HomeMy WebLinkAboutNMain_1131_PA-T1-2020-00095CITY OF
41 N
, xSHLA D
May 06, 2020
Notice of Final Decision
On May 6, 2020, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
Planning Action: PA-TI-2020-00095
Subject Property: 1] 31 N Main Street
Applicant; Kendall Olson -Cassidy
Description: A request for Site Design Review approval to convert an existing detached
garage into a 672 square feet Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) for the property at 1131 N
Main. There are no proposed site changes associated with the application, all work will be
interior to the garage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family
Residential; ZONING: R,-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 391E 0 BA; TAX LOT: 700
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day
after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all
conditions, of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project
completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51
Winburn Way, Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of
Ashland copy fee schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may
request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO)
18.5 . 1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO
18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached,
The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the
Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fav 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800.735-2900
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, aType I decision becomes effective 12 (lays after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider aType I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been niade by providing evidence to tile Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect tile decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input oil the application sufficient to afford tile Staff Advisor all opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision,
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advise]- shall
decide within three (lays whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error Occurred crucial to the decision, tile Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration, The Staff Advisor shall decide within tell days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action,
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that all error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
(IV. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
L Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.13.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5,1.050.G. 1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of
this subsection. Tile fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If all appellant prevails at the
hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Thne for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date tile notice of
decision is mailed.
c. Content of Notice qf,4ppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by tile required filing fee and shall
contain.
i. Ali identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision,
ii, A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to, appeal,
iii. A staternent explaining the specific issues being raised oil appeal.
iv. A statement derrionstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d, 'File appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings oil Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de nova hearings before
the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to tile application materials, evidence and other
documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading tip to the Type I decision, but may include other
relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument
concerning any relevant ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings oil appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5. 1 .060, subsections A — E, except that tile decision of the Planning Commission is tile filial
decision of tile City on all appeal of a Type I decision..A decision oil all appeal is filial the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be flied with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 19T805 - 197,860,
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 ftburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00095
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1131 North Main
APPLICANT/OWNER: Rouge Planning 1 Kendall Olson -Cassidy
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to convert an existing
detached garage into a 672 square feet Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) for the property at 1131
N Main. There are no proposed site changes associated with the application, all work will be
interior to the garage.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION:
MAP: 39 lE 0 BA; TAX LOT: 700
SUBMITTAL DATE:
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE:
STAFF APPROVAL DATE:
DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.):
FINAL DECISION DATE:
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE:
DECISION
Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5;
March 31, 2020
April 1, 2020
May 6, 2020
May 18, 2020
May 19, 2020
November 19, 2021
The proposal is to convert an existing shop into a detached Accessory Residential Unit (ARU).
The subject property is located at the intersection of North Main and Fox and is located in the R-
1-7.5 zoning district. The property confonns to base zone requirements including setbacks and lot
coverage. The surrounding neighborhood is comprised exclusively of single-family homes and is
also zoned R-1-7.5.
The property is 0.47 acres and is developed with a single story single family house constructed in
1946 and a detached garage that was improved as a shop in 2009 (See Building permit #BD-2009-
01600). At the time that the shop was improved the applicant entered into a "No kitchen
agreement" as is standard practice. A condition of approval will be that the applicant request that
the city record an `amendment of restrictive covenant' removing the no -kitchen agreement.
According to the Jackson County Assessor the main house is 1605 square feet. Accessory
Residential Units are required not to exceed 50-percent of the Gross Habitable Floor Area (GHFA)
of the primary dwelling with an upper limit of 1000 square feet. The proposed ARU has a GHFA
of 672 square feet (less than 50-percent of the main residence).
The ALUO parking requirements for an ARU and a single-family home requires three automobile
parking spaces. The application demonstrates that the property has at least three off street parking
spaces (two at the rear of the property, and one under the car port). That said, House Bill 2001
amended ORS 197.312 (effective January 1, 2020) to include language that state "`reasonable local
regulations relating to siting and design' does not include * * *requirements to construct additional
off-street parking" [emphasis added].
PA-T1-2020-00095
1131 N Main/aa
Page 1
The application complies with all of the applicable provisions of the R-1-7.5 zoning district, the
applicable Site Development and Design Standards in AMC 18.4, and the special use standards
for an ARU provided in AMC 18.2.3.040.
The applicant has submitted materials to the Planning Department that demonstrate compliance
with these approval standards.
The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040,
as follows:
B. R-1 Zone. Accessory Residential Units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following
requirements:
1. One Accessory Residential Unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling
units shall not exceed two per lot.
2. Accessory Residential Units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area
requirements of the zone.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the Accessory Residential Unit shall
not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not
exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback
requirements of the underlying zone.
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions
for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040, except that parking spaces, turn-
arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections
18.4.3.080.D,1 and 18.4.3.080.D.2 and paving requirements in subsection
18.4.3.080. E.1.
The criteria for Site Review approval are described: in AMC Chapter 18.6.2.050 as follows:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the
underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot
area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building
orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part
18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable
Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection
E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6
Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity,
urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate
transportation can and will be provided to the subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may
approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the
PA-T1-2020-00095
1131 N Main/aa
Page 2
circumstances in either subsection I or 2, below, are found to exist.
There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site
Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an
existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will
not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the
exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and
Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the
difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but
granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the
stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards.
In staffs assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable
ordinances and meets all required criteria.
Planning Action #TI-2020-00095 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one
or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then
Planning Action #Tl-2020-00095 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached
to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise
specifically modified herein.
2) That all necessary building permits, including permits for the new electrical service to the
Accessory Residential Unit, and system development charges for water, sewer, storm
water, parks, and transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3) That the applicant petition for a new address for the ARU, and correct the address issue for
the primary residence.
4) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with
those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are
not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an
application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to
issuance of a building permit.
5) That bicycle parking to be shown on the Final Plan. If bicycle parking is provided in
garages, final interior dimensions of garages shall be provided to insure adequate space
needs.
6) That the applicant request that the city amend the restrictive covenant ensuring that no
cooking facilities be installed in the shop and pay for the recording fees
7) That the property owner shall sign in favor of Local Improvement District (LID) for the
future street improvements, including but not limited to paving, curb gutter, storm
drainage, sidewalks and undergrounding of utilities for Fox and Noah Main Street prior to
issuance of the building permit. Nothing in this condition is intended to prohibit an
owner/developer, their successors or assigns from exercising their rights to freedom of
speech and expression by orally objecting or participating in the LID hearing or to take
PA-T1-2020-00095
1131 N Mainlaa
Page 3
advantage of any protection afforded any party by City ordinances and resolutions.
8) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be
installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements,
b) That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for
approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the
requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right -
of -Way.
c) All automobile parking and bicycle parking shall be installed according to the
approved plan, inspected, and approved by the Staff Advisor.
d) All landscaping, hardscaping and irrigation, shall be, installed according to the
approved plan, inspected and approved by the Staff Advisor.
May 6, 2020
Bill Molnar, Community Development Director
Date
PA-T1-2020-00095
1131 N Main/aa
Page 4
STATE OF OREGON
County of Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
Z On May 6, 20201 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice
to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on
this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-00095, 1131 N
Main Street.
C 011)1114-
Signaiure of Employee
DccurneW 516/202D
PA-T1-2020-00095 PA-T1-2020-00095 PA-T1-2020-00095
OLSON-CASSIDY KENDALL BARTON BRUCE G TRUSTEE ET AL RICHARDS SARA A
330 PATRICK LN 2310 NW WOODCREST AVE 1179 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ALBANY, OR 97321 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
HAYESJEREMY
1321 VISTA DR
CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502
PA-T1-2020-00095
SPENCE GARY C TRUSTEE ET AL
1172 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
ELDER JIMMIE R TRUSTEE ET AL
346 HIGH ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
MILLER ERIN ET AL
1164 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
VOISIN CAROL J TRUSTEE FBO
908 FOX ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
FINK THOMAS K TRUSTEE ET AL
1176 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
1131 N Main
05/06/2020 NOD
21
PA-T1-2020-00095
OLSO-CASSIDY KENDALL
1131 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
NELSON BRYAN L
1180 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
EATINGER EDWARD
1161 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
ESTES STEPHANIE
1146 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
JAMES MARY E ET AL
1140 JACKSON RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
PECARIC JASNICA
PO BOX 1162
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
SLATER JUDITH C TRUSTEE ET AL
1168 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
HAWKSLEY SARAH ELISA BIROBERT
1169 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
WILSON MICALAH
1140 FOX ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
BRECHEISEN BENJAMIN BNALEA C
1135 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
BRECHEISEN JONATHAN J
1775 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
Rogue Planning & Development
33 Central Ave #213
Medford, OR 97501
wG ��� 1�
F ��/
n 'hr
7 � �'i.,�
�� �'�/�
' yw.
f
mI 'I IOF 1 11 Planning Department, 51 Winbui,, Ay, Ashland, Oregon 97520 TY C
`611111 e 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 wwwashland.orms TTY: 1-800-735-2900 -ASHLAND
. ..... . . ....... . ..............
:10154"T,
PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00095
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1131 N Main
OWN E,RIAPP LI CANT: Rogue Planning / Kendall Olson -Cassidy
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to convert an existing detached garage into a 672 square
feet Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) for the property at 1131 N Main. There are no proposed site changes associated
with the application, all work will be interior to the garage, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single
Family Residential; ZONING: R-1 -7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 391 E 0 BA; TAX LOT: 700
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 1, 20'20
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS:
i L/A
April 1,5, 2020
Subject Property
1131 N Main St.
PA-TI-2020-00095
N
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to, submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland,
Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m, on the deadline date shown above.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine it a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Uporr determination of completeness, a notice is sent to
surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than
45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same
properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning CommNsion of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning
Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050,G)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter,
or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of
Appeals (LUBA) on that issue, Failure to specify wlilch ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure
of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the
issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at
reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 WinbUrn Way,
Ashland, Oregon 97520.
ff you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at 541-488-5305,
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.05C
The following criteria shall be used to approve or de,., k application:
A, Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and
yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable
standards.
B, Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18,3),
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18A, except as
provided by subsection E, below.
D, City Facilities- The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water,
sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject
property.
E, Excoption to time Site Development and Design Standards: The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design
Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist,
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect
of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not Substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and
approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum
which would alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves
the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards,
ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNITS 18.2.3.040
Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, except as exempted in subsection 18.2.3,040,A, below.
A. Exemptions, Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved' building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under
chapter 18.5.2 provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements.
1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require
Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted Outright under this subsection,
2, The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable zone in subsections 1823,040,13, C, E and F, below, except as
otherwise exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A.
3. The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area (GHFA).
4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the
Historic District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building permit, and accessory residential units located in detached
structures (Le,, not attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review Linder chapter 18,5.2 and are not permitted outright under this
subsection.
5 The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in
subsections 1 and 2 of 18,43.080B and paving requirements in subsection 18A.3.080.E.1.
6. Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residofltial unit if on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property.
Alternatively, one off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for accessory
residential units in section 18,4.3.080.
B. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements,
1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot.
2, Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence
on the, lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone,
5. Additional parking shall be provided in, conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.080, except that
parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2 of 18.4.3.080,D and_paving requirements in
subsection 18,43,080.E.I.
C. RR Zone, In addition to the standards in subsection 18.23.040,13, accessory residential units in the RR zone shall meet the following requirements.
1. No on -street parking credits shall be allowed for accessory residential units.
2, If located in the Wildfire zone, the accessory residential unit shall have a residential sprinkler system installed.
D, R-2 and R-3 Zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standards in subsection 18,23.040.13, except that the maximum
gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential Structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the to(, and
shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA,
L NN Zones. Accessory residential units in the Normal Neighborhood District under chapter 18,3.4 shall meet the standards in subsection 18.2.3.040,8,
F. NM Zones. Accessory residential units in the North Mountain Neighborhood NM zones under chapter 18.3.5 shall ineet the standards in subsection
18.2.3.040,B, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit must not exceed 750 square feet GHFA and
that second story accessory residential units constructed above a detached accessory building must not exceed 500 square feet GHFA,
ActionsWolicing FoldeN%iafled Nolices & S6cns\202C�TA-TI-2020-00095,,docx
STATE OF OREGON
County of Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On April 1, 20201 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-00095, 1131 N Main.
Signature of Employee
C:1UserslsmbdaAFNHEADesklopVAFFI DAVIT OF MAILINGjs.dacx 41112020
PA-T 1 -2020-00095 391E05BA400 PA-T 1 -2020-00095 391E05BA1500 PA-T 1 -20 20-00095 391 E05BA3000
BARTON BRUCE G TRUSTEE ET AL BRECHEISEN BENJAMIN BNALEA C BRECHEISEN JONATHAN J
2310 NW WOO DCREST AVE 1135 ASHLAND MINE RD 1775 ASHLAND MINE RD
ALBANY, OR 97321 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391E05BA300
EATINGER EDWARD
1161 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391E05BA3100
FINK THOMAS K TRUSTEE ET AL
1176 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391E05BA1700
JAMES MARY E ET AL
1140 JACKSON RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T 1 -2020-00095 391E05BA700
OLSON-CASSIDY KENDALL
1131 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T 1 -2020-00095 391 E05BA501
RICHARDS SARA A
1179 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T 1 -2020-00095 391 E05BA1600
VOIS€N CAROL J TRUSTEE FBO
908 FOX ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
411120
1131 N Main NOC
21
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BA200
ELDER JIMMIE R TRUSTEE ET AL
346 HIGH ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BAl01
HAWKSLEY SARAH ELISA BIROBERT
1169 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BA702
MILLER ERIN ET AL
1164 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391E05BA100
OLSON-CASSIDY KENDALL
330 PATRICK LN
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E058A1000
SLATER JUDITH C TRUSTEE ET AL
1168 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BA701
WILSON MICALAH
1140 FOX ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BA800
ESTES STEPHANIE
1146 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BA600
HAYESJEREMY
1321 VISTA DR
CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502
PA-T1-2020-00095 391E05BAl100
NELSON BRYAN L
1180 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BA3200
PECARIC JASNICA
PO BOX 1162
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095 391 E05BA1001
SPENCE GARY C TRUSTEE ET AL
1172 ASHLAND MINE RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00095
ROGUE PLAN NINGIDEVELOPMENTAMY
GUNTER
33 CENTRAL AVE STE 213
MEDFORD, OR 97501
Planning Division ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
51 Winburn Way, Ashland O�R 97520
CITY OF FINE VA `_V_ 2. CCk)(�A5
AS1 i I -AND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT site Review for Accessory Residential Unit
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED@ Certification? 0 YES 0 NO
Street Address 1131 North Main Street
Assessor's Map No. 391 E 05B,6 Tax Lot(s)
Zoning R-1 -7.5 Comp Plan Designation Single-EamjlV Residential
APPLICANT
Name Rogue Planning & Development Phone 541-951-4020 E-Mail amygunter.planining@gmail.com
Address 33 Central Avenue; Suite 213 City Medford Zip 917501
PROPERTY OWNER
Name Kendall Olson -Cassidy Phone E-Mail
Address--_ 330 Patrirk Lanp. City Ashland -Zip 97520
SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
Title Name Phone E-Mail
Address City Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct, I understand that al/ property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection, In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request,,
2) that the findings of fact furnishadjustiflos the granting of the request,,
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further
4) that all structures or improvements are property located on the ground,
Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be removed t my expe a. If I have any doubts, I 6m advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance.
A p(�pl AVON n at u re Date
As owner of the property involved in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
owner,
v[
Property Owner's Signature (required) Date
[To be completed by C4 DO] e 175 771
Date Received Zoning Permit Type Filing Fee Srid
OVER 0
Wcomm-devlplanningWorms & Handouts7oning permit Appheation doc
APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner.
FINDINGS OF FACT — Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or
findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include
information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre -Application Comment document,
V1 2 SETS OF SCALED PLANS no larger than 1 Vx17". Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape
details. (Optional — 1 additional large set of plans, 2'x3', to use in meetings)
WJ FEE (Check, Charge, or Cash)
1:1 LEED@ CERTIFICATION (opfional)l — Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall
provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps:
• Hiring and retaining a LEE,DO Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and
construction of the project; and
• The LEED0 checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued.
• Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis,
• Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property
owner(s), all required materials and full payment.
• All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance
with ORS 227.178.
• The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission
meeting. (Planning Commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1:30 pm, or the full Planning Commission, which
meets at 7:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held' at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St).
• A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns.
• It applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree andior Historic Commissions,
E"D
(,:)"t Ashle,"and
Wcomm-de0planninj omis & Handouts\Zomng Permit Appheatimi doc
An&
ROGUE PLANNING 9 I)EVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
March 6, 2020
SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL
FOR ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT
Subject Property
Address: 1131 N Main Street
LE,p & Tax Lot: 39 1E 05BA: 704:
Comprehensive
Plan Designation: Single Family Residential
Zoning: R-1-7.5 (7,500 square foot lot minimum)
Adjacent Zones: R-1-7.5
Lot Area:
WEU-Maz=
1131 N Main:
Kendall Olson -Cassidy
330 Patrick Lane
Ashland, OR 97520
20,691 SF (.475, ac)
Applicant: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC
33 N. Central Avenue #213
Medford, OR 97501
Request:
A request for Site Design Review to allow for the conversion of a detached, 672-square foot guest
house to an accessory residential unit that is located to the west of 1131 North Main Street.
14)
0
Property Description:
The property at 1131 N Main is .475-acre
(20,691 SF), and occupied by an
approximately, 1,605 SF single story
residence. There a garage and a carport
structure attached to the residence. To
the, west of the residence there is a 672
square foot, detached cottage structure.
The parcel is to the southwest of the North
Main and Fox Street intersection.
1131 N Main is accessed via a gravel
driveway from N Main Street. There is a
ROGUE PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
�A
I V,)
5-1
second looping driveway that connects from N Main through to Fox. There is also a carport structure
that is accessed: from a driveway curb cut on Fox Street,
North Main Street is paved with curb and gutter. There are no continuous sidewalks, on North Main
Street. There are no sidewalks on the southside of North Main Street.
City facilities are available within the rights -of -way to service the properties and the development
proposed. There is, a public sewer line that transacts the property.
Proposal:
The request is for Site Design Review to allow the existing 672 square foot cottage to be converted to
accessory residential unit (ARU).
The required parking spaces for the residence and the ARU, available within the existing driveway from
Fox Street, and in the driveway accessed from North Main, Street.
The structure has an existing electrical meter and no site improvements or structural modifications are
proposed. A kitchen stove was added when the guest house conversions were made in the early 2000s.
On the following pages, findings of fact addressing the criteria from Ashland Municipal Code are provided
on the following pages. For clarity, the criteria are in Times New Roman and the applicant's responses
are in Calibri font.
R E
of Ashlan(,J",
2
A!
W1110
ROGUE PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
CRITERIA froin the Ashland Land Use Ordinance
B. Applicability. Except as otherwise required by an overlay zone or plan district, the following standards
apply to residential development pursuant to section 18.5.2.020. See conceptual site plan of multi -family
development in Figure 18,4.2,030,
t, Accessory Residential Units. Unless exempted frorn Site Design Review in 18.2.3.040.A, only the
following standards in Chapter 18.4.2 apply to accessory residential units: building orientation
requirements in 18.4.2.030.C, garage requirements in 18.4.2.030.D, and building materials in
18,4.2.030.E. If an accessory residential unit is located in the Historic District overlay, the standards in
18.4.2.050 also apply. See the Special Use Standards for accessory residential units in section 18.2.3.040.
18,.5.2.050 Site Design Review
A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone
(part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and
floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
Finding:
The 20,691 square, foot lot area exceeds the minimum lot area in the R-1-75 zone.
The existing structure complies with the setbacks in the zone and is more than ten feet from North Main
Street.
The accessory unit does not need to meet density standards.
The, existing lot coverage is lot coverage complies with the maximum lot coverage in the zone. The
accessory residential use is within an existing structure and the building height, orientation, architecture
and complies with applicable standards for an accessory residential' unit.
Standards for Residential Zones:
18.2.3.040 Accessory Residential Unit
Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, except as
exempted in subsection 18.2,3.040.A, below.
A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved
building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2
provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements.
1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM
zones, Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design
Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection.
Finding:
The property is in the R-1 zone. The unit requires Site Design Review because the
ARIJ is detached and is more than 500 square feet in area.
ainO
of Ai,�;hl 3
A&
ROGU�F PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable
zone in. subsections 18.2.3.0403, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted
in subsection 18,23.040.A.
Finding:
The proposed accessory residential unit meets the requirements of the applicable
zone found in subsection 18.2.3.040.B.
3. The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross
habitable floor area (GHFA).
Finding:
The accessory residential unit is 672-square feet in area.
4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an
existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the Historic
District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building
permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures (i.e., not
attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2
and are not permitted outright under this subsection.
Finding:
The accessory residential unit is detached from the primary residence by three
feet. A Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 is required,
5. The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces,
tum-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections I and
2 of 18.4.3.080.D and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E.1.
Finding:
The property has four off-street parking spaces that are within the two -vehicle
carport accessed from the Fox Street driveway. There is another driveway
accessed from North Main Street that provides two additional parking spaces,
6. Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residential unit if
on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one
Mr.
4
,,Cool "y of,Ashland
ROGUE PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the
off-street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18.4.3.080,
Finding:
On -street parking spaces are available on both street frontages.
B. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following
requirements:
1, One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of
dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot.
Finding:
The proposal is for one accessory residential unit in addition to the existing
residence.
2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area
requirements of the zone.
Finding:
Density standards do not apply.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential
unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot,
and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA.
Finding:
The GHFA of the accessory residential unit is 672-square feet in area. This is less
than 50 percent of the GHFA of the 1,605 square foot residence on the site.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback
requirements of the underlying zone.
Finding:
The lot coverage and setbacks are existing on the property. The coverage is less
than allowed in the zone. The structure complies with setbacks and was converted
to a habitable space with building permits.
WMA
))) 4011
vo 0%
5
c
A I
ROGUE I'MINRIG 9 UIVELOPMENT SERVUIES, L[C
S. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking
provisions for single-family dwellings in section II 8.4,"A) ' 40, except that parking
spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in
subsections 18 4 D,I and and paving requirements in
subsection I R, 4,, 1, 80 1
Finding:
There are four on -site parking spaces provided on the property, There is available
on -street parking along the frontage of the property,
B. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
Finding:
The property is within the Wildfire, Hazards overlay zone. There are no changes to the site to
accommodate the existing structure to be converted to an accessory residential unit.
C. Site Development and Design Standards.
Finding:
The trash / recycle area is be provided behind a screening fence and not visible to the public street.
Building Materials. Building materials and paint colors should be compatible with the
surrounding area. Very bright primary or neon -type paint colors, which attract attention to the
building or use, are unacceptable.
Finding:
The structure is existing and is not bright, primary or neon type paint.
Streetscape. One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of
frontage for that portion of the development fronting the street pursuant to subsection 18.4.4.030.E.
Finding:
There is a steep, ivy-covered slope along the street frontage of North Main where the ARU is
present. There is a mixture of deciduous trees along the hillslope. The frontage is more natural
that what the street standards seek. A request for exceptions to sidewalk standards is included
in the request.
Landscape / Tree Protection:
Finding:
C 6
N
NI
k."JA
ROGUE PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLE
The property is in a fairly natural state with unmanicured landscapes. There are lawn areas with
established trees. There is a patio/deck area for the, tenants of the ARU'.
A City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities,
and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved
access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject
property.
Find
Adequate city facilities exist and presently service the SFR and the ARU in North Main Street and Fox
Street. Water', sewer and storm drainage are present on the site. The structure was constructed with
permits for a detached, heated, habitable space. A separate electric service and meter for the ARU exists
on the property, A "change of use" permit will be obtained to address the occupancy change to
residence.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve
exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either
subsection 1, 2, or 3, below, are found to exist.
I. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development
and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed
use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent
properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site
Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the
difficulty;
None requested.
� 0 0 E
(D c � a
C
dole: 8- 14.2018
drown by R I,
pro�lccf nqm: CAS-3 1 33
sccie: P= 25'-0"
11 X 17 PRINT
ral E., C'
iinue E D
existing site plan
Tlill
of As.:1,"fla, r"to
L 0 1
City of Ashland
Community Development Department
51 Winburn Way
Ashland, OR 97520
Telephone: 541-488-5305
Inspection Line: 541-552-2080
Plan Type: Type I Planning Action
Work Class: Type I Planning Action
PERMIT NUMBER
PA-T 1-2020-00095
[Apply Date: 3/6/2020
Ma & Tax Lot
Property Address
391 E05BA700
1131 N Main St
Owner Information Applicant Information
Owner: Kendall Olso-Cassidy Applicant: Rogue Planning and Development
Owner 1131 N Main St Applicant 33 N Central Ave 213
Address: Ashland, OR 97520 Address: Medford, OR 97501
Phone: (707) 280-6696 Phone: (541) 951-4020
Project Description
I Slte review to convert existinq building to ARU 1
Fees
Fee Description: Amount:
Accessory Residential Unit (Type 1) $710.00
Applicant:
Date:
Total Fees: $710.00
9000
ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
March 6, 2020
SITE REVIEW SUBMITTAL
FOR ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNIT
Subject Property
Address: 1131 N Main Street
Map & Tax Lot: 39 1E 05BA: 7011
Comprehensive
Plan Designation: Single Family Residential
Zoning: R-1-7.5 (7,500 square foot lot minimum)
Adjacent Zones: R-1-7.5
Lot Area:
Property Owner:
1131 N Main:
Kendall Olson -Cassidy
330 Patrick Lane
Ashland, OR 97520
20,691 SF (.475 ac)
Applicant: Rogue Planning & Development Services, ILLC
33 N. Central Avenue #213
Medford, OR 97501
Request:
A request for Site Design Review to allow for the conversion of a detached, 672-square foot guest
house to an accessory residential unit that is located to the west of 1131 North Main Street.
RE C" HIVED
t4AR 0 6 2020
Property Description:
The property at 1131 N Main is .475-acre
(20,691 SF), and occupied by an
approximately, 1,60�5 SF single story
residence. There a garage and a carport
structure attached to the residence. To
the west of the residence there is a 672
square foot, detached cottage structure.
The parcel is to the southwest of the North:
Main and Fox Street intersection.
1131 N Main is accessed via a gravel
driveway from N Main Street. There is a
fl A
ROGUE PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
ce.w.ta NM
5-1
second looping driveway that connects from N Main through to Fox. There is also a carport structure
that is accessed from a driveway curb cut on Fox Street.
North Main Street is paved with curb and gutter. There are no continuous sidewalks on North Main
Street, There are no sidewalks on the southside of North Main Street.
City facilities are available within the rights -of -way to service the properties and the, development
proposed. There is a public sewer line that transects the property.
Proposal':
The request is for Site Design Review to allow the existing 672 square foot cottage to be converted to
accessory residential unit (ARU).
The required parking spaces for the residence and the ARU, available within the existing driveway from
Fox Street, and in the driveway accessed from North Main Street.
The structure has an existing electrical meter and no site improvements or structural modifications are
proposed. A kitchen stove was added when the guest house conversions were made in the early 2000s.
On the following pages, findings of fact addressing the criteria from Ashland Municipal Code are provided
on the following pages. For clarity, the criteria are in Times New 1toman and the applicant's responses
are in Cal ibri font.
pia r E I EE
sue 1i�J�
y CH C,
2
ROGUE PLANNING 8 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LIC
CRITERIA froin the Ashland Land Use Ordinance
B. Applicability. Except as otherwise required by an overlay zone or plan district, the following standards
apply to residential development pursuant to section 18,5.2.020. See conceptual site plan of multi -family
development in Figure 18.4.2.030.
1. Accessory Residential Units. Unless exempted from Site Design Review in 18,2.3,040.A, only the
following standards in Chapter 18.4,2 apply to accessory residential units: building orientation
requirements in 18.4.2.030.C, garage requirements in 18.4.2.030.D, and building materials in
18.4.2.030.E. If an accessory residential unit is located in the Historic District overlay, the standards, in
18.4.2.050 also apply. See the Special Use Standards for accessory residential units in section 18,2.3.040,
18.5.2.050 Site Design Review
A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone
(part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and
floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
Finding:
The 20,691 square foot lot area exceeds the minimum lot area in the R-1-7.5 zone,
The existing structure complies with the setbacks in the zone and is more than ten feet from North Main
Street.
The accessory unit does not need to meet density standards.
The existing lot coverage is lot coverage complies with the maximum lot coverage in the zone. The
accessory residential use is within an existing structure and the building height, orientation, architecture
and complies with applicable standards for an accessory residential unit.
Standards for Residential Zones:
18.2.3.040 Accessory Residential Unit
Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, except as
exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, below.
A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved
building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2
provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements,
1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R- 1, R- 1 -3.5, RR, NN and NM
zones, Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design
Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright tinder this subsection,
Finding:
The property is in the R-1 zone. The unit requires Site Design Review because the
ARID is detached and is more than 500 square feet in area.
W ("A
� bornE"
rnal Ig
6 7,070
I
3
ROGUE PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, ILC
2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable
zone in subsections 18.2.3.040.13, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted
in subsection 18.2.3.040.A.
Finding:
The proposed accessory residential unit meets the requirements of the applicable
zone found in subsection 18.23.040.13.
3. The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross
habitable floor area (GHFA).
Finding:
The accessory residential unit is 672-square feet in area.
4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an
existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the Historic
District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building
permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures, (i.e., not
attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2
and are not permitted outright under this subsection,
Fincling:
The accessory residential unit is detached from the primary residence by three
feet. A Site Design Review under chapter 18.5,2 is required,
5. The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces,
turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections I and
2 of 18.4.3.080.D and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E. L
Finding:
The property has four off-street parking spaces that are within the two -vehicle
carport accessed from the Fox Street driveway. There is another driveway
accessed from North Main Street that provides two additional parking spaces,,
6. Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residential unit if
on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one
#N)g
21
Ivor
1, , A"
4
ROGUE PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLC
off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the
off-street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18.4.3.080.
Findiqg:
On -street parking spaces are available on both street frontages.
B. R- I Zone, Accessory residential units in the R- I zone shall meet the following
requirements:
1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of
dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot.
Finding:
The proposal is for one accessory residential unit in addition to the existing
residence.
2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area
requirements of the zone.
Finding:
Density standards do not apply.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential
unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot,
and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA,
Finding:
The GHFA of the accessory residential unit is 672-square feet in area. This is less
than 50 percent of the GHFA of the 1,605 square foot residence on the site,
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback
requirements of the underlying zone,
Finding:
The lot coverage and setbacks are existing on the property. The coverage is less
than allowed in the zone. The structure complies with setbacks and was converted
to a habitable space with building permits.
11)
, ()(") 2020
0
A 01 1
&I
I r1A_ 0111
ROGUE PLANNING 9 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLE
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking
provisions for single-family dwellings in section 1 8,4,,,3,,(.),40. except that parking
spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in
subsections 1 '8,d,3 � 0 8 01,, 1Y, 1 and 18,4 3, 08 2 and paving requirements in
subsection
Finding:
There are four on -site parking spaces provided on the property. There is available
on -street parking along the frontage of the property,
B. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
Finding:
The property is, within the Wildfire Hazards overlay zone. There are no changes to the site to
accommodate the existing structure to be converted to an accessory residential unit.
C. Site Development and Design Standards.
Finding:
The trash / recycle area is be provided behind a screening fence and not visible, to the public street.
Building Materials. Building materials and paint colors should be compatible with the
surrounding area. Very bright primary or neon -type paint colors, which attract attention to the
building or use, are unacceptable.
Finding:
The structure is existing and is not bright, primary or neon type paint.
Streetscape. One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of
frontage for that portion of the development fronting the street pursuant to subsection 18A.4.03O.E.
Finding:
There is a steep, ivy-covered slope along the street frontage of North Main where the ARIA is
present. There is a mixture of deciduous trees along the hillslope. The frontage is more natural
that what the street standards seek. A request for exceptions to sidewalk standards is included
in the request.
Landscape / Tree Protection:
Finding:
P'j gu
R'6
"�1020
AYO*(� fild('n 'a"
11""V11 6
Ifft
I N9 F01IR
ROGUE PLANNING 6 DEVEtOPMENT SERVICES, tLE
The property its in a fairly natural state with unmanicured landscapes. There are lawn areas with
established trees. There is a patio/deck area for the tenants of the ARU.
D. City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities,
and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved
access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject
property.
Finding:
Adequate city facilities exist and presently service the SFR and the ARU in North Main Street and Fox
Street. Water, sewer and storm drainage are present on the site. The structure was constructed with
permits for a detached, heated, habitable space. A separate electric service and meter for the ARIJ exists
on the property. A "change of use" permit will be obtained to address the occupancy change to
residence.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve
exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of pail 18.4 if the circumstances in either
subsection 1, 2, or 3, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development
and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed
use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent
properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site
Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the
difficulty;
None requested.
kt
4r
'pirl,
19
0 F.
0
oo
A
J
fps CNC)
LO
(D
::E 0
-7(5
CI)
11,0
000
✓ 0
duke : 8.14,2018
drown by: RJL
CAS-3133
1 POrs
Yg scale: 1 25' - 0"
of" AsItiland 19 X 17 PRINT
existing site plan
L U' I