HomeMy WebLinkAboutGranite_538_PA-2016-00102
t
CITY F
ASHLAND
i
March 21, 2016
Notice of Final Decision
On March 21, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:'
Planning Action: PA-2016-00102
Subject Property: 538 Granite & 580 Ashland Creek Drive
Applicant/Owner: A to Z Tree Service Inc. (Bruce Ziegler)/Lawrence & Cathy Leichliter
Description: A request to remove a 19 inch in diameter at breast height madrone (Arbutus
menziesii) tree on the subject properties. The tree has a significant lean with evidence of decay at root base
and lower trunk. The arborist notes the subject tree is located among several large trees that, in the event of
a failure, could topple adjacent trees in the area as well presenting a greater hazard to the existing dwelling.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Residential; ZONING: RR-.5; ASSESSOR'S
MAP: 39 1E 17AA; TAX LOTS: 1109.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 121 day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of
approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F)
and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The
ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be
made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Mark Schexnayder in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 (
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 1
i
l'
t
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.B.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this
subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing
or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of
decision is mailed.
c. Content ofNotice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the
Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation,
and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and
arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant
ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 -
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
W, r WAIS
i
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00102
SUBJECT PROPERTIES: 538 Granite Street & 580 Ashland Creek Drive
APPLICANT: A to Z Tree Service Inc. (Bruce Ziegler)
OWNER: Lawrence & Cathy Leichliter
DESCRIPTION: A request to remove a 19 inch in diameter at breast height madrone
(Arbutus menziesii) tree on the subject properties. The tree has a significant lean with evidence of decay
at root base and lower trunk. The arborist notes the subject tree is located among several large trees that,
in the event of a failure, could topple adjacent trees in the area as well presenting a greater hazard to the
existing dwelling. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Rural Residential; ZONING: RR-
.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 17AA; TAX LOTS: 1109.
SUBMITTAL DATE: January 15, 2016
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: January 25, 2016
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: March 21, 2016
DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): April 4, 2016
FINAL DECISION DATE: April 5, 2016
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: October 5, 2017
DECISION
The application is a request for a hazard tree removal permit to remove one madrone tree from the
property located at 538 Granite Street. The arborist report identifies the madrone tree as 60 feet in height
and 19 inches DBH. The tree is located near the property line between 538 Granite Street and 580
Ashland Creek Drive.
The site is on the west side of Granite Street and on the east side of Ashland Creek Drive. The property
at 538 Granite Street is 11,300 square feet in size and zoned Rural Residential (RR-.5). The property at
580 Ashland Creek Drive is 10,000 square feet in size and zoned Rural Residential (RR-.5). Pedestrian
and vehicular access is provided off Granite Street.
The approval criteria for a tree removal permit for a hazard tree in AMC 18.5.7.040.B.1 require that the
application demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard
(i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an
existing structure. The application includes a report from a certified arborist that identifies the madrone
tree has decay and a wound to the trunk. In addition, the tree has an unhealthy root collar under the
decaying trunk area. The arborist states that the tree has a high risk of failure and causing significant
damage to the existing home due to a heavy lean on tall oak trees adjacent to the subject tree.
The approval criteria also require that the hazardous condition cannot be alleviated by treatment,
relocation, or pruning. Since the tree exhibits a heavy lean toward the downhill slope beginning at the
base and shows signs of trunk decay, pruning or removal of portions of the tree will not alleviate the
hazard. Finally, the approval criteria allow that mitigation be provided for the removed tree and a
condition has been added to that effect.
i`
PA #2016-00102
538 Granite Street/MMS
Page 1
i
The Ashland Tree Commission reviewed this request at their regular meeting on February 4, 2016. The
Commission recommended denial without prejudice because no ISA Standard Risk Assessment Form
was provided with the application and no one was available to discuss the information on behalf of the
applicant. Subsequent to the February Ashland Tree Commission Meeting the applicant provided the
requested ISA Standard Risk Assessment Form which clearly establishes the hazardous nature of the
subject tree.
The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit for the removal of hazard trees are described in AMC
Chapter 18.5.7.040.13 as follows:
1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds
that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the
imposition of conditions.
a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear
public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable
danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger
cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of
hazard tree in part 18.6
b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant
to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the
permit.
Planning Action #2016-00102 is a request for a hazard tree removal permit to remove one madrone tree
from the property located at 538 Granite Street and 580 Ashland Creek Drive. The application with the
attached conditions below complies with all applicable City ordinances for removal of a hazard tree.
Planning Action #2016-00102 is therefore approved to allow the removal of the subject tree. Further, if
any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then
Planning Action #2016-00102 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the
approval:
1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically
modified herein.
2. That the tree removal shall be mitigated as provided in AMC 18.5.7.050 within one year of the
permit issuance.
. Z 1. LP
Maria Harris, Planning Manager Date
Department of Community Development
PA #2016-00102
538 Granite Street/MMS
Page 2
t t
I
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
C
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On March 21, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-2016-00102, 538 Granite.
Sig ture of Employee
Document/ 3121/2616
i
PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1100 rA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1106 `rA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1107
STAUNTON CYNTHIA FAIRMAN/JOHN CALLANAN DAVID A/ELIZABETH INGBER LESTER/LOUISE
MARSHALL 518 GRANITE 545 ASHLAND CREEK
3524 HILL RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
TULELAKE, CA 96134
PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1108 I PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1110 PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1111
CARLSON JOSHUA N ET AL LEICHLITER LAWRENCE E/CATHY D ZEVE LINCOLN/DENEICE
550 ASHLAND CREEK DR 538 GRANITE ST 2710 SISKIYOU BLVD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1133 I PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1200 .
PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1300
MORRISON DOUGLAS P WOOD FAMILY TRUST ET AL I SWINK KEITH A/CAROLE JANA
532 GRANITE ST PO BOX 248 524 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MURPHY, OR 97533 ASHLAND, OR 97520
II I
BRUCE ZIEGLER
PO BOX 1978 538 GRANITE
GRANTS PASS OR 97528 3/21/2016 NOD
I 10
~I
I I I
I I
I
I I
I i
I
i. I
i
l
I I! I is
I - -
-
l
I
gill 'I it
I II
I
I
rv
Client ~4S~~la~ia~ cN~® us
Address/Tree to on i ~ Date -2 - _ 0 _ __-L.~_ Time_
-jCd
Tree species C~ V Tree no. Sheet of-~
dbh Iq~`
Assessor(s) ,~e 2,P~ / ,r ~Height Crown spread dia.
-~Time frame 5 Tools used
Target Assessment
m t ~-L G bti ` D ~d r Target zone
l-1 c'l a Occupancy r.
rate O V
c
Target description 3 c r= 1-rare m` o
~ g ro r „ x 2-occasional ~ v u
~ ~c ~ I K r •3' 4-constant a ~ ~ :1.
~
3 CILI c' + ' n~ f-Ar-1 -7
4
History of failures Site Factors
Site changes None❑ Grade change0 Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology El Root cuts ❑ TDescgribbe— Fite ❑Al slope ? Aspect
Soil conditions Limited volume 0 Saturated ❑ Shallow 0 Compacted ❑ Pavement over roots ❑
Prevailing wind direction % ~escriecv
Common weather Strong winds ly iceilf Snowg Heavy rain Describe
Tree Health and Species Profile
Vigor Low [J Normalp High ❑ Foliage None (seasonal) 0 None (dead) 0 Normal P-0 % Chlorotic
Pests ak y ~j°6 Necrotic
Abtoli
Species failure profile Branches❑ Trunkg Roots Describe c cct ll\
ehstr,7 ~r o C~-CI
Load Factors
Wind exposure Protected ❑ Partial Fuii Q Wind funneling❑
Crown density Sparse❑ Normal Dense0 interior branches Few❑ Normal Relative crown mo Small❑ Medium Large El
Recent or planned change in load factors - Dense ❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss p N~ rjp
Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure
Lit E,C',,r,Ll Crown and Branches
Unbalanced crown, LCR
Dead twigs/branches?f la% ov~ll Max. dia. 3 Cracks ❑ Lightning damage ❑
Broken/Hangers Number Codominant 0
Max. dia. Included bark 0
over-extended branches ❑ Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole~% circ.
Pruning history
Previous branch failures ❑
Crown cleaned ❑ Similar branches present 0
Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay; D,
Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑
Flush cuts 0 Other Heartwood decay
Response growth -
Main concern(s) 67r,( v t e~A nn
C c/'U2.v -i 41t1 0 -1
Load on defect N/A'O Minor ❑ Moderate, Significant ❑
Likelihood of failure improbable ❑ Possible K Probable ❑ imminent ❑
i
• --'Trunk ~
Dead/Missing bark Abnormal bark texture/colors Roots and Root Collar
Codominant stems D Dollar buried/Not visible ❑ Depth Stem girdling 13
s
Included bark ❑ Cracks ❑ Dead ❑
Sapwood damage/decay t3, Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze 0 Decay 0 Conks/Mushrooms ❑
Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood deca doze ❑ Cavity 0 % circ.
yX Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks O Cut/Dama
Cavity/Nest hole % tire. Depth poor taper ❑ ged roots Q Distance from trunk
Lean Corrected? _Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑
Response growth -
Main concern Response growth
R (s) tK ~e=?€
rim r Mairrconcem(s)
Load on defect t t r I Y 4 _ ?L 4: ^
N/A 0 Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant~,,{{
Likelihood of failure ,~'t road on defect N/A 13 Minor 13 Moderate ❑ Signi nt
Improbable ❑ .Possible ❑ Likelihood offailure
Probable imminent ❑ Improbable ❑ Possible ❑
Probable, imminent Q
Risk Categorizabon
w Likelihood
Failure Impact Failure & Impact Consequenees
e c a (from Matrix 1)
1D m
Risk
C o C rating
c Conditions
o t: - Ln Target o
E a s to ;y of part
J, W
u Tree part of concern ii u protection E; a2 E a v c c Y to = m> (from
G rn > Z y w Matrix 2)
r
1~Un4Z Tr¢Q I~j rd a(
o'
3 -
4
Matrix I. Likelihood matrix.
Likelihood Likelihood of - ; ; - _
Impacting Target ? ?
of Failure Very low Low - `F
Medium High
Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely
Untikel Very likely Probable - i _
-
Y Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely
Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somew at likely T !
Improbable Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely
Matrlx2. Risk rating matron - -
Likelihood of Consequences of Failure j; - '
Failure & Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe -
Very likely Low
Moderate High Extreme `
? Likely Low Moderate High High
Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate North
Unlikely Low - .
Low Low LoW _
Notes,,explanations, descri tions k1z,
Aitig'ation options v rJS f yl L
°i 1 cl O Residual risk
' C
Residual ri k"
.17
Residual risk ~1dL_
)verall tree risk rating Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High Residual risk
X Extreme 17
)venall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate D High 11 Extreme)] Work priority 10 2X 3 0 4 0
Recommended inspection interval
rata Final 0 Preliminary Advanced assessment neededXNo L7yes-Type/Reason
Ispection limitations,)RfNone OVisibility []Access !Nines ORoot collar buried Describe
his datasbeet was produced by the Intemationai Sudety of ArboricWture (ISA) and is intended for use brTree Risk A`, ,,SmP t ~nF~ r r n srn _a_
L
ASHLAND TREE COMMISSION
PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET
February 4, 2016
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00102
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 538 Granite Street & 580 Ashland Creek Drive
APPLICANT: A to Z Tree Service Inc.
DESCRIPTION: A request to remove a 19 inch in diameter at breast height
Madrone (Arbutus menziesii) tree on the subject properties. The tree has a significant lean
with evidence of decay at root base and lower trunk. The arborist notes the subject tree is j'
located among several large trees that, in the event of a failure, could topple adjacent trees
in the area as well presenting a greater hazard to the existing dwelling.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Residential - Rural; ZONING: RR-.5;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 17AA; TAX LOT: 1109.
The Tree Commission recommends that the application be denied without prejudice, noting the following:
1) The Commission would reconsider this recommendation - either for the current
application or on a future request - if an ISA Standard Risk Assessment Form prepared
by a certified arborist was provided with additional information more clearly establishing
the hazard. No one was available at the hearing to discuss the information provided on
behalf of the applicant, and the Commission was unable to verify, for instance, whether a
probe had been used to in determining the evidence of decay noted at the root base and
lower trunk.
2) The Commission would in the meantime recommend pruning of the tree on its downward
side.
Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5350
CITY OF
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 -ASHLAND
- I T F
Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashland.or,us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ~LAND
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2016-00102
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 538 Granite Street & 580 Ashland Creek Drive
OWNER/APPLICANT: Larry & Cathy Leichliter/Bruce Ziegler of A to Z Tree Service
DESCRIPTION: A request to remove a 19 inch in diameter at breast height Madrone (Arbutus menziesii) tree on
the subject properties. The tree has a significant lean with evidence of decay at root base and lower trunk. The
arborist notes the subject tree is located among several large trees that, in the event of a failure, could topple
adjacent trees in the area as well presenting a greater hazard to the existing dwelling. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION: Residential - Rural; ZONING: RR-.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391 E 17AA; TAX LOT: 1109.
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community
Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 25, 2016
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: February 8, 2016
SUBJECT PROPERTY
538 Granite Street & 580 Ashland Creek Drive!
j
PA-2016-00102
A
Syzg NO
\ ` ~RFFk pR - ~ ~RgN~T~
cs10r
1:600 ASHLAND
I Inch 50 feet umn4.nw.mi..W anan.a, w~.«ra.«.on
- 'I~ic
o ,
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
cer
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
18.5.7.040.E c
i
1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the
following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. {
a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to
fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such
hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part
18.6.
b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such
mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2016\PA-2016-00102.docx
t
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On January 25, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-00102, 538 Granite Street & 580
Ashland Creek Drive.
Sig ure of Employee
Documentl 1/2512016
i
i
PA-2016-00102 391 El 7AA 1100 rA-2016-00102 391 E 17AA 1106 +-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1107
STAUNTON CYNTHIA FAIRMAN/JOHN CALLANAN DAVID A/ELIZABETH 4INGBER 5 ASHLAND R/ OU ISE
MARSHALL 518 GRANITE CREEK
3524 HILL RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
TULELAKE, CA 96134
PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1108 PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1110 PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1111
CARLSON JOSHUA N ET AL LEICHLITER LAWRENCE E/CATHY D 271OESISK YOU/BLVD ICE
550 ASHLAND CREEK DR 538 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1133 PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1200 PA-2016-00102 391 E17AA 1300
KEITH
ITE STCAROLE JANA
MORRISON DOUGLAS P WOOD FAMILY TRUST ET AL 5241 GRAN
532 GRANITE ST PO BOX 248
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MURPHY, OR 97533 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-00102
1/25/2016 NOC
'il I
i
Y,
COOK
i
i
Bi
f
IM CHU 11 A
a'
g S, P. 006
06
M
lap, vs I
41 R to tot I
1 -0
,
iL'_ tt
ARE m;z
00 11 Z
nor
199 11H 5 CON")
lep
t
cot
QDo
~ i
to _n
1 ~ ~1 lI L q
++ii ~Y ~ f
car ce p
U21 '
DATE OE I IMiA 11. CRATE WORK COMPLETED
s o• -
I
I . ,
t
L_rLF ~V~'gI't '
Certified Arb®rist License #157014 PHONE
PN-7335A Bonded ® Insured
\:SiIIUI VU r X50 ® Medford 732-0503
Tractor Work ® Logging
Grants Pass 474-6057 Stump Grinding ® Wood Splitting
.0. Pox 1978 ® Grants Pass, Oregon 97523 ODF Forest Thinning & Fire Protection
J~) f>~1~ll,'111Cy7il ;'..\J~tr~l~i~ljl' I) a~lir?i~'
sr~
I y
fi
I y
~ a
I
t
E
i
a . r
p' I
I
x
I
x
!a, 6
[ I
r'
- t r
I
0 Grind stump(s) 6 e 8" belt-,Bound level,
_ ti. r F d _F L- I leave chips & dirt
Not responsible for damage to or consequential damages from contact with unmarked or unex ` Chip and haul brush I " ; jp
posed utilities. It is the property owners responsibility to have correct property lines indicated, P
and hereby release A to Z from any and all damages relating to any errors regarding these lines. Leave brush as is
Payment is due upon completion of Job and may vary due to any unexpected circumstances
Leave wood in fire-wood k; nc;ill;;
or conversed chances.
With your signature you agree to have the above work done Date Leave wood as is 'I p-',,,i
X Split wood, leave ul
,I ~
i
tn~
/ I I
oi,
off.
a iVl
y_ + C I
i
I
1 -
Is i
x ~
r ti -
r
I
~a
ws .
L
i
~v. ~~/t+' -'tad. 3 .rvt y t'u<', :ti
a-
a, rte.. k ~ k^Y'~'C ~~ti t`* °ry ~ ~R` _
71
S F 4 Y
~j
~ ,...fit e• 3 r `.'-jF + N ~ k~4.
~ Ftti L ~ -
-vt
# ,.~~n a t' I
~ ,e S` ~,11 ~ ~ ~ Irk y', r %3' + ~ 1 1 s
} cl ~ f e 5 4"- s ~ '~l r,r~
-5
I
t; L
/FCC,
S. ~3" r f s wit f1~ 7 i i _ a S ~ ~ + _ S 11
F ~2 lq L•~C. ! 1 ` A l4 ` Z ~F
4 r7 y se 1}+ S S ~ Ti ~Ktt [ f (k h ir` . ~ x 1 ,
' _ ...1 d r ~dd,~aCC1„Yi ~ it gV [f, ~ t S ~a' S
~ ~ is n { ~ e~°--3., '.K ya 1{ +f `l,`Y~ r r i ♦ E L p-r ~1 ,
~ ~~-0 ~ SAX il;~• ~ z°, t< {~r A ~~`5 r t' ~ ~ t BF~ G t ~ 1 _ -
~~~~~1~ s~~`°,k 3 ~ t~~-gar ~1¢~c>!.~ ~~s~ I ~ ° ~ o ~ 1~ t ~ ti ~ ~~c~~i• ~
'
+Z74 ;T]~ F.,S -hq' tu~n.3.c~I4r~[ ,,IT2.a k ,t fe
r
r1 ~
. yR~ r+S s_W
41 R
dR. „~0,~ C -f'-~Y '~d` f~ 4 r'd`1 h ~l •:.1 } t~l ~i `y~ ~ t \W..
r
I r e a, rte.' ,tFl ¢ ; ~ ~ a ! T ~ , { • ~ a ~1 'x~r r!t ~ ~
?aR'Ne" q 1 1 YFkny-5 ! k., F` '1 , ' 1~: S iii 3' if 1
,t
i
f
Planning Division ZONING IT APPLICATION
51 Winbum Way, Ashland OR 97520 PR_
C I T Y OF 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE A01 V ODIN
ASHLAND
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY _n Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES 9NO
Street Address ( c hG' an /~A rce .1d cCw(Z C7~
Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E t` Tax Lot(s) z/ l0
Zoning Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT ~.a• 4 / S_
Name one - ° 53 ° E- ail
~1`v~ 2 ✓ , ~G
nn
Address 00 6Q K I? 2 k city %-A as C Zip
PROPERTY OWNER
a
/,e Name
lc~i'►~ ICA ~t t-W Phone \~'Llf- 2Oa-227 E-Mail
Address ty 6TZZ i -)I ls~ City ua, Zip
SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER
Title COO n► S Name - >
~I l Phone/-~ EMail {3~~JCe _ ~L,
Address nU CIS K City C~r~~S irS C92 Zip
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct. 1 understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. 1 further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:`
1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in th's regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be remov at my expe e. If I have any do , I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance.
M
Ap ica s ' ature Date
As owner of the property mvoly in this request, l have read and understood the complete application nd its co equences to me as a property
own K
)
7,
_Az~___
Propert n 's Signature (required) Date
fro be completed by City Staff)
Date Received ~D Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ Cq~C~
E:
OVER N
GAcomm-dev\planning\Fo,ms R Handouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc
Iii,'
t
I
Job Address: 538 GRANITE ST Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
C
Owner's Name: LARRY/KATHY LEICHLITER O Phone:
P Customer 07644 N State Lic No:
P A TO Z TREE SERVICE T City Lic No:
L- Applicant: PO BOX 1978 R
Address: GRANTS PASS OR 97528 A
C C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: Address:
N Applied: 01/15/2016 p
T Issued:
Expires: 07/13/2016 Phone:
State Lic No:
Maplot: 391 E17AA1109 City Lic No:
DESCRIPTION:
VALUATION
i
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
~I
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
Tree RemovalNerification 28.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY ® F