Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWalnut_699_PA-2016-01365 C I T Y ASHLAND August 22, 2016 Notice of Final Decision On August 19, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA-2016-01365 Subject Property: 699 Walnut Owner: Sara Lovelady Applicant: D.A. Boldt Construction Description: A request to construct a 486 square foot accessory residential unit on the northeast corner of the lot. One 16" DBH Redwood tree has been proposed for removal. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 AC; TAX LOT: 15600. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12rt' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Enter Planner's Name in the Community` Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Sara Lovelady Property owners within 200 ft. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY; 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us r rb i I; I c SECTION 18.S.1.OS0 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) r E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. j F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050. G. 1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision, ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us I I I ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01365 f SUBJECT PROPERTY. 699 Walnut OWNER: Lovelady APPLICANT: D.A. Boldt Construction DESCRIPTION: A request to construct a 486 square foot accessory residential unit on the northeast comer of the lot. One 16" DBH Redwood tree has been proposed for removal. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 05 BD; TAX LOT: 706. C SUBMITTAL DATE: July 18, 2016 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: July 25, 2016 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: August 19, 2016 FINAL DECISION DATE: August 31, 2016 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: March 1, 2018 DECISION The application involves a request for Site Design Review approval to construct a 486 square foot Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) in the northeast corner of the tax lot at 699 Walnut Street. The approximately 7,500 square foot subject parcel is located on the west side of Walnut Street where Grant Street terminates. The existing structure that serves as the primary dwelling unit on site is an approximately 1,200 square foot one-story home with a basement that was constructed in 1900c. The subject parcel was divided using the flag lot partition review process in 2004 to create an additional lot (695 Walnut). At this time, full street improvements including sidewalk, parkrow and street trees were installed along the frontage of the property. Vehicular access to 699 Walnut is taken from the flag drive on the south side of the property. The existing yard is landscaped with lawn grass and a variety of trees and shrubs that are to be retained. The existing site is fully irrigated with spray heads for the lawn areas and drip system for the trees and shrubs. The proposal includes the following elements: ® Wood frame ARU oriented toward Walnut Street with concrete footings, masonry block stem walls, composition roof, vinyl widows, and 1" x 8" ship lap siding. ® Expanded off-street parking area to accommodate a total of two spaces; one on-street parking credit has been requested. ® New pedestrian path from parking area to ARU. ® Removal of a 16" DBH Redwood tree. ® Increase in lot coverage to approximately 37.2%, or 2,748 square feet. f! CONCLUSIONS The ARU as proposed meets applicable Special Use Standards per. Ashland Municipal Code 699 Walnut St PL-2016-01365 Page ( 1 CTD i (AMC) 18.2.3.040, conforms to all requirements of the underlying zoning designation, and meets the requirements for residential design. Staff has found that capacity exists for the on-street parking credit that has been requested allowing the proposal to meet the automobile parking requirements outlined in AMC 18.4.3. Required bicycle parking will be located on the porch of the ARU; bicycle parking for the primary residence will be located in the existing basement which is accessible from an exterior door. On August 4, 2016 the Tree Commission reviewed the applicant's request to remove the 16" DBH Redwood and made a recommendation to Staff to approve the request with the recommendation the applicant plant an Evergreen species instead of the proposed Maple, or alternatively, a minimum of two deciduous trees. The Tree Commission was supportive of the proposed Tree Protection plan which will utilize the "wall" method to prevent access to an entire section of the lot instead of wrapping individual trees at the drip line. The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040, as follows: A. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone, except that accessory residential units shall be counted in the density of developments created under the Performance Standards Option in chapter 18.3.9. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1, 000 square feet GHFA 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080. E. 1. C. R-2 and R-3 Zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standards in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follows: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density 699 Walnut St PL-2016-01365 Page 2 CTD b and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. 8. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties, and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. In staff's assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action #2016-01365 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2016-01365 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Site Design Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) That all recommendations of the Ashland Tree Commission, where consistent with the applicable ordinances and standards and with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall be [ conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. 699 Walnut St PL-2016-01365 Page 13 CTD i 3) That an updated Site Plan reflecting the Tree Commission recommendations be submitted to and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. 4) That all necessary building permits and associated fees and charges, including permits and/or inspection fees for the kitchen and fire separation installation, permits and service connection fees for the new electrical service to the accessory residential unit, and any applicable system development charges for water, sewer, storm water, parks, and transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The building permit submittals shall include: a) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. b) Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas. e) That a revised Tree Protection Plan consistent with the standards described in 18.4.5 be submitted for review and approval by the Staff Advisor prior to the issuance of a building permit. The plan shall identify the location and placement of fencing around the drip lines of trees identified for preservation. The amount of fill and grading within the drip line shall be minimized. Cuts within the drip line shall be noted on the tree protection plan, and shall be executed by handsaw and kept to a minimum. No fill shall be placed around the trunk/crown root. I, f) That a Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division prior to site work, building demolition, and/or storage of materials. The Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the tree to be protected and the installation of tree protection fencing for the silver maple tree on the site. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.61.200.B. 5) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy: a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements. b) That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right- of-Way. C) That the applicant shall screen recycle and refuse containers from adjacent properties and public right-of-ways. 699 Walnut St PL-2016-01365 Page 4 CTD i e) That all required landscaping and mitigation plantings shall be installed according to the approved plan, and tied into the existing irrigation system, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. ill Molnar, irector Date ln~epartmen!/U Community Development 699 Walnut St PL-2016-01365 Page 5 CTD t 1 I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING l STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 8/22/161 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01365, 699 Walnut. Signature of Employee DocumenQ 812212016 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 707 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4700 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 801 ARMSTRONG PATRICIA AUSTIN AUSTA S BLUE MARIPOSA LLC 695 WALNUT ST 385 CHERRY LN 2532 OLD MILL WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4804 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4706 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 1000 FREIHOFER NANCY L TRUSTEE ET AL HAMMOND WAYNE E/A PEREIRA HILL ADRIENNE J 355 GRANT ST 685 CHERRY LN 667 WALNUT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4703 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 900 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 703 JACOBSON JANET L TRUSTEE ET AL LAUGHLIN JOHN B ET AL LENK MARTIN C/KAREN L YOUNG- 688 WALNUT ST 667 WALNUT ST 410 SHERIDAN ASHLAND, OR 97502 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 1600 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 706 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4701 LESSMEIER MICHAEL L TRUSTEE ET AL LOVELADY SARA LOVETT LESLIE ANNE ET AL 448 TUCKER ST 699 WALNUT ST PO BOX 427 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 702 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4803 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4800 LUBLINER IRVING ET AL PEW VERNON L/DEBBIE S SHAW ARTHUR E/NANCIE L 1351 PONDEROSA 731 GROVER ST C/O CHERYL WERTHEIMER ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 14020 E LAKEVIEW DR WICHITA, KS 67230 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 700 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 705 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 800 SMITH BRUCE D TRUSTEE ET AL UDOM JARIN VIT SR TRUSTEE ET AL VAUGHAN ANTONIA W TRSTE FBO 707 WALNUT ST 122A KAELELOI PL 21427 IBANEZ AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 HONOLULU, HI 96821 WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 803 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 704 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4805 WATT EVELYN C/RANDOLPH H WESTERMAN PAUL E/ANNE K WISNESKI PEGGY/JEFFRY W PO BOX 853 420 SHERIDAN ST 375 GRANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 DA Boldt Construction N699 OD Walnut PO Box 998 NOD 8/22/16 ASHLAND, OR 97520 22 ASHLAND TREE COMMISSION i PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET August 4, 2016 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01365 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 699 Walnut OWNER: Lovelady APPLICANT: D.A. Boldt Construction DESCRIPTION: A request to construct a 486 square foot accessory residential unit on the northeast corner of the lot. One 16" DBH Redwood tree has been proposed for removal. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 AC; TAX LOT: 15600. The Tree Commission recommends approving the application as submitted with the following recommendations: 1) Mitigate the Redwood removal with another evergreen tree or plant two deciduous trees in its place. Department of Community Development Tel: 541488-5350 CITY F 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 AS F-ji LAN D www.ashland.or.us Planning Department, 51 `Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 = r TY F 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashland.or,us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ~ NOTICE OF APPLICATION I PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01365 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 699 Walnut OWNER: Sara Lovelady APPLICANT: D.A. Boldt Construction DESCRIPTION: A request to construct a 486 square foot accessory residential unit on the northeast corner of the lot. One 16" DBH Redwood tree has been proposed for removal. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 09 AC; TAX LOT: 15600. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, August 4, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: July 25, 2016 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: August 8, 2016 ~(699 Wailnut y i GRANTST i J 4- WrIF- t 41 1H, - 44 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. Wcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FoldeAkfailed Notices & Signs\2016\PA-2016-01365.docx 7 SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18,2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below.; D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 18.5.7,040. 13 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. 2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.10. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks, c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone, d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050, Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. i Wcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2016\PA-2016-01365.docx AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 7/25/16 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope i with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01365. Signature of Employee Document4 7/25/2016 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 707 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4700 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 801 ARMSTRONG PATRICIA AUSTIN AUSTA S BLUE MARIPOSA LLC 695 WALNUT ST 385 CHERRY LN 2532 OLD MILL WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4804 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4706 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 1000 FREIHOFER NANCY L TRUSTEE ET AL HAMMOND WAYNE E/A PEREIRA HILL ADRIENNE J 355 GRANT ST 685 CHERRY LN 667 WALNUT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 k PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4703 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 900 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 703 JACOBSON JANET L TRUSTEE ET AL LAUGHLIN JOHN B ET AL LENK MARTIN C/KAREN L YOUNG 688 WALNUT ST 667 WALNUT ST 410 SHERIDAN ASHLAND, OR 97502 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 1600 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 706 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4701 LESSMEIER MICHAEL L TRUSTEE ET AL LOVELADY SARA LOVETT LESLIE ANNE ET AL 448 TUCKER ST 699 WALNUT ST PO BOX 427 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016 01365 391 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4800 E058D 702 PA-2016-01365 391E05AC 4803 SHAW ARTHUR E/NANCIE L LUBLINER IRVING ET AL PEW VERNON L/DEBBIE S C/O CHERYL WERTHEIMER 1351 PONDEROSA 731 GROVER ST 14020 E LAKEVIEW DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 WICHITA, KS 67230 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 700 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 705 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 800 SMITH BRUCE D TRUSTEE ET AL UDOM JARIN VIT SR TRUSTEE ET AL VAUGHAN ANTONIA W TRSTE FBO 707 WALNUT ST 122A KAELELOI PL 21427 IBANEZ AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 HONOLULU, HI 96821 WOODLAND HILLS, CA 91364 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 803 PA-2016-01365 391 E05BD 704 PA-2016-01365 391 E05AC 4805 WATT EVELYN C/RANDOLPH H WESTERMAN PAUL E/ANNE K WISNESKI PEGGY/JEFFRY W PO BOX 853 420 SHERIDAN ST 375 GRANT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01365 699 Walnut D.A. BOLDT CONSTRUCTION NO PO BOX 998 22 7125116 ASHLAND, OR 97520 22 - - I ~ NN 4BO I, S IUD 7 _ TOT 706 4103 4741 800 -4100 4106 1000 AI X ~ i ~~~11w 4 2 1392 I t D.A. BOLDT CONSTRUCTION CO. P.O. Box 998, Ashland, OR 97520 541/482-4865 Fax: 541/482a1so darrell@daboldtconstruction.com CCB#31003 SITE REVIEW APPLICATION TREE REMOVAL PERMIT July 15, 2016 Applicant: Darrell A. Boldt, D. A. Boldt Construction Co. 611 Siskiyou Blvd. Suite 4, Ashland, Oregon Owner: Sara Lovelady 699 Walnut St., Ashland, Oregon Legal Description: 39 lE 05BD Tax Lot 706 Zone: R1-7.5 Nature of project: Construct 486 SF Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) General The existing residence was built in 1900 and expanded in 1964 and is 1,201 SF. The proposed ARU at 486 SF is less than 50% of the square footage of the existing structure as prescribed by Ordinance 18.2.3.040.A.3. The existing residence has two bedrooms. The ARU unit will be one bedroom with great room, kitchen and bathroom and a small room that can be used as an office or storage. Both the existing residence and the proposed ARU are and will be single story. The ARU will be in the right front corner (northeast) so as to minimize any obstruction of the view from the main house. Side yard setback = 6' Front yard setback to ARU = 15" per code Front yard setback to ARU porch = 9' code requires 8' There is a street light on the utility pole at the northeast corner of the lot adjacent to Walnut St. Lot size and coverage Lot size: .17 Ac or 7,405 SF. Existing House: 1201 SF Existing front porch: 80 SF Existing west deck: 192 SF Existing north deck: 188 SF Existing sidewalk: 56 SF Two on-site parking spaces: 464 SF New ARU: 486 SF New ARU front porch: 72 SF New ARU sidewalk: 9 SF Total area of impervious and decks: 2,748 SF 37.2% Total landscape area: 4,657 SF 62.8% Total impervious surfaces: 2,369 SF Maximum lot coverage per Ordinance 18.2.5.030.A is 45% with 55% landscape area. f, Structural elements The ARU will have concrete footing and masonry block stem walls. The structure will be wood frame construction. The exterior of the ARU will have exterior finishes to match existing house consisting of lx8 ship lap siding pattern 137 and 1x4 and 1x6 window and door trim. The windows will be vinyl frame with insulated glass. The roofing will be architectural composition shingles. Trees and landscaping, irrigation and tree protection The project will include the removal of a 16" diameter redwood tree that is located within 4' of the south east corner of the proposed ARU, the drip line of the tree will be impacted as well as the root system when excavating for the foundation as well as framing of the ARU. There will be a relocation of a 2" diameter apple tree to make room for the new construction. There are five existing trees of varying sizes that will be retained as well as three existing street trees and a few shrubs. All of the trees are healthy and will not require any treatment. The Applicant will administer the tree protection plan. See drawings for Tree Protection locations. We will install 6' high chain link fencing to protect the landscape areas outside of the construction area. In construction of the tree protection fences we find it better to run a line of fence protecting the trees from all foot traffic instead of protecting each tree individually. The existing yard is landscaped with lawn grass and a variety of trees and shrubs (see the Site Plan) and will be retained. The existing site is fully irrigated with spray heads for the lawn areas and drip system for the trees and shrubs. Tree replacement Per ordinance 18.5.7.050.A the replacement tree can be a minimum 1 caliper deciduous tree or a five to six-foot evergreen. Since evergreens grow to considerable height and would block the view from the house, we propose to plant an Acer P Emperor 1 Japanese Maple which will have a height of 15' and spread of 12'. Solar set back The ARU is 20' wide with a 6.8:12 pitched roof that runs east west parallel to the north property line. The roof pitch matches the existing house roof pitch. The ridge at 16'-2" will be the highest shadow producing element of the building. Based on the slope and the roof pitch the solar set back should be 30.2' from the neighbor's south property line. There are two 10' flag drives between this property and the property to the north which results in the set back from this property's north property line to be 10.2'. The designed set back from the north property line to the center point at the ridge is 16' and therefore well beyond the prescribed solar set back. Slope: -.112 Formula 1: 30/.445 + S = 30/.445 + (-.112) = 67.3 Standard A H = 16'-2" = 16.16' S = -.112 H-6= 16.16-6= 10.16 .445 + (-.112) =.333 SSB = 10.16/..333 = 30.5' 30.5 - 20.0 for flag drives = 10.5 SSB Actual set back: 16.0' i Parking Auto The existing residence is two bedrooms requiring 1.75 vehicle parking spaces and the ARU requires 1 parking space. There currently is one space on the property and one on-street parallel parking spaces. We will add a second onsite parking space adjacent to the existing space. For on-site parking there will be on 8' x 16' compact car space and one 9' x 18' regular parking space. The parking area will be surfaced with minus crushed rock to match the existing parking surface. The existing paved driveway will be retained for usage. Bicycle Bicycles for the existing residence are stored in the secured basement that is accessed by an exterior door. The ARU requires one bicycle parking spot which will be on the front porch of the ARU with a secure attachment bike rack. Utilities Water: There is an 8" water main in Walnut St. The existing 3/a" meter will remain for the main house. A new 3/4" water meter will be installed for the ARU Sanitary Sewer: Existing 8" main in Walnut St. ARU will be connected to the existing 4" sewer line from the existing residence to the street. Electric: Existing overhead service to the meter base and service panel on the south side of the existing house. We will install a dual meter base with disconnects at the house with a supply line to a service panel at the ARU. The existing overhead supply lines on the south side of the lot will be retained. Storm water drainage: There is a 12" storm sewer in Walnut St. There is an existing storm drain from the main residence through the curb into the gutter at the street. We will tie into that storm drain outlet. The outlet is 6' from the storm drain inlet in the curb. Fire Flow: I confirmed with Margueritte Hickman, Fire Marshall, that no fire line or fire flow will be required for this project. Trash and recycle storage Trash and recycle bins will be stored on the north side of the ARU between the building and the side yard property line and screen from view. Grading and Drainage Plan The ARU is a small unit in the northeast corner of the property. The existing grade will be retained. Site drainage will not be an issue. Bags will be placed in the gutter at the construction site to filter any sediment that drains from the site during construction. I. PROJECT INFORMATION: PROTECTION FENCE 6' TALL Project Name:Lovelady Accessory Unit (ARU) - N Owner: Sara Lovelady Address: 699 Walnut Street, Ashland, Oregon MAPLE TREES Zoning: R1-7.5 Including surrounding lots Lo DRiPLiNE i Legal Description: 391E05BD Tax Lot: 706 _ General Contractor: co 77.83' % D.A. BOLDT CONSTRUCTION - co 's' ONCE Phone; 541-482-4865 ° 00 / w'20'-8" Building Square Footage: 42'-611 i 11 6 / v Existing DECK TO REMAIN Existing House: 1201 s.f. % w New ARU: 486 s.f. Z . Lot Coverage: z0 g Z Lot Size:.17 AC. =7405.2 s.f. z ANdE ' Existing House Size: 1201 s.f. C) Q 2 Existing Front Porch: 80 s.f. 00 (E) HOUSE TO REMAIN 1201 S.F. o~ciiwi Existing Deck w/ Pergula: 188 s.f. j 00 28edraoms m T REMAIN i0 Existing Side Deck: 192 s.f. Z m W w Sidewalk: 56 s.f. 0 / 13'-9" > > Existing Parking Area: 309 s.f. 0 cas METER / = p p Total Existing Coverage: 2026 s.f. / 7405.2 = 27% ' FE!NCI! Y Z'7 9-1 PORCH O Proposed ARU Size: 486 s.f. WO U) 0 ~ SANITARY LIN Q~ 3 -J -J ARU Front Porch Size: 72 s.f. W m w ~LU> u- e- Walkway off front porch of ARU: 18 s.f. 9 Q - 0 a a ° 17'-7" 22' 0" ' ' 4" m (0 0 LO / a o 7.2 36'•0" Additional Parking For Space 2: 155 s.f. ' 120-1b" rn /W~ Proposed Coverage: 2758 s.f. / 7405.2 = 37% ® ~a w CO) ` Solar Calculation: PARKING a u = _ °D GRAVEL o ~W LLN UJ N 6'-0®,N Slope: AV = 17.5 / 150 112 W 25 S„~ Wn Z w~ o w N Lot Classifacation: 30'/ ,445 + S: 30'/ .445 + N 1 a Z ° W w o ° (-.112) = 67 ~a PARKING= m w N - S Lot Dim = 92.87 > 67: Use Standard A o N ~o 0-0 1 ~aM 'a ~w; ° wiq° NEW Ln z Highest Shadow: 16'-2" @ Ridge ~ °o ° Ne ;,y w c7f N ARU N tL SBB Calc: 7 CO ' p; 0. , 80W 486 SSB = 16'-2" - 6' = 10.16 '4 ~ ~a WNO S. F. / SSB = .445 -,112 = .333 ~e ° mi ~LL SSB=10.16/.33=30.5SB-20'=10.5SB TO Ridge 0;t M a ¢ SSB REQUIREMENT MET. PORCH Brief Description Of Project: New ARU building added to existing ~p ( `j ; o 20'.0" zm [N)ACERPgAPENE5EMAPLE5'TALL-~ 0 1 , o property with typical cont. concrete foundation / cmu stem walls. % m"• 10.0 Standard wood frame construction, wood siding to match existing and vinyl windows, Class a roofing on stick framed rafters or manifactured TELEPHONE BOX / SIDEWALK trusses. 92 7 POWER POLE W/ TREET LIGHT FOWE RLIES aTELE HONEBOX~ u - J_ ° cn 2u - 4 STORM DRAIN 10" PARKING 3 vRl1 ~nHirv 4%w cs~ a~ r ! W 1-- 0 / MANHOLE COVER/ SEWER > ° SANITARY LINE 8" `IIf"T STREET j ? Op i _J >Q Q a WATER LINE 8" s f pp:. Q 0) (n / r2~• 1bE.l,r' 34'-10° 0 to Q r PROJECT: ~m e MAIL BOX Y U1 f r ARU FIRE HYDRANT SHEET N C1 DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN Y, I Scale: r ~ ti - VICINITY MAP PAGE-1 PROJECT SITE L C 0 l`{ Y i CO O M v U U Composition roofing over 518" plywood UQ 2x6 Fascia board Z pJp 12 1x6 Ship Lap siding to match existing 0 O D LO iv 6.8 over Drain Wrap Over 7/16 OSB iv ® Y Z ~ WJU) ON l4 tp w m ~5 (D 00 L 'T oQ~ U ®co0u~i i i i i O N p p _ I~ °o o 8x16 CMU Co 11 , 0 I i J -T N ' ' I 131-8" 71-2" p (J/ 201-01, F- 0 cl~ 20'-10" > J z ~o~g 1 EAST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION z _ 8"x16" cont. concrete footing SCALE: 114" =1' w/ 2 #4 cont. rebar #4 vert. SCALE: 114" =1' o U) k.0 Q 32" o.c. PROJECT: LOVELADY 8xl6x16 Pier w/ 2 #4 rebar both ways ARU w/ 10' sona tube w/ 1 #4 vert SHEET DESCRIPTION: EAST & WEST ELEVATIONS m i PAGE-2 i 3 M O _ MM$~ a C11 - U U i 0_J F" UQ ~p 1 Om UO g-i c~ amu~od oQ~W~ 56 o 23'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION o SCALE: 114" =1' N I-- 0 m >J~ ~o3g W ~ oQ EE PROJECT: LOVELADY ARU - - SHEET DESCRIPTION: SITE PLAN 25'-0" NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" =1' PAGE-3 i 1U'-U" I 20'-0" co T-2" 10'-0" 2'-1011 r------------ - - _ _ - _ _ _ - - 1 aakA o N, -9-OX3-0 X0 b----------- 1 y U iv I I 1 W - (A 1 _ z z o -----L------------- o J r 1 - _ BEDROOM U U Q 10' X 9'-6" OFFICE m - - - - - - - - - - - - - - J r - - - - - - - - - - - U) 8'X6'3" ° I Zm 0 0D C) Lo 00 of rl-o 00 w I®Yz~ WmU)o 00 El ------2'-a" r-- - - - - - v m (0 0 Lo W 1 0 o W 1 i0 Lr) - d- - N 0 0 in N 0 1 71-811 ~,lr-- N 1 ~ I I 1 0 GREAT ROOM CLOSE r-- h x - 11' X 13'-6° 2' X 2 I (Q ~X j I kD O O iv I 1 KITCHEN 8'5" X T-8" Do 01) I - - - - - - - - - --Q r-- -I I 1 I 1 I I - - - 1 Q u) 0 o 0 0 1 g~00 LU >z® 13-0 r 3-0X3-0 OX r I I I I j Q Z 4-0X4-0 XO I LU I I 1 z I 1 0U)toQ I I I I I G I ~ FRONT PORCH 112'X 6' j 1 1E~S 1 0 1 PROJECT: 0 F~ I I LOVELADY ® 3'-0" ® I 2X6 I I ARU 4X8 DFI BEAM I 1 I I 1 SHEET FLOOR PLAN I I 1 DESCRIPTION: SCALE: 1f4"=1' iLLLLFLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN PAGE-4 ROOF PLAN SCALE: 114" =1' 8°X16" CONTINUOUS CONCRETF``100TING W/ 8"X16" CMU CONTINUr-''S W/ 10" ]-BOLTS TWO #4 REBAR CONTINUOUS Vu, > 4 REBAR 6'0.C. & WITHIN 1' Of ,ORNERS JOIST BLOCKING 2' O.C. @ EACH END VERTICALS 32" O.C. 61-8" 13'-4" CONTINUOUS ROW OF BLOCKING ABOVE PONY WALL 2x4 DF PONY WITH W/ 2X4 DF STUDS 2' O.C. u S -------ce) PLATES O I U I I I I I D I I I I I I I _ZQ I --I 0 2 -------------I I I 6"X12" FOOTING I U Q W/ 8" J-BOLTS I p I 6' 0. C. - - - - - - - U Zm 91-811 0~ 0 2 ~I- oa ZO Z 7 I om~000 I I I I I I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - oQ,-~.= I I I 1 m®oON I I I I I I I I I I I I I _ I I I I I I - I I I I I I _ I FOUDATION VENTS X101 1 0 1 q 0 1 I Ln ----1 N kD I I I N - o N I I I I I I I N 1 1 I I I I I 1 ---------I N~ l I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I 0 I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -I------ Ur) t----------------' --I I I I I I O Q 1 h 0 I 1 I W i I I >z® L---------------- I I I i I o I I I I I I 20'-0" RIM JOIST z c)) 2 I o Uai%.0 Q 1 I I I I I I 3' 0" S PRE~SURO A_ E 70~STS AND RXM PROJECT: I LOVELADY I ARU F7 I I I I I I I I ~~I I___j I _j 4X8 PRESSURE TREATED BEAM SHEET DESCRIPTION: 8"X16"X16" PIER W/ TWO #4 REBAR EACH WAY FOUNDATION PLAN W/ TWO #4 VERTICALS W/ 10" SONITUBE SET ON TOP FLOOR FRAME PLAN FOUNDATION PLAN PAGE-5 SCALE: 1/4" =1' FLOOR FRAMING PLAN SCALE: 1/4" =1' - Engineered Trusses 2' o.c. M R-40 Insulation _ U Z_ ZQ 0_J I- _ UQ ~j N-i Zm 7 rc ()o o F ® ) zOSE Z,7 "JC)ON w0- N wm~W~ m®(DOL0 D Y 2x6 Studs 16" O.C. w/ DBL Top Plates 0 N N i Tyvek Drain Wrap 1X6 Ship Lap siding to match existing house R21 Insulation 7/16 OSB Wall Sheeting 3/4" OSB T&G Subfloor 1" Versa Rim 0 U) -1/2" BCI 600 goo oJ° R-30 Insulation 2x8 P.T. Plate z ~J3g 1/2x10" J-Bolt W/ 2x2 Washer z o, _ ouai0Q I 8" CMU 8"x16" Concrete Footing PROJECT; W/ 2 #4 Continuous and LOVELADY #4 Rebar verticals 32" ARU O.C. SHEET DESCRIPTION: E 6 Mil. Visqueen wausection F- I 11-411 PAGE-6 i LANDSCAPING/ GARDEN AREAS 10 MAPLE TREES S" ID' DRIP LINE ~ i, co LI °o 77,83' co •6'NLrE .L 14 -1 JL „ F c~' 42 -6 11 6 20 -8 may Existing DECK TO REMAIN i•~ I _W 01 ❑ 1 ®--v LAWN AREAS z z _9„ 0 J Z Or\~ ENGrE J T_ Q 2 co (E) HOUSE TO REMAIN V EK ling 1201 S.F. D CKWI 00 2 Bedrooms p ERGULA J TO REMAIN (h Z Q~ P 13'-9" > > 0 0 o! ~ 0 TREES w oo GAS METER ffNC9 ^ ❑ ❑ 0 ~ S2 Z 0 N a PORCH SEWER LINE / Q Q w m U) d°D ( =L J J W w ' LL LL O G < O< o i o 0 6' o" GRAVEL PARKING AREA n g~ , 4 wg _j (N t7 u " w io a z i z wUz 0 V, O i~-1 lUC ,!C LL F a / 0_ I1 ,D gx LL C~`x ~CxAI's1,R~L-x~ 0 m I U O CD - l70 ww(~Oc~(~ s( u " a"0EVd z N OD r\p W W w 0 486 iD I 0 w S. F. ACER P JAPANESE MAPLE TREE GC i~v e L J 2N / r Nr Oc mp PORCH ;o / \ - - 12' 0" to I 0 0 20$ 0" o m N (N) ACER P JAPANESE MAPLE ff-Ffl A O1-O„ TREE S' TALL I I TELEPHONE BOX SIDEWALK / IRRIGATION/ DRIP SYSTEM 92 7 POWER POLE W/ TREET LIGHT 0 POWER LI ES o © TELE HONE BOX ~ _ -TREE PROTECTION FENCE 6' TALL 0 L 0 LU :D PARKING 3 ORM DRAIN MAN HOLE COVER/ SEWER j LU WALNUT STREET Q z LLI 10-1 rw 24'-0, 34'-10" o In ~ Q F-1®-® MAIL BOX / I I TI PROJECT: LOV RUELADY IA N FYRE HYDRANT Scale: 1/16"=V SHEET N DESCRIPTION: Z EXISTING Q LANSCAPE & IRRIGATION PAGE-7 CD CD (D VI " P~ (D CD CD C AD M (D ® 0 v~ N 0 r+1 CD ~f D (D v o (D "H ° o CD o oo ® 0 Ull w 0 O vi J ® (h 69 b4 ~ ~ ~ f O O i f!9 bf3 ~3 fi9 ff3 b9 64 69 ffi ff3 fft b9 69 bR} I~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 Z W W w 01 .P rr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OD 00 ~ N N J ~ B1 O 01 0 ~ ~ J J J o~ O oo o~ oo v~ OC~ N w 00 GO O O \o O W O O O In N n ® O ® O O O O O O O O O O O h O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 b9 F{j bA ~ ~ w ® o Y. CD rqn I I I ~ ~r,,s sekjs~be 6sds 0 rC W w w „ 00 00w.4, (DD Ui U►NNO a1 P00000~00-P NQ~ ~ NON.~ 01 01 J J N O A ~10 oo 110 W In ~l0 O In ~10 0 ® ® 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pp 4, 41 4 N N Efib9 bA64b9b9ffib9E~f~4b4bFtbFtfflffl~b4y} ~1 ~ I 00 C) C) 00 ®w~ J in Nw ink N N N N N J Vi N O J N ~ N N N J J i I I N I IU.)~ I W O O ® 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O 0 0 O w w r w CD AD (D 0 (D w. 0 CD a P, rt N ap (`D ~0 r+ ff3 0 C!~ ~ ~C CD oc) ® Uri 0 ® W N ~p ~ N w (D W O ~d N y O n CD ~ W o 00 n o y o ~ o ff? ff~ b9 b4 N 00 N ~ W W ~ 00 i; P 00 00 ® Vi O 0 ®1 01 000 i ® O O O u r Planning Division ZONING P MIT APPLICATION 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 21 CITY OF FILE # ~!1 ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT S/729- I,,eV_11-z:v DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES NO Street Address 5P 9 1,0A t IY' l Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E Lip Tax Lot(s) IC Zoning l 6 Comp Plan Designation IN e-- L,~ L a vii (_L APPLICANT Name b, A• j~c_> o,c, r Phone E-Mail ~ ~r~// ~ ~o~l~(ECd t, s vffL ivy Address X J9 City Sr`F ~Lf ~ Zip 75 PROPERTY OWNER Name SAGA LOVr1-UY' Phone E-Mail c,v~Riv'~ . ~i Address _ C, '/2 City A 5*4 ,_,9 Zip C"K SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER Title Name ~7o Phone ~ 11yr-5 , E-Mail Address~77~'~sf:i Ciry A P Zip Title Name - ~cc r Phone E-Mail Address ff-c'• Ca >c % City. A Ff ~ ~r r7 Zip 9zf 1 hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact are in all respects, true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expense. If I have any doubts, I a advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. Applicant's Signature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, l have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. Property Owner's Signature (required) Date fro be completed by City Staff] I Date Received 7 1/ Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ f ~r%'~~I OL" OVER N CAUsers\D A Booldt Comt\AppData\Local\Microsoft\windows\Temporary Intemet Files\Content.Outlook\3E45UIQI\7.oning Permit Application.doc Job Address: 699 WALNUT ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C P Owner's Name: SARA LOVELADY 0 Phone: P Customer 00198 N State Lic No: P D.A. BOLDT T City Lic No: L Applicant: R I Address: A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: (541) 482-4865 T Address: N Applied: 07/18/2016 0 T Issued: R Expires: 01/14/2017 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E05BD706 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Site Review for and ARU and tree removal VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount CUP Accessory Residential 664.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF ASHLAND ~i i [best hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts nderstood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 . This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation (180 days). Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 664.00 $ 664,00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 664.00 Fees Paid: $ 664.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF ASHLAND