HomeMy WebLinkAboutChapman_2980_PA-2016-01909
CITY OF
LA i3
s
November 21, 2016
Notice of Final Decision
I~
On November 21, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
i
Planning Action: 2016-01909
Subject Property: 2980 Chapman Lane
is
Applicant: John Clason
s
Description: This application proposes a 499 sq. ft. Accessory Residential Unit
(ARU) above the garage of the residence currently under construction. COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; ASSESSOR'S MAP:
39 1E 14 CA; TAX LOT: 1802.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12' day after the
Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of
approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way.
Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee
schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a
reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F)
and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The
ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be
made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. I
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Cory Darrow in the Community
Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
Cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305
51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
www.ashland.or.us
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no P
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.B.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.0 50.G. 1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of
this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the
hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of
decision is mailed.
c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall
contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal,
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before
the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other
documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other
relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument j'
concerning any relevant ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City snails the 5
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winbum Way Fax: 544-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 P
www.ashland.or.us ~
3
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
E
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01909
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2980 Chapman Lane
APPLICANT: John Clason
DESCRIPTION: This application proposes a 499 sq. ft. Accessory Residential Unit
(ARU) above the garage of the residence currently under construction.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5;
ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IF 14 CA TAX LOT: 1802
SUBMITTAL DATE: October 10, 2016
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: October 24, 2016
STAFF APPROVAL DATE: November 21, 2016
DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): December 3, 2016
FINAL DECISION DATE: December 4, 2016
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: May 4, 2018
DECISION
The application involves a request for Site Design Review approval to construct a 499 square foot
Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) on the second level of a single-family home that is currently j
under construction at 2980 Chapman Larne. The approximately 9,147 square foot subject parcel is I>
a relatively level flag lot that takes access from Chapman Lane and is located behind 2974
Chapman Lane to the south.
CONCLUSIONS
One ARU is proposed and the maximum number of dwelling units does not exceed two, as required
within the R-1 zone. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential
unit does not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and does not
exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA. The proposal, with attached conditions, conforms to the overall
maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone.
The maximum lot coverage for an R-1-5 zoned lot is 50%, or 3,803.4 square feet for this particular
lot (the flag pole portion of the lot is not included in the lot coverage calculation). A total area up
to 200 square feet or 5% of the permitted lot coverage, whichever is less, may be developed in an
approved, porous solid surface that allows storm water infiltration, and is exempt from the lot
coverage maximum; the porous solid surface exemption does not apply to driveways and parking
areas.
The application proposes installation of approximately 4,436 square feet (58%) of impervious
surface and does not take advantage of the option to develop up to an additional 200 square feet
or 5% of the permitted lot coverage in an approved, porous solid surface. Proposed gravel areas in
the required side yards total approximately 673.5 square feet. An alternative natural material, such
as bark or soil will likely need to be substituted in order to meet the requirement. The Building
Permit submittals will need to reflect an adjustment to this design in order to comply with
2980 Chapman Lane
PA-2016-01909 i'
Page I 1
CTD
c
i
Additional parking has been proposed in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for
single-family developments. Flag lots are required to provide three off-street parking spaces; one
off-street parking space is required for ARUs under 500 square feet bringing the total required
parking for the proposal to four off-street spaces. The application identifies two full-size parking
spaces in the garage, and two compact parking spaces in the front of the property. As required, the
applicant has proposed a 5-foot landscaping buffer between the parking area and the northern
property line.
While the Ashland Municipal Code stipulates that "in all residential zones, off-street parking in a
front yard far all vehicles, including trailers and recreational vehicles is limited to a contiguous
area no more than 25 percent of the area of the front yard, or a contiguous area 25 feet wide and
the depth of the front yard, whichever is greater", this ordinance was not intended to apply to flag
lots. Despite the lack of intent to apply this code to flag lots, the proposal does meet the
requirement. The required front yard of the property is 1,246.2 square feet (15' x 83.08'). Areas
dedicated to vehicular parking that fall within the required front yard total 144 square feet (8' x
16 1 x 16'); this calculation includes one compact space plus one foot of the second compact
space. Area dedicated to parking in the front yard (144 square feet) equates to 11.6% (144 /
1246.2). Staff acknowledges the additional impervious within the required front yard however, I`
this area is not proposed as a parking area; this area functions as an extension of the flag drive and
provides the requisite turn-around area to accommodate vehicles entering and exiting in a forward
manner.
All uses, with the exception of residential units with a garage and uses in the C-1-D zone, are
required to provide a minimum of two sheltered bike parking spaces. As proposed, two bicycle
parking spaces would be provided in the garage. This proposal poses two issues for Staff. The first
issue originates from the fact the garage is associated with the primary dwelling unit and provision
of bicycle parking for the ARU in this location would the ARU be granted 24-hour access to the
garage.
The second issue originates from AMC 18.4.3.070.1.3, which requires all required bicycle parking
be located within 50-feet of a regularly used building entrance, not further fiom the entrance than
the closest motor vehicle parking space, and shall have direct access to both the public right-of-
way and to the main entrance of the principal use. Staff finds the walk fronn bicycle parking space
nearest the rear garage door to the entrance of the ARU exceeds the maximum 50-feet in distance,
nor does it provide direct access to both the public right-of-way and to the main entrance of the
ARU. Staff finds that locating the ARU's required bicycle parking under the balcony on the eastern
side of the structure, the entrance to the ARU, would satisfy the requirement. The conditions of I
approval reflect this finding.
Under the Parking, Access and Circulation section of the Site Development and Design Standards
pedestrian access and circulation require a continuous walkway system extending throughout the
development site that are reasonably direct and convenient between primary building entrances
and all adjacent streets. As the proposal needs to be modified in order to remove some or all of the
gravel from the eastern side yard, a pedestrian path leading from the ARU's primary entrance to
the turn-around area of the driveway is necessary. This pathway needs to be delineated on the
building permit. The conditions of approval reflect this requirement.
2980 Chapman Lane j
PA-2016-01909
Page 12
CTD
Site Development and Design standards that apply to ARU proposals include Landscaping,
Lighting, and Screening. The general landscaping standard states that all portions of a lot not
otherwise developed with buildings, accessory structures, vehicle maneuvering areas, parking, or
other approved hardscapes shall be landscaped. The application proposes planting approximately
80 one-gallon plants of varying drought-resistant species, installing grass in the front and rear
yards, and installing bark, in select areas. The application proposes to provide automated irrigation
for all landscaped areas including pop-up sprinklers for the grass areas and drip for the plants. No
trees were proposed in the application. Landscaping standards, per AMC 18.4.4.030 require the
use of a variety of deciduous and evergreen trees, shrubs, and ground covers. The conditions of
approval reflect the need to install a minimum of one deciduous and one evergreen tree. I
4>
Recycling and refuse disposal areas have been proposed along the western property line and will
be screened behind a privacy fence running perpendicular from the western property line to the
structure.
With the attached conditions, the ARU proposal meets all applicable Special Use Standards,
conforms to all requirements of the underlying zoning designation, and meets the requirements for
Site Design Review.
The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040,
as follows:
A. R-I Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements.
1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units
shall not exceed two per lot.
2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone, except that accessory residential units shall be counted in
the density of
developments created under the Performance Standards Option in chapter 18.3.9.?
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not
exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed j?
1,000 square feet GHFA.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements
of the underlying zone.
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for
single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3,040, except that parking spaces,turn-arounds, and
driveways are exempt from the paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080. F. 1.
The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follows:
2980 Chapman Lane
PA-2016-01909
Page 13
CTD
ii
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone
(part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density
and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable
standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 98.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site
Development and Design Standards of part 98.4, except as provided by subsection E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities
and that adequate capacity of City facilities for wafer, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved
access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the
subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve
exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 98.4 if the circumstances in either
subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development
and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing -structure or the
proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact
adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of
the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would
alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the
exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site
Development and Design Standards.
1
In staff's assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable
ordinances and meets all required criteria.
Planning Action #2016-01909 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or
more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning
Action 42016-01909 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the
approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise
specifically modified herein.
2) That one bicycle parking space for the ARU be provided under the porch on the eastern
side of the structure under the entrance for the ARU in conformance with the standards
outline in AMC 18.4.3.070.
3) That lighting shall be provided in a bicycle parking area so that all facilities are
thoroughly illuminated and visible from adjacent walkways or motor vehicle parking lots l
during all hours of use.
2984 Chapman Lane
PA-2016-01909
Page 4
CTD
4) That outdoor bicycle parking facilities shall be surfaced in the same manner as the
automobile parking area or with a minimum of two inch thickness of hard surfacing (i.e.,
asphalt, concrete, pavers, or similar material) and shall be relatively level. This surface
will be maintained in a smooth, durable, and well-drained condition.
I
5) Bicycle parking racks shall consist of staple-design or inverted-u steel racks meeting the
individual rack specifications as illustrated in AMC Figure 18.4.3.070.3.1. The Staff
Advisor, following review by the Transportation Commission, may approve alternatives
to the above standards. Alternatives shall conform to all other applicable standards of the
AMC.
6} That all exterior lighting be installed in a manner that there is no direct illumination onto
adjacent residential properties.
7) That the applicant shall install a reasonably direct, and convenient walkway connection
between the primary ARU entrance and the driveway area.
8) That a minimum of two trees, one deciduous and one evergreen, be planted on site at a
minimum size of 1.5" caliper. Trees and landscaping shall be irrigated.
9) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with
those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit
are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an
application to modify the Site Design Review approval shall be submitted and approved
prior to issuance of a building permit.
10} The Building Permit submittal shall reflect lot coverage in conformance with the standards
set forth in AMC table 18.2.5.03 O.A. by reducing the lot coverage to an absolute maximum
of 3,803.4 square feet, not including the allowance of an area up to 200 square feet or 5%
of the permitted lot coverage, whichever is less, that may be developed in an approved, j
porous solid surface that allows storm water infiltration.
11) That all necessary building permits and associated fees and charges, including permits
and/or inspection fees for the kitchen and fire separation installation, permits and service
connection fees for the new electrical service to the accessory residential unit, and any
applicable system development charges for water, sewer, storm water, parks, and
transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. The building
permit submittals shall include:
a. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking
areas, gravel, walkways, exterior stairs, bicycle parking, etc.
12) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
s
E
2980 Chapman Lane
PA-2016-01909
Page 5
CTD
I
ii
a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be
installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements.
b) That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for
approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the
requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right-
of-Way.
c) That all required landscaping shall be installed according to the approved plan.
ti November 21, 2016
ill Molnar, irector Date
epartme of Community Development
I
3
i
l
2980 Chapman Lane
PA-2016-01909
Page 16
CTD
f
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON }
County of Jackson }
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
I . I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, ~
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On November 21, 2018 1 caused to be mailed by regular mall in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
F
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list j
under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01909, 2.980 Chapman Lane.
a l
Si'gnatW-e of Employee
t
I
Documentl 1 1 7211261 6
i
f
r
i A1l3At/-09-008-L i 3Wdn-dod pAogaA e1 AajgAgJ `y' aa 0965 @AU3RY/ jpuq n Ell aas!E!.tn
i cuaa ICaanWnnnnnn + op up aAnq)eq el q zoi!daa ap ®a5 ' aalad sa ise¢ sa;lanbiu
PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 2300 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 2100
I Ei
ASHLAND STORE-A-WHILE LLC BELLVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST
3325 DARRELL DR 1033 TOLMAN CREEK RD
MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520
I
I
PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 1802 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 100 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 900
CLASON COMPANY LLC COOK JEANETTE C/COOK HERBERT CROSS WILLIAM/PAULA GREIST
220 DEAD INDIAN MEMORIAL RD 990 SPRING WAY 715 GRANDVIEW DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-01909 391E14BD 1300 PA-2016-01909 39IE14CA 110 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 1200
DONNELLY MICHAEL/JAYNE C ELLIS KATHARINE C TRUSTEE ET AL FLEISHER ANTHONY
2970 BARBARA ST 992 SPRING WAY 964 JAQUELYN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 j
i
I i
i
PA-2016-01909 391E14BD 1000 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 1800 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 1100
HARDING PENNY MODINE LIVNI INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC LOVETT RICHARD P TRUSTEE
3000 BARBARA ST 2532 OLD MILL WAY PO BOX 427 !E
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
1 i
PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 1900 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 1000 PA-2016-01909 391EI4CA I I I
MC KELVEY KEVIN K/DIANE D MICHELANGELO JENNIFER PERKINS EDWARD L TRUSTEE ET AL
PO BOX 3451 560 REITEN DR 941 PINECREST TERR
ASHLAND, OR 97520 i ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
~ j
I I
i
PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 3800 i PA-2016-01909 39IE14BD 1400 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 2000
RAMOS ROBERTO/MARIA ROSS MICHAEL E ET AL SAIGO ROY H/BARBARA W
1002 TOLMAN CREEK RD 2599 PIONEER RD 1001 TOLMAN CREEK RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 j ASHLAND, OR 97520
j
I ~
PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 800 PA-2016-01909 391EI4BD 1100 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 3700
SCHWEIGER JOHN C TRUSTEE ET AL SCOTT M LEE/SANDRA A SMUCKER LEONARD L TRUSTEE ET
PO BOX 3520 j 2990 BARBARA f 1004 TOLMAN CREEK RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
i€.
NOD
PA-2016-01909 391E14BD 1200 PA-2016-01909 391E14CA 300
TOPPO UGO J/LAUREN E WONG TUNG BALL 1 1/21/20 1b Ir
2978 BARBARA ST 1147 PARK ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
' j
j j
i
i
I
i
I
I
T Wl95P3 do-dod asodxa r....... jaded paaj f @)09 LS ejeldwal ®Aaany asn
F 909L5 ®AU3AV i 04 aui! 0uo!e puae ® i siage~ ~~aad I~sa3
CITY OF
Planning Department, 51 Winbuln Way, Ashland, Oregon 97529
541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland, ar.tts TTY: 1-800-735-2900 3H LAND
NOTICE OF APPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-01909
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2980 Chapman Lane
OWNER/APPLICANT: John Clason
DESCRIPTION: This application proposes a 499 sg, ft. Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) above the garage of the
residence currently tinder construction. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential;
ZONING: R-1-6; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 891E 14 CA TAX LOT: 1802,
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: October 24, 2016
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: November 7, 2016
9160
1
w
7
I LU a
297
I
975
l
i
A
I
I
II
i
I
1
a
2980
985
iiiiiiiii ONO No,
(11, t4
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the city of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn
Wary, Ashland, Oregon 07520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date show above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a
notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the
comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the
application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning
Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.5.1.050,G)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this
application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of
appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue, Failure to specify which ordinance criterion, the objection is based on also precludes your
right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion, Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be
provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services
Building, 51 Winburn Way„ Ashland, Oregon 97520.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305.
GAcomm-dcvlplanni ri&lannrtng ActionsWiaticing FoldeAlKOW Notices & S"igns12016TA-2016-01 90rV ocx
ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
18.2.3.040
Where accessory residential units are allowed, they are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, and shall meet all of the 3
following requirements.
A. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements.
1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. l
2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone, except that accessory residential units shall
be counted in the density of developments created under the Performance Standards Option in chapter 18.3.9.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence
on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone.
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18,4.3.040, except that E
parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the paving requirements in subsection 18,4.3.080.E.1.
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.5.2.050
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and
yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable
standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as
provided by subsection E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4,6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for
water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the
subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design
Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist,
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual
aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent
properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is
the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better
achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards.
li.
I
f:
li
r
G:Icomm-devlplannirLSTiannina Aclions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & SignsU016TA-2016-01909.docx
i~
If
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON )
County of Jackson )
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that.-
1 . I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97529, in the Community Development Department. 1
2. On 16/24/16 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope
with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person
listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each
person's name for Planning Action #2616-01909, 2980 Chapman. {
Signature of Employee
f
I
DocumenQ 1012412015 1
PA-2016-01909 399 E14CA 1700 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 2100 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 1801
ASHLAND E LAC
GREGO BELLVIEW CHURCH OF CHRIST CLASON COMPANY LLC '
GREGORY & & JACQUELINE TAYLOR MGRS 1033 TOLMAN CREEK RD 220 DEAD INDIAN MEMORIAL RD
3325 DARRELL DR
MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 100 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 900 PA-2016-01909 391E14BD 1300
COOK JEANETTE C/COOK HERBERT M CROSS WILLIAM/PAULA GREIST DONNELLY MICHAELIJAYNE C 'I
990 SPRING WAY 715 GRANDVIEW DR 2970 BARBARA ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 110 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 1200 PA-2016-01909 391 E14BD 1000
ELLIS KATHARINE C TRUSTEE ET AL FLEISHER ANTHONY HARDING PENNY MODINE
992 SPRING WAY 964 JAQUELYN ST 3000 BARBARA ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 1800 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 7900 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 1900
LIVNI INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC LOVETT RICHARD PAUL TRUSTEE ET AL MC KELVEY KEVIN KIDIANE D
2532 OLD MILL WAY PO BOX 427 PO BOX 3451
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
E
5
PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 1000 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 111 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 3800
MICHELANGELO JENNIFER PERKINS EDWARD LIELEANORE B RAMOS ROBERTOIMARIA
560 REITEN DR P 0 BOX 8 1002 TOLMAN CREEK RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 r
PA-2016-01909 391 E14BD 1400 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 2000 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 700
ROSS MICHAEL E ET AL SAIGO ROY H/BARBARA W SCHWEIGER JOHN C TRUSTEE ET AL
2599 PIONEER RD 1001 TOLMAN CREEK RD PO BOX 3520
MEDFORD, OR 97501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-01909 391 E14BD 1100 PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 3700 PA-2016-01909 391 El 48D 1200 I
SCOTT M LEE/SANDRA A SMUCKER LEONARD L TRUSTEE ET AL TOPPO UGO J/LAUREN E
2990 BARBARA 1004 TOLMAN CREEK RD 2978 BARBARA ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-2016-01909 391 E14CA 300 2980 Chapman j`
WONG TNG BALL NOC 10124/16
1147 PARK ST 22
ASHLAND, OR 97520
l
A ST
I `
1400 120 1 { 1
ti
1
1
„
1 A
,'qr p1' r 1
• 1$41 ~
I
1+, 110
r
Illllli' a
I `
s
11K i
•
k 4700
i
I
r