Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutEMain_50_PA-2016-01385 CITY ASHLAND August 26, 2016 Notice of Final Decision On August 26, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA-2016-01385 Subject Property: 50 East Main St Applicant: Ted DeLong/Oregon Shakespeare Festival Description: A request for Site Design Review approval for exterior changes to a contributing property in the Downtown Historic District. The proposal is to construct a 150 square foot addition to the existing Edeck located at the rear of the . IGNATION: CommercialuDownt Downtown; C- Main SASSES ORS MAP: 39 E DESIGNATION: PLAN 09BB; TAX LOT: 40000. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12`h day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Mark Schexnayder in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 11 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 - wti vv .ashland or us 4 SECTION 185.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type 1 decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter, 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. C. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.6.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Titne for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of'Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal, iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments, The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305 - 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 d€w" .ash(and.v,.rzs ASHLAND PLA ING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01385 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 50 East Main Street OWNER: Camps Building Condominium Association APPLICANT: Ted DeLong/Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for exterior changes to a contributing property in the Downtown d atl the rear Tofethproposal is to e building loc t dtatc50 EasOt square foot addition to the existing deck located Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: ®Commercial-Downtown; ZONING: C-1- ; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09BB, 2016 SUBMITTAL. DATE: July July 21, , 2016 2016 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: JuSTAFF APPROVAL DATE: August 20 6 FINAL DECISION DATE: SMarcheptembber r 7, 2016 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: 7, 2018 DECISION: The Camps F. L. Building is located on tax lot 39 lE 09BB 40000, a 0.10 acre parcel which includes a portion of the Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF) campus as well as several other businesses. The Oregon Shakespeare Festival owns a portion of the Camps F. L. Building and uses the second floor for various offices and a Membership Lounge. The Membership Lounge, including the existing deck at the rear of the building, was approved as an addition to the existing structure in 1994 (PA-94-121). The property is irregularly shaped and zoned C-1-D (Commercial Downtown) which is consistent with the surrounding properties. The current application involves a request for Site Design Review approval to allow exterior modifications to the Camps F. L. Building for the property located at 50 East Main Street. The modifications are associated with adding approximately 150 square feet to the existing deck, which adjoins the OSF's Members Lounge. The deck addition will serve several purposes including providing support for a new rain catchment system and additional space to accommodate users of OSF's Members Lounge. Site Design Review The proposal will expand the OFS's Members Lounge deck by 150 square feet to accommodate a new storm water collection system, and will include the relocation of mechanical equipment to the buildings roof. The application explains that the only exterior change associated with the proposal is a small addition of deck space, over an existing areaway, to assist in water mitigation. The new portion of the deck will project outward toward the Chautauqua Walkway, but will not project past the existing deck or beyond the west face of the building. The materials are proposed to match the existing materials in place including large wood sections and steel pickets for the guardrails. The wood will be painted Tudor Brown and the pickets will be painted flat black. In addition, the wearing surface of the deck will be replaced entirely with a wood/plastic composite material. The application emphasizes that the proposed addition continues and supports the PA #2016-01385 50 East Main Street/MMS Page 1 existing character of the building, using similar materials and finishes that minimize visual impacts and a design that integrates the existing materials, openings and treatments of the Camps F. L. Building's architectural style. Both the Historic Commission and the Tree Commission reviewed the proposal at their regular meetings in August of 2016, and both recommended that the request be approved as presented. The criteria for Site Design Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 15.5.2.050 as follows: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. In staff's view, the proposed modifications to the Camps F. L. Building to add an approximately 150 square foot deck addition, storm water collection system, as part of improvements to redirect excessive water falling on the deck. The improvements minimal and designed to blend with the existing structure, and will not adversely affect the way the building relates to the streetscape or associated design standards. Planning Action 42016-01385 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2016-013S-5 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicants, and all applicable conditions of previous land use PA #2016-01385 50 East Main Stree~S Page 2 t approvals, shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2) That a Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division prior to permit issuance, site work including demolition, staging or storage of materials. The Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the tree to be removed and the installation of tree protection fencing for the trees to be preserved. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.61.200.B. 3) That any new exterior lighting shall be appropriately placed, directed or shrouded so f er is no direct illumination of surrounding properties. ill Molnar, DiI ctor Date epartment of 7ommunity Development PA #2016-01385 50 East Main Street/MMS Page 3 Ns, X c t!* 1020 1 1 40004, c~ 14400 1 417 4 ~d1 1 ids 14 p- r~4 1a4! 1100 1 1 901 t AFFIDAVIT OF (MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 8/261161 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action 42016-01385, 50 E Main. Signature of Employee Document6 812612016 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 14400 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 60001 PA-2016-01385 391E09BC 1100 58 E MAIN STREET LLC 60-68 EAST MAIN STREET LLC ASHLAND CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PO BOX 306 P 0 BOX 306 PO BOX 1360 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 10100 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 10200 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 40001 CLAYCOMB GORDON E TRSTE FBO CONKLIN JAMES TRUSTEE ET AL DONOVAN MICHAEL/TAUB DAVID CLAYCOMB STEFANIE 3120 SOUTH STAGE RD 767 S MOUNTAIN AVE 105 CHRISTY COURT MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PHOENIX, OR 97535 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 13000 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 99001 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 10300 FIRST INTERSTATE BANK/OR NA C/O SACKS STEPHEN/BINGHAM MICHAEL STANDING STONE BREWING CO THOMSON PROPERTY TAX SERVICES 50 W NEVADA 101 OAK ST P 0 BOX 2609 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 CARLSBAD, CA 92018 PA-2016-01385 PA-2016-01385 PA-2016-01385 DAVE STEVENS ORW ARCHITECTURE TED DELONG OREGON SHAKESPEARE CAMPS BUILDING CONDO ASSOC 2950 E BARNETT FESTIVAL PO BOX 158 MEDFORD, OR 97504 PO BOX 158 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01385 DAVID WILKERSON ORW 50 E Main ARCHITECTURE NOD 8/26/16 2950 E BARNETT 13 MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Planning Application Review August 3, 2016 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01385 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 50 East Main Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Ted DeLong/Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for exterior changes to a contributing property in the Downtown Historic District. The proposal is to construct a 150 square foot addition to the existing deck located at the rear of the building located at 50 East Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial - Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 0966; TAX LOT: 40000. Recommendation: The Historic Commission recommends approving the application as submitted. Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 } www.ashland.or.us I Y F r Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 j 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland, or,us TTY: 1 800 735 2900 _ s NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01385 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 50 East Main St OWNER/APPLICANT: Ted DeLong/Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for exterior changes to a contributing property in the Downtown Historic District. The proposal is to construct a 150 square foot addition to the existing deck located at the rear of the building located at 50 East Main Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial - Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E 09BB; TAX LOT: 40000. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday August 3, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 27, 2016 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: August 10, 2016 / r ~ Z 1 J Q / oa l l fo. J ~Al ~sr t SUBJECT PROPERTY. 60 East Main Street Q PA-201&01386 ~j - Lam- - 1:600 - tinch =50 feel w e uron~o u,.em..¢®h ~vl m,n eovmma+dk,ersy. p9luwe,.,eune Iec04Ja, m,emMxroffimy r„_~, T_~ ,bauWbWepa+dervM lkN VeGYE la n4mae,M'wwwtlan The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. determination eness Ashland Planning Division Staff determine 200 feet ofthle prlopertycsubmitting lappl cat on whichual olwsl for)ao14 day comment pero d!etAfter the notice is sent to surrounding properties comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\Maitcd Notices & Signs\2016TA-2016-0138 SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards, B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. G:\comnrdev',planning\Planning Acti--Noticing FolderWailed Notices & SignsL016TA-2016-01385.docs A2Y'ej0 IJ U <p 10206 r w a_ "Ol Etgai 2 11 lull n U-3 i i u l' Il 'A' 1410 'I O U 5t -D r: . g d r . "OUD E AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 7/27/16 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person I listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01385, 50 E Main. Signature of Employee DocumenQ 7/26/2016 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 14400 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 60001 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 10100 58 E MAIN STREET LLC 60-68 EAST MAIN STREET LLC CLAYCOMB GORDON E TRSTE FBO PO BOX 306 P 0 BOX 306 CLAYCOMB STEFANIE ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 105 CHRISTY COURT PHOENIX, OR 97535 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 10200 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 40001 PA-2016-01385 391 E09BB 13000 CONKLIN JAMES TRUSTEE ET AL DONOVAN MICHAEL/TAUB DAVID FIRST INTERSTATE BANK/OR NA 3120 SOUTH STAGE RD 767 S MOUNTAIN AVE C/O THOMSON PROPERTY TAX SVC MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 P 0 BOX 2609 CARLSBAD, CA 92018 PA-2016-01385 391E09BB 99001 PA-2016-01385 391E09BB 10300 PA-2016-01385 SACKS STEPHEN/BINGHAM MICHAEL STANDING STONE BREWING CO DAVE STEVENS 50 W NEVADA 101 OAK ST ORW ARCHITECTURE ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 2950 E BARNETT MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA-2016-01385 PA-2016-01385 TED DELONG PA-2016-01385 OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL CAMPS BUILDING CONDO ASSOC. DAVID WILKER PO BOX 158 PO BOX 158 ORW ARCHITECTTU URE ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 2950 E T MEDFORD, OR OR 97504 50 E Main NOC 7/27/16 12 iE Regan Trapp From: Dave Stevens <dstevens@orwarch.com> Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 1:41 PM To: Regan Trapp Cc: Ted Del-ong (tedd@osfashland.org); Scott Resch Subject: RE: OSF Camps Deck Addition-Revised for lighting 1544 Good afternoon Regan, By separate email, I will be providing a link to download the revised documents for the OSF 50 E Main St Camps deck planning application. This will avoid recipients having to download the files to their inbox. The files include: ® Revised elevations showing the downlight. The other three drawings remain unchanged. ® Revised Findings addressing the lighting. ® Revised Appendix A ® New Appendix B with lighting cut sheet. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers, Dave Stevens 541.779.5237 x13 From: Regan Trapp [mailto:Regan.Trapp@ashiand.or.us] Sent: Monday, July 25, 2016 10:46 AM To: Dave Stevens <dstevens@orwarch.com> Subject: RE: OSF Camps Deck Addition 1544 Dave, Can you get me the additional sheets today if possible? Permit Technician - Community Development City of Ashland Regan.Trapp@as' e _ is 541-552-2233 TTY 800-735-2900 541-488-6006 (fax) From: Dave Stevens [mailto:dstevens@orwarch.com] Sent: Friday, July 22, 2016 1:40 PM To: Regan Trapp Subject: RE: OSF Camps Deck Addition 1544 Good afternoon Regan, Regarding the OSF 50 E Main St Camps deck package submitted Wednesday, I just realized that the planning application did not indicate a downlight wall pack on the new deck portion of the application. 1 Can I send you a couple of revised PDF sheets to slip into the set? Let me know. Cheers, Dave Stevens, CSI+CDT Project Manager/ Specifications/ Design Technologist OgdenRoemerWilkerson Architecture ARCHITECTURE ph 541.779.5237 x13 fx 541.772,8472 2950 East Barnett Road Medford, OR 97504 www.ORWa roitectu re.com 2 Oregon Shakespeare Festival CAMPS Deck Addition Planning Application Project Findings July 21, 2016 ARCHITECTURE W VIW . ORW ARCH ITE ETTREROAD 2950 EAST 5 0 L H E D F O R O OR 4 City of Ashland F 5 L Planning Division 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 Project Identification Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF) Site Address: 50 E Main St, Ashland, OR 97520 Map 391 E09BB Tax Lot: 40000 Zoning: C-1 -D (Commercial, with Downtown overlay), Basic Site Review, Detail Site Review, Historic District and Downtown Design Standards. ORW Architecture 1544 Purpose: These findings are intended to serve as the guiding document that will allow and addit on tol and to review and make its determinations regarding how the planned worl<renovation will of acceptable within the existing deck. It will explain and demonstrate Ashland Municipal Code. Project Goals: Deck and Site nd re minor addition the The Oregon Shakespeare Festival deck, at the location above, will undergo had flooding. catchment nt econ and approximately 150 SF. The goals are to: t First, ea'rso provide rain to provide a method existing restaurant below, which in recent years, additional space to accommodate of supporting the rain catchment; and third, provide some a users of OSF's Members Lounge, which adjoins the deck. Municipal Codes: The existing deck, and new addition will be renovated under the follows: Land Use Ordinance ALUO Chapter 18 Land Use Standard development codes a a Par} 18.2 - Zoning Regulations a. 18.2.2.030 - Allowed Uses. b. 18.2.4.020 - Accessory Structures and Mechanical Equipment. t s General Exceptions. 050 -Yard Requirements and c. 18.2.4. 2.6.030 -Unified Standards for Non-Residential ones d' 18. including: b Part 18.3 - Overlay Zones, uisites. a. 18.3.10.020 - qpplicability luding the Basic pre-req b. 18.3.12.030 - Detail Site Review Overlay, inc Overlay District. c. 18.3.12.040 - Downtown d. 18.3.12.050 -Historic District O erl a dards Site Development and Design C. Part 18.4 - a 18.4.2.040 - Basic and Detail Site Revtandards b 18.4.2.050 -Historic District Dsstandards c 18.4.2.060 - Downtown Design Outdoor Lighting d 18.4.4.050 - 18.4.5.030 -Tree Protection Water Management Facilities. fe' 18.4.6.080 - Storm Drainage and Surface 3~ it Commercial Summary: Development Area are feet of new development over existing developed areaway. The renovated project has 150 squ Structural Site Coverage of rint The renovated project will not affect the building envelope square footage. fo} h footprint footp will remain at 3,337 SF. The site is 4,356 SF which results in a building p approximately 77 percent. Impervious Surface Coverage The project has no new impervious surfaces. Existing impervious surfaces include the building footprint, existing deck, and areaway, which will be covered by the deck addition. Parking Spaces The Camps building has street side parking on East Main Street, which will not be affected by the scope of this work. Landscaped Area The renovated project has approximately 20 SF of existing landscaped area adjacent to the Chautauqua Walkway. A single tree will require protection during construction. Energy Requirements: Air Pollution and Hazards Gas, Electricity, Water, Sewer, Waste, Refuse, Site Lighting, The existing systems are not affected and will remain un-modified by this application. Storm Water Storm water falling on the existing deck, and space where the deck addition will be constructed, is currently collected and pumped into the sewer by a sump pump on the property. alleviate flooding, and to direct storm water into the correct collection system, a brain asin at the top of system and gutters will be installed to divert the rain water the water to the volume of water entering Chautauqua Walkway. This will add a negligible amount o the Ashland storm water system. Zoning Regulations This application is for work to an existing building. The proposal is reviewed to verify compliance with the underlying zone. Chapter 18.2.2 - Base Zones and Allowed Uses 18.2.2.030 Allowed Uses (pa 2-7/pdf 33 B. Permitted Uses and Uses Permitted Subject to Special Use Standards. Uses listed as "Permitted (P)" are allowed. Uses listed as Permitted Subject to Special Use Standards (S)" are allowed, provided they conform to chapter 18,2.3 Special Use Standards. All uses are subject to the development standards of zone in which they are located, any applicable overlay zone(s), and the review procedures of part 18.5. See section 18.5.1.020. Finding: The property is zoned C-1-D, Commercial Downtown. Table 18.2.2.030 specifies 'Office' use as 'P', or Permitted. Finding: OSF currently uses the building as an office, with a lounge accessory space. Conclusion: The existing building complies with the current zoning requirements. Chapter 18.2.4 - General Regulations for Base Zones 18.2.4.020 Accessory Structures and Mechanical Equipment (pq 2-39/ df 66 A. Accessory Structures. Accessory buildings and structures shall comply with all requirements for the principal use, except where specifically modified by this ordinance. B. Mechanical Equipment. Mechanical equipment shall not be located between the main structure on the site and any street adjacent to a front or side yard, and every attempt shall be made to place such equipment so that it is not visible from adjacent public streets. Mechanical equipment and associated enclosures, not taller than allowed fence heights, may be located within required interior side or rear yards, provided such installation and operation is consistent with other provisions of this ordinance or the Ashland Municipal Code, including but not limited to noise attenuation. Any installation of mechanical equipment shall require a building permit. Finding: The existing deck, and deck addition, comply with an ancillary designation for the IMW requirements of an Office use. Finding: Existing mechanical equipment in the areaway, not installed higher than allowed fence heights, is partially visible on the side yard, through the existing landscape screening, from the Chautauqua Walkway. Existing rooftop equipment is not visible, or shrouded from view by existing trees. Finding: A mechanical condenser is being relocated from the areaway to the roof. To not provide evidence that additional screening is required , per phot s section toward was requirements of 18.4.4.030 G 4, amock-up o show thel v~ews from the Public Right the new condenser location, and pr of Way. This information is provided in Appendix A. Finding: Screening toward residential zones is not required. unittto zoning requirements. Conclusion: The existing building complies with the current ted to improve the Chau Conclusion: Relocatio taU qua Walkw y view from the Public Right of Way. the 78.2 4.050 Yard Re uirements and General E ~ 8 2'5 and 18 2.6/yard requirements shall conform A. In addition to the requirements of chapters to the Solar Access standards of chapter 18.4.8. B. Eaves and awnings may encroach three feet into required yards; all other architectural projections may encroach 18 inches into required yards. C. The following general exceptions are allowed for structures that are 30 inches in height or less, including entry stairs, uncovered porches, patios, and similar structures: 1. The structures are exempt from the side and rear dsetback duced by half. 2. The front and side yards abutting a public street may be re Solar access requirement do not apply within the C-1-D district. Chapter 18.4.8 Finding: Solar Access will not be included in these Findings. Finding: The existing building is not within the setback. Finding: The existing uncovered deck is allowed within the setback, by exception. Finding: The new deck addition is not within the setback. Conclusion: The existing building and new deck addition comply with the current zoning requirements. Chapter 18.2.6 - Standards for Non-Residential Zones (pg 2-56/pdf 82) 18.2.6.030 Unified Standards for Zone C-1-D extracted fRomdtable 178.2.6.030 Zones Requirement Thg1wheree following standards EE Density' (dwelling 60 du/ac wed per section 18.2.3.130; within E-1 zone, per R Overlay (see chopter 18.3.13 Residential Overlay . Lot Area, Width, Depth Lot There is no minimum lot area, width or depth, or maxi9c Coverage minimum front, side or rear yard, except as required tdistrict and overlay zone provisions of part 18.3 or the design standards of part 18.4. ere is no minimum front, side, or rear yard requiredthe subject site abut a residential zone, in which case Setback Yards (feet) Th and a rear yard of not less than 10 ft per story is reqThe solar setback standards of chapter 18.4.8 do no1-D zone. tthe he soC- I lar zone ack Except for buildings within 100 feet of aresidential eo zone, standards of chapter 18.4.8 do not apply See also section 18.2.4.030 Arterial Street Setback. Building Heightsas _ Maximum 40 ft, except: - Buildings greater than 40 ft and less than 55 ft are permitted in C-1-D zone with (feet) approval of a Conditional Use Permit. greater than -Where located more than 100 feet from a residential zone, buildings a Conditional 40 ft and less than 55 ft are permitted in C-1 zone with app Use Permit. __J 2See definition of "height of building" in section 18.6.1.030. 3parapets may be erected up to five feet above the maxi'for height, for mechan0i al egoripment mechanical equipment screening requirements, and 18.5.2.020 review process. - e standards of meet Landscape Area - Minimum None, except parking areaAccces~, asewice nd Circalat on, aald 18.414 Landscaping, of developed lot area) chapters 18.4.3 Parking, Lighting, and Screening. Finding: There are no residential units in the Office space. Finding: The existing property conforms with the area, width, depth, omax verlays dotnot coverage; minimum front, side or rear yard. The app modify these requirements. indin : The rear of the property is adjacent to a R-1-75 residential zone. The building F 9 setback complies with standard. The sides of the property are adjacent to C-1 -D commercial zone. The building Finding: setbacks comply with the standard. Finding: The property is within 100 feet of a residential zone, on the bu utngid hof the property. The solar setbacks apply to the north side requirement does not apply. Owner provided drawings from the 1979 renovation indicate the height of the Finding: Special Districts and Overlay Zones Chapter 18.3.10 - Physical and Environmental Constraints Overlay (pg 3- 129/pdf 213) 18.3. 10 020 Applicability A. Physical Constraints Review Permit. A Physical Constraints Review Permit is required for the following activities in the land classifications in section 18.3.10.060. 1. Alteration of Land. The alteration of the land surface by any of the following activities in areas identified as Flood Plain Corridor Land, Hillside Land, or Severe Constraint Land. 2. Special Flood Hazard Area. All activities located within an area of special flood hazard are subject to the provisions for a Development Permit under AMC 15.10 Flood Damage and Prevention Regulations. 3. Tree Removal. Finding: The application does not include the Alteration of Land, or Tree Removal. Finding: The work is not located in a special Flood Hazard Area. Conclusion: The requirements of this Overlay are not applicable to the Scope of Work in this application. Chapter 18.3.12 - Site Development and Design Overlays (pg 3-176/pdf 260) 18.3.12.020 Detail Site Review Overlay Is subject to section 18.4.2.040.C, and will be address in these Findings under that article, 18.3.72.040 Downtown Design Standards Overlay Is subject to section 18.4.2.060, and will be address in these Findings under that article. 18.3.12.050 Historic District Overlay Is subject to section 18.4.2,050, and will be address in these Findings under that article. i Site Development and Design Standards 1 8.4.2 ® Building Placement, Orientation, and Design 78.4.2.040 Basic and Detail Site Review (pq 4-10/ df 290 This application is for work to an existing building. Many of the guidelines of this section discuss and advise to design scope not included in this project. Finding: The deck addition does not modify or change the existing building Orientation, Scale, Streetscape Street Trees, Landscaping, Noise and Glare from artificial lighting, and does not expand the building and site. It proposes a small addition of deck space, over an existing areaway, to assist mat dials and dteo gn of this of Conclusion: This application conforms to the requirements section, and are compatible with the existing deck and complimentary to the existing building. 18.4.2.050 Historic District Design Standards (pq 4-241df 304 contributing historic This application is for work to an existing building considered to be a primary resource within the district. Many of the guidelines of this section discuss and advise to dethat the sectio is scope not included in this project. However, lde k addition are compat ble with the existing design and material treatment of the proposed building and surrounding neighborhood, and are consistent with the Historic District. le, Finding: The deck addition does not modify or change the existing l bui dings Height, daces Massing, Setbacks, Roof, Rhythm of Openings, Base or P or Garages. Conclusion: This application conforms to the requirements, deck materials and deo gory tohis and the section, and are compatible with the existing de existing building. The following key requirements of this section, pertaining to this project, are addressed as follows: 17. Imitation of Historic Features Recommended - Accurate restoration of original architectural features on historic buildi gs. does construction, including additions, that is clearly contemporary in design, not compete visually with adjacent historic buildings. Avoid - Replicating or imitating the styles, motifs, or details of historic buildings. Findin : The original building constructed in 1905, used monolithic brick construction. 9 Finding: The building was renovated 1994. The extension was built using stud/cavity/single wythe brick construction, with brick color matching the existing 1905 color brick. Finding: The deck addition in 1994 was constructed using a combination of wood, steel, cement board, glass, and plexi-glass for the deck skylight. There was no brick used in the construction of the deck. Finding: Materials of the deck addition call for using large wood sections and steel pickets for the guardrails, to match existing. The wood will be painted Tudor Brown, OSF's standard paint color covering much of the surrounding area. The pickets painted flat black to matching existing colors. (See paint drop colors) Finding: The wearing surface of the deck, will be entirely replaced with a woad/plastic composite. This is for improved wearing and maintenance purposes, and will not be required to 'match' the current deck, however, the color of the composite will closely match the existing color (see sample). Finding: Replacement cement board will be re-applied to existing locations (under the new deck/adjacent to existing deck) and new locations (supporting deck wall). The new cement board will match the existing smooth cement board, and include a board and batt motif, which was provided during the 1994 renovation. No sample is provided for the smooth cement board, as this is a commonly used material. The material will be painted Tudor Brown to integrate with OSF's color painting scheme. Conclusion: The deck materials used for the addition, are much the same as was provided for the existing 1979 deck. Many of the products are still available in the market place, which will provide a seamless integration to the existing deck, and do not intend to mimic any of the original historic building. 12. Additions Recommended - Additions that are visually unobtrusive from a public right-of-way, and do not obscure or eliminate character defining features of historic buildings Avoid - Additions on the primary fagade or any elevation that is visually prominent from a public right-of-way, and additions that obscure or destroy character defining features. Finding: The addition is not on the primary fagade, nor is it on any wall which has character defining historic features. The addition is nestled between the existing deck and the back wall of the building, over an existing areaway. Finding: The original restaurant tenant improvement, on the first level of the building, installed modern mechanical and ventilation ducts and piping running up the south face of the existing historic brick wall. The existing mechanical ducting and ventilation piping is being collected, and screened with materials co'isistent with the deck addition. E Ei Conclusion: The deck addition complies with the recommendati n appurtenances further, aonddresses the face other existing conditions to mitigate existing indus pp of the historic building. 18.4.2.060 Downtown Design Standards (pa 4-35 df 3 of the guidelines of this section discuss This application is for work to an existing building. Many o and advise to design scope not included in this project. Finding. The deck addition does not modify or change the existing building e ght, qid h, Openings, Horizontal Rhythms, Vertical Rhythms, Roof Forms, or Pedestrian Shelters. The following key requirements of this section, pertaining to this project, are addressed as follows: 2. Setback Avoid ve on c. Recessed or projecting balconies, verandas, or other useable space above the groun existing and new buildings shall not be incorporated in a street facing treatments shown in Figure 78.4.2.060. C.4 and 7. The deck addition does not face a street, nor does it project past the property line, Finding: or existing building elements. Conclusion: The deck addition complies with this section. 8. Materials a. Exterior building materials shall consist of traditional building materials found in t treatments downtown area including block, brick, painted wood, smooth stucco, or shown in Figure 18.4.2.060.C.4 and 9. Findin : The existing historic building is constructed of traditional building materials. No 9 modifications are occurring to the building. Finding: The new deck is designed primarily with painted wood and black iron. The decking floor is a wood composite, for durability and maintenance issues, and blends with the color and texture of the painted wood. Conclusion: The deck addition materials complies with this section. I, 10er a. Non-street or alley facing elevations are less significant than stfblock, levations. oe caan sidewalls of buildings should therefore be fairly simple (e.g., wood, stone, masonry clad, with or without windows). b. Visual integrity of the original building shall be maintained when altering or adding building elements. This shall include such features as the vertical lines of columns, piers, the horizontal definition of spandrels and cornices, and other primary structural and decorative elements as illustrated in Figure 18.4.2.060.C.6. Avoid treatments shown in Figure 18,4.2.060.C.4 and 9. Finding: The deck addition is on a public alleyway. The proposal maintains the simple deck design of the existing deck, for this elevation. Finding: The deck addition maintains the visual integrity of the original deck expansion by incorporating 'heavy' wood guardrail tops and large timber perimeters of the deck. Conclusion: The proposed design incorporates design elements which address the requirements of this section. 18.4.4 - Landscaping, Lighting, and Screening (pg 4-69/pdf 349) 78.4.4.050 Outdoor Liahtina (pq 4 77/pdf 357) C. Standards. As a guideline, lighting levels shall be no greater than necessary to provide for pedestrian safety, property/business identification, and crime prevention. All outdoor lighting, except streetlights, shall comply with the following standards. 1. Arrange and install artificial lighting so there is no direct illumination onto adjacent residential properties. 2. Provide light poles no greater than 14 feet in height for pedestrian facilities. (Pedestal- or bollard-style lighting is an alternative method for illuminating walkways located inside a development but not located in a public street right-of-way.) 3. Where a light standard is placed over a sidewalk or walkway, maintain a minimum vertical clearance of eight feet. 4. Install light fixtures where they will not obstruct public ways, driveways, or walkways. Where a light standard most be placed within a walkway, maintain an unobstructed pedestrian through zone per Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance. 5. Except as permitted for signs, direct outdoor light fixtures downward and have full shielding to minimize excessive light spillover onto adjacent properties. 6. For streetlight requirements, see subsection 18.4.6.040.D.18. Finding; The proposed lighting directs the illumination downward. See Appendix B for proposed lighting fixture cut sheet. Finding: The Owner proposes to have an equivalent lighting level of a 60w bulb for the additional light. Finding: The location of the lighting does not obstruct public ways, and does not obstructed ADA zones. Conclusion: The proposed light fixture complies with the requirements of this el-,dinance. 18.4.5 - Tree Preservation and Protection (pg 4-81/pdf 361) The impact on existing trees for this application is expected to be minimal. 18,4.5.030 Tree Protection (pq 4-81/pdf 361) A. Tree Protection Plan. A tree protection plan shall be actions. the tree removal is proposed, with applications for Type 1, Type II, and Type III planning a Tree Removal Permit pursuant to chapter 18.5.7 may be required. B. Tree Protection Plan Submission Requirements. In oclearly depicts all trees to beotection plan; an applicant shall submit a plan to the City, which preserved and/or removed on the site. The plan must be drawn to scale and include the following. 1. Location, species, and diameter of each tree on site and within 15 feet of the site. 2. Location of the drip line of each tree, 3. An inventory of the health and hazard of each tree on site, and recommendations for treatment for each tree. 4. Location of existing and proposed roads, water, sanitary and storm sewer, irrigation, and other utility lines/facilities and easements. 5. Location of dry wells, drain lines and soakage trenches. 6. Location of proposed and existing structures. 7. Grade change or cut and fill during or after construction. 8. Existing and proposed impervious surfaces. 9. Identification of a contact person and/or arborist who will be responsible for implementing and maintaining the approved tree protection plan. 10. Location and type of tree protection measures to be installed per section 18.4.5.030. C. Finding: A Tree Protection Plan is provided indicating the required items. Finding: There is only one tree, with a DBH of 6 inches or greater, within 15 feet of the project. Finding: No trees are removed for this project. Conclusion: The submitted plan and documents comply with the requirements. 18,4.6 - Public Facilities (pg 4-84/pdf 364) This application is to an existing building. Many of the guidelines of this section discuss and advise to design scope not included in this project. Finding: The designs propose no change in function, connectivity, width, slope to the existing bricks or Chautauqua Walkway as part of this application. The extent of scope is to verify and clear existing storm drains, and divert water from an existing sump pump pumping to sewer, to an existing storm drain, to prevent future areaway flooding. Finding: There will be no new utilities provided to the project. Conclusion: The owner will comply with the requirements of the City Engineer. The following key requirements of this section, pertaining to this project, are addressed as follows: 78.4.6.080 Storm Drainage and Surface Water Management Facilities (pq 4-1 19/pdf 399) A. Storm Drainage Plan Approval. Development permits for storm drainage and surface water management plans must be approved by the City Engineer and Building Official, C. Effect on Downstream Drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development would overload an existing drainage facility, the City shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with City standards. Finding: The existing branch from the catch basin to the main is clogged with roots and is not performing as intended, OSF intends to perform maintenance on the branch to restore it to operation. Finding: Heavy and prolonged rain fall into the existing areaway and through the existing deck is collected and pumped to the sewer. The Scope of Work proposes to re- route most of the water from falling into the areaway, eliminating the need to pump the water, by connecting it to the existing catch basin. Conclusion: The owner will comply with the requirements of the City Engineer. i Oregon Shakespeare Festival APPENDIX A SITE LINES OF MECHANICAL ROOF TOP RELOCATION FOR ARCHITECTURE WWMW AMC` ME.I- n9 e° FAa A CAMPS Deck Addition M ° °M s' Project Identification Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF) Site Address: 50 E Main St, Ashland, OR 97520 Map 391 E09BB Tax Lot: 40000 Zoning: C-1-D (Commercial, with Downtown overlay), Basic Site Review, Detail Site Review, Historic District and Downtown Design Standards. ORW Architecture 1544 The existing condensing unit attached t following t eS de off thheSbuilding epCircled in R sd)e a the created with a mock-up (the red box in the condensation unit after relocation on the roof top. An aerial view image plan and photos are presented following this page. a~ E ~ t IML F 'Ok, t ~ r S y~ F 6 a i ey r~ %ANN (6 1 1 Y~ at y + ry ~ u moo i q c~ t l IL IN t r rl - j ti ? 4 I A a FF~ _ 14 INN V zy Image I - Existing Condenser Image 2 - Mock-up in Place { , ,;~•ra iJ it 1 it r i - - { N T. Image i view;~in Bricks Courtyard 1 I - Image 4 - View from Bricks Courtyard 2 w, v l~A A~ wf -`il, .4' ldn t' t iti ti x je. 1 I i i 1 mar' r ~ t o-a~ Iwo"" t}' a -r Im 1 1 /iew from travelling up Chautauqua Walkway l 1 411, 3 . Ott, ~ , ~ , = , ~ JIMI t ~ 3, ,r ~ r, r m image 6 - View from Chautauqua Walkway Landing Oregon Shakespeare Festival APPENDIX Lighting fixture Cut Sheet FOR o„ DDEH HER RECTU RE CAt\/IP Deck Addition ARC H I T CRW ARCH TECTURE.COH 2950 EAST SARNETT ROAD H E D F 0 R D 0R 9 1 5 0 4 P 5 4 1] J 9 5` 3 J F S L I J J 2 B J 2 Project Identification Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF) Site Address: 50 E Main St, Ashland, OR 97520 Map 391 E09BB Tax Lot: 40000 Basic Site Review, Detail Site Review, Zoning: C-1-D (Commercial, with Downtown overlay), Historic District and Downtown Design Standards. ORW Architecture 1544 i Catalog t~ ' © Number AMWO l All~ Notes FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE -For building-and wall-mounted applications. Type CONSTRUCTION - Rugged, die-cast, single-piece aluminum housing. Die-cast doorframe has impact- resistant, tempered glass lens. Doorframe is fully sealed with a closed-cell silicone gasket. Finish: Standard finish is textured dark bronze (DDBT) polyester powder finish, with other architectural Wall-Mounted Luminaire colors available. / OPTICS-Hydroformedreflectorfor superior uniformity and control.Verticallampodentationforimproved lamp output and life. ELECTRICAL -Compactfluorescent utilizes an electronic high-frequency ballast. Quick-disconnect plugs TWF easily disconnect reflector from ballast and fixture from supply wires. Socket is four-pin positive latching thermoplastic. INSTALLATION - Universal mounting plate with integral mounting bolts supports the fixture for easy, one-person installation. ` `e^ FLUORESCENT:26DTT-70TRT LISTINGS - (SA Certified to U.S. and Canadian standards. Down orientation only. NOM Certified (see r"ns Options), IP65 rated. 2142 wattages and below are listed to 30°( ambient, 57W and 7OW are listed to 25°C ambient. Emergency options (all wattages) are listed to 25°C ambient. ELED: U,S• Patent No. 7,737,640. WARRANTY-1-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at Specifications _ www acuitybrands Com7CtlstonlerResourceslTernisand conditions asox Width:l6(40.6) NOTE: Actual performance may differ as a result ofend-user environment and application. Widh16(46(25.6) H Heig 10 Specifications subject to change without notice. Depth: 9-5/8 (24.4) "Weight: 24lbs (10.9 kg) _LL All dimensions are Inches (centimeters) W ( D J unless otherwise indicated. ,Weight as configured in example below. NIGH TIMEn FRIENDLY Cmsstml vxa~ I AEU' y°+I: 8 Green Gb &t fm light Falt,t~ rzdudk n Example: TWF132TRT MVOLT LP I W iii!ll.1 11;1 i'e1'l,'101EI Lead times will vary depending on options selected. Consult with our sales relresentative. TWr1 Series Wattage Voltage Ballast Mounting Options TWF1 260TT 120 (blank) Electronic0°F (blank) Surfacemount Shiaoedinstalledinfixtur_g Shlooed separately GMF Internal slow-blow fusing (nla with MVOLT) 2/260TT 277 2"'T 347 (W20 Cold-weather ggW $urfacemounted E( Emergencycircuit'a ae,an ballast 2R6TRT MVOLT' back ce m ELDW Emergency battery pack (32°F min. operating temperature DS Dual ELDWC Emergency battery pack (0°F min. operating temperature)2•1•10•12,13 32TRT switching' 2/32TRT ELOWRPS Fixture wired ready for PS1400 or PSD1_3 remote battery pack (battery pack not included; 32° min. 211 Two one-lamp operating temperature)" 11,14.15 42TRT ballasts' ELED Emergency LED secondary source battery pack(-4°F min, operating temperature)& 51 7T TRT 2ELED Emergency LED secondary source (two modules) battery pack (-4°F min. operating temperature)"" 7TRT 70TRT Lamp1e roptio,as continued) LPI Lamplncluded Emergenrycircuit12-volt(35W(ampinduded)816 ShioaedseDatat?nze,texturedoerDurableFinishes DDBXD Darkishes LPI LampInp Emergencycircuitl2-volt(two35Wlampinduded)816 WG Wire guard ne,textured cuitl2-volt(20Wlampinduded)a'a VG Vandal guard alurninum,textured DDBLXD Black NAXD N turalaluminum DC2012 Emergencycir 7wd 2DC2012 Emergency circuit l2voit(i<vo20Wlampinduded)eae extured ,extured DWTXD White PE Photoelectric <ell-button type" CRT Non-stick protective coating DDBTXD Textured dark bronze CSA (SA certified (black only) OBLBXD Textured black NOM NOM certified DNATXD Textured natural aluminum DWHGXD Textured white Notes ryr ratesinemergrm:ybacluipmol optional multi-voitelectronic ballast capable afoperatinganyBne 6. Must specifyfinish when ordered asanaaesso Natavailable wtth 11. Forwo-lamp<onfirations,ontyoneampol' or70TRT. voltage fioith 277V. ELED or 2ELED. mducled. 1213. . Not Not available available ble with with 57TRT MV01T. ordered Nd lewtogethith57TRTor70TRT.(SV20andELDWCcannothe 7. axnmumallowable ithotheremegenc ewith2/4FTRT,.57TRTof 70TRT. deredtogethen 6. C Cannot be ordered ordered with anyanyotheremergencyoption. 14. Pilot/test svnichmounting plate indu?ed. is Not avail 3. Available vdth2126DTT,2/26TRT,2/32TR Tafind 2142TRTonly. Not 910. CLOW . Not available ELDWC2/32TRm2142TRore T or7oTRaRSfyNmth 16. Not availabable available wwith 2EC, tics, /26DTELDWS,2/1or PE Carolina code criteria for state owned buildings per 2012 NC Building 17. See wwwlithonia.comlatchcalprsforaddi:iciti«loroptlenr. 4. Available RTand2742TRionty.NOt Code: 1006.3 and 1006.4. 1R. Must be specified. 35K lamp with I.Pl. available available with EC, DCS DCS, ELOWS DWS or DS D5. . 5. May b e ordered as an accessory. Prefix with TWF1. TWI OUTDOOR WF1 Compact Fluorescent, &.1 Mounted TWF1 2/26TRT TEST No: LTL18189 TWF1 2/32TRT TEST NO: LTL18188 ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) ISOILLUMINANCE PLOT (Footcandle) .2 -2 rs 2 ~ O '1 = -1 0 .5 0 Z 0Z 2. ,51 12 2.51 12 0.50 5 p 2 O 2F 2( z Z ~ 3? 3w z 4 4F 0 5 3 4 5 6 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 p 1 2 32W triple-tube lamps. 26W triple-tube lamps. Footcandie values based on Footcandle values based on 12' mounting height, 1800 rated lumens. 12' mounting height, 2400 rated lumens. Luminaire Efficiency: 57.5% Luminaire Efficiency: 66.0% 1 , Notes 1 Photometric data for other distributions can be accessed at 64ww.lnh0nia.C0n1. 2 Tested to current iESandNEMAstandards under stabilized iboratryconditions. Various operating factors cancause differences between laboratory data andactual field measurements. Dimensions andspecificationsonthis sheet based on without notice. the most current available data and are subject to change 3 for electrical characteristics, consult outdoor technical data specification sheets on wwv ithonia.com. 4 Actual performance may differ as a result ofend-user environment and application. TWFI-( An "cult0rands Company nnna on1A hcuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 11112) ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION Planning Division 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE # c l r v o F ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Oregon Shakespeare Festival - CAMPS Deck Repair and Addition Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address 50 E Main St. Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E 09 1313 Tax Lot(s) 40000 Zoning C-1-D Commercial Downtown Comp Plan Designation Commercial APPLICANT Ted DeLong/Oregon Shakespeare Festival Phone (541) 482-2111 E-Mail Tedd@osfashland.org Name City Ashland Zip 97520 Address P. O. Box 158 PROPERTY OWNER Name CAMPS BUILDING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION Phone (541) 482-2111 E-Mail cynthiar@osfashland.org City Ashland Zip 97520 Address P. O. Box 158 SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER David Wilkerson, II Phone (541) 779-5237 x2C~_Mail david@orwarch.com Title Architect Name City Medford Zip 97504 Address 2950 E. Barnett Rd. Phone E-Mail Title Name Address City Zip l hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. l understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish. 1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request,- 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate,- and further 4) that all structures orimprovements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this re a will result most likely In not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be remove my pense, ff l have any dpu I am advised to seek competent professional advice and sslsl nce. Applicant's Signature Date As owner of e property involved in ihi q t, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a proplrty owner - Prope wner's Signature (required) Date (To bo completed by City slafq Date Received Alk- Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ I y~' ~ I I OVER 0 Gkomm-devlplanning\Forms & Handouts\Zoning Permil Application.doc I Oregon Shakespeare Festival CAMPS Deck Addition Planning Application Project Findings EN Of HEP ILFE R ARCHITECTURE July 21 , 201 2950 OEA T 0 BIARN TT, R0 A0 M E D F 0 R D 0R 9] 5 0 4 5 4 3 J F 5 4 it 2 B J 2 City of Ashland F 5 Planning Division 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 Project Identification Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF) Site Address: 50 E Main St, Ashland, OR 97520 Map 391 E09BB Tax Lot: 40000 C-1-D Commercial, with Downtown overlay), Basic Site Review, Detail Site Review, Zoning. ( Historic District and Di 54nt wn Design Standards. ORW Architecture # Purpose: uididocument that will allow the City of Ashland s are intended to serve as the gng These finding tanned renovation of and addition to an to review and make its determinations regarding the p existing deck. It will explain and demonstrate how the planned work will be acceptable within the Ashland Municipal Code. Project Coals: Deck and Site kes Festival deck, at the location above, will undergo ~ minoraddition the The Oregon She peare rovide rain catchment a to provide a method approximately 150 SF. The goals are to: First, to p ng. e existing restaurant below, which in recent years, has shad ome) add t onal space to accommodate of supporting the rain catchment; and third, pr users of OSF's Members Lounge, which adjoins the deck. Municipal Codes: L )I and new addition will be renovated under the Ashland Land Use C~'rd+nai' The existing deck, ) c.~a I ins rhnr,ter 18 Land Use Standard development codes as follows: f c. 18.2.4.050 - Yard Requirements and General Exceptions. d. 18.2.6.030 - Unified Standards for Non-Residential Zones b. Part 18.3 - Overlay Zones, including: a. 18.3.10.020 -Applicability b. 18.3.12.030 - Detail Site Review Overlay, including the Basic pre-requisites. c. 18.3.12.040 - Downtown Overlay District. d. 18.3.12.050 - Historic District Overlay. c. Part 18.4 - Site Development and Design Standards a. 18.4.2.040 - Basic and Detail Site Review b. 18.4.2.050 - Historic District Design Standards c. 18.4.2.060 - Downtown Design Standards d. 18.4.5.030 - Tree Protection e. 18.4.6.080 - Storm Drainage and Surface Water Management Facilities. Commercial Summary: Development Area The renovated project has 150 square feet of new development over existing developed areaway. Structural Site Coverage The renovated project will not affect the building envelope square footage. The building footprint will remain at 3,337 SF. The site is 4,356 SF which results in a building footprint coverage of approximately 77 percent. Impervious Surface Coverage The project has no new impervious surfaces. Existing impervious surfaces include the building footprint, existing deck, and areaway, which will be covered by the deck addition. Parking Spaces The Camps building has street side parking on East Main Street, which will not be affected by the scope of this work. Landscaped Area The renovated project has approximately 20 SF of existing landscaped area adjacent to the Chautauqua Walkway. A single tree will require protection during construction. Energy Requirements: Gas, Electricity, Water, Sewer, Waste, Refuse, Site Lighting, Air Pollution and Hazards The existing systems are not affected and will remain un-modified by this application. Storm Water Storm water falling on the existing deck, and space where the deck addition will be constructed, is currently collected and pumped into the sewer by a sump pump on the property. o alleviate flooding, and to direct storm water into the correct collection system, a rain collection system and gutters will be installed to divert the rain water to the storm drain catch to the volume of waterfentering Chautauqua Walkway. This will add a negligible amount of water the Ashland storm water system. P'_ ' 'I ~I ILI Zoning Regulations This application is for work to an existing building. The proposal is reviewed to verify compliance with the underlying zone. Chapter 18.2.2 - Base Zones and Allowed Uses 18 2 2 030 Allowed Uses (pg 2-7/pdf 33) B. Permitted Uses and Uses Permitted Subject to Special Use Standards. Uses listed as "Permitted (P)" are allowed. Uses listed as "Permitted Subject to Special Use Standards (S)" are allowed, provided they conform to chapter 18.2.3 Special Use Standards. All uses are subject to the development standards of zone in which they are located, any applicable overlay zone(s), and the review procedures of part 18.5. See section 18.5.1.020. Finding: The property is zoned C-1-D, Commercial Downtown. Table 18.2.2.030 specifies 'Office' use as 'P', or Permitted. Finding: OSF currently uses the building as an office, with a lounge accessory space. Conclusion: The existing building complies with the current zoning requirements. Chapter 18.2.4 - General Regulations for Base Zones 18.2.4.020 Accessory Structures and Mechanical Equipment (pq 2-39/pdf 66) A. Accessory Structures. Accessory buildings and structures shat] comply with all requirements for the principal use, except where specifically modified by this ordinance. B. Mechanical Equipment. Mechanical equipment shall not be located between the main structure on the site and any street adjacent to a front or side yard, and every attempt shall be made to place such equipment so that it is not visible from adjacent public streets. Mechanical equipment and associated enclosures, not taller than allowed fence heights, may be located within required interior side or rear yards, provided such installation and operation is consistent. with other provisions of this ordinance or the Ashland Municipal Code, including but not limited to noise attenuation. Any installation of mechanical equipment shall require a building permit. Finding: The existing deck, and deck addition, comply with an ancillary designation for the requirements of an Office use. Finding: Existing mechanical equipment in the areaway, not installed higher than allowed fence heights, is partially visible on the side yard, through the existing landscape f f t screening, from the Chautauqua Walkway. Existing rooftop equipment is not visible, or shrouded from view by existing trees. Finding: A mechanical condenser is being relocated from the areaway to the roof. To provide evidence that additional screening is not required per wets taken toward nsta requirements of 18.4.4.030 G 4, a moist dpo was how thel v~ews from the Public Right the new condenser location, and pres of Way. This information is provided in Appendix A. Finding: Screening toward residential zones is not required. requirements. Conclusion: The existing building complies with the current to the zoning expected to improve Conclusion: Relocation of the mechanical condensing the Chautauqua Walkway view from the Public Right of Way. 18.2.4.050 Yard Re uirements and General Exceptio and 182-4 6/yard requirements shall conform A. In addition to the requirements of chapters 18.2.5 to the Solar Access standards of chapter 18.4.8. B. Eaves and awnings may encroach three feet into required yards; all other architectural projections may encroach 18 inches into required yards. C. The following general exceptions are allowed for structures that are 30 inches in height or less, including entry stairs, uncovered porches, patios, and similar structures: 1. The structures are exempt from the side and rear yard setback reduced by half. 2. The front and side yards abutting a public street may Solar access requirement do not apply within the C-1 -D district. Chapter 18.4.8 Finding: Solar Access will not be included in these Findings. Finding: The existing building is not within the setback. exception. Finding: The existing uncovered deck is allowed within the setback, by excep Finding: The new deck addition is not within the setback. Conclusion: The existing building and new deck addition comply with the current zoning requirements. 2-56/Pd~82)~.. Chapter 1 8.2.6 - Standards for Non-Residential Zones (pg 18.2.6.030 Unified Standards for Non-Residential Zones A n.qn far Zone C-1-D~'', e is no minimum lot aar yard, dex ept depth, or maximum lot coverage; or required to comply with the special erage mum front, side or re ict and overlay zone provisions of part 18.3 or the site development and rSetback Area, Width, Depth qd gn standards of part 18.4. , or rear yard required, except where buildings on Yards (feet) e is no minimum front, side e subject site abut a residential zone, in which case a side of not less than 10 ft and a rear yard of not less than 10 ft per story is required. The solar setback standards of chapter 18.4.8 do not apply to structures in the C- 1 -D zone. Except for buildings within 100 feet ofa residential t zone, ththe e C- lar setback standards of chapter 18.4. do not apply zone. See also section 18.2.4.030 Arterial Street Setback. Building Heightzaa _ Maximum 40 ft, except: (feet) - Buildings greater than 40 ft and less than 55 ft are permitted in C-1-D zone with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. -Where located more than 100 feet from a residential zone, buildings greater than 40 ft and less than 55 ft are permitted in C-1 zone with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. 2See definition of "height of building" in section 18.6.1.030. 3Parapets maybe erected up to five feet above the maximum 5 2 020 building for Site Design Review for mecha~i a egouipment mechanical equipment screening requirements, review process. Landscape Area - Minimum None, except parking areas and service stations shall meet the standards o of developed lot area) chapters 18.4.3 Parking, Access, and Circulation, and 18.4.4 Landscaping, Lighting, and Screening. Finding: There are no residential units in the Office space. Finding: The existing property conforms with the area, width, depth, maximum lot coverage; minimum front, side or rear yard. The applicable overlays do not modify these requirements. Finding: The rear of the property is adjacent to a R-1-75 residential zone. The building setback complies with standard. Finding: The sides of the property are adjacent to C-1-D commercial zone, The building setbacks comply with the standard. Finding: The property is within 100 feet of a residential zone, on the of the building. south side of the property, The solar setbacks apply to the north requirement does not apply. Finding: Owner provided drawings from the 1979 renovation indicate the height of the building as 11'-1 1/2" . Conclusion: The existing building and new deck addition comply with the current zoning requirements. Special Districts and Overlay Z nes Chapter 18.3.10 - Physical and Environmental Constraints Overlay (pg 3- 129/pdf 213) I 18.3.10.020 Applicability A. Physical Constraints Review Permit. A Physical Constraints Review Permit is required for the following activities in the land classifications in section 18.3. 10.060. 1. Alteration of Land. The alteration of the land surface by any of the following activities in areas identified as Flood Plain Corridor Land, Hillside Land, or Severe Constraint Land. 2. Special Flood Hazard Area. All activities located within an area of special flood hazard are subject to the provisions for a Development Permit under AMC 15. 10 Flood Damage and Prevention Regulations. 3. Tree Removal. Finding: The application does not include the Alteration of Land, or Tree Removal. Finding: The work is not located in a special Flood Hazard Area. Conclusion: The requirements of this Overlay are not applicable to the Scope of Work in this application. Chapter 18.3.12 - Site Development and Design Overlays (pg 3-176/pdf 260) 18.3.12.020 Detail Site Review Overla i Is subject to section 18.4.2.040.C, and will be address in these Findings under that article. 18.3. 12.040 Downtown Design Standards Overlay Is subject to section 18.4.2.060, and will be address in these Findings under that article. 18.3.12.050 Historic District Overla Is subject to section 18.4.2.050, and will be address in these Findings under that article. I s i Site Development and Design Standards 1 8.4.2 ® Building Placement, Orientation, and Design 78.4.2.040 Basic and Detail Site Review (pp 4-10/pdf 290) This application is for work to an existing building. Many of the guidelines of this section discuss and advise to design scope not included in this project. Finding: The deck addition does not modify or change the existing building Orientation, Scale, Streeiscape Street Trees, Landscaping, Noise and Glare from artificial lighting, and does not expand the building and site. It proposes a small addition of deck space, over an existing areaway, to assist in water mitigation. Conclusion: This application conforms to the requirements of materials and design of this section, and are compatible with the existing deck and complimentary to the existing building. 78.4.2.050 Historic District Design Standards (pc 4-24/pdf 304) This application is for work to an existing building considered to be a primary contributing historic resource within the district. Many of the guidelines of this section discuss and advise to design scope not included in this project. However, key consideration in reviewing this section is that the design and material treatment of the proposed deck addition are compatible with the existing building and surrounding neighborhood, and are consistent with the Historic District. Finding: The deck addition does not modify or change the existing building's Height, Scale, Massing, Setbacks, Roof, Rhythm of Openings, Base or Platforms, Form, Entrances or Garages. Conclusion: This application conforms to the requirements, materials and design of this section, and are compatible with the existing deck and complimentary to the existing building, The following key requirements of this section, pertaining to this project, are addressed as follows: 11. Imitation of Historic Features Recommended - Accurate restoration of original architectural features on historic buildings. New construction, including additions, that is clearly contemporary in design, which enhances but does not compete visually with adjacent historic buildings. Avoid - Replicating or imitating the styles, motifs, or details of historic buildings. Finding: The original building constructed in 1905, used monolithic brick construction. i stud/cavity/single The building was renovated 1994. The extension was built using 905 color brick. Finding: the existing wythe brick construction, with brick color matchin a combination of wood, steel, Finding: The deck addition in 1994 was c lassrfor the deck skylight. There was no brick cement board, glass, and plexi g used in the construction of the deck. deck addition call for using large wood sections and steel pickets Finding: Materials of the d will be painted Tudor Brown, for the guardrails, to match existing. The woo area. The pickets OSF aint color covering much of the surrounding s standard p colors.-(See paint drop colors) painted flat black to matching existing co ( lastic wearing surface of the deck, will be entirely replaced with itawood/Pd will not Finding. The and maintenance p composite. This is for improved wearing composite will be required to `match' the current deck, however, the color oft the closely match the existing color (see sample). lied to existing locations (under the new Finding: Replacement cement board will be re-app (supporting deck wall). The new deck/adjacent to existing deck) and new locations the existing smooth cement board, and include a board cement board will match the 1994 renovation. No sample is and batt motif, which was provided during the smooth cement board, as this is a commonly used material. The providmaterieald fwillor b the painted Tudor Brown to integrate with OSFs co or painting scheme. was provided for uch the same Conclusion: The deck materials used for t ucts he addition, are a e still available as in the market the existing 1979 deck. Many of the prod deck, and do not place, which will provide a seamless integration to the existing intend to mimic any of the original historic building. 12. Additions public right-of-way, and do not Recommended - Additions that are visually turest of historic buildings fining obscure or eliminate charactea d facade or any elevation that is visually prominent from a public Avoid - Additions on the prinY features. right-of-Way, and additions that obscure or destroy character defining wall which has Finding: The addition is not on the primary fagade, nor is it on any defining historic features. The addition is nestled between the existing character over an existing areaway. deck and the back wall of the building, g~f;~ mbrovement, on the first level of the build` nnn+ i _ Conclusion: The deck addition complies with the recommendations, and further, addresses other existing conditions to mitigate existing industrial appurtenances on the face of the historic building. 7 8 4 2 060 Downtown Design Standards (pa 4-351 pdf 3151 This application is for work to an existing building. Many of the guidelines of this section discuss and advise to design scope not included in this project. Finding: The deck addition does not modify or change the existing building Height, Width, Openings, Horizontal Rhythms, Vertical Rhythms, Roof Forms, Awnings, Marquees, or Pedestrian Shelters. The following key requirements of this section, pertaining to this project, are addressed as follows: 2. Setback Avoid level on c. Recessed or projecting balconies, verandas, or other useabte space faboveevation the ground el. existing and new buildings shall not be incorporated in a sreet treatments shown in Figure 18.4.2.060.C.4 and 7. Finding: The deck addition does not face a street, nor does it project past the property line, or existing building elements. Conclusion: The deck addition complies with this section. 8. M= a. Exterior building materials shall consist of traditioal stucco, or namatrials tural stone. treatments downtown area including block, brick, painted wood, smooth shown in Figure 18.4,2.060.C.4 and 9. Finding: The existing historic building is constructed of traditional building materials. No modifications are occurring to the building. Finding: The new deck is designed primarily with painted wood and black iron. The decking floor is a wood composite, for durability and maintenance issues, and blends with the color and texture of the painted wood. Conclusion: The deck addition materials complies with this section. 7 0. Other a. Non-street or alley facing elevations are less significant than street facing elevations. Rear and sidewalls of buildings should therefore be fairly simple (e.g., wood, block, brick, stucco, cast stone, masonry clad, with or without windows). i r F : I i I b. Visual integrity of the original building shall be maintained when altering or adding building elements. This shall include such features as the vertical lines of columns, piers, the horizontal definition of spandrels and cornices, and other primary structural and decorative elements as illustrated in Figure 18.4.2.060.C.6. Avoid treatments shown in Figure 18.4.2.060.C.4 and 9. Finding: The deck addition is on a public alley way. The proposal maintains the simple deck design of the existing deck, for this elevation. Finding: The deck addition maintains the visual integrity of the original deck expansion by incorporating 'heavy' wood guardrail tops and large timber perimeters of the deck. Conclusion: The proposed design incorporates design elements which address the requirements of this section. 18.4.5 - Tree Preservation and Protection (pg 4-81/pdf 361) The impact on existing trees for this application is expected to be minimal. 18.4.5.030 Tree Protection (pg 4-81/pdf 361) A. Tree Protection Plan. A tree protection plan shall be approved by the Staff Advisor concurrent with applications for Type 1, Type 11, and Type III planning actions. If tree removal is proposed, a Tree Removal Permit pursuant to chapter 18.5.7 may be required. B. Tree Protection Plan Submission Requirements. In order to obtain approval of a tree protection plan; an applicant shall submit a plan to the City, which clearly depicts all trees to be preserved and/or removed on the site. The plan must be drawn to scale and include the following. 1. Location, species, and diameter of each tree on site and within 15 feet of the site. 2. Location of the drip line of each tree. 3. An inventory of the health and hazard of each tree on site, and recommendations for treatment for each tree. 4. Location of existing and proposed roads, water, sanitary and storm sewer, irrigation, and other utility lines/facilities and easements. 5. Location of dry wells, drain lines and soakage trenches. 6. Location of proposed and existing structures. 7. Grade change or cut and fill during or after construction. 8. Existing and proposed impervious surfaces. ~j 9. Identification of a contact person and/or arborist who will be responsible for implementi.1p?yand .l maintaining the approved tree protection plan. r_ 10. Location and type of tree protection measures to be installed per section 78.4.5.03'0.'G` Finding: A Tree Protection Plan is provided indicating the required items. i I- Finding: There is only one tree, with a DBH of 6 inches or greater, within 15 feet of the project. Finding: No trees are removed for this project. Conclusion: The submitted plan and documents comply with the requirements. 1 8.4.6 ® Public Facilities (pg 4-84/pdf 364) This application is to an existing building. Many of the guidelines of this section discuss and advise to design scope not included in this project. Finding: The designs propose no change in function, connectivity, width, slope to the existing bricks or Chautauqua Walkway as part of this application. The extent of scope is to verify and clear existing storm drains, and divert water from an existing sump pump pumping to sewer, to an existing storm drain, to prevent future areaway flooding. Finding: There will be no new utilities provided to the project. Conclusion: The owner will comply with the requirements of the City Engineer. The following key requirements of this section, pertaining to this project, are addressed as follows: 18.4.6.080 Storm Draina e and Surface Water Management Facilities (Pq 4-119 df 399 A. Storm Drainage Plan Approval. Development permits for storm drainage and surface water management plans must be approved by the City Engineer and Building Official. I l C. Effect on Downstream Drainage. Where it is anticipated by the City Engineer that the additional runoff resulting from the development would overload an existing drainage facility, the City shall withhold approval of the development until provisions have been made for improvement of the potential condition or until provisions have been made for storage of additional runoff caused by the development in accordance with City standards. Finding: The existing branch from the catch basin to the main is clogged with roots and is not performing as intended. OSF intends to perform maintenance on the branch to restore it to operation. Finding: Heavy and prolonged rain fall into the existing areaway-and through the existing deck is collected and pumped to the sewer. The Scope of Work proposes to re- route most of the water from falling into the areaway, eliminating the need to pump the water, by connecting it to the existing catch basin. Conclusion: The owner will comply with the requirements of the City Engineer. Oregon Shakespeare Festival APPENDIX A SITE LINES F MECHANICAL ROOF TOP R LOATIO N FOR ARFCHITECTURE CAMP Deck Addition WW,V DRW ARCN T E C T RE [DM 1- EAST 04 RNETT ROAD N E p F O R D OR 9] 5 0 4 P S t S 4 z Project Identification Oregon Shakespeare Festival (OSF) Site Address: 50 E Main St, Ashland, OR 97520 Map 391 E09BB Tax Lot: 40000 Zoning: C-1-D (Commercial, with Downtown overlay), Basic Site Review, Detail Site Review, Historic District and Downtown Design Standards. ORW Architecture 1544 The existing condensing unit attached to the side of the building (Circled in Red) was re-created with a mock-up (the red box in the following images), and represents the size of the condensation unit after relocation on the roof top. An aerial view image plan and photo's are presented following this page. , -sk a Ix kN i n. i b ! #a t 1 s- MOM 16 i~ ~ ti I f f y 7 h F fi ~4 ii Image I Existing Condenser ?k,e - ~ = r : :may ~ t"WW: - Image 2 - Mock-up in Place Z k f t ,p..`~ t tj~ ~ ~1 e. ,r- Sall- ...~i- aN 'k 1 Image 3 - Yy k s .1 S I e image 4 - View from Bricks Courtyard 2 j h a 41-7 M ~ G f 5 _ X71 fy- T'_ ~r Image 5 - View from travelling up Chautauqua Walkway i ~q`~~ F ~ ~F 3r'`,r-l.r~. rqK ~ e'afr•,' - l ~ ~ ~ E' ~ rra rte,. Image 6 - View from Chautauqua Walkway Landing Job Address: 50E MAIN ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C Owner's Name: CAMPS BUILDING CONDOMINIUM ASSOI 0 Phone: N State Lic No: H Customer 05717 T City Lic No: OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL R L Applicant: 15 PIONEER ST S Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A C C Sub-Contractor: Address: A Phone: 1 N Applied: 07/20/2016 T Issued: R Phone: Expires: 01/16/2017 State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E09BC1800 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Type 1 for Commercial Site review. Camps deck repair and additon VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Amount Fee Description =Description Amount ) 1,292.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL I - =77:1 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ell: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us CITY F Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 i ; r i I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation (180 days). Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 1,292.00 $ 1,292.00 C or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 1,292.00 Fees Paid: $ 1,292.00 i Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wnaw.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F I V w ,r v o I L~- ! I r' W ~ _F_Ir 1 I r w w~ r r - I y o ti p w w w w I 1 I - - 9 -I 77- I L -1- 77 I ilk -7 - I 3 I lh~ I~ f f f ~I ~~U ~~I a 11 ~~T~ f 1 I I r ~ III` I s e I I_ '.i 7y - Ip _ a I _ ~ Tw9 w w t- `T ~ I i/ c I I sr~ _~oe w5 5 6'a I LL .L g 8 a V 0 o I , - c- I I w m L I P ~ Tt~l I E r I I G J I I - se I 1 V Lu Z a u ~y = I N C k s I e ~ / I 1 - _ S / L u Z - ~ Il ! 1. o ~ 3 fr T-_ %/.zi~e-,o~„ ~ /-.znz-z „r✓~a-.e~ m V- o l~ .-ry / - - O .Blf 9-,SZ 6 n o ~ o ti yC p LL y F, N N 2 Vw O " =F = O N N s p 3 C a 0- a~ ,e6 i C £ O vV) ti y N p N ❑ O_ N 10 o_ p y o w s v s LO 0 C) -0 M 0 0 N O N p a M ❑ C '6 O > Ln '0 o LO 0 y 0 O O a z a) N 'o N O C \ pM_ ..-a C V N -y N 00 ❑ 00 - C O N a T, O a) Q o L T, E al C N = M O N N N V O N O N M 6 C'V D7 ❑ ti o_ O LOS O C ❑ ,7 o E r m a s a M o N y o- o r 3 3 s - O o E o a > >r~O.?O c 0 oZ TO o o 3$ o A Y o ❑ c a .5 sP~ - 6 o a>i ai o 0 o I N o ° o X y o o o o C3 SPA,. o 0)-0 0) E ❑Q oa❑ Q o .c 3❑ E a a~ a~ ❑ n Q.N a n. ~ as ❑ y rn~ a o ~ o ❑ m w a j w Z o a❑ s s i? a s o® X a w u C a F❑ w c a n V v o ❑ v rn J a ❑a o ai ~ O wng.. r. N M ~ > w Q O- O Q "6m0~ N C 000 v Oy-• - C m 0 C 3 -a N Q C3 "a O O r' C O O N C O UO _ N rOOU C Oa 0 '21 i s u M c M = ❑ o s o mss°~ i ` x .6 a a o 0 o a n C O t o E o 0 0 a- 0 C, 0 LO C: 0 a) C y C C O O >i o > ❑ o C r_ o a ~ > a v a "E E ❑ Z ~0mp par' 3= ❑ V a o" o ti o o a s a❑ V a a 0 o x E o w c o `o E E o w v a) D` N O 6 -a a a o> _ (D 0-0 O 0 0 O N O U1 a 0 c-4~ V inQ~f NO n2 V) Lt w inn a Ov E ~ - p hN , ~ i sM 1 _ r e C9 ~ ' ai rt J ~ o _ ~ H ~ ll Q z w 43 'te +a r LL c .Iy e aLL -T TT-T] N R r w ->f Ca F1 ~Fl~ F1 F1 Li I-IT a r ~r I oK ~o I[III➢I ~ I ! ~ _ I I ~I` o a 1 - N _I O d ~w Via. J - - a 'I - x o> m o r;~ I I r ` v - - I E a I ~ i c, I Kn I - ' oo~ocS I - 4 I w I ~ I. I I, II I I * l LUZ ~g lI ,L~ rrJ r 11I ; % V I _ Z L x~~_' ' r d zile of 11 d ii ,vla .z zno-.el ro V) e ,eres-ea Ln a~ ;u :u w vx .U IK z Y [YIp, ~ ~ W,I °mf 12 ° r - ~ i - - q i f I r a I o p . ~ r L' I U. W 1 ~r 3~ z? N 30£ - ]°LL s - Q Lu Z J L)V) CL Q _ Z t a ~q V® LU h ° ° x :V a~ t;a ~ aao ~ ~a 1 F-7 L x E-- LJ ~ o__ I r - - - Ill 1 r - - i > (Y r 101 w: 4 & 5 _ (n LLB;=~z goo ~ z gLL w- g 'H g p W Na z ow 's spa - ~FNass LL 3 cn g _ ~ O K~ ~a €y o _ „ w sus Qo Wes'-agz~g~°1 t co ap 7$x°° p~NO~wQ~ rho 0 w L-A U n Lu Z g CL _ L f W °o0