Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Grandview_Pump_Station_PA-2016-01449
f i CT F September 13, 2016 Notice of Final Decision On September 12, 2016, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: h Planning Action: 2016-01449 Subject Property: Intersection of Grandview Drive & Wright's Creek Drive Applicant: City of Ashland, Public Works/Engineering Department Description: A request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit to remove and replace the existing sanitary sewer pump station located on the west side of Wright's Creek Drive, just south of its intersection with Grandview Drive, within the identified floodplain of Wright's Creek. (NOTE: The pump station is located entirely within public right-of-way.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Derek Severson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 ' Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to j subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. E Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity i" to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 qd'onus i ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: 2016-01449 SUBJECT PROPERTY: Intersection of Grandview Drive and Wright's Creek Drive OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Ashland, Public Works/Engineering Department DESCRIPTION: A request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit to remove and replace the existing sanitary sewer pump station located on the west side of Wright's Creek Drive, just south of its intersection with Grandview Drive, within the identified floodplain of Wright's Creek. (NOTE: The pump station is located entirely within public right-of-way.) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10 SUBMITTAL DATE: July 29, 2016 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: August 15, 2016 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: September 12, 2016 DEADLINE TO REQUEST A HEARING DATE (4:30 p.m.): September 26, 2016 FINAL DECISION DATE: September 27, 2016 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: March 27, 2018 DECISION The application involves a request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit by the City of Ashland Public Works/Engineering Department to remove and replace the existing sanitary sewer pump station located on the west side of Wright's Creek Drive, just south of its intersection with Grandview Drive, within the identified floodplain of Wright's Creek. This pump station is located entirely within public right-of-way. (A similar request was approved in April of 2009 as Planning Action #2009-00074 but expired without the work ever being completed.) The project site is the underground sanitary sewer pump station located southwest of the intersection of Grandview Drive and Wright's Creek Drive, just to the west of the street edge at the intersection and entirely within the right-of-way. Because it is within 20-feet of the top of bank, the existing pump station is considered to be within the designated floodplain of Wright's Creek. At this location,' Wright's Creek flows entirely within a culvert under the city street. The Grandview Sanitary Sewer Pump Station was installed in 1974 using pumps and motors salvaged from a City of Medford pump station. The pump station is 14 feet deep by 14 feet wide by 12 feet long. It is located underground and is constructed of 12-inch thick reinforced concrete to support truck traffic over the roof of the station. There is a concrete lid on the station which has vent tubing, and a control box for the pump station. The sewage from a number of nearby streets flows through the sewer lines to the pump station where it is pumped up Wright's Creek Drive to Wimer Street where it then gravity flows to the City's Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP). The pump station is located within the 20 feet of the identified top of bank of the Wright's Creek corridor and is therefore considered to be on floodplain corridor lands. The proposed pump station replacement is part of the City of Ashland's annual Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) list, and the application materials provided note that the proposed replacement will greatly reduce the likelihood of a complete pump failure and the resulting environmental disaster. PA #2016-01449 Grandview Pump Station/dds Page 1 The application explains that the pump station has reached a point where maintenance problems are now a common occurrence, the electrical equipment is severely outdated, and much of the equipment is nearing obsolescence. Replacement parts are difficult to obtain, and although pump stations are designed with a large redundancy factor, the complete failure of this station could have catastrophic environmental results. The application further notes that with replacement, the following improvements would be achieved: ® The collection wet well and discharge line would be improved and downsized to provide a more rapid pump cycle, decreasing the time sewage remains in the well and pipeline. This will reduce offensive odors in the lines and around the pump station. ® Quick replacement components would be used to allow quick and easy repairs. A new submersible pump could be completely replaced in 15 minutes. ® The new station will be designed for 100 percent redundancy with two pumps mounted on quick change rails within the wet well. Only one would operate at a time, with the second pump on reserve as back-up. A third pump would be kept in inventory as additional back-up. ® The proposed new pump station would be fitted with an electrical socket to enable the connection of one of the city's existing portable power generators in case of a power outage. An auxiliary pumping port would also be provided to allow the use of a portable pump should all other systems fail. ® The new station would have electrical components and controls mounted in a compact enclosure located above ground and adjacent to the station. This eliminates the need for personnel entry into the confined space of the pump station. A Physical and Environmental (P&E) Constraints Review Permit is required because the void left by removing the existing equipment and installing the new will require 66 cubic yards of fill. By ordinance, one of the thresholds that qualify as development and requires a ME permit is when the amount of fill exceeds 50 cubic yards. This proposal exceeds that and thus requires a ME permit. The applicants note that they researched other potential areas to relocate pump station, outside of the floodplain. Those other options required extensive excavation of the streets to move the utility connections leading to and from the pump station which could have had a more adverse impact to the Wright's Creek drainage, and as currently proposed the project will simply remove the roof and a very small portion of one wall to place the smaller new station within the old station, resulting in many environmental and cost savings benefits: minimal surface disturbance, minimal excavation, the use of existing utilities, no physical impacts to Wrights Creek itself as the creek is culverted in this location, and cost savings in using the existing shell. An alternative site would require excavation to a depth of at least 14 feet, necessitating a weeks' long street closure and relocation of numerous utility lines. The new pump station equipment is smaller in area than the existing and thus by placing it in the same vault, a void will remain that requires filling. The applicants have proposed to use slurry (a mix of concrete and sand)- as the `fill' to eliminate the large void and stabilize the concrete walls that are not proposed to be removed. Section 18.3.10.080.A.3 states `the amount of fill in the Flood plain Corridor shall be kept to a minimum. Fill and other material imported from off the lot that could displace flood water shall be limited to the following: a) poured concrete and other materials necessary to build permitted structur°es...; b) aggregate base and paving materials...; c) plants and other landscaping and agricultural material; d) a total of SO cubic yards of other imported fall material; and e) the above PA #2016-01449 Grandview Pump Station/dds Page 2 i i limits on fill shall be measured from April 1989, and shall not exceed the above amounts. These amounts are the maximum cumulative fill that can be imported onto the site, regardless of the number of permits issued." The application explains that the project will use concrete as a part of the improvements in the form of curbing, gutters, and a four-inch thick electric utility mounting pad as well as concrete slurry to fill any voids left in the existing pump station vault and the new station is installed. The application emphasizes that none of the fill material proposed will displace any floodwater in a way which differs from the current conditions. While some fill will be within ten feet of the interpreted edge of the floodway channel, the fill activities are confined to a limited volume of the existing pump station vault as well as some required utility trenches and vault boxes. The void space to be filled already exists, and Wright's Creels is already culverted in this location. The fill volume is expected to be approximately 66 cubic yards, but is only to fill existing vacant airspace and will provide necessary structural support that is difficult to obtain from the native materials on site. These improvements are to be flood-proof and meet current established public safety standards. All excavation is to be held to a minimum, and existing street grades and topography are not to be altered. The pump station is subject to strict Department of Environmental Quality restrictions and will be constructed in accordance with those requirements. The existing pump station has withstood other flood events without sustaining damage and the new station will be constructed in a `water tight' manner creating a closed system so as no infiltration can occur. A new control box and disconnect box will be constructed above the concrete lid of the pump station. The control box shall be located in a manner as to not interfere with the vision clearance requirements at the intersection of Grandview Drive and Wrights Creek Drive, and the use of fill inside of the void will not be displacing the flood waters. As addressed by the language in the section of code refers to building structures, the intent of that section of code was for the construction of structure and to raise the elevation of the site above the flood plain corridor. If there were to be a flood, the pump station's concrete vault as proposed to be altered will not have any additional impact beyond the existing condition. In accordance with the Ashland City Council decision on Planning Action #2006-01784 in August of 2007 and the Ashland Municipal Code 18.3.10.080.M, no new utilities or streets are proposed within floodplain corridors; this application is for the replacement of existing facilities which are within existing rights-of-way which existed prior to the regulations for development in the floodplain were adopted in 1986. The above regulations pertain to the prohibition of new subdivisions and new partitions from attempting to maximize development through utilization of Flood Plain and Riparian Lands for their infrastructure. Therefore, the replacement of existing facilities which will have no greater adverse impact on adjacent properties is permitted under this section of the AMC. There are three small diameter Scotch pine trees near the pump station; a fourth dead pine tree was removed in conjunction with the previous application. The Parks Department's staff arborist provided an assessment of the trees with the previous application in 2009, noting that while they have been parasitized by Sequoia pitch moth this is unsightly but not a cause for mortality. The trees were noted as being healthy in their upper canopies, and street-side pruning was recommended along with an evaluation of the root health and stability. At that time, it was noted that the trees provide important screening to adjacent property owners and should be preserved. The trees remain, and a condition has been included below to require that either the current Parks arborist or a private arborist reassess their health and make final recommendations on their protection during and after construction prior to the PA 42016-01449 Grandview Pump Station/dds Page 3 i commencement of site work, and that the arborist's recommendations to preserve and protect the trees be adhered to. As noted in the 2009 application and reiterated here, the applicants researched other possible locations for a pump station outside of the floodplain, but these other options required extensive excavation of the streets to move the utility connections leading to and from the pump station which could have had a more adverse impact to the Wright's Creek drainage than the amount of fill proposed to fill the voids within the existing concrete vault housing the pump station. Additionally, the amount of surface disturbance will be minimized due to the existence of the concrete vault, and associated utilities. Lastly, Wright's Creek flows through a culvert under the road at this location which creates a physical barrier to the actual floodplain. Subsequent to the approval of the previous application, the Water Resource Protection Zones Ordinance as implemented through AMC 18.3.11 has taken effect and regulates the Water Resource Protection Zones of creeks in Ashland. In this instance, while Wright's Creek is regulated as a Local Stream, the work proposed is exempt from review as provided in AMC 18.3.11.050.B.5 which allows for the routine maintenance and replacement of existing public utilities. The criteria for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit are described in the Physical and Environmental Constraints Chapter AMC 18.3.10.050 as follows: An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. 8. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances. Therefore, Planning Action #2016-01449 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #2016-01449 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. 2) That any requirements of the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) for the construction of the sewer pump station shall be conditions of approval. PA #2016-01449 Grandview Pump Station/dds Page 4 3) That no tree removal, as defined in AMC Section 18.62.030, is approved as part of this application. If tree removal is necessary, a separate Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit will be required. 4) That all erosion controls measures proposed in the final construction documents shall be installed according to the approved plan, inspected and approved on site prior to any site disturbance. 5) That the Parks Department Horticulturalist/Arborist or another qualified arborist shall reassess the trees in the immediate vicinity of the proposed work and provide their assessment and recommendations to the Staff Advisor prior to the commencement of any construction. Any recommendations for root evaluation, tree pruning, etc. shall be carried out in accordance with the arborist's recommendations. 6) That the control panel and other structures shall be located outside of the vision clearance triangle at the intersection of Grandview and Wright's Creek Drives or shall comply with the I vision clearance standards. 7) That prior to the commencement of construction, the applicant shall provide a letter from the project engineer with a current engineer's stamp to certify that the fill water will in no way lace floodwaters. September 12, 2016 Pill 'Molnar, D ector Date Community D elopment Department G c PA #2016-01449 Grandview Pump Station/dds Page 5 I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) [ County of Jackson ) : The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On September 13, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01449, Intersection of Grandview & Wrights Creek. Sign re of Employee Documend 9113/2016 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 600 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 701 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 813 AUCHINCLOSS JAMES LEE TRUSTEE BARNARD JOHN/KATHLEEN BAUER JEFFREY T/ELIZABETH W 707 BENJAMIN CT 525 GRANDVVEW DR 460 SUNSHINE CIR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 607 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 602 !PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 403 CHURCH JOHN/DUBINICH IRYNA CROSS W J/PAULA P GREIST DRESCHER ALLEN G TRUSTEE ET AL 2305 ASHLAND ST C 136 715 GRANDVIEW DR PO BOX 760 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 704 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 116 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 407 FINKLEA EDWARD A/ERIN K GIBBONS MARK H/SUSAN M GOLDMAN LOUIS ET AL 545 GRANDVIEW DR 500 FERNWOOD 705 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 117 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 406 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 405 HOLINBECK KATHY JONES RICHARD J/LEIGH E KITZMAN DAVID M 414 S 1ST ST 705 WRIGHTS CREEK RD 1780 NE BEULAH CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ROSEBURG, OR 97470 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 803 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 103 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 500 LJUNGKVIST KRISTIANNALERIE MAGNUSON LEE/PAULA MCDONALD WILLIAM J TRUSTEE JR 366 WRIGHTS CREEK DR 585 FERNWOOD DR ET AL ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 720 GRANDVIEW DR `ASHLAND. OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 120 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 118 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 706 MURPHY ELIZABETH A TRUSTEE ET j NEUJAHR PHILIP J TRUSTEE ET AL OPPENHEIM-BEGGS SARAHMEGGS 550 GRANDVIEW DR 1: ; 590 FERNWOOD DR PO BOX 416 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 :ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 121 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 119 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 412 OWEN JOHN F TRUSTEE ET AL RICHARDS JOHN B/MEI-WEN ROBBINS EUGENE BRODERSEN 500 GRANDVIEW DR 590 GRANDVIEW DR 635 WRIGHTS CREEK RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 700 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 400 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 410 ROBINSON JANE W REV LIVING RUNDELL ANDREW RNICTORIA L SPRAGUE ANN ET AL 6528 BURNHAM CIR 545 WRIGHTS CREEK DR 827 ST ANDREWS WAY PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 32082 ASHLAND, OR 97520 EAGLE POINT, OR 97520` PA-2016-01449 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 705 CITY OF ASHLAND PA-2016-01449 STIRITZ RICHARD L ET AL KEVIN CALDWELL HARDEY ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES 13403 HWY 66 51 WINBURN WAY P.O. BOX 1625 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501-0063 Intersection of Grandview Dr & Wrights Creek 9/13/2016 NOD 27 e Planning Department, 51 Win6-, Nay, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland,orms TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION i PLANNING ACTION: 2016-01449 SUBJECT PROPERTY: Intersection of Grandview Drive and Wright's Creek Drive OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Ashland, Public Works/Engineering Department DESCRIPTION: A request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit to remove and replace the existing sanitary sewer pump station located on the west side of Wright's Creek Drive, just south of its intersection with Grandview Drive, within the identified floodplain of Wright's Creek. NOTE: The pump station is located entirely within public right-of-way. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN RESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: August 15, 2016 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: August 29, 2016 ® - PA #2016-01449 GRANDVIEW PUMP STATION - J--- r SUBJECTPROPERTY L -A GRANDVIEW DR The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. Document] PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL C®NSTr 'NTS 18.3.10.050 An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. Document] I L PLANNING ACTION: 2016-01449 SUBJECT PROPERTY: Intersection of Grandview Drive and Wright's Creek Drive OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Ashland, Public Works/Engineering Department DESCRIPTION: A request for a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Permit to remove and replace the existing sanitary sewer pump station located on the west side of Wright's Creek Drive, just south of its intersection with Grandview Drive. This site is located within the identified floodplain of Wright's Creek. NOTE: The pump station is located entirely within public right-of-way. C COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; PLANNER: Derek TREE: No HISTORIC: No (Criteria: P&E) i t E: l' F' ka (t t: 4 G'I 11 y Y I ~ I f - ! - J a J_ ss, D Q. ~q®-0 W F--, i+ D U CM w at7v~i SCI SdHSI~I - - - I ~ I II 1 I I I I f r t` +r41 - 1i € 11 - ru 1J ll, e ( 1 5111]7 me, 303 I 1484 U02 30 cum, s Slow, 803 sts M III l AM y~11 T'~1 101 91 ~altll+ ] ~ ~ r € a , 706 104 tax 40 1 20 ,,lot Its ms C 112 % to Zia Ui 1 IN pas 'lus I t 14 .240 ,,U, 11 k` 1a S'it' T11,y. ,125+ F, 4T2: 7 i , ~ teal , fl 134111 [ 9013 T, I r I V~ wool ~E- out, ODA Ia5 x,14 3 12 r q j'1} u s • to 014 1 " 01,x. ~ ~ f T 605 di] sit 41 B" 1d~ 1 4118 1 I tl tE a i "1 H11 lot t< 60 ! 14 Ins 114 . g a~ ll h 205 ft' f " , J -1 I lea iF t ~b a e ~ C ' MY , §6 ,i`-ii # I~f1~~7 C 1 L 0 h (i la p 11 G.1f-4t+ 6 9 jJ g d i AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On August 15, 2016 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2016-01449, intersection of Grandview Drive & Wrights Creek Drive. C, Signatu of Employee i Dxumend 8115/2016 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 600 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 701 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 813 AUCHINCLOSS JAMES LEE TRUSTEE BARNARD JOHN/KATHLEEN BAUER JEFFREY T/ELIZABETH W 707 BENJAMIN CT 525 GRANDIVEW DR 460 SUNSHINE CIR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 (ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 607 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 602 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 403 CHURCH JOHNIDUBINICH IRYNA CROSS W J/PAULA P GREIST 'DRESCHER ALLEN G TRUSTEE ET AL 2305 ASHLAND ST C 136 715 GRANDVIEW DR PO BOX 760 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 704 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 116 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 407 F1NKL,EA EDWARD A/ERIN K GIBBONS MARK H/SUSAN M GOLDMAN LOUIS ET AL 545 GRANDVIEW DR 500 FERNWOOD 705 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 117 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 406 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 405 HOLINBECK KATHY JONES RICHARD J/LEIGH E KITZMAN DAVID M 414 S 1ST ST 705 WRIGHTS CREEK RD 1780 NE BEULAH CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ROSEBURG, OR 97470 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 803 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 103 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 500 LJUNGKVIST KRISTIANNALERIE MAGNUSON LEE/PAULA MCDONALD WILLIAM J TRUSTEE JR 366 WRIGHTS CREEK DR 585 FERNWOOD DR !ET AL ASHLAND, OR 97520 ! ASHLAND, OR 97520 ;720 GRANDVIEW DR ASHLAND. OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 120 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 118 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 706 MURPHY ELIZABETH A TRUSTEE ET NEUJAHR PHILIP J TRUSTEE ET AL OPPENHEIM-BEGGS SARAH/BEGGS 550 GRANDVIEW DR 590 FERNWOOD DR 'PO BOX 416 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 121 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 119 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 412 OWEN JOHN F TRUSTEE ET AL RICHARDS JOHN B/MEI-WEN ROBBINS EUGENE BRODERSEN 500 GRANDVIEW DR 590 GRANDVIEW DR 635 WRIGHTS CREEK RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 700 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 400 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 410 ROBINSON JANE W REV LIVING RUNDELL ANDREW RNICTORIA L SPRAGUE ANN ET AL 6528 BURNHAM CIR 545 WRIGHTS CREEK DR 827 ST ANDREWS WAY PONTE VEDRA BEACH, FL 32082 ASHLAND, OR 97520 EAGLE POINT, OR 97520 PA-2016-01449 PA-2016-01449 391E05CD 705 CITY OF ASHLAND PA-2016-01449 STIRITZ RICHARD L ET AL KEVIN CALDWELL HARDEY ENGINEERING & ASSOCIATES 13403 HWY 66 51 WINBURN WAY P.O. BOX 1625 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501-0063 I 1 3 I t t Applicant: Kevin Caldwell, Project Manager J L L 26 L 4 o City of Ashland Public Works; Engineering City i ~ O $ l t 20 East Main Street Ashland OR 97520 (541) 552-2414 I Owner: City of Ashland 20 East Main Street Ashland OR 97520 Application for: Physical & Environmental Constraints Permit Project Name: Grandview Drive Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Replacement Legal Description: Public Right-of-Way at Wrights Creek Drive Zoning Designation: R-1-10, Single Family Residential Project Description: This is an application for a Staff Permit under the Physical and Environmental Constraints Ordinance Chapter 18.62. The proposed replacement of the Grandview Drive Sanitary Sewer Pump Station will greatly reduce the probability of a complete pump failure and a resulting environmental disaster. The existing Grandview Drive Sanitary Sewer Pump Station was constructed in 1974 using pumps and motors salvaged from a City of Medford pump station. It is located entirely underground and is designed and constructed to support truck traffic over the roof of the station. The station walls are 12" thick reinforced concrete. The pump station is located within the right of way of Wrights Creek Drive near the intersection of Grandview Drive. Sewage gravity flows from Grandview Drive, Sunnyview Street, Skycrest Drive, Sunshine Circle, Benjamin Court, Westwood Street, Orchard Street, Nyla Lane, Placer Run, Tessa Lane, Oakwood Drive and Fernwood Drive. The sewage is consolodated at the low point of Grandview Drive and Wrights Creek Drive. The sewage is then pumped up Wrights Creek Drive to Wimer Street where it again enters a gravity flow sewer system. The pump -station has reached a point where maintenance problems are now a common occurrence, the electrical equipment is severely outdated and much of the equipment is nearing obsolescence. Replacement parts are very difficult to obtain. Although sewer pump stations are G:\pub-wrks\eng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A Eng\Planning Issues-documents\P&E Application Narrative.doc I i designed with a large redundancy factor, the complete failure of this pump station could have catastrophic environmental results. The proposed pump station replacement would provide the following improved conditions: 1. The collection wet well and discharge line would be improved and downsized to provide a more rapid pump cycle, decreasing the time that sewage remains in the wet well or discharge pipeline. This will reduce offensive odors in the lines and around the pump station. 2. Quick replacement components would be used allowing quick and easy repairs. For instance, the submersible pump could be completely replaced within 15 minutes. 3. The new station would be designed for 100% redundancy with two pumps mounted on quick change rails within the wet well. Only one pump would operate at a time reserving the second pump as a back-up. A third pump would be in inventory as an additional backup. 4. The proposed pump station would be fitted with an electrical socket to enable connection to one of our existing portable power generators in case of a power outage. An auxiliary pumping port would also be provided to allow the use of a portable pump should all other systems fail. 5. The new station would have all electrical components and controls mounted in a compact enclosure located above ground and adjacent to the station. This eliminates the need for personnel entry into the confined space of the pump station. The location of the proposed pump station is within the Wright's Creek riparian zone, but after extensive research as to the optimal location of a new pump, we found many environmental and cost savings benefits to keeping the pump station in the same location. The Public Works Department proposes to simply remove the roof and a very small portion of one wall and place the smaller new station within the old station. Advantages include: 1. Minimal surface disturbance: By using the existing pump stations shell to contain the new pump station, excavation and asphalt surface removal would be minimal. The existing discharge force main will also be used by providing a "slip lining" for the pipe by pushing a new lining into the existing pipeline. 2. Connection to the discharge force main would be simple and would require little extra excavation. 3. Since the pump station was in place prior to placement of most of the other utility lines, few if any utility conflicts are anticipated eliminating the need for additional excavation within the riparian zone. 4. Electrical, water and telemetry connections are already available at the present pump station site, again, eliminating the need for additional excavation. 5. There would be no physical impact to Wrights Creek as the creek is culverted-at this location where it crosses under Wrights Creek Drive. 6. There is significant cost savings available by using the existing pump station shell to house the new station- .111. 9 ?016 f G:\pub-wrks\eng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A Eng\Planning Issues-documents\P&E Application Narrative.doc t To provide an alternative site for the pump station would create additional problems and disturbances including: I 1. The wet well would necessarily be placed within the Wrights Creek Drive right of way and would require a large excavation area. The excavation area would encumber most of the street and would require that a section of the street be closed for several weeks. 2. Since the wet well must be located at the lowest possible point, the excavation would be approximately 14 feet deep and may require rock excavation by blasting or hydra hammer which can be disruptive and noisy. 3. It would be necessary to relocate utility lines to accommodate the excavation for a new pump station. The proposed Grandview Drive Sanitary Sewer Pump Station Replacement project meets the developments standards for Floodplain Corridor Lands and Riparian Preservation Lands and demonstrates the following criteria for approval: 18.62.070 Development Standards for Flood plain Corridor Lands A. Standards for fill in Flood plain Corridor lands: 1. Fill shall be designed as required by the International Building Code and International Residential Code, where applicable. All design/construction will meet current acceptable industry and City of Ashland Standards for civil engineering projects and will be performed by a licensed Professional Engineer. All fill design will be reflected in the approved final drawings before the project goes out for public bid. 2. The toe of the fill shall be kept at least ten feet outside of floodway channels, as defined in section 15. 10, and the fill shall not exceed the angle of repose of the material used for fill. There will be filling activities taking place within 10 feet of the interpreted edge of the existing floodway channel. However; the fill activities performed as part of this project will be confined to a limited volume of the existing pump station vault as well as some required utility trenches and valve boxes. As such the considerations for the location of the toe of the fill as well as the angle of repose of the material used for filling purposes does not apply. 3. The amount of fill in the Flood plain Corridor shall be kept to a minimum. Fill and other material imported from off the lot that could displace floodwater shall be limited to the following: None of the imported fill material used as part of this project will serve to displace any floodwater in any way which differs from the current site conditions. a. Poured concrete and other materials necessary to build permitted structures on the lot. JUL 29 2016 G:\pub-wrlcs\eng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A_Eng\Planning Issues-documents\P&E Application Narrab c.doc The project will utilize concrete as part of final improvements in the form of curbing, gutters and a 4" thick electrical utility mounting pad as well as concrete slurry fill material to fill any voids left in the existing pump station vault space after the new pump station has been installed. b. Aggregate base and paving materials, and fill associated with approved public and private street and driveivay construction. These materials will be in accordance with current City of Ashland Construction Standards. All work associated with any street and driveway construction as well as that involving utility trenching will be inspected by a qualified representative of the Ashland Engineering Services Department. c. Plants and other landscaping and agricultural material. Not applicable. d. A total of SO cubic yards of other imported fill material. Based upon the preliminary project design, fill in the interpreted floodway is calculated as 66 cubic yards. This fill is only to fill vacant air space after the installation of new pump station within the current confines of existing pump station. e. The above limits on fill shall be measured from April 1989, and shall not exceed the above amounts. These amounts are the maximum cumulative fill that can be imported onto the site, regardless of the number ofpermits issued. No fill has been placed at this location since April of 1989. 4. If additional fill is necessary beyond the permitted amounts in (3) above, then fill materials must be obtained on the lot from cutting or excavation only to the extent necessary to create an elevated site for permitted development. All additional fill material shall be obtained from the portion of the lot in the Flood plain Corridor. Fill material is identified as concrete slurry. Slurry is necessary to completely fill the voids in the existing wet-well and will provide necessary structural support that is difficult to obtain from native materials on site. 5. Adequate drainage shall be provided for the stability of the fill. Not Applicable. JU L 0 W'tA' G:\pub-wrks\eng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A_Eng\Plannmg Issues-documents\P&E Application Narrative.doc 6 Fill to raise elevations for a building site shall be located as close to the outside edge of the Flood plain Corridor as feasible. Not applicable i B. Culverting or bridging of any waterway or creek identified on the official maps adopted pursuant to section 18.62.060 must be designed by an engineer. Stream crossings shall be designed to the standards of Chapter 15, 10, or where no floodway has been identified, to pass a one hundred (100) year flood without any increase in the upstream flood height elevation. The engineer shall consider in the design the probability that the culvert will be blocked by debris in a severe flood, and accommodate expected overflow. Fill for culverting and bridging shall be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve property access, but is exempt from the limitations in section (A) above. Culverting or bridging of streams identified as Riparian Preservation are subject to the requirements of 18.62.075. Not applicable. C. Non-residential structures shall be flood proof to the standards in Chapter 15.10 to one foot above the elevation contained in the maps adopted by chapter 15. 10, or up to the elevation contained in the official maps adopted by section 18.62.060, whichever height is greater. Wl7ere no specific elevations exist, then they must be flood proofed to an elevation of ten feet above the creek channel on Ashland, Bear or Neil Creek; to five feet above the creek channel on all other Riparian Preserve creeks defined in section 18.62.050.B; and three feet above the stream channel on all other drainage ways identified on the official maps. The pump station improvements/structures will be flood-proof and meet currently established public safety standards as established by any governmental agency having jurisdiction over the proj ect. D. All residential structures shall be elevated so that the lowest habitable floor shall be raised to one foot above the elevation contained in the maps adopted in chapter 15. 10, or to the elevation contained in the official maps adopted by section 18.62.060, whichever height is greater. Where no specific elevations exist, then they must be constructed at an elevation of ten feet above the creek channel on Ashland, Bear, or Neil Creek; to five feet above the creek channel on all other Riparian Preserve creeks defined in section 18.62.050.B; and three feet above the stream channel on all other drainage ways identified on the official maps, or one foot above visible evidence of high flood Water flow, whichever is greater. The elevation of the finished lowest habitable floor shall be certified to the city by an engineer or surveyor prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the structure. Not applicable. E To the maximum extent feasible, structures shall be placed on other than Flood plain- Corridor Lands. In the-case where development is permitted in the Flood plain corridor area, then development shall be limited to .that area which would have the shallowest floodzn-. ,II IL 2 9 G:\pub-wrks\eng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A Eng\Planning Issues-documents\P&E Applicntion Narrative.doc Not applicable i! F. Existing lots with buildable land outside the Flood plain Corridor shall locate all residential structures outside the Corridor land, unless 50% or more of the lot is within the Flood plain Corridor. For residential uses proposed for existing lots that have more than 50% of the lot in Corridor land, structures may be located on that portion of the Flood plain corridor that is two feet or less below the f ood elevations on the official naps, but in no case closer than 20 feet to the channel of a Riparian Preservation Creek. Construction shall be subject to the requirements in paragraph D above. Not applicable. G. New non-residential uses may be located on that portion of Flood plain Corridor lands that equal to or above the flood elevations on the official reaps adopted in section 18.62.060. Second story construction may be cantilevered or supported by pillars that will have minimal impact on the f ow of f oodwaters over the Flood plain corridor for a distance of 20 feet if it does not impact riparian vegetation, and the clearance from finished grade is at least ten feet in height, and have minimal impact on the flow of floodwaters. The finished f oor elevation may not be more than two feet below the flood corridor elevations. Not applicable. H. All lots modified by lot line adjustments, or new lots created from lots which contain Flood plain Corridor land must contain a building envelope on all lot(s) which contain(s) buildable area of a sufficient size to accommodate the uses permitted in the underling zone, unless the action is for° open space or conservation purposes. This section shall apply even if the effect is to prohibit further division of lots that are larger than the minimum size permitted in the zoning ordinance. Not applicable. I. Basements. Not applicable. 1. Habitable basements are not permitted for new or existing structures or additions located within the Flood plain Corridor. 2. Non-habitable basements, used for storage, parking, and similar uses are permitted for residential structures but must be f ood proofed to the standards of Chapter 15.10. .I. Storage ofpetroleum products, pesticides, or other-hazardous or toxic chemicals is not permitted in Flood plain Corridor lands. Not applicable. JUI 2 9 P, G:\pub-wrks\eng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A Eng\Planning Issues-documents\P&E Application Narradve.doc K. Fences constructed within 20 feet of any Riparian Preservation Creek designated by this chapter shall be limited to wire or electric fence, or similar fence that will not collect debris or obstruct flood waters, but not including wire mesh or chain link fencing. Fences shall not be constructed across any identified riparian drainage or riparian preservation creek. Fences shall not be constructed within any designated floodway. j Not applicable. L. Decks and structures other than buildings, if constructed on Flood plain Corridor Lands and at or below the levels specified in section 18.62.070. C and D, shall be flood proofed to the standards contained in Chapter 15.10. Not applicable. M. Local streets and utility connections to developments in and adjacent to the Flood plain Corridor shall be located outside of the Flood plain Corridor, except for crossing the Corridor; and except in the Bear Creek Floodplain corridor as outlined below: There will be utility connections made and/or reconstructed in order to tie into the new pump station which is located within the interpreted floodway. These are necessary for the pump station to operate and will be constructed following current City of Ashland Standards. 1. Public street construction may be allowed within the Bear Creek Flood plain corridor as part of development following the adopted North Mountain Neighborhood Plan. This exception shall only be permitted for that section of the Bear Creek Flood plain corridor between North Mountain Avenue and the Nevada Street right-of-way. The new street shall be constructed in the general location as indicated on the neighborhood plan map, and in the area generally described as having the shallowest potential for flooding within the corridor. Not applicable. 2. Proposed development that is not in accord With the North Mountain Neighborhood Plan shall not be permitted to utilize this exception. Not applicable. JUL 2 9 016 18.62.0 75 Development Standards for Riparian Preservation lands A. All development in areas indicated for Riparian Preservation, as defined in section 18.62.050(B), shall comply with the following standards: 1. Development shall be subject to all Development Standards for Flood plain Corridor Lands (18.62.070) G:\pub-wrks\eng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A Eng\Planning Issues-documents\P&E Application Narrative.doc The proposed pump station improvements will comply with all Development Standards for Flood Plain Corridor Lands by utilizing the existing pump station structure to house the new pump station. Proposed excavations will be held to a minimum and street grades and topography will not be altered in any way. 2. Any tree over six inches d. b. h. shall be retained to the greatest extent feasible. No trees over 6" DBH will be removed as part of this project 3. Fill and Culverting shall be permitted only for streets, access, or utilities. The crossing shall be at right angles to the creek channel to the greatest extent possible. Fill shall be kept to a minimum. No additional filling or culvert piping will be included in this project 4. The general topography of Riparian Preservation lands shall be retained. (Ord 2808, Added, 1210211997) f` The general topography of this Riparian Preservation Land will not be altered in any significant way by the installation of these pump station improvements. Attachments/Exhibits Exhibit A Map of riparian corridor Exhibit B Preliminary construction plans (2) Exhibit C Photos Exhibit D "No Rise" certificate Exhibit E Horticulturist tree review Exhibit F Ashland Fire and Rescue comments SUN 2 g 'i! k) G:\pub-wrks\cng\2007 Project Year\07-26 Granview Pump Station\A_Eng\Planning Issues-documents\P&E Application Narrative.doc i - 4 i" 1 _ [Type here] JUL 2 9 `)Q'Ib L Win: :z ry~ S z t , u' 6 f `te=a ~ i [Type here] JUL 2 9 1 ~I r C. i l [Type here] JUL 2 9 26, i I , i April 3t 2009 E. Floodwater Displacement - Grandview Pump Station Replacement Project To Whom It May Concern: The fill material planned for this project will in no way displace fluid water. The voids to filled cu. r tly exist within the existing pump station vault which will house ie new pump station, Filling these voids writ h 66 cubic yards of Control Density Fill is not pertinent to the intent or Section 18.62.07A.3.d which specifically references the displacement of flood plain water as the result of filling actlvity, The fill to be placed in the voids remaining after the installation of the new pump motion will effeWveiy convert the entire space to a much more stable condition than currently exists, 4~ 27PE-/- t 41 Jul I i i tk RECEIVE1 j SEP _ 00, l To: Morgan Wa City JI Asni nd yman, Engineering From: Donn Todt, Parks Horticulturist Field 0 office [I COU11 Re: Trees at the corner of Grandview and Wright's Creek j Iv i The trees at the comer of Grandview and Wright's Creek, adjacent to the pump station, are Scotch Pines. They are less than 12 inches in diameter and though they look unthrifty within the lower street-side canopies, the upper canopies of the live trees are healthy. (One stem is dead) The trees are parasitized by Sequoia pitch moth but this is usually more unsightly than a cause for mortality. The most important function of the trees, besides the standard environmental functions, is that they provide privacy screening for the adjacent property owners. The owners are quite attached to this privacy and consequently to the trees. I recommend street-side pruning, using commonly accepted standards, to accommodate necessary work. After the pump vault has been removed, the trees should be evaluated for root damage and stability. If it is possible to preserve the trees, I would do so. Blest, D L. Todt JUL 9 01 Ashland Fire & Rescue Pre-Application Comments Project Description: Grandview Pump Station Contact: Margueritte Hickman 552-2229 Applicant: Morgan Wayman - CofA Permit Number: PL-2008-01406 Phone: Fire department has no objection to this application. If fire season is in effect, a permit may be required to operate equipment off of paved areas. Contact fire department for current restrictions. Please note that the final determination of fire hydrant distance, fire flow, and fire apparatus access requirements will be based upon plans submitted for Building Permit review. Changes from plans submitted with this application can result in further requirements. Any future construction must meet fire code requirements in effect at that time. The fire department contact for this project is Fire Marshal Margueritte Hickman. She may be contacted at (541) 552-2229 or hickmanm@ashland.or.us. Grandview Pump station September 10, 2008 Page 11 r cu i - `o i r ; t _ 1 yy ~ ~ r \ ~ B s I I y d 1 ti I i' 1. LL n ~vvn `O W S' E Q "J o R p01~ Vr F U g ~i $ Z 9 d d° ~xnmao x x, nauwH, s o ,0`"oc Z k W rr ~w uw w~ w Lli z _ °a ~t G tnuxvx, 6 •u ooorussm z 5 d a "5 x W L~- ZooM z° C7 J 'p a 3 'u aoowa YUe ; 1I p m I Q$ _ oa •ao aol - ;~rrnam 0 X w ° m<; g U 6 xvm aoiaaor+i _ ° Z w b a a c- G6q ° to 0 a r K w s a rc U~ 9E~nK ~n71, o° N a S11WIl ulo m Q H ' t5 w w w w w$ w w w < N ue om W a L, Z > o I.u'1'rl r ci7 u w fn R a a A CL d U P L J F o o p° O Z5 x U a❑ m r o °n' o m W J J J I F 000 o e L'~o Z Z Z o~~ »w¢o woN Z ZO ZO 0 0 O z0 .di zF°, - .off°n U U Z z z Q o=Q Omom a4 N~`.'O~ wa>z,.. W Q 2 f < aw5o °w .r _'Q yN O° ~a~v H F 0 0 ° U°Qag~k-'go_s_ r< W Z Z W W w w Y = n U to O0 wNawzzz W Z 2Nf yl2000 0 m w fA th N N N O W w J 0 0 0 m _ > Q Q F W W CC a: W m a a ° 00 a a WD N t~ < < o Q 0. 4~W1^ vOio W w ~J Z U U U W w w Q z~w o a°z zon < w<z I..L SQmc~° a oaw'n Quo Q ~ S~~N Y i{>~W O Utn°O OSNI-~~~ UN=O° YQO GI` ~fL<Y°mN 'OZp Q~~~O 1.0 LL OR, U oN o~N ? _ F°'Y t-iz UaQv WUt°n mQ~ °~N U ~m < o OC p z ~Zm< m° a.. rr W Q W W ° In m Ywg~ n n m ~o2a Z P, Z co F. d C7 z g° W z go (II Z o (D CL j o T z w z o N z N N II _ WCL C7N zo m? II .w. rn w m Q¢w a~• Z ED ZQwn `ga aN_~o o wz aWZ o wz J3Q. W -Z O ¢aa ~ F NM: °~n Zz° PN FNOM in-P, 2Zp w H I- ,5 > Og Z d' 6 Q Ny = N Sy N RNW N . WCL v wfA~v Qyo ° ao:~ Naz I mJ z I 1.0 QD Z~ < wm Qm<w «aduNi <~9td" °U<o¢dI lLO7Z >-Q oz~ QNO 1zsz.n ww zin O <za pZ w wzpW Nom Fo°Zwo °Q~w< in ~Oy .g ~Z O LLZ Ewe . 'D2! x:4: H WWw2;~. }}~=p x O w)o OOd >2 d~pK UONQ.~.. U~'s NQv ~UF NQ.m.. F~t4S Q~2 ~t ULo <a xa~a. HO 'AJO SiHOiann q . ~ % Emig a F HIO o a - ° ~69 ~ vdi a 2F $ ° $ 25 o a$as $c 5 w~< a g 6 ?N s 9as$_ $ $ w ¢ H v4 E6 °y$$ N 9w.8m z ff °d m ~za W zw i °zd O °~om ~mw $ o a a v$ q4~ ~'F a $Bm° a`s - k w ° ~Q $~o W aw° a ago a jog 3m ° E HE saw $ zd>m °aa2 211 5 U) MI oc peg !!2 W g g oaa~ w > x wNS 8~6oo U >P;H As o G, < TN W _I~ u ~o~°'' a a E_.5 S U G~ S a n ~ ~~zac"i'`a~=N ~ ~~`a N ~ d~~ ~~s c~~wa~rcF(n ~G oE~°'x ~ Y Yo 6sa~ q g > i 2 q5 z ki+~ :~5 S so6m wOy a_m -ao U omg Z x oz ' cs 1 o`L ax ~ c m ~ ~ ~ 'a = N _ = o~E eoy a N N K ~ ¢ -Fl. C G y .~C. v H L o - o___________-_______-_______________ o N o mN~-m a~ E m~ O ;C~ II o L- SAD w C C .2i y C p~• H S n,v' N Epp nC _ 6 ,S G w - _ _ _ _ < = rr. m ~ a E'~ g, ~°~rs> > a y N = N zo: EL ~ as ~ •Q ~ A ~'o ¢ fi Z U IT E. w MC v ~F=vu¢6 ° c~ N--- H° I I IL^L-•II. W _ ~d a I , I no=- i I I oa'- I I aa° I " Na re .ct oo.ct co- 2IQ ~I2I~ S LHJRIrY1 _ I I; I - rfl , I, - ~ a a N~~ W W Lq W xQ ~ SiHDMAA, 07 i I I l i 1 r ~ G o s aw - p.~ oc aN U v U a~ zm G co O Y o P° ~ DW G o(~1 a 1,~ .tiTY i W Nei 1n " - Vl,c lmo ` ' Z a.oor i, m rn oN rm--- - - _ wti~ - - F U N Z I\ I ~ 1~ tl L, N 1 N 1 NN 1 1 i to ~ W W A - - - - - - - - - O op i N h Z - - v wm z 1 11 ~ ~ m e = ~ ~ ~ ~ Q 1 41 N. Q h~ r ~n W v wl• x~ Q© _ - / ~ L'' n LJI a Fa~ \ n 1 N ~ 1 , .rte N 1 NN - UI 1 W W ~ - - o r - - o H S €c~ oaf R tea a Eg%g ,`oc' F ~a `oo ~ w vACPavCF 4 ~ a 4 G v~ LLU cro a q~_ `~y~aE o~ OA S '47~yG a ED y' y 8 `C > g u q ~ o a k 1 ~o <N U C7 n m m k~j' ~ o a ~o o ~'e E c g~uR:w8 § w .s s 3 E w-68 Q w Ell- T -17 \ w _ Q u uQ `a in x~ao ~o UQ o 0 Z. 6 = t'i2zd IQ Nom ¢~n x m p"~ OJ OJ ¢ m w a m U N J= I 3 N N z O W W N_ Z Z O y a N g m J w m 4 y S J W 0 o le' SC ZW Q, 0 =J°J wSO O K UWnO OOO ~O m w Va~Q '-wz z z UN; V JOw ix- N V OQU=W Jd Zv N wN33 O Z =WY (J U'Z 00m~p Y W>WLLO mj0 Ndz d N ¢m 2 ¢ZWZ ¢yj ZOy N ON 4Jw1 d VpS~Q ~a~= ¢ WO= NdJ00 J-°2 OWO ¢WZ K N ~I .¢J/ImN Jm3W WQ Wa- 0 ¢ Fm O w a ~ Z N Wmm QQ N Wr'10 O N}W`~J UN2m WQWaW N7Z_ zWlOO W - ~ m0 OMW }OO mom J =Owl ° m Zd~M OU1 J I W } N~ Z~ N U S J Od' Z.x -W. ~.0.u p:: I N...... W. Z_.~~ ....O~000 NQri a4v'OZ J OU O 'A Z.O 'saW Z a. U ~n ZN N Z K ww >w I RZ w>~ NSNW- J ~OJ Wwa O 1- J NW....N WJg U FLL¢ I JY WO NWUW JV Wm W_ _ Jx2 w;; ZZI~Y... ZW 1JiQK W N ¢w~2j zaJ J= JV mo7 Z N ~ZmO aU¢ IjZ 004{-.0 ajUmK QVm-~ Mga6U w g6akU 0, WZQ. 2 N > LLw ~WQ QN Q~ I O.WY F-K 30l-7 OOQ¢ F-W7 m p,QFkti 'O K.f~ WV- >WW N \ J ¢J JJ~F- F-:1C) H¢ 3 h V 06. Nm O¢O p,O ¢ Um mmm N¢Q 3 ar¢.m mp. O ff.a N ONN n 4~iN4 ¢R.N NO NO 00 0 0 0 O O O O O J K O ¢ 4O y m`p J w¢o a }a w O O Z a 0 W Q Z VS1 W O O I W m w aN ¢rc S K 00 an 'n U6 O a.W4 p W W ON> F- QZ ON d6 o 4-N It J LL N K } U Z O W O O m N m W d 1- y Z N KKZ Q N w¢ 4 p ¢Gw Q¢FZa ^ ° J§-:Dw w OUdW HNC O W 4 W tN~ OF-Z Ky-¢WNNZ N I W ~m❑ X N Ot~n!° z'WSW o °oo o. vi a3Q>zo¢ j 3Un m4 f O W'm O O WW vs SQL w w <Z~~ W I - ~Paz .9-.9 =00 WO~0 BY II °~3s <00 m W N 4 O W aN¢o ~ .4,t t_.t 0 I°n :j N +r. Q7'- v m 1 : I z~ I I ~ Q m o m I \ II 111 I O II I O Y ii n N N II u I Wwo o~zvj J II wzzd Z~O~ u I vNi N Wow a w o= I 3d L 8'S l= H1d30 l'73M13M ° Joan Q I- ZdW wONO o} I w m ' m Q N F U w2 F- m O Np_p. ¢W W >m vl w°a, °z z a° I n w w z Q O Z O a w W ~w~w <<o ~~O n 11 Zp0 NE¢a i - - - - - - - - - - - - it o'm vii 1D z wg ~iiZ V z ZF' I °N 4Q° 0N 11 ii (Lw2 o g z Y x I ¢w K U ¢ Q¢ U~ ii>NJ Z UZI I-W UO JO 11W6W O lr - Ka ~'M R, n}} OW o> wo v ` I I'~v~ ~ o w ~ z z ~ z o 0 u z ~ V Q Q VI Q N Q O 4 Q ~I' NUFS-v ~ `I7 La.N 'n IIZO N ' J a a a a N o - I 11 - of ; U J¢ ItO i IIa JC}} z 2 J O d N R N ZUZ rc I I LL 1 1 V I i U w F O W h 2 z z z a ° N ~~..~~........LL~v~-~~ LL. a°w z ¢z' Iwil S w o `I r. f- a i i% II N p 11 i i I J a i'.::; i i ~ ¢ Q N J I I I' • I I z I 1.':. 11 jl u] O f" O .i I NI t0 < b IT ii -I O N Q m i Z O W ' LL 1 I H_ N WW •1 . t IO N O I N O 'rl'7 J\ F N N O 1~ f f r. 2 0 `NJ~_ L. • :I 1 iC ~ yv W ~ y I. m m O ~t o a- I ° m i. N o • m .;i____ •~____1_~__~_ _:-~__.a.. w m In n w N I N ' lp . ' J I I W> N N N N N N N I = N J ~ r ~ w In I S ,p w W uo° w w ITr ~ OOz L O V O O4 UFW O D-w v f!~✓ . t_ W O 2 t j/ Planning Division ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION c r r 0 e 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE ASHLAND 541-488-5305 )Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT IA/Ct `dzwa ie,y` Z/ P4- a'/by) ~Ll~~ 71'~'Ut S DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES Q~NO Street Address _!!Kh ecJ o i oS revdyiew &i dt4 uJi-i"W-1 ~ a e'v'e-, Assessor's Map No. 391 E Tax Lot(s) Zoning Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name /j wg C - P ~G t° d Phone x-52. -2-c/NE-Mail @c~7yt . l'~ fd )Cap i~ ~ r ~7~t c t", X15 Address 2 0 g / i w City k4 `QV-al Zip 77-s` Z 0 PROPERTY OWNER - Name 644 ~ fr o',W) Phone -E-Mail Address 2b P_ ZLAILIA `icy' City N3 IC V d Zip -7 SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip Title Name Phone E-Mail Address City Zip 1 hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. 1 understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. 1 further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that 1 produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request, 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my ex e . If I have any doubts, l am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. Applicant's Signature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, l have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. Property Owner's Signature (required) Date [To be completed by city Staff] Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee $ / t OVER 4 G:\comm-dev~phumingTorms & Handouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc t ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ❑ APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. ❑ FINDINGS OF FACT - Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre-Application Comment document. ❑ 2 SETS OF SCALED PLANS no larger than 11"x17". Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape details. (Optional -1 additional large set of plans, 2'x3', to use in meetings) ❑ FEE (Check, Charge or Cash) ❑ LEED® CERTIFICATION (optional) - Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps: ® Hiring and retaining a LEED® Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and I construction of the project; and ® The LEED® checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued. NOTE: ® Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis. ® Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. ® All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance with ORS 227.178. ® The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. (Planning Commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1:30 pm, or the full Planning Commission, which meets at 7:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St). ® A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns. ® If applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree and/or Historic Commissions. i Qkom dev\planningTo ms & ffandouts\Zoning Permit Application.doc Job Address: 0 TBA Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: A Owner's Name: CITY OF ASHLAND 0 Phone: N State Lic No: ~ Customer 08955 CITY OF ASHLAND T City Lic No: L Applicant: R Address: A c; Sub-Contractor: A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 07/2912016 T Issued: Expires: 01/25/2017 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Wastewater lift station replacement - Corner of Grandview Drive and Wrights Creek Public works contact is Kevin - 552-2414 VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount Physical Constraints Permit 1,022.00 h' CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 C I T Y F i I i t i i+ I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation (180 days). Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 1,022.00 $ 0.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the Sub-Total: $ 1,022.00 applicant. Fees Paid: $ 0 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 1,022.00 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 f www.ashland.or.us Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 j g -ASHUNND