Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAshland_610_PA-2018-00592 s ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINDINGS & ORDERS 1. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2018-00592 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 610 Ashland St APPLICANT: Rogue Planning & Development ® ER: Teresa Lockwood and George Schoen DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review to convert an existing garage into a 484 square-foot Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) along with the construction of a new carport and garage to provide covered parking. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 16AB; TAX LOT: 2000 SUBMITTAL DATE: March 29, 2018 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: April 26, 2018 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: May 31, 2018 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): June 13, 2018 FINAL DECISION DATE: June 14, 2018 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: December 14, 2019 DECISION Subject Property The proposal is to convert a detached garage into an Accessory Residential Unit at the front of the property at 610 Ashland St. The applicant would also build a new garage and carport to create new sheltered parking spaces. The subject property is located on the south side of Ashland St between Weller Ln and Morton St. The home is the fourth lot on a paved flag drive. The surrounding neighborhood is comprised of almost entirely single family homes. The subject property is zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-10). The zoning to the north of the subject property is Single Family Residential (R-1-7.5), the area to the west is Single Family Residential (R-1-10), the area to the south is a mix of Single Family Residential and Rural Residential (R- 1-10 and RR-.5) and the properties to the east are Single Family Residential (R-1-10 and R-1-7.5). The subject property is .40 acres or 17,536 square feet in size. The property is currently occupied by a single-family residence and the detached garage/studio. The residence was built in 1980 and is a two-story structure. .y In 2000, the properties to the immediate north and south were split into five total lots with Planning Action 2000-002. 610 Ashland St was a pre-existing parcel with improvements already constructed. The other lots were prescribed building envelopes, but 610 Ashland St was not. The proposed ARU will convert the existing 484 square foot garage into a living space with a kitchen. The applicant will add a new garage attached to the west side of the existing structure. In addition, an attached carport will be added to the north side of the structure. The total proposed impervious surface will be 4,634 square feet, which includes the existing'impervious surface. PA-2018-00592 610 Ashland Sthirc Page 1 The approval standards req,-,ire that an Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) in an R-1 zone does not exceed 50% of-the-gross habitable floor-area (GHFA) of the primary residence on the lot and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet. The main structure is given as 1,952 square feet. The proposed ARU is 484 square feet, G thus meeting the size requirements. The development of the property is also required to conform to maximum lot coverage of 40% and base setback requirements. The proposal indicates the total lot coverage will be approximately 32%. The proposal provided a site plan showing that the structures will comply with setback requirements. The applicant did not provide solar setback calculations, but references them on the site plan and appears to meet them. Solar setback calculations will be required with building permits. Site Design Review An ARU is required to meet Site Design Review standards. The ARU is greater than 20 feet from Ashland street and thus is not required to orient to the street. The lot does .not have street frontage. Parking is accommodated near the driveway entrance where it was originally built. The applicant has indicated that parking is not visible from the street and that this location will minimize impacts to trees-as much as possible. The application for a single family home served by a flag-drive with an ARU of less than 500 square feet requires four automobile parking spaces. One of these parking spaces will be in the newly constructed garage. Another_ spot will be under the new carport. The two remaining spots will be -compact and constructed as surface parking next to the garage. These spots will require the removal of several trees in order to provide adequate backup and turnaround as required by flag drive-standards. Two bike parking spots will be provided in the garage and one additional spot will be located-under the new carport. The bike parking under the carport will need to- meet the standards of 18.4.3.070 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. The property is required to have 8% of the lot available as open space for use of the tenants. The applicant has indicated that this will be met by the AR U's patio -and that the tenants will have access to all open space on the property. An area for garbage and recycling will be provided next to the carport. The existing landscaping is mature and has been in place for many years. The-applicant will revegetate any areas of disturbance and=continue to maintain the landscaping in good condition-. The application includes a tree protection- plan and shows that- tree fencing will be installed-before construction. Three trees, an-incense cedar and two Doug frs, are proposed to be removed. The applicant states that the creation of-the required parking and turn-around requires- the removal of the trees. In addition, the applicant notes that eight trees will remain in the- immediate vicinity and additional large stature trees of varying species are located on the property. The application states that the tree canopy will -not be substantially reduced and impacts on erosion, soil stability, and surface water will be minimal. The Tree Commission reviewed the application at their regular meeting on May 3rd and recommended approving the plan as submitted by the applicant. The property is currently served by adequate City facilities for water, sewer, storm drainage and electricity. PA-2018-00592 610 Ashland St/nre Page 2 h I, The applicants have submitted materials to-the Planning Department-that demonstrate compliance with approval standards. The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040, as follows: A. Rm1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential-unit is allowed per lot, -and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone, except that accessory residential units shall be counted in the density of developments created under the Performance Standards Option in chapter 18.3.9. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the 'b'FA of the primary ; esidence on the lot, and shall not-exceed 1, 000 square feet GHFA. 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shahl be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single- family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways-are- exempt from the pavingrequirements in subsection 18.4.3.080. E.1. The criteria for Site Review approval are described in-_ C Chapter 18.5.2.050 as-follows: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of-the applicable provisions of the underiying zone (part- -18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks; lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. D. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements-( part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 184, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The-proposal complies-with-the applicable standards in section 18, 4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage; paved access to- and throughout the property and adequate transportation-ean and will be provided-to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site- Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances -in either f subsection 1 or 2, below, are-found-to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific-requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use o a site; and approval of the exception will nog` substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or PA-2018-00592 610 Ashland St/nre Page 3 I 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the-specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieve the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. C In staff's assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action #2018-00592 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason- whatsoever, then Planning Action #2018- 00592 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: I 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2) That all necessary building permits for the accessory residential unit (ARU) shall be obtained, and -associated fees and charges including applicable-system development charges relating to the ARU for water, sewer, storm water, parks,- an. d_ transportation, shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3). That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in conformance with those approved as part of this- application. If the plans submitted for the building permit -are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part-of this application, an application to modify the Site Review approval would need to be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. Building permit submittals shall include: a. Lot coverage -calculations including all building footprints, driveways,- parking, and circulation areas shall be provided with the Building-Permit. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 40 percent as required in the R-1-10 zoning district, b. Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with Solar Setback StandardA in-the formula [(Height - 6)/(0.445 + Slope) = Required Solar Setback] and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade. 4) That storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak rainfalls must be-collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm pipe or public drainage way) or through an approved alternative in accordance with Ashland Building Division policy BD-PP-0029. On-site collection systems shall- be detailed on the building permit submittals. 5) That a Tree Verifrcation_Permit shall be applied for -and approved by the Ashland Planning Division prior to-site work, tree removal, staging or storage of materials. The Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the trees to be removed and the installation of tree protection fencing for the trees on and adjacent to the site to be protected. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.4.5.030. 6)- That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy: r PA-2018-00592 610 Ashland St/nre Page 4 a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements: b) That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for and approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right-of-Way. j c) The requirements of the Ashland Fire Department to address fire apparatus access shall be satisfactorily addressed. d) All automobile parking and bicycle parking shall be installed according to the approved plan, inspected, and approved by the Staff Advisor. Bill Molnar, Community Development Director Date t PA-2015-00592 610 Ashland St/nre Page 5 i I CITY OF ji May 31, 2018 Notice of Final Decision On May 31, 2018, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA-2018-00592 Subject Property: 610 Ashland Street Applicant: Rogue Planning & Development Description: A request for Site Design Review to convert an existing garage into a 484 square-foot Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) along with the construction of a new carport and garage to provide covered parking. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 16AB; TAX LOT: 2000 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Nathan Emerson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 i i SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) I E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. t F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: I . Who May Appeal, The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content ofNotice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period, d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 4 w~ N~,ashland, or.its ~ i i AFFIDAVIT OF FAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. I 2. On May 31, 20181 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-2018-00592, 610 Ashland St. Signature of Employee i, l k C:Wserslsmithda.AFNHBDesktoptAFFIDAVIT OF MAILING _ds.docx 5131/2018 i PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 2114 PA-2018-00592 391E16A6 2113 PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 1500 BOGGIA JANET TRUSTEE ET AL BRISCOE JAMES CHRISTOPHER BUCOLO OLIVER ET AL 818 PALMER RD TRUSTEE ET AL 683 FOREST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 6625 CAMINITO BLYTHEFIELD ASHLAND, OR 97520 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 I PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8205 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8100 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2111 CLARK-FREED REVOCABLE TRUST ET COMMAND CAROL A DUNN STEPHEN R TRUSTEE ET AL AL CLARK PAUL S&FREED JULIE B 635 ASHLAND ST 570 WELLER LN 675 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 2110 PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 1700 PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 2004 ENGELUND KENDALL J TRUSTEE EVANS DEAN FRANCO PRISCILA S TRUSTEE ET AL 560 WELLER LN 698 ASHLAND ST 2305 ASHLAND ST C PMB 276 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 2105 PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 2009 PA-2018-00592 391E16AB 2008 FREEMAN BRENTON WHOLLY C GLEN DAVID M GORHAM BRIAN L TRUSTEE ET AL 575 WELLER LN 611 FOREST ST 615 FOREST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2005 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2108 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8204 HALPRIN PATRICIA M HOLDEN DEBORAH L TRUSTEE ET AL JENSEN SCOTT R ET AL 1126 E SKYLINE DR 564 ASHLAND ST 21480 MILES DR GLOBE, AZ 85501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 WEST LINN, OR 97068 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2000 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2007 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2300 LOCKWOOD THERESA S ET AL MCCANDLESS DAVID F/PARTHENIA R MCDONALD WALTER R LIV TRUST ET AL PO BOX 672 602 ASHLAND ST JULIE A LOCKHART ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 682 FOREST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7704 PA-2018-00592 391E16A61800 MORGAN SHERRILL DAVIS TRUSTEE ET PA-2018-00592 391E09DC 8200 MORGAN BONNIE K TRUSTEE ET AL AL PADILHA JUSSARA 650 ASHLAND ST 660 PRACHT ASHLAND, OR 97520 484 EUCLID ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7702 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2109 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2112 PAGE MURILLA ELISE TRUSTEE ET AL PIRASTEH HASSAN TRUSTEE ET AL SMALL JUDITH ELIZABETH 486 EUCLID ST 582 ASHLAND ST 580 WELLER LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2201 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2104 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7900 SMITH CONSTANCE L SUTER PAUL J TRUSTEE ET AL TAHVILI ZAHRA 680 FOREST ST 1589 CHEMEKETA ST NE 595 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 SALEM, OR 97301 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2103 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7800 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 1900 VALENTINI DONALD L TRUSTEE ET AL WELLS STEVEN L/MARY CUTLER WOLFE PATRICIA J TRUSTEE ET AL 565 WELLER LN 565 ASHLAND ST 175 LITHIA WAY UNIT 203 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7701 PA-2018 00592 391 E09DC 8000 PA-2018-00592 YORK ELIZABETH G TRUSTEE ET AL ZUFICH-COX NANCY R/ROBERT J COX CARLOS DELGADO ARCHITECT 640 PRACHT ST ZUFICH NANCY R 217 FOURTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 615 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 PA-2018-00592 610 Ashland St KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ROGUE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT 5-31-2018 NOD 545 A STREET, STE 3 33 N CENTRAL, STE 213 35 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 I Planning Department, 51 Winb`u. Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 V 01 _ 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA- 2018-00592 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 610 Ashland St APPLICANT: Rogue Planning & Development Services OWNER: Teresa Lockwood and George Schoen DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review to convert an existing garage into a 484 square-foot Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) along with the construction of a new carport and garage to provide covered parking. j COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 16AB; TAX LOT: 2000. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 26, 2018 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: May 10, 2018 ASHLAND ST i e l G\ SUBJECT PROPERTY t- t i C(1v 690 ASHLAND ST Uj, PA-2018-00592 Z ILL- O J 1 FOREST ST ms The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. Q\comm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\ivtailed Notices R Signs\2018\PA-2018-00592.docx I,. SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards, B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18A.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18A if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. k GAcomm-dev\planning\Planning Actions\Noticing Folder\Mailed Notices & Signs\2018\PA-2018-00592.docs AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON ) County of Jackson ) The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 4/26/181 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #2018-00592, 610 Ashland. a 'Signature of Employee DocumenQ 4/26/2018 i PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2114 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2113 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 1500 BOGGIA JANET TRUSTEE ET AL BRISCOE JAMES CHRISTOPHER BUCOLO OLIVER ET AL 818 PALMER RD TRUSTEE ET AL 683 FOREST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 6625 CAMINITO BLYTHEFIELD ASHLAND, OR 97520 LA JOLLA, CA 92037 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8205 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8100 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2111 CLARK-FREED REVOCABLE TRUST COMMAND CAROL A DUNN STEPHEN R TRUSTEE ET AL CLARK PAUL S&FREED JULIE B 635 ASHLAND ST 570 WELLER LN 675 ASHLAND ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2110 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 1700 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2004 ENGELUND KENDALL J TRUSTEE EVANS DEAN FRANCO PRISCILA S TRUSTEE ET AL 560 WELLER LN 698 ASHLAND ST 2305 ASHLAND ST C PMB 276 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2105 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2009 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2008 FREEMAN BRENTON WHOLLY C GLEN DAVID M GORHAM BRIAN L TRUSTEE ET AL 575 WELLER LN 611 FOREST ST 615 FOREST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2005 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2108 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8204 HALPRIN PATRICIA M HOLDEN DEBORAH L TRUSTEE ET AL JENSEN SCOTT R ET AL 1126 E SKYLINE DR 564 ASHLAND ST 21480 MILES DR GLOBE, AZ 85501 ASHLAND, OR 97520 WEST LINN, OR 97068 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2000 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2007 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2300 LOCKWOOD THERESA S ET AL MCCANDLESS DAVID F/PARTHENIA R MCDONALD WALTER R LIV TRUST ET AL PO BOX 672 602 ASHLAND ST JULIE A LOCKHART ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 682 FOREST ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 1800 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7704 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8200 MORGAN BONNIE K TRUSTEE ET AL MORGAN SHERRILL DAVIS TRUSTEE PADILHA JUSSARA 650 ASHLAND ST 484 EUCLID ST 660 PRACHT ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7702 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2109 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2112 PAGE MURILLA ELISE TRUSTEE ET AL PIRASTEH HASSAN TRUSTEE ET AL SMALL JUDITH ELIZABETH 486 EUCLID ST 582 ASHLAND ST 580 WELLER LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2201 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2104 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7900 SMITH CONSTANCE L SUTER PAUL J TRUSTEE ET AL TAHVILI ZAHRA 680 FOREST ST 1589 CHEMEKETA ST NE 595 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 SALEM, OR 97301 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 2103 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7800 PA-2018-00592 391 E16AB 1900 VALENTINI DONALD L TRUSTEE ET AL WELLS STEVEN L/MARY CUTLER WOLFE PATRICIA J TRUSTEE ET AL 565 WELLER LN 565 ASHLAND ST 175 LITHIA WAY UNIT 203 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 7701 PA-2018-00592 391 E09DC 8000 PA-2018-00592 YORK ELIZABETH G TRUSTEE ET AL ZUFICH-COX NANCY R/ROBERT J COX CARLOS DELGADO ARCHITECT 640 PRACHT ST 615 ASHLAND ST 217 FOURTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-2018-00592 PA-2018-00592 610 Ashland KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ROGUE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT NOC 4/26/18 545 A STREET, STE 3 33 N CENTRAL, STE 213 35 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501 i I ' ~ o.. J' 'Y0.hk ~ ~ ~l~ ~ J ,7 llll' i J i.~ LI ~ d'~'L~'~ ~ ~ •,.m ~ w i 1 • - r iii 3 tl~1 i~ am I (SS" .43" glouD - P'RAC:I IT S r= l,. lu _ a o ;31 fib.. f; ST 101 60 lal 1601 TO 110' 10 1 1ado 120 v_= I 1 ~1A z,...na. - r. 2400 21,11) 260 i ri 2106 PMO 194)4 I i+. Mo 2245 4 2127 i 1 .211;a 21,11 MOS 22, % a~~ I i Planning Division ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 51 Winbum Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE C I T Y O F H LAN ® 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Site Review for Accessory Residential Unit DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification? ® YES NO Street Address 610 Ashland Street Assessor's Map No. 39 1E 16AB Tax Lot(s) 2000 Zoning R-1-10-P Comp Plan Designation Single Family Residential APPLICANT Name Rogue Planning & Development Phone 541-951-4020 E-Mail amygunter.planning@gmail.com Address 33 Central Avenue; Suite 213 City Medford Zip 97501 PROPERTY OWNER Name Teresa Lockwood and George Schoen Phone E-Mail george.schoen@sbcglobal.net Address PO BOX 672 City Ashland Zip 97520 SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER carlos@carlosdelgaoarchitect.com Title Architect Name Garin-, Delgado Architects Phone 541-552-9502 E-Mail Address 217 Fourth Street City Ashland Zip 97520 Title Landscape Design Name KenCairn Landscape Architect Phone 541-488-3194 E-Mail kerry@kencarin.com Address 545 A Street, Suite 102 City Ashland Zip 97520 I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. /understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. i further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate, and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at m expense. v y doy ts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance, ML 72 tel. A pli ant' Sig_ P e T Date As owner of the roperty inv Ivedin4 his request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. i'~': 40 VO Prope ®wne 's ' nature (required) Date (To be mWieted by City Staff] Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee OVER GAcomm-deOplmninglFom & Hmdouts\Zoning Permit ApplicationAm ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC March 22, 2018 Site Review for new Accessory Residential Unit Property Address: 610 Ashland Street Map & Tax Lot: 39 1E 16AB; 2000 Comprehensive Plan Designation: Single Family Residential Zoning: R-1-10-P Adjacent Zones: R-1-10-P; R-1-7.5; RR-.5 Property Owner: Teresa Lockwood George Schoen PO Box 672 Ashland, OR 97520 Architect: Carlos Delgado Architect 217 Fourth Street Ashland, OR 97520 Landscape Architect: KenCairn Landscape Architecture 545 A Street, Suite 3 Ashland, OR 97520 Planning Consultant: Rogue Planning & Development Service 33 N Central Avenue, Suite 213 Medford, OR 97501 1 j ROGUE PLANNING S DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC Request: Request for Site Design Review to allow for the conversion of the existing garage into an Accessory Residential Unit. A carport and a single vehicle garage are proposed to be added to the garage to provide for covered parking areas. ' S€t \Ihp i91LC ASHLAND Property Description: d I ~,,,r ~g ao, The subject property is on the southside of Ashland Street, ( j accessed via a private driveway. The 17,536 square foot lot is occupied by a 1980s single family residence. There is a odetached garage structure to the west of the residence. In ttr 's 1992, a minor land partition was approved that created two Mal parcels with the subject lot as Parcel #2. nu ~n3 ! ~ t fr, ~ 230 In early 2000, a five-lot subdivision (partition) was approved. ra, it 1 7 alai. A n: This created a number of flag lots. Each flag lot excepting the >0T subject property was prescribed a building envelope that has larger setbacks to the east and west of the residences and smaller setbacks indicative of side yards to the north and south of the residences. The subject property and the surrounding properties are all zoned Single Family Residential (R-1-10-P). The property is within the wildfire hazard zone. There are areas of hillside slopes on the property, they are not impacted by the proposed development. Proposal: The proposal is for the approval of an Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) within the existing garage. The ARU is proposed to have a single vehicle garage to the west of the existing converted garage. A covered carport is proposed to the north of the proposed ARU. A trash and recycle enclosure area will be provided on-site. Covered bicycle parking will be provided in the garage and in the carport. A small porch area and access to the yard area to the south will provide outdoor recreation space for the ARU. The existing residence has large deck areas and yard areas for outdoor recreation area. In order to facilitate the required back-up and turn around for automobiles, the removal of two small stature trees is necessary. On the following pages, findings of fact addressing the criteria from Ashland Municipal Code are provided on the following pages. For clarity, the criteria are in Calibri font and the applicant's responses are in Times New Roman font. 2 ROGUE PLANNING G DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC CRITERIA from the Ashland Land Use Ordinance Standards for Residential Zones: 18.2.3.040 Accessory Residential Unit Where accessory residential units are allowed, they are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, and shall meet all of the following requirements. A. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. One accessory residential unit is proposed.. Including the single-family residence, the maximum number of dwelling units will not exceed two per lot. 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone, except that accessory residential units shall be counted in the density of developments created under the Performance Standards Option in chapter 18.3.9. The lot was created as part of a standard subdivision and further divided through a 1990s-minor land partition and again part of an early 2000s partition. The lot exceeds the minimum lot area in the zone by approximately 7,500 square feet. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA. The proposed accessory residential unit is 484 square feet in area. The primary residence is 1,952 square feet in area, more than 50 larger than the proposedARU. 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. The proposed lot coverage at 4,634 square feet is 32 percent of the total lot area. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080. E.I. The small AR U less than 500 square feet requires one parking space in addition to the three required for the single-family residence. All of the parking is accommodated for on site. 3 s ROGUE PLANNING 5 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC 18.5.2.050 Site Design Review A, Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. The subject property is zoned R-1-10P, Single Family Residential. The parcel is 17,536 square feet and exceeds minimum lot area and minimum lot dimensions in the R-1-10 zone. The proposed residence complies with the minimum setbacks in the zone. The solar setback standards are met through the design of the structure, and the lot is subject to Solar Setback Standard B. Lot Coverage: Proposed impervious areas including building footprints, patios, pathways, driveways, decks are 4,634 square feet. The maximum coverage is the zone is 40 percent the proposed lot coverage. The proposed lot coverage is 32 percent of the total lot area. Parking: Four parking spaces are required for the development of the property. All vehicle parking and necessary back-up, turn around areas are accommodated for on-site. Three bicycle parking spaces are required. Two bicycle parking spaces are provided for within the garage and one is provided under the carport. Energy Usage: Both units will be constructed to the most current standards of the State of Oregon Building Standards for residential construction. 0. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). The property is within the Ashland Wildland Urban Inter face and the wildfire overlay zone. The proposed tree removal and the previous site work removing the ladder fuels, the small diameter timber and the understory growth will make the property compliant with the standards fi°om 18.3.10.030.b. A composition shingle roof of class B or better or metal roofing will be provided. C. Site Development and Design Standards. The proposed site development complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4. The layout and design does not provide for vulnerable areas that are not visible from the units and open space. Shrouded yard lights that provide down-lighting and security for the unit but will not directly illuminate adjacent properties will be provided No plant materials are proposed that prevent surveillance of the yard areas. 4 \1 ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC More than eight percent of the site is available cis open spaces for the use of the residents. There is a substantial deck, patio and yard area to the west of the single family. The ARU will have access to all of the yard areas on the site. A private patio area is provided to the south of the proposed AR U. Building Orientation. Building Orientation to Street. Dwelling units shall have their primary orientation toward a street. Where residential buildings are located within 20 feet of a street, they shall have a primary entrance opening toward the street and connected to the right-of-way via an approved walkway. The proposed ARU is more than 20 feet f ^om the street. Limitation on Parking between Primary Entrance and Street. Automobile circulation or off-street parking is not allowed between the building and the street. Parking areas shall be located behind buildings, or on one or both sides. The parcel as a f ag lot is not visible from the public street. Build-to Line. Where a new building is proposed in a zone that requires a build-to line or maximum front setback yard, except as otherwise required for clear vision at intersections, the building shall comply with the build-to line standard. There is not a build.-to or maximum setback line in the R-1 zone. Garages. Alleys and Shared Drives. Where a lot abuts a rear or side alley, or a shared driveway, including flag drives, the garage or carport opening(s) for that dwelling shall orient to the alley or shared drive, as applicable, and not a street. The only vehicular access to the site is via a flag driveway access. Setback for Garage Opening Facing Street. The minimum setback for a garage (or carport) opening facing a street is 20 feet. This provision does not apply to alleys. The garage faces the driveway. Building Materials. Building materials and paint colors should be compatible with the surrounding area. Very bright primary or neon-type paint colors, which attract attention to the building or use, are unacceptable. 5 ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC The building materials are compatible with the surrounding area. The materials are typical building materials such as hardi plank, lap siding and stucco. Fiberglass windows and a composition roof. The exact paint colors have not been selected but they will not be bright primary or neon colors. Streetscape. One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of frontage for that portion of the development fronting the street pursuant to subsection 18.4.4.030.E. The property does not have any street f outage, excepting the flag driveway. Recycle/Refuse Disposal Areas. Landscaping and recycle/refuse disposal areas shall be provided pursuant to chapter 18.4.4. Area for a trash and recycle container is proposed adjacent to the carport. 18.4.4.030 Landscaping and Screening The landscaping on the site is in good condition. Areas of disturbance will be revegetated with similar materials. The existing irrigation system on the site will remain. Three trees are proposed for removal to accommodate the vehicle back-up and turn around. All landscaping shall be maintained in good condition and replaced by the property owner. D. City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities, and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. Adequate city facilities exist to service the proposed ARU. Tree Preservation, Protection, and Removal 18.4.5.030 Tree Protection: The trees along the south and west property line. Are proposed to be protected with six-foot chain link fencing in accordance with the tree protection plan provided herein. 18.5.7 Tree Removal: B. Tree Removal Permit. Three trees are proposed for removal. Two Douglas far trees, one six-inch DBH and one ten-inch DBH. Also, a 13-inch DBH Cedar tree will be removed. 6 ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC 2. Tree that is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.3.10. The trees prooposed for removal will be impacted by the construction of the driveway back-up /turn around area. According to the table of allowed uses in the zone, the construction of a accessory residential unit and a carport area a permitted use in the R-1 zone (18.2.2.030.8). Driveways greater than 50 feet in length require back-up and turn around areas on-site. The locations of the trees prevent adequate turnaround areas. The removal of the trees allows for the site to be developed in accordance with the permitted uses allowed in the zone, and for the single-family residence, accessory residential unit and the carport accessed from the shared access easement and provide the required vehicle turnaround b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. There is a significant canopy coverage on the parcel, eight trees will be retained in the immediate vicinity. There are other large stature trees remaining on other portions of the property that are not near the construction area. The removal of the trees will not have impacts on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, and protection of adjacent trees or existing windbreaks. c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. There are a significant number of deciduous and confer trees within 200 feet of the property. The removal of the trees will not have a negative impact on the densities, sizes, canopies or species diversity within 200 feet of the site. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. 7 ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC The proposal complies with residential densities. The proposal for a single-family residence and an Accessory Residential Unit on the property complies with the allowed residential densities. The removal of the trees facilitates the construction of required back-up and turn around areas necessary for driveways greater than 50 feet in length. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Due to the existing substantial canopy coverage on the property, and the location in the tivildfire hazard zone, alternatives to planting trees that achieve similar size and stature at maturity. Smaller stature, deciduous trees or a payment in lieu ofplanting would be an appropriate mitigation on this property;. Attachments: 1) PROPOSED SITE PLAN 2) ELEVATIONS 3) LANDSCAPE PLAN 4) TREE REMOVAL / TREE PROTECTION PLAN 8 ~o KenCairn Landscape Architecture I9"CO ~IFER~.~ ~ b16AST, SiE3, ASHLAN0.0P 01540 °.1 1 541,188.3191 6' DE1CIpuous M ` row 2195 rn tow 2196 lY 1 - - - - - _ _ - d ~ 01-0 REAR6TBK RO 8K Drawn By; I~ 1 kk 1 N~ i tow 2194.5- SCALE ~ I pp Tr IjI Ij\ _ I N ,r l~I .mac- t r i I ~ N I I I l .1 i tow aw2198< i- ;'F2 omparls _ yy tow 2191 1 tow2192. tow 2193 ~ 6" DECIDUOUS tow 2194 - W V low 196 tow 219 W t /96 - - - -1 Ltm i Y 2 tu. f lv 1 ~o W rn U L 10, A i o O e I q W R L- -11 - srsk~ ''JII , r ~ Q JOB No. xxxx REVISION DATE SITE PLAN 24x36 1"=8'` 11x17 1"=16' j A 1F 24 32 24 x 36 =L_- NORTH LANDSCAPE 0 16 32 48 6411x17 SITE PLAN ISSUE DATE; DATE 1 ® TREE PROTECTION AND REMOVAL NOT F' 1. PRIOR TO DELIVERING EXCAVATION EQUIPMENT OR COMMEl ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ON \ TJ Urn~~~ THE SITE, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE L-0SCAPE ARCHITECT FOR A K I e11111V 6A4 PRE-CONSTRUCTION MEETING WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND EXCAVATION SUPERVISOR II 11 It I, PRIOR TO COMMENCING ANY WORK ON THE SITE, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL BE NOTIFIED 11 I Landscape ATChltecture BY THE CONTRACTOR 48 HRS. IN ADVANCE FOR ALL SITE VISITS REQUESTED, CONTRACTOR SHALL ~JI 1 `'i °\°~ll OBTAIN WRITTEN APPROVAL FRONT THE OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE THAT CONSTRUCTION MAY BEGIN II + 1' AFTER ALL OF THE DESCRIBED FENCING IS IN PLACE. FENCING SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE UNTIL THE I + IF`\j`. - e r PROJECT IS COMPLETED. #12 II 1i i+{~~^, I+~ ° 1IM 2. FENCES MUST BE ERECTED TO PROTECT TREES TO BE PRESERVED AS SHOWN IN DIAGRAM. FENCING 555 SHALL BE 6'TALL TEMPORARY CHAIN LINK PANELS INSTALLED WITH METAL CONNECTIONS TO ALL a I _IC +1 + x1 I 1 py\+ PANELS AREA INTEGRATED, THESE FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED 50 THAT IT DOES NOT ALLOW I I x+x N~ I I~ I biN + PASSAGE OF PEDESTRIANS AND/ OR VEHICLES THROUGH IT. FENCES DEFINE A SPECIFIC PROTECTION II\1 ZONE FOR EACH TREE OR GROUP OF TREES. FENCES ARE TO REMAIN UNTIL ALL SITE WORK HAS -i+- - - - -O _ _ _ _ BEEN COMPLETED. FENCES MAY NOT BE RELOCATED OR REMOVED WITHOUT THE PERMISSION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. I I \ I ` wM..x~c~mtawn~.am 3. CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, TRAFFIC AND STORAGE AREAS MUST REMAIN OUTSIDE FENCED TREE 645nsr, STE 3, ASHLAND, OR 97520 PROTECTION ZONES AT ALL TIMES. FRONT STBK~I H'~I I\ ' ' I II I 1.\ ~ r 1+ 1 , I\`~ Ir 541.9883194 'I -{Ili 1 \ 1x +1 + i i - 4. ALL PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES AND DRAIN OR IRRIGATION LINES SHALL BE ROUTED I I( II \ 1++ ' I it OUTSIDETHETREE PROTECTION ZONE. IF LINES MUST TRANSVERSE THE PROTECTION AREA, THEY SHALL BE TUNNELED OR BORED UNDER THE TREE ROOTS. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I N r Ix \ Y+•, ,11+ + r I IMMEDIATELY IFANY PROJECT PLANS CONFLICT WITH THIS REQUIREMENT, ;y l. I \ 1 rI 5. NO MATERIALS, EQUIPMENT, SPOIL, OR WASTE OR WASHOUT WATER MAY BE DEPOSITED, STORED, OR v 1 L r 1 1 I PARKED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE (FENCED AREA). i 1 11 6. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF TREE PRUNING IS REQUIRED CONSTRUCTION CLEARANCE. 1 -~~`1 \ 1\ I l FOR THATUSED UNDER PAVING MATERIALS MUST BE SAFE FOR USE AROUND TREES AND # ANY HER ICIDES 7 LABELED 13 \l 1 1 ;I 8. IF INJURY SHOULD OCCUR TO ANY TREE DURING CONSTRUCTION, NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE A,, i ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY. ALL DAMAGE CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION TO EXISTING TREES SHALL BE _ t '"~I I 1+ Drawn By: COMPENSATED FOR BYTHE OFFENDING PARTY, BEFORETHE PROJECTWILL BE CONSIDERED COMPLETE. RR. kk 10. EROSION CONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS SILT FENCING, DEBRIS BASINS, AND WATER DIVERSION 'i -(i]E i 1i r e STRUCTURES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE TO PREVENT SILTATION AND/ OR EROSION WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE, I I hPP'ROX. SCALE T + 11. BEFORE GRADING, PAD PREPARATION OR EXCAVATION FOR THE FOUNDATIONS, FOOTINGS, WALLS, ti ~fPIC1, L) \ I - _ =10' I OR TRENCHING ANY TREES WITHIN THE SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION ZONE SHALL BE ROOT PRUNEDI J ) I ' _ - - FOOT OUTSIDE THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE BY CUTTING ALL ROOTS CLEANLY AT A 90 DEGREE - I l ANGLE TO A DEPTH OF 24 INCHES. ROOTS SHALL BE CUT BY MANUALLY DIGGING ATRENCH AND ! \X II II+ II ' i i` ~,r1 CUTTING EXPOSED ROOTS WITH ASAW, VIBRATING KNIFE, ROCK SAW, NARROW TRENCHER WITH #8 _ ~AlI SHARP BLADES, OR OTHER APPROVED ROOT-PRUNING EQUIPMENT. #1 12. ANY ROOTS DAMAGED DURING GRADING OR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE EXPOSED TO SOUND TISSUE I + _ IE \ 4 J _ r I\ \ I i ; AND CUT CLEANLY ATA90 DEGREE ANGLE TO THE ROOT WITH ASAW. PLACE DAMP SOIL AROUND ALL CUT ROOTS TO ADEPTH EQUALING THE EXISTING FINISH GRADE WITHIN 4HOURS OF CUTS BEING #11 #5 13. FTEMPORARY HAUL OR ACCESS ROADS MUST PASSOVER THE ROOT AREA OF TREES TO BE RETAINED, A ROAD BED OF6 INCHES OF MULCH ORGRAVELSHALL BE CREATEDTO PROTECTTHE 1++\ \s+ - II SOIL. THE ROAD BED MATERIAL SHALL BE REPLENISHED AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN A 6 INCH DEPTH, I I, + +I t 14. SPOIL FROM TRENCHES, BASEMENTS, OR OTHER EXCAVATIONS SHALL NOT BE PLACED WITHIN THE #9 TREE PROTECTION ZONE, EITHER TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY. Ilt 15. NO BURN PILES OR DEBRIS PILES SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE. NO ASHES, \ I U DEBRIS, OR GARBAGE MAY BE DUMPED OR BURIED WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE, n i 1 16. MAINTAIN FIRE-SAFE AREAS AROUND FENCED AREA ALSO, NO HEAT SOURCES, FLAMES, IGNITION I+r'` +I + +1 + SOURCES, OR SMOKING IS ALLOWED NEAR MULCH OR TREES. 17. DO NOT RAISE THE SOIL LEVEL, WITHIN THE DRIP LINES TO ACHIEVE POSITIVE DRAINAGE, EXCEPT TO #3 MATCH GRADES AS SHOWN ON THE GRADING PLAN, FEATHER THE ADDED TOPSOIL BACK TO EXISTING + \ ~n - - I ~2DQ''_ GRADE ATA MAXIMUM 3:1 SLOPE. r r 18. REMOVE THE ROOT WAD FOR EACH TREE THAT IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN AS BEING REMOVED. ' 19, EXCEPTIONS TO THE TREE PROTECTION SPECIFICATIONS MAY ONLY BE GRANTED IN EXTRAORDINARY #1O m CIRCUMSTANCES WITH WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ANY WORK COMMENCING. 1Lx #2 05 20. ASA PROTECTIVE MEASURE TO COMPENSATE FOR CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS, TWOTOSIXWEEKS -q-a o-o-o-o- o-o-,-a-o-,- - PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ALL RETAINED TREES WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ADJACENT TO OR WITHIN THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN SHALL RECEIVE AN APPLICATION OF MYCOAPPLY ALL PURPOSE SOLUBLE PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. THIS MYCORRHIZAE - PRODUCT IS A SPECIALLY FORMULATED NATURAL ROOT BIOSTIMULANT WHICH ENHANCES THE N ABSORPTIVE SURFACE AREA OF THE TREES'ROOT SYSTEMS, THIS PROMOTES AND IMPROVES NUTRIENT AND WATER UPTAKE CAPABILITIES OF THE REMAINING ROOT STRUCTURE. DISTRIBUTE - ELEVATION PLAN MYCOAPPLY EVENLY WITHIN THE ACTIVE ROOT ZONE OF RETAINED TREES. APPLY 30 GALS. OF Q C 24X36 1"=6' P ~Dp U 0) SOLUTION PER TREE 6° DBH AND GREATER, A MINIMUM OF 4- BELOW SOIL SURFACE IN QUANTITIES OF V I T G P L A N 11 X 17 116' °~a oa bo OQ N 00 112 GALLON AT EACH POINT OF APPLICATION. LOCATE THE ACTIVE ROOT ZONES WITH LANDSCAPE - Q 6 jp ARCHITECT PRESENT. : - 4 ti d ° O MYCOAPPLY IS AVAILABLE FROM MYCORRHIZAL APPLICATION, INC., PHONE (541) 47&3985. B 16 24 32 24X36 °a A dp QDo 6~0°~ J ,II NORTH -0 D 66 LL] c C> i2 TREE LEGEND 0 16 32 48 64 11x17 4 b zoNe° a ' a 4b o Q ~pQ TREE PROT. O Q DBH Heightln Clown Radus Tolerance to Tree Protection Zone p d 0. Q ZONE 6 q Species (inches) Feet in Feet Construction Radius in Feet Current Condition Notes do qoO Q Q Q 4 b 1 Pinus ponderosa 10° 40' 12' Good 5' Heathy \7 4~ o JOBNO.XXX% 2 Arbnfos-A.se 12° 30' 201 Poor 12' Madeale FENCE CONTINUOUSLY REVISION DATE 3 Get...das decurans 6" 28' 10' Moderate 5 Healthy AROUND TREE AT 4 Calocedme deartens 6' 25' 40' Moderate 5' Healthy DRIPLINE 61 TALL CONTINUOUS CHAINLINK 5 Pseedotsuga memiesii 6" 38' 20' Goad 6' Healthy FENCING ON CONCRETE PIERS F 6 Pseudotauga menrlesii 10' 22' 25' Goad 10' Moderate Tree has been topped, has new leader NOTE: 7 Cebcedmsdecu-s 13' 45' 24' Moderate 10' Healthy 1. TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO START OF TREE 8 Calocadrus decurans 10' 30' 15' Mcderale 8' Healthy CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL REMAIN IN PLACE THROUGH COMPLETION OF J 9 Pseudolsuge memies8 10• 40' 25' Good 10 Healthy 2. ALL PRO ECT. PROTECTION EXCAVATION WITHIN DRIPLINE OF TREES SHALL BE DONE BY HAND. IF ROOTS 10 Quercuska8o0i 26'(x3) 50' 50' Moderate 26' Healthy (3)Wnks OVER 2'INDIAMETER AREENCOUNTERED, CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSULT WITH PLAN 11 Calocedrus decunens 10° 30' 10' Goad 10 Healthy LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR ARBORIST BEFORE PROCEEDING, 12 Pinus P--d--e. 12° 40' 24' Good 6' Healthy Tree has been topped, has new leader 3. TREE ROOTS ENCOUNTERED DURING CONSTRUCTION, SHALL BE CUT CLEANLY AT A 90 DEGREE ANGLE AND PACKED WITH DAMP SOIL IMMEDIATELY, ISSUE DATE, 4, DURING CONSTRUCTION ALL TREES TO REMAIN SHALL BE IRRIGATED ONA WEEKLY BASIS OR AS NECESSARY WITH LEAKY PIPE ENCIRCLING THE TREE FROM DATE 7 + TREE CANOPY OF 0 TREE TRUNKOUT TO DRIP LINE. :PROTECTION TREES TO BE o TREESTO REMOVED PROTECTION ZONE REMAIN FENCING 1 TREE PROTECTION F1.0 THE TREE PROTECTION ZONE FOR EACH TREE IS BASED ON THE GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED BY: Mathcny,N,&CIadGT.l998, 7izerandDe.elopmenl:dTechnirnl Cuide loPreeemarion ofT}rea ArrtogLandDmzlopmnu. p.72. ~o~ ~q' 5 DO C VICINITY MAP ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND DRAWING INDEX PROJECT DIRECTORY ~ o 9TFOF0 ~ A's ANCHOR BOLT ~ELEVATION FINISH ELEVATION TAG A-UP. ALTERMTEBRACEPMEL KD. KILN IXilEO A0.1 INDEX. SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS, OWNER: THERESA LOCKWOOD& GEORGE SCHOEN ACOUST. AcousnrAL 610ASHLANDST. AW. ADBISTABIE VICINITY MAP, PLOT PLAN Am WIT, qm CONDIT101 R LT. I•°MILA'TEO P RR71 , ASHtAN0105 97621 U J \ LT. uGHr HE ASSEMBLY TYPES 415.272.8015 ATE ABOVE FBlISN ON W A Po4 FIDOR ASI.O ARCHITECNRAL SITE PLAN ® E \Wy 1 R, e, 3 s m AH AIR HANDLE. LL INE LOAD (FLOOR, WALLS, ROOF) NO CLOS ARCHITECT. 2AjF0URTH BT,00ARCMTECT n O AC. ASPHALTC0.4CRETE MrR hUN11FACNpER BUILDING SECTION TI.O TREE PROTECTION AND REMOVAL PLAN 3 N 9oF. BOTTOM OF 1`00@•G LIECH MECRkMM `71 ASHLAND, OR 97520 N d ULW. LLAKENWYMK LI LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN 541.552.9502 N'= METAL f(~/ S Bll. BENA SECTION BAcEP µG MVS-E CON1EM e OETNL BRACE PMR 3 y 4F ~ U aP. At.t FLOOR PLAN, ELECTR[CAL AND ROOF PLANS CONTRACTOR T80 CAB. CABINET p0 NEW n P'°~ C 10 (p 0 N£19 5 E CM CEMNG HLC NOT INCOMRACi 4 REVISION A2.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS& BUILDING SECTION 0 cm CENTER NT.S, NOTTOSCALE vsm L 2 INTERIOR ELEVATIONS& DOOR &WINDOW SCHEDULE O N4~d A O' c ll COLUMN ~ 005. OBSCURE ODOR NUMBER A3.1 V Q N COAL, Co1,'CRETE qc. OEExTEa A4KENCAJR 2 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. KENCARN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE W e N LITHIA EARL G OVER .1 ARCHITECTURAL ASBEMBUES80ETNLS S7 CAW. CONCRETELNSQ\RYVAgT WINDOW TYPES _ F, PARK GI r AHr / oR ` A4.2 ARCHITECNRAL DETAILS 545'A'BTREET Pia u R Po C COITIROLJain PR PAR ® EQUIPMENT ID TAG ASHLAND, OR 97520 d N PL PLASTIC M PLATE U s ? S1.0 STRUCTURAL DETAILS 541.488.3194 m `LQ. MK DEADL.SlNx PJAAL PlpsnclA51WATE ROOM ft0°M NAME 51.1 FOUNDATION PLAN B DETAILS ® = V ILJI la'IA ~i D,L DEADLOAO P P° STRUCTURAL ENGINEER: ACE ENGINEERING = DP, DEEP P.T. .T. PRESSURE85URETREATED S4ROOF FRAMING PLANB DETAILS ALLAN GOFFE t I U D D1101SIR P.L PROPERTY LR,E 1 KEYNOTE p,O. BOX 231 P~ ML 3 C Dim ILL DULEpN ASHLAND, OR 97520 LL L DOUBLE R 541,552.1417 £ DS. ORAWSPOIrt RE RADIUS Q N RWLV r ~ - J ~ VJ,'G. DPAWNG REG G. RECR~BiFA TGP ~ INTERIOR ELEVATIONS U iI RE. DRU'KN'G fOUNTAM RE1N4'. REIN'FORCLNG eH 2~ I EA. REGW REQUIRED HTHAN ~ I ES EACH EACHSAE RD- R- ROOF C ROFDRAW D E EXTERIOR ELEVAT S PLANNING SUMMARY , WYV EVJ. EACH WAY RM ROOM q ELEC. ELEVAT RWGHOPENM'G C N pALTALHMRS ELEV, ELEVATKNJ IT R0. RUBBER BASE ENEL ENCLOSURE NEWWOODSTUD Prwc or EN. EDGE NA@LV'G J. sa9'MJOIM PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: W I, ~ I I 1 E EQUAL .o BECi. S FRAME CONSTR. - FULL HT. T ZONING DESIGNATION: R1-7.6 E Ase74 sr s1L01HEEAR ASSESSOR'S UHT. m EXL EXHAUST PARCEL NUMBER: 341E-I6AB; T.Litx00 E- EYIRTNG "I'A NEWWOOOSTUD NID LEI EXSMG SUNNC 610 ASHLAND ST, ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 .-PARTULL HT. 3 D EXP. F.S. M°L. 9D000CIiE FRAMECONSTR I "g 6 P FIXi® Ea ESPAMSIO4lOwr BFXt SPEAKER LOTCOVERAGE6UMMARY: C¢. EXT. EXtERIDN SPEC. SPEGHCATIQIS z 1 °s Ouae E Sa eaUAraE EXISTINGWALLS (E) BUILDING FOOTPRINTS: 1,588 BE PG FmERGUSS - SS. STAINLESS STEEL (EXISTING CONSTR.) 0 FIN FLNRH STD, STMDARO (N)ADDTIOW 278 SF P R O J E C T S I T E x FF. N HROOR sn F.O. EOAIVEWAY,WAK&&DECKS: 930 SF d I ( I FACE CF_ SIRUCT STRUCINUl 1 FM FLOOR BLISP. SUSPEtAN ONE-HOUR RATED AREA TOITA PARKING LEXIS77NG~L0T COUERRAGE Y 4,840 BE R ( ( E -i~ G °ATE ERE SEPARATION WALLS U) CITY OF ASHLAND W 8 GALV GC GgWE TELW. TEMP-REDCR U) G➢- GARBAGE DISP.SSAL TENT ORARY TOTA LOT A EAL 17,605 BE (.40 ACRE) GL GLASS TTiG TONGI1E&GOOVE SHEARWALLS TOTAL LOT COVERAGE ALLOWED 45%-. 7,922 SF ,y GLB. GLUE LAMSEA14 TJ. TOOIEDJOCB O TOTAL EXISTING LOT COVERAGE % (4,304 SF 117,605 SF): 32% GYP9D. GYPSUTAWALLBGARO T0. TOP OF.-. TP. lYF1CA1 2 j Hnx' HARDWARE N° R HEADER WATERREGISTAM BUILDING AREA PLANNING SUMMARY H T- xElG1i w5/` WP. . Y+EAnERPRCOF NVAC w=4 VME MESH o HOLD-DOWNS E) MAN HOUSE-TO REMAIN AS IS 1,952 SF H.V HEATP'GVDNG WELDED o ® ( &AIR Ca4GTaMac 1W WRH (E) SINGLE CAR GARAGE-TO RECONVERTED INTO ARU SPACE 2745E HC HOLLOW CORE WY YRTHOUT HD5A (E)STUDIO-TO BE CONVERTED INTO ARU SPACE: 210 SF HAL HmoW IAETAL WD, WOOD HORIL HORIZONTAL (N) ADDITION TO (E) TURF 156E (N) SINGLE CAR GARAGE: GARAGE' 278 SF H.B. H05E BMB (N) TOTAL- 2,714 BE SITE PLAN REDUCED (REFER TO AS1.0) DFFB,REETPARKINGB°'"hARY: ® N 3 BEDROOM DWELLING REQUIREMENT; 2SPACES 499 SF ARU UNIT REQUIREMENT: 1SPACE ® Z FLAG LOT REQUIREMENT: {SPACE O 0 0 0 J SOLAR SETBACK SUMMARY W N HT, OF (E) ROOF. t13'-6' H- ~C TYPE I SLOPE OF ROOF: 6:12 SLOPE C, SETBACK STANDARD. TABLE •A' I 1 1 0"IQ W t` m ULI CD D (220D.50'(-)2192,W)= S50(-)8'=2.N(.445(-.011))-1A'6SB ROD rn 0 I' (2205.50'()2192.00')=13.W'(-)B'=7.W(.445(-.0731)=20'-2"SSBROD V 0 F I / \ a5/ w l "AVG. ISY SLOPE TO NORTH IS (2203.5'-2192,0 =-11b')(2178.5'-2108.0'=-146)(-11'1150'=-,073) 0 x 0 "FORMULA 1:30'W0.4461(-'073=87.4T ONZ M 11 \ ` L V \ 7V ~ "AVG. NORTH /SOUTH LOT DIMENSION 90' 51 00y 0 0 Q a r W w o 1 U ii1 I ORSC EF MEASURES BUILDING CODE SUMMARY F w 1 X a f1I .-a f, `r BUILDING CODE OREGON RESIDENTIAL SPECIALTY CODE 207 New dwe'Frgs shall nmel the envelope requirements oTORSC Table 1,11101.i(i)arda Ii(, r ( mE I[ mremum of 50%ofpemlaneallynstalled fighting fixtures shall have highmLaoy lamps, ® I "Sd6a heated buildings g5Red a..t two the a600 BE l Mass mere et,a SCme FOR CONSTRUCTION 4 original heated fl Boo, ow area shehatlhave el least two of the Additional Measuresfiom ORBC Table N1m11(2)ooe from Emulape Eahanoemenl and ors from Cone-U. (see ba' JAl Energy Effieamyrom-parent. ..At be rebedad on U. plans 1 \ CIE Ii 1 E CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-WOOD FRAMED YyyII Envelop. Enhamosment Measure (Select One) OCCUPANCY TYPE R RESIDENTIAL \ la 5 Air searing hems and dads Mandatory air sealing of all wall-dogs at top plate and air Sealing STRUCNRALLOADS FLOOR LOAD, 40PSFLL, 20 PSF DL i .a nneddlM(aD6awD.ak w DRAWN: CHECKED: egenlfar ...ling ofall nind.Yarfiw wall-.o,g to top p!ale ROOF LDnI}.25 psFSw°w (2009 ELer.)20psFDLAVwPANEIS Q J~ bamer adaoonNrwram 5 fraraing,seffirgwith to=gasket, raulkorother approved Sealantfistart frSearngwan 0 TS CD -ring material to stiuBWral malerdl),and ENERGY EFFICIENCY (n eh ,I DATE: Mechanicalwhdoboldlrg ventilation system with rates meefingM1503 crASHRAE 622, and ORSC TABLE N1101.1(1) UL All ductsandair ith hmollma mnLined within bolding emdope and CODE VALUES DESIGNVALUES AA dHds sealedwiN mastic Q 3107118 SITE PLAN WALL INSULATION ABOVE GRADE R-21 R-28 r r=to'o• WALL INSULATION BELOW BELOW GRADE R-I51R-21 WA CoervaM.-as, (SeledOne) W FIAT CEILINGS A-09 REO ~ PROJECT: o n NORTH VAULTED CEIUNGS A High efidency HVAC System: UNDERFLOORS RR-30 WA 30 Rao N LOCKWOOD 18 Gasfiredlumen or bailerAFUE 94% (seat" ambe.6on air BIABEDGEPERIMETER RAS WA I- SaRdiii dHd.adi-ty from outdoce.Nfurns- w bell.,iwhe HEATED SLAB INTERIOR R10 WA W Al's areispac.Rw WINDOWS U-0.30 G0.30 W SHEET: Nr-source heat pump 9.5/15.0 SEER cooSg, ce WINDOW AREA LIMITATION WA WA T Ground source heat pump COP 36 or Energy Star rated SKYLIGHTS U-0.50 IJ0.60 EXTERIOR DOORS ".20 U-0.20 EXTERIOR DOORS Wh2.5fl2 GLAZING U-0,40 0,40 c \o e FORCED AIR DUCT INSULATION R-0 R-8 OF SHEETS L-_- it a s ni ID,OREGON ~ 4450 9%F 0 OR -N E mN~ o nL U CV)~ \c C rn Q 0) w 1 I ~ C ® L 2 . C = c LL W LL E( ) DRIVE m m me ®®~o~ 14•.0, q y'•, o I a i i t 1 A mss-' REAR STBK' z o ~I I I I i` I i A I IS FR TSTB~ 1 I ~111N CA P RTL U' iii' i S w }((1 4EQ (MEA - I_ ICJ j " II 7 1/97 2)E EcT. 1 jLJCARACEYS7UD10 ( o ; veRiFY ~E) CONVERTED To (N)ARII I ELECr.SIZE o v, F USF(t)S E HOUSE N H t o sERVI E& mlDwnT_FnuAeo - . 1 1 W °o qq N coNDUT F ! IP u O Z w 0 1 N ~ Z - I Ij \'v ~7 fj iI N o ~z 0 11 ~jII A TORE NE~~ I /w/ y J 12' m, zap v~ A a ry 1 ~1 A A F IA 91TION. I Ij 0~1~. m E%ISTIaG u 0a 0) Q o ~e A 1 mzw E 3o w EE o=o m - ;A II 'I -E owz c) 0 I l a \ j \ ( ro , ~ i _ 1 D' \ N U(0(Z ~1 T(\r 1 ~n J Q v Q w m w ~ I y w o 0, U) v~ t0 or o X Q o ~m W MEMMEMMEMMEM SITE PLAN 1" 10' o° FOR CONSTRUCTION 0 m .0 30 NORTH w DRAWN: CHECKED: TS CD DATE: LL a 3107118 w PROJECT: LOCKWOOD_18 w SHEET: U) X 100 OF SHEETS 2 A39 s Do 14'-P' A,OREGON \ y1y ELECTRICAL LEGEND ------------1------ 9TFOF0~` T SWITCH, SINGLE POLE, MOUNTED 148- UN.O. LIGHT FIXTURE, CEILING MOUNTED ® DSn TTT a a E N~0 SWTCH,THREE POLEI2WAY), lAOUMED+48'U.N.O, { } LIONT FIXTURE, WALL MOUNTED I ~ ^ W U YYY 1~~} pL n N SWITCH, FOUR POLE (B IVAY), A10UNTED+48'UN.O. LIGHT FIXTURE, RECESSED, I.C. RATED CAN WHERE IN CARPORT J,~(\ ON CONTACTWITH INSULATION I i ~ ~ N 0 d I N o 7 SWITCH, DMIMER CONTROL, MOUNTED-4WNNO. LIGHT FIX URE, RECESSPOIOIREC ONA ,LC RA D Q) i CAN WHERE IN LOMACT{NTN INSULATION I ( Q I~ SWITCH, TUBER CONTROL, IAOUNTEDa48'UND. LIGHTFF(TUREI EXHAUSTFAN RECESSED,VFO(TC. I w RATED CANWHERE IN CONTACTV4ITH INSULATION) 0 t. I VJ ~ N SWITCH,.-'ON SENSOR, IAOUIITED+4W U.N.O. C ® EXHAUST FAN, VENT TO OUTSIDE I .C 1 DUPLEX RECEPTACLE, GROUNDING TYPE, 12'-U' 14'-0' 10'-0' -C O MOUNTBD+15"UH.D. WD J C DEDICATED DUPLEXRECEPTACLE, w FLUORESCENT LIGHT FIXTURE, SURFACE MOUNTED n i DUPLEX RECEPTACLE GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTING, _ O1 I Q N AIOUNTAD,IB'U.N.O. vran 'T~ TRACK LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNT PER DETAILS PF DS DUPLEX RECEPTACLE, GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTING, o REF os A R BENCH WATERPROOF - - - - - - LIGHT FIXTURE UNDER COUNTER LED TAPE LIGHT gHADRAPLEX RECEPTACLE, GROUNDING TYPE, ------ELECT. FLOOR HEAT, THRMSTPtACEDATWALKTHRU (N)100 r I \ I j I,40UNTED+15'U.N.O. ELEC C 4 ! PANELS 3 $ 5 BAT FAN FIXTURE, CEILING 0.90UN1E0 a ~ I ENTRY 220V RECEPTACLE, I,wuMEO+1cuN.o. H Q KITCHEN A4.1 " I ® SPECIAL RECEPTACLE, NN,IACONFIGURA710N TO CARBONIAONOXIDEI SMOKE DETECTOR, HARD WIRE , `vT" I g MATCH EQUIPMENT TYPE F l li 4 F~ INTERCONNECTED BI/ OTHER DTRB, WI BATTERY BACK-UP i ~ J O Z II O DUPLEX RECEPTACLE, GROUNDING TYPE, FLUSH 4 THERMOSTAT J I 7-012'I O 1 ¢ FLOOR MOUNTED (BRASS FACE PLATE, METAL BOX) 111 Z 6 v 0- L 4 DOORBELLSWTCH J AIR I A4.1 LEC a B KB W!H r ® TEUDATAICABLE OUTLET BACKBOX, PROVIDE Rb19, GAGE w DOORBELL CHIME RJ46,CATS,COAX, PER OWNERS ROMN79.)+ICUN.O. 4 I YOJ w SECURITY KEYPAD(H=HORN IN SOFFIT) SKYLTJ ' O F - / 6'-3' 0 Ei E TELEPHONE OUTLET BACKBOX, SINGLE GANG, 05 I m N O M +15. U.N.O., HOMERUN TO CENTRAL EOUIPMEM ® ELECTRIC PANEL BOARD l I I ® PANEL BOARD -CABLE, DATA,TELHUB E (CTHFEED VI ' ~\l ET BACKBOX, SINGLE GANG, (HOMERUN ALL CABLE, DATA, TEL TO HUB) TEUDATAOUTL +15° UN,O., HOMERUN TO CENTRAL EQUIPMENT ❑-i DISCONNECT SWITCH -Z~ ' I----- - - © BDRM > LU "NOTE: ELECTRICIAN TO WALK THROUGH WITH CLIENTS AND CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO INSTALLATION ---1111 LAIR Ni °I J N os Q W 0 o Z STOR Q ( 00 F © 2'10' / i (E)50 MP N ELECT ANEL DS TO BE R MOVED W~ LU -7'/ 10'-91 I 10'-310 L~ N ,2'-3,12' (P) F L 00 R P L A N SCALE: 118'=1'-0' w r) o oom a V Z~ - t 050 LU 0 m EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN ~ 05 O IN)100AMP- REF <zaft ~J 4 < ELECT / ( - / NEW WALLS Z PANEL&IATR \ _ v 0 / E TRY ' /d~\ EWALLS TO BE REMOVED _j Q Q q' V r (KITCHEN NORTH w 0 u) 7- U) ~z U) UJI (L E-ft U) U) i'-~x ® WENT /GARAGE - X Q ® w -50 71- I FOR CONSTRUCTION BDRI z ' III w DRAWN: CHECKED: i 4R TS CD DATE: LL \/i B r a 3107118 V~ STOR 1 x Ul PROJECT: a 3 LOCKWOOD 18 - lul - - w SHEET: ELECT(LIGHTING PLAN ROOF PLAN N was oe =ra SCALE: 114°-,'-0' ~ A1.1 - X p,eEa~u, k OF SHEETS L_-- . ~ 00 4(' DG s O,OREGON V-4460 ~OF ELEVATION KEY NOTES 12 TA. PLATE 13.50' ' EXISTING ASPHALT SHINGLE ROOF, MATCH NEW ADDITION R1 6 O2 STANDING SEAM METAL ROOF, MATCH TONE OF EXISTING 12 Rz ® E m Da $ 1 v INEERED TR HORIZONTAL SIDING, MATCH EXISTING PROFILE N w ® 1X4 V' GROOVE VERTICAL SIDING, MITER CORNERS T.O. PLATE ~(T 0 8X6 DF #1 POSTS g I I 8.00' PA° © WOOD CLAD WINDOWS & DOORS C) a 7O OVERHEAD GARAGE DOOR, VERIFY WI OWNER /TYPE I I w p 8O POURED CONC. RETAINING WALL PER STRUCT. -l GREAT o ROOM _ m GABLE END VENT, VERIFY W/OWNER /TYPE E1 0 2 s U 10 2X FASCIA BRD WI FLASHING TO MATCH ROOF o I F2 1= 1 CONTINUOUS GUTTER, MATCH (E) STYLE AND ROOF COLOR T.O. F.F. U o c 0.00' LL E n i 1820'-0' d i NEW CARPORTICOVEREDENTRY EXISTING BUILDING I I fi I I I ~ wllilll jllll z T.O. PLATE T.O. PLATE 0 13.5D' 13.50' o ! f _ 10 ~ i, i I l '~I I F. Uw T-T w 4 T.O. PLATE ' _ T.O. P 8.00 TEMP ~~It I./~ III TEMP 4 L_ - 2 5 B (I~~ h ® I I 0 I fill ~ ~ N III I~ 11(I T.O. F.F. r6 ELI ® p 0 0.00' NJ-,) w T-1417- F 40 ~ 0 24' 23 J 12'-D' N ~ EXISTING BUILDING NEW CARPORTGARAGE AUDITION NEWCCARARPORT GARAGEAOOITON N ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION Lu WN- Oprn a WEST 4 1 2 SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" ~dzaf `0 0 w 0 0 4 8 12 ~xp O1oz m ag 0 o x z 0 < Q a co N w w T.O. PLATE T.O. PLATE _ U) 13.50' ❑ OIL 13.50' F W ~ I x a 1 uj ,gk T.O. PLATE e. T.O. PLATE 8.00' - 8.00' L] B B FOR CONSTRUCTION TE P T~ ~ 2 ~ ~ - I B ~II e N - j w DRAWN: CHECKED: 3 TS CD _ T~ ~K TEM17P i i - - DATE: T.O.F.F. TEMP F.F. - - -III co 0.00' - - = 3107118 r-a' 24'-D° 3'0 zoo 16'-6' Q PROJECT: GARAGE ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING (NIGRG EXISTING BUILDING NEW CARPORT - LOCKWOOD 18 r f WEST ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION SHEET: U) Y r r°- - SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 0 4 e SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0" 0 4 8 12 12 x 2.1 OF SHEETS j i Job Address: 610 ASHLAND ST Contractor: ASHLAND OR 97520 Address: I C A Owner's Name: THERESA/GEORGE LOCKWOOD/SCHOE 0 Phone: N State Lic No: Customer 09765 L THERESA/GEORGE LOCKWOOD/SCHC T City Lic No: Applicant: 610 ASHLAND ST R Address: ASHLAND OR 97520 A; C C Sub-Contractor: , A Phone: T Address: N Applied: 03/29/2018 0 T Issued: Expires: 09/25/2018 Phone: State Lic No: Maplot: 391 E16AB2000 City Lic No: DESCRIPTION: Site Review for an Accessory Residential Unit VALUATION Occupancy Type Construction Units Rate Amt Actual Amt Constuction Description Total for Valuation: MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL STRUCTURAL E_~ PERMIT FEE DETAIL Fee Description Amount Fee Description Amount CUP Accessory Residential 680.00 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wwmashland.or.us CITY F Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 i Pil i«r i I hereby certify the contents of this application to be correct to the best of my knowledge, and furthermore, that I have read, Fee Summary Paid Amounts understood and agreed to the following: Building: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 1. This permit shall remain valid only in accordance with code State Surcharge: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 or regulation provisions relating to time lapse and revocation Development Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 (180 days). 2. Work shall not proceed past approved inspection stage. All Systems Development Charges: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 required inspections shall be called for 24 hours in advance. Utility Connection Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 3. Any modifications in plans or work shall be reported in advance to the department. Public Works Fees: $ 0.00 $ 0.00 4. Responsibility for complying with all applicable federal, state, Planning Fees: $ 680.00 $ 680.00 or local laws, ordinances, or regulations rests solely with the applicant. Sub-Total: $ 680.00 Fees Paid: $ 680.00 Applicant Date Total Amount Due: $ 0 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 20 East Main St. Fax: 541-488-5311 Ashland, OR 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wwwashland.or.us CITY F Inspection Request Line: 541-552-2080 Iftu