Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutBenson_1030_PA-2016-00877 -----Original Message----- From: Tom Owens [mailto:thomasporterowens gmail.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2016 5:33 PM To: Jeremy Payne Subject: 1030 Benson Way Jeremy - I was advised that there is a building to be built on the lot next to my property, 1040 Benson Way, and until yesterday I had no concerns as I supposed the building would meet general requirements as put forth for this area's E-1 zoning. Yesterday I got word that a 2-story building is going to be built on my north property line, which evidently has been determined to be the curb line of my driveway. This determination of the property line is a surprise, as when I bought my property in 2002 1 was told that a metal fence post (still there) was the property corner and that the line ran back to another similar post at what would be my northwest property corner. For the past 14 years I have been weed whacking this strip, thinking it was mine. That aside, the idea that a 2-story building has been approved in which to park cars, by an owner who is not providing employment is very much at odds with the E-1 zoning... and presents a potential down- line problem in the future for any redevelopment or re-use of this building. My understanding has been that the development of this subdivision, according to its original developer, Irv Toney, (from whom I purchased Lot 1, Lot 2, and Lot 3, before buying Lpt 4 (1040 Benson), that the concept was a business park, with structures suitable for any variety of businesses that put people to work. The building design, placement on the lot and the intended use do not meet Irv's vision, nor do they meet the E-1 criteria. Please respond to my concerns... as I have other related concerns relative to this matter. Respond by email or call me: (541) 631-8801 Thank you, Tom Owens, President of Body Support Systems, Inc. 1040 Benson Way Sent from my iPhone i CITY F ASHLAND June 24, 2016 Notice of Final Decision On June 23, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA-2016-00877 Subject Property: 1030 Benson Way Applicant: Ron Lang/Rogue Planning and Development Services Description: A request for Commercial Site Design Review approval to construct a 4,998 square foot commercial building that will accommodate an auto-detailing shop, storage, and office space. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1 ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 141); TAX LOTS: 200. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Cory Darrow in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Property owners within 200 ft i; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us I/ i I SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. j, F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. (k G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Connnission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us , i iSHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00877 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1030 Benson Way OWNER: Ron Lang APPLICANT: Rogue Planning and Development Services DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for construction of a new 4,998 square foot commercial structure at the above mentioned address. The structure will facilitate an automotive detailing shop, offices, and storage space. Two exceptions have been requested. The first, AMC 18.4.4.030.F.2. a, requires a five-foot landscaped strip between parking areas and property lines, and the second, AMC 18.4.6.040.A.2, requires all streets contain both a parkrow and sidewalk. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 14 D; TAX LOT: 208 SUBMITTAL DATE: May 6, 2016 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: May 27, 2016 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: June 23, 2016 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): July 5, 2016 FINAL DECISION DATE: July 6, 2016 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: January 6, 2017 DECISION The current application is a request for Site Design Review approval for the proposed construction of a new 4,998 square foot commercial building that will facilitate an automotive detailing shop, offices and storage space. The applicant asserts the proposal meets all applicable approval criteria although, two exceptions were requested for the following standards: The first, AMC 18.4.4.030. F. 2. a, requires a five- foot landscaped strip between parking areas and property lines, and the second, AMC 18.4.6.040.A.2, requires all streets contain both a parkrow and sidewalk. The subject property is zoned E-1 (Employment) and is approximately 13,939 square feet (.32 acres) in area with an approximately 11% slope to the west. The subject property is located on the west side of Benson Way. The property's western boundary to the rear abuts the Southern Oregon Pacific Railroad. Site Review The Site Design Review approval criteria focus on verifying that: A) The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone, including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards; B) The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements; C) The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4; and D) The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities, and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property, The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 in specific circumstances, where applicable criteria are satisfied. PA #2016-00877 1030 Benson Way Page 1 The applicant asserts the proposal meets E-1 zoning district standards, including setbacks, lot area, lot coverage, and building height. The applicant asserts that the proposal meets all applicable aspects of the Basic Site Review for a commercial structure, if granted the two aforementioned exceptions that were requested. The building and primary entrance are oriented towards the public street and are accessible from the sidewalk. The majority of the fagade is within 20-feet of the property line and is setback adequately to provide the required landscaping buffer. Requisite street trees have been proposed. Parking requirements for the proposal are as follows: One (1) space per 1,000 square feet of shop/ detailing space and one (1) per 500 square feet of office space. The proposal has identified that of the 4,998 proposed square feet, 822 square feet are intended for office space, 928 square feet are intended for storage, and the remaining 3,248 square feet are intended for shop/ detailing space. As proposed, the parking requirements are 1.644 parking spaces (822 / 500) for the office space, and 4.176 parking spaces (4,176 / 1,000) for the shop/detailing and storage space. The total required parking for the proposal is six stalls (5.82 = 4.176 + 1.644). The proposal includes four off-street spaces and there are two available on-street parking spaces that will be credited to the total. Two sheltered bicycle parking spaces are proposed in conformance with City standards. Staff is aware that future intensification of the site is probable. In the event that the proposed ground-floor storage area is converted to office space, the parking requirement would increase from six stalls (5.82 rounded) to seven stalls (6.75 rounded). As proposed, there is not sufficient parking to accommodate the conversion from storage to offices. Site Review would be required at the time of a proposed conversion. Site Design Landscaping standards outlined in 18.4.4 are met in the proposal by providing a ten-foot drought-resistant landscape buffer between the building and Benson Way, planting two two-inch caliper street trees in the right-of-way, situating the refuse container in a non-visible location, and installing exterior lighting hoods to cast light downward. The applicant has requested an exception to two standards: The first, AMC 18.4.4.030. F. 2. a requires a five-foot landscaped strip between parking areas and a property line. The applicant has indicated that due to the slope of the property and grading that will be involved with the development, the proposed parking area will be below the grade of the adjacent property and will be effectively screened by a retaining wall. Additionally, the side of the building on the abutting property facing the parking area does not contain windows or doors and is situated nearly on the property line, which limits pedestrian access and visibility from that side of the building. The applicant asserts that an exception is warranted in these situations and staff is in agreement as the intent for ordinance is largely to reduce aesthetic impacts of parking areas on neighboring properties. The second standard the applicant has requested an exception to deviate from is AMC 18.4.6.040.A.2, which requires all streets contain both a parkrow and sidewalk. The applicant notes that the standards at the time of the original subdivision approved a curbside sidewalk without a parkrow. As the subject property is the last remaining undeveloped lot on the west side of Benson Way, imposing the new standard on one lot would lead to a reduced aesthetic by creating an irregular pattern. In order to maintain a cohesive design and avoid irregular bends in the sidewalk,.staff supports the request for an exception to AMC 18.4.6.040.A. 2. The criteria for Site Review Approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follows: A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and PA #2016-00877 1030 Benson Way Page 2 floor area, lot coverage, buuumg height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). w C. Site Development and Design Standards. The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City )Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities, and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. Planning Action #2016-00877 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2016- 00877 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. All proposals of the applicant are conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. 2. That any conversion of the storage area into a higher intensity will need to be evaluated for consistency with Chapter 18 of the Ashland Municipal Code. 3. That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 4. That the front entrances adjacent to Benson Way shall remain functional and open to the public during all business hours _ June 23, 2016 ~BPil. - ar, Director Department of Community Development PA #2016-00877 1030 Benson Way Page 3 ik k AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) 4; County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 6/24/16 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-00877, 1030 Benson. Signature of mployee DocumenQ 6/24/2016 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 206 DIERKS PROPERTY LLC BARBARA S PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 212 PA-2016-00877 391 El 4D 1100 DIERKS -MANAGER DODDS STEPHEN T/REBEKAH K DWAIN & BUD LLC PO BOX 3298 1575 E NEVADA ST 801 AVENUE C ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 WHITE CITY, OR 97503 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 208 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 209 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 200 LANG RON M TRUSTEE ET AL LEFORS DAVID P/ JAYNE M MANTA INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL 700 TERRACE ST PO BOX 462 700 MISTLETOE RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 HOLUALOA, HI 96725 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 210 PA-2016-00877 391 El 4D 207 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 214 MB TERMINAL COMPANY OWENS THOMAS P SUPERIOR PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 3595 1040 BENSON WAY 6581 GRIFFIN CREEK RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 PA-2016-00877 PA-2016-00877 PA-2016-00877 CARLOS DELGADO LAURIE SAGER ROGUE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 217 FOURTH ST 550 MISTLETOE RD, STE B 1424 S IVY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 1030 Benson NOD 6/24/16 15 f Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 I T F 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland,orms TTY, 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION i PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00877 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1030 Benson Way OWNER/APPLICANT: Ron Lang/Rogue Planning and Development Services DESCRIPTION: A request for Commercial Site Design Review approval to construct a 4,998 square foot commercial building that will accommodate an auto-detailing shop, storage, and office space. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1 ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 14D; TAX LOTS: 200 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 27, 2016 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: June 10, 2016 f ` YSui I ect P:r-o ` e:rt, s , h \7 N ` LI J ' rY S NO 'r0& ~!f x_ The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. I Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. ocs i SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 f( The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or.. unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. I< i GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FOlderVdalled Notices & Signs\2016\PA-2016-00877.docx i.'.: G AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On May 27, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-2016-00877, 1030 Benson Way. I: cow I It AW Sig' ture of Employee G:kcomm devlplanninglTemplateslTEMPLATE-Affidavit of Mailing-Planning Action Notice.dot 5127/2016 it i z PA-2016-00877 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 206 kn-2016-00877 391 E14D 215 CARLOS DELGADO DIERKS PROPERTY LLC DODDS STEPHEN T/REBEKAH K 217 FOURTH STREET j BARBARA S DIERKS - MANAGER 1575 E NEVADA ST ASHLAND, OR97520 j PO BOX 3298 ASHLAND, OR97520 ASHLAND, OR97520 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 1100 PA-2016-00877 391 E 1 4D 208 PA-2016-00877 DWAIN & BUD LLC LANG RON M TRUSTEE ET AL LAURIE SAGER AND ASSOCIATES 801 AVENUE C 700 TERRACE ST 550 MISTLETOE RD, SUITE B WHITE CITY, OR97503 :'ASHLAND, OR97520 ASHLAND, OR97520 PA-2016-00877 391E14D 209 PA-2016-00877 391E14D 200 PA-2016-00877 391E14D 210 LEFORS DAVID P/ JAYNE M MANTA INVESTMENTS LLC ET AL MB TERMINAL COMPANY' PO BOX 462 700 MISTLETOE RD PO BOX 3595 HOLUALOA, HI96725 i ASHLAND, OR97520 ~OR97520 III j j PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 207 ! PA-2016-00877 PA-2016-00877 391 E14D 214 OWENS THOMAS P ROGUE PLANNING AND DEV SUPERIOR PROPERTIES LLC 1040 BENSON WAY 1424 S. IVY 6581 GRIFFIN CREEK RD ASHLAND, OR97520 MEDFORD, OR97501 'MEDFORD, OR97501 ~ I I j 1030 BENSON j 5/27/2016 NOC 12 I I i I I I i I I I , II Il i! I ! it ! III, 'ij Ill j EI tug U223 Mou 2L 82 J 621 T Emu 1110 -5201.6214 BID 12, 6226 100 MUD 1200 5 =~JJi 3E;"i~ 1Lt 3`11LID 171 I aUC I MCI .1 4103- ni si 2C.0 3, _ 'ilU11 19CI: X17'G C a 215 1100 G~3 216 208 9`9 C 9 3 E° 'C, REGO MCI 20.7 9 59 -a' 215 9200 204 ~'Dlcj Y, I USE El MKI 200 J.-- ri ~j SO J1 Y t~IL 1j[' 4 e i 4 !1 4a,C`1 BM Building Site Design Review for new Commercial SUBJECT PROPERTY 1030 Benson Way PROPERTY OWNER Lang Living Trust Ron Lang ARCHITECT Carlos Delgado Architect LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Laurie Sager and Associates PLANNING CONSULTANT Rogue Planning & Development Services I b. 9 f ROGUE PLANNING ii DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC May 2016 Subiect Property Address: 1030 Benson Way Map & Tax Lot: 39 1E 14D; Tax Lot 200 Property Owner/Applicant: Ron Lang 700 Terrace Street Ashland, OR 97520 Architect: Carlos Delgado, Architect 217 Fourth Street Ashland, OR 97520 Landscape Architect: Laurie Sager and Associates Laurie Sager 700 Mistletoe Road; Suite 201 Ashland, OR 97520 Engineer: Thornton-Daley Engineering Kirk Daley 260 N Third Jacksonville, OR 97530 Planning Consultant: Rogue Planning and Development Services Amy Gunter 1424 S Ivy Street Medford, OR 97501 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Employment Zoning: E-1 Lot Area: .32 Ac / 14,000 sf Request: Approval for Site Design Review for the construction of a 4,998 square foot commercial building, the building has 4,170 square foot footprint and an 822 square foot mezzanine. An Exception to the Site Design Standards is requested to eliminate a five-foot landscape buffer between property lines. An Exception to the Street Standards is requested to allow for the existing five-foot' curbside 1 ROGUE PLANNING S DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LIE sidewalk that terminates at the north and south property lines to continue along the frontage of the property. Site Background: The subject property at 1030 Benson Way (Tax lot 208). $ .23 Ac. P _ Lot #7 was created as part of the South Valley Business-6c 110.60, Park subdivision. The property is a 13,987 square foot 2®~i % parcel on the west side of Benson Way. The property is i to 0.32 Ac. ---35.57' trapezoidal with 90.16 feet of frontage along Benson Way (east) and 137.98 feet along the rear (west) property line. 7 As& The north property line is 110.60 feet and the south 207 property line is 158.58 feet. 0.43 Ac The property slopes an average of 11 percent from west to east towards Benson Way. There is a multi-stemmed black cottonwood tree in the center of the parcel. The site lacks any other significant natural features. A ten-foot wide Public Utility Easement is adjacent to the Benson Way right-of-way. The Southern Oregon Pacific V \ Railroad right-of-way abuts the rear (west) property line. There is a ten-foot Talent Irrigation District (TID) Easement along the rear property line. Benson Way terminates approximately 300-feet past the property. Benson Way is improved with 36- feet of pavement, curb and gutter. A five-foot-wide public sidewalk terminates at both the north and south property lines. There is an approximately 22-foot wide driveway curbcut on the south side of the property. There is a fire hydrant across Benson Way from the subject property. There is an 8-inch water main, an 8-inch sanitary sewer main, and a 12-inch storm sewer main in Benson Way. Electric service is underground and served via a vault that is located to the north of the subject property. A new transformer may need to be installed depending on the quality and location of the existing conduit. The property is zoned Employment (E-1). All of the properties to the CRCM AN~ north, south and east are zoned E-1. The property to the west across ~JILL ; the railroad right-of-way is zoned with the Croman Mill (CM). The SUB,ECTP~OPERTY property to the southwest is zoned Jackson County RR-5 and is Comprehensive Plan designated as E-1. Y, t 3; The properties to the north and south are occupied by commercial RR-s ! . structures and associated parking lots that were constructed in 1996 ~10~ and 1997 respectively. The property to the east, across Benson Way zorviNG MAP is vacant. The property to the west is part of the Croman Mill site and is partially vacant. The property to 2 ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC the property frontage, one on-street parking credit requested. Additionally, the building is designed in a manner that allows for the customer parking spaces secured within the secure structure. Exception to SDUS: An exception to the Site Design and Use Standards is requested for the five-foot buffer between parking spaces and property lines. The proposed parking is adjacent to the north property line. Due to the topography of the site, the parking spaces will be below the grade of the adjacent property. The buffer would not technically be buffering the space from anything because the building to the north is a metal building, approximately 22-feet tall with no openings and nearly on the property line. Site Use: The request is for a metal building that is capable of housing a secure auto detailing shop, the use is similar to an auto repair shop which is a permitted use in the Employment zone. The building is designed in a manner in which the detail services are able to occur within the structure. A reception and storage room area is proposed on the ground floor and the business office in the second floor mezzanine. Parking spaces are shown within the building to allow for all customer vehicles to be stored within the structure so that they are in a secure location versus in the surface parking with perimeter fencing as the means of security. The proposed use of the structure as an auto facility, is a special permitted use in the Employment Zone. The primary criteria from the auto/truck repair facility involves proximity to residential zones and screening of autos from the public right-of-way. The property is more than 200-feet from any City of Ashland land zoned for residential uses. The property to the west is zoned Jackson County Rural Residential. This property is envisioned to be annexed into the city as Employment zoning. Employment zoned lands area addressed in the Ashland Comprehensive Plan as These areas are for a variety of office, retailing, manufacturing, storage, repair, and wholesale operations. (Comprehensive Plan Chapter 2.04.09) The proposed use as an auto detail is consistent with uses that are occurring on adjacent lands. The other possible uses of the site if the auto detail shop is discontinued, include food processing facilities, light manufacturing, wholesale and distributing facilities. The Benson Way neighborhood is developed primarily as employment in the trades and there are very few offices on the street. Other businesses on Benson Way include, food production, light manufacturing facilities, automobile repair, warehousing and mini-storage facilities. The proposal is consistent with the Economic Element of the Comprehensive Plan which states that "the exact mix of retailing, services, wholesaling, and manufacturing is impossible to predict and difficult to control, so forecasting should err on the side of allowing ample, rather than restrictive policies for land availability." In this case, allowing for construction of a commercial building in the employment zone that has the flexibility to convert to a higher intensity employment use while conforming to the Site Design and parking standards, development in the employment zone should be encouraged to provide a predictable outcome to the approval process when standards are met. (Comprehensive Plan; Economic Element, Chapter 7.04) 4 ROGUE PLANNING E DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC the southwest that is zoned Jackson County RR-.5 is occupied by a residential structure and its accessory buildings. h Proposal: The proposed commercial structure is a 4,170 square foot concrete block and metal building. At the front of the building is a 928 sf storage area. Above the storage area is 822 square foot mezzanine for office space. The rear of the proposed structure is proposed as 3,248 sf area for an automobile detail garage. The total square footage of the building is 4,998 square feet. The proposed structure is an average of 22-feet high with peak height of 24-foot, three-inches. The structure is adjacent to the south property line. The proposed building is a pre-engineered metal building. The south 1/6 of the building is proposed to be clad with vertical corrugated metal siding. The main body of the building is proposed as horizontal, multi-rib, metal siding. The proposed building will be brick red. Vertical cedar siding with a natural stain is proposed to frame the front entrance (see Attachment A) A five-foot marquee awning suspended with cables is proposed over the front entrance the proposed awning will also wrap around the north side of the structure. The north side of the structure is proposed to have two roll-up doors. A man-door to the shop area is proposed on the north side of the structure as well. Windows are proposed on the second floor for the mezzanine area to provide natural light into the shop area. The structure is designed in a manner that will allow for the future installation of windows if a business opts to modify the proposed storage room into office space. See attached elevations, photographs and specification sheets for reference. The preliminary building design demonstrates compliance with the building design standards for E-1 zoned lands and the Basic Site Review Standards. The entrance is oriented towards the public street and is accessible via a walkway from the sidewalk to the entrance. The majority of the fagade is within 20- feet of the front property line. The structure is setback the required 10-feet from the front property line for the front yard landscape buffer and clearance of the public utility easement. A 252 square foot shed roof overhang is proposed to cover the ADA parking space, off-loading area and bicycle parking spaces on the north side at the rear of the structure. Parking: The parking demand for industrial, manufacturing, production, warehousing and freight is 1 parking space per 1,000 square feet gross floor area or one space for every two employees whichever is less, plus one space for a company vehicle, specific uses are not identified in the land use ordinance. The proposed building is 4,998 square feet in area which requires 4.9 parking spaces. Five vehicle parking spaces are provided. The proposal is to provide four on-site parking spaces, two standard spaces, one compact and one ADA space with required off-loading zone. The parking lot layout (Sheet L-1.0) demonstrates that a full sized SUV type of vehicle is able to back out of any of the parking spaces and turn around on-site and exit in a forward manner. There are two on-street parking spaces adjacent to 3 i ,I ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, RE Public right of way improvements: The proposal will relocate the driveway to the north side of the property to provide adequate driveway separation. The existing driveway curb cut that is adjacent to the south property line will be removed. Exception to Street Standards: A five-foot wide curbside sidewalk terminates on both the North and South property lines. When the South Valley Business Park subdivision was approved a five- foot curbside sidewalk was what was required. The code has changed but to remain consistent with the existing sidewalk pattern, the exception is being sought. Tree Removal: There is one smaller stature, multi-stemmed deciduous tree in the middle of the parcel. This tree will be removed as part of the site development. Three trees are proposed as part of the landscaping. One mitigation tree and two new street trees will be planted behind the proposed sidewalk. Findings of fact addressing the criteria from the Ashland Municipal Code are provided on the following pages. For clarity, the criteria are in Times New Roman font and the applicant's responses are in Calibri font. CRITERIA from the Ashland Land Use Ordinance 18.2.3.050 Automobile and Truck Repair Facility Though the proposal is not for an automobile repair facility that provides vehicle servicing for auto repair a detail facility is quite similar in function. A. All cars and trucks associated with an automobile or truck repair facility shall be screened from view from the public right-of-way by a total sight-obscuring fence. All vehicles associated with the facility will be housed within the secure structure. A site obscuring fence is not proposed. B. Automobile or truck repair facilities of three service bays or larger shall not be located within 200 feet of a residential zone. There are no City of Ashland residentially zoned properties within 200 feet of the site. C. Auto body repair and/or painting shall not be located within 200 feet of a residential zone. There are no City of Ashland residentially zoned properties within 200 feet of the site. 5 i ROGUE PLANNING E DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC D. Where a use includes auto body repair and/or painting, all objectionable odors associated with the use shall be confined to the lot, to the greatest extent feasible. For the purposes of this provision, the standard for judging "objectionable odors" shall be that of an average, reasonable person with ordinary sensibilities after taking into consideration the character of the neighborhood in which the odor is made and the odor is detected. Auto body repair and painting is not proposed. The structure is for auto detailing and no objectionable odors beyond those typically found in a zone that allows for manufacturing and food production will occur as part of this proposal. E. The use shall comply with all requirements of the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. All environmental standards that apply to detail shops will be complied with prior to operation. Site Development and Design Review 18.5.2.050 Approval Criteria A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. The proposal complies with the required yard setbacks. There is a ten-foot front yard landscape buffer provided. There are no side or rear yard setbacks in the E-1 zone. The proposed structure complies with the solar setback standard B. The lot area and dimensions are pre-existing. The proposed lot coverage from the site development is 8,771 square feet. The building is 4,170 square feet, the driveway, parking area and walkways are 4,349 square feet. This is 63 percent of the total lot area. There are no residences proposed and density does not apply. The floor area ratios (FAR) are not applicable in the Basic Site Review zone. The building at 22-feet is less than the maximum of 40-feet allowed in the zone. The building is clearly oriented towards Benson Way. The building has architectural details that make it more interesting than a typical metal building in the Employment zone. A window on the ground floor has been provided where none is required by code. To allow for potential intensification of use of the storage area at the front of the building, an entry / exit door is being framed but not installed near the east corner of the structure, additionally, the area for future windows on the ground floor have been accommodated for in the design. With the potential intensification of the use of the buildings, windows and a second access could be provided upon installation of the man door. The proposed parking area of four spaces is to the side of the proposed structure. The parking area, with less than seven parking spaces complies with the majority of standards specified in section 18.4.3, excepting, 18.4.3.080. B.S., regardless, a shade tree and a carport structure are proposed. Four-inch, curb bumpers will be provided to delineate the surfacing parking areas. The parking area is proposed 6 ROGUE PLANNING ii DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC to be surfaced with concrete or comparable surfacing, constructed to standards on file in the office of the City Engineer. Provisions have been made for the on-site collection of drainage waters to eliminate sheet flow of such waters onto sidewalks, public rights-of-way, and abutting private property (see Prelim Grading Plan). The driveway approach will be paved with concrete surfacing and constructed to standards on file in the office of the City Engineer. The existing driveway approach will be removed. B. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). The property is not within any overlay zones. C. Site Development and Design Standards. The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. 18.4.2.040.B. Basic Site Review Standards. 1. Orientation and Scale. a. Buildings shall have their primary orientation toward the street and not a parking area. Automobile circulation or off-street parking is not allowed between the building and the street. Parking areas shall be located behind buildings, or to one side. The proposed building's primary orientation is towards Benson Way. The entrance to the structure is clearly oriented towards Benson with material treatments and the walkway from the sidewalk to the front entrance. b. A building fagade or multiple building facades shall occupy a large majority of a project's street frontage as illustrated in Figure 18.4.2.040.B, and avoid site design that incorporates extensive gaps between building frontages created through a combination of driveway aprons, parking areas, or vehicle aisles. This can be addressed by, but not limited to, positioning the wider side of the building rather than the narrow side of the building toward the street. In the case of a corner lot, this standard applies to both street frontages. Spaces between buildings shall consist of landscaping and hard durable surface materials to highlight pedestrian areas. The building facade occupies a large majority of the project's street frontage. c. Building entrances shall be oriented toward the street and shall be accessed from a public sidewalk. The entrance shall be designed to be clearly visible, functional, and shall be open to the public during all business hours. The building entrance is clearly visible, functional and will be open to the public during all business hours. A five-foot-wide walkway is proposed from the public sidewalk to the entrance. Emphasis to the main entrance has been added with the proposed marquee awning and the vertical cedar siding. d. Building entrances shall be located within 20 feet of the public right of way to which thr~ ,ire required to be oriented. Exceptions may be granted for topographic constraints, lot configuration, dc Icn> where a 7 ROGUE PLANNING G DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC greater setback results in an improved access or for sites with multiple buildings, such as shopping centers, where other buildings meet this standard. The building entrance is adjacent to the ten-foot public utility easement and the required ten-foot landscape buffer and is less than 20-feet from the public right-of-way. e. Where a building is located on a corner lot, its entrance shall be oriented toward the higher order street or to the lot corner at the intersection of the streets. The building shall be located as close to the intersection corner as practicable. The subject property is not a corner lot. f. Public sidewalks shall be provided adjacent to a public street along the street frontage. A five-foot curbside public sidewalk that extends from the existing five-foot curbside sidewalks that terminate at both the north and south property lines will be installed along the street frontage. g. The standards in a-d, above, may be waived if the building is not accessed by pedestrians, such as warehouse and industrial buildings without attached offices, and automotive service stations. Not applicable. The standards in a - d have been addressed and the criteria from a - d is met with the proposal. 2. Streetscape. One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of frontage for that portion of the development fronting the street pursuant to subsection 18.4.4.030.E. Two, two-inch caliper street trees are proposed along Benson Way. 3. Landscaping. a. Landscape areas at least ten feet in width shall buffer buildings adjacent to streets, except the buffer is not required in the Detail Site Review, Historic District, and Pedestrian Place overlays. There is a ten-foot landscape buffer proposed between the building and Benson Way. b. Landscaping and recycle/refuse disposal areas shall be provided pursuant to chapter 18.4.4. The only tree on the site is a multi-stemmed cottonwood tree that is located in the center of the parcel. It will be removed as part of the proposal. A variety of drought tolerant plant materials are proposed for the site that conform to the water conserving guidelines addressed in 18.4.4.030. Two, two-inch caliper street trees are proposed along Benson Way. 8 ROGUE PLANNING G DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC A 1 Paper Bark Maple tree is proposed adjacent to the parking spaces. The required five-foot buffer between the parking area and the adjacent property is not provided because the structure of the property to the north is on the property line and has no openings. See exception findings below. The refuse container is proposed to be located around the southwest corner of the structure. The proposed location has been verified with Recology. The refuse area will not be visible from adjacent properties due to the structure and the retaining walls. 4. Designated Creek Protection. Where a project is proposed adjacent to a designated creels protection area, the project shall incorporate the creek into the design while maintaining required setbacks and buffering, and complying water quality protection standards. The developer shall plant native riparian plants in and adjacent to the creek protection zone. No creek protection zone is required on the property. 5. Noise and Glare. Artificial lighting shall meet the requirements of section 18.4.4.050. Compliance with AMC 9.08.170.c and AMC 9.08.175 related to noise is required. The exterior lights are proposed LED dusk to dawn lights that have a hood to cast light downward. (See attachment B). Noise generated by the auto detailing will be comparable to noises to be expected in an employment zone that allows for production, manufacturing and repair. D. City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities, and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. Adequate City facilities (utilities) exist to serve the proposed development. There is a fire hydrant across Benson Way from the property. All utilities are underground within the public right-of-way or within the public utility easement along the frontage of the property. Utilities will be extended to the property at the time of development. There is an 8-inch water main in Benson Way, an 8-inch sanitary sewer main, and a 12-inch storm sewer main. Those facilities have capacity to service the proposed development. Electric is underground and served via a vault that is located to the north of the site. A new transformer may need to be installed depending on the location of the existing conduit. If a new transformer or vault is necessary, it will be located in the public utility easement and not within the sidewalk. The water meter is located near the north property line behind the sidewalk. The fire vault is proposed to be located near the south property line within the public utility easement and out of the sidewalk. 9 4 ROGUE PLANNING ii DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty. i The exception to not provide the five-foot landscape buffer between the parking area and the property to the north is due to the location of the existing structure on the adjacent property to the north. The structure to the north is built nearly on the property line and has no openings along the entire south side of the structure. The topography of the subject property with an average 11 percent grade change requires a sizeable poured concrete retaining wall to create a level driveway and parking area that complies with ADA accessibility. A five-foot buffer at the top of the retaining wall would be difficult to maintain with the adjacent structure on the property line. The small setback provides for little room for vegetation growth. The building wall is the south wall of the adjacent structure, and the heat transfer from the structure will create a constant challenge for plant survivability. Elimination of plants and irrigation adjacent to the retaining wall and the foundation wall of the adjacent property will be beneficial to the structural integrity of both structures. The exception will not have a negative impact on the adjacent properties. The view of the existing structure will remain as it has for the last 20 years. The request is consistent with the purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards and consistent with the goals and policies of the Comprehensive Plan which encourage the development of Employment Zoned properties. The spacing standards for driveways on the street are met with the proposal, the Solar Setback ordinance requires that the structures be located to the south and therefore the parking lot is to the north of the building. The retaining wall could be seen as similar to a fence buffering the parking spaces as well. 18.5.7.030. B. Tree Removal Permit. 2. Tree that is Not a Hazard. a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.3.10. The tree is nearly centered on an Employment zoned lot. In order for a structure to be constructed on the site, the tree removal is necessary. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stabi Iity, tl oNv of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. 10 i. C •ROGUE PLANNING ii DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC The tree is a multi-stemmed black cottonwood tree. Its removal will not have any negative impacts on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters and it is not part of any windbreak. c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. The tree removal will not have a negative impact on tree densities, sizes, canopies or species diversity within 200 feet of the property. There are other cottonwood and deciduous trees found along the railroad tracks to the south of the property. The removal is necessary to construct a commercial structure, and associated parking area in the employment zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. There are no residential units are proposed as part of this application. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. See below. 18.5.7.050 Mitigation Required One or more of the following shall satisfy the mitigation requirement. A. Replanting On-Site. The applicant shall plant either a minimum 1 %z-inch caliper healthy and well-branched deciduous tree or a five to six-foot tall evergreen tree for each tree removed. A 1 4-inch Paper Bark Maple is proposed to replace the tree that will be removed. Two, 2-inch caliper, eight-foot-tall Zelkova street trees are also proposed. The trees will be planted and maintained per the specifications of the Recommended Street Tree Guide. Exception to Street Standards 18.4.6.020.B.1. a. There is demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of this chapter due to a unique or unusual aspect of the site or proposed use of the site. The existing sidewalk that terminates into the north and south property lines of the subject site is a five-foot curbside sidewalk as part of the development criteria that was applicable at the time of Subdivision approval. b. The exception will result in equal or superior transportation facilities and connectivity 11 ROGUE PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC considering the following factors where applicable. For pedestrian facilities, feeling of safety, quality of experience (i.e., comfort level of walking along roadway), and ability to safety and efficiency crossing roadway. In order to comply with the current sidewalk standards, a significant bend would be necessary in order to achieve accessibility standards and curvature standards. This would negatively affect the comfort level of walking along the roadway because it would break that straight line that the existing sidewalk along the curb creates. C. The exception is the minimum necessary to alleviate the difficulty. The exception is the minimum necessary to alleviate the difficulty in installing a landscape buffer. d. The exception is consistent with the Purpose and Intent of the Street Standards in subsection 18.4.6.040.A. The Street Standards section speaks to sidewalk and street connectivity; the sidewalk provides connectivity to the existing curbside sidewalk system. Attachments: A: EXTERIOR FINISHES B: LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS C: RETAINING WALL EXAMPLES SITE PLAN (L-1.0) TREE REMOVAL; LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION (L-2.0 AND L-2.1) EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS (A-2.1 AND 2.2) PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL (EC-1 AND EC-2) PRELIMINARY GRADING (C-2) PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN (C-3) 12 Commercial Building- Purposed Color & Material 1030 Benson Way Ashland OR 97520 r u p EXTERIOR FINISHES SIDING #1- HORIZONTAL RIBBED 2° Deep Ribbed Metal Brick Red i SIDING #2- CORRUGATED Vertical Corrugation ZINC-ALUM (SILVER) SIDING #3- V GROOVE 1x6 Vertical Siding Cedar Siding-Natural Stain I WINDOWS, DOOR, & GARAGE Metal Clad Silver ROOF Metal-12" O.C. 24 Gauge Standing Seam ZINC-ALUM (SILVER) 217 Fruui:h SfreeC Ashland, 011 975205r41.5:i2.950I Carlos Delgado A R C H I T E C T ATTACHMENT A ® ® Catalog Number LED Wall Luminaire Notes ® ~Y? it m ng Type t facts d70series Introduction Specifications The D-Series Wall luminaire is a stylish, fully Lurminaire Bach Box (BBW) integrated LED solution for building-mount Width: 18-112" Weight: 21 Ibs Width: 5-1/2" BBW 1 Ibs applications. It features a sleek, modern design (47.0 cm) (9.5 kg) (14.0 cm) weight: (0.skg) and is carefully engineered to provide long-lasting, Depth: 10" Depth: 1-1/2" energy-efficient lighting with a variety of optical (25.4 cm) (3.8 cm) and control options for customized performance. Height: 7-5/8 Height: 4 (19.4 cm) (10.2 cm) With an expected service life of over 20 years of NPT~ W - For - ° y j side-entry ~ nighttime use and up to 76% in energy savings side-entry ~i conduit _ over comparable 40OW metal halide luminaires, " H the D-Series Wall is a reliable, low-maintenance I0~00~0~~~~ _ _4 lighting solution that produces sites that are 1A' exceptionally illuminated. EXAMPLE: DSXW2 LED 30C 700 40K T3M MVOLT DDBTXD DSXW2 LED DSXW2 LED 20C 20 LEDs 350 350 mA 30K 3000 K T2S Type II Short MVOLT t Shipped included Shipped installed (two nes) 530 530 mA 40K 4000K T2M Type II Medium 120' (blank) Surface PE Photoelectric cell, button type 4 30C en LEDs 700 700 mA 50K 5000 K T3S Type III Short 208' mounting PER NEMA twist-lack receptacle only (no controls) 30 (three 1000 1000 mA AMBPC Amber T3M Type III Medium 2401 bracket DMG 0-10V dimming driver (no controls) engines) H A) phosphor T4M Type IV Medium 277' DCR Dimmable and controllable via ROAM' (no controls)' converted TFTM Forward Throw 3472 Shipped separately' PIRH 180'motion/ambient light sensor, 15-30' mtg Lit I Medium 4801 BBW Surface- PIRIFC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 8-15' mounting height, ASYDF Asymmetric mounted ambient sensor enabled atlfc' diffuse back box (for PIRHIFC3V Motion/ambient sensor, 15-30' mounting height, conduit entry) ambient sensor enabled atlfc' Shipped installed Shipped separately' DDBXD Dark bronze DSSXD Sandstone DWHGXD Textured white SF Single fuse (120, 277, 347V) a BSW Bird-deterrent spikes DBLXD Black DDBTXD Textured dark bronze DSSTXD Textured sandstone DF Double fuse (208, 240, 480V) e WG Wire guard DNAXD Natural aluminum DBLBXD Textured black HS House-side shield' VG Vandal guard DWHXD White DNATXD Textured natural aluminum SPD Separate surge protection' NOTES Accessories 1 MVOLT driver operates on any line voltage from 120-277V (50/60 Hz). Specify 120, 208, 240 or 277 options only when ordering with fusing (SF; DF options), or photocontrol (PE option). Ordered anj-,&Ppeds=psra~ely 2 Available with 30 LED/700mA options only (DSXW2 LED 30C 700). DMG option not available. DLL127F 1.510 Photocell - SSL wrist-lock (120-27N)" 3 Also available as a separate accessory; see Accessories information. DI1347FiSCUUD I'hoto(ell-SStiv;i5block(34N)r' 4 Photocontrol (PE) requires 120, 208, 240 or 277 voltage option. Not available with motion/ambient light sensors (PIR or PIRO. 5 Specifies a ROAM@ enabled luminaire with 0-10V dimming capability; PER option required. Not available with 347V, 480V or PIRH. Additional DtU80t 1.5 (Ut lU NhmI(cell-SSLt:ist-lork'(480V )" hardware and services required for ROAM® deployment; must be purchased separately. Call 1-80OA42-6745 or email: sales@roamservices.net. SLU Shertingcap " 6 Specifies the • - 1, c control; see', - i.,:, for details. Includes ambient light sensor. Not available with "PE" DSXWHS U ronsr -sideshfi-«ne per light engine) option (button type photocell) or DCR. Dimming driver sta idard. 7 PIR and PIRIPC3V specify the control; PIRH and PIRHIFC3V specify the s t a ri' control; see DSXWBSIytI 81 rA-dcterranhL.LJ for details. Dimming driver standard. Not available with PER5 or PERT. Ambient sensor disabled when ordered with DCR. 0iIW21YG U R1rc guard aaessory iNr Separate on/off required. DS%PJNG II Ondzi g wrtl auessory 8 Single fuse (SF) requires 120, 277 or 347 voltage option. Double fuse (DF) requires 208, 240 or 480 voltage option. 9 See the electrical section on page 2 for more details. DS%C12BZI Hack boxaccessont 10 Requires luminaire to be specified with PER option. Ordered and shipped as a separate line item. DDBXD u (specifyfinish) is One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 • Fax: 770.918.1209 - © 2012-2016 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. ATTACHMENT B Lumen Ambient Temperature (LAT) Multipliers Electrical Load Use these factors to determine relative lumen output for average ambient temperatures from 0.40°C (32-104°F). 120V 208V 740V 277V 341V 180V 0°C 32"F 1.02 350 15W 0.23 0.13 0.12 0.10 - 10°C 50°F 1.01 530 36W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 - - 20°C 68°F 1.00 20C 700 47W 0.44 0.25 0.22 0.19 - - 25°C 777 1.00 1000 74W 0.68 0.39 0.34 0.29 - - 30°C 861 1.00 350 36W 0.33 0.19 0.17 0.14 - - 40°C 104°F 0.98 530 S4 W 0.50 0.29 0.25 0.22 - - 30C 700 71W 0.66 0.38 0.33 0.28 0.23 0.16 1000 109 W 1.01 0.58 0.50 0.44 - - Projected LED Lumen Maintenance Data references the extrapolated performance projections for the DSXW2 LED 30C 1000 platform in a 25°C ambient, based on 10,000 hours of LED testing (tested per IESNA LM- 80-08 and projected per IESNA TM-21-11). To calculate LLF, use the lumen maintenance factor that corresponds to the desired number of operating hours below. For other lumen maintenance values, contact factory. 0 25,000 50,000 100,000 L0 0.95 0.92 0.87 To see complete photometric reports or download .ies files for this product, visit Uthonia Lighting's U Isofootcandle plots for the DSXW2 LED 30C 1000 40K. Distances are in units of mounting height (25'). Distribution overlay comparison to 40OW metal halide. LEGEND 4.. 3 2 1 . 0 1 2 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 z 3 4 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 LEGEND 4 4 3 4 3 0.1 fc DSXW2, I. 3 -a 3 3 ! -o 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 3 z z z TWF2 1.Ofc O.Sfc f Q 1 4 10'W Sidealk 0 LLDs: .1 w '1 -1 o' TWF2=0.72 .z g ° .z 0 2 DSXW2 =0.95 N N P TWF2: DSXW2: 458W 109W 3 T2M Z vza, 3 T3M Z N 3 US ? z DSXW2 LED 30C 40K 7000 T2M, 4 w -0 w '4 a w TWF2400M Pulse, 25' Mounting Ht FEATURES & SPECIFICATIONS INTENDED USE INSTALLATION The energy savings, long life and easy-to-install design of the D-Series Wall Size 2 make itthe smart Included universal mounting bracket attaches securely to any 4" round or square outlet box choice for building-mounted doorway and pathway illumination for nearly any facility. for quick and easy installation. Luminaire has a slotted gasket wireway and attaches to the CONSTRUCTION mounting bracket via corrosion-resistant screws. Two-piece die-cast aluminum housing has integral heat sink fins to optimize thermal management LISTINGS through conductive and convective cooling. Modular design allows for ease of maintenance. The CSA certified to U.S. and Canadian standards. Rated for -40°C minimum ambient. LED driver is mounted to the door to thermally isolate it from the light engines for low operating DesignLights Consortium" (DLC) qualified product. Not all versions of this product may be temperature and long life. Housing is completely sealed against moisture and environmental DLC qualified. Please check the DLC Qualified Products List at to contaminants (IP65). confirm which versions are qualified. FINISH WARRANTY Exterior parts are protected by a zinc-infused Super Durable TGIC thermoset powder coat finish Five-year limited warranty. Complete warranty terms located at that provides superior resistance to corrosion and weathering. A tightly controlled multi-stage process ensures a minimum 3 mils thickness for a finish that can withstand extreme climate changes without cracking or peeling. Available in textured and non-textured finishes. Note: Actual performance may differ as a result of end-user environment and application. OPTICS All values are design or typical values, measured under laboratory conditions at 25 °C. Precision-molded proprietary acrylic lenses provide multiple photometric distributions tailored Specifications subject to change without notice. specifically to building mounted applications. Light engines are available in 3000 K (80 min. CRI), 4000 K (70 min. CRI) or 5000 K (70 CRI) configurations. ELECTRICAL Light engine(s) consist of 10 high-efficacy LEDs mounted to a metal-core circuit board to maximize heat dissipation and promote long life (187/100,000 hrs at 25°C). Class 1 electronic drivers have a power factor >90%, THD <20%, and a minimum 2.5KV surge rating. When ordering the SPD option, a separate surge protection device is installed within the luminaire which meets a minimum Category C Low (per ANSWEEE C62.41.2). One Lithonia Way • Conyers, Georgia 30012 • Phone: 800.279.8041 Fax: 770.918.1209 r DSXW2-LED ' © 2012-2016 Acuity Brands Lighting, Inc. All rights reserved. Rev. 02122116 ATTACHMENT B I K ~ v Image of versa-lock wall. Similar to wall at rear of property. s 3 .t 7 I i i Image of poured concrete wall. Similar to poured concrete wall along north property line. ATTACHMENT C f VICINITY MAP SHEET INDEX U Z /p LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PLANS N L-1.0 SITE PLAN H L-2.0 TREE REMOVAL IRRIGATION AND PLANTING PLAN h b W. OtFLNDA L•2.1 TREE REMOVAL IRRIGATION AND PLANTING LEGEND x PLepd ENGINEER PLANS ~ Q ! ECi PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN Q N EC2 PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL PLAN a F C2 PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN Q > N C3 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN U U) L ARCHITECTS PLANS Z G 01 A-2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 0 Z A•22 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS N 0 O el~o PLANNING SUMMARY a Q 0 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: F- g O ZONING DESCRIPTION: E-1 U` 1.1 PRO ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 391E14D LOT8208 a 0 N FR~II 1030 BENSON WAY, ASHLAND OREGON 97620 Lo U) Z PROJECT SITE LOT COVERAGE SUMMARY: W Q g I ifOt~' O Z I' SIRUCNRE: 4,1705f 0 COVERED PARKING: 252 SF Z 0 (P)8°CONCRETE WALL cm'er 7suu,vu DRIVEWAYPND SIDEWALK: 4,349 SF Q Q , IMPERVIOUS SURFACES TOTAL: 8,771SP/63% TOTAL LANDSCAPED AREAS: 3,229 Sf f 37X BU1LO1pG r (J / - TOTAL LOT AREA: 14,00 SF L i. E-1 (85% LOT COVERAGE) r / 1n o / U 1E)w4TER TOTAL ALLOWABLE LOT COVERAGE: 11'900 BE 185% logo (P) PARKING AREA MSTFR {r / PARKING SUMMARY: r 1 } r 1 ' / ( `1 I ! BIKE PARKING: (2 TOTAL) 2COVERED (P) STANDARD GRAY VERSA 1 I - - 1 _ I ! CAR PARKING: (5 TOTAL) 2 STANDARD ON SITE LOKSTACKEDBLOCKWALL 1CaAPACTDNSITE / v 1 1wcONSITE I ON STREET l W A. (P) LANDSCAPE /Lu 1 HT.OFIN) RGOR 124'13' { / / A ! ! J TYPE/ SLOPE OFROOF: 1:12 SLOPE HIC LOADING , SETBACK STANDARD: TABLE'S' SETBACK PER STANDARD: ;20 •0.8~~ 1p: r (2099.75'1-)201876')=23'1•)18'=7.6'/(.445(+.02))=IM'SSB ROD n1APE cN AVO 150' S LOPE TO NORTHIS(2082.D•2085.0 +7$2069.5'•2072.5' (P)CONCRETECURB (P) FOgPLINE =+3)(+B /2=+3) +3v15n =.o2 A, FORMULA t 3n/0.aas"AVO.NORTIi7S0UTN LOT DIMENSION=(137.98'8113'=22B.N'2) P 1usB P 2COVEREDBIKEPARKWO O PROJECT CONSULTANTS E A~ (P) LANDSCAPE I f OWNER: RGNUNG i G- 7W TEPRACE STREET RevislGn Dole: r { ! 1 (P) FUTURE - 1 1 ASHLAND, 976213 I - ~l J 860.8620761 1 } 1 J TRASHIRECYLB (P)CONCRETE SIDEWALK I ' 7 ! / \ I! ) I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: LAURIE SAGER S ASSOCIATES ! ! (P)CONCRETE STEPS I J z , f LANOSOAPEARCHITECTS INC. 700 MISTLETOE RD. SUITE 201 } l /r ! ) i 1~„ I ) r J r ASHLAND. OR 97620 64 489.1446 DmemBy 1/ / - _ I ) - 1 J PLANNER: ROGUE PLANNING AND C6 0%: Q Q DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ~Q 3 1 11X17Scale: l'-16'A' 14248.IVY STREET lr ' ( / ' 7 LI MEDFORD OR, 87801 2436 ScDle:1' ° 8'-0' 0 / Q• ( / • / 2 J 841.951.4020 i' J~(P)LANDSCAPE ,1/h (P) GARAGE (P)SHOP ~O1J 9 Q ENGINEER: THORNTOENGINEERING IFS 1 / i~ 3,248 SF 928 SF ~I 4:1 (U I I 3~y si1e991~sLE,o8e753D h / A~ bti NDg • _ , ' I ) ARCHITECT: 2117 FOURTH STREET ARCHITECT z Ji-u I / ' I (P) LANDSCAPE ) 2 ASHLAND, OR 07520 641.552.9502 = / r STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: STRUCTURAL SOLUTIONS r J / I r y JASON PRINS m r,, / { { / I 1 1 / ~1. I J ( ) 0 ti 39snsHAFERLANE ~ JACKSONVILLE, OR 97530 Q / ~I 1 I 6411.608.8117 Q Z qi) r p y~ oonmaoroR 6p6JAA1EacDNST.GO. Lu 8425 AGATE RD. w WHITE CITY OR 97503 (P) ELECTRICAL METER 641,82e66e9 0 I Um z 1 1 I oS j { l ! 1 1 1 1 (P) LANDSCAPE o / I (P)DOWNSp.1UT I q ' { l l I ! I I l (P)FIRE RISER s SO, ° I SITEPLA&d (P) DOWNSPOUT May 6, 2016 PROPERTY LINE //(E)RETAININ6WALL - l _ - _ I / - 1SB'-7' 0 I I 0 M 6 16 24 b~.® ( - - - _ - (E)CONCRETECURB (E) DRIVEWAY 1 I P U Z h U w H r L) 0 pROPE Q ('4 1 w } C FINE GRADET08'BELOWWALL. U t / SPREAD PRE EMERGENT AND U) INSTALL 4' OF 314• GRAVEL p 0, q tY 0 C~/~~z ~Y ~E)80/101MG w w w I 0 99 C (P) 2 SLEEVES Wg7F U r PROVIDE HUNTER PLD•10.18INLINE RMFIE l N 1-ACED 'R Z DRIP TUBING 1 GAL EMITTERS TO TREE C w_ IN CIRCLES OFIO'DIA.AND30'DIA. WITH XZONE OF3"OF MULCH 0 Z 18.OHOT IRRIGATION POINT OF PROVIDE HUNTER PLD-10.18IN LINE DRIP CONNECTION. TUBING 1GALEMITTERS TOCHOISYATERNATA IW k/1 VERIFY PSI AT CONNECTION. EMITTERS ATI8'O.C.ANDSPACE LINES AT24 W u k APART. TRIANGULATE EMITTER SPACING. l1IIa.G 1 C (C 0 (P)ROOFLIPlE C - 1 . (P)2 SLEEVES C ~ ~ - - . 4-BURG - FORAGEFESCUE x,~//ff 1 3•BERA NO IRRIGATION FOR FORAGE FESCUE / OII (P)25LiEVES C ~y[STBR 1 Y. OnL:coN Cl ' X 2i 1 11 -SESA j'~ Rta nstr / - HUNTER PRO-C CONTROLLER WITH x / B-BUXG nune5ager -W tV~ Cl SOLAR SYNC RAIN SENSOR H I o~uo~ ~ti j'SCH40LATEM P-E ARG (P)GARAGE (P) SHOP -g1•ZELG 1~~JJ ~ RevislonDole: 8-SERA BACKFLOWPREVENTER f \ I 1' WILKINS 350XLT OR EQUAL II n f PRESSURE REDUCING VALVE ' / t I x I PROVIOE(3)20AL Diawn By. e x j EMITTERS AT LACH TREE X I IX17 Scale: l' -16'-0' II 8•BUXG 2436 Scale: l'-0'-0D 1' SCH 40 MAINLINE FROM j SCH 40 LATERAL WATER METER TO VALVES / • FINE GRADE, SPREAD PRE EMERGENT I a i •ZELG AND INSTALL 3'OF MULCH I PROVIDE (2)1GAL EMITTERS AT EACH SHRUB AND GRASS O }i ZONE 2•RAINBIRDXCZ-LF-100VALVEIPR / FILTER AT 30 PSI/ 1.75 GPM WITH IN LINE 11 } DRIP TUBING •HUNTER PLD-1048. I / - 1 11 SESA ~p s be~ 0 ZY/ PROPERTY LINE ZONE I.RAINBIRDXCZ-LF-100 w w } (E) RETAINING ~ WALL 0 VALVEIPRFILTERAT30PSI/2.03 1 p ~ GPM WITH DRIP TUBING AND 0 a 0 (e)CONCRETE CURB (E) DRIVEWAY EMITTER AS SPECIFIED TO EACH u w o PLANT U m z SEE SHEET L-2.1 FOR LEGEND, m 0 /Aay16,2016 i za- TREE REMOVAL, IRRIGATION AND PLANTING PLAN 0 0 16 ( ~ II U Z U) U TREEINVENTORY y P TREE# SPECIES DBH HEIGHT CROWN RADIUS CONDITION SPECIES TOLERANCE TREE PROTECTION ZONE NOTES ~ O IN INCHES IN FEET IN FEET TO CONSTRUCTION RADIUS IN FEET A (V 1 POPULUS TRICHOCARPA 14 30 12 GOOD GOOD NIA TO BE REMOVED Wa WF O Q LEGEND N N Lo / ® O 01 I EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED Z Q \ ~00 W W W N PLANT LEGEND Q FO j WULu ® I CATEGORY SYMBOL SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME SIZE Q O N O` TREES ACEG ACER GRISEUM PAPERBARK MAPLE Iy'MULTI to :~E Z ZELG ZELKOVA'GREENVASE GREEN VASE ZELKOVA 2'CAL W Q SHRUBS, a O = PERENNIALS BERA BERBERIS'AUREA' GOLDEN BARBERRY I GAL AND BUXG BUXUS'GREEN BEAUTY' GREEN BEAUTY BOXWOOD 2GAL Q Q GRASSES CHOT CHOISYATERNATA MEXICAN ORANGE 2 GAL SESA SESLERIAAUTUMNALIS AUTUMN MOOR GRASS 1GAL MIXES1 FORAGE FESCUE SEED { GROUNDC OVER INSTALL PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATIONS I SECURING TIES USE RUBBER HOSE AT BARK SHRUBS SHALL BE SLIGHTLY HIGHER IN RELATION TO FINISHED GRADE W.I. MULCH W MIN PRUNE DAMAGED OR 1X4 BRACING DESICCATED ROOTS GENTLY COMPACTED SOIL MIX 2"WOOD STAKES (3) SCARIFY PIT BOTTOM SET ROOT CROWN 2' 150mm (6') MIN. ABOVE FINISH GRADE .6 X DIAMETER 0 ®RE61 ~TATF (11 MULCH: 2' MIN. KEEPING MULCH 1' ROOT BALL awaYFROMTRUNK 2 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL SOIL SAUCER: USE PREPARED SOIL MIX 4' NOTES _ ROPER AT TOP OF BALLSHALL BE 1. STOCKPILE ON BETE TOPSOILFOR FUTURE USE. CU T. REMOVE TOP Y, OF BURLAP. 2. BACKFILL BETWEEN STACKED BLOCK WALLS WITH GRAVEL TO 24' NON-BIO-DEGRADABLE MATERIAL FROMTOP OFWALL AND WITH fO'OFTOPSOILTO6"FROM TOP OF SHALL BE TOTALLY REMOVED. WALL. INSTALL I2'OP TOPSOIL AT FRONT PLANTING AREA 3.IMPORT COMPOST AND INSTALL 4' IN PLANTING AREAS AND TILL. . - - HOLD FINISH SOIL LEVEL Z'BELOW ADJACENT FINISH GRADE. - BACKFILL WITH PREPARED MIX OF 25% 4. INSTALL DRIP IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANT MATERIAL PER PLAN. ReN5ID0 Date: IMPORTED COMPOST AND TOPSOIL AND 5. MULCH PLANTING AREAS WITH 3" MULTI BARK. 2X BALL 75%, NATIVE SOIL Dm. MIN' IRRIGATION NOTES UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL NOTE; 1. ALL IRRIGATION MAINLINE AND LATERALS SHALL BE BCH 40 PVC. 1. STAKE TREES ONLY IF NEEDED AND REMOVE AFTER 2 YEARS MAXIMUM. MAINLINE TO BE BURIED AT I8'OEPTH AND LATERALS AT 12'DEPTH. 2, INSTALL SUNSCALO WRAP/TREE GUARD ON TREES PLACED IN FULL 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY SLEEVING LOCATIONS AND COORDINATE DwwnB SUN. AVAILABLE THROUGH AN. LEONARD. WITH GENERAL CONCTRACTOR. SLEEVES SHALL BE INSTALLED UNDER By: ALL RARDSCAPE AREAS FOR IRRIGATION AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12'. 3. INSTALL PROVISIONS FOR WINTERIZATION. 4. INSTALL VALVE FILTRATION SYSTEM PER MANUFACTURER'S I I X17 Seale: V - I &V SPECIFICATIONS. 24X36 Scale: I'= 8',0' 5. TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE OF IRRIGATION: 1066 SF. 1 TREE PLANTING DETAIL MONTHLY IRRIGATION SCHEDULE ZONE 1 ZONE 2 Z YEAR1 MAY: 30 MIN. X 3 TIMES PER WEEK MAY: 30 MIN. X2 TIMES PER WEEK G JUNE: 45 MIN. X 2 TIMES PER WEEK JUNE: 45 MIN. X 2TIMES PER WEEK -s JULY: I HR X2 TIMES PER WEEK JULY: 45 MIN. X 2 TIMES PER WEEK 7 AUGUST: I HR X 2 TIMES PER WEEK AUGUST;45 MIN. X 2 TIMES PER WEEK m SEPTEMBER: 30 MIN. X 2TIMES PER WEEK SEPTEMBER 30 MIN. X 2 TIMES PER WEEK 'OCTOBER: 30 MIN. X 2 TIMES PER WEEK 'OCTOBER: 30 MIN. X2 TIMES PER WEEK J a, ZONEI ZONE2 Q Q MAY:45 MIN.X I TIME PERWEEK W YEAR2 MAY:45MIN. XI TIME PER WEEK JUNE: 45 MINX I TIME PERWEEK JUNE: 45 MIN. X I TIME PER WEEK :2 Z JULY: 45 MIN. X 2 TIMES PER WEEK JULY: I HR. X I TIME PER WEEK 0 O AUGUST: I HRX 2TIMES PER WEEK AUGUST: I HR. X I TIME PER WEEK SEPTEMBER: 45 MIN. X 2TIMES PER WEEK SEPTEMBER: 45 MIN. X I TIME PER WEEK 10 w C 'OCTOBER: 45 MIN. X I TIME PER WEEK 'OCTOBEPo 45 MIN. X I TIME PER WEEK Uao z ' IF NEEDED 0 g W M N Z Q May 6, 2016 TREE REMOVAL, IRRIGATION AND PLANTING LEGEND L-2.1 1 you Do' A,OREGOS. , 44 9 OF 0 E T.O. PEAK rr~ h m E 11® 2 24.25' ~J1d/~~ m N m OIL ELEVATION KEY NOTES VJ Q1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, SILVER $ = wpNA (17] FOX GRAY. FASCIA = 3 O 30 VERTICAL CORRUGATED SIDING, SILVER a) N 4Q 2- DEEP RIBBED METAL SIDING, HORIZONTAL, BRICK RED © SCUPPER d ROUND DOWN SPOUT, SILVER _ ,O V (1 IXSV' GROOVE VERTICAL CEDAR SIDING, CLEAR I _ Ell 02 6-SO STEEL POST, MATCH GARAGE DOOR POWDER COAT ! - R r I (1 POURED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL, LEAVE SNAP TIE HOLES "a Q N S.S. METAL RODS SUPPORTING ENTRY ROOF `lamL `q _ Ill 10 VINYlWINDOWS , BRONZE OR SILVER COLOR (iBDj I1 ALUMINUM DOOR(TBD), SILVER COLOR (TOD) t2 FUTURE DOOR ANOWINDOWS - ~ ~ 13 FASCIA GUTTER, SILVER 0O 4'ADDRESS NUMBERS, CONTRASTING - Z ' ' O TEMP { 14 ZO + 4 II 1 1111 Jill D. h s T.O. F.F. o 27'.p 21,-0` 0.00 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 114"= f-0" V Z co ® N J z F- 2 yo( m N h = U Z~ Wo m 0 M W 3 d 0 GO 10 0 W N w a m b 1 OBS - e f H j TEMP i _ 11 i w DRAWN: CHECKED. TS CD 16 a 30'4' i8 4r rn DATE: Tr-W 05106116 e NORTH ELEVATION PROJECT: q SCALE: U4"=1'-0• LANG 16 0 4 B 2 w SHEET; ~ Lo n A2.1 0 OF SHEETS rn c I 'f L~7 W %mECal~ f 0 No$ I s T.O. PEAK 2425' WJ 0 L ELEVATION KEY NOTES 2 _ 12 1 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, SILVER 1 1v V,d v = rn FO%GRAY. FASCIA U ~ v Q3 VERTICAL CORRUGATED SIDING, SILVER N W . O Q4 2' DEEP RIBBED METAL SIDING, HORIZONTAL, BRICK RED - I- try © SCUPPER 6 ROUND DOWN SPOUT, SILVER - U © 1%6 V GROOVE VERTICAL CEDAR SIDING, CLEAR QT 6- SO STEEL POSY, MATCH GARAGE DOOR POWDER COAT 3 j V p r- QS POURED CONCRETE RETAINING WALL, LEAVE SNAP TIE HOLES 4 ^ F 91) S.S. METAL RODS SUPPORTING ENTRY ROOF 6 I `I c 10 VINYL WINDOWS, BRONZE OR SILVER COLOR(TBD) 11 ALUMINUM DOOR (180), SILVER COLOR(TBD) 12 FUTURE DOOR AND WINDOWS j 13 FASCIA GUTTER, SILVER 112 12 I 14 4- ADDRESS NUMBERS, CONTRASTING 2 _ b >o F I 3'0 I H 1111111 1. CE T.O. F.F. OAO 14.0' 31,0. 14'.a to a WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 114"= 1'-0' 0 z a ® 0 J z ~ o I ~I m o- j Q 3 o 70.- oof 2 ~ W Z I m5o j C o= Z H2'-(r ~ 7~! I 0 0 U) N j ~ I Z 1 N o ~ 7 37- e j- w DRAWN: CHECKED: TS CD 3 L---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1n DATE: Tra 05106116 W PROJECT: SOUTH ELEVATION LANG 16 SCALE: i/4"= 1'-0' w E= T- SHEET: ~ 0 4 B 12 ~ A2.2 z m OF SHEETS m U j t I j~ 3 1 NEW CATCH BASIN WITH FLOWGARD CATCH BASIN INSERT FILTER AND / ppp ORIFICE OUTLET CONTROL. NEW 3" S.D. + NEW 4" THROUGH CURB / ROOF DRAINS / / - I II 3 ~y I I NEW WATER SERVICE + ~ I alp 3 h + ~ I I a I II NEW SANITARY + I I SEWER LATERAL FLOGARD DOWNSPOUT I I FILTER, TYP. R ~ ~ a a oow~-""-- hL0 iy PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN SCALE.• /~-10' o l0 20 Fm- 44scwr.oAa PRAWN. KJp p RBOr~f i~ORrrrriO P•o. box 476 260 north 3rd street le, or 753 (11X17 SCALE.' 1 °°=20') pAh; 5/3/2018 rho GI LL RING I. (5 acksonvil89 (5eg 699 34 90fax issu ~cCALL FOR UTILITY LOCATE 48 HOURS REVISIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION 1-800-332-2344 P ELIMIN PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN SHEET .1W - - pp`~a NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING 7y 1030 BENSON WAY l~ w"i xu wa: i~ n/:ov ASHLAND, OREGON r L Erosion control measures are to be In place prior to construction + / activities protected they will etelolled as soon as o structure which should uld b be is complete. ~ 1 2. No areas of soil storage and/or waste is anticipated on-site. 3. The contractor shall be responsible to maintain and/or Improve 1 erosion control measures to prevent visible or measurable erosion from leaving the construction site - measureable erosion is defined as: a. Deposits of mud, dirt, sediment or similar material exceeding 1/2 I UI! / c.F. In volume in any area of 100 s.F. Or less on public or private ! , l streets, adjacent property, or Into the storm & surface water system g06° / i either by direct deposit, dropping, discharge, or as a result of the action of erosion: or b. Evidence of concentrated flows of water over bare soils, turbid or / \ I sediment laden flows, or evidence of on-site erosion such as rivulets on bare soil slopes, where the flow of water Is not filtered or captured on the site using the techniques in the approved erosion control plan, or c. Earth slides, mud flows, earth sloughing, or other earth movement which leaves the property. If you have any questions about deq permit requirements, please contact the deq at (503) 229-5256 or loll free / - - -L / Inside oregon at 1-800-452-4011. P all 4. When trucking saturated soils from the site either tight trucks must , be used or loads shall be required to drain until dripping has been } - reduced to less than 1 gallon per hour before leaving the site. - 5. Nature of construction activity is for construction of a residential site / and associated Improvements including: driveway, parking lot, storm / / i- - T - - - - - - - - - drainage, utilities, etc. 6, Total area to be disturbed is approximately 07 acres. / 7. The contractor shall provide a project schedule and proposed schedule for implementation of the erosion control to the engineer for approval prior to starting construction. The permit (If required) controlling the erosion control measures shall be in the owners name and thereby becomes his responsibility. 8, NI unsurfoced/unlondscuped areas are to receive seed, mulch, & / j ,I I Irrigatlon until a healthy stand of gross Is obtained. OONMUMON NOTM + I M1°'r ROCK ENTRANCE FOR 50' MIN. TO PREVENT TRACKING OF SOIL O ONTO ROADWAY, B' MIN. THICKNESS OF SHALE ON FILTER Qv / `~M16w I ( I Q' FABRIC. LINE AND GRADE SHALL CONFORM TO FUTURE / DRIVEWAY FUTURE ENTRANCE, DRAIN INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED BY 02 BIO-FILTER RAGS, SEE ERD 1015 CONSTRUCT SILT FENCE PER ERD 1040 + rb' R I ' I I I l l' - "MO 2 NEXT DOWNSTREAM INLET n PRELIMINARYEROSION CONTROL PLAN 0 10 20 SCALE.' 1"=10' (11X17 SCALE 1"=20) JOB NO. 16-026 rue AtSE W.DXV DRAWN: KJD ~Rg,O PROff~ THOR TO p•o. box 476 ' 260 north 3rd street DATE: 5/3/2016 1 N jacksonville, REVISIONS 15,913 lorENGINEERIN INC. (541) 899-1489 (5411)) 899-34 90fax P ELI G PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL HEET CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATE 48 HOURS yi r 1 t Ey NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING PRIOR TO EXCAVATION - 1-800-332-2344 ekJ D"` 1030 BENSON WAY k H M wrz: Iz 3I zon ASHLAND, OREGON t f t PrykNs Pye Pq6rh taelmNkm W ~ Ch.dd C rd pt01630j _ Pml OR LOW AREAS saza AT DITCH SECTION wi Ed5gpard NRN ENDS I% I'h iure 1 E,V nNSd.o. gg p. PROFILE Xl 8 T ragas eW. m 26 M, Re P t Pm ~n wh omeavdaxamT lj .1 ApareSe apadT 2 a e POST SPACING OVERLAP ELEVATION s2uWaa. a.ae.N Not": ex Ponw~n % GEOTE%TILE END CONNECTIONS Q) IW ~.-iaere tl'-V ea~0eae~~aa © W)dft a m<~ aPw~a er PLAN Nor. Bmm G) FENCE SPACING FOR GENERAL APPLICATION INSTALL PARALLEL ALONG POST SPACING _ CONTOURS AS FOLLOWS j .am,mnP~s~..ma • om eRA~, MrWMUMSPACING SUppodedSediment Fence GRADE ON GRADE its.e'eemnaausead~v OREGON STANDARD DRAWINGS me.ammn~dN.eada2 OREGON STANDARD DRAWINGS Grade<10% 3D0 4' Unsuppated Sediment Fence with Smeaad ae,*R, We de:We S Ihe-1ee we,ge gs'e ea G-11)dTe elongatlant5p% m.~m ID.--Iy S~I0.rfNfF.,.JENPFN CE,UN FENCE,5UPP01DED SUPPORTED n.Wea gh-fiV CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES 10% -Grade<15% 150' --w-ed- enro P-do.. u~~U~W Pr~ePm: 15%iGrade<20% 100' k aaP Abu"tee"ew"" anepa eaNne eae reeP°o- 6' UnsuppatedSediment Fence wh . yfth-..d.notadPm 2m~'aaNP.ww~daadPa 2M ' be usetlv#AOWwna,3Lge a`.we [ e< 50'be medxanoaeasadq. GeoteA47e elongation 150% R4Mered P.f ww ErM..r. re R.e!n.rea Ror.w;aw EpH.... 30% iGrade_ 25 - - - - - ERD11140 ERD10D0 <.uw Eew ruw e.w w°Ef«nw1 ra --16 - hA-'A, MICAL SECTION s>bn EARTHEN BERM ~~ar,3[<Ir"~1 SECOON e-B Mm -rsuw e.w N°iES, A A umiem~ma rrs, Ewe wrx ~ wR°"° mw I' ~~iwo.~wr ~ a awa-em _ plod OT+A IE W N•) flMh &a A 1w.. b Ww~FM mvN wtlwlvwtl-M1tl F e~yp SECBON A-A Mre \ .4 PLAN SECTION A-A~ ,r-r~ u'-r~ z-r~'+P - / A.WOUT eMfdum"'ie s T. DITCH INLET SECnavC-C NJ owa-ma ~.e w 2) ~ r~ a raj t 1•lke2 4s abkf ryba A 6ax mPae V "I II_ hl 0 2 oreuPabNNtae. W~0'wa.amw ( m<. EA CONCRETE WASHOUT f SIGN DETAIL I; A 6T I It1 A Tee. b~l I- le Pqa Ard M. n.- Flow ® M Nw R~ lal 1 STAPLE DETAIL ow~ma PLAN hareu. Pasch w E<xh~,.. CATCH BASIN + o ~ "pNp wa TAO its sek9weM OSeaute OREGON STANDARD DRAWINGS - I TEMPORARY WATER POLLUTION slwwadomWna,.ece aPAgeed a"m ew." AREA DRAIN h°IXOfs'A°~'Y INLET~ TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY CONTROL DEUUB 2sw~c;'.eMe P'6dd.. Ia ~w aeePre.~.aNew w!e resPO<. BI0ILTFABAGS Pay a"x,ey'^ w fI3pCRARY CONCRETE 00ye the wer vd,Wd net 2uPa WASHOUTFACtIM b. ueedxaadwsua.ye TEMPORARY CONCRETE WASHOUT FACILITY NO SCALE Re2151ered Rofn2!onel Ergheec w Boa rr (Nn rtw) ERD101 5 u JOB W,, 16-018 ME.- aASEU4P OW DRAWN: KdU D PROFS i~OR i0 P.D. box 476 • 260 north 3rd street DATE: 5/3/2016 1 s~oy~ ~ 1 (5988991469 (54ll8993419Dfax REVISIONS 2 I6,e73 P ELI ON N OREGON PRELIMINARY EROSION CONTROL HEFT CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATE 48 HOURS y,RkF 21 ~-k NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING PRIOR TO EXCAVATION - 1-800-332-2344 J. Gp` I030BENSON WAY EC RENEWAL OATS 12/31/202 ASHLAND, OREGON 1 4 TW=2085,5 AC=2074.55 / I / TW=2087.5 BW=2080.5 AC=2074.30 TW=2080.0 - 1W=2000,5 j Ull , °gt TW=2079.5 t 1 / ~ L TW=2078.5 AC=2074.60 ! GRATE=2074.26 TW=2075.5 I i I rype4 - ~ AC-207448± BSW=2074.46± /ll x + fJ APPROXIMATE DETENTION ~0'B 00 POND OUTLINE r1 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING Ac 2o74ss CURB AND GUTTER WITH DROP / mI CURB AND GUTTER. PROPOSED TW=2080G I I f DRIVEWAY k 1W=2085.5 / ,7 - - - - - - - - - AC=2074.73 ? + ~ / TC=2075.23 y / I / 2074.gb - I I AC=2073.85± BSW=2073,851 F.F.=2074.90 / I ! BSW=2074.00± 1W=2083.5 / i / BW 20805 i ry J PROPOSED SIDEWALK / h I I TW=2080.0 REMOVE AND REPLACE EXISTING / DROP CURB WITH FULL HEIGHT CURB AND GUTTER. f eqo BSW=2072,70± PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SCALE.' 1 "=)0' oe NO. 16-028 DW . 0 to x° rwe aTuxn ow0 (11X17 SCALE: 1 "=20') DRAWN: KJD iHOR i0 p .o. box 476 260 north 3rd street DATE: 5/3/20ts Jacksonville, Oregon 97530 REwsiaus G 541) 899-1489 (541) 899-3419 fax Wl VINGINEIRIN CALL FOR UTILITY LOCATE 48 HOURS P EUMIN PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN SHEET PRIOR TO EXCAVATION - 1-800-332-2344 21 '9N+ NEW COMMERCIAL BUILDING OREGO ak op~ 1030 BENSON WAY ea wu a E: 12 JI/:mr ASHLAND, OREGON i SURVEY N0. b 3 " II SURVEY NARRATIVE TO COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPH 209.250 j OREGON REVISED STATUTES i f Survey for: Erv Toney Construction 2870 Wedgewood Lane Ashland, Oregon 97520 Location: Southeast one-quarter (1/4) of Section 14, Township 39 South, Range 1 East of the Willamette Meridian in the City of Ashland, Jackson County, Oregon Purpose: To survey, monument and prepare a plat for SOUTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK per client's request Procedure: Control established for Recorded Survey No. 12179, which was done by this office, was used for this survey. The actual width of the railroad right-of-way was questioned and after much research evidence was found to show that the railroad had a valid claim to 50 feet from the centerline of the tracks as described in Volume 13, page 736 of Deed Records in Jackson County, Oregon. Measurements were made to the centerline of the existing railroad mainline. The existing curve radius was found to be in close agreement with the recorded radius as shown on the railroad map on file with the County Surveyor. The record radius was held to control the curve and the subdivision line was computed to be 50 feet from and parallel to the mainline centerline. Computations were mcie and arc lengths were computed for chord definition curve. Lots were computed and monuments set per client's request as shown on the attached map. I I Basis of Bearino: N.O.A.A. True Bearing on the East boundary of Section 14, the reference line for this survey is the centerline of Interstate Highway No. 5 as shown on OAK KNOLL MEADOWS PHASE 2 r Date: May 25, 1993 i• f REGISTERED f PROFESSIONAL x PECENED * * LAND SURVEYOR i Dale- By 5~ Utu~ ff~f This SU":4'1 C1:!ciOs Of: OREGON ' IWUAAY i, 19B1 1 DARRELLaL HUCK !a'i~e Darrell L. Huck JACKSON CaINITY L.S. 2023 - Oregon SURVEYOR Expires 12/31/93 Hoffbuhr & Associates, Inc. 1062 East Jackson Street Medford, Oregon 97504 I (svbspknr.dlh) I I SOUTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK Located In: The S.E. 1 /4 of Section 14, Te39Se, Re 1 E.,Wee City of Ashland, Jackson County, Oregon eoo eoo eoo ooe DEC LARAIION KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, ERV TONEY CONSTRUCTION, INC., AN OREGON CORPORATION, and STATE OF OREGON ) ERV TONEY Is the owner In fee simple of the lands hereon described, and that we have subdivided the some Into lots County of Jackson) ss. and sire of3 as shown hereon, and the number of each lot and the course and length of all lines are plainly set forth, and that this plat Is a correct representation of the subdivision, end we do hereby dedicate to the public I, Darrell L. Huck, a duly Registered Professional Land Surveyor of the State of for public use the street shown hereon, together with those easements labeled as public utility easements. We Oregon, do hereby certify that I have correctly surveyed and marked with the proper hereby designate sold subdivision as SOUTH VALLEY BUSINESS PARK. We hereby grant to the City of Ashland in too monuments as provided by law the tract of land hereon shown and the plot Is a correct simple that area designated as a street plug. By Its approval of this plat, the CI of Ashland undertakes that upon representation of the same, and the following Is an accurate description of the boundary lines. approved dedication of the extension of the affected street, it will deed the stree plug for public street purposes. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we have set our hand and seals this Ilt" day of 19~ Commencing of the Northwest corner of Donation Land Claim No. 54 In Section 14, WEST 8. foot t o 39 South, Range 1 East, Willamette Meridian, Jackson n County, Ihe thence ca WEST 488,23 feel to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of Interstate Highway No. 5, said point being marked with a brass disc in concrete for the INITIAL PONT OF BEGINNING; thence along said westerly right-of-way Y line South 2537'52" East 216,04 feet; thence South 29'29'37 East 200.25 feet; thence South ERV TONE 28'37'52" East 804.99 feet; thence leaving said right-of-woy line North 35'30'00" West 388.10 STATE OF OREGON) feet; thence South 49'08'42" West 462.83 feet; thence South 2537'52" East 40.03 feet; thence County of Jackson s0' South 39'00'22" East 27,93 feet; thence South 50'59'38" West 65.18 feet; thence North 39'00'22" On __U&VNL_ `Z,-, 19-6d, personally appeared the above named ERV TONEY, West 56.34 feet; thence North 26'37'52° West 769.02 feel to the Easterly right-of-way line of the and acknowledged the foregoing Instrument to be his voluntary act and deed. Southern Pacific Railroad, said point being 50.00 feet from the center line of the railroad main line as If now exists; thence Northeasterly along the curvature of said railroad right-of-way line, parallel Before m; to and 50.00 foot from sold main line as It now exists, along the arc of a 814.49 foot radius curve to the loft (the long chord to which bears North 00'48'17" East 441.16 feet) an arc distance eY of 446.74 feel; thence leaving sold right-of-way line EAST 408.28 feet to the INITIAL POINT Or BEGINNING. CHERR P, F Iti? NOTARY PUBLIC - r} GON My C~-ceion Enpis~ I.~' l ?i3 ERV TONEY CONSTRUCTION INC.: STATE OF OREGON ONEY-/ County of Jackson ) / On L_L 1911, personalty appeared the above named ERV TONEY, to me personally known, who belnb duly sworn, did say that he, the sold ERV TONEY. Is the President of ERV TONEY CONSTRUCTION, INC., the within named corporation, and that the sold Instrument was signed on behalf of sold corporatlon by authority of Its Board of Directors, and ERV TONEY acknowledges sold I, Victoria Koenig, am the undersigned beneficiary of o certain ?rust Deed recorded April 14, 1989, Instrument to be the free act of said corporation. as Instrument No. 89-07558, Official Records of Jackson County, Oregon, affecting the land described herein, Before me: hereby release from the lion of sold Trust Dead all property shown as dedicated to the public for public use. IGCq / C1 ).gl ,y y Signed this day of Y51 Victoria Koenig Before mo 1 ~ v tJ fiC:, eur..r ~Jy l rl 1~l H e e• APPROVALS e e e - a ~ ~ r c e ,i ses ~l Ashland I P nnina We certify that, pursuant to authority granted to us by the City of Ashland Planning Commission In Bank of SoulhernJ Oregon, are the undersigned beneficiaries of a certain Trust Deed recorded Planning meeting of February 8, 1.26 day plat Is hereby approved by the City of Ashland August 5, 1993, as Instrument No. 93-25826, Official Records of Jackson County, Oregon, affecting the land qNudzY Plnning Commlalo t Ihls of 19~`.'( .7 described herein, hereby release from the lien of sold Trust Deed ail Z y shown as dedicated to the public for public use. Attest: l64 ✓'trl rri en acr ry Signed this day of ! 1993 Michael Neyt (President) Examined and approved this .F day of Ir'nfian~ 1924, Before me: City Surveyor Talent Irrigation District I, Burl Brim Jr., am the undersigned beneficiary of a certain Trust Deed recorded August 5, 1993, This plot and the dedication hereof is subject to the condition that Talent Irrigation District has as Instrument No, 93-25858, Official Records of Jackson County, Oregon, cif in the land described herein, no obligation to deliver water, although this land Is subject to the statutory powers, runes and herby release from the lien of sold Trust geed all property shown as 4#41 ca regulations of Talent Irrigation District. to public for public we. c ~ Slgnod this _.~~y Examined and approved 6 the Talent Irrigation District In regular session this /a?, day of Bu Brm Jr. Before me; .Tvn~ ~ 1 ~ ~resfdenl S®crolary ✓ 4 y i~(I i:I~P.j) w+ 1)81=? v,~'j ' 9-~._ III SY_ , ~CI![R7 T E1~IS N(OTAR, lJRI `l,jC,0N *KuatAjd7. CiiIS SillVi°1 r "'-s" 1 q,- i~Examined and approved as required by O,R.S. 92.100 as of 19 ~/~Ch~ ~2r~ , il:rralPrd hLLI l For order of the County Court approving this plat see Volume - page o1 County Assessor, Deparlment of Assessment PI i)I a )b sir C1) fifY Commissioners Journal of Proceedings, N f n..w lT i I Brass disc f Engineering Station t 60 5+00 A marked pp ( STATE H10NRAY DEPARTMENT SOUTH VALLEY BUSINESS A I\y INITIAL POINT ELEVATION o.S Jest Brass 6'x 6'x e conoreto BM N 11 J 2 10' Easement for Pipe Line marked INITIAL POINT Located in: per Volume 444, Page 309 \ LS 2023 Jackson County Dead Records I' Street Plug 25.03' 1 EAST 25,03', 425.47 408,28' WEST 48823' N. A. CORNER The S.E. 1 /4 of Section 141 To39Se, R. 1 E., W.M. Ar- 117.69_ - 738 --240.335'-- - brass DL.C. disc in No. 64 concrete City of Ashland, Jackson County, Oregon 1>,~ o flush ur{th pavement ® a 5 go 000 5 w~30' PUE~ a° o in OAK KNOLL DRIVE marked o u~ o, T39S RTE 50' ` 2 DLC 0 IN8T17'15"E o `P8T1T15"E \~a+ NK54 c 10101' P 20.00' \ ~a 51p9Npp 1990 a \6 ` D I P U I O c' x®~ EI 150' w V i A T 10 v ii ~8T17'l5'E 100.22' ss N oo CURVE TABLE m u CURVE DELTA RADIUS LENGTH CHORD OEAAINO Q I I /A ry~ } I 119'17'1 120.00' 249.83' 207,09' S2917'34 W a c2 25' 25 2 125'25'41 95.00' 207,9T 168.86' N21'49'2 E 67 ~rry~ry• \-S \ I - I 3 31'48'2 105.00' 58.19' 57,55' N65'02'S E > 1p~10 p0 I N8T1Tt5"E ~ coo \ `6 } 4 119'15'5 30.00' 82,45' S1.7T 52918'14 W 3 T58'it W z r 5 134'1'45 60.00' 140.56' 110.55' Ni s 110.60'p~ s~ s 6 54'44'2 20.00' 19.11' 18,39' N5T42'S4 W o 3}` ( 4Q~ 6~ 1 40 7 0822'0 170,00' 24.83' 24,80' 534'3145 E ~J 50' S 4 3 8 08'22'0 195AO' 28,48' 28.45' N34'314 W 7 t i ,od 9 08'22'0 220.00' 32.13' 32,10' N34!31'45 "W ~0 pA \ 10 21'01'1 230,00' 84.39' 83,92' 828'12'0 E 163 Sh6 \ \ 11 36100'01 205.00' 128.81' 126.70' N20'42'45 W 10' Irrigation Earemertt Ad'W 20' Easement per m Per Voiuma 164, Page 14 ' •32 9•% Volume 569, Page 228 m 12 36'00'01 180.00' 113.10' 111.25' N20'42'45 W }50 'w 13 14'5841 230.00' 60.13' 59.98' S10'I2'0 E 4 Jack v 1 7.5' Jackson County Deed Records I S1 56" Jackson County Deed Records • b 14 09'42'2 814.49' 137.98' 137,81' H1140'25 E 15 0664'2 814.49' 98,11' 98.05' N03'21'3 E 12 30' PUE 16 OB'05'1 814.49' 114.88' 114.79' N04'07'51 W 1-0,62' dud ~i0 17 06'44'2 814,49' 95.71' 95.71' N11'32'2 W fpod'0~ s~ ds2\s9 00 I\\ 18 31'264 814,49' 446.74' 441,15' N00'48'I E sv ~~66 ,oSAti 4p 0' k ~y 1 NOTE: SEE NARRATIVE STATEMENT PERTAINING TO CURVES #14 THRU #18. IIN Ma= ® tIEI ® j 9 \ b~pea °~J pa 7 91L 7 8 \ 3~ NNm e'a Net 1 33,975 011 2 23300 tt' p ah~ 6ti~1 2 6Y ~N~,fl~ ~0 3 15,504 33.BS'J oi, iv o i 4 15,488 4 ~~j °0 5 16,000 { '0 0 ~ vol. \ \ J1? 6 18,650 a6d~ 6}, ov ~~0 7 13,981 8 10,161 yak 0s. A6) 9 .p~ r~ 10' PUN 1J T \ \ Cy'L 11 9 11,509 111,027 10 \ \ \ \ g 12 87,065 HOFFBUHR k ASSOCIATES, INC. r~, y 9 B 1A, s , \ 13 108,076 1062 E. JACKSON STREET MEDFORD, OREGON 95 06 \ ° 'y 779-4641 ~0 , so. 0J' C/L t0' PUB 01,§"1 r . BY: DARRELL L. HUCK PLS No. 2023 \ See Note d 1'91 \0d SCALE. I Inch = 100 teat May 25, 1993 BASIS OF BEARING - N.O.A.A. true bearing on the East boundary p of Section 14, the reference line for thls survey eo ` \ d o~ U the centerline of Interstate Highway No, 5 as shown 6 9jg' 1, ti yp ,y ry6* I p, dp as ` on OAK KNOLL MEADOWS PHASE 2 •10 6 \ /,.+6 tit \ ` 'o a w 0 Sol 5/8"x24' Iron pin with plastic cap stamped "D• Huck LS 2023". 10' PUE \ ,des 1 !6' PUN yu \ \ tt Sat 5/8'x30' Iron pin with plastic cap 4 56 pN6 Sy 6^ stamped "D. Huck LS 2023. to, PUN ^o' o t 6 ' p6ry Driveway 00, \ ® = Found 518' Iron pin per S/N 12179 marked S01108'04"W Easement Ii "D. McMahan LS 1913' unless otherwise noted 68.24' 3 Kdo6 N~~ ,19 \ Found brass cap monument q POT 57'11" Ir 4J o~ 1ti C, o 1 8A•9z' ti1,5bd Ala Ny3 d1P s 2 ~o } 4 = Set 2" dla, brass disc stamped LS 2023 on a ry • y'C \ i" dio. pipe In a monument case 0o y1 \ 'h10 !6ry• Q \ ti6 ys I Put - Easement for public utilities, sidewalk, storm drainage, pas, h o' 25l d \ water, electric, telephone, cable telovislon and sanitary Access Easement maintenance per Insrument No, 89-30757 S26'37'S?"E sewer, construction and 9h ~ °c 7 40.03 / POT Brass disc = \0 1621+00 POT Point on Tangent p o. 193 p1 marked Al SIN 4207 11STATE HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT NOTE: A E L F T r II r 0 Found b/8 iron pin ,~i <J REFERENCE 10' P.U.N. as dedicated per Partition Plat No. 90-1990, PB~FUR' Ii LAND SllRVEYOH w/~lasHc cap marked ~ recorded in Volume t, Papa 90 of 'Partition Plate SNAIN RLS 769° N39'00'22 WZ _ in Jackson County Oregon and on fits as Survey No. !2179 bears E 56,34' J PS 110, in the Office of the Jackson County Surveyor. 0,.4040' ' / / .q®,aGl6 rte?/,aa~. i 1 S19~ 00. Platuiftig,Divisioii ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION F 51 Winburn Fay, Asliland OR: 97520' FILE , AN b/ - ~4 t 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 CJt 7 l IE-~ L~. ~d~ - DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT New Commercial Building DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES 0 NO street Address 1,030Benson °Way Assessor's Map No. 391 E -391 E 14D Tax Lot(s) 200 Zoning E-1 Comp Plan Designation Employment` APPLICANT Name Rogue Planning & Development Services Phone 541-951-4020 E-Mail amygunter.planning adwail.com Address; 1424 S Iuy Street, City Medford zip. 9750.1 PROPERTY OWNER Name Lang Living Trust / Ron Lang Phone E-Mail ronlangsport a(ayahoo.com Address 700 Terrace Street City Ashland Zip 97520 SURVEYOR. ENGINEER, ARCHITECT. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER TitteArchiteCt Name,Carlos Delgado Phone 541-552-9502 E-Mail carlos@carlosdelaadoarchitect:com Address 217 Fourth Street City Ashland zip 97520 Title Landscape Architect Name Laurie from Laurie Sager and Associatesphone 541-488-1446 E-Mail lauriesager@lauriesaggr.com Address 550 Mistletoe Road; Suite B City Ashland zip 97520 1 hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. 1 understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 14) that,all structures,or improvements are,properly located on the,ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be remove at my expense. If I have any doubts, l am advised to seek competent professional advic and assistance. A lic s gnature Date r-~ As owner of the property involved in this request, l have read and understood t e complete application a d ifs c sequences to me as a property owner, Property Owner's Signature (required) Date [To be completed by City Staff) Date Received 0-. Zoning Permit Type T(Iv, Filing Fee. OVER G;komm-de0planningTorms & HandoutsVoning Permit Application.doc i Job Address: 1030 BENSON Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C A A Owner's Name: RON LANG 0 Phone: P Customer 08842 N State Lic No: L RON LANG T City Lic No: Applicant: 700 TERRACE AVE R Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 05/06/2016 T Issued: Expires: 11/02/2016 R Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 El 4D 208 City Lie No: DESCRIPTION: Type 1 Commercial Site Design review VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Commercial Site Review (type1) 2,762.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ~I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY ® F I I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 (180 days). 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 2,762.00 $ 2,762.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the Sub-Total: $ 2,762.00 applicant. Fees Paid: $ 2,762.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F