HomeMy WebLinkAboutGranite_219_PA-2015-02071
CITY
December 22, 2015
t
i
t
r
Notice of Final Decision
On December 21, 2015, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
is
Planning Action: PA-2015-02071
Subject Property: 219 Granite Street
Owner/Applicant: Len Eisenberg
Description: A request for Site Design Review and a Variance to lot coverage in
order to construct a single family residence and detached Accessory Residential Unit. The site
has several trees that will be impacted by the applicant's proposal. However, no tree removal
permits have been requested because the trees to be removed are too small to be regulated.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 08DA; TAX LOTS: 900.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of
approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F)
and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The
ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be
made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Zechariah Heck in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
d id or,us [ /L
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
L Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.B.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of
this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the
hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of
decision is mailed.
c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall
contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before
the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other
documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other
relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument
concerning any relevant ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
i11C ,or.tls PL
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2015-02071
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 219 Granite Street
OWNER/APPLICANT: Len Eisenberg
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and a Variance to lot coverage
in order to construct a single family residence and detached Accessory Residential Unit. The
site has several trees that will be impacted by the applicant's proposal.
COMPRE NSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-
10; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 08DA; TAX LOTS: 900.
SUBMITTAL DATE: October 29, 2015
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: November 9, 2015
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: December 22, 2015
APPEAL DEADLINE (4:30 P.M.) January 4, 2016
FINAL DECISION DATE: January 4, 2016
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: June 22, 2017
DECISION
This application pertains to tax lot 900 in the 39 lE 08DA Assessor's Map. The address associated
with the property is 219 Granite Street. Tax lot 900 is approximately 0.27 acres, or 11,731 square feet.
The zoning is R-1-10, Single Family Residential - minimum lot size of 10,000 square feet. The
property slopes toward Granite Street and, according to the City's GIS maps, contains areas with
hillside slopes in excess of 25%.
The lot is currently vacant, though, according to the applicant's submittals, there were two historic
homes on the lot which were condemned and demolished circa 2014. The lot is sparsely forested with
approximately 28 trees on site and adjacent to it. There are several ornamental trees, and larger
broadleaf and conifers throughout the property. The subject parcel has access to Granite Street via an
existing curb cut on the southern edge of the property. This driveway is shared through an easement
with the property at 221 Granite Street.
The application involves a request for the following permits/reviews: 1) a Variance from lot coverage
maximums to develop the property as proposed; and 2) a Site Design Review to construct an
Accessory Residential Unit behind the proposed main residence.
The applicants are requesting a Variance to lot coverage maximums because their proposal involves
covering the property with approximately 47-percent of impervious surfaces, which exceeds the 40-
percent maximum for the zone. The application argues the Land Use Ordinance does not account for a
deeded access easement affecting the subject property. The easement, according to the applicant, is
limiting development of the property that would be consistent with the neighborhood. Further, the
applicant asserts that if half of the driveway's impervious surfaces were counted as the lot coverage for
221 Granite Street, the proposed lot coverage of this application would be less than the maximum and
no Variance would be necessary.
PA #2015-02071
219 Granite/zgh
Page 1
221 Granite Street, the proposed lot coverage of this application would be less than the maximum and
no Variance would be necessary.
The applicant has provided information explaining why the Land Use Ordinance does not account for a
special circumstance of the subject property. In this case, the applicable zone is R-1-10, which has a
40-percent lot coverage maximum. The subject lot is approximately 11,731 square feet. Under the R-1-
10 zoning standards, this would mean approximately 4,692 square feet could be covered with
impervious surfaces. As proposed, the development will cover 5,473 square feet, or, about 7-percent
over the allowable maximum. Moreover, the easement mentioned in the application is approximately
1,820 square feet, or 15.5-percent of the total lot area. It appears the applicant's proposal could be in
compliance with the Land Use Ordinance if the easement did not exist. Therefore, the 7-percent
increase in lot coverage seems reasonable given the unique situation that is the deeded driveway
easement affecting the subject property.
Through information provided by the applicant, Staff has determined the applicant has proposed a
I
reasonable project that is arguably the minimum necessary to allow the property to meet the target use
of the zoning district. For no foreseeable reason is the applicant's proposal creating a more significant
negative impact on the area's natural resources or adjacent land uses. The application includes
neighboring home's square footage and states the proposal at hand is less than what has been allowed
on adjacent properties. Lastly, the requested Variance does not seem to be self-imposed as the
applicant/property owner was not involved in the granting of the original access easement in 1958.
Part of the application is to construct an Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) behind the proposed single
family residence. Within the R-1 zoning district ARUs are permitted, as long as there is only one per
lot and that no more than two dwelling units exist on any given lot. The application's proposal to
construct an ARU on the subject property is within the density limitations of the Land Use Ordinance.
In addition, the proposed ARU is less than 50% of the proposed main residence and does not exceed
1,000 square feet. A total of three parking spaces are provided, which accounts for the required two for
the main residence and one for the 490 square foot ARU. All standard setbacks, in addition to the solar
setback, are complied with as presented.
Furthermore, where ARUs are allowed, they are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2.
Accordingly, applicants are required to demonstrate compliance with the criteria for Site Review
approval. The existing unit conforms to the underlying zone's density and floor area requirements,
maximum building height, lot coverage, area and dimensions, setbacks, building orientation, and
architecture. Parking requirements are complied with, including three sheltered bicycle parking spaces.
An enclosed, screened area will be provided for both units, according to the application materials. A
paved walkway connects both units to the parking area and to Granite Street. As the site is moderately
forested, the applicant's are not proposing any landscaping in conjunction with their proposal.
Site Review design standards require buildings to have a strong orientation to the street. Both
structures are in compliance with this standard. The application asserts the building materials and paint
colors are compatible with the surrounding area. The existing driveway will need to be paved with
concrete, asphaltic, porous solid surface or comparable surface. A neighbor did provide comment
during the application's notice period asking that the driveway be made out of a porous solid surface to
mitigate the increase in lot coverage. As presented, the driveway meets the requirements for a flag lot,
per AMC 18.5.3.060. This is required because the driveway is greater than 50 feet in length. Granite
Street is an improved city street with asphalt pavement, curb and gutter and storm drains. Sidewalks
PA #2015-02071
219 Granitefth
Page 2
have already been installed along Granite Street in front of the subject property. There does not seem
to be street trees on the property and so a condition has been added below to ensure the City's street
tree standards are complied with. Furthermore, Staff has determined there is adequate capacity of City
facilities to accommodate the applicant's proposal. F
i
The proposed residences are in the Wildfire Zone, which requires additional development standards.
The application asserts their plan incorporates all required standards. A condition below has been
added to ensure sprinklers are included in the building design before building permits are issued.
The application materials provided include a tree inventory. There are approximately 28 trees on site, a
variety of ornamentals, deciduous and hardwoods. Fifteen trees are slated for removal, the largest
being a 14-inch diameter at breast height (DBH) cedar tree. All of the trees to be removed are within
building or driveway/parking area footprints. The applicant asserts they will try to preserve as many as
possible during construction.
The Tree Commission reviewed the application during the December 3, 2015 regular meeting. The
commission approved the plans as submitted but requested a tree protection plan to be submitted for
the Tree Commission to review before building permit issuance. A condition has been added below to
this affect.
There were several comments received during the notice period of this application. One of the
comments suggested the driveway be paved with a porous solid surface to compromise the increase in
lot size.
The approval criteria for a Variance are detailed in AMC 18.5.5.050 as follows:
1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique
physical circumstances of the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent
development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination may be sufficient evidence of a
hardship for purposes of approving a variance.
2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances
related to the subject site.
3. The proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts on the development of the
adjacent uses and will further the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan
of the City.
4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the
variance request does not arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval
previously granted to the applicant.
The approval criteria for Accessory Residential Units are detailed in AMC 18.2.3.040 as follows:
1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall
not exceed two per lot.
2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the
zone, except that accessory residential units shall be counted in the density of developments
created under the Performance Standards Option in chapter 18.3.9.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed
50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet
GHFA.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the
PA #2015-02071
219 Granitefth
Page 3
I
underlying zone.
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for
single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and
driveways are exempt from the paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.0 80.E. 1.
In staffs assessment, the proposal has been designed to meet the target use of the applicable zone.
Based on the material submitted, the application with the attached conditions complies with all
applicable City ordinances. Therefore, Planning Action #2015-02071 is approved with the following
conditions. If any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason
whatsoever, then Planning Action #2015-02071 is denied. The following are the conditions and they
are attached to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically
modified herein.
2) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those
approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in
substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to
modify the Variance/Site Design Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to
issuance of a building permit.
3) That a Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division
prior to tree removal, site work or storage of materials. Trees on site shall be identified by
number, those to be removed marked with flagging tape, and access to the site provided. The
Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the trees to be removed and the installation
of tree protection fencing for the trees on and adjacent to the site. The tree protection shall be
chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with the Tree Ordinance.
4) That all necessary building permits, including permits for the new electrical service to the
accessory residential unit, and system development charges for water, sewer, storm water,
parks, and transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
5) That a separate, underground electric service for the accessory residential unit shall be installed
in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements prior to issuance of the
certificate of occupancy.
6) That street trees, 1 per 30 feet of street frontage, shall be installed on the Granite Street frontage
prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. All street trees shall be chosen from the
adopted Street Tree List and shall be installed in accordance with the specifications noted in
AMC 18.4.4.030.E. The street trees shall be irrigated.
7) That the existing driveway is to be paved and constructed to standards on file in the office of
the City Engineer (see 18.4.3.080.E) before issuance of certificate of occupancy. To mitigate
the increase in lot coverage allowed by the Variance, it is recommended the driveway be
constructed out of a porous solid surface.
8) That all recommendations of the Ashland Tree Commission (listed below), where consistent
with the applicable ordinances and standards and with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall
be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein.
a. That a tree protection plan is submitted for review before building permits are issued.
9) That building permit submittals shall include:
PA #2015-02071
219 Granite/zgh
Page 4
t
a. Identification of all easements, including public and private utility easements, mutual
access easements, public pedestrian access easements, and fire apparatus access
easements.
b. Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with the
applicable Solar Setback Standard in the formula [(Height - 6 or 16)/(0.445 + Slope) _
Required Solar Setback] and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the
highest shadow producing point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade.
c. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and
circulation areas.
d. That storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak
rainfalls must be collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection
system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm pipe or public drainage way) or
through an approved alternative in accordance with Ashland Building Division policy
BD-PP-0029. On-site collection systems shall be detailed on the building permit
submittals.
10) That a final storm drainage plan for the driveway shall be provided for the review and approval j
of the Ashland Building, Planning and Engineering Divisions prior to the issuance of an
excavation permit or commencement of any site work. The storm drainage plan shall be
designed, constructed and maintained in a manner that will avoid erosion on-site and to
adjacent and downstream properties in accordance with 18.3.10.090.C
11) The requirements of the Ashland Fire Department, including: fire hydrant distance and
clearance; fire flow; addressing; fire apparatus access and turn-around; firefighter access
pathways; Fire Department work area; fuel break; and an approved Fire Prevention and Control
Plan for Wildfire Lands shall be complied with prior to issuance of permits or the use of
combustible materials, whichever applicable. Fire Department requirements shall be included
on the engineered construction documents. Note: If this project takes place during fire
season restrictions and is on lands protected by the Oregon Department of Forestry or within
118 of a mile of ODF protected lands, applicant should check ODF restrictions at
wwlv.swofrre.com or call (541) 664.3328).
Bil Molnar, rector Date
Cornmu~ ntyD velopment Department
i
PA #2015-02071
219 Granite/zgh
Page 5
i
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
i
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
i
I
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On December 23, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-02071, 219 Granite.
Signature of Employee
Docume nt1012/22/2015
I
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 400 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 501 PA-2015-02071 391 E08 DA 1100
CHISHOLM ALEX/SALLIE EDSON STEVEN/LIBBY EGGERS ELIZABETH JO ANNE TRUSTEE
2207 HARRIS ST 144 STRAWBERRY LN 221 GRANITE ST
EUGENE, OR 97405 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 900 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1501 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1300
EISENBERG LEONARD AND KAREN HEYCKE JENS KURT ET AL JACOBSON KRIS N TRUSTEE ET AL
TRUST ET AL 237 GRANITE ST 233 GRANITE ST
223 GRANITE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 300 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1201 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 200
KAEGI RICHARD JOHN/ANNA MASTAIN RICHARD K TRUSTEE ET AL MOREY ROBERT S/LAURIE J
199 GRANITE ST 227 GRANITE ST 189 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 701 PA-2015-02071
MURPHREE JAMES THOMAS/LIESE NEWTON 02071 391E08DA 1000 MICHAEL HODGIN COLEMAN CREEK
FAYE NEWT JUDITH A 205 GRANITE ST CONSTRUCTION
229 GRANITE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 248 WALKER
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02071
BILL EMERY 219 Granite
2962 GRIZZLY DR NOD 12/22/15
ASHLAND, OR 97520 13
i
40 SLOPESURVEY
LYING SPITJATE IIV
2015 I
j; SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8,
I TOWNSHIP 39 SOUTH, RANGE 1 EAST, W.M.
JACKS
I ONCOUNTY OREGON
I FOR
LATH WITH GREEN I W Len E15enberg
RIBBON (TYP.) 219 Granite Street
W I Ashland, Oregon 97520
S 89'59'33" W - 19307'
rn 1 ~ ~ 11 151 1127 1 ~o\ 1 111 11 11 11 1 I I I I I I I I I I II II II 1 ~1 ~I o
Lr)
\111 Iwllll~ ~ ~
'1\~1111i11~1QIill"II l to 1 1 1 1 1Q'I~
~ 1® 1 1 1 1 1 ~ I I I I I 1 I I) ~ 1 y~l ~I
1 1 1 1 ® I I I 1191 GI1AM' S T /
11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 III i j l I I I J; &I "I w
~1j1i111111111111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~
o111t1111111111 i III 111 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 o
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1~ l l l i l ~
1 3~1~- ` t 1 I X15 2 SCALE.• 1" = 30'
1 DRIVEWAY W
S 89'5933" W - 198.07' I FLAWD GISTERED
FESS SUR Y
NO PORTION OF THE SUBJECTPROPERTYHAS I
M~Lj
GROUND SLOPE EQUAL TO OR GREATER TMN25 OREGON
XLY 14, 1B9B
I SHAWN KAMPMANN
2883 LS
a RENEWAL DATE: 6/30/2017
I
SURVEYED BY.
POLARIS LAND SURVEYING LLC
P.O. BOX 459
ASHLAND, OREGON 97520
I (541) 482-5009
I 40
DATE: DECEMBER 10, 2015
PROJECT NO. 603-10
Assessor's Map No, 39 IL 08 DA, Tax Lot 900
POLARIS LAND SURVEYING
i
Zechariah Heck
From: JoAnne Eggers [ejo.eggers@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 30, 2015 4:18 PM
To: Zechariah Heck
Subject: Planning Action # 2015-02071
Zechariah,
I thought it would be best to put my other request in writing:
Re: Shared driveway 219 & 221 Granite St.
The front of low clearance cars (e.g. my Honda Civic) graze the street when exiting the drive. It is worse with
the relatively new sidewalk and apron. Suggestion: Reduce slope (or flatten) the lower 6 to 10 feet of the drive
to improve the angle at which vehicles enter the street.
Thank you for your consideration.
JoAnne Eggers
221 Granite St.
1
t
Zechariah Heck
From: JoAnne Eggers [ejo.eggers@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 1:28 PM
To: Zechariah Heck
Subject: Planning Action # 2015-02071
I
Zechariah,
I spoke with you late this morning about the variance requested for construction at 219 Granite St. and
appreciate your helpfulness and the information you shared with me.
I do have a suggestion, potentially a condition of issuing a variance. That is the use of "pervious" paving for the
driveway and parking area, which would partially compensate for the increase of lot coverage from 40% to
47%.
I think such use becomes even more important as we experience the consequences of runoff from larger rain
events projected as a result of climate change.
Please let me know what you think and what the planning department is doing to prepare for climate change.
Thank you,
JoAnne Eggers
221 Granite Street
1
i
Planning Department, 51 Winbui Nay, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 L J Ili X
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: 2015-02071
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 219 Granite
OWNER/APPLICANT: Len Eisenberg
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and a Variance to lot coverage in order to construct a
single family residence and detached Accessory Residential Unit. The site has several trees that will be impacted
by the applicant's proposal. However, no tree removal permits have been requested because the trees to be
removed are too small to be regulated. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential;
ZONING: R-1-10; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 08DA; TAX LOTS: 900.
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, December 3, 2015 at 6:00 PM in the
Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way.
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: November 20, 2015
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: December 4, 2015
T,219 JECT PROPERTY
Granite Street
15-02071
M
I
1:409 = ®T w cx r
IInch =34 feet E -ASHLAND
Yapplrp la ac M1a-" and bead no warnny of accuracy.
o--a Aq /eatvres, a~uctuna, hcllbs, aasemant or rwJway locatbm
et,ouN Ce indapendanty Mld varrled for eabtence and/or lo<atlon.
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.108.040)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
ocx
VARIANCE
ti
18.5.5.050 Approval Criteria
1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of
the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination
may be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance.
2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site.
3. The proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts on the development of the adjacent uses and will further the
purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the City.
4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not
arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant.
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.52050 Approval Criteria
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including
but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height,
building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design
Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate
capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property
and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site
Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards
due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the
exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent
with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which
would alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a
design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards.
GAcomm-dcv\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\Mailed Notices & Signs\2015TA-2015-02071.docx
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
i
i
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On November 20, 2015 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #2015-02071, 219 Granite.
v-,o Sig at re of Employee
DocumeW 1111912015
4
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 400 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 501 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1100
CHISHOLM ALEX/SALLIE EDSON STEVEN/LIBBY EGGERS ELIZABETH JO ANNE TRUSTEE
2207 HARRIS ST 144 STRAWBERRY LN 221 GRANITE ST
EUGENE, OR 97405 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 900 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 702 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1501
EISENBERG LEONARD AND KAREN EISENBERG LEONARD I TRUSTEE ET AL HEYCKE JENS KURT ET AL
TRUST 223 GRANITE ST 237 GRANITE ST
223 GRANITE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1300 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 300 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1201
JACOBSON KRIS N TRUSTEE ET AL KAEGI RICHARD JOHN/ANNA MASTAIN RICHARD K TRUSTEE ET AL
233 GRANITE ST 199 GRANITE ST 227 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 200 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 701 PA-2015-02071 391 E08DA 1000
MOREY ROBERT S/LAURIE J MURPHREE JAMES THOMAS/LIESE NEWTON JUDITH A
189 GRANITE ST FAYE 205 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 229 GRANITE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
MICHAEL HODGIN-COLEMAN CREEK BILL EMERY
248 WALKER 2962 GRIZZLY DRIVE 219 GRANITE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 11/20/2015 NOC
14
i
~Ill, c! U U ~ 94 is U U, U ll LM X
!11 lJ 1 U
1j x'11 11, '
ILL
JUT Vaa0,
v 111J.u 1t111JD fIln:l 1i" d, 'fill H1,N1' U1U1111
11 .r l 1, -i fi fl 11 ti r" f 11~i U U t11 fh 1t U'111JH~" 11 H aia u d,
',f f11111it 11 !alt 7~, 111,1J~~ a,UUfi
0+U L S Y;1A fl .Uaj u U, N'd a, 'd U H U, itd H,H H, ~ilJi IU U
+ft 9 120 11A 1i!8,11 J, Jig t •U-S U U 1 VU a U+ D a
1 t U U~ + 'U I'll 1111 in U 3 i u U~' J'U f1' U. ll U. a , , a u tl
' JU U. 11
!J 11i a~ 11 H+ d ~t l) i ~ ~ 11 f1 ~11u a 11 to
d 1111 H A 11 if] 11,
11U+9, ~1~i_~ ~A UU+~'Ufl 13aG
~1U•U~
1~ C 1 s ~l,~+Ll>I ~5fli! TUI 0, T, 2 UUU+ A'Ullil:
I 1111 UUU T -A U IN HU, t~UU+
~!~+1111 ~t9 +i 1 l Hil fl ll
z ll ,1 ,H; t lull, U v UU 1{ H, U, tU U f1
c~9U8,UfU ,''llUI H.UU~H, ,b,I1.H li~H~fU lbmn+ "M UUhUu+ 1i:aflt
H11~' 11>~ H 3'JU c f}U,H.
A4 lu U,
.H H, v'1 '5+11'11,5'8 3,H.fl,j
U D
1a 11, x'11 H U+ 1711i 11 ~I d' so
x
{f'lj'i H~.~'1)J I' ~~U U' jiff 3.
SQ1k TO U,
CU '>h
0,2 $99
fifft 44M 3 4.2
1 100
1 1i
nor
901 WIN a'1k~ I !3'11 fi
• 11 ~f ~g~11I1'
704 1 11+1)t
t~i11
I ~ 1 ~'+++1111~
ill T 5-0t tcu-U.., 22d U 't
t,1uU 1170f1+
121 In U A, In D 11
too 210 "At
T ILI U. 2G U4 Ad If 4*21,
Lh !
-702 5UD
1 IL, 11
a
703 i ;i`f}p~'~kt ''OU''tog '704, 0 0, t A'a U.
4A t all) D
4 ti 11~ L~ 11j ~ U T U'U, J. ,1i 5 t1° 11
1 €p 111 U`U+ Tun's ~i HtJ ' ~ 5'fl I
A
2,119,
P
i
Zechariah Fleck
From: Zechariah Heck [zechariah.heck@ashland. or.us]
Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:27 AM
To: 'Leonard Eisenberg'; 'colemancreek@gmail. com'; 'bill@ashiandhome. net'
Subject: 219 Granite
Attachments: Granite_219_HillsideSlope11.10.15.pdf
Gentlemen,
I have finished with the completeness review for your Variance and Site Design Review application. There are two issues
that I noticed, which I want to bring to your attention.
1) In the submitted plans, the slope is listed as being zero (0); 1 calculated slope to be -0.063. This does not
necessarily affect the approval of a Variance or Site Design Review, but it may determine what can actually be
built.
2) The ARU is proposed to be located on hillside lands. I appreciate the note speaking to the hillside lands in the
application as suggested in the pre-application meeting. However, where the ARU is currently proposed needs
to be addressed in greater detail. I see three paths forward, please let me know which one you want to pursue:
o Provide a slope analysis of the area where the ARU is to be located that proves the area has slopes less
than 26%.
o Move the ARU south, outside of the hillside lands (identified in pink/red in the attached map).
o Apply for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit ($1,012) to locate the ARU where it is
currently proposed.
I am okay with moving the application forward and , if approved, these issues can be addressed in the conditions of
approval. However, it is important to note that an approval for the Variance and Site Design Review as proposed will not
necessarily mean the ARU can be built where it is now. That is to say, a building permit for the ARU will not be approved
without the aforementioned issue being resolved through one of the three paths I suggested. Further, a building permit
for the house may not be approved if the solar setback is not met.
Please let me know how you want to proceed. To meet an internal deadline, I need to deem the application complete or
incomplete soon. I am okay with deeming the application complete now, but I would like to hear back from you guys if
you are alright with moving forward with the aforementioned issues being resolved as conditions of approval.
My apologies for any inconvenience, I should have been more clear about the hillside slope issue.
Thank you,
Zechariah Heck, Assistant Planner
City of Ashland, Community Development Department
20 E. Main St., Ashland, OR 97520
541.552.2052 Tel
800.735.2900 TTY
541.552.2050 Fax ~
i
This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Law for disclosure and retention. If you I'
have received this message in error, please contact me at 541.552.2052. Thank you.
1
'f
I
REQUEST FOR VARIANCE: 219 GRANITE ST. IPERVIOUS SURFACE REQUIREMENT
FINDING OF FACT:
Len and Karen Eisenberg of Ashland, Oregon hope to build a single family, one story home and an ARU
on a vacant lot next to their home and property at 223 Granite St. in Ashland. The property in question
is a 0.27ac lot zoned R-1-10 at 219 Granite St. (Assessor map 39 1E 8DA tax lot 900). Both residences are
intended to be rentals. (A site map is attached, with the proposed dwellings.)
See also the attached: request to build new house and ARU
The variance requested regards the 60/40 permeable to non-permeable-surface ratio requirement. We
request that a ratio approximately53/47be approved, so that an 1860 Sq Ft single story home, and a
490sq. ft. ARU can be built.
We request that a variance be granted because 1) the 60/40 code provision does not account for a
deeded access easement over 219 Granite St., 2) the variance would be the minimum necessary to
address the development-limiting effect of the easement, and would be consistent with neighboring
properties, 3) negative effects of a variance would be minimal, and the benefits (greater affordable
housing stock) significant for the city, and 4) the need for the variance is not self-imposed.
It is also interesting to note that if half of the shared driveway (with deeded access) is excluded; the
percent of impervious is reduced to thirty-seven. This is significant as otherwise this would be
impervious surface required for tax lot to the south which is already too narrow to accommodate a
driveway.
Further details on reasons to grant a variance follow:
1) An access easement (deed documents attached) held by the adjacent property at 221 Granite St. (tax
lot 1100) occupies most of the southern 10 feet of 219 Granite St. The easement is 182ft by 10ft, or
approximately 15.5% of the area of the 219 Granite St. lot (1820/11770 Sq Ft). Currently 155 feet of the
easement is used for a gravel driveway that provides access for both 219 and 221 Granite St. This
represents approximately 13% of the 219 Granite St. lot.
This access easement pretty much requires that associated onsite parking for the:proposed dwellings be
where the current parking area resides, toward the back of the lot. The minimum off street parking area
for just a single family residence (two parking spaces), with enough area to safely backup and
turnaround, in the area of the current parking pad, is approximately 800 Sq Ft. Together, the easement
driveway and the minimum parking area total approximately 2350Sq Ft of non-permeable surface, or
approximately 20% of the 219 Granite St. lot.
r
If an ARU is added to a single family unit, three off street parking spaces are required, and the driveway
easement plus parking would cover approximately 2570 Sq Ft, or more than 23% of the lot.
i
If no deeded access easement existed over 219 Granite, 3 off street parking sites could be carved into
the front of the lot, and they would only occupy approximately 486 Sq Ft, or just 4% of the lot.
Three parking areas carved into the front of the lot, plus the existing area of the access easement, would
cover 2036 Sq Ft of non-permeable surface, or approximately 17% of the lot.
2) Allowing the variance would increase the stock of (relatively) affordable housing in Ashland. The
three bedroom, single family home would rent for approximately $1800/month. The ARU unit would
rent to a student or older single for approximately $700/month.
3) Adjacent properties currently both have two separate residences (see attached figure). 205 Granite
St. has a 4157 Sq Ft single family home and a 1720 Sq Ft ARU in the back. 221 Granite St. has two
separate homes, the 1450 Sq Ft one in front is currently rented, and the property owner lives in the 644
sq ft rear home. Granting the requested variance would allow a single family home and an ARU to be
built at 219 Granite St., which would result in development consistent with the current character of the
neighborhood.
4) Because of the non-permeable driveway easement and parking area, adhering to the 60/40 ratio,
whilst avoiding any damage to the 26"DBH oak in the center of the lot, and honoring appropriate solar
and other setbacks, would realistically only allow a single residence of less than 2000sq. ft. to be built at
219 Granite. Other homes in the same block of Granite St. are generally much larger (per Jackson Co.
tax records): 205 Granite -4157 Sq Ft; 199 Granite St. -4884 Sq Ft; 189 Granite St. - 2952 sq ft; 185
Granite St. - 2562 Sq Ft; 227 Granite St. 2586 Sq Ft; 233 Granite St. - (under construction, approx. 4500
Sq Ft; 241 Granite St. - 2589 Sq Ft; 247 Granite St. - 2844 Sq Ft. - the average for this section of Granite
St. north and south of 219 Granite St. being 3200 Sq Ft.
Granting the requested variance would result in development minimally consistent with the current
character of the neighborhood.
5) An adjacent property currently has a non-conforming permeable to non-permeable-surface ratio (see
attached figure). The ratio for 205 Granite St. is approximately 48/52 permeable to non-permeable.
The ratio for the other adjacent property, at 221 Granite St, is approximately 60/40. Granting the
requested variance would result in development consistent with the current character of the
neighborhood.
k.'
Further considerations:
The city-provided topographic contours note the presence of a narrow, north-south-oriented patch of
hillside land on the west, uphill side of the current parking area. This is a man-made cut, approximately
two feet high, and not a natural topographic feature.
Possible building envelopes are severely limited by the presence of a large (26"DBH) oak at the exact
center of the 219 Granite St. lot Adhering to the 60/40 ratio makes reasonable development even more
difficult. Trees to be removed in our proposed development (all much less than 18"DBH) are shown on
the attached map. Petitioners note that other trees that could be removed, but for which every effort
will be made to save, with an arborist's help, include a 16"DBH maple close to the northeast corner of
the proposed single family residence, and a 8"DBH walnut on the eastern edge of the proposed parking
area.
The two rental residences we hope to build at 219 Granite St. will both be furnished with energy-
efficient ductless, heat pumps. The main house will be equipped with both solar hot water and
photovoltaic systems. Our goal is to create two affordable, environmentally sound rentals, to provide
income for ourselves and progeny, and to increase housing stock in Ashland, hopefully to allow more
young families with kids to inhabit the city.
Summary
We suggest that the driveway easement imposes an undue burden on any reasonable development at
219 Granite St., by limiting the number and size of any dwellings, if the 60/40 ratio is maintained. We
respectfully ask City of Ashland to grant the requested variance.
REQUEST TO BUILD NEW HOUSE AND ARU AT 219 GRANITE ST. FINDING OF FACT:
Len and Karen Eisenberg of Ashland, Oregon hope to build a single family, one story home and an ARU
on a vacant lot next to their home and property at 223 Granite St. in Ashland. The property in question
is a 0.27ac lot zoned R-1-10 at 219 Granite St. (Assessor map 39 1E 8DA tax lot 900). Both residences are
intended to be rentals. (A site map is attached, with the proposed dwellings.)
Please also see the attached request for a variance for exceeding the impervious surface limit.
18.5.2.040.B.8.b Narrative
i. Total square footage in the development: 11,731
ii. Number of dwelling units: (1) one bedroom, and (1) three bedroom
iii. Percentage of lot coverage
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION SQ FT PERCENT
MAIN HOUSE 1877 16
MAIN HOUSE PORCHES 159 1
ARU 494 4
ARU PORCH 49 0
WALKWAYS 324 3
DRIVEWAY AND PARKING 2570 22
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 5473 47
LANDSCAPING 6258 53
TL 900 TOTAL LOT AREA 11731 100
ASHLAND FIRE AND RESCUE CONCERNS ADDRESSED:
Residential fire sprinkler: An approved fire sprinkler system will be installed in the ARU, as we are
unable to meet the requirement for a fire truck turn around.
Addressing: Building addresses will be posted in accordance with fire regulations and the AMC.
Temporary signs will be posted at the onset of construction.
Firefighter Access Pathway- An approved footpath around the structure will be installed so that all
exterior portions of the structure can be reached with the fire hose.
Fire Hydrant Distance to Structures - Hydrant distance is measured from the hydrant, along a driving
surface, to the approved fire apparatus operating location. Hydrant distance exceed 300 feet for the
ARU. An approved fire sprinkler systems will be installed.
Gates and Fences: No gates or fences across the property are planned at this time.
Wildfire Hazard Areas: The property is located within the current wildfire hazard zone, and will meet all
regulations for fire mitigation.
Vegetation - existing and intentionally planted vegetation will meet the clearance requirements found
in the International Wildland-Urban Interface Code. (OFC 304.1.2)
OTHER CONCERNS
Three sheltered bicycle parking spaces will be provided on the porches of the house and ARU.
A fenced area will be provided at the east side of the parking area for recycling and trash.
Although we will not be applying for LEEDS certification, the house and ARU will be built with ecological
and sustainability concerns in mind. Both houses will have solar hot water, and the main house will
have a photo voltaic array on the roof. Both houses will have metal roofs in a light color.
TREES:
The largest tree to be removed is a 14" cedar at the southeast corner of the ARU. All other trees
removed are too small to be significant. The large trees P06, P11, P13, P14, and P15, are at distances
from areas of excavation that they will not be endangered. See the tree schedule on page one of the
plot plan. We will be beyond the drip lines of all of the major trees where the excavation for the
foundations and utilities will occur. Some minor trees noted to be removed will be retained if conditions
permit at the time of excavation. A tree protection plan will be provided at the time of submittal for
building permits.
EROSISON CONTROL:
An erosion control plan is not included at this time, but can be submitted prior to construction. The
contours require little modification as the entire lot slopes uniformly toward granite streets. Roof and
foundation drain will be gravity fed to the curb on the west side of Granite St. and will drain to a catch
basin to the north. The new driveway and parking areas will largely follow the existing contours and will
only require minimal cut and fill. The main house will step to follow the contours of the slope, and will
require little modification of the existing grade.. The ARU will foundation will step to follow the natural
grade, and will require little modification of the existing grade.
LANDSCAPING
It is our intention to retain as many of the trees as possible as indicated in the tree schedule included in
the plans. No landscaping plan is provided at this time; but can be provided if necessary at the time of
building submittal. We have kept impervious surfaces to a minimum possible, as indicated earlier in the
narrative.
UTILITIES:
We are currently exploring with Public Works, and City of Ashland Electric the best ways to provide
utilities for this lot, and the adjacent lots mentioned above in the most efficient, least invasive way.
Tax Lot 1100: The gas and telephone for the neighboring tax lot 1100 to the south run in the existing
driveway, and will need to be relocated when the new driveway is constructed.
Tax Lot 900: The water and sewer for the subject tax lot currently connect to the city mains on the
northeast corner of the property; these connections will be abandoned in order to preserve the historic
retaining wall.
Water and sewer will be relocated near the southeast corner of the property and run in a common
trench under the driveway. The water line for the ARU will be sized for a code compliant sprinkler
system.
All other utilities will run in a common ditch under the driveway. This will include electric, telephone,
Charter, and Ashland fiber Net.
Tax Lot 901: Len and Karen Eisenberg would also like to grant an easement from tax lot 900, to their
property to the west, tax lot 901 to facilitate future development. The utilities would be installed in a
common ditch under tax lot 900's driveway, and be adequate to serve a 3000 square foot main house,
and a 1000 square foot ARU.
Tax Lot 702: Len and Karen Eisenberg would also like to grant an easement for utilities across tax lot
900 to their residence at tax lot 702 to the west for water and Ashland Fiber Net. They are not currently
served by Ashland Fiber Net. The water line that currently runs up their flag drive is inadequate; and it
makes sense to include this in utility excavation for tax lot 900.
~ I
i
219 GRANITE ST SOLAR CALCULATIONS
60 FOOT NORTH/SOUTH LOT DIMENSION I
-0.067 SLOPE I~
B STANDARD APPLIES
24 DEGREE SOLAR ANGLE
5.5 IN 12 PITCH OF ROOF (PEAK GOVERNS)
24.62 PITCH IN DEGREES
F
E:
20.5 HEIGHT OF MAIN BUILDING AT EAST END
20.75 DISTANCE OF SHADOW PRODUCING POINT FROM PROPERTY LINE
20.75 DISTANCE OF SHADOW PRODUCING POINTADJUSTED FOR NORTH
FORMULA H-16/.445+5= DISTANCE
0.445 SOLAR SLOPE FACTOR
-0.067 SLOPE TO NORTH,
11.9 REQUIRED DISTANCE
20.75 DISTANCE PROVIDED'
I
19.75 HEIGHT OF MAIN BUILDING AT STEP UP
20.75 DISTANCE OF SHADOW PRODUCING POINT FROM PROPERTY LINE
20.75 DISTANCE OF SHADOW PRODUCING POINTADJUSTED FOR NORTH
FORMULA H-16/.445+S= DISTANCE
0.445 SOLAR SLOPE FACTOR
-0.067 SLOPE TO NORTH
9.92 REQUIRED DISTANCE
20.75 DISTANCE PROVIDED
18.25 HEIGHT OF ARU BUILDING EAST END
19 DISTANCE OF SHADOW PRODUCING POINT FROM PROPERTY LINE
19 DISTANCE OF SHADOW PRODUCING POINTADJUSTED FOR NORTH
FORMULA H-16/.445+S= DISTANCE
0.445 SOLAR SLOPE FACTOR
-0.067 SLOPE TO NORTH
5.95 REQUIRED DISTANCE
20.75 DISTANCE PROVIDED
i
PAGE TITLE LAYOUT PAGE TABLE REQUEST FOR VARIANCE FOR IMPERVIOUS
SEr.LP19IE 9dD / 1 LOCATOR MAP, PROJECT INFORMATION SURFACE IN ORDER TO BUILD NEW HOUSE AND
2 SITE ANALYSIS PLAN391308DA900 ARU
3 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 391308DA TL 900
r r sTanwaeaav LaNS - - - 4 FLOOR PLANS; MAIN HOUSE AND ARU 1/8" SCALE OC
4W.,oo. 5 MAIN HOUSE ELEVATIONS OWNERS: I°
6 ARU ELEVATIONS U)
00 7 PICTORIAL FROM SOUTHEAST EISENBERG LEONARD IRWIN TRUSTEE
EISENBERG KAREN DIANE TRUSTEE
8 PICTORIAL: FROM NORTHEAST
aoll z EISENBERG LEONARD AND KAREN TRUST C)
300 r
} `C Z
EI MAILING ADDRESS:
EISENBERG LEONARD AND KAREN TRUST ET AL
LLI
702 a~
C.);.:.
:b it 223 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND OR, 97520 U 0 cm c
C'iIMli 410.. -
SUBJECT TAX ' T 900 MAP AND TAXLOT: 391 E08DA 900 < -J cI tD
Ili,
SITUS ADDRESS: 219 GRANITE STASHLAND
ZONING: R-1-10 - ao co
U
y 12Cq, TAXLOT ACR EAG E 0.27
L .u:nr-~i L 701. 1701 -
t u 0
C) Lo s4A
1 1
~0r) ltla
1300
AOI it+,c 1
' G52w12 1
151149 -
V'iu
MAP AND TAX LOT 391 E08DA 900
LOCATOR MAP: NOT TO SCALE
w
ti
g0 '
00
J®
z
w
O~ttuu
T-
tu 7 to
x®OL
0
~QL0
0-. z >
<
i
I
SHEET,
/
KEY NOTES: ANALYSIS AND PROPOSED PLOT PLAN PLANT SCHEDULE
N MBER BEL NUMBER LASE COMMENTS
01 TER AIN SHOWN IN 2' NCREME TS P01 4" A P
02 PROPERTYBOUNDARY P02 3" APPLE I-
03 LINE OF SETBACKS P03 26" OAK
04 LINE OF SETBACKS 18.2.5,060 YARD EXCEPTIONS P04 20" TRUE CEDAR D
05 E/L EASEMENT LINE LINE OF DEEDED ACCESS FOR DRIVEWAY P05 7" CEDAR
06 EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SHOWN DASHED P06 15" CEDAR
07 FORMER HOUSE SITE SHOWN DASHED P07 8" CEDAR f)
08 182' TO FIRE HYDRANT TO SOUTH P08 2" MADRONE z
09 EXISTING STONE STEPS P09 8" APPLE ON PROPERY TO THE WEST
0 EXISTING TWO TIER RETAINING WALL P10 24" REDWOOD ON PROPERTY TO THE NORTH
1 ADJACENT RESIDENCE P11 18" MAPLE ON PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH sg~ Z
2 ADJACENT SHED P12 35" CEDAR ON PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH
3 EXISTING WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION TO BE ABANDONED P13 12" OAK ON PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH
4 GAS & PHONE FOR TL 1100 TO THE SOUTH P14 4" OAK TO BE REMOVED - cr 5 CITY SEWER P15 B" OAK TO BE REMOVED -
(.)O 0 00
Cv
6 WATER MAIN P16 6" CEDAR TO BE REMOVED :L 'IT
7 LINE OF CURB P17 5" OAK TO BE REMOVED LINE STILE LEGEND of N ~
18 EXISTING UTILITY POLE AND TRANSFORMER P18 14" CEDAR TO BE REMOVED UJ C~
19 OVERHEAD POWER QWEST AFN & CHARTER P19 8" WALNUT TO BE REMOVED P/L -PROPERTY LINE Q
cy) 4t
20 220 V UNDERGROUND SERVICE P20 1" HOLLY TO BE REMOVED SB/L -SETBACK LINE LL! 2 co
21 AVERAGE DRIVEWAY GRADE 16% P21 ORNAMENTAL TO BE REMOVED E/L -EASEMENT LINE _j '
2 COMMON TRENCH ALL UTILITIES P22 2" OAK TO BE REMOVED 220V -UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 0 0
23 CONCRETE WALKWAY P23 ORNAMENTAL TO BE REMOVED " w/w -ROOF AND FOUNDATION DRAINS C) LC) U
24 3 9'X 18" PARKING SPACES P24 8" MAPLE TO BE REMOVED
G _GAS LINE ~
25 ENLARGED CURB CUT P25 " OAK TO BE REMOVED T -TELEPHONE LINE
26 HOUSE AND ARU ELECTRIC METERS P26 3" OAK TO BE REMOVED C/w -WATER LINE
27 NEW 2' HI DRY STACK RETAINING WALL P27 3" OAK TO BE REMOVED s -SEWER LINE
28 NEW WATER METERS FOR TL 900 AND 901 P28 6' MAPLE TO BE REMOVED "I
~e
29 PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS
i
30 SOLAR HOT WATER 3~~ !
31 TRASH AND RECYCLING
32 ROOF AND FOUNDATION DRAINS TOSTREET
33 EXISTING MAILBOX
34 SHELTERED BIKE PARKING 2 1 st Floor, - cn
TAX LOT 1000 ZONING R-1-10
35
EXTERIOR LIGHT 11 ~
/ X
PIO
v 1 .0,
P07 PI'L
1_ M 02 ailllutr \ i C / Y`1
1 L tiB / LY (o P04 P05 PO \ Q
11~'I F E
SB/L P15 B SBIL 981E 16tFl00r SBIL SB/L 68(L PPa~IL $
Pla 03
CD
11
P25 ~S / X15' CD
11 N
4" Pei Lu m
07
' PI4 U1 (n
U)
d
C (C) P07 ~,j I' ~ ~ P03 I 09 N cc W
3: Q
02 PO r~lll,~i , ~l\~ _ CD 17 t
to
06 MAP AND TL: 391 E03DA 900 - - - - _ z o
ZONING: R-1-10 AREA 11731 SQ FT w „ % P27 N to
05 Pz2 Pz5
~01 E/L E/L Ell E/L - EIL EIL EIL ElL EIL EIL EIL ~E!
08 <<~
w/w W/w wI w W/w W/w w/w_ - -w/w --W/w- w/w - w w
L ~Bll SBIL SBIL SBI'o SBIL L ft-
SB/L SB/L SBIL SBIL SBIL SB/
SBIL SBII D G G G G G' G G G o
l P/L PIL M Pl P!L P! L-PIL~lL - _1 - P/L PIl PIL PlL PIL N
10 O O co 01 m M m N N N \N~ N '(D d 0 PI3 C
0 0 0 C) o o PI2 0 0 0 0 8
N N N N\ N\ N N N N N N1_N• N N\ N N N ---N-. II
COMMON TRENCH FOR UTILITIES I / \
SHEET,
FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF [1:2] TAX LOT1100 ZONING R-1-10
~
TAX LOT 901 TO THE WEST 2/8
1
KEY NOTES, SITE ANALYSIS /AND PROPOSED PLOT PLAN SOLAR CALCULATIONS: FEET IMPERVIOUS SURFACE CALCULATION Z
NUMBER LABEL LOT DESIGNATION=13 MAIN HOUSE 1877 0
01 TERRAIN SHOWN IN 2' INCREMENTS
02 PROPERTY BOUNDARY NORTH/SOUTH LOT DIMENSION 62 MAIN HOUSE PORCHES 159 I-
03 LINE OF SETBACKS NORTH/SOUTH ALLOWABLE LOT WIDTH AT 0 SLOPE 67 ARU 494 0
04 LINE OF SETBACKS 18.2.5.060 YARD EXCEPTIONS ARU PORCH 49
05 E/L EASEMENT LINE LINE OF DEEDED ACCESS FOR DRIVEWAY MAIN HOUSE ON EAST FACE WALKWAYS 324
06 EXISTING GRAVEL DRIVEWAY SHOWN DASHED PITCH: 5.5/12 SOLAR PITCH DRIVEWAY AND PARKING 2570
07 FORMER HOUSE SITE SHOWN DASHED HEIGHT OF PEAK ABOVE NATURAL GRADE 19.75
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 5473 U)
O8 182' T FIRE HYDRANT TO SOUTH N/S DISTANCE TO PROPERY LINE FROM PEAK. 22.75 0
09 EXISTI NG STONE STEPS 0
10 EXISTING TWO TIER RETAINING WALL N/S DISTANCE REQUIRED TO PROPERTY LINE 7.3 HALF OF DRIVEWAY 1125
12 ADJACENT SHED 25 16' ! (0.445-0)= 7.3' REQUIRED TL 900 TOTAL LOT AREA 11731
11 ADJACENT RESIDENCE rHEIGHT RMULA BELOW
13 EXISTING WATER AND SEWER CONNECTION TO BE ABANDONED PERCENT IMPERVIOUS 47 W
14 GAS & PHONE FOR TL 1100 TO THE SOUTH N HOUSE AT RAISED FLOOR OC 00
c\j
15 CITY SEWER CH: 5.5!12 SOLAR PITCH IT'S INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT IF HALF (J 0
N
6 WATER MAIN OF THE SHARED DRIVEWAY WITH DEEDED T- C)
7 LINE OF CURB OF PEAK ABOVE NATURAL GRADE 2013 ( Z _1 T- C) c\J
18 EXISTING UTILITY POLE AND TRANSFORMER N!S DISTANCE TO PROPERY LINE FROM PEAK. 22.75 ACCESS) IS DEDUCTED; THE PERCENT < w I cg
19 OVERHEAD POWER QWEST AFN & CHARTER N/S DISTANCE REQUIRED TO PROPERTY LINE 10.11 IMPERVIOUS IS REDUCED TO 37.
20 220 V UNDERGROUND SERVICE FORMULA BELOW W 2 0) op ca
21 AVERAGE DRIVEWAY GRADE 16% 20.5-16' ! (0.445-0)= 10.11 ' REQUIRED r
22 COMMON TRENCH ALL UTILITIES LINE STILE LEGEND 0 I 05 23CONCRETE WALKWAY ARU AT EAST PEAK PIL -PROPERTY LINE
24 (319'.X 18" PARKING SPACES PITCH: 5.5/12 SOLAR PITCH SBI L -SETBACK LINE -
26 HOUSE AND ARU ELECTRIC METERS HEIGHT OF PEAK ABOVE NATURAL GRADE 18.25 E /L -EASEMENT LINE
25 ENLARGED CURB CUT N!S DISTANCE TO PROPERY LINE FROM PEAK, 19 - -
27 NEW 2' HI DRY STACK RETAINING WALL 220v UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC o
N/S DISTANCE REQUIRED TO PROPERTY LINE 5,61 wlw -ROOF AND FOUNDATION DRAINS
a
28 NEW WATER METERS FOR TL 900 AND 901
G -GAS LINE
29 PHOTO VOLTAIC PANELS FORMULA BELOW TELEPHONE LINE
30 SOLAR HOT WATER (18.5-16')/ (0.445-0)= 5.61 REQUIRED t -
c -WATER LINE
31 TRASH AND RECYCLING
s -SEWER LINE
32 ROOF AND FOUNDATION DRAINS TO STREET
33 EXISTING MAILBOX
134 ISHELTERED BIKE
35 EXTERORLLIGHT PARKING 2 TAX LOT 1000 ZONING R-1-10 11 \
PI)
1 .0 Poi P/L ~ 1st Floor tu
1 m 02 Poe \i I C 1 W
B/L 38l Ly ip Poa - eos - -
Q
SBIL B/L B/L SBIL SB! 1 S
03_B 4- 0 UJI
1st Floor C)
S 15' N 0~
~ 4' I 07~~ T_ ~m
o. m
1 490 SID FT ARU 2 V Iz
i Poe ~
0 35 1860 SQ FT MAIN HOUSE 10 '1
9 Q
r W
-FIS Z ~ LU
® 34 J/1 ~C Ul
N ~21i,~~ / IlCL ~ Poa( 0 <
23 09 rv
JEE
Pot
' i 31 0 I V
17 u W
,I
®J J J 3 Ill
eoz _ ~ l~ I - 34 r IU OL
a MAP AND TL: 391 E08DA 900
® s;- ZONING: R-1-10 AREA 11731 SQ FT < ~n
} - - -
~i~ 25 `L Q
05 220V 220V 220V 220V 220V 220V 220V
F' 10' E!L EA - EIL : EIL EIL EIL EIL Q EIL ElL - ~EIL EIL I
wIW w W wIW-- 1v wIW v1lW Q- iW1w wlW w I W uIW V, I 48 ] Lu
IL SB I L SBIL--~SBIL SBIL ----`'o--°- SOIL - SBl '22i Q'
I1'-SB U
22 / c -N- c 22< < z21G1 ~fK d
SBIL ~P SBILio 21 ~T T /'T T T
_ o
P/L Pll -AP/ P!L PI Pl /L di PIL ` PIL PIL PIL PIL 22p1, o~
p ~-P1L N
00 et c) M M m M N \N N \N o o Pt3
0 CD
0 010 0 0 0~ ~q o P12 0 0
C) 0 0 0 0 ~o
c\1 N N N\ N~ N N N,\ N N N N N\ N N N - N 11 8
COMMON TRENCH FOR UTILITIES
FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT OF 12 TAX LOT1100 ZONING R-1-10 SHEET:
TAX LOT 901 TO THE WEST
1 11 \ L3/8--
391E08DA900 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SCALE:1 in -15 ft
I I
Z
2048.75' F_
RIDGE 0
2043.75A'
TOP PLT
Z
2035.75'
2032,75' ARU FLOOR
2031' RIDGE Y Z
RIDGE
W 0
1TO2U
023.75' 2026.5'
TOP OF PARKING ® CV N
2023.75 P PLgTE 2024'
TOP PLAT BOTTOM OF PARKING 2 2 P
Z C:)
_j cq
2017,5'
2015.75
FLOOR FLOOR J co
3: CC)
2011' ®U
TOP OF RETAININ ELEVATION (PROJECTED HEIGHTS) SCALE: 1 in =15 ft Z.) Lo 0
2006'
SIDEWALK
2~
3
59
15' T-8" 914" > 271-2" u.1 j
_m_-
Y 5020LS ~ 5020LS ~ ~ 5020LS - 604pLS ~ ] 4
6 CC
25' Q - o
3'5112" 5'2112" 2'4° 4 14_
~D Q-11
<
W
2068 60~20LS W N
1' ~W DEN
(0 V'""l o ~ 90 sgli (V d3
N
l _.1 I W CO to ASTER BA I{. I r o I:
_ STERBDR w„ 87sgft ~3 „ ENTRY m r
O o I U) Z, ( Msg1t----, (f) I ltd 88 sq It
(o
0
v - I [L, ]
CD yy
2068. we ~ I o
N I N I r 3 0~ I
_ ev I 5 \ 3; 4068 4068 CLOSET LA5 sgeY~U~ I 4L
4 4 PORCH CLOSET 0 i y- 3066
A. - A9sg0 28 sq 11 3 1
l2 :1 , 2666 2666 266e
2,
r I - f0 ` GREAT ROOM i*)
M UP
t38 It 697 sq It m d ;
HALL Lu
~
~I z
- - ° CLOSET 2668- 2068 2666 L
r W
20 sq It 0
P~~ g $
i G? I o L_ C~0v
a
O68
I~,R us s
DN m ~ ~
OL
dOQ"
N N
BE ROOM i - (L
OFFICE -1aA14A7 sq0 us m O Ua < to
' W l~ ]
403OLS 40301S g 48sgn 6q 11
WW
4' 16' 8" 4'-4" - 6068 w m <
. 8
25 CLOSE U-1
]
203DLS 4050LS 7030TS 604OLS
(2) ELECTRIC METERS-
5'-4
12' 8" 112" 5'-10112" U-1 211-21' --4,-
59'
ARU FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8 in =1 ft
SHEET:
MAIN HOUSE FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8 in =1 ft / I
Z
COMP ROOF SUN TUNNEL F-
U
6" LAP SMOOTH HARDI SIDING (TYP)
x:12 - :12 5:12 U)
12 2020FX 5:12 5:12
L- 1. T 0
1X4 TRIM (TYP) Z
5020L5 5T020LS ~
6 5020LS
X6 P (TYP) ~
6040LS
6050LS 6050LS ~OSIT 6050LS Z: "d, ce)
-J C\l
LU
HOME c
EXISTING STONE STEPS AND RETAINING WALL
ELEVATION 2 118 in =1 ft f
ELEVATION 1 118 in =1 ft
Q I
~ I
tU
W
PHOTO VOLTAIC ARRAY STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF
SUN TUNNEL SOLAR HOT WATER 0 j
Q ~
5:12
3112:12
4X4 POS 203OLS 0 uuj
u
LJ
5040LS 40,1 7030TS I
5040LS m 6040LS ~ lu ~
®Q°
ELECTRIC METER < p
- = 1- 0
Z J u.!
-1 - - I - - f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - w
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -e-r~~ <
~L - - - - - - - - -
- - - 1J - - - - - - - J - - - 1 - 1rL- - - - - - - - _ - -
_ I
i
i
ELEVATION 3 118 in =1 It ELEVATION 4 118 in =1 ft
SHEET:
5/8
Z
0
U
5 EXPOSURE SMOOTH
HARDI SIDING F_
COMP ROOF
5:1 5:12 5;12
`Y Z
6D20LS C)
6X6 POST 1X4 TRIM (TYP)
505OLS WATER HEATER OD
VINYL WINDOV~
Z C)
<WI C~
W 0)
- - - _j ° co
®®L V
ELEVATION 5 1/8 in =1 ft ELEVATION 6 1/8 in =1 ft
FJ b
0
SOLAR HOT WATER J
lU
7 6:72 5:12
Q
x.
L~
SOLAR HOT WATER TANK ® IZ
AND EQUIPMENT 7 lu
ZO
r---------------------~ z~u~
ELEVATION 7 1/8 in =1 ft ELEVATION 8 1/8 in =1 ft a- 7
W
SHEET:
1
f t
z
V/
U)
Z
C/
~e rz
W
w®
~®~N 110
Z2: (y)
W C\j
I
f op m
U~
Lo (J
,r
Fr
I
w
v0
0..N
A
d
tU
O~w
tu D-
7
o
ujVU-
a LU
0
Oz>
w
i
SHEET;
i
7/
i
Y Z
w® 1
®N
Z®
Q-IN(0
~w®~
w 0®
CO U
- i
OC
LL
<<
eU-1
C~
z
w
0►~w
I0~
wZw
UJ
o
0- z>
a-
SHEET;
8/8
J ,
1
! O 1 i 13 .,,11
j i r }t l s
v i 1
r
i
r
t
i
It i
yp l yy
4 ~
144 .i ~I !3 P I j i }I ' ~4}
o
J)
R
1
~ i t ! 1 s ( t 1 ~is I ~ I
,
I
I
" - t ~ t 4 t ~S
i
y.y
( t
i
199'`
i
f
~ I 2
•
\I t
t ti t ~t ~i tea
4
a
t
205
1
1
3
5
j q l
'1 1 I
o y k
1 ~t 219
%
1 p s a ~ ~ ~ i
* i
y 4
4
,
i
a a 4 1 z ~ ~ _ ' '
,
t
It
p
Property lines are for reference only, not scaleable
0 510 20 Feet
LAYOUT PAGE TABLE
NUMBCR GENERAL INFORMDESCRIPTION ~MPIIi NTS
A l ION PROJECT INFO AMA 1 ION, REVISIONS PLO I PLAN -
2 ELEVATIONS FOR GRADE- j _ -
f \ I \ \ p Cn
\ l / z
1 3.0 feet'
\ 8"cedar \ W
20 e cedar 17"ce ar I
(0 71
rj-- I O 1 III ' ~5oedar-I• 1® N
~
0 00
6 ce' ar _ omamenwl
r Se}+ped rH"i t jr
~Ither sida of ~als l C\j (0
to parklag area" I I r
\ i===~\ - I < 0
~3"cak
C
W 00
0 r C)
40
12"m dron~~ LC) U
•
33.5
< <I
o "
` 8"wain i'
A,
Pa k1 g 261oak kcdcanopy vab k ?'t"
~o
uu
le 4"apple 2010
2040 ~w1 3'app 2030 2020
Window
25' 2 oak c a.. ~
1
_ Widened D& wa~®
12r paved
UI
LINE OF SET BACKS w
3
16 to
112"0a J t 1 ~ 35"cedar r W ~
18"ma le ir
C ~z
z z
19 Grani e Street TL 900 Ma 391E DA o
C, U-
p PLAN SCALE: 1 in =15 ft I m tu
~ N H
LOT COVERAGE (IN SQUARE FEET): E
Map & TaxLot 391 E08DA 900
LOT: 11731 Acreage 0,27 a
MAIN HOUSE: 1963 Zoning R-1-10
MAIN PORCH: 117. Situs Address 219 GRANITE ST ASHLAND 02
STUDIO: 495
STUDIO PORCH: 46 Mailing Address EISENBERG LEONARD AND KAREN TRUST ET AL
223 GRANITE ST m SHEET:
DRIVEWAY AND PARKING: 4800 ASHLAND OR, 97520 1/
~,F
Z
Peaked Roof
U)
2036' Z
26" dbh Oak
- Cut
y z
_ w -
Parkin Area 2027'
Peaked Roof 0
(C'7
r
Z~J(~®
~Cut(offsettonorth) W
for steps to parking Ill a
JUD area, curved to avoid ®I r co
® _ tree roots of big oak. / ®®T C)
® 0 lp U
Sidewalk L..
2002' e
~U
195 feet
NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 in =15 ft
W
Q
0 '
N
Z
0 0
N
N <
a }
Peaked Roof
5
)36' b ^ TrPT Z z
26°dbh oak g
Cut 7-
a_
rt
Parkin Area 2027 o
r Peaked Roof w
' _ z 0
¢ lL
u
Q Fl I m W
~ v Cut(offset tonorth) z
for steps to parking
area, curved to avoid o
tree roots of big oak. Cut - - , _ / m
5 r
x
® J.Sidew
' 2002
SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1 in =15 ft
u
O
m SHEET;
2/2
i
0
i
r
ZONING VMMIT APPLICATION
f - Planning Division
4 51 Winbum Way, Ashland OR 97520
CITY, ~ 541.488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE
I.A.
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT _ /7/,7(-/',%~
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ® YES 0
Street Address 2J7 L g zy / r `t°
Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E 0812A Tax Lot(s) 9'00
Zoning Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT
221/ / /1!d3 Phone E-Mall
Name Z
Address 2Z5, tq1V I )-e 57- City X51 AJ Zip
PROPERTY OWNER
Name r4mv_-- a As i t: ~z= Phone E-Mall
Address City Zip
SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER
Title 61-W e,91\1714 . Nam^c4ai Phone~~®~ ®~Z E-Mail CoA5
Address City tvc-A
Title i~ Name ®ll r~ _ Phone E-Mail ~ y/` 4 AI&1401W 62
Address 2 W~2_ 7_z Z_y :D<' City A S 1_~ &k Zip 76'zo
I hereby certify that the statements and Information contained In this application, Including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are In all respects,
true and correct, /understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site Inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be Incorrect, the owner assumes full responslbliity. 1 further understand that if this request Is subsequently contested, the burden%w01 be on me to
establish.
1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;
2) that the findings of fact fumishad Justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further E
4) that all structures or Improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in thl regard will uIt most like in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly In my structures being built in relianpe thereon being required to
be remove at my expa e. 1 1 have adoubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance
l P <
Applicant's 1gnature Date
As owner of the pro p rty Involved In this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner. f'f
r 13 20 5
Property ner's Signatur ulred) Date
[Po be complaW by Oily Staff] ;
o
Date Received Zoning Permit Type~_ Filing Fee $
OVER
(3Acomm-dev\p1andnS\Fonn9 & HandoutAZoning Permit Application.doc
r, 1
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
Planning Division
51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520
C IT 0 IF 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE
ASH L,14,N
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT -Icoft V,4j .
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? 0 YES 0
Street Address '2 l
Assessor's Map No. 391 E 0812A Tax Lot(s) 00
Zoning V I -IQ Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT
Name L nZ /,5E/Y.0 Phone,~"// 4~~ E-Mall 6N4WC0eq
Address 22-A,(V1)-Z 7- City 14,5X,11* /V Zip
PROPERTY OWNER
Name A.4--
45 Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER ' I
Title ~ ~CWV7`/d• Nam iC4e48/ & ,..4j PhoneS1//- V(,m2//Z E-Mail Co A5 ~1fC/~f~~ µl o
Address City ' - svZip 7
Title DL P:5 t" !a :2 Name o l/ Phone E-Mail ~ 7
Address-2W'2- a 7-z L- City S~/-^Pt,/ Zip 76 'Zo
I hereby certify that the statements and Information contained In this application, Including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are In all respects,
true and correct, /understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site Inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be Incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility, l further understand that if this request Is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;
2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or Improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in th s regard will r r'l It most Ilk ly In not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in Mllance thereon being required to
be remove et my expenf I have a y doubts, l am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance,
,
Applicant's S gnature Date
As owner of the prope Involve . l have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner.
( l
64 / od
Property Owner's Signatures quired) Date
(To be completed by City 8WM
Date Received Zoning Permit Type _ Filing Fee $
OVER
aacomin-devlplmningiForms & Handouts\Zoning Permit Applloatlon.doc
i
Job Address: 219 GRANITE ST Contractor:
ASHLAND OR 97520 Address:
C
A Owner's Name: EISENBERG LEONARD I/KAREN D O Phone:
P Customer 06934 N State Lie No:
P EISENBERG LEONARD I/KAREN D T City Lie No:
L Applicant: 223 GRANITE ST R
Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A
C C Sub-Contractor:
A Phone: (541) 482-3754 T Address:
N Applied: 10/29/2015 O
T Issued:
Expires: 04/26/2016 R Phone:
State Lie No:
Maplot: 391 E08DA900 City Lie No:
DESCRIPTION:
VALUATION
Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description
Total for Valuation:
MECHANICAL
ELECTRICAL
STRUCTURAL
PERMIT FEE DETAIL
Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount
CUP Accessory Residential 658.00 Variance (Type 1) 1,012.00
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
20 East Main St, Fax: 541-488-5311
Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland,or.us
Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF