HomeMy WebLinkAboutVanNess_156-160-164_PA-2015-00991 C I T Y OF
ASHLAND
Planning Department 1 - -
51 Winburn Way
Ashland, OR 97520
~ 1 I f-r
541-488-5305
Ashland Historic Commission
Design Review Form
i
I
I
Applicant Date //S
Address
Proposed Action
® Commercial esidential
® New Construction O Changes to Existing Structure
Historic Review Board Comments:
3 ff
44'
In the spirit of protecting the historic design and compatibility of your project, if you wish to amend your
building plan in order to apply any recommendations of the Historic Review Board, we encourage you to
prepare an addendum and resubmit it to the Building Department.
1
Applicant Signature Historic Review Board Signature
G:lcomm-devlplanningICommissions a CommitteeslHistoric CommissionNisc Admin-FORMSIDesign Review Form.doc
12/13/2007
i
i
Carolyn chwendener
Subject: 160 Van Ness
Location: Lithia Room
Start: Thu 9/3/2015 3:45 PM
End: Thu 9/3/2015 4:15 PM
Recurrence: (none)
Meeting Status: Meeting organizer
Organizer: lithiaroom@ashland.or.us
Sean Downey will meet with Historic
I
r;
1
t
CITY OF
ASHLAND
August 3, 2015
Notice of Final Decision
On August 3, 2015, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
Planning Action: 2015-00991
Subject Property: 156 Van Ness
i
Applicant: Sean Downey
I
Description: A request for a minor modification to Site Review (PA2015-00178) in the form of a
Tree Removal Permit. The subject tree was previously designated to be protected under the Site Review
permit and thus why the applicant needs to go through a modification to their pervious approval.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential; ZONING: R-3; ASSESSOR'S MAP:
39 1 E 04CC; TAX LOT: 1200
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval
identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available
for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file
documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or
file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO
sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made
directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Zechariah Heck in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 `
www.ashiand.or.us
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the
decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party
asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are
limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public
input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within
three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for
purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The
City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning
action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision,
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.6.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the
specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type
I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee
required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City
and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the
initial hearing shall be refunded,
b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is
mailed.
c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision,
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional
defect and will not be heard or considered,
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning
Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues
raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission .
may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to
section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an
appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of
Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 -197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us `
t
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-00991
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 156 Van Ness
OWNER: Southern Oregon Renovations
APPLICANT: Sean Downey
DESCRIPTION: A request for a minor modification to Site Review (PA2015-
00178) in the form of a Tree Removal Permit. The subject tree was previously designated to be
protected under the Site Review permit and thus why the applicant needs to go through a
modification to their previous approval.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density Residential; ZONING: R-3;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 04CC; TAX LOT: 1200
SUBMITTAL DATE: May 26, 2015
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: June 8, 2015
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: August 3, 2015
FINAL DECISION DATE: August 17, 2015
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: February 17, 2017
DECISION
The subject parcel is located on the north side of Van Ness mid-block between Laurel and
Helman Streets. The parcel known as 156 Van Ness is at the intersection of a north to south
alley. The subject property and surrounding properties are zoned R-2, Low-Density Multi-
Family Residential and is located within the Skidmore Academy Historic District. This parcel is
8,300 square feet, and slopes approximately four percent to the north-northwest. There is an alley
along both the north and east sides of the property. There is a Historic Contributing residence
situated at the front of the property adjacent to Van Ness Street. According to the Historic
Resources Inventory the residence is known as the Emma Hammond House constructed
sometime between 1898 and 1907.
The application is a request for a tree removal in the form of a minor modification to Planning
Action #2015-00178. The original application was a request for Site Design Review to allow for
two dwelling units on the consolidated parcel; one of the dwellings will be the existing cottage
moved to the rear of the property accessed off of the alley and a new residence constructed at the
front of the parcel. Site Review approval was also requested for two units at 156 Van Ness (the
existing cottage at 160 Van Ness was proposed to move to rear of that properly). A tree removal
permit was also requested to remove a seven inch DBH Box Elder tree. Planning Application
#2015-00178 was approved with conditions (see file for more details). The tree proposed for
removal in Planning Action #2015-00991 was labeled as being preserved in the preceding
planning action (#2015-00178).
This application was reviewed by the Tree Commission during their regular meeting on July 9,
2015. The Tree Commission did not see the proximity of the two trees as a detriment to their
overall vigor. The Commission did not agree with the applicant that removing one of the trees
would help the other. Conversely, the Commission felt that removing one tree could actually
PA #2015-00991
156 Van Ness/zgh
Page 1
r
negatively impact the other.
In the absence of an arborist report submitted by an applicant, Staff relies heavily upon
recommendations of the Tree Commission. Taking the Tree Commission's recommendation into
consideration, the application to remove the proposed tree is in contrast to the approval criteria
found in 18.5.7.040.B.2. Specifically criterion "b" that states: "Removal of the tree will not have
a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of
adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks [emphasis added]."
The Tree Commission stated they would reconsider their determination if the applicant obtained
an arborist report that stated the subject tree is actually a detriment to the health of the adjacent
tree. Staff informed the applicant of the Tree Commission recommendation and the applicant
stated they would not pursue an arborist report. Consequently, the Staff Advisor finds that the
burden of proof to support removal of the tree has not been presented, and, therefore, the request
for tree removal, Planning Action #2015-00991, is denied.
The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050, as follows:
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the
underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot
area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building
orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part
18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site
Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E,
below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6
Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity,
urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate
transportation can and will be provided to the subject property.
The criteria for a Minor Modification approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.6.040.C, as
follows:
1. Minor Modification applications are subject to the same approval criteria used for the initial
project approval, except that the scope of review is limited to the modification request. For
example, a request to modify a commercial development's parking lot shall require Site
Design Review only for the proposed parking lot and any changes to associated access,
circulation, etc. Notice shall be provided in accordance with chapter 18.5.1.
2. A modification adding or altering a conditional use, or requiring a variance, administrative
variance, or exception may be deemed a Major Modification and/or may be subject to other
ordinance requirements.
3. The approval authority shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions the application, based
on written findings; except that conditions of approval do not apply, and findings are not
required, where the original approval was approved through a Ministerial review.
PA #2015-00991
156 Van Ness/zgh
Page 2
The criteria for a Tree Removal approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.7.040.B.2, as
follows:
1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other
applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to
applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and
Environmental Constraints in part 18.10.
2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow
of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks.
3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes,
canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant
an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and
no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone.
4. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the
permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider
alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would
lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other
provisions of this ordinance.
5. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval
pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval
of the permit.
(Dep ll Mo nar, irector ` Date
a rtment f Community Development
PA #2015-00991
156 Van Ness/zgh
Page 3
4
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On August 3, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-00991, 156 Van Ness.
Signature of Employee
Doeument2 8/3/2015
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 200 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 900 PH-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1401
305 MORTON LLC BELHUMEUR JASON M ! BERNARD MATTHEW C TRUSTEE ET
255 HELMAN ST 176 VAN NESS AVE AL
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 181 BIRDSONG LN
!ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3100 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2600 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3200
BOWLAND SIDNEY J/SHERI L i BROWN MICHAEL HAROLD & CAMPBELL DAVID ALLAN
PO BOX 1025 ; PHYLLIS ROS ET AL X171 VAN NESS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 119 VAN NESS !ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520 j
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1400 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1000 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3000
DARST INVESTMENTS LLC DOWNEY SEAN M/JULIE E GALLOWAY PAUL E/KIMBERLY D j
176 SPRINGWOOD DR 915 OAK ST 157 VAN NESS
EUGENE, OR 97404 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
ij
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1300 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2700 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2900
GARFAS JOSEPH - TRUSTEE GREENE FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY HIRSCHBOECK ROBERT WM
1188 TYLER CREEK RD I COMPANY 171 SCENIC DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ! 367 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 503 1 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 800 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 901
INGET ROBERTMOLANTA E KERN WILLIAM !LOWRY MEREDITH L
1137 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S 1298 W HERSHEY ST 1 180 VAN NESS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 801 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3400 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 500
MCGRATH ROBIN D TRUSTEE ET AL MEADS ARNOLD S TRUSTEE PENSCO TRUST COMPANY ET AL
240 N LAUREL ST 121 S LAUREL ST 1180 VAN NESS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3201 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 60002 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2800
RUTKAI R D/WENDY OSTLUND- SANFORD MARK/DEBORAH ;SNIFFEN MATTHEW S/REBECCAA
179 VAN NESS AVE 258 AST STE 1 199 UNION ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 'ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1200 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3300 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1100
SOUTHERN OREGON RENOVATIONS SQUIRES CHARLES D/TIKA J STUELPNAGEL JULIE E
915 OAK ST 195 VAN NESS 915 OAK ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 jASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 700
ZUCK C BELLEFEUILLE/T F III :'156 VAN NESS
671 GLENWOOD DR '8/3/2015 NOD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 '25
Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 1 T Y
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or,us TTY: 1-800-735-2900
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2015-00991
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 156 Van Ness
OWNERIAPPLICANT: Sean Downey
DESCRIPTION: A request for a minor modification to Site Review (PA2015-00178) in the form of a Tree Removal Permit,
The subject tree was previously designated to be protected under the Site Review permit and thus why the applicant needs
to go through a modification to their pervious approval. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density
Residential; ZONING: R-3; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 I E 04CC; TAX LOT: 1200
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, July 9, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the Community
Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 25, 2015
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: July 9, 2015
SUBJECT PROPERTY
156 Van Ness St.
_i PA2015-00991
J
V
0 b 10 20 Feet mF=.ry rn, .,.e~..~,e.m«,nq, „n ~ar~d«
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. 0CX
MINOR MODIFICATIONS APPROVAL CF °RIA
18.5.6.040
C. Minor Modification Approval Criteria, A Minor Modification shall be approved only upon the approval authority finding that all of
the following criteria are met.
1. Minor Modification applications are subject to the same approval criteria used for the initial project approval, except that the
scope of review is limited to the modification request. For example, a request to modify a commercial development's parking
lot shall require Site Design Review only for the proposed parking lot and any changes to associated access, circulation,
etc. Notice shall be provided in accordance with chapter 18.5.1.
2. A modification adding or altering a conditional use, or requiring a variance, administrative variance, or exception may be
deemed a Major Modification and/or may be subject to other ordinance requirements.
3. The approval authority shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions the application, based on written findings; except that
conditions of approval do not apply, and findings are not required, where the original approval was approved through a
Ministerial review.
18.5.7.040.6 Criteria for Issuance of Tree Removal Permit
B. Tree Removal Permit.
1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of
the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions,
a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e.,
likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or
facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition
of hazard tree in part 18.6.
b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such
mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority
finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions.
1. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use
Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards
in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.10.
2. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters,
protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks,
3. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species
diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to
the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as
permitted in the zone.
4. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the
zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate
landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other
provisions of this ordinance.
5. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section
18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\Mailed Notices & Signs\2015\PA-2015-00991.docx
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On June 25, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015, 156 Van Ness.
Signature of Employee
Document16/25/2015
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 200 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 900 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1401
305 MORTON LLC BELHUMEUR JASON M BERNARD MATTHEW C TRUSTEE ET
255 HELMAN ST 176 VAN NESS AVE AL
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 181 BIRDSONG LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3100 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2600 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3200
BOWLAND SIDNEY J/SHERI L BROWN MICHAEL HAROLD & CAMPBELL DAVID ALLAN
PO BOX 1025 PHYLLIS ROS ET AL 1 171 VAN NESS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 119 VAN NESS 'ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1400 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1000 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3000
DARST INVESTMENTS LLC DOWNEY SEAN M/JULIE E GALLOWAY PAUL E/KIMBERLY D
176 SPRINGWOOD DR 915 OAK ST 157 VAN NESS
EUGENE, OR 97404 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1300 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2700 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2900
GARFAS JOSEPH - TRUSTEE GREENE FAMILY LIMITED LIABILITY HIRSCHBOECK ROBERT WM
1188 TYLER CREEK RD COMPANY !71 SCENIC DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 367 OXFORD ST ;ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 503 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 800 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 901
INLET ROBERT/JOLANTA E KERN WILLIAM LOWRY MEREDITH L
1137 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S 298 W HERSHEY ST 1 ! 1180 VAN NESS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 801 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3400 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 500
MCGRATH ROBIN D TRUSTEE ET AL MEADS ARNOLD S TRUSTEE PENSCO TRUST COMPANY ET AL
240 N LAUREL ST 121 S LAUREL ST 180 VAN NESS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3201 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 60002 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 2800
RUTKAI R D/WENDY OSTLUND- SANFORD MARK/DEBORAH SNIFFEN MATTHEW S/REBECCA A
179 VAN NESS AVE 258 A ST STE 1 , 99 UNION ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 1 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i,
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1200 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 3300 1 PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 1100
SOUTHERN OREGON SQUIRES CHARLES D/TIKA J STUELPNAGEL JULIE E
RENNOVATIONS LLC 195 VAN NESS 915 OAK ST
915 OAK ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 'ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-00991 391 E04CC 700
i
ZUCK C BELLEFEUILLE/T F III 156 VAN NESS
671 GLENWOOD DR 6/25/2015 NOC I
ASHLAND, OR 97520 25
i
c,C,~r r
LOS
L
ZGCCu
X54 ' c. or1 CL'a6,
C_L,C CGGt, L i!ti L'GG'.+ CC,S
GCCCIO CG up
CGTx LG4 C-LCb
F
FIGR6
CIE,
CC'S'~'° GC~E
NO cGW
OUR
ED12 CID Lz
CGCrl
' CICI U, C D L G'
CC6C lZtl
DD cC C,~ Cr.G 159E
GoL
~~y iLLJi^L I
CZ~ C°G4E 4
U i L LL34 mv-f
L~ GS L
ooze
A-Qv C.C+P71
0014 OGEE C,C,Rz
CID i
C-0 0mv
006
owi
~c
C Ltb t7
om~
GAO I E CIIQ
PO 4L
GuG'1 L
CD ID i
GG£4k CGLG C'Cfii'.
£CG~ CC+SGL
GGz L ~ C"C•C,C
L69LL CEISG {'_C-CbC
C0 1 L'1 CLS IC'C( E
[ICE 4
~ r;D 6
GG~ii GGeLL cGl E
LLCIL4 (3C,CE
,iGC G L GDC6
11020 L i1 DOM C CZ E,
CGiG L CCH
LG~C"
C'LIZ 5
C+GLC' Lz
LC'C'C
V0~ '
coaz
CC,~L CC'G~
LGa LCilG' ct~pz
CCLu
GGEL'
DG CrLGC' ZO%Z
GC G, z toy
6C'G CGLB
E C.S'1
iGsS GC~h rrrsa Z
RD"
The Downey
omebuilders
5/25/2015
We are requesting a minor modification of the site review for 156-158 Van Ness in the
form of a tree removal permit. In the approximate middle of the lot there are two Elm
trees about ten feet apart. The larger one to the west is 21" DBH while the smaller one
to the east is 14" DBH. In the attached photo it can be seen that the smaller Elm is
leaning to the east and starting to overtop the larger tree on one side. Elms in our
climate can grow to an impressive size and these two are too close together. It would E
be better to have one healthy tree than two that are competing for light and water. As
mitigation for the removal of this Elm, we propose to plant a Black Locust at the
northeast corner of the property. This would give shade and structure to the corner of
the alley.
Sean Downey
i
MAY 2 b 2015
915 Oak St. Ashland, Oregon (541) 488-8804
CCB#112442
I
f
}
MAY 2 6 2015
f
i
• r
Fire hydrant
216 it
111=20' Electric Meters Bike parking 8'X8' Storm drain City Sewer
200' 24'
I
Deck New acces cry structure Parking 8!X2Q
GHFA 125 sqft
New2 bdr house
Porch
Parcel 1 R-3
GHFA 18 6 sqft
11,990 sgft / 1C
Storm drain
m
ewer Porch
ater .7-;71
/o a Porch I - 1 _ -
3. /
Patio Gr e~ Patio
10'
Trash & Reeve[
Relocat d 1bdrm house
\ ® GHFA 61 sgft
at : Water ewe r
40' -
Parcel 2 R-3 io m
8,010 sqft L so' I
28' io
-
Existing 2b r
" - use
ro ExiP-I'
GHFA 940 sqf Deck g8'z1 r
Patio 10'
Porch Sewer Relocat 2bdrm house er GHFA 61 sgft
0 ro
Bike ar , For
Water arking 18'x2/
~.5
- -
II e Storm drain /
HasvRnt ~66o~ 5 g""" R / Electric Meters tormdrain
.fOf1oSd a mentfor
J - - - -
r
~ g ire'' ar
1: "T
- - a Access
. d
51 ~ r ~ r r c f r r 3 Trash h keC~r~er ~ w
N
f Ir`4 F l Cn
1
D r Flrepparatus ~4GCess f
ASS
Im '~f reNW'kjv
tC u 0( t New Electric transformer
~Ci 11 J
ff r~ al Van Ness Cottage Relocation January 30,2015
Sean & Julie Downey i A-0 100 Iw)'~~ l: ir nI~t
DOUG L
u C 915 Oak St
~Q
Ashland OR 97520
PROJECT SITE x f1260,01
i
CITY OF ASHLAND +
i
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
1 f Planning Division
51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520
CITY ° 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE #
-5HLA.ND
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT .a,DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO
Street Address
Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E Tax Lot(s)
Zoning Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT
Name Phone , E-Mail
Address City Zip
PROPERTY OWNER
Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
1 hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish;
1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in this rogard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be removed at my expense. If I have any doubts, f am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance,
Applicant's Signature Date '
As oTner of the property involved in this request, 1 have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
own0
Property Owner's Signature (required) Date
fro be completed by City Staff]
Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $
OVER 0
GAcomm-dev\planning\Forms & Handouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc
L.
Job Address: 156 VAN NESS AVE Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
C
A Owner's Name: SOUTHERN OREGON RENOVATIONS O Phone:
N State Lie No:
Customer 08239
SOUTHERN OREGON RENOVATIONS T City Lie No:
Applicant: 915 OAK ST R
Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A
C C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: (541) 840-5064 T Address:
N Applied: 05/26/2015 0
T Issued: R
Expires: 11/22/2015 Phone:
State Lie No:
Maplot: 391 E04CC1200 City Lie No:
DESCRIPTION: Modification for Tree Removal
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Tree Removal/Verification 28.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF