Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutClay_876_PA-T1-2018-00024'/'� Q ' L"*C"jl I,- A!°> ion, Dec. - 4.8% ow. RD. EXHIBIT B + 876 Clay + Solar Waiver Proposal 11/20/2018 CITY OF ASHLAND October 30, 2018 Notice of Final Decision On October 30, 2018, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following; Planning Action: TI-2018-00024 Subject Property: 876 Clay Street Applicant: David Wisniewski/Sid Deboer Description: A request for Site Design Review and an Exception to the Solar Setback for an Accessory Residential Unit. The garage in the southwest corner of the property is proposed to be demolished and replaced with a two-story Accessory Residential Unit; the proposed building is taller than what would typically be allowed under the Solar Access chapter. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 IE 14 BC; TAX LOT: 2200 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12'h day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way, Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Fotini Kaufman in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541 BB-5305 51 Winhurn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ww w.ashland,or.as ZiA SUCTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action alter the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to snaking a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. d. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that all error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: I . Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.13. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specifies! deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. C. Content ofNotice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of tine decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Conm>ission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and Other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow tine Type lI public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — E, except that the decision of tine Planning Conwnission is the final decision of tine City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Con unission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197,905 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305 51 Knbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Im Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 1i'w""ashland.01".115 ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: T1-2018-00024 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 876 Clay Street APPLICANT/OWNER: David Wisniewski/Sid Deboer DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and an Exception to the Solar Setback for an Accessory Residential Unit. The garage in the southwest corner of the property is proposed to be demolished and replaced with a two-story Accessory Residential Unit; the proposed building is taller than what would typically be allowed under the Solar Access chapter. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 14 BC; TAX LOT: 2200 SUBMITTAL DATE: August 16, 2018 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: September 25, 2018 STA-VT, APPROVAL DATE: October 30, 2018 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): November 13, 2017 FINAL DECISION DATE: November 14, 2017 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: May 14, 2020 DECISION The proposal is to construct a detached accessory residential unit at the rear of the residence at 876 Clay Street. The subject property is located on the cast side of Clay Street. about 500 feet north of the Siskiyou and Clay Street intersection. The surrounding neighborhood to the west, north and east is comprised primarily of single-family homes. The area to the south of the subject property includes variety of multi -family homes and businesses along Siskiyou Boulevard. The subject property and surrounding area are zoned Single -Family Residential (R-1-5). The property is 20,530 -square feet or .47 of an acre in size. The property slopes downhill to the north. There is a single- family residence located on.the southern half of the lot that is accessed by a driveway off of Clay Street and another driveway off of the southeast corner of the property from Diane Street. The subject property recently received approval for a lot partition (PA-T1-2018-00001) that has not yet been recorded. A condition has been added to ensure that the proposed ARU complies with setbacks once the partition is recorded. The approval standardrequire that an Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) in an R-1 zone does not exceed 50% of the gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the primary residence on the lot and shall not exceed 1,000-square feet. The proposed ARU is does not exceed 50% of the 1459 square -foot primary residence or 1,000 square feet. The application stated the ARU's GHFA was 774 although that included area under the stairs that is not counted towards GHFA. The resulting GHFA is 729 square -feet. The development of the property is also required to conform to maximum lot coverage of 50-percent and base setback requirements. The proposal indicates the total lot coverage will be approximately 49.2-percent. The PA-T1-2018-00024 876 Clay StAk Page 1 proposal complies with setback requirements of the zoning district. The ARU has its primary orientation to the street. None of the ARU's parking is proposed between the primary entrance of the ARU and the street. There are no garages on -site. The building materials proposed are compatible with the surrounding area, and the siding is proposed to match the house. The application for one single family home, and an ARU less than 800 square feet requires three automobile parking spaces. The application demonstrates that two of these parking spaces are available in the existing driveway that runs along the south side of the main residence. The additional space can be accommodated in the rear driveway that leads directly to the ARU. The parking area is to be improved with gravel. As indicated in the narrative, a bike storage area will be available in the entryway of the new ARU in to comply with chapter 18.4.3.070 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. No additional landscaping or outdoor lighting is proposed. Recycling and Refuse disposal area is proposed to be located adjacent to the south side of the ARU. A tree protection plan was not submitted with the application and there appears to be no trees 15-feet of the building site. A condition has been added requiring a tree protection plan if there are trees within 15-feet of the building site. A Solar Setback Exception was requested with this application should the partition be recorded because the ARU does not meet solar setbacks once that partition is in place. If the property remains one lot, the ARU does meet solar setbacks. The owner of the future neighboring property to the North has signed in favor of the Solar Setback Exception. The first approval criterion states, "The exception does not preclude the reasonable use of solar energy (i.e., passive .and active solar energy systems) on the site by future habitable buildings. " The application states the proposed ARU casts a shadow directly on a steel accessory workshop and a concrete shadow, and does not preclude the reasonable use of solar energy by the future home site on the property to the north. The building envelope is in the front portion of the lot, away from the shadow of the ARU. The second, "The exception does not diminish any substantial solar access which benefits a passive Dr attire solar- energy system used by a habitable structure orr an adjacent lot. " The application states the proposal does not diminish any substantial solar access. The third, "There are unique or unusual circumstances that apply to this site tn,hich do not typically apply elsewhere. " The lot to the North has an unusual "L" shape and the proposed shadow is concentrated on the bottom of the "L" portion that incorporates the steel accessory structure onto the property to the north and is not the location of the future home site. A :comment was submitted by a neighboring property owner concerned about the proposed height of the ARU. The co-minent references potential property value decrease, view protection and lack of privacy due to the proposed structure. However, the code does not address these concerns and with -the consent of the neighboring property to .the north, a solar setback exception can be granted. The application con-iplies with all of the applicable provisions of the R-1 zoning district, and- the Site Development and Design Standards in AMC 18.4. The application notes that the proposed ARU has been designed to provide a sense of orientation to Clay Street and the main residence. The property is currently served by adequate City facilities for water, sewer, storm drainage and electricity. In staff s assessment, the proposal will not have a greater adverse material impact on the impact area in terms of architectural compatibility, air quality, and generation of traffic, noise, light and glare and the development of adjacent properties than the prior use of the property, or the target use allowable within thezone. The applicants have submitted materials to the Planning Department that demonstrate compliance with these approval standards. PA-T 1-2018-00024 876 Clay St/fk Page 2 The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040, as follows: Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, except as exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, below. A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements. 1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design Review under chapter 1852 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable zone in subsections 18.2.3.040.13, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A. 3. The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area (GHFA). 4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the Historic District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures (i.e., not attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 5 The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2-of 1'8.4.3.080.D and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E.1. 6. Additional off-street parking is not required -for the accessory residential unit if on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18.4.3.080. B. R-1 zone, Accessory residential units in the RA zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square -feet GHFA, 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone, 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.080, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2 of 18.4.3.080.D and -paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E.1. The criteria fo-r Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follovrs: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building andyardsetbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: -The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C, Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities:- The proposal complies with the applicable standards In section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City- facilities for -water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the -subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design- Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18A if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist.- 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique- or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties,- and PA-Ti-2018-00024 876 Clay Sdfk Page 3 approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. In staff s assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action #T1-2018-00024 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #T1- 2018-00024 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein, including that a residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in the Accessory Residential Unit as proposed by the -applicants. 2) That all necessary building permits for the accessory residential unit (ARU) shall be obtained, and associated fees and charges including applicable system development charges relating to the ARU for water, sewer, storm water, parks, and transportation, shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building_ permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Site Review approval would need to be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. Building permit submittals shall include: a. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas shall be provided with the Building Permit. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 50 percent as required in the R-1-5 zoning district. b. A Tree Protection Plan is required if there are trees located within 15-feet of the building envelope. 4) That storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak rainfalls must be collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm pipe or public drainage way) or through -an approved alternative in accordance with Ashland Building Division policy BD-PP-0029. On -site collection systems shall be detailed on, the building pen -nit submittals. 5) That a Tree Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division prior to site work, tree removal, staging or storage of materials. The Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the trees to be removed and the installation of tree protection fencing for the trees on and adjacent to the site to be protected. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.4.5.030. G) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy: a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements. b) That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall nicet the requirements of the PA-T1-2018-00024 876 Clay St/f c Page 4 Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right -of -Way. c) The requirements of the Ashland Fire Department to address fire apparatus access shall be satisfactorily addressed. d) All automobile parking and bicycle parking shall be installed according to the approved plan, inspected, and approved by the Staff Advisor. e) That a site plan be submitted to the Planning Department showing recorded partition and ARU's compliance with setbacks. i i 3 4... t 1 j Bill Molnar, Comununity Development Director Date a PA-T1-2018-00024 876 Clay SV k Page 5 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that-, I . I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On October 30, 2018 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2018-00024, 876 Clay St, ignature of Employee CAUse"snathda AFNHFDesktapWF1DAV1T OF M1L1NQ,A&dccx 101300018 PA-T1-2018-00024 39IE14BC 3400 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E1413C 8302 ASHLANDER ASHLAND LLC FINANCIAL BAUMGARDNER GEORGE PACIFIC INCIPHIL MCLENNAN 599 N SIWASH CREEK RD 21435 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TONASKET, WA 98855 BEAVERTON, OR 97007 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 1800 BOHN LARRY ALANIMARGARET ELLA 858 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2103 CAMPBELL CAROLYN J 2785 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2200 DEBOER SIDNEY B TRUST ET AL 234 VISTA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 4100 FERGUS DOUGLAS B 857 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 8301 HUFF HELEN F - TRUSTEE 7636 BODEGA AVE SEBASTOPOL, CA 95472 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2108 MCCLINTOCK KAREN A TRUSTEE ET AL 2790 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1 -2018-0 0 024 391E14BC 2100 MIDDLETON BARBARA A TRUSTEE 2815 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8300 ROSENBERG DEBORAH 839 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2500 BREWER FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST ET AL 2804 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 1500 CINNAMON SALLY 852 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2400 EMERY WILLIAM C TRUSTEE ET AL 2962 GRIZZLY DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E1413C 3800 FOSTER TAMARA K 147 N LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2105 LESCHER GEORGE J TRUSTEE ET AL 347 HIGH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1601 MCKEEVER JOSEPH D TRUSTEE 848 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E1413C 4200 OYLER KATHLEEN TRUSTEE FBO 855 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1 -2018-00 024 391E14BC 3500 SANFORD CRAIG 883 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2102 BERLIN ALAN S 2795 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 39IE14BC 2101 BRONK JAMES B MD TRUSTEE ET AL 50 EL MONTE WAY NAPA, CA 94558 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E148C 3600 CLEAN GREEN PROJECTS LLC 2280 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1600 ERA KIMBERLY AVELYN 842 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2107 HEAD ROBERTMENNIFER 2770 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3700 MCALLISTER ANGELA ET AL 875 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2109 MICHELSEN MARY-KAY TRUSTEE 2810 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2106 RAY AMANDAIMANN JEFFREY 2745 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2104 SHERR DAVID TRUSTEE ET AL 148 STRAWBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3501 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3900 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 8303 STUMBO JAMES S SWAN SIMONE WILLING JONATHAN DAVID 881 CLAY ST 255 N GRANADA AVE 811 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 TUCSON, AZ 85701 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 PA-T1-2018-00024 876 Clay St WISNIEWSKI DAVID KAMPMANN SHAWN 10-30-2018 NOD 876 CLAY ST PO BOX 459 32 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 10/4/2018 Denial of Application f? Reply all I - 6 Delete Junk I - ... George Lescher < glescher@ashl a nd home. net> Yestenday, 6AS PM Fotini Kaufman I Inbox Dear Ms, Kaufman, I am writing to express my opposition to the requested planning Action #T1-2018-00024 at 876 Clay St &N 4) Reply all I \,, I own the adjacent property to the south at 2765 Diane St. The garage, that the proposed Accessory Residential Unit is to replace is immediately, across the fence from my back deck which Occupies the space from the exterior door of my living roorn to the property/fence line. Construction of a two-story structure that is 22'3.5" tall would be a total invasion of privacy for all current and future residents. Furthermore, I believe that invasion of privacy would be a deterrent to prospective buyers and therefore decrease the value of my house and property. Because the Accessory Residential Unit is taller than would typically be allowed and is just over the fence from my deck, it would block the view of the Cascade Mountain Range and undoubtedly lend to the feeling that it is built right on top of our property. I believe these considerations warrant a denial of the application based on 18,5,2.050 E of the Site Design and Use Standard because approval would have a substantially negative impact on my property. I await your final decision and am hopeful the final decision will be to deny the application whereby the applicants may submit an application for a single story Accessory unit that would not have such a negative impact on any property. Thank you, George Lescher W " - 2,01 6;'0 hitps://oullook.office365,com/owa/projection.aspx 112 Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 0 F PFF 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.orms TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -ASHLAND I Ll 1011 N A A ZT1 -a a, I 159TVIII [01 lk PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1- 2018-00024 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 876 Clay Street OWNER/APPLICANT: David Wisniewski/Sid Deboer DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and an Exception to the Solar Setback for an Accessory Residential Unit, The garage in the southwest corner of the property is proposed to be demolished and replaced with a two-story 774 square - foot Accessory Residential Unit, the proposed building is taller than what would typically be allowed under the Sol'lar Access chapter, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1 E 14 BC; TAX LOT: 2200 I P 885 P153,, 885 0161 885, 61 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has, received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice ot'decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planmng Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18,5. 1 .050,G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objecfion is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520, If YOU have questions or comments concerning this request, piease feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305 AcliunslNulicing Folder. Maalzd Noice s& Signs%2018TA-7 1-2018-0002,1 &tx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18,52050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 183), C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The, proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18,4,6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the Subject property, E, Exception to the Site DevefopeneM arm Design Standarchs. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a Unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty,; or 2, There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNITS 18.2.3.040 Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 1852, except as exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, below. A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements. 1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM zones, Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design Review under chapter 18,.5.2 and are riot permitted outright under this subsection. 2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable zone in subsections 18.2.3.040.13, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted in subsection 18.2,3,040,A, 3, The size of the accessory residenflat unit is less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area (GHFA). 4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the Historic District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures (i.e., not attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 5 The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in Subsections I and 2 of 18.4.3.080.D and paving requirements In subsection 18A.3,080'E'1, 6. Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residential unit if on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18A.3,080, B. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot, 2. Accessory residential units are not Subject to the density or miriinnum lot area requirements of the zone, 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA. 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.080, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2 of 18.4.3.080.D and -paving requirements in subsection 18A,3,080.EA. C. RR Zone. In addition to the standards in Subsection 18,23,0403, accessory residential units in the RR zone shall meet the following requirements, 1. No on -street parking credits shall be allowed for accessory residential units, 2. If located in the Wildfire zone, the accessory residential unit shall have a residential sprinkler system installed, D., R-2 and R-3 Zones, Accessory residential units in the R-,2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standard's in subsection 18,23,0403, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. E, NIN Zones, Accessory residential units in the Normal Neighborhood District under chapter 18,3.4 shall meet the standards in Subsection 18.2.3.040.B. F. NIM Zones, Accessory residential units in the North Mountain Neighborhood NM Zones under chapter 18,3.5 shall meet the standards in subsection 18.23.040.13, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential Urflt Must not exceed 750 square feet GHFA and that second story accessory residential units constructed above a detached accessory building must not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. ActionONoticing Folde,tMailed Notices& SignOO I STA-TI-2018,00024,dax STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department, 2a On September 25, 2018 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-20118-00024, 876 Clay Street. Signature of Employee C.1Users4soulida-AFNHBDesktoplAFFIDAVIT OF fAPJLINQ_ds.dmx 912512018 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3400 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 8302 ASHLANDER ASHLAND LLC FINANCIAL BAUMGARDNER GEORGE PACIFIC INCIPHIL MCLENNAN 599 N SIWASH 21435 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TONASKET, WA 98855 BEAVERTON, OR 97007 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2500 BERRY SUSANIWILLIAM 2804 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2103 CAMPBELL CAROLYN J 2785 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2200 DEBOER SIDNEY B TRUST ET AL 234 VISTA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391Ell 48C 4100 FERGUS DOUGLAS B 857 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8301 HUFF HELEN F - TRUSTEE 7636 BODEGA AVE SEBASTAPOL, CA 95472 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1800 BOHN LARRY ALANIMARGARET ELLA 858 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1500 CINNAMON SALLY 852 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E148C 2400 EMERY WILLIAM C TRUSTEE ET AL 2962 GRIZZLY DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3800 FOSTER TAMARA K 147 N LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2105 LESCHER GEORGE J TRUSTEE ET AL 347 HIGH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1 -2018-00024 391E14BC 2108 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1601 MCCLINTOCK KAREN A TRUSTEE ET AL MCKEEVER JOSEPH D TRUSTEE 2790 DIANE ST 848 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2100 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 4200 MIDDLETON BARBARA A TRUSTEE ET OYLER KATHLEEN TRUSTEE FBO AL 855 CLAY ST 2815 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8300 ROSENBERG DEBORAH 839 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3500 SANFORD CRAIG 883 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E148C 2102 BERLIN ALAN S 2795 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2101 BRONK JAMES B MD TRUSTEE ET AL 50 EL MONTE WAY NAPA, CA 94558 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3600 CLEAN GREEN PROJECTS LLC 2280 OLD HWY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 1600 ERA KIMBERLY AVELYN 842 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E148C 2107 HEAD ROBERTIJENNIFER 2770 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3700 MCALLISTER ANGELA ET AL 875 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2109 MICHELSEN MARY-KAY TRUSTEE 2810 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2106 RAY AMANDAIMANN JEFFREY 2745 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2104 SHERR DAVID TRUSTEE ET AL 148 STRAWBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3501 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3900 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8303 STUMBO JAMES S SWAN SIMONE WILLING JONATHAN DAVID 881 CLAY ST 255 N GRANADA 811 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 TUCSON, AZ 85701 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 PA-T1-2018-00024 876 WISNIEWSKI DAVID KAMPMANN SHAWN 9-25-2018 NOC Clay St 876 CLAY ST PO BOX 459 32 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 hi 1100 1200 130 i 8204 82,0 8406 8206 8208 aznw 12 ,8213 UMM K-Firm Date Received' ed s 0101 RIII[ p1111D .EmD SEP 19 201ti C44ty O�f A- 5 (to be completed bv staff I Applicant's Statement of Completeness (To be completed by the Applicant and returned to the City of Ashland Planning Division) JZc: IIA-TI -2018-00024, 876 Clay St Date Application Expires: February 12, 2019 Pursuant to an Incompleteness Determination, 1, the undersigned applicant or agent for the applicant, elects one of the three options below by initiating: i elected) I. Submit All of the Missing Information 1. am submitting all of the information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter. Unless checked below, I am requesting that the City of A-shland Planning Division review this additional information within 30 days of submission to determine whether the application is complete, I understand that this 30-day review for completeness period for the new information preserves illy opportunity to submit additional materials, should it be determined that the application is still incomplete after the second review. (Note: the 120-day period for the City of Ashland's final determination ofcompliance w ithapplicable criteria does not conmience until the additional review for completene'ss period is completed.) Check if desired El T-waive further review of the information submitted for completeness and direct review of the information submitted for compliance with the Community I)evelopinent Code criteria, regardless of whether the application is, in fact, later determined by the staff to be incomplete. I understand that --by checking the above statement, the application will be evaluated based upon the material submitted and no notice of any missing infibimiation will be given. Ifinaterial information is missing fi-Orn the application, tho application will fitil to meet the burden of Showing that till criteria are inct, and tile application will be denied, Community Development Dept, Tog 5448&5306 20 E, Win Street rw 641-488.5311 A Ashland, Oregon 97620 TM 800-735-2.000 1W Im" wwashland.or,os 2. Submit Some of the Requested Information: Decline to Provide Other Information (Initial if elected) I am. submitting sonic of the information requested and declining -to submit other irtl'ormation requested in the incompleteness Determination letter: I understand that by declining to submit all information the City of Ashland believes necessary, the Ashland Planning Division may conclude that the applicable ctiteria are not met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. ( ^� 3. Decline to Provide any of the Requested Information (initial if elected) I decline to provide any of the information requested. I understand that the Community Development Department may conclude that the applicable criteria are not. met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. Signed and Aelmowlodged (.Applicant or Applicant's Agent) _J Date Return to: Planning Division Department of Community Dev6lopment City of Ashland 20 E.-Main St. Ashland, OR 97520 Community Devalopment Dept. Tel: 541486.5305 20 p. Main street Fax_ 541488-6311 Ashland, Oregon 97620 TIY; 800-735-2,Wfl wwashland.Orms lrza Solar Setback Exception The existing lot has an average width of 58.7' due to how the N/S lot dimension is measured. Given that the average slope of the lot is only -4.8% , the property is subject to the Solar Setback Standard B. The proposed ARU would generally not comply with the aforementioned standard given by the city due to the unusual flag shaped lot to the north. The proposed ARU is partly in the most narrow part of the lot. A solar setback waiver will be needed -to address the shadow casted onto the northern lot by the proposed ARU. The approval authority finds all of the following criteria are met. i. The -exception does not preclude the reasonable use of solar energy (i.e., passive and active solar energy systems) on the site by future habitable buildings. The shadow casted by the proposed ARU is directly on the steel building and concrete patio to the north. The solar shadow does not shade the habitable structure to the north by a significant amount. ii. The exception does not diminish any substantial solar access which benefits a passive or active solar energy system used by a habitable structure on an adjacent lot. The proposed exception does not shadow the existing structure by a significant amount and does not diminish access to passive or active solar energy systems used now or in the future on the adjacent lot. iii. There are unique or unusual circumstances that apply to this site which do not typically apply elsewhere. (Ord. 3147 § 8, amended, 11 /2112017) Due to the unusual shape of the lot, and where the proposed ARU is located, the city -required setbacks are unattainable. The already existing garage building casts a shadow onto the northern lot. However, most of the increase in solar shadow created by the proposed ARU is directly on the uninhabitable steel building and -concrete patio to the north. on, Dec. - 4.8% ow. ?D. EXHIBIT B • 876 Clay • Solar Waiver Proposal 11/20/2018 17y OF ASHLAND October 30, 2018 Notice of Final Decision On October 30, 2018, the Conununity Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: T1-2018-00024 ,Subject Property: 876 Clay Street Applicant: David Wisniewski/Sid Deboer Description: A request for Site Design Review and an Exception to the Solar Setback for an Accessory Residential Unit. The garage in the southwest corner of the property is proposed to be demolished and replaced with a two-story Accessory Residential Unit; the proposed building is taller than what would typically be allowed under the Solar Access chapter. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 lE 14 BC; TAX LOT: 2200 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winbum Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are changed based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Fotini Kaufman in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541ASS-5305 51 Winhurn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 w ww.ashland.or.its SECTION 18.5.I.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: I . Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Tinie for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content ofNolice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered, 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Conunission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be fled with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 ftburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 91520 TTY: 800-735-2900 %"vNv.ashland.or.us ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: T1-2018-00024 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 876 Clay Street APPLICANT/OWNER: David Wisniewski/Sid Deboer DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and an Exception to the Solar Setback for an Accessory Residential Unit. The garage in the southwest corner of the property is proposed to be demolished and replaced with a two-story Accessory Residential Unit; the proposed building is taller than what would typically be allowed under the Solar Access chapter. COMPREIIENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 39 1E 14 BC; TAX LOT: 2200 SUBMITTAL DATE: August 16, 2018 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: September 25, 2018 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: October 30, 2018 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): November 13, 2017 FINAL DECISION DATE: November 14, 2017 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: May 14, 2020 DECISION The proposal is to construct a detached accessory residential unit at the rear of the residence at 876 Clay Street. The subject property is located on the east side of Clay Street. about 500 feet north of the Siskiyou and Clay Street intersection. The surrounding neighborhood to the west, north and cast is comprised primarily of single-family homes. The area to the south of the subject property includes variety of multi -family homes and businesses along Siskiyou Boulevard. The subject property and surrounding area are zoned Single -Family Residential (R-1-5). The property is 20,530 -square feet or .47 of an acre in size. The property slopes downhill to the north. There is a single- family residence located on -the southern half of the lot that is accessed by a driveway off of Clay Street and another driveway off of the southeast corD-er of the property from Diane Street. The subject property recently received approval for a lot partition (PA-T1-2018-00001) that has not yet been recorded. A condition has been added to ensure that the proposed ARU complies with setbacks once the partition is recorded. The approval standards require that an Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) in an R-1 zone does not exceed 50% of the gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the primary residence on the lot and shall not exceed 1,000_square feet. The proposed ARU is does not exceed50% of the 1459 square -foot primary residence or 1,000 square feet. The application stated the ARU's CTHFA was 774 although that included area under the stairs that is not counted towards GHFA. The resulting GHFA is 729 square -feet. The development of the property is also required to conform to maximum lot coverage of 50-percent and base setback requirements. The proposal indicates the total lot coverage will be approximately 49.2-percent. The PA-T 1-2018-00024 876 Clay St/fk Page 1 proposal complies with setback requirements of the zoning district. The ARU has its primary orientation to the street. None of the ARU's parking is proposed between the primary entrance of the ARU and the street. There are no garages on -site. The building materials proposed are compatible with the surrounding area, and the siding is proposed to match the house. The application for one single family home, and an ARU less than 800 square feet requires three automobile parking spaces. The application demonstrates that two of these parking spaces are available in the existing driveway that runs along the south side of the main residence. The additional space can be accommodated in the rear driveway that leads directly to the ARU. The parking area is to be improved with gravel. As indicated in the narrative, a bike storage area will be available in the entryway of the new ARU in to comply with chapter 18.4.3.070 of the Ashland Land Use Ordinance. No additional landscaping or outdoor lighting is proposed. Recycling and Refuse disposal area is proposed to be located adjacent to the south side of the ARU. A tree protection plan was not submitted with the application and there appears to be no trees 15-feet of the building site. A condition has been added requiring a tree protection plan if there are trees within 15-feet of the building site. A Solar Setback Exception was requested with this application should the partition .be recorded because the ARU does not meet solar setbacks once that partition is in place. If the property remains one lot, the ARU does meet solar setbacks. The owner of the future neighboring property to the North has signed in favor of the Solar Setback Exception. The first approval criterion states, "The exception does not preclude the reasonable use of solar- energy (i.e., passhr e and active solar enej gy systems) on the site by . future habitable buildings. " The application states the proposed ARU casts a shadow directly on a steel accessory workshop and a concrete shadow, and does not preclude the reasonable use of solar energy by the future home site on the property to the north. The building envelope is in the fi•ont portion of the lot, away from the shadow of the ARU. The second, "Tire exception does not diminish any substantial solar access which benefits a passive or active solar energy system used by a habitable structure on an adjacent lot. " The application states the proposal does not diminish any substantial solar access. The third, "There are unique or unusual circumstances that apply to this site which do not typically apply elsewhere. " The lot to the North has an unusual "L" shape and the proposed shadow is concentrated on. the bottom of the "L" portion that incorporates the steel accessory structure onto the property to the north and is not the location of the future home site. A comment was submitted by a neighboring property owner concerned about the proposed height of the ARU. The comment references potential property value decrease, view protection and lack of privacy due to the proposed structure. However, the code does not address these concerns and with the consent of the neighboring property to the north, a solar setback exception can be granted. The application complies with all of the applicable provisions of the R-1 zoning district, and the Site Development and Design Standards in AMC 18.4. The application notes that the proposed ARU has been designed to provide a sense of orientation to Clay Street and the main residence. The property is currently served by adequate City facilities for water, sewer, storm drainage and electricity. In staffs assessment, the proposal will lrot have a greater adverse material impact on the impact area in terms of architectural compatibility, air.quality, and generation of traffic, noise, light and glare and the development of adjacent properties than the prior use of -the property, or the target use allowable within the zone. The applicants have submitted materials to the Planning Department that demonstrate compliance with these approval standards. PA-Ti-2018-00024 876 Clay St/fk Page 2 The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040, as follows: Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, *except as exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, below. A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements. 1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable zone in subsections 18.2.3.040.13, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A. 3. The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area (GHFA). 4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the Historic District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures (i.e„ not attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 5 The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2-of 18.4.3.080.D and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E.1. 6. Additional off-street parking is not required. for the accessory residential unit if on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18.4.3.080. B. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square -feet GHFA. 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.080, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2 of 18.4.3.080.D and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E1. The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follows: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. D. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities— The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City -facilities forwafer, sewer, electricity, urban stoBn drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the -subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design- Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18A if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist: 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique, or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and PA- T 1-20 ] 8-00024 876 Clay St/fk Page 3 approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. In staff s assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action #TI-2018-00024 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #TI- 2018-00024 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: I } That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein, including that a residential fire sprinkler system shall be installed in the Accessory Residential Unit as proposed by the -applicants. 2) That all necessary building permits for the accessory residential unit (ARU) shall be obtained, and associated fees and charges including applicable system development charges relating to the ARU for water, sewer, storm water, parks, and transportation, shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building- permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Site Review approval would need to be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. Building permit submittals shall include: a. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas shall be provided with the Building Permit. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 50 percent as required in the R-1-5 zoning district. b. A Tree Protection Plan is required -if there are trees located will -tin 15-feet of the building envelope. 4) That storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak rainfalls must be collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm_ pipe or public drainage way) or through -an approved alternative in accordance with Ashland Building Division policy BD-PP-0029. On -site collection systems shall be detailed on, the building permit submittals. 5) That a Tree Verification Permit shall be applied for and approved by the Ashland Planning Division prior to site work, tree removal, staging or storage of materials. The Verification Permit is to inspect the identification of the trees to be removed and the installation of tree protection fencing for the trees on and adjacent to the site to be protected. The tree protection shall be chain link fencing six feet tall and installed in accordance with 18.4.5:030. b) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy: a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements. b) That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the requirements of the PA-TI -2018 -00024 876 Clay St/fk Page 4 Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right -of -Way. c) The requirements of the Ashland Fire Department to address fire apparatus access shall be satisfactorily addressed. d) All automobile parking and bicycle parking shall be installed according to the approved plan, inspected, and approved by the Staff Advisor. c) That a site plan be submitted to the Planning Department showing recorded partition and ARU's compliance with setbacks. Bill Molnar, Community Development Director Date PA-T 1-2018-00024 876 Clay St/fk Page 5 F-1-24 STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On October 30, 2018 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under, each, person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1 -2018-00024, 876 Clay St. ignature of Employee C.1Users6srrithdaAFNHL7DesktopVu FFIDAMT OF IAAJLIN'G—ds.docx 10130018 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3400 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8302 ASHLANDER ASHLAND LLC FINANCIAL BAUMGARDNER GEORGE PACIFIC INCIPHIL MCLENNAN 599 N SIWASH CREEK RD 21435 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TONASKET, WA 98855 BEAVERTON, OR 97007 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1800 BOHN LARRY ALANIMARGARET ELLA 858 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E 14 BC 2103 CAMPBELL CAROLYN J 2785 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2200 DEBOER SIDNEY B TRUST ET AL 234 VISTA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 4100 FERGUS DOUGLAS B 857 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8301 HUFF HELEN F - TRUSTEE 7636 BODEGA AVE SEBASTOPOL, CA 95472 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2500 BREWER FAMILY REVOCABLE TRUST ET AL 2804 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1500 CINNAMON SALLY 852 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2400 EMERY WILLIAM C TRUSTEE ET AL 2962 GRIZZLY DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3800 FOSTER TAMARA K 147 N LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2105 LESCHER GEORGE J TRUSTEE ET AL 347 HIGH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2108 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1601 MCCLINTOCK KAREN A TRUSTEE ET AL MCKEEVER JOSEPH D TRUSTEE 2790 DIANE ST 848 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E 14 BC 2.100 MIDDLETON BARBARA A TRUSTEE 2815 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8300 ROSENBERG DEBORAH 839 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 4200 OYLER KATHLEEN TRUSTEE FBO 855 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3500 SANFORD CRAIG 883 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2102 BERLIN ALAN S 2795 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2101 BRONK JAMES B MD TRUSTEE ET AL 50 EL MONTE WAY NAPA, CA 94558 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3600 CLEAN GREEN PROJECTS LLC 2280 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 1600 ERA KIMBERLY AVELYN 842 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2107 HEAD ROBERTIJENNIFER 2770 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3700 MCALLISTER ANGELA ET AL 875 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1 -2018-00024 391 E14BC 2109 MICHELSEN MARY-KAY TRUSTEE 2810 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2106 RAY AMANDAIMANN JEFFREY 2745 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E146C 2104 SHERR DAVID TRUSTEE ET AL 148 STRAWBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E148C 3501 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3900 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E146C 8303 STUMBO JAMES S SWAN SIMONE WILLING JONATHAN DAVID 881 CLAY ST 255 N GRANADA AVE 811 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 TUCSON, AZ 85701 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 PA-T1-2018-00024 876 Clay St WISNIEWSKI DAVID KAMPMANN SHAWN 10-30-2018 NOD 876 CLAY ST PO BOX 459 32 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 101412018 Denial of Application P Reply all I v @ Delete Junk I v ... Denial of Application C_ hlandhome.net> George Lescher <gleschei-@as Yesterday, 6:48 PM Fotini Kaufman v 111L)DY Dear Ms. Kaufman, I am writing to express my opposition to the requested planning Action VTI-2018-00024 at 876 Clay St. ib P Reply all I v I own the adjacent property to the south at 2765 Diane St. The garage that the proposed Accessory Residential Unit is to replace is immediately, across the fence from my back deck which, occupies the space from the exterior door of my living room to the property/fence line. Construction of a two-story structure that is 22' 3.5" tall would be a total invasion of privacy for all current and future residents. Furthermore, I believe that invasion of privacy would be a deterrent to prospective buyers and therefore decrease the value of my house and property. Because the Accessory Residential Unit is taller than would typically be allowed and is just over the fence from my deck, it would block the view of the Cascade Mountain Range and undoubtedly lend to the feeling that it is built right on top of our property, I believe these considerations warrant a denial of the application based on 18.5.2.050 E of the Site Design and Use Standard because approval would have a substantially negative impact on my property. I await your final decision and am hopeful the final decision will be to deny the application whereby the applicants may submit an application for a single story Accessory unit that would not have such a negative impact on my property. Thank you, George Lescher httpS,://Outlook.offiGe365.com/owalprojection.aspx 112 P, i, Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY OF r 541-488-5,305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -ASHLAND PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2018-00024 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 876, Clay Street OWNER/APPLICANT: David Wisniewski/Sid Deboer DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and an Exception to the Solar Setback for an Accessory Residential Unit, The garage in the southwest corner of the property is proposed to be demolished and replaced with a two-story 774 square - foot Accessory Residential Unit; the proposed building is taller than what would typically be allowed under the Solar Access chapter. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 391 E 14 BC; TAX LOT: 2200 NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: September 25, 2018, DEADLINE FOR S,UBMISS,ION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: October 9,20,18 ( �859 857 869 A 877 875 a I 85 0148 186 01147 8815 P164 85 0145 885 P153, 885 P151 885 P1�6', 6,76 I BLACKbER'RY LN SUBJECT PROPERTY 876 CLAY ST PLANNING ACTION #T1-2018-00024 r__ � � r810 '2804 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submft written comments to the, City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m, on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staffs decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages M circuit Court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Budding, 51 Winburn Way, Ashiand, Oregon 97520, If you have questions or cornments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305 Wccnim-dev%li Tanning Act icns4\oficing FolderVN I ii led NO tic es & Signs'2018U'A-'r I -2918-00024,dotx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.52050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards, B. Overlay Zones: The proposal cornphes with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards; The proposal complies with the applicable! Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by Subsection E, below, D. City Facilities- The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18A.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection I or 2, Mow, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unLISUat aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in, a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNITS 18.2.3.,040 Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5,2, except as exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, below. A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements. 1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable zone in subsections 18,23.040.13, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A. 1 The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area (GHFA). 4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an existing primary residence, Accessory residential units located in the Historic District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures (i.e., not attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review Linder chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 5 The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces, turn-arOLinds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in Subsections 1 and 2 of 18.4,1080,1D and paving requirements in subsection 18,43.080,1E.1, 6. Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residential unit if on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18.4.3.080. B. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements, 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per Ilot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot, 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA. 4, The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shalt be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3-1080, except that parking spaces, WRI-arOUnds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2 of 1:18.4.3.080.D and.paving requirements in subsection 18.4 3,08O.P. ... ....... - C. RR Zone. In addition to... the standards in subsection 1823.040.13, accessory residential units in the RR zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. No on -street parking credits shall be allowed for accessory residential units. 2. If located in the Wildfire zone, the accessory residential unit shall have a residential sprinkler system installed. D. R-2 and R-3 Zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standards in subsection 18,23.040.13, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. E. NN Zones. Accessory residential units in the Normal Neighborhood District Linder chapter 18.3.4 shall meet the standards in subsection 18.2.3,040.13, F. NIVI Zones. Accessory residential units in the North Mountain Neighborhood NM! zones tinder chapter 18,3,5 shall meet the standards in subsection 18,23.040,13, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit must not exceed 750 square feet GHFA and that second story accessory residentiat units constructed above a detached accessory building Must not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. G Actions\Nofici rig FolderhN failed Notices & Signs\20184,A-'1'1-2018-00024,dol;¢ STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On September 25, 2018 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2018-00024, 876 Clay Street. gignature of Employee C:YUsershsdthdaAFNHPDesktopIAFFIDAVIT OF KNLING—ds.docx 912U2018 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3400 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 8302 ASHLANDER ASHLAND LLC FINANCIAL BAUMGARDNER GEORGE PACIFIC INC/PHIL MCLENNAN 599 N SIWASH 21435 SW SCHOLLS FERRY RD TONASKET, WA 98855 BEAVERTON, OR 97007 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2500 BERRY SUSANfWILLIAM 2804 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2103 CAMPBELL CAROLYN J 2785 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2200 DEBOER SIDNEY B TRUST ET AL 234 VISTA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 4100 FERGUS DOUGLAS B 857 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 8301 HUFF HELEN F - TRUSTEE 7636 BODEGA AVE SEBASTAPOL, CA 95472 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E148C 1800 BOHN LARRY ALANIMARGARET ELLA 858 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1 -2018-00024 391E14BC 1500 CINNAMON SALLY 852 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2400 EMERY WILLIAM C TRUSTEE ET AL 2962 GRIZZLY DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E1413C 3800 FOSTER TAMARA K 147 N LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2105 LESCHER GEORGE J TRUSTEE ET AL 347 HIGH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1-2018-00024 391 E 14 BC 2108 PA-T 1-2018-00024 391E 14 BC 1601 MCCLINTOCK KAREN A TRUSTEE ET AL MCKEEVER JOSEPH D TRUSTEE 2790 DIANE ST 848 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2100 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 4200 MIDDLETON BARBARA A TRUSTEE ET OYLER KATHLEEN TRUSTEE FBO AL 855 CLAY ST 2815 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 8300 ROSENBERG DEBORAH 839 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1-2018-00024 391 E 14 BC 3500 SANFORD CRAIG 883 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2102 BERLIN ALAN S 2795 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 2101 BRONK JAMES B MD TRUSTEE ET AL 50 EL MONTE WAY NAPA, CA 94558 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3600 CLEAN GREEN PROJECTS LLC 2280 OLD HWY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1-2018-00024 391 E 14 BC 1600 ERA KIMBERLY AVELYN 842 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1 -2018-00024 391 E14BC 2107 HEAD ROBERT/JENNIFER 2770 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391 E14BC 3700 MCALLISTER ANGELA ET AL 875 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 2109 MICHELSEN MARY-KAY TRUSTEE 2810 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E1413C 2106 RAY AMANDAIMANN JEFFREY 2745 DIANE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391El4BC 2104 SHERR DAVID TRUSTEE ET AL 148 STRAWBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3501 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 3900 PA-T1-2018-00024 391E14BC 8303 STUMBO JAMES S SWAN SIMONE WILLING JONATHAN DAVID 881 CLAY ST 255 N GRANADA 811 BLACKBERRY LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 TUCSON, AZ 85701 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2018-00024 PA-T1-2018-00024 876 Clay St WISNIEWSKI DAVID KAMPMANN SHAWN 876 CLAY ST PO BOX 459 9-25-2018 NOC ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 32 0 1160 I 8304. 8305, 8203 f a. -9202- 4204 820 8400 8205 w8208 Kill = 82A 8212 8219, 92,43 gZ18 8214 glil 80 Date Received RECEIVEI ) SEP :t D Nid City Of AS111' (to be completed by staff) Applicant's Statement of Coinpletelle." (To be completed by the Applicant and returned to the City of Ashland Planning Division) lZe: PA-TI -2018-00024, 876 Clay St Date Application Expires: February 12, 2019 PUBLIant to al) incompleteness Determination, 1, the undersigned applicant or agent for the applicant, elects one of the three options below by initiating: ( *T 1. Submit All of the Missing Information onitia i lected) I am submitting all of the information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter. Unless checked below, I am requesting that the City of Ashland Planning Division review this additional information within 30 days ofstibinission to determine whether the application is complete. I iinderstand that this-30-day review for completeness period for the new information preserves nay oppoIlLinity to submit additional materials, should it be determined that file application is still incomplete after the second review. (Note: the 120-day period for the City of Ashland's final determination ofconipliance with applicable criteria does not commence until the additional review for completelless period is Completed) Check if desired 1 waive further review of the infbrination submitted for completeness tared direct review of the inforniation SUbinitted lor coinpliance with the Community I)evelopment Code criteria, regardless of whether the application is, in fact, later deterrnineld by the staff to be: incomplete. I understand that -by checking the above statement, the application will be evaluated based upon the material submitted and no notice of any missing information will be given, Ifinaterial information is missing froi-n file application, file application will flail to mect the burden of showing that all criteria are inet, and the application will be denied, Community Development Dept, Tel: 54 1 A88-5306 20 E. Main SIteet Fax: 541488-5311 AA Ashland, Organ 51520 TTY: 8W-735-2900 WMushland'orms VMS ( 2. Submit Some of the Requested Information: Decline to Provide Other Information (Initial if elected) I am submitting some of the infomration requested and dechning_to submit other inrorn3ation requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter: I understand that by declining to submit all information the City of Ashland believes necessary, the. Ashland Planning Division may conclude that the applicable criteria are not met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. ( __ __) 3, Decline to Provide any of the Requested Information (Initial if elected) I decline to provide any of the irtformation requested. I understand that the Community Development Department may conclude that the applicable criteria are not, met and a Denial will be issued or recommended. Signed and Acknowledged (Applicant or Applicant's Agent) Date Return to: Planning Division Department of Community Development City of Ashland 20 E.. Main St. Ashland, DR 97520 Community Development Dept. Tel: 54146-5395 �' 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541.48W11 Ashland, Oregon 97529 TTY: 8f19-735-29M i wv+vv,ashland.orms Solar Setback Exception The existing lot has- an average width of 58.7' due to how the NIS lot dimension is measured. Given that the average slope of the lot is only -4.8% , the property is subject to the Solar Setback Standard B. The proposed ARU would generally not comply with the aforementioned standard given by the city due to the unusual flag shaped loot to the north. The proposed ARU is partly in the most narrow part of the lot. A solar setback waiver will be needed -to address the shadow casted onto the northern lot by the proposed ARU. The approval authority finds all of the following criteria are met. i. The exception does not preclude the reasonable use of solar energy (i.e., passive and active solar energy systems) on the site by future habitable buildings. The shadow casted by therroposed ARU is directly on the steel building and concrete patio to the north. The solar shadow does not shade the habitable structure to the north by a significant amount. ii. The exception does not diminish any substantial solar access which benefits a passive or active solar energy system used by a habitable structure on an adjacent lot. The proposed exception does not shadow the existing structure by a significant amount and does not diminish access to passive or active solar energy systems used now or in the future on the adjacent lot. iii. There are unique or unusual circumstances that apply to this site which do not typically apply elsewhere. (Ord. 3147 § 8, amended, 11/21/2017) Due to the unusual shape of the lot, and where the proposed ARU is located, the city -required setbacks are unattainable. The already existing garage building casts a shadow onto the northern lot. However, most of the increase in solar shadow created by the proposed ARU is directly on the uninhabitable steel building and -concrete patio to the north. t at Ishlasid N) ge slope CITY OF -S H-LAN D September 6, 2018 David Wisniewski 876 Clay Street Ashland, OR 97520 RE: PA-T1-2018-00024 Property located at 876 Clay Street Incompleteness Determination Dear David: I have reviewed your application received on September Gil' for Site Design Review for an Accessory Residential Unit located at 876 Clay Street. After examining the materials presented, I have determined that the application -is incomplete because the 3pformation fasted below was not provided. Incomplete applications are subject to delay in accordance with ORS 227.178. The application cannot be further processed and deemed complete until the missing information is submitted or the applicant indicates that the missing information will not be provided. 1. Solar Setback Exception_---- Addressing justification and providing materials for an Exception to Solar Setbacks (AIMC 18.4.8.020.C) for the height of the ARU. Administratively, we would not be able to approve the height of the ARU without the materials -required for an exception (see AMC 18.4.8.020.0 for materials required). To continue -review of your application, you must select and complete one of the following three options: 1. Submit all- of the missing information; 2. Submit some of the requested information and give the City of Ashland Planning Division written notice that no other information will be provided; or 3. Submit written notice to the City of Ashland Planning Division indicating that no other information -will-be provided. Please note that failure to complete one of the -three options within 180 days of the application submittal date (August 16, 2018) will result in your application being deemed void. The application will be -deemed void if th-e additional information is not submitted by February 12, 2019. I have enclosed a form, entitled the "Applicant's Statement of Completeness." Please review the enclosed form and return it to me with any additional _material you will be submitting. Your application Community Development Dept, Tel: 541488-5305 20 E. Main Street Fax! M1488-6006 mA Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wmy.ashland.or.us will not be farther processed-witilthe Applicant's Statement of Completeness form is completed and received by the City of Ashland Planning Division. If you have questions, please contact me at 541-552-2044 or fotini.kaufman@gmail.com. Sincerely, ,4:r— �- Fotini Kaufman Assistant Planner Encl: Applicant's Statement of Completeness Cc: Pile Hardcopy mailed to Applicant 2 Community Development Dept. Tel: 541-488-5305 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541-488-6006 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-29M www.ashland.or.us OpWrIA"AMA Date Received (to be completed by staff) Applicant's Statement of Completeness (To be completed by the Applicant and -returned to the City of Ashland Planning Division) Re: PA-T1-2018-00024, 876 Clay St Date Application Expires: February 12, 2,019 Pursuant to an Incompleteness Determination;l, the undersigned applicant or agent for the applicant, elects one of the three options below by initiating: ( 1. Submit All of the Missing Information (Initial if elected) I am submitting all of the information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter, Unless checked below, I am requesting that the City of Ashland Planning Division review this additional information Nvithin 30 days of submission to determine whether the application is complete. I understand that this 30-day review for completeness period for the new information preserves my opportunity to submit additional materials, should it be determined that the application is still incomplete after the second review. (Note: the 120-day period for the City of Ashland's final determination of compliance with applicable criteria does not commence until the additional review for completeness period is completed.) Check if desired ❑ I waive further review of the information submitted for completeness -and direct review of the information submitted for compliance with the Community Development Code criteria, regardless of whether the application is, in facts -later determined by the staff to be incomplete. I understand that by checking the above statement the application will be evaluated _based upon the material submitted and no notice of any. missing information will be given. If material information is missing froin the application, the application will fail to meet the burden of showing that all criteria are -met, and the application will be denied. Community Development Dept, Tel: 541-488-5305 20 D. Main Street Fax: 541-488-5311 ��, Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 vAm.ashland.or.us ( ) 2. Submit Some of the Requested Information: Decline to Provide Other Information (Initial if elected) I am submitting some of the information requested and declining to -submit other information requested in the Incompleteness Determination letter. I understand -that by declining to submit all information the City of Ashland believes necessary, the Ashland Planning Division may conclude that the applicable criteria are not rnet and -a Denial will be issued or recommended. { �) 3. Decline to Provide any of the Requested Information (Initial if elected) I decline to provide any of the information requested. I understand that the Community Development -Department may conclude that the applicable criteria are not met and a Denial -will be issued or recommended. Signed and Acknowledged (Applicant or Applicant's Agent) Date Return to: Planning Division Department of Cormnunity Development City of Ashland 20 E. Main St. Ashland, OR 97520 Community Development Dept. Tel: 541-488-5305 20 E. Main Street Fax: 541-488-5311 FF A Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wwsv.ashland.orms IIrjA11 Planning Division i& 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 CITY or ASHLAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-60,06 DESCRIPTION OF (PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address 17tt� (14- B :4 IN lyl I ............... Pursuing LEEDO Ceaification? El YES FI NO Assessor's Map No, 39 1 E C Tax Lot(s) (),200 Zoning 8 Comp Plan Designation Name Phone IW_ ' �"// -VW/E-hail Address City A�6160W Zip PROPERTY OWNER Name Phone E-Mail rA`_,2 Q L. � Address (23Y K5;6,a City 1451111619d zip cl—)(0 "1" 7­1 o'! U o/) SURVEYOR, ENGINEER -HITEC �.ARTJ, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title _,f frV(4Pr Name .. . ........ . Phone fW­ YffA —!�M I E-Mail S6aw/7cc� U 6001) Address P 0, i3o'k vs-q city 45410rml zip — Title Address Name 1? Phone 0,�I 10 E - M a j I Iv evI - City _245hkIld Zip --- LLIl,- I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are it, all respects, tare and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not sho;vn or their location found to be incorrect, tire owner assumes full responsibilik i further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that / produced sufficient factual evidence, at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact tumishlodjustifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) thal all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also Possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereen being required to be re ved 71nype se�f i h ve ny doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. Ar AppTlb'a A's Sig ature Date As owner of the properly-inYolv6d in Mis request, f have read and understood the complete application and its conseq l e 110 rrtff,�,q3va,,P TO W4 owner. 7" 5" — n re " y Owner's S,ignature (required) Date [To be compreted t,j C4 slap] G J!" Date, Received It", Zon�ng Permit Type Hing Fee L b" 619 OVER 0 Wcomm-d,Opl,u ning,Toons & "XldOIIISt700ing NrIllil Applicalion dw ARU at 876 Clay St. In order to maximize the living space for an A.R,U on the 876 Clay Street property, the existing garage needs to be demolished.The proposed A,RU. will be located right on top of where the garage is now. See, A Sheets ). The two story building will be 774sqft of dwelling space. Open Space : The open/ usable space stretches around the building to include the concrete patio. The shared concrete patio along with the grassy area in the corner of the lot will be this units open space. to the shared side patio area. Parking: spaces will be accommodated in seperate locations; One space is on the paved driveway and the other compact space will be located next to easement on the opposite side of the building.. Bicycle parking will be providedin the room that's next the covered entry slab . Please see A sheets for a visual representation The lot coverage is currently 48.5,%. Here is a lot coverage breakdown to show that the building meets L.C. requirements : 101,395 sqft lot @ 48.5% Lot Coverage --) 5041.58 sqft covered Demolished garage -390 Proposed ARU +3,87 Covered patio +50 Bicycle Park./Storage +70 Trash / Recycle +25 One Compact +128 Parking Spot Deck Exemption -200 (The 876 Clay St. home has a large deck that allows water to drain into the subgrade, giving a 200 sq/ft exemption from the lot coverage.) Total Difference +70 Scl Ft New Total Covered Area 5,111.58 Sqft New L.C.% 49.17% t ril, pwl n AUG ,I f A Meters: The ARU will have its own meters, with the electric meter being out of the roads view. Please see the A sheets for the proposed locations, A Public Utility Easement has been added to the survey to accommodate the planned placement of the new meter per Mr. Tygersons suggestions. Ashland Use Ordinance : There is only one accessory unit allowed The primary residence is 1459 sq/ft, allowing for a 774 scl/ft ARU that meets GHFA site standards. The ARU will require a solar waiver from the northern lot, (No address yet) The lot coverage will remain under 50% with the new addition. The two required parking spaces will be provided, along with, covered bicycle parking. EXI TIN IT P �nciy a ne TI I al q el r P I I ea4enygaragetoberemoved I p T � i diane st, R (0 PP IT J a f x✓ ss �����- � r� property line f 7� J - upgeedelc nnecq to Ielvc�a+ f ,• CrQ t9g 4dnven, a,p) 1 d9' 9" n4 3 "' cennect 0 street: va g , a5 M 511 EM�1 T «...�. ,atC'„Be'w9r; '1i} `' drivewayy ease n nt i asl irecy�l g GVF.ti'm 2092, .. M S17E PLAN PRO POSEO SHEEMrgo1-x SHEET SET 24X36 Al Site Plan & Project Info A2 Floor Plans A3 Elevations & Building Section 51 General Notes 52 Foundation & Roof Framing Plans S3 Detai&s & sections S4 Details & Sections C0i 'H_risk6r 1 S Owner contact David Wisnlewskl phone 541,944,4491 email david@davidscottconstruction.com General Contractor company David Scott Construction contact David Wisniewskl phone 541944,4491 email davad�Odavidscottconstruction.com Structural Engineer Ciota Engineering contact Cameron Harris address 156 Clear Creek Road, Suite 101 Ashland, OR 97520 phone 541.552.0290 email cameron@c9otaenglneeriiig.corn Electrical Contractor TBD company me phone email ... HVAC Contractor TBD company name phone email Plumbing Contractor TBD company -.... name __...w... phone _ email PF-20PPOSEO Two -Story accessory dwelling unit can the SE corner of TaxLot 2200. The project is to con- sist of a 774sf of dwelling space, 70sf attached bicycle storage, and a 50sf covered porch on the E elevation of the proposed ARU. Access to the ARU is provided from Clay St. uti- lizing the (e)driveway & Diane St, by way of a 10ft driveway easement. 2 offstreet parking spaces are proposed; 1 adjacent to the E & 1 to the W elevation of the ARI.). I'll-'E / SPACE / COV'ERACE Lot 0.47Acte 20,530 �fl �11f�lllyf111��11y 111111i 1I1IJI11A��11J, Existing 5,424 <26.5% 1,459 Single Fam61y Residence 815 Shop Building 390 Garage (to be removed) 400 Deck 80 Concrete Porches (entry 807deck adj, 425) 325 Walkways 1,955 Driveway Proposed 142 <1% -390 Garage removed 387 ARU footprint 50 Covered Patio 70 Bicycle Parking/Sto rage 25 Trash/Recycling Lot Coverage 5,566 27.1% ` /I C IINI-IF Y MJEAFJ r4Tom— Z WZS W, w Z a x 4 Z iia A 0 O W Qf: W U) Z 0 aw a. 0 0 C3 to r_ csa ©G 0' r C: W U) M U r~ tea 0 q SIiTE, PLAN/COVER 8 sCAtE: 1/4-=1'--a" p 8J1J1f) ZI-Q 119" Y.1 112, 11-1 " co"".t. 'rep zt Ho0, 7W- 1 n I 'IST PLIOOR PL-AN mm m E z E W w 'RE !2, z Lu :S c:) (14 LO I-- CY) w 0 < w z U) C) 00 Floor Plans 'Pad �R/,70 H6ffl SCALE.- 1/4'=l'-0' 8/1118 A2 .1 SH T. 2 OF 3 EAST SEC710N.ck -tWkq--\ 5,57-1 '2'-O"typ 21 "d 1/2 bath . . ..... ... ,30 floor r'sulmior typ rtv top of s.bfl— t.p ©f -b4— SOUTH ;, U 9e r4OR7FH or�- Nwhu 119I.d. 5 3 .10" sbbbe�-d) M z E I W W z L9 z , W-�, coi w v UA U) < Q- c:) N Lo I- 0') cl� 01 ry r— i> < Lli z cl) OD Scutions/Elevotlons SCALE: 1/4--i'—D- 8/1118 A3 ,H F. 3 OF 3 is {5ti -1 pp c* 4 + tdz ! r WWI p� -* I1��W I MR �3T_ -1�4� � �1 pig �- R 6� bm a S taro �� } LLm O Spgp L �465 � ii � 6RSss 3 � �_a �6 p� a fl. zs 4R d W Hit V4 X m. 4 x tl� gA sa Ps m Row ° s� �s >r- 4 E N as U t° g 3 m ^ g WO y.>= sj_i oL wx�pp s a �y aao '� ��� 4�� S � S � m � aa, �41va. �•� R � '� t 7 £ � � N 'O S' �� � v�, � �� S� � � � $'� V`� � '� _ 04 IRN gg �yT s q pfi a °lit 1,151 1, fli o rR 7�i s u a a � ­ daeum end the Ideas and dealena Iaanraa.otad harem. es an 1a trss t a a y t a e I-' CLR XS2 j L -n� Y dnelnaerine.. end 1s n. or to be ,r god, to whrda el` In Part, tar any 120 zip; PI 17 7�q > ri "c I 1 ai a the k,'ttan eathwiaatlan. or Ckta Cng6�csrinq Mtn New ARC cn P 156 CLEAR CREAK DR SUITE 101 A o - x� ASHLAND, OR 97520 0r 876 Clay St. Ashland, OR 97520 PHONE: (541)552.0290 p T U1 01 1 �qj UH gi a' ju j kiMp r� ig n Rp 4 a. gig mmn F1 It I m 0 v-- if L If 99 7i c .5 z p P F fl KIM aa Fv &� MNT QIR !� 31 9 egg a U'R ILI ge p 5j Et 70- �j2'ja j9M U '91 jI ILI i Z-1 it-IM 3 7 10 q , I TF4 RgE Iff M � IR it h t [I Or , tl- jc, 19 F VT !VllflE Z jig . 1 Z7a. lquui� 4 ff at jg�ts i� Va Nva §_8 w-MI t ggi kii a gm d h""M' an c' !"t""'t 'f Praf .. ­1 ­1­ 1e t­ property of Ci.I. Enqr­flhq, .,d r. not t. b. .­d. New AU 876 Clay St. Ashland, OR 97520 4MH 5N SM —7 >0 d 1 4 d CLR 0 2 --i x R it part, fr any sthsr projoct without the ­Ittee ­n,rlz,tran o! crotc Lng in-11,9 CIOTA ENE31NEERING 156 CLEAR CREEK DR SUITE 101- ASHLAND. OR 97520 PHONE: (541) 552-0290 ROOF FRAMING PLAN SCALE. V4-I'-O' 2NE), FLOOR FRAM IN6 PLAN SCAM 114'4-O' Wt - 11WICATES, 2.6 SW -AR POLL. 5EE 1,54,2,S4 ] ONO HAIL ROOF Tom.AT 24'0G ffr OREIr,0N UOEI6W VMGWR 4 MAWFACM)RER. FR,WpE TR)5�� U40P PRAKWW NO5 TO ER FOR REVIBq PRIOR To FAVRZAT10K MF"M 2.4 LET-nt OVIIOOKW5 0 46' cc, MIN OR PER. TRLr-G H"-K PROVIDE Tfdr,' , KOOK110 EA Mr% BAY KjLI- 12WN AT BEAMN5 MWS. HOW TFMw6ES AT LOW 64r-D ROOF a 24' Or-, TYP. ROOF 4EATWI,NOTV: PFTAJL 3,54 5/8' G-0 EMT, GLUE PLYWOOD OR APA RATED 050 E>Vlpei1, PANEL ID. 40/20. NAIL TO FRAKINS YV 80 6M7 0 61' C- AT ALLALLSUPPORTED PAWL HP&E5 AW AT 12' Or, AT KTEFU�MAMTP WPPORT5 ' 116TAI-L PERPVVWa-AR TO Wr.� F-FIWl qSrA66ER PARFI-5. t,IAIN 4 2RU FLOOR FRAHING NOTE'� ALL FLOOR FRA"H6 t,9511:5 5K-LL BE SINGLE 09 KLTI WM 11 1/8'861 510DO 1.1 uF o W ar- ALL Pla3 PEXETT AT ICN5 PER "r-R. sFrGs. Top uAna cm Ptyjmwp 5TEii KA@L PT PLATE W ITS HAMERS, TYP. PLATFOW FRAmF AT 2RD FLOOR, TYTI. AT JWERI-'EDWE BFAWIl' WCRIPFLE P0,LL, 96TAU B' I F3LOCKJI;5 EA SAY, Typ. FLOOR 5HF-AT-HlW, NOTFt LXzIXL 3S41 5/4' 51TWT Z T4 6, C-E? EXT. 6-1-M FLYHoop OR APA RATED OSO EXPOSURE 1, PAML ID. 40124. ATTACH W PAJ49- APFESd AND NAIL TO rRAM WS W 100 00wo 61 00 AT ALL %NrORTEO PAM- � fSTRL�-TLRAL SCRB 6 FEWIrTru) AND ATI2'cc,ATINTERPEpiATFswPoRT5, n6TALLFSRFevIVA-AR To H?MlffNr AJ42 5TAO6W PAWL' 5, 5M DETAIL br,4. F2 61 COW,, 5 WI&LI. �vl I r F 1-17, Ll Qi Tu I I I I I I I I I I VI I 4 1 L Lu J d FOUNDATION PLAN SC&E, V4'=I'-,O' REAM 5GHEDULE I - I '. I RB"M EM 3 V2 x 11 WVL 2,W 31,00 DF MQ 6 x b OT-. H!2- HEADER 5GHEDULE —4r54JYP SIZE 91-1-MT STWSlLki -ttK— HM (21 2.6 OF H02 49,IAM. Al rj"5 HX2 4 x 6 PF 140.2 (0 rjh& WR3 4 . 10 PF HO.2 (2) JAM. (1) KJN5 HVR4 CzQNGRETE SLAD NOTE: 4'C,0W,*affTH 5L-45 VV " 0 16' or, FArA HAY ON VAPOR BARRJE3Z OVER E5/4' HMS O:kn`A6TEU 5TRJYC-TLRAL FILL OVER M1015TURPEO NATIVE. 5AN JOINTS RECa-ft'El0BO AT WOO, DETAIL 3M. FIBER FT/ Nl AVVITIVE FOR CRACK CONTROL AT OWd375 OPTIM WCATES 5MF5C4 WI)2-505 I-;OLDO7%16 W 55TI316L ASCA40R.S. 57ALL PER I VFR 5F5r. DOWLE 2�6 ED&C 'i=&tTW STUDS HIR REOVIREE) MIA 16D RAILINS 0 &'Cl- 5TA66 EACH LAYER SEE MrAdL5 4,53 A_7 FnnTIN(-', c-)(-.HFDIJI F PO NOT SCALP FOIOTN-'l --D'FE 512r — -- F1 1'-0' fi x IW v CONT. STRIP FCOV45 (:2J 04 CON% 1771- 5rO F2 v-O'N x W V 09W. 5MP FOOrnIv, (3) 04 Wtar, OIL Ir--3 14- 14 . 101 p cow. HoNoLITMIO SLAB FDeE (3p #4 OONT, VTL 21W F4 24' 50! x 110* DEEP SFREAD 1-37#4 ESIL, PTL 363 PLAN NOTE5: y 5L. Al 5HEET A2 iff-14gl 1. ALL FOOTIW AND 5LAB 9)DSRADE5 %IALL DECLEAREP OF ALL L005E PEDR15, OR6,AK-c- 5OL AND ANY EXPN61VE 501L. 2, FOOrIN65 AND %,-0 5KN-L BE FOVC)FP ON 6' MIN COWAOTED c4a)S iFu ROC'K OVER P" iLtIIJ957vzvrD M71vr %W-FAW. POOTII0 4 KN-L COMPETE ! HALL Be %000 M "H AT;245 RAYS. 4. NO NAVY VizKOI-E LOAD', PERM TTEO VtRb,' Tt-Y Ra41W KALL5, 5. VERIFY ALL. PlKe4sk-Alrl PRIOR To Opt6Tplrll1QK 6. ALL KITM PROOFIt6 A)U MSTURE PROTEYTION IS BY C'ONTRAL:TOR- -1. SEE- FLOOR FLAl6 FOR INTMOR PARTITILA6, 01MW54a6 NO ELEVATIONS. 0. ALL MOI97WE PROTEC,710K SEALAM Alto FLASHW55 BY OTHER5. q. SM ROOF FRAMM, NOTE FOR REOUREM305. fO. SEE DETAIL lr54 AND 2.54 POR SHEARKALL RML1146 REGUREI-ENTS AND 50HEMUE lI. 5EE PETAIL5 3/54 FOR DIAPHRAM KNLIK6 REWIREMBiTS. Q. SEE VETAJL Sr54 FOR VOLBLE TOP PLATE SPLICE REGUREHaM. 5TAIR FRAMING NOM (3; 1 V4.14' 1,4 1000 STMMOER, RrWRFI2. "T5. ATTAC+44H" AND MTNI-5 PrR DOMff rA50AM STAIR T. r'T"n" IRFAD5 A,. IV .11VM PER I'll, fV'5?p' ""ma Nsm "'J 04 § IF PR 7 92 soil 0 z E W W z D 0 L9 TTl C) (N I LO t-- cr) ry 0 :D < < Z (D r- 00 Foundation/ Main Floor Framing & Roof Framing Plana SCAM 1/4'-1'-0' 7 /5 SH T. 2 OF 4 2.6 S41E` Nh1.L PER PO4 160 '5N PER �'AiEIX -2.0 PT PLAIV PQ 5/5' AD, PER 5GNEO. AU614 TO too " PER NOTE IW5IDE FAc-11 AT 5EAFtlt9. 0-- _SHEATHIN5 PER PLAN 1517 'UN PER 5010P, . clotr a _ STE141WI. w -BUILT UP 2xb OR P05T PER 0�4 -�E Or: SHEAR K',LL. _=T Wef[6 0 Ib* 00. PLA24 a EOC TE BENLY. IN FT1,. -...... - 1151MAIT."I FIL ... PLIV a 16' 01- W ITS -P0-,T FIR PLAN PV CPTZ --WU-�,M fsOLVOH4 PER N .... // 2x05 13EARWrAlEAR IVLL PER PLJ4 T BASE. 11`45TALL PER t-RiM STUDS a Io' G1_ 2.6 PT Cat!". PL W 51d* A.13.5 FIIL 6RAVE VARIES AND PLATE PW-AER5 PER 5C-, LE (2) 04 U'rAIAMED PQiELS. 0) 04 CaVIRUOU5 a TOP emu.SLAB PER PU4 BB40 INTO SLAP,, s2' LE65. , 4' COr- Stl,Es PER PLA 2z1TBL 4 PER PLAN 09 t�' M AT No 5H1EATIflNr, PLANFlit. 6RADE SEE AN FOR -05T Mn4rATTOit (3) 44 EA KAY a FOOM46 PER 50-IEO� #4 COW. HORIZ RE13AR la a T 4 B. (3) 04 COtff. HORJZ REAR c a FOOT1% PER SC4*V. 0 42) 04 612NTIH� a DIM . . ........ . 4' PERF PYr, BRAIN IV I,, L2��j GLEAN IN DRAIN FZOCr- I.-W rOOTiN6 5RALL BE PLACED ON APPROVED DRAIN TO DAY1.101-17, n-P. MGF- VV5TUREM NATIVE WE36RADE OR APPROVED COW/4,TED SOIL, LOOS FILL. REMOVE ALL EXFAWAVE SOIL, LOOSE DEBRIS 4 ROOT ECUs. FO NPATION DETAIL FOUNDATION DETAIL FOUNDATION DETAIL 4 HOLDONN DETAIL SEE PLAN FOR BMAMW, WALL W-4 OR 1 112, w W-KIO W ov a 8' oC, To PLATE 2x6 DEAR1145/511EAR NALL PER FLN L 2x6 DEARINSr-f" MULL PER PGA'PGA'STUDS 0 16' 01- STUDS a 16, 0_' 4 too -SH PER S_Iev. P60 -,N PER SCWIM lop -0?4 PER 51,14up.- lop -at PER SCHEID. 2xb VEARIN55r,44EAR K&LL FER PLN I IWVIL 11 2400 RIM E30ARP I T/2' VIL Ll 2400 RM DOARP 16P 'W PER SC+M. -N 51W5 0 to, or W A36 o 321 or, iV A35 o 321 o-, '­2x CRIPPLE so" PER PLAN to . OG STUDS, VOL TOP PI, 517 IEN PER Sct-m eV 'EN PER SchiEv. PT PLATE PV AB. a 45' GY_ W -EN PER .{„FED. 3/4' WM SHIM CONTINXXJS f2) 04 CONT.W HOZ REBAR 60 -EN PER 5alm?' VBL 2.6 TOP FL 0 FOOFINS FER SGFED. F- Z45T5 PER PL.Nk 8p -el. PER So4w, - bu -EN PER EGIED, FLOOR JoI515 Pffz PLAN, S a 16 O_G VEL. 2x6 TOP PL ml BW6 a 48* or, STUD VEWL 2xb TOP 1_j _X0 J! -I M 2.15 BEARIN&r.W_AR KALL PER PLN J. _1� 5TV05 a 16' 01- DEARIN&r;fEAR KALL PERLH F STLW5 a I&ff M k, Y ELFOUNDATION DETAIL SHEAR TRANSFER DETAIL SHEAR TRANSFER DETAILS SHEAR TRANSFER DETAILS U 5LIVO PTF! PLAb PRE-ENSV 6AW.-hAJL TF16SES FUR PLN o 24' 00 K) 'VN PER 5C44ED' 2x WLIP PA -KO VA 13AY W! A35 . 45' VENT "OLES1NGTcjlF` BY CdXATRAC,TOR LY PA501:15OFFT BY CONTRACTOR ov 'EN PER SCAIEU Pt%- 2x6 TOP Ft- 2xb I3EARJlWr*sFARJs4.-A_L PER FLAN. 5TUL). 16" Or-, SEE _%tE"A_E SHEAR TRANSFER DETAILS PRff­F FFR P Do -Es 2.50 BAY s' varr I By c1c FA -"- BY C, 150 'E 10 SHEAR TRANSFER DETAILS 5cqI0' @'=V-0" [ Od a 6' ol- few) 2.4 FLAT OJA_OvKER5 e 4,51 X-. /_ 61RIZT SCREW a oUTLooKP1Z To TRUSS LET IN a GABLErRU95 BY TP161, MBARON5TALL UPRIGHT AS REQ1) PV 131-W61 \ . ...................... ti 45-ea ciag ROOF TTIL)S& BY "ER5 2x4 DIA60t4AL BRACE a 415 'x VV A34 CLIP To PLATE I (4). TO ELK'& _E TRU% a 52' G,_ 5M'6 V17-1- HFIWT EV a 01- SPAtINS PER SC4fEM_E ADI-) C0NTIHJOUk5 PM 2.6 TOP PLATE 2.6 BEARINS/544EAR. MULL PER PILN 5TMS a 10, a', BALLOON FRAME PER PLAN - OM 2X6 CDN'r. TOP PLATE ST(1224 DRAB STRAP E6VAL uIST. OVER BEAM/roP PLATE. DEM PER PLAN, '4J 16V 51WER55 DOUBLE 2x6 BUILT UP POST, 5IN&LE 2.6 KI%9 STUD W A35 AT TOP 2xb S4EAJOIALL PER PLAN. SEE 5C+EoULE FOR IREW-11 II SHEAR TRANSFER DETAILS 12 FRAMING DETAIL (D z W wLIJ cr TI, 011 Z LJJ 0 L) L w GA on Lo Z 0 9 (10 K C) 00 S G K STRUCTURAL DETAILS ti SCALE: 7/5/18 S3 SH T. 3 OF 4 ......... ......... SHEAR NALL NAILIN6 5GHEDULE OYERHA1411 AT ROOF we', 110K. STRXTURAL sy0j: CLIP MK MATERIAL 50FATIOO EPOE 50FAR TRAN51FER AWSHOR BOLT5 SHTY, 140T REOV. WiXtDARY KAUN& 04') UN (fjwte 1) NAILING (ENS) NAILiN6 (54NI) (fjwte b'"11) 0"-E Tor PLATE AT F06ES DIRECTLY PLAN Onote 2,q) (F�te 4) EN- 5TA66ERED a PA14EL 5TA6CAR aLY REQV OVER PtALL PLATE. SEE P<WLE Top m15 4 0 VOLeLE VOEV WILLS 51irG NOTP ON PLAN5� 5NI 7116,0513 (11 ir2d a 6"0<' 5/&'xl2' a 48' 00 DUL EV&F 5WD5, TYP, I / ... . .... .. . ..... . _4 TT -- (one side) 2x HOW, E3LC"Kjw'- 1 -.7 . . . . . . . . . . . SK2 -1116, 053 bat a 4' e jow% TYE. (one side) lod EnD RAILS O��13 STAG DER ENO a TOP d IV 4 BOTNIM "TH" 4 (one 51do) 0 PNE-'- JOINTS, FIELD RAILINI, ITH-) ad 0 &" OC INT911. 5TVP5 Ov'ER HFAPER ARE I&' 0�- EXTBW KIN& ------- 4- AS REGURM, TYP� NOT 50OV00 E44EAR PiALL. 5nV5 RILL LIGHT FOOTNOTE5 4 CODE REQUIREMENT "a: o INTERIORA- j, r OOP I. Sheathing shall loo 'APA'ratod (056) Struct 1, C-17, ext. qfUe, 24/0 span rating. D5L EIXIE 5yw OR KALL E)TM FL I To FLOOR - PV AAILER HEADER PER PLANRM a TOP 4 DOT (AS vi 2. Edge nalling (ENO) as Called for on plans and in details, refers to edges of all POST PER "4 ;,Ear5W-AR 1,04LL SCA-9-D, FOR SHEAR W&R43 SN'), sheets Into verWoI studs, bottom 4 top plates and horTzOnWI 2x edge blo6ling. PLATE VIASfER PER Sea 5heor P011 ncilling detail. SG+ELAtF' I.IPPER FLOOR OR ROOF ACE6 ONJE= SMIr EACH END 5, Field nail" "') at Intermediate ��vpporls rWI he ad 0 (5, 0(�. SHEATHING TO M- TOP OR EFICZ CAP PER M-W HOLDOM 4 AN(AIOR- I W-8 STUD via 4. Vwar� nailing (�,N*) occurs at bottom plate Into diaphragm shaathlnq� PER MAX PIL (OR moo<ne) - 5HE Flat) NAILINS FLOOR ROOF SHT�5 NOTE 5. P,'hara shear Noll is more thm one panel In hak3ht, block edges and 5tocIclor joints. T, 7 AS, o 12'01 ON PI.AH FOR 13CUCARY T- 2 KING SlUD UO 6, ArwAsr bolts shall be A30'7 grade with 5tondaird bond, Pro act 2 112' MTn above 5111 plate, Anchor 511t plate wIth 0.2--Iqx3' sqcxre No5lier5 (or approved equal) per TACOER EVOE 2014 C*56-5emtlon 2305.12,13 �5elsmic, Gat. P). 5ee 5hear Mall naGing detail. ATTA4,4IKIlV551tVS4---'--- i 511��4 A�5.9 ail' 1. 61" plates shall be 2x or 3x P.T. Doug Fir HILIT additional anchor bolts at 61 from A.B.PER SCHEDLLE. RAILING 01-) ALL LINSUIPPORTED JA215 5=5 TO6En-IER P / —P PANEL EOCZ5 SHALL EA SIPE e PROX-CT 2142" Hill I"V ANFL5 RIM r, OR HA%'E 16d * IXOC, EA LAYER end or each plate'-7 each 4 open". 2x *,LATE OR t� 142* 5TWS ARE 16' OG PLAN VIFV4 PERPFJWICbL-AR TO PANEL WF-1, TYP. 0. All shoo Nall segment ends with holdoVins require double studs ottochad with, 16d MM VW 3x PLATE, ELEVATION IAEP4 FRAMR&S, STA&SERED. a W o<, staggered, or post as shoe-4n on plans. cl. Halls shall be 5d common (2 i/2'xO.131'). 6olvanized nails snail be hot dipped. ,5HEARNALL 56HEDULE SHEARNALL NAILINC, 3 UNBLOOKED DIAPHRAGM G4 HEADER DETAIL T(MOAL 56010: Nl5 �5,.Iea N�T5 Scaler,Scaler,NT5 )---EASeale: NT5 MIR 6'0' TO IEXT 5PLIrE - LAP' DETVErN LOVZ PLATES. JOWS TO BE CENTERED DIVER Snus OR I`"JJOK 2 RafiI5 OF (15) - t6d 0 2 U2, Or, STA6.Fzi SFLICA-= UFFER 4 LOVER RATES IN SAM MANWR "i W54 TOP PLATE SPLICE 5r-aTe: NT5 ev -vN PER SCAED 2X4 DLK45 EA VA'( 'rR EA STUD MONO, Roof TP11" KR PLAN HANOMR PER TR4�1 MHFR DmEGwy INTO RIM J06T OR CORTArT EN&FEER FOR I-EvOtR OPTION r,—'\ SHEAR TRAN5FER PETA11-5 p0lft AU L") W WI o z 9 ID z N' w Elf Uj L5 z 0 < a: Q cL ca 0 STRUCTURAL DETAILS SCALE, 1'-1'-0' 8 LL 7/5/1J 181-0`'I/S-DTLS S4 4 51 11. 4 OF I srcN 'SPEED 2,' 24' DECIDUOUS 7AXLOT1800 TAXL07'2106 joy.11MENT� LI) 30' 30' IPP Assessor's Mop No. 39 1E 14 BC, Tax Lot 2200 W A 12- PINE TAXLOT2104 TA XL 0 T 2103 12' PINE 10 DRIVEWAY Q) EASEMENT PER O.R. 93-01044 CONCRETE t?RIVEI AYp TAXLOT2105 S T R E E T . .......... ..... � � ---06 -- -- PRELIMINARYPAR TITIONMAP LOCATED AT 876 Clay Street Ashland, Oregon L YINCY S17UA IT W1 T1-1W NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14 TOWNSHIP 39 SOUTH, RANGE I EAST, WILLAMETTE MERID)AN CITY OFASHLAND, JACKSON COUNTY, OREGON F 01? Sid Deboer 234 Vista Street Ashland, Oregon 97520 SCALE: I" = 30' REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURE OREGON JULY 14, 1998 j4fSHA�N KAMPMANN 2883 LS RENEWAL DATE: 6/30/2019 SURVEYED BY: POLARIS LAND SURVEYING LLC P.O. BOX 459 ASHLAND, OREGON 97520 (541) 482-5009 DATE: AUGUST 2, 2018 PROJECT NO. 1191--- 17 1 A F-% I 9m l A its I 9 p F-%% Jor—%loo A. 201% City of Ashland Community Development Department 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 Telephone: 541-488-5305 Inspection Line: 541-552-2080 Plan Type: Type I Planning Action Work Class: Type I Planning Action PERMIT NUMBER. ? PA-T1-2018-00024 Apply Date: 8/16/2018 Mao & Tax Lot Property Address 391 E14BC2200 876 Clay St Owner: Sidney DeBoer Trust Owner 234 Vista Address: Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: (541)-62-5-3749 Site desictn review for ARU Applicant: David Wisniewski J.R. Applicant 876 Clay St Address: Ashland, OR 97520 Phone: (541)631-8010 Fee Description: Amount: Accessory Residential Unit (Type l) $696.00 Applicant: Date: Total tees $696.00