HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-0402 Council Mtg MIN
CITY OF
-AS H LA N D
MINUTES FOR THE REGULAR
MEETING
ASHLAND CITY COUNCIL
Tuesday, April 2, 2019
Council Chambers
1175 E. Main Street
Note: Items on the Agenda not considered due to time constraints are automatically continued to the next regularly
scheduled Council meeting [AMC 2.04.030.E.]
6:30 Executive Session*
*Purpose of Executive Session Item - To consult with counsel concerning the legal rights and
duties of a public body with regard to current litigation or litigation likely to be filed.
The Executive Session was adjourned at 7:05 PM.
7:00 p.m. Regular Meeting
1. CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Stromberg called the Business Meeting to order at 7:10 PM.
11. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
III. ROLL CALL
Councilor's Graham, Akins, Seffinger, Rosenthal and Jensen were present.
Councilor Slattery was absent.
IV. MAYOR'S ANNOUNCEMENTS
Mayor Stromberg announced the current Commission and Committee vacancies.
Mayor Stromberg welcomed Steve Vincent and Brian Markison of Avista to speak regarding the
recent outage.
Mr. Markison went over the causes of the outage. He explained it was human and equipment
error. He spoke that the effected customers would be receiving a $50 credit on their next utility
bill. He also explained that Avista will be donating $25,000 to the Ashland Parks Foundation.
Avista apologized to all customers and thanked everyone for their patience.
V. CITY ADMINISTRATOR REPORT
City Administrator Kelly Madding gave an update regarding the Community Center. She
explained that facilities had seen a slightly bowed wall at the Community Center. She explained
that an engineer had looked at the structure and a report will be out in the next day or two. Due
to safety reasons the building will not be rented out at this time. Currently Staff is looking at
other options. She explained that an update will be brought back to Council.
Council discussed the importance of all City buildings being looked at on an annual basis.
VI. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. Study Session of March 18, 2019
2. Business Meeting of March 19, 2019
Rosenthal/Seffinger moved to approve the minutes. Discussion: None. All Ayes. Motion
passed unanimously.
VII. SPECIAL PRESENTATIONS & AWARDS
1. Independent Media Week Proclamation
Akins read the proclamation into the record (see attached).
Seffinger spoke that she is impressed with local independent film festival.
VIII. MINUTES OF BOARDS, COMMISSIONS, AND COMMITTEES
Airport Conservation Forest Lands
Historic Housing and Human Srvs. Parks & Recreation
Planning Public Arts Transportation
Tree Wildfire Mitigation
IX. PUBLIC FORUM Business from the audience not included on the agenda.
(Total time allowed for Public Forum is 15 minutes. The Mayor will set time limits to enable all
people wishing to speak to complete their testimony.) [I5 minutes maximum]
Bruno Marcotulli - Ashland - Spoke regarding the horseshoe pit at Lithia Park (see attached).
Candy Burnhill - Ashland - Spoke regarding the monthly Public Safety Support Fee. She passed around
pictures (see attached).
Huelz Gutcheon - HWY 99 - Spoke regarding reducing carbons. Spoke regarding electric vehicles and
the importance of education. He suggested the City do an energy audit.
Phillip Lang - Ashland - Discussed the Americans with Disability Act and how it effects OSF (see
attached).
X. CONSENT AGENDA
1. Appointment of Charisse Sydoriak to the Wildfire Safety Commission
Seffinger/Graham moved to approve the Consent Agenda. Discussion: None. All Ayes.
Motion passed unanimously.
XI. PUBLIC HEARINGS (Persons wishing to speak are to submit a-speaker request form" prior
to the commencement of the public hearing. Public hearings shall conclude at 9:00 p.m. and be
continued to a future date to be set by the Council, unless the Council, by a two-thirds vote of
those present, extends the hearing(s) until up to 10:30 p.m. at which time the Council shall set a
date for continuance and shall proceed with the balance of the agenda.)
XII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
XIII. NEW AND MISCELLANEOUS BUSINESS
1. Approval of Capital Improvement Program: 2019-2038
Public Works Director Paula Brown and Public Works Deputy Scott Fleury presented Council
with a PowerPoint (see attached).
Brown thanked Karl Johnson and Tami Campos for their work on this project.
Items discussed were:
• CIP Update.
• Water Master Plan.
• Storm Water Master Plan.
• 20-year Master Plan.
• Maintenance cost vs capital cost.
• General operating expenses.
• Street Fund - Roadway Improvements.
• Sidewalk and pedestrian projects.
• Small water projects.
• Wastewater Treatment Plant.
• City facilities.
• Electric.
• Long-term underground mainline.
• Priorities.
Madding thanked the Public Works Staff. She spoke in appreciation of the document.
Seffinger/Akins moved to approve the 2019-2039 Capital Improvements Program as
presented. Discussion: Seffinger spoke to the importance of this document. Akins spoke that
this document was well done and is great help in the City's planning process. Jensen clarified
that this money is not spent yet and explained that this is just a plan. Graham spoke that this is a
system that we need in order for the City to do its job to making sure citizens money is being
well spent. Seffinger suggested a study to come back showing how much the City is saving and
not just spending. Roll Call Vote: Graham, Akins, Seffinger, Rosenthal and Jensen: YES.
Motion passed unanimously.
2. Approval of Economic Development, Cultural, Tourism, and Sustainability
Grants Ad-hoc Committee
City Recorder Melissa Huhtala gave a brief Staff report.
Council discussed the formation of the Ad-Hoc Committee.
Graham /Jensen moved to bring this item back to the next Council Business Meeting.
Discussion: None. All Ayes. Motion passed unanimously.
XIV. ORDINANCES. RESOLUTIONS AND CONTRACTS
XV. OTHER BUSINESS FROM COUNCIL MEMBERS/REPORTS FROM COUNCIL
LIAISONS
Graham announced that Wildfire preparedness will begin soon to get people information on what
they can do to get ready for fire season.
XVI. ADJOURNMENT OF BUSINESS MEETING
The Business Meeting was adjourned at 8:55 PM
Respectfully submitted by:
City Recorder Melissa Huhtala
Attest:
Mayor t omberg
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting,
please contact the City Administrator's office at (541) 488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification
72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the
meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
April 2, 2019
New LJthla Park Horseshoe Pit Structure
PROCLAMATION Good evening,
• A well-informed citizenry is a cornerstone of democracy. My name is Bruno Marcotulli. I am a resident of Ashland. I'm here because I believe the newly
• An informed citizenry depends on an objective, responsible and reconstructed horseshoe pit area in Lithia Park is dangerous, and should be rebuilt to its original
unrestrained press, which provides greater access to accurate information, dimensions, or eliminated altogether.
more points of view and greater diversity of thought and fact. (PLEASE SEE EXHIBIT A)
• The trend toward the consolidation of media ownership has resulted in
journalistic practices that hinder public awareness by excluding or I believe there is now a very real danger of someone, particularly someone older, being injured
marginalizing minority and dissenting viewpoints. while swinging a heavy horseshoe some 24 feet. Such effort requires balance, and such
balance requires the room to twist, move & heave. The problem is that the backstop is now too
• Fewer media voices can result in homogenized messaging and the close to the stake, as are the two sides of this new boxed area. This confined space makes it
silencing of many points of view. very easy to imagine someone falling backward over the backboard, or tripping over the 4 inch
• Democratic principles support the case for more independent media in this high side-borders, and impaling themselves on the stake.
country, not less. Mr. Oxendlne, Superintendent of Parks, addressed my concerns by writing:
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council and Mayor, on behalf of the citizens of (PLEASE SEE EXHIBIT B)
Ashland, do hereby proclaim the week of April 17-23, 2019 as
"Horseshoe pits vary widely in dimensions and features as you can see in the attached photos.
"INDEPENDENT MEDIA WEEK" The Eagle Scout working on this project made measurements and built the pits to acceptable
and encourage all Ashland citizens to seek out and explore the rich diversity of standards with the materials they had available. It is important to exercise caution when
playing
independent media available within, and to our community. horseshoes in general due to the nature of the game and it seems reasonably safe the way it is
set up."
Signed this 2"" day of April, 2019.
My final response to Mr. Oxendlne:
"The pictures you attached (with courts that have NO borders) would be far more preferable,
and prudent, than the one rebuilt by the Eagle Scout, with available materials. To hope everyone
exercises caution when playing on this court is lovely, but believe me, the old adage "An ounce
John Stromberg, Mayor of prevention is worth a pound of cure" will be one you may regret disregarding in the event one
of the many senior citizens in this retirement haven seriously injures themselves, or worse, due
to the now diminished dimensions of this horseshoe pit structure. God forbid "reasonably safe"
turns out not to be safe enough."
Melissa I Iuhtala. City Recorder I have submitted a diagram of an appropriately sized horseshoe pit area.
(PLEASE SEE EXHIBIT C)
The new IJthia Park horseshoe pit structure's dimensions are two feet shorter from side to side,
and two feet shorter from backboard to stake, than those shown in the submitted diagram.
I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE THESE CONCERNS PART OF THE PUBLIC RECORD.
IT IS MY HOPE THAT A VERY SIMPLE MODIFICATION CAN BE MADE TO THE NEW HORSESHOE
PIT STRUCTURE IN LITHIA PARK SO THAT NO ONE WILL EVER BE INJURED, OR WORSE.
I
9 4
` Q M
* Ir"', 41liallm, -x- "'e°"". - w b~ "r`~t s *n# ,.e^, .°,q' '."R~4...' "•.!a,wm"':. 1 w5Y 4 -
w
i. y
3
~ w
>
3 .
l, mm
f`~'S~i !tom
F E}; ;t 'ru r~s o P't
a a.._ _
new horseshoe re
%G
r,
`3 /
p.
r F ~1i 1 _t 4 ~
• r ae S 4540 Z,iS IV
r r ~ . t • 1 II
~ 1T Q■
u
f
:
91
tf I ~s A~ s t 3HV1S s t
AM n y, s Hi \ ~ Y r I ~ r~•. r.r.tr. Wu.l~
tsd
f, R rft~ ~
AL 01
w
p DDor+ x3
.c
U
h~ d
.E
I~ n µ~Nll inn 'JNMlalid
i
g.
Wo 11,
u
I
.n
x s i, 1
r
8 Fr x yak ~r h "e" r
"Al ,
Y
f
P y
^r a' aU
w.
4 x t ~'n'^."'_° y by
w
w Tf b~
i'x u ~ ~ ro • ~ i~ - y s - l _i s,,
r
a x y vx n;., pg
S
x.
All
10
y . N
Will,
1
x
f},y
N y+
a
rt
4s
n
S t'. N
eye 3
PROM: Primerus Law institute - North America
Developer Claims for Indemnification of
11. LIABILITY INSURANCE. OSF shall procure, and during the term of this ADA Violations are Barred by FHA
Lease shall continue in force, the following policies of insurance at OSF's cost: Public
liability and property damage in a responsible company with limits of not less than Written By. Shaw M. Blatt. Esq.
$250,000.00 for injury to one person, $500,000.00 for injury to two or more persons in
one occurrence, and $100,000.00 each occurrence for damage to property. City may Freund, Freeze & Arnold
require OSF to increase these limits in the event of any change in the provisions of ORS
30.270, or in the event these limits are found to be not totally applicable to a city. Such Dayton/Cincinnati, Ohio
insurance shall cover all risks arising directly or indirectly out of OSF's activities on or as
a result of the condition of the Property and shall protect the City and OSF against all against In recent years, developers we and have seen an increase in Fair din t the he
Act suits
claims of third persons. Certificates evidencing such insurance and bearing general contractors involve d to construction of in endorsements requiring thirty (30)
days written notice to the City prior to any change or claims are by wms and other multi-family housing. These
cancellation shall be furnished to the City. It is agreed that the City shall not be liable to claims are brought by public interest groups, on behalf of disabled
any third persons as a result of the use of the Property by OSF, its employees or agents, for persons, violations who of the inspect Amerricans With neicans With tad rnu Disabilities
es family housing looking
Act ("ADA"). These
4 suits target any ADA violations that can be found in a thorough
inspection, including proper slope of wheelchair ramps, heights of
countertops and electric outlets, restroom accessibility, and other ADA
requirements. The suits, of course, seek not only repair and correction
of the physical structures, as well as damages, but also attorney fees
and costs incurred in litigating the claim. These claims can quickly
become expensive for the client. '
Typically, suits asserting FHA/ADA claims will target the
15. COMPLIANCE WITH ADA. Except for the Parking Facility Property, OSF developer/owner and general contractor of the project. Under the FHA,
shall be solely responsible for any improvements, alterations or repairs to the Property ! all entities involved in the construction of the project can potentially be
required by the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), whether or not the ADA imposes held liable for the FHA/ADA violation, right down to the sub-
required subcontractor, who is responsible for installing a wheelchair ramp. To
such requirements on the City as owner of the Property. OSF shall provide all services, those filing the FHA lawsuit, the burden of pleading in so many parties
programs or activities conducted by it on the Property in compliance with the ADA, and the lack of knowledge of which entities actually did the work usually
whether or not such compliance is imposed by the ADA upon the City. OSF shall defend results in only the developer/owner and general contractor being named
and indemnify and hold entirely free and harmless City from and against all ADA-related as defendants. It is then left to the developer and general contractor to
claims, judgments, damages, penalties, fines, costs, liabilities, or losses which arise respond to the claims and to investigate the lower tier subcontractors to
during or after the lease term and which are imposed on, or paid by or asserted against determine which entities were involved in the actual work.
City by reason improvements, alterations or repairs to the Property or services, programs
or activities conducted on the Property by OSF. What inevitably results is a third-party complaint against all
subcontractors who did the work that resulted in the FHAIADA
violation. The general contractor likely hired design experts as well as
construction consultants to ensure compliance with all applicable
federal laws and regulations, including the Americans with Disabilities
Act. The claims against those third party subcontractors will include
indemnity and contribution claims, professional negligence/ construction
defect claims, as well as contract and warranty claims. The
developer/general contractor will claim that, if it is found liable for
violations of the ADA and FHA, then all those subcontractors that did
the actual work, or oversaw compliance, will be liable to him for the total
amount awarded to the plaintiff.
Commercial developers/general contractors will invariably include Archstone-Smith Trust, 602 F.3d at 602. Those federal statutes do not
indemnification language in their contracts to ensure that the set forth any provision allowing for indemnification of one found in 0~3
subcontractor holds it harmless for any violations of law or damages violation of the regulations. Because they are not members of the
that arise out of the sub's work, including the agreement that the sub special class for which the ADA was created, general contractors and
will reimburse the developer for all attorney fees and costs involved in developers cannot do what federal law prohibits by seeking to transfer
enforcing the agreement. their liability to the subcontractors that performed the actual work.
United States v Quality Built Construction, 309 F. Supp. 2d 767
Claims for Indemnification of Damages for FHA Violations are (E.D.N.C. 2003).
Barred
by Doctrine of Federal Obstacle Preemption Allowing an entity to transfer its liability under the FHA to third parties
interferes with and stands as an obstacle to the purpose of the FHA and
The developer reasonably believes, pursuant to his contract, that he ADA by disincentivizing developers from ensuring compliance.
has insulated himself from any potential liability. That belief is false Archstone, 602 F3d at 602. As stated by the court in Archstone:
security when it comes to claims arising under the Fair Housing Act.
Federal courts interpreting the Fair Housing Act hold that claims for If a developer of apartment housing, who concededly has a non-
indemnification, whether contractual or at common law, are preempted delegable duty to comply with the ADA and FHA, can be indemnified
by the FHA and cannot be used to transfer FHA liability to third parties, under state law for its ADA and FHA violations, then the developer will
including the subcontractors that actually did the work. United States v not be accountable for discriminatory practices in building apartment
Quality Built Construction, Inc.. 309 F. Supp.2d 767 (E. D. N C 2003). housing. Such a result is antithetical to the purposes of the FHA and
Accord, United States v. Gambone Bros. Dev. Co., 2008 WL 4410093 ADA.
(E. D. Pa. Sept. 25, 2008); United States v. Shanhe Co., Inc., 610 F
Supp.2d 958 (S.D. III., Feb. 23, 2009); Access 4 All, Inc. v Trump Int'I Archstone, 602 F.3d at 602.
Hotel & Tower Co., 2007 WL 633951 (S.D. N.Y., Feb. 26, 2007); Sentell It should be noted that indemnification and contribution claims are only
v. RPM Mgtmt. Co., U.S. Dist. Lexis 75126 (E.D. Ark 2009), Mathis v. barred because one entity is seeking to transfer its liability for the FHA
United Homes, LLC., 607 F. Supp.2d 411, 421-23 (E.D. N.Y. 2009); to another. All parties who perform work on a particular project could
Miami Valley Fair Housing Center v. Steiner & Assoc., 2010 U, S. Dist. potentially be directly liable to the plaintiff if violations occurred and their
Lexis 63915 (S.D. Ohio 2010). conduct and work was the cause of those violations
At least one appellate court has ruled on the issue and held that no Preemption Applies to "De Facto" Indemnity Claims
third-party claim for indemnity can be made to transfer liability for FHA
and ADA violations. See, Equal Rights Center v. Archstone-Smith The prohibition against indemnity claims applies regardless of how the
Trust, 602 F.3d 597, cerf denied, 131 S. Ct. 504 (4h Cir. 2010). claim is pled. If the claim is pled as one for negligence or breach of
contract, but is actually seeking to transfer liability for FHA violations, it
The prohibition against such claims is based on the concept of federal is barred as well. A contractor cannot attempt to do through state law
obstacle preemption, i.e., the notion that enforcing a right of claims what Congress has prohibited under federal law. Thus, all
indemnification and contribution would conflict with, or act as an claims of "breach of contract," "negligence," "architect/engineer
obstacle to, the achievement and execution of the purpose and malpractice," or "unworkmanlike performance" that amount to "de facto"
objective of the Fair Housing Act. Id at 601. A state law claim will be claims for indemnity are barred. Anytime a party is attempting to
preempted where it interferes with the methods the federal statute was transfer liability it may have under the FHA or ADA to a third party, that
intended to use to accomplish its purpose. Id. The courts that have claim will be barred.
considered the issue have looked to the language of the Fair Housing
Act and the ADA and have examined the purposes behind those Acts. Generally, claims against the lower tier subcontractors will be asserted
These courts have noted that Congress did not create any right of for the first time as a third party complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 14.
contribution or indemnity under the FHA and that the absence of such a Third party claims, by their nature, are strictly claims for indemnification,
remedy presumes that Congress intended that defendants in such either partial or full. Under Federal Civil Rule 14, the only claim that
cases are to have a non-indemnifiable, non-delegable duty to comply can be asserted is a derivative claim, i.e., seeking to transfer liability to
with the Act. United States v. Gambone Brothers Dev. Co., 37 NDLR a third party. No independent claims unrelated to transferring liability
254 (E.D. Pa. 2008). for the claims in the original complaint can exist in a third-party
complaint. American Zurich Ins. Co. v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Co., 512
The ADA was drafted to benefit a specific class (disabled persons), and F.3d 800 (611 Cir. 2007). Thus, where the original complaint solely sets
because the ADA did not create any special provision to benefit forth ADA/FHA violations, third party claims should be preempted as a
violators, those found liable should not be able to avoid sanctions by matter of law.
transferring their liability to third parties. The nature of the ADA and
FHA is regulatory, designed to prevent discrimination against those with These decisions create obvious problems for general contractors and
a disability and to ensure fair housing throughout the United States. developers. Almost all construction projects involve vertical indemnity
i
i
I
' CIVIL Medford, OR 97501 Grants Pass, OR 97527
STRUCTURAL 304 S. Holly Street 11967 walams Hwy, Sulto 206 33" wide and lies a vertical lip of nearly 1" at the top. The vertical I" lip has been removed and
Tel: (541) 7723607 Tel: (541) 4795601 the ramp is now flush with the landing. (This area has been renovated with a new entrance,
PLANNING Fax (541) 616-7369 Fa:c (541) 244.2651 Photo 8390 and appears to meet ADA requirements.)
kas@kasktaoom kastillkasirr-corn 6. The ramp to the Administration Office (Photos 1151-1157) is "L" shaped with a 43'x43" landing
at the comer. This upper end of the ramp lies a slope of 0.3% and less than a 2% cross-slope
June 12, 2017 with a 34"-36" high handrail on one side. The lower romp has a slope of 15.5% near the top and
14.6% near the bottom with a 36" high handrail on one side. (This area has been renovated 14111
a new ramp, Photo 8390, 8394 and appears to meet ADA requirements.)
Dr. Philip I.ang 7. The stairs from the plaza to the Administration Office (Photo 1158) have 7" maximum riser
758 "B" Street height and 11" minimum tread width and has 34"-36" high handrails on both sides. (This area
Ashland, OR 97520 has been renovated with new stairs, Photo 8392 and appears to meet ADA requirements.)
8. The Plaza area near the Angus Bowmer Theatre (Photos 1159-1163) has a 36" high handrail
Re: OSF Plaza Renovation along one side. The lower portion of the plaza ramp slope is 13.8%. The center portion is 11.7%
with a 4.1% cross-slope and the upper portion is 7.6% with a 4.8% cross-slope. (This area has
Dear Dr. Lang: been renovated with a new rarnp)ust from the Angus Boomer accessible entrance to the
On June 12, 2017,1 observed the existing condition of the renovated OSr Plaza area near the Angus Elizabeth on Stage and new stairs, Photo 8387. The ramp and stairs appear to
meet ADA
Bowmer Theatre, H..linbethan Stage, Gift Shop, Administrative Office and Plaza Area in front of the requirements, however there is NO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE from the Elizabethan Stage
to the
Thomas Theatre and Box Office and Parking Garage. The Plaza Area between the Angus Bowmer GY? Shop or AdnrinlstraNtm offices without going through the Angns Bownler Theatre.)
Theatre and Pioneer Street has been renovated, but is not quite complete or ready for use. I did NOT 9. Both entrances into the Elizabethan Stage (Photos 1164, 1165) are
less than 5% slope. (This area
has
review the Construction Drawings for these improvements and therefore cannot compare the completed been renovated with new pavers and appears to meet ADA requirements.)
10. The ramp along the left side of die Elizabethan Stage (Photo 1166) lies a slope of 11.7% with
work to the approved documents. i will just compare this area to my previous observations. In order to less than a 2% cross-slope and has no handrails. (This area has been renovated
with a new
compare the proposed improvements to my observations of the site I will use my October 26, 2015 letter stairway and ramp parallel to Pioneer Street and appears to meet ADA
requirements.)
numbering as a guide. 11. The ramp to the south accessible restroom inside the Elizabethan Stage (Photos )167-1169) has
i submit the following observations with how i see each item addressed compared to my site observation a slope of 8.7% with less than a 2% cross-slope. There is 3/8" to
vertical lip where the brick
on July 19, 2012 in bold italics, as numbered from my April 24, 2015 teller: pavers meet the concrete landing. There are 36" high handrails on both sides of this ramp. 'flue
location of this restroom is NOT well marked. (This ramp has not changed but there is a no
1. The slope on the Chautauqua Park ramp access from Main Street (Photos 1140, 1141, 1142, longer a lip between the pavers and the concrete entrance. New signs, Photos R385,
8386
1145) measured 184% at the bottom end 18.9% at the top. This has a grooved concrete surface have been added, but no new signs show you where the restroom Is from the Service
and there is a 36" high handrail on one side. This is NOT the accessible route to the theatre Counter area.) The ramp to the north accessible restroom is 7.2% with no lip
and 36" handrails
plaza, but it is a main point of connection for pedestrians. (This area has not changed and was on both sides. It also is NOT well marked. (T Ids area has been renovated with
a new ramp
NOT part ojthe renovation.) and wheetchair ly? and appears to meelADA requirements.)
2. The ramp to the custodial office (Photo 1144) lies a slope 23.6%, with 33" high handrail on one 12. The Plaza between the Elizabethan Stage and the center of the Planar
is shown in Photos 1170
side and the ramp is 36" wide. (This area /ras not change and ryas NOT a part of Ore and 1172. These slopes are in excess of 5 / and there are no handrails. (This area
has been
renovated with new pavers and is mach Improved, however in some areas; the cross-slope
renowrll exceeds 2% and does NOT meet ADA requirements for an accessible route.)
3. The brick k landing at the top of the Chautauqua Park ramp (Photos 1143, 1146) leads the 13. The Plaza between Pioneer Street and the center of the Plaza is shown in Photos
1171 and 1173.
custodial office map and stairs lending plaza. to the The stairs have maximum riser r height of The slope parallel to Pioneer Street is 11.9% and there are no handrails.
The brick pavers are
7" and a minimum tread length of 11"an d has three, 36"high handrails. (Ilse proposed plans I
slow this landing and fire stairs leading to the Plaza and the Courtyard to be removed and also uneven in this area as visible in Photo 1173. (This area has been renovated
wills new
replacer! The proposed grading plan will create a landing area with slopes of2% or less. The pavers but lire slope is unchanged.)
renovation does NOT make this nreaADA accessible.) 14. The Plaza area near the old Box Office location (Photos 1174-1178) has not changed from my
proposed
the stairs A the plaza (Photos 1147, 1148) has a maximum previous report with slopes as high as 19.4%. There is a 36" high handrail from Pioneer Street
4. The of 11.2% 1 area n L2% [r and ear rothemp leadibottomng from 3rom the [tear the top with 34" high handrails on both sides. sidewalk to the old Box Office location.
(This area has been renovated with new pavers and
slope brick
new grad
(This area has been renovated with a ramp and stairs, Photos 8388, 8389 and appears to meet exceeds 2~G % Photo and does 8393 N es NOTand Is muchmeet ADA improver! however
in some areas; the cross slope
ADA requirements.) regerlrcrnenlsfor an accessible route.)
5. There are two ramps from the plaza to the Gill Shop (Photos 1149, 1150). The right ramp has an 15. The crosswalk at Pionccr Street (Photos 1179-1181) is concrete with
an 11.9% slope. (This area
has 8% slope and less than 2% cross-slope with a 35" high handrail on one side. The left ramp has as NOT clanged.)
an 1 I% slope and a 4.7% cross-slope with a 36" high handrail on one side. This ramp is only
www.kosinc.corn mt us at www.kasinc.com
16. The Thomas Theatre brick paver plaza (Photos 1182, 1183) has a slope of 3%. (This area has 7. The downstairs restroom facilities are NOT ADA accessible. (Tire proposed
plans do NOT
NOT changed.) address this Item. The proposed elevator does NOT serve the basement area, including the
17. The ramp from the Thomas Theatre plaza to the new Box Office concrete landing (Photos 1184, men's restrooms. This is beyond lire Limits of Construction. I could NOT verify
any changes
1185) has a slope of 9.5% with NO liandrails. (This area has NOT been renovated,• however, an to this area.)
accessible Bor Office entrance has been created closer to the maim entrance to this Thealre 8. There is access to one (1) unisex ADA accessible restroom with a privacy
lock near the one
and appears to meet ADA requirements.) accessible entrance to the building. There is also a drinking fountain in the accessible corridor as
18. The main Plaza area directly facing the stage in the center of the Plaza (Photos 1186-1188) has a well as two other drinking fountains in the main lobby. I did not go into
restroom and cannot
slope of 9.3%. (This area has been renovated with new pavers and new grades, Photo 8393 verify if it truly meets ADA requirements or not, but it is marked as being accessible.
(The
and Is much improved, however in some areas, lire cross slope erceeds 2% and does NOT proposed plans removes and relocates one (I) unisee ADA accessible restroom and does
NOT
meet ADA requirements for an accessible route.) show the drinking fountain being removed or replaced. I could NOT verlfy any changes to flits
19. The Point of Sale and Service Counters at the Elizabethan Theatre are NOT ACCESSIBLE. area.)
Section 1109.11.3 and 1109.11.4 of the 2010 OSSC requires an accessible counter. Tlris same 9. There are two (2) spaces for wheelchairs just inside the theatre at the
end of the accessible
condition may occur in other facilities, which we did not have access to at the time of my visit. entrance from the plaza. There is NO companion seating area as these two
spaces are enclosed
(These Counters have NOT been changed or modifted) by railing on three sides. According to OSSC Section 1108.2.2.1 there should be 7 wheelchair
20. The intersection of Hargadine Street, Fork Street and South Pioneer Street is relatively flat and spaces in an assembly area holding 600 people. This facility has 2 spaces.
There is NO elevator
could be a possible location for an "Accessible Site Arrival Point". This location is close to the in this building. (The proposed pions do NOT address the number of wheelchair
spaces. An
Elizabethan Theatre and should be considered for this purpose. (IYris comment has NOT been elevator is proposed in this new plan that will go from the lobby, to liteADA accessible
addresser) or changed) restroom and egress floor and to the second floor. I am not sureif there are any ADA
facilities on the second floor and seating inside file theatre is beyond the Limits of
I subunit the following observations with how I see each item addressed in the proposed renovation plans Construction. I could NOT verf, any changes to this area.)
in bold italics, as numbered from my September 5, 2014 letter. 10. The only route from the theatre to the main lobby area, where food service is provided requires
leaving the building through the accessible entrance and going down the plaza through the main
1. There was a "Green Show" information table set up in front of the old box office location. This lobby entrance. (The proposed elevator will provide access from the Theatre
seating area to
is at the bottom of a very steep grade, as noted in number 14 of my previous letters. (This area the lobby, as well as an ripper floor, but NOT the basement. I could NOT verify
any changes to
has been renovated with new pavers and grades.) flits area.)
2. The Tudor Guild building just north of the Allen Elizabethan Theatre on the plaza sells food and 11. Listening Devices are available in the lobby; however, the signage
is very poor. (Tire proposed
souvenirs. The single counter is too tall and is NOT ADA accessible. OSSC Section 1109.11.3 plans do NOT address this Item. I could NOT verf, any changes to this area.)
and 1109.11.4 requires Point of Sale and rood Service Counters to be accessible. (This building 12. 1 also looked at the intersection of Pioneer and Hargadine streets and
there is a nice flat area that
has been removed and the area renovated with landscaping and pavers.) could be re-designed to provide at least a two-car drop-off area. It would require loosing some
3. The Tudor Guild Gill Shop does have two ramps from the plaza area to the building, as noted in trees and landscaping, but it could be done. (The proposed plans do NOT address
this item aid
number 5 of my previous letters. There is also a ramp on the inside of the building to service the 1/ris 1s beyond the L1mhs of Construction. This hem has NOT been addressed
There is still
upper floor area. This ramp appears to meet ADA requirements. (See Number S above) NO ARRIVAL POINTfor this complerl)
4. The main entrance area into the Angus Bowmer Theatre has quite a slope to it, likely over 5%,
but there are no Irandmils. Portions of this short ramp may even be over 8%. On the left side of The proposed renovation plans do NOT address any items in my September 5, 2014
letter for the
this main entrance are two box office windows, neither or ADA accessible and there is no level Thomas Theatre. (77ris Is bgtbnd the Limits of Construction. I could NOT verify
any changes to this
landing area to stand in front of these windows. (This area has been renovated, Photo 8391 and area.)
there are no longer Box Office windows. This entrance now appears to meet ADA standards,
although there is NO ACCESSIBLE ROUTE to get to lire entrance from Pioneer Street At your request, i also looked at the provided Handicap Parking spaces in the Parking
Structure adjacent
because some areas have more titan 1% cross-slope.) to the Thomas Theatre. These spaces and the access out of the building and to the OSF facilities do
5. The main lobby of the theatre does have two heights of service counters, but the lower service NOT meet minimum ADA requirements. The slopes in the parking and aisle spaces
exceed 2% in both
counter is still higher than 34" and therefore does NOT meet ADA requirements. (I could NOT directions, the doors exiting the structure to the sidewalk do NOT provide a minimum
32" wide clear
verify if this item has clanged or not but was NOT o planned part of the renovation.) space when opened and the sidewalks have more than 2% cross-slope in areas.
6. There is NO directional signage for ADA facilities visible in the lobby area or near the main
entrance. Staff members have to tell people to use the ADA accessible entrance from the plaza The following summarizes my opinion ofthe recent renovations to the OSF facilities.
This renovation
area that is near the Tudor Guild building. The location of accessible facilities is shown on map has improved the accessibility and safety in numerous ways, even though some
of the renovations may
in the Playbill and on other literature, but there are NO directional signs visible. (I could NOT NOT meet ADA accessibility standards. Some very important ADA requirements
were NOT addressed
verif, Ifthis item has changed or not but was NOT a planner/ part of the renovation.) in the renovation, such as an ARRIVAL POINT and ACCESSIBLE ROUTES between all facilities.
vwn.m www.kasinc.com wsausat www.kasinc.com
i
If you have any questions or need further assistance or consultation, please give me a call.
Sincerel~Cy UA'-
A
Scott D. Pingle, PR, S.E. y~Q Pkp~f.\,
12103Let6 s ,
15 x1l
~rcula - ~ i
big,
L'XI InF itt31.2WP ~ ~ ~/v
D 9-3
r
vi3;raser www.kasinc.com
i
il-
KAS 12-103 Report KAS 12-103 Report
y
....1
" .
w
1 i
m m rtr= ar, sY
i
MIMI
IMG 8391 IMG R388 I1MG8394 - IMG_8387.
..•,i~ aF~ a `
I- 7A
a ant t
r ; 5asrt
Wl1TIAfT
r
1,~4G Ri89 lm( ;-839() ni 8381 1MG_8386
- M-7
IMG 8392 IMG 8393
CLACK
i
c 1 i Y 0'
ASHLAND
s.
City of Ashland
Capital Improvements
Program-,
city council
NO'
CIiY OF
-ASHLAND
CIP - Overview
1 ry~.
r Capital Planning o Budgeting
az Utilize Master Plans on a zo year z year appropriation; forecast
horizon spending
Update every 5-8 years Capital Program focus on 6 years
Evaluate changes every budget with the ability to forecast through the
cycle and verify project/program zo year planning horizon
priorities Update every z years
Assess changes in development Validate priorities and project timing
Include Council goals and priorities Capital Plan approved by Council
Y Ensures forward planning
20 Year CIP E Allows multi-year programming
Layer project priorities s Necessary for larger capital projects that
Assess utility components with span more than one budget cycle
street improvements
CITY OF
CIP - Synchronization ASHLAND
Capital Plans, Rates and Operations
Financing and Rates = Maintenance vs Capital
• Ensure a financing plan is CIP allows for planned capital
included in each Master Plan expenses
• Rates and fees - Streets and pavement condition
• Grants or loans
Other funding options Should reduce the need for
• Evaluate long term costs major unplanned or emergency
maintenance expenses
• Plan ahead for rate increases
Operational Expenses
• Smooth the cost of operations Generally, should be known and
and minimize dramatic increases predictable
SIMON=
CITY OF
CIP - Master Plans links ASHLAND
Transportation System Plan (TSP) - 2013 ( )
• Transit Feasibility Completed March 2019
• Full TSP proposed for FY20-21
Comprehensive Water Master Plan - 2012 ( )
• Currently being updated -completion in June 2019
• Water Management and Conservation Plan - 2013 )
• updated by staff March 2o1g
Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Master Plan - 2012 ( )
• Facilities Assessment in progress - complete October 2019
• Collection system master plan proposed for FYzo
Storm Water and Drainage Master Plan - 2ooo ( )
• Update in process - completion in October 2019
Airport Layout Plan (ALP) - 2005 )
• Update in process - completion July 2019
Facilities - 2oo8 Master Plan )
• City Hall Upgrades 2o18-19
Electric Department 1o Year Planning Study ( )
• System Plan proposed FY20-21
Parks and Recreation
• Lithia Park Master Plan underway - completion in late 2019 ( )
• All Parks Master Plan proposed FY21
CITY OF
CIP - Spreadsheet by Fund ASHLAND
Tricks on how to read the following CIP spreadsheets V
Color coding for the project lines:
White - the top lines in white are projects that should be completed in FY19 (current BN)
Yellow - this upcoming BN 2019-21 (FY 20 and FY 21)
Green - BN 2021-23 (FY 22 and FY 23)
Blue - BN 2023-25 (FY 24 and FY 25)
Peach - BN 2025-27 (FY 26 and FY 27)
Purple - BN 2027-29 (FY 28 and FY 29)
Gray - ongoing costs
White - the second lo-years FY 30 to FY 39
Note that is a projects starts in one color and the total is in another color, project spans multiple years
SDC - Systems Development Charges for that Fund
Fees and Rates; Street User fees, water or sewer rates, etc.
Other is defined on each sheet (typically grants, Food and Beverage Tax or something special)
All costs are in current 2019 dollars (not inflated for year of construction)
~I
visa=
CITY OF
Street Fund - Roadway Improvements ASHLAND
Fees & Rates, Grants and Gas Tax Funded
Anticipate new projects with the TSP Update
20 year
4
Project Description
o Roadway Improvements Project Totals Street SDC other Fees & Rates
7 N- Main Refuge Island $ 80,000 $ $ - $ 80,000
8 Railroad crossing Improvements; Hersey & Laurel $ 749,754 $ - $ 255,642 $ 494,112
9 Independent Way - Washington St to Tolman Creek Rd $ 1,544,807 $ 576,664 $ 968,143 $ -
io Grandview Drive Improvements - Phase II $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ 350,000
u City Wide Chip Seal Project (CMAQ) $ 53,592 $ - $ 468,244 $ 53,592
a Lithia Way (OR 99 NB)/E Main Street Intersection Improvements $ 73,750 $ 7,375 $ 66,375 $
13 Ashland Street (OR 66)/Oak Knoll Drive/E Main Street Intersection Improvements $ 602,851 $ 60,285 $ 542,566 $
is Walker Avenue Festival Street (Siskiyou Boulevard to Ashland Street) $ 1,150,500 $ 416,717 $ - $ 733,783
is Normal Avenue Extension $ 3,630,499 $ 1,133,776 $ - $ 2,496,723
16 Clear Creek Drive Extension $ 4,600,000 $ 1,436,543 $ - $ 3,163,4571
17 N Main Street Implement Permanent Road Diet $ 295,000 ! $ 37,722 $ $ 257,278
is Ashland Street Streetscape Enhancements (Siskiyou Boulevard to Walker Avenue) $ 1,298,000 $ 454,300 $ 843,700 $
a9 Croman Mill Development $ 1,080,000 $ 337,275 $ - $ 742,725
zo East Nevada Street Extension $ 6,494,400 $ 649,440 $ 5,844,960 $ -
$ -
u Anticipated Roadway improvements per TSP 54,500,000 450,000 $ 4,050,000
22 Subtotal Roadway $ 26,423,153 $ 5,560,097 $ 12,571,386 $ 8,291,670
U m
LAND
c- 0~
Street Fund - Overlay (2020-2029) ASH
Food & Beverage Tax funding for arterial and collector streets
If not an arterial or collector, project is funded from street user fees or gas tax revenue
24 Street Overlays/Reconstructions Project Totals Street SDC Other Fees & Rates
25 Hersey St - N Main St to N Mountain Ave $ 4,500,000 $ $ 4,500,000 $
26 Wightman St - Quincy St to Siski ou Blvd $ 1,014,500 $ - $ 1,014,500 $ -
27 N Mountain Ave - 1-5 Overpass to E Main St $ 4,060,000 $ - $ 4,060,000 $ -
23 Ashland St - Siski ou Blvd to Faith St $ 4,500,000 $ - $ 4,500,000 $ -
29 Oak St - City Limits to E Main St $ 2,500,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 $ -
30 Siski ou Blvd - E Main St to Walker Ave $ 6,500,000 $ - $ 6,500,000 $ -
31 Maple St - Chestnut St to N Main St $ 500,000 $ - $ 500,000 $ -
32 Tolman Creek Rd - E Main St to Ashland St $ 1,000,000 $ $ 1,000,000 $
33 Walker Ave - E Main St to Siski ou Blvd $ 800,000 $ - $ 800,000 $
34 A St - Oak St to Eighth St $ 1,900,000 $ $ 1,900,000 $ -
35 Garfield St - E Main St to Siski ou Blvd $ 750,000 $ - $ - $ 750,000
36 Granite St - N Main St to End of Pavement $ 2,500,000 $ $ 2,500,000 $ -
37 Morton St - Siski ou Blvd to Ashland St $ 650,000 $ - $ 650,000 $
38 N Laurel St - W Nevada St to N Main St $ 550,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ -
39 S Mountain Ave - E Main St to Emma St $ 2,000,000 $ - $ 1,750,000 $ 250,000
4o Park St - Siski ou Blvd to Crestview Dr $ 1,000,000 $ - $ 1,000,000 $ -
4: _ Tolman Creek Rd - Ashland St to Siski ou Blvd $ 700,000 $ - $ 700,000 $ -
I,, Wimer St - Thornton Way to N Main St $ 900,000 $ - $ 900,000 $ -
WATAM
Street Fund - Overlay (2030-2039) ASHLAND
Food & Beverage Tax funding for arterial and collector streets
If not an arterial or collector, project is funded from street user fees or gas tax revenue
43 Nutley St - Scenic Dr to Winburn Way $ 350,000 $ - $ - $ 350,000
44 Winburn Wa - E Main St to Nutley $ 550,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ -
45 _ Van Ness Ave - N Main St to Oak St $ 650,000 $ $ 650,000 $ -
46 B St - Oak St to N Mountain Ave $ 2,800,000 $ $ 2,800,000 $
47 Ashland St - Guthrie St to S Mountain Ave $ 1,300,000 $ - $ 1,300,000 $ -
48 Bellview Ave - Siski ou Blvd to End of Street $ 400,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ -
49 Chestnut St - Maple St to Wimer St $ 700,000 $ $ 700,000 $
so'. Church St - Scenic Dr to N Main St $ 550,000 $ - $ 550,000 $
51 Greenmeadows Way - Bellview Ave to Tolman Creek Rd $ 1,000,000 $ $ - $ 1,000,000
52' Gresham St - E Main St to Iowa St $ 600,000 $ $ 600,000 $ -
53 Iowa St - Terrace St to Siski ou Blvd $ 1,200,000 $ - $ 1,200,000 $ -
54 E Main St - Lithia Way to Walker Ave $ 2,500,000 $ - $ 2,500,000 $ -
ss Liberty St - Siski ou Blvd to End of Street $ 1,500,000 $ - $ - $ 1,500,000
56 Hen St - Liberty St to S Mountain Ave $ 200,000 $ $ - $ 200,000
57 Fordyce St - Evan Ln to End of Street $ 250,000 $ - $ 250,000 $ -
5s Glenn St - N Main St to RJR Tracks $ 200,000 $ - $ 200,000 $ -
59' Heiman St - W Nevada St to Lithia Way $ 1,600,000 $ $ 1,600,000 $ -
60 Rand St - Laurel St to Heiman St $ 200,000 $ $ - $ 200,000
61 Hillview Or- Siski ou Blvd to Crestview Dr $ 400,000 $ - $ 400,000 $ -
62 Holly St - Terrace St to Liberty St $ 800,000 $ $ 800,000 $
63 Indiana St - Siski ou Blvd to Woodland Or $ 650,000 $ $ 650,000 $
64 Iowa St - S Mountain Ave to Walker Ave $ 550,000 $ - $ 550,000 $ -
65 Oak Knoll Dr - Hwy 66 to Crowson Rd $ 900,000 $ $ 900,000 $
66 range Ave - R/R Tracks to Heiman St $ 450,000 $ - $ 450,000 $ -
67 Overlay per PMS/OCI $ 800,000 $ - $ 800,000 $
68 Subtotal Street Improvements/Overlays $ 57,424,500 $ - $ 53,174,500 4,250,000
Street Fund - Sidewalk/Ped Improvements ASNLA' D
Fees & Rates, Grants and Gas Tax Funded
Anticipate new projects with the TSP Update
70 Sidewalk/Pedestrian Prol9d Totals Street SDC Other_ Fees & Rates
71 Downtown ADA Ramp Replacement/Plaza Sidewalk Replacement $ 152,438 $ - $ 88,950 $ 63,488
72 N Main Street RRFB Installation - Nurse Street & Van Ness Avenue $ 75,000 $ - $ - $ 75,000
73 N Mountain Avenue - 100' south of Village Green Drive to Iowa Street $ 663,750 $ 644,634 5 - $ 19,116
a N. Mountain Avenue RRFB Installation - Fair Oaks Avenue $ 50,000 $ - $ - $ 50,000
75 N Main Street (Hwy 99) - N Main Street to Schofield Street $ 73,750 $ 71,626 5 - $ 2.124
7e Beaver Slide - Water Street to Lithia Way $ 73,750 $ 71,626 $ - $ 2,124
n Diane Street- Jaquelyn Street to Tolman Creek Road $ 29,500 $ 7,375 $ 22,125 $
1o Walker Avenue Oregon Street to Woodland Drive $ 295,000 $ 73,750 $ 221,250 $
z9 Tolman Creek Road - Siskiyou Boulevard to City Limits (west side) $ 626,875 $ 608,821 $ 18,054
w A Street - Oak Street to 8th Street $ 418,750 $ 104,688 $ 314,063 $ _
er Garfield Sueet - E Main Street to Siski uu Boulevard $ 1,106,250 $ 276,563 $ 829,688 $
82 Carol Street - Patterson Street to Hersey Street $ 221,250 $ 55,313 $ 165,938 $ -
ss Laurel Street - Nevada Street to Orange Avenue $ 737,500 $ 184,375 $ 553,125 $
m Scenic Drive - Maple Street to Wimer Street $ 368,750 5 92,188 5 276,563 $ -
ss Park Street -Ashland Street to Siski ou Boulevard $ 958,750 5 239,688 $ 719,063 $
w Wimer Street - Thornton Way to N Main Street $ 1,180,000 295,000 $ 885,000 $
v Wi htrnan Street - 200' north of E Main Street to 625' south of E Main Street $ 590,000 $ 147,500 $ 442,500 $
w Ashland Street - S Mountain Avenue to Morton Street $ 663,750 5 165,938 5 497,813 $
w Clay Street - Siskiyou Boulevard to Mohawk Street $ 442,500 5 110,625 5 331,875 5 -
w Lincoln Street - E Main Street to Iowa Street $ 663,750 $ 165,938 $ 497,813 $
9r Liberty Street - Siskiyou Boulevard to Ashland Street $ 958,750 $ 239,688 $ 719,063 $ -
r California Street - E Main Street to Iowa Street $ 737,500 $ 184,375 $ 553,125 $
93 Faith Avenue - Ashland Street to Siskiyou Boulevard $ 516,250 $ 129,063 $ 387,188 $ -
w Glenn Street/Orange Avenue - N Main Street to 175' east of Willow Street $ 295,000 $ 73,150 $ 221,250 $ -
s Orange Avenue - 17~ west of Drager Street to Heiman Street $ 368,750 $ 92,188 $ 276,563 $ -
. Clay Street - Faith Avenue to Siskiyou Boulevard $ 1,475,000 $ 368,750 $ 1,106,250 $ -
97 Subtotal Sidewalk/Pedestrian $ 13,742,563 $ 4,403,457 $ 9,109,200 $ 229,906
cITY OF
LAND
Street Fund - Bikeway Improvements ASH
Fees & Rates, Grants
Anticipate New Projects with the TSP Update
99 Bicycle Project Totals Street SDC Other Fees & Rates
roo Wightman Street Bicycle Boulevard - E Main Street to Siskiyou Boulevard $ 81,420 $ 27,601 $ 8,142 $ 45,677
ror Lithia Way Bicycle Boulevard - From Oak Street to Heiman Street $ 149,270 $ 50,603 $ 14,927 $ 83,740
102 Main Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Helman Street to Siskiyou Boulevard $ 67,850 $ 23,001 $ 6,785 $ 38,064
101 Walker Avenue Bicycle Boulevard - From Siskiyou Boulevard to Peachey Road $ 54,280 $ 18,401 $ 5,428 $ 30,451
rod 8th Street Bicycle Boulevard - A Street to E Main Street $ 27,140 5 9,200 $ 2,714 $ 15,226
ros Oregon/Clark Street Bicycle Boulevard - Indiana Street to Harmony Lane $ 54,280 5 18,032 $ 5,428 $ 30,820
1os Maple/Scenic Drive/Nutley Street Bicycle Boulevard - From N Main Street to Winburn Way $ 149,270 $ 50,603 $ 14,927 $ 83,740
1m Normal Avenue Bike Lane - From E Main Street to Siskiyou Boulevard. Coordinate with Proje $ 257,830 $ 87,404 $ 25,783 $ 144,643
1os N Main Street Bike Lane - Frorn Jackson Road to Helman Street $ 352,820 $ 119,606 $ 35,282 $ 197,932
r99 Laurel Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Orange Street to Nevada Street $ 54,280 5 18,401 $ 5,428 $ 30,451
rro S Mountain Avenue Bike Lane - From Ashland Street to E Main Street 162,840 $ 55,203 $ 16,284 $ 91,353
Water Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Hersey Street to N Main Street $ 40,110 $ 13,801 $ 4,071 $ 22,838
u2 Tolman Creek Road Bike Lane - From Siskiyou Boulevard to Green Meadows Way $ 135,700 $ 46,002 $ 13,570 $ 76,128
113 Nevada Street Bike lane - From Vansant Street to N Mountain Avenue. Coordinate with Proj $ 312,110 $ 105,805 $ 31,211 $ 175,094
114 Wirner Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Scenic Drive to N Main Street. Coordinate with Projec $ 27,140 $ 9,200 $ 2,714 $ 15,226
115 B Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Oak Street to N Mountain Avenue $ 108,560 $ 36,802 $ 10,856 $ 60,902
rro Clay Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Siskiyou Boulevard to Mohawk Street $ 27,140 9,200 $ 2,714 $ 15,226
117 Ashland Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Morton Street to University Way $ 40,710 $ 13,801 $ 4,071 $ 22,838
us Iowa Street Bike Lane - From Terrace Street to road terminus and from S Mountain Avenue t $ 325,680 $ 110,406 $ 32,568 $ 182,706
r19 Northside Trail - Multi-use Path - From Orchid Avenue to Tolman Creek Road $ 2,714,000 $ 901,577 $ 271,400 $ 1,541,023
12o Heiman Street Bicycle Boulevard - From Nevada Street to N Main Street $ 108,560 $ 36,802 $ 10,856 $ 60,902
121 Indiana Street Bicycle Boulevard - Siskiyou Boulevard to Oregon Street $ 27,140 S 9,200 $ 2,714 $ 15,226
M MultiUse Path - From Clay Street to Tolman Creek Road $ 542,800 $ 184,009 $ 54,280 $ 304,511
r21 Subtotal Bicycle $ 5,821,530 $ 1,954,661 $ 582,153 $ 3,284,716
12d TOTAL 1
CITY OF
Water Fund - Supply and Treatment ASHLAND
Fees & Rates, Loans and Grants (potentially)
Anticipate new projects with the Water Master Plan Update
128 Project Description
1m Water Supply Pro ect Totals Water SDC Other Fees & Rates
131 TID Terrace St Pump Station Improvements 687,374 $ 687,374 $ - $ -
132 Dam Safety improvements $ 5,900,000 $ 737,500 $ 2,950,000 $ 2,212,500
133 Ashland (TID) Canal Piping: Starlite to Terrace Street $ 3,800,000 $ 2,500,000 $ 1,300,000 $ -
134 East & West Fork Transmission Line Rehabilitation $ 2,226,000 $ - $ - $ 2,226,000
135 Reeder Reservoir Variable Depth Intake $ 131,500 $ - $ _ - $ 131,500
136 Sediment TMDL in Reeder Reservoir $ 980,000 $ 735,000 $ - $ 245,000
137 Subtotal Water Supply 5 13,724,874 $ 4,659,874 $ 4,250,000 $ 4,815,000
1N Water Treatment Storage Pro ect Totals Water SDC Other Fees & Rates
1. 7.5 MGD Water Treatment Plant $ 34,199,399 $ 3,419,940 $ - $ 30,779,459
141 Subtotal Treatment & Storage $ 34,199,399_L$ - 3,419,940 $ _ _ _ - $ 30,779,459
CITY OF
Water Fund - Distribution (2020-2029) ASHLAND
Fees & Rates; Anticipate some allocation to SDCs
143 Water Distribution Project Totals Water SDC Other Fees & Rates
144 Park Estates Pump Station $ 1,991,000 $ - $ - $ 1,991,000
145 Pipe Replacement Program $ - 6,000,000
146 Subtotal Water Distribution $ 7,991,1W(7 $ - $ - $ 7,991,000
14e Water Mainline Protects Proett Totals Water SDC Other Fees & Rates
149 Siskiyou Boulevard - Crowson Road south towards 1-5 Exit 11 $ 196,208 $ - $ - $ 196,208
150 Ivy Lane - Morton Street to west end of Ivy Lane $ 40,807 $ - $ - $ 40,807
151 Oak St - Watewaster Treatment Plant to E Nevada St $ 675,000 $ - $ - $ 675,000
152 Ditch Road - Strawberry PS to Grandview Dr $ 203,000 $ - $ - $ 203,000
is Parker Street - Walker Ave to Lit Way $ 215,000 $ - $ - $ 215,000
1s4 Harmony Lane, Lit Way & Ray Lane - Ashland St to Siskiyou Blvd $ 205,000 $ - $ - $ 205,000
155 Maple St - Chestnut St to N Main St $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ 180,000
I% Washington St - Ashland St to Jefferson Ave $ 140,000 $ - $ - $ 140,000 j
IS/ Beach Street - Larkin Lane to Siskiyou Blvd $ 125,000 $ - $ - $ 125,000
Ise AHS Property - Fire hydrant in school property $ 123,000 $ - $ - $ 123,000
159 Walker Ave - E Main St to Siskiyou Blvd $ 540,000 $ - $ - $ 540,000
16o Normal Ave - Siskiyou Blvd to Homes Ave $ 543,450 $ - $ - $ 543,450
161 A St - First St to Sixth St $ 320,000 $ - $ - $ 320,000
162 Vista Street - Fork St to Hillcrest St $ 168,000 $ - $ - $ 168,000
163 Granite St - Strawberry Ln to End of Pavement 810,000 $ - $ - $ 810,000
164 Morton St - Siskiyou Blvd to Iowa St, Euclid Ave to Ashland St $ 210,000 $ - $ - $ 210,000
165 N Laurel St - W Nevada St to Randy St $ 90,000 $ - $ - $ 90,000
166 Elkader Street- Ivy Lane to Pinecrest Trail $ 305,000 $ - $ $ 105,000
88,000
167 Ivy Lane - South Mountain Ave to Elkader St $ 88,000 $ - $ - $
16e S Mountain Ave - Ashland St to Emma St $ 300,000 $ - $ - $ 300,000
169 Meade Street - Vista St/Hillcrest to Iowa Street $ 769,000 $ $ - $ 769,000
no Park St - Siskiyou Blvd to Crestview Dr $ 320,000 $ - $ - $ 320,000
i
I
c- or
Water Fund - Distribution (2030-2039) ASHLAND
Fees & Rates; Anticipate some allocation to SDCs
Anticipate new projects with the Water Master Plan Update
171'. Pinecrest Terrace - Walker Ave to Starlight Place $ 443,000 $ - $ - $ 443,000
172 Nutley St - Scenic Dr to Granite Street 90,000 90,000
179 Winburn Way - E Main St to Ashland Creek Bridge $ 40,000 $ - $ - $ 40,000
17a B St - Oak St to N Mountain Ave $ 590,000 $ - $ - $ 590,000
vs Chestnut St - Maple St to Wimer St $ 160,000 $ $ $ 160,000
176 Pinecrest Terrace - Penny Drive to Woodland Drive $ 201,000 $ - $ - $ 201,000
to Penny Drive - Woodland Or to Weissenback Way $ 92,000 5 - $ - $ 92,000
178'. Greenmeadows Way - Morada Ln to FH231313-025, FH23BA-014 to Tolman Creek Rd $ 180,000 $ - $ - $ 180,000
179. Iowa St - Terrace St to Siskiyou Blvd $ 450,000 $ - $ - $ 450,000
tao E Main St - Lithia Way to Walker Ave $ 840,000 $ - $ - $ 840,000
161 Fordyce St - E Main St to End of Street $ 230,000 $ - $ - $ 230,000
m2 Woodland Drive - Leonard St to Pinecrest Terrace $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ 60,000
193 Hiawatha Place - Walker Ave to FH 15CA-020 65,000 5 - $ - $ 65,000
uA Morton Street - FH 16AC-023 to PRV 12 $ 146,000 5 - $ - $ 146,000
lase Randy St - Laurel St to Helman St $ 160,000 $ - $ - $ 160,000
tab' Hillview Dr - Siskiyou Blvd to Crestview Dr $ 380,000 5 - $ - $ 380,000
187 Iowa St - 5 Mountain Ave to Wightman St $ 250,000 $ - $ - $ 250,000
tea Ashland Mine Road - Cedar Way to Fox Street $ 130,000 $ - $ - $ 130,000
tag Fox Street - Ashland Mine Road to N. Main Street $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ 60,000
Loo Oak Knoll Dr - Hwy 66 to Twin Pines Cir (S) $ 410,000 5 - $ - $ 410,000
191 Almeria Drive - Almeda Dr to Dog Park Road $ 38,000 $ $ $ 38,000
192 Crispin Street - Oak Street to Patterson Street $ 184,000
193 Oak Lawn Ave - Oak Street to Sylvia Street $ 146,000
194 Subtotal Mainline Projects $ 11,711,465 $ - $ - $ 11,527,465
195 WATER TOTAL $ 67.626,737 $ 8,079,81.4 $ 4,250,000 55,112,923-
ASHLAND
Wastewater Fund - Treatment
Funded with Fees & Rates
Anticipate new projects with the Wastewater Facilities Assessment Update
SDC allocation to be verified
191 Wastewater Treatment Plant Project Totals Sewer SDC O_th_er fees & Rates
198 UV System Upgrades $ 600,000 90,000 _ " - - -X510,000
199 WWTPRiparian Restoration/Shading -Water Quality Temperature Trading Program 4,005,000 600,750 2,000,000 1,404,250
2oo Outfall Relocation Fish Screen 1,773,324 265,999 - 1,507,326
201WWTP Process Improvements (Headworks) 960,000_ _ 144,000 - 816,000
202. WWTP Process Improvements (Harmonics) 210,000 31,500 - 178,500
203 WWTP Process Improvements (Miscellaneous) 3,000,000 { $ 450,000 - 2,550,000
2D1 Membrane Replacement (two trains) 3,600,000 _ - - 3,600,000
205 Oxidation Ditch Shell 3,051,967 $_1,190,267. 1,661,700
206 Subtotal Wastewater Treatment Plant 17,200,291 2,772,516 2,000,000 12,427,775
t OF
Wastewater Fund - Collections ASHC.YY OF
LAND
Funded with Fees & Rates
Anticipate new projects with the Wastewater Collections Master Plan Update IF
SDC allocation to be verified
zoa Wastewater Collection System Pro ect Totals Sewer SDC Other Fees & Rates
2o9 Grandview Pump Station Replacement 553,175 - - 553,175
uo Wastewater Line Replacement; 15" Main -Mountain Avenue 214,661 ~ 150,262 - 64,398
211 Wastewater Miscellaneous In-House Replacement 2,100,000 - 2,100,000
212 Wastewater Miscellaneous Trenchless Pipe Lining 2,650,000 2,650,000
213 Wastewater Line Upsizing - Bear Creek Trunkline - Wightman to Tolman Creek Road 250,000 175,000 75,000
214 Tolman Creek Rd - Abbott Ave to Ashland St 92,000 - - 92,000
215 A St - First St to Eighth St 461,710 69,257 - 392,454
216 Granite St - Baum St to Nutley St, Strawberry Ln to Pioneer St N of Ashland Creek Dr 216,000 - - 216,000
217 N Laurel St - W HerseYSt to Orana Ave 121,000 121,000
- 47,000 ,000
218 S Mountain Ave-Ashland St to Pleasant Wa 47
219 Nutley St- Scenic Dr to Pine St 29,000 29,000
220 N. Mountain Ave Pump Station Replacement 350,000 350,000
221 Wimer St - Prim St to Walnut St, Chestnut St to Alta Ave 89,000 89,000
222_B St - 2nd St to 3rd St, 8th St to N Mountain Ave 132,000 - - 132,000
223. Bellview Ave - Siskiyou Blvd to Black Oak Wa 6000 - - 68,000
224. Chestnut St - Luna Vista St to Winner St 32,000 - - 32,000
225 Gresham St - Pearl St to Auburn St 47,000 47,000
226 Iowa St - Gresham St to Fairview St 44,000 44,000
227 E Main St - Sherman St to 7th St 86,000 86,000
228. Liberty St - Siskiyou Blvd to Holly Street, S. of Clarence to End of Street 143,000 - - 143,000
229 Liberty St - Siski ou Blvd to Holly Street S. of Clarence to End of Street 600,000 600,000
230 Subtotal Wastewater Col ectlon System 8,325,546 394,519 7,931,027
231 WASTEWATER • 3,167,035 2,000,000 20,358,903
CITY OF
Stormwater Fund 'ASHLAND
Fees and Rates
231 Storm Drain Pr ectTotals Storm SDC Other Fees & Rates
238 Hersey Wetlands 24" high flow bypass 55,000 22,000 - 33,000
239 Storm Drain Relocation - Intersection of Woodland & Indiana 55,000 - - 55,000
24o Beach Mountain Creek; Various Improvements per SWMP 660,000 264,000 - 396,000
241 2nd Street Storm Drain E. Main to Lithia Way 155,000 46,500 1 80 500
242 Liberty Street - Iowa to Pracht Street Storm Drain Line Installation 90,000 18,000 72,000
243 Storm Drain Line Replacement / Upsize, etc per SWMP 400,000 120,000 280,000
244 Open Drainage Improvements; 0&M Plan; Cemetery Ck, Clay Ck, RR Park 200,000 40,000 160,000
245 Hersey Street Bridge Bottom replacement 390,000 15 78,000 - 312,000
246 • DRAIN TOTAL $ 2,005,000 01 1,416,500
NOTE: Project list will significantly change with completion of the
Storm Water Master Plan update (2o1g)
•ASH LAN D
Other Funds "TY
w:
248 Airport Project Totals Other Fees & Rates
249 Pavement Maintenance Program 140,000 140,000
25o Entitlement Grant-Airport lmprovments -TaxiwayRehabilitation 6,692,100 15 6,022,890 669,210
251 AIRPORTTOTAL II 6,022,890 809,210
252
253 ADMINISTRATION - Clty Facllltles Project Totals Other ! Fees & Rates
254 City Facility Upgrades & Maintenance 5,400,000 5,400,000
255 Emergency Operations Center - Grove Priority Improvements 205,000 25,000 180,000
256 Pioneer Hall Priority Improvements 195,000 195,000
257 City Hall Improvements 6,697,100 6,200,000 497,100
2~8 Hardesty Property Relocation and Paving 300,000 200,000
259 Community Center Priority Improvements 165,000 - 165,000
-
i zbo BriscoeekRoof Re eplacement 300,000 300,000
261 Emergency Operations Center & Training - Police 1,520,000 1,520,000 .
262 City Hall Computer Network 750,000 750,000
263 Archive Building Construction 750,000 750,000
264 City Facilities Upgrades - based on a Facilities Plan 3,500,000 3,500,000
265 ADMINISTRATION TOTAL $ 01 101 13,257,100
267 Flre and Rescue Pro ect Totals Other j Fees & Rates
268 Communications Tower 335,000 335,000 -
269 Public Safety Training Facility 2,600,000 2,500,000 100,000
270 FIRE •RESCUE • III 2,835,000 100,000
271
272 Electric Project Totals Other Fees & Rates
273 Mountain Avenue Substation Purchase 900,000 900,000
274 Mountain Avenue Upgrades 1,000,000 1,000,000
275 Circuit Automation 500,000 500,000
276 Underground Main lines 4,000,000 4,000,000
277 TOTAL 1 I 1 1 1 6,400,000
CITY or
Ashland Parks and Recreation Fund ASHLAND
Other = Food and Beverage Funds
279 Parks Project Totals Other Fees & Rates
280 Project Manager 360,000 360,000
281 N. Mountain Park Nature Play Area 238,330 238,330
282 Oak Knoll Irrigation Improvements 92,850 92,850 -
283 Ashland Creek Park Basketball Court 75,000 75,000
284 E. Main Development 950,000 950,000
28s Mace Property Trail 250,000 250,000
236 Dedicated Pickleball Courts 175,000 175,000
287 All Parks Master Plan 200,000 200,000
288 Senior Center Improvements 50,000 50,000
289 TID Irrigation 100,000 100,000
290 Japanese Garden 1,500,000 1,500,000
291 Oak Knoll Improvements (playground) 250,000 250,000 -
292 Repair Butler Perozzi Fountain 626,970 626,970
293 Kestrel Park Bridge 500,000 500,000
294 Daniel Meyer Pool - Rebuild & Cover 4,000,000 4,000,000 -
295 Lithia Park Improvements (Winburn Way Sidewalk) 175,000 175,000 -
296 Ashland Creek Park, Public Works Requirements 35,000 35,000
297 Lincoln Park Improvements 50,000 50,000
298 Mountain Bike Skills Park and Pump Track 250,000 250,000
299 PARKSTOTAL 9,879,150 I
smog=
CIP Totals: CITY OF
-ASHLAND
Note: all costs are in current 2019 dollars (not inflated for construction year)
First 10 years - FY20-29 ($157.6M)
NOTE: FY21 and FY22 Water Treatment Plant costs make these higher than average typically expected
FY20 FY21 FY22 FY23 FY24 FY25 FY26 F27 FY28 FY29
TRANSPORTATION TOTAL $ 7,565,938 $ 6,273,987 4,401,981 5,076,420 $ 7,401,645 $ 7,638.329 $ 7,474,070 $ 2,486,780 S 3,829,590 $ 4,815,160
WATER TOTAL 5,999,730 17,867,770 $ 18,099,000 $ 2,983,450 $ 759,000 $ 738,000 $ 1,250,000 $ 1,793,000 $ 973,000 $ 1,156,000
WASTEWATER TOTAL $ 1,830,000 $ 2.430,000 $ 1,430,000 $ 1,277,000 $ 1,436,000 S 1,605.000 $ 3,686,000 $ 726,000 $ 397,000 $ 614,000
STORM DRAIN TOTAL $ 55,000 $ 165,000 $ - $ 165.000 $ - $ 165,000 $ - $ 165,000 $ - $ 155,000
AIRPORT TOTAL $ 20,000 $ 200,000 $ 2,030,700 $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000
ADMINISTRATION - FACILITIES TOTAL $ 530,000 $ 725,000 $ 1,305,000 $ 2.150,000 $ 3,150,000 $ 720,000 $ 1,800,000 $ 800.000 $ 1,550,000 $ 1,050,000
FIRE AND RESCUE TOTAL $ 35,000 $ 325,000 $ 75,000 $ 2,500,000 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
ELECTRIC TOTAL $ - $ 900,000 $ 150,000 $ 850,600 $ 350,000 $ 650,D00 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000
PARKS TOTAL $ 1,930,000 $ 3,090,000 $ 4,595,000 $ 60$ 60,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ - $ - $
$ 17,965,668 31 976 757 32 086 681 15,081:N9 13 156 60.5 $ 115 76 329 14,480,070 6,220,7W 6 999 590 $ 8060 160
Second 10 years - FY30-39 ($77.6M*)
*NOTE: not fully built out for several funds awaiting master planning results
FY30 FY31 FY32 FY33 FY34 FY35 FY36 FY37 FY38 FY39
TRANSPORTATION TOTAL 9,563,650 $ 3,998,560 $ 4,181,600 4,D68,180 4,206,550 $ 4,151,550 S 4,088,860 3,586,190 3,056,550 $ 3,317,800
WATER TOTAL $ 1,373,000 $ 1,390,ODO $ 893,000 $ 9301000 $ 1,140,000 $ 1,441,D00 $ 1,340,000 $ 740,000 $ 1,388,000 $ 630,000
WASTEWATER TOTAL $ 1,989,000 $ 717,000 $ 450,000 $ 676,000 $ 406,000 $ 698,000 $ 1,670,000 $ 705,000 $ 470,000 S 705,000
STORM DRAIN TOTAL $ - $ 90,000 $ - $ 150,000 $ - $ 150.000 $ - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 $ 390,000
AIRPORT TOTAL $ 2001000 S 2.030,700 $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 20,000 $ - $ - $ 220,000 $ 2,030,700
ADMINISTRATION-FACILITIES TOTAL $ 800,000 $ 300,000 S 800,000 $ 300,000 $ 800,000 $ 300,000 S 8001000 $ 300,000 $ 800,000 S 300,000
FIRE AND RESCUE TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ -
ELECTRIC TOTAL $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 S 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000 $ 250,000
PARKS TOTAL $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - S - $
14,175,650 $ 8,776,260 $ 6,594 600 6 374180 6,902,5561 7,01D,556 1 8,148 860 $ 5 731190 $ 6,334,555i 7,623,500
I
I
I