Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutB_556_PA-2016-02114 CITY F ASHLAND February 28, 2017 Notice of Final Decision On February 28, 2017, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: h Planning Action: 2016-02114 Subject Property: 556 B Street Applicant: Jamie and David Kaufinan Description: A request for Site Design Review to allow for the construction of a 485.5 square foot detached Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) on the subject property. The proposed structure will also include a two vehicle garage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 AB; TAX LOT: 7500. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Mark Schexnayder in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. i cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 -=y www.ashland.or.us ~.'E i SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.onus i ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PL NG ACTION: PA-2016-02114 SUBJECT PROPERTY. 556 B Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Jamie & David Kaufman DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review to allow for the construction of a 485.5 square foot detached Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) on the subject property. The proposed structure will also include a two vehicle garage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 AB; TAX LOT: 7500. SUBMITTAL DATE: November 9, 2016 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: February 1, 2017 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: February 28, 2017 FINAL DECISION DATE: March 13, 2017 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: September 13, 2018 DECISION The application involves a request for Site Design Review approval to construct a new detached Accessory Residential Unit (ARtJ) on the property located at 556 B Street. The subject property is located on the south side of B Street between Fourth Street and Fifth Street. The property is rectangular in shape, with an area of approximately 6,650 square feet. The back of the parcel abuts an alley between Fourth Street and Fifth Street. The subject property gently slopes from the alley down to B Street. There are currently several mature trees located on and adjacent to the property. No trees are proposed to be removed as part of this application. The subject parcel and the immediate surrounding uses are zoned R-2, Multiple-Family Residential. B Street is identified as an Avenue and is improved with paving, curb, gutters, sidewalk, park row and street trees in place. Sidewalks exist in front of the subject property and throughout the rest of the street. According to Jackson County tax records and the application materials provided, the subject property, tax lot 7500 currently has a 1,732 square foot single-family dwelling constructed in about 1900. The single-family dwelling currently has city facilities including water, sewer, gas, and electric service. Site Design Review Where accessory residential units are allowed, they are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2. Accordingly, applicants are required to demonstrate compliance with the criteria for Site Review approval. The following text addresses the applicant's proposal and the applicable criteria. The first criterion for Site Design Review approval is that, "The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. " The proposed Accessory Residential Unit conforms to the underlying zone's density and floor area PA #2016-02114 556 B Street/MMS Page 1 i i requirements, maximum building height, lot coverage, area and dimensions, and setbacks. The proposed ARU is setback approximately six feet from the rear lot line and four feet from the side ' lot lines. The proposed structure has an average building height of 14.46 feet, which allows for a reduced rear and side yard setback (AMC 18.2.5.060.B). The accessory residential unit is separated by more than six feet from the primary dwelling on the lot. Therefore, the accessory residential unit is not counted in the gross floor area for the Maximum Permitted Floor Area (MPFA) within the historic district (AMC 18.2.5.070.E). In the Ashland Municipal Code, chapter 18, sizes of ARU's are limited to 50 percent of the Gross Habitable Floor Area (GHFA) of the primary residence, and, no greater than 500 square feet in the R-2 zone. The ARU is 485.5 square feet, under the required maximum of 500 square feet and is less than 50 percent of the 1,732 square foot primary residence. The application materials state the property is covered with approximately 50 percent (3,449 square foot) impervious surfaces. Thus, the proposed ARU's meets the code requirements for setbacks, lot coverage, density, floor area, and building height. The second approval criterion is that, "The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). " The proposal complies with all standards for the Historic District Overlay including Maximum Permitted Floor Area (MPFA) and Historic District Design Standards. The Ashland Historic Commission reviewed the current proposal at the regular meeting on February 8, 2017. The commission recommended a change to the design of the accessory residential unit. The recommendation included adding a gable with a three foot deep porch above the door of the ARU facing the alley. The commission was supportive of the overall design of the proposed unit and recommended approval of the application with the requested changes. The third approval criterion is that, "The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection K " The proposed accessory residential unit front entrance faces the alley to the rear of the subject property since the residential building is located more than 20 feet from a street. There are two existing street trees planted in the park row on B Street. The applicant has submitted a tree preservation plan showing four trees on or adjacent to the site. No trees are proposed for removal with this application; however, the applicant will need to provide tree protection measures and show them on a revised tree protection plan as a condition of approval (AMC 18.4.5.030. B.10). The applicant has allocated more than the required eight percent (532 square feet) of lot area to open space by providing approximately 180 square feet of patio area, 156 square feet of the front porch, and 200 square feet of at grade deck with yard area between the two dwelling units for an open space total of 536 square feet. The application materials describe some landscaping, but no landscaping or irrigation plan was submitted with the application and will be required prior it issuance of a building permit (AMC 18.4.4.030.C). In addition, the applicant has not provided a walkway system connecting the proposed ARU to the public right-of-way on B Street (AMC 18.4.3.090.B). A condition will be added to require a revised site plan map demonstrating that the requisite walkway is identified prior to issuance of a building permit. Two parking spaces are required for the primary single-family dwelling, and a third is needed for the proposed ARU. The application notes that two off-street vehicle parking spaces will be provided off the rear alley in the proposed garage and ARU structure. Tax lot 7500 has approximate 50 feet of street frontage available for vehicle parking, which would allow for the PA #2016-02114 556 B Street/MMS Page 2 i i `t one additional on-street vehicle parking credit to satisfy the minimum parking requirements (AMC 18.4.3.060). The three bicycle parking spaces required will be provided in the proposed garage. Trash and recycling facilities will also be provided for adjacent to the proposed garage (AMC 18.4.4.040). I The proposed tree protection plan was reviewed by the Ashland Tree Commission at the regular meeting of February 9, 2017. The commission recommended the applicant be required to submit a letter from the property owners of 586 B Street acknowledging the risk to the tree located near the rear property line. In addition, the commission recommended that the applicants provide a mitigation tree if the tree located at 586 B Street shows decline within one year after construction begins. The applicant will be required to identify a contact person and/or arborist who will be responsible for implementing and maintaining the approved tree protection plan. Moreover, the location and type of tree protection measures (AMC 18.4.5.030.B.10) to be installed shall be required prior to issuance of a building permit. The fourth criterion is that, "The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. " B Street is paved, with curbs, gutters, park- row, and a sidewalk in place along the subject property's full frontage. Utility services will be extended from the rear of the existing residence to the proposed unit. The property is currently served by water and sewer from B Street. The storm drain for the new structure will be piped to B Street along the west side of the property and electric service will be taken from the power pole at the rear of the property. CONCLUSION No public comments were received with regard to the proposal. Therefore, with the conditions below, staff finds that the proposed unit would be in conformance with the standards of the R-2 zone, the minimum requirements of the Accessory Residential Unit and Site Design Review chapters of the Ashland Municipal Code. The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040, as follows: A. R-I Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone, except that accessory residential units shall be counted in the density of developments created under the Performance Standards Option in chapter 18.3.9. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit PA #2016-02114 556 B Street/.NMS Page 3 i 4 I 4 I, shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1, 000 square feet GHFA. i 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking I provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080. E. 1. C. R-2 and R-3 Zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standards in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primacy residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follows: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. PA #2016-02114 556 B StreeVMMS Page 4 i 1 E c i! I r I In staff's assessment, with conditions, the application complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria for approval of the construction of a multiple family development. is Planning Action #2016-02114 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2016-02114 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2) That all necessary building permits and associated fees and charges, including permits and service connection fees for the new electrical service to the accessory residential unit, and any applicable system development charges for water, sewer, storm water, parks, and transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The building permit submittals shall include: a) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That building permit submittals shall include: a) Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with Solar Setback Standard A in the formula [(Height 0/(0.445 + Slope) = Required Solar Setback] and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade. b) Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 65 percent as required in AMC 18.2.5.030.A. I c) Verification that the new ARU on tax lot 7500 complies with the Maximum Permitted Floor Area requirements of AMC 18.24.040.1. d) That storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak rainfalls must be collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm pipe or public drainage way) or through an approved alternative in accordance with Ashland Building Division policy BD-PP-0029. On-site collection systems shall be detailed on the building permit submittals. 4) That a revised Tree Protection Plan consistent with the standards described in 18.4.5 be submitted for review and approval by the Staff Advisor prior to the issuance of a building permit. The plan shall identify the location and placement of fencing around the drip lines of trees identified for preservation. The amount of fill and grading within the drip line shall be minimized. Cuts within the drip line shall be noted on the tree protection plan, PA #2016-02114 556 B Street/MMS Page 5', and shall be executed by handsaw and kept to a minimum. No fill shall be placed around the trunk/crown root. 5) That a Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division. The tree protection shall be inspected and approved by the Ashland Planning Department prior to site work, storage of materials and/or the issuance of a building permit. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.4.5. No construction shall occur within the tree protection zone including dumping or storage of materials such as building supplies, soil, waste, equipment, or parked vehicles. 6) That all recommendations of the Ashland Tree Commission, where consistent with the applicable ordinances and standards and with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. 7) That a landscaping and irrigation plan to include irrigation details satisfying the requirements of the Site Design and Use Standards under AMC 18.4.4.030 and showing { park row improvements shall be provided prior to issuance of a building permit. 8) That all recommendations of the Ashland Historic Commission, where consistent with the applicable ordinances and standards and with final approval of the Staff Advisor, shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. 9) That all exterior lighting shall be directed on the property and shall not directly illuminate adjacent proprieties. 10) That all public improvements including but not limited to the sidewalk, street trees, and street lighting shall be installed to City of Ashland standards under permit from the Public Works Department and in accordance with the approved plan prior to Certificate of Occupancy. 11) That prior to issuance of a building permit the applicant shall submit a revised site plan map demonstrating that the requisite walkway is identified (AMC 18.4.3.090.13). 12) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy: a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements. b) That a separate address for the accessory residential units shall be applied for approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right-of-Way. c) That all landscaping in the new landscaped areas shall be installed according to the approved plan, and tied into the existing irrigation system, prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. PA 92016-02114 556 B StreeVMMS Page 6 I i C 4 k d) That the bicycle parking facilities shall be installed prior to Certificate of Occupancy. e) That the screening for the trash and recycling enclosure shall be installed in accordance with the Site Design and Use Standards prior to the Certificate of ...--Occupancy. r B 4af ill olnar, Z ning Director DD partment of ommunity Development PA #2016-02114 556 B StreeVWWS Page 7 c AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, I Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On February 28, 2017 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-02114 NOD, 556 B Street. Signa e of Employee Documend 2128/2017 A113AV-0E-008-L ,wdn-dod paogaa al a019AW juawaBiep f @09LS @AN3AV jiaege6 al zosimn da op sues as ad sa l,e sa}}anb113 i uaoYRaaAe nnnnnn i ap ulIa aang3e4 el e , zall a I PA-2016-0211439IE09AC5201 PA-2016-0211439IE09AB6303 PA-2016-0211439lE09AC4400 525 C STREET LLC AJANI OREGON LLC ET AL BINGHAM M S/ELIZABETH C 2336 ROSS LN (1685 OLD HWY 99 50 W NEVADA MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 I PA-2016-0211439IE09AB6000 PA-2016-02114391E09AB8200 j PA-2016-0211439IE09AC4500 DAMON-TOLLENAERE MATTHEW GOLDMAN MARTIN/GREENE j HARRIS SHARON B 235 FIFTH ST 9647 WAGNER CREEK RD 1155 FIFTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 I PA-2016-02114391E09AB7500 PA-2016-0211439IE09AB6301 PA-2016-0211439IE09AB7800 KAUFMAN JAMIE DESMOND/DAVID LOMBARDI ROBERT J ET AL LOVETT RICHARD P TRUSTEE 556 B ST 1685 OLD HWY 99 S PO BOX 427 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 I I PA-2016-02114391E09AB7900 PA-2016-0211439IE09AC4200 PA-2016-02114391E09AB8000 p MARSHALL SUSAN H TRUSTEE ET AL i MEAGHER KATHLEEN C TRUSTEE ET OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL I, PO BOX 1909 1561 C STREET PO BOX 158 MCCALL, ID 83638 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-02114391E09AB6100 I PA-2016-0211439IE09AB7300 PA-2016-0211439IE09AC5100 PEIL THOMAS HANSEN TRUSTEE ET PERLOFF FRED R/LAURA E ROGERS VALERIE M ET AL 335 GARFIELD ST 164 5TH ST 130 FOURTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-0211439IE09AC43 00 PA-2016-02114391 E09AB 83 00 PA-2016-0211439IE09AC4100 SMITH MORTON I TRUSTEE ET AL SMITHTON ROBERT LEE TRUSTEE ET STEINFELD DAVID E TRUSTEE ET AL 129 FIFTH ST PO BOX 1856 107 5TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ROSS, CA 94957 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-0211439IE09AB7400 I PA-2016-02114391E09AB6200 PA-2016-02114391E09AC3800 ~ I SZANTO VICTOR ET AL I WILSON ARTHUR/MARY ELLEN YANG JAMES PO BOX 11274 565 B ST 156 FIFTH ST 2 ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-0211439IE09AB 8100 BILL EMERY j PA-2016-02114391E09AB8100 2962 GRIZZLEY DRIVE YULA CLAIRE PROPERTIES LLC ASHLAND, OR 97520 41 GRANITE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 I i I i i I i i I W1aGp3 do-dod asodxe waded paaA f p09LS alelduual @IGaAV esn 009LS OA EIA i of cull fuole puce ` sl0qe3 ®laad t(se3 I i ASHLAND i PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET February 9, 2017 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-02114 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 556 B Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Jamie & David Kaufinan DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to allow for the construction of a 485.5 square foot detached accessory resident unit (ARU) on the subject property. The proposed structure will also include a two vehicle garage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09 AB; TAX LOT: 7500. The Tree Commission recommends approving the application as submitted along with specific recommendations below: 1. That the property owners of 586 B Street submit a letter to the City of Ashland Planning Division acknowledging the risk to the tree on their property. 2. That the applicants agree to provide a mitigation tree if the tree on the 586 B Street property shows decline within one year of when construction begins. Department of Community Development Tel: 541488-5350 CITY F 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ~,Nvw.ashtand.or.us IN " ~ ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Planning Application Review February 8, 2017 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-02114 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 556 B Street I' APPLICANT/OWNER: Jamie & David Kaufman DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review to allow for the construcation of a 485.5 square foot detached accessory residential unit (ARU) on the subject property. The proposed structure will also include a two vehicle garage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple Family Residential; ~ ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 09 AB; TAX LOT: 7500. Recommendation: c i The Historic Commission recommends approving the application as submitted subject to the " specific recommendations below: Include the following revisions in the building permit submittals: 1) Elevation # 1 - Gable above door and small window with a 3 foot deep porch. h i; I I f Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5305 _ 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.orms : Planning Department, 51 Winbu"m Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 I T F 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 7D -ASHLlik NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-02114 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 556 B Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Jamie & David Kaufman DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to allow for the construction of a 485.5 square foot detached accessory resident unit (ARU) on the subject property. The proposed structure will also include a two vehicle garage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 09 AB; TAX LOT: 7500. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday February 8, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, February 9, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 1, 2017 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: February 15, 2017 SUBJECT PROPERTY 7 656 B Street ; PA-2016-02194 _ r ~ i i Lo 1:800 - " 1 Inch = 50 feet vie epyb9lr rchemak oNy mdf ar roemrmdYtlermrxY. A91l 1ee,wee, YUUavra,ittniri o-a m m='==1- The eM1OUld be tndepeMervty MW 1 V9kd for exbtettAshland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. Wcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2017\PA-2016-02114.doex i SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards, B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below, D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. 18.2.5.060 Yard Exceptions A. Front Yard Exceptions. 1. If there are dwellings or accessory buildings on both abutting lots (even if separated by an alley or private way) with front or side yards abutting a public street with less than the required setback for the district, the front yard for the lot need not exceed the average yard of the abutting structures. 2. If there is a dwelling or accessory building on one abutting lot with a front yard of less than the required depth for the district, the front yard need not exceed the average yard of the depth of the abutting lot and the required front yard depth. 3. The front yard may be reduced to ten feet on hillside lots where the terrain has an average steepness equal to or exceeding a one foot rise or fall in four feet of horizontal distance within the entire required yard; vertical rise or fall is measured from the natural ground level at the property. B. Side and Rear Yard Exceptions for Accessory Buildings and Accessory Residential Units, 1. Yards Abutting an Alley. For accessory buildings and accessory residential units that are not attached to any other building and not more and 15 feet in height, the side yard abutting an alley may be reduced to three feet and the rear yard abutting an alley may be reduced to four feet. The reduced side or rear yard provision does not apply to the primary structure. 2. Other Side and Rear Yards. For accessory buildings that are not attached to any other building, are not more than 15 feet in height, and are erected more than 50 feet from any street, the side or rear yard may be reduced to three feet, except when said yard is abutting an alley as provided in subsection 18.2.5.060.B.1, above. l GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing PolderWailed Notices K Signs\2017\PA-2016-02114.docs 4 i i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING C; STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On February 1, 2017 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-2016-02114, 556 B Street. 01-9-W 4 IWI, Sign ure of Employee C:lUsersltrapprlDesktopkTemplatesMFIDAVIT OF MAILING_Regan.docx 1/3112017 Easy Peel® Labels i A - Bend along line to i ® V - ® 51600 Use AveryO Template 51600 Paper expose Pop-up EdgerM PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 5201 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 6303 PA-2016-02114 525 C STREET LLC AJANI OREGON LLC ET AL BILL EMERY 2336 ROSS LN j 1685 OLD HWY 99 2962 GRIZZLY DR MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 4400 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 6000 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 8200 BINGHAM M S/ELIZABETH C DAMON-TOLLENAERE MATTHEW GOLDMAN MARTIN/GREENE HARRIET 50 W NEVADA TRUSTEE ET AL 9647 WAGNER CREEK RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 235 FIFTH ST TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ; PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 4500 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 7500 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 6302 HARRIS SHARON B KAUFMAN JAMIE DESMOND/DAVID LOMBARDI ROBERT J ET AL 155 FIFTH ST 556 B ST 1685 OLD HWY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 6300 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 7600 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 7800 LOMBARDI ROBERT J/CORINNE S LOVETT RICHARD P TRUSTEE LOVETT RICHARD P TRUSTEE 1685 OLD HWY 99 PO BOX 427 PO BOX 427 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 7900 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 4200 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 8000 MARSHALL SUSAN H TRUSTEE ET AL MEAGHER KATHLEEN C TRUSTEE ET AL OREGON SHAKESPEARE FESTIVAL PO BOX 1909 561 C STREET PO BOX 158 MCCALL, ID 83638 ( ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 6100 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 7300 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 5100 PEIL THOMAS HANSEN TRUSTEE ET AL PERLOFF FRED R/LAURA E ROGERS VALERIE M ET AL 335 GARFIELD ST 164 5TH ST 130 FOURTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 i PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 4300 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 8300 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 4100 SMITH MORTON I TRUSTEE ET AL SMITHTON ROBERT LEE TRUSTEE ET STEINFELD DAVID E TRUSTEE ET AL 129 FIFTH ST AL 107 5TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PO BOX 1856 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ROSS, CA 94957 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 7400 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 6200 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AC 3800 SZANTO VICTOR ET AL 1 WILSON ARTHUR/MARY ELLEN YANG JAMES PO BOX 11274 565 B ST 156 FIFTH ST 2 ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-02114 391 E09AB 8100 YULA CLAIRE PROPERTIES LLC j 556 B STREET 41 GRANITE ST 2/1/2017 NOC ASHLAND, OR 97520 25 Wquettes faciles a peler Repliez a la hachure afin de vuww.avery.com Sens de Utilisez le gabarit AVERY@ 51600 j cha gement reveler le rebord Pop-upmc j' 1-800-GO-AVERY A I „jk F x I a L { t ~ 1 f III 1, t f it E W r E , i Riau ~ -i I s Ulf LUlD GOO 620 If 6 00 J I~ F 7 7 a, 15-00 1400 120.0 d h 1 I a ~ _ 7100 8100 u 45M TOW 5100 AU 2 3 2 a+ -i,I:)J r Mud, 4 ~ o - t --id U t Adl 44, AMENDED FINDINGS PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR A SITE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 556 B STREET, ASHLAND, OREGON I OWNER: BUILDING DESIGN: Dave and Jamie Kaufman Bill Emery 556 B Street 2962 Grizzly Drive Ashland, OR 97520 Ashland, OR 97520 SITE ADDRESS & MAP/TAX LOT INFORMATION: 556 B Street; 391E 09AB; 7500 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Family Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-2; Multi-Family Residential ADJACENT USES: WEST: Residential with detached accessory structures EAST: Residential with detached accessory structures SOUTH: 16-foot wide gravel surface alley - Residential with detached accessory structures and apartment building. NORTH: B Street - residential uses and employment zoned properties with residential uses, commercial buildings at intersection of B and 4th Streets. SUBJECT SITE: Single Family Residence PLANNING ACTION: The applicant is seeking approval for Site Review approval to construct a adjacent to the alley RU) and garage with storage above adJ detached Accessory Residential Unit A Y at the r tached Accesso ~ i., rear of the property. FINDINGS OF FACT - GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The information provided by the applicant is to help the Planning Staff and neighbors understand the proposed project. In addition, the required findings of fact have been provided to ensure the proposed project meets the criteria for an ARU and for Site Design Review, historic district development, required parking, lot coverage and allowed setbacks. 13 2016 6 Y Oi ni n t i Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Site Review approval to construct a detached, 1,175 square foot accessory building. A two-vehicle garage is proposed to be attached to a 485,5 square foot ARU. The subject site can readily accommodate the proposed construction within allowed setbacks, coverage, parking, and historic district design standards, Existing Site Conditions: The property is 6,650 square feet and is occupied by the 2,086 square foot, Henry White Rental House. The residence is listed in the Historic Resources Inventory as a Historic Contributing Structure, When f?' purchased in 2012, the structure was in a dilapidated state. Dave and Jamie Kaufman with the design assistance of Bill Emery and the construction expertise of Coleman Creek Construction, embarked on a major restoration of the existing residence in 2012. The award for Historically Contributing Remodel in 2013 was awarded to the Kaufman's and their talented team. There is a 200 square foot, brick paver patio at the rear of the residence. The property has 50-feet of frontage on B Street and extends to the south 133-feet. The rear property line is bound by an east / west alley. A north / south alley T's into the rear of the property. The alleys have 16- feet of dedicated right-of-way. A large City of Ashland power pole is adjacent to the rear property, nearly centered on the rear property line, an easement for the adjacent property's electric lines and city of Ashland power lines that exist on the east side of the property. The pole itself has a five-foot radius required as a no build area, a portion of this encroaches onto the property, B Street has a 60-foot wide right-of-way and is improved with curb, gutter, park row with street trees and sidewalk. There are four tax lots that front on this side of the 500 block of B Street. The property directly adjacent to the west, at 554 B Street has a driveway curb cut that is directly adjacent to 556 B Streets west property line. There are no driveway curb cuts from B Street accessing the lot. The property to the east, the, Wolff Manor lot, is a corner parcel and does not have any curb cuts from B Street or from Fifth Street. There is a retaining wall with fence above along the alley at the rear of the subject property that prevents on-site parking. There are three trees at the front of the property near B Street, the trees are partially on the subject property and adjacent property to the east. These trees are not going to be affected by the proposed site work as they are on the northwest side of the residence where no site work is proposed. There is a 13-dbh deciduous tree on the adjacent property to the east. There is an existing six-foot solid panel fence adjacent to this tree, protecting it from the impacts of construction on the subject properties side of the fence. FINDINGS OF FACT - RESPONSE TO CRITERIA: Site Design Review -18.5.2.050 Approval Criteria The proposed ARU complies with all the applicable provisions of the underlying zone, including building and yard setbacks, the lot area at 6,650 SF allows for the construction of a 500-square foot or less accessory residential unit when the lot area is less than 7,500 square feet, 2 The proposed lot coverage folloV _.ig construction is less than allowed in the -pie, 3449 square feet (50%) of impervious area are on the site. The ARU and garage has an average building height of 14.46 feet which allows for a reduced rear and side yard setback (18.2.5.060. B). The rear yard abutting an alley may be reduced to four feet when the average building height is less than 15-feet. The west side yard setback has been proposed at four-feet, where three-feet is allowed. The east side yard setback is five-feet. There is a five-foot public utility easement proposed along this side of the property as requested by the Ashland Electric Department. The neighboring properties electric service already exists on the site and the allowance of the easement from the Kaufman's to benefit the City of Ashland saves the City substantial amounts of money and service downtime by not forcing the City to relocate the encroaching utilities. With more than 20-feet of separation, there is substantially more than the required 12-feet between the ARU and the primary residence. The proposed architecture of the unit is compatible with the historic district design standards and is compatible with the existing Historic Contributing Henry White Rental House. The proposed structure's height is compatible with the historic structures and existing structures on the adjacent properties. The scale and mass of the structure is similar too, and is not significantly larger or smaller than adjacent structures. The pitch of the roof at 9:12 to provide a small area headroom in the storage, space above. Consistent with the historic district design standards this pitch is similar to the pitch of the historic home but does not match. The openings (windows and doors) are compatible with the openings on the historic home and on the structures on the adjacent properties. Single hung windows with divided light uppers are proposed. The proposed 16-foot garage door is proposed as a carriage style door to maintain the character of historic neighborhood. The 16-foot wide door allows adequate access to the two vehicle parking spaces within the garage. But, due to the wider structural dimensions required for two separate bay doors, the proposed garage door opening to 20-feet which requires a larger portion of the new structure's facade to be devoted to garage. The overall structure is compatible with the historic residence on the site and it can be found that a historically compatible door is appropriate with the intent of the historic district design standards. Consistent with the code, the proposed ARU / garage is to the rear of the primary residence. The new structure is proposed to not detract from the Henry White Rental House but to provide an amenity to the property and the neighborhood. The new residence provides a cozy, new dwelling within walking distance of the downtown, covered, on-site parking, needed storage area for the property owner and a detached home office space much desired by the property owner. Horizontal, smooth, cement board siding with a six-inch exposure is proposed. The colors are proposed to be match the primary residence. The roofing is proposed as dark grey solar panels that are like composite shingles. The shingles themselves are the solar panels and the intention is to not have to then install a flush mounted system over composite shingles. See attachments for additional details. 3 i Of M n t G i To achieve the required 22-feet of back up, the structure is proposed to be setback six-feet from the alley, c The proposed setbacks are consistent with the setbacks allowed in the zone and with those on adjacent properties, A detached garage with a four-foot setback is located to the east of the proposed structure. This garage has a six-foot rear setback. The structures across the alley to the southeast are within three to four feet of the property lines and the property to the west has a detached garage that is within inches of the shared property line. Multi-Family Site Design Review -18.4.2.030 Building Orientation to the Street: The proposed ARU faces the alley where it is located. The unit does not face the street because it is more than 30-feet from the street and is behind the existing two story residence that has a clear orientation to the street; the new structures entrance and "front" facade is parallel to the alley. Building Materials: The proposed structure is architecturally compatible with the design standards in the historic district. StreetseMe: Two street trees are planted in the public right-of-way. Landscaping and Open Space- The required open space for the lot is 532 square feet. A 180-square foot patio area is proposed to the west and south of the ARU. The front porch of the primary residence is 156 square feet and a 200-square foot, at grade deck and large yard area (not landscaped presently as plans for this area are being developed) exists between the two structures. There is 536 square feet of developed site area devoted to openspace, this does not include the yard area between the two structures, The subject property has landscaping (lawn and a mix of perennial and annual plant) between the primary residence and the sidewalk. The area around the ARU will be surfaced with patio pavers to provide for open space outside of the ARU. Within the fences proposed between the ARU and alley, pavers, step able plants and potted plants will be provided. The area though small will be nicely designed and will provide a relaxing, enjoyable outdoor space for the tenant, Attached are images of the type of patio landscaping that will be provided for the ARU outdoor open space. The property is serviced by water and sanitary sewer from B Street. The existing utilities will be extended from the rear of the existing residence (addition constructed in 2012 on the west side of the residence provides access to these utilities). The storm drainage from the new structure will be piped to B Street along the west side of the residence. Electric is served from the power pole at the rear of the property, a two-pack meter base will be installed on the east side of the garage to service the existing residence and the ARU. Accessory Residential Unit Criteria -18.2.3.040 - One ARU is proposed, for a total of two dwellings on the lot, as allowed, - The ARU is not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. - The gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the proposed ARU (500 square feet) the maximum allowed GHFA for properties that are less than the required area for two residential dwelling units. - The proposed ARU conforms to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the - underlying zone (see Site Plan exhibit). i 4 Maximum permitted floor are, ~n the historic district does not apply Accessory Structures and Accessory Residential Units that are separated by more than six-feet from the primary residence. i Parking - 18.4.3.040 The site development requires three parking spaces, two for the primary residence and one for the 500- square foot, one-bedroom ARU. The site currently has no on-site parking. To remedy this situation, a two- vehicle garage that contains a parking space for the ARU and one space for the residence is proposed to be accessed from the rear alley. One of the existing two, on-street parking spaces is requested to be retained. The street frontage is 50-feet in width and there are no curb-cuts from B to the property, nor is there vehicular access to the site from the alley presently. B Street is improved to City Standards. There is substantial on-street parking credit between the two on-street spaces in front of the subject property, but also the property to the east is a 75-foot wide lot with no curbcuts and another 133-feet along Fifth Street with no curb-cuts. The proposal reduces the properties dependence on on-street parking. C Bicycle Parking - 18.4.3.070.I & J The site accommodates for three bicycle parking spaces with room on the front porch for one bicycle and room for bikes in the two-vehicle garage. Additional Elements: The exterior lighting at the front (south) entry to the ARU, the side door of the ARU and outside of the man-door for the garage a historically appropriate carriage lamp is proposed. These wall-mounted fixtures will not directly illuminate any of the adjacent residential properties. A motion sensor security light is proposed adjacent to the parking space with a timer. Trash and recycling will be provided adjacent the garage. A 6 1/2 foot tall, solid panel cedar fence is proposed around the exterior of the property lines restricting the view of the proposed ARU. This is to provide a physical barrier from the dirt alleys and to prevent headlight glare into the ARU. Tree Protection and Preservation Plan - AMC 18.4.5.030 There are three trees at the front of the property near B Street, the trees are partially on the subject property and adjacent property to the east. These trees are not going to be affected by the proposed site work as they are on the northwest side of the residence where no site work is proposed. There is a 13-inch DBH deciduous tree on the adjacent property to the east. There is an existing six-foot solid panel fence adjacent to this tree, protecting it from the impacts of construction on the subject properties side of the fence. Due to the limited developable area on the site and the narrow lot width (50-feet) there is no additional tree protection fencing proposed for the tree on the adjacent property to the east beyond the existing 6 1/2 foot tall solid panel wood fence. The branches of the tree encroach approximately eight-feet onto the subject property. The tree will be carefully pruned to the property line to allow for the construction of the ARU/garage and not damage the structural integrity of this tree. Conclusions: We believe it can be found that the proposed ARU with attached garage, adequate bicycle parking, outdoor living space, adequate setbacks, lot coverage, building orientation and a historically compatible design utilizing historically compatible materials that are also environmentally beneficial can be found to comply with all of the standards from the Ashland Municipal Code for Site Design Review. X 5 JAN 13 c sii ItY k sW n . i i 1 Attachments: Solar shingle image Exterior light image Siding Garage door options ARU patio treatment graphics k Site Plan Floor Plans Elevations Electric distribution plan Tree Protection Plan ((k F k[( fff is p`Pp k! 4id 6 Additional Details: Solar Shingles I r l I , NV" 3 1 Y - it 4 7 ry ' r r4 I Fem. J i p s x c. I ti ,4 y ~ r i ~r ~ J- ~ IN, t S~ `5- - lY1 R t I fa 7 Lea R- JAN 13 2016 City ski Exterior Lights: I A - I I -U- G Preferred: More historically appropriate t ~^v h t 3 f F ~ im . K s y~. a f 3 ]notion settsocsecurityJight et parking space g i i t Siding and Trim: I A r ~ .l S 1 3 r~; r is Garage Door (similar to these styles): F rY 3 L-LI 77 t, 9 JAN 13 2016 - 4 kMand I i ARU Patio Ideas: E k + d 1 1 ~ v 7Y ;.r a 1J y tr r~ ~ l .i W f s{~ h` ~ i 4 _I ( 13 r.- ~ ~ ¢L < ''mot T .z j'" ~ ..^.S~ ~ k ~ ' f _ t 1 f~ ~ ~ I 7 i j ~ + _r 1 ~ r i i i s{ r ~ 1rt r ~rt7 s eV- ~ E-,i ~ ACT ~i•. - . ~ "'C a ~ ; 4 irr- { )t . C~ ~ H ~ 7 ~ F ~ f` k t i^^. i y l t ~Aq AIV r y y( ~ ~ r t r'i N, I y{ 1 OL- wt w-. 10 s , \ ID 15 ' N Rat -T / 13 f P~ r~ 391 E09A 75~T0 0.15 0 Zoning 1 12 I 06 (ex I > I. i Cr, Y 09 t ~ i F REQ lJ SITE PLAN NoQ SCALE: 1 In= 20 ft „j.. ~ ~NL~v4 sy, , a i Snl n ~fC3 `ONblHSb `lS g~S ry f ` R9`dil°3dr'sf3l F` I , 0 is a ~ ~II ~IZ~~ I e E a ~ i ¢ 1~ ~ I ~ E I 5 I ~o I IIIII 1 I k C) a© N0 :I 9' LU U, ! - g P. 77 .0 v ~d I x O UT L - 7 U1 < Qd 819a G CL Z Z~z, pco °u L c d ¢.Adc;~ZOO JadC _ Colo Z ~>S Q c l®~Gi J¢ ftJ }d2i wln ~ ryC~¢e ~U~21 Q Y `S q o~'am ss<i 2 m AIL `~.-I I~ Q OC W ¢ ;.IC1 z >~ooaQ2 Q°ZZ C!J r ° s w O LU Ul UD UI Z Z fl Q Q U U 0- z c.~ OW) U1, I'. Y~•`..31 iO Oi - y. _ :2 2 = d d I F- O O LI.i W uu_ru~ LL LL s o c~ co r o-- a Z o ua w¢i¢zz~~zZu11XXx_ N G v v Z ~1~ J _f - Z +W LL L13 N tiS' 1L Lt [L IL ¢~L LL ! [a.fcL ®a ¢ !.L LL Cry 1 I t7 C9000000 r 3 ' d I $ k I k ( k I U) 41) U3 W Vi U) U; U) _ z= ~ I i ~I~ImlNlrl~ll~l~l < U O $ N rs~e-jcn co rm m o N co v~z~ co~~Io m r r ° m~ Q 2E<NO V) M m ooo~oooooorr.-T- i- w Q LU _ 0 d L J iL z ~ tCl i ply ® u3 ~ = d 5 t LL it U. LL LL ll 11 a00°° \ l1 1 I t arco rt°i c~v ~ ~ (I t ( r 11 l l a ° iii J ..r C1 ~f® `®N HSb` `1.S S 999 NVINAnvN 31"vr GNV 3AVG ~Mzl r - - - - - - - - - - - - I f1mon ! ~ J c I I~ '41 y I co ! I - I cl~ u, -mss. , a ,en ~r - - r - 'i to I Q U -ti- 3 i °I - - 7;k I ~I - h I I- - - - - - _ C ' C. ~ G + ( EEEEp ~ f I w „ c , h L- 4S £R - _ - - Y.SD$9Z - - - - - - - -HS6 -i----- -TTT~ ~ LZIL 0-,84 40 '(]N'7-IHS`d `is 9 999 NVVYAnvN r 31NVP (INN 3AVC1230 Z' I 4. s I I ~Nz I -i fry I ~ E 1 L/ J 'LL I o I" I ~ ~ I I I ~ ~ Ip 3 I ' VI v" H53£$Z r,7 i F 17----1 ii W-IDo, i r z w m z U Z ox 4 Z - Q < ® G ~ mus 1 p o n < ft m Z m 0 L mN Z Z_1 0 0 co }z u~x U Z V o X ~ I : 2 I ! CO LI I II N Ill ~ I I („Ilii I II ' ~ III I ill 'III I I I III III~II~ I i ~ l i i i i' 1 1 II ;II ii W ! ~lil I I lll~li) I) it II O 11 D) fl LL m LLI I i~! I I '.I III I! I LmJ I I o P I o j ( ( ! w0 CL ~ ~ I I I ,I I I I --11 I. I N z ~ 1 I Z j IB rHw H ---Li I T LiJ =S LL C7 u U o C oia> m% ern T-z o-,- a z zl u. x oi_ LI o ~i> o''.. oll y Flo m c qq ~m I <z > Q LIU I~ ¢.m oQ v v 210 `CINVII-ISV`LS a 999 0 c~ NVN:AnvN i EIINVr I ~ ~ s= I IIII I~ i I a~ I I I 'j I a I I i li it ~I ~ 6-- II C III „ ~I ~ I I ~~I ~ II FFF i ' i~ I , I k II I 'I ' II I 'I III ' is a - u 3 I i w VIII ~II~~ ❑I>~a~ ~I LU < U V - III "r I I I w sn ~ C- ~ III, m ~ I I w -h1 ~-ttlt}, It _ II,I ~I II I d t' MI 1H I ' i i I I I _ ~Jw ~ I I C i I- H~'~Mrf~ K ~"~II(I ( I I I II I i i~I I,, ~ ~ I III 'i I I F , - I , I I Ili i r, ~ ~is: ~ I II li I z~ e= I I I I ~ I J UJ I IL' LU w cn II I I II;(~~ ~iI I II L I'I _ II i 11 I~. I IBC I, ~ I II ~ , rat l - J. III( II I r II 2IO `QNVIHSV `1S 8 999 IV; Sv I 31vqvr GM 3 z2 oinnis as ` E NBN °i i i i N~ LU ry E f ~ „vrs as v®~ „vts a-,~ vtis a-,s r m o o `o ~r o 0 0 o msI N c o i 4 November 23, 2016 Jamie and Dave Kaufman 556 B Street Ashland, OR 97520 RE: Incompleteness Determination for PA-2016-02114 556 B Street Dear Mr. & Mrs. Kaufman, After reviewing the November 9, 2016 application submittal requesting Site Design Review approval for an accessory residential unit for the property located at 556 B Street, I have determined that the application is incomplete. Incomplete applications are subject to delay in accordance with state law (ORS 227.178), and cannot be further processed until the missing information listed below is turned in. 1. A tree protection plan (AMC 18.4.5) including a plan drawn to scale showing the location, species, and diameter of each tree on site and within I5 feet of the site. 2. A utility service plan as required by AMC 18.4.5.030.B.4. The plan should show the location of existing and proposed roads, ivater, sanitary and storm water, irrigation, and other utility lines/facilities and easements. To continue review of your application, you must either: 1. Submit all of the missing information listed above; 2. Submit some of the requested information and give the City of Ashland Planning Division written notice that the remaining information will not be provided; or 3. Submit written notice to the City of Ashland Planning Division indicating that no additional information will be provided. Please note that failure to complete one of the three options within 180 days of the original application submittal date of November 9, 2016 will result in your application being deemed void. The application will be deemed void if the additional information is not submitted by May 8, 2017. Planning staff will expedite review of the requested materials once they are received. I have enclosed a form, entitled the "Applicant's Statement of Completeness". Please review the enclosed form and return it to me with any additional material you will be submitting. Your application cannot be further processed until the Applicant's Statement of Completeness form is completed and received by the City of Ashland Planning Division. If you have questions, please contact me at (541) 552-2044 or via e-mail to mark.schexnayder@ashland.or.us. Community Development Dept. Tel: 541-552-2040 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 WINI www.ashland.or.us derek.seversona()ashland.or.us Regards, Mark Schexnayder, Assistant Planner Encl: Applicant's Statement of Completeness Cc: File Community Development Dept. Tel: 541-552-2040 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 Gwy PWAAN www.ashland.or.us derek.severson(ashland.or.us Date Received i (to be completed by staff) Applicant's Statement of Completeness (To be completed by the Applicant and returned to the City ofAshland Planning Division) Re: PA-2016-02114, 556 B Street Date Application Expires: May 8, 2017 Pursuant to an Incompleteness Determination, I, the undersigned applicant or agent for the applicant, elects one of the three options below by initialing: 1. Submit All of the Missing Information (Initial if elected) I am submitting all of the information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter. Unless checked below, I am requesting that the City of Ashland Planning Division review this additional information within 30 days of submission to determine whether the application is complete. I understand that this 30-day review for completeness period for the new information preserves my opportunity to submit additional materials, should it be determined that the application is still incomplete after the second review. (Note: the 120-day period for the City of Ashland's final determination of compliance with applicable criteria does not commence until the additional review for completenessperiod is completed.) Check if desired I waive further review of the information submitted for completeness and direct review of the information submitted for compliance with the Community Development Code criteria, regardless of whether the application is, in fact, later determined by the staff to be incomplete. I understand that by checking the above statement the application will be evaluated based upon the material submitted and no notice of any missing information will be given. If material information is missing from the application, the application will fail to meet the burden of showing that all criteria are met, and the application will be denied. Community Development Dept. Tel: 541-552-2040 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541-552-2050 j Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us derek.severson o()ashland.or.us i 2. Submit Some of the Requested Information: (Initial if elected Decline to Provide Other Information I am submitting some of the information requested and declining to submit other information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter. I understand that by declining to submit all information the City of Ashland believes necessary, the Ashland Planning Division may conclude that the applicable criteria are not met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. ( 3. Decline to Provide any of the Requested Information (Initial if elected I decline to provide any of the information requested. I understand that the Community Development Department may conclude that the applicable criteria are not met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. is Signed and Acknowledged (Applicant or Applicant's Agent) Date Return to: City of Ashland, Planning Division Attn: Mark Schexnayder, Assistant Planner % 20 East Main Street Ashland, OR 97520 Community Development Dept. Tel: 541-552-2040 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 WIN IFF&MRS www.ashland.orms derek.seversonna.ashland.orms i ` ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION i P anning Division - 51 Wiithtrrn Way, Ashland OR 97520 E Y 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-60001 FILE _ ASUILANO i DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT SITE REVIEW FOR ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED` Ccilification'? 0 YES YNO Street Address 556 B STREET Assessors Map No. 391 E 09 AB Tax Lot{s} 7500 Zoning R-2 Comp Plan Designation MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL APPLICANT Name JAMIE AND DAVE KAUFMAN phone 541-292-4742 E..Mail JAEFAPQYAHOO.COM Address 556 B STREET City ASHLAND zip 97520 PROPERTY OWNER Name SAME AS APPLICANT Phone E-mail Address City Zip SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER *ritl+~ BUILDING DESIGNEP, Name BILL EMERY Phone 541-944-8897 E-Mail BILL@ASHLANDHOME.NET Address ..2962_GRI7ZLEY._DR1VE. City..ASHLAND....._._.__................... Zip..~9.7.520..._....._._..... "Dille Name Phone E•Mall Address City Zip- / hereby certify that the statements and infiaink?k7n arafalnecl L) /his applia lon, tncludhtg the enclosW d1mi;ings and the required Andings of fact.. are in aillcspects, true and corr e:ct. t cnderstand that 31/I~rvperty pins must bf> shmmn on the drm ings and v1sib1e upon, the site ins 20Ction. In lk." eve-nt the pins are not sherlm or !hair location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full respunsfbilgr l further understand lhal if this request Is subsequenty contested the burden will be on me to est,bllsh. that I pr oduced .iufflclent Mclail e, vidence al the hearing, to suppnrt this request..: 21 fhef lb0 tlndfngs offact 1untished jrnr.'f es the grarrting of Me reques( 7) that f ,o Andtngs of fact furnished by mo are adoquale, and lunhar 41 that all sim lams orimplovements are 1Nmper4,1ii(.Med on the gimnif. I'. r Failum; /Il MIS regard will A" Siff IrOSt fikOly' in not only ffi& reiluest being seat aside, but also p ssibIv in m y sir ucluw5 baing twill i,7 rer'iance thereon 1 eing required to e removad elf my eapen . I a ' an , dou .5, 1,7m, adrrsed to seek competent proresvoni/ ad'' plicant's Signature Date k i??? As ominer of the properly InvoJvcd In this request, / have road and anderslood tho coin late applicatlon and its r, c rronces 1n me as a property owner, r - r perty Owner's Signature {require gate r12! W tmlp:~.:w Ly (::Y Sk:Yr Date Received i Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ OVER O:wmtmt• o~~^,~t;mni::a\Po:;ae Hxn;Lxd~%rn:na• Pav:it A3:p1;r,Sicm.ecx i PROJECT DESCRIPTION FOR A SITE REVIEW FOR AN ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 556 B STREET, ASHLAND, OREGON OWNER: BUILDING DESIGN: Dave and Jamie Kaufman Bill Emery 556 B Street 2962 Grizzly Drive Ashland, OR 97520 Ashland, OR 97520 SITE ADDRESS & MAP/TAX LOT INFORMATION: 556 B Street; 391E 09AB; 7500 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Family Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-2; Multi-Family Residential ADJACENT USES: WEST: Residential with detached accessory structures EAST: Residential with detached accessory structures SOUTH: 16-foot wide gravel surface alley - Residential with detached accessory structures and apartment building. NORTH: B Street - residential uses and employment zoned properties with residential uses, commercial buildings at intersection of B and 4th Streets. SUBJECT SITE: Single Family Residence PLANNING ACTION: The applicant is seeking approval for Site Review approval to construct a detached Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) and garage with storage above adjacent to the alley at the rear of the property. FINDINGS OF FACT - GENERAL DESCRIPTION: The information provided by the applicant is to help the Planning Staff and neighbors understand the proposed project. In addition, the required findings of fact have been provided to ensure the proposed project meets the criteria for an ARU and for Site Design Review, historic district development required parking, lot coverage and allowed setbacks. Proposal: The applicant is requesting a Site Review approval to construct a detached, 888 square foot accessory building. A single vehicle garage is proposed to be attached 500 square foot ARU. The subject site can readily accommodate the proposed construction within allowed setbacks, coverage, parking, and historic district design standards. 1 i FINDINGS OF FACT - RESPONSE TO CRITERIA: Site Design Review - 18.5.2.050 Approval Criteria The proposed ARU complies with all the applicable provisions of the underlying zone, including building and yard setbacks, the lot area at 6,650 SF allows for the construction of a 500-square foot or less accessory residential unit when the lot area is less than 7,500 square feet. The proposed lot coverage following construction is less than allowed in the zone, 3,220 square feet (48%) of impervious area are on the site. The ARU and garage has an average building height of 14.62 feet which allows for a reduced rear and side yard setback (18.2.5.060. B). The rear yard abutting an alley may be reduced to four feet. To achieve the required 22-feet of back up, the structure is proposed to be setback six-feet from the alley. The west side yard setback has been proposed at four-feet, where three-feet is allowed. The east side yard setback is nine-feet. There is more than 12-feet between the ARU and the primary residence. The proposed architecture of the unit is compatible with the historic district design standards and is compatible with the existing Historic Contributing Henry White Rental House. The proposed structure's height is compatible with the historic structures and existing structures on the adjacent properties. The scale and mass of the structure is similar too, not significantly larger or smaller than adjacent structures. The openings (windows and doors) are compatible with the openings on the historic home and on the structures on the adjacent properties. Single hung windows with divided light uppers are proposed. The proposed single vehicle garage door is proposed as a carriage style door. The pitch of the roof at 10:12 with a shed dormer to provide headroom in the storage space above. This pitch matches the historic home. The lower pitch roof over the dormer is similar to the pitch on the adjacent properties. Horizontal, smooth, cement board siding with a six-inch exposure is proposed. The colors are proposed to be match the primary residence. The roofing is proposed as dark grey solar panels that are like composite shingles. The shingles themselves are the solar panels and the intention is to not have to then install a flush mounted system over composite shingles. See attachments for additional details. I Multi-Family Site Design Review - 18.4.2.030 Building Orientation to the Street: The proposed ARU faces the alley where it is located. The unit does not face the street because it is more than 30-feet from the street and is behind the existing two story residence that has a clear orientation to the street; its fagade is parallel to the alley. The parking for the ARU is located to the east side of the proposed garage. A single vehicle parking space is located within the new garage and one of the two existing on-street parking spaces is requested on B Street. The street frontage is 50-feet in width and there is not a curb-cut from B to the property. There are only three single family residences that front on this block of B Street and the property to the east has double frontage on both B and Fifth Street. The garage and one of the, parking spaces is located adjacent to the alley. 2 S Building Materials: The proposed structure is architecturally compatible with the design standards in the historic district. Streetscape: Two street trees are planted in the public right-of-way. Landscaping and Open Space: The required open space for the lot is 532 square feet. A 180-square foot patio area is proposed to the west and south of the ARU. The front porch of the primary residence is 156 square feet and an at grade deck and large yard area (not landscaped presently as plans for this area are being developed) exists between the two structures. The subject property has landscaping (lawn and annual plants) between the primary residence and the sidewalk. The area around the ARU will be surfaced with patio pavers to provide for open space outside of the ARU and for the single vehicle parking space. Within the fences proposed between the ARU and alley, pavers, step able plants and potted plants will be provided. The area though small will be nicely designed and will provide a relaxing, enjoyable outdoor space for the tenant. Attached are images of the type of patio landscaping that will be provided for the ARU outdoor open space. The property is serviced by water and sanitary sewer from B Street. The storm drainage from the new structure will be piped to B Street. Electric is served from the power pole at the rear of the property, a two-pack meter base will be installed on the east side of the ARU near the parking space. Accessory Residential Unit Criteria -18.2.3.040 • One ARU is proposed, for a total of two dwellings on the lot, as allowed. • The ARU is not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. • The gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the proposed ARU (500 square feet) the maximum allowed GHFA in the historic district. • The proposed ARU conforms to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone (see Site Plan exhibit). Maximum permitted floor area in the historic district does not apply to Accessory Structures and Accessory Residential Units that are separated by more than six-feet from the primary residence. Parking -18.4.3.040 Three parking spaces are required on the property. Two parking spaces are required for the primary residence. The proposed 500 square foot ARU requires an additional parking space. The existing residence does not have any on-site parking and utilizes two on-street parking credits, the property does not have a curb cut and no parking access from the rear alley. The proposed garage and storage above are not accessible from the ARU and are intended for the use of the primary residence. To the east of proposed garage side of the structure an 8' X 16' surface parking space is proposed. Parldng Space Buffer Exception - The surface parking space adjacent to the garage is not separated from the side property line by five feet. Historically, the property did not have any on-site parking and relied solely on on-street parking credits. Through the development of the site with the ARU and the single vehicle garage, the applicant wanted to provide an additional space on the property. There is a large main line electric power pole at the rear of the property at the T of the alley intersection. Due to the amount of services on the pole, it cannot be relocated. A five-foot "buffer" is required around the pole. 3 f: The pole location limited vehicular access to the site. There is a six-foot-tall solid panel cedar fence and a detached accessory structure on the adjacent parcel. The fence and the structure provide buffering from any vehicle door noise or engine noise better than a five-foot wide landscaping would. We believe the provision of an additional on-site parking space provides a greater benefit by removing the 100 % dependence on the on-street parking spaces. Bicycle Parldng -18.4.3.070.I & J The site accommodates for three bicycle parking spaces with room on the front porch and an area for three bikes is in the garage. Additional Elements: The exterior lighting at the front (south) entry to the ARU, the side door of the ARU and outside of the man-door for the garage a historically appropriate carriage lamp is proposed. These wall-mounted fixtures will not directly illuminate any of the adjacent residential properties. A motion sensor security light is proposed adjacent to the parking space with a timer. Trash and recycling will be provided adjacent the garage and parking (without encroaching on the parking area). A 6 1/2 foot tall, solid panel cedar fence is proposed around the exterior of the property lines restricting the view of the proposed ARU. This is to provide a physical barrier from the dirt alleys and to prevent headlight glare into the ARU. The fencing will also provide a Attachments: Exterior light image Solar shingle image ARU patio treatment graphics Site Plan Floor Plans Elevations Electric distribution plan 4 Additional Details: Solar Shingles . E 1 f Exterior Lights: 5 I ~a I/ E e~j I Preferred: More historically appropriate motion sensor security light at parking space Siding and Trim: 6 i =y Al f i ' r e d ARU Patio Ideas: 7 { a i i L j l 1 ~ y j # 55 Y~ i F ti r u i 04/14/2016 To Whom It May Concern, I have met with Jamie Kaufman regarding the project on 556 B Street. It is in the best interest of the Electric Department not to relocate the existing power pole (P5095750) due to the needed location and support facilities required for both the Electric and Communication's company pole contacts. We have approved the encroaching parking area within 2' of both sides of the existing power pole. The requirements from the Electric Department will be to install (2) protective barriers located on both sides of pole. (See attached PDF) Also required will be a raised concrete poured parking bumper on the driveway side near the pole location. Any questions or concerns, please give me a call @ 541.552.2389. Regards, David Tygerson 544 556 N~ Up r Q) > Install 2-pack Meter Base ► CO for 556 B Street and Future ARU E > 3" PVC 350 AL secondary 'Future ARID M 1° M H5753 0 Install (2) Protective Barrier Posts @ 24" from Pole P5750 160 6 a 607 M 0 10 20 40 FT 1 i i i I - Remove Service CO > PVT SVC -0 m o F O -Q m N) I CD t) _ W o n O CAD CD o U) U (n D Cr al (D CD CD w ' a P CD G Ul ~ -a I Nom- n~ CY)N n Q~ v-0 CD > 00 OCCv n (n ® n x Cr F-+0 p:p > 0 (n CD O cn (D 3 = X O Q(D Q- :0< v0 , -0 Cr cn < Q. W CD N y CD ~ (n C D OP m ~ ~ ~ •O 7 W a ,fA j $ W x I Z ~W Vi X _ m Galvanized NonSlip Door w/Locking Latch 1'-6" Long Galvanized "C" Channel Full 180' Open (1 Each End) \ Dia. Lift Insert (4 Places in Top) Ni\G\\`\\ \ \ / r TOP No. 23-2436NS 450 lbs. 2'-0" Long Galvanized "C" Channel (1 Each Side) 2'-0° ® 3'-6" " BASE 3-0 No. 233-B -0 S-0" 2,100 lbs. 2'-8" 18" x 18" Knockout (1 Each End) 41 6" Dia. / Sump Galvanized Pull/Lift Iron -l 2'-8" / (i Each Corner) ~12" x 12" Knockout v (2 Each Side) (2) - 1j" Dia. Lift Holes 1" Dia. Ground Rod Knockout (2 Places in Floor) SCALE: 1/2"=l' 233-ASHLAND 233-ASHLAND castle Precast® File Name: 233-ASHLAND 2 X 3 PO Box 323, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070-0323 Issue Date: 2012 CITY OF ASHLAND Tel: (503) 682-2844 Fax: (503) 682-2657 oldcastleprecast.com/wilsonville i 233-ASHLAND 3'-8" (4) - Dia. Lift Inserts 64" 7" 6}' -0" 1'-0" O O 00 (a V A O A N (2) - 1" Dio, Ground Rod Knockouts No. 2436NS S-0" Galvanized NonSlip Door w/Locking Latch PLAN VIEW TOP PLAN Top Not Shown, See Top Plan 2'-0" Long Galvanized "C" Channel 18" x 18" Knockout (1 Each Side) (1 Each End) 14" Dla. Lift Hole (1 Each Side) 12" x 12" Knockout (2 Each Side) 1'-6" Long Galvanized "C" Channel (1 Each End) .16 O N II' '1' 'll II' ~I~ 'll I M iL 0~ LA ILL" -tL- -JI I ini A., 1_6.. -4" 6" Dia. Sump Galvanized Pull/Lift Iron (1 Each Corner) SECTION AA END VIEW Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" ILI 233-ASHLAND 233-ASHLAND Itl Precast® File Name: 233-ASHLAND 2 X 3 PO Box 323, Wilsonville, Oregon 97070-0323 Issue Date: 2012 CITY OF ASHLAND Tel: (503) 682-2844 Fax: (503) 682-2657 oldcastleprecast.com/wilsonvilie Dave °Tygerson <dave.tygerson@ashland.or.us> 'ro Lea Richards Cc Amy Gunter Kaufman, Jamie Sep 26 at 2:00 CAM Lea, I would like to change language on attached layout (note: Developer responsible for excavation required to replace existing H-5753 with traffic bearing secondary vault 233-Ashland / vault supplied by COA Electric Department ) Electric Department approves required parking improvements @ this location for future ARU. Regards, Dave Tygerson 23® `C Jd EHSd `1S S 999~ ® LS5 NV-!d EWS G„,, 1-,S /2EMJVQ t --l: r i I III z Z ice' i LLI~ i c uc N0 3: ~ Z ~ to Z Lr, ~0 00 z ~IaSZ I Q ~W < 61 60 Z > d ( v~`_ H i ZZ U) X z OZ L 3 O m v Z W d ~U) U SIC <.J 3 C 7 LL' Cja~ ,J Q~ _ 0 Q Qt a -°zm n zcc3: t <Eu~k :hI <mi Q z L o a0 F m ~F ~ ~ ~5~ 7tJI:_ .~..~}damn}~ ~W Z~ U d W 6~~ M1 D m D o Q _ d m S Z 4 =:CL' U, ~ a Q u, corn n. ~L,3© IZCWS'S` ~z W O <UJ L>11 21E Y Y L7dr Q1. CoOY <ul~ d ~ 2 G) Y~ LL LL LL ~~~L J[n 42IWi v J LL LiC LLi d LL _LL! I C3 uaa?<Xc'` -~Lzl- QZ0~i }'4O~~d>!- 1(n (7J Cf3 fn L _,.~r 1"S,"~=.O~C:~ 'S LL J 00 Q 2 Z / ~M v7 Anson. 10cLm!0 G Ci 0000' 11J , ~Noh ZZ LL ZZ Z z W Q a a 0 0 tn 00ZO ®-00 4- h- C K LL i- W t, I c~ O0 ZOLY XiLU LL_SIx x ~Li o a d zX QG D zz~J~~J~z~ _ i- s- o-- o- i- d- Yy Ib a Lis ®d Ur LL LL LL LL LL LL L6. LSIe-C7OLY QO z I OOOOO OO L- W Z- N Z O i I d m, m !n m (o fo co ~QU'ZJ~ ~Q I a ! I ' mcN+ahm cov s°n ~~'N M aSJ m h4m'63 O r N M v~m~m i" m O) h to h h- m N m m en 0gdN 0 rr'~~ ca atolooooaooo~ co M m M o ca i`. m 0 1 a o~ 0 0 00 LLf o O G1 ~ WU' uJ ® z U co V) 0 2 F t- i- h LL 6s. LL lL iL OOOC'7 C1 to O cA O to 1 1 y 1 C o m o 0 C ~7 tN+3 ro m _ Ir` m ~ L m i ~:JO 'C IV"I -ISV ` l S S 999 c € VIN-4n [ 'C ' 1V :7AVC 8OJ ` 1 v z z I ~ o I ~ I I ~ L~ M s I~`F t F m O - ~ ~ V_ it 1 ~ s , , 9 1~0 `(INVll-SV `iS a 999 ~ - ® j ! 5 9 VvNq~fl 3INVP GNV 3AVG ~0~ L i - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - T I j w I I I I ~ ~ I I ~ j E I I I I I ~ I ~ ~ i I E(! E( I I I- PE -:z Z _ I II i I I ! 9i G- j ~ I oT r, i i~ .I ~ t I ► I j I I al ~ I ~ ( I I i j ~ I I 1 ~ ~ ~ I I L_ bZ Ia L: 'dO `C 4V-IFISV `IS S 999 0 NVN3n i 7e13H ,-'Nd 3AVCI ?Joj NOLLVAt C igniS 13J VS M3N L 0 zr iul 1.0 Iz < !LL } Ix s t-. 7 i ;LL LL Ix LL v" 'S O ...,d L>_ F o q Ali W w L 0) IiLY C9 L U u Id m _ > cA Z T~Ia 'Q,~ o COI lb ,1Z"OZ g .8iL Z-,O u Z9'~i a 9 LiL L ,p l ! Z9'S 4 Z9"S OO'S 9! 1L L5^s 9WfL L C 6 1 I I F 'II ~ a o ~ i z i ( rn r i ~ 1( z x i III I i z cn u; I i ~ Q I i t I i i I I I ~ tr ~ ~ I I i Lu I o I o 1 I z_ oz ETD I t I 1 aj, i 0 m i l~ I E I~ I I I 1 z II 'I I I I i I , I (I I i I j I( ~ I ~ I i Iii I ~ I i I ~ i j. I I I I II ~ I ! i IiI RI y j i 6!£ 0-.8 .O O-,8 8-,£ - IILL C y°o Q o sjN ~c x r Z u- LIJ 0 0~ Z o o< O C L O O F xi co x o `o O ~ F '10 `CINV`I BS`d `-LS S 999 I @VVVI:jnvA I SNOI~VA3 12 01®~11s /30 Vf) AA3N I LI-I ~ i I (III jl 1Ill,.li. II ,,III it li E i1 I. , ~ I II I I I I I li I I i I II Ili II 7, , I I II ~ I ~ I~ `wQ I c i li 'JU O~ I i - 'wrn : II II I I J I i,l I m i II # li I' ( I u ii (I i IIII 'I I Iii I 'l II III) i' I i II II ii I I I i,l i ;I' I I~ I I ill 1, ( ~ iI ! I I I I II t0 1 f~ iI f _ ri H H Ft i 1 II I ti_H ~ ~ ~ p T r s; ~r ~Q ~ A ~ -LIa I I i I~ L' ~ 9 I I ~c - I I M= - I I I m 2 Ili l ¢w w m J U w cn ' I t ~a I I it II y ,I I~ k-~ li I I I I I : I/N I I Job Address: 556 B ST Contractor: ' ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C I Owner's Name: KATHLEEN/JAMIE VARGAS/KAUFMAN O Phone: Customer 07141 State Lic No: L KATHLEEN/JAMIE VARGAS/KAUFMAN T City Lic No: Applicant: 556 B ST R Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: (541) 292-4742 T Address: N Applied: 11/09/2016 O T Issued: R Expires: 05/08/2017 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E09AC4700 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Type 1 Site REviewforARU I VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount CUP Accessory Residential 664.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY OF I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation (180 days). Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 664.00 $ 664.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 664.00 Fees Paid: $ 664.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 CITY F