The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutSiskiyou_872_PA-T1-2020-00088CITY (3F -ASHLAND February 11, 2020 Notice of Final Decision On February 10, 2020, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action- PA-TI-2020-00�088 Subject Property: 872 Siskiyou Blvd Applicant: Doug Houston Description: A request for Site Design Review approval for the development of a new 1268 square foot Single Family Home on a property that is developed with all existing 470 square foot home which will become an authorized ARU. The presence of the existing small home and the 'creation' of an ARU necessitates the Site Design Review, COMPRE HENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; MAP: 39 1 E 09 DA;TAX LOT- 6900 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed, Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file docuinents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who, was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to, the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. ,The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 wxw as � I hi I (Lor. u S SECTION 18.5.L050 Type IProcedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) R. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.C, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City snails the notice of decision. �F'. Reconsideration. Tile Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking; for reconsideration, which in tine opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during true opportunity to provide public input oil the application sufficient to afford tiwe Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to quaking a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five clays of availing tine notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. Tile Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of tine planning action. d. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that air error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial sliall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: I. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the suubject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5. I .Q5OR c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments oil the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5. 1.050.G. 1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying tine appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee rewired in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Timefor P"iling. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date tine notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. 'file notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. Ali identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person fling the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining; the specific issues being raised oil appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that tine appeal issues were raised during the public comment period, d. The appeal requirements of this section must befully ►net or tine appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de nova hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading; tip to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Nearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — F, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails tlue adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.8W COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax:541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 �w�woa .aa�E�tr�rm3srr.ara; ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00088 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 872 Siskiyou Blvd. OWNER/APPLICANT: Doug Houston DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for the development of a new 1268 square foot Single Family Home on a property that is developed with an existing 470 square foot home which will become an authorized ARU. The presence of the existing small home and the `creation' of an ARU necessitates the Site Design Review, The proposal includes a request for an exception to the landscape buffers for the parking area and a variance for rear yard setback. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; MAP: 39 1E 09 DA; TAX LOT: 6900 SUBMITTAL DATE: January 3, 2020 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: January 9, 2020 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: February 10, 2020 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): February 25, 2020 FINAL DECISION DATE: February 26, 2020 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: August 26, 2021 DECISION The proposal is a request for Site Design Review to designate the existing 470 square foot home as an ARU and develop a new single family house at the rear of the property. The proposal also includes an exception to the Site Design Standards to reduce the landscape buffers for the required parking spaces located between the two structures, and a variance to rear yard setback. No trees are proposed for removal as part of the application. The subject property is approximately 6,098 square feet, oriented nortb/south and fronts the south side of Siskiyou Boulevard. The subject parcel is relatively narrow and, irregularly shaped, The subject property and surrounding neighborhood is zoned exclusively R-2. The property is under the size that would allow for the development of a second dwelling, therefor the applicant is applying for Site Design Review to approve the construction of a new single family home large enough that the existing home would meet the requirements of an ARU in the R-2 zone. The existing home and the northern portion of the property is located in the City of Ashland's Nationally Registered Siskiyou-Hargadine Historic District (an area approximately eighty -feet in width which runs parallel to Siskiyou Blvd.). The proposed development is to the rear of the property and south of the Historic District. The adjacent property located to the west is developed with a single-family dwelling, has driveway access off Siskiyou Boulevard. To the south and east, the parcels are owned by the Ashland School District and are undeveloped but used for parking. The parcel adjacent to the east has a driveway access off Siskiyou Boulevard. Right-of-way is located adjacent to the north of the subject parcel. PA-T1-2020-00088 872 Siskiyou Blvd./aa Page 1 The property conforms to base zone requirements including lot coverage and setbacks. The existing home (which will be reclassified as an ARU) is 480 square -feet which is less than the limit of 50-percent of the new primary residence. The ALUO parking requirements for an ARU and a single-family home requires three automobile parking spaces. The application demonstrates that two of these parking spaces can be provided behind the existing home. State law has long allowed for local communities to regulate ARU's "subject to reasonable local regulations relating to siting and design". That said, House Bill 2001 amended ORS 197.312 (effective January 1, 2020) to include language that state "`reasonable local regulations relating to siting and design' does not include * * *requirements to construct additional off-street parking" [emphasis added]. As such, staff recognizes that the requirements of the ALUO would be unlawful to apply, and concede that the two parking spaces provided are sufficient, Bicycle parking is required and will be required as a condition of approval. A five-foot wide landscape buffer is required between the parking space for the accessory residential unit and the property line, and an eight -foot buffer is required between the parking space and the accessory residential unit. The proposal is to provide a small landscaped area in front of each of the two parking spaces adjacent to the property line and a three-foot wide buffer to the ARU. On the adjacent property immediately opposite the proposed parking there is an existing accessory structure, therefore this reduction in buffering should cause no impact on the on the other property. These exception will allow the property to develop to its highest and best use. Finally, the application also includes a request for a variance to rear yard setbacks. At the time that the existing home was constructed there was a very large pine tree that was located in the front yard, this caused the existing home to have an abnormally large front yard setback. While the tree that caused this pattern of development has since been removed it set the stage for this proposed development to be forced to the extreme rear of the property. These circumstances were not self-imposed by the applicant but rather was the result of development patterns that were required based on the preservation of significant trees. Staff feels that the configuration of the property and development pattern constitute a unique set of circumstances justifying the variance. The amount of the variance is the minimum necessary to address these concerns, and the resultant development provides greater benefit and does not result on negative impacts on surrounding properties. The application complies with all of the applicable provisions of the R-2 zoning district, and the applicable Site Development and Design Standards in AMC 18.4. The property is currently served by adequate City facilities for water, sewer, storm drainage and electricity. The applicant has submitted materials to the Planning Department that demonstrate compliance with these approval standards. The special use standards for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040, as follows: B. R-1 Zone. Accessory Residential Units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements: PA-T1-2020-00088 872 Siskiyou Blvd./aa Page 2 1. One Accessory Residential Unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot, 2. Accessory Residential Units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the Accessory Residential Unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA. 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3,040, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 18.4.3.080.D.1 and 18.4.3.080.D.2 and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E,1. D. R-2 and R-3 Zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standards in subsection 18.2.3.040.8, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.060 as follows: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. The criteria for a variance are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.5.050 as follows: The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination may be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance. PA-T1-2020-00088 872 Siskiyou Blvd./aa Page 3 2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site. 3. The proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts on the development of the adjacent uses and will further the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant. In staff s assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action #T1-2020-00088 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #T1- 2020-00088 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 2) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify the Variance approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) That all exterior lighting shall be directed on the property and shall not directly illuminate adjacent proprieties. 4) That all necessary building permits, including permits for the new electrical service, and system development charges for water, sewer, storm water, parks, and transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit. 5) That building permit submittals shall include: a. Identification of all easements, including public and private utility easements, mutual access easements, public pedestrian access easements, and fire apparatus access easements. b. Solar setback calculations demonstrating that all new construction complies with Solar Setback Standard A in the formula [(Height — 6)/(0.445 + Slope) = Required Solar Setback] and elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing point(s) and the height(s) from natural grade. c. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 65 percent as required in AMC 18.2.5.030.A. 6) That prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy the following shall be completed. a. The landscaping and irrigation shall be installed in accordance with the approved plans prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Vegetation shall be installed in such a manner as to be substantially established within one year of installation. b. That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements. PA-T1-2020-00088 872 Siskiyou Blvd./aa Page 4 c. That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right -of -Way. d. That recycle and refuse containers for the accessory residential unit shall be screened from ` adjacent properties and public right-of-ways. ill Molnar, Ckmmunity Development Director Date PA-T1-2020-00088 872 Siskiyou Blvd./aa Page 5 STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undiersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1, am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2, On February 11, 20201 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed, on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-0008,8, 872 Signature of Employee Docurmnd 2111(2020 PA-T1-2020-00088 PA-T1-2020-00088 PA-T1-2020-00088 SISKIYOU PLAZA LLC FOSTER TAMARA K ALEXANDER-O'CONNOR RORY 850 SISKIYOU BLVD 3 147 LAUREL ST 2768 QUAIL RUN RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 PA-T1-2020-00088 BISHOP JOHNSON OREGON LLC 2400 N AURORA AVE N208 SEATTLE, WA 98109 PA-T1-2020-00088 HOUSTON DOUGLAS D 180 GREENFIELD AVE AUBURN, CA 95603 PA-T1-2020-00088 MARNEU LLC 110 BUTLER LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00088 PA-T1-2020-00088 872 Siskiyou ASHLAND SCHOOL DIST #5 D ORFANI MARISA I ET AL 02/11/2020 NOD 885 SISKIYOU BLVD 284 BEACH ST 8 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 gCTY OF Planning Department, 51 Winbui,, Nay, Ashland, Oregon 97520 I 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 wwwashland.orms TTY: 1-800-735-2900 o -ASHLAND . ......... NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00088 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 872 Siskiyou Blvd OWNER/APPLICANT:, Doug Houston DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for the development of a new 1268 square foot Single Family Home on a property that is developed with an existing 470 square foot home which will become an authorized ARU. The presence of the existing small home and the 'creation' of an ARU necessitates the Site Design Review. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 391 E09DA; TAX LOT: 6900 11=111111111111111211MUR URN 1-1016M 1419M alA N1111111111 ROK9191011111 i 872 y,ou�iw PA-TI-2020-00098 302 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above., Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winbu,rn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the cleadiine date shown above, Ashland IPlaninng Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not rnore than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision an the application, A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to thee Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision, (AMC 18,5.1,050.G) The ordinance criteria, applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states, that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient spe6ficity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that cdterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval With sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the Issue precludes an action for damages in circuit Court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested, All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Divlsuon, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. if you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at 541-488-5305. SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2,050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited tobuilding and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3), C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18A, except as provided by subsection E, below, D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6, Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E� Exceplion to Yw Site Development and Desq"In Standards, The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist, 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the, stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNITS 18.2.3.040 Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, except as exempted in subsection 18,2.3.040.A, below. A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5,2 provided that the accessory residential unit meets all, of the following requirements. 1, The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design Review under chapter 18,5,2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable zone in subsections 18,23,040.13, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, 3. The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area (GHFA). 4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the Historic District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures (ii.e., not attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection. 5 The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections, I and 2 of 18.4.3.080.D and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080,E. 1. 6. Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residential unit if on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18.4.3.080. B. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements. 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot, 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. 1 The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA, 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.080, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in Subsections I and 2 of 18,4,3,080.D and_paving requirements in subsection 18 43 080.EA. ............. . .. . 111-.111 C. RR Zone. In addition to the standards in subsection 18.2.3.040.13, accessory residential units in the RR zone shall meet the following requIremenits. 1. No on -street parking credits shall be allowed for accessory residential units. 2. If located in the Wildfire zone, the accessory residential unit shall have a residential sprinkler system installed. D. R-2 and R-3 Zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standards in subsection 18.23.040.13, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA, E. NN Zones, Accessory residential units in the Normal Neighborhood District under chapter 18,3A shall meet the standards in subsection 18,23.040.B. F. NM, Zones. Accessory residential units In the North Mountain Neighborhood NM zones under chapter 18.3.5 shall meet the standards in subsection 18.2.3.040,13, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit must not exceed 750 square feet GHFA and that second story accessory residential units constructed above a detached accessory building must not exceed 500 square feet GHFA. C;:SconiTn-devlplaniiiiigkPlatindng A6ons\'Nloficing FolderNNlailed Notices Fr SignsMVYA-T I -2020-00088Aocx STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 11. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On January 10, 2020 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealled envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-TI-2020-00088, 872 Siskiyou Blvd.. Signature of Employee DocurmW 111312020 PA-T1-2020.00088 PA-T1-2020-00088 PA-T1-2020-00088 D ORFANI MARISA I ET AL ASHLAND SCHOOL DIST NO 5 SISKIYOU PLAZA LLC 284 BEACH ST 885 SISKIYOU BLVD 850 SISKIYOU BLVD 3 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00088 FOSTER TAMARA K 147 LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00088 HOUSTON DOUGLAS D 180 GREENFIELD AVE AUBURN, CA 95603 PA-T1-2020-00088 ALEXANDER-O'CONNOR RORY 2768 QUAIL RUN RD TALENT, OR 97540 PA-T1-2020-00088 MARNEU LLC 110 BUTLER LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00088 BISHOP JOHNSON OREGON LLC 2400 N AURORA AVE N208 SEATTLE, WA 98109 , . . , : . . � �� \� §� i} . 1 - m�»� � �� . ^ y. �\ I; \ gyp �.\., � . �:}�\� � } : � � � ^� � � \^� °�. � \ � � � � ` \ . . \ . � . . . , . . . � « \ �^ . . 2 � )a, \ \ � � : � � \.\ ��6 z� . � > . y «� � PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00088 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 872 Siskiyou Blvd. OWNER/APPLICANT: Doug Houston DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for the development of a new 1268 square foot Single Family Home on a property that is developed with an existing 470 square foot home which will become an authorized ARU. The presence of the existing small home and the `creation' of an ARU necessitates the Site Design Review, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; MAP: 39 1 E 09 DA; TAX LOT: 6900 PLANNER: Aaron TREE: No HISTORIC: No (Criteria: Site Design Revieii; ARU) W, m jw. I . . . . . . . . . . 00 C) C) C) (D 00 cD (D (P 0 M C� Cl) 0) to C) r4� 0-I CY) S" CT, I CID Planning Division CITY or 51 Whiburn Way, A sliland OR 97520 ASH LAND 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 N DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address Assessor's Mar Zoning U -L Comp Plan Designation r*91 ki I 19 N ii I A I Pursuing LEED@) Certification? 1771 YES 0 NO APPLICANT Phone ail A Address )6C) 4—mic— CityA Zip e�l PROPERTY OWNER Name,, Phone E-Mail Address SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title Name Address Title Name Address City Zi Phone — city Phone — city E-Mall — Zip E-M ail — Zip I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true and correct. I understand that allproperty pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection, In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request- 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me Oro adequate; and further �"`� that oil structures orimprovernents are property located on the ground. Failure in thi r and 'I result m t likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be ryKoved I avmr? doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance, A 1) 5%o'A"n t"i-tiaffatu re Date 9s dwder of thb property iokwo, in this 7 re uest, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. �/J(T_./ - - Property Owlnero)sSig4nate X(required) Date [To be compMed by C 8 Date Received 7.c) Zoning Permit Type 1—�i Filing Fee $_,_tl OVER I (3AC0mm-d0V4pWw1n9\FuraU & H&nduv¢s47*ning Pennat Applicafiomdoc ARU Special Use Standards B.R-Zone 1. The proposed project and application are less material to an ARU as the proposed project seeks to build a new 1250+ sf primary residence, which by the nature of the exiting 500 sf unit, would then be converted into anAR0. Z.This project wiNcompk/uvithdensltyandmoininmwnn|otstandardshutvohamcesasvve|lasmodest exceptions are required b)complete the project to maximize function and aesthetics. 3. Once this unit is built, the 500 sf existing unit shall be converted into an ARU. Further, in cailculating square footage requirements, this conversion clearly complies with the GHFA calculus. 4.This project wiOcomu�ly with the maximum lot coverage standards established by the City but shall require variance and possible exception approvals/authorization to proceed. Given the unique configuration and evolution of this property, this applicant is requesting a six foot variance from the required twenty foot set back off the rear property line. The purpose of the variance is to better accommodate the required parking space standards and turn -around requirements for a primary reyidenceandsltuotethesespauessoas1om[ninmizevehKc|eexposurefromsLree1"|ineofsight."Th|s variance will also accommodate a more functional back up and turn -around scenario for the vehicles on the premises. Further the location of the existing unit on the lot is limiting in maximize use potential. Had the existing unit been located closer to Siskiyou Avenue, the variance would not have been required. Exceptions will also be required, permitting for parking encroachment co a neighboring fence line and the existing structures. 5.The applicant and attendant project will provide for two full sized spaces (Three spaces originally proposed and can still be accommodated per City's requested suggestion) However, ithas come hzthe applicants attention that, per new Oregon law as it pertains to ARU/ADU requirements, January 1, 2020 municipalities are prohibited from requiring ainadditional off-street space per new ARUconstructed. The applicant understands that the City has yet tuamend parking standard codes toreflect the changes imlaw and will remain flexible and adapt the plans accordingly, ifneed be, tobeconsistent with the new adopted standards. However, in regard to proposed parking, exceptions shall be necessary to accommodate said spaces including landscaping and cramsitimna|buffering from the existing and proposed units as well as property line of a neighboring group home situated to the North of the project. That said, with the proposed two spaces instead of three, the applicant will be granted additional flexibility immeet buffering requirements. SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS 1. New structure shall comply bofullest extent with "Building Orientation to Street" criteria,. 2. Likewise, the proposed project seeks tolocate parking behind existing umitsuas to maximize visual aesthetics. 3. Not Applicable D. Does not apply. E. Applicant intends to utilize building materials, treatments and paint colors that are mostly consistent with the existing unit on the lot. Staff raised a question about the proposed use of board and batten siding, preferring horizontal siding. This is under consideration. However, as this applicant understands it, given that the placement of this new unit is outside the historic zone it is not subject to the same rigor in meeting design standards. Be assured that this applicant intends to construct a home that will complement the neighborhood and its surroundings and if it is the City's desire that the external siding conform to the existing structure the applicant will fully comply. SITE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA A. Underlying Zone. For functionality purposes, including meeting parking and turn -around requirements this proposal shall require a variance for established building set -backs. This is necessitated by the unique configuration of the property's boundary lines. To illustrate, it is the applicants understanding that minimum lot for width within the downtown area is 40 feet. Research suggests that this property was the product of an approved subdivision plan dating back to the 1888 and evolved since wherein in order to achieve maximum sub -divisible units, among other anomalistic outcomes the rear property line at 872 Siskiyou is less than 31 feet. In terms of meeting other "Underlying Zone" requirements including lot coverage, building height, orientation architecture and other applicable standards shall be in full compliance. B. Overlay Zone. There are two possible overlay zones identified as being potentially residing within the scope of this project. The first, the Siskiyou Harradine Historical District should not be impacted as this zones overlays the Northern portion of the property, which will remain unchanged. As for the second overlay zone, the Wildfire Overlay, the applicant intends with all the requirements of the fuel modification areas required by AMC 18.3.10.090. C. Site Facilities and Design Standards. It is this applicants understanding that the existing structure residing on this property is award winning and has been recognized by the City of Ashland honored by the City for its outstanding contribution to the preservation, restoration and maintenance of Ashland' historic district. Given the honor that has been bestowed on the exiting unit, this applicant intends to duplicates to the best of his abilities the design that underscores what the City must value in aesthetics in its historic district. D. City Facilities. Applicant intends to make appropriate accommodations to utilize city services of the new structure and will meet applicable standards water, sewer and urban storm drainage. Paved access to and throughout the property is under consideration as this applicants is contemplating other land coverage and surface treatments that permits for improved water absorption and minimized heat island effect. The applicant intends to erect a bike rack adjacent to the new residence and is contemplating decorative, iron fencing that is "cycling themed" along the front of the property line, facing Siskiyou Blvd. pending City review and approval as this portion of the property lies within a historic zone. E. Exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards. As has been exhaustively articulated in this "burden of proof' document, given the unique and unusual configuration of this property, coupled with the impractical placement of the existing structure meeting site development and standards while constructing a useable and aesthetically pleasing structure will be impossible to achieve. This applicant has spent time with city planning exploring options in order to meet a mutually agreeable outcome. Along with a variance required of the standards rear set -back, exceptions will be necessary to allow for parking encroachments along a neighboring fence line along with the existing structures. As stipulated, this applicant intends to incorporate landscaping buffering the existing structures from the parking area. VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA Al, The variance and exceptions are necessary due in large part to, among other things, the history of this property and its unorthodox dimensions (See Attached Survey Narrative). As has been stated the rear lot width is roughly thirty feet or ten feet less that what is currently required. In addition, in order to meet previous design standards the previous property owner situated the existing structure in the middle of the property so as to avoid damage to an existing 40+" in diameter tree and its root systems. Sadly the previous owner had the tree removed without permits and has planted another tree (without city consideration). Without the tree, its aesthetics, its canopy it lends the appearance of a home floating on a lot without due consideration to proper placement et al. Although it is this applicant's understanding that he is under no obligation to mitigate for the removal of this tree, he does intend to plant a minimum of three, fifteen gallon trees on site. A2. The proposed variance and exception are necessary to maximize the utility of the property, encourage infill and promote visual aesthetics that are consistent with the existing home and neighborhood. A3. The property in question is bordered by school district lands to the south and west, a group home to the north and a City thoroughfare to the east (Siskiyou Blvd) The applicant does not envision any negative impacts associated with the approval of this application and attendant variance/exception considerations. Approval will lead to improved densification (discouraging sprawl). In addition, the applicant is exploring utilizing the new structure for student housing creating new affordable housing stock within the core downtown area. The proximity to public transit amenities including a bus stop (less than a block away), bike lanes and broad sideway will lead efficient transit and vehicle miles travel avoidance. A4. There are no adjustments to the lot lines envisioned in this application. B. The applicant stands prepared to discuss further consideration of conditions including mitigation that will lead to a structure that meets the mutual need and benefit of applicant and the City of Ashland. WNSUL3ENG SURVEYOR (Xvgon • washinaton Area CO& 503 JM3.43,• Via, SWAIN$URViEYING,INC. ( , 1. 771h 3Vorth M>:n Slrttl Ashland,0"gon 97521D Survey No. 10691 v xnnar „1L, TO COMPLY WITH PARAGRAPH 209.250 Jiiic7Et iinnnn, s,, — wu OREGON REVISED STATUTES SURVEY FOR: Peggy Ann Sammons 155 Terrace St. Ashland, OR 97520 LOCATION: Situated in the Southeast quarter of Section 9, Township 39 South, Range 1 East of the liillamette Base and Meridian, Jackson County, Oregon. PURPOSE: To survey and monument that tract of land as set forth in Document No. 76-17942 of the Official Records of Jackson County, Oregon. PROCEDURE: Review of the Jackson County Surveyor's records revealed several surveys within the immediate area which might have an influence on the ultimate location for the boundaries of that tract of land, which is the subject of this survey. geed research was conducted, at the court house, to determine the compatibility of the adjacent properties. It became apparent that few of the deeds, which were prepared for land transactions in this immediate area, are mathemati- cally correct. Some error of closures are excessive. In reviewing Recorded Survey No. 4107, several things became questions. First of all, although Mountain Avenue has been shown over the years to be a straight line from Ashland Street to a point Northerly of East Plain Street, does not necessarily mean that it is in fact a straight line over its entire length. Mountain Avenue, Northerly of Siskiyou Boulevard,was once known as Douglas Street. A portion of that street was created in the platting of the Ashland Homestead Association subdivision. Other parts were apparently acquired by deed. Mountain Avenue, Southerly of Siskiyou Boulevard was created in the platting of the liontview Addition subdivision. It would be extremely doubtful if a retracement, under these circumstances would yield one straight line over the entire length of Mountain Avenue. N.L. McCall, in 1888, surveyed the centerline of Siskiyou Boulevard giving distances to side streets. In retracing the centerline of Siskiyou Boulevard, the iron pin at the centerline of Iowa Street, as described by McCall, was found along with the stone monument at Union Street, since replaced with an iron pipe and brass disk (see Recorded Survey No. 4267). These monuments were tied together in order to establish a measurement index factor.' A comparison to a previous measurement index factor, which was established by the retracing of McCall's resurvey of the outer boundary of Donation Land Claim No. 40, was made. The two measurement index factors were very close. Therefore, as 1 had previously done, I held McCall's distance, adjusted by said index factor, Southeasterly along the centerline of Siskiyou Boulevard from the iron pin found at Iowa Street, to position the centerline inter- section of Mountain Avenue and Siskiyou Boulevard. A heading was then determined by utilizing a found iron pipe in a monument case at the vicinity of the South line of Section 9. This heading is very close to the retracement value of Mountain Avenue, Southerly of Ashland Street. Utilizing Beach Street and South Mountain Avenue, as retraced by this survey, the distance along the Southwesterly right of way line of Siskiyou Boulevard was computed. The computed distance was found to be 0.89 of a foot shorter than that distance recited in Volume 31, page 278 of the Deed Records. A check with the City of Iof3 Survey No. Y 0 6 i 1 Peggy Ann Sairinons Page 2 of 3 Ashland Engineering Depcirbirailt, i , j,1 regards ta a V11cCall mop of 11892, revealed nothing. Beach Street is not in evidence on the last offically .dop Therefore. I am pted C;+,, �f ' 8 ' �h - inn,4 min Aafpd NnvPmhPr 5, 1888. unaware oi"Ithe map as referred to by Recorded Survey No. 4107. Further, monumentation as found and utilized by Recorded Survey No. AIM is qnn-what onetionable. Walker's field book No. 39, page 8 does show-several'lots as being surveyed with black dots and indicating a pipe at these corner points. However, nothing on this page would suggest or indicate how Walker arrived at his right of way locations for Mountain Avenue and the Boulevard. I have tied several of these monuments in the past and it was difficult to find an answer for where Waiker's bd51(; CO9YL1101 was der-oved from. UrV^y 11 conducted at least 37 years after McCall ran the centerline of Siskiyou Boulevard. it is now 98 years after McCall ran the centerline of Siskiyou Boulevard and there are still enough McCall monuments left, in place and undisturbed, to determine a very close position for Mountain Avenue and Siskiyou Boulevard, per his 1888 survey. Further Recorded Survey No. 4107 states in his narrative that "the west boundary of larger subject tract was found to have been established in D.R. 31-278. Monuments recorded in Walker's field book No. 39, page 22 were recovered and used to establish this original division." In reviewing Walker's field book No. 39, page 22 1 find no notation of monuments being set at the corners of the boundary lines shown thereon. Further I find no date on page 22 to indicate when this survey actually took place. on page 20-112 1 find a date, which was probably wriltten in at some point in time after some of the other data was recorded, as 7/1-26. On page 23-1/2 a date is noted as 3/3-26. On page 14 a date is shown as 9/11-25. This survey, which is shown at the bottom of page 22 as "City Grade School Tract", does not agree in all respects, with the description as set forth in that Warranty Deed: filed for record in Voltime 164, page 167 of the Deed Records of Jackson County, Oregon. Said deed record does not call for any artificial monument- ation. It does however, limit its courses and distances to adjoiner tracts and street rights of way. Because of the lack of proof positive, that Walker actually surveyed thi,s tract of land before it was conveyed to School District Five and for other reasons stat-c—dhereinabove, 1 have rejected the rational of Recorded Survey No. 41'07. Without a date fixing the time of Walker's survey, it is just as logical to believe that Walker may have surveyed this tract of land after it was conveyed to School District Five which would leave the pipes found in the field subordinate to the deed record location of said tract. These pipes, which were found, may have some value in relation to claims of adverse possession, but that remains a question to be answered by lawyers or a court of competent jurisdiction. With this analysis of prior surveys out of the way, I turned to the positioning of my client':s tract of land. It was found that what is called the "Taverner Tracts" were apparently created in the early 19,40's. In calculating the closures of these four tracts of land, it was found that the closures were ranging from fair to bad. In reviewing the four Taverner deeds, it was fairly obvilous what distances were selected for each tract abutting Siskiyou Boulevard. Also, it was quite clear as to the intended distance for each trac6 Southerly boundary line. In order to establish the latitude of the Southerly boundary line of said tracts, it was decided to retrace the outer boundary encompassing the, entire four tracts. The result was near perfect. It was apparent that whoever prepared these legal descriptions did not have the expertise to calculate the correct courses and distances to make these tracts of land mathematically close. The Southeast corner of Volume 248, page 352 was held as shown on the accompanying map. Then the deed record bearing oriented to the bearing of this survey and deed record distance was held proceeding Northeasterly therefrom. The closing course of said volume and page was computed directly back to the point of beginning forcing a closure and throwing the error in, the last course of said deed. My Client's tract of land is a Junior title holder in relation, to the other three Taverner Tracts. The results, once this was all analyzed, were very good in relation to the deeds of record. Those pipe monuments found are as shown, on the accompanying map. 9 Survey ING.— Peggy Ann Sam pons Page 3 of 3 BASIS OF BEARING. True Meridian at the N-S centerline of Section 9 as derived from the Oce!nic and AL=sheric Adm,'--+Ir-atio.n (fo—.-rly Coast and Geodetic Survey) survey net established in 1968 and file in the office of the Jackson County Surveyor. September 2, 1986 Swain Surveying, Inc. 27 1/2 U. Main St. Ashland, OR 97520 0 N A L �IRA /"'* * RECEIVED * * N� Dat,_1/1-7/94 By-lk— Tbi5 WHY r0ftsists Of' / shec'!t) map 3 JACKSON MITY/ SURVEYOR Tax Lot 6800 39 1E 9DA w- -1 HO-u-STON RESIDENCE ASHLAND,, OREGON SYMBOLS E3LIPrv, INFORMAMON lNl:;`EX TO 1�RVN(55 L .1 Gl3YzJCSHEET [-:EIa:l= ZONIN AF-GHITFC:M)KAL NnSCJHRT 5T D r L - FLAN METAL ^SrHALT FOERGLA,5 NJLATION ,m, lllSj,LATON F,Li EARTH rN F Na5H rC)oFfi�A N(C,>N r.) (CNT Am FRoroe�EV KrS?PeNC.ETOTAL: LC kFLP FOOTFRNTt uprem FLOOR rOOTFRNT: GO WZE, F?4TRT-, ' �TNO tCIrAL LOT iAJF�E, Tw,kL LOT AREA TGI L ALLTe+ o lmpmy4 5 C"VeR E 615% TC AL p�(�,SED LOT COVF��V, .FF5TREET V Se f Ln — ETA•L FLCh'°� —5 Fr —ATu FL— 'SY F MS 'SECTicJ^.5 A- e AS ExTFSYIGR N/151ON H15TORY KrAsys I R" PATE 1 7777 777 I FHONF- NO. I JOC�3 Mi iVFR1 I (:,ONTA%CT INFORMATION I Douc, HOUSTON O%INFR -iTE,-7Iq-I840 OmEF-15I)ILVER PF,OJF-r,T PF-5rKIFITION C-ONSTRUC,TO14 OF SECOND REWUENG Z CION- SISTIN& OF A 7Y40 STORY STRVr-TLJKF AND ADDITIONAL, PARKING SPACE. I QEFERRE� SUBMITTALS 7- BUIL-01NO CODE 'SUMMARY 5dIL-MNr,.OD ESUMMARY: STATE OF OREGON RESIDENTIAL ST-FVALTY CODE 2017 ED. Z GETS OP THE FOLLaT'/;'H"- Cx.MSTRUC-TON TYPF. TYPE I/ - VOOr> FRAMED VATATO NGLun OCx-Uf-AN0Y TYPE: R-Rr-51PENTIA4- -,NT v€s-N - �vxa_y STRUCTURAL LOADS: FLOOR. LOAD: 40 F5F LL, 12 PST- D�L d4VES To F5F PARTITION ROOF LOAD: 25 P5F E-NOY'(fIt5IO'ELEVArON) 15 F5F PL FCC. A FRAME NSPrC4 H 13L)JLPVN6 PLANNINC� DATA: -ALt & EA -ER -TH THE n.c�P I 5ri5mio DV5;rN 6ATEGORY (5nG) FROM TABLE R301.2(I): Di 2 BASIC WIND SPEEDS FROM I`$6LJRE R501.2(4) 95 M.1"K PL—" FICATION FROM SE6TVON F,301.2.1.4t B 3� EXPOSVRE GLASSIF 4 . rjfNI? I-OAI:>S FROM TABLE S01.20) AND TABLE K501-2(2)I Z5 rSF S. rEISHT5 OF MATERIALS PER 5ECTON R301.2.2. 2.1! A. ROOF/0LIN6 ASSEMBLY: DEAD - Ir, PSF LIVE -- 25 FSF SNO]N LOAD B. EXTERIOR. YtAl-L 13RAe-FD LINE: 15 P5F C.INTF-ROIBRACEDALL BRACED UNE :F15r V. FLOOR ASSEMBLY: DEAD - 15 F'5F LIVE - 40 rrlr AT7W, VENTING; �/l 50 TOTAL NET FREE VENTILATING AREA. /aca PROVIDED AT LEAST 50% AND NOT MofltE THAN aOT. VENTILATION AREA PROVIDED YVIE NT OPENINGS LOCATED IN ur-rFR PORTtON OF SPACE. AT LEAST EAVE OR VENTS YlJTH BALANCE PROVIDED BY SAVE OR CORNICE VENTS. FOUNDATION VENTING: THE MfN`ML;- NET AREA OF VFNTILA-HON 01-ENIN59 SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN 1 5c57, FOOT FOR EACH 15Li Sri. FT. OF UNDER FLOOR SPACE AREA. UNLESS THE GROUND 5VF-r-Ar,F= 15 COVERED BY A GLASS k VAPOR RETARDER. MATERIAL. YnHEN A CLA55 I VAPOR RETARDER. MATERIAL IS USED LESS THAN I SG1. FT. FOR EACH 1500 50 FT OF UNDER -FLOOR 15!`AOE AREA. ONE ClV-'H '/F-NrIL-AT'Nr' OPEN'NC' SHALL BE "THIN 5 FEET, OF EACH C,-'>RNrR OF THE DVILViNO, ILA ' f SEIa:.a+; £%cT iblJllL c-xm �,rhKE II I •P'crU M✓wM F:,.iS� bECP.L% IN SLOPEV .AREA £ta u.%�ETYT IN -LAY A -EA ET.7"' L I x' 4F"'M U II LE L/ NO 5r-ALF. 3✓4"x3l4' NOO© STA' 5 MAX. 4"-0" 041. �, ✓P a" EaD3ER 12G4LL a:" C% M'YN. TO 4"MAX .S'� E'.MD FnMENT NOTM MNSTALL. "{ "A TA®ER ,BOLL Q - A.LONS A LEVEL Gf77A�'OUf2 ,r o \ . INSTALL. A -15EfZ 3I MOLL NEAR l'•`aMr SLOPE.. TRANSITION5 INTO A STEEPER. SLOPE �. i' `A I 1 L—E PETNL Nam SCALE VEGETAM N MANA&EMENT EYh'¢ncl Gxa+EY TIB.t£ 5.53tlhTH FO¢ 3C TtYYYM IAC+1 S"vE" OF F:aD Ll>\S .'� ragiA JE v rvYwry Ics G £r' aaJfLET. 3 ELM 4hTE AW G'rAP?YKhiPI FR�T¢EE5 GRMC "1GMG 6V LPvaS T E ¢ooP To E [" KE cG LfhvES, EET»LE5 EGErArkhil. 4 b1-"5FFLTk?t F+, PY�R'Tpu,aFf'^ti.�oY✓.u-. TN>r F SK£%' SwnLL eE cmY.awEn �¢KP3Y. Ttl FRIAL cSF YWe 6Ua.vh.i f E¢i'.li. 6RAt)IN& NOTES i. SFULL B£ GRh�£YJ Ytl TJpZ4:W 5va2F.4GE. N{hTElQ NWA'R' FfLGM Fdhl`aDZ l* . THE 6RhRE EHM1.L FAPA. A N�',wyR - AF b" YVTYaIY TWiF:25T 10IO'-L7' �, tutt"£fZW IL VS'SP.R PAGES '£till 1 ILY—Or TNF. BU 1.13 A+v SF«ML6- SF aL(]F'�.tl A s` "+;'.F'VM pY` d/4' FL`R PCM'T (2'M-.D hb"VLY FRlJMti TrdE FGhAPATiG`J- 3-. vxaTER EiacJTF.a;T!©ai r>F?;�.RSS 51xhLL B£u++.F'L£W,£ri0Y£V AT Tla£ S'fY f 11—E OF CCA:t+TIxxY,.'TKSN AGTPffTY.. F'-RG GTa 'SHALL P'REWENT ERG`- 1 N+Y3 KEThna 5 L PLMa�i Fe CY^+' YFaE SRE'lYeRfYl6W Tw? RY'£. OF A BA.wL±'a a'MS'rtE.N'., vthTTLE. L N.OTES Y'wF £iM enETAI.. f'EWG,NG ve.LE Arca'^ EXran^;s �hvEa k"i+Lu. / f4+ r t f 4 d� &�`�yk ++r # a «#+ VFYtlPGSCLi TREES �� 4 I EG E.v IM t T « ++ �+ + i» ` k ,4. + ++ /r+# t +R + M i++yR+R B ttAF«i+ t ++k 4« «+*+ # « i E�GS'YMb T'A'dL'RS �3 ✓+ REMAzh. » + * 0 4 + 4+ l 5 T¢1Cf r+ a + i + + + +#t + R++r+K t Lh`,iT�GAPk45�'r ✓' '+ + + + #+ § V ++y+ *:+'++ ++++ ++++++ e�N.4G ti tr+ Jia++*++ # ° + t ++ r \ « EXI°aTIN6 dry. � �-. E,��rr.r, cw.veL erz'vznar A +« '( ! a R4 A ! P qP ' k+ + ry r + a i � * CA t pjpp��vRa¢�icr�� EUGYGLE Y n£fi .4RPFLat, ;•s _ P � l.tliiti�r..G:�F'.. a ycccern• o YY yy %`dyry 1 � P Y Ilt �A dY P'fat7 C1=3� 1 �pn ��V r��sl ENGE P p �`I v aara� FT. PP � itl IBC SETT�K-IG, 3 I ."T4" D-4 ¢aYF AFLA CYF WA'a•'A!aGE MWa � ......:..._. .... __, _...... ��,..:_._ ...mom .:.........:.:..: d44 tl1-09-7tl.3G IL F w ii d-eu'mg u�tw^4: SR'E pLA"4 A4f3 4.5ETA!LS d•afr�. r8: UPPER FLOOR FLAN 5CALF 1/4" - V-O' LPVINr, 5FAc,E &S2 5,:E, FT, C, BLDFOOTFR 4T C-AES 5a. FT. IL 4Agp�= �7 "Irl 14 V VGY IEt4T y 65, K 11 GH N Z -Ll+T. —77T till— i 1 m LOY4ER FLOOR PLAN 'Z56 5a FT. BLV5 rOOTrMr,4T 636 Sp. FT, p, d-g t,4 jh j re e. YL- TMO mda i. as Itl L. LL A3 TRUSS "A" r_ I A Wl M'M M �11�1 WAMM PM1¢OY+Y>E M3T-9'P AT ALL 1 EAI'a —,E —T —T BE NBTNA. O THE I- --M —E515 THEY f E, ST THE —s— OP r�,e �� E,�m "{ �-�5 — THE ATTIC. A� — TIIE5�1 ROOF FR,,5,,MIN6 J=LAN 3 4' T,� PLY ET-1 FL, A I LWA 0 LVA I I LVIA NY - UPPER FLR. FRAM'& E,OLF 1/4" = 1= VIkO I—T. A 4' 11FOOTINO PETAIL — — — - — - — - — — — — — — — — — - — — — — — — — — IA -T ----------- w_lq,m FAMIq Irld FOUNPATION PLAN SCALE 1/4' 1'-0" d,t, J,b ro. d;q N ph-9 re r. Z U) wd- z 0 mA ID 0 12 V as e—,"q d—rq m A4 5EC,TION "C," cnhvFR <K T TYP. L -12 e W 4-11 llC- TJ115 . W OG 1/5- —T U Z: SCA ITER5 T-5 .Elf� —,MS -2x6 5—GF —T� SF-CTON "B" Ia 3.2 LAUNDF Z— MIA IN 11 �7 �11- SECTION "A" 51-A�Z M Dk e,.cg —lvt �—A- dr-9 ro� .A5 WEST ELEVATION F A— WE 1-1 --N NORTH ELEVATION SCALE 1/4' -. ]"-U' tAaE aKt SOUTH ELEVATION TdF^. 5 I- I— A I W—dy 5y 0M1'+FRS EAST ELEVATION 5C,#,LE 1/4' = V-0' 10 it FLEC-TRICAL AND 'LIGHTING LEGEND —FL- —T 13 Rel-1=55elU FIXTURE ^ATFR PROOF/ &RO"m FAULT INTERRUPTER EXHAL15T FAN PUPLEX OVn-FT rlFZOUNP FAULT VN7VRRUPTCR PAN/ LIGHT O,.;,t4E3iXAnOI4 TF Q PLEX OUTL FT 4f SMOKE T VET HARX7 rv`�,EP 0aa0 22o rurLT-n- ovTLF-7 WB7TER f BK KUP CARBON MONOX,VF L�FMCTOR Mi PHONE CVTLe-r IIAI-P MKE� w/ BATTERYBACKUP A,9 r.V. CLE IHH CbMPVTER + FA LIGHT COME30 5 POLE LIGHT 5FrT H 4 POLE Ll(,HT E,rFrGH t 5!NrLF FOI-F 1,R-,HT SMTC44 2 X 4 FLUORE5'r.ENT LIGHT LIGHT Sr FrOl / PiMMER I X 4 FI-UOPFFI-FNr LIGHT 0 KECF55FP PECOR 5POT L-1,5HT PHOTO IIIIINTED FIXTURE I PHOTO CELL + —ILINI .1.. IIEN-11 LIGHT 14TEMICIM VNJDM CO�TER DrHTIN6- C-EJLJNr, HL�r, PFNP�T SELF 9,ill-Hll'O MKTM� 5ECJKITY L-10"T NOTES T. N—. F— —, 5— ,.N, Alro 1— A — rz— TZ �l — L—L ALL FFd]ARiSr mTrGTU*L5 A— tr --r—T —F A'� "T� —.T -E E. T,,S GOo�EA�:V n,z F,'RE 1-1. I- IA 4. —E M,T( AT 1,E TUP OF TW F STA¢5 —T AS "i" T, ST.£R A 1. AT l.'Fw T 5. I—e rlvG]FF-=*LF T aAT I I TI re- L—. ST—S. NS —S£TGJ —T A— H^Y£ T11 L A 11 —OT =l AT 1,15T AVJ A— e Y. —1— T� —��a TAYAA!iF .Z �r- 6. AT L �—1 �e 2� ��P � A�T. SH— F� T-Z A v-- -- --y —e- 1'. UPPER FLOOR ELECTRICAL PLAN 51--4-E 1/4"w 1'-0' LOY4ER FLOOR ELE(:,TRICAL PLAN mm L City of Ashland Community Development Department 51 Wnburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 Telephone: 541-488-5305 Inspection Line: 541-552-2080 Plan Type: Type 1 Planning Action Work Class: Type I Planning Action PERMIT NUMBER PA-T1-2020-00088 Apply Date: 11312020 Map & Tax Lot. - , .: Property Address 391F09DA6900 872 Siskiyou al Owner Information Applicant Information Owner: Doug Houston Applicant. Doug Houston Owner 180 Greenfield Ave Applicant 180 Greenfield Ave Address: Auburn, CA 95603 Address: Auburn, CA 95603 Phone: (916) 719-1850 Phone: (916) 719-1850 Project Description . Site design review and variance for a single family home & ARU Fees Fee Description: Amount: Accessory Residential Unit (Type 1) $710.00 Variance (Type 1) $1,092.00 Applicant: Date: Total Fees: $1,802.00 The comments of this pre-app are pretiminary in nature and subject to change based upon the submittal of additional or different infor»ration. The Planning Commission or City Council are the final decision making authority of the City, and are not bound by the comments made by the Staff as part of this pre -application. ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISON PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE COMMENT SHEET December 3, 2019 PLANNING DIVISION COMMENTS SITE: 872 Siskiyou Blvd. APPLICANT: Doug Houston REQUEST: Site Design Review for an ARU with a Type I Variance This pre -application conference is intended to highlight significant issues before the applicant prepares and submits a formal application. Summary: The proposal requires a planning application and approval for Site Design Review for an ARU in addition to a variance for rear yard setback. The primary issues in meeting the applicable design standards are setbacks, and vehicle parking location. Variance: There are a number of considerations that may support the request for a variance. The shape of the property is unique, and the existing home was built with a deep setback due to a large tree that has since been removed. Ultimately the decision will be based on the strength of the application and the Burdon of proof documents making findings that all criteria have been met. Exceptions to the Site Design Review Standards: The application will require a request for exceptions to a number of standards that relate to parking. Typically, parking is required to be buffered from adjacent properties by at least five feet, and eight feet from residential structures. (AMC 18.4.4.030.F.2 a&b) Unauthorized Tree Removal: The previous planning action that approved the variance for driveway spacing (reference PA-2016-00587) required that a large (24" DBH 150') tree be protected. Subsequent to that planning action the tree appears to have been removed. Application materials should address this unpermitted tree removal and address how it will be appropriately mitigated. The final application shall address a location for Recycling and Refuse Disposal in accordance with AMC 18.4.4.040 Vehicle Parking: see Vehicle Area Design standards in AMC 18.4.3.080. ✓ One space is required for the ARU, and two for the single family home. ✓ Parking standards are 9'x18' for standard, and 8'x16' for compact. One one compact would be allowed. ✓ Parking spaces are required to have a minimum of 22 feet of backup area. Might be easier maneuvering if the parking space is angled. Bicycle Parking ✓ One sheltered bicycle space meeting the requirements of AMC 18.4.3.070 is required for the development. Bicycle parking should be clearly identified on the application submittals. 872 Siskiyou Blvd. December 3, 2019/aa Page 1 ARU SPECIAL USE STANDARDS B. R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements: 1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot. 2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone. 3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA. 4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone. 5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.040, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 18.4.3.080.D.1 and 18.4.3.080.D.2 and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E.1. SITE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS C. Building Orientation. Residential buildings that are subject to the provisions of this chapter shall conform to all of the following standards. See also, solar orientation standards in section 18.4.8.050. 1, Building Orientation to Street. Dwelling units shall have their primary orientation toward a street. Where residential buildings are located within 20 feet of a street, they shall have a primary entrance opening toward the street and connected to the right-of-way via an approved walkway. 2. Limitation on Parking Between Primary Entrance and Street. Automobile circulation or off-street parking is not allowed between the building and the street. Parking areas shall be located behind buildings, or on one or both sides. 3. Build -to Line. Where a new building is proposed in a zone that requires a build -to line or maximum front setback yard, except as otherwise required for clear vision at intersections, the building shall comply with the build -to line standard. D. r� Not applicable, no garage is proposed. E. Building Materials. Building materials and paint colors should be compatible with the surrounding area. Very bright primary or neon -type paint colors, which attract attention to the building or use, are unacceptable. SITE DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL CRITERIA An application for Site Design Review shall be approved if the proposal meets the criteria in subsections A, B, C, and D below. The approval authority may, in approving the application, impose conditions of approval, consistent with the applicable criteria. A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable 872 Siskiyou Blvd. December 3, 20191aa Page 2 standards. B. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards. The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities, and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1, 2, or 3, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty; VARIANCE APPROVAL CRITERIA A. The approval authority through a Type I or Type II procedure, as applicable, may approve a variance upon finding that it meets all of the following criteria. 1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination may be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance. 2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site. 3. The proposal's benefits will be greater than any negative impacts on the development of the adjacent uses and will further the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant. B. In granting a variance, the approval authority may impose conditions similar to those provided for conditional uses to protect the best interests of the surrounding property and property owners, the neighborhood, or the City as a whole. 872 Siskiyou Blvd. December 3, 2019/aa Page 3 Tree Preservation/Protection: A tree protection plan is required with the application to ensure that trees are protected during site disturbance (including demolition, construction, driveway/parking installation, staging of materials, etc. This plan is required to address all trees on the property over six -inches in diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) and all trees that are located on adjacent properties within 15 feet of the property line as well, including any existing street trees. o Solar Setback: The application materials need to demonstrate compliance with the solar setback standard in AMC 18.4.8.020. o Utility Connections: A utility service plan is required with the Planning application, and needs to show locations of existing set -vices and proposed utilities. Any transformers or cabinets shall be placed in locations that are the least visible from the public right-of-way. the utility line and meter locations needs to be coordinate with the tree protection plan to identify any potential impacts to trees that are six inches dbh or greater. • Electric Meter - The city requires a separate electric unit for each residential unit. Electric meters/boxes should be placed in locations that are least visible form the street right-of-way. See Elearic Connnet7ts below. o Drainage Plan: A drainage plan to deal with roof / footing drains and surface drainage will need to be submitted for the review and approval of the Building and Public Works/Engineering Departments. The Ashland Building Division policy BD-PP-0029 requires that storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak rainfalls must be collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm pipe or public drainage way) or through an approved alternative. o System Development Charges (SDC's): The payment of systems development charges (Water, Sewer, Storm Water, Parks, Transportation) is required at the time of issuance of a building permit. Front counter staff can provide an estimate of the likely permit fees and SDC charges for the project. OTHER ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS: No comments. OTHER CITY OF ASHLAND DEPARTMENT COMMENTS BUILDING: No comments at this time. Please contact the Building Division for any building codes - related questions at 541-488-5305. CONSERVATION: For more information on available water conservation programs, including any available appliance rebates or assistance with landscaping and irrigation system requirements, please contact Water Conservation Specialist Julie Smitherman of Conservation Division at 541-552-2062 or via e-mail to iulie.smitherniangashland.or.us . For information on any financial or technical assistance available for the construction of Earth Advantage/Energy Star buildings, please contact Conservation Analyst/Inspector Dan. Cunningham at 541-552-2063 or via e-mail to 872 Siskiyou Blvd. Deceinber 3, 2019/aa Page 4 dan.cunnin hg ain a,ashland.or.us ENGINEERING: No comments at this time. Please contact Karl Johnson of the Engineering Division for any Public Works/Engineering information at 541-552-2415 or via e-mail to karl.'ohnson c ashland.or.us . FIRE: See attached comments. Please contact Ralph Sartain from the Fire Department for any Fire Department -related information at 541-552-2229 or via e-mail to ralph.sartain a,ashland.or.us. WATER AND SEWER SERVICE: if the project requires additional water services or upgrades to existing services the Ashland Water Department will excavate and install in the city right of way all water services up to and including the meter on domestic and commercial water lines. if a fire line is required, the water department will also only install a stub out to the location where the double detector check assembly complete with a Badger brand cubic foot bypass meter should be placed in a vault external to the building. The vault and the DCDA device housed in it are the responsibility of the property owner and should be placed at the property line. Fees for these installations are paid to the water department and are based on a time and materials quote to the developer or contractor. Meter sizes and fire line diameters will need to be provided to the Water Department at the time of a quote being requested. Please Contact Steve Walker at 541-552-2326 or ( walkerspashland.or.us ) with any questions regarding water utilities. ELECTRIC SERVICE: Please contact Dave Tygerson in the Electric Department for service requirements and connect fee information at (541) 552-2389 or via e-mail to tygersod@ashland.or.us. Dave will arrange an on -site meeting, and develop a preliminary electrical service plan for the site. Please allow additional time to accommodate scheduling of this on -site meeting and preparing the preliminary plan. Submittals will not be deemed complete without a preliminary approved plan from the Electric Department. PROCEDURE Site design review for two or more units is subject to a "Type 1" procedure which includes an administrative decision made following public notice and a public comment period. Type 1 decisions provide an opportunity for appeal to the Planning Commission. 872 Siskiyou Blvd. December 3, 20191aa Page 5 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS Submittal Information. The application is required to include all of the following information. a. The information requested on the application form at http://www,ashland.or.us/Files/Zoning%20Permit°/`2OApplication.i�df . b. Plans and exhibits required for the specific approvals sought (see below). c. A written statement or letter explaining how the application satisfies each and all of the relevant criteria and standards in sufficient detail (see below). d. Information demonstrating compliance with all prior decision(s) and conditions of approval for the subject site, as applicable. e. The required fee (see below). The Ashland Land Use Ordinance, which is Chapter 18 of the Municipal Code, is available on-line in its entirety at: Iittps://asltland.municipal.codes/LandUse Written Statements Please provide two copies of a written statements explaining how the application meets the approval criteria from the sections of the Ashland Municipal Code listed below. These written statements provide the Staff Advisor or Planning Commission with the basis for approval of the application: o Accessory Residential Unit: AMC 18.2.3.040 o Site Development and Design Standards: AMC 18.4.2.030 C, D & E o Site Design Review AMC 18.5.2.050 o Variance AMC 18.5.2.050 Plans & Exhibits Required Please provide two sets of exhibits (plans or drawings) addressing the submittal requirements from the sections of the Ashland Municipal Code listed below. These exhibits are used to copy the Planning Commission packets and for notices that are mailed to neighbors. Please provide two copies on paper no larger than 11-inches by 17-inches and reproducible copies that are drawn to a standard architect's or engineer's scale. o Site Design Review: AMC 18.5.2.040 o Tree Removal (if applicable): AMC 18.5.7.030 PLANNING APPLICATION FEES: ARU: Site Design Review $710 Type I Variance $1,092 NOTE: Applications are accepted on a first come -first served basis. All applications received are reviewed and must be found to be complete before being processed or scheduled at a Planning Commission meeting. Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) and property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. Applications are reviewed for completeness in accordance with ORS 227.178. For further information please contact: December 3, 2019 Aaron Anderson, Assistant Planner Date City of Ashland, Department of Community Development Phone: 541-552-2052 or e-mail: aaron.andetson0iashland.onus 872 Siskiyou Blvd. December 3, 2019/aa Page 6 Pre App Comments Date: 11-26-2019 Project Address: 872 Siskiyou Permit Number: PreApp-2019-00158 Project Description: SFR Ashland Fire & Rescue Contact: Ralph Sartain 541-552-2229 ralph.sartain@ashland.or.us Fire department comments are based upon the 2014 Oregon Fire Code as adopted by the Ashland Municipal Code, and Ashland Land Use Laws: Addressing - Building numbers or addresses must be at least 4 inches tall, be of a color that is in contrast to its background, and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Additional directional signage may be necessary to guide emergency responders down a driveway, path or through a gate. All premises identification, street signs and building numbers, must be in place with temporary signs when construction begins and permanent signage prior to issuance of any occupancy. OFC 505 Fire Apparatus Access Approach -The angle of approach at the point where the public road transitions to the private fire apparatus access road must meet the City of Ashland Engineering Department specifications. OFC 503.2.8 Fire Apparatus Access -Single Residential Lot -If the furthest point on the structure is greater than 150' from the street, the entire length of the private drive or street must meet fire apparatus access. Fire apparatus access shall be 15 feet clear width, with the center 12 feet being constructed of an all-weather driving surface. Fire apparatus access must support 60,000 pounds, no parking, have a maximum slope of 10 percent, and have vertical clearance of 13' 611. With the installation of fire sprinklers, 200' of the driveway is allowed to have an 18 percent slope. Inside turning radius is at least 20 feet and outside turning radius is at least 40 feet and must be indicated on site plans submitted for building permits. Fire apparatus access is required to be signed as "No Parking -Fire Lane". Final plat needs to indicate that the private drive is fire apparatus access and must state that it cannot be modified without approval of Ashland Fire & Rescue. Fire Apparatus Turn Around -An approved fire apparatus turnaround is required for projects where fire apparatus access roads are greater than 150 feet in length. They are required to provide a fire apparatus turn around. The turnaround must be identified in an approved manner with "No Parking -Fire Lane" signs and must remain clear at all times. Please refer to the City of Ashland Minimum Turn -Around Standards diagram to determine which layout works best for your project. Firefighter Access Pathway — An approved footpath around the structure is required so that all exterior portions of the structure can be reached with the fire hose. Any changes in elevation greater than two feet in height (such as retaining walls) require stairs. The stairs shall be an all-weather surface, and meet the requirements as specified in the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. OFC 503,1.1 Fire Hydrant Distance to Structures - Hydrant distance is measured from the hydrant, along a driving surface, to the approved fire apparatus operating location. Hydrant distance shall not exceed 300 feet. Hydrant distance can be increased to 600 feet if approved fire sprinkler systems are installed. Fire Hydrants Clearance - Hydrants must have 3 feet of clearance extending from the center nut of the hydrant all the way around. Fences, landscaping and other items may not obstruct the hydrant from clear view. Hydrants must be shown on site plan when submitting for building permits. 872 Siskiyou Blvd. December 3, 2019/aa Page 7 Fire Sprinkler System— The installation of a fire sprinkler system may be an acceptable means to mitigate deficiencies related to other fire requirements such as fire flow, hose reach, fire lane width, fire apparatus turn -around, distance to fire hydrants, and fire department work areas. OFC 503,1.1 Gates and Fences — Obstructions such as gates, fences, or any other item which would block or reduce the required fire apparatus access width must be shown on the plans and approved by Ashland Fire and Rescue. Wildfire Hazard Areas — On lands designated in the Wildfire Lands Overlay, a "Fuel Break" as defined in Ashland Municipal Code, section 18.3.10.100 is required. Wildfire Hazard Areas - All structures shall be constructed or re -roofed with Class B or better non -wood roof coverings, as determined by the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. No structure shall be constructed or re -roofed with wooden shingles, shakes, wood -product material or other combustible roofing material, as defined in the City's building code. AMC 18.3.10.100 Vegetation — existing and intentionally planted vegetation is required to meet AMC 18.3. 10. 10013(2) General Fuel Modification Area Standards. The Fire Wise landscaping brochure provides diagrams and examples of how to meet these requirements. www.ashlandfirewisc.org. Contact Ashland Fire & Rescue Forestry Division for a fuel break inspection. Fire Season -- If work will be completed during fire season, check fire season fire prevention requirements found at www.ashland.or.us/frreseason. Final determination of fire hydrant distance, fire flow, and fire apparatus access requirements will be based upon plans submitted for Building Permit review. Changes from plans submitted with this application can result in further requirements. Any future construction must meet fire code requirements in effect at that time. The fire department contact for this project is Fire Marshal Ralph Sartain. He may be contacted at (541) 552-2229 or ralph.sartain@ashland.or.us. ashland.or.us. 872 Siskiyou Blvd. December 3, 2019/aa Page 8 CITY OF ASHLAND Planning Department 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 541-488-5305 Ashland Historic Commission Design Review Form Applicant Qfi �1,�' Date Address�� Proposed Action �,I-`Z r CI Commercial O,'Residential 0 New Construction O Changes to Existing Structure Historic Review Board Comments: /Wcb !dVe�--6k<(XAV6/J ato w1D1?mo6W APV1Z---C�TAL- :5i Aj A-T �"X ebstz In the spirit of protecting the historic design and compatibility of your project, if you wish to amend your building plan in order to apply any recommendations of the Historic Review Board, we encourage you to prepare an addendum and resubmit if to t, Applicant Signature Historic Commission Review Checklist ❑ Walls — Surface materials (siding to be used); Profile (width, thickness of siding); Finish (rough, smooth, paint stain) ❑ Roof — Pitch; Height; Form/Type (mansard, hip, gable) and Materials (shake, comp) ❑ Windows — Materials (wood, metal, clad); Type (double hung, casement, fixed, bay); Style (Queen Anne, Palladian); Trim (Shutters, molding, sills, pediments); Sizes (Window schedule); Glass (clear, frosted decorative); Arrangement and number of windows ❑ Boors and Main Entry — Materials (wood, metal, clad); Style; Trim (framing, sidelights); Sizes; Hardware ❑ Chimneys — Material (brick, faced with siding); HeighYwidth; Functional or decorative; Style ❑ Porches, Decks, Stairs — Materials; Dimensions; Scale in relation to structure; Supports (posts, columns); Trim (railings, brackets, balustrades) ❑ Foundation — Exposed; Material ❑ Color — Paint, stain, natural ❑ Orientation of Structure to Site — Height; Scale; Symmetry/Harmony; Relationship/Compatibility to neighborhood and adjoining/surrounding buildings ❑ Other Design Details — Signage (materials, type, illumination); Fences, Walls; Exterior Lighting; Outbuildings (gazebos, garages, guesthouses); Driveways, sidewalks, Parking Area Aesthetics; Miscellaneous (columns, domes, quoins, ornamental trim); Landscaping; Setback of structure (relationship to neighboring buildings); Orientation of Main Entrance ❑ Historical Precedents —Architectural style and period of structurelfagade; Reference to existing or previous Ashland buildings; Removal or change of historical elements ❑ Meter Placement — Size, location The purpose of the following guidelines is to ensure the proper use of materials and details within the Historic District: • Be sure the remodeled portion's exterior wall finish matches the existing or original material. • Design window additions to duplicate existing or original windows. • Design the roof on additions or remodels to have the same pitch as the original roof. Extend the ridge lines where possible. On one-story rear additions, shed roofs are acceptable. • Match the style of any porch or entry addition at the front of the structure to the original or existing style. • Match colors of any additions to the colors used on the existing exterior. • Try to rehabilitate and restore as many features as possible. • Sawn shingle and, for economy, composition roofs are preferred. Asphalt shingles, which match existing color and texture, are acceptable. Shake shingles, tile and metal roofs are not compatible with most architectural styles in Ashland's historic districts. • Diagonal and vertical siding is not compatible in most cases. • Imitative materials such as asphalt siding, wood textured aluminum siding or artificial stones are not compatible. • Any'detached structures should be compatible with the existing building and conform to the above guidelines. • Styles of other eras or locales, such as Tudor and Western style, are to be avoided. GAcomm-de4ianninglConvWssions 8 Camrrltse*rlst(Ac Commiss ontl."isc Adrrdn-FORA1SU)esign Review Form,doc 1211312007 C I T Y 0 F Planning Division ,AS HLAND 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, OR PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE APPLICATION 97520 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Description APPLICANT PA) E-Mail Name Phone` Address "V fF city ' 4-1/43V/11/0 1p -20 .011- PROPERTY OWNER Narne A 5 4A nzk Day Tine Phone Address city Zip F6-E-SCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address97) K i NJ 1,3 U —Assessor's Map No, 39 1 E Tax Lot(s) V/ SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS To request a pre -application conference, submit this form with two sets of scalable plans, one large format 24"06" and one no larger than I V'x17", Include the following information plus your submittal fee of $142,25 (check, Visa, MasterCard or cash accepted): 1. Completed Application. 2. Narrative — Provide a written description of proposal and request, (if in Historic District, provide pictures of existing structures, elevations of proposed structures and details of planned exterior design features and materials) 3, Site Plan — The site plan should contain all applicable elements in the Site Plan Checklist (see reverse) plus any other information pertinent to this proposal., The site plan will be checked to insure: all applicable information is included at the time the pre -application date is set. 4. Additional Information - Provide in the narrative or with the site plan: 1) Number of acres in development 2) Total gross square footage of all structures 3) Number of stories on each structure 4) Indicate number of and square footage of: a) Dwelling Units (include the units by the number of bedrooms in each unit — e.g. 10 1 -bedroom, 25 2-bedroom, etc) b) Office Spaces c) Retail Units d) Other Spaces 5) Percentage of lot coverage by: a) Structures e) Landscaping b) Streets, & Roads f) Number of parking spaces c) Parking Areas/Driveways g) Total square footage of landscaped areas. d) Recreation Areas h) Other pertinent information of the proposed developmenliyl,, "TIf p [I 5,. LEED@ Certification —Indicate whether project will be pursuing LEED@ certification. 6. Submittal Fee ()CIT 1, 'I(M) pp ty o f As I fland Pg,3 of 6 G:karrm-de,Ap'an09Tormq & HandoutsPfe-Apoxatan lnfonaJon Sheel SubmAd RequTernen1s_FY201M8 PRE -APPLICATION SITE PLAN CHECKLIST YES NO NIA 1. Pro'ect Name 2. Owner Name 3. Site Address and Map & Taxlot Number 4. Vicinity Map - with street names and locations of all existing and proposed streets within or on the boundaDt of the proposed development 5. Scale & North Arrow 6. Lot Layout with approximate dimensions for all lot lines 7. Zoning Designations in proposed development and surrounding properties 8. Location & Use of all propoied and existing building, fences and structures 9. Indicate which buildings are to remain and which are to be removed 10. Location of all landscaped areas. Indicate existing trees, size, species, and approximate drip line outer branch location). Identify trees to be removed. 11. Location and size of all public utilities in and adjacent to the proposed development including water line and meter size, sewer lines, storm drain lines, nearest fire hydrant. 12. Locations of drainage ways or public utility easements in and adjacent to proposed development. 13. Location, size and use of all contemplated and existing public areas 14. Approximate topography (sloe of the site 15. Location of all parking areas and individual and handicap parking spaces, ingress and egress on the site and on -site circulation 16. Use designation for the areas not covered by buildings (e.g. loading, storage, vacant, open space, etc. 17. Elevations of the building(s) 18. Construction materials -wood frame, masonry, etc. (If project is in a Historic District provide pictures of existing structures and indicate proposed exterior materials for siding, windows, trim and roofing) PRE -APPLICATION BUILDING INFORMATION Please attempt to indicate the following (Note: if information is not known please leave blank) 1. Current Building Occupancy Type select one): a) Assembly = More than 50 occupants (e.g., Theaters, Restaurants, Nightclubs, Taverns and Bars, Community Halls, Art Galleries, Places of Worship, Arenas, Bleacher's, etc. b) Business = Less than 50 occupants (e.g., Professional Service Office, Barber and Beauty Salons, Training and Skill Development not within a school or academic program, Bank, Print Shop, etc. c) Educational (e.g., Schools K-12th Grade, Religious Educational Rooms and Auditoriums, Day Care Facilities d) Factory (e.g., F- Occupancy's include, among others, the use of a building or structure or portion thereof, for assembling, disassembling, fabricating, finishing, manufacturing, packaging, repair or processing operations that are not classified as Group H-Hazardous or Group S-Storage Occupancy's) P9.a or s GAcomm-da AplanniagT6nns & HandovlsPra-Appl'csUon Information 5hee1 Subm'llal Requwemenls_FY2017-18 -AP 0 �U4 tx' e) High Hazard (e.g., H-Occupancy's includes, among others, the use of a structure, or a portion thereof, that involves the manufacturing, processing, generation or storage of materials that constitute a physical or health hazard in quantities allowed in control areas complying with section 414 of the Oregon Structural Specialt Cade. f) Institutional (e.g., I -Occupancy's includes, among others, the use of a building or structure or a portion thereof for more than 16 persons, excluding staff, who reside on a 24 hr, basis in a supervised environment and receive custodial care. Detoxification Facilities, Hospitals, Medical Care, Nursing Homes, Congregate Living Facilities, Social Rehabilitation Facilities, Assisted Living Facilities, Alcohol and Drug Centers, Correction Centers, Jails, Reformatories, Adult and Child Day Care Facilities. g) Mercantile (e.g., Department Stores, Drug Stores, Markets, Motor Fuel -Dispensing Facilities, Retail or Wholesale Stores, Sales Rooms. h) Residential (e.g., Single Family Residence, Hotels, Motels, Apartment Houses, Vacation Time Shares, Congregate Living Facilities (more than 16 occupants), Assisted Living Facilities (with or without a Memory Care Endorsement), Residential Treatment Facilities etc. 2. Is a Change of Occupancy being requested? If yes, please indicate the proposed Occupancy Type: (Sample Occupancy Types given above a Assembly e High Hazard b Business Institutional c Educational g) Mercantile d Factor h Residential 3. If Residential lease indicate which type select one): a) R-1 Occupancy (e.g., Hotels (transient), Motels (transient), Boarding Houses (transient) with more than 10 occupants) b) R-2 Occupancy (e.g., Apartment Houses, Congregate Living Facilities (nontransient) with more than 16 occupants, Dormitories, Hotels (nontransient), Motels (nontransient), Vacation Time Share Properties, Boarding Houses nontransient with more than 16 occupants etc. c) R-3 Occupancy (e.g., Detached One and Two family Dwellings and Townhouses, Adult Care Facilities (six or fewer persons of any age less than 24 hrs.), Adult Foster Homes as defined in ORS Chapter 443, or Family Child Care Homes located in a private residence as defined in the Oregon Structural Specialty Code section 310.2. Buildings that do not contain more than two dwelling units, Boarding Houses (nontransient), Child Care Facilities that provide accommodations for six or fewer persons of any age for less than 24 hrs., Congregate Living Facilities (nontransient) with 16 or fewer occupants, Lodging Houses etc. d) R-4 Occupancy (e,g., This occupancy shall include buildings, structures or portions thereof for more than five but not more than 16 persons, excluding staff, who reside on a 24-hr. basis in a supervised residential environment and receive custodial care, Congregate Living Facilities, Halfway Houses, Social Rehabilitation Facilities, Alcohol and Drug Centers Assisted Living Facilities (with or without a Memory Care Endorsement), Residential Care Facilities (with or without a Memory Care Endorsement), Residential Treatment Facilities, Group Homes and Facilities etc. Pg.5 of 6 GftwmardeJrplannngWorms 8 Handaul5lPra-Apgfcafion Infocmalion Sheel Subm:tlai Requ'rements_}Y2pil-18 y cOPF- 5UMMARY 201-1 ram. I li CNKY ooK,:BVTF FLyvioop 0rsum 50A p STuo Y9 L - PLAN i ASPk4ALT FX5�-i Nqi 7--1 N�LATION FOR,CAVs FILL EA,TH Imp FYNI51 r400p m-,�No (CONTJ LF-6F-Nl:;) WEV G A CID E3LI:;)6. INFORMATION -22, —fl—1,-- AREA rR,,Os_rV f.EVVENCC TOTAL:. LOVi'o=R FLCXiK: 221 —I, vi C,Vvr-gp-D MiT : r,aqTR4,5 FItiMNCF: TOTAL i CGE, "TOTAL. LOT ARF✓'- TOrrAL_ ALi LOT CO"OtAOF 40% TOTAL KOT,05rD LOT - C�WM'Ae rt vFFSTTZF--T FAK�0; CINITY MAP IN17)F-X TO 1:7RAKNi Al clol-cRS^le�r -I ARr-HITr-6Ti fAM i AddiJ CTeTACLs —1—F 1- A' ELECTK— REVISION HISTORY' V - I R� I i vx=� I rLar F&r PHONE NO. joe i -c,e NTAi INFORMATION T�r,06 i OMFR 9IC-11-3-1540 OiNNER/BUII-VEK PROJECT PF-SrRIPTION Ce:;NSTi OF Si RE51i ClP-- 5157IN6, OF A Tyqo 5TORY STRUCTURE AND Aor?i FAFli SPACE. BUILPIN& GONE SUMMli DEFER REP 51JEWITT/i STATE OF OFZli, RESII;�15NTi FAaR�GATEV ROOF �vs,,Ez, 5FTCLA�LT'I' CODE GONSTRUOTION TYF-i TyFF YJOUL) FRAHEE? 1. TK-SG LAYOJT 011b .N65, OC-CUFANCY TYPE: R-p-,V5lpENrL^L 3. TFy C^�J�N VATA TO i Ammo.: .- No OTK�. e—s A— ��N. ��L.Y 5TRUC-MRAL LOADS: ri-.00R 1 40 F5F in F5F VL- li Y— �r =rs 10 F'5F FAR-TrION ""KAT6 A� ROOF 1 2$ FSF sNo^ (jolo'liN) 15 F5F i �,rrT^Ls SHALL 0=- AT Le 4 P�S F�� To C� �T� A FitA F �'=PIi Fi E>ATA C./%FaE,v oft ALL. v F DE5jrNrATi (SE70) FROM TABLE -901-20): OM Tr �,E DALMN� 5TWr OrWEN SPEED FROM FIGURE 31 �i,kr`Ofz~ce Y�nia V�" [�.rrr is 3. Exi CLASS IF�CATION, FR ,om sEr-TON F,901.2.1.4z D 4� rm, 4. WIND LOADS FROM TABLE 501 ANC` TABLE P-301 115 FSF S. VqEloHT5 OF MATERLALS PER 5Br,-i P-50T -2-2-2-1 : A R00FICii A55i DEAD - IF, F5F LIVE - 25 1 5NOVA LOAD B. Ex-rFR1c:;,R WALL- BRACT LING: IS FSF C. INTERIOR Y'iALL BRACED LIKE 1 10 PSF FLOOR A5SEi DEAD - I r, FSF LIVE - 40 F5F ATTIC VF-NT[Mr-z � /i5o TOTAL Ne"r FREE VENTIi AREA /-too pi AT I-ASTEkO% AND NOT MORE THAN SO% VET4T[-ATIOH AREA F,nVID,j:p kV VENT OPENINGS LOCATED IN UFi IFOR 17ON OF SPADE AT LEAST Sl AE:kWE i OR CORNICE VENTS I"i" BALANCE Pi By EA /E OR OaRi VENTS. FOUNDATION Vi L, NOT BE i THAN T SO� THE MINIMUM NET AREA OF VENTILATIONOrENi 5HAL 6ROUNE? FOOT FOR , EACH'.'ISO SDP. FT. OF UNDERFLOOR SPACE AREA. UNLE55 THE SURFACE IS CoYnIeEP BY A CLASS I VAPOR Kii MATERIAL. i A CLASS I VAPOR RETARDER MATERIAL i5 URaEL% LE55 THAN 1 SC3. FT. FOR EACH 9500 SO FT OF UKpER-FLOOR CWAr-F AREA, ONE. SUCH VENT'i OpEi Si BE. rqFri 5 OF EACH CORNER OF THE 51 v J"b ro, C�ty of Ashbi id ro To 11 pip Fr. SITE FL.,NN M!'17 E V E (not 12 U- z gj za J (I 1201g 11 1 Dify of +12 �z m - m L)ppFg FLOOR FLAN W& so wr sc,#Tr U-4- � izW INS FLOORPLAN Sl14 WV FT. dete g bj.�. roll L/YfPlC Ally T ". OCT 2019 CRy of Ashbnd ATW.12' -1 al N :L TRU55 "A" tri FA A I AS LC I , x I Kill IT A VENTS THE THEATTiG AREh O'F ROOF FRAMIN& PLAN e—,At-V 1/41' • GONG. W 6.6 0-M Ce 5,5. BY 4. TO iImo{{ ------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - FOf N. 'A' OULE . .. . ........ z . . .. . ....... . I N, FOUNPATION PLAN 21,2019 Y FIZANI.. ANLi A4 1 Tt , 'A' . —4 5T T5 BFIDIR, m BED i_W4- Ta FLY,' OFor-E .- L�Aj r qiAx 1.4 q� A. IItj SE r-,TIONr w- z Lm- --- - ------- rr T H ALE 7 RA-1- ST-5 W 6v . DIP. N-L-n 16' .6)tp. PP Ta -6 M-15 V--A ATidN 1 .vtGSG . . ..... STARSTG'rtA.E 41— 24 -a ST> s .la' pc ./ R-LI b.;2 HE ER S 4' TS PLTW— ��O M 1. 4RA� OAq4 SECITON 21 06 —V MA5TER KITOAFN FLY— EAn— JLV� y . ...... 5T1 uIS-GG R-11 SF-C,TION "A" 0 c T 1 21"'11,119 SEcnOIM A-G I"A 1.4 �'ceN SV- - r4'T" I[ F&- �,� F-Az�m � vew ,9 m^fa FJ"FM, -- NORTH AS 5y a-,Q�r 5az6� —6 FAO0A 'Er,L Our .se x arm FE V�F5T F-L-F-\/,A%TION ===� 1-11E = 11 of t2-- eoUTH �I-EV,,NTION ..10 Mga�r� M,4 F-A5T F-L-F-\/A%TION TTO d'a"8 E-4—r-6TMtCAL ANO LIGHTING' LEGEND ... . . .. ....... . . . ... —FLEX —ET PEr-ES5EV FD<'NRE ;HATER PROOr/ 6RCVNp F^ULT NTFRRUPTFIZ EXHAU5T FAN GUPLFX OVT1-PT "Rov'p FAULT IN e",UPTER FANI LIGHT COMBINATION Pvfll-rx T SMOKE DETECTOR HAP-O VIRXO —0 220 DUPLEX OUTLET W/13AITTr-my VAOKu G-^RBON MONOX177r VPTEr"rop. PHONE VVYL.E-T HARD vP.ED wl 6ATTE1-IY 13ACKUP IH TY. r-AE3LF I COMPUTER -n j FAN/ L-K HT C-'�+IFBO 9 POLE LIGHT SYSfre-H LL t4 4 POLE LIGHT S:NIT6H t SINGLE POLE! LIGHT SnTr-H 2 X 4 FLUOr- RFSENT LIGHTt. LIGHT SAMCA4 W/ DIMMER 1 X 4 FI-00--�P!NT LIGHT r_rtJNISa t4ouNTEV FIXTWZ ptm-u55ro p5r-OR 57-oT u6HT Y4ALL MOUNTED FIXTURE r-EJLtNC, HUNGPEND�ANT LIGHT rJALL- WOUNTM, rtxr� W/ PHOTO CELL (EXTZRIOF-) UNDER ..1L.11 L11111.0 COLINC, HUNG PF-HEDANT SELF 'y'4T,7�HNr, EXTERUR soc'uRrTy LIGHT NOTES i. ^RNG FOR E�GT�5 SHALTN� Floc 5 AALtILV 5I.—%THE F 61�LION6 �TFODm SHALL eE P �TA-�gCOR� eEc'�NEKT �STHAN F IS, �4A�F�LTC �TC��RCHALLFTS.�TALL ISIAOH—T�. Pt ��A!� TO T� ANV LCAL��ALL ��TV05cR�EP To Or`:LY r— A'( TOME OF FRAMN6 14. ALL KTCHEN TOF`5 Tl� ��TAIW 2 S�A,0�-E BE LISTED AS �MFLY�04b '47, -5TAT AND LOOA- C E ANW5T— ^--- TO— --, OF TN�t� — THE HOUSEHUt1D pp[:N15'1N1 15. UHT M%TVRL MALL 5E LAEEI.ED ^ xrAe�L F— PA— 10. ALL E L--- Sm—E TORS, 5—L. 6E Yrr L(?C.+�TOGK� "o —/ T — OATT" Y BAD.. LF —STATE AND HEcarf+awMIT5. tJ, VAT —NI FP�M eF.LS THE OER' S, 4. S— —�T� AT Ov- THE -,TA",5 SHALL Be �Tf'S� A OR —_8 LjANr A' k4�6�-,�Y TO MEET STATE. AND LOO- �E5. ^LA.2. MTH AHALA f VLE C,N. S-- 115. AT LSA5r ONS IN FAOH BATHROOMR AND LMUTY USHr.6 24 THF. KITGHRa 19 ALL 0 — AREA. OF THE HOME (: VkPR6 "O. AND BATKROO . HALL Ays, 5TA'X5 u.N NIS ROO"S, ETGJ r BT ALA HAVE. a- —TALL A FH E MIZNCY L — N THE L.A&➢N W4H EHFr,L6HTNs OR. OF rROVE?FJD "TH A F m AND MOTION SENSORS OR HIGH MAIVAL ON MU—N S ICH. AT ALL rX7 FTGOR no, TTIE W`PG'# �omAT�ALLY �— — . . "I"H N THE ell-- THAT slrmjE I' voLT' —.LL'. 'HAS. 1'v AND Mr OAF'ABLF O OF. TVHNeaS ON MAsa50At.Ly KIND — A-, O' '5 N azo. Cv SY+ C#4. ST,^LrL BE FTF-jGir3 BY AN ARC -FAULT GR M IN- TERRVPTGR V TO F.—Z —T➢ON FOR 6DATRd REGPPTAuLE C3tTL.ETS 5HALL .�FiUa-- BY AT LEAST ONE nO ~F CXF—�r� BU6H CRCLITS SHALL HAVE HO C 71HSK a?VTLFTS.(ALT. -10-52, NE-J'. q. F—E —V�TAT GSHTR— IN [iA7HFCCX. AS. CJ.IRPY.. m—xo AL.—5,SHAI-L HE USM0 A' G3 LYTNG Mn4 Vt- 2 54 A40 OF. NSTALL— A':D —I-,— N THE St ALL RE E FF:dMARY 1-4., — FROM uArrERy rm",Asy FC 15 UPPER FI-00F, F-LEC.,TRICAL ILAII E ()lC,fl 0 2 i L-C^F-R FLOOR F-LEC-7,TRIGAL PLAN -i[J IL V-1 w ♦131 � z Ila IL 7) fA LJ(4 sz dr-1,19 'kerl� -JAI City of Ashland COMMUnity Development Department 51 WinbUrn Way Ashland, OR 97520 Telephone: 541-488-5305 fnspection Line: 541-552-2080 Plan Type: Pre -Application Review Work Class: Pre -Application Review Map & Tax Lot 391 E09DA6900 PERMrr NUMBER PREAPP-2019-00158 Apply Date: 10121/2019 872 Siskiyou BI -Owner Information Applicant Information Owner: Doug Houston Applicant: Doug Houston Owner 180 Greenfield Ave Applicant 180 Greenfield Ave Address: AubLIM, CA 95603 Address: Auburn, CA 95603 Phone: (916) 719-1850 Phone: (916) 7-19-1850 P'roject Description 1214 2pm. Pre App for SFR on light with small house already Fees Fee Description: Amount, Pre -Application Fee $142.25 R E a n d Applicant: Date: Total Fees: $142.25 Aaron Anderson From: Brandon Goldman Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2020 2:54 PM To: Derek Severson; Maria Harris; April Lucas; Aaron Anderson Subject: 1/21 Development meeting Below are some notes from this morning's development meeting. Present at the meeting were Dave Tygerson, Karl Johnson, Ryan Lougheed, Brandon Goldman, April Lucas. 123 Church: Due to the proximity to the side yard (36") additional building code requirements could apply. The eaves have to be fire rated (blocking) and can only extend to be at least 2' from the property line. Building will check whether penetrations in the wall (windows) are permitted if the wall is exactly 36" from the property line. 872 Siskiyou: The new electrical service installed for the front unit will need to be upgraded with a 2-pack meter base for the new house. This requires an upgrade of the underground service as it was installed with only a one unit capacity. Kestral (KDA): Engineering has not seen a preliminary grading plan for Phase 2, nor has electric reviewed the potential electrical plan. Electric will check with CDC about when it can be expected. 1511 Hwy 66: Issues of utility extension (water, electric, storm) as an underground install from the City limits, under the RR truss bridge, and to the subject property still needs to be addressed. Questions came up whether a sidewalk under the truss bridge would be protected? Comments were made regarding a recent car accident in the southbound lane where the car hit the concrete wall of the bridge. Additionally, it was noted that any existing PP&L customers within the area of annexation will have to switch to the City of Ashland service, at which time PP&L requires Ashland's Electric Department "buys" those customers at a rate of twice the annual revenue PP&L received. Tygerson indicated that this cost should be born by the property annexing as the cost is passed on to the developer. With only one house on the property this is a minor issue. Brandon Goldman, AICP Senior Planner City of Ashland, Planning Division 20 East Main Street, Ashland OR 97520 (541) 552-2076, TTY: 1-800-735-2900 FAX: (541) 552-2050 Brandon.goldman@ashland.or.us This ernail transmission is official business of the City of Ashland, and it is subject to Oregon Public Records law for disclosure and retention. If you have received this message in error, please contact me at (541)552-2076. Thank you.