Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLiberty_818_PA-2016-01007 CITY F ASHLAND I r July 19, 2016 Notice of Final Decision On July 19, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA-2016-01007 I' Subject Property: 818 Liberty Street Applicant: Daniel Dawson Description: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for alteration of the land surface on lands identified as Hillside Land. The project will involve re-grading and paving of an existing driveway, creating a larger landing\parking space near the garage, and terracing. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 16AD; TAX LOTS: 6200. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12t" day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Mark Schexnayder in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ` www.ashland.orms i% i SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 \ Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.onus `l i i a~ c ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01007 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 818 Liberty Street APPLICANT/O ER: Daniel Dawson DESCRIPTION: A request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for alteration of the land surface on lands identified as Hillside Land. The project will involve re-grading and paving of an existing driveway, creating a larger landing/parking space near the garage, and terracing. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 16AD; TAX LOT: 6200. SUBMITTAL DATE: May 27, 2016 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: June 24, 2016 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: July 19, 2016 FINAL DECISION DATE: August 1, 2016 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: February 1, 2017 DECISION: The application is a request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit approval to re- grade and pave the existing gravel driveway, create a larger landing and turnaround area at the top of the driveway near the garage, make a small recreational vehicle parking space near the dwelling, create a fenced garden area, and terracing for slope stability on the subject property. The proposed improvements will include working inside of an easement located on the neighbor's property. No additional modifications to the site beyond the proposal are being considered with this application, and any future development or modification of the site would require a separate Planning Action. The subject property is accessed from Liberty Street through the neighboring property by way of an access easement. The lot comprises approximately 22,651 square feet in area and is developed with an existing single-family dwelling. The existing gravel driveway climbs steeply from the neighboring property to the existing single-family dwelling. The remainder of the property slopes from southwest to northeast on lands identified as Hillside, Severe Constraints, or Wildfire. The subject property is heavily forested and this is the primary means by which the existing slope of the lot is currently retained. The proposal, per the site plan and supporting materials, is to grade an area of approximately 7,000 square feet of Hillside, Severe Constraint, or Wildfire lands in order to widen an existing gravel driveway to include an adjacent garden area. Also included in the proposal is the grading of a parking space and landing area as well as a pedestrian path near the single-family dwelling. The project will also include the installation of Versa Lok retaining walls on the uphill side of the driveway, the downhill side of the new parking area, and adjacent to the north property line to retain the hill slope. Dry Stack Stone Walls and Concrete Walls will also be used to retain hill cuts around the garden area and single-family dwelling. All proposed terraces will be less than four feet in height above natural grade. The project will only require fill material behind the proposed retaining walls and will be replanted as shown on the landscape plan provided with the application. No additional cutting or filling of the slope is proposed. Per the requirements of the Ashland Municipal Code Section 18.3.10.090.13.1, the applicant was required to have the proposed grading, retaining wall, and erosion control plans designed by a PA #2016-01007 818 Liberty Street/MMS Page 1 1 f geotechnical expert. The geotechnical evaluation and design was submitted with the application and completed by KenCairn Landscape Architecture to provide for the design and construction of the new retaining walls, terracing, and landscape plan. Based on the proposed site plan materials the applicant plans near vertical cut slopes contained behind the proposed retaining walls. The proposed retaining walls, terracing, and paved driveway will eliminate existing adverse impacts on the subject property, neighboring properties, and the environment by further stabilizing an existing hill slope (AMC 18.3.10.050.A). The application materials state that where land is disturbed or vegetation removed appropriately selected vegetation will be planted at the completion of development. The landscape plan identifies appropriate species and locations for planting areas disturbed by construction activates to minimize erosion (AMC 18.3.10.050.B). The site plan evaluation and recommendations of the geotechnical expert dated May 26, 2016 prepared by KenCairn Landscape Architecture, are conditions of the Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit approval, and thus, must be instituted with the proposed development. The approval criteria for a Physical & Environmental Constraints Permit require that the applicant take reasonable steps to reduce adverse impacts to the environment (AMC 18.3.10.050.C). The area of impact for this project will be confined to the Hillside, Severe Constraint, or Wildfire lands adjacent to the existing driveway area and single-family dwelling. According to the site plan and narrative, four trees are proposed for removal or will be impacted by this project. A tree protection plan has also been included with the application. On July 7, 2016 the Ashland Tree Commission reviewed the applicants Tree Removal and Protection Plan for the subject property. During the public hearing, the applicant stated his intent to revise the Tree Removal Plan to propose the removal of only three trees instead of four. The crab apple tree located near the northeast corner of the dwelling unit will be protected. The commission approved the Tree Removal Plan as presented and recommended the applicant modify the Tree Protection Plan to include using a single wall of chain link fencing to prevent access to protection areas instead of encircling individual trees. It is Staff s opinion that the proposal meets the requirements of the Physical and Environmental Constraints chapter for Hillside, Severe Constraints, and Wildfire lands and that with the conditions of the approval this project can be found to comply with the requirements. The criteria for a Physical Constraints Review Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.3.10 050, as follows: A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor° or Planning Connn-fission-shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. PA #2016-01007 818 Liberty Street/ WS Page 2 i Planning Action 2016-01007 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 2016- 01007 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. 2) That all measures installed for the purposes of long-term erosion control, including but not limited to vegetative cover, retaining walls and landscaping shall be maintained in perpetuity on all areas in accordance with 18.3.10.090.B.6. 3) The landscaping and irrigation for re-vegetation of cut/fill slopes and erosion control shall be installed in accordance with the approved plan. Vegetation shall be installed in such a manner as to be substantially established within one year of installation. ks 4) That a revised Tree Removal and Protection Plan consistent with the standards described in 18.4.5 be submitted for review and approval by the Staff Advisor prior to the site work. The plan shall identify the location and placement of fencing around the drip lines of trees identified for preservation. The amount of fill and grading within the drip line shall be minimized. Cuts within the drip line shall be noted on the tree protection plan, and shall be executed by handsaw and kept to a minimum. No fill shall be placed around the trunk/crown root. 5) That the tree protection fencing shall be installed according to the approved plan prior to any site work, storage of materials or issuance of the building permit. The tree protection shall be inspected and approved by the Ashland Planning Department prior to site work, storage of materials and/or the issuance of a building permit. 6) That a Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division prior to site work, tree removal, building demolition, and/or storage of materials. The Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the tree to be removed and the installation of tree protection fencing for the trees on and adjacent to the site. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.4.5. ( c Bill ' olnar, Pla ing Director Date De artment of > ommunity Development PA #2016-01007 818 Liberty Street/MMS Page 3 I Y I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I G STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) 1 i The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, I Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On July 19, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01007, 8178 Liberty. Signature of Employee Document17/19/2016 i t PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6000 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 100 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5800 ATNIP GERALD LYNN/ANITA IRENE BAXTER JOHN R ET AL BURNHAM R 0/MILDRED I NARUM 801 BEACH ST 831 LIBERTY ST 809 BEACH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 C PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6200 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3900 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5900 DAWSON DANIEL RAND LESLIE LIV TRU D'OLIVO MARK DUNHAM FRANCES W TRUSTEE ET AL PO BOX 273 804 BEACH ST 807 BEACH ST MAMMOTH LAKES, CA 93546 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 447 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AA 5000 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6202 FERNANDES JOAO/BERGAN- FERNANDES FINKLE PETER L ET AL HOWARD LEONARD JOSEPH 762 LISA LN JUDITH M 785 BEACH ST 800 LIBERTY ST 762 LISA ASHLAND, , OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AA 5100 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 201 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6201 JONES ERIC P JUAREZ JAMES LANDES JONATHAN 1700 SHATTUCK AVE 247 468 PARKRIDGE PL 796 LIBERTY ST BERKLEY, CA 94709 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3904 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6100 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3800 MASLOW JENNIFER MCKINLEY DOROTHY A ET AL MILLER MERRILY D 2200 OLD SISKIYOU HWY 99 S 795 BEACH ST 800 BEACH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5500 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3700 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5601 NICKELS JAC PHELPS PATRICK B TRUSTEE ET AL PHILIPPS FRANK J TRUSTEE ET AL 821 BEACH ST 2638 SAKLAN INDIAN DR APT 1 813 BEACH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 WALNUT CREEK, CA 94595 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AA 7301 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 202 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AB 3700 SINCERNY STEPHEN C TRUSTEE ET AL SUNCREST HOMES LLC TALBOT JOBY 790 LIBERTY ST PO BOX 1313 30 CALAIS GATE CORMONT RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 LONDON, SE5 9RQ PA-2016-01007 391 E16AB 3600 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5700 PA-2016-01007 TAMA JANE TRUSTEE ET AL TEKER SUNI S ET AL DANIEL & LESLIE DAWSON 75-5481 MAMALAHOA HWY 811 BEACH ST 818 LIBERTY ST HOLUALOA, HI 96725 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 PA-2016-01007 ROBIN WARREN SHAWN KAMPMANN 818 Liberty APPLIED GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING POLARIS LAND SURVEYING NOD 7/19/16 1314 MEDFORD CENTER #452 PO BOX 459 26 MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 I i Y F Planning Department, 51 Winbu'rn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -AS I NOTICE OF APPLICATION i PLANNING ACTION: 2016-01007 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 818 Liberty OWNERIAPPLICANT: Daniel Dawson DESCRIPTION: A request for Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit for alteration of the land surface on lands identified as Hillside Land. The project will involve re-grading and paving of an existing driveway, creating a larger landinglparking space near the garage, and terracing. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 16AD; TAX LOTS: 6200. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 24, 2016 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: July 8, 2016 SUBJECT PROPERTY T 818 Liberty Street PA-2016-01007 t ~1 - f 1:600 1 Inch = 50 feet w-~( Tr_r_i lr IAappinp is cchanalc any m,a bean nonorrmry Macurtacy. should bo ba lndependon a, epoodrn,dy IoclGad,maemant Orroodw+y locood 5f c<n All B loM vaiibdtor anbronw ondlor lowdon. l The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period' and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. 0CC I I r PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS, 18.3.10.050 An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2016\PA-2016-01007.doca i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) F The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On June 24, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01007, 818 Liberty. Signature of Employee Documentt 6124/2016 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AA 5000 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AA 5100 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AA 7302 FINKLE PETER L ET AL JONES ERIC P SINCERNY STEPHEN C TRUSTEE ET 785 BEACH ST 1700 SHATTUCK AVE 247 AL ASHLAND, OR 97520 BERKLEY, CA 94709 790 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 3139 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AB 3600 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AB 3700 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 100 TAMA JANE TRUSTEE ET AL TALBOT JOBY BAXTER JOHN R ET AL 75-5481 MAMALAHOA HWY 30 CALAIS GATE CORMONT RD :831 LIBERTY ST HOLUALOA, HI 96725 LONDON, SE5 9RQ ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 201 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 202 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AC 447 JUAREZ JAMES SUNCREST HOMES LLC FERNANDES JOAO/BERGAN- 468 PARKRIDGE PL PO BOX 1313 FERNANDES JUDITH M ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 975401313 1762 LISA LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3700 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3800 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3900 PHELPS PATRICK B TRUSTEE ET AL MILLER MERRILY D D'OLIVO MARK 2638 SAKLAN INDIAN DR APT 1 800 BEACH ST 804 BEACH ST WALNUT CREEK, CA 94595 3053 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 3904 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5500 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5600 MASLOW JENNIFER NICKELS JAC SUNCREST HOMES LLC 2200 OLD SISKIYOU HWY 99 S 821 BEACH ST PO BOX 1313 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 : !TALENT, OR 975401313 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5601 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5700 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5800, PHILIPPS FRANK J III/NANCY ! TEKER SUNI S ET AL BURNHAM R 0/MILDRED I NARUM 813 BEACH ST 811 BEACH ST X809 BEACH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 i PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 5900 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6000 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6100 DUNHAM FRANCES W TRUSTEE ET ATNIP GERALD LYNN/ANITA IRENE MCKINLEY DOROTHY A ET AL AL 801 BEACH ST j 795 BEACH ST 807 BEACH ST ASHLAND OR 97520 ''ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6200 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6201 PA-2016-01007 391 E16AD 6202 DAWSON DANIEL RAND LESLIE LIV LANDES JONATHAN HOWARD LEONARD JOSEPH TRU ET AL 796 LIBERTY ST 800 LIBERTY ST PO BOX 273 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MAMMOTH LAKES, CA 93546 DANIEL DAWSON KERRY KENCAIRN 818 LIBERTY 818 LIBERTY 545 A STREET #3 6/24/2016 NOC ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 26 i c i I LJ ryA 3 ~ a ,g~ u~ ail u~ k u 4 ~ 4 € pp u u, All 409 6202 1 4 swo I..~ E t 3 a a 9 6i 4* 4NO 53 ~I'~~111!l~ 1 I I Application Submittal 818 Liberty Street 39 1E 16AD Tax Lot 6200 Owners Daniel and Leslie Dawson Geotechnical Engineer 818 Liberty Street Robin Warren Ashland, OR 97520 Applied Geotechnical Engineering 760 937-4198 1314-B Center Drive #452 Medford, Oregon 97501 Landscape Architect and Planning 541226-6658 Kerry KenCairn KenCairn Landscape Architecture Surveyor 545 A Street Suite 3 Shawn Kampmann Ashland, OR 97520 Polaris Land Surveying 541488-3194 P.O. Box 459 Ashland, Oregon 97520 541482-5009 Project Description This property is already developed, including a gravel drive, home, and circulation/garden around the house. The lot is interesting in that most of its circulation is within an easement. This application includes the development of a deer fenced vegetable garden within the easement (the easement language allows for general landscape within it) the goals of this project are many and include: • Re-grade and pave the driveway which is currently over-steepened in some locations and flat in the wrong locations, the gravel surface when this steep is very unstable under turning tires. • Create a better landing and turn around opportunity at the top of the drive/in front of the garage. • Create parking for a small RV next to the house. • Increase the general aesthetic of the site. • Make a more usable patio area behind the house. • Formalize and create better circulation around the home. The drawing package includes the proposed changes listed above in the following drawings: Cover Sheet L 1.0 Tree Protection Plan L 1.1 Slope Analysis L 2.0 Grading and Drainage Plan L 2.1 Cut and Fill Analysis L 3.0 Layout Plan L 4.0 Irrigation Plan L 5.0 Planting Plan This project will require compliance with the following code sections, the changes requested are addressed within these code sections as well: 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones - Parking and Setbacks 18.3.10 Physical and Environmental Constraints Hillside 18.4.5 Tree Preservation and Protection 18.5.7 Tree Removal Permits 1 18.3.10 - Physical and Environmental Constraints Overlay 18.3.10.020 Applicability A. Physical Constraints Review Permit. A Physical Constraints Review Permit is required for the following activities in the land classifications in section 18.3.10.060. 1. Alteration of Land. The alteration of the land surface by any of the following activities in areas identified as Flood Plain Corridor Land, Hillside Land, or Severe Constraint Land. a. Earth-moving activities such as grading, filling, stripping, or cutting involving more than 20 cubic yards on any lot, or earth-moving activity disturbing a surface area greater than 1000 square feet on any lot. This project falls under the Physical and Environmental ordinance due to movement of earth on an area greater than 1000 square feet, the total volume of movement will also be over 20 cubic yards. b. Construction of a building, road, driveway, parking area, or other structure; except that additions to existing buildings of less than 300 square feet to the existing building footprint shall not be considered development for section 18.3.10.090 Development Standards for Hillside Lands. This project proposes improvements to an existing driveway, and the creation of a parking pad alongside the existing home. The project also includes the creation of flat terraces for landscape use. c. Culverting or diversion of any stream designated by chapter 18.3.10. Not Applicable 3. Tree Removal. c. Hillside Land and Severe Constraints Land. Tree removal, in areas identified as Hillside Land and Severe Constraint Land, except that a permit need not be obtained for tree removal that is not associated with development, and done for the purposes of wildfire management and carried out in accord with a Fire Prevention and Control Plan approved by the Fire Chief. There are four trees proposed for removal to allow the proposed improvements to the property. 18.3.10.040 Application Submission Requirements The following information is required for a Physical Constraints Review Permit application: See graphic submittals for this project, they comply with all required information. 18.3.10.050 Approval Criteria An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. z Dawson 818 Liberty Street 2 B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. This proposal solves problems with minimum alteration and disturbance of the existing property. The proposal does include concrete paving as a solution to dust control and stability for a steep driveway. The additional lot coverage has been kept to a minimum 18.3.10.060 Land Classifications The following factors shall be used to determine the classifications of various lands and their constraints to building and development on them. B. Hillside Lands. Hillside Lands are lands that are subject to damage from erosion and slope failure, and which include areas that are highly visible from other portions of the city. The following lands are classified as Hillside Lands: All areas defined as Hillside Lands on the Physical and Environmental Constraints Hillside Lands and Severe Constraints map and which have a slope of 25 percent or greater. Some of these improvements fall within hillside lands but not all. Much of this lot was already leveled when it was developed for the existing home. The enlargement of the parking area, the inclusion of a turn around, and the creation of the vegetable gardens all create interaction with slopes over 25%. Additionally, it is the overall movement of soil within the hillside lands overlay that brings it into a Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit requirement. C. Wildfire Lands. Lands with potential of wildfire. The following lands are classified as Wildfire Lands: All areas defined as wildfire lands on the Physical and Environmental Constraints Wildfire Lands map. This property falls within the wildfire lands zone. 18.3.10.090 Development Standards for Hillside Lands It is the purpose of the Development Standards for Hillside Lands to provide supplementary development regulations to underlying zones to ensure that development occurs in such a manner as to protect the natural and topographic character and identity of these areas, environmental resources, the aesthetic qualities and restorative value of lands, and the public health, safety, and general welfare by insuring that development does not create soil erosion, sedimentation of lower slopes, slide damage, flooding problems, and severe cutting or scarring. It is the intent of these development standards to encourage a sensitive form of development and to allow for a reasonable use that complements the natural and visual character of the City. A. General Requirements. The following general requirements shall apply in Hillside Lands. This project is alteration of an existing lot with an existing home, it has already been developed per hillside lands requirements. 4. Geotechnical Studies. Not Applicable, this is a pre-existing lot with a pre-existing house. A geo-tech has provided details for the versa-lok wall and the RV parking area. Dawson 818 Liberty Street 3 G. Hillside Grading and Erosion Control. All development on lands classified as Hillside shall provide plans conforming to the following items. 1. All grading, retaining wall design, drainage, and erosion control plans for development on Hillside Lands shall be designed by a geotechnical expert. All cuts, grading or fills shall conform to the International Building Code and be consistent with the provisions of this ordinance. Erosion control measures on the development site shall be required to minimize the solids in runoff from disturbed areas. 2. Timing of Improvements. Not Applicable, this is a single family home. 3. Retention in natural state. This lot is just over % acre at 22,651 square feet. The average slope of the lot, where we are proposing changes, is 22%. The actual area of the lot that is already disturbed, plus what is being proposed for additional disturbance is 7,000 square feet, which equals 30% of the lot. 4. Grading - Cuts. On all cut slopes on areas classified as Hillside Lands, the following standards shall apply. a. Cut slope angles shall be determined in relationship to the type of materials of which they are composed. Where the soil permits, limit the total area exposed to precipitation and erosion. Steep cut slopes shall be retained with stacked rock, retaining walls, or functional equivalent to control erosion and provide slope stability when necessary. Where cut slopes are required to be laid back (1:1 or less steep), the slope shall be protected with erosion control getting or structural equivalent installed per manufacturers specifications, and revegetated. Not Applicable, there will not be any exposed cut slopes, all vertical cuts and fills are covered by walls of either stone or versa-lok segmental retaining wall system. b. Exposed cut slopes, such as those for streets, driveway accesses, or yard areas, greater than seven feet in height shall be terraced. Cut faces on a terraced section shall not exceed a maximum height of five feet. Terrace widths shall be a minimum of three feet to allow for the introduction of vegetation for erosion control. Total cut slopes shall not exceed a maximum vertical height of 15 feet. The top of cut slopes not utilizing structural retaining walls shall be located a minimum setback of one-half the height of the cut slope from the nearest property line. See Figure 18.3.10.090.B.4.b Not Applicable, there will not be any exposed cut slopes, all vertical cuts and fills are covered by walls of either stone or versa-lok segmental retaining wall system. c. Cut slopes for structure foundations which reduce the effective visual bulk, such as split pad or stepped footings, shall be exempted from the height limitations of this section. See Figure 18.3.10.090. B. c. Not Applicable, this is an existing home. Dawson 818 Liberty Street 4 d. Revegetation of cut slope terraces shall include the provision of a planting plan, introduction of top soil where necessary, and the use of irrigation if necessary. The vegetation used for these areas shall be native, or species similar in resource value to native plants, which will survive, help reduce the visual impact of the cut slope, and assist in providing long term slope stabilization. Trees, bush-type plantings, and cascading vine-type plantings may be appropriate. All disturbed areas are proposed to either be planted and/or be protected by walls. 5. Grading - Fill. On all fill slopes on lands classified as Hillside Lands, the following standards shall apply. a. Fill slopes shall not exceed a total vertical height of 20 feet. The toe of the fill slope area not utilizing structural retaining shall be a minimum of six feet from the nearest property line. All proposed terraces are less than 4 feet in height. b. Fill slopes shall be protected with an erosion control netting, blanket or functional equivalent. Netting or blankets shall only be used in conjunction with organic mulch such as straw or wood fiber. The blanket must be applied so that it is in complete contact with the soil so that erosion does not occur beneath it. Erosion netting or blankets shall be securely anchored to the slope in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. All proposed fills terminate vertically and are protected by walls. b. Whenever possible, utilities shall not be located or installed on or in fill slopes. When determined that it necessary to install utilities on fill slopes, all plans shall be designed by a geotechnical expert. All utilities are already in place and proposed terraces are not going over them. c. Revegetation of fill slopes shall utilize native vegetation or vegetation similar in resource value and which will survive and stabilize the surface. Irrigation may be provided to ensure growth if necessary. Evidence shall be required indicating long-term viability of the proposed vegetation for the purposes of erosion control on disturbed areas. There are not any fill slopes where native vegetation would make sense; the planting plan indicates plants that are well suited to the area, and native adapted and deer tolerant. 6. Revegetation Requirements. Where required by this chapter, all required revegetation of cut and fill slopes shall be installed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, signature of a required survey plat, or other time as determined by the hearing authority. Vegetation shall be installed in such a manner as to be substantially established within one year of installation. All areas of disturbance are either being planted or paved. 8. Site Grading. The grading of a site on Hillside Lands shall be reviewed considering the following factors. a. No terracing shall be allowed except for the purposes of developing a level building pad and for providing vehicular access to the pad. Terracing is being proposed to improve the vehicular and pedestrian circulation of the site. Additionally, the wall and terrace along the north property line is being proposed to define the property boundary, and lessen the steepness at the edge of that property line. Using a wall to define this line will allow for planting along the property boundary, improving soil stability and privacy opportunities. Dawson 818 Liberty Street 5 b. Avoid hazardous or unstable portions of the site. The proposed work is occurring within stable portions of the site, the site has been in a state of stasis since it was originally developed in 2011. c. Building pads should be of minimum size to accommodate the structure and a reasonable amount of yard space. Pads for tennis courts, swimming pools and large lawns are discouraged. As much of the remaining lot area as possible should be kept in the natural state of the original slope. Not applicable, the house/building pad is pre-existing. The proposed terraces are to facilitate vegetable gardening and some landscaping, the patio at the south of the house is enlarged enough to make it usable, improve the drainage next to the house, and to improve/rebuild the very poorly done existing rockery walls. 9. Inspections and Final Report. Not Applicable C. Surface and Groundwater Drainage. All development on Hillside Lands shall conform to the following standards. Currently, stormwater is directed to a large catch basin in the shared access drive above the house access drive, much of the water falling on the site misses this catch basin and there is a problem with erosion on the gravel driveway. All new retaining walls (at vegetable gardens, south rebuild of rockery walls, and at north property line) will be directed to the existing city storm line. This design collects surface flows off the drive and adjacent hard surfaces and takes them across, then under the drive, tight lined to the existing city storm sewer connection. This development greatly improves the control of erosion and storm flows on this site. D. Tree Conservation, Protection and Removal. All development on Hillside Lands shall conform to the following requirements. 1. Inventory of Existing Trees. Tree surveys were conducted initially by Polaris Land Surveying, with back up and detailed inventory work by KenCairn Landscape Architecture. The attached graphic exhibit L 1.0 provides all the information required by this section of the ordinance. 2. Evaluation of Suitability for Conservation. See exhibit L 1.0 3. Tree Conservation in Project Design. Significant trees (two feet DBH or greater conifers and one foot DBH or greater broadleaf) shall be protected and incorporated into the project design whenever possible. See exhibit L 1.0 4. Tree Protection. On all properties where trees are required to be preserved during the course of development, the developer shall follow the following tree protection standards. See exhibit L 1.0 for implementation of protection standards. 5. Tree Removal. Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum number of trees on a site. The development shall follow the standards for fuel reduction if the development is located in Wildfire Lands. When justified by findings of fact, the hearing authority may approve the Dawsopmoval of trees for one or more of the following conditions, 818 Liberty Street 6 The trees proposed for removal (4 each) are either in parking improvement areas or are malus species that are not doing well and are better removed to allow for more appropriate adapted landscape. We are proposing the integration of vine Maples into the project landscape, and not proposing any replacement tree. The property is already full of native oaks and would not benefit by the inclusion of more trees. E. Building Location and Design Standards. All buildings and buildable areas proposed for Hillside Lands shall be designed and constructed in compliance with the following standards. Not Applicable, this is an existing single family home. F. All structures on Hillside Lands shall have foundations designed by an engineer or architect with demonstrable geotechnical design experience. A designer, as defined, shall not complete working drawings without having foundations designed by an engineer. Not Applicable, this is an existing single family home. G. All newly created lots or lots modified by a lot line adjustment must include building envelopes containing a buildable area less than 35 percent slope of sufficient size to accommodate the uses permitted in the underlying zone, unless the division or lot line adjustment is for open space or conservation purposes. Not Applicable, this is an existing single family home. 18.3.10.100 Development Standards for Wildfire Lands A. Requirements for Subdivisions, Performance Standards Developments, or Partitions. This project does not require afire prevention control plan. This application does not trigger a reinvestigation of these requirements. B. Requirements for Construction of All Structures. Not Applicable, this is an existing single family home and already complies with all of the appropriate requirements. 18.3.10.110 Development Standards for Severe Constraint Lands Not Applicable. This proposal does not include any sever constraints lands. Dawson 818 Liberty Street 7 Chapter 18.5.7 - Tree Removal Permits 18.5.7.020 Applicability and Review Procedure All tree removal and topping activities shall be carried out in accordance with the requirements of this chapter and as applicable, the provisions of part 18.3 Special Districts and Overlay Zones, and chapter 18.4.4 Landscaping, Lighting, and Screening. If tree removal is part of another planning action involving development activities, the tree removal application, if timely filed, shall be processed concurrently with the other planning action. Applications for Tree Removal Permits are reviewed as follows. A. Ministerial Action. The following Tree Removal Permits are subject to the Ministerial procedure in section 18.5.1.040. 1. Emergency Tree Removal Permit. B. Type I Reviews. The following Tree Removal Permits are subject to the Type I review in section 18.5.1.050. This section applies to removal of trees that are a hazard or are not a hazard. 1. Removal of trees greater than six-inches DBH on private lands zoned C-1, E-1, M-1, CM, or HC. 2. Removal of trees greater than six-inches DBH on lots zoned R-2, R-3, and R-1-3.5 that are not occupied solely by a single family detached dwelling. 3. Removal of significant trees, as defined in part 18.6, on vacant property zoned for residential purposes including but not limited to R-l, RR, WR, and NM zones. 4. Removal of significant trees as defined in part 18.6, on lands zoned SOU, on lands under the control of the Ashland School District, or on lands under the control of the City. 5. Tree Topping Permit. C. Exempt From Tree Removal Permit. The following activities are exempt from the requirement for a tree removal permit in 18.5.7.020.A, subsections A. and B, above. 2. Removal of trees in single family residential zones on lots occupied only by a single family detached dwelling and associated accessory structures, except as otherwise regulated by chapters 18.3.10 Physical and Environmental Constraints and 18.3.11 Water Resource Protection Zones. Tree removal is proposed is consistent with requests of a Physical and Environmental constraints Review Permit, the two oaks requested for removal are within areas being developed for vehicle circulation and parking needs. Two of the trees proposed for removal are fruit trees and therefore not covered under the tree removal permit criteria. 18.5.7.040 Approval Criteria B. Tree Removal Permit. 3. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. Dawson 818 Liberty Street 8 a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.3.10. Tree removal is proposed is consistent with requests of a Physical and Environmental constraints Review Permit, the two oaks requested for removal are within areas being developed for vehicle circulation and parking needs. Two of the trees proposed for removal are fruit trees and therefore not covered under the tree removal permit criteria. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. Removal of these trees will have no negative impact to the stability of the site. c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. This project is at the forest interface, there are large numbers of trees on the site and adjacent to this development. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. The removal of these trees should not require mitigation, there are already an abundance of trees on the site. The applicant would like to incorporate vine Maples in to the planting plan while preserving the ponderosa pines and native oaks on the site. 18.5.7.050 Mitigation Required The applicant is proposing that the addition of vine Maples to the planting plan is sufficient mitigation for the trees proposed for removal, this is a forest interface site and would not benefit from addition al trees. Dawson 818 Liberty Street LOT COVERAGE PROJECT INFORMATION: KenCairn TAX LOT - 391 EI SAD 6200 LOT SIZE: 0.52 ACRES = 22,651 SQUARE FEET OWNERS: DANIEL & LESLIE DAWSON Landscape Architecture HOUSE FOOTPRINT: 2,258 SQUARE FEET 818 LIBERTY ST. / PROPOSED PAVED DRIVEWAY: 1,830 SQUARE FEET ASHLAND, OR, 97520 / PROPOSED PAVERS AND WALKWAY 1,452 SQUARE FEET / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: KERRY KENCAIRN ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE PER ZONE: 45% =10,193 SQUARE FEET KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ` TOTAL PROPOSED LOT COVERAGE 24% = 5,540 SQUARE FEET 545 A STREET ASHLAND, OR, 97520 / LOT DISTURBANCE PHONE: (541) 488.3194 LOT OVER Y2 ACRE 0.52ACRES =22,651SQUARE FEET ~ 1 catch ' ` - AVERAGE SLOPE basin TOTAL DISTURBANCE 22% LOCATION: 818 LIBERTY SL S STE3 Aaeuso OR 975M 7,000 SQUARE FEET 5n.a85siw i T 391 El 6AD 6200 % OF TOTAL DISTURBANCE 30% EXISTING ISTIN LOT SIZE; 0,52 ACRES (22 ,651 SQUARE FEET) (22 STERQ o a - - ZONING: R-1.7.5 ~ SrnTEOF~O OREGON REG. # 493 _ KenyKenCaimti11 Drawn By: --2230-- SGB 0 PROPOSED - \ \ \ SCALE T'=16,,0„ - - r / CONCRETE sv DRIVEWAY / v ` A v g w W i z~ v E S~ I - 1 - ~9a/ wal/b ~v vv v y W oA9/oo~o~pa -_2235-_---____ \ - adaraa~ ~\1 \ \ ~`OW \ i I / ales v v~ v LL. w A I VEGETABLE BEDS WITH / \ I GRANITE PATH / / 7 °5ro \ PROPOSED ~0 S1/ - - - - CONCRETE ` ` z \v XV - - - - - - - - - - DRIVE i barb WAY 0V - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ` v v I I~ I f ----------------2240-_`-- RETAINING BOULDERS TO ` I E I BEUSEDATSTEPS(TYP.)EXG.PORCH \V I II II 1 II II~ GARAGE FINISH FLOOR 2237.69 _ RETAINING WALLS USE EXISTING ~ CC ~ I I II II ~ 11 i Z AND NEW MOSS ROCK TO MATCH HOUSE KNISH FLOOR 224216 l I FOR NEW AND ADDITIONAL l~ 1 EXISTING GRADES TO ~ ~ I I 1 I I LLI t 11 1 I ~I I I W RETAINING WALL LOCATIONS REMAIN BEHIND RETAINING ®W N I BOULDERS VI I I --224lv__ II I I J I LLI I Exc. DECK I II 0 RIPARIAN II W P PROTECTION ZONE AND I JD 5T ~',,I II W SLOPES OVER I Z _ i I v~ 1 11 11 ~12 c II 25% I 0 W Z 0 DG PATH TO FOLLOW I I ~ I S h2 EXISTING GRADE 1 ~ FOREST ST I- ~ b W~ N PATIO m Q 'o }~e,,;6 UI PAVEDING, -I~ I 11 0~ I Q Oc © Q 0 G1FA. W /vE AND STEPS co ~O0 atrt 0 Y 0 I( RN PAVER LANDING, d F I v vI 1 ~v vv A ~0 PATIO I AND STEPS REVISION DATE LU U) U W I RETAINING WALLS USE EXISTING v I I j _m 7 J ( AND NEW MOSS ROCK TO MATCH SHEET KEY I P j L~ l 0 I FOR NEW AND ADDITIONAL ~j I I I COVER SITE PLAN & VICIVICINNITY MA RETAINING WALL LOCATIONS ` PL L1.o TREE i LANDSCAPE 0 j n CO ~ L1,1 SLOPE ANALYSIS C' 4e PROSRECT ST L2.0 GRADING PLAN i SITE PLAN d ` YI L 2.1 CUT/FILL ANALYSIS + t~ ` \ \ 111 a0 L 3.0 LAYOUT PLAN I L4.0 IRRIGATION PLAN ! VICINITY L 5,0 PLANTING PLAN II ISSUE DATE: MAY 26, 2016 E v V v \v v-'~V I I 1 ` I oRn PROPERTY j E - ~rllltllav tie4,JI `i ~ v v v V 1 I ~ II 1~\V A~ I I v v Mh4A ST - iSCALE1-16-W ~~~~1 - - - - - - -r - -t L- - -I~ 1~ r VICINITY MAP 20 i I KenCairn j j Landscape Architecture 16 TREE BPROEEE OVATION EQUIPMENT OR COMMENCING ANY CONSTRUCT ON ACTIVITIE ON 1 1. . PRIOR TO DELIVERING EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT OR COMMENCINCING ANY ANY C CONSTRUCT CTI ON ON A ACTIVITIES ON 17 1 + THE RE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND EXCAVATION SUPERVISOR 14 1 P 18 / 15 PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK ON THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED / C 1 BY THE CONTRACTOR 48 HRS. IN ADVANCE FOR ALL SITE VISITS REQUESTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE THAT CONSTRUCTION MAY BEGIN AFTER ALL OF THE DESCRIBED FENCING IS IN PLACE. FENCING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE \ / ( - I ~'~'M,S PROJECT IS COMPLETED. 10 2, FENCES MUST BE ERECTED TO PROTECT TREES TO BE PRESERVED AS SHOWN IN DIAGRAM. FENCING - SHALL BEV TALL TEMPORARY CHAIN LINK PANELS INSTALLED WITH METAL CONNECTIONS TO ALL y~ / / I \ \J ;t _ ' PANELS AREA INTEGRATED, THESE FENCES SHALLBEINSTALLED SO THAT IT DOES NOT ALLOW ee / % 51$A6T 6TE3, ASHLAND. OR 97520 \a \L /~ji---_ AV ( ( ( \ \ \ PASSAGE OF PEDESTRIANS ANDI OR VEHICLES THROUGH IT. FENCES DEFINE A SPECIFIC PROTECTION srl.4es.a1a1 - ZONE FOR EACH TREE ORGROUP OFTREES. FENCES ARE TO REMAIN UNTIL ALL SITE WORK HAS \ ti / ( ( '/Fr '.s\ \ \ \ BEEN COMPLETED. FENCES MAY NOT BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED WITHOUTTHE PERMISSION OF V _urs--___~ l ( ♦ v A AV A j `Y I THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. ~,'s'1'Rr.~ / \ N _ - _ _ 3. CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, TRAFFIC ANO STORAGE AREAS MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE FENCED TREE ~~STATB OP d I A ! \ \ r \ I PROTECTION ZONES AT ALL TIMES, OREGON REG. 4493 \ / 4. ALLPROPOSEO UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAIN ORIRRIGATION LINES SHALL BE ROUTED h H 1 _ 1 \ / \ \ !~1 OUTSIDE THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE, IF LINES MUST TRANSVERSE THE PROTECTION AREA, THEY N U _ \ I I SHALL BE TUNNELED OR BORED UNDER THE TREE ROOTS NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ~KerryKenCaim~,~h unxw IMMEDIATELY IF ANY PROJECT PLANS CONFLICT WITH THIS REQUIREMENT, 1P \ ` / 12 c9PE ARC ( I 5. NO MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SPOIL, ORWASTE OR WASHOUT WATER MAYBE DEPOSITED, STORED, OR 9 9 PARKED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE (FENCED AREA). 13 \ \ \ I I 1, p`, I I 6. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF TREE PRUNING IS REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION CLEARANCE. Drawn By: sly \ II II I II I I I 7. ANY HERBICIDES PLACED UNDER PAVING MATERIALS MUST BE SAFE FOR USE AROUND TREES AND SGB LABELED FOR THAT USE. [ :u 1 `,i 11 11 I I~ I i IoA•- RIPARIAN 8, IF INJURY SHOULD OCCUR TO ANY TREE DURING CONSTRUCTION NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE SCALE I"=36'•0" I I t PzOTEOauo I ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY, ALL DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION TO EXISTING TREES SHALL BE ( L.\ 1 I (tl l Ij SLWES OVER 1 COMPENSATED FOR BY THE OFFENDING PARTY, BEFORE THE PROJECT WILL BE CONSIDERED 7, ~k III I (I I 25% COMPLETE, [ +a II ( 10. WATERING SCHEDULE: WATERING PROTECTED TREES SHALL FOLLOW THESE STANDARDS, HOWEVER ( 1 I PERIODS OF EXTREME HEAT, WIND, RAINFALL OR DROUGHT MAY REQUIRE MORE OR LESS WATER r A -s- { 1 ~IJ I THAN RECOMMENDED IN THESE NOTES, / \ \ - ~.A s//•\ 111\ \ IPI I A MOST SPECIES: 1TIME PER MONTH DURING IRRIGATION SEASON (USUALLY MARCH THROUGH SEPTEMBER) { T. I It\ (III I I I B. QUERCUSIOAK: DEEP WATER IN MAY AND SEPTEMBER, DO NOT WATER DURING OTHER \ !\I - 11 I I I~ I MONTHS. FOR OAKS ALREADY IN THE VICINITY OF IRRIGATED CONDITIONS, AUTOMATIC SPRINKLERS OR REGULAR WATERING SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO SPRAY ON OR WITHIN 3 FEET 1 / ~V A V ~r w OFTHETRUNK. THE WATER SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO POOL OR DRAIN TOWARDS THE TRUNK. 2 \ \ I \I 1{~ I C. WATERING METHOD; HAND WATERING SYSTEMS, RECOMMENDED FOR TREES THAT ARE PART OF 3 \ ` ` 1 111 A DEVELOPMENT PROJECT THAT MUST BE WATERED TO INSURETREE SURVIVALDURING THE 8 h \ II I II \ 0 COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION UNTIL AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION IS INSTALLED. C \ \ \ \ \ \ 1 11. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS SILT FENCING, DEBRIS BASINS, AND WATER DIVERSION S ' \ \ \ I\ I I STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TREE PROTECTION ZONETO PREVENT I 4 %i" Q \1 I SILTATION AND/ OR EROSION WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE _-_._.J------ 12. BEFORE GRADING, PAD PREPARATION, OR EXCAVATION FOR THE FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS, WALLS, 1 \I I\ 1G~\\\{{1 III ~I OR TRENCHING, ANY TREES WITHIN THE SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION ZONE SHALL BE ROOT PRUNED I 6 x \ \ u \ 11 / J FOOT OUTSIDE THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE BY CUTTING ALL ROOTS CLEANLY ATA900EGREE 1 7 \ \ \ I I ANGLE TO A DEPTH OF 24 INCHES. ROOTS SHALL BE CUT BY MANUALLY DIGGING A TRENCH AND g \ 1 CUTTING EXPOSED ROOTS WITH A SAW, VIBRATING KNIFE, ROCK SAW, NARROWTRENCHER WITH - SHARP BLADES, OR OTHERAPPROVED ROOT-PRUNING EQUIPMENT. 13. ANY ROOTS DAMAGED DURING GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE EXPOSEDTO SOUNDTISSUE W AND CUT CLEANLY ATA90 DEGREE ANGLE TO THE ROOTW9TH A SAW. PLACE DAMP SOIL AROUND ALL CUT ROOTS TO A DEPTH EQUALING THE EXISTING FINISH GRADE WITHIN 4 HOURS OF CUTS BEING Z TREE LEGEND MADE, DBH Crown Radius Tree Protection Tolerance to ELEVATION PLAN 14, IF TEMPORARY HAUL OR ACCESS ROADS MUST PASS OVER THE ROOT AREA OF TREES TO BE ® I- Q 4 Species Height in o RETAINED, A ROAD BED OF 6 INCHES OF MULCH OR GRAVEL SHALL BE CREATED TO PROTECT THE (Inches) Feel In Feet Zone Radius In Feel Construction Condition Notes PQ 4 vOQ aoA SOIL THE ROAD BED MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLENISHED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A 6 INCH DEPTH. 1 Mabs spp. 6,6,7 10 11 WA Moderate Fell REMOVE W d b0 ° a Q 1~~~dQ 15, SPOIL FROM TRENCHES, BASEMENTS, OR OTHER EXCAVATIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE k 2 Pinus ponderosa 26 60 15 20 Good Good a 0 Z II~~ 0 0 d yo\ti ~Nc TREE PROTECTION ZONE, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY. Uj e Quercus kelbg0 5,5,7 30 120 7 Moderate Fair Crmvded, Some dead (/j t7~ A p D p0 4 Quercus ke11o91 5,6,7 30 12 7 Moderate Fair Crowded Some dead po o o p 16. NO BURN PILES OR DEBRIS PILES SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE, NO ASHES, 5 Quercus keliog0 7,8 30 12 0 Moderate Fair Crowded, Some dead n~ TREE PRO I Q DEBRIS, OR GARBAGE MAY BE DUMPED OR BURIED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE. f ZONE O p n 6 IAabs sPp. 3,4,4,6 25 12 6 Moderate Fair Scmggly 5?a4 Q 0 TREE PROT. 6 17. MAINTAIN FIRE-SAFE AREAS AROUND FENCED AREA. ALSO, NO HEAT SOURCES, FLAMES, IGNITION 7 Quercus kelbg8 6,0 30 11 6 Mode mle Gaud D 0 d ZONE SOURCES, OR SMOKING IS ALLOWED NEAR MULCH OR TREES. o LL Q d D 0 e Querws keBOg® 7 30 10 7 Moderate Poor Crmrded 4~A~Q044 e 4 ~O 4M 18. DO NOT RAISE THE SOIL LEVEL WITHIN THE DRIP LINES TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE, EXCEPT TO m 9 Maws spp. 3,4,6 20 7 NIA Moderate Prot A ld ofdeedvmod, REMOVE MATCH GRADES WITH SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND IN THOSE AREAS, FEATHER THE ADDED TOPSOIL 10 Querwskellog6 7,0 30 to 8 Moderate Fair FENCE CONTINUOUSLY BACK TO EXISTING GRADE AT APPROXIMATELY 3:I SLOPE. J J II Querws kellogg 6 25 13 6 Moderate Fair AROUNDTREEAT 19, REMOVE THE ROOT WAD FOR EACH TREE THAT IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN AS BEING REMOVED, Q 0 DRIPLINE 12 MzbSa 6 20 10 6 Moderate Fv a' -PP. 8'TALL CONTINUOUS CHAINLINK Q ~ Q 20. EXCEPTIONS TO THE TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS MAY ONLY BE GRANTED IN EXTRAORDINARY 13 0uerwsa6a 7,9,14 35 15 14 Moderate Good FENCING ON CONCRETE PIERS CIRCUMSTANCES WITH WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY WORK 14 Do-kelbgi 9 25 14 WA Moderate Good REMOVE NOTE: COMMENCING, I 15 Quercus ketlogi 9 25 13 9 Moderate Fair Some dead 1. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIORTO START OF 21. AS A PROTECTIVE MEASURE TO COMPENSATE FOR CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS, TWO TO SIX WEEKS 16 Plnuspendemsa 12 45 9 9 Good Fair CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACETHROUGH COMPLETION OF PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ALL RETAINED TREES SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL RECEIVE AN REVISION DATE 17 P9ws ponderosa 14 50 12 11 Good Good PROJECT. APPLICATION OF MYCOAPPLY ALL PURPOSE SOLUBLE PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. THIS 18 Quercus ke6ogi 4,6 25 12 WA M1bdemle Good REMOVE 2. ALL EXCAIN DIVATION WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREES SHALL BE DONE BY HAND. IF ROOTS MYCORRHIZAE PRODUCT IS A SPECIALLY FORMULATED NATURAL ROOT BIOSTIMULANTWHICH - OVER 2' AMETER ARE ENCOUNTERED, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH ENHANCES THE ABSORPTIVE SURFACE AREA OF THE TREEVROOT SYSTEMS, THIS PROMOTES AND g LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR ARBORIST BEFORE PROCEEDING, IMPROVES NUTRIENTAND WATER UPTAKE CAPABILITIES OF THE REMAINING ROOT STRUCTURE. 3. TREE ROOTS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE CUT CLEANLY DISTRIBUTE MYCOAPPLY EVENLY WITHIN THE ACTIVE ROOT ZONE OF RETAINED TREES. APPLY 30 II TREE CANOPY OF TREE ATA 90 DEGREE ANGLE AND PACKED WITH DAMP SOIL IMMEDIATELY. GALS, OF SOLUTION PER TREE 6" DBH AND GREATER, A MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW SOIL SURFACE IN 6 I I PROTECTION TREES TO X REMOVED OBE PROTECTION 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION ALL TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE IRRIGATED ONA QUANTITIES OF 112 GALLON AT EACH POINT OF APPLICATION. LOCATE THE ACTIVE ROOT ZONES WITH TREE l I ZONE REMAIN „ REMOVE FENCING WEEKLY BASIS OR AS NECESSARY WITH LEAKY PIPE ENCIRCLING THE TREE FROM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRESENT, N// TRUNK OUT TO DRIP LINE. MYCOAPPLY IS AVAILABLE FROM MYCORRHIZAL APPLICATION, INC., PHONE (541) 476-3985. PROTECTION PLAN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE FOR EACH TREE IS BASED ON THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY: Molheny,N.@Clark1.1998. Trees andDnelopmenlrA7echnfral Guide to Presennrion ofTnuDimirg LandDnelopmem. p.72 1 TREE PROTECTION ISSUE DATE: MAY 26, 2016 QRT SC0.LG,"=air-0. L 1 ,0 k 01 10, 2(y ~rM [ I I 1 t / KenCairn Landscape Architecture 0- i S15A9T STE 3, ASHLAND, OR 97520 Q~STATEOF Q xl~••_ _ OREGON REG. N493 f, C U Kerty KenCaim --22da-- i L k I GAPE AEG r• /j \ ~ h Drawn By: SGB ~ ':l J I SCALEI"=18'A" 1235 --------SPA F i EI - - - - vv ~ t dos l 1 tf~ ~ ✓ 11 v < K p ~~'t%~'~. 1 / j U N,./' M I k' l" RIPARIAN W I- O \ *f\ PROTECTION j L3 W N v y : v. ZONE AND W U k, SLOPES OVER j W cy) ( 25% I U Z~Q W z v' ! J J SLOPE ANALYSIS LEGEND C/) / : \ F>! Q coo Less than 25% ~ - 4 ~ r K 74- t vV " ; x> k j REVISION DATE 5r; 25%TOas% • n r x e x I ® Greaterihan 35% 1 ' ~Yva~ = I \ \ T,\ \ 'f~ Y•C ky a \ ° j SLOPE LIMIT OF WORK LOT ANALYSIS \ AREA ro') PERCENT ANALYSIS LIMIT OF WORK LOT TOTAL 15,823 ft' TOTAL ENVELOPE 2,268n' 14.3% I PLAN LIMIT OF WORK LOT SLOPE ANALYSIS E - \ \ \ LESS THAN 26% 8,822n' 83.6% V A 4~~ 25%7035% 2,886n' 11.4% \ V -AV oREATERTHAN 3s% 2,577 n° 1s.6% , \ \J ISSUE DATE. i TOTAL 13,565 ft' MAY 26, 2016 EASEMENT LANDSCAPE SLOPE ANALYSIS \ \ " \ 1 I I \ I ,JORn LESS THAN 25% 1,OtB n' E `V A V 1 \ V ! I 25%7035% 406 n' 23.2% GREATER THAN 35% 265 n' 15.1% TOTAL 26 50 fl' V AV 1 N V ~I 1 ! \ \ \ 's 1 1 ! SCALE I' =i6'-(r - L1. i \ v vv vv ~ a s 10, 20' I ' i KeKalrn Landscape Architecture ~ezg 2222 N t- rOBw 2225.5 drop to meet as \T' , 9 wall TOP OF GRATE 2223.65 exg 2J2 I ~575 AST 9TE 5, ASHLAND, OR 916M TO ' SII.488.3141 1225 _ j3VV .5 6JS T ~ E s - E E 4~ SrnTEOFFO ( L _ TO@1112225.5 r Ev9 H ti 7--T _pohf31.00 Kenczl 1 EA I f.:33.5 EXGTOW ---2230-- 30,0 Iobf3600.- L Drawn 6y: tow 36.6 _tobf 33.D0 1 SGB AI a/h EXGTOW ow 35,0 tow 35.5 tow as 92.5 O SCALE 1" _ 16'-0" TOW 32.5 e - flat at aaP tow 37.5 N~ o \ E \ ` 32.5 \ a os9 °nojP ~y~~ ryo I J G 22x5- ---'6~ \ 0 ~d7. 3 EXGTOW ti "i TOW 35 - 34 flat 30 i Top of wall chases grade 34.01 - ' - rather than sloping evenly. Wall is just under four feet tall per detail. TOW 37.0 o\ - flat at FG 36.5 35.5 FG.0 toc37. I/P TOW38.0~ 2240-_ ~ f /-FG 37,4 ~ loc 37.7 FG2236.0 . 1 BW 38.50 O 38 11ds TOW 39. ~ - ' - TOW 40.0 TOW41.0- BS 37.92 GARAGE FINISH FLOOR 2237.69 l W TOW_ 42_.0 I ' U HOUSE FINISH FLOOR 2242.16 7 TS 220.0.5 Z BS 2236.14 TOW 435 LU C:) ..___-_2745--_._ LLI C-4 i FG 40,75 W In TOW 44.0 (NIATCHEXISTG) 0 RIPARIAN PROTECTION ZONEAND W 0') t W4a5 SLOPES OVER 1 25% I , TOW 45.0 1 O W I E TOW \ I t' 00 45.5 r CIO i TOW 43.5 ~I 1 1 2250•' I - y OpF X8922400 I 1 REVISION DATE TS 22415 1 i 'TOW 46.5 1 } 1 I; i ~/I ~IW it LANDSCAPE i TOW 46.5 OpF 1 to I GRADING i i Tow o t PLAN E \ TOW 44.5 ` 1 I E ISSUE DATE: I E I 1 MAY 26, 2016 TOW 44.5 ` f SCALE 1'=160° L 2e0 1. ly 20' i KenCairn I Landscape Architecture I X22 +3 +4 + I,7 9 D ® ✓ ® ~~7 , Ti \t I .488,MN J, ASHWrfl, OR 97520 SIi s'~~.. - - E ------o&II~mN' d Y I ~TArnaon 1b p" m~ ~ 2230-- ~ _ Drawn By: SCALEV 16,0„ 1 - xl~ --2235-________ - IL 2 -2 E~ 0 [t - - - - - - - - - - - - h` ti e - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1. a CAF 3 -a - -a +1 +2~ _ - V. 3i - f _--------------2240-_ 3 'a / 9a A ♦ I •2 E +1~ 1J I, W - - - l :q +2 1 Z 2245-__ - I, WN 0 i -a RIPARIAN 1 W U') ° PROTECTION P 00 ZONEAND U) r I SLOPES OVER 25% - 4 m Q J v/ E III J I Z Q Co 00 Q -q REVISION DATE CUTMLL ANALYSIS KEY 22501 -2 yr, I t Kf r 2110 EXISTING CONTOUR ® 1 FT PROPOSED CUT .6 n } 1 1 FT PROPOSED FILL " a 2 u ~I, cf) LANDSCAPE UNOIBTURBE016,0536,F.=87% LL I I CUT/FILL ;~IO 1 , (25%+S6%=61%REQUIRED) ANALYSIS l TOTALLOTAREA: 22,651 SQUARE FEET E v~ v v ( ISSUE DATE: TOTAL AREA OF DISTURBANCE INCLUDING HOUSE: 7,924 SQUARE FEET I E \ I i A I j MAY26,2016 PERCENT OF LOT DISTURBANCE: 35Y< MAXIMUM CUT OUTSIDE FOOTPRINT OF BUILDINGS: 5 FEET _ _ A \.A - - - - - - - MAXIMUM FILL OUTSIDE FOOTPRINT OFBUILDINGS: 6FEET \ \ \ \ SCALE I"=16'-0 L2,1 OTHER CUTS AND FILLS AS SHOWN ON PLAN E \ 1 A V A, A `'N \ l I 0' 6' 10' 20' KenCalrn Landscape Architecture HOLD FACE W OFF PROPERTY LINE '6 m / S9'.,. ' ~A I m I wm \ + Y6'.g, 5l5 AST 57EJ ASHLAND. 0R4i5i0J ea ~C r SIf.JB9 J181 i tmb h ~ ' S m LL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL TE,2 T O A h m v _ DO NOT REFLECT SLOPE STATE' OFEd ORECAN 1T-5"; b - - 4 y' I N REG. W 493 a Kerry KenCaim h 8.2 m ,~5 ~ Ate ~ I unaa ,yy'ti ro y m I D. + d APE ARG Drawn By: m I r °?R RT~n I ~P o t I SGB ~4m ALL DISTANCES ARE HORIZONTAL g ` AND DO NOT REFLECT SLOPE p I ~LIJ 9. 96J 0a O , SCALE 1"-16'0" ® L~~ I P I 1 ~~R ti i m ®m 34:,6, r ,S, ,A i m, i I I o ~ i zo:; m e m b4 ~ ® I J EXO. ALLCORNE R EXG, WALL CORNER ~ 0N, 3j"mm 1q5' ~A I is di 8e I ?ate. yes, ~ I ~65~ T6;2, y I l~J stjJ ) I M T 10. I b 6a6, 1 i a I ! AY m IAA d r/° / +~P W/~ t V ~Q~ to Sr IP^a^d I I ~G to I 4;6° 3; L I ti a6' Z HORIZONTAL I J I r Q 5'-0'DASELIFEOIIdS OFF THIS CORNER ALL AND DO NOT DISTANCES ARE REFLECTSLOPE {'SOC4 I I o W N EnLONCFOOr1NC a, 4 RIPARIAN j L1I PROTECTION j (n ZONE AND If LU xx I -4 SLOPES OVER j b\ F N o, m I / 25% I z 0 I ~R I ' of o i 6t4. LJJ I ,w Z " Sk I 1 i b e I j Q [of) i p 0~ a 000 Q A `P ab, 3~oIt10, j " I / I ' I y N r " n 1T ka,O a " f¢ I I REVISION DATE Z " y i; y h I } I I o " a ^q I I; j I " n ry $ ¢ p j I I b ° °y y I U. j' LANDSCAPE I 10 j LAYOUT I y 'gym, I- M I ' PLAN I I 1 ISSUE DATE: l ( oRT MAY 26, 2 - ---J SCALE t"=18'0' L 3,0 -19 D' 5' 19 ZO' IRRIGATION HEAD LEGEND KenCairn SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 0I ("t NOZZLE ROD, FLOW RATE GPM Landscape Architecture to ® V11/4,1/2, , FULL Hunter PR530 kip-Rotator lOW 0.11,021,0.44 P ( FULL Hunter PRS30 MP-Rotator 1000 0.135, 027, 0,54 22 5.0 B 0 ■ FULL Hunter PR340 MP-ROlalor 1000 14' 0.19,0.38,0.75 Drip 0 , FULL Hunter PRS40 MP-RWalor2000 19' .40,0.74,1,47 P, 'q In 13 CENTER Hunter PRS40 MP4Rotator Std Sidi) 0.19,0.38 0 0 114112 Hunter PR530 RaMbird SO, 4' 0.12,0.23 9 _ _ - _ & Hunter RZWS-18-25-CV 025 pp 515 A ST, STE J. ASHLAND, OR 975M - - MLa0aa191 an 2 6.90 Q-STATE OF~Q OREGON J// REG. #493 N Keay KenCaim (4 01PE ARG 2230-- NOTE: I \ ` \ Drawn By: PROVIDE SLEEVES @ WALLS 11` \ \ \ \ \ _ _ / WHERE IRRIGATION LINES v SGB ] ° v A A\ ARESHOWNPEN/fTRATING / / / / / \ ~D_ \ , 2S\ \ \ ) ~ v I I l / v v v v v vv W SCALE 1" 16'-0" S / / / v vv r v v v v v IRRIGATION LEGEND - I SYM, ITEM A / _ \ \ \ \ LL S HUNTERICV-101G (SPRAY) O HUNTER PCZ-101 (DRIP) ♦ \ / / / \ \ \ \ \ I MAIN LINE: SCH.40 PVC (1-1/2') J LATERAL LINES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC. % / \1 \ SLEEVES -SGH.40, MIN. SIZE SHALL BE 2x DA. OF PASSING PIPE. T ® DRIP LINE TUBING: HUNTER PLD-04-18(SPACE ®18°O.C.) i Q\\ \ \ /_-JI H ISOLATION GATE VALVE-LINESIZE `ter I \,t" ` \ \ ® QUICK COUPLING VALVE: HUWER44RC r- 9p\ \ \ I © CONTROLLER: HUNTER PRO-CWITH SOLAR-SYNC ` \ ✓ \ / I I - v 1 A \ ~`v A A ~ I ZONE I.D. 1 15.0 -G.P.M Sp.y -APPLICATION I T _ \V A\ 1~ I II II E VALVE SIZE - " 1 IRRIGATION NOTES - ---'I I~ \ 1 1 1 I I V LLI , 1. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW AND BE FAMILIAR WITH THE IRRIGATION SPECIFICATIONS I / i\:% ~ I I I I ~ I V (328400) FOR ALL ASPECTS OF IRRIGATION MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ----i " I \ I (I I i Z PROCEDURES. - 1 AV ( I I ~I I 2. MAINTAIN AT JOB SITE ONE(i(COPY OF DRAWINGS, SPECIFICATIONS, ADDENDA, AND APPROVED SHOP DRAWAINGS, CHANGE ORDERS,AND OTHER PROJECT DOCUMENTS. O _ I I III II W N 3. RECORD ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL CONCEALED COMPONENTS, PIPING SYSTEM, CONDUIT AND SLEEVE J \ ` I I I I co LOCATIONS. KEEP THIS DOCUMENT CURRENT. DO NOT PERMANENTLY CONCEAL ANY WORK UNTIL I \ \ I \ I ( I W lQ REQUIRED INFORMATION HAS BEEN RECORDED. FURNISH TWO (2) COPIES OF RECORD DRAWINGS TO THE I II'1' II II to N N L0 OWNER. REDUCE ONE COPY OF RECORD DRAWING TO FIT INSIDE CONTROLLER LID. LAMINATE REDUCED _ LL COPY. 4. ALL WORK SHALL BE INSTALLED BY COMPETENT WORKMEN EXPERIENCED IN TRADE IN ANEAT AND I 11 II II LNU r/~ ORDERLY MANNER ACCEPTABLE TO THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. I I ' I I I Li. U) LJ- 5, CONFORM TO ALL PERTINENT CODES AND REGULATIONS. COMPLY WITH THE LATEST RULES OF THE \ \ I NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND THE AMERICAN MASTER PLUMBERS CODE. rr \ 1 I C I I O 6, VERIFY FIELD MEASUREMENTS ARE AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. I I I I 1 7. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF ALL SITE OBSERVATION VISITS REQUIRED - _ \ \ \ / I \ 1 y'/ Q BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE PRESENT AT EACH SITE OBSERVATION Il \ I I O VISIT. REFERTOTHE SPECIFICATIONS FOR REQUIRED SITE OBSERVATIONS. W Z I - \ 1 I\~ Q _ m 8. IRRIGATION PIPE, HEADS, VALVES, BACKFLOW DEVICE AS NOTED ON LEGEND ANOSPECIFICATIONS. 9. VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES. J I \ \ I 10, INSTALL PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE TO REDUCE PRESSURE TO NO MORE THAN 40 PSI AT THE \ I I I J -tJ~ FURTHEST HEAD ON ANY ZONE ON THE SYSTEM. VERIFY PRESSURE AT P.O.C. BEFORE INSTALLATION. E \ \ \ I I~ III MAXIMUM ZONE-15.0 GPM. 00 11, PIPING LAYOUT IS DIAGRAMMATIC ONLY. ROUTE PIPING IN PLANTING AREAS AND AVOID PLANTS, i ; ~I \ \ II %I I 1 ® cn UTILITIES, AND STRUCTURES. LAYOUT SHALL FOLLOW AS CLOSELY ASPMCTCAL THE SCHEMATIC \ \ \ 00 DESIGN ON THE DRAWINGS, MAKE NO SUBSTANTIAL CHANGES WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL FROM THE I\ \ \ \I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. A ~~pAv I j I 12. ALL LATERAL PIPE SIZES ARE SPECIFIED BY LINE TYPE. REFER TO PLAN FOR PIPE SIZING, REFER TO \7 / / "I rl I IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR PIPE TYPE. 13. COORDINATE ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT LOCATIONS WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS. I \ \ r I /III/ REVISION DATE 14. LAYOUT SPRINKLER HEADS AND MAKE ANY MINOR ADJUSTMENTS REQUIRED DUE TO DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SITE AND DRAWINGS. ANY SUCH DEVIATIONS IN LAYOUT SHALL BE WITHIN THE INTENT OF THE ORIGINAL DRAWINGS, AND WITHOUT ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY I \ \ \ / /I } THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. I \ \ \ \ I , YY I W 3 7,51 15, ALLSPRINKLER HEADS ALONG SIDEWALKS SHALL BE TWO INCHES FROM SIDEWALKS, \ \ \ 1 \ I\ I\\ W 1° MP ROlaW7 16. PIPE DEPTH - LATERAL LINES -12INCH MINIMUM; MAINLINE -1B INCH MINIMUM. \ 17. BOTTOM OF TRENCHES AND BACKFILL MATERIAL SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, CLODS, AND OTHER SHARP \ \ I ] OBJECTS, SNAKE PIPE FRONT SIDE TO SIDE AT TRENCH BOTTOM TO ALLOW EXPANSION. I I \ YI (J) n. _ LANDSCAPE 1B. DO NOT INSTALL HEADS UNTIL LINES HAVE BEEN THOROUGHLY TESTED AND FLUSHED CLEAN. \ \ I I I 19. SHUT OFF VALVES ARE REQUIRED AT EACH POINT OF CONNECTION, VALVE BOX, AND AT EVERY LOCATION i \ ` 1 i I 1 I III O P ln-LloeDdp IRRIGATION WHERE THE MAINLINE PASSES UNDER 20 FEET OF PAVEMENT. \ \ \ \ I I 1 20. A MANUAL DRAIN MUST BE INSTALLED AT THE LOW SPOT OF EACH ZONE.THE DRAIN SHOULD BE A BRASS I \ \ ` \ \ \ ( I \ PLAN \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I I I MANUALANGLE VALVE WITH "T'STEM. DRAINS LOCATED ON LATERAL LINES SHALL BE 1" SIZE. 21. INSTALLER MUSTVERIFY EACH ZONE'S SPECIFIED PSI AT THE FURTHEST HEAD ON EACH ZONE. I E \ \ \ \ \ III \ I 1F-', 22. COORDINATE WIRE AND CONDUIT LOCATIONS BETWEEN ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVES AND THE ELECTRIC I E \ \ \ \ \ \ \ y I \ CONTROLLER. \ \ \ \ ~I I I 23. UPON COMPLETION OF ALL SYSTEMS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORMA COVERAGE TEST TO I E \ \ \ 41 ISSUE DATE: I 5 4 1 i \ \ \ E\ \ \ \ I I \ MAY 26, 2016 DETERMINE THAT WATER IS BEING APPLIED CORRECTLY AND ADEQUATELY TO ALL PLANTINGS. CHANGE ORT \ \ \ \ \ I I \ I\ 1' Fne Nit, ANY HEADS, NOZZLES, OR ORIFICES AS MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE COVERAGE AS INDICATED ON THE In- \ \ \ \ I \ DRAWINGS. PROMPTLY ADJUST HEADS TO KEEP WATER OFF BUILDINGS AND STRUCTURES WITH MINIMAL SPRAY ON PAVED SURFACES. 6A•\-•-•r-•\••-•-•-•- - - . 1 \ AV I I A\ a\V A 111' MP Rotator ~ SCALE I"=18'-0' 3LEEVING: ` A 1 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SLEEVING LOCATIONS AND COORDINATE WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. E \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ / I SLEEVES ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY GENERAL CONTRACTOR. THE INSTALLING CONTRACTOR SHALL L 4.0 COORDINATE SLEEVE DEPTHS WITH THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR, 0' S' 10 20 8 1112' dado inset 2'.6' WR CEDAR CAP OVER POST 1. 12' 2'x6' WR CEDAR CAP OVER N m ' POST(S) TOBAC NESTOCOVER FROM w 6x6 CEDAR PORT m TO RACKOFWALL w 2x2 WR CEDAR VERTICAL MEMBER ` @ MID-POINT OF MID -RAIL 0 (3)114'0 GALVANIZED CABLE -PROVIDE m o x EYE-BTS AND GALVANIZED NRNBUGKLES ~Lo PROVIDE A 2'BATTER FOR EACH W @ ONE ND 0 114.0 GALVANIZED CABLE • PROVIDE I f 12'GF VERRCALWALL (3)114 a ',n 6 s EYE-BOLTS AND GALVANIZED tl TURNBUCNLE3 @ ONE END 2'X6' WR CEDAR CAP (1-112' dad. inset) STONE WAILTU BE W I WNn CONSTRUCTED OF MOSS ROCK 0 6'x6' WR CEDAR POST N H w 2'x8' WR CEDAR CAP (I 11T dada E (2)2x4°WR CEOARVERT. RAIL g hseQ m 2'x2'WR CEDAR VERTICAL TRIM cue 2c2 WIi CEDAR VERTICAL TRIM 4 - 4x4 WELDED WI RE MESH-HORIZONTAL v ADJACENT PLANTING BED- q N WIDTH VARIES ALTO MEMBERS SHALL ALIGN FROM PANEL TO PANEL ALIGN 4x4 WELDED WIRE MESH -y ADJACENT PAVINGWITH EDGE 2'x4'WR CEDAR BOTTOM RAIL-BOTTOM RAIL TO FLLU RESTRAIN-SEE PLAN FOLLOW SLOPE OF WALL. PROVIDE 3' q n CLEARANCE UNDER BOTTOM RAIL ° POST TO WALL CONNECTION - SEE DETAIL 47)L 4.1 E v Q POST TO WALL CONNECTION• 1 SLOPE OF WALL VARIES-SEE GRADING PLAN G-Ia - PROVIDE 014' MINUS CRUSHED n n SEE DETAIL#IIL 4.1 - ROCK FOR BASE AND WALL BACKFILL. 1 y 4'0 PERR DRAIN PIPE IN FILTER FABRIC SLEEVE DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT ~C , (MAX.) NOTE. 8'-0'OC P"t m ITWILLBENECESSARYTO CUT THE WIRE MESH Q~E (MAX.) @BOTTOM RAIL. KEEP ALL WIRE ENDSWITHIN x; ELEVATION SECTION THE BOTTOM RAIL. SECTION - DRY STACK STONE WALL GARDEN FENCE @ NON-SLOPING WALL GARDEN FENCE @ SLOPED WALL 1 SCALE: 31411'-O' 3 SCALE: 112'=1'-0' 2 x6'AAX OPENINGS SCALE:If1=1'-0' I CAST IRON OR STEEL GRATE 2x4 WR CEDAR POST PAVED AREA 2'x6'WR CEDAR CAP OVER POST a 2s4 R CEDAR CAP(I'dsd. SLOPE TO GRATE L'yI$TER III 1212x4 WR CEDARTOP RAIL \ ~STATEOFRd §'FtANGE OREGON 111 6'.6* CEDAR POST RED.9493 F 2.2 Y1R CEDAR VERTICALTR0.1 uiH 24' S0. w P.UN. (1) 114'0 GALVANIZED CABLE - PROVIDE y V fr EYE-BOLT SAND GALVANIZED TURNBUCKLE 114 BEND 0R LDEDSIEEVE .L~tl @ONE END WELDED BAFFLE -yUI 4x4 WELDED WIRE MESH MIN. 3TaNLET c9PE A~G 1.114'NBE STEEL GATE FAAh1E. GRIND `R SMOOTH ALLWELDS AND POWDER COAT ALL STEEL MEMBERS, MAINTAIN 1' CLEARANCE Revision Date: AROUND GATE ___,Y4'ASPHALTCOATED CAST[RON GATE LATCH TO BE A SPRING LOADED GATE PI N. _ 10 GA. ASPHALT COATED STEEL RECEIVE PIN @ POST, (2) 2x4 WR CEDAR BOTTOM i OR ADJACENT ASPHALT PAVING RAIL 4' THICK ftEINF, CONCRETE Drawn By; 00 y 4x4 WELOEDWRE MESH INF LL@GATE POSTTO MAIL CONNECTION• 24'ORRCP SEE DETAIL 7h 4,1 PROVIDE PIN HINGE SYSTEM @ LEFT Scale as Indicated TOPANOBOTTOM OF GATE. - 4' M IN.1'-0 CRUSHED ROCK GALV. WIRE MESH INFILL. TACK 6' '.'.5 COMPACTED TO n n POST TO FOOTING WELD @ALL POINTS OF CONNECTION-SEESIh9LAR CONTACTWIFRAME CONDITION, DTL #TL 4.1 1'x1"x118'ANGLE IRON. TACK MODULAR BLOCK WALL-SEE GENERAL NOTES: WITHIN IALTY CODE REQUIRES A CLEAN OUT TO BE INSTALLED n WELD TO TUBE STEEL FRAME DETAIL 3,L 4.1 1. OREGON PLUMBING SPEC •114'%1.114'TUBE87EEL 5FEET OF7NEBEND OR BAFFLE IF THEY ARE NOT REMOVABLE t IN FIELD) FRAME 2 MWASEETO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE CONCRETE (CGC) PER 2002 ODOTIOREGON IVADJACENTERIFY CONCRETE WALL 314' MINUS BACKFILL @ WALL 3. CONNECT CATCH BASIN TO EXISTING STORM DRAIN SYSTEM ADJACENT TO STREET. RUN OUTLET PIPE UNDER DRIVEWAY VIA THE SHORTEST ROUTE ELEVATION SECTION (a~ FRAME 'NO7 GARDEN GATE TO SCALE SECTION GUARDRAIL @ MODULAR BLOCK WALL SECTION - AREA CATCH BASIN - C 4 SCA E; 7W'=1'-0 SCA E:1°=,'-0' SCALE;151'-0' 61 6. ~2'tread Vr CHAIAFER ALLTOP EGES 114"F.1 l #33RRa®us ;~I-Ili V NOTE: V ° PROVIDE112'VERTICAL EXPANSION JOINTS on step ~i FOR WALL @MID-POINT AND CORNERS OF Z 6' PROPERTY LINE, LOCATE ANON-i+ WALL Lu hURK PRIOR TO STARTING EXCAVATION WORK, ^_I, Q Z PIP CONCRETE WALL, PROVIDE #4 REBAR 1 _ @ 16' O.C. EA WAY WI MIN. 2' CLEARANCE Q ALL SIDES WW 0 K PATH PROVIDE IO WEEP HOLES @ 98' D.C. O ADJACENT JACENT BRICK JOIN WATERPROOF MEMBRANEAT 1-0' NUMBER OF STEPS VARIES -SEE PLAN BACK OF WALL Ij PROVIDE KEY AT BASE OF WALL Z I/-~-, V! SAND FINISH CONCRETE FINISH GRADE @ PLANTER 1# 0'924' CONCRETE FOOTING O EXPANSION JOIN 314' MINUS CRUSHED ROCK Y'3 Al7JACENBRICK PATH BACKFILL _'i m~ Y4' MINUS AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED TO 95% 6 1 COMPACT SUBGRAOE 4°0 PERF.ORAIN PIPE IN FILTER FABRIC SLEEVE. DRAIN TO - APRIL1~40i6 NOTES: DAYLIGHT -U ! i 1 (i.-I 1! 1^I- 1. CONCRETE SHALL HAVE SAND FINISH 2, REINFORCE CONCRETE STEPS WITH IN REBAR AT I8'OCEV7 I AND AND 93 AT NOSING OF EACH STEP. L V SECTION - CONCRETE STEPS SECTION - CONCRETE WALL @ GARDEN SITE DETAILS ~ scuelmr-0• 8 BCALE: i'=,'-0' 8 ti CAP UNIT TO ADHERE TO 8" o TOP UNIT WI VERSA LOK Ny,.v CONCRETE ADHESIVE m~ VERSALOK STANDAARO 20 v MODULAR CONCRETE - 18'- 24'CLEAN TOPSOIL Q ~(aD UNITS ('LONG RE AR STARE °¢x 1 ORNE O 1 X 8 TREX FACIA USED AS 4x I^----- - DRAINAGE A..RE.ATE CORNER POUND UND i'~ c ¢ B'THICKMIN. BELOWPAYERLEVEL PAVER AREA DEFINITION AND q of N N RESTRAINT REINFORCED BACKFILL m rn y 2' COMPACTED 1W MINUS - COMPACTED OC OF DENSITY BANG SET PAVERS - INSiALL PATTERN STANDARD PROCTOR DENSM 9N~ DECOMPOSED GRANITE CHIPS \ PER OWNER'S CHOICE 2" COMPACTED 314'MINUS BASE \ TO 112'(25-00 M14)BEOOING SAND CONCRETE CURB OR 40 PERF. DRAIN PIPE IN FILTER STEEL HEADER-BEE +o ~ `3'DEPiH COMPACTE0314"AIMUS 'D " FABRIC SLEEVE. DRAIN TO DAYLIGHT - J LAYWTPLAN FOR PATH `70ZNON WOVEN GE6TEXTILE FABRIC - m FILTER FABRIC UNDER BASE ROCK NATIVE OR FILL ♦-LL() LAYOUT r COMPACTED SOIL SUBGRADE 90% COMPACTED SUBGRADE - I^- RELATIVE COMPACTION 3N' MINUS CRUSHED ROCK LEVELING PAD@ 6-THICK u DG PATH PAVER PATIO PATH SECTION - MODULAR BLOCK WALL I SCALE: 12'=1'-0' 3 SCALE: ffi•=1'-0' ~o BCALE: I2 =1'-0' Ua 49 GRAVITY CURB. ALLOW FOR NO MORE PAVING THAN IB'OFVERTICAL HEIGHTATFACE ADJACENTASPHALT Tr., PLANTING IDTH VARIES PROIDE PROVIDE 11AWOFTOPSOIL IN I. BOULDER PLACEMENT SHALL BE BOULDERS PER OWNER'S SELECTION A3 REBPR@16'O.C. ALL PLATNING AREAS AS INDICATED ON RMOOM. VERIFY lAYOUTWITH BURY 113 OF BOULDER INTO SOIL TO ANCHOR (M4%)E0. WAY 1, _ THEPLPNS PROVIDE PLANTING SPACES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. _ 4 PERF,N PIPEIN AMONGST BOULDERS ~gg FLTE'DR FABRIC SLEEVE 16' a GRAIN TO DAYLIGHT '/L m 12"-24'BOULDFRS- FINISHGRADE BURY BACKIft.N- SLOPE. ~pT p 3/4' MINUS CRUSHED OWNERTO SELECT TYPE OF p(,Sw L'`\L,• ROCK BACKFILL BOULDER 4.Y SPATE OF d 12' ORE ON B4PP ~y REO.g493 A ACAP ~ Keny KenC-(yT PE SPLIT ENDS OF Revision Data: BOTH CAP UNITS BOULDER PLACEMENT DETAIL SECTION'-0'- BOULDER FALL Drawn By: 00 SCALE: f2'=T-0' SCALE: 12'=1 USE SPLIT HALF UNRTO CONST.@ NEW CONC: NOTE; FINISH STEP IN TOP OF WAIL Scale as Indicated KNIFE PLATES ARETO BE 3116'FRLETWELDS INSTALLED PARALLEL WITH 314"OVERHANG R (2) 3M• BOLT HOLES THE WALL 0 318 KNIFE PL 318" BTM PL 12'DEFROMEDBAR #3 BAR CAPPING DETAIL-PROFILE 374'TOOLED RADIUS,TYP, WR CEDAR POST FOR STRAIGHT WALLS, ALTERNATE ACAPANO B-CAP STEP AT TOP OF WALL ADJACENT PLANTING AREA FINISH GRADE r 314IFE PLATE DEt27 'GAIV,BOLTS W1 ITS WI ADJACEMPAVING SHERS AND NUTS PER SPLIT EXPOSED SIDE ATE. RANDOMLY BTAEGER li VERTICAL JOINTS NEAR VERTCAL PINHOL CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CURB 1 't'` RSA-TUFF PIN f _:I I 114STEP 2PER UNIT ' f BACK 1 •y MINUS BASE ROCK AT 95-4 RELATIVE COMPACTION GENERAL NOTES FOR CAPPING: I1 -LOK C :11 1 . CAPS SHALL BE ADHERED TO WALL USING EOENING SLOT j 1 SUBGRADE AT 90% RELATIVE COMPACTION 8. - r DRILL a EPOXY DEFORMED 2 CAPS MAYB PLACEDTE ADHESIVE WIT A BAR ~OVERHANG OF TOP COUR ETO 3. WHEN SPLITTING CAP UNIT FOR WALL END DO NOT USEACAPSECTION LESS THAN 6'WIDE NEAR VERTICAL PINNING DETAIL 4. DO NOT OVERHANG CAP AT END OF COURSE SQUARE FOOT UNIT-CROSS SECTION I MORE THAN I' W SCALE; NONE Q ZO SECTION - DRIVEWAY CURB SECTION - POST TO WALL CONNECTION MODULAR WALL CONSTRUCTION 6 SCALE ;1=1'- SCALE: 12'=1'-0' SCALE: 12'=1'-0' /W/ uj WN LL N LL Z~0 0U'o N Q am U) OJQ MARCH, 2015 i I L 6.1 SITE DETAILS ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Planning Division 51 Winburn Way, Ashland 97520 C I T Y OF 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 FILE # -201 0) Q5 ASHLAND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT I~r( (4t- -f- EDWO 06N L4t-WIk-t- C_O IJ S716~A/ A) <5 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED@) Certification? 13 YES Street Address 19-7 Assessor's Map No. 391 E ~ 0 Tax Lot(s) b Zoning K (_71 S Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name ) I iLlSOLI Phone X60_730_yl'ti?E-Mail J(c le-jauso.. CD 9 rv.cm Address l o Q-),_J!4 SJ City /-Sh. ic,_4 Zip 7 S z C) PROPERTY OWNER Name S C' r-2 Phone E-Mail Address City Zip SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITEC LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THER Title 1-42S Name ~/Phone Sy/ y98 3d E-Mail L5P_! KS K-M60L f k~,'/ J (2-(r) d1- Address city L) Zip Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip 1 hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that /produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request, 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate, and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in h egard will result most likely in t only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be remove at expense. ny do am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. ` L-7- Apple nt' 1gnature Date As owner of the property invol"isrequest, have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. r Property wner's Signature (required) Date fro be completed by City StaM Date Received , Zoning Permit Type a~~ E ~ - Filing Fee $ 1 V 1~ , 0 OVER, N i G:\comm-dev\planning\Porms & Handouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc i t t Job Address: 818 LIBERTY ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C A Owner's Name: DANIEL/LESLIE DAWSON 0 Phone: P Customer 08869 N State Lic No: DANIEL/LESLIE DAWSON T City Lic No: L Applicant: 818 LIBERTY ST R I Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: (760) 937-4198 T Address: N Applied: 05/27/2016 0 T Issued: Expires: 11/23/2016 R Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391E16AD6200 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: For P & E VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Physical Constraints Permit 1,012.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 (180 days). 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 1,012.00 $ 1,012.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 1,012.00 Fees Paid: $ 1,012.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF -AS I I LAN