The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLupine_2310_TREE-2019-00064 CITY C A I 1 May 21, 2019 Notice of Final Decision On May 21, 2019, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: TREE-2019-00061 Subject Property: 2310 Lupine Applicant: Mountain Ranch HOA / Doug Kay Description: A request for a Tree Removal Permit to a mature Birch tree. The tree is partially dead. The applicant's arborist states that there is evidence of `bronze birch barer' which will likely kill the tree. The trees location is on the common area of the HOA (tax lot 1300), but is identified by the street address for clarity dale to the odd property configuration of the common area. The tree is marked with surveyor's tape for identification. Due to the lame number of trees on their property the applicant requests off site mitigation, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 23 BB TAX LOT: 576 l 1300 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the. 12"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn '`Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was inailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18,5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The A:LLO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron. Anderson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax; 541-552-2050 ( 7 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2904 ` j S'EC'TION 18.5,1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.0, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. E. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. I . Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action alter tine decision has been evade by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of tine party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during tine opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, tine Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. Tire Staff Advisor shall decide within ten clays to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. it. If the Stuff Advisor is not satisfied that ail error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision unay be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: I . Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 1.8.5.1.050.13. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of .Appeal, Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.01.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to tine procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by tine City and whose boundaries include tine site. If ate appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Thee for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the: Staff Advisor within 12 days of tine date the notice of decision is mailed. C. Content of Notice of Appeal, The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. L An identification of tile decision teeing appealed, including tine date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating tine pet-son filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining (lie specific issues being raised one appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 1 Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions evade by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. Tine appeal shall not be limited to tine application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to tine Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. d. Appeal. Bearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type It public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City oil ail appeal of a. Type I decision. A decision on am appeal is 'final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Td: 541488-5305 51 Wintaurn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 ) Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ~7 -J ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: TREE-2019-00064 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2310 Lupine Dr. OWNERS: Mountain RCH Prop Owner Assoc. APPLICANTS: Same DESCRIPTION: A request for a Tree Removal Permit to a mature Birch tree. The tree is partially dead. The applicant's arborist states that there is evidence of `bronze birch borer' which will likely kill the tree. The trees location is on the common area of the HOA (tax lot 1300), but is identified by the street address for clarity due to the odd property configuration of the common area. The tree is marked with surveyor's tape for identification. Due to the large number of trees on their property the applicant requests off site mitigation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 23 BB; TAX LOT: 576/1300 SUBMITTAL DATE: April 22, 2019 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: May 2, 2019 STAFF DECISION DATE: May 21, 2019 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): June 3, 2019 FINAL DECISION DATE: June 4, 2019 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: December 4, 2020 DECISION This proposal is to remove one birch tree from a property located at 2310 Lupine Dr, in the R-1-7.5 zoning district. The tree is identified as a Betulal)endula and is approximately 18-inches DBH. The tree is located along the conunon area separating 1725 Greenrrreadows Way and 2310 Lupine Drive approximately 10' behind the curb line. As stated above, due to the odd configuration of the common area its location was identified as 2310 Lupine for clarity. The tree is in poor health and has a significant amount of dead wood in the crown, which is most likely caused by the bronze birch borer. The applicant's submittal included a report by a licensed arborist who states that the tree will not survive and should be removed. The Mountain Ranch HOA is a pro-active Firewise community and want to remove the tree infected with the bronze birch borer to prevent its spread and protect the many other trees under their care. At the Tree Commission's May 9t" meeting the application was reviewed. The Tree Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the tree removal. In staff's assessment, the tree removal as proposed satisfies the criteria for "Tree that is not a hazard" criteria. TREE-2019-00064 2310 Lupine St./aa Page I The criteria for a Tree Removat Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.7.040.B as follows: 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions, a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. 2, Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.10. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance, e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7,050, Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Planning Action #TREE-2019-00064, a request to remove one hazard tree, complies with all applicable City ordinances with the imposition of the conditions attached below. Therefore, Planning Action #TREE- 2019-00064 is approved. If any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid, for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 4TREE-2019-00064 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2. That one (1) mitigation tree with a minimum of a 1'/2-inch caliper and shall be a large stature iiduous t ee at maturity, shall be planted on site within one (1) year of issuance of this decision. ill Molnar, irector Date epartmen of Community Development T1zEE-2019-00064 2310 Lupine St./aa Page 2 I AFFIDAVIT' CAF MAILING STATE OF OREGON } County of Jackson } The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On May 21, 20191 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action TREE-2019-00064, 2,310 Lupine. Sign ture of Employee D9cunwnl 50117015 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 541 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 542 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 539 ALEXANDER JOHN DIALEXANDER BALLANTYNE MATTHEW CROPPER TANNER EDWARD/MELISSA TAYLOR M SCOTT/KATHRYN NOEL STOUT 1980 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2030 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 1820 GREEN MEADOWS WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 547 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 533 GODEREY ROSEMARY L TRUSTEE ET TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 552 DONOVAN JESSE/MARIKA AL GORDON STANLEY MIMICHELLE M 1630 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2125 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2303 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 540 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 551 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 565 HARTEIS GRETCHEN A ET AL HOGAN LOANNE MARIE KILBURN REBECCA ANN LIV TRUST ET 1880 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 1725 GREEN MEADOWS WAY AL ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 2325 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 521 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 564 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 550 LAMBERT STEVEN MITIFFANIE L ULLIBRIDGE BETTY A TRUSTEE ET AL LINDOW JAMES T TRUSTEE ET AL 1575 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2315 LUPINE DR 2370 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 566 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 567 TREE-2019-00064 391 E238B 536 LOESSI KAREN M TRUSTEE ET AL LOWES PAUL K ET AL MONNING BERNIECE M TRUSTEE ET AL 2335 LUPINE DR 2345 LUPINE DR 1680 GREEN MEADOWS WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 575 TREE-2019-00064 391E23BB 563 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 573 NIEBUHR DENNIS GICARIN L PETROU-SMITH BIANCA LOUISE ET AL SLOAN TAYLOR TRUSTEE ET AL 2320 LUPINE DR 2305 LUPINE DR 2340 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 538 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 574 TREE-2019-00064 391 E238B 549 SOTOS PAUL G TRUSTEE ET AL STONE KAREN D TYLER VALERIE L 1730 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2330 LUPINE DR 1925 GREEN MEADOWS WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 548 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 576 TREE-2019-00064 WEISSBERG ROBERT CIMIRIAM A WILBUR LEMERT Q JR TRUSTEE ET AL MOUNTAIN RANCH DOUG KAY 2025 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2310 LUPINE DR 2350 RANCH RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 2310 Lupine 05/21/2019 NOD 24 ASHLAND TREE COMMISSION PLANNING APPLICATION REVIEW COMMENT SHEET May 9, 2019 PLANNING ACTION: TREE-2019-00064 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2310 Lupine Dr. OWNERS: Mountain RCH Prop Owner Assoc. APPLICANTS: Same DESCRIPTION: A request for a Tree Removal Permit to a mature Birch tree. The tree is partially dead. The applicant's arborist states that there is evidence of `bronze birch borer' which will likely kill the tree. The trees location is on the common area of the HOA (tax lot 1300), but is identified by the street address for clarity due to the odd property configuration of the common area. The tree is marked with surveyor's tape for identification. Due to the large number of trees on their property the applicant requests off site mitigation. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 23 BB; TAX LOT: 57611300 Following a presentation by staff and the applicant the Tree Commission deliberated and moved to approve the application subject to the following: 1. That the applicant shall mitigate the tree removal either off-site or on-site at the applicants discretion. Department of Community Development Tel: 541-488-5350 CITY OF 51 an Way Fax: 541-552-2050 -A5 H L y1A\N D Ashiand, , Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 gt~u. ashland,or, us I 4 1 . 1 Planning Department, 51 Winbuin Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-29000 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: TREE-2019-00064 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2310 Lupine ►rive OWNERIAPPLICANT: Mountain RCH Prop Owner Assoc,. DESCRIPTION A request for a Tree Removal'' Permit to a mature Birch tree. The tree is partially dead. The applicant's arborist states that there is evidence of 'bronze birch borer' which will likely kill the tree. The trees location is on the common area of the HO'A (tax lot 1300), but is identified by the street address for clarity due to the odd property configuration of the common area. The tree is marked with surveyor's tape for identification, true to the large number of trees on their property the applicant requests off site mitigation, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Singe Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP 391 E 23BB; TAX LOT: 1300 NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, May 9, 2019 at 6:00 Ply in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn'Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: May 3, 2019 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: May 17, 2019 ~i SUB,ECT PROPERTY ;23io Lupine Dr. PAJREE•toiq•ooa ~ The Ashland Planning, Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted alcove. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written corments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winbaurn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the (Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland, Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LU!BA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the applioation, all documents and evidence retied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn'Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. if you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson in the Ashland Planning Division at 541-483-5305. G_'u¢omm-dc~^11r1avtmin~,~P9nnttin~, fedansWoiM,hL FpldeN failed n'btlCes R: Sedns32019C1'REE-2019-00064.docx TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 18.5.7.040.B 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning, See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7,050, Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. 2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18,10. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone, In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18,5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. G:%conmr-deviplanningTi,inning AclionsWaticing Folded,\lalled Notices R Signs1201919RU-2019-00064_docs A I AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson j The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On May 3, 2019 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE-2019-00064, 2310 Lupine Drive. fF~~u~,a V gnature of Employee C:WserslsffffidaAFNHRDeskdog WF1DAVfT OF F, NL1NG..ds.daux 51312019 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 541 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 542 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 539 ALEXANDER JOHN/TAYLOR BALLANTYNE MATTHEW & CROPPER TANNER/MELISSA STOUT 1980 GREEN MEADOWS WAY KATHRYN NOEL 1820 GREEN MEADOWS WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 2030 GREEN MEADOWS WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 533 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 547 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 552 DONOVAN JESSEIMARIKA GODFREY ROSEMARY L TRUSTEE GORDON STANLEYIMICHELLE 1630 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2125 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2303 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 540 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 551 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 565 HARTEIS GRETCHEN A ET AL HOGAN LOANNE MARIE KILBURN REBECCA ANN TRUST 1880 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 1725 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2325 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 521 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 564 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 550 LAMBERT STEVEN/TIFFANIE LILLIBRIDGE BETTY TRUSTEE LINDOW JAMES TRUSTEE 1575 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2315 LUPINE DR 2370 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 566 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 567 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 536 LOESSI KAREN M TRUSTEE ET AL LOWES PAUL K ET AL MONNING BERNIECE TRUSTEE 2335 LUPINE DR 2345 LUPINE DR 1680 GREEN MEADOWS WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 575 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 563 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 573 NIEBUHR DENNISICARIN PETROU-SMITH BIANCA LOUISE SLOAN TAYLOR TRUSTEE 2320 LUPINE DR 2305 LUPINE DR 2340 LUPINE DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 538 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 574 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 549 SOTOS PAUL G TRUSTEE ET AL STONE KAREN D TYLER VALERIE 1730 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2330 LUPINE DR 1925 GREEN MEADOWS WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 548 TREE-2019-00064 391 E23BB 576 TREE-2019-00064 WEISSBERG ROBERTIMIRIAM WILBUR LEMERT JR TRUSTEE MOUNTAIN RANCH 2025 GREEN MEADOWS WAY 2310 LUPINE DR DOUG KAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 2350 RANCH RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 2310 Lupine 513119 NOC 24 L #j . CIA 74 G 651, . 1300 N_ 516$1 540 641 I A :10 M ,~y - FL Z V / o d r .may ~ C O 0 V a p .l L3 v 4 y C fi w ~ C ~ L L uj O Y w a (ki O Lij LLij Q f a O 3 Q ~Q y 3 = F 1 r i f~ /i :k t O N r ` - v OLL t N \ c d l V Ir ~ ~ ~ City of Ashland Community Development Department PERMIT NUMBER. 51 Winburn Way TREE-2019-00064 Ashland, OR 97520 Telephone: 541-488-5305 Apply Date: si312a#9 Inspection Line: 541-552-2080 Plan Type: Tree Removal Work Class: Tree Removal Permit Review Ma & Tax Lot Pro a Address 391 E23BB576 2310 Lupine Car Owner Information Applicant Information Owner: Mountain RCH Prop Owner Assoc Applicant: Mountain RGH Prop Owner Assoc Owner Po Box 3141 Applicant Po Box 3141 Address: Ashland, OR 97520 Address: Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: (541) 482-9933 Phone: (541) 482-9933 Project Description REmove dead tree in common area next to 2310 Lupine Fees Fee Description: Amount: Tree RemovalNeriflcation Fee (Type 1) $30.00 Applicant: Date: Total Fees: $30.00 l r. , ZONiNG PERMIT APPLICATION Planning Division 51 Winbuurn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE # AS ~A LAN 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 t m. . DE'SCR6PTION OF PROJECT DESCRIPTION OP' PROPERTY Pursuing LEELO Certification? ® YES El NO t... Street Address i , t ° , Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E Tax. Lot(s) Zoning Comp Plan Designation. APPLICANT a i Name Phone -E-Mail Address city w zip PROPERTY OWNER Name ! Phone E-Mail u Address city Zip SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTH''ER Title Name Phone E-Mail Address city zip Title Z Name Phone E-Mail ..dress City Zip . . I her.: y certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed dr , ings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. I understand that all property pins roust be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect; the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that l produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request;. 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request,; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expeasre if l ha ve any * assistance. doubts, l am advised to soak competent professional advice and I ~ Appli ant's Signatura,, Date As owner of the property involved in this request, It have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to rite as a property owner. ropert Owiner's Signature (required) Date (To be completed by City staff) J Date Received zoning Permit Type Filing Fee e, OVER 0 Ed:'kumm-dev\pl.an.ningTocros & Ha.ndoutsgoning Permit Application,doc ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS C t APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner, FINDINGS OF FACT - Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre-Application Comment document, n 2 SETS OF SCALED PLANS no larger than 11"x17", Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape details, (Optional --1 additional large set of plans„ 2'x3`, to use in meetings) o FEE (Check, Charge or Cash) ❑ LEEDC CERTIFICATION (optional) -Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps: • Hiring and retaining a LEED@ Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and construction of the project; and • The LEED@? checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued. NOTE: * Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis. Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property owner(s), all required materials and full payment, All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance with ORS 227.178. • The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. (Planning commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1,30 pm, or the 6011 Planning Commission, which. meets at 7:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St), • A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns, • If applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree and/or Historic Commissions, 'A Wcornm-&OplanningWorms & F3andoarts'\Zoning Permit Applicalion..doc P TCA Basic Tree Risk Assessm+eiit Form Client Date - Time Address /Tree location Tree no. Sheet of Tree species dbh Height Crown spread dia. Assessor(s) Time frame Tools used Target Assessment Target zone Occupancy w rate ° c 29 cr r X.-rare n « i® Target description x 2-occaslanal C, s ~ 3-frequent f;~ > m 4-constant . a C'xu: D. 1 2 3 4 Site Factors History of 'failures. Topography Fla-°Slope❑ % Aspect , _ _ Site changes None,❑, Grade change[] Site clearing[] Changed soil hydrology[] Root cuts[] Describe Soil cornditions Limited volume Ell Saturated ❑ ShallowD Compacted ❑ Pavement over roots[] % Describe / Prevailing wind direction _ Common weather Strong winds ❑ Ice ❑ Snow ❑ Heavy rain ❑ Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Lc~v p. Normal 11 High ❑ Foiiage None (seasonal)[] None(dead)El Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic % Pests + Abiotic Species failure profile Branches CJ Trunk[] Roots[] Describe Load Factors Wind exposure Protected[] Partial[] FuI10) Wind funneling[] Relative crown size Small[] Mediun7Ai Large[] Crown density Spars'er' Normal[] Dense[] Interior branches Few❑ Norma Dense[] Vines/Mistletoe/Moss ❑ Recent or planned change in load' factors Tree Defects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure - Crown and Branches Unbalanced crows, f f LCft 6 /a C Cracks ❑ Lightning damage CI Dead twigs/branches 4 > %overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ Included bark ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. a Over-extended branches ❑ Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole /a circ. Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present Pruning history Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark 11 Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ crown cleaned Thinned )tl Reduced 0 Topped Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Main concern(s) defect Load on L kelihoodof failure Improbable 11 Possible Probabie e❑ Imm vent Trunk - Roots and Root. Collar - Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color ❑ Collar buried/Not visible Depth Stem girdling ED] Codominant stems ❑ Included bark ❑ Cracks ❑ Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls[] Sap ooze ❑ ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ %circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay[] Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks[] Clot/D'amaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole la circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean ° Corrected? Response growth Response growth Main concern(s) Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A D Minor D Moderate Significant o Load an defect N/A D Minor D Moder atr Si„nificant ❑ Likelihood of failure Likelihood' of failure Improbable[] Possible ❑ Probable El Imminent Improbable[] Possible PtcbaV le 1 l 4rnn in? nt Page I of ~ y u a a Go m f i 1 - 4 I 4S C 4hi i o l 4 m CL e CY) 10 Z3 Ti t 0 ~g o l t m - C -S i N j i ~ ate- -a ,pp L1.J t. j. 4 ti Cf7 rv Clam y L d h ~ ~ ty w { - ~ C5 aJJ O N CS l~} N w 0 LL N r<s" ~ ca s ~ o - Lp o ~ t ~ t " 3~ry '.y ~ ~ f~ r : , At r ~ ~ ~ V ~ , , ~r ~ ~ ~ 1~ + yy 4wN' - - '~i~ 4 ~ ~ ~ 4 ti r~ ~ ~ 1 ' 1 ! 1 7 L . r l 1111 \ ~ ~G r ~ ,i / / ~ 1 ~ r~ m yea f I - ~.nrmuw J ~ i ti ~ 1'j 4 ~ ~ a,, _ ~ ~ ~ ~ '1t ~ ~ ~ 'N f- i r,' f hh l r ' ~ ti , i ~ ~ ( I i{ ~ ~ r i i~ f i~l ~ r' a i~ i~ ' ~ { ; L e !~i1 f y. w~p - - ' ~ - - ~ ~ _ 1 r ~i i ~ 111 i +7 1 ~ ~ k~ `yJ ' ~ , ~ s ' r 1 ~ ~ .t`~ .r~~ ~ ,'w , h, ~ - ~A ~ .1~ ti~~ t,. ~i ~ ~ , it ~ z ~ r ~ j ~i i ~ 1 ~ .S ~ f t °a r .~.4 ' ~f. 1 r-? - i ~ r ~ 3. ~ t i ~e i ~ ~r _ ~ ~ =1 ~ t / ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r 1r.. 1 p .;W y~ ~ ~ ` S:ti~~~ ~ ~ ~ii~ b,w ~•~.14 W "4.P N 1 t+.",. ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ r r ' ~ t , ~ , t( ~ S `~~A y ,./I i / 7 iV it ` , ~T) r } ~ 1,1 I ~ r t ~ ~ ,I 1 ~t ~ ~ 1 ~ Y.,. ,r 1 ~ ~-~.r ~ ~,.`y `,ir r r~l 3R /r' y,'fiF 1` r+ f~~~ r II ` ` %i ;.E i ~ ,r ra ~11f e ~~t~ i. ~ , ~r i Y ~ ,,r,~ r r , ~ ~ „'r r . , 1, ~ ~ ~'i ~ • i ~ ~ ~ , , r b r 1. ~ r r a, ~ - . u 2 t r r ~ ~ ~ ~r ,1 ~ ~ "e f ~ J r, ~ ~ , ~I ~ ;i~ ~ ~ ~ r` r~ ~ ,ark ~ r ~ ~ i ~ 1 V I F `t` r r r 4 i J i 1 I 47{I 1 - ~ r ! ~ Irk ~ ~ r ~ ii, 4 r , ~ Cr ~ l is r ~ ~ rr, ~ ~ ~ ,r~u ~ ~ ~ • 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r ~ Ire , ~ 4 ' ~ , ~ F r , ~ ri, r,r .,;r. ~ i