's expansion, we
placed the historic integrity of our Carnegie library as a first priority. So I'm also concerned that
this big, modernistic sculpture will obstructed, and/or overshadow, our view of the library, as
well as detract from the view looking out Of the library. Finally, the citizens of Ashland deserve
to have a say in an art installation of this size and permanence.
City Council members, please do not approve the Public Arts Co mmission' s recommendation.
Instead, begin a public dialogue about an art installation that truly represents our community.
Thank you.
Joanie Keller-Hand
Sandra L Franklin
dspfrank.W. integrity com
Sculpture Chosen for Plaza
You guys aren't really serious about putting that horrible sculpture on the plaza are you? I grew
up in Ashland what the heck is going on there??? Preserve some history and stay in theme with
the historic plaza!!! What happened---did too many progressives move in and take over? That
thing looks like a fan or a wormhole out of a sci-fi m ovie. SO SAD ASHLAND HAS COME
TO THIS.
23
Marla Deere
msbdear omsn.com
metal sculpture?
please don't do it!! I know I don't live there anymore, but the piece you have selected doesn't in
ANY way represent the Ashland I grew up in, back in the 50s-70s. there HAS to be something
better ...or just leave the plaza as it is!!
hope you get LOTS of emails and letters saying NO to that!!
Aaron D Cruz Garcia
unleaded ink(j ~gmail.com
The "gateway" art installation
I am writing simply to state that I too do not care for the art piece selected to be installed in
ashland across from the fire station I'm a local resident, illustrator, and parent - and would prefer
to see a local artist featured.
Morgan Ward
tulipsored ,gmail.com
Sculpture
Please fufill your resposibilities to the community and allow the people a voice in your decisions
regarding public spaces. What was done to the Ashland Plaza is abhorrent, horrifically
unappealing not just to those that live here but to the vast masses who choose, repeatedly, to visit
us here. This modern sculpture wont reflect our local abundance or flavor in any wa y, especially
because it is not even a local artist whose work is being xonsidered. I hope you will bring this
meeting forward and allow the local people to be heard, and that when they are speaking, you
listen. It seems to me like an outrageous amount of money to spend just to result in loosing favor
with the community and tourists. Thank you for your consideration, and I look forward to
hearing from you.
Jeff Mitchell
jeff(a thisnicehouse. com
The Ashland Public Arts Commission Sculpture
It looks like a 20' high anus. I hope you (the city council) all have your photo taken next to it so
Ashland residence can have something to reference you all by.
ruth ainsley
24
ruthieainsley gmail.com
Ashland art
How about art that speaks of Ashland? Like a sculpture of a stand of trees, or real trees or a
perfect sculpted tree? That exercise wheel you proposed is not vaguely related Ashland and what
she stands for.
Matt Matthews
rnatthews t mind.net
Ugly expensive sculpture
The proposed sculpture for the island across from the Fire Station is not attractive and seems to
me to be a wasteful expenditure.
I'm a 4th generation Ashland native, and I want my money back.
Respectfully,
Matt Matthews
willow murawski
willowco ote Ayahoo.com
Gateway Island Sculpture
The proposed metal donut sculpture screams "look at us, we collected a crapload of money from
hotel taxes and aren't we artsy?" It says absolutely nothing about our community. This instead: a
larger than life size statue of Angus Bowmer. He is wearing iconic Elizabethan costume with one
arm raised in welcome and holding a Tony awar d to his chest with the other. The pedestal is
designed to allow one to climb up and stand next to Angus for photos. Angus is designed with a
place for his upraised arm to hold a flag which is set for special occasions (American flag on july
4th, OSF flag on opening day of the festival, SOU or AHS flag when they are in a sports
championship, etc.) This statue is created by a local artist. Every tourist will want to want the
ENTIRE length of Main Street to have their photo taken with Angus, which is great for all the
businesses.
Diane Kish
dmk895(cjive.com
Gateway Sculpture
I think the gateway sculpture is hideous. What does it represent? It's too contemporary. A
wormhole to an interstellar destination??? Could the residents have 3 or 4 to choose from to vote
on? Please don't erect what looks like an old fan. Does it represent Ashland or Oregon? How
25
about something that represents outdoor living, hiking & biking, fishin g, boatin g,learning,
culture, mountains, lakes, forest? If people can't relate to the 'gateway' piece how welcoming do
you think it feels? Not at all. How will it affect the Christmas Tree? Back to the drawing board,
and don't over think it. Look at the bronze sculptures at Taprock Restaurant, Grants Pass for
inspiration.
Darci davis
Darci.davis a ate. corn
art for the welcome island.
That is ugly. Looks like a the cage on a fan..... And it should be a local artist!
Will Sears
WiIICSearS a mail.com
Gateway sculpture
While I am all in favor of public art in Ashland, I am again dismayed that such large and
expensive projects, which effect all of the citizens, are embarked upon and decided upon with
little or no public involvement, approval or feedback.
We live here too, have elected you to represent us and provide the money that you fund these
project s with. < bri>The public needs to be consulted, met with repeatedly.and allowed to
provide a general sense of approval for how our money is spent for "beautification" projects such
as this.
This same type of attitude is what created the unhappy mess that the plaza project became.
The general buy-in of the community is an essential
element of a healthy and well run city government.
Please do better in the future.
Thank you, Will Sears
Amy Haptonstall
haptonstall.amy(:a2amail.com
public art
We are known as a city of art. Refuse imported art, there is bound to be acceptable art created by
at least one Ashland native or resident. Or, how about we spend $100,000 on something more
useful like our housing crisis or taking away taxing us for maintaining forest service(federal)
26
land.
Samuel James III
samtrippiamesAgmail.com
new sculpture
I'm sorry but spending $100,000 on a piece of metal? What about spending that money towards a
better shelter for homeless veterans? Or even homeless teens and young adults. Don't waste
money on objects when there are living beings in need of help.
Carol Brockfield
carol. bfieldAgmaiLcom
Public sculpture
There are so many find artists in the area,why not support them with your commission?
Disappointed residents want this sculpture to have some connection with Ashland. I don't think
it's ugly, but does it represent Ashland in any way? Not that I can see. It's kind of an insult to go
abroad to find someone to do a public artpiece.
Elizabeth Austin
mycoachAmind.net
Gateway Art Project
I urge the Council to reject the Public Art Commission's proposal of "Gather."
I attended the public presentation/ exhibit of the three finalists for the Gateway Art Project. Only
one captured the essence of Ashland: Roger White Stoller's "Ashland Helix". I would be proud to
see it daily, to show it off to everyone. One of the attendees co mmented: "we have never had
such a beautiful work here." 1 agree. It is time we do!
Stoller's Artist Statement reveals how in tune he is with the nature of Ashland. Read it! Look at
the illustration!
On the other hand, Ms. Zoccola's proposed sculpture is weak and loosely related to the history
and values of Ashland. The comments made about her work were mostly concerns about the
safety issue: the 20 ft. sculpture would invite climbing, with the probability of kids falling, and
no safety net. Another issue is that although she recommended LED lighting for her project,she
did not include it in her proposal.
27
The third proposal by Pete Beeman was a novel interactive sculpture. It is attractive in its own
way, but doesn't strike me as representative of the depth of the spirit of Ashland. There was
concern for safety expressed by the public attendees. Its moving parts would require annual
maintenance. The artist himself stated it would withstand use and elemen is for "d ozens of
years." That doesn't sound durable enough to me.
Of the three proposed sculptures, one clearly stands out: Ashland Helix. What puzzles me is how
the Public Art Commission could arrive at the decision they made.
Finally, I appreciate the effort each of the artists put into their submission. Each put forth their
best effort and made a sincere attempt to depict Ashland.
Thank you for reading this.
Elizabeth Austin
Kimberly Avelyn Era
OhsogladAgmail.com
Sculpture
Please do not install this sculpture. It is an eyesore not unlike the "profile" by the other fire
house. I'm wondering at the make-up of the committee overseeing sculpture choices.
Kristin Abbott
kristinAleffnet.org
$100,000 mistake
That sculpture the City's going to spend $100,000 on? I protest. Strenuously. It's really REALLY
ugly. I seriously question the taste level of whoever picked it. I'm guessing you didn't have much
to choose from. Anyhow, skip it altogether. Reallocate the money to FOTAS so the dogs and
cats in the shelter can have a better life while waiting to be ado pted. Or give it to the food bank
so they can stock up. People and animals are suffering here, and you want to spend $100k on a
giant, rusty fan. I know these are restricted funds, but some rules need to be changed, and this is
one of them. Respectfully yours, Kristin Abbott.
Alisha Smith
alishads80kgrnail.com
28
Sculpture
This is an atrocity and does not represent the quaint yet dynamic town we live in. Seriously, who
is in charge of the aesthetics of this town needs to be fired, the Plaza is terrible and does not
match the historical feel of the downtown area and now this!
Steven Bright
pastorbright(a gmail.com
Gateway project
As a citizen of this fine town I appose this hampster cage sculpture and feel that we as citizens
should have a say as to what will represent our town
Renee Miereanu
Smoking~ends a,gmail.com
Proposed metal sculpture across from Fire Station
I am not opposed to more art in Ashland but not This proposed sculpture! Why? Because it is
ugly, does not represent our precious village and our values here in Southern Oregon in any way
shape or form, it's unbelievably expensive, and is not done by local artists. Please stop this from
going any further and put thi s money t o better use. Support local artists to beautify our
community.
Debra Waldon
RusticHillbillygwildblue.net
Gateway Island Sculpture
$100,000? For the ugliest thing ever? It looks like a Slinky with the ends together. 1 can't believe
it's even a consideration.
Heather Loring
Hdzamboni(2(yahoo.com
Art work installation
I am not sure what it is called, the art proposed to go in across from the fire station, but what
about a tree? $100,000 seems like too much money for something most of us will drive past. A
true town improvement would be finding a way to help get more of the homeless off the streets.
29
Julia Rowland
Stewart,i uliagoutlook.com
Art piece for the center of town.
Although I like the idea of putting a beautiful art in the center of town, I do not believe that this
chosen artwork is the right one for our artistic little city. I don't believe it depicts what Ashland is
all about. Ashland is organic, and artistic, and beautiful. This metal sculpture looks like a fan
from the 50s. Why not ha ve the sa me artist who made the beautiful rock sculpture on the
stairway going from Granite Street down to Guanajuato way make a nice organic piece of art like
that one. I feel it would better depict to Ashland is all about.
Kelly Harding
subshinedesi nme ,gmail.com
Sculpture
I saw that you would like to purchase a new sculpture for the city, I suggest you hire a local artist
to make a sculpture and keep the money local. thank you for your atrention.
Kathleen Hildreth
Khildreth54gyahoo.com
Public 'Art'
Please don't put this thing up. It will add nothing except perhaps confusion to anyone looking at
it. Amusing critiques notwithstanding, there has to be a better way to spend $100,000 in our
town. I'd rather send it to a refugee camp; not the sculpture, the money. The refugees are
traumatized enough.
Trina Sanford
TrinaCobbSanfordAgmail.COm
NO to the Art sculpture in from of Ashland Library
Dear City Council,
It has recently come to my attention that you are considering an art piece, an ugly art piece, for
our downtown area that has been created by an artist who resides in Seattle.
42 yrs ago I was born in Ashland. I have grown up here and watched it transform and morph into
wha t it is t oday. Sadly, I feel it's changing in a negative way.
30
Our once beautiful little town who was over flowing with children and families, is now
struggling to survive the ups and downs of the economy, the infiltration of the welcomed
homeless, the trash of "free" offerings on almost every street corner and so on. This is NOT the
Ashland I grew up in.
Now and then I read or hear of Ashland residences supporting one another, buying local, having
a strong sense of community and yet, when it comes down to it, those all seem to just be words.
There's no real meaning behind them.
When you choose to go out of our city limits to purchase art or any other good or service, you
are betraying the people you say you are representing. For this, you should give up your position
on the council as frankly you are not doing your job.
Art is known fro being controversial. I for one cannot wrap my head around how one could
choose an artist from Seattle who only visited a nd took pictures of our area as inspiration for the
metal sculpture that has been created. Ashland is known as a community frill of talented artist
who's hearts and souls reside here. They aren't visiting. They LIVE here! Shame on you for not
"buying local" when given the chance.
That said, why is an art piece even being considered for this location when it's very possible that
not all members of our community will agree with it? At one time a big beautiful tree stood
there. Mother Nature, the most amazing and talented artist there will ever be created something,
and can recreate something, to fill that space. Have you considered giving her a chance?
This fan looking sculpture in no way represents Ashland. If you want to go deep, to get real with
your representation, why don't you go around town (weekends are usually best), pick up all the
"free" offerings on the corners along with all the homeless etc and pile THAT on this plot of land
for all to see? That w ould seem to represent the new Ashland in a much more realistic light.
OR! make a better choice. Work to clean up our community. Support it. Help it grow in a
positive, safe and beautiful way.
I for one vote NO! on this art piece. I already try to avoid downtown as a result of its lack of
parking and the sidewalks being littered with homeless who heckle and beg for my hard earned
money or left over food while I am holding my children near. This art piece at the entrance of
downtown would become another reason to stay away.
It's heart breaking and extremely frustrating to see how this town is changing.
31
For everything this art piece represents you should be ashamed.
Linda Detweiler
lindadetweilerAmsn.com
Metallic sculpture at Gateway Island
Please do not approve this metallic sculpture. It does not represent the area well at all and it does
not fit in with the Ashland culture of providing local support to the area by supporting a local
artists. This is not something that is appropriate or attractive for the area. If this amount of
money is to be spent on publi c art pie ase there is mcuh better ways to do this that will benefit
the area! !
Please have them go back to the drawing board and try again!!
Very disappointed in the choice!!
Nick David
nickymono cr,gmail.com
Gateway Island Sculpture
Greetings Counselors,
Please do not approve the purchase of this piece of art. Although it may be nice art, it's not suited
to the interests of Ashland. I know you have already committed to spending 3% of the lodging
tax on art for tourists to look at, and I'm not necessarily opposed to that. However, you may
consider COMMUNITY input on the i ssue before causing another tragic, albeit first-world,
problem for Ashlanders to complain to each other at the Co-Op about.
Thanks for your time!
Nick David
James di Properzio
Properzionjeffnet.org
Public Arts sculpture
I oppose the framework donut sculpture proposed for the space in front of the firehouse. 1 find it
dated in style, unappealing, and a terrible allocation for $100,000 of public funding. After the
fiasco of de-beautifying the Plaza, we need to do a better job with the aesthetics of our public
spaces.
32
Sincerely,
James di Properz io
Melissa Irish-Miller
miss a me.com
Art Installation
Dear Council.
Please reconsider spending $100,000 on a sculpture made by a non-local artist to represent our
town. We DO NOT need a giant metal sculpture of a (fan?) in our town. We need trees, grass,
more parks and safe areas for children to play. Please do not approve this sculpture. Plant a tree
and spend the money elsewhere. If you must have a sc ulpture in that location at least use a local
artist.
Sincerely,
Melissa Irish-Miller (full time Ashland resident)
Shannon Burruss
onegruvychic(a maiLcom
AshlaND Sculpture
While I'm not against the idea of a sculpture I'd like to protest the commission of a nonlocal artist
to produce it. We are very fortunate in this town to have a myriad of wonderful and talented
artists. As a member of the Ashland Community 1 would formally like to request the commission
of a local artist for the new sculpture, thereby encoura ging the city's buy local attitude and also
keeping funds flowing through our local economy.
Sharon Bolles
sebolles(r~g nail.com
Gateway Sculpture
Please use much of the $100,000 for something more beneficial to the area, and commission a
piece of art by a local artist!
Brian LeBlanc
hisnameisbrianjLa]gmail.com
33
Art Installation ATTN: MAYOR
Here's a link I would encourage you to go visit, it's a long thread about the proposed art
installation that I'm hoping you've heard about. With the amount of local renowned artists in this
area and their connection to the nature and values of this community, I'm amazed that this is
even an idea. Anyway, the link has some fairly prominent locals' opinions and ideas for you to
consider. Please take the time and check it out, maybe even leave a comment or two, I'm sure
we'd all appreciate it.
https•//www.facebook.corn/TheA sh land PIazaRestorationProject/photos/a.428981923936329.107
3741828.428396960661492/522523514582169/?type=l &frefinf
Kimberly Meyer-Rooklyn
kim.rookl Ly gmail.com
Gateway Island Sculpture
I recently saw the article about the proposed art installation for the plaza in front of the fire
station and would like to share my impressions. I do not see how the selected sculpture
represents Ashland, the Rogue Valley, or the Northwest. Other than its title, "Gathering", the
piece seems very cold and uninviting. Ashland for me is about art, music, theatre, nature, foliage,
parks, family, deer, bears, birds, hikes, biking, shopping, eating, community, education, and
more. I just don't get how "Gathering" demonstrates any of those valuable things that Ashland is
for me. Thank you for the opportunity to share my thoughts.
leslie caplan
coura eoushearinmotionoy iom
Public Art Installation
I strongly oppose the decision to choose a non-local artist for the public art installation. I know
our community would prefer our tax dollars to support local artists. I would love to see and feel
Ashland take that same position, to keep the money close to home in support of this amazing
community. If you read social media rega rding thi s issue, you will see hundreds, and probably
more, people who are horrified to thing that the city of Ashland will choose the ferris-wheel
looking piece instead of finding a local artist, or a collaboration of local artists to adorn our city
with.
KATHY & JOHN WILSON
jkwilsonl4 ayahoo.com
Wind Fan Sculpture
34
Is it a giant hairbun? Is it for boating in the everglades cuz that's what this pie looks like, see the
water grass standing there with the big fan going? Or maybe just a giant fan. Seriously, what
must you be thinking. I can't even fathom this in Ashland. Maybe somewhere in LA or NY, but
no, just no...
Maureen Sever
maureenclaire a,opendoor.com
Public Art
City Council,
As an Ashland resident for over 40 years and a graduate of SOU with a degree in Fine Art, after
viewing the proposed Art Installation to be installed across from the Fire Station, I believe it is
inappropriate< and am strongly against its purchase. It would be $100, 000 very poorly invested.
Please purchase something from a local artist th at actually represents Ashland as a Community.
Mitzi Miles-Kubota
mitzimileskubotaLgmail.com
Proposed Gateway Sculpture
Tell me it's just a bad dream that a giant Slinky will be adorning the gateway to downtown! It's
hideous! It's silly, it says NOTHING about our town, and it's going to end up covered in shoes or
yarn or other such adornment that the city will have to pay people to remove over and over and
over. It just cries out to be made fun of.
Nip this project in the bud NOW, and save us all a massive amount of embarrassment!
brett geoly
lobodance@gmaii.com
proposed rusted circular fan/thing
$100,000 allocated for an out of town artist to erect an ugly rusted fan-like thing across from the
fire station would be a sad, sad thing.
I'm quite sure that a LOCAL artist with I/10 of such funding could make something much more
appropriate and beautiful.
Phyllis Brown
Phyllisbuck(j~opendoor.com
35
"art" thing
City Council: Please, all of you, read comments re Gateway on the facebook pages for Ashland
Plaza Restoration Project. Especially mine and George Kramer's. Please don't spend this money
on corporate/disliked "art" that we don't want. you will regret it, your legacy.
Anna Humphreys
happyheart67a gmai l.com
Art Installation
Hello,
I am writing to express my disproval for the aesthetically unappealing, absorbidantly expensive,
and non-locally sourced piece that taxpayers are expected to pay for. If taxpayers are expected to
participate in this decision, it may be useful to distribute a vote via Facebook or another online
source which citizens of our beautiful town ace ess regularly. Please reconsider this decision and
make it easier for us to participate in these monumental choices in the future.
Sincerely,
Anna Humphreys
Brett Thomas Lutz
Weatherbtingmail.com
Art in front of fire station
$100,000 of tax payer money for that object? Why not plant a nice tree, instead? There are much
better things the city could spend that money on, to include a teacher or two more at the Walker
Elementary school, paying teacher's Aids, psychiatric counseling for the homeless, stream
restoration. While art is to be valued, this is frivo lous and a terrible waste of precious tax payer
money. If you vote for this, you certainly are more likely to lose my vote and those of my friends
and family in the next election. Please make a better decision than purchasing this piece of art.
Sincerely,
Brett Lutz
Yelena Sedochenkova
breathofcolour(cwahoo.com
36
Gateway Island Sculpture
Dear City Council,
1 would just like to put in my two cents in regards to the sculpture that has been chosen to be
installed across from the Fire Station. Honestly, for a town that is full of artists, we could do
much better. What about a sculpture that represents the values that we all share here in Ashland?
Love of na ture, jus tice, food equality, motherhood,... I'm sure there are many others. Perhaps
there can be a gathering of local artists who would be interested in working on the project? That
way the money can stay here and help support our local economy. Thank you for your attention.
Tasha Schaal
Tashaschaal~,gtnail.com
Arts commission restoration
I think the proposed "art iron sculpture" for $100,000 across from the fire station is as ugly as the
Plaza Restoration turned out. I truly feel we need more quaint charm to represent Ashland not
removing trees and putting in grey bricks or big rusty fan looking things. Please can we attend a
meeting on the restoration?
Respectful ly,
< br/hTasha Schaal
Rudy Dietz
rudydietz n gmail.com
Gateway Island Sculpture
Hello,
I am writing to say I strongly oppose the proposed art piece being placed across from the fire
station. While the piece is nice in some ways, its size and placement are completely
innappropritae.
We don't need a new piece of art to make Ashland special - it's natural beauty and architecture
already does!
Thank you,
Rudy Dietz
37
Joanne Luman
benbeecoAmsn.com
art for Ashland
I do not like, enjoy, or welcome the chosen art which is ugly and very costly. Truly would be
another huge embarrassment for our truly artistic city. There are many local arts that would and
could create a far better design for a fraction of the proposed cost. I hope the City Council rejects
this project. The "face" design by the south fire station is hor rible, to o.
Shiloh O'Connor
theagnesspoet ,hotmail.com
Proposed sculpture near library
I must strenuously assert, that the plan to place the sculpture on the dividing area between the
library and the fire station is incredibly ill-founded. For one, no Ashland artists were considered
for the work, even though there are plenty with the talent and wherewithal. Second, the sculpture
chosen by the commission is a compl ete eye-s ore, even uglier than the one at the fire station on
sherwood st. Finally, I believe you should seek out more public input on these projects, so you
don't end up with stale works of art by out-of-towners that do not reflect the beauty or history of
Ashland.
Respectfully yours,
Shiloh
Claire Baker
toneequa uaAaol. coin
Proposed sculpture for area in front of fire house
The proposed sculpture for the area in front of the fire house does not in any way enhance our
town. It is an inappropriate, expensive piece of nothing made by an out of state artist. I suggest
you immediately halt the plan and take the time to carefully re-think the use of the precious
$100,000 for something more pleas ing to yo ur residents. The Public Arts Commission seems
unable to make aesthetically and fiscally wise decisions.
Chani Hubbell
Chanirhubbellnymail.com
Plaza art installation
38
That 20-foot monstrosity would be hideous on the Plaza, why on earth would you think spending
100000 taxpayer dollars on that eyesore is a good idea? You know what's great? Trees. Leave the
damn trees alone, and pay the teachers more.
Wendy Temple
wend !mmp]Agmail.com
gateway sculpture
I have to say that I, and many others, are not impressed with the proposed sculpture for the
gateway installation. In addition, we have very talented local artists who could have done much
better than this.
Becky Sniffen
becky.snuffen a]gmail.com
Public art vs public education
I've just learned about the City's plan to install another sculpture at the cost of $100,000. While
the sculpture is fabulous, what we really need the money for is our public schools.
All of the school's lost significant amounts of money this year- $50,000 and more per school.
This means fewer aides working with kids, fewer resource s for their classrooms, fewer
specialists for boosting those that are struggling with math, reading, language, or behavior. We
desperately need money at the schools!
This sculpture can wait. Our kids can't.
Thank you for all you do.
Becky Sniffen
Lorraine d'Entremont Rawls
hotmail.com
Lrawlsoregon,na
Public art decision
As a lifetime resident let me first say that I support public art. I do not however support the
possible decision for this particular piece that the arts commission is considering.
This metal art piece is not, in my opinion, in keeping with the spirit of Ashland.
I urge the council to take more time to consider other po ssibiliti es. Look around at what our
valley has to offer. We have so many creative and amazing local artists. Please take a deep
39
breath and explore other artists ideas.
Todd Kemp
toddgash Iandcreek.net
New Art piece.
I remember hearing that the city doesn't have enough money for issues like dealing with the
downtown bum problem or the deer that are over-populated and sick, or the ugly plaza redo, or
the buckeling sidewalks, or the dusty alley that runs around my house, or the lack of street lights
in so many neighborhoods But $100K for this huge slinky? 1 am not a fan of th is huge
$100,000.00 fan. $100K is to much! Especially for a piece by a nonlocal artist...... But then again
all the local artists had to move away because Ashland has become so expensive. I am
disappointed.
Lisa Vanderzwan
VanderZwan y charter.net
Downtown art project
The sculpture to be chosen, in my opinion, really should be from a local artist.
After all we are such an artist community, and have so many wonderful artist here. if it's
representing Ashland, I don't understand why you wouldn't choose work from someone local.
We are all about keeping it local... Local foods, local businesses. The art should c ome from
here as well.
Cliff Beneventi
cliff a blindscientist.com
Art installation
Please, PLEASE people. Listen to the people that you represent. This sculpture is a mistake.
Katy
Kayynnrepp(c,gmail.com
Art piece
1 vote no thanks. Hopefully that's a bad drawing because I can't imagine a giant fan won the
contest!
Linda Novak
40
leenalumind.netg mail.com
Spiral donut across from fire station.
Please don't do it!
Thanks!
Linda
Susan Yeagley
Soosanowc2gmail.com
New art downtown
I just saw the proposed sculpture to be installed across from the fire station for $100,000. Wow!
It's frankly an awful choice and FAR too much to spend. I vote for a LOCAL artist and a MUCH
lower price!!!
Lorie List
lorielist ,gmail.com
Proposed Gateway Art
I'd like to voice my opposition to the Ashland Public Arts Commissions selection of "Gather" for
the intersection of Siskiyou and E. Main. I think there are excellent ways to bring together
modern and historic, but I don't think does it. Ashland is a historic town and this simply seems
too jarring of a piece. I'm open to being wrong, but that's my fi rst impre ssion. Thanks for taking
my feedback into consideration.
Marion Lee Moore
marion(a~Olpt.net
Art piece selected for downtown gateway
I think this piece of art was the ugliest of the three finalists, and does not reflect the spirit of
Ashland in any way. Both other pieces were better, in my opinion. Please do not approve
purchase of this art piece (I've heard it called the hamster wheel, that seems fitting!).
Hi Ann and Dave,
I have a problem with the proposed Gateway art piece. On the one hand, I think the PAC did a
masterful job with the selection process over the past year and I really really don't want to
undermine the selection committee. On the other hand, while I think the chosen piece was the
41
best of the three, I didn't think it was Susan Zoccola's best piece, and so far it's not going over
very well with the public. So I definitely feel stuck in a corner here.
In talking to John, we wondered if a compromise would be for the council to ask the PAC to
work with Susan to develop another, different piece. For example, something like the tree
sculpture she did for Tri Met would have been perfect for our site. My question to you is simply
whether that's a feasible approach and how you think the PAC would respond.
Of course, the rest of the council may be ready to approve the selection, so my question may be
irrelevant in the end. But I would appreciate your counsel.
Best,
Pam
Mayor Stromburg and members of the City Council,
As you know, I am a member the Ashland Historic Commission (AHC), but this note is
expressing only my personal point of view, as the AHC has not discussed or been asked to
comment on the Gateway Art Project in any formal way.
The Public Arts Commission (PAC) has consulted with the AHC in the past, on at least three
occasions that I remember: (l) The `Rio Amistad' tile path on Granite St., (2) with the placement
of the `Peace Banner ' tiles at the Library, and (3) the AHC's Historic Marker project that
combines art and history. The meetings had some conflicting view points, but there seemed to
be an understanding that respecting History is an important context for Art in the City of
Ashland.
The City ordinances do not require that Art be reviewed by the AHC unless it is attached to the
historic building facade. However, the location of significant City projects such as the Gateway
Art Project and the Plaza renovation hugely impact the Historic Districts. The Historic
Commission's purpose is to protect the historic integrity of the City of Ashland; if we have no
opportunity to review these types of projects, we cannot fulfill our responsibilities.
Please consider letting the Ashland Historic Commission review the Gateway Art Project during
our October 7 meeting and postponing the City Council decision.
Respectfully,
Dale Shostrom
Claudia Michelli
michelliel (tyahoo.com
Public Art
42
The proposed public art sculpture is not suitable for our town. Not only has it been created by a
non-local artist, the design and concept does not fit at all with the natural beauty the area.
Please do not approve this piece and allow more time for local artists to submit proposals.
Thank you,
Claudia Michelli
Tabitha Wenke
TabithaWenkeggrnai Isom
Art installation
To whom it may concern,
I am very surprised to find out that tax money of this magnitude is going to be used toward this
art installation located on the island near fire station. We as a community could use these
resources od funds to help the people who live in Ashland. The fact that the art installation is
being purchased by a non local ar tist is e xtremely difficult to understand. Please use this money
in a better manner for our community.
Thank you for your time
Rebecca DeVall
rebecca.devallAgmail.com
New Artwork to be represent Downtown Ashland
Dear City Council,
I am a native Ashland resident, born at ACH 41 years ago. I would like it known that I do not
approve of the "artwork" that has been selected to represent the essence of Ashland and I
especially take issue with the fact that you went OUTSIDE our eclectic and amazing art
community to hire an artists to create this atrocity. The selected artist has no historical
knowledge of our community and it shows in what she feels represents us.
Every time I pass through downtown, I feel the loss of the beautiful evergreen tree that used to
reside on what you have termed Gateway Island. Considering the value that the City of Ashland
places on trees, I'm unclear why it was removed in the first place.
I know that I am not the only community member that feels that you have acted outside of the
wants of our city with your heavy handed decision making. The FACE that resides in front of the
43
Fire Station is bad enough, but at least it's not in a prominent location and most people don't even
notice it (I should know as I live on the street with The FACE, and most people have no idea
what I'm talking about when I tell them where I live). Don't make the same mistake twice. This
should be something that the people of Ashland get to help make a decision on. Select several
arti sts and t hen let the people decide which represents our community the best, because the
"Gather" is not it.
Sincerely,
Rebecca DeVall
Shauna Farmer
shaunamadrengmail.com
no tax dollars for a sculpture we need affordable housing
Really money for affordable housing needs in our community far outweigh the need for a
sculpture especially the one being considered.
Jane Sterling
janesterling421 nmac.com
metal sculpture
I continue to see the council making financial decisions that are not well thought out. $100,000
for a metal sculpture is absurd. And it is not even from Ashland. There are so many more ways
to spend our taxpayer money to help those that need food. Why be so elaborate???? It is not
where my money wants to go. You are acting like there is endless mo ney. What about the
schools getting that money? Something that is useful and needed. I am always disappointed in
the councils thinking.
Bonnie McCracken
mcbonnie7gyahoo.com
ashland Plaza Restiration
i am very opposed to the proposed $100,000 sculpture. It is a waste of money. To best represent
our unique city, plant trees and flowers. Because we value the accomplishments of our youth,
student sculptures could be displayed on a rotating basis, perhaps to tie in with First Friday.
Student musical performances, from our schools and SOU, could be scheduled, to model the
Green Show idea. The Plaza is the center of our town. It should reflect our values and be
dynamic. Thank you for re-thinking the purpose of the plaza.
44
Sarah Greenblatt
MuchlovegOW gmail.com
Statue
Too much money. Couldn't we spend that on more important things? Pick a local artist that
doesn't need $100,000 dollars of our hard earned money. Maybe a collaborative effort from
multiple artists.
David Smith
,gmail.com
primordialstuff?
new sculpture proposed across from fire station
I am writing to express my disapproval of the proposed artwork to be installed across the street
from the fire station. I think it is an eyesore and I am appalled that an out of town artist would be
considered. The town of Ashland has a prolific artist community. Please use a local artist, and
please find something that look s like art, unlike the current proposal which looks like something
fell down the stairs.
Joslin Carson
Mothernature9Li7yahoo.com
Sculpture
Please do not spend $100,000 on art projects from out of town artists.
Patrick Hildreth
patrickh4l P_opendoor.com
The excrescence planned for the island.
Start a voluntary fund to pay for this - do NOT impose your collective will on the rest of us
without our collaboration and approval. If you truly believe that there is a real desire for this
object, then go the voluntary find route.
Kellie barry
K 1 I barry a yahoo.com
100,000 dollars for art
I would like you to rethink spending 100,000 to a artist who doesnt live in area, why not look to
45
artists who live in area and not spend so much on the art work.
Mary Brooks
mdbbrooks(ahotmail.com
Sculpture proposal
have been an Ashland resident for forty years. For the most part, I have appreciated the
improvements in the city. But, not the sculpture proposed for the triangle across from the library.
It does not fit the charm and unique character of Ashland. It is suitable for Seattle where the
artist comes from, not here. We have so many talented local arti sts here; why not SUPPORT the
local economy, and com►nision a sculpture that is made by an artist who will best reflect
Ashland? I envision a sculpture built with sustainable, green, and/or recycled product that
reflects the true spirit of Ashland.
Kristy Doty
sowilo ct lanthir.com
Proposed sculpture for the gateway island.
As an artist, former resident and SOU student that visits as frequently as possible, I have to say
that this proposed sculpture does not seem to fit the feeling of the town or represent the residents
in any way. Ashland is a colorful and vibrant town due to the residents and history they create! If
you choose a sculpture that not only goes against the vibe of those residents, but also goes
against what they believe, you will further alienate the entire reason the town exists in the first
place. I am not sure the towns people would appreciate a costly non functional bit of much too
modern art when there are other more important societal needs to address. I cannot even believe
that I am against installing art when I myself am an artist... kind of makes me sick to my stomach
to type those words. A better installment would be something that benefits the environment and
is a reminder to those driving by it to be better humans. I would love to see something that
tourists and Ashlanders alike would proudly stop and take a picture in front of as a memento of
their time spent in Shakespeare country. Now imagine all the photos of the proposed sculpture
with all the perfect bird purchases covered in bird waste and nests frozen in time for all to behold
in the coming years. It would be a joke and bring visitors for al I the wro ng reasons.
Ariella St. Clair
astclairgmind.net
Welcoming sculpture
The sculpture picked for represent Ashland is ugly, first of all. Secondly, the person does not live
here so how does she think she can best represent Ashland. There are hundreds of Qualified
artists in this Rogue Valley. I would like to see drawings of what local artists submitted and was
46
rejected.
Allen & Karen Drescher
drescheralgaol.com
Ashland Arts Commission
September 17, 2015
Dear Mayor and City Council,
Have you seen the Giant Hearing Aid that the Ashland Arts Commission wants you to install?
This metallic monstrosity is supposed to be the welcoming symbol for visitors to Ashland. I
know that we have an aging population, but a Giant Hearing Aid is going too far!
Thi s is beyond goofy. It's insulting to your intelligence and a joke on the people who actually
try to make a living in Ashland. What a whacky symbol to welcome visitors to Ashland.
It's just nuts to pay $100,000 to a Seattle artist for an ugly metallic structure that has nothing
whatsoever to do with Ashland or Ashland's history. Ugh!!! Don't do it.! You'll have to avert
your eyes every time you drive by the Giant Hearing Aid.
Allen and Karen Drescher
131 Birdsong Lane
Ashland, Oregon
Gretchen Hartrick
gghartrickAhotmail.coin
Sculpture
I have just seen a picture of a proposed art peece (a 20 foot metal spiral) that is reportedly a
consideration for the entry of Ashland.
Ashland is an artistic town, with a deep history of many types of art.
Many agree, this piece does not appear to reflect Ashland, it's history or character. Tax dollars
spent on an art piece created by a local ar tist would likely be spent locally. Your citizens urge
you, as a council, represent local character, showcase local art, spend our money locally, and
support local artists. As elected officials, please commit to the embodiment of the Ashland ideals
and way of life.
47
Arianna Van Heusen
ariannavh(aagmail.com
Gateway Island Sculpture
I would like it noted that I am NOT in support of the proposed Gateway Island Sculpture. Not
only is it incredibly expensive, but the sculpture itself in no way expresses anything about
Ashland and what makes it so special. In addition, my understanding is that the artist is not local,
which would also be such a positive thing to support. Somethin g that relates and works with all
the natural beauty that surrounds Ashland (and not a large spiral donut) would feel so much more
appropriate for this small space.
Thank you,
Arianna Van Heusen
Ashland resident for 43 years
Jessica Leonard
jska510 agmail.com
Plaza restoration art
The proposed art is not only unappealing, it seems to be an extravagant price. There are so many
great local artists, we should commission one of them to create something beautiful and more
organic, befitting the Ashland culture, rather than some random piece of metal in an already ugly
plaza. The leftover money could be spent to find a new city administr ator, since he has proved
lacking in his abilities.
Susan Roudenbush
Susan Roudebush a mindsprina.com
proposed sculpture by library
I detest the sculpture. It resembles a summer fan case. It does not reflect to me the spirit or
beauty of Ashland. I have longed for a lovely large evergreen such as a Colorado spruce. If that
can't be done, why not a large tree sculpture, reinforcing Ashland's Image as a city that cares
about and appreciates our beautif ul enviro nment. This sculpture you propose speaks to industry,
mechanical industry, something Ashland has never been known for. Please reconsider. I am
happy to help
Nancy Rose
wndrfl7Agmail.com
48
plaza restoration
I cannot believe you are NOT displaying a work of art created by one of our local artidts or one
from our SOU students. I also am frustrsted thst you are using and considering further expansion
of artificial turf! It may save on water, questionably, but after it's life cycle of 5 years or so it has
to be replaced and since it is synthetic.... it is NOT re cyclable....and is just more plastic to add to
oue endless dumping into our earthly environment. Shame on us as a model city for promoting
destructive solutions rather than 'clean energy.'
Laura May Fields
laurama fieldsahotmail.com
What is the point of spending so much money on a sculpture that is mediocre.
Please reconsider different sculpture for Ashland. With a town frill of artists, why choose
something out of town. I think you could choose something that better represents the community,
and why does it cost so much? I think a vote should be done. Democracy is more appealing for a
t own as un ique as ashland. Thank you for hearing me. Laura May
Jody Zonnenschein
ayalaz26 kgmail.com
Art Installation
I would like to express my disappointment that the city has chosen a piece of art done by a
Seattle artist. i think we should be acting locally by choosing one of our many local artists work,
and I don't believe that the chosen piece is representative of our city. I'm told that it will cost the
city $100,000 to purchase and install this piece. I'm sure that money would be well used to serve
our citizens in a myriad of other ways. Thank you.
Kathy curtis
Kc1419Lahoo.com
For what it's worth
l don't find anything compelling about this piece. It doesn't seem representative of Ashland, or
thought provoking in any way. It looks like a playground installation.
1 feel the $100,000 slated for this area would be better spent fixing the Plaza.
Sincerely
Kathy Curtis
Thread Hysteria
49
AuroFree Walker-Vanderwerf
freeandco I Ayahoo.com
Metalic sculpture Wheel
Please use these city fiends for planting Edible gardens or installing Solar Panels... Or anything
else. This Giant Wheel is ugly and says NOTHING about the unique beauty that is Ashland.
Thank you.
AuroFree Vanderwerf
Jeanne Chouard
chouard.jeanne a gmaiLeom
sculpture selection
The metallic sculpture, resembling a hamster's exercise wheel, selected an recommended by the
Ashland Public Arts commission is ugly, meaningless and doesn't fit in our fair city. What's
more, with so many talented local artists, spending $100,000 on an artist from outside our area is
a slap in the face to our local art community and irresp onsible u se of city funds.
For much less money, we can ask the welding class at Ashland High School to weld together a
"sculpture" of recycled bicycle rims and the result will look just as good or better than this piece.
We can do so much better. Let's find a local artist to make a beautiful piece of art that actually
looks like something and reflects the spirit of our community and it's love of history and nature.
As a 20 year resident and taxpayer, I strongly object to installing this piece. Thank you.
Rick Kirschner
rickCa]theartofchange.com
Artwork for the island
I'm writing to suggest that if the city is going to spend taxpayer money on public artwork (which
I favor), that local artists should take priority for such highly visible public works!
Thank you,
Rick
cathy moore
cmoore a mind.net
metal art thing
50
The giant round metal art thing being considered as Ashland's "gate way" is just not right for this
town. Keep it in Seattle. We need something more organic and nature inspired created by a
LOCAL artist. Let's keep the money in our community.
Heather Lilly
hbunI I I a,gmail.com
Gateway Island Sculpture
I am writing in regards to the proposed metallic sculpture that is supposed to be installed across
from the fire station. I hope that you will PLEASE reconsider installing this piece. I find it
extremely unappealing, and what's worse, the artist is not even from Ashland. At best I think it
looks like an oversized, misshapen fan, or perhaps a ger bit wheel . I don't feel that this piece of
art represents Ashland at all, and it would really be a shame to have to look at this every day if it
were to be placed there. I know I am not alone in expressing this opinion, and I hope you will
consider the voices of Ashland residents before making the final decision on this matter. Thank
you very much for reading.
Regards,
Heather Lilly, Ashland resident
Salina Piddington
cutiequine c gmail.com
plaza
The proposed metal sculpture for the plaza restoration has many problems.
Doesn't fit the community's personality.
Not done by a local artist.
Extremely expensive.
Then again maybe it will fit. It's everything hypocritical about Ashland itself.
Claiming to support it's members and character, while boldly doing the opposite.
Clai ming to b e progressive, while following trends of other cities, but 10 years behind.
Boasting it's natural organic untouched beauty, while contrasting with a cookie cutter non unique
wire sculpture instead of adding to the already wonderful scenery.
This sculpture would be embarrassing for locals to know this is what our city council thinks
represents us. Embarrassing that this is what tourists will be taking pictures next to.
Embarrassing to drive by while trying to find parking downtown.
Embarrassing, hypocritical and expensive.
1 hope this sculpture does not make it to reality.
51
Jim Maynard
Jim Maynardkopendoor.com
Gateway Island Sculpture across from the Fire station.
The proposed sculpture for the Gateway Island across from the Fire station isn't bad looking.
However, it seem COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE for the Gateway Island.
I don't see how it is an improvement at all. It does not seem like a good use of one hundred
thousand dollars.
Phyllis Brown
Phyllisbuckgopendoor.com
Gateway art commission uproar
This selection is appropriate for a corporate campus. My idea, mostly serious and worth
consideration, is to install a fiberglas statue, like Blackbird. We'd feature a lumberjack, or Wm
Shakespeare, with a sign, "Welcome to Willie World!" functional, affordable, memorable and
fun.
Wylene Rogers
Jwylenero msn.com
Art project
Why? Asland is a beautiful city, this piece of art does not represent Ashland. Why can't we get
something that represents nature, Shakespear,trees, wildlife, etc, something that shows what
Ashland all about. Not something people look at and say "What is it?", instead say "That's a
beautiful (name of object)"
Alice DiMicele
ottermusic a,mind.net
Art
Dear Council,
I find it odd that in a town full of artists the City of Ashland will spend $100k on installing an art
piece by a non local.
52
Jack Leishman
jacktortoisegmsn.com
proposed art piece
Regarding the proposed fish trap that's been designed to adorn the south entrance to downtown:
To me, this just doesn't say "Ashland" at all; I see no connection; the statue at the other end of
town (endowed by Matthew Haines as a gift to the City) feels much more representational, both
historically and artistically I'm all for more modern st ructures and expressions, but would
love to see something that "feels" more like here, instead of like somewhere in downtown
Portland......
Eric Dusenbury
Gderic eharter.net
art work across from fire station
this project is to big for the space it is intended. Plus in my opinion it adds nothing to the space
thats redeeming in nature, quite frankly it has no appealing features.
53
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Council Communication
December 15, 2015, Business Meeting
City Council support for lifting the statewide pre-emption on inclusionary zoning
FROM:
Brandon Goldman, Senior Planner, Community Development Department,
brandon. og ldman e ashland.or.us
SUMMARY
At its regular meeting of November 19, 2015, the Housing and Human Services Commission
unanimously passed a motion to forward a recommendation to the Council to support legislation that
would lift the state ban on the ability of individual jurisdictions to pass inclusionary zoning laws.
Inclusionary zoning is the practice of mandating a certain percentage of affordable units in new
housing developments.
BACKGROUND AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS:
"Inclusionary Zoning" is a general term for any local zoning ordinance or land use policy which either
mandates or encourages developers of housing to include a specified percentage of housing that is
affordable to lower and/or moderate income households. Oregon and Texas are the only states that
currently prohibit local communities from considering land use policies commonly known as
inclusionary zoning.
The Housing and Human Services Commission felt that it was important for the City to have the local
option to even consider whether or not to enact inclusionary zoning laws.
Rohde/Crader m/s that we as a Commission recommend to the City Council that they pass a
resolution in support of lifting the ban on inclusionary zoning in the state of Oregon.
Should Council decide to move forward with this recommendation, as this is a time sensitive matter for
the State Legislature's review, Council could direct staff to draft a letter supporting efforts to revise the
Oregon Revised Statutes (see attached HB 2564) to remove the current state prohibition on
inclusionary zoning. The letter in support of lifting the statewide pre-emption on inclusionary zoning
would be presented to the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City.
COUNCIL GOALS SUPPORTED:
Goal 7. Keep Ashland a family friendly community:
7.3 Support land-use plans and policies that encourage family-friendly neighborhoods.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS
N/A
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
N/A
Page 1 of 2
CITY OF
ASHLAND
SUGGESTED MOTION:
I move to direct staff to draft a letter, to be signed by the Mayor, in support of removing the statewide
pre-emption on inclusionary zoning.
ATTACHMENTS:
Proposed Amendments to A-Engrossed House Bill 2564
Page 2 of 2
~r,
HB 2564-A5
(LC 2270)
5/4/15 (BHC/emm/ps)
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO
A-ENGROSSED HOUSE BILL 2564
1 Delete lines 4 through 26 of the printed A-engrossed bill and insert:
2 "SECTION 1. ORS 197.309 is amended to read:
3 "197.309. [(1) Except as provided in subsection (2) of this section,] Not-
4 withstanding ORS 91.225, a city, county or metropolitan service district
5 may [not] adopt a land use regulation or functional plan provision, or impose
6 as a condition for approving a permit under ORS 215.427 or 227.178, a re-
7 quirement that has the effect of establishing the sales or rental price for a
8 new housing unit or residential building lot or parcel, or that requires a
9 new housing unit or residential building lot or parcel to be designated for
1o sale or rent to any particular class or group of purchasers or renters based
11 on income, provided the condition:
12 "(1) Does not require more than 30 percent of housing units within
13 a residential development to be sold at below-market rates; and
14 66(2) Offers developers one or more of the following incentives:
15 "(a) Density adjustments.
16 "(b) Fee waivers or reductions.
17 "(c) Waivers of system development charges or impact fees.
1s "(d) Finance-based incentives.
19 "(e) Preferential treatment for processing of permits.
20 "(f) Expedited service for local approval processes.
21 "(g) Modification of height, floor area or other site-specific re-
22 quirements.
1 "[(2) This section does not limit the authority of a city, county or metro-
2 politan service district tod
3 "[(a) Adopt or enforce a land use regulation, functional plan provision or
4 condition of approval creating or implementing an incentive, contract commit-
s ment, density bonus or other voluntary regulation, provision or condition de-
b signed to increase the supply of moderate or lower cost housing units; or]
7 "[(b) Enter into an affordable housing covenant as provided in ORS 456.270
a to 456.295.]".
9
HB 2564-A5 5/4/15
Proposed Amendments to A-Eng. HB 2564 Page 2
CITY OF
SHLAND
Council Communication
December 15, 2015, Business Meeting
Second Reading of three separate ordinances amending the City of Ashland
Comprehensive Plan, Comprehensive Plan Maps, Transportation System Plan,
and Land Use Ordinance (Chapter 18) to adopt the Normal Neighborhood Plan
FROM:
Brandon Goldman, Senior Planner, Community Development Department
Brand 011. Goldman (61 ashlaDd.or.us
SUMMARY
The three ordinances presented for second reading amend the Comprehensive Plan, Transportation
System Plan, and Municipal Code Chapter 18 (Land Use Ordinance) to implement the Normal
Neighborhood Plan.
The first ordinance amends the Comprehensive Plan to add Normal Neighborhood Plan designation to
Chapter 2 [Introductions and Definitions], Add the Normal Neighborhood Land Categories to Chapter
IV [Housing Element], Change the Comprehensive Plan Map to establish the boundaries of the Normal
Neighborhood Plan area and amend the boundaries of Conservation Areas within the neighborhood .
This ordinance also adopts the supporting documents (i.e. Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework
dated May 2014 as amended), as a support document to the Comprehensive Plan.
The second ordinance amends the Transportation System Plan (TSP)t o incorporate the Normal
Neighborhood Plan's Street and Bikeway Networks into the TSP, and to establish standards for the
new Shared Street designation within the Street Design Standards section of the municipal code
(Chapter 18.4.6).
The third ordinance amends the Ashland Municipal Code creating a new chapterl 8.3.4 Normal
Neighborhood District, amends chapter 18.2.020 to add a Normal Neighborhood zoning classification,
and amends chapter 18.2.1.040 to add a Normal Neighborhood Special District designation.
Properties within the Normal Neighborhood Plan area are not rezoned by adoption of this ordinance;
rather the zoning designations and district development standards are to be applicable to future
developments upon annexation and zone change requests.
BACKGROUND
A Public Hearing was held at the Planning Commission on July 28, 2015, to review the final
ordinances, which was continued to August 11, 2015. A public hearing for first reading of the final
ordinances was held at the City Council on September 1, 2015, continued to September 15, 2015,
October 6, 2015, and November 17, 2015.
Page I of 9
IrN
CITY OF
ASHLAND
The City Council directed a number of amendments be made to each of the three ordinances presented
at first reading. At the conclusion of first reading of the ordinances, as amended, Council clarified that
public testimony presented at second reading shall be limited to comments exclusively addressing the
changes to each the ordinances that were approved by Council at first reading.
The amendment made to each ordinance between first and second reading are as follows:
Ordinance 1 (Comprehensive Plan and Normal Neighborhood Framework Document)
The Land Use Map in the Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework, pg 5, was modified to change the
southernmost block of property zoned as NN-1-3.5-C to NN-1-3-5, retaining the commercial overlay
zoning for only the northern block.
,
- - _ t Zoning
NN-15
v. NN-1-3 5
I
W- 1 -3 5-C
2 ~Z
f
Open soam
. Road CFassdicaewns
Normal Neighborhood District
Zoning Classifications C 3c
The newly modified image/map above incorporates the reduced area of NN-1-3.5-C as amended. This
amended map is additionally included within the Normal Neighborhood District Land Use Ordinance
(Ordinance 43)
• The Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework description of an alley, pg 28, was amended to
eliminate the sentence:
o "The narrow street section of rear lanes reduces the extent of impervious sup faces in
the Normal Neighborhood and supports wetland and stream health. "
Page 2 of 9
CITY OF
ASHLAND
• The Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework Advance Financing and Phasing of Public
Improvements section, pg 30, was amended to clarify the improvements that are to be made to
East Main Street, from Walker to Clay Street. Although the original motion only stated that the
phased improvements related in general to East Main Street, it was clarified that the motion
should have stated improvements be made to East Main Street "from Walker Avenue to Clay
Street". The amendment below presented for second reading incorporates this clarification:
o During the first phase of development within the plan area, prior to, or simultaneously
with any construction or development that borders East Main Street, improvements
shall be made to East Main Street, .from Walker Avenue to Clay Street, so that at a
minimum.
■ Travel lanes and turn lane improvements are fully installed a minimum of 250'
on either side of any newly constructed intersection with East Main Street. Full
street improvements shall he completed from Walker Ave. to Clay Street upon
installation of any second new public street intersection with East Main Street.
■ Pedestrian and Bicycle improvements shall be installed.fr•om 0"alker° Ave. to
Clay Street with the initial phase of any annexation and development that
borders East Main Street, and shall be completed prior to completion of the
proposed development.
o The following previously existing language in the Framework has been removed from
the Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework as it was superseded by the above
clarification:
■ Consideration of a phased improvement plan for- new intersections along East
Main Street will include an evaluation of adequate pedestrian and bicycle
connectivity from Walker Avenue to Clay Street. A full sidewalk along the south
side of East Main Street, or an alternative bicycle and pedestrian path system
within the project area connecting a proposed development to the middle school
should be provided in the initial phase of development.
• The Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework was amended to add a new section, Plan
Monitoring and Updates, pg 33, to stipulate the neighborhood plan is subject to review as
follows:
o Plan Monitoring and Updates
Neighborhood plans, by their nature, are subject to periodic review and changes to
reflect changing local conditions, demographic shifts, and other./actors. To monitor
the plan's implementation the City Council will evaluate the Normal Neighborhood
Plan either ten years.following the plan's adoption, or upon the cumulative land use
approval of 150 dwelling units or more, whichever occurs earlier. The purpose of this
review is to ensure the neighborhood's development is consistent with the objectives of
the Normal Neighborhood Plan.
The City Council may initiate revisions to the Normal Neighborhood Plan at their
discretion at any time should the any of the following conditions warrant plan
adjustments.-
- The Neighborhood Plan no longer reflects the community's current goals and
objectives;
Page 3 of 9
~r11
CITY OF
-ASHLAND
• The Neighborhood Plan is in conflict with current city or state policies;
• Conditions have materially changed so that projected trends in land use, population,
housing needs, economic conditions, local services, natural resources, or other
elements are no longer accurate;
• Experience with the Neighborhood Plan and the goals and policies, regulations and
other measures employed to implement the Neighborhood Plan suggests the need to
improve the clarity and effecliveness of the Neighborhood Plan.
The City Council may determine upon revieii, that modifications to the plan are
unnecessary. In the event the City Council determines major changes to the plan, or
legislative changes to the Land Use Ordinance, are necessary to respond to current
conditions, revisions to the plan will be subject to a approval process consistent with
Chapter 18.3.4 and Chapter 18.5.9 of the Land Use Code and ivill be reviewed in
consideration ofpublic inputfrom the neighborhood.
Ordinance 2 (Transportation System Plan and Shared Street Standards)
The Transportation System Plan and Shared Street Standards amendments were approved by Council
at first reading with the direction to modify the Shared Street description to allow this new street type
to be applied in areas other than those that are physically constrained as follows:
o Provides access to residential uses in an area in which right-of-tivay is constrained by
natural features, topography or historically significant structures. The Shared streets
may additionally be used in circumstances where a slower speed street, collectively
shared by pedestrians, bicycles, and autos, is a./unctional and preferred design
alternative. The design of the street should emphasize a slower speed environment and
provide clear physical and visual indications the space is shared across modes.
Ordinance 3 (Land Use Ordinance)
The amendments to the Land Use Ordinance were approved by Council at first reading have been
incorporated into the ordinance presented at second reading as follows::
• 18.3.4.030 C 1.b.iii
A change in the Plan layout that changes the boundaries or location of an oven space
- - * 0 area to correspond with a delineated tivelland and water resource protection zone,
07" relocation of a designated open space area.
• 18.3.4.030 C.3. Minor Amendment
Type I Procedure. A Minor amendments to the Normal Neighborhood Development Plan as
identified in 18.3.4.030. C.1. b. i and 18.3.4.030. C.1. b. ii are subject to an administrative decision
under the Type I Procedure.
Type H Procedure. A minor amendment to the Normal Neighborhood Development Plan as
identified in 18.3.4.030. C.1. b. iii is subject to a public hearing and decision under a Type II
Procedure.
Minor amendments are subject to the Exception to the Site Design and Use Development
Standards of'chapter 18.5.2.050.E.
Pale 4 of 9
CITY OFF
.S LATD
• 18.3.4.060.B 7 Conformance with Open Space Network Plan:
New developments must provide open space consistent with the design concepts within the
Greenway and Open Space chapter of the Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework and in
conformance with the Normal Neighborhood Plan Open Space Network Map. The open space
network will be designed to support the neighborhood's distinctive character and provide
Passive recreational opportunities where people can connect with nature, where water
resources are protected' and where riparian corridors and wetlands are preserved and
enhanced.
a) The application demonstrates that equal or better protection for identified resources will be
ensured through restoration, enhancement, and mitigation measures.
b) The application demonstrates that connections between open spaces are created and
maintained providing for an interlinked system o f greenlvays.
c) The application demonstrates that open spaces function to provide habitat for wildlife,
promote environmental quality by absorbing, storing, and releasing storm realer, and
protect future development fi°om flood hazards.
d) The application demonstrates that scenic vietivs considered important to the community are
protected, and community character and quality of life are Preserved by buffering areas of
development f win one another.
Options for Review and Plan Updates
During the Council discussion on November 17, 2015, members of the City Council requested staff
present options for consideration regarding plan review thresholds addressing the ability to evaluate
plan changes in the future.
Option #1 as presented below is included in the Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework (pg 33)
presented for second reading this evening. Staff recommends Option #1 as it identifies examples of
the types of changing conditions might be additional factors, beyond the year and dwelling unit
number thresholds, which may be considered by future City Council's in electing to make
modifications to the plan or land use ordinance.
Plan Review Option #l:
Neighborhood plans, by their nature, are subject to periodic review and changes to reflect changing
local conditions, demographic shifts, crud other° factors. To monitor the plan's implementation the City
Council will evaluate the Normal Neighborhood Plan either ten years following the plan's adoption, or
upon the cumulative land use approval of 150 units or more, whichever occurs earlier, to ensure the
neighborhood's development is consistent with the objectives of the Normal Neighborhood Plan.
The City Council may initiate revisions to the Normal Neighborhood Plan at their discretion at any tirrre
should the any of the following conditions warrant plan adjustments:
• The Neighborhood Plan no longer reflects the con nrunity's current goals and objectives;
• The Neighborhood Plan is in conflict with current city or state policies;
• Conditions have materially changed so that projected trends in land use, population, housing
needs, economic conditions, local services, natural resources, or other elements are no longer
accurate;
Page 5 of 9
IAM
CITY OF
S H LAl''rI D
• Experience with the Neighborhood Plan and the goals and policies, regulations and other
measures employed to implement the Neighborhood plan suggests the need to improve the clarity
and effectiveness of the Neighborhood Plan.
The City Council may determine upon review that modifications to the plan are unnecessary. In the
event the City Council determines major changes to the plan, or legislative changes to the Land Use
Ordinance, are necessary to respond to current conditions, revisions to the plan will be subject to a
approval process consistent with Chapter 18.3.4 and Chapter 18.5.9 of the Land Use Code and tivill be
reviewed in consideration of public input from the neighborhood.
Plan Review Option #2:
It is anticipated that the conditions within Normal Neighborhood District could change over tune and
alter the premise for the various elernerrts of the plan, therefore it is important to periodically review the
plan. It is anticipated that the plan elements will be regularly examined through review of annexation
and development proposals. To monitor the plan's implementation the City Council will evaluate the
Normal Neighborhood Plan upon construction of'150 dwelling units within the plan area, or len years
following the plan's approval, whichever occurs first.
The City Council's review will consider the effectiveness of the plan in meeting the pr°ojeci objectives
and neighborhood module concepts, including the preservation of'open space, protection of natural
resources, provision of a variety of housing types, and the adequacy of the transportation system. In
order to determine if an application to amend the adopted neighborhood plan is warranted the City
Council may additionally consider development aclivity that has occurred ivilhin the plan area while
subject to county development standards:
The City Council may determine upon review that modifications to the plan are unnecessary. In the
event the City Council determines major changes to the plan, or legislative changes to the Land Use
Ordinance, are necessary to respond to current conditions, revisions to the plan will be subject to a
approval process consistent with Chapter 18. 3.4 and Chapter 18.59 of the Land Use Code and will he
reviewed in consideration of public input from the neighborhood
Plan Review Option #3
Should the City Council elect to revise the automatic triggers put forth above, the Council
could insert a different period of years, or different unit count in either Option 1, or Option 2:
either years following the plan's adoption, or upon the cumulative land use approval of uruilS
or more, whichever occurs earlier,...
either years following the plan's adoption, or upon construction of _ units, whichever occurs
earlier,...
Plan Review Option #4
Should the City Council elect to remove the automatic review triggers (10 year or 150 units),
but decide to retain a section on plan review within the Normal Neighborhood Plan framework
document, the Council could select option #1 above and direct the removal of the following
sentence:
Pale 6 oi- 9
IAMI
CITY OF
ASHLAND
"To monitor the plans implementation the City Council will evaluate the Normal
Neighborhood Plan either ten years following the plan's adoption, or upon the cumulative land
use approval of 150 units or more, whichever occurs earlier, to ensure the neighborhood's
development is consistent with the objectives of the Normal Neighborhood Plan. "
NEXT STEPS
Upon approval of second reading of the Normal Neighborhood Plan's implementing ordinances,
Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law regarding the Normal Neighborhood Plan ordinances will be
drafted and presented at the Council's regular business meeting, January 5, 2016, for review and
approval.
COUNCIL GOALS SUPPORTED:
Goal 7. Keep Ashland a family friendly community:
7.3 Support land-use plans and policies that encourage family- fi-iendly neighborhoods.
Goal 13. Develop and support land use and transportation policies to achieve sustainable development.
13.1 Create incentives and ordinances for energy-efficient buildings.
13.2 Develop infill and compact urban form policies.
13.3 Support alternative transportation choices.
Goal 14. Encourage and/or develop public spaces that build community and promote interaction.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
N/A.
COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations of the Planning and Transportation Commissions is provided in the Planning
Action (PL-2013-01858) Staff Report dated July 28. and Staff Report Addendum dated August
11, 2015, provided to the City Council at first reading.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION AND REQUESTED ACTION:
Staff recommends approval of second reading of each of the three ordinances.
SUGGESTED MOTION(S):
Separate motions are required to address each of the three proposed ordinances:
Ordinance I - Comprehensive Plan Amendments
I move to approve the Second Reading by title only, including the amendments to the ordinance which
have been read in full this evening, of an ordinance titled:
"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF ASHLAND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ADD A
NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN DESIGNATION TO CHAPTER II [INTRODUCTION AND
DEFINITIONS], ADD THE NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD LAND CATEGORIES TO CHAPTER IV
[HOUSING ELEMENT], CHANGE THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION FOR
APPROXIMATELY 94 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF ASHLAND URBAN GROWTH
BOUNDARY FROM SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TO THE
NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN DESIGNATION, AND ADOPT THE NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD
PLAN FRAMEWORK AS A SUPPORT DOCUMENT TO THE CITY OF ASHLAND COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN,"
Page 7 of 9
WPAKA
CITY OF
SHLAIND
Ordinance 2 - Transportation System Plan Amendments
I move to approve the Second Reading by title only, including the amendments to the ordinance which
have been read in full this evening, of an ordinance titled:
"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STREET DEDICATION MAP, PLANNED INTERSECTION AND
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT MAP, AND PLANNED BIKEWAY NETWORK MAP OF THE ASHLAND
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AREA, AND
AMENDING STREET DESIGN STANDARDS WITHIN THE ASHLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
18.4.6 TO ADD A NEW SHARED STREET CLASSIFICATION",
Ordinance 3 - Land Use Ordinance Amendments
I move to approve the Second Reading by title only, including the amendments to the ordinance which
have been read in full this evening, of an ordinance titled:
"AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ASHLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CREATING A NEW CHAPTER
18.3.4 NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD DISTRICT, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.2.1.020 TO ADD A NORMAL
NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING CLASSIFICATION, AND AMENDING CHAPTER 18.2.1.040 TO ADD A
NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL, DISTRICT.
ATTACHMENTS:
Ordinance 1 - Comprehensive Plan Amendments
Ordinance 1 Exhibit A (Appendix amendment)
Ordinance 1 Exhibit B (Normal Neighborhood Framework)
Ordinance I Exhibit C (Map)
Ordinance 2 Transportation System Plan Amendments
Ordinance 2 Exhibit A (Street Network Map)
Ordinance 2 Exhibit B (Pedestrian and Bike Network Map)
Ordinance 3 - Land Use Ordinance Amendments
Ordinance 3 Exhibit A (Ch 18.3.4)
Pale 8 of 9
EAL
CITY OF
ASHLAND
Letters
Public letters submitted relating to Planning Action PL-2013-01858 , including prior iterations of the
draft plan (pre-July 2015), have been presented to the City Council at prior hearings. These letters
remain available online at xi~N-w.ashland.or.us/normalplan, which includes the following electronically
linked letters:
2015 2014 2013
All 2014 letters combined - All 2013 letters
PDF combined - PDF
c Vidmar letter (7/1312015) o Jones/MaharHomes letter o DeMarinis letter and
c Vidmar letter (3/31/2015) (11/20/2014) exhibits (10/31/2013)
Miller letter (3/23/2015) O Vidmar letter (1.1/15/2014) o DeMarinis letter and
Alvarez letter 8/2012015 o ACCESS Inc. letter (11/12/20 exhibits (10/8/2013)
o Hoffman letter 8/11/2015 o Vidmar letter (10/27/2014) O Meadowbrook Home
c Lutz letter 7/28/2015 o Miller letter (9/29/2014) Owners (Anderson)
c Anderson letter 7/28/2015 o Mahar Homes Concept Plan letter and exhibits
Hoffman letter 7/27/2015 (9/18/2014) (10/8/2013)
o DeMarinis letter 8/25/2015 o Lutz letter (9/17/2014) o Ashland Meadows
o Teague letter 8/29/2015 O Miller letter (9/12/2014 (Skuratowicz) letter
o Palmieri 8/29/2015 O Miller letter (9/03/2014) (10/8/2013)
o Rhudy letter 8/30/2015 o Boyer letter (8/20/2014) o Koopman letter and
o Barnes letter 1 8/30/2015 O DeMarinis letter (8/06/2014) exhibits (10/8/2013)
o Barnes letter 2 8/30/2015 O Boyer Letter (8/06/2014) o Lutz letter (9/26/2013)
o Force letter 8/30/2015 o Vidmar letter (7/30/2014) o Vidmar letter
o Ragosine letter 8/30/2015 o Breon letter (7/22/2014) (7/29/2013)
o Parker letter 8/29/2015 o DeMarinis letter (7/22/2014) o Carse letter
o Parker -paper 8/29/2015 o Vidmar letter (7/21/2014) (6/27/2013)
o Colwell - Gracepoint letter 9/01/2015 O DeMarinis letter (7/15/2014) o Gracepoint letter
o Various letters submitted at 9/01/2015 o DeMarinis letter (5/19/2014) (6/12/2013)
hearing o Anderson letter (4/08/2014) o Vidmar letter
o Chetron letter 8/31/2015 o Grace Point letter (5/06/2014) (4/26/2013)
o McKirgan letter 8/31/2015 o Livni letter (4/29/2014) o Shore letter
o Hoffner letter 8/31/2015 o Mandell letter (5/05/2014) (4/10/2013)
o Lander letter 8/31/2015 o Marshall Letter (04/30/2014) o Marshall letter
o Koch letter 8/31/2015 o Miller Letter (4/30/2014) (4/10/2013)
o Woods letter 8/31/2015 O Neher letter (5/02/2014) o Horn letter
o Oring letter 8/31/2015 o Quiett letter (5/1/2014) (3/05/2013)
o Pagani letter 8/31/2015 o Wallace letter (5/01/2014) o Filson letter
o Vos letter 9/1/2015 o Seidler letter (4/30/2014) (2/25/2013)
o Ourshalimian letter 9/01/2015 o Sharp letter (4/29/2014) o Vidmar letter
o Agee letter 9/01/2015 o Jacobson letter (4/27/2014) (2/25/2013)
o Cleland Sipfle letter 9/01/2015 o Arsac letter (4/29/2014)
o Zonnenschein letter 9101/2015 o Brannan letter (5/04/2014)
o Mattson letter 9/01/2015 o Gerschler letter (5/04/2014)
o Shanafelt letter 9/01/2015 o Open City_Hall public comments
o Lutz letter 9/01/2015
o Wells letter 9/2&9/3/2015 o GracePoint letter (3/11/2014)
o Hoffman Cie letter 9/08/2015 o Anderson Letter (3/11/2014)
o Parker BLI letter 9/10/2015 o Skuratowicz letter (3/11/2014)
o Parker letter 9/10/2015 o Hunter letter ( 2/25/14)
o Smith letter 9/10/2015
o Matthews letter 9/15/2015
o Anderson letter 9/15/2015
o Anderson letter 9/30/2015
o DeMarinis letter 10/06/2015
Page 9 of 9
M
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CITY OF ASHLAND
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO ADD A NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD
PLAN DESIGNATION TO CHAPTER II [INTRODUCTION AND
DEFINITIONS], ADD THE NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD LAND
CATEGORIES TO CHAPTER IV [HOUSING ELEMENT], CHANGE
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MAP DESIGNATION FOR
APPROXIMATELY 94 ACRES OF LAND WITHIN THE CITY OF
ASHLAND URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY FROM SINGLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL AND SUBURBAN RESIDENTIAL TO THE
NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN DESIGNATION, AND ADOPT
THE NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN FRAMEWORK AS A
SUPPORT DOCUMENT TO THE CITY OF ASHLAND
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Annotated to show deletions and additions to the code sections being modified. Deletions are
bold lined th -oug and additions are in bold underline.
WHEREAS, Article 2. Section 1 of the Ashland City Charter provides:
Powers of the City The City shall have all powers which the constitutions, statutes, and
common law of the United States and of this State expressly or impliedly grant or allow
municipalities, as fully as though this Charter specifically enumerated each of those
powers, as well as all powers not inconsistent with the foregoing; and, in addition thereto,
shall possess all powers hereinafter specifically granted. All the authority thereof shall
have perpetual succession.
WHEREAS, the above referenced grant of power has been interpreted as affording all
legislative powers home rule constitutional provisions reserved to Oregon Cities. City of
Beaverton v. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 1660, Beaverton Shop 20 Or. App. 293;
531 P 2d 730, 734 (1975); and
WHEREAS, the City of Ashland Planning Commission considered the above-referenced
recommended amendments to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan at a duly advertised public
hearing on July 28, 2015 and continued the hearing to August 11,2011, following deliberations,
recommended approval of the amendments by a vote of 5-0; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland conducted a duly advertised public hearing
on the above-referenced amendments on September 1, 2015, September 15, 2015, and October 6,
2015; and
Ordinance No. Page 1 of 3
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland, following the close of the public hearing
and record, deliberated and conducted first and second readings approving adoption of the
Ordinance in accordance with Article 10 of the Ashland City Charter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland has determined that in order to protect and
benefit the health, safety and welfare of existing and future residents of the City, it is necessary
to amend the Ashland Comprehensive Plan in manner proposed, that an adequate factual base
exists for the amendments, the amendments are consistent with the comprehensive plan and that
such amendments are fully supported by the record of this proceeding.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The City of Ashland Comprehensive Plan, Chapter II, [INTRODUCTION AND
DEFINITIONS] is hereby amended to add the following new Section [NORMAL
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN 2.04.17] and to adopt the Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework as
a supporting document to the City's Comprehensive Plan; former Section 2.04.17 is renumbered
[PLAN REVIEW 2.04.181, to read as follows:
PLAN RENTIENA7 (2 n^ 1 7)
NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN (2.04.17)
This is a residential area that promotes a variety of housing types including sinjIle
family, attached, and multi family residential, with base housing densities ranging
from 4.5 to 13.5 units per acre. This area implements the Normal Neighborhood
Plan Framework (2015) to accommodate future housing, neighborhood scaled
business, create a system of greenways, protect and integrate existing stream
corridors and natural wetlands, and enhance overall mobility by planning for a safe
and connected network of streets and walking and bicycle routes.
PLAN REVIEW (2.04.18)
SECTION 3. The City of Ashland Comprehensive Plan Appendix entitled "Technical Reports
and Supporting Documents" is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A.
SECTION 4. The document entitled "The City of Ashland Normal Neighborhood Plan
Framework (2015)," attached hereto as Exhibit B, and made a part hereof by this reference is
hereby added to the above-referenced Appendix to support Chapter II, [INTRODUCTION AND
DEFINITIONS] of the Comprehensive Plan.
SECTION 5. The officially adopted City of Ashland Comprehensive Plan Map, adopted and
referenced in Ashland Comprehensive Plan Chapter II [PLAN MAP 2.03.04] is hereby amended
to change the Comprehensive Plan map designation of approximately 94 acres of land inside the
Ordinance No. Page 2 of 3
urban growth boundary from Single Family Residential and Suburban Residential, to the Normal
Neighborhood Plan designation including designated Conservation Areas as reflected on the
revised adopted Comprehensive Plan Map, attached hereto as Exhibit C, and made a part hereof
by this reference.
SECTION 6. The City of Ashland Comprehensive Plan Housing Element [Chapter VI]
Estimated Land Need table [Section 6.06] is hereby amended to include the Normal
Neighborhood Land Use Categories within the table's Land Category Key as follows:
MFR - Multi-family, High Density Residential
(R-2,& R-3 & NN-2 zoning)
SR - Suburban Residential
(R-I-3.5 & NN-1-3.5 zoning)
SFR - Single-family Residential
(R-1 -5, R-1: 7.5, R-1:_10, & NN-1-5)
LDR - Low Density Residential
(RR.5 zoning)
SECTION 7. Severability. The sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses of this ordinance
are severable. The invalidity of one section, subsection, paragraph, or clause shall not affect the
validity of the remaining sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses.
SECTION 8. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City
Comprehensive Plan and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section",
or another word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided
however that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Sections 1, 3-5, 7-8) need not
be codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any
typographical errors.
The foregoing ordinance was first read by title only in accordance with Article X,
Section 2(C) of the City Charter on the day of , 2015,
and duly PASSED and ADOPTED this _ day of , 2015.
Barbara M. Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of , 2015.
John Stromberg, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
David Lohman, City Attorney
Ordinance No. Page 3 of 3
Exhibit A
Appendix A: Technical Reports and Supporting Documents
City of Ashland, Oregon Comprehensive Plan
Periodically, the City may choose to conduct studies and prepare technical reports to adopt by reference within
the Comprehensive Plan to make available for review by the general public. These studies and reports shall not
serve the purpose of creating new city policy, but rather the information, data and findings contained within the
documents may constitute part of the basis on which new policies may be formulated or existing policy
amended. In addition, adopted studies and reports provide a source of information that may be used to assist
the community in the evaluation of local land use decisions.
Chapter II, Introduction and Definitions
The following reports are adopted by reference as a supporting document to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan,
Chapter II, Introduction and Definitions.
1. Croman Mill Site Redevelopment Plan (2008) by Ordinance 3030 on August 17, 2010
2. Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework (2015) by Ordinance on , 2015.
Chapter IV, Environmental Resources
The following reports are adopted by reference as a support document to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan,
Chapter IV, Environmental Resources.
1. City of Ashland Local Wetland Inventory and Assessment and Riparian Corridor Inventory (2005/2007) by
Ordinance 2999 on December 15, 2009.
Chapter VI, Housing Element
The following reports are adopted by reference as a support document to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan,
Chapter VI, Housing Element.
1) City of Ashland: Housing Needs Analysis (2012) by Ordinance 3085 on September 3, 2013
Chapter VII, Economy
The following reports are adopted by reference as a support document to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan,
Chapter VII, The Economy.
1. City of Ashland: Economic Opportunities Analysis (April 2007) by Ordinance 3030 on August 17, 2010
Chapter XII, Urbanization
The following reports are adopted by reference as a support document to the Ashland Comprehensive Plan,
Chapter XII, Urbanization.
1. City of Ashland: Buildable Lands Inventory (2011) by Ordinance 3055 on November 16, 2011.
LA
N
LLI
y T r7 n;
r'
I
y
0
0
E
°
LL x
C x
O X
IL u) C
co
'O O M
p N z
O V N
m >
.O C Q)
L C z
0) O
z c O o,
_ to O c
m x w
E a, ~
x O C ~
° LA 6 1 C
z O ° U
u m c
O
C - O O ~m m
c Ln c E t E ro
O O - N O 2 C C J
O n
C O fV u 7 L t C co
y -
y > a Y C L O O C O) C L `O d
L Ul a) a) a) ` co (O
4l O (Q p Lr) (n z c
N n 'c J > 0 C i0 Nc
0 ca 0 cc cc cu
'Oa a cc " O u a) 0 ca v v m
3 ¢ o a n C7 U cn z a d
o ~
c
V ~
Q ~
N
7
U
L
U
Q
m
m
° m m
° E N
E co °
O c0 O C
C
` m C
T
(6 u a) = a O C O 6 E 0) o
O O
C T C co Q. = L o C N N
c O a p C O C C > E u7 co cu Q > p Lr) 01 CU ca -
O
N O O) 7
ll7 ..C O C C p_ .C
a C C O _
c U c c o i
o Y a o
a) c ° c E a m U p ° c o ° 0)
o c° a) c (n
E a w c > ° a 0 o x
a T O C C ~ m
O w U v a
o ' m m H d J a~ (n W N c E
C7 E ° m Q E 2 a) - o U ~ ai m ° m
o m c 3 Y L7 c (D o n a ~ a) m
-o F E ° a C 3 T ° ~ c U 'v n
c LL > o t°- o o E a a° o- -°a .o
° O T O r+ ca z l7 0 C C N ~ T C O O -
m c (n L y to O a -0 ° N (0 O U ° p
Y O v
a " v C ° m c E c ° J O ° m
C ~p C .i., 7 i O_ C ° O C Q N N t
m - t c^ C p m m
to O C
N H x cu Y N i r_ 01 a0 r O N N O U 2 O N Q
r a c v m o CC a u z c o o L p a Q a o c
V o o E - 3 a v m a a o cn C
U v
m a ^ cu E m > c N o a c o r
a m v ° " m -y v ° m r c ° m e 0 L
a U 0 n. Ln d -i z U H H C~ o a cn w o H v
M ~ M M M M M a
m
rr
II II, i
' 'I II 3
o
I. -
r
II W i o
Q a
C
I Z o
Q N
L
WI'': z a
I
L
W E
UI w w J O'I m
Ln m~
Q z o
ZII O
tA m Q
CaC ~ Z O ~ Z
LL >Q> < t/1
z 7 ~ v~l D J
z' H a
LM %6 ri
N M I~r LM Ul) ~o m rn N; N %D r" m ON m m o
CD CD
C
O I
U tY
0 Q
O J
.O III O
F N Ln
Fw w
w X
O O
_ z cc
Ln
o u N a
C) ui O O
Q U Z Ln ~n V
a p w N co
z ¢ U Z D
L.L m m Q Z { O a_ F- H O
d Ln O D p LU H w
N p l7
z z a O
Z Y a
O_ z O 1- cr z
z Q
o m J' v/i O L/) O ' U Z
0 0 z O O w I- Z w O N Z > in
H m O a a ~ w m Q w Q J O p LU CL
w
l7 a Q z O p Q ~ z w I- I¢ Q ~ H Z
C) U Z w z D 7) - w m m J w z w
Z O% Z W N D ; Q W m w ~ w z Q
cc §
z U- O ¢ OS p Q OC Z O Ln Q Ln O I- Un pQ
a- w Ov
i Z l7I
MI ~I
In ~o ^ oo rn o
N N N N N m
O
a
E
2
LL
C ~
c
a Y (6
~ ~ 01
O z
O 6 a
L c c E 7
O M ra >
v a z
a
z 3 3
v v =
E
o V) Ln o
c
z -0 _ _ t Ln O
0 0 CJ
aj Cl- a
t C JS Q) O O N I ~ c
- Z u m
L L a ! i a
Ol Ol N ~ J
N Z Z m
-
Z Z vii Q -
3 c
a a a Q. a
T
01 O_ Q Q. O-
_ a c
C a a a a c
Q~1 (1) (3)
J C
O
06
a)
N m V' Vl kO rl W N N N N Lf1 ^ O N N N N
C Q
f6 4.
Y m
f6 v - O
O O -
m ~ ~ a
Z O Q- V1 Y
Z -Q - O O
a a
-0 2 4 N
3 I V a_-~
Q c 3 3
j O v O _
3 a` v v Z3 -
G) O U ~ N m ^ a a ^ -O -O
c c o 0 0 0 0 0 ° ° 0 E
c Q ro p - u a U O
O O 0 Z Z Z > > m
in d M Z Z Z Y Y Q Q a O O N
fr a) r6 O C C C
o In d
ai (L -C
Q U Y a a a .91
O o v a Z
a) a -0
T O m a z -0 -0 v a O Z Z to Z c
a Z 0 v a a - - n I- F- F- F-
tn a Y ¢ Q a v as a a a a
W + a v a ra Cl) a v v v v w
ru m ci C) a) (1) 0. -C ru X X -C 4t 4t
a u -i u w v w w Z Z Z O U In Vl L/) In V) L/)
T
l7
LL v
7~
O g a
bb 0 0 "C'
a
b ti o v d b q u ° o c
G '3 o c ° v ro u u ° c m
v b v u ° O ro 4 C bn G ° ti G
b O
bn b ° o m C p u n ° a
v cc
ire G" v 5 M c~Gc! o o w R' M 'O cc O
tr,
a
v
U c C a bn _n n
cl-
u C G U 7 v, .G O N
cam, cS C a`"i
rl-
u bfj O p- u~ U O O G ti U u O v C h 4
u C u v p v E v N ^O a v
> a ° CJ bn ° d a ern .0 £
_ °
115
U L O ° C u bh ~ "U K n C C u_ C a ~C
0 -Z
v d u v c
a v U O 2- v v
v k m tCn u a u a d -d o o v d o a o .v bn o
. C pa', b U,
It u
bn -0
ul P_ Z_ -
-C E
71
o v° r ° 3 s° o 17 w ° ❑ o~ U ti v
ti ti a 8 _rz U ar o ° c c o
c °
°o w 2= bn ° o ° v c v x v u
u _u
u 7,
bn C v r r C v d c Y C n
0
0
c
~E
a
0
0
s R
0
3
N
E
ca
LL
c
m
C
O z
O N
L
O >
L N
L z
71
O - E u v c 5 y ° o "j y c
y o C ° ~ x bn ~ ~ ~ v
u ~ O ~ ~ y ~ ~ C 'O ^U y ❑ • C c
~ rr
2,1' ° bn j by O J
c t - c ° o
bn cn o G v>
. a bn v r ..O Q. O O w v v C
C o w bn O~. 1
T i [ r ° a
r, a o
v -C G
a v -o o bn Q) v a
ti
W O y O .x ~ U "d Gti. v ~ v 71 O
Q n x a 3 y o o `
G.. p cd y~ 'Y ~ rV ca 3 c~ C
ti
'a ~ ~ - ~ cC N ty, y al Lti., U U ~ y ~ N
bn a G y ° u a I' c~
G c ° CrV bn v bn o 4 -
c
bA s awi ~ u v
n. u v L br fy v v . E is C v v 3
r O -d c'--J 'b v u C -u O 9
CL
73 r
O MD O bA N
bc 140,
O N cc C. vu 0.. G u <a M 72
C ° m
b"D
C. O
k, v C N "L'i V 6~1 cC w M C ° bn ~n
° y 3 o ro y y -C5
tp E o
0
tj~ C w v O c~ y v' Off, v w
v
U n Q Y
u
y
r
l C
~ a{
3
- o
l7
ea~(~Mt~te*nFtR~~~~a!x~+~tn~~ ~ ~ c
m
0
a
c
m
F
i
7 N
o L! V
o
5 M~
FR jam.
ti
lz -PIA 9
IL
ctl GA 4I <d U N v
. N
v O Cbb O v v v > O a0 C
v r^ u O o v c 3 r¢ o d°_
14-
bf,
v ° v G > a v c c o o v o > v M ° n U U
v v; U v G ~ ro
cis W cn N IJ
n R n s ~ o v 3 w El
en G ° m
U N G ° C bA O O
m ° v y r 3 U n c
C ce m u G[) u r F~ -u
v C v v
LL m O v m o q m G~„ O, r, p ~t ca
-d 'd c o .O ' v v bUn
co V h b o v [ ai -c7 u v r v o C
C G~
El t
o [ ° v a O v d 3° U v s> a[ 0 3 °c oCn
c ~ c..
z .4 [ o o > 7 c q C c r 4 c L;
U O v CA U b v i v v O O N v
(a 'tJ L O a U cd U v G u ° v Ci. iA cc
v v C m v v G u O v tf
O U O o O 0 O SJ O N r-G ci > C ° C C N c
Z ~ O' q p U N O U U
N
co
G y ti O .-G js v ° y U C b) P-,
O ayi U p v e> o p CL
-C 'q q q y y v ° 'G ° G " p
c w s -11 11
E13 0 -b,
00 Y ° ° M y v c y 2 ° 3 3 ° v
t, m- zi
p r y p
Z v Y' C CA o v0. v O O y > U C Zn
Gj -u u^ "b u c^O.A O CA o p bA -C G bA C
cu "d 't N G QJ c~C O p y v N y 4l
v ro Q. [ ° .b •Y cy v
^ "O v R. p, CU
0 c4 ~ ° F v cr v c a C n r c
Z C a bn p p y y o 3 3 ° ° o ° ° v ° v G U
' v v U v p O C v Ct. O J v 2, o a
y b p r O
y v
ca G U
nu yU u d 'b O U w v Q
G v a G o ° i ° o o
v y l.. O of •C u k bA 7D 0. c
v °J Q ~c C v i.. 0 C u c
~-7 l~ v 7 d y ns w u
u 0 U a.l o" 'C C. o 'O Q "t7 O m u u ❑ w
d
c
3
0
F
1aa115 APP
N
7
U
N
C
O >faal:) Aep ~ L
U
3 E - -
'6 3 3 ~
o E
Y
bM PuellaM fn
Y
O
„awD A,a>awaD 3
N
a
k
ZIM PuehaM •~r
°
E
N
anuany ~vwloN ~ y N
.w "O
GM Puell-M C
1
o t
w
o lJ
C
f~ d
- -rte Ow .....t
,c
A
i a Ste, .a,.... •y.... - '
• ~ d
f..
t~
U
[ v > u
'a >
3 a v 3 ~ on
Cct
Y CA O ~ U [ 4 b ~
O O C ~ ~ " CA r3.
~ ~ ~ v ~ b v G a L
v n u on
U ~ [ C
c p C ,
C O [ [ Ft v
d o r o u
a t n 3
ch y ~ r
00 a ~ 0. G ~ ~ ~ o v cr
c a ~ v u
cl.
CU) p 'O u
N O a C [ U
z ~n U "d cc~~ v .C O p O CA O cC
J~ a •v. cC G N v U U U G r ~ G
a= O C v on m O..
r„ u I U
V
LCD
v
3 bp o u A c v ' V O O C CA N U
m c .b -d v c c m c S - n
E p '2 C a b ° ° bn a ° w ~ c o
C C
•u -d O b cc
o
uC cNa
IL -0 2
r
d 2 b n o~ o ° a m U Z
L bur, am)
o C C O 00 O r7 ~ ~ O C ~ O Ti -b 0 J 'd ~ O O O >
> bA O 'r'i. 3 Z .L U C N 4. "Y bq v •-C Z
aCi C C O v a' C cCd .II G GIl w _ r Obl'i
m O O C C O C
Z t!1 o c br, L u p u "D 3 0 ~ ~ N~ u o
E o a y 3 o r b v c H n
bh tz 'o cu
J ~ ~ 22 ~ C •o a u b ~ ~ ~ c o 0
7D tL r (D
z o
c[ ti v o A° v ro bin a
It
l7
u p bq C1,
ca-
C- Jc-
y~ C w
O O o O n o m o a= o
v a E
O ° o o n
u C" o a v 3 .v o y o
z m c G C Z p N > Q, Q' LL u U It O m
a-
C
4 ~ L ~
c _ r
ro $ Y v
to
v crt z z z z 6
R s Q
o ~N
NN co
f + Y
c
ca
a -
a
o q x
O -
L Wr
.r
O m
0
s. $E -
m r
E t
o
_ tIR CD o
N ~ C r
Q c. i Z N V
1 C
J ~
.K' 01
~C 5
U C
Q1
N
,x 1 O
f E
N e V
O _ P .K d1
2 c
v ? o ~ ° Y
on s o G m
o v
ti 7E x u C y o° c Z Q
o v f, .4 v ~c droo n o G a m
n > a m c [ ° o r m CJ
M o
cn c o Z ~ y ~ 7 n. ~ ~ ~ cb ~ cn
a
C
o n 2 a ~ U Z r ° [ U o> [ ~°c e a °
` u v o0 h : •.C S~ r, C t~ v~ M q~ .4 `o y OA u O
p 'b p 'Y_+ 'C3 G i cfj a~ N 'C 'O O 1]
r ro x N 7 o C u r ° 2 ° [ ct aj
co cD.
-15 c
c~ ai U ..r C C O a O 'd v v c O [ r 3 ,b x
V o a .X > 3 G I n o o c
a ° '3 ° o " a o° cn o f
y ❑ m o y [ m a c ti w
o o C v M N d ° °c a. It It
r°° o v u>° m
a c o ° v 0 [ Z ~cn G p o o G ° v o v o
u ° c y ^ v o ,t tO y r o Q m
o g -I th
Z > d
CD cl,
c b o o n Z cn o 3 M ° °o N
a v K b 3 v 2 ° o > u t H v o o o
E 0. u v N O y J > ..C N [ C L O
It
AAA T
`o ° c Z
Cy~~ o Z[ It "a o c 3° v o v r
z FF . n Z O r Z w v M
CD
ti
cA
° u > cn c v r C c u a E u
u U, CL
c [mod ° ao v_ c°, C u L ° an N
ca a a° Y C v °n Q ti N aA v 3; Z
3 Z u
d n a° ° F c U CA Q u z v 'u
o r 3 a u u p u oU Z Q v n o v C >
L) WD
71
z v r, v; r ° 't7 Vl v 'b v; a CA v, u
a ¢ y r m 3 m v o > r u 3 c
p C v p u v N i ° y v v r M v
UU t- :3
'.t bp
Z ai LL - G ❑ q u C Z o
-0 0 3 - a-,- r v v
"d 'aA v C c bA y N i u a
b ° ^C c v u ° 'S o ^ o c
O 7 ~ 'D p v ~ v aoi v (O v ~0
-0 7j (D
a ° o~ o ^ M v v v GA x
t; u 'd u CA
y v q u F p > Cn u T c
o N U v v v u u o m
U U cm
d u r ° o 0 3 M Q v d Q 3
0
H
N t ~f Q
cn O ,gz `
t•
C Lu
t f',' .rt k t y IL
M ,•!r C
m
Y
C
N
C)
01
m
C
' m
L
3
-G c
N O
O ~ .r
O
r o n.
N
71 GU c
°
O r+ v R. 0. N
Z z:: v
O v a ¢ m A
u 'C v u
O .Y
~ v ~ v D
It n. 0 'd
m p v
v O av.
c > v 3 o p
Z C v ~ v ~ O [
o Z -O cpc ° ro 'Z ° v on 2 i
~v. nA C M to cC C ai •C O
71
a u o ° o o a v on
b cn s c p c Q
° cp c
3 o G ? --c' S
np o o n v c p a ^
O p 0., v v .G
-u u
a~ QJ p v w Cf-, w u o
c b M - y
u 't g
ti 3 a a c M o
° u
co v a N a~ ° G a v U c G
o d u
a U N a a° v c 4 c 3 v
c a c c bJ7j
v v
~ tuo v ~ Lr)
L o ~ o ca v ~ L)
o v ~ en
c C
b `v 0 3 c 3 v b h c [ o
p
c O a o Q -2 Qj Z 3 z c U o w O v[ owo[ n N r o u
o
H r co a ° ty o 0
C C o U 3 a c c c~ v
V v
E b° Z N b n u a U ° c
N v
o z e o e7~ m ° on ° - z o
c u
z cC v d > v c r Q [ h M Z v
co
0
71
'J O C
u
v
LL -o aJ b Qj
c d 3 c m o tr. a
= o C
It
d ti o B c
co
~ C O r "d ~ ~ 3 pU m
O ° N O ~u bA CA 'D O z
F 7
Q CO CA T y _L' G TY cv, z
c
_~A ti a o ro ? -
CD u
tr ~
z u "R a 'O p r -C'i,
0. > L: to
O c
Z u u C O
/
u c c
u co
C, -f: u Z7
G c C°C en > 3 r. c
to ° r D. O u k7': .x w O
u ca
= o ~c to c -o ti c 0
_ to a'
N u J C . j u L ti g } zs _ C-6
°v tf c `s ' r
R C v to ct 'L's - N
-C > to C ~u
R
ti
O Zl°
C O C u C Gp .
2 v G
72
C eJ -O v v -
to to
' ~ <t CU cuJ bA -
3 N [ o c u C o
o > 5 c L
c C ai u ~
J ~ V to ° ❑ ~ sr
~ y v ^ `c., to ~ ~ ~
n. ° ° ~ ~ ~ trJ -
~ C O ~ L'am' v ~ ~ .E4~►, _
4, ~ ct
p[ p u o k- 1
V ° ro C u co
G F a o o cA E R
u v tL o 7 C 0. to - uT .j N
GL U O
C C ~ - O
t>J to vbA C 5 u
cut C r 't u V
O b m °
C
d
E
a
rn
A
C
N
t
r~ O
G ~
U C
u O
~ u
u u
J ~ O
C a
r
u ~ G A
J t
~ r
- C
~ c
N C . II O ~ C d
U u U
L u O V
L: 'C .v ti O L 0
v ~ v
C u ~ u ~ a~
J p"
J v
'O v u ,a0i ~ ~ 'Y
C y y O
'N u CG % G.. ti
tn.
o w v - ~ v u ~
w o i v °
o
v t r
o 7d tj~
11 - ti
c o ° w
c a ° - o r
° cn b a ° y w v u ° > c
c
'O ti' ~ C -L' c ~ ~ C u -c7 -a
o ° d_ y cr_ C
` O y u y u 'b N G U v . t u r M
r
tj~
a~ o c n c o b 3 3 a tri
,iz
C u n. o a. C C - H' ro o
t, -C~ 71
d z [ C c^ w v -d 'b C u stn
id C i. C r C r W cn t.~ J rC' bL C
p C su. u ~ v YO ~ CL R. a "d v r
3 ~ L -o w w ~ spa, on
2 ° c c x v ° x °`a
j5 " > °J C u o ° o
' o 0 .5 y3u , o ° ° o o v ~ c c
c c E u c u C a
C G C > u c o u 0 0 0 ° c v u u o n
°
a ~ C
ca p v
E v ~ ~
° w w
CV
z
0
Y
0 0 0 hails paaegs
h ti .ti
U
~ bA by t
LL 0 [ o d g
d U U _,..d. m
(6 O v ti -
L1, U "b ~ f `JT' C
O Abp
r u 1
[ v, o ~
-0 th
.O > -b U ~ U f
.O ~ . N O O cd ~ iC - A - 1 t..•.•^ 1. Q
U >N> _ ^4
.
O ~ _ O ti cC U - , ~ y
w a C 0. bD { c
a
z O v [ p ~ -t: o
M v O jt U
c" CS, u
bJj
O > O U u O
U -
v ~ O ~ ~ O u c
~o d
L U 4- Q v C ,U ra c
o ° y c E y a 3
Q v a O ra ti
L C v S N 'O O 01 ~l QJ FO-
E > O O C U Q~
N O rQ Q t rG O O U .'n O rC U N
uU>~ un.
U
U
k. L
Q
hails paaegs
~ ~ T Y
r _
gg O
999
F
t4 _s ~ a
aolaa;ji-) poogjoggbiaU
a
~ e
n n ~
ce c
1 ~ r
Ln o
s ` i` Yr N
Q ~ y
L
d
Vf £ - ~ ~ V
'a R7 O
IQ ~ ~ ~a b U
'a 7 H
d f)
{
~ M f
'N 1 V ~ •r ~ ~
3 Z ` C7R
s e+
= Z Ir
all
z
a~4 0- C)
v~ z ASK :3
p Q ISn
U- ~ C}
1 v °4
ili E
z w ar c
CD-) - i
z in Z ~ ~ 1 j H Ica Ec,
c v z z z z
z
N
M
Y
L
C
(0
O
O N
L O
>
.O ~
Z t 7 0~
_ a 1 c
m
O C
Z O
U
a
C
[6
N
C J
Q -
n - u °
u u u Q c° a v
v G ~ ~ 4: ~ v ~ U
-75
C to
n v U o u E o s 0 3
C) 0
U C a>
y c o ° °o ° 3' to a U °
O o n to a c [
o ° w 4 u °
c ° v u [ v a v u O E .L c c L
[ b ei ci C CA R. C' v v u .t
14,
s v
L a t~ ° o y o° c O ° u o° v m
f-' u cy r~ O ~ U ~ ran u~-+ -~i L a (6
r U N N -
G H
O-. n v U_ U -U
R' 4^ camc!! ~'~vj
N
J Q. a Cr u x/''~l v O v~! CA C O G v v; -,j u
G ° n c ° W
p u v 0 4 o u
O
C c c ti o -J V9 [ G u u °
d v p u` [ aE
Ls1 0 u a E
o "t - ❑ v U m U t J s " a n m
a a ® n
o
u a ° `o v ° o b p ° ° au n C ° c ° a
O q O v O u o w y~ uu f-. C CJ. n
v o -a v 0 v v 'C Q
y tf 0 z vv C 3 C 'r.~• R. C v-to to 0 It It u
f- C~ U .b v G O rr++.. T
° Y
j aJ C
a.
U v G p 'ip O G ~ p O C
u 4' 3 o
o c p a a s
v K ~ .=L O ~ R. ce ~ bG i~ -rdy h n; ~ • ~ L7
C bA ~ v y C bvA O ~ rC ~ ~ p .^..G bn ~ E
cC O ".G > "a Ci. G ate. ' U > O
cd
ti,
N aG. C
o v C
1. " v C CA v O .-G q U v
rn ~ 'r v C L s O -G d
bb bn
3 U o
.v ro O U O C U M 'd .-C 'Y p p N i-.
4 d Q v .o v U
c C
C L o ° c o v o d v ° U h
C O v GAL ~C ~ [ ~ ~ Q v 3 v ~ b r3 n v
d v, v .L > v O p v is i" 3 0
y ya 6 L b C N bf J O U O
U u v m v U ~ O ❑
~ ~ v V v O ~ O 7 a+ u
.3 v O C v: O J O v c ` C v
v ~
v a~J a+ O U v ti G N v
vv> C "d w m [
Li-
C
a a
o -
7o I>
3 N c o
ccf ~C v u C° O
LL o o d a o° o o [ M ° M
y
m a~ v bL ti O U ' p bA C R1 v
O
0 b a a
v x o 3 'v 3 c z
>
v
o • 3 U ° ° ~ ~ ~ 0 3 ❑ r 3 v ~ z
v v [ v c
n U cC U "b [O G. U G CO 4~ y .U r v C' :n C
U a~.E O~. U v N 'u id ctl 'G F4 ~n
O a~ 4-. o.. o r cc c ° p L bfJ ca '3 v Vii c
Z N a n o N o v [ o v c7 ° 0
c u U
v 3 c m
u ° U C~ - LE ~ y ~ 0 3 by m
4 v 0 3 c a, 3 0 v 4. r r~ c
° 4c c ° ! ° ° bA v cr
o a o d o
G C c~E v 0.= V O O O~' C" p O C7 bUA p O ,a~
c
c
m
d
C
a m 1 H
N .f
r: , fig a
W - 4F? S: ..3 U
O ss w
z3
C~. f 5
{
40
a m
<71
f J'
w ♦ a • E`er
a^.
a x
e
s T ~y
V ~
0 CL
a+ ~ sue.'
c '7E
O 3 O 'LbA O. CA .gyp,' %d G p Cam. c, C
_ .U N c p ti w u 3
v -n o ~ o~ K v -C ~ I C•~ o o
5 v v u G u ro C 3
cl,
cl, -2
v i 7c b u G u 5
72
o b G v > o Cn ° 3 v v °
b v C ~ [
o r O O
itl c, u
e ° o p N ^yuy br 4 w G G b U a
U O U y O c .C o N
u G~ u C C4 v ~ u ~ V V N u
bA p cC c u u_ L c J r~ G r U 'b C aJ
.Y p. "'Q C G ~Gfi O G r' G C N CL G .L -p ^C .C
a ~
a ~ ~ J 3 c v v s, o ~ ~ ~ G G ~ r a!
G a v N ° ❑ Z ° v u G x Q v
12
v 3 'v o G a 3 ^A > o c o v
to '2
r c u w a ° G ca. G n v
O u ° N
bn v re
OA
4 ° 3 0 v G y r
N v F c a a M c c N s a
c d v cn v o r ° o N v r
bQ -E
o o c Q c cp r J v n^n a o b >
°rn c u o a p G v F c p c v
a ° a ° 0 1 y m > o
u
> o ~ ~ cc iv yr .
LL-
7E 4 E'~{t
t
r~ u
~ Y- C r s
11. ILI
ti
o
LL
"
m
o r, t ~
r (1)
i ifs z
L ° -rte...- t ..3,
~l
O T, `
Z 3ie `
kS to U
a
m
m
^ cd ~ C J
U avi G v w° . ter'
r~-!! F N v [ v
73 U
O
O b byA "II a -C 'b G v, N a U 3 > v C
"b ° v vC' O v ° > U iv„ v O ~O C
a~
0
v cn
• u c>v OU "b O O O u U F~ C; l a
3 o Z c Z° a. a ti c° r r
3U w d u o r > , ° > °
bin ^-vfi p u 'C1 U m
O o o n.. l p. v o v i> ca to u cv u C m
_ o; p p U v v C v X51. v O -O
3 a[ w a v o a y X v c v -
.O 'b u ° v 'TJ ca o sU. C v p -b .bn 'b
v Op v; O C c C v: G. C <ve
Z >
G U.
o Q o~ o
14-
cri
'Z"-' avi v U p O .-C ev.~ cd O• r v `n
3 v U { 3 ro O u u p v 'M C d p 2
G v R. u a b G C rC O bn v
3 U. 00
-4 .X b ❑ a v o o u ° v
p ^ 4. R. c o C 'b
bvA N p,' <c a ti X
v Z v ° .x -x c -b -d a, `.o J o u c c
°
u z v o v o v a ? v p c u
o b u ❑ o a u u ° S co
n m o r c co
3 ° o v
.c c u .'u -2, ~ a. 3 p o u v ~ -b
o bn C C U y C .-a p N O, G G C m
p ti0 W v p O v 0. ~ v C1, v v ~ ~ ~ ~ O d
U v v' Z p _
o c bin ° -c Z u r [ c C
bA y v C C u p C~ r° G u C v c
u G u o v a > u ON u a ° o m
z u o s m m > ° a p u o o s
M C u
o c E bn ° a~ v d o bon b
° v o m ° w
r-u ci) N v . a: °U u _
'b C C ~ C ~ ~ ° C 'b "d a0i O ~ crC W ~ ~ C v ~ ~ 'd p C
G CL Oz cd
'O ~ o cCa ~ ei ~ C cOi C Q ~ - ~ ° b
q 2 o p cIt ° s
11 alS
v Q CA cCd x w "'d 'O r C bA I ~
bl-j
fn.
-c -m ct u
0
bA v - 't3 v v -c1 m
x "G p 0.. u 0 C -u Ln
3 C N
bA d N d y / y b c R 5 L
-ld e~ cn W a
r cd R. 'd v tLQ
7- u c a o o vi U v a~ U 5 u o W Q
O
ri
Li
10
% Ix Q e t
t3
a 4D
r
cs
LL
O -
w: O C.
r- 04
Z (n
O
z
L a ~ ~
U o 'b
°A ~ U n+ o ~ ~ ~ ^7 ~ ~
ro ti c 2it v o o
ce v " U c S1 v c+, " W
o [
° o c ° a
4j .
C7 ~ bA G G -b c N o c a
o x c c J-7:; a r ° G C °u N
° , ° - u - m -Ij
° -o z Z: bh Z o It
-L4
° a
° c Q ~br o >
.r w v u u u v C m
c U cm
z ~ C ° u W o u J a o
c 71
U - U C O G_ N 4-.
Z v ° O
O v v R. It
z ❑ ,c v v o v `v u C
L n Ua u C c c[ a ° _
o a a ° r° u
3
o n " a d c o)
0 1 u ~bn c
v u G W v rvA u v 3
v° u b ° v v c a as
bn a a a c% Z ° °
c
0 o e u v o i bn c~° bL
c M -
ice., C U ° ~ ^ 4" nZ
o o G ° 5 n o v o c 'o o F
o Q
d o w u a C x a o C
U GA u
c
o U a [ w °o r o m
<C S1, y< i W u R U 1.
It Cli [ CA
u
~ U ~ . ~n O O V U
q"j
75 U ~ a
N 6 u c u u c v ° 0 3
o
c c - Z
o CE F° J c °
a, ~p °o [ ~ a. 0 _c° G m ~ r
o
C ~
s~ ° o o c bA 7 ° o ~ n G V Q
o o aC, EE bb
~ v v v ro v j a
U U ❑
c ro a > a c u o .N o
a c u
o R C[ _ r
m U v ro a+ c7 G U
E bA U U ti
c n° c u b a u
71 C ° CyA .c," cJ U a
C) t
C i; bA CA 71 cC L' u [ .UU. u C O t
E '42) _r
v
d °a. Z c 3 w ti u o v o o a w
O u CL: U
U.Qj
V
y ~ Y
. v a
v ~ ~ ~ c e
cn v m
v ~ 3 ci w w v ~ v ~ A
O v, p U O .x O ai v
U 7 u
ti U o 'LJ v v cv.G > cv n' w 3 L
O bA O w a~ ~c Cl.
nC
O
ti
tf~
0
ell
.N d
d ~
I
f
r
N
}
e,
o -
.i µ
z
m
E
0
0
N
N
Y
O
3
E
ca
LL w'
c
m
c
-p
m
C
m
r -
m
J
C
F3 ~ C
3 ~
- m
3
H
m
w
Y
>O
~y N
C Q
Z y R. ca " m
o c v w a
o cp C v C c
w v ~ M v C r n, ro =
° o L o -C~ s
b ' u v o
v r;~
O ~ O .3 d
'J O cJ d
°U u 01
v N ti O C
o_ u s
o a
u
° u 3 v o
U °
a_n o c
C _ v ~ u N-
° ~ u .C c
0
N
d
d
C t
_ t-
-S ~
- -
0
0
0
z
E
0
z
n
N
Cl)
N
Y
O
a>
E
2
LL
C
(II
C
d m
m
O Z
O N
L_ zi
O >
N
9 Z
z 0)
C
L6 -
C O 7 c
Z o
e~ U
a
J1ji, } f C
7 m
_ f F
13~" f
U
L
T Q
i+
co
E
C co
Y
O
~ c
G
ti ° c1 U ~~j°j. "cY
71-
~ C3 > H ~ Q7 r
C[; v b 4 w 3 m
r UfC co
v 3 x a n a
r U a 3[ o° -
o E v~~ ~ o r c h
o u a n o a
° ° Z
b C
v
U
C:" 0
N Ql t
a
s ~ ~ Gq o ~ ~ ° ~ ~ 0 3
u u a, y x v o
a
2 r v ~ 3 3 i. c~ 4
Ln
N
~ a
4101.
z
E
z
N
Ln
N
Y
O
O
E
2
LL
C
C
I co
cm
O z
O N
{ 7
O
Z
Z ~
_ C
IFs U
5
Z - ice. o
U
m
a)
a J
C
± m
y
p
N
7
. U
N
' L
U
Q
a+
O m
Cam"
14
v a 0 3
bn a
w° ~ 0 3 a a
Cl.
p 4.
O v .b O U p v cC -
O b 'O v ~ ~ .-Y cV v "O X
O ~
r- b.0
"II O V O V p m
Cl. Z d
7 o on o H
C 73
112
v, cd U y v 11 v O
bh
O N V W
r7, CF
71
O
o o v u o v [
? E G .v o 0
o a c v n > v n r n o
J o bh
o 4s m o a
Z v r a U ° Z c
o v F ¢ v o v c
~ o G
° ro v v o;. F
v
Ln
0
N
d
L
~ V
m
C~
pile
*77 G
~41wo
p...
fig'. R {
LL .rv
C
a„
i
-o
0
0
~E
0
m
E
0
z
co
N
N
Y
O
O
LL
C
m
cm
LL co
O z
O ~
O ~
N
t z
47
Z
A to
cm
C
3
0
777
tr- N
O
3
y a~ Q
-a
<s cs y ~ v K ~a r v C
L O v ~ '6 > x
L1e U. Q Q.k u Q3 Q U R 6J CL
cu,
18
v v v v
y v O a. t v, O 't7 N
v c n
b cl,
4 v o
R t U c r
nA V
C C
c M H ~ E
Ly
A
~ '7 ~ y ~ ~ O ~ ctl ti L
O U C O O
v v~J, O iC [ O
u o a [o O l7
h QJ N C
N _v v 7r C "d C r
N
o o o ° a
o 0 C
o
> a
v >
Y. O N v r v
e'3 3 C 7 v 0., Q.
Q ci. r 3 cn Q w~ :s. r~ c~. o
N
d
L
d
T v
~ y
0
O
- R
O
N
LL
C
a
0
0
0
z
E
0
z
co
m
N
Y
O
3
O
E
ca
LL
C
C
(Q
O Z
O N
L 3
>
a N
L _ Z
Lr - .
Z ai
_ C
O _ ~ C
Z O
a
C
m
d' - O
J
d
_ C
o
U
U
m
O
to
_
It
C ai ~
O cl U u X
~ 1 G O d
i F
-n -cs E
C C v7 E a
M It a
u u [ m
o es o d
b
v d o
U
>
tz c
. m
v M U
U o 3 c
c Z ~ a
c v
° G b
"r+ C C
O ti +hJ. O ~ ~ ~
v o N
:J
F d V
u
O
a n u o U o o c
° u u n c r
~ a, v ~ q W o > v c v ~ r,j~
a U u o° u o
ti- CL CL
C r ° V C
Cl.
cn c a, o ~ w o
Q r.
75
o .ce .n"
a C c o ~ ~ o ° rya o p ~ a, o v ❑ m
a+
N > c 3 C -a ~ ~ v a ~ ~
-c ~ v u c ~ '3 cn ~ o 3 a ~ M ~ ~ ~ a, b
n a O a
c v u v ° G a r ° E y ° n. o v
CL ccr
~ r Q c ~ ~ ~ ~ C ~ v
'u r" u v W n o ° o
It G ° c n v a b v n o a o
'd O ° U CG w
u c u c r ° o o o o c o v
C~°. a
o cr u o u
U ° C v S ° u
r ° Z U W n o Q Q r
0
CJ
E
m
a
0
z
m
0
z
0
CJ
Y
O
N
O
LL
C
L6
C
cu
_0 0)
O z
O N
L O
O >
N
L z
a -
z 0)
_ C
m
C ~
N
O C
Z O
U
a
c
C
4. N J
cA C y G
5 3 c x
u n, o 3 It
r v cd G~ C O cd O G o v r rC C
caIt
a U o a a c o [ x 3 p tc
v
• v ~ ~ G L ~ ~ 'o O Mme, N -b M ~ o ~
+3+
cx, u > o o ~c y o
y 2
i U ~ bA ~ L fY1 U O C O O ~ v ti O ~ [ y
3 k L L v N e~ L C $ 0 d m
a It
is v v L v is G .b •^A GA Ct c>eE
C c: Cn Z v G _ •u '3 V O U Q-i CA
G 'L' 'J' i G v v M G u CA M ~ -
Lr" In
12
a. ~ y cn ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 ~ .5 ~ y - G ~ 3 3 N
00
3 M v h o o u o > H o c
8 y
v ° a a v
It
v
J ~
c 3 v s y' o o y r m
3 c c v ° v c r o[ 3° m
o b a 4[ c v `o ~ v
V G cn G cif -b o Q n. C ~ o c a to ~ u~ °-z c
Q o W 'J W a o o ° 3° 74 c
o o o
OC ar y ~ u a, o ~ ~ o a. ~ o -
° o
411 -r-
U
6, m
° c o 0
ro v .3 v ,..c ro U v > ~y .bA > o
W c o r
ti o > > o m ° a 'o O c v o
a. v ° v u o v ° x L~ J T
v c
0 0
v a 3 U b o v C w w .°A w v °a
o _ > w _
[ 3 ~ [ [ c <r .a C c 2 o c v c o c
U v o °
o v r c v o
W c
c
a s > m c U M Q n
N -d 'G sv. y O . G o 'C7 v c~ W Cl.
M
71 Cl.
a o v ° o a c [ v e r G a v >
c:z
° c v b o C7 c G c 4 U
o
w v > G- C ti v7 ca c
O np o- r u v `y a~ r b c _u
•Z7
t, u
ti o o v v c o c ° W ° v W
X v
U 7:1 u C_ C)
c v Uo ° o E v u ti c 3 ° ° o r
v -o ~ c ~ ❑ ~ v ovn N ~ x o ~ c n, v > ~ cn
c
a v o a o[ a° o o v
7 U v o 3 E - b v w o M o
m b m > G " ro u
r D 3 C o It r o Z x r J o y x
_ o
v c[ 3 o O c J N an 3 o L v c o c
o a U u C7 ro a - O t ° U v
c M n. Ln V, v a c v u~ v n cA Z
Y
O
N
E
F
LL
r_
a
0
0
0
C)
z
co
E
0
z
N
Y
O Cl)
co
~ u
E
2
LL
C
C
a
o z
O a)
L
O
O
z
L
O1
Z CT)
C
3
N
O C
Z °
u
a
C
? o a
J U ~ U U 4: C
v
P3 c
u r_ ca
G 4J
c a C d
0 u
n > [ °
U o
v o „ ~ ° ~ - a U Q ~ ❑ ~s
G n u C ° 11
J p
I"d c cn ° c u
"G v
It >
2 b ° o °
~j C C' v
ti ° ^ a c lu ° -
6/1 ✓ ° u C O p ^e p 3
u Ca. C.
Q s 3 ti >
t
0
~ r. ate, ~ ° ~ ~ •4 ^ •y o ° x
Q d a r c °
3 a o 0 o F o c m
G v .v C cii c
Z v° T S 2 Z v> Z ci R
c
s
O ~ "b v 0. O ~ , Y O a~ ~ ~ R. -2 u O O U U ° h
cG, [ H U o U g uk U o o° w
Z o v v o a ° c d o c
U c CJ a y x
a 2 ° v c a
CITY OF Exhibit C
ASHLAND_
3
I
I
I t I
Ashland wj rs
E Middle i i
School
1
1. ' -
i ;
Walker j I .
Elementary,
School
r
tt
0 200 400 800 1,200 Fe
Normal Neighborhood Plan l i i i l i i i l i► i l
Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment
Normal Neighborhood Plan
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE STREET DEDICATION MAP,
PLANNED INTERSECTION AND ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT MAP,
AND PLANNED BIKEWAY NETWORK MAP OF THE ASHLAND
TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM PLAN FOR THE NORMAL
NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN AREA, AND AMENDING STREET DESIGN
STANDARDS WITHIN THE ASHLAND MUNICIPAL CODE CHAPTER
18.4.6 TO ADD A NEW SHARED STREET CLASSIFICATION.
Annotated to show deletions and additions to the code sections being modified. Deletions are
bold lined through and additions are in bold underline.
WHEREAS, Article 2. Section 1 of the Ashland City Charter provides:
Powers of the City The City shall have all powers which the constitutions, statutes, and
common law of the United States and of this State expressly or impliedly grant or allow
municipalities, as fully as though this Charter specifically enumerated each of those
powers, as well as all powers not inconsistent with the foregoing; and, in addition thereto,
shall possess all powers hereinafter specifically granted. All the authority thereof shall
have perpetual succession.
WHEREAS, the above referenced grant of power has been interpreted as affording all
legislative powers home rule constitutional provisions reserved to Oregon cities. City of
Beaverton v International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1660, Beaverton Shop 20 Or. App. 293;
531 P 2d 730, 734 (1975); and
WHEREAS, the City of Transportation Commission considered the above-referenced
amendments to the Transportation System Plan at a duly advertised public hearing on April 23,
2015 and following deliberations recommended approval of the amendments by a vote of 6-0;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Ashland Planning Commission considered the above-referenced
amendments to the Transportation System Plan at a duly advertised public hearing on July 28,
2015 and August 11, 2015, and following deliberations recommended approval of the
amendments by a vote of 5-0; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland conducted a duly advertised public hearing
on the above-referenced amendments on September 1, 2015, September 15, 2015, and October 6,
2015; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland, following the close of the public hearing
and record, deliberated and conducted first and second readings approving adoption of the
Ordinance in accordance with Article 10 of the Ashland City Charter; and
Ordinance No. Page 1 of 6
WHEREAS, the Ashland Comprehensive Plan includes goals and policies intended to work
towards creating an integrated land use and transportation system to address the Transportation
Planning Rule (TPR) Oregon Administrative Rule 660-012-0000 directive for coordinated
land use and transportation plans should ensure that the planned transportation system supports a
pattern of travel and land use in urban areas that will avoid the air pollution, traffic and livability
problems faced by other large urban areas of the country through measures designed to increase
transportation choices and make more efficient use of the existing transportation system."; and
WHEREAS, the Street Dedication Map, Planned Intersection and Roadway Improvement Map
and Planned Bikeway Network Map are adopted official maps for long range planning purposes,
and are periodically amended to identify streets and pedestrian and bicycle paths that will be
needed in the future to connect the street network and provide access to undeveloped areas
within the Urban Growth Boundary (UGB); and
WHEREAS, the Ashland Comprehensive Plan includes the following policies addressing street
dedications: 1) Development of a modified grid street pattern shall be encouraged for connecting
new and existing neighborhoods during subdivisions, partitions, and through the use of the Street
Dedication map. (10.09.02.32); and 2) Street dedications shall be required as a condition of land
development. A future street dedication map shall be adopted and implemented as part of the
Land Use Ordinance. (10.09.02.34).; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland has determined that in order protect and
benefit the health, safety and welfare of existing and future residents, and to address changes in
existing conditions and projected needs related to land use and transportation patterns, it is
necessary to amend the Ashland Comprehensive Plan in the manner proposed, that an adequate
factual base exists for the amendments, the amendments are consistent with the comprehensive
plan and that such amendments are fully supported by the record of this proceeding.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. The officially adopted City of Ashland Street Dedication Map, referenced in
Ashland as Figure 10-1 in the Ashland Transportation System Plan is hereby amended to include
the Normal Neighborhood Plan Street Network attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION 4. The City of Ashland Planned Bikeway Network Map, referenced in the Ashland
Transportation System Plan as Figure 8-1. is hereby amended to include the Normal
Neighborhood Plan Pedestrian and Bicycle Network attached hereto as Exhibit B.
SECTION 5. The City of Ashland Planned Intersection and Roadway Improvement Map,
referenced in the Ashland Transportation System Plan as Figure 10-3. is hereby amended to
include East Main Street as a Planned Avenue from Walker Avenue to Ashland St.
Ordinance No. Page 2 of 6
SECTION 6. The Ashland Municipal Code Chapter 18.4.6.040, Street Design Standards,
street classification table is hereby amended to include a new classification of "Shared Street" as
follows
18.4.6.040 F Design Standards. A description of street design standards for each street
classification follows in Table 18.4.6.040.F and subsection 18.4.6.040.G. All elements listed are
required unless specifically noted, and dimensions and ranges represent minimum standard or
ranges for the improvements shown. The approval authority may require a dimension within a
specified range based upon intensity of land use, existing and projected traffic and pedestrian
volumes, or when supported through other applicable approval standards. The approval
authority may approve dimensions and ranges greater than those proposed by an applicant.
Table 18.4.6.040. F. 01V of Ashland Street Design Standards
WITHIN CURB-TO-CURB AREA
TYPE OF A 1'ERAGE RIGHT = CURB-TO- MOTOR MEDIAN BIKE PARK- CURB PARK- SIDE-
STREET DAILY OF- CURB l'EHICLE AND'OR LANES ING ROW 66ALKS
TRIPS TVA Y" PAVEMENT TRA17F_L CEN"T"ER
(ADT) CVIDTII WIDTH LANES TURN on on on on
LANE both both both both
sides sides sides sides
2-Lane 8,00010 61'-87' 34' 11' none 6' 81-9' 6" 5,-8,1 6'-TO''
Boulevard
3-Lane 30,000 73'-99' 46' I1' 12' 6' 8'-9' 6" 5'-8'1 6elo'2
Boulevard
5-Lane 95'421' 68' l1' 12' 6' 81-9' 6" 5'-8'' 6'-10'2
Boulevard
2-Lane Avenue 3.000 to 59'-86' 32'-33' 10'-10.5' none 6' 81-9' 6" 5'-8'' 6'-10"
10,000 70.5'-
3-Lane Avenue 97.5' 43.5'-44.5' 10'-10.5' 11.5' 6' 8'-9' 6" 5'-8' ~ 6'-10''
Neighborhood 1,5001o NA NA'
Collector. 5,000
Residential
No Parking 49-51' 22' 11' none 6" 8' 5'-6'
Parking One 50'-56' 25'-27' 91-10' 7' 6" 7-8' Y-6'
Side
Parking Both 57'-63' 32'-34' 91-10' 7' 6" 7'-8' 5'-6'
Sides
Neighborhood
Collector,
Commercial
Parallel
Parking One 55'-65' 28' 10' 8' 6" 5'-8" 8'-1o''
Side
Parallel
Parking Both 63'-73' 36' 10' 8' 6" 5'-8" 8'-10' '
Sides
Diagonal 65-74' 37' 10' 17' 6" 5'-8' 1 8'-10'
Parking One
Ordinance No. Page 3 of 6
Table 18.4.6.040. F. City of Ashland Street Design Standards
WITHIN CURB-TO-CURB AREA
TYPE OF AVERAGE RIGHT- CURB-TO- MOTOR MEDIAN BIKE PARK- CURB PARK- SIDE-
STREET DAILY OF- CURB 11711CLE AND%OR LANES ING ROW ibALKS
"TRIPS 667AY' PAi'EMENT IRAV L CENTER
(ADT) I1'ID771 WIDTH LANES TURK' ah On On on
LANE both both both both
sides sides sides sides
Side
Diagonal
Parking Both 81'-91' 54' 10' 17' 6" 5'-8" 81-10''
Sides
Neighborhood less than NA NA
1,500
Street
Parking One 47'-51' 22' 15, 7' 6" 5'-8' 5'-6'
Side Quelling
Neighborhood
Street
Parking Both 50'-57' 25'-28' I P-14'
Queuing 7 6 5 8 5'-6'
Sides
Less than 15'-20' 12'-15' Oueuing NA NA AA NA NA NA
Private Drive 100
Shared Less than 25' 18' paved 12' NA NA NA NA NA NA
Street 1500
12' paved
Alley AA 16' width, 2' NA AA AA AA NA AA AA
strips on both
sides
C-10'paved
Multi-Ilse Path NA 12,48, width, 2'4' NA AA NA AA NA NA NA
ships on both
sides
1) 7'- 8' landscape parkrow shall be installed in residential areas; 5' hardscape parkrou with tree wells shall be installed in commercial areas on streets
with on-street parking lanes, or 7' landscape parkrow may be used in commercial areas on streets without on-street parking lanes or where the street
corridor includes landscaped parkrou. Street Trees shall be planted in parkrows pursuant to 18.4.4.030.
2) 6'sideiealk shall be installed in residential areas, 8'-10'sidewalk shall be installed in commercial areas, 10' sidewalk shall be required on boulevards
in the Downtown Design Standards Zone.
3) Bike lanes are generally not needed on streets with low volutes (less than 3.000 ADT) or loin motor vehicle travel speeds (less than 251nph). For over-
3, 3,000 ADT or actual travel speeds exceeding 25 mph, 6' bike lanes, one on each side of the sheet moving in the same direction as motor vehicle traffic
4) A private drive is a street in private ownership, not dedicated to the public, which serves three or less units. Private drives are permitted in the
Performance Standards Options overlay.
SECTION 7. The Ashland Municipal Code Chapter subsection 18.4.6.040 G, Street Design
Standards, is hereby amended to add a new classification of "Shared Street" as follows:
18.4.6.040.G.8
Shared Street
Ordinance No. Page 4 of 6
Provides access to residential uses in an area in which right-of-way is constrained by
natural features, topography or historically significant structures. Shared Streets may
additionally be used in circumstances where a slower speed street, collectively shared by
pedestrians, bicycles, and autos, is a functional and preferred design alternative. The
design of the street should emphasize a slower speed environment and provide clear
physical and visual indications the space is shared across modes. See Figure 18.4.6.040.G.8.
Prototypical Section: Shared Street
17
18
25'
Figure 18.4.6.040.G.8
Shared Street
Street Function: Provide vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle neighborhood circulation
and access to individual residential and commercial properties designed to encourage
socializing with neighbors, outdoor play for children, and creating comfortable spaces for
walking and biking.
Connectivity: Connects to all types of streets.
Average Daily Traffic: 1,500 or less motor vehicle trips per day.
Managed Speed: Motor vehicle travel speeds should be below 15 mph.
Right-of-Way Width: 25'
Pavement width: 18' minimum, maintaining full fire truck access and minimum
turning at all changes in alignment and intersections at all changes in alignment and intersections.
Ordinance No. Page 5 of 6
Motor Vehicle Travel Lanes: Minimum 12' clear width.
Bike Lanes: Not applicable Bicyclists can share the travel lane and easily nejZotiate these
low use areas.
Parkint!• ParkinlZ and loading areas may be provided within the right of way with
careful consideration to ensure parked vehicles do not obstruct pedestrian, bicycles, or
emergency vehicle access.
Parkrow: Not applicable.
Sidewalks: Not applicable Pedestrians can share the travel lane and easily nejZotiate
these low use areas Refuge areas are to be provided within the right of way to allow
pedestrians to step out of the travel lane when necessary.
SECTION 8_ Severability. The sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses of this ordinance
are severable. The invalidity of one section, subsection, paragraph, or clause shall not affect the
validity of the remaining sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses.
SECTION 9. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City
Comprehensive Plan and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section",
or another word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided
however that any Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions (i.e. Sections 1, 3-5 need not be
codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references and any
typographical errors.
The foregoing ordinance was first read by title only in accordance with Article X,
Section 2(C) of the City Charter on the day of ,2015,
and duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day of , 2015.
Barbara M. Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of , 2015.
John Stromberg, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
David Lohman, City Attorney
Ordinance No. Page 6 of 6
Exhibit A
B:B:gd ton
Road
Classifications
~iiiiilnneigborhood
collector
E
local street
shared street
- - - - - multi-use path
Shared Streets within the Normal
Neighborhood Plan areamay be
alternatively developed as alleys
or multi-use paths.
Improvement of the rail road
; crossing requires approval of
an application for an at grade
railroad crossing.
L__j L_j
Normal Neighborhood Plan
Street Network Map 0 200 400 800 Feet
CITY OF ExhibitB
ASHLAND
#
i
i
i
•
•
•
i
•
• • ~!i!/I ~1~IS~~I
i•.••
boo
• ' • -
• #
00,000
#
•
•
# • a
00
0,0 0
•
•
i • •
r
•
Normal Neighborhood Plan 2= Avenue with sidewalks & bikelanes
Pedestrian and Bicycle Network Streets with sidewalks
Shared Street
1-1 0 200 400 800 Feet • • • • Multi-use path
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ASHLAND MUNICIPAL CODE
CREATING A NEW CHAPTER 18.3.4 NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD
DISTRICT, AMENDING CHAPTER 18.2.1.020 TO ADD A NORMAL
NEIGHBORHOOD ZONING CLASSIFICATION, AND AMENDING
CHAPTER 18.2.1.040 TO ADD A NORMAL NEIGHBORHOOD SPECIAL
DISTRICT.
Annotated to show deletions and additions to the code sections being modified. Deletions are
bold lined through and additions are in bold underline.
WHEREAS, Article 2. Section 1 of the Ashland City Charter provides:
Powers of the City The City shall have all powers which the constitutions, statutes, and
common law of the United States and of this State expressly or impliedly grant or allow
municipalities, as fully as though this Charter specifically enumerated each of those
powers, as well as all powers not inconsistent with the foregoing; and, in addition thereto,
shall possess all powers hereinafter specifically granted. All the authority thereof shall
have perpetual succession.
WHEREAS, the above referenced grant of power has been interpreted as affording all
legislative powers home rule constitutional provisions reserved to Oregon cities. City of
Beaverton v International Ass'n of Firefighters Local 1660, Beaverton Shop 20 Or. App. 293;
531 P 2d 730, 734 (1975); and
WHEREAS, the City of Ashland is projected to grow by approximately 3,250 residents by 2030
and 2,000 employees by 2027, and the City Council reaffirmed the long-standing policy of
accommodating growth within the Ashland Urban Growth Boundary rather than growing
outward into surrounding farm and forest lands in the Greater Bear Creek Valley Regional
Problem Solving (RPS) planning process; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ashland seeks to balance projected population and employment growth
with the community goal of retaining a district boundary and preventing sprawling development,
and to this end examines opportunities to use land more efficiently for housing and businesses;
and
WHEREAS, the City of Ashland continues the community's tradition of integrating land use
and transportation planning, and using sustainable development measures such as encouraging a
mix and intensity of uses on main travel corridors to support transit service and use, integrating
affordable housing opportunities, and reducing carbon emissions by providing a variety of
transportation options; and
WHEREAS, the City conducted a planning process involving a series of public workshops, on-
line forum, key participant meetings and study sessions from October 2011 through July 2015
Ordinance No. Page 1 of 4
involving a three-step process in which participants identified the qualities that make a
successful neighborhood„ developed vision statements for the study area, and reviewed and
revised plans illustrating an example of what development might look when the 94 acre is
incorporated into the City of Ashland; and
WHEREAS, the final report for the Normal Neighborhood Plan included recommended
amendments to the zoning map and land use ordinance which would support the development of
the neighborhood as envisioned in the planning process being small walkable neighborhood
modules that provide concentrations of housing grouped in a way to encourage more walking,
cycling and transit use; and
WHEREAS, the City of Ashland Planning Commission considered the above-referenced
recommended amendments to the Ashland Municipal Code and Land Use Ordinances at a duly
advertised public hearing on July 28, 2015 and August 11, 2015, and following deliberations,
recommended approval of the amendments by a vote of 5-0; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland conducted a duly advertised public hearing
on the above-referenced amendments on September 1, 2015, September 15, 2015, and October 6,
2015; and following the close of the public hearing and record, deliberated and conducted first
and second readings approving adoption of the Ordinance in accordance with Article 10 of the
Ashland City Charter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Ashland has determined that in order to protect and
benefit the health, safety and welfare of existing and future residents of the City, it is necessary
to amend the Ashland Municipal Code and Land Use Ordinance in manner proposed, that an
adequate factual base exists for the amendments, the amendments are consistent with the
comprehensive plan and that such amendments are fully supported by the record of this
proceeding.
THE PEOPLE OF THE CITY OF ASHLAND DO ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The above recitations are true and correct and are incorporated herein by this
reference.
SECTION 2. A new Chapter 18.3.4 of the Ashland Municipal Code creating a new overlay
district [Normal Neighborhood District ] set forth in full codified form on the attached Exhibit A
and made a part hereof by this reference, is hereby added to the Ashland Municipal Code.
SECTION 3. Chapter 18.2.1.020, of the Zoning Regulations and General Provisions section of
the Ashland Municipal Code, is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.2.1.020 Zoning Map and Classification of Zones
For the purpose of this ordinance, the City is divided into zones designated and depicted on the Zoning
Map, pursuant to the Comprehensive Plan Map, and summarized in Table 18.2.1.020.
Ordinance No. Page 2 of 4
Table 18.2.1.020
Base Zones Overly Zones
Residential -Woodland WR Airport Overly
Residential - Rural RR Detail Site Review Overly
Residential - Single-Family (R-1-10, R-1-7.5, Downtown Design Standards
and R-1-5 Overly
Residential - Suburban (R-1-3.5) Freeway Sign Overlay
Residential - Low Density Multiple Family (R-2) Historic District Overlay
Residential - High Density Multiple Family (R-3) Pedestrian Place Overlay
Commercial (C-1) Performance Standards Options
Overlay
Commercial - Downtown (C- 1-D) Physical and Environmental
Constraints Overlay
Employment (E-1) -Hillside Lands
Industrial (M-1) -Floodplain Corridor Lands
-Severe Constraints Lands
Special Districts -Water Resources
Croman Mill District (CM) -Wildfire Lands
Health Care Services District (HC) Residential Overlay
Normal Neighborhood (NN)
North Mountain Neighborhood District (NM)
Southern Oregon University District SOU
SECTION 4. Chapter 18.2.1.040, of the Zoning Regulations and General Provisions section of
the Ashland Municipal Code, is hereby amended to read as follows:
18.2.1.040 Applicability of Zoning Regulations
Part 18.2 applies to properties with base zone, special district, and overlay zone designations, as
follows:
Table 18.2.1.040: Applicability of Standards to Zones, Plan Districts and Overlays
Designation A licabilit
Base Zones
Residential - Woodland (WR) Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
Residential - Rural (RR) Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
Residential - Single-family (R-1-10, R-1- Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
7.5, R-1-5) Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
Residential - Suburban (R-1-3.5) Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
Residential - Low Density Multiple Family Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
(R-2) Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
Residential - High Density Multiple Family Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
(R-3) Chapter 18.2 Applies Directly
Commercial (C-1)
Commercial - Downtown (C- 1-D)
Employment (E-1)
Industrial M-1
Ordinance No. Page 3 of 4
Table 18.2.1.040: Applicability of Standards to Zones, Plan Districts and Overlays
Designation Applicability
Special Districts
Croman Mill District Zone (CM) CM District Replaces chapter 18.2
Health Care Services Zone (HC) NN District Replaces chapter 18.2
Normal Neighborhood District (NN) NM District Replaces chapter 18.2
North Mountain Neighborhood (NM)
Southern Oregon University SOU
Overlay Zones
Airport Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Detail Site Review Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Downtown Design Standards Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Freeway Sign Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Historic Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Pedestrian Place Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Performance Standards Options Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Physical and Environmental Constraints Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
Residential Overlay Modifies chapter 18.2
SECTION 5. Severability. The sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses of this ordinance
are severable. The invalidity of one section, subsection, paragraph, or clause shall not affect the
validity of the remaining sections, subsections, paragraphs and clauses.
SECTION 6. Codification. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the City Code
and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "code", "article", "section", or another word, and
the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered, or re-lettered, provided however that any
Whereas clauses and boilerplate provisions, and text descriptions of amendments (i.e. Sections 1-
2, 5-6) need not be codified and the City Recorder is authorized to correct any cross-references
and any typographical errors.
The foregoing ordinance was first read by title only in accordance with Article X,
Section 2(C) of the City Charter on the day of , 2015
and duly PASSED and ADOPTED this day of_ , 2015.
Barbara M. Christensen, City Recorder
SIGNED and APPROVED this day of 2015.
John Stromberg, Mayor
Reviewed as to form:
David Lohman, City Attorney
Ordinance No. Page 4 of 4
Exhibit A
Normal Neighborhood District
Chapter 18 Code Amendments
18.3.4.010 Purpose
18.3.4.020 Applicability
18.3.4.030 General Requirements
18.3.4.040 Use Regulations
18.3.4.050 Dimensional Regulations
18.3.4.060 Site Development and Design Standards
18.3.4.070 Conservation Area overlay
18.3.4.075 Advanced Financing District [Placeholder]
18.3.4.080 Review and Approval Procedure
18.3.4.010 Purpose
The neighborhood is designed to provide an environment for traditional neighborhood living. The
Normal Neighborhood Plan is a blueprint for promoting a variety of housing types while preserving open
spaces, stream corridors, wetlands, and other significant natural features. The neighborhood
commercial area is designated to promote neighborhood serving businesses with building designs that
reflect the character of the neighborhood and where parking is managed through efficient on-street and
off-street parking resources. The neighborhood will be characterized by a connected network of streets
and alleys, paths and trails, with connection to the natural areas, wetlands, and streams. This network
will also connect to the larger network of regional trails, paths, and streets beyond the boundaries of the
neighborhood. The development of the neighborhood will apply principles of low impact development to
minimize the extent and initial cost of new infrastructure and to promote the benefits of storm water
management.
18.3.4.020 Applicability
This chapter applies to properties designated as Normal Neighborhood District on the Ashland Zoning
Map, and pursuant to the Normal Neighborhood Plan adopted by Ordinance [#number (date)].
Development located within the Normal Neighborhood District is required to meet all applicable
sections of this ordinance, except as otherwise provided in this chapter; where the provisions of this
chapter conflict with comparable standards described in any other ordinance, resolution or regulation, the
provisions of the Normal Neighborhood District shall govern.
18.3.4.030 General Regulations
Page 1 of 13
A. Conformance with the Normal Neighborhood Plan. Land uses and development, including
construction of buildings, streets, multi-use paths, and open space shall be located in accordance
with those shown on the Normal Neighborhood Plan maps adopted by Ordinance [#number (date)].
B. Performance Standards Overlay. All applications involving the creation of three or more lots
shall be processed under chapter 18.3.9 Performance Standards Option.
C. Amendments. Major and minor amendments to the Normal Neighborhood Plan shall comply
with the following procedures:
1. Major and Minor Amendments
a. Major amendments are those that result in any of the following:
i. A change in the land use overlay designation.
ii. A change in the maximum building height dimensional standards in section 18.3.4.050
iii. A change in the allowable base density, dwelling units per acre, in section 18.3.4.050.
iv. A change in the Plan layout that eliminates a street, access way, multi-use path or
other transportation facility.
v. A change in the Plan layout that provides an additional vehicular access point onto
East Main Street or Clay Street.
vi. A change not specifically listed under the major and minor amendment definitions.
b. Minor amendments are those that result in any of the following:
i. A change in the Plan layout that requires a street, access way, multi-use path or
other transportation facility to be shifted fifty (50) feet or more in any direction as
long as the change maintains the connectivity established by Normal Avenue
Neighborhood Plan.
ii. A change in a dimensional standard requirement in section 18.3.4.050, but not
including height and residential density.
iii. A change in the Plan layout that changes the boundaries or location of an open
space Gonsepjat;m, area to correspond with a delineated wetland and water resource
protection zone, or relocation of a designated open space area.
2. Major Amendment
Type II Procedure. A major amendment to the Normal Neighborhood Plan is subject to a public
hearing and decision under a Type II Procedure. A major amendment may be approved upon
finding that the proposed modification will not adversely affect the purpose of the Normal
Neighborhood Plan. A major amendment requires a determination by the City that:
a.The proposed amendment maintains the transportation connectivity established by the
Normal Neighborhood Plan;
Page 2 of 13
b.The proposed amendment furthers the street design and access management
concepts of the Normal Neighborhood Plan.
c. The proposed amendment furthers the protection and enhancement of the natural
systems and features of the Normal Neighborhood Plan, including wetlands, stream
beds, and water resource protection zones by improving the quality and function of
existing natural resources.
d.The proposed amendment will not reduce the concentration or variety of housing types
permitted in the Normal Neighborhood Plan.
e.The proposed amendment is necessary to accommodate physical constraints evident on
the property, or to protect significant natural features such as trees, rock outcroppings,
streams, wetlands, water resource protection zones, or similar natural features, or to
adjust to existing property lines between project boundaries.
3. Minor Amendment
Type 1 Procedure. A-Minor amendments to the Normal Neighborhood Development Plan
as identified in 18.3.4.030.C.1.b.i and 18.3.4.030.C.1.b.ii ^na whioGh is are subject to an
administrative decision under the Type I Procedure.
Type II Procedure. A minor amendment to the Normal Neighborhood Development Plan
as identified in 18.3.4.030.C.1.b.iii is subject to a public hearing and decision under a Type
11 Procedure.
Minor amendments are subject to the Exception to the Site Design and Use Development
Standards of chapter 18.5.2.050.E.
18.3.4.040 Use Regulations
A. Plan overlay zones. There are four Land Use Designation Overlays zones within the Normal
Neighborhood Plan are intended to accommodate a variety of housing opportunities, preserve natural
areas and provide open space.
1. Plan NN-1-5 zone The use regulations and development standards are intended to create,
maintain and promote single-dwelling neighborhood character. A variety of housing types are
allowed, in addition to the detached single dwelling. Development standards that are largely the
same as those for single dwellings ensure that the overall image and character of the single-dwelling
neighborhood is maintained.
2. Plan NN-1-3.5 zone. The use regulations and development standards are intended to create,
maintain and promote single-dwelling neighborhood character. A variety of housing types are
allowed including multiple compact attached and/or detached dwellings. Dwellings may be grouped
around common open space promoting a scale and character compatible with single family homes.
Development standards that are largely the same as those for single dwellings ensure that the
overall image and character of the single-dwelling neighborhood is maintained.
Page 3 of 13
3. Plan NN-1-3.5-C zone. The use regulations and development standards are intended to provide
housing opportunities for individual households through development of multiple compact attached
and/or detached dwellings with the added allowance for neighborhood-serving commercial mixed-
uses so that many of the activities of daily living can occur within the Normal Neighborhood. The
public streets within the vicinity of the NN-1-3.5-C overlay are to provide sufficient on-street parking
to accommodate ground floor neighborhood business uses.
4. Plan NN-2 zone. The use regulations and development standards are intended to create and
maintain a range of housing choices, including multi-family housing within the context of the
residential character of the Normal-Neighborhood Plan.
B. Normal Neighborhood Plan Residential Building Types. The development standards for the
Normal Neighborhood Plan will preserve neighborhood character by incorporating four distinct land use
overlay areas with different concentrations of varying housing types.
1. Single Dwelling Residential Unit.
A Single Dwelling Residential Unit is a detached residential building that contains a single dwelling
with self-contained living facilities on one lot. It is separated from adjacent dwellings by private open
space in the form of side yards and backyards, and set back from the public street or common green
by a front yard. Auto parking is generally on the same lot in a garage, carport, or uncovered area.
The garage may be detached or attached to the dwelling structure.
2. Accessory Residential Unit.
An Accessory Residential Unit is a secondary dwelling unit on a lot, either attached to the single-
family dwelling or in a detached building located on the same lot with a single-family dwelling, and
having an independent means of entry.
3. Double Dwelling Residential Unit (Duplex).
A Double Dwelling Residential Unit is a residential building that contains two dwellings located on a
single lot, each with self-contained living facilities. Double Dwelling Residential Units must share a
common wall or a common floor/ ceiling and are similar to a Single Dwelling Unit in appearance,
height, massing and lot placement.
4. Attached Residential Unit. (Townhome, Row house)
An Attached Residential Unit is single dwelling located on an individual lot which is attached along
one or both sidewalls to an adjacent dwelling unit. Private open space may take the form of front
yards, backyards, or upper level terraces. The dwelling unit may be set back from the public street or
common green by a front yard.
5. Clustered Residential Units - Pedestrian-Oriented.
Page 4 of 13
Pedestrian-Oriented Clustered Residential Units are multiple dwellings grouped around common
open space that promote a scale and character compatible with single family homes. Units are
typically arranged around a central common green under communal ownership. Auto parking is
generally grouped in a shared surface area or areas.
6. Multiple Dwelling Residential Unit.
Multiple Dwelling Residential Units are multiple dwellings that occupy a single building or multiple
buildings on a single lot. Dwellings may take the form of condominiums or apartments. Auto parking
is generally provided in a shared parking area or structured parking facility.
7. Cottage Housing. [Reserved]
C. General Use Regulations. Uses and their accessory uses are permitted, special permitted or
conditional uses in the Normal Neighborhood Plan area as listed in the Land Use Table.
Table 18.3.4.040 Land Use NN-1-5 NN-1-3.5 NN-1-3.5-C NN-2
Descriptions Single family Suburban Suburban Multi-family
Residential Residential Residential Low Density
with Residential
commercial
Residential Uses
Single Dwelling Residential Unit P P N N
(Single-Family Dwelling)
Accessory Residential Unit P P P N
Double Dwelling Residential Unit N P P P
(Duplex Dwelling)
Cottage Housing [Placeholder] P N N N
Clustered Residential Units N P P P
Attached Residential Unit N P P P
Multiple Dwelling Residential Unit N P P P
(Multi family Dwelling)
Manufactured Home on Individual Lot P P P P
Manufactured Housing Development N P P P
Neighborhood Business and Service Uses
Home Occupation P P P P
Retail Sales and Services, with each building limited to N N P N
3,500 square feet of gross floor area
Professional and Medical Offices, with each building N N P N
limited to 3,500 square feet of gross floor area
Light manufacturing or assembly of items occupying
six hundred (600) square feet or less, and contiguous N N P N
to the permitted retail use.
Restaurants N N P N
Page 5 of 13
Day Care Center N N P N
Assisted Living Facilities N C C C
Public and Institutional Uses
Religious Institutions and Houses of Worship C C C C
Public Buildings P P P P
Community Gardens P P P P
Open space and Recreational Facilities P P P P
P = Permitted Use; CU = Conditional Use Permit Required-, N = Not Allowed
1. Permitted Uses. Uses listed as "Permitted (P)" are allowed. All uses are subject to the
development standards of zone in which they are located, any applicable overlay zone(s), and the
review procedures of Part 18.5. See section 18.5.1.020 Determination of Review Procedure.
2.Conditional Uses. Uses listed as "Conditional Use Permit Required (C)" are allowed subject to
the requirements of chapter 18.5.4 Conditional Use Permits.
3.Prohibited Uses. Uses not listed in the Land Use Table, and not found to be similar to an allowed
use following the procedures of section 18.1.5.040 Similar Uses, are prohibited.
18.3.4.050 Dimensional Regulations
A. The lot and building dimensions shall conform to the standards in Table 18.3.4.050 below.
Table 18.3.4.050 Dimensional Standards NN-1-5 NN-1-3.5 NN-2
NN-1-3.5C
Base density, dwelling units per acre 4.5 7.2 13.5
Minimum Lot Area, square feet 5,000 3500 3000
(applies to lots created by partitions only)
Minimum Lot Depth, feet 80 80 80
(applies to lots created by partitions only)
Minimum Lot Width', feet 50 35 25
(applies to lots created by partitions only)
Setbacks and yards (feet)
Minimum Front Yard abutting a street 15 15 15
Minimum Front Yard to a garage facing a public street, 20 20 20
feet _
Minimum Front Yard to unenclosed front porch, feet 82 82 82
6 6 6
Minimum Side Yard 0 s 6 s
Minimum Side Yard abutting a public street 10 10 10
Minimum Rear Yard 10 ft per Bldg Story, 5 feet per Half Story
Setback and yard requirements shall conform to the
Solar Access Solar Access standards of chapter 18.4.8
Page 6 of 13
Maximum Building Height, feet / stories 35 / 2.5 35 / 2.5 35 / 2.5
Maximum Lot Coverage, percentage of lot 50% 55% 65%
Minimum Required Landscaping, percentage of lot 50% 5% 35%
See section 18.4.3.080 Vehicle Area Design
Parking Requirements
Minimum Outdoor Recreation Space, percentage of lot na na 8%
1 Minimum Lot Area , Depth, and Width requirements do not apply in performance standards subdivisions.
2 Minimum Front Yard to an unenclosed front porch (Feet), or the width of any existing public utility easement, whichever is
greater; an unenclosed porch must be no less than 6 feet in depth and 8 feet in width, see section 18.6.1.030 for definition of
porch.
3 Minimum Side Yard for Attached Residential Units (Feet)
B. Density Standards Development density in the Normal Neighborhood shall not exceed the densities
established by Table 18.3.4.050, except where granted a density bonus under chapter 18.3.9.
Performance Standards Options and consistent with the following:
1 General Density Provisions.
a. The density in NN-1-5, NN-1-3.5, NN-1 -3.5-C and NN-2 zones is to be computed by dividing the
total number of dwelling units by the acreage of the project, including land dedicated to the
public.
b. Conservation Areas including wetlands, floodplain corridor lands, and water resource protection
zones may be excluded from the acreage of the project for the purposes of calculating minimum
density for residential annexations as described in section 18.5.8.050.F.
c. Units less than 500 square feet of gross habitable area shall count as 0.75 units for the
purposes of density calculations.
d. Accessory residential units consistent with standards described in section 18.2.3.040 are not
required to meet density or minimum lot area requirements.
e. Accessory residential units shall be included for the purposes of meeting minimum density
calculation requirements for residential annexations as described in 18.5.8.050.F.
2. Residential Density Bonuses.
a. The maximum residential density bonuses permitted shall be as described in section
18.2.5.080.F.
b. Cottage Housing. [Reserved]
18.3.4.060 Site Development and Design Standards. The Normal Neighborhood District Design
Standards provide specific requirements for the physical orientation, uses and arrangement of buildings; the
management of parking; and access to development parcels. Development located in the Normal
Neighborhood District must be designed and constructed consistent with the Site Design and Use Standards
chapter 18.5.2 and the following:
A. Street Design and Access Standards. Design and construct streets and public improvements in
accordance with the Ashland Street Standards. A change in the design of a street in a manner
Page 7 of 13
inconsistent with the Normal Neighborhood Plan requires a minor amendment in accordance with
section 18.3.4.030.8.
1. Conformance with Street Network Plan: New developments must provide avenues,
neighborhood collectors, streets, alleys, multi-use paths, and pedestrian and bicycle
improvements consistent with the design concepts within the mobility chapter of the Normal
Neighborhood Plan Framework and in conformance with the Normal Neighborhood Plan
Street Network Map.
a. Streets designated as Shared Streets on the Normal Neighborhood Plan Street
Network Map may be alternatively developed as alleys, or multiuse paths provided
the following:
i. Impacts to the water protection zones are minimized to the greatest extent feasible.
ii. Pedestrian and bicyclist connectivity, as indicated on the Normal Avenue
Neighborhood Plan Pedestrian and Bicycle Network Map, is maintained or
enhanced.
2 Storm water management. The Normal Neighborhood Plan uses street trees, green streets,
and other green infrastructure to manage storm water, protect water quality and improve
watershed health. Discharge of storm water runoff must be directed into a designated green
street and neighborhood storm water treatment facilities.
a. Design Green Streets. Streets designated as Green Streets within the Street Network,
and as approved by the Public Works Department, shall conform to the following
standards:
i. New streets must be developed so as to capture and treat storm water in conformance
with the City of Ashland Storm Water Master Plan.
3. Access Management Standards: To manage access to land uses and on-site
circulation, and maintain transportation safety and operations, vehicular access must
conform to the standards set forth in section 18.4.3.080, and as follows:
a. Automobile access to development is intended to be provided by alleys where possible
consistent with the street connectivity approval standards.
b. Curb cuts along a Neighborhood Collector or shared street are to be limited to one per
block, or one per 200 feet where established block lengths exceed 400 feet.
4. Required On-Street Parking: On-street parking is a key strategy to traffic calming and is
required along the Neighborhood Collector and Local Streets.
B. Site and Building Design Standards.
1. Lot and Building Orientation:
a. Lot Frontage Requirements: Lots in the Normal Neighborhood are required to have their Front
Lot Line on a street or a Common Green.
Page 8 of 13
b. Common Green. The Common Green provides access for pedestrians and bicycles to
abutting properties. Common greens are also intended to serve as a common open
space amenity for residents. The following approval criteria and standards apply to
common greens:
i. Common Greens must include at least 400 square feet of grassy area, play area, or
dedicated gardening space, which must be at least 15 feet wide at its narrowest
dimension.
2. Cottage Housing: [Reserved]
3. Conservation of Natural Areas. Development plans must preserve water quality, natural
hydrology and habitat, and preserve biodiversity through protection of streams and wetlands.
In addition to the requirements of 18.3.11 Water Resources Protection Zones (Overlays),
conserving natural water systems must be considered in the site design through the application of
the following guidelines:
a.Designated stream and wetland protection areas are to be considered positive design
elements and incorporated in the overall design of a given project.
b.Native riparian plant materials must be planted in and adjacent to the creek to enhance habitat.
c.Create a long-term management plan for on-site wetlands, streams, associated habitats and
their buffers.
4. Storm Water Management. Storm water run-off, from building roofs, driveways, parking areas,
sidewalks, and other hard surfaces must be managed through implementation of the following
storm water management practices:
a. When required by the City Engineer, the applicant must submit hydrology and hydraulic
calculations, and drainage area maps to the City, to determine the quantity of
predevelopment, and estimated post-development, storm water runoff and evaluate the
effectiveness of storm water management strategies. Computations must be site specific and
must account for conditions such as soil type, vegetative cover, impervious areas, existing
drainage patterns, flood plain areas and wetlands.
b. Future Peak Storm water flows and volumes shall not exceed the pre-development peak flow.
The default value for pre-development peak flow is .25 CFS per acre.
c. Detention volume must be sized for the 25 year, 24 hour peak flow and volume.
d. Development must comply with one or more of following guidelines.
i. Implement storm water management techniques that endeavor to treat the water as close
as possible to the spot where it hits the ground through infiltration, evapotranspiration or
through capture and reuse techniques.
ii. Use on-site landscape-based water treatment methods to treat rainwater runoff from all
surfaces, including parking lots, roofs, and sidewalks.
iii. Use pervious or semi-pervious surfaces that allow water to infiltrate soil.
Page 9 of 13
iv. Design grading and site plans that create a system that slows the stormwater, maximizing
time for cleansing and infiltration.
v. Maximizing the length of overland flow of storm water through bioswales and rain gardens,
vi. Use structural soils in those environments that support pavements and trees yet are free
draining.
vii. Plant deep rooted native plants.
viii, Replace metabolically active minerals, trace elements and microorganism rich compost in
all soils disturbed through construction activities.
5. Off-Street Parking. Automobile parking, loading and circulation areas must comply with the
requirements of chapter 18.4.3 Parking, Access, and Circulation Standards, and as follows:
a. Neighborhood serving commercial uses within the NN-1-3.5-C zone must have
parking primarily accommodated by the provision of public parking areas and on-
street parking spaces, and are not required to provide private off-street parking or
loading areas, except for residential uses where one space shall be provided per
residential unit.
6. Neighborhood Module Concept plans. The Neighborhood Module Concept plans (i.e.
development scenarios) are for the purpose of providing an example of developments that
conform to the standards, and do not constitute independent approval criteria. Concept plans
are attached to the end of this chapter.
7. Conformance with Open Space Network Plan: New developments must provide open space
consistent with the design concepts within the Greenway and Open Space chapter of the
Normal Neighborhood Plan Framework and in conformance with the Normal Neighborhood
Plan Open Space Network Map. The open space network will be designed to support the
neighborhood's distinctive character and provide passive recreational opportunities where
people can connect with nature, where water resources are protected, and where riparian
corridors and wetlands are preserved and enhanced.
a) The application demonstrates that equal or better protection for identified resources will be
ensured through restoration, enhancement, and mitigation measures.
b) The application demonstrates that connections between open spaces are created and
maintained providing for an interlinked system of greenways.
c) The application demonstrates that open spaces function to provide habitat for wildlife,
promote environmental quality by absorbing, storing, and releasing storm water, and protect
future development from flood hazards.
d) The application demonstrates that scenic views considered important to the community are
protected, and community character and quality of life are preserved by buffering areas of
development from one another.
Page 10 of 13
18.3.4.65 Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards
An exception to the requirements Site Development and Design Standards must follow the procedures and
approval criteria adopted under section 18.4.1.030, unless authorized under the procedures for a major
amendment to plan.
18.3.4.070. Open Space Area Overlay
All projects containing land identified as Open Space Areas on the Normal Neighborhood Plan Open Space
Network Map, unless otherwise amended per section 18.3.030.C, must dedicate those areas as: common
areas, public open space, or private open space protected by restrictive covenant. It is recognized that the
master planning of the properties as part of the Normal Neighborhood Plan imparted significant value to the
land, and the reservation of lands for recreational open space and conservation purposes is proportional to
the value bestowed upon the property through the change in zoning designation and future annexation.
18.3.4.075. Advance Financing District [Reserved]
18.3.4.080. Review and Approval Procedure. All land use applications are to be reviewed and processed
in accordance with the applicable procedures of Part 18.5.
Page 11 of 13
Neighborhood Module Concept plans
The City recognizes that future innovations in building technologies, water conservation practices, and
creative approaches to site design and layout will help shape the neighborhood module concept in
consideration of the unique characteristics of the properties being developed. As such these example
illustrations presented are primarily intended to assist those involved in conceptualizing a development to
better address the principle objectives outlined within the Normal Neighborhood Plan.
n
00
I
1 _
i
Page 12 of 13
Normal Neighborhood District Zoning Classification Map.
far
-LAP
~ ZorEEt1C„},
a NN-1-5
NN-1-3.5
4 NN-1-3.5-C
NN-2
Open Space
ffGVL-- AY Read Classifications
rrefgborhood collector
local street
9 =ti
n., shared street
i
pwh
i
Normal Neighborhood [district
Zoning Classifications o 2 4W WoFeet
Page 13 of 13