HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlacerRun_535_PA-2015-02180
CITY F
L
December 22, 2015
Notice of Final Decision
On December 22, 2015, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
Planning Action: PA-2015-02180
Subject Property: 535 Placer Run
Applicant: Kerry Kencairn
Owner: Jeffi•ess Hailand
Description: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit
for alteration of the land surface on lands identified as Hillside Land. The project will involve
widening and grading of an existing driveway. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
Woodland Residential; ZONING: WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 08BA; TAX LOTS: 910.
The Community Development Director's decisi r"
on becomes final and is effective on the 12 day after the i;
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of
approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F)
and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The
ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be
made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Mark Schexnayder in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
i
4•
cc: Jeffress Hailand; Parties of record; Property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us %r' ~
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.B.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of
this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site, If an appellant prevails at the
hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Thne for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of
decision is mailed.
c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall
contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before
the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other
documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other
relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument
concerning any relevant ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 I \
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 j
www.ashland.or.us \ j
i
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-02180
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 535 Placer Run
APPLICANT: Kerry Kencairn
OWNER: Jeffress Hailand
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for
a proposed alteration of the land surface in areas identified as Hillside Land. The applicant's proposal is
for the widening and grading of an existing driveway on West side of the property located at 535 Placer
Run. The project will also involve the implementation of permanent erosion control measures.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Woodland Residential; ZONING: WR9
ASSESSOR'S P: 39 lE 08BA; T LOT: 910
SUBMITTAL DATE: November 16; 2015
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE; December 7, 2015
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: December 22, 2015
FINAL DECISION DATE: January 4, 2016
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: July 4, 2017
DECISION:
The application is a request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review approval to widen and
grade the existing driveway and install permanent erosion control measures consisting of a Concrete Site
Wall with a maximum height of four feet on the uphill (West) side of the existing driveway on the
subject property. The proposed improvements are intended to allow improved site access and stabilize
an existing hill cut that was created during previous site development. The erosion control installation
will increase the stability of the existing hillside by protecting the slope from further erosion while also
ensuring the protection of native vegetation located upslope from the project. No additional
modifications to the site beyond the proposal are being considered with this application, and any future
development or modification of the site would require a separate Planning Action.
The subject property is accessed from Placer Run. The lot comprises approximately 74,923 square feet
in area and has an existing single-family dwelling. The existing cut slope was created to accommodate
the driveway, is approximately 100 feet long and composed of silty sand soils (decomposed granite).
Currently, the slope is unsupported with minimal vegetation and no terracing.
The proposal, per the site plan and support ing materials, is to re-grade an area of approximately 1,260
square feet in order to widen an existing gravel driveway. The project will also include the installation of
a Concrete Site Wall to retain the hill cut. This installation will create a new retaining wall without
terracing. The project will only require fill material behind the proposed retaining wall and under the
newly paved driveway. No additional cutting of the slope is proposed. Once the new retaining wall is
installed the applicant proposes revegetation of the hillside with added top soil to support a native
erosion control hydro-seed mix.
Per the requirements of the Ashland Municipal Code Section 18.3.10.090.13.1, the applicant was
required to have the proposed grading, retaining wall, and erosion control plans designed by a
geotechnical expert. A geoteclmical evaluation analysis report was submitted with the application
completed by Applied Geotechnical Engineering and Geologic Consulting to provide design
PA #2015-02180
535 Placer Run/MMS
Page 1
recommendations for the design and construction of the new retaining wall. Based on the proposed site
plan materials the applicant plans near vertical cut slopes contained behind the proposed retaining wall.
The project narrative specifies that the proposed retaining wall will eliminate existing adverse impacts
on the subject property, neighboring properties, and the environment by stabilizing an eroding hillside
(AMC 18.3.10.050.A). The geotechnical engineers report states that erosion control measures may be
required where vegetation is disturbed or removed because the decomposed granite soil is easily eroded.
Mulch consisting of either straw, wood cellulose fiber or other similar materials should be placed in
areas disturbed by construction activates (AMC 18.3.10.050.B). In addition, it is also recommended that
where concentrated flows do occur, large-sized crushed rock and straw bale check dams should be
installed. The findings and recommendations of the geotechnical engineer dated August 23, 2015
prepared by Applied Geotechnical Engineering and Geologic Consulting, are conditions of the Physical
and Environmental Constraints Permit approval, and thus, must be instituted with the proposed
development.
The approval criteria for a Physical & Environmental Constraints Permit require that the applicant take
reasonable steps to reduce adverse impacts to the environment (AMC 18.3.10.050.C). The area of
impact for this project will be confined to the Hillside Lands adjacent to the existing driveway area.
According to the site plan and narrative, no trees are proposed for removal or will be impacted by this
proj ect.
It is Staff's opinion that the proposal meets the requirements of the Physical and Environmental
Constraints chapter for Hillside Lands and that with the conditions of the approval this project can be
found to comply with the requirements.
The criteria for a Physical Constraints Review Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.3.10.050,
as follows:
A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to
the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized.
B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development naay create and
implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development.
C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the
environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The
StaffAdvisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the
surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance.
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Planning Action 2015-02180 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of
the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2015-
02180 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified
here.
2) That all measures installed for the purposes of long-term erosion control, including but not
limited to vegetative cover, retaining walls and landscaping shall be maintained in perpetuity on
all areas in accordance with 18.3.10.090.B.6.
E!
PA #2015-02180
535 Placer Run/MMS
Page 2
3) That written verification from the project geotechnical experts addressing the consistency of the
building permit plan submittals with the geotechnical report recommendations shall be submitted
with the building permit submittals.
4) The landscaping and irrigation for re-vegetation of cut/fill slopes and erosion control shall be
installed in accordance with the approved plan. Vegetation shall be installed in such a manner as
to be substantially established within one year of installation.
Bill Molnar, lanning Director r Date
lepartment~ f Community Development
PA #2015-02180
535 Placer Run/MMS
Page 3
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
i
c
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On December 22, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-02180, 535 Placer Run.
Signature of Employee
Document312/22/2015
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 500 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 1000 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 903
CRESSE JOAN E/DIXON RODNEY SCOTT DUKES ERIC N ET AL DUKES ERIC/MELISSA
170 TESSA LN 520 PLACER RUN 520 PLACER RUN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 907 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 908 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 700
FELT DONALD K TRUSTEE ET AL FIERRO EDWARD JOSEPH TRUSTEE GAGNE STEPHEN/CYNTHIA
PO BOX 309 121 WESTWOOD ST 155 WESTWOOD ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 902
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 910 PA-2015-02180 391 E08100 MARKUS JANOS PANNONLIUS
HAILAND JEFFRESS B LESHER FORREST/MARY C/0 SANDRA D HARDEE, ESTATE REP
38 WILLOW HILL RD 55 BIRNAM WOOD ROAD 834 BEAR TRCE
ST LOUIS MO 63124 ASHLAND OR 97520
HOOVER, AL 35226
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 906 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 800 PA-2015-02180 391 E08104
NORVELL RICHARD L/LISA BROOKS PLEXIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC ROSENTRETER ERIC TRUSTEE ET AL
115 WESTWOOD ST 340 OAK ST 2860 NW VERDE VISTA TERRACE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PORTLAND, OR 97210
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 504 PA-2015-02180 391 E08 300 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 900
SAWICKI RICHARD/NANCY SCHILLING FREDERICK SCHULMAN CHARLES TRUSTEE ET AL
147 TESSA LN 740 PARK ST 135 WESTWOOD ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 208 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 503 PA-2015-02180
SIMMS G L/CYNTHIA PETERSON YAMANE ROBERT/NANCY KERRY KENCAIRN
585 NYLA LN 167 TESSA LN 545 A STREET, STE 3
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
535 Placer Run
NOD 12/22/15
Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 541-488-5305 Fax:541-552-2050 www,ashland.or.us TTY:1-800-735-2900
ASHLAND
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2015-02180
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 535 Placer Run
OWNERIAPPLICANT: Jeffress Hailand/Kerry Kencairn
DESCRIPTION: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for alteration of
the land surface on lands identified as Hillside Land. The project will involve widening and grading of
an existing driveway, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Woodland Residential;
ZONING: WR; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 08BA; TAX LOTS: 910.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: December 7, 2015
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: December 21, 2015
I 1,
1 I
w
PLACER RUN pl
I
SUBJECT PROPERTY Iw~ - IJ
535 Placer Run
PA-2015-02180 -
C
m
1:1,200 A CITY op
1 inch = 100 feet w-q SHLAN E3
rr-[-,-r-r~-r~ Y7 - 4lapping (s s0-1 only and bemf no 1-1y of e¢uraey.
0 25 50 Is Ica Fell s All leaNres, etru<turas,facllalm.oafamant or roadway locallons
should W indopondenlly Ibld ywilbd for eMbtance and/or location.
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\Mailed Notices & Signs\2015TA-2015-02180.docx
PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL( )NSTRAINTS
15.3.10.050
An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and
shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria.
A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and
nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized.
B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures
to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development.
C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible
actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall
consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this
ordinance.
G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2015\PA-2015-02180.docs
S
•
- k
_i
'sj) L f f
Es
1= ~ j s
ham''
a'
1
LL I
C~ C5
43
a I
C ~ C61: a , ~ ITI
i
ta:l ~ry
Z`_z
=v [ti T;z
a
P'_'I ri +C9J Cz
j
aia 'a ,~`~I r ~ ' ~ i~ r~~l I'•=~ ice, r:;a,
a q
C~ll C2 C.3
r. r CJl to La iwl s GJ if
Ali Pti ca r-• r ? c?I
LIZ
LAN
IL q
f z c
ZZ,
Lrl LO FF r--
L' I{
m ILL=
y~
6z CZ
MAI
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 500 rA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 903 F'A-2015-02180 391 E08BA 907
CRESSE JOAN E/DIXON RODNEY DUKES ERIC/MELISSA FELT DONALD K TRUSTEE
SCOTT 520 PLACER RUN PO BOX 309
170 TESSA LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 908 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 700 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 910
FIERRO EDWARD JOSEPH TRUSTEE GAGNE STEPHEN/CYNTHIA HAILAND JEFFRESS B
121 WESTWOOD ST 155 WESTWOOD ST 535 PLACER RUN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2015-02180 391 E08100 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 909 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 906
LESHER FORREST/MARY MARKUS JANOS PANNONLOUS NORVELL RICHARD L/LISA BROOKS
55 BIRNAM WOOD ROAD 834 BEAR TRCE 115 WESTWOOD ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 HOOVER, AL 35226 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 800 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 400 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 504
PLEXIS HEALTHCARE SYSTEMS INC ROSENTRETER ERIC TRUSTEE SAWICKI RICHARD/NANCY
340 OAK ST 2860 NW VERDE VISTA TERRACE 147 TESSA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 PORTLAND, OR 97210 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02180 391 E08 300 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 900 PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 208
SCHILLING FREDERICK SCHULMAN CHARLES TRUSTEE SIMMS G L/CYNTHIA PETERSON
740 PARK ST 135 WESTWOOD ST 585 NYLA LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02180 391 E08BA 503 PA-2015-02180 PA-2015-02180
YAMANE ROBERT/NANCY KERRY KENCAIRN JEFFRESS HAILAND
167 TESSA LN 545 A ST #3 38 WILLOW HILL ROAD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ST LOUIS, MN 63124
PA-2015-02180
CARLOS DELGADO ARCHITECT 535 PLACER RUN
217 FOURTH STREET 12/7/2015 NOC
ASHLAND, OR 97520 19
i
i
At Lav
Suite E-
December 4, 2015 225 S. P
Clayton, I .;souri 63105
City of Ashland 314/863-8833
Development & Planning FAX 314/863-8835
20 E. Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
RE: 535 Placer Run
To Whom It May Concern:
I own the residence at 535 Placer Run. Currently, this is a "second" home. There may be
periods when we are unable to collect our mail. As we anticipate real estate issues in our
neighborhood, possibly soon, we are concerned about receiving notices from the City.
Would you please ensure that our mailing address for any such notices be shown as
follows:
Jeffress B. Hailand
3 8 Willow Hill Road
St. Louis, MO 63124
Please note that this is our billing address for City Power.
Enclosed please find a copy of this letter. Would you please acknowledge receipt of this
letter and return it to me in the enclosed, stamped, self-addressed envelope for my records? I
would hate for this to be lost in the mail without my knowing.
I
Thanking you in advance for your attention to this matter, I am,
Very truly yours,
r
Je r s H
JBH/lab
Enclosures
Y
lie
eotechnical
I' ngineering August ^3 2015
& Geologic Consulting
KenCairn Landscape Architecture
545 A Street, Suite 3
Ashland, OR 97520
SUBJECT: Geotechnical Investigation and Erosion Control
Site Improvements Including a New Pool and Garage
535 Placer Run
Ashland, Oregon
At your request, Applied Geotechnical Engineering and Geologic Consulting LLC (AGEGC) has
completed a geotechnical investigation and erosion control plan for the proposed new garage and
pool to be built at 535 Placer Run in Ashland, Oregon. The intent of our work is to provide design
recommendations for design and construction of the new garage and pool. The geotechnical
evaluation included a review of available geotechnical and geologic information for the property
and vicinity, a ground-level reconnaissance of the property and vicinity, and engineering analyses.
This report describes the work accomplished and provides our recommendations for design and
construction of the new additions, including erosion control.
We understand the project consists of a new pool located in the existing lawn area north of the
home, a new garage located in the existing parking area/drive located south of the home, and
retaining walls along the south side of the existing driveway and in landscaped areas.
SITE DESCRIPTION
A licensed geotechnical engineer and geologist provided by AGEGC completed a site visit to the
site on August 13, 2015. The site is currently developed with a wood-frame, single-family
residence. The property has been graded with a large cut uplull (south) of the home, and a
relatively thick fill downhill (north) of the home. Indications of excessive settlement were not
observed in the exterior foundations of the home. An existing gravel/paved driveway and parking
area is located around the perimeter of the home site. Some settlement of the fill soils downslope
of the home has occurred over time.
Subsurface conditions were evaluated based on the soils exposed in the road cuts south of the home
and our previous experience in the area. Surficial soils consist of silty sand soils (decomposed
granite). Geologic maps of the area indicate the site is underlain by granite at depth. No mapped
faults or other geologic structures that could adversely impact development are shown on geologic
maps of the area nor were observed in the area during our•site reconnaissance. Native slopes in the
vicinity of the existing home are relatively uniform and no indications of deep-seated slope failures
were observed. Minor surface erosion (rifling) was locally observed on portions of the cut slope
south of the home. Indications of groundwater springs or seepage were not observed in the vicinity
of the home. We anticipate that groundwater typically occurs at depths of greater than 30 ft;
however, perched groundwater likely occurs at the top of the weathered granite during periods of
heavy and/or extended rainfall. There are no developed drainages near the home and we anticipate
that surface water runoff typically occurs as sheet flow.
. ~ .sr y. R t;
41 1
ed. ~ rFp 0 9.~0 ' ~"t'czs e. 3`'ak.3 226-6- 95t
4096-15 535 Placer Run
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
In our opinion, the site is suitable for the proposed improvements. The main geotechnical and
geologic considerations are the existing fills in the pool location, moderately steep cut and fill
slopes, and the potential for seasonal perched groundwater. If the geotechnical recommendations
for development of the property are followed, in our opinion, there is no significant increased risk
of slope instability in the vicinity of the home, Recommendations for development and erosion
control for the proposed improvements are provided below.
Lot Development
1) Final graded cut and fill slopes should be no steeper than 2H:1V. Landscaping fill
should be compacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by
ASTM D 698, Structural fill under buildings, driveways and concrete flatwork should
be compacted to at least 95% of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D
698. All fills constructed using native (on-site) soils should be overbuilt a minimum of
2 ft beyond final grades then trimmed back to design elevations using a trackhoe
equipped with a smooth-lip bucket. The disturbed silty sand soils are highly
susceptible to erosion and should be revegetated as soon as practical. Prior to
placement of any fill, the ground surface in the fill are should be stripped of organics
and existing fill. The strippings are not suitable for use as compacted fill and should be
removed from the site or used in landscaped areas.
2) The design and construction of the existing MSE wall (stacked block wall) located
adjacent to the lawn area is unknown. The wall has some indications 'of movement.
We recommend as part of site improvements, the MSE wall be removed and replaced
as needed with cantilevered retaining walls. When the MSE retaining wall is removed,
the drainage system of the remaining concrete block wall that abuts east end of the
MSE wall should be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer and replaced if needed.
3) Fill placed within 3 ft of driveway areas, the house footprint, retaining walls, and.
concrete flatwork should consist of compacted, structural fill. The on-site soil (without
deleterious material) may be used as structural fill if properly moisture conditioned and
compacted; however, it is typically not practical to use the on site materials as
structural fill during periods of wet weather. Structural fill may also be constructed of
imported granular fill, such as 3/-in.-minus crushed rock. Structural fill must be
compacted to at least 950 of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM D
69$, at a moisture content within 3% of optimum. The ground surface within all areas
to receive fill should be stripped of surf cial organics prior to placement of the fill.
4) Structural loads for the garage may be supported on continuous spread footing
foundations founded on stiff native, undisturbed silty sand soils or on structural fill
over undisturbed native soils. Foundation excavations should be completed using a
backhoe or trackhoe equipped with a smooth-lip bucket. Spread footing foundations
may be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of up to 2,500 ps£ This
allowable soil bearing pressure assumes all footings will be founded as recommended
in this report. The minimum width of any footing should not be less than 12. in.,_and
footings should be established a minimum of 18 in. below the lowest 4djaeeot, exterior
grade.
2
4096-15 535 Placer Run
5) The site should be graded to provide positive drainage away from footings, retaining
walls, and exterior walls. Subsurface drains (foundation drains) should be provided
adjacent to all exterior foundations.
6) We anticipate that existing non-structural fill soils are likely located within the
proposed footprint of the new pool. The fill soils are not suitable for support of the
pool without excessive settlement and should be removed under the pool and within a
horizontal distance of at least 3 ft beyond the pool footprint using a trackhoe equipped
with a smooth-lip bucket. The overexcavated soils should be replaced with imported
crushed rock fill C/-in.-minus crushed rock) placed and compacted as structural fill. A
subsurface drain (perforated drain pipe inside a non-woven geotextile sock) should be f
placed along the bottom of the downhill side of the fill and daylight to drain.
7) Concrete slab-on-grade floors (including the bottom of the pool) should be underlain
by a minimum of 6 in, of in.-minus imported crushed rock. We recommend
installation of a moisture retarding membrane under the garage concrete slab to
minimize wicking of moisture up through the slab.
8) New retaining walls will be constructed upslope of the driveway and new garage, as
part of the landscaping, and for the embedded pool walls. The following embedded
wall design recommendations assume that the wall backfill is compacted to 90 to 95%
of ASTM D 698, the backfill is level within 10 ft of the wall, and the embedded wall is
fully drained, i.e., hydrostatic pressure cannot act on the wall. Walls that are allowed
to yield by tilting about their base should be designed using a lateral earth pressure
based on an equivalent fluid having a unit weight of 35 pe£ Cantilevered retaining
walls are typically considered yielding. Relatively rigid retaining walls should be
designed using a lateral earth pressure based on an equivalent fluid having a unit
weight of 50 pef. Embedded pool walls are typically considered rigid (non-yielding).
Horizontal shear forces can be resisted partially or completely by frictional forces
developed between the base of spread footings and the underlying soil and by passive
soil resistance, The total frictional resistance between the footing and the soil is the
nonnal force times the coefficient of friction between the soil and the base of the
footing. We recommend an ultimate value of 0.4 for the coefficient of friction; the
normal force is the sum of the vertical forces (dead load plus real live load). The
coefficient of friction can be increased to 0.5 when the foundation is underlain by a
minimum of 12 in, of 3/4-in.-minus crushed rock that extends at least 2 ft past the front
of the wall foundation, Passive earth pressures on foundations can be assumed to be
400 pef when the foundations are backfill with crushed rock (structural) fill.
9) We estimate that competent granite (moderately weathered) occurs at a depth of less
than 20 ft at the site. In our opinion, seismic design for the new improvements can be
completed based on a Site Class B material.
3
4096-15 535 Placer Run
Erosion Control
The intent of the erosion control plan is to decrease erosion and off-site migration of soils. This can
be accomplished by decreasing surface water runoff by means of vegetation, hay bales and rock
coverings or checkdams; holding the soil in place by establishing a vegetation cover as soon as
practical; and by directing surface water flow away from areas disturbed by construction activities.
1) We anticipate that a minimal portion of the property will be disturbed during construction
of the proposed garage, pool, driveway, and retaining walls. Landscape areas on the lot
where the vegetation is disturbed or removed should be revegetated as soon as practical.
The silty sand (decomposed granitic soils) is easily eroded when disturbed by construction
activities. Mulch consisting of either straw, wood cellulose fiber or other similar materials
can be placed in areas where landscaping will not be established prior to September 15. If
required, the mulch should be applied at a rate of approximately 2,000 pounds per acre.
2) The existing gravel access drive is located downslope of the proposed improvements of the
pool and garage. During construction, the gravel driveway will provide adequate erosion
control along the downhill side of the project. The driveway should be maintained with
clean gravel (gravel contaminated with soil should be replaced with new, relatively clean
gravel).
3) We recommend (where practical) the ground surface upslope of the new retaining walls be
graded such that surface water upslope of the disturbed area is directed away from the new
walls. Check dams using straw bales or large-sized crushed rock should be installed every
15 to 20 ft along this swale to reduce velocities of surface water flows prior to vegetation
or ground cover being established.
4) We anticipate that some concentrated flows will occur from the sloped portion of the gravel
driveway along the west side of the garage and pool area. Where this concentrated flow is
discharged over the slope below (north of) the driveway, we anticipate a combination of
large-sized crushed rock (9- to 12-in. maxirnum size, well graded) and straw bale check
dams will be required. Actual long-term erosion control measures will be determined once
site grading in this area is completed.
5) Roof downspouts from the garage should be hard-piped to discharge below the existing fill
slope.
6) During construction and prior to establishment of the site landscaping, the erosion control
measures must be monitored and will require periodic maintenance. Maintenance may
include installation of straw bales or silt fence, removal of sediment from the gravel drive,
and the placement of additional ground cover. The amount of required maintenance of the
erosion control measures will decrease significantly as the landscaping becomes
established.
7) The project geotechnical engineer should evaluate the erosion control , measures,
periodically during construction, including on about September 30 and after storm events.
4
. F
k 4096-15 535 Placer Run
CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS SERVICES
Based on our observations at the site and our review of the proposed improvement plans completed
by you, we recommend the following site visits be completed by the geotechnical engineer of
record for this project to observe and document the following:
1) Pool subgrade soils and structural fill for the pool, installation of the drain under the pool.
2) Foundation subgrade for the garage foundations.
3) Foundation subgrade for the new retaining walls, wall backfill for the retaining walls, wall
drainage.
4) Final site grades including the drainage Swale above the southern retaining walls.
5) Erosion control measures after installation, after storm events, and every other month
during winter and spring months until vegetation is re-established.
LIMITATIONS
This report has been prepared to aid the owner's design team in the design and construction of the
proposed improvements on the referenced property located at 535 Placer Rim in Ashland, Oregon.
The scope is limited to the specific project and location described herein, and our description of the
project represents our understanding of the significant aspects of the project relevant to the design
and construction of the proposed new pool, garage, and retaining wall improvements. This report
does not address any improvements to the existing home.
The conclusions and recommendations submitted in this report are based on the information
described above. It should be understood that there are limitations in a study of this type (without
field explorations). If the owner wishes to reduce these uncertainties beyond the level associated
with this report, we should be advised at once.
We have performed these services in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering
practices in southern Oregon at the time the study was accomplished. No other warranties, either
expressed or implied, are provided.
Please contact AGEGC if you have any questions or require additional information.
Sincerely,
Applied Geotechnical Engineering and Geologic Consulting LLC
Robin L. Warren, G.E., R.G. D PRO
Principal ~aIN~ ssia
//A045PE ~t
a~ GQN
0}'25, Ag~oG
Renewal: June 2016 ,5
Application Submittal
535 Placer Run
39 1E 08BA Tax Lot 910
Owners: Geotechnical Engineer:
Jeffress Hailand Robin Warren
38 Willow Hill Road Applied Geotechnical Engineering
St Louis, MO 63124 1314-B Center Drive #452
541 324-9999 Medford, Oregon 97501
541226-6658
Landscape Architect and Planning:
Kerry KenCairn Structural Engineer:
KenCairn Landscape Architecture ACE Engineering
545 A Street Suite 3 Allan T Goffe PE, SE
Ashland, OR 97520 PO Box 231
541488-3194 Ashland, OR 97520
541552-1417
Surveyor:
Stuart Osmus
Terrasurvey
274 4th Street
Ashland, Oregon 97520
541482-6474
Project Description
This project seeks to"reconf,.ig,ure the..lat.lines.and--buildi g-i melo.pes---for the two--remaining, This
proposal involves the widening and regarding of an existing driveway into slopes over 35%. It
also retains and existing cut as part of the widening process. The widened drive will be paved
and is currently gravel.
Chapter 18.3.10 - Physical and Environmental Constraints Overlay
18.3.10.040 Application Submission Requirements
This narrative has been submitted with all the necessary graphic support to satisfy the requirements of
the Physical and Environmental Constraints Chapter for Hillside Lands, Sever Constraints in the Wildfire
Zone.
18.3.10.050 Approval Criteria
All approval criteria has been met
18.3.10.060 Land Classifications
This project is constrained by the following classifications:
Hillside Lands - The project contains slopes over 25%
Wildfire Lands - the pro0ject is within the wildfire zone
Severe Constraints Lands - there are slopes being affected that are greater than 35%
18.3.10.090 Development Standards for Hillside Lands
A. General Requirements. The following general requirements shall apply in Hillside Lands.
1. Buildable Area.
This is an existing lot and this application does not include a building.
2. Building Envelope.
This is an existing lot and this application does not include a building.
2. New Streets and Driveways. New streets, flag drives, and driveways shall be constructed on lands of
less than or equal to 35 percent slope with the following exceptions.
This application is an improvement to an existing driveway, it makes it wider and enhances an
existing cut slope with a retaining wall.
4. Geotechnical Studies. For all applications on Hillside Lands involving subdivisions or partitions, the
following additional information is required: A geotechnical study prepared by a geotechnical expert
indicating that the site is stable for the proposed use and development. The study shall include the
following information.
A geotechnical study is included with this submittal
B. Hillside Grading and Erosion Control. All development on lands classified as Hillside shall provide
plans conforming to the following items.
1. All grading, retaining wall design, drainage, and erosion control plans for development on Hillside Lands
shall be designed by a geotechnical expert. All cuts, grading or fills shall conform to the International
Building Code and be consistent with the provisions of this ordinance. Erosion control measures on the
development site shall be required to minimize the solids in runoff from disturbed areas.
535 Placer Run 1
All grading, retaining wall design, drainage and erosion control has been designed by a geotechnical
expert. All cuts, grading and fills comply with international building code and are consistent with this
ordinance. Erosion control measures have been implemented to reduce runoff and sediment transport.
2. Timing of Improvements. For development other than single family homes on individual lots, all
grading, drainage improvements, or other land disturbances shall only occur from May 1 to October 31.
This project is being proposed is a single family home.
2. Retention in natural state. On all projects on HillsideLands involving partitions and subdivisions, and
existing lots with an area greater than one-half acre, an area equal to 25 percent of the total project
area, plus the percentage figure of the average slope of the total project area, shall be retained in a
natural state. Lands to be retained in a natural state shall be protected from damage through the use of
temporary construction fencing or the functional equivalent. For example, on a 25,000 square feet lot
with an average slope of 29 percent, 25%+29%=54% of the total lot area shall be retained in a natural
state. The retention in a natural state of areas greater than the minimum percentage required here is
encouraged.
The portion of this project within hillside lands is 1,260 square feet (the area of the lot affected by the P
and E), the overall lot size is 74,923 square feet. 89.6% of the lot is being kept in its natural state after
the existing home and drive areas have been removed from the calculation.
4. Grading - Cuts. On all cut slopes on areas classified as Hillside Lands, the following standards shall
apply.
a. Cut slope angles shall be determined in relationship to the type of materials of which they are
composed.
All cut slopes shall be nearly vertical and controlled and contained behind a retaining wall.
b. Exposed cut slopes, such as those for streets, driveway accesses, or yard areas, greater than seven
feet in height shall be terraced.
All cut slopes shall be nearly vertical and controlled and contained behind a retaining wall. The
proposed wall is a maximum of four feet in height.
c. Cut slopes for structure foundations which reduce the effective visual bulk, such as split pad or
stepped footings, shall be exempted from the height limitations of this section.
This is an existing lot and this application does not include any additional building.
d. Revegetation of cut slope terraces shall include the provision of a planting plan, introduction of top
soil where necessary, and the use of irrigation if necessary.
The revegetation behind this wall is identified on the erosion control plan as permanent hydro-seed.
Top soil will be added behind this wall to support native erosion control hydro-seed.
5. Grading - Fill. On all fill slopes on lands classified as Hillside Lands, the following standards shall
apply.
There are no proposed fill slopes on this project. The only fill is behind the retaining wall and under
the paved driveway.
6. Revegetation Requirements. Where required by this chapter, all required revegetation of cut
535 Placer Run 2
and fill slopes shall be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, signature of a
required survey plat, or other time as determined by the hearing authority. Vegetation shall be installed
in such a manner as to be substantially established within one year of installation.
Revegetation will occur the moment the project is built and the appropriate weather conditions allow,
early spring or late fall so the moisture required for naturalized hydro-seeding is present.
8. Site Grading. The grading of a site on Hillside Lands shall be reviewed considering the following factors.
a. No terracing shall be allowed except for the purposes of developing a level building pad and for
providing vehicular access to the pad.
This work is being proposed to enhance vehicular circulation to a garage and paving of the existing
driveway.
b. Avoid hazardous or unstable portions of the site.
This proposal stabilizes an existing cut face.
c. Building pads should be of minimum size to accommodate the structure and a reasonable
amount of yard space. Pads for tennis courts, swimming pools and large lawns are discouraged.
As much of the remaining lot area as possible should be kept in the natural state of the original
slope.
This is an existing lot and this application does not include a building.
9. Inspections and Final Report. Prior to the acceptance of a subdivision by the City, signature of the final
survey plat on partitions, or issuance of a certificate of occupancy for individual structures, the project
geotechnical expert shall provide a final report indicating that the approved grading, drainage, and
erosion control measures were installed as per the approved plans, and that all scheduled inspections,
as per 18.3.10.090.A.4.j were conducted by the project geotechnical expert periodically throughout
the project.
The geotechnical engineer will submit a final report on this project.
C. Surface and Groundwater Drainage. All development on Hillside Lands shall conform to the following
standards.
1. All facilities for the collection of stormwater runoff shall be constructed on the site and according to the
following requirements:
a. Stormwater facilities shall include storm drain systems associated with street construction,
facilities for accommodating drainage from driveways, parking areas and other impervious
surfaces, and roof drainage systems.
A stormwater control system is already in place for this property, the portion of this project
requiring a Physical and Environmental Constraints permit shall be added to that system.
b. Stormwater facilities, when part of the overall site improvements, shall be, to the greatest extent
feasible, the first improvements constructed on the development site.
A stormwater control system is already in place for this property, the portion of this project
requiring a Physical and Environmental Constraints permit shall be added to that system.
c. Stormwater facilities shall be designed to divert surface water away from cut faces or sloping surfaces
of a fill.
The stoomwater is being directed away from cuts faces and fill.
535 Placer Run 3
e. Existing natural drainage systems shall be utilized, as much as possible, in their natural state,
recognizing the erosion potential from increased storm drainage.
f. A stormwater control system is already in place for this property, the portion of this project
requiring a Physical and Environmental Constraints permit shall be added to that system.
e. Flow-retarding devices, such as detention ponds and recharge berms, shall be used where practical
to minimize increases in runoff volume and peak flow rate due to development. Each facility shall
consider the needs for an emergency overflow system to safely carry any overflow water to an
acceptable disposal point.
A stormwater control system is already in place for this property, the portion of this project
requiring a Physical and Environmental Constraints permit shall be added to that system.
f. Stormwater facilities shall be designed, constructed and maintained in a manner that will avoid
erosion on-site and to adjacent and downstream properties.
A stormwater control system is already in place for this property, the portion of this project
requiring a Physical and Environmental Constraints permit shall be added to that system. There
are not any current issues related to stormawter, this proposal contains all stormwater associated
with it by directing flow into the landscape and then a behind wall drainage system.
g. Alternate stormwater systems, such as dry well systems, detention ponds, and leach fields, shall be
designed by a registered engineer or geotechnical expert and approved by the Public Works
Department or Building Official.
There are not any alternative stormwater systems being proposed in association with this project.
D. Tree Conservation, Protection and Removal. All development on Hillside Lands shall conform to the
following requirements.
1. Inventory of Existing Trees.
There are no trees associated with this submittal
2. Evaluation of Suitability for Conservation.
There are no trees associated with this submittal
3. Tree Conservation in Proiect Design.
There are no trees associated with this submittal
4. Tree Protection.
There are no trees associated with this submittal
5. Tree Removal.
There are no trees associated with this submittal
6. Tree Replacement.
There are no trees associated with this submittal
7. Enforcement.
There are no trees associated with this submittal
535 Placer Run 4
E. Building Location and Design Standards. All buildings and buildable areas proposed for Hillside
Lands shall be designed and constructed in compliance with the following standards.
1. Building Envelopes. All newly created lots, either by subdivision or partition, shall contain
building envelopes conforming to the following standards.
There are no building envelopes associated with this proposal.
2. Building Design. To reduce hillside disturbance through the use of slope responsive design techniques,
buildings on Hillside Lands, excepting those lands within the designated Historic District, shall
incorporate the following into the building design and indicate features on required building permits.
There is no building associated with this proposal
F. All structures on Hillside Lands shall have foundations designed by an engineer or architect with
demonstrable geotechnical design experience. A designer, as defined, shall not complete working
drawings without having foundations designed by an engineer.
There are no structures associated with this proposal.
G. All newly created lots or lots modified by a lot line adjustment must include building envelopes containing
a buildable area less than 35 percent slope of sufficient size to accommodate the uses permitted in the
underlying zone, unless the division or lot line adjustment is for open space or conservation purposes.
There are no newly created lots or lot line adjustments associated with this proposal.
H. Exception to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands. An exception under this section is not subject
to the variance requirements of chapter 18.5.5 Variances. An application for an
exception is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and may be granted with respect to the
development standards for Hillside Lands if the proposal meets all of the following criteria.
Not applicable, this application is not requesting any exceptions.
A. Requirements for Subdivisions, Performance Standards Developments, or Partitions.
Not applicable, this application is for the regarding of a portion of an existing driveway and a
retaining wall.
B. Requirements for Construction of All Structures.
Not applicable, this application is for the regarding of a portion of an existing driveway and a retaining wall.
18.3.10.110 Development Standards for Severe Constraint Lands
A. Severe Constraint Lands are extremely sensitive to development, grading, filling, or vegetation removal
and, whenever possible, alternative development should be considered.
This is an existing site, we are proposing to enhance and stabilize an existing condition.
B. Development of floodways is not permitted except for bridges and road crossings. Such crossings shall be
designed to pass the 100-year flood without raising the upstream flood height more than six inches.
There is no floodway associated with this project, it is in the hillside lands category.
C. Development on lands greater than 35 percent slope shall meet all requirements of section
535 Placer Run 5
18.3.10.090 Development Standards for Hillside Lands in addition to the requirements of this
section.
This proposal meets all requirements of section 18.3.10.090.
D. Development of land or approval for a planning action shall be allowed only when the following study
has been accomplished. An engineering geologic study approved by the Public Works Director and
Planning Director establishes that the site is stable for the proposed use and development. The study
shall include the following information.
A geotechnical report/study has been submitted as part of this application.
535 Placer Run 6
KenCaim
E'llNJAtillIN CI z ~ Landscape Architecture
-----r IF~CI (I)
T
I I
I
WSASi.siE j,ASHt40,0WbN
ISTE
tf~~STATE OF~d
~ ~ I OIt000N
P
~l
04 ' Imo. H Kerty Ken aim
~Ry9 / c9PE AR~~
P&E EXCLUSION
AREA Drawn B
STAFF
SCALE I" 20'-D"
y I
SCALE; 1" = 400'•0..
VICINITY MAP
PROJECT INFORMATION: W
'
-T-- OWNERS: JEFFRESS HAILAND
535 PLACER RUN Z
j ° ASHLAND, OR, 97520 W
/ BUILDING DESIGN: CARLOS DELGADO ARCHITECT
217 FOURTH STREET
ASHLAND, OREGON, 97520 W
PHONE: (541)552-9502
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KERRY KENCAIRN
KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE
545 A STREET Z C:)
ASHLAND, OR, 97520
PHONE: (541) 488.3194
LOCATION: 535 PLACER RUN CY)
TAX LOT: 391 E08BA 910
n I EXISTING LOT SIZE: 1.72 ACRES (74,923 ft') O
Z LL!
0 10 20 40 ZONING: WR ® Q Z
P&E EXCLUSION EXHIBIT SCALE: 1" = 20'-0" J
0 Lo
Cf) U)
<
U U
REVISION DATE
LOT COVERAGE
TAX LOT 391 E08BA 910
LOT SIZE: 1.72 ACRES (74,923 ft')
HOUSE FOOTPRINT: 2073 SQUARE FEET j
PAVED DRIVEWAY: 4352 SQUARE FEET
PAVED WALKWAYS: 1853 SQUARE FEET P&E
TOTAL LOT COVERAGE: 8278 SQUARE FEET EXCLUSION
PERCENT LOT COVERAGE: 11,4% EXHIBIT
CONTENTS:
COVER P&E EXCLUSION EXHIBIT ISSUE DATE:
L 1.0 SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN OCTOBER 15, 2015
L 2.0 LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN
L 2.1 CUT/FILL ANALYSIS PLAN IKORTiN
L 2.2 LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE PLAN COVER
L 2.3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
KenCalrn
Landscape Architecture
T 0 P 0 F
\ZAOS P ~ 4
i
_ ! E s+snsr s~Ea wNwm, arcyrsa~
O DDE
511.k5A465
VEL D R I VEI4A Oq~
GRA qV\
~GIS TER,6~
d
STATE OF
OREGON
REG. # 493
K-y K-Cai- ~,C~
qPE AgG
Drawn By:
\ DS STAFF
DECK POST(TYP.)
T iff sF~~ ~~FR SCALE: I"= 16'-0"
P&E EXCLUSION J.
AREA '
i ~
\ Mq o e SLOPE ANALYSIS LEGEND
aRrw 0
a4 W
HVAC Less than 25% V
UNIT .i 1 D$ L
s
N Y I 0 Ap Cy Co
25% TO 35% W
~ ~ 1 FASO"R
J Q
E ^ Greater than 35% Q ~
E aqR~~" D R 241 z r--
4 p c Posr
a
0
o i a
241 Z LLB
0Q°z
N A
J
~Az _0
ce) U)
o J V Ln Q
242P
REVISION DATE
1
i
j
2430--
SLOPE
ANALYSIS
~ - onT PLAN
CONTENTS:
COVER P&E EXCLUSION EXHIBIT ISSUE DATE:
L 1.0 SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN OCTOBER 15, 2015
L 2.0 LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN
L 2.1 CUT/FILL ANALYSIS PLAN
L 2.2 LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE PLAN 0 8' 16' 32'
L 2.3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN scale; V=16'4' L 1.0
i
i
4 ,
KenCalrn
a. Landscape Architecture
B. RETAINAING WALLS OVER 4' IN OVERALL HEIGHT
MUST BE ENGINEERED FOR FINAL
\ \ CONSTRUCTION DETAILS. DETAILS OF THIS
WALL ARE SHOWN FOR ESTIMATING PURPOSES
\ ONLY
r %PROVIDE WATER PROOFING BEHIND ALL WALLS,
I I {I EXTEND T02'FROh1 TOP OF WALL
J NOTE:
43 -III- DO NOT FILL WALL TIE HOLES UNLESS
0 , OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THE CLIENT
E NN III oM1S tJ ASHuWo,~rrom
Q f 0 fAf.5151465
3r4' CRUSHED ROCK AND 4' PERFORATED
F III DRAIN LINE @ BACK OF WALL-SEE
/240 III SHEETL2.2FORDRAINAGE GISTER
_ / III SAND FINISH CONCRETE SURFACE STATE Or
OREGON
?qOS\ / - / I OR FINISH GRADE QPLANTER -SEE R
EG. #493 H
i PAN
r
U
REBAR AT CONCRETE WALL Kerry KenCai
III III
I I- ( -#4 rebar at vertical relnferce-t IUIt99
#3 reber at horizontal Merv-nt 9PE p~G
l/ AArelnfo ngbarell-0'D.C.
/ - -III III J. III- -Double becateMMwalls
-Center barn wall
Drawn By:
--814•CRUSHEDROCKBASECONTIN000S KKSGB
V
_ \ j UNDER WALLS. COMPACT709E%.
3b SCALE: 1" 15'-0'
\ I\F 1 SECTION CONCRETE SITE WALLS
Scale: NTS
F
_ ~qs
Fe
I nh
P&E EXCLUSION h - ~12 `2"'3 ;
AREA
if Lu
,I I\ 413 U
414 A'
1 ~1Iw
V ,a
N `111 \ I~414 Q
444TTT444......
? I 41
;f1 41C 415 ~AAS
GATE
A r 4Ie Z LO
Z rn
~rA ;v 1 420 V
\v V A:' i . °o 0
V -420 -1 J Q
PROPOSED CONCRETE - ---241 J 0. J
SITE WALL SEE DTL, #1 0 ro
V Lo Q
THIS SHEET
\ .2415-
\ \ \ REVISION DATE
J - - - - LANDSCAPE
GRADING
-2a25-
\ (R)T PLAN
\ CONTENTS:
COVER P&E EXCLUSION EXHIBIT ISSUE DATE:
L 1.0 SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN OCTOBER 15, 2015
_ 2g3p L 2,0 LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN
I n
L2.1 CUT/FILL ANALYSIS PLAN
L 2.2 LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE PLAN 0 8' 16' 32'
L 2.3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN scale: V=16-0" L 2.0
i
SLOPE ANALYSIS KEY KenCairn
Landscape Architecture
2410 EXISTING CONTOUR
1 FT PROPOSED CUT +1 1 FT PROPOSED FILL
2 FT PROPOSED CUT ±2%, 2 FT PROPOSED FILL
3 FT PROPOSED CUT 3 FT PROPOSED FILL
usner,sT~ a. asxww, cwerszo
NOTE: THE LOT IS ALREADY DEVELOPED. WE ARE WORKING IN 1,261 SQUARE W"~
o _ FEET OF HILLSIDE IS - E
OSTATE F
1 AVERAGE LOT SLOPE: 35% OREMN
TOTAL LOT AREA: 74,923 SQUARE FEET (1.72 ACRES) r PEG. a493
1 I I y U
TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE: 1,065 SQUARE FEET 0 K -y Kenai. ~r,t
' 9PE ARG
PERCENT OF LOT DISTURBANCE: 1.4%
. MAXIMUM CUT OUTSIDE FOOTPRINT OF BUILDINGS: 3 FEET Drawn By:
- SGB
.MAXIMUM FILL OUTSIDE FOOTPRINT OF BUILDINGS; 3 FEET
SCALE V 16'•0"
- * OTHER CUTS AND FILLS AS SHOWN ON PLAN
i
P&E EXCLUSION
AREA
t W
+z W
~ W
_ i
ki ,:2 ~A Q
N
+1 Lo
A
kk ~
\ 0
a»io Q Q Z
I ~
~y v~N J Q
Q CO
11
~A ,24t5 U Q
\
1
REVISION DATE
o "
2as3 CUT/FILL
ANALYSIS
oaT
-
CONTENTS: PLAN
A 24~p~ COVER P$E EXCLUSION EXHIBIT ISSUE DATE;
L 1.0 SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN
L 2.0 LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN OCTOBER 15,205
L 2.1 CUTIFILL ANALYSIS PLAN L -T
L 2.2 LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE PLAN 0 6' 16' 32' 2.1
L 2.3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
scale: 1"=16'-O"
KenCalrn
DRAINAGE PLAN LEGEND Landscape Architecture
CATCH BASIN
3 SURFACE DRAINAGE
/240 ' TIGHT LINE TO CATCH BASIN - 4" HARD PIPE
?RO / 576 AST STEM ASNWVD, O U75b
WALL PERFORATED DRAIN COLLECT 61S TER
AND DISPERSE- 4" PERFORATED PIPE Q~ STATeorIO
❑ _ OREGON
r REG. 8493
U
Ke"y KenCulm
24j~ d~ "n199
\ \ _ cgPE AR~~
Drawn By,
KK, SGB
~I SCALE: 16'.0"
F
P&E EXCLUSION
AREA I m }
I 1
AM C)
I :415
U)
%
% ~ZL0
. ~.\1420~~'a 0
ado ` .21 0 V
o1 ~ U)
Lo <
\ \ R?o / 2420 REVISION DATE
\
o\ \ 2425....
/ LANDSCAPE
DRAINAGE
OftT
-2430 CONTENTS: PLAN
COVER P&E EXCLUSION EXHIBIT
L 1.0 SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN ISSUE DATE;
L2.0 LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN OCTOBER 15,2015
L 2.1 CUT/FILL ANALYSIS PLAN L -T L 2.2 LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE PLAN
^
L 2.3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 8' 16' 32' /~,L
scale: 1 "=16'-0" L
I,.
CONTENTS: KenCairn
COVER P&E EXCLUSION EXHIBIT EROSION CONTROL LEGEND Landscape Architecture
L 1.0 SLOPE ANALYSIS PLAN
L2.0 LANDSCAPE GRADING PLAN
L 2.1 CUT/FILL ANALYSIS PLAN
L2.2 LANDSCAPE DRAINAGE PLAN PERMANENT HYDROSEED AREAS STANDARD HYDROSEED MIX:
L 2.3 EROSION CONTROL PLAN
Hard Fescue, Micro Clover, Tall Fescue,
White Yarrow, w/ wood fiber mulch,
tackifier, slow-release fertilizer, & mycorrhizal innoculant
545 A SI, STE 3, ASHW 0, QNR iib2
SILT FENCE 541.545.1465
~GISTER,~,
2405' ft. SFATE OF O
uuuuuuunuugill u1uuuuw TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CATCHMENT PIPE OREGON
r" REG.n 493 N
i
ti
iimoire
re K
CATCH BASIN - SEE L 3.2 DRAINAGE PLAN
c9PE AgG
° Drawn By:
TC TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CATCHMENT - SEE DTL. #2 THIS SHEET STAFF
~ TC I
SCALE: 1"=16'A"
NOTES:
1. AREAS NOT SHOWN AS HYDROSEEDED WILL NOT BE DISTURBED
\ \F 2. INSTALL TEMPORARY CATCHMENT AT LOW POINT IN SILT FENCE LAYOUT
\ IRRIGATION NOTES:
\ 1. Trees and ornamental landscape with irrigation will be designed prior to building permit application.
~qs 2. Hydroseed species have been selected to flourish without supplemental water.
F~
P&E EXCLUSION 1 V
AREA Z
W
- Uj
\
1
415 ,
Z O
~Z~
\ 0
vA\ \ A A ~QZ
,A \ J
A -420 \ \ J a
nd10~ 0/ L
~o ~~HayBates secure with rebar where V N Q
Filter fabric material placed on soil.
V ` wireupp mesh Outlet pipe • Raise pipe
supported by y wire
Ifnecessary invert to 1,5'above bottom
\ A REVISION DATE
.,A A \ \ Attach filter fabric 3
\ places per post
\ \p V _ ! Temporary Settling Basin
Anchor trench --4 x 6 feet across x 2 feet deep
s -
Ii t
a 1
p Itt
9° 1 Discharge to catch basin or EROSION
to f continue with flexible, corrugated
_
- 2° ,1 { apaleboRemefslope
GBT CONTROL
,2425- _ ~L ® PLAN
Bury bottom offabdc 2' by 2'wood stake
In 9'to 12' deep trench or metal T stake ISSUE DATE.
\ -
OCTOBER 15, 2015
. -2430
1 SCHEMATIC: SILT FENCE CONSTRUCTION 2 SCHEMATIC: TEMPORARY SEDIMENT CATCHMENT 0 8' 16' 32' 11
L2.3 Seale: NTS L Scale: NITS scale: 1"=16'-0" 2.3
vibm uc
FINISH GRADE
6" CAST IN PLACE
= CONCRETE WALL 64
AT 2ALLOC OWELS STRUCTURAL BASK FILL _ ksR s 7~0
J k~av T~
FINISH GRADE = io
6" CAST IN PLACE w
6 x
_ 6" = CONCRETE WALL = #4 WALL DOWELS
L
b J AT 3 1 " OC 4 HORIZONTAL
= STRUCYLIRAL,BAGK FILL' I
GEOTEXTILE J #4 HORIZONTAL o v GEOTEXTILE BARS AT 16" OC
o _j BARS AT 16" OC a FRABIC
Y FRABIC--------- 2 AT TOP 00 2 AT TOP
1 1/2" 1 1/2"
°J DRAIN ROCK FINISH GRADE X DRAIN ROCK FINISH GRADE
4" PERFORATED DRAIN ¢ 4" PERFORATED DRAIN
x PIPE TO DAYLIGHT 4-#4 LONGITUDINAL PIPE TO DAYLIGHT 6-#4 LONGITUDINAL
#4 HEY DOWELS BARS, (CO TINUOUS) v #4 KEY DOWELS BARS, (CO TINUOUS) c - /F
#8 SCREWS AT 6" OC AT 12" OC AT 12" OC
FINISH GRADE
2' b 2" D
~ N
1 1/2", 18 GAGE
ROOF DECK y4 L~INGITUQI AL o 2LONGITUQINAL
CORRUGATED METAL
BAR$ (CQNTi DUS) . i BARS (CONflNUOUt)
n to m
STRUCTURAL,BACK •FILLL 1
PLACED PRIOR TO INS`fALL1NG "CAST IN PLACE 11-6" 6. -0" 3'-0" -O"
ROOF FRAMING CONCRETE WALL
w4 VERTICAL BARS
AT 10" OC
= 3'-0" 4'-6"
C-D a-
w ca
= w
4„ = SECTION
ALE: 1/2"=1'-0" SCALE: LE: 1/
1/
CD a ~ 53.1 SCALE; 1/ S3.1 2"=1'-0"
nm o~
~ I=3
#5 DOWELS L 8" °J c
AT 10" OC ~ 4 HORIZONTAL
GEOTEXTILE BARS AT 16" OC
FRABIC 2 AT TOP #8 SCREWS AT 6" 0
W
1 1/2'. SLAB ON GRADE -#4 CONTINUOUS F
DRAIN ROCK HOOK AROUND CORNER w
5 TRANSVERSE AT 16" OC 24" MINIMUM t
1 1/2", 18 GAGE
4" PERFORATED DRAIN CORRUGATED METAL z a
PIPE TO DAYLIGHT 11-#4 LONGITUDINAL ROOF DECK 3 a
N BARS, (CONTINUOUS) N zo
#3 TIES AT 8" OC a N
L'
Z
2 ..'o' _#4 CONTINUOUS
8• HOOK AROUND CORNER a*~~ c
24" MINIMUM 0
C °o aRo
3 SECTION g7 Y~
53.1 SCALE: 1'=1'-0" DATE: 08-26-2015
scut: AS NOTED
2'-10" 8" 2'-6"
IRW. W. 2015-16
6'-0" aRAww By. ATG
SECTION SHEET: 53,1
S .1 SCALE: ALE: 1/ 1/2"=1'-0"
PACE 1 OF I
FULL 512E AT 2436 SHEET
l
J
' ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
Planning Division
C I T Y o 51 Winbum Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE #
ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO
Street Address S35 PLC R P-d N
Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E 0 ti!) A 1W Tax Lot(s)
Zoning Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT p
Name Phone a q If-Mail 1<84-e-j~ M ~~tMGr ~
,A -7f - GO~i
Address Tq5 City s D Zip 7
PROPERTY OWNER
Name J 5 Ff .Q Phone 5fV FQ , E-Mail 1 ~h (0~us eq oL,b ` ' C d
Address :3 0 6l I u-0 -W I-f tl.c. p City ST Levi S Mdzip 6 31 Zf
SURVEYOR, ENGINEER ARCHITECT ANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER
Title ' &:~S ame Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact are in all respects,
true and correct. 1 understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request,
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground,
Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be removed at expense. If I ave any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance.
Applicant's Sig ture Dat /
As owner of the pro erty involve in is request, If have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner.
,I e
Property 0 e s Signature (required) Date
rro be completed by City Stalls
Date Received -P / " 14 - /J - Zoning Permit Type J. Filing Fee $ v
OVER
G:\comm-dev\ptanning\Fomvs & Handouts\Zoning Permit Apptication.doc
Job Address: 535 PLACER Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
C
A Owner's Name: JEFFRESS HAILAND C Phone:
P Customer 04621 N State Lic No:
P KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARC T City Lic No:
L Applicant: 545 A ST a
I Address: #3 A
C ASHLAND OR 97520 C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: (541) 488-3194 T Address:
N Applied: 11/16/2015 p
T Issued:
Expires: 05/14/2016 R Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E08BA910 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: P & E Constraints Permit
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Physical Constraints Permit 1,012.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF
Sw w LAN D"