Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutC_746_PA-2017-00325 4 CITY ASHLAND April 13, 2017 Notice of Final Decision On April 13, 2017, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA-2017-00325 Subject Property: 746 C Street Applicant: Philip and Micaila Gahr Description: A request for Site Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the conversion (and expansion) of an existing garage into habitable living space to be used as an Accessory Travelers' Accommodation. This request includes Site Design Review for the future conversion of the newly created living space into a formal second dwelling unit upon the discontinuation of the accessory travelers' accommodation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E09AC; TAX LOT: 8700. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Brandon Goldman in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 l www.ashland.or.us i SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the, City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for• Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ! www.ashland.or.us kt ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT Cr< FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00325 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 746 C Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Philip and Micaila Gahr DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the conversion (and expansion) of an existing garaged into habitable living space to be used as an Accessory Travelers' Accommodation. This request would approve the future conversion of the newly created living space into a formal second dwelling unit upon the discontinuation of the conditional use. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E09AC; TAX LOT: 8700.. SUBMITTAL DATE: February 23, 2017 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: March 2, 2017 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: April 13, 2017 FINAL DECISION DATE: April 25, 2017 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: October 25, 2018 DECISION The subject property is located at 746 C Street, Assessor's map 391E 09AC, tax lot 8700. The property is approximately 0.17 acres in size and is zoned R-2 allowing for multifamily development, although the property is occupied by one single family home and accessory structures. The main residence was constructed circa 1910 and the detached accessory structure to be expanded and converted into the proposed Accessory Travelers Accommodation has been used as a garage. The primary home retains high historic integrity and is considered "Historic Contributing" on the National Register of Historic Places (survey#331 Railroad Historic District). The application proposes to remodel the existing garage, including a small addition and new hipped roof, to create a 500 sq.ft habitable area, and a 79sq.ft. storage area. The 500 sq.ft. habitable area is proposed to be an Accessory Travelers Unit, however the applicant is seeking approval to allow its conversion to a separate full time rental unit at a future date. The 79 sq.ft. storage area will be separate from the habitable space, with its own exterior entrance. As proposed, there are no physical changes to the primary home at 746 C Street. . The Municipal Code contains specific requirements for the conversion of a portion of a residential home for use as an Accessory Travelers' Accommodation. Such requirements include: ® The operator of the accessory travelers' accommodation must be the property owner and the property must be the operator's primary residence. The operator must be present during operation of the accessory travelers' accommodation. ® The property is limited to having one accessory travelers' accommodation unit, covered under a single reservation and consisting of two or fewer bedrooms. Meals are not provided and kitchen cooking facilities are not permitted with an accessory travelers' accommodation, with the exception of kitchen cooking facilities for the primary residence. ® The total number of guests occupying an accessory travelers' accommodation must not exceed two people per bedroom. ® The property must have two off-street parking spaces. The total number of guest vehicles associated with the accessory travelers' accommodation must not exceed one. ® Signs are not permitted in conjunction with the operation of an accessory travelers' accommodation. ® The property owner must maintain a City of Ashland business license and pay all transient occupancy tax in PA-2017-00325 746 C St./b1g Page 1 i x accordance with AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04. ® Advertising for an accommodation must include the City planning action number assigned to the land use approval. li ® Before operation of the Accessory Traveler's Accommodation, the structure must be inspected by the Fire Department and Jackson County Health Department. j r The applicants have submitted materials to the Planning Department that demonstrate compliance with these approval standards, and with the criteria within the Conditional Use section of the Ashland Municipal Code for an Accessory Travelers Accommodation. The home at 746 C St. will serve as the primary residence of the property owners. The area to be used as the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation unit identified in the application materials is a 500sq.ft. habitable space within the remodeled and expanded garage. The current garage is nonconforming in relation to the rear yard setbacks as it is approximately one foot from the rear property line. Current setback requirements off on an alley would require a minimum 4ft. setback. The applicant is proposing an addition to this existing non-conforming structure where the addition will comply with required setbacks at a proposed 12' 4" from the rear property line and over 6' from the east property line. The shadow of the proposed addition and increased roof height will cast onto the subject property to the north. The applicant's proposal to operate a single room Accessory Travelers' Accommodation requires two parking spaces. As identified on the applicant's site plan, the property has adequate space for two off-street parking spaces. The application also identified an on-street parking space on C Street to accommodate a third space which would be required upon conversion of the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation into a full time dwelling. As the application seeks to gain approval of both the currently proposed Accessory Travelers' Accommodation, and a potential future conversion of this space into a dwelling, the on-street parking space presented satisfies the future requirement for three total spaces in conjunction with a future formal second dwelling unit. The floor plan for the remodel of the current garage presently shows a kitchen facility to be installed, however the land use ordinance stipulates a kitchen cooking facility is not permitted with an accessory travelers' accommodation (18.2.3.220.C.2). However, at the time the unit is to convert to a full time dwelling unit a kitchen will be necessary. As the installation of cooking facilities constitutes a kitchen, a stove cannot be added until such time as the use as an Accessory Travelers Accommodation is discontinued, and the use as a second dwelling is formalized. Additionally, at the time of such a conversion the property owner will have to pay the applicable building permit fees and System Development Charges relating to a second dwelling prior to the installation of cooking facilities and occupancy as a residence. Conditions of approval relating to both scenarios are included in these findings. City departments have not expressed any concern with the applicant's proposal as adequate public facilities (water, sewer, electric, and transportation) are in place to serve the property. The site is within walking distance of downtown and, due to the proximity of Lithia Way, using public transportation is a viable option for travelers and or residents. The Historic Commission has reviewed the proposed addition to the garage, and the exterior modifications including the new steeper pitched hip roof. The Commission has provided recommendations relating to the exterior modifications of the building including using smooth rather than woodgrain siding, and the use of beige vinyl windows rather than white vinyl windows. Lastly, the application complies with all of the applicable provisions of the R-2 zoning district. The property is located within the Historic District, and the proposed exterior changes to the buildings will not negatively impact the historic design or integrity of the impact area. No trees are proposed to be removed. It is the opinion of Staff that the property has adequate landscaping presently installed to meet all standards in AMC 18.4.4. The operation of an Accessory Travelers' Accommodation, or the conversion of the structure into a second dwelling will have minimal impact on public facilities. Staff finds that the proposal will not have a negative effect on the impact area vis-a-vis architectural compatibility, air quality, generation of noise, light and glare, and the development of adjacent properties. PA-2017-00325 746 C St./blg Page 2 i The approval criteria for a Travelers' Accommodation are detailed in C 18.2.3.220 as follows: Where travelers' accommodations and accessory travelers' accommodations are allowed, they require a Conditional Permit under chapter 18.5.4, are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, and shall meet c the following requirements. See definitions of travelers' accommodation and accessory travelers' accommodation in part 18-6. A. Travelers' Accommodations and Accessory Travelers' Accommodations. Travelers'! accommodations and accessory travelers'accommodationsshall meet all ofthefollowing requirements. 1. An accommodation must meet all applicable building, fire, and related safety codes at all times and must be inspected by the Fire Department before occupan cyfollo wing approval of a Conditional Use Permit and periodically thereafter pursuant to AMC 15.28. 2. The business-owner of a travelers' accommodation or the property owner of an accessory travelers' accommodation must maintain a City business license and pay all transient occupancy tax in accordance with AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04 as required. 3. Advertising for an accommodation must include the City planning action number assigned to the land use approval. 4. Offering the availability of residential property for use as an accommodation without a valid Conditional Use Permit approval, current business license and transient occupancy tax registration is prohibited and shall be subject to enforcement procedures. B. Travelers' Accommodations. In addition to the standards described above in section 18.23.220.A, travelers' accommodations shall meet all of the following requirements. 1. The property is located within 200feet ofa boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector as identified on the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the propertyfrom a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. 2. During operation of a travelers' accommodation, the property on which the travelers' accommodation is sited must be the primary residence of the business-owner. "Business-owner"shall be defined as a person or persons who own the property and accommodation outright; or who have entered into a lease agreement with the property owner(s) allowing for the operation of the accommodation. Such lease agreement must specifically state that the property owner is not involved in the day-to-day operation or financial management of the accommodation and that the business- owner has actual ownership of the business and is wholly responsible for all operations associated with the accommodation, and has actual ownership of the business. 3. The primary residence on the site mustbe atleast20years old. The primary residence may be altered and adapted for travelers' accommodation use, including expansion of floor area. Additional structures may be allowed to accommodate additional units, but must be in conformance with all setback and lot coverage standards of the underlying zone. 4. The number of travelers' accommodation units allowed shall be determined by the following criteria, a. The total number of units, including the business-owner's unit, shall be determined by dividing the total square footage of the lot by 1,800 square feet. Contiguous lots under the same ownership may be combined to increase lot area and the number of units, but not in excess of the maximum established by this ordinance. The maximum number of accommodation units shall not exceed nine per approved traveler's accommodation with primary lotfrontage on boulevard streets. For travelers' accommodation without primary lotfrontage on a designated boulevard, but within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector street, the maximum number of units shall be seven. Street designations shall be as determined by the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the propertyfrom a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collectorshall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. b. Excluding the business-owner's unit and the area of the structure it will occupy, there must be at least 400 square feet ofgross interior floor space remaining per unit. PA-2017-00325 746 C SUblg Page 3 i 5. Each accommodation must have one off-street parking space and the business-owner's unit must have two parking spaces. All parking spaces shall be in conformance with chapter 18.4.3. 6. Only oneground or wall sign, constructed of a non-plastic material, non-interior illuminated, and a maximum of six square feet total surface area is allowed. Any exterior illumination of signage shall be installed such that it does not directly illuminate any residential structures adjacent or nearby the travelers' accommodation in accordance with subsection 18.4.4.050.C.1. Z An annual inspection by the Jackson County Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. 8. Transfer of business-ownership of a travelers' accommodation shall be subject to all requirements of this section and conform with the criteria of this section. Any further modifications beyond the existing approval shall be in conformance with all requirements of this section. C. Accessory Travelers'Accommodations. In addition to the standards in section 18.2.3.220.A, accessory travelers' accommodations shall meet all of the following requirements. 1. The operator of the accessory travelers' accommodation must be the property owner and the property must be the operator's primary residence. The operator must be present during operation of the accessory travelers' accommodation. 2. The property is limited to having one accessory travelers' accommodation unit, covered under a single reservation and consisting of two orfewer bedrooms. Meals are not provided and kitchen cooking facilities are not permitted with an accessory travelers' accommodation, with the exception of kitchen cooking facilities for the primary residence. 3. The total number ofguests occupying an accessory travelers' accommodation must not exceed two people per bedroom. 4. The property must have two off-street parking spaces. The total number ofguest vehicles associated with the accessory travelers' accommodation must not exceed one. 5. Signs are not permitted in conjunction with the operation of an accessory travelers' accommodation. The approval criteria for a Conditional Use Permit are detailed in AMC 18.5.4.050.A as follows: A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. 1. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare. f. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use. 4. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. 5. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows [a, b, d - 1, not included as not applicable]. PA-2017-00325 746 C St./blg Page 4 is I c. R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. The criteria for Site review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follows A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. 8. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).` C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. i In staff's assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action 42017-00325 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2017- 00325 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified here. 2. That the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation shall be operated in conformance with the standards enumerated in AMC sections 18.2.3.220A and 18.2.3.220C. 3. That the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation shall meet all applicable building, fire, and related safety codes at all times, and shall be inspected by the Fire Department before commencing operations and periodically thereafter pursuant to AMC 15.28. i 4. That an annual inspection of the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation by the Jackson County PA-2017-00325 746 C St./blg Page 5 k i. f Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of ! Oregon. 5. That the applicants shall obtain and maintain a city business license and register for and pay all transient occupancy tax as required in AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04 prior to operation of the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation.' 6. That no signage visible from the public right of way is permitted on site. 7. That any advertisement for the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation unit must include the City of Ashland Planning Action number assigned to this city land use approval (i.e., PA#2017-00325). 8. That no kitchen facilities shall be installed in the Accessory Travelers' Accommodation unit, unless the use as a travelers' accommodation is discontinued for the conversion into a second dwelling unit. 9. That prior to installation of a kitchen facility operation as Accessory Travelers' Accommodation shall be discontinued. Installation of a kitchen shall require building permit approval and that associated fees and charges for the second residential unit shall be paid including any applicable system development charges for water, sewer, storm water, parks, and transportation. 10. That prior to occupancy as a second dwelling: a. That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right-of-Way. b. That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be fs, installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements. _ATril 13, 2017 13 "11"Molna Di ector- Date G PA-2017-00325 746 C St./blg Page 6 I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING I; STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On APRIL 13, 2017 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2017-00325, 746 C STREET. ~,+~)n,W,- Signature o mployee h Document? 4/12/2017 'i PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 12600 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8500 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8600 ASHLAND CITY OF BARTON JOHN E TRUSTEE ET AL BASS RONALD E TRUSTEE ET AL CITY HALL 17671 SNOW CREEK RD 78 SIXTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 BEND, OR 97701 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8400 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9000 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9300 BRUNO DENNIS TRUSTEE ET AL CENTURYLINK DALLAGIACOMO-RHODES KAROL 4010 W OLIVET RD ATTN: GENERAL ACCOUNTANT- TAX 32 SELENA CT SANTA ROSA, CA 95401 1600 7TH AVE 2306 ANTIOCH, CA 94509 SEATTLE, WA 98191 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 2500 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9500 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8700 DENON WILLOW FEINSTEIN ALLAN DAVID TRUSTEE GAHR PHILIP E AND MICAELA M GAHR T 132 SIXTH ST 777 E MAIN ST 746 C ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9600 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8200 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 1500 GREENEWOOD HOMES LLC HUTTON HARRY E/ZELPHA G LANG PHILIP C TRUSTEE ET AL P 0 BOX 516 59 SIXTH ST 758 B ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8800 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 1400 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 1600 MULLER HUGH H/GENEVIEVE ANN PETERSON WALTER S ROOKLYN DALE TRUSTEE ET AL 3150 JUANIPERO WAY APT 312 107 SEVENTH ST 137 SEVENTH ST MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9700 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 2600 SANDERS J AND L REV SURVIVOR'S PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 2800 ROSS CAROL M TRUSTEE ET AL TAU ET AL SIMON EMILY C/O STONE FRUIT LLC 120 SIXTH ST 26 NE 11TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 820 C ST PORTLAND, OR 97232 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9400 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8900 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8100 SOLONIUK LEONARD TRUSTEE ET AL STRONG BETTY L ET AL TALENT PROPERTIES LLC 1751 EL CAPITAN PO BOX 628 64 THIRD STREET REDDING, CA 96001 TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8300 PA-2017-00325 C STREET TOPCUOGLU SIVEZAT LALE ET AL CHRISTPOHER BROWN N746 OD 22 77 SIXTH ST 426 A STREET, STE 101 NO ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 4/13/17 r i~ r / a t ~ ~~d, ' r i - ~ ~ ~ ;r' / h ~lh I a i i '~r - ~~~,.n / r ' " i I CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT-NONCONFORMING STRUCTURES (CHAPTER 18.1.4.030) 2. Restoration, rehabilitation, repair, and maintenance of a nonconforming structure (e.g., roof repair, upgrading electrical systems, and similar work) are permitted where all of the following standards are met: h a. The structure is not changed in size or shape (i. e., three-dimensional building envelope must not change including but not limited to building footprint, mass, volume, roof shape, and height). The applicant is proposing to replace the existing roof with new trusses and a change of roof-type from gable to hip, in conformance with neighboring properties on the alley. The proposed roof replacement will increase the height of the ridge 1'-6"(from 12'-6" to 14'-o") and the slope of roof from 5/12 to 6/12. This will not have an adverse effect on solar setback or views, as the proposed alteration occurs at the alley property line to the south of the subject parcel. -------------------------------roof weak 12'-6" laatehelght IL 8'-0" _finlshed floor leye 0'-0" existing west elevation(alley/parking entrance) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - roof weak 14'-0" - _ _ - _ - -plate heigh 0.. O D~ E is -_-f_nishedfloorlevel n 0' - 0„ proposed west elevation(alley/parking entrance) 12 i f b. Not more than 40 percent of any exterior building wall and not more than so percent of the building floor area is permanently removed; where a larger alteration is proposed, approval of a Conditional Use Permit is required. i SJ~o demolrshed of original footprint L -j F- ILI 25% demo of original 8.2% of original floor area removed 22% of original linear perimeter wall to be removed (21'-2" of 94'-8") ) c. Where temporary orpermanent removal of a building wall orfloor area is proposed, the ownershall submit with a building permit application a construction management plan that documents existing building conditions, proposed methods of construction, and proposed building plans. The applicant intends to submit a construction management plan with the building permit application that complies with the documentation of existing building condition along with proposed methods of construction and building plans. 13 i : e SIDING/COLOR/WINDOW FINISH EXAMPLES TO MATCH PRIMARY RESIDENCE AT 746 C STREET VIEW OF MAIN ENTRANCE(FACING C STREET):' i I 5 t J b F k.. E k:`ti s 0 SIDING: HARDIPLANK: 4" EXPOSURE COLOR: SAND BEIGE(BODY), TAUPE(TRIM) WINDOWS: VINYL(WHITE) DOORS: RED 14 t SIDING/COLOR/WINDOW FINISH EXAMPLES TO MATCH PRIMARY RESIDENCE AT 746 C STREET I VIEW FROM REAR YARD OF PROPOSED UNIT(FACING MAIN RESIDENCE): 7 t, Y ry, ter.:. e w i SIDING: HARDIPLANK: 4" EXPOSURE COLOR: SAND BEIGE(BODY), TAUPE(TRIM) WINDOWS: VINYL(WHITE) SLIDING DOORS: TOUPE 15 f DETAIL AT WINDOW/DOOR TRIM, TYPICAL: Z I r~ Sa t 1 I 5 i 16 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: SIDING: HARDIPLANK: 4" EXPOSURE COLOR: SAND BEIGE(BODY), TAUPE(TRIM) WINDOWS: VINYL(WHITE) SLIDING DOORS: TOUPE ENTRY DOOR(S): RED 14-0" LO-0"P1,61 yr" ------fie heigt$ i r i _fn6hed fbar level d-0, proposed west elevation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - jqjf peak A'\ 14'-0" -----~ateheig1 8 0„ I T finished floor level 0'-0" proposed east elevation 17 I I a 0 0 HE O p n n I 3 N O O E: (D (p (D CD O p II 3 7 T e 11 1 ILI I ( I I I I t A I ~ I //Ark I j LJ I I ' I I I t I I I I I ~ i I Ia I ~a I e - m to I~ I~ ~jO I~ 0 4In ~?I~0 A o ~ A 16 ~ ~ im I~. 18 ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Planning Application Review March 8, 2017 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00325 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 746 C Street APPLICANT\OWNER: Philip and Micaila Gahr DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the conversion (and expansion) of an existing garaged into habitable living space to be used as an Accessory Travelers' Accommodation. This request would approve the future conversion of the newly created living space into a formal second dwelling unit upon the discontinuation of the conditional use. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391E09AC; TAX LOT: 8700. Recommendation: The Historic Commission recommends that the public hearing be continued to allow the applicant the opportunity to make revisions to the original application submittals. The Historic Commission made specific recommendations to include the following revisions in the new application submittals: 1. Include more historic details and information regarding color, dimension, and type of windows, siding, paint, trim. 2. More specifically, Exterior elevations of all proposed buildings, drawn to scale of one inch equals ten feet or greater; such plans shall indicate the material, color, texture, shape, and design features of the building, and include mechanical devices not fully enclosed in the building (AMC 18.5.2.040.B.4.a). Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Cory Darrow From: Mark Schexnayder Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 9:38 AM To: christopher brown Cc: Cory Darrow; Maria Harris Subject: RE: 746 c street historical I c Hey Chris, The Historic Commission recommended a continuance of the public hearing to next month in order to give you the opportunity to add more historic details to the plans (i.e. plans showing window types, colors, and siding materials). In addition, the Historic Commission pointed out that the conversion from a garage to living space may technically require a Demolition Permit. Please check to make sure that your project will not require a Demolition Permit and submit revised materials confirming a demolition will take place or evidence to the contrary. I have included the Building Code definition of a demolition at the end of this message. In addition, AMC 18.1.4.030, states "Not more than 40 percent of any exterior building wall and not more than 50 percent of the building floor area is permanently removed; where a larger alteration is proposed, a Conditional Use Permit is required." The Historic Commission also pointed out that the proposed roof pitch of the converted structure is different than the existing building. This fact means that your proposal would also require a Conditional Use Permit to Alter A Non- Conforming Structure (AMC 18.1.4.030.13). Please submit revised materials for a Conditional Use Permit if your project proposal is to change the existing roof pitch or submit materials clarifying that you do not propose to change the "Three- dimensional building envelope including but not limited to building footprint, mass, volume, roof shape, and height" as described in AMC 18.1.4.030.A.2. I have CC'd Cory Darrow and Maria Harris on this E-mail. Please respond all with any questions that you may have regarding this information. 15.04.210 Demolition or relocation of structures A. For purposes of sections 15.04.210 through 15.04.218, the following terms, phrases, words and their derivations mean: 1. Demolition: To raze, destroy, dismantle, or any act or process that may cause partial or total destruction of a structure where less than 60% of the structure's external walls will be retained in place; or where less than a majority of the facade will remain. 2. Facade: The front or principal face(s) of a building, excluding an attached garage of a residential structure, sometimes distinguished from the other faces by elaboration of architectural or ornamental details and often serving as the primary entrance. All the best, Mark Schexnayder, Assistant Planner City of Ashland, Community Development Department 20 E. Main St., Ashland, OR 97520 541.488.5305 Tel 1 i i t 800.735.2900 TTY 541.552.2050 Fax This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Law for disclosure and retention. If you have received this message in error, please contact me at 541.552.2044. Thank you. From: Cory Darrow Sent: Monday, March 13, 2017 8:37 AM To: christopher brown Cc: Mark Schexnayder Subject: RE: 746 c street historical Hi Chris, I have cc'd Mark Schexnayder (Staff Liaison to the HC). My understanding is that the HC had concerns with the proposal. Mark will be able to provide greater details. Best, Cory Darrow, Assistant Planner 541.552.2052 Tel 800.735.2900 TTY 541.552.2050 Fax City of Ashland, Department of Community Development 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, OR 97520: This email transmission is official business of the City of Ashland and it is subject to Oregon Public Records Law for disclosure and retention. If you have received this message in error, please contact me at (541) 552-2041. Thank you. From: christopher brown [mailto:arkitek@arkitek.us] Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2017 2:36 PM To: Cory Darrow Subject: 746 c street historical hi cory, i just wanted to check in on the status of 746 c street at the historical commission meeting last week, i had to attend my daughters talent show and was unable to make it to the meeting, thanks cb arkitek christopher brown AIA NCARB LEED HOR1 ES BD+C @ 426 a street suite 101 ashland, OR 97520 ph.541.591.9988 2 I i F t NPS Forth 10-900-A OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service Register National Historic Continuation Amended-March 2002 Section Number: 7 Page: 95 Ashland Railroad Addition Historic District, Ashland, OR Ashland businessmen and owners of "Rose Brothers Confectionery." The Rose brothers retained ownership until 1922 when the house was sold to Isaac Meese. In 1948 the house was occupied by Charles A. Smith. Floyd Grimes rented the property in 1964. The Rose Brothers Rental House retains high integrity and effectively relates its historic period of development. ID # 331.0 survey #125 LUDLOW-STEVE NS HOUSE 1909 746 C STREET 391E09AC 8700 Other: Vernacular Historic Contributing A single-story vernacular ell, this wood-frame house was built in 1910 after the lots were purchased by E. L. Ludlow. "E. L. Ludow has bought four lots near the Catholic Church from P. O. Smith, which he plans to considerably improve." (Tidings, 6-Dec-1909) Just a few weeks later the paper reported that Ludlow was already underway. In July 1911 Bertrand R. Stevens, a teacher, purchased the property and the family retained ownership until 1930. The Ludlow-Stevens House retains high integrity and effectively relates its historic period of development. ID # 332.0 Survey #126 BRYANT-TURNER HOUSE [Modified] 1990c 774 C STREET 391E09AC 8800 Other: Vernacular Non-Historic, Non-Contributing The social history of this mixed one and one-half to two story wood-frame dwelling is unclear. Dated at 1905 by the County Assessor, the one and one-half story gable portion shows in 1928 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps when the house was owned by Grover N. and Mary Bryant. A series of transfers throughout this period involving the Bryants and Ruth Turner left the ownership unclear until 1944 when the Bryants assume full control and retain ownership through the early 1980s. (JCD 254:605) No owner prior to the early 1920s was located. In the 1990s the two-story gablle wing was constructed, yielding the present ell footprint and the building was rehabilitated with the new full-with front porch.41 While generally compatible and incorporating at least some elements of the original dwelling, this structure is essentially as built in the 1990s and is accordingly considered a compatible, non-historic, feature within the Railroad District. ID # 333.0 survey #127 POLEY, W. M. RENTAL HOUSE 1903c 89 SEVENTH ST 391E09AC 8900 Other: Vernacular Historic Contributing This one-story vernacular cottage was built as a rntal in 1903. "Mrs. Wilmer M. Poley has bought Lots 1 and 2 in Block S at the corner of 7' of C Streets." (Tidings, 26-Feb-1903, 2:5) Poley, wife a prominent druggist who lived elsewhere in Ashland, kept this as a rental until 1914.42 In 1948 the house was occupied by Mrs. Della Perry and in 1964 the house was owned by Mrs. Lila Tucker, who moved sometime prior to 1977. The Poley House retains high integrity and effectively relates its historic period of development. 41 Although built recently, no information on the permit or the contractor for this addition and remodel was located in the "C Street" file at the City of Ashland Building Department. 42 The Poley's own house, at 64 Gresham, outside the district, was designed by prominent Rogue Valley architect Frank Chamberlain Clark. 14 Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax; 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or,us TTY; 1-800-735-2900 1 NOTICE OF APPLICATION I PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00325 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 746 C Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Philip and Micaila Gahr DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the conversion (and expansion) of an existing garage into habitable living space to be used as an Accessory Travelers' Accommodation. This request includes Site Design Review for the future conversion of the newly created living space into a formal second dwelling unit upon the discontinuation of the accessory travelers' accommodation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391 E09AC; TAX LOT: 8700. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday March 8, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 2, 2017 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 16, 2017 1 9:0; d ~ /~746 78 1 ? / / > ,774 Approx. location of proposal 50' ) The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing FolderWailed Notices & Signs\2017TA-201 7-003 2 5.docs s i E : SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 r The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design t Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 18.5.4.050.A A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. 1. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage, b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area, d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare, f. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan, g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use. 4. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. 5. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows. a. WR and RR. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones, b. R-1. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. c. R-2 and R-3, Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. d. C-1. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. e, C-1-D. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 1.00 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. f. E-1. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. g. M-1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, complying with all ordinance requirements. h. CM-C1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.50 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. I. CM-OE and CM-MU. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area, complying with all ordinance requirements. GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\Ntailed Notices R Signs\2017\PA-20 t 7-00325.docx E F k. CM-NC. The retail commercial uses lis' i chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed a' intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. 1. HC, NM, and SOU. The permitted uses listed in chapters 18.3.3 Health Care Services, 18.3.5 North Mountain Neighborhood, and 18.3.6 Southern Oregon University District, respectively, complying with all ordinance requirements. i k, TRAVELERS' ACCOMMODATIONS 18.2.3.220 Where travelers' accommodations and accessory travelers' accommodations are allowed, they require a Conditional Permit under chapter 18.5.4, are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, and shall meet the following requirements, See definitions of travelers' accommodation and accessory travelers' accommodation in part 18-6. A. Travelers' Accommodations and Accessory Travelers' Accommodations. Travelers' accommodations and accessory travelers' accommodations shall meet all of the following requirements. 1. An accommodation must meet all applicable building, fire, and related safety codes at all times and must be inspected by the Fire Department before occupancy following approval of a Conditional Use Permit and periodically thereafter pursuant to AMC 15.28. 2. The business-owner of a travelers' accommodation or the property owner of an accessory travelers' accommodation must maintain a City business license and pay all transient occupancy tax in accordance with AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04 as required. 3. Advertising for an accommodation must include the City planning action number assigned to the land use approval. 4. Offering the availability of residential property for use as an accommodation without a valid Conditional Use Permit approval, current business license and transient occupancy tax registration is prohibited and shall be subject to enforcement procedures. B. Travelers' Accommodations, In addition to the standards described above in section 18.23.220.A, travelers' accommodations shall meet all of the following requirements. 1. The property is located within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector as identified on the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. 2. During operation of a travelers' accommodation, the property on which the travelers' accommodation is sited must be the primary residence of the business-owner. "Business-owner" shall be defined as a person or persons who own the property and accommodation outright; or who have entered into a lease agreement with the property owner(s) allowing for the operation of the accommodation. Such lease agreement must specifically state that the property owner is not involved in the day-to-day operation or financial management of the accommodation and that the business-owner has actual ownership of the business and is wholly responsible for all operations associated with the accommodation, and has actual ownership of the business. 3. The primary residence on the site must be at least 20 years old. The primary residence may be altered and adapted for travelers' accommodation use, including expansion of floor area. Additional structures may be allowed to accommodate additional units, but must be in conformance with all setback and lot coverage standards of the underlying zone. 4. The number of travelers' accommodation units allowed shall be determined by the following criteria. a. The total number of units, including the business-owner's unit, shall be determined by dividing the total square footage of the lot by 1,800 square feet. Contiguous lots under the same ownership may be combined to increase lot area and the number of units, but not in excess of the maximum established by this ordinance. The maximum number of accommodation units shall not exceed nine per approved traveler's accommodation with primary lot frontage on boulevard streets. For travelers' accommodation without primary lot frontage on a designated boulevard, but within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector street, the maximum number of units shall be seven. Street designations shall be as determined by the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. b. Excluding the business-owner's unit and the area of the structure it will occupy, there must be at least 400 square feet of gross interior floor space remaining per unit. 5. Each accommodation must have one off-street parking space and the business-owner's unit must have two parking spaces. All parking spaces shall be in conformance with chapter 18.4.3. 6. Only one ground or wall sign, constructed of a non-plastic material, non-interior illuminated, and a maximum of six square feet total surface area is allowed. Any exterior illumination of signage shall be installed such that it does not directly illuminate any residential structures adjacent or nearby the travelers' accommodation in accordance with subsection 18.4.4.050.0.1. 7. An annual inspection by the Jackson County Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. 8. Transfer of business-ownership of a travelers' accommodation shall be subject to all requirements of this section and conform with the criteria of this section. Any further modifications beyond the existing approval shall be in conformance with all requirements of this section. C. Accessory Travelers' Accommodations. In addition to the standards in section 18.2.3.220.A, accessory travelers' accommodations shall meet all of the following requirements. 1. The operator of the accessory travelers' accommodation must be the property owner and the property must be the operator's primary residence. The operator must be present during operation of the accessory travelers' accommodation. 2. The property is limited to having one accessory travelers' accommodation unit, covered under a single reservation and consisting of two or fewer bedrooms. Meals are not provided and kitchen cooking facilities are not permitted with an accessory travelers' accommodation, with the exception of kitchen cooking facilities for the primary residence. 3. The total number of guests occupying an accessory travelers' accommodation must not exceed two people per bedroom. 4. The property must have two off-street parking spaces. The total number of guest vehicles associated with the accessory travelers' accommodation must not exceed one. 5. Signs are not permitted in conjunction with the operation of an accessory travelers' accommodation. G:\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Polder\D4ailed Notices & Signs\2017\PA-2017-00325.docx X i dt E } t X d11 d ilP y, ~yy tYt+ tjt may. •It ° r°,' i7 ,~I„ ti m_ i i 6~nv. ; B t t °^3, tP 'd m~V ® 9tt dj~ ~ id_a ti tS°r..-_° f ~t d! d t~ 16 _ P Ia` iP e!d i e m SIP ttt i It td tjt 1 t G Rt i H 7aay~S, t p'~ d 4M119r R1P o Xp is !j - `.u`M1!?®H !!t t F It. t t ttti t' I ' li iI i d P, ! ! n - -0 m t t 1 Pld X: it p 1z,~ tt V a 4jHO t 1 pt 1 t .3"0 t t 'ma, ° ~ Y 1 } it t e~ _ F T.t 2w a" d e 1 Iwo .qtr ~ 1 H a' ~ t il< Y_Y iii dT 11,O)a V is SA-0 140 1} _ ~t1I'V i - p p Sir 83 1 a 1~. 1 . pY{Y ° t 74 ,itt itt' ,tI o i i 6700 i ° d 1~~ _ w v i tt j II 17+F.l u ~ 4P N tP X 'C'VV>~P i 0,101 ~1 if I 9"o f 1 Ilium" - Mine 1250 i~ ENO to j 1220 Cod t 'r r AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) I The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 3/2/171 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2017-00325, 746 C St. Signature of Employee DocumeW 3/2/2017 i E PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8500 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8600 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8400 BARTON JOHN E TRUSTEE ET AL BASS RONALD E TRUSTEE ET AL BRUNO DENNIS TRUSTEE ET AL 17671 SNOW CREEK RD 78 SIXTH ST 4010 W OLIVET RD BEND, OR 97701 ASHLAND, OR 97520 SANTA ROSA, CA 95401 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9000 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9300 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 2500 CENTURYLINK DALLAGIACOMO-RHODES KAROL DENON WILLOW ATTN: GENERAL ACCOUNTANT- TAX 32 SELENA CT 132 SIXTH ST 1600 7TH AVE 2306 ANTIOCH, CA 94509 ASHLAND, OR 97520 SEATTLE, WA 98191 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9500 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8700 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9600 FEINSTEIN ALLAN DAVID TRUSTEE GAHR PHILIP E AND MICAELA M GAHR T GREENEWOOD HOMES LLC 777 E MAIN ST ET AL P 0 BOX 516 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PO BOX 1409 ASHLAND, OR 97520 JACKSONVILLE, OR 97530 I PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8200 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 1500 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8800 HUTTON HARRY E/ZELPHA G LANG PHILIP C TRUSTEE ET AL MULLER HUGH H/GENEVIEVE ANN 59 SIXTH ST 758 B ST 3150 JUANIPERO WAY APT 312 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 1600 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 1400 ROOKLYN DALE/MEYER ROOKLYN PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 2600 PETERSON WALTER S ROSS CAROL M TRUSTEE ET AL 107 SEVENTH ST KIMBERLY SEVENTH ST 120 SIXTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND137 SEVENTH 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9700 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 2800 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 9400 SANDERS J AND L REV SURVIVOR'S SIMON EMILY C/O STONE FRUIT LLC SOLONIUK LEONARD TRUSTEE ET AL TRU ET AL 26 NE 11TH ST 1751 EL CAPITAN 820 C ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PORTLAND, OR 97232 REDDING, CA 96001 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8900 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8100 PA-2017-00325 391 E09AC 8300 STRONG BETTY L ET AL TALENT PROPERTIES LLC TOPCUOGLU SIVEZAT LALE ET AL PO BOX 628 64 THIRD STREET 77 SIXTH ST TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2017-00325 PA-2017-00325 746 C St PHILIP & MICAELA GAHR CHRISTOPHER BROWN 23 746 C STREET 426 A ST, STE 101 NOC 3/2/17 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 z \ ZONING G IT APPLICATION Planning Division CI T* OF Tp~ 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE # PA-7~y 7~p~ 541-488-5305 Fax541-488-6006 ~J 0015 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT C svelc-n S / ® Cs ~osn A C,44+6-e- ro -5-ce S ® a DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? ❑ YES 0 Street Address 7q& S r A u-G® r Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E (9 Tax Lot(s) 9 7 c o Zoning Comp Plan Designation t_0 Da"Al.51r1l Ve_r/°r-4 /cy APPLICANT Name ; J,2i r •i(0. M _ Phone Z° l® ail CoM4 Address City l Zip 1 PROPERTY OWNER Name ltd,,, it' Al ton (ot, 6 14 Phone, l® l®® E Mail i v Address 4 & City IL I' Zip SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title 140-1-*! Name 15"PAIOX ® 6""Al Phone '5'y/ 1-79 E-Mail ! lc 1 r ,44/ • Lo I: Address L/ 2 4 XL -,1r&- / City -}S oyb zip 7 7 5'2. y i Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further F111 2 3 2017 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard ill result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed Lee. If I h ve any d ts, I m advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance, Applicant's Si ature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. A Property Ow is Signature (required) Date [ro be completed by City Stafll Date Received Zoning Permit Type e , Filing Fee $ ) I OVER 0 GAcomm-dev\planning\Foms & Handouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc J M_'. __i G XIVQFI 1 ,-22.17 PROJECT NAME. 746 C St a TYPE F PLANNING ACTIN: Residential Site Review CHR umm prj BR6~& r6 PROJECT INFORMATION: N OWNER: Philip/Micaela Gahr % 746 C Street Ashland, OR 97520 ARCHITECT: Christopher Brown 426 A Street Suite a.oi Ashland, OR 97520 PROJECT ADDRESS: 7y.6 C Street Ashland, OR 97520 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 39-iE-og CD Tax lot 8700 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low-Density Multi-Family Residential 1', 23 ZONING DESIGNATION: 1p1 R-2 SITE DATA: Area of Property: 7,405.2 S.F. (.17 acres) ioo% Proposed Residence Total Area: 5oo S.F. 7% Proposed Garage Total Area: Bo S.F. I% Existing Main House Coverage Area: x.,51.2 S.F. 20% Existing Pool/Patio Area: 850 S.F. 11% Impervious Surface Area 688 S.F. 9% Total Lot Coverage: 3,63o S.F. &.q% Landscape/Undisturbed Area: 3,775 S.F. 51,% 1 PA IR'r 6 0,! TIRED-. Total Spaces Required: 3 [Existing (Main House(a..5) + c oo sf Proposed Residential Unit(l) ® 2.5 credits] Total Spaces Required 3 Spaces PR "O" D PARKING SPACES: Total Spaces Proposed: 3' On-Street Standard i Spaces ®n-Site Standard :L Spaces Compact :L Spaces On-Site Total 3 Spaces J proposed street credit I I off-street parking ®xiaitra re64darn nd In wpe) 111 111 i , I j I UA-A ~ j o ILI ALL 2 t SITE DESCRIPTION: t LAND USE: In the general area of the subject property, the use is low-density multi-family residential (Zoned: R®2). SETBACKS: According to the land use ordinance, the'rear' property line is the line that is parallel with the public -Wo" alley (6tn/7th St) behind C Street. The existing garage to be converted to the proposed residence will remain in the existing location and therefore is not required to meet the setback requirements at the alley(4'Flo"). The proposed new addition build-out is located 12'-4" from the alley property line, and therefore a non-issue. The setbacks at east/west property lines are both in accordance with current city requirements. There is a 5'-o" vegetated buffer at the west property line between the alley parking space and the adjacent property. The proposed residence has a storage/shop area adjacent to the alley parking, thus providing the 8'-o" required separation distance between residential use and parking area. s.o Rear Property Line(Southern/Alley-side) L~I i Wil Mla raw„ 1PL 2-'-0or hngpufmag 'i q 9 G- pr-, I&' 50A 10'-10' r st=ir,,,-tH. / M L u v L ~r'.G~ 6~ ry ~gqq l 5'-0" vegetated buffer ( existing shop ( l proposed residential ( l fenced trash/recyclmg addition ` J enrlosm e existing parking space conversion of existing covered bicycle ( 1 covered pool ( ) garage to residence parking l J equipment PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS: The property located at 74.6 C Street is approximately 7,405.2 S.F. (.17 acres) in size, and currently has 3,63o S.F lot coverage area, including an existing i. bedroom residence and pool/patio. i l l 1.01 sw Viewto Existing Garage/Proposed Residence i.oa NE View to Existing Garage/Proposed Residence 3 1 ACCESS TO PROPERTY: Vehicle and pedestrian driveway access are via both C Street and the `rear' alley (between 6t"/7thSt). The C Street driveway runs i6'-o" from the center of the lot to C Street and is 8'-o" wide. The `rear' alley driveway is 24'-0", with a 5'-o" vegetated buffer at the SW corner of the lot and is -14'-0" wide. There is a walkway at the main entrance of the house that leads to the formal porch from C street. At the proposed residence on the south end of the property, a gated entrance leads from the `rear' alleyto the main entrance of the proposed studio unit. a J Q)ddire MFjId@Rf:*Qt In Soap) I W Cl [l _ ;14 3 2017 v a ~I. it I _)I gg 1.63 Access to Property at 746 C Street Vehicle Access Pedestrian Access 4 i PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REOVEST: The proposed plan entails the conversion of a Soo sf existing garage unit into a proposed residence of Soo sf(including an addition of 87 SO. 79 sf of the garage will remain to be used as shop/storage. The new addition will create an exterior fenced courtyard at the entrance off of the alley, and allow for an intermediary connection to the shared yard area with the existing residence. LOW-DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING COMPLIANCE. The proposed usage complies with the R-2 Zone District (Chapter 18.24) in regard to permitted uses, setbacks, lot coverage, and height. ACCESS/PARKING; AMC 18.2.5.030.A requires 1..5 parking spaces for the primary residence and i. space for the proposed residential unit, due to the proposed area of the unit being less than or equal to Soo sf. A total of three parking spaces will be required, one of which is proposed to be an on-street (standard) parking credit at the discretion of planning staff based on 64'-0" of street frontage on C street for approximately 33.3% of the required parking per eode(eSo%). `C' STREET PARKING STUDIES: The request for granting of a parking credit for an on-street parking space is based on a series of photographs by the applicant exhibiting the minimal demand for street parking at the location of the proposed residence. As exhibited by the photographs there is a high availability of parking spaces along C street between 61" and 7t" street, specifically along the South side of C(applicants property). The North side of C street has had higher density street parking due to the construction/restoration of the church and surrounding properties at the corner of 61"/C street. 1 i I i 1.04 C Sire2t 6`~/7`h 12/16 2p171 1.o5 C Street 6"/7'h 1/1711 am 1.o6 C Sireot 61''/,"' 2/1; vo am UTILITIES: Existing water/gas/sewer and storm sewer lines are located to the east of the existing residence and new lines will be installed at existing location and run southeast to the proposed unit. There is currently an existing seperate electrical meter and service installed for the proposed residence and will be metered separately in coordination with Dave Tygerson of City of Ashland. ARCHITECTURE: The applicant has provided a site plan, floor plans for the proposed residential unit, exterior elevations and sections as well as digital renderings. F oc' i wv~ nIe bike parking/trash enclosure 1.07 Proposed Residence Floor Plan proposed residence existing residence a i Mil a.o8 Proposed Residence Perspective 6 i i f J V- k-ra! 1.09 south elevation - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I U'-b I I I ~ i 1.10 north elevation jll~ ".-011 W&A i i 1.11 east elevation 1.12 west elevation proposed residence existing residence 1.13 propo id n 0 p ctive W° III Nil T MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT (AMC:18.40): The proposed one-story structure is :14'-0" in height, staying under the maximum 35'-o"/two and one-half stories in height as required by the R-2 zone. SOLAR ACCESS(AMC 18.70): The city of Ashland solar ordinance is specifically designed to address solar impact to adjacent properties to the north. The proposed structure will be in conformance with the ordinance, having no impact on neighboring property across C street(north of the lot). LANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE: Total landscaping for the site is 3,775 sf (51%), exceeding the requirement for zone requirements for 35% landscape. All existing landscape is irrigated and has a variation in coverage/height per zoning requirements. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS: ASHLAND PLANNING: dements such as exterior lighting, trash and recycling, and bike parking would also need to be shown on the plan and described how they will be integrated into the proposal. All exterior lighting will be down-lighting with motion sensor/timer control, to ensure minimal disturbance to the surrounding neighborhood. Trash, recycling, and bicycles will be inside the fenced yard perimeter and under the shelter of the roof overhang. NEW ELECTRIC SERVICE: ASHLAND PLANNING: The City of Ashland requires that a separate electrical service/meter be installed for each independent living unit. Installation of a new electrical meter/service would also require that a service connection fee be paid to the Electric Department and the meter installed, inspected and approved prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the unit. Staff would suggest contacting Dave Tygerson of the City of Ashland Electric Department to verify service requirements, including meterplacement and applicable fees. ALSO this requires that the new unit be assigned a new address. A new electrical service/meter is currently installed on the eastern face of the existing residence. The applicant will pay a connection fee to the Electrical Department and the meter will be inspected and approved prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the unit. NEW ADDRESS: ASHLAND PLANNING: All new Accessory Residential Units require new addresses assigned by the City of Ashland Public Works Department. The applicant intends to take the necessary steps to be assigned a new address for the Accessory Residential Unit by the City of Ashland Public Works Department. TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION: ASHLAND PLANNING: All planning actions are required to include a tree preservation/protection plan in accordance with AMC x8.61; this is intended to ensure that trees are protected during all site disturbance (including demolition, construction, driveway/parking installation, staging of materials, etc. This plan must address all trees on the property over six-inches in diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) and call tries thai nr-- located on adjacent properties within iS feet of the property line as well. The construction of the proposed building will not impact any 6"<DBH trees on the property. 111, 23 2114 8 i ENERGY USE APPROXIMATION The project intends to use a electrical ductless mini-split system for the heating and cooling of the proposed residence. It is estimated that an annual energy budget of 5,ooo kWh (per energystar website) E will be required for use. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CHAPTER 18.5.4) In reference to section 18.2.3.22o Travelers Accommodation in R-a and R-3 zones, the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use permit under chapter -18.5.4, subject to Site Design Review under chapter i8.5.2 and meeting the following requirements: i. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. Confirmed, applicant is in conformance with zoning standards. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. Confirmed, all aforementioned services and access will be provided to subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 28.5.4.oSo.A.S, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. Confirmed, as shown in elevations/plans. b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. The applicant anticipates light to moderate usage of the traveler accommodation during the peak spring/sum mer/fall seasons. The estimated average weekday ITE trip rate for a multifamily unit is 6.47 in comparison the ITE trip rate for a hotel unit 8.7. This disparity in trip rates will most likely be a non-issue as the applicant will be providing bicycles for transportation and the proximity to both the railroad district and downtown will encourage pedestrian/bicycle transit as the preferred means of transportation. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. Confirmed, as shown in photographs/elevations/plans. d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare, f The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive flan. g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authorityfor review of the proposed use. y. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. S. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows. c. R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed ai the density permitted by chapter 18.2.S Standards for Residential Zones: 23 1 9 t A. During operation of a traveler's accommodation, the property on which the traveler's accommodation is sited must be the primary residence of the business-owner. "Business-owner" shall be defined as a person or persons who own the property and accommodation outright; or who have entered into a lease agreement with the property owner(s) allowing for the operation of the accommodation. Such lease agreement must specifically state that the property owner is not involved in the day-to-day operation or financial management of the accommodation, and that the business-owner has actual ownership of the business and is wholly responsible for all operations associated with the accommodation, and has actual ownership of the business. B. The property is located within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector as s' identified on the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. 4 C. The primary residence on the site must be at least 20 years old. The primary residence may be altered and adopted for traveler's accommodation use, including expansion of floor area. Additional structures may be allowed to accommodate additional units, but must be in conformance with all setback and lot coverage standards of the underlying zone. D. The number of traveler's accommodation units allowed shall be determined by the following criteria: 1. The total number of units, including the business-owner's unit, shall be determined by dividing the total square footage of the lot by 1,800 square feet. Contiguous lots under the same ownership may be combined to increase lot area and the number of units, but not in excess of the maximum established by this ordinance. The maximum number of accommodation units shall not exceed nine per approved traveler's accommodation with primary lot frontage on boulevard streets. For traveler's accommodation without primary lot frontage on a designated boulevard, but within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector street, the maximum number of units shall be seven. Street designations shall be as determined by the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. 2. Excluding the business-owner's unit and the area of the structure it will occupy, there must be at least 400 square feet of gross interior floor space remaining per unit. E. Each accommodation must have one off-street parking space and the business-owner's unit must have two parking spaces. All parking spaces shall be in conformance with chapter 18.4.3. F. Only one ground or wall sign, constructed of a non-plastic material, non-interior illuminated, and a maximum of six square feet total surface area is allowed. Any exterior illumination of signage shall be installed such that it does not directly illuminate any residential structures adjacent or nearby the traveler's accommodation in accordance with subsection 18.4.4.050. C. 1. O. Traveler's accommodations must met all applicable building, fire, and related safety codes of all times and must be inspected by the Fire Department before occupancy followiriri approval of o Conditional Use Permit and periodically thereafter pursuant to AMC 15.28. W. An unni.1ul inspection 3 i~ 10 by the Jackson County Wealth Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. H. An annual inspection by the Jackson County Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. L The business-owner must maintain a city business license and pay all transient occupancy tax in accordance with AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04 as required. J. Advertising for any traveler's accommodation must include the City planning action number assigned to the land use approval. K. Offering the availability of residential property for uses as a traveler's accommodation without a valid Conditional use Permit approval, current business license and Transient Occupancy Tax registration is prohibited and shall be subject to enforcement procedures. L. Transfer of business-ownership of a traveler's accommodation shall be subject to all requirements of this section and conform with the criteria of this section. Any further modifications beyond the existing approval shall be in conformance with all requirements of this section. The applicant is in agreement with and meets the requirements of the aforementioned conditions for a Conditional Use Permit for Travelers Accommodation in R-2 and R-3 zones. 3Mif 11 i li I II I i i I I I i i I I, I i i j ~i i I i j i I I ;I t; i i. i i P 1 ~i t%' ~ I I j ~ i , L, ~i'~ 119 I ~.I ~ i I ~ ~I ii I~ I ~ i ~ I:I - ~ 1 I ~ I I j 1 i I' 1 i I f I 1 _ ~ ~ j i i I i I i - ~ I f II ~ i I - I I I - i i I I i i I 0 W LL LL O o o c o o (D CO U) o 0 01 0 o rn z ~ r o N m v S n w U 0 O J W W w L F Z Q O CD d' U al C? y U U Q L Z ~ ifl [n CA C7 n U Q Q W o ❑ LL LL Q Q W F Z_ U Z w U) U) LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL F- U S W Q w~ c U) O O U) U) U) U) Z W N W O 0 r- c) Lq N C) CC) NLD co Cl) C) LIJ pUtn 0 U) MW W Lo 0~C co Cco CL < m 'm 6 w0 W W W J J ..,n m Q °Ww W 00 °o = ~ W m S{- pwQ C:) 0 i>> LL; LLI F- 40, co C) LU C-) 0 U) LL LL LL CDZ UQ Q- U rr® Q z U) U3 I- Q~ g WE E ED z V W 5 J W CV M M Z WQW QQ S O Q t!S to r) (D -t ~L7~ OCn ZoO ' 'n~ U O $Q~ Z ~ W Z a Z Lli CD bz= Jw Yom} Ga] v~~~ ,"~•3 O J ~.i' - 0 W O ¢ LLI W a m P O co W J W fi U ~S r~j. = c ~~W LL W z L= Cl) W LL EL ~O O O ` UXo Jz U~ LU a) LL Qrz O ❑ C7 wW 01- Q Q / NZTr ~ ~zM aoo ° Q ®Q LLM ~ w a ~W zr >Q~ U)QQ ri) _ Ltl - u u.9Q W O LLUWd =w M Z cfl=~ IILL.~ =0 ❑ z B 0< [:C~ ~O v) U LLJ w= c7w0 d U)a7 - d i s1 O U pp O d p i cn0LL C3 C) zW x rQ j < U w QO W W = O 0 OwOw o_ ~w cp O cri w U) wJ U) U) > Z -j O~ n~ 0- new w 7 C7 O ~J 00 0- L'i -i =s rng az wz~ w U) LL LL < LLJ o iii cr O 00 ~S2 a I- wz~o w= w ow a can ¢o G d tr 00 L or r;)X O Z x0LI: =w xzZ~ rW i- i- UU)rn ~m ~Q¢U ¢ z<C ON CD IL d a i ! i ! / / o / i ! i / / o O) x v ! i ! CD o s / co m : - :eta I a) 0 CD CO ! Q Q MU -J co i0 _O CO U a ! ~ Q ~ it o ~ o I jl~ 0 0 0 f` I ( C9 m ! a Q'~ ~ ~a~ pg ® ; G' h \ `„11 O A N ~1 / NIJQIPo, ~ ~ ! S / orW.~ GJ / ~ / ,L 1 ra 0 LL o w LL LL. UJ co 0 0 o a o o a o Z ~ r o° r° ~ rn r r a~ S + LU LL W co 0 W W Q Q O O JQ C() K X d F-~ oL ov¢ L p Lt IL ~ O i2 Q Q W _ n U- LL -j < w U) CI) LL LL Q ~ C) !3 No U) W Z W I=-W QNp n c co 0 ® d N O W w 0 0) 0~ O W M U LS Co 3 C 9 0 ~ Q L co O Q d¢ w W y o s t~l' in Q M w~Q W W J-J L L~- a Q ~a ° C) 0 Way UW ~ _ o=W ¢LL °F-W M < O N F- m H z Q W Q dwOF LL~a Q O L LL < 1-4 LL CD 3; < O L9 cV F co co Z Q~g wo aUw O L c,4I- U O in Q ~c9LL V¢ CDOO _ r Q) W Y - F- Oa fl w Z d z CLij -1 D-Z OW zn -m D I-~w ELI rn~ O O Q w~ CCW~ A n ®m <~z LL a p F U) LLI ULL a- U ®I 0xW mz W~ LIJ cq®a a00 rU Q Q ®O OOQ 1 9 ZZD'F- 3= vz~a Q ri) }Q~ -~67~ U1 ~ 7n Q. LL CL j < a 2E0W Z > ° '!I M cfl= SOQ ❑ > >Elf LIJ< u10 w O a0w2 ° W 2aZ vu m d~~ Z OQ ~C9 ~O Co cJ °c- =a Q W Q° - UI¢OQ U) 7-5 O Ov ® Qp ~Ui 1: ❑ O O WOu-0 ON ZWX ~ Cn W V? W -F U1 O W -I EL F- W L`F1 0- U F- ~ LLI w 0 ~ z C7 O ~-j 00 ~z > J 0(r C9 o- TcnW CL < ❑ to Z O E-H 00 [O0 w Q a>°I mz wZl=--o B ¢ zQ ON (D a 0I0 w L =°Fi° =w =Oz°~ I-0cf)rn F-m F-000 J / 0 i i / i 7 m a, ! i J i ! Zr a~ o o F vG l1 i G + a Ly ` / w~a U l Waf, y O y O C0 10 U - ! 31 IZ / I- co co co y0 ~ 'gal O h ti ~~0 6u'-- 8'.02 U ..Z-.8 U -.Cl 6w~ied a)iiq ;uawdpb"e good r i b w a I o I a .v OO N ~O .0 -.7. m R w 40 R D cn Q o 0 s ~ m ~ " m R r 0 y ~ 9 l L R O L ~J O r OI m 9m I I m ml °I °T RI c°I -m _ m I I I I I I I I I I I - _ I Y O L O R m _ v LIB O ~ I I I ~ I I - I I O III - _ It L O > O N 'Q .C c0 IO p r O N R1 G m N I I I I / ~oooo V ~ c m N m 0 a I ~ N EJ ~ -III- I I=1 Iii X0000 X00 II lei i~ QC~ i i 1= I=i i- A 0000 ilTli A4 IIII~ ' V X III- 1=1 II1= goo ~=j = ,111 0 III mgr N r 1111' iu - - - - ~ J _ _ _ \ -m.,_...__. .c ~ - ` 1'~~\ Z - ~ - i Job Address: 746 C ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: C A Owner's Name: PHILIP/MICAELA GAHR 0 Phone: P Customer 08779 N State Lic No: ~ Y' City Lic No: P PHILIP/MICAELA GAHR Applicant: 746 C ST R Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A C C Sub-Contractor: A Phone: (541) 531-1245 T Address: N Applied: 02/23/2017 O "f Issued: Expires: 08/22/2017 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E09AC8700 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Type 1 site review for multi family and CUP for travelers accom VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Conditional Use Permit Type 1 1,022.00 Residential Site Review 1,090.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us T Y F t CI O Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 f -ASHLANU i i 1 I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 (180 days). 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 2,112.00 $ 2,112.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 2,112.00 Fees Paid: $ 2,112.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us CITY OF j Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 ASHLAND