Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBeach_399_PA-2015-01695 s' , • I , I , ! : _ I I I ' ! - I ' ~ ~ I I ! Gv ~ ' I i I i - - i _d_..... i - , - - - ~j ~T.. `FIRS - I , i : C_ Pt a V F_ i. _ - ' 1 /QRINI ! - - I , , - L i Til T i I I : ' ~ l , 6 I 9. I I i L. I ~ T. 0 - I ; , i : L4 7-,V 1 - I : I - - - _FT I ; -I - - , I I " I - - - - I ; et, L I : TROT - l/ c:. Pli-l UN- , e\~ c i J3,A , i : , , , ti. : , I d J ~ ~ . j I: Y~F i 3...' a I ti CITY F Ilk 171 Shr LAND October 19, 2015 j Notice of Final Decision On October 16, 2015 the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: 2015-01695 Subject Property: 399 Beach Street Applicant: Chris & Samae Chlebowski Description: The property owners are proposing to construct a new garage to facilitate off- street parking. Due to circumstances on the property, the application requests a Variance from the standard setbacks. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09DD; TAX LOTS: 1200. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12`h day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. la; If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Zechariah Heck in the Community j Development Department at (541) 488-5305. F` cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900_•? Www.ashland.onus 4 SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. ! 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: L Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Thne for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. r 1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050fia Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www. ashland.onus ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01695 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 399 Beach Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Chris and Samae Chlebowski DESCRIPTION: The property owners are proposing to construct a new garage to facilitate off-street parking. Due to circumstances on the property, the application requests a Variance from the standard setbacks. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09DD; TAX LOTS: 1200. SUBMITTAL DATE: September 3, 2015 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: September 24, 2015 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: October 16, 2015 FINAL DECISION DATE: November 2, 2015 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: May 2, 2017 DECISION The subject property is approximately 10,157 square feet, oriented east/west and fronts the west side of Beach Street. There are two structures on site, a 2,169 square feet main residence and a carriage house of approximately 300 square feet. The residence was constructed circa 1905. Though the property is within the federally designated historic boundaries, it is outside of the City's historic districts. The subject lot is zoned R-2 and abuts the R-3 zoning district to the west. Currently, there is no off-street parking provided on the lot. The application is for a Variance to standard setbacks. The property owners desire to have off-street parking. To that end, they are requesting to build a two-car garage accessed by an alley at the rear property line. Due to circumstances on the property, the owners feel they cannot meet the side-yard setback requirement of 10 feet from Henry Street. As can be seen via aerial photographs and detailed in the submitted site plan, the subject property has extensive landscaping and natural features. The proposal includes a removal of one 12-inch diameter at breast height (DBH) box elder (Acer negundo), located in the footprint of the proposed garage. No tree removal permit is necessary for this removal because of the exemption listed in 18.5.7.020.C.3. Furthermore, part of the stated reason for the Variance is to protect a 28-inch DBH Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) and a 22-inch DBH California Black Oak (Quercus kelloggii). The proposed location of the garage is located in such a way to preserve these large stature trees while maximizing the side yard setback. It should also be noted that Henry Street, though improved with curbs and sidewalks, has a 16-foot right of way from the curb to the applicant's side property line. Visually speaking, this provides a 21-foot side yard setback from the proposed garage to Henry Street. The aforementioned circumstances lead Staff to believe that the application satisfies the first two i approval criterion in 18.5.5.050. is The Land Use Ordinance requires two off-street parking for a single-family residence. The historic property has a carriage house with a driveway and curb cut off Henry Street. However, the applicant's claim the carriage house is too small to fit a modern sized vehicle. In addition, the existing curb cut is prone to flooding. According to the application, the property owner's want to have off-street parking on PA #2015-01695 399 Beach St/zgh Page 1 their property because of limited on-street parking. Therefore, Staff has determined that, "the proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts", and thus satisfies approval criterion number three. The property owner's are trying to accommodate off-street parking on a historic lot with unique circumstances. The applicant's have not requested a property line adjustment or partition which affect the proposed non-conforming setback. The large stature trees were planted long before the applicant's took ownership of the property. For no apparent reason does Staff believe that the requested Variance is self-imposed. Therefore, the application satisfies approval criterion number four. The application was reviewed by the Historic Commission during their regular meeting on October 7, 2015. The Commission had a few recommendations and were supportive of the application. Conditions of approval have been added below addressing their comments. Overall, Staff feels that the applicant has addressed any potential negative impacts associated with the proposed Variance. Due to the unique circumstances of the property, the proposal does not have any apparent adverse affects on the livability of the impact area. The proposed garage location does remove one tree, though a permit would not be required to remove it. More importantly, the location preserves two large stature trees. After review of the application submittals, Staff has decided that all applicable criteria have been satisfied. The approval criteria for a Variance are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.5.050.A, as follows: 1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination inay be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance. 2. The variance is the mininZUm necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site. 3. The proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts on the development of the adjacent uses and will further the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the city. 4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant. Planning Action #2015-01695 complies with all applicable City ordinances with the imposition of the conditions attached below. Therefore, Planning Action #2015-01695 is approved. If any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid, for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2015-01695 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2. That storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak rainfalls must be collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm pipe or public drainage way) or through an approved alternative in accordance with Ashland Building Division policy BD-PP-0029. On-site collection systems shall be detailed on the building permit submittals. 3. That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Variance approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. PA #2015-01695 399 Beach St/zgh Page 2 substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Variance approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. That building permit submittals shall include: a. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 65 percent as required in AMC 18.2.5. b. Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with Solar Setback Standard A in the formula [(Height -16)/(0.445 + Slope) = Required Solar Setback] and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade. 5. That the existing curb cut on Henry Street is removed with appropriate permits obtained from the City's Public Works Department prior to building permit issuance. 6. That a Tree Protection Plan consistent with the standards described in 18.4.5 be submitted for review by, and, approval by, the Staff Advisor prior to the issuance of a building permit. The plan shall identify the location and placement of fencing around the drip lines of trees identified for preservation. The amount of fill and grading within the drip line shall be minimized. Cuts within the drip line shall be noted on the tree protection plan, and shall be executed by handsaw and kept to a minimum. No fill shall be placed around the trui-Aderown root. 7. That the tree protection fencing shall be installed according to the approved plan prior to any site work, storage of materials or issuance of the building permit. The tree protection shall be inspected and approved by the Ashland Planning Department prior to site work, storage of materials and/or the issuance of a building permit. 8. No construction shall occur within the tree protection zone including dumping or storage of materials such as building supplies, soil, waste, equipment, or parked vehicles. 9. That all exterior lighting shall be directed on the property and shall not directly illuminate adjacent proprieties. 10. That all recommendations of the Ashland Historic Commission, where consistent with the applicable ordinances and standards and with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. The Historic Commission's recommendations are as follows: a. The proposed garage siding should match 1 x 6 large V grove on the existing cottage. b. The proposed garage door(s) should be historically compatible. c. The proposed garage roofing material specifics are required. ZarLiaHarriis, Planning Manager Date Department of Community Development PA #2015-01695 399 Beach St/zgh Page 3 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 2200 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 2500 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 1500 BAYOUTH MARGARET S/RICK S BEAM THOMAS W TRUSTEE ET AL BUETTNER GAIL H 376 LIBERTY 1015 MARY JANE AVE 363 BEACH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 2700 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 1200 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 4600 CHAPMAN LUCILLE E CHLEBOWSKI JOHN CHRISTOPHER ELUCA RONALD L TRUSTEE ET AL 424 LIBERTY ST 399 BEACH ST 725 ROYAL AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 2400 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 4700 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 2100 EATON JASON P ET AL ISSER STEPHEN J TRUSTEE ET AL JENSEN HEIDI TRUSTEE ET AL 865 HENRY ST 84 GARFIELD ST 366 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND OR 97520 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 4401 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 2600 391E09DD 2300 LITHIA GROUP MCMILLAN EMIL G JR/CAROLE A QUAC IA BI5LL L 2305-C ASHLAND ST 504 416 LIBERTY ST 390 LIBERTY BI ASHLAND, OR 97520 390 LIBERTY ST j ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 1300 PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 4500 RIFKIND MICHAEL i PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 4400 SHEA RORY B SPIERINGS FRANK J 5899 EMPIRE GRADE 2768 QUAIL RUN RD 2240 CAMP BAKER RD SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 TALENT, OR 97540 MEDFORD, OR 97501 j PA-2015-01695 391E09DD 1400 NOD 10/19/2015 SVAREN ESTHER I TRUSTEE ET AL 375 BEACH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On October 19, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-01695, 399 Beach Street. Signa re of Employee Document310/19/2015 11 I 1 Il~ 1 1 re.~Hl ~ r! 1 t ~ - ~1!~ I ~1:~ 111 ( ~ 1 I~' ' ~ 1 1 .1: 111 1"1_ 111 ~ 1 1 ~ ~ Itl 11 II' I li I il~~ i J - ~~!T l I - s 11 1 j t 3 ~ 7 1 b I'~ 1 1 1 ~ ~ 1 i Rj 1=,1 E 7 ( ~ P 114 1 1-, 1 FA r~ C ~ i I I, d r~ t ~ ,;.111 1',I ! rl ~ v ,.1 r-i G , . fa Planning Department, 51 Wi C [ TV OF nburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland,or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -ASHLP-' "I'D NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-01695 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 399 Beach Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Chris and Samae Chlebowski DESCRIPTION: The property owners are proposing to construct a new garage to facilitate off-street parking. Due to circumstances on the property, the application requests a Variance from the standard setbacks. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 09DD; TAX LOTS: 1200. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday, October 7, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way, NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 24, 2015 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: October 8, 2015 F-- SUBJECT PROPERTY } _ 399 Beach Street - PA-2015-01695 LU J i U Q LU es m HENRYST TM-TTTri 0510 20 Peet Nrperty Nnes are fw ~ renrn ordy, rvot smfeobte F e Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. y affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn y, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. land Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a ce is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the ment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the 18.110 8. Staffs deois onfmust be made in writing eto same the Ashland s Planning Division dwithin rs12 days from the date appeal to the Planning Commission the Planning 18.108.040) of the mailing of final decision. (AMC The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & En ineerin will be Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. g g Services If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Siens\2015\PA_9M cmcnc VARIANCE 18.5.5.050 Approval Criteria 1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of the subject site, topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination may be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance. 1 such as 2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site. 3. The proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts on the development of the adjacent uses and will further the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not arise as result of a pro ert line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant. p y i t: I G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\Mailed Notices& Sians\2075\PA_M ic_ni<~~ I PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 2200 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 2500 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 1500 BAYOUTH MARGARET S/RICK S BEAM THOMAS W TRUSTEE ET"AL BUETTNER GAIL H 376 LIBERTY 1015 MARY JANE AVE 363 BEACH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 2700 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 1200 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 4600 CHAPMAN LUCILLE E CHLEBOWSKI JOHN CHRISTOPHER DELUCA RONALD L TRUSTEE ET AL 424 LIBERTY ST 399 BEACH ST VILLAGE APARTMENTS ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 725 ROYAL AVE MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 2400 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 4700, PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 2100 EATON JASON P ET AL ISSER STEPHEN J TRUSTEE ET AL JENSEN HEIDI TRUSTEE ET AL 865 HENRY ST 84 GARFIELD ST 366 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 4401 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 2600 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 2300 LITHIA GROUP MCMILLAN EMIL G JR/CAROLE A QUACCIA BILL L 2305-C ASHLAND ST 504 416 LIBERTY ST 390 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 1300 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 4500 RIFKIND MICHAEL PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 1100 SHEA RORY B 5899 EMPIRE GRADE SCHOOL DISTRICT 5 C/O ALEXANDER-CONNOR RORY SANTA CRUZ, CA 95060 0 2768 QUAIL RUN RD TALENT, OR 97540 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 4400 PA-2015-01695 391 E09DD 1400 SPIERINGS FRANK J SVAREN ESTHER I TRUSTEE ET AL 2240 CAMP BAKER RD 375 BEACH ST MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520. Is 399 Beach r 9/24/2015 NOC 16 i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING k k STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On September 24, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-01695, 399 Beach. Signature of Employee r t Document3 9124/2015 I ~1 !I pip, 9 41 :z I 0042 t t OOP "a~ i I { 4 OORZ ktt Lt bt R out n n n~ meeting RE: 399 Beach Street Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for taking the time to read this letter and consider our request for :,etback variance. The intention of this letter is to explain and satisfy all of the relevant criteria and standards for proposing a property setback code variance/ meeting the variance approval criteria 18.5.5.050 for a new garage structure at 399 Beach St, owned by Samae and Chris Chlebowski. The main reasons for asking for this variance are to facilitate off street parking. Two, to not interfere with properties' large primary tree. Three, to remove the inadequate, and flood- prone, existing curb cut to an existing unusable garage. And finally, to better meet the intent of the parking code. All of this is further facilitated by the existing 10' setback on Henry Street. 1. Facilitate two off-street parking spaces: A). 399 Beach St currently has no usable off street parking; AMC states that two off- street parking spaces are required for a single-family residence. B). The current single parking space is unusable as it is just under 10' long and leads very steeply into the existing historic carriage house which is too small to park most modern cars. Q. The corner of Beach and Henry street has a fire hydrant so approximately 44% of the on street parking of the 399 Beach property is un-usable. D). 399 Beach is located two blocks from SOU. During the school year all parking spaces are occupied by 9am until roughly 5pm by college students. Additionally the old Lincoln School is across the street, which currently houses a Montessori program. During child drop off and pick up times parking is also hindered. Finally, directly to the south on Henry Street is an apartment building. This also generates a high density of cars in a residential area. E) Proposed garage with two off street parking spaces will lighten demand for on-street parking along Beach and Henry. F) This also helps address the variance criteria 18.5.5.050 paragraph 3 2. To not interfere with properties primary trees A) Building the new proposed garage at the standard 10' side yard setback puts the l building inside the drip line of the properties biggest and oldest tree, a 28" diameter Doug fir that is in excellent condition. See attachment assessment by arborist. B) Henry street along 399 Beach has a generous 10' setback already in place. Building a i garage another 10' off of the property line would infringe on the large tree. Q Reducing side yard setback to 5'6" would reduce major impact due to construction effecting Doug Fir root zone. D). One 10" diameter box elder will need to be removed in order to build. Removing it appears to have no aspect on affect on other trees, soil erosion, utilities, density, windbreak or other any other concerns. E) This site is the only spot on the property where a two-car garage facilitating two off street parking spots can be achieved without impacting one or more of the properties mature trees. F) This relates to criteria code 18.5.5.050 paragraph 1 and 2. 3. Remove inadequate and prone to flooding existing curb cut A) During times of heavy rain the existing carriage house is subject to regular flooding as water comes down the alley on the south side off Henry street, and is directed via the steep crown in Henry street directly down the driveway into the garage which sits lower than the street. (see attached photos and videos). This also makes this garage unusable for storage as it has flooded many times B) Plans include fixing side walk/curb at homeowner's expense. This should help to reduce car/pedestrian interactions. We will be remedying these issues by removing curb cut and old driveway and replacing it with regular curb and sidewalk eliminating flooding and also reducing car/pedestrian/cyclist interaction. Q This issue is also directly relates to the code variance 18.5.5.050 by addressing special features of property and the benefits out weighing the negatives. paragraphs 1, 2, and 3. Meet Ashland City code by creating two parking spaces within garage A) Building of this garage will allow two parking spaces inside the garage. This will lighten the on street parking demand and meet the requirement for two parking spaces B) Parking in the existing spot is impossible due to how steep it is and parking in it would block pedestrian travel along the sidewalk. Q Again this issue falls under the variance approval criteria paragraphs 2 and 3. . Additional Information The section of Henry Street along 399 Beach Street has a ten-foot setback. Requiring an additional ten feet off of this would force the garage td be built in such. a, way to damage the large 80" tall Doug Fir. Because of the 10' setback any structure built would not feel as if it is too close to the street. Other structures along Henry street include the existing carriage house which is built right on the property line. A residence at 865 Henry Street, which is 5'6" from the setback. Garages across Henry street, which are directly on, the property line. We believe that a request to build 7' off of the property line is reasonable and is in line with current structures. This makes the most sense for flooding issues and to not damage the large tree on the property. This structure will be built to match the existing home and will not appear to be a non conforming structure in any way. Vision clearance on the alley will not be affected by this structure as it will be 15' 6" from Henry Street and matching the residence at 865 Henry Street which is also along this alley. We also hope that the above issues and our intent to remedy them make us compliant with the variance approval criteria 18.5.5.050. Finally, the need for this variance is not self-imposed by owner, therefore meeting the last variance criteria as stated in paragraph 4 Of the code. Thank you for your time in considering our variance request Sincerely, Samae and Chris Chlebowksi 0 P ® P65 FD C AeAC~C r MT. o,,: 4► GA9AC-lE- 6 M6 s1 f1- r P9d6g $ED 12'.A5H I6'4®' 9 Iv - MAIN HDJSF 2400 s F~ I 0 -sue= Zechariah Heck From: Zechariah Heck [zechariah.heck@ashland. or.us) Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 4:47 PM To: 'zaydemoose@hotmail.com' Subject: 399 Beach St - Variance Application Hello Samae and Chris, I am contacting you in regards to the application submitted for a Variance at 399 Beach St. The application looks well done, good job compiling everything together. I also appreciate that you addressed the issues raised in our pre- application meeting. There is one issue, however. The site plan is well done for being hand drawn, but it appears there are a few errors with the scale. The called out distances to not jive with the listed scale when I measure them. Before I deem the application "complete", I ask that a revised site plan is submitted with accurate distances. Also, if it isn't too much trouble, I recommend that you include the Variance criteria in your narrative. The criteria is listed in the pre- application material and also included below. The reason I recommend this, is that if neighbors get involved and do not like your proposal, you will want as solid of an application as possible. If your narrative addresses the Variance criteria specifically, then it makes it easier for neighbors to understand if you are in compliance with the City's land use ordinance. Please try to at least get in the revised site plan by the end of next week, Friday, September 18th. And feel free to give me a call or shoot me an email if you have any questions or concerns. L Thank you! Have a great weekend. c; VARIANCE 18.5.5.050 Approval Criteria 1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination may be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance. 2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site. 3. The proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts on the development of the adjacent uses and will further the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant. Zechariah Heck, Assistant Planner City of Ashland, Community Development Department 20 E. Main St., Ashland, OR 97520 541.552.2052 Tel 800.735.2900 TTY 541.552.2050 Fax This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashiand, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Law for disclosure and retention. If you have received this message in error, please contact meat 541.552.2052. Thank you. 1 The Village Arborist LLC; CCB License #167378 August Schilling; ISA Certified Arborist #PN1330A 280 Meade St; Ashland OR 97520 +1.541.482.8529 City of Ashland; Planning Commission 51 Winburn Way Ashland OR 97520 Opinion Regarding Tree Preservation As Pertains To The Chris Chlebowski Garage Project, 399 Beach St Ashland Oregon To Whom It May Concern: At the request of Mike Jack, I have visited the property at 399 Beach St in Ashland to inspect three trees that will be impacted by the proposed garage construction. The trees in question are a boxelder (Acer negundo) approximately 25' tall and 10"dbh, a Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menzsieit) approximately 60' tall and 22"dbh, and a California black oak (Quercus kelloggii) approximately 60' tall and 18"dbh. It is my understanding that the city would like the new garage structure situated 10' from the southern property boundary and 10' from the western property boundary, preserving all three abovementioned trees. It is my opinion that this is a misguided directive. If the building is constructed with the prescribed 10' setback, it will have a negative affect on all three trees. In the case of the boxelder, this setback would place the building's western wall approximately 1' from the tree's base. This would necessitate destroying approximately 30% of the tree's roots, negatively impacting the health of the tree and increasing the likelihood of the tree falling into the alleyway in the future. There is also the possibility that the boxelder, if it survives, could cause foundation damage to the new garage in the future due to this proximity. In the case of the Doug fir and the oak, the prescribed setback would place a portion of the building within the critical root zone of both trees, providing a deleterious affect to the health of the trees. The homeowner is interested in pursuing a variance in order to move the new structure 5' closer to both the southern and western property lines. This places the boxelder within the footprint of the new garage, necessitating this tree's removal. I believe that it would be better to remove the boxelder to minimize the impact on the more valuable and mature Doug fir and oak trees than to proceed with an attempt to preserve all three trees. The latter attempt actually provides a huge negative impact for the boxelder and significant negative impacts for the Doug fir and the oak. Put simply, I would rather have two healthy trees than three negatively impacted trees, one of which (boxelder) is certain to be a liability in the foreseeable future. In conclusion, I recommend that the city grant the variance for the project and sacrifice one small tree in favor of minimizing damage to two trees of much higher value. Thank you for your attention regarding this matter. Feel free to contact me for further questions, concerns, or clarification. Sin 1~~v7~~~~f August Schilling 31 August 2015 t RE: 399 Beach Street Dear Sir or Madam: Thank you for taking the time to read this letter and consider our request for a setback variance. The intention of this letter is to explain and satisfy all of the relevant criteria and standards for proposing a property setback code variance for a new garage structure at 399 Beach St, owned by Samae and Chris Chlebowski. The main reasons for asking for this variance are to One, facilitate off street parking. Two, to not interfere with properties' large primary tree. Three, to remove the inadequate, and flood-prone, existing curb cut to the existing unusable garage. And finally, to better meet the intent of the parking code. All of this is further facilitated by the existing 10' right of way on Henry Street. 1® Facilitate two off-street parking spaces: A), 399 Beach St currently has no usable off street parking; AMC states that two off- street parking spaces are required for a single-family residence. B). The current single parking space is unusable as it is just under 10' long and leads very steeply into the existing historic carriage house which is too small to park most modern cars. Q. The corner of Beach and Henry street has a fire hydrant so approximately 44% of the on street parking of the 399 Beach property is un-usable. D). 399 Beach is located two blocks from SOU. During the school year most parking spaces are occupied by gam until roughly 5pm by college students. Additionally Lincoln School is across the street, which currently houses a Montessori program. During child drop off and pick up times parking is also hindered. Finally, directly to the south on Henry Street is an apartment building. This also generates a high density of cars in a residential area. E) Proposed garage with two off street parking spaces will lighten demand for on-street parking along Beach and Henry. . To not interfere with properties primary trees A) Building the new proposed garage at the standard 10' side yard setback puts the building inside the drip line of the properties biggest and oldest tree, a 28" diameter Doug fir that is in excellent condition. See attachment assessment by arborist. B) Henry street along 399 Beach has a generous 10' right of way already in place. Building a garage another 10' off of the property line would infringe on the large tree. C) Reducing side yard setback to 5'6" would reduce major impact due to construction effecting Doug Fir root zone. D). One 10" diameter box elder will need to be removed in order to build. Removing it appears to have no effect on any other trees, soil erosion, utilities, density, windbreilic or other any other concerns. This box elder is infected with box elder bugs in the spring and is a great nuisance to the neighbors to the East. They have requested that the tree be removed on numerous occasions. E) This site is the only spot on the property where a two-car gat-age facilitating two off street parking spots can be achieved without impacting one or more of the properties mature trees. ® Remove inadequate and prone to flooding existing curb cut A) During times of heavy rain the existing carriage house is subject to regular flooding as water comes down the alley on the south side off Henry street, and is directed via the steep crown in Henry street directly down the driveway into the garage which sits lower than the street. (see attached photos and videos). This also makes this garage unusable for storage as it has flooded many times B) Plans include fixing side walk/curb at homeowner's expense. This should help to reduce car/pedestrian interactions. We will be remedying these issues by removing curb cut and old driveway and replacing it with regular curb and sidewalk eliminating flooding and also reducing car/pedestrian/cyclist interaction. 4® Meet Ashland City code by creating two parking spaces within garage A) Building of this garage will allow two parking spaces inside the garage. This will lighten the on street parking demand and meet the requirement for two parking spaces B) Parking in the existing spot is impossible due to its steepness and parking in it would block pedestrian travel along the sidewalk. 5. Additional Information The section of Henry Street along 399 Beach Street has a ten-foot public right of way. Requiring an additional ten feet off of this would force the garage to be built in such a way to damage the large 80' tall Doug Fir. Because of the 10' right of way any structure built would not feel as if it is too close to the street. Other structures along Henry street include the existing carriage house which is built right on the property line. A residence at 865 Henry Street, which is 5'6" from the setback. Garages across Henry street, which are directly on the property line. We believe that a request to build 5'6" off of the property line is reasonable and is in line with current structures. This makes the most sense for flooding issues and to not damage the large tree on the property. This structure will be built to match the existing home and will not appear to be a non- conforming structure in any way. Vision clearance on the alley will not be affected by this structure as it will be 15' 6" from Henry Street and matching the residence at 865 Henry Street, which is also along this alley. i Thank you for your time in considering our variance request Sincerely, Samae and Chris Chlebowksi - rN~ 6 1 l NEW : CIARA- ~ of I { , 1L MAN 2z 41 1. _ 1 is I I - ! . , , , , ~ i. - r r `f ~ I JJ I ~ - • S ~ I - - L-051146 .-T - - °f - J MAIN ROUSE' - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ _ - a L } i I VV- i \ ! i r 5 - , • , A or:; To L- s %A AVCRLTtCuN- - i - - eE Oft LAD till' 6$ l.EVk~co I 3 ~5 30 6J ~ PAsTUfvT18q_ 30,50 - r 11~ rr 41 dvz e~ ;e - ur- a - N° ~,gV e ding Code Compliance p anset Was prepared to comply - _ b the International cntlal Code (IRCI o ",neters For Design Speed: 100 mph, 3 sec. gust ;xposure: 'B' - 42- c Category:` I and' B' - - - .I i toad: 30#/sq. k. h 4 i g Data ,n ,„0„ - - - )ction Type: °V" J [ ~ I I ; p 3T 4AM - ! - - i - I r ----I - .8 6 -i - 3° - ~A l _ ' - 1 Ir~me 6ORRUGATE4.PLAGTIC RIDGE CAP OF SAME RIDGE VENT FOLDS MATERIAL A9 " OVER RIDGE, ROOFING IJAILED To CONFORMING TO 9NEATNIWG TNROUGN 9LOPEOFR0OF. PLASTIC VENT. ROOFING _ _ %SNEATNING ~~_AS ED ~~A KEEP SIIEATNING I IN. r1 e / IM^ CoNc(' / f To I a IM. FROM RIDGE ►L IP1-%/ CLI PS TO ALLOW FREE s AIRPAGSA6E• l®Ptlil ~~~C`1FItl6&5~®~C!lx~lYC~~ - - - a RIDCEVENT DETAIL t, l - - - / F0-OT►rrca I~ I - M CAI- 5L~~ i - - - - I 4q, 5/®T--1i1 i o r q Reuty Bpi R \z V - 3 I V, 21~ - EhDti~ tt D DW >S - - Air BRA MHEL CROSS SEC71 JUGV rly, 1 JCWI4. CJUDUD I I of l MDL SVGV rry. I JCWItl, LOU:JOV I I 1 1 11lv11V Mike Jack Mike Jack Qty; 2 FF DR DRW: Mike Jack Mike Jack Qty: 13 FROM; DR DRW: T1 Wgt:162.4 Ibs I 05/06/15 T2 Wgt;145.6lbs 1 05!06!15 114 1re^ 8B 1'4H '4'10' iP ITI'12 ' 14 iBT~~ 2Y , 74'9 .L 4'10"4 ti' L iT1"12 1_9TT 22' 11'8' I r7772777d"' Gt"12 12 7.71' P 74'9 T 75'11 6'1"12 -r 6'1"12 T5"11 74'9 1 006 F 14X10 ®3X4 E G-3X4 B2 G B2 a 12 8 V c r Z r F 13X6 w ° o E A b S° ®3X4 D ®3X4 d m C AF D ®3X4 .3X41Af) 3X Al) 1 B I~61A1) Z Y x ®3x4 -J6 ®3Xp4 T S fl 1 11.6X4 -3X5 ass& 03V5 14%4 IT, 9`3 }'q 63'8 L _ 63re 9.3 ire' 77'13 75"11 53"8 53"8 75'11 72"13 4 11' 1T3'8 17rd''1,4, 9'9 1~ 2Y ~7 72'13 4'8'e it' i73'8 195'3 22' 2rf3 I1,4,44 LEFT RAKE= 74"14 RIGHT RAKE = 74"14 LEFT RAKE = 2'4"14 RIGHT RAKE = 24"14 Loading Criteria (psf) Wind Criteria Snow Criteria (Pg,Pf in PSF) Defl/CSI Criteria A Maximum Reactions (Ibs), or `=PLF Loading Criteria (psf) Wind Criteria Snow Criteria (Pg,Pf in PSF) Defl/CSI Criteria A Maximum Reactions (Ibs) TOLL: 25.00 Wind Std: ASCE 7.10 Pg: 25.0 Ct:1.1 CAT: II PP Deflection in too Udell U# Loc R / U / Rw / Rh / RL / W TCLL: 25.00 Wind Std: ASCE 7.10 Pg: 25.0 Ct:1.1 CAT: II PP Deflection in loc Udell U# Loc R /U / Rw / Rh / RL 1W TCDL: 7.00 Speed: 110 mph Pf;19.3 Go: 1.0 VERT(LL): 0.018 V 999 240 B- 2030 / 84 1879 ! • / 265 /132 TCDL: 7.00 Speed: 110 mph Pf:19.3 Ce:1.0 VERT(LL): 0.240 M 999 240 B 1303 ! • 1504 ! • /133 /5.5 BOLL: 0.00 Enclosure; Closed Lu: - Cs: not used VERT(TL): 0.037 V 999 180 V* 1964 / 142 /724 / - /132 BCLL: 0.00 Enclosure; Closed Lu: - Cs; not used VERT(TL): 0.491 M 530 180 J 1304 / - /504 ! - /5.5 BCDL: 10.00 Risk Category: II Snow Duration: 1.15 HORZ(LL): 0.007 L - . Wind reactions based on MWFRS BCDL: 10.00 Risk Category: II Snow Duration: 1.15 HORZ(LL): 0.157 D - Wind reactions based on iviWFRS Des Ld: 42.00 EXP: B HORZ(TL); 0.014 L - B Min Brg Width Req = Des Ld: 42.00 EXP; B HORZ(TL): 0.323 D - B Min Brg Width Req = 1.3 NCBCLL: 10.00 Mean Height: 15.00 ft Code / Misc Criteria Creep Factor: 2.0 V Min Brg Width Req = - NCBCLL:10.00 Mean Height: 15.0 It Code / Misc Criteria Creep Factor; 2.0 J Min Brg Width Req = 1,3 Soffit: 2.00 TCDL: 4.2 psf Bldg Cade; IRC 2012 Max TC CSI: 0,186 Bearings B & V are a rigid surface. Soffit: 2.00 TCDL' 4.2 psf Bldg Code: IRC 2012 Max TC CSI: 0.704 Bearings B & J are a rigid surface. Load Duration: 1.15 BCDL 6.0 psf TPI Std: 2007 Max BC CSI: 0.220 Load Duration: 1.15 BCDL:6.0 psf TPI Std: 207 Max BC CSI: 0.852 MWFRS Parallel Dist: 0 to h/2 Re Factors Used: Yes Max Web CSI: 0,261 Maximum Top Chord Forces Per Ply (Ibs) MWFRS Parallel Dist: 0 to h/2 Rep Factors Used; Yes Max Web CSI: 0.335 Spading; 24.0 " Cords Tens.Comp. Chords Tens. Comp. C&C Dist a; 3.0 ft FT/RT: 20.0%(0.0%)!10(0) Mfg Specified Camber Maximum Top Chord Forces Per Ply (Ibs) Spacing: 24.0 p Chords Tens.Comp. Chords Tens. Comp. C&C Dist a: 3.0 ft Ff /RT: 20.0 °/4(0.0%)!10(0) Mfg Specified Camber: GCpf: 0.18 Plate Type(s): A - B 154 0 1-1 35 -266 GCpi: 0.18 Plate Type(s): A - B 79 0 F - G 453 0 Wind Duration: 1.60 WAVE VIEW Ver:13.02.07.0228.14 B - C 29 -645 J - K 193 •1222 Wind Duration: 1.60 WAVE,18SS VIEW Ver:13.02.07.0228.14 B - C 57 -1595 G - H 105 "1120 Lumber C - D 18 -568 K - L 39 "897 Lumber C - D 32.1635 H -1 32 -1636 D - E 6 •999 L - M 28 -987 To chord 2x6 DF•L SS(g) D -E 104 1121 I -J 56 1598 Top chord 2x6 DF-L SS(g) E • F 28 -987 M - N 6 •999 P E - F 452 0 J - K 79 0 Bot chord 2x6 DF-L #2(g) F • G 39 -897 N-0 18 -568 Dot chord 2x6 DF-L #2(g) ) '62 2x4 DF-L #i &Bet.(g): '62 2x4 DF-L #1 &Bet.(g): Webs 2x4 bF-L Standard(g) G•H 193 •1222 0-P 29 -645 H 1 35 266 P Q 154 0 Webs 2x4 DF-L Standard(g) Maximum Chords Tens.Comp. Chords Tens, Comp. Plating Notes Plating Notes Connectors in green lumber designed using Maximum Bot Chord Forces Per Ply (Ibs) Connectors in green lumber (g) designed using B - P 1290 0 N - M 1067 0 (g) P-0 1295 0 M- L 1297 0 NDS/TPI reduction factors. Chords Tens.Comp, Chords Tens. Comp. NDS/TPI reduction factors. 0 . N 1067 0 L • J 1293 0 All plates are 1.5X4 except as noted. B - Z 419 -57 V - U 837 -36 Loading Loading Z - Y 419 -53 U - T 425 -53 Truss passed check for 20 psf additional bottom Maximum Web Forces Per Ply (Ibs) Y - X 425 -53 T . S 425 -53 chord live load in areas with 42"-high x 24"-wide Webs Tens.Comp. Webs Tens. Comp. Truss spaced at 24,0" OC designed to support 2.0-0 X • W 425 -53 S - R 419 •53 to cord outlookers. Cladding load shall not exceed clearance. P . C 0 -372 Q - G 137 •1833 P W V 837 36 R-P 419 57 Bottom chord checked for 10.0 f non-concurrent 3.00 PSF. Top cord must not t be out or notched. Ps C-0 55 •264 H • M 756 0 Truss passed check for 20 psf additional bottom Maximum Web Forces Per Ply (Ibs) 01.5. chord live load applied per IRC-12 section O . D 755 0 M I 54 267 chord live load in areas with 42"-high x 24"-wide E-0 137 -1833 I - L 0 -371 clearance. Webs Tens.Comp. Webs Tens. Comp. Unbalanced snow loads have not been considered. F - Q 593 -43 Bottom chord checked for 10.0 psf non-concurrent Y - D 0 -493 AD- J 235 •733 Wind bottom chord live load applied per IRC-12 section D -AA 492 0 K - U 176 -654 301.5. AB-AC 4,92 0 U -AE 476 0 Wind loads based on MWFRS with additional C&C Unbalanced snow loads have not been considered. AC- W 476 0 AE-AF 492 0 member design. W . G 176 •654 AG- N 492 0 Wind H -AD 235 -733 N - S 0 -493 Wind loads based on MWFRS with additional C&C I -AD 229 -74 member design. Additional Notes Maximum Gable Forces Per Pty (Ibs) Gables Tens,Comp. Gables Tens. Comp. See DWGS Al1515ENC102012, GBLLETIN0212, & GABRST10212 for more requirements. C - Z 39 -57 AE- L 10 •29 E•AA 18 -83 AF-T 21 -100 X -AB 21 -100 AG- M 18 -83 F -AC 10 -29 R - 0 39 •57 -WARNING- READ AND FOLLOW ALL NOTES ON THIS DRAW INGI **WARNING- READ AND FOLLOW ALL NOTES ON THIS DRAWINGI -IMPORTANT- FURNISH THIS DRAWING TO ALL CONTRACTORS INCLUDING THE INSTALLERS -IMPORTANT** FURNISH THIS DRAWING TO ALL CONTRACTORS INCLUDING THE INSTALLERS Trusses require extreme care in fabrbatf2, handii , shipping, installing and bracing. Refer to and follow the latest edition of BCSI (Building Trusses requirQ extreme care in fabricaA h~li shi ng, installing and bracing, Refer to and follow the latest edition of BCSI (Building Component Safety Information, %y TPi a is SBCA) for safety practices prior to performing these functions. Installers shall provide temporal Component Satety Information, by TPI an SBGA) f~oi safety practices poor to performing these functions. Installers shall provide temporary) bracing r BCSL, Unless noted o"therwise,top cord shall have properly atl ched structural sheathing and boltpm chord shall have a properly bracurgper BCSL Unless noted otherw~e,top chord shall have property attached stmcturaf sheathing d bottom chord shall have a proper y attachecr id ceihnq Locations shhown for permanent lateral restraint of wes shall have bracin installed per BCSI sections B3, B7 or B10, attached r id ceili pLocations sown for rmanent lateral restra nt of webs shall have bract instal ed per BCSI sections 63, 87 or iQ as applica6Ne. Apply ales to ach face, of truss and position as shown above and on the Joint Details, unless noted otherwise. hefer to as apps 6e. Apor staloria~ard I fa eh facii ortru and position as shown above and on the Joint Details, unless noted otherwise. )?efer to plate drawings 160A"Z for standard pe(ate positions, ITW ggut i Components Group Inc. shall not be responsible for any deviation from this drawing an failure to build the truss in conformance ITW BuildMComponents Group Inc. shall not be responsible for anv deviation from this drawln9,anfailure to build the truss in conformance with Af I VTP1 1, cr for handl j shippi , installation and bracing of trusses. A seal on this draw~ng or cover page listing this drawing, with ANSI TT 1 1, or for handhnp, shipping, installation and bracing of trusses. A seal on this drawing or cover Ae listing this drawing, indicates acceptance of rofessiona~ en ineering resppoonsibility sole) for the dg ippn shown. The suite ffity and use of this Indic es acceptance of roTessiol a en rnaering responsrbflfpv soiel for the d ign shown. The su~bility and use of this drawing for any structure Is the responsibii fly of the Building Designer)Yer ANSIIT~I TSec.2, drawing for any structure is the responsibii ity of the Building Designer ~er ANSUMI Sec.2. HEADER AS SPEC'D, " HEADER AS SPEC'D, . SHEATHING; SHEATHING/SIDING HEADER AS SPEC'D. VAPOR BARRIER VAPOR BARRIER 0 _2X CASING FLASHING(DRIPEDGE -WINDOW WRAP TRIM NOTE: CORNER REINFORCING BARS AS PER GENERAL NOTE `F , 4' C l WRAP TRIM -YEBIE1URACK CLEARANCE HEAD D I SHIM NAILING FIN FOR ATTACHMENT O) REQUIREMENTS I 2 X¢ PRESS•TRTD, SILL HEAD D IN - W/.112' X 10' A.B. ®4S" O.C. JAMB SIZED FOR CASING CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR WALL THICKNESS t W TRACK HEAD D FLASHING /DRIP EDGE GARAGE DOOR STOP, MAY BE FITTED WITH SEAL E - GRADE L4 VINYL WINDOW UNIT SHEATHING, /777777- . VAPOR BARRIER II TRACK • MOUNTS J F „ TO CASING WRAP TRIM , TOP COURSE BONO 9z JAMB > CASING, NAIL TO FRAMING t`.I BEAM W/ 1• CONT. #5. I J w JAMB /VAPOR BARRIER I u a w JAMB D STOP WINDOW WRAP TRIM Cp C,M.U, FOUNDATION' F o CAULK WALL Wf FILLED CELLS I 0 ROLLERS MOUNTED - I~ _ _ a w TO GARAGE DOOR DOOR PANEL W1 MORTISED HINGES ^CAULK CONT. CONCRETE O a ' (D7 i NAILING FIN FOR ATTACHMENT FOOTING W1 2-#5 THICKENED CONCRETE . GARAGE DOOR FLOOR SEAL JAMB D c; ~1 LL f SLAB EDGE AS SELECTED OPTIONAL DEPRESSED SLAB KING STUD EDGE FOR RAIN SEAL THRESHOLD WITH SEAL BEARING SOIL $ u THRESHOLD D THRESHOLD D - - TRIMMER STUD #5 VERTICAL @ 48' O,C. CONCRETE FLOOR HOOK , - .4e $HIM FOR LEVEL AND SUPPORT (DC.- . a FOUNDATION WALL APRON/PAVING 2X4SILL FOUNDATION ASSPEC'D. 112' EXPANSION (ALTERNATE) JOINT MATERIAL I ODOOR TAIL NAILING FIN FOR ATTACHMENT e e SILL D WINDOW WRAP TRIM VAPOR BARRIER @GARAGE DOOR DETAIL PLAN VIEW SHEATHING. 3I4" = 1'•0" CRIPPLE STUDS 1 OPTIONAL BLOCKING AS NEEDED - NOTE: DOOR AND WINDOW COMPONENTS SHOWN ARE GENERIC _-CORNER STUDS ~ AND ACTUAL PRODUCTS MAY VARY SLIGHTLY IN CONFIGURATION, CORNER FRAMING OPTIONS OVINYL WINDOW DETAIL Oa DOUBLE TOP PLATE DOUBLE TOP PLATE ` OVER HEADER CRIPPLE STUDS HEADEfl AS NEADER AS ' ' SPECIFIED SPECIFIED DOUBLE TOP PLATE i HEADER AS SPECIFIED HEADER AS SPECIFIED - CRIPPLE STUDS 71 0 do- KING STUD Z FILLER MAY BE REQUIRED Z VERIFY WINDOW ROUGH Q •I' ROUGH-OPENING OPENING_=1 .WITH SELECTED TRIMMER. a to. PRODUCT BEFORE FRAMING . SINGLE KING STUD Z(~ Z DOUBLE TRIMMER STUDS M z z TRIMMER I O O d w 2 SILL a. Lu O 0 KING STUD 0 •GARAGE DOOR OPENING GARAGE DOOR OPENING' p DOOR OPENING m J, _ A g to ® J U. CRIPPLE STUDS Z N ~w O JF-2 BOTTOM PLATE O 0 W ® a O (7 in 0 J ANCHOR BOLT BOiioM PLATE BOTiDMPLATE w a 00 Z QW lo = - ul 00$30 SHEET y TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL O AA O SEPARATOR - -A--I -TAIL _ O FRAMING TAIL OWINDOW FRAMING T I of % SLOPE AS SPEC'D. Strudurallueneral Notes /Specifications , 2' - D" common v OH E General ROOFING AS SPECIFIED Be followmonalessholldadhand supplement the working drawings. _ TRUSS 15# FELT.' 15 32CDX PLYWOOD SHEATHING C r~a I. DHIP MGEFCASRMIG 216 OPTIONAL GUTTER 20 10 BACKSPAN O'HANG ROOFING AS SPEC'D. o SIMPSON H•1 Uve too 112'. 1 X 6FASCIA Q~ pool 25Podsf SHEATHING e - Raars.••...••,,,,,,,,•,,,_401HId s4e ' DOUBLE 2 X 4 VENTED 2 X BLOCKING E SmlrsBErist.......... IOOIWd 2 X 4 FLAT LOOKOUTS, TOP PLATE W1 (3) SCREENED LET-IN,@ END TRUSS N4 a 2'0 HOLES WALL FRAMING ~ DRIP FLASHING Earth Plenuli 301bildguh.Fluid pressure 22%6 AAKEBOAflD _ mum E Soil bFoundation alo 1, ~OTRUSS VE IL Sailkariapdaro notavailohk,Apum[dwY hadngmpautp=15BOIWd. X 1 TRIM BETWEEN LOOKOUTS , 2. Extend oil footings clovers to undisturbed sad of theswiiBedfiengthwith a minimum depth all'-0'befew adjacent grods,ormnquiredbyfemlbuilding ~ 9y~ SIDING official, based onkmlhaslRnedepth, Q-- --ASSPECD. 314° = 1'•0" L, 0 3. Center all feelings on columns and walk anlepspecifically dimensioned 01140NIse, END RAFTER & Compassed fill in be well graded and granular with not mote than s%possinga200slere.Place in6-inshloose lifts andcompact to95%modifiedAASHO 2~ - D. dendlyalopfimummoisum. -RAFTER 4 X 4 A4EMBENS Cort4mPfem Concrete and Reinferdna Simi 1. Concrete of the following 284al strength: Sock coment/cy, fmin.25911.1); may. 6 god wororlsack Far all structural controls, including firundafionsond kb 2 X 4 FLAT LOOKOUT LET IN AOOF SHEATHING on grade. Maximum sized opgmgatoW.Rnrimumslump 4'.AddMosterBuilders Ponoilhpet monubalumisrecommendations to all concrete except footings. TO TOP CHORD OF END TRUSS 2. Re Concrete faeexterior lASTMrobaairenhoinadlS%ohJ.. o® ALE LOOKT TAIL 2, R[infordnpsMlASfMAblSgmda40160,Usepsoda4ghshmpamNtasteal,sHUUpsonddowal[Dahi4fobtitataand fmincaardaamwith lhalolmt dyNnalACL'Manual0lSNedadPnun',. SCALE: 1"= P-0" 7. (onuelammanmiohrdnpstcel(slamdimanpoasJ: L Suspendedslobe.................................. NAIL •SUBRAKE I . Baams6[plums(nfis) Ih' 2 X IT, r2X XRAKEBOMD Nonaipamdmfimllaa 3. 114'0 LAG SCREWS YesNml loan exposed to earth orwaalher.Y @' EA J004T AS SHOWN, BottomoffeaNnps..... ................3 CBORE 6 PILOT ORLL Slob"nymde(fromtop)..•......... ...•.._1'W ' v;4• Up all field splices 24dmmahrs withminimumofll'.Bendauhrwallfeelingbars12inchsorusecareerbars atoRmmers ondwallintersmHon v- S. Providemia. oumntinuous#4 barolropandbottomalfondoNonwellswl#4 o112'o.Lwhole"RheightarmedtoofaLPlovideMintwo01Hauam CONT. 2 X 4 WALLTOP LATE k 2 X 4 STRUTS #4 bars in hotings Dowalfoundationwalhmfootngsvl#4[1-0'k*l9IV04 Embedded6'inbiooHng.(Noshearkeys required) N END TRUSS d. R[infermamundwallandslohapanMgs,riHh ddesollYarOrmNwHhNo#SMrs edaedinpN'hayondmmersonoNhursidaPmri~eaoevho#S 2:,8' MIN. E FFOUNDATIONPLAN 1.. Slabson-gmde. Roll sub grade and moistenbolanpour.SawcutomkmnHelloinhwilhin24hours ofpourorinAOli11p3hip,with mormumollY-0'fas 2X4DOUeLEA 4'nom-renhmddoln and40'-0'ferninkssodslob[(mimninhm[q:w6[6•wL4[IA,suppamd) CHORD 6, Yibmna0mweh.SaprgafianolmoHrrobt.bepnted,TestOfmdetsnotrequired. T_ 9. PlotenoHllopainslkuadolanarhummentwalls unftfloors oreIn pkmwwolhhavebeenodagealehshoredrormielMmlwAhprmure s LING NAILE T T ~ Masonry(amoolimblel 6d NAILS @ 6' O.C., G IPANE L SID SIDING 1. Hollow S%I p4% lime sooBhall[m.mJ ; In LI 1~ II ( II AND HEADER ) AS SPECIFIED Gadart0000peagrhepuNimed INTO ALL STUDS Gmu1:lNOpppeapmmlmnaeD(lmd) ~,I I LI ~,I LI I, TRUSS LINE OF SIDING AS SPECIFIED 1. ReMfemopSeaal:ASiMA-0IS,pmdeW. HEADER AS SPEC'D, l a 3. Plomgroullnlihsnoprmhrdan l'-0'he(phl. 2x4 r J,I ~I ^I^ SINGLE STUD DOUBLE TOP e _ 4, Walh[inlardnp: NAIL SHEATHING 6'welis,#4vetfiml@46'o,[wl#9wxehodaJoinuainh@6'o.[ TTOOH~ DER@6'O,C, I I) PLATE OF WALL EA. 'wel@#SvelHral@48'o.tw13(l6'dio.waeuhok ndopes. Lo@6'w[ ' i,l I'I I I I' 3 2 X 4 STUDS,,NAIL ABL I T. DBRACETAIL InsroNN dboo romers,woeinnrsmwells. an6npsandamundapm(ngMSIape11bars 20indieandpinheinferdnp,l2inshslhemmahanfarauhr - f) -karslaho ndbaemsandatiMenaUfapwall[ APA RATED SHEATHING SHEATHING TO EACH 2 S. AndmrbOvenear b wood 6amedwall as dalaUdwith22go,311th'il'patron[dcorrugated wall Hmp16'oxwWoywilhoneAmproan20aaa11. 3/8' MIN. 24/0 EXP. 1 ' . BOTH OUTSIDE AND I _ imberandWood Fmmine INSIDE FACES ' 1. SobHBuNn olwood seeds Identified hmainmay be asepprovedby tool Building Official and material strength andmpaa7isfholequal serreed that of DOUBLE TRIMMER STUDS 314' T&G PLYWOOD thespecies Identified heroin. 2. All lumber to be graded pit book 16 of the West CoodLumber inspection Bureau: SINGLE KING STUD WALL FRAMING _ HFNFno,2far lal9t,lafmrs,light framing, plahsand bracing OF no. ferpotand beams I ' SOLE HF1DF'snd'farsndwall homing a .2 X 4'' PLATE 3. Comply with M[khdeditors oftheNFPA'HodmolDesign SpedbmSon'asmoddiedbythe IBCkraHfiudurolHmbaNgNmmmh ICI I ( I.I.I 0 1. Joitondmflenshollhave 2'nominolnikksold blocking olsuppoft s r. I SIMPSON STHD14 OR EQUAL Z S. Spike laminated membeahgedmvllOdstage @IYa.[snppaied.Splinfeminafionsalsuppathoely. r; p VIM, I EMBED INTO CONCRETE SECOND FLOOR RIM JOIST AS SPEC'0, Z , 6. Pmddemtwohealaroll bolts hearing onwood.V. Allnilsdoll bammmonwHatraiL it mmn JOIST AS SPEC'D. Z nsalF•V6 FULLY NAIL TO WALL & Glue4aminhdlmbers,DouglmFlr,ALT.Cgmding:mmbindon24F43hrdmpbspo for mnfilarnadsponLDD mndiNom of use. klHihAuml ,.5. s:.fi - appearance finds where exposed roview. Fabrication plant MtCimpodadlWmpindlridualmembam 4412', TYP.. ; 9, Plywood: RoolSheaAing to beWC-Ofirst-ape plywood with exterior glut, Pd.24/0(use S-ph'for poneilrad rools)Nalllnq 6d@ 6' a.[mpanel edges and :y; (so E s ) 0d@12o.[alintermediahfuppomSsb4oodngsbe'/VC4lupoplyNndrisharlodorglue, P.I.06.Use TEDileoundedaymmt.Give andPoll with m y f I'I' 1/2'DIA,ANCHOR SOLTS -6d @Vo.Latpanel edges and@Wee intermedmhapports.' .a:4, • W7 T MIN. EMBEDMENt DOUBLE 2X C TOP PLATE Q~ ~M' WQ ~ 10.Po-febrimhdhesedmembers to bedesigned byopplimblegals imawedengineer inamordonmwthrequirements shown Inthedrandr%Conhatlorsholl i I W ~~[/1;JI Q 4, verily as-homed dimensions andeond#ansprior rohushbdmHonandmaedloohosrequired. All engineering data shall bemode avaNoblekrsuhmHlalta the BuildmpOfiaUlotguired. 2 X 4 @ 16' D.C. 1'yplcnl ST}ID WALL FRAMING - ShuMr°ISmal Cavern r(nslaItalian l III It I W IJe I. All steel, except tubing: ASTMA36.ppa:ASTMA-53,Type Eor S,gmdeB.Tubulorsection; ASTMAS00,grode8.All bolts: ASTMA301. on 3-2xatudo GRADE LINE' 1. All fehdmdaa,[raFnnand deroilingshall be In accordance with the latest ednionof the'Manuol01SlalCamhudiou'ofthe American buffinto OfSteal U o t 1'L - IO ~Q Construction. PRE 3. MweldmgbyWABOmfihadweldasinawldanmwahHe WaldipNaodboak 6yHedunedmnWeld'mgSodap. CONCRETE FOUNDATION. TREATED SILL RE SHEATHING/SIDING/VAPOR = Z 3 J k All wilds 3d16'reirymntfeuautfllelweldsuHA WAS,ETglgaladtodal WI 112' X 10" BARRIER AS SPEC'D• IJQ 0 0 ~Q S Pm dawmkananollhuBad onn 0ant AS SPEC'D. @ 48' ANCHOR BOLTS W BOLTS CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL WZ W 0Q G &'All srealnotembddedromnaehormamnry sMHmocks oneshop mmalonapproved primer pafet,Apply twocoasafhwgaspholtlepoiotmallSHal upaudroeaHh• r (#4 TOP AND BOTTOM CONCRETE SLAB FLOOR / (#4 @ 12' HE IF T) 'l7 _j M D 7. Furniss ulapdmdnp[pdarhkhdmHon. ® ALTERNATE BRACE WALL PANEL WALL> 24' HEIGHT) Z J M 0 Miscellaneous - I Z Z 3 h CK 3/4" V-V Q 1. sloosand dimensions In field. - ~I / FIN. GRADE m~ F Q jI h 2, Provide temporary bmdnpmrequited ualHall pmmonedmana?mnsondstfadnghmNanInstalled. 3. Yedfysize andlamtionsofallopenings Infloor, molaadwalls andmardinamw~deddmlandmadonimiwork 0 ' J _j W J W 4. Pro-(oMmhditems Aallbehandled ndirytalledinosatdonmwith monukMmdrxammendatons. Pro•foMmndassemblisshall be coordinated with a101u0 PAUEL Q anyas6uihmnGHOm6yNsmohMorepadmpdmendon dmsamm~dopplmMe6vilWnpmdenquinnnm COUTIOUOU4 4UEATMIUG(oR4TUD .006, POLYETHYLENE i W I= m y •WALL VAPOR BARRIER f (VERIFY/SATISFY W p, 9.J .4 S, MI HYAVguipmanlshall 6ademminad6yommpadlmmntmAorspad8[rodis HalKtandmmplyrifeallopplimM[mdK PetMrmanmdalaond RORIBOUTAL Z WALL FOR 41UOLE CON41"RUCTIOW) LOCAL DEPTH = N b^ Q 0 W . N & 6imbst R it the n intent of these ese dpmmdaptananis and mmb lpebBmenimitiawttmro (ommplymplywithhlhaqu0ahther aquire16meotssaEY~ofth[eoh' u Bu11mnhenrnndois~brreevntcodDMddo METALFNA4UIUG GRAVEL BASE ASREO'D. a REQUIREMENT) Building fada and olharnlsammdsonrMnanmt W/2•IU.(MIU.) COUTIMUOUG _ SHEET fthege pnnfomorenars daleekdadhbrought mHue~ncioafdedesigner ArdorifmHonarmlmHoo6ehtm,~inninpfeeworkltUdm JOIUT4. OCkLAPQ MOI4TUREPARRIER CONCRETE FOOTINGW1(2) e . d m Mydiscrepancies, responsibility ofd[[mlmnhodarmsxkdedRadonormnedanHewd" . 2 METAL FLA4UIU0 #4, CONT AND #4 DOWELS r 9101UO PANEL @ 16' O.C. VERT. MOISTURE! BARRIER 4101WG PANELS OPTIONAL FOOTING DRAIN, FV FOR CONCRETE BLOCK- 5' 6' 5' COpiIN0004 SEOiION (C.M•UJ FOUNDATION .1 q "ALTERNATE SEE BEARING SOIL UUOER HOR120UUL I: © FLASHING TAIL OF ewA FOR PANEL SIDING 0TYPICAL WALL TI 314" = p,0e - FASTENING REQUIREMENTS - TABLE 11602,8(1) TABLE RW2,3(2) FASTENER SCHEDULE FOR STRUCTURAL MEMBERS ALTERNATE ATTACHMENTS NUMBER ANOTYPEOF IIPACING10FFA TIERS ITEM DESCRIPTION OF BUILDING ELEMENTS FASIENERxw° SPACING OFFASTENERS NOMINAL MATFRIALTHICKNESS DESCRIPRON"OFFASTENERANDLENGIH Edges IMetmedmmeuppanr TABLE 11402.30) Roof (Inches) OnNaer (inohal 1 Inch. REQUIREMENTS FOR WOOD SRRVOIURALPANEL 1 Blocking between joists or rafters to top plate. toe nail 3.80 11"x0,1139 _ Wand etmine, penalawb8oar, mafend w+Il nh.Nl~lelramlog and parlklebaaMwallaheafhin lofromin WALL SHEATHING USED 1O REm9TWWDPRESSURES'"" Staple IS as. l'/ 4 8 , "fill! HAL aoaswN Darnyw 124tlhWUMaxasrtED 2 Cello oists t0 late, toe nail 3-8d 211"x0.113") - WODO NOIDNAL MAIatUdl eaxELxuLeeAUNC a P uplo'/2 p,097.0.099Nai1211 3 6 eTRUCruwt PANG WALLSIM Cellingjoisu not attached to parallel raft, laps over partitions, _ mxintla7 vANaLSpaN Txmgama SPACMO T= Red wind 3 face Dail 3dOd staple)6ga. 1'/, 3 6 9110 MTAN Dmoe. Rn:aw 0.P E Cr e EdC.D, 1S p4p 3B 16 6 11 ISO gp 86 4 Collar Us raftar, faro mil or l4"x20 rid she 3•10d(31 x0.128 - 0.113 Nail 2 3 6 , (20'x0.113 5 Rafter* to plate, toe nail 2.16d(3111 x0.135- - 0/31 and 9p Stale 15 and 16ans. 2 4 8 BdCamm n Ill 6 12 130 110 NOS 0.097.0.099 Nail 2114 8 fd"x0.13 1.75 2Nt6 TR6 Roof rafters In ridge, valley or hip, rafters: u 6 12 110 90 as 6 toe eau 4-16d 1111 0,1359 - Stale 14." 2 4 8 E ei/ Y/ Fa m: lie!>Of./mm,l muemrbsx=O./e7 ds. fcanall 3.160 i)"x0.13$9 - a.Peel,vaigrbuieq>uWOrympendnWUm-ppyu,tlrx.pyplYPwdOdeMoYwAbrmleWsadmueR+ola®daoscA~aeE°Rmyptialwia.pud 19 AgLLp~ m'aJd aitprp:ndmlumsuppwa. Wall a/ands) Staple 15 a- V/ 3 6 enL,N~we"nwMpnwa mymmdndar,Ymmb3an&ndapasztlooRbl2.Lglmmnp e~mm wmwoanemGSw v 0A97.0.099Nat24 8 d-A6o2Ia 7 Built-up tomes studs 10d(3"x0.1289 241 oa, Sta 1e 16 n2 4 8 w wwdsaecmreseuazsm,hspmrsaegaR5I616wwa4zl"IbsR,mUravmnuansxmp:cmu m°uq,p^ndoyelywadetdrognedta«m2a g Built-up header, two iuce with'/"s car 160(3'!"x0,135 I6'o.a alto ached ~I49hPamiceWarueluiu^<roPgalxlAaaGt6tPSeamyWU-16°adElyxmdddlsgld..)W dweba,dsWmiamadrumenaladu Staple 14&a.2/ 4 8 ` 9 Continued header, two pieces 16d(3141 x0,1359 161 o.o. along each edge. O.l13Nail 211 3 6 TASLERaC23(4) 30 Continuous tsaderto stud, lot nail 48024°x0d139 - I 8 ALLOWABLE SPANS FOR PARTICLEBOARD wALLSHE44nNG° It Double studs, face Raft 10d(3"x0,128 24'0.6. Staple 15 0. 24 4 0.097-0.099Nai124 4 8 TNmxlaes anw > (T 12 Doublet lates, face nail 10d 3"x0.1289 241 ox. 0xhl (TRADE wh-fftobncnadtaahds wknawmgmnd!tdwdwmt,p Dwble lopplaW, minimum48-inch offsetofeDdjoinU, 14 a SPACdK,°OFFASfENFJiS E '72 M-)7 aria glne 16 - 13 facenail inl era 8.160 (3 ft x0,1359 - NOMINAL TAATEAWLTHICKNES3 BESCAIP1I011" OF FASTENERANDLFNOIiI Edges BodyotpneP J Ilncha IncMa Inch. nohm Q C % M-2Entaor&1. 16 16 14 Sole late to joist ablocking, fact nail 16d(311"x0,135) 16"0.0. Romundef4ymantlplyemod4Wrdbomd-WktGboard 0 0 was: 11.1,=25,1- 15, Sole Plato to joist orblocking at braced wall panels 3-16d(34"x0.135" 161 o.c. FI-- s ~ ,m rw511dvMngmskpoardmtAewu~hx.tfPsPrWsuerpplDdlo~wuY,IMeodJaiafsadepmAdzn4"LiaenOnf grcLmwrdlr,amrec ~ A' 9 Aue+«srdskmwbenpposbaLm<e'hgaslptwattnRaeumdnmmcmurdan'r,msh6nmpmdm8aa 3-Bd(24a°x0,113') - 11/°ringarsmewshaokna it-minfn 3 6 Z E 16 Stud to 6Ukplate, toe tail or 11,-d'las t24 a. (0.099")shenkdiamUAr 0 d 2.16d 311" x 0.1359 - staple 18 La.. 'i'1, crownrvidth _ 2 5 F N 17 T or sole late to stud, end nail 2.16d 331"x0.13$" - ll/ ring or screw shanknal"inimim W O III To laws,laps atComm andiotessectiom,face nail &lOd(3"x0.1289 _ f'/s+,~/s~1flsa,and 1/s °l2y,ga. (0,099'1shank diameter 6 8° d s3 19 ("bmcet0 each stud and lam, (aceoaU 2-Sd(21f2"x0.113") - 11/2 time orsmcw Shank mil-minimum 6 8 F 2Stales Pl" - 11/,11.Ul3agndl/4 1217, a.(0.099") shank diameter 2.8d(2t/2"x0,113) SIak16 as, 114 f 6 8 20 1"x6° sheathing to each bearing, face nail 2 lee P/" _ Nerdboerd' 2I i"x8"shaUdagm each bearing, face nail 2-8d(24a"x0.113") - V ton ring- ovedundeda em nail 6 6 3R ksll - 0200 4d cement-coated sinker nail 6 6 22 V✓iderthan 7"x8" sheatWngb each bearing, face nail 3•Sd 12112°x0.1139 - S k 18', 71 long (Plastic 3 6 4 staples 1314" - padiclabonid Fina 23 Joist to sill orgirder, roe nail 3.8d(211' x 0,113' _ 43 4d rin• Dyed unduln enlnail 3 6 2-81(211,° x 0,1131) _ staple 18 a. 71, tong, 37 Crown 3 6 24 1"x 61 s0floor or less to eerhioist, fete mil 2slap1. 1311" - sf 1 6d ring-grooved underle trail 6 10 25 2"subflom to joist argirder, blind and face nail 2.160(31/'x0.1359 - s Staple 16 a„117 tan Jl crown 3 6 'r v a 1 26 Rim' istioto plate, toenail (roof Applications also) 8S(2t/"x0,113 6"0,o 6d rin • ooved waderia t nail 6 10 y p/ (p 27 2" lanks(plank &beam-floor&mof) 2-160 11'x0,135 azeachbearin 2 su le to e, 29 a0n ,y crown 6 Nail each layer as follows: FocSJ. (inch=25A.- ' 28 Built-up 32"D.c, at top and bottom and a•NaO is agenemldexriptmn andmrybeFluad, modifodround lxad orraaodhevd. gmdem andbearm,2-Inch lumber layers IOd (3"x0.1281, staggered Two Delta at ends h. Staples shall honaminimum amwm width o0leimhan diametaareptunoted. and at each ice, cNulsacsmPlesslull6asp-eMatnatmomdun6imhesonamere[illsuppmuahuespmsam48inehnmgreaueNailsmstaplualuB6espaadatnotrtarc i that 12 isahesnmcmtaazfntamediateauppomfarUrs. 29 Ledger ship supporting joials orraBet, 3.16d(311°x0.135") Ata6b olstorafter d. Fsslutars staff be pbeedinagndV(Pero throughout the body of the panel e. Fm5•plypaneb, intermediate nails shall be spaced notmms thin 12 inches oncentaeeth Ray. SPACING OFFASTENERS L?'~n6ma~lma±•.•taya_rntebellconfomstn ANSVARAAU54. k i E DE$CAIPROHOFBUILDING gdpa6 tftonodlat. REM MATERIALS OFSCRIPRONOFPASTENER°'w' Ondsell Qnem3) O € Wand 3WeNnI pene9, aubfwr, root and Inwdm wallWmihing to fnmingend PedfcMwtdweu tA.ming m framing z 30 313". It. 6d common (2"x 0.1139 nail(subfloor wally Z 2 ad common (211,n x 0,1314) nail (rout) 6 120 HEADER AS SPECO. a 11 3/ Ty^ 6d Common (2 x0.113")Dall(subfleor, wall) 2X CASING 16 2 8dconmmn(21/,nx0A3I-)nA1(soq I 6 123 m 32 19/4"•1" Sd common nail (211,"x0.131') 6 123 HEAD z JAMB SIZED FOR 33 VIA • 144" IW common (3' x 01489nail or 6 12 WALL THICKNESS N m a 80(2/2' x 0,131") deformed nail TRACK W 7 a O , ❑ ❑ DOW Wall MNrming° STOP, MAY BE GARAGE DOOR FITTED WITH SEAL t 34 1!~ Stmctuml cellulosic '/2' galvanized mo6ngmf4 Ih6"crown or J" fiberboard sheathing (Town staple Ill g.., t'le'totg 3 6 35 211,2 structural cellulosic 1314" galvaniud roofing nail, 7/nIn own or l' SIDING PANEL C fiberboard sheathing crown staple l6gA,Yy"IDOg 3 6 TRACK-MOUNTS TO CASING TRIM 36 Its" gypsum shealhingd 14=galvanizedmolingnali; staple galvanized, 7 7 JAMB Z I le"long; I /4 amews, Type W orS JAMB ~ y f STOP F° 37 '!a"gypsumshathiog° I'14^glava0aed roofing nail; staple galvanized, 7 7 ROLLERS MOUNTED W9 J I/a long;lla screws,TypeWmS TO GARAGE DOOR l- N Weedmahneipanele, combnot!"subtoorwdenaymmlto framing Ill6 FO ❑ 38 314 ad less bd common 1209) nag il 6 12 BLAB EDGE CONCRETE GARAGE AS SELECTED DOOR FLOOR SEAL Wz K or THICKENED 8d commonon (2112'21(2"x x 0,1319na OPTIONAL DEPRESSED SLAB 7U) 99 7/.•1, 8dcollm,on(21/g"x0.131')nailor A EDGE FOR AAINSEAL z 8ddeformed (2'/2"xa1207mR 12 THRESHOLD' Z z - 40 11, If/" IOdcommon(3"x0.148) Pallor 0 r A Sddefo®cd(21/2"x 0.120") nail 6 12 TE10. Fm SL lil,mt$Amm,lCO1=704.8mm,Imlle pnhwro0.d49 eats; iWl=6.895 hIPa. All raieares-nosh-mmoe, boxordefaamM3banks except WN oduwisest".Nailforframing end shnubgminimum W Mw;801x1forshsakdi-ter of(1)92Imh(20dcammoss.0). 90kstfmshankdiamrareI.Mthm0,142iabbut not APRON/PAVING = N FOUNDATION AS•S12° EXPANSION b.Staples,m 16gagawfmandbayeamiNmom'/,Cinch on, dhmeaaavawidth. 1JOINT MATERIAL ~ SHEET m dPots-fe*by-B•footm4footby-9-fadlpanels shill be appled-fleally, a e. Spring otiutenenw inaadWb Ads mbleshe6 ba baud ox7abl4R6023(2). E L Praregin.heA.Sbadewbdspeed of 110 mphorgtafe, 8ddekamed(21/r`x0.120)adNshrllbeusedfaanzebingpywoodandwood sWCwrdpanel roof shothiogto framingwithin miaimum48 inehdistance fmmOlae d wells, if m.nmorAeigbi is more than 25fee; up to 35 feet maximum. .0 9. Porn 'a'baringbaslcwiMspxdofToomphorkss,na6sfasltuhlogWinds mmlwalPsmisoo46nfr1ogtagobbcodwilltnming6 6ibespead6imM1a anaMa, WlxobaakwiadspadiagnatersAen100mph,mihCmemrhiogpanel roofshuWlagmktamediausuppodsshell6especed6imLumaotefor O GARAGE DOOR DETAILS 4asrxhdbarxubomai dge,eessandg~Meeodwansand4inehea an ceadampb)eendwell homing ,C minlmwn OF L GygEn NxatldogshaUCmlmmw ASTMCi396 atdahill be Iosulledin nuatdeme wiUt OA 153. Ffher6oaal shwlhiog shall eanfmmm A51M C1m, T I. gpuiogothhnemrsafloasAenNingpaoeledgesepfdlu topaneladgmsuppoftedbyfnmlagercmhen andmguuedhfsekiogudmell0oarpesimutaswly, ° Spxiagd'tMmoemoaAwls6eathmgpaacledgarppliesmpsnHMgusrppm~byfiamUgmemhersaodrequhedhlx}ing.Blrcldagofsooforb,' 6uhh• U 49 mgpeaeledgapapmdituYr m Ike fnmiag manbsenadnotbsplovided exaptu nquifedbyc~Auplmisiam of Odeacde, I4ompa13mW ahdl<auppotted by!'3min8 memhas or rned6lonkiog APPLICATION I Planning Division ZONING PERMIT 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 CJITY 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE # ASHLAND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY / Pursuing LEEDO Certification? I] YES El NO Street Address C~ I r ~j C'k ~J k k 14YI ( t 'R- 5 2.0 Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E Tax Lot(s) Zoning Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name Phone !;gI.gIq-4-2_'rLail 4- -e, o5eja ~ to Address f~ City k 1 Zip 1 15 ).0 PROPERTY OWNER Name Phone E-Mail Address City -Zip SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zi P Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City 7;D I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact are in all respects, true and correct. /understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. 1 further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of urnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structur r impro ments are properly located on the ground. r Failure in this re ikel not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliancq thereon being required to be rem my exp rise. h a d ubts, I m a vised seek comp tent profession 1 a ice and assistance y ' _ l Ap I' Signatu Date wn, of the rop yinvolved in th r uest, 1 have read and understood the ico pl to application and its consequences to me as a property 3 !S Prope wner's nat r required) D[ro be completed by City Staltf Date Received Zoning Permit TypeFiling Fee OVER 4 GAcomm-dev\planningTorms & Handouts\Zoning Permit Applicadon.doc I I. ih 111, J!', i i Job Address: 399 BEACH ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: c C P' P Owner's Name: CHRIS/SAMAE CHLEBOWSKI/HORNER C Phone: P Customer 08467 N State Lic No: L CHRIS/SAMAE CHLEBOWSKI/HORNER T L City Lic No: Applicant: 399 BEACH ST R Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 09/03/2015 O T Issued: Expires: 03/01/2016 R Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E09DD1200 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Type I variance VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Variance (Type 1) 1,012.00 L CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F -ASHLI AND