The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutEMain_1046-1056_TREE-2018-00041CITY OF -ASHLAND January 24, 2019 Notice of Final Decision On January 24, 2019, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: TREE-2018-00041 Subject Property: 1046-1056 E Maim Street Applicant: Kyle Bartell/Don Skillman Description: A request for the removal of a 34-inch diameter in breast height (DBH) Giant Sequoia. The application states the tree is causing structural damage, changes in frame work, and significant concrete cracking and lifting. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density, Multi -family Residential; ZONING: R-3; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IE 09AD; TAX LOT: 6400. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Fotini Kaufman in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ow www.ash[and.orms ITANi SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Ad►ninistr•ative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. Tire Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of all issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the rnatter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. Tile applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.13. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Thne for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the'decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. H. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal, iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading tip to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type I1 public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type 1 decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.astrland.or.us ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: TREE-2018-00041 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1046-1056 E Main Street APPLICANT: Kyle Bartell OWNER: Don Skillman DESCRIPTION: A request for the removal of a 34-inch diameter at breast height (DBH) Giant Sequoia, The application states the tree is causing structural damage, changes in frame work, and significant concrete cracking and lifting. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density, Multi -Family Residential; ZONING: R- 3; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 09AD; TAX LOT: 6400 SUBMITTAL DATE: December 17, 2018 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: January 3, 2019 STAFF DECISION DATE: January 24, 2019 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): February 5, 2019 FINAL DECISION DATE: February 6, 2019 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: August 6, 2020 DECISION This proposal is to remove a 34-inch diameter at breast height and 65-feet tall Sequoia tree. The tree is located on the south side of the building, east of the parking area. The subject property is located on the south side of East Main, and is zoned R-3 (High -Density, Multi - Family Residential). The property abuts R-2 zoning to the west and R-3 zoning to the east and North. The property is 0.32 acres in size and rectangular in shape. According to the application, the tree is causing significant concrete cracking and lifting. The units are built on a solid slab of concrete and the tree is starting to cause structural damage and changes in the frame work. The property owners have attempted to grind down the concrete and patch the cracks. However, the door and frame are being compromised by "the very invasive root system of a large fast-growing tree planted much too close to the building." The applicant mentions root pruning is not a common practice and would likely increase the potential hazard by cutting major anchor roots on the back side of the tree. The tree is located within 10 feet of two large mature trees that are better suited for the site. The Tree Comrnission's January meeting was cancelled due to lack of quorum, so they did not review this application. In staffs assessment, the tree removal as proposed fully meets the "tree that is a hazard" criteria. The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.7.040.B as follows: 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e,, likely to fall TREE-2018-00041 1046-1056 E Main St/fk Page 1 and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or -pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. 2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a free that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The free is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.10. b. Removal of the free will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent frees, or existing windbreaks. C. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050, Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Planning Action #TREE-2018-00041, a request to remove one hazard tree, complies with all applicable City ordinances with the imposition of the conditions attached below. Therefore, Planning Action #TREE- 2018-00041 is approved. If any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid, for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #TREE-2018-00041 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2. That one (1) mitigation tree shall be planted on site within one -(I) year of issuance of this decision. 3. That a mitigation tree shall be planted at a minimum of a V/2- inch caliper consistent with the requirements of AMC 18.5.7.050. Bill �olnar,' Dire toy- DepartTnent of C mrnunity Development Date TREE-2018-00041 1046-1056 E Maim St/fk Page 2 STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 1/24/191 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE-2018-00041, 1046-1056 East Signature of Employee Documen[3 V2412019 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5300 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5400 TREE-2018-00041391 E09AD 5500 AUBIN-ADDICOTT SUZANNE TRUSTEE CASA CONTENTA LLC CORYELL-BEIGEL DOMINIQUE ROXANE 115 BROOKS LN 944 KESTREL PKWY 52 ALIDA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 1500 EDDINGTON MARY J 1045 E MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 1401 LIVNI GIL TRUSTEE ET AL 453 TUCKER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041391 E09AD 6100 MCINTYRE THOMAS 535 GEARY ST 706 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5800 SEYMOUR PAUL J TRUST ET AL 33 MORSE AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5601 VOTO-BERNALES SELBY TRUSTEE 2717 21 ST ST SAN PABLO, CA 94806 TREE-2018-00041 391E09AD 1800 HOGAN FAMILY REV TRUST ET AL 75 ZIRCON PL SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 6000 MARSHALL JACQUELINE L TRUSTEE 3319 S LUCILLE LN LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 I TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5100 RAllANO LORN PITESS L 622 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391EOMD 6400 SKILLMAN DON C TRUSTEE ET AL PO BOX 486 i TALENT, OR 97540 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 1700 WEISLER FAYE 2305 ASHLAND ST C ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5900 JAROLIMEK-PRONER FRANK 6437 HEATHER RIDGE WAY OAKLAND, CA 94611 TREE-2018-00041391 E09AD 5200 MC CAFFREY GEORGEICHRISTINE 1743 S LEYDEN ST DENVER, CO 80224 TREE-2018-00041391 E09AD 6600 SCHRODT GARY TRUSTEE ET AL j 1124 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 1 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 6800 TEN SIXTY EIGHT LLC 604 FAIR OAKS CT ASHLAND, OR 97520 i I TREE-2018-00041 391E09AD 1600 WEISS PHILIP M TRUSTEE ET AL 220 N ZAPATA HWY 11 LAREDO, TX 78043 TREE-2018-00041391 E09AD 6500 TREE-2018-00041 1046-1056 East Main WITTICH BRUCE KYLE BARTELL 848 BULL CREEK RD 3699 AVENUE G 1/24119 NOD GRANTS PASS, OR 97527 WHITE CITY, OR 97503 20 com ICef a aca3"ft e e .rs ah Planning Department, 51 Wutoulrn Way, Ashland!, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 0 F 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 wwashland,or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -ASHLAND . .................... NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: TREE-2018-00041 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1046-1056 E Main Street APPLICANVOWNER: Kyle Bartell/Don Skillman DESCRIPTION: A request for the removal of a 34-inch diameter in breast height (DBH) Giant Sequoia, The application states the tree is causing structural damage, changes in frame work, and significant concrete cracking and lifting. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: High Density, Multi -Family Residential; ZONING: R-3; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 09AD; TAX LOT: 6400, NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: January 3,2019 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: January 17, 2019 The Ashland Planning DiMsion Staff has received a complete application for the property noted! above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. 'Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to Surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the appfication being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18,5AM0,G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide, sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Faiiure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit COUrt. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. Ail materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Fotini Kaufman at 541-488-5305. G ActionsWoficing Folder-Maited Notices& 6igns12019VIREE-2018-00041.tlocx TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 18.5.7.040.E Hazaf'd D'ee, A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning, See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b, The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Acfions�N'oficing Folder' failed Notices& STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department, 2. On 1/3/191 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE-2018-00041, 1046-1056 East Signature of Employee Docume* lIX2019 TRIEE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5300 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5400 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5500 AUBIN-ADDICOTT SUZANNE TRUSTEE CASA CONTENTA LLD CORYELL-BEIGEL DOMINIQUE ROXANE 115 BROOKS LN 944 KESTREL PKWY 52 ALIDA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 1500 EDDINGTON MARY J 1045 E MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 1401 LIVNI GIL TRUiSTEE ET AL 453 TUCKER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 6100 MCINTYRE THOMAS 535 GEARY ST 706 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94102 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5800 SEYMOUR PAUL J TRUST ET AL 33 MORSE AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5601 VOTO-BERNALES SELBY TRUSTEE 2717 21 ST ST SAN PABLO, CA 94806 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 1800 HOGAN FAMILY REV TRUST ET AL 75 ZIRCON PL SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94131 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 6000 MARSHALL JACQUELINE L TRUSTEE 33119 S LUCILLE LN LAFAYETTE, CA 94549 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5100 RAllANO LORN MESS L 622 LIBERTY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018 00041 391 E09AD 6400 SKIILLMAN DON C TRUSTEE ET AL PO BOX 486 TALENT, OR 97540 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 1700 WEISLER FAYE 2305 ASHLAND ST C ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE2018-00041 391 E09AD 5900 JAROLIMEK-PROVER FRANK 6437 HEATHER RIDGE WAY OAKLAND, CA 94611 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 5200 MC CAFFREY GEORGE/CHRISTINE 1743 S LEYDEN ST DENVER, CO 80224 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 6600 SCHRODT GARY TRUSTEE ET AL 1124 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 6800 TEN SIXTY EIGHT LLC 604 FAIR OAKS CT ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE-2018-010041 391 E09AD 1600 EISS PHILIP M TRUSTEE ET AL 220 N ZAPATA HWY 11 LAREDO, TX 78043 TREE-2018-00041 391 E09AD 6500 TREE-2018-00041 1046-1056 East Main WITTICH BRUCE KYLE BARTELL 848 BULL CREEK RD 3699 AVENUE G NOC 113r19 GRANTS PASS, OR 97527 WHITE CITY, OR 97503 �466, TRWO .... . .. . . .. ... sol ISO Ito do" Wad, 2dw Van rID 1802 77 rill 41410 4200 4508 EMM 20,120111 Ulu 60, Imm I I I 16400 Planning Division C1 T V or 51 WinbU111 Way, Ashland OR 97520 -ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 Street Address I C� A(;�— , a - Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E — N A D Zoning — R_ ADDI WAKIT Comp Tax Lot(s) Plan Designation Name Phone k-T131, E-Mail FILE # I Pursuing LEED(@ Certification? 0 YES 0 No Address City :j=LSL? V�0\ --m � bc) Zip, 9L—t Q,;:!3 _W lQuo 99 !!�'.-A V Name 'fir,,. '� \ k vv\^ t,.J Phone �53'i - G 10E-Mail Address 10(A(2- 105t, 1�__V, -city A -Sm Zip OV1 %'20 SURVEYOR, ENGI;NEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER TitleAZtoq;!7� Name q.7- vz %A Phone Address !0? g0c( ^-V14_ city an_z=_--,� Zip Title Name Address, Phone City E-Mail sm hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. / understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are riot shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full' responsibility. I further understand that it this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnishedjuslifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result friost likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be re 'Mqvqd at my expej)tf+AQye any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. Applicanth Signature As owner owner. Date in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property Prod66V"s, Signature (required) Date [To W comoOed by Oty Slaffl Date Received Zoning Permit Type QW1, Filing Fee CCB. 200911 IYN-6891A Dear city of Ashland planning department, Located approximately 50" from the front door of apartment 1046 East main street, is a giant sequoia with a DBH of 3,4inches and an approximant height of 65 feet. The tree in question for removal is causing significant concrete cracking and lifting. The units are built on a solid slab of concrete and the tree is starting to cause structural damage and changes in the frame work. The idea of mitigating the problem was the first step, by grinding down the concrete and patching the cracks to alleviate the trip hazards to the occupants. However, this proved to be a temporary patch as the door and frame are becoming comprised by the very invasive root system of a large fast-growing tree planted much to close to the building. Although root pruning is not a common practice or recommended if done in this, situation, I feel like it would only escalate the potential hazard by cutting major anchor roots on the back side of the tree, taking the strong prevailing winds into consideration. Given the unfortunate facts that this tree is causing significant damage and creating a hazard to the area, I feel like removal is the necessary step in protecting the building for the long term. The tree being removed is located within 10 feet of two large mature trees in better suited location on the property and minimizes the overall looks in the landscape. Thank you, Kyle Bartell Certified Arborist PN-689 I A 12- (6- IV 0 C) L T I spr Aa4ft City of Ashland Community Development Department 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 Telephone: 541-488-5305 Inspection Line: 541-552-2080 Plan Type: Tree Removal Work Class: Tree Removal Permit Review PtRMIT NUMIEIM;:', TREE-2018-00041 Apply Date: 12/17/2018 aPry p'erty ,Address-: 391E09AD6400 1046 E Main St o "(CMrtY7ki 1 11 ;- �' it wrier I I - . .. . . . ...... . . . ..... Alpip'lli6"n" I f a Owner: Don Skillman Trustee Applicant: Rogue Valley Tree Care Owner 1046 E Main St Applicant 3699 G Ave Address: Ashland, OR 975,20 Address: White City, OR 97503 Phone: (541) 535-6803 Phone; (541) 951-8733 escrip 10"� 1046-1056 E Main St ee Fee Description: Amount., Tree RemovalNerification Fee (Type 1) $30.00 Applicant: Date: Total Fees 1 $30.00