HomeMy WebLinkAboutCamelot_945_PA-2015-02297
YT1' OF
ASH U, ~
i
February 23, 2016
j
F
Notice of Final Decision
On February 23, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: G
Planning Action: PA-2015-02237
Subject Property: 945 Camelot Drive
Applicant: Laz Ayala
Description: A request for a Site Design Review and Minor Modification to a previously
approved Subdivision under the Performance Standards Option (PA-2003-158). The proposal is to allow
for a detached single-family dwelling including an accessory residential unit. The subject lot was previously
approved as a townhome, including accessory residential unit, attached to five townhomes to the East of
the site which have since been built. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: North Mountain
Neighborhood District; ZONING: NM; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 04AD; TAX LOTS: 1600.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of
approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F)
and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The
ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be
made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Mark Schexnayder in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
I.
I
i
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 ( ?
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 k
a•.t~s L _ 1
i
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.13.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this
subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing
or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of
decision is mailed.
c. Content ofNotice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the
Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation,
and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and
arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant
ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 l
F
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
f
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-02297
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 945 Camelot Drive
OWNER: Laz Ayala
APPLICANT: Meadowbrook Townhomes, LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review and a Minor Modification to a
previously approved Subdivision under the Performance Standards Option (PA-2003-158). The
proposal is to allow for a detached single-family dwelling including an accessory residential unit.
The subject lot was previously approved as a townhome, including accessory residential unit,
attached to five townhomes to the East of the site, which have since been built.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: North Mountain Neighborhood District;
ZONING: NM; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 04 AD; TAX LOT: 1600.
SUBMITTAL DATE: December 8, 2015
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: January 4, 2016
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: February 23, 2016
FINAL DECISION DATE: March 7, 2016
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: September 7, 2017
DECISION
The subject property is Tax Lot #1600 of the Meadowbrook Park II Development at North
Mountain Subdivision that was originally approved through Planning Action #2003-158. The
property is irregularly shaped, located on the North side of Fair Oaks Avenue, West of its
intersection with Camelot Drive, and is addressed as 945 Camelot Drive.
The current request involves proposed modifications to the Meadowbrook Park II Development
at North Mountain Subdivision Final Plan (PA#2003-158) to modify the approved plan to allow
or a detached single-family dwelling including an accessory residential unit. Previously, the
subject lot was approved as a townhome, including accessory residential unit, attached to five
townhomes to the East of the site, which have since been built.
The following is a brief history of the planning approvals that preceded this application:
In May of 1997, the Council adopted the North Mountain Neighborhood Plan, which included a
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Map amendment and a new chapter in the Ashland Land Use
Ordinance - North Mountain Neighborhood.
In May of 2003, the Planning Commission granted Outline Plan approval, for the subject
property, for an 81-lot subdivision under the Performance Standards Options, located within the
North Mountain Neighborhood Plan area West of the North Mountain Avenue, East of Bear
Creek channel, and South of Nevada Street.
f:
G
PA #2015-02297
945 Camelot Drive/MMS
Page 1
In January of 2004, the Planning Commission granted Final Plan approval for an 81-lot
subdivision under the Performance Standards Options, located within the North Mountain
Neighborhood Plan area West of the North Mountain Avenue, East of Bear Creek channel, and
South of Nevada Street.
In July of 2005, the Planning Commission granted Commercial Site Review approval for four
mixed-use buildings comprised of commercial and residential condominium units in the "Village
Center" area of the Meadowbrook Park Subdivision located adjacent to North Mountain Avenue
near East Nevada Street.
In October of 2005, the Planning Commission granted Site Design Review approval for the
construction of 26 attached, single-family townhome units to be built on approximately 2.5 acres
located within the Neighborhood Multi-Family Overlay (NM-MF) of the North Mountain
Neighborhood zoning district. The townhomes are identified as Series 8, 9, 10, & 11 on the
previously approved subdivision master plan, and are primarily situated at the Western portion of
the project around the central "Village Green."
The proposed Site Design Review and Minor Modification approval for the construction of a
detached single-family dwelling including accessory residential unit is consistent with the
underlying North Mountain zoning. The applicants propose a fagade distinguishable from
adjacent townhomes with different roof system, different pattern of openings, stepped fagade
along Fair Oaks Avenue, and a different entry and window pattern. The new single-family
dwelling will comply with standard yard setback requirements, lot coverage, and solar access
within the NM-MF zone. The utilities to service the proposal are available and were installed
with the subdivisions initial infrastructure. No changes are proposed or are necessary with the
proposal as the number of units, including the accessory residential unit, and demand for service
remains the same. Three vehicle parking spaces are required for this proposal, two are for the
primary dwelling unit and one is for the accessory dwelling unit. Two off-street vehicle parking
spaces will be provided in the garage and one on-street credit is allowed given the amount of
space along the properties three street frontages.
The approval criteria for Site Design Review are detailed in AMC 18.5.2.050 as follows:
An application for Site Design Review shall be approved if the proposal meets the criteria in subsections
A, B, C, and D below. The approval authority may, in approving the application, impose conditions of
approval, consistent with the applicable criteria.
A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying
zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions,
density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other
applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards. The proposal complies with the applicable Site
Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below.
PA #2015-02297
945 Camelot Drive"S
Page 2
11
l
(f
D. City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public
Facilities, and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm
drainage, paved access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be
provided to the subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve
exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either
subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist.,
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and
Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of
a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties;
and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and
Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the
exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site
Development and Design Standards.
The criteria for a modification of Final Plan approval are described in AMC 18.3.9.040.B.5
as follows:
Final Plan approval shall be granted upon finding of substantial conformance with the Outline
Plan. This substantial conformance provision is intended solely to facilitate the minor
modifications from one planning step to another. Substantial conformance shall exist when
comparison of the outline plan with the final plan meets all of the following criteria.
a. The number of dwelling units vary no more than ten percent of those shown on the
approved outline plan, but in no case shall the number of units exceed those permitted in
the outline plan.
b. The yard depths and distances between main buildings vary no more than ten percent of
those shown on the approved outline plan, but in no case shall these distances be reduced
below the minimum established within this Ordinance.
c. The open spaces vary no more than ten percent of that provided on the outline plan.
d. The building size does not exceed the building size shown on the outline plan by more
than ten percent.
e. The building elevations and exterior materials are in conformance with the purpose and
intent of this ordinance and the approved outline plan.
f. That the additional standards which resulted in the awarding of bonus points in the
outline plan approval have been included in the final plan with substantial detail to ensure
that the performance level committed to in the outline plan will be achieved.
g. The development complies with the Street Standards.
PA #2015-02297
945 Camelot Drive/MMS
Page 3
I
k k,
EI
S
I
h. Nothing in this section shall limit reduction in the number of dwelling units or increased
open space provided that, if this is done for one phase, the number of dwelling units shall
not be transferred to another phase, nor the open space reduced below that permitted in
the outline plan
For staff, key issues with the proposal lie in insuring that the modifications proposed remain
consistent with the initial planning approval for the subdivision to minimize impacts on the
neighborhood and natural environment. Furthermore, the application with the attached conditions
complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Planning Action #2015-02297 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or
more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then
Planning Action #2015-02297 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached
to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise
modified herein.
2) That all conditions of the subdivision land use approval (PA #2003-158) shall remain in
effect unless otherwise modified herein.
3) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with
those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit
are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an
-appl3 ation to modify the subdivision approval shall be submitted and approved prior. to
issce of / uilding permit.
/7- -n f
ill Molnar, irector Date
Department f Community Development
PA #2015-02297
945 Camelot Drive/MMS
Page 4
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
I'
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On February 23, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-02237, 945 Camelot Drive.
Signature of Employee
DocumenQ 2/2212016
I':
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3600 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3700
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1300
ALI SHAHID j AMERICAN DREAM HOMES LLC AMERICAN DREAM HOMES LLC
50 LOWE RD 132 W MAIN ST 202 132 W MAIN ST 103 ;
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDFORD, OR 97501
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3400 PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 494 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5000
AYALA LAZARO FAMILY TRUST ET BANCROFT JEFFREY M/GLORIA A BANCROFT JOHN
132 W MAIN ST 202 j 969 OVERLOOK DR III 912 PATTON IN
MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
l ~
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2200
BECKER TIMOTHY /MICHELE LOUISE BELEN CAIXA TRUST ET AL BISHOP RONALD DE VERE TRUSTEE
922 PATTON IN 19451 BELLETERRE DR 975 CAMELOT DR EEC
ASHLAND, OR 97520 REDDING, CA 96003 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4200 ! PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 424 i PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 428
BRONK JAMES B MD TRUSTEE ET AL CARLTON SUSAN L CHENG GUGHONG
50 EL MONTE WAY 4301 INNSBRUCK RIDGE 945 OVERLOOK DR
NAPA, CA 94558 j MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4300 ! PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 425
COLONDRES FERNANDO L ET AL COX FRED COMPANY LLC EHRLICH KENNETH E TRUSTEE ET
969 CAMELOT DR 213 EASTBROOK WAY 955 OVERLOOK DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2900 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5800 ( PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4500
F & L PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC GAGNEJA ARVINDER PAL SINGH ET GILL WILLIAM L TRUSTEE ET AL
,
132 W MAIN ST 202 562 FAIR OAKS AVE 911 PATTON IN
MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5200 j PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6400 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1200
GOMEZ KRISTIN j HANSEN DOUGLAS J/SOOK-JA H HANSEN MICHAEL S ET AL
502 FAIR OAKS AVE 917 PLUM RIDGE DR 563 PLUM RIDGE CT
ASHLAND, OR 97520 j ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1700 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2300
HEAP KATHLEEN JAMES FOREST J/TAMARA E JOHNS LIVING TRUST ET AL
951 CAMELOT DR 967 PATTON IN 979 CAMELOT DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3200 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3000 ( PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2000
KDA HOMES LLC KDA HOMES LLC KURTH FAMILY LIVING TRUST ET AL
132 W MAIN ST 103 132 W MAIN ST 202 965 CAMELOT DR
MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5400 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1500
LANGLADE JEAN-PIERRE/JULIE C LASH STEPHANIE LISSBERGER SCOTT TRUSTEE ET AL
522 FAIR OAKS AVE 925 PLUM RIDGE DR PASHLAND, OR 97520 j ASHLAND, OR 97520 SANTA ROSA, CA 95402
j
!
it
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5900 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1800 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5500
MEADOWBROOK BUILDERS LLC j MEADOWBROOK TOWNHOMES LLC MITZEL STEVEN D/MICHELE A
604 FAIR OAKS CT 132 W MAIN ST 201A 532 FAIR OAKS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4400 ! PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6200 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5300
NICHOLS RICHARD A TRUSTEE ET AL RALSTON DAVID ROUDEBUSH SUSAN
921 PATTON LN 369 LAUREL ST N 512 FAIR OAKS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 i ! ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
II! Ij I
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1900 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6300
SAGE JEAN SHERBOW MARK A ET AL SHUBAT VINCENT P TRUSTEE ET AL
6615 SHEPHERD WAY 985 OVERLOOK DR 919 PLUM RIDGE DR
WEED, CA 96094 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5700 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5600 945 CAMELOT
SPAUN JOHN M SPOONER RAYMOND M/PAMELA 2/23/2016 NOD
552 FAIR OAKS AVE j 780 VIVIAN DR ! 4&l
ASHLAND, OR 97520 LIVERMORE, CA 94550
- I
Urban Development Services
604 Fair Oaks Drive Ili
Ashland, O 97520
!i
I
II I
I
~ I
I
Regan Trapp
From: Joanne Johns <jbsjohns@yahoo.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 12:17 PM
To: Mark Schexnayder
Cc: Carolyn Schwendener; Regan Trapp
Subject: Planning Action 2015-02297; 945 Camelot Drive
Hello Mark,
We'd like to submit the following comments for consideration on this application.
We don't see a building height on the plan, and feel this is important, so that cars leaving both Patton Lane and Camelot
Drive can safely enter Fair Oaks Drive without a sight restriction.
In the application, it is indicated that there are roughly six on-street parking spaces along the site's three street
frontages. There is quite limited parking on Camelot Drive in front of this parcel, as the street frontage is quite small, and
on Patton Lane, this property is clearly marked with a sign that says no parking on this side of street. Fair Oaks is the
main street into the subdivision, and is quite narrow. If cars are parked on the side of this parcel, not to mention the other
side of Fair Oaks as well, it will be difficult for vehicle traffic and impossible for fire trucks/emergency service vehicles to
gain access. The parking situation in Meadowbrook Park is already tenuous, and we ask that the Planning Staff take a
good, hard look at what has already been approved in the entire development, as well as new applications, in an effort to
prevent the traffic congestion and safety issues for pedestrians that will ensue in this high density development.
Thank you,
Brian and Joanne Johns
979 Camelot Drive
Ashland, OR
c
E
1
i
Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y T
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900
' g
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2015-02297
SUBJECT PROPERTY: -945 Camelot
OWN ER/AP PL [CANT: Meadowbrook Townhomes, LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review and Minor Modification to a previously approved Subdivision under
the Performance Standards Option (PA-2003-158). The proposal is to allow for a detached single-family dwelling including
an accessory residential unit. The subject lot was previously approved as a townhome, including accessory residential unit,
attached to five townhomes to the East of the site which have since been built. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
North Mountain Neighborhood District; ZONING: NM; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391 E 04AD; TAX LOTS: 1600.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 12, 2016
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: January 26, 2016
- _ I
~SUBJECT PROPERTY
945 Camelot Drive
xa
-
PA-2015-02297 T7
1 ~ /I
I
s.
Q a
(3/ 4Z;l
/0 J
FAIR OAKS AV
- r - -
FAIR OAKS CT
IA ZT-
zf 1
I I SIT 1\
- f - - nr:600 G f T V or,
1 inch = 50 feet vre -ASHLAlE>
Mapplnp Is -0- 1Y and been: no warranty of accuracy.
D act s Ali (estates, structures, facilltias, oae arrtent or rood-y locations
My be Independently Held yerifled for existence and/or local(on.
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be<
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
Docuinent3
MINOR MODIFICATIONS i
18.5.6.040
t
r
C. Minor Modification Approval Criteria. A Minor Modification shall be approved only upon the approval authority finding that all I
of the following criteria are met.
1. Minor Modification applications are subject to the same approval criteria used for the initial project approval, except that the
scope of review is limited to the modification request. For example, a request to modify a commercial development's parking
lot shall require Site Design Review only for the proposed parking lot and any changes to associated access, circulation,
etc. Notice shall be provided in accordance with chapter 18.5.1.
2. A modification adding or altering a conditional use, or requiring a variance, administrative variance, or exception may be
deemed a Major Modification and/or may be subject to other ordinance requirements.
3. The approval authority shall approve, deny, or approve with conditions the application, based on written findings; except that
conditions of approval do not apply, and findings are not required, where the original approval was approved through a
Ministerial review.
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.5.2.050
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but
not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building
orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of
part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity
of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate
transportation can and will be provided to the subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site
Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to
a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not
substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of
the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design
that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards.
DocumenO
,
~ P ss
i
1 ,
I I 1°k ~I tp
14-07 i'4 140,01114 10 ~ 411 '1U d E
{
'MAJ U,
Off a
`4u 2,
3
m qu_
e
1 4764. zzoa
493 3700 1200
t ce
k9 ,g
~ . .
C R" 4414 "M 13 1 NO 9 UG nl,
Aq
1 I ,L 11
423 aZ3P7~IN~F ~t ;
1
31106
424
1 f L
:e
11
F 4 3500
4251, n 1400 I
B UZ,
$ ` 42: rr 1
42d ~a 3 400 .3U*
430 '53W f#UW 5700
5400 5800 5
4 2:41 5200 jow
` i_AN R T
-435 P ;
4AO 6300
414 sloo
y; ~a1 } h r i 3'1fi.-I4 D 1111 1I1~1
640,9 3
411 IT 4401-'?
4 5-M
b
441
4,10 41H U ik fib 4 3'D
44*31
'au'u, 485
A~, o-o sf,,u a, 3311 12-1-1
Pik
4 IJ
is
t
I
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
f
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On January 12, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-02297, 945 Camelot.
Signs re of Employee
Y
Document51/12/2016
fr
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1300 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3600 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3700
ALI SHAHID AMERICAN DREAM HOMES LLC AMERICAN DREAM HOMES LLC
50 LOWE RD 132 W MAIN ST 202 132 W MAIN ST 103
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDFORD, OR 97501
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3400 PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 494 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5000
AYALA LAZARO FAMILY TRUST ET BANCROFT JEFFREY M/GLORIA A BANCROFT JOHN
132 W MAIN ST 202 969 OVERLOOK DR 912 PATTON IN
MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2200
BECKER TIMOTHY /MICHELE LOUISE BELEN CAIXA TRUST ET AL BISHOP RONALD DE VERE TRUSTEE
922 PATTON LN 19451 BELLETERRE DR '975 CAMELOT DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 REDDING, CA 96003 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4200 PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 424 PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 428
BRONK JAMES B MD TRUSTEE ET AL CARLTON SUSAN L CHENG GUGHONG
50 EL MONTE WAY 4301 INNSBRUCK RIDGE 945 OVERLOOK DR
NAPA, CA 94558 MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4300 PA-2015-02297 391E04AC 425
COLONDRES FERNANDO L ET AL COX FRED COMPANY LLC EHRLICH KENNETH E TRUSTEE ET
969 CAMELOT DR 213 EASTBROOK WAY 955 OVERLOOK DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND; OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2900 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5800 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4500
F & L PROPERTY INVESTMENTS LLC GAGNEJA ARVINDER PAL SINGH ET GILL WILLIAM L TRUSTEE ET AL
132 W MAIN ST 202 562 FAIR OAKS AVE 911 PATTON LN
MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5200 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6400 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1200
GOMEZ KRISTIN HANSEN DOUGLAS J/SOOK-JA H HANSEN MICHAEL S ET AL
502 FAIR OAKS AVE 917 PLUM RIDGE DR 563 PLUM RIDGE CT
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1700 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2300
HEAP KATHLEEN JAMES FOREST J/TAMARA E JOHNS LIVING TRUST ET AL
951 CAMELOT DR 967 PATTON LN 979 CAMELOT DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3200 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 3000 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 2000
KDA HOMES LLC KDA HOMES LLC KURTH FAMILY LIVING TRUST ET AL
132 W MAIN ST 103 132 W MAIN ST 202 965 CAMELOT DR
MEDFORD, OR 97501 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5400 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1500
LANGLADE JEAN-PIERRE/JULIE C LASH STEPHANIE LISSBERGER SCOTT TRUSTEE ET AL
522 FAIR OAKS AVE 925 PLUM RIDGE DR PO BOX 7
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 SANTA ROSA, CA 95402
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5900 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1800 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5500
MEADOWBROOK BUILDERS LLC MEADOWBROOK TOWNHOMES LLC MITZEL STEVEN D/MICHELE A
604 FAIR OAKS CT 132 W MAIN ST 201A 532 FAIR OAKS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4400 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6200 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5300
NICHOLS RICHARD A TRUSTEE ET AL RALSTON DAVID ROUDEBUSH SUSAN
921 PATTON LN 369 LAUREL ST N 512 FAIR OAKS AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 1900 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 4100 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 6300
SAGE JEAN SHERBOW MARK A ET AL SHUBAT VINCENT P TRUSTEE ET AL
6615 SHEPHERD WAY 985 OVERLOOK DR 919 PLUM RIDGE DR
WEED, CA 96094 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5700 PA-2015-02297 391E04AD 5600
SPAUN JOHN M SPOONER RAYMOND M/PAMELA
552 FAIR OAKS AVE 780 VIVIAN DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 LIVERMORE, CA 94550
Urban Development Services, LLC
604 Fair Oaks Court
Ashland, OR 97520
~I
PROJECT DESCRIPTION AN FINDINGS FACT
FOR A SITE VIEW PERMIT FOR THE PROPERTY AT
9% CAMELOT DRIVE, A SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE WITH AN
ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT
AVO,
'I J t h..
-r"
l tp ! "1' 1 1 1T !
- i
- ~ yl i . L(r
1 ^ 1 `w
1-11, F"
SSUBMITTED TO
CITY OF ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ASHLAND, OREGON
SUBMITTED BY
URBAN DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
604 FAIR OAKS COURT
ASHLAND, OR 97520
DECEMBER 8TH, 2015
Page I of 7
ADDRESS & LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
945 Camelot Drive 391E 04AD Tax Lot 1600, Lot# 53
PROJECT INFORMATION:
APPLICANT: LAND USE PLANNING:
Meadowbrook Townhomes, LLC Urban Development Services, LLC
604 Fair Oaks Court 604 Fair Oaks Court
Ashland, OR 97520 Ashland, OR 97520
DRAFTING
Design Residential
PO Box 8062
Medford, OR 97501
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
North Mountain
ZONING DESIGNATION:
NM -MF
LOT COVERAGE: E
75% permitted, 47% proposed (5,305 sq. ft. lot / 2,475 sq. ft. coverage)
APPLICABLE ORDINANCES:
Site Design & Use Standards, Chapter 18.72
NM Neighborhood Design Standards, Site Design & Use Standards, Section VII
APPLICATION FEE:
$1,146 (Residential Site Review $1,012 + $67 per unit)
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The subject property lies on the corner of Fair Oaks Avenue, between
Camelot Drive and Patton Lane. An approximate 12' grade change between the two streets exists, but
other than the grade change, no unique natural features exist as the properties were pre-graded with all of
the site's utilities, curbs and sidewalks previously installed.
PLANNING ACTION PROPOSAL: The applicant desires to obtain a Site Review Permit to modify a
previously approval where the subject tax lot accommodates a single family residence and accessory
residential unit. Previously, the subject lot was approved as a townhome, including accessory residential
unit, attached to five townhomes to the east of the site which have since been built. The modification
request was requested by the Ashland Planning Department, Michael Pena, in a correspondence in March
of 2014 in order to verify various design standards are being complied with, including landscaping,
irrigation, building separation and repetitive elevations as required within the North Mountain Design
Standards.
Page 2 of 7
' II I5 Attached
townhomes
"constructed"
i
V ",A:
r
- = _7 - u
Detached I
_ SFR Attached
proposed" townhomes
"constructed"
I
Site Review Permit: The elevations for the proposed single-family residence and accessory residential
dwelling unit were developed in collaboration by the project's Designer, Land Use Planner, Contractor
and Owner. The elevations are designed to provide a distinguishing facade, both front and back facades,
from the adjacent townhomes in order to avoid a repetitive appearance as required by the North Mountain
Design Standards. Besides the detached "break" between buildings, the proposed residence has a different
roof system, different pattern of openings, stepped facade along Fair Oaks Avenue, and a different entry
and window pattern. Overall, the applicants' contend the design of the single-family residence provides
streetscape variation providing relief for Camelot's Drive's existing attached housing pattern as well as
the attached townhomes directly to the west along Fair Oaks Avenue (see above map and below inserted
photos).
Building Setback: The proposed building will be separated per the City's Municipal Code, Section
18.3.5.060 (Table) which requires standard side yard setbacks within the Multi-Family (NM-MF) zone to
be 5' per building story. In the proposal's case, the standard (interior) side yard setback is proposed to be
6' from the first floor. The ground level is a basement and is not applicable to the setback and therefore
the setback is based on the finished first floor.
Lot Coverage: The proposal complies with the NM-MF Zone's lot coverage of 75% as the proposed
single family residence and accessory dwelling unit has a lot coverage calculation of 47%, including
walkways, driveway and house footprint.
Page 3 of 7
moil
c „ 4
1
e.
I mNillltonles to the north 01'945 Camelot Io~~~nhomes to the south of 945 Camelot
i^T. n
r
Subject Property - 945 Camelot Drive Commercial "Octagon Building" to the East
Note: Directly to the west, across the street along Patton Lane, are to be single-family detached houses,
similar in scale and context as the proposed single family home and accessory residential unit.
Solar Access: The submitted elevations illustrate how the proposed unit complies with the Solar Access
standard for the North Mountain Neighborhood Plan. In this case, the code provides for a "relaxed"
standard allowing a shadow line casting 4' up the southern wall (fiom finished floor) of the proposed
townhome on Lot #54 per PA-2003-158 #31, which states:
31) The following Solar Access standards shall be applied to the project:
A. Single Family Homes (Type F). - All homes (Type F) with the public right-of-way to the north
shall be subject to Solar Access Standard "A All other homes (Type F) that are to be constructed
on east/west oriented lots and that do not have a right-of-way to the north shall be permitted to have
their shadow encroach four feet up (measured 4-feet above the living area's finished floor elevation) I
upon the neighboring residence.
Note: This same solar access provision is also included for Toiim Homes (See Condition ;131 B).
Page 4 of 7
Utilities: The utilities to service the proposal are available and were installed with the subdivision's initial
infrastructure. No changes are proposed or are necessary with the proposal as the number of units,
including Accessory Dwelling Unit, and demand for service remain the same.
Parking: In accordance with Chapter 18.92, a minimum of two parking spaces have been allocated, not
including parking within the driveway or along Camelot Drive, Fair Oaks Avenue and Patton Lane.
Overall, there are two off-street parking spaces accessed from Patton Lane and roughly six on-street
spaces along the site's three street frontages.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The following required findings of fact have been provided to ensure the proposed project meets the Site
Design & Use Standards as outlined in the Ashland Municipal Code (AMC), Section 18.3.5.030 C. Site
Plan and Architectural Review Procedure, Supplemental Approval Criteria; Section 18.3.5.100, NM
Neighborhood Design Standards, Site Development & Design Standards; Section 18.5.2.050 Approval
Criteria; 18.3.5.050 D.
For clarity reasons, the follolving documentation has been formatted in. "outline" form ivith the City's
approval criteria noted in BOLD font and the applicant's response in regular font. Also, there are a
number of responses that are repeated in order to ensure that the f ridings of fact are complete.
CHAPTER 18.72.070 SITE DESIGN REVIEW CRITERIA:
A. All applicable City Ordinances have been met or will be met by the proposed development.
It has been the intention of the applicant to meet all City Ordinances. To the applicant's knowledge, all
applicable City ordinances have been met and will be met. At the time of the building permit submittal,
the application will be substantially consistent with the proposed application and will meet all conditions
of approval imposed by the City of Ashland.
B. All requirements of the Site Review Chapter have been met or will be met.
All of the applicable requirements listed in the Site Review Chapter, Section 18.72, have been met. The
Site Review Chapter was designed to ensure that high quality development is maintained throughout the
City of Ashland. The proposed application was designed in order to best meet this purpose and produce a
quality living environment consistent with the intent of the Site Review Chapter.
C. The development complies with the Site Design Standards adopted by the City Council for
implementation of this Chapter.
The development complies with the City of Ashland's Site Design Standards, adopted August 0', 1992
and specifically the North Mountain Neighborhood Design Standards.
D. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, paved access to and through the
development, electricity, urban storm drainage, and adequate transportation can and will be
provided to and through the subject property. All improvements in the street right-of «~ay shall
comply with the Street Standards in Chapter 18.88, Performance Standards Options.
Page 5 of 7
All utilities serving the project are within the adjacent rights-of-way installed with the original
construction of the Meadowbrook Park II Subdivision, including the location and separation of fire
hydrants, storm water detention, sidewalks and street lighting. None of the utilities are at capacity to
service the single family residence and accessory dwelling unit.
SITE DESIGN APPROVAL STANDARDS:
SECTION II - Street Tree Standards
II-E-1 Location for Street Trees - Street trees shall be located behind the sidewalk except in
cases where there is a designated planting strip in the right-of=way, or the sidewalk is
greater than 8 feet wide. Street trees shall include irrigation, root barriers, and
generally conform to the standards established by the Department of Community
Development.
II-E-2 Spacing, Placement, and Pruning of Street Trees - All tree spacing may be made
subject to special site conditions which may, for reasons such as safety, affect the
decision. Any such proposed special condition shall be subject to the Staff Advisor's
review and approval. The placement, spacing, and pruning of street trees shall be as
follow:
1. Street trees shall be placed at the rate of one tree for every 30 feet of street
frontage. Trees shall be evenly spaced, with variations to the spacing permitted for
specific site limitations, such as driveway approaches.
2. Trees shall not be planted closer than 25 feet from the curb line of intersections of
streets or alleys, and not closer than 10 feet from private driveways (measured at the
back edge of the sidewalk), fire hydrants, or utility poles.
3. Street trees shall not be planted closer than 20 feet to light standards. Except for
public safety no new light standard location shall be positioned closer than 10 feet to
any existing street tree, and preferably such locations will be at least 20 feet distant.
4. Trees shall not be planted closer than 2 V2 feet from the face of the curb except at
intersections where it shall be 5 feet from the curb, in a curb return area.
5. Where there are overhead power lines, tree species are to be chosen that will not
interfere with those lines.
6. Trees shall not be planted within 2 feet of any permanent hard surface paving or
walkway. Sidewalk cuts in concrete for trees, or tree wells, shall be at least 25 square
feet; however, larger cuts are encouraged because they allow additional air and water
into the root system and add to the health of the tree. Tree wells shall be covered by
tree grates in accordance with city specifications.
7. Trees, as they grow, shall be pruned to provide at least 8 feet of clearance above
sidewalks and 12 feet above street roadway surfaces.
Page 6 of 7
8. Existing trees may be used as street trees if there will be no damage from the
development which will kill or weaken the tree. Sidewalks of variable width and
elevation may be utilized to save existing street trees, subject to approval by the Staff
Advisor.
II-E-3 Replacement of Street Trees - Existing street trees removed by development
projects shall be replaced by the developer with those from the approved street tree
list. The replacement trees shall be of size and species similar to the trees that are
approved by the Staff Advisor.
II-E-4 Recommended Street Trees - Street trees shall conform to the street tree list
approved by the Ashland Tree Commission.
Street trees have already been planted along the development's primary streets - Camelot
Drive and Fair Oaks Boulevard leaving the Patton Lane (a secondary street) to be planted
with trees at time of the occupancy permit. In the applicant's proposal, at the time of a
Certificate of Occupancy Permit, street trees will be planted and irrigated to the standards
noted in the Site Design and Use Standards, Section II, as well as the attached plans.
CHAPTER 18.3.5.030 C. NM - SUPPLEMENTAL APPROVAL CRITERIA:
1. That a statement has been provided indicating how the proposed application conforms with the
general design requirements of the North Mountain Neighborhood Plan, including density,
transportation, building design, and building orientation.
The proposal conforms to the general design requirements of the North Mountain Neighborhood Plan,
Section 18.3.5.100, in addition to the Overlay Zone's density, transportation, architectural design, and
building orientation. The proposal is for the construction of a detached single family residence and
accessory residential unit whereas the previous approval was to be an end-unit of a six-plex townhome
development, approved as part of the Meadowbrook Park II master plan which was adopted by the
Ashland Planning Commission, recorded as legal lots of record, and all relating infrastructure installed.
No additional density beyond what was approved is proposed, including the accessory residential unit.
The proposed residence conforms to the North Mountain Design standards which include human-scale
streetscape elements such as porches, articulated front entrances, recessed garages and various
architectural elements to give the design a positive streetscape appearance.
2. That the proposed application complies with the specific design requirements as provided in the
North Mountain Neighborhood Design Standards.
As noted above, the application complies with the specific design requirements provided in the North
Mountain Neighborhood Design Standards and include various design features beyond the two that are
required, including multiple porches, recessed entrances, gables, dormers, posts, eaves and multiple off-
sets. The proposed home has articulated entrances oriented to both Camelot Drive and Patton Lane to
enhance the building's orientation. Overall, one of the primary benefits of the application besides
breaking up a long wall of townhomes is to minimize repetitive elevations and encourage individual home
ownership.
Page 7 of 7
NOTES:
1810 ® LO N U)
CAMELOT DR.
z
8'PARKROW
~ w ® w
SITE DATA: ® Z
TOTAL LOT 5305 FT.
LOT COVERAGE: GE:
28.520' „ 2475 SO. FT.47% P \ LL
1810 ~/Jy
co U)
i 12% GRADE 10'P.U.E.
o'er \ I p()
\ 09
s~
T \ \ h
DATE: GRANGES
j \ \
j \
NI ~ \ TITLE:
SITE PLAN
BUILDmcFOOrPRINT \ \ 1800
/ 1901 Sq. FT: UNDER ROOF \ \ \~s''o SCALE: 1116" =1'0"
\ FILE:
\ \
' I ~5 \
a~ \
JWT 11124115
CHECKED BY: DATE:
CB 11/24115
I \ DRAWING INDEX NO.
\ \
AO, 1
I y
j I DRIVEWAY \ I
4045°. Fr. SHEET 2 OF 7
PROJECT:
S.F.D,@
i j 941-945 CAMELOT DR.
ASHLAND OR OR 97520
pj~
E O'P.U.E. FO SILVERSTONECONST.
* E
- - CUSTOMER/
_1 . GEN. CONTRACTOR
i 5' SIDEWALK SILVERSTONE CONST.
2130 DUNCAN DR,
MEDFORD, OR 97504
j 541-941-1921
1800 PATTON LN ccea43830
OWNER:
LAZ AYALA
132 W. MAIN ST.
MEDFORD, OR 97501
541-941-2978
design residential
Design Residential, Inc.
P.O. Box 8062
Medford, OR 97501
541-609-3956
www.desi nresidential.biz
4 TE
0
6 0 528
1 p 3 4 5 t- C
Tree6es312' Y Tho-AIAadw,
Oom ground OREGON
W II. d-h ~wxm
W°Pbca WA, 2Pe, hee
Roolbali to 6eeq~al to entree"r~P s3e bsL.4e,vl f++
12'abo+e gyade ~
tea,,. N a,m°m mda, won a."d1a M r PLANTING
gvdc.1W
1I1,vGie wi,6 Pax W3 mC;-184.=
°11Ei51e hRt er o11u1&16h~F-
Bolan) al Name Size
GENERAL CONSTRUCTION NOTES aeM1O1zYU- Quantity Common Name
ii W1a1 ~ me cae°1-1W
SM1Yb PWH
1. General preparation of site to include: Dxumuousr Minting W1nll Trees
\ G I
A. Eradication of weeds; through the certified application of herbicides, allowing 0
adequate time for Hit, 2 Maple, Trident Acerbuergeranum 1112"
B. Removal, from site, of all existing surface rock in planting beds. 1 Oak, Green Pillar Quelcus palustris'Pringreen' 1112"
a 2. All shrub beds tobefinishrakedtoasmoothconditionpnortomulching. CAMELOT DR.
3. Medium dark mulch to be placed in all shrub beds to a depth of 3" Shrubs
4. Plan is diagrammatic and measurements should be confirmed on-site. Any changes
are the responsibility of the contractor to co-ordinate with the owners representative. IC ----8 Barberry, Crimson Pygmy Berbers thunbergi'CrimsonPygmy'
2g
6, INCLUDE 160 DAYS OF MAINTENANCE from the day of acceptance. Including but Camellia, Japanese Camellia japonica 3g n1 .y
notlirdtedto', epenKRav SITERATP, 19 Heather, Carley Dale Erica purpurascens'Darleyensis' 2g ®
A. Maintain planting area in a healthy, weed free condition through a minimum of TOTAL-LOT5305SQ.FF. i 7 Holly, Dwarf Chinese Ilex cwrnuta'Burfordil
Compacla' 3g
bi-weekly visits. LOT COVERAGE- 25 Lavender, Hiccote LavandLtiaangusfifolia'Hidoote' 2g E, o
B. Replace any material showing signs of stress. 2475 SQ. FC47% 5 Laurel, Otto Luyken Prunus laurocerasus'Olto Luyken' 39
W
QMonitor irrigation for correct timing. - 17 Viburnum. David Vlburnumdaddll 2g mp
UN N
D. Provide ownerwlth complete list of instructions for continued care at the end of L
za50' Ground Cover/ Grasses a N
CL a
the maintenance period
10 Broom, Lydia Genista pilosa 1g m
H 5 Grass, Hameln Dwarf Pennisetum alopecuroldes'Hameln' 1g a ;r U "4
21 KinnlMnick,Massachusetts Arclostaphylosuva-ursl'Massachusetts'lg NW
~ Parkmw to remain as planted
L _J
Maintenance Access t
y PLANTING
f ~
H 1. Plant material lobe provided in accordance with species, sizes and quantities indicated
m
9~A below. Substitutions based on the approval of landscape architect,
9 2. No planting to proceed unfit irrigation system is fully functioning in the area to be planted.
G~ 3. All plant holes to be dug 2 times the volume of their root ball size. Backfll shall consist of
113 organic mulch, 213 native soil, mlcorrhizae supplement and 16-16.16 fertilizer as follows,
IRRIGATION DETAILS )gal 1oz W
3-5gal 2oz
1. An automatic Irrigation system to be provided for all plant materials areas larger 4oz
in accordance with industry standards. System Is intended to perform at _ 4. Plant upright and face to give best appearance or relationship to plants. structures
and N
8 gpm and 40 psi. Confirm on-site before proceeding depending on the predominant viewing angle. Trees are to be planted so as to be straight up and down
L®~
without the assistance of staking. Staking is solely for support against outside forces,
el materi vsate sours. 5. Loosen and remove twin binding and burlap from around top of each root ball.
2, n materials approved are to be new and in original condition. Scarify root balls of plants exhiblting a root bound condition, being careful not to
damage C
eded 3. Install and double check valve per city and state requirements. rements, the roof balls Integrity. Stake and guy trees immediately after this
work
4. Placemanualdrainvalvesasareawitetlow con pointstomainine o 6. Place and compact baddfllsoil mixture carefully to avoid injury toroots, andfillallvoids.
co 0
5, MaInhouldbedanretation surrounding 7. When hole is 213 filled with soil, completely soak and allow water to soak away at least two Lb _J
utilities. Melnlnelocationallonon plan for t ease of interpretation times or more, as necessary to completely water indwdualplants.
r r I
6. All drip zones to use PVC laterals to locate a point of conneclionineach 9UILDINGFOOTPRINT 6. Guarantee plant materials and elatedwokmansMpoflnstallalion,beginningat
erwritlen W
nub areas to be bed. 1901 SQ. FL-O roER ROOF acceptance of work, for one year, -
7. ShmareacobelBu ngto dr10poti tubing. A. Replace plant material not surviving or in poor condition during guarantee period,
A. Allsurfaedriptbingto buried poly imurnTubingendstohave B. Perform all replacement work In accordance with original specifications at no ®Qr, flf
removable caps. Tuhing to a minimum of 3 5" and held cloven every additional cost to Owner. V
5' Win J-slakes. C. Damage or toss of plant materials due to vandalism, freezing or acts of neglect by v N
B. Rain Bird X&10 Emitters to be placed at the outside edge of root zones p others, is exempt from Contractors replacement responsibility. Q
of plants at the following rate
v 1-2g plants 2-1GPH emitters placed on opposite sides of root ball E
3-5g. plants 3-1GPH emitters placed on opposite sides of root ball °
Largo material 5.1GPH emitters spaced equally around perimeter of f
root ball
t
C. All Drip zones to include a 200 mesh filter and 30psl pressure regulator
6. NI trenching to be a minimum of 1T' deep. BacM➢I is to be dean and free of p
any material larger than 1112" in diameter. Backfitl shall be adequately
compacted and guaranteed against further settling. {p T GRADING
9. NI lateral pipe shall be PVC sc40 and 1" minimum
10. Include a Hunter X-Core 2-station control clock wired to a constant electrical ® H t' 1. General contractor to include removal of deb is 1112" or larger
and the removal of
ontheoutsideofthe Southwi P H compacted rock, gravel and existing fill in all planting areas in all planting areas toa
source
11. Zoning to be spll to combine Sou h with pies, and North with East D depth of 15" relative to surrounding hardscapes.
12. Sleevin es. provided under all herdscaes by general contractor far irrigation 2. Landscape contractor to place 15" of compacted(2ry' loose) topsoil
in all planting beds.
purposes. D Tr 3. Placement of any soil to be done in coordination with suitable weather condition so as
13 I rogation system to be dateof aed against defective materiel or workmanship to prevent damage to soil structure. vandalism, freeonoyearfromfhealeoffinalacceptance.Dama
ge trlessduetoceme t 4. Landscape contractor responsible to provide a finish grade within 3"of surrounding
ing or acts of neglect by others, Is exempt from Contractors replacement hardscapes. All graded material to be adequately firm without being overly compacted,
ons Provide owner ozeo 5. Landscaper to place sufficient compacted dean topsoil to achieve finish grade in
r e p ibll
14. Providenywithanaccwaleas-bullftoafingallvalves,wiresplices,main shrub areas. Additional soil may be necessary depending on available existing soil.
as s~ar..ax"~~w line and any sleety g. 6. Finish grade in shrub areas to be a smooth even grade mounded 2" Ngh in the
middle a~F s A;
5. Provide ownerwlhpreliminary waledngscheduleforiheestablishadlandsape. of beds and ending 3" below surrounding areas. All finish grading to promote positive Sew
16. Provide owner with complete set of written instructions for operation of sprinkler drainage away from structures and to be done in such a way as to eliminate
puddling or
system including spring start up, clock operation, and winterization, mwa~," n,nwe
PATTON LN collection of water. .....«w. urr
7. Landscape contractor responsible for addressing any drainage problems encountered mv~-h
17. VJalkowner through theentire system descnbi~lheoperating instructions. ae
.vrtm9r 'efi
° during the course of construction, with owners representative. in d*
ans«
® -Febce 850XL 314" Double Check Valve 8. Some grades may vary based on subsurface rock .1,,"
DRAWN Br. TM
CHECKED BY: TM
12.07.15
SCALE:
1196° =1'
LANDSCAPE
PLAN
NOTE: IF THIS SHEET IS LESS THAN IV x 17" IT HAS BEEN REDUCED AND IS NOT TO SCALE.
C L -I
1 2 3 4 5 0 4 8 16 24 32 40 L 1
NOTES:
I
0
m
i; r'dr itv
EAST ELEVATION
DATE: CHANGES
TITLE:
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
SCALE: 118" =1'0"
FILE:
III] lilt[ ,
- - - JWT 71124115
CHECKED BY, DATE:
CB 11124115
DRAWING INDEX NO.
o
m
SHEET 7 OF 7
M PROJECT:
941-945 CAMELOT
- ASHLAND, OR 97520
FOR:
° .
,a I SILVERSTONE CONST.
CUSTOMER/
GEN. CONTRACTOR
0
SILVERSTONE CONST.
o 2138 DUNCAN DR.
MEDFORD, OR 97504
541-941-1921
CCBM43830
OWNER:
___________________t LAZAYALA
132 W. MAIN ST.
13'-2" 26'-3" MEDFORD, OR 97501
541-941-2978
39'-5"
SOUTH ELEVATION
design resideA.T ntial
Design Residential, Inc.
P.O. Box 8062
Medford, OR 97501
541&083956
www.design -3idential.biz
NOTES:
HARDIEPANEL
SHAKE SIDING, COLOR: BOARD & BATT
12 SIDING, 18- O.C.
COLOR: 40 YR. ARCH-COMP
ROOFING, COLOR:
5 T P UNLESS
NOTED
5112" X 5112"
DF CORBELS
COLO
7112" VERT CEDAR
COLOR:
0
io
0
o -
91
414 X 12 CHOICE RIM, COLOR. nnnn❑ I
E 11E =1E I 1I R II❑ N=E1~ o
m
4/4X4 CHOICE TRIM
COLOR: r! v,r" r; v rt r.,v,r i! v.ri,r i; a,rr,r - i! Ner,r r! ve~✓ rs v,rr,r - r! ",_"n_- -
DF#28XBPOSTS
COLOR: -
12 12" X 12" BOXED COLUMNS 42" HIGH WINDOWS SINGLE HUNG
7"HARDIEPANEL COLOR: CULTURED STONE OR SLIDERS
HORIZ LAP SIDING, COLOR: 4 COLOR: VINYL, LOW E DATE; CHANCES
WEST ELEVATION COLOR:
TITLE:
EXTERIOR
ELEVATIONS
SCALE: 1/8" =1'0"
FILE:
JWT 11124115
- CHECKEDBY: DATE:
- CB 11124(15
® ® ® DRAWING INDEX N0.
2.1
0
SHEET 8 OF 7
m
PROJECT:
0
841-945 CAMELOT DR.
_ ASHLAND, OR 97520
FOR:
SILVERSTONE CONST.
CUSTOMER/
GEN. CONTRACTOR
7p SILVERSTONE CONST.
0 2130 DUNCAN DR.
m MEDFORD, OR 97504
541-941-1921
_ _ _ _ _ _ CCBN43030
r-------'---------'---'-_____ r!Y,rhr r! ,r rd-a nJpr` r!v,r
- _ ° OWNER:
- LAZ AYALA
132 W. MAIN ST.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MEDFORD, OR 97501
22'-9" 541-941-2970
NORTH ELEVATION design residential
>6U5AHELYGPEATHOME DE61GH
Design Residential, Inc.
P.O. Box 8962
Medford, OR 97501
541£0&3956
www.desi nresidential.biz
NOTES
6'-10" 12'-0" 9'_0^ 9'-2"
s-0'xa•a'
0
ry 5'-0'x9'-0'
N
m
BEDROOM #3 q
BEDROOM #2
10'8" X 10'8,
k
COVERED/ o
6`01
PORCH
6110" X 81
BATH -0'
v 4' a-0
X 51,
I
~i ~ i O N t o O
4:' ',sI
o MAIN FLOOR:
[n2 1586 SQ. FT: LIVING
W.' ENTRY PRIMARY
MASTE LAUN
5110"X Illy REF BASEMENT:
ATH D72 SQ.FT.-LIVING-PRIMARY
7" X 5'11475 SQ. FT.-A.R.U.
KITCHEN a 1D TOTAL LIVING PRIMARY:
1 I 11'7" x 10'3" ° 1656 SQ. FT.
io 1 14
116t "r"
dw.
r0' I DATE: CHANGES
MASTER Q N
N PANTRY
BED OOM 5'-°°xs-0
15'6^ 13'
WIC TITLE:
wAWLTED> 8110"x912^ ; FLOOR PLAN
MAIN
_ EATING 4 SCALE: 1/8"=1'0"
ILTED) 18' X 10'6° FILE:
1 (01 CLNG)
e'-0'xsa
UAI L:
1 I
1 JWT 11/24115
4 OPEN TO LIVING (1I2WALL) _ CHE7TDBY: DATE:
4 -1________ CB 11124115
BELOW 15'X18' °xsu' DRAWINGINDEXNO,
F- I AL0
COVERED DECK
c-0•xra' la SHEET 4 OF 7
1 147"X9' I~
N
PROJECT:
0 0 1 S.F.D.@
1 - 941-945 CAMELOT DR.
1 I,; ASHLAND, OR 97520
1 FOR:
1 t u2 WALL) SILVERSTONE CONST.
9'o'x6'-0° CUSTOMER/
GEN.CONTRACTOR
SILVERSTONE CONST.
2138 DUNCAN DR.
MEDfORD, OR OR 97750
504
20'-6" 8'-4Y:" 16-0"
541-941-1921
CCBff43830
OWNER:
MAIN FLOOR LAZ AYALA
132 W. MAIN ST.
MEDFORD' OR 97501
541-941-2978
design residential
Design Residential, Inc.
P.O. Box 8062
Medford, OR 97501
541-60B-3956
vAm.desi nresidentialbiz
NOTES:
91-9W 6'-0"
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
0
a
ca o
2-CAR GARAGE UNFIN ST '
20'X19' ME
r 72 SQ.FT. -LIVING - PRIMARY
475 SQ. FT: LIVING -A.R.U.
,5~
I
BATH
10'4°X5'2" KITCHEN RE5
-,1 zs 12'4"X 8' DATE: CHANGES
4'-1 „
- uw it - n
B 0
B. OR8TA m EATING 4
.4 II TX 8' M
T5' TITLE:
ENTRY
4 =<~.n---= FLOOR PLAN
a BASEMENT
BEDROOM ZOVERE ' SCALE: 1I8" = 1'0°
2'-0'x 5W LIVING
n 10'4" X 1010" PORCH
m
FILE:
12'5" X 10' 6'X 8'
ENTRY
COVERED
--DRAWN BY: UAItz:
PORCH dw 5
9,X 8' CHECKED BY: DATE:
CB 11124115
DRAWING INDEX N0.
AIJ
26'-13" W'-41/2° 24'a/" 6'-0" SHEET 5 OF 7
PROJECT:
S.F.D.@
941-945 CAMELOT DR.
BASEMENT ASHLAND, OR 97520
FOR'
SILVERSTONE CONST.
CUST0MEPJ
GEN.CONTRACTOR
SILVERSTONE CONST.
2138 DUNCAN DR.
MEDFORD, OR 97504
541-941-1921
CCBU43830
OWNER:
LAZAYALA
132 W. PAIN ST.
MEDFORD, OR 97501
541-941-2978
design residential
Design Residential, Inc.
P.O. Box 8062
Medford, OR 97501
fi41S0&3956
v,Ww.desi nresidential.biz
NOTES:
i
i
I
I
i
s ~ j
,
,
~a =
EAST ELEVATION , s ~ ® r. ~ r. ~ r• r. ~ s
941-951 CAMELOT 951 CAMELOT ~a
WEST ELEVATION nu
i
951 CAMELOT 941-951 CAMELOT
i
DATE; CHANGES
TITLE:
SOLAR SETBACK
VISUALS i
SCALE: 118" =1'0"
FILE:
JWT 11124/15
❑ CHECKED BY: DATE:
9/15115
§ a CBDRAWIN'INDEXNO~
samwrma-cur
L Z T__ _>__>_L LLLLLZLZL2ZZZ2 Z
° SHEET 3 OF 7
PROJECT:
S.F.D.@
SHADOW ON 951 CAMELOT DR. 950 OVERLOOK DR.
ASHLAND, OR 97520
FOR:
SILVERSTONE CONST.
CUSTOMER/
GEN.CONTRACTOR
SILVERSTONE CONST.
2138 DUNCAN DR.
MEDFORD, OR 97504
541-941-1921
CCB943830
OWNER:
LAZ AYALA
132 W. MAIN ST.
MEDFORD, OR 97501
541-941-2978
I
design residential
>Ih15AFiEI.YGP,El,TH06dE DF.51C-I!
Design Residential, Ina
P.O. Box 8062
Medford, OR 97501
14/-611-1951
wvm.desi nresidenlial.biz
i
I
3
1
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
Planning Division
L CITY o 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE
541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 #
-45HLAND
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pur ng LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO
Street Address / v`
Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E Tax Lot(s) _ C
Zoning H ~AIF Comp Plan Designation >
APPLICANT t
~-4 i
Name ~0V1, Phone 3~ E-Mail vv\,~ r~
Address ` City Zip S
PROPERTY OWNER
Name -k Phone E-Mail
7
Address _ jo City Zip
SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER i A
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
1 hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct. 1 understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request,-
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request,
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in this regard will result most likely in of only the request seeing set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be removed at my e nse. If 1 have an oubts, l am advise ek competent professional advice and assistance.
Applicant's Signature Date
As owner of the property involved i uest, l have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner.
Property Owner's signature (required) Date
[To be completed by City Staff
Date Received Zoning Permit Type Fiiing Fee (70
OVER 4
6j c? r.i<.
G9comm-dev\plmming\Forms & Handouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc
1
Job Address: 945 CAMELOT DR Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
C
Owner's Name: MEADOWBROOK TOWNHOMES LLC 0 Phone:
P N State Lic No:
Customer 07306
P
P MEADOWBROOK TOWNHOMES LLC T City Lic No:
Applicant: 2138 DUNCAN DR R
Address: MEDFORD OR 97504 A
C C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: (541) 944-1921 T Address:
N Applied: 12/08/2015 0
T Issued: R
Expires: 06/05/2016 Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E04ac400 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION: Site Review for a New Single Family Home and ARU
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Residential Site Review 1,146.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF
it