HomeMy WebLinkAboutMeade_95_PA-T1-2020-00099CITY OF
,t-xSHLAND
May 12, 2020
Notice of Final Decision
On May 1, 2020, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
Planning Action: PA-TI-2020-00099
Subject Pi-opefty: 95 Meade
Applicant: Rogue Planning / Meade LLC
Desci-iption: A request for Site Design Review approval to convert existing 493 square
feet of habitable space above the garage into an authorized Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) for
the property at 95 Meade Street. There are no proposed site changes as the property is fully
developed. There are no changes to the windows or exterior of the building, and the garage would
continue to be used for pat -king.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day
after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all
conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be net prior to project
completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence SLibirtitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51
Winbum Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of
Ashland copy fee schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may
request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO)
18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO
18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached.
The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the
Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541 A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-736-2900
SECTION 18.51.050 'Type I Procedure (Administrative Decisions with Notice)
R. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.O50.G, a "Type I decision becomes effective 12 clays after tine City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. Tile Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of tine Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised byletter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sisfficient toafford the Staff Advisor all opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsiderations requuests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for prUposcs of reconsideration, The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to tine decision, the Staff advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requnested reconsideration,.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to tine Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. Tine applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.13.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Piling Procedure,
a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this
subsections. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals rnnade by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing
or upon subsequent appeal, tlse fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b. Thne f r Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of tise date the notice of
decision is mailed.
c. Convent oaj'Notice gfAj)pea1, The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of tine decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully niet or the appeal will be considered by tine City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearhngs before the
Planning Commission. Tlne appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation,
and specific issues raised in the review leading uup to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and
arguments. "file Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant
ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings oil appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final.
decision of tlse City oil an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on all appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State € and Use Hoard of
Appeals, pursuant to CARS 197,805 - 197.860O
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel:541-488-5345
51 Wdnburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00099
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 95 Meade Street
APPLICANT/OWNER: Rogue Planning / Meade LLC
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to convert existing 493
square feet of habitable space above the garage into an authorized Accessory Residential Unit
(ARU) for the property at 95 Meade Street. There are no proposed site changes as the property is
fully developed. There are no changes to the windows or exterior of the building, and the garage
would continue to be used for parking.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5;
MAP: 39 lE 09 BD; TAX LOT: 15000
SUBMITTAL DATE:
March 30, 2020
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE:
April 13, 2020
STAFF APPROVAL DATE:
May 12, 2020
DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.):
May 25, 2020
FINAL DECISION DATE:
May 26, 2020
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE:
November 26, 2021
DECISION
The proposal is to convert habitable space above the garage into a detached Accessory Residential
Unit (ARU). The subject property is located at the between of Hillcrest and Meade St. and is
located in the R-1-7.5 zoning district. The property is 0.19 acres and is trapezoidal in shape. The
property conforms to base zone requirements including lot coverage and the non -conforming
setbacks are existing. The surrounding neighborhood is comprised exclusively of single-family
homes and is also zoned R-1-7.5.
The property is located in the City of Ashland's Siskiyou-Hargadine Historic District. According
to the City of Ashland Historic Resources Inventory, the existing structure is known as the Pierre
S. Provost House and was constructed in 1904. The late 19th / 20'h century American Bungalow
has been somewhat compromised by the installation of a large picture window and partial
enclosure of the front porch but, retains original siding, a fine brick chimney and other detailing
that sufficiently relate its original design and appearance during the period of historical
significance.
In 2014 the property went through a pre -application for an ARU but no Site Design Review was
ever processed. Instead the carriage house, that is the subject of this planning action, was
constructed as a `guest house' during an extensive renovation (See Building permit #BD-2014-
02231). Because the habitable space over the garage was designated as a `guest house,' the
applicant was required to entered into a "No kitchen agreement" as is standard practice. A
condition of approval will be that the applicant request that the city record an `amendment of
restrictive covenant' removing the no -kitchen agreement and pay for the recording fees.
PA-T I-2020-00099
95 Meade St./aa
Page I
According to the Jackson County Assessor the main house is 2317 square feet. Accessory
Residential Units are required not to exceed 50-percent of the Gross Habitable Floor Area (GHFA)
of the primary dwelling with an upper limit of 1000 square feet. The proposed ARU has a GHFA
of 493 square feet (less than 50-percent of the main residence).
The ALUO parking requirements for an ARU and a single-family home requires three automobile
parking spaces. The application demonstrates that the property has at least three off street parking
spaces (two at the rear of the property, and one under the car port). That said, House Bill 2001
amended ORS 197.312 (effective January 1, 2020) to include language that state "`reasonable local
regulations relating to siting and design' does not include * * *requirements to construct additional
off-street parking" jemphasis added]. The application indicates that the required bicycle parking
will be provide in the garage below.
While the Site Design Standards do apply to this action because the habitable space is existing,
and that there are no proposed exterior changes to the building those criteria will not be discussed.
The application complies with all of the applicable provisions of the R-1-7.5 zoning district, the
applicable Site Development and Design Standards in AMC 18.4, and the special use standards
for an ARU provided in AMC 18.2.3.040.
The applicant has submitted materials to the Planning Department that demonstrate compliance
with these approval standards.
The criteria for an Accessory Residential Unit are described in AMC Chapter 18.2.3.040,
as follows:
B. R-1 Zone. Accessory Residential Units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following
requirements:
1. One Accessory Residential Unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling
units shall not exceed two per lot.
2. Accessory Residential Units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area
requirements of the zone.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the Accessory Residential Unit shall
not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and shall not
exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback
requirements of the underlying zone.
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions
for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3,040, except that parking spaces, turn-
arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections
18.4.3.080.D.1 and 18.4.3.080.D.2 and paving requirements in subsection
18.4.3.080.E.1.
PA-Ti-2020-00099
95 Meade Stha
Page 2
The criteria for Site Review approval are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.2.050 as follows:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the
underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot
area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building
orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part
18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable
Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection
E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6
Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity,
urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate
transportation can and will be provided to the subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may
approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18A if the
circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site
Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an
existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will
not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the
exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and
Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the
difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but
granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the
stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards.
In staff s assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable
ordinances and meets all required criteria.
Planning Action #T1-2020-00099 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one
or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then
Planning Action 4T1-2020-00099 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached
to the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise
specifically modified herein.
2) That all necessary building permits, including permits for the new electrical service to the
Accessory Residential Unit, and system development charges for water, sewer, storm
water, parks, and transportation shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit.
3) That the applicant petition for a new address for the ARU.
PA-T 1-2020-00099
95 Meade St./aa
Page 3
4) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with
those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are
not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an
application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to
issuance of a building permit.
5) That bicycle parking to be shown on the Final Plan. If bicycle parking is provided in
garages, final interior dimensions of garages shall be provided to insure adequate space
needs.
6) That the applicant request that the city amend the restrictive covenant ensuring that no
cooking facilities be installed in the shop and pay for the recording fees
7) That the property owner shall sign in favor of Local Improvement District (LID) for the
future street improvements, including but not limited to paving, curb gutter, storm
drainage, sidewalks and undergrounding of utilities for Hillcrest and Meade Streets prior
to issuance of the building permit. Nothing in this condition is intended to prohibit an
owner/developer, their successors or assigns from exercising their rights to freedom of
speech and expression by orally objecting or participating in the LID hearing or to take
advantage of any protection afforded any party by City ordinances and resolutions.
S) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy:
a) That a separate electric service and meter for the accessory residential unit shall be
installed in accordance with Ashland Electric Department requirements.
b) That a separate address for the accessory residential unit shall be applied for
approved by the City of Ashland Engineering Division. Addressing shall meet the
requirements of the Ashland Fire Department and be visible from the Public Right -
of -Way.
c) All automobile parking and bicycle parking shall be installed according to the
approved plan, inspected, and approved by the Staff Advisor,
d) All landscaping, hardscaping and irrigation, shall be installed according to the
approved plan, inspected and approved by the Staff Advisor.
May 1, 2020
Bill Molnar, Community Development Director Date
PA-TI-2020-00099
95 Meade St./aa
Page 4
F-111 9 1 imfflj Igo] a kyj F-111 I I VA
STATE OF ORE ON
County of Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On May 12, 2020 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in, a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice
to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on
this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-00099, 95 Meade
Street.
Signature of Employee
Documentl 5WW20
PA-T1-2020-00099 PA-T1-2020-00099 PA-T1-2020-00099
DELUCA RONALD L TRUSTEE ET AL LAWRENCE JOHN A JR TRUSTEE ET PATTON KENT DIAMY S
228 MORNINGLIGHT DR 307 RAVENWOOD PL 15735 SW 76TH AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TIGARD, OR 97224
PA-T1-2020-00099
LE MY T
14300 SADDLE MOUNTAIN DR
LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022
PA-T1-2020-00099
MURPHREE ROSEMARY F TRUSTEE E
1105 TALBOT AVE
ALBANY, CA 94706
PA-T1-2020-00099
MEADE LLC
95 MEADE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
COOKE BRIANIKERRI
6404 REEDY SONG KNL
CLARKSVILLE, MD 21029
PA-T1-2020-00099
CHAMBERS KENNETH G TRUSTEE
25690 ADAMS RD
LOS GATOS, CA 95033
PA-T1-2020-00099
KNOPPOW WILLIAM
445 WILSON RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
NIEMANN SANDRA KAY TRUSTEE ET
1430 ACTON ST
BERKELEY, CA 94702
PA-T1-2020-00099
NOBLE DREW ALDEN
4 HILLCREST ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
VADIM AGAKHANOV
262 B STREET
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
RIZZO BRUCE W
342 VISTA ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
TITUS GAYLE L TRUSTEE ET AL
1 HILLCREST ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
PATRIDGE ROBERT WIMARY M
5 HILLCREST ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
ANDERSON LARRY EIANDERSON E A
311 RAVENWOOD PL
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
SLYT JOHN C TRUSTEE ET AL
385 PEARL ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
SCHNEIDER MARK
303 RAVENWOOD PL
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
ALLMAN DAVID W TRUSTEE ET AL
134 TERRACE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
PATTON SHIRLEY D TRUSTEE ET A
110 TERRACE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
FEHRER FREDERICK
365 PEARL ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
NYSTROM JANET L
112 PINE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
GORDON WADE ET AL
18 HILLCREST ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
RAVENWOOD TOWNHOMES OWNERS
PO BOX 518
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
SCHEIN STEVEN AND PATRICIA TR
135 MEADE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
CAUGHEY AARON
1261 SW UNDERHILL RD
PORTLAND, OR 97219
PA-T1-2020-00099
RICHMOND MICHAEL ET AL
309 RAVENWOOD PL
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099
ROGUE PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT
33 N CENTRAL #213
MEDFORD,OR 97501
95 Meade
05/12/2020 NOD
28
k
u
dmi �
I
Planning Department, 51 Winbu., Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY OF
541-488-5305 Fax:541-552-2050 www,ashland.or.us TTY:1-800-735-29,00 -ASHLAND
- 5115134102 :I:INLWIIllolom
PLANNING ACTION: PA-TI-2020-00099
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 95 Meade Street
OWNER/APPLICANT: Meade LLC/Rogue Planning
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to convert existing 493 square feet of habitable space
above the garage into an authorized Accessory Residential Unit (ARU) for the property at 95 Meade Street. There
are no proposed site changes as the property is fully developed. There are no changes to the windows or exterior
of the building, and the garage would continue to be used for parking. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION: Single Fainily Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 IE 09 BD; TAX LOT: 15000
NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: April 13, 2020
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: April 27,2020
Subject Property
95 Meade St.
L—j PA-Tl-2020.00099
I u
f �i
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland,
Oregon,97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above,
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to
surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than
45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the apphcation. A notice of decision is mailed to the same
properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning
Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter,
or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes Your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of
Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure
of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the
issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at
reasonable cost, if requested!. All materials are aivailable at the Ashland Manning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way,
Ashland, Oregon 97520,
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at 541-488-5305.
C�:WscrsNsnikhdi OLP[look,%PP634ZS9'd'A-'FI-2020-00099.docx
SITE, DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.5.2.050
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and
yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, budding height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable
standards.
B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
C. Site Development and Design, Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as
provided by subsection E, below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section, 118.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water,
sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject
property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards: The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design
Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection I or 2, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect
of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and
approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum
which would alleviate the difficulty.; or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves
the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards.
ACCESSORY RESIDENTIAL UNITS
18.2.3.040
Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, except as exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, below.
A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved budding permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under
chapter 18.5,2 provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements.
1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require
Site Design Review under chapter 18,5,2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection.
2. The accessory residential unit meets afl of the requirements of the applicable zone in subsections 18.2.3.040.13, C, E and F, below, except as
otherwise exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A.
& The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross habitable floor area (GHFA),
4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the
Historic District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building permit, and accessory residential units located in detached
structures (i.e,, not attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5,2 and are not permitted outright under this
subsection,
5 The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in
subsections 1 and 2 of 18,43.080,[) and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E.1.
6, Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residential unit if on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property.
Alternatively, one off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for accessory
residential units in section 18.4.3.080.
B., R-1 Zone. Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following requirements.
1. One accessory residential unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot.
2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area requirements of the zone.
3. The maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence
on the lot, and shall not exceed 1,0010 square feet GHFA,
4� The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback requirements of the underlying zone.
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18.4.3.080, except that
parking spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and 2 of 18,4.3.080.D and -paving requirements in
subsection 18,43,080.E.1.
C. RR Zone. In addition to the standards in subsection 18.2.3.040.13, accessory residential units in the RR zone shall meet the following requirements.
1. No on -street parking credits shall be allowed for accessory residential units.
2. If located in the Wildfire zone, the accessory residential unit shall have a residential sprinkler system installed.
D, R-2 and R-3 Zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones shall meet the standards in Subsection 18.2.3.040.13, except that the maximum
gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential structure shall not exceed 50 percent of the GHFA of the primary residence on the lot, and
shall not exceed 500 square feet GHFA,
E. NN Zones. Accessory residential units in the Normal Neighborhood District Linder chapter 18.3.4 shall meet the standards in subsection 18,23,040,13,
F. NIVI Zones,. Accessory residential units in the North Mountain Neighborhood NM zones under chapter 18.3.5 shall meet the standards in subsection
18.2.3.040.8, except that the maximum gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential unit must not exceed 750 square feet GHFA and
that second story accessory residential units constructed above a detached accessory building must not exceed 500 square feet GHFA.
0UsC,S\.5m!0WR AFNEik3.\Appl)alakLocaMlicrosofl%%�'iiidowsXIN'CtCacilelContent.OullookIdIP634ZS9\PA-TI-2020-OO999.doc.x
STATE OF OREGON
County of Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn, states that-,
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2, On April 13, 2020 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for, Planning Action #PA-TI-2020-00099, 95 Meade.
Signature of Employee
CaUsers%"IhdaAFNHE'AppDatalocaIV,licfmftl"'lindavisWNetCachelContentOoloo�TP634ZSg�AFFIDAVIT OF MUNGJ5 Meade.docx 01312020
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD11000
DELUCA RONALD L TRUSTEE ET AL
228 MORNINGLIGHT DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD13600
CHAMBERS KENNETH G TRUSTEE
25690 ADAMS RD
LOS GATOS, CA 95033
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD15100
NOBLE DREW ALDEN
4 HILLCREST ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD15400
NIEMANN SANDRA KAY TRUSTEE ET
1430 ACTON ST
BERKELEY, CA 94702
M-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD13400
RICHMOND MICHAEL ET AL
309 RAVENWOOD PL
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD13700
SCHNEIDER MARK
303 RAVENWOOD PL
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD15200
PATTON KENT D/AMY S
15735 SW 76TH AVE
TIGARD, OR 97224
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09CA11301
ALLMAN DAVID W TRUSTEE ET AL
134 TERRACE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 39IL09BD11300 PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD11400
RAVENWOOD TOWNHOMES OWNERS CAUGHEY AARON
PO BOX 518 1261 SW UNDERHILL RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 PORTLAND, OR 97219
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD11600
COOKE BRIAN/KERRI
6404 REEDY SONG KNL
CLARKSVILLE, MD 21029
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD14700
KNOPPOW WILLIAM
445 WILSON RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E096D15500
TITUS GAYLE L TRUSTEE ET AL
1 HILLCRESTST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09CA10500
SCHEIN STEVEN AND PATRICIA TR
135 MEADE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD13200
NYSTROM JANET L
112 PINE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD14900
RIZZO BRUCE W
342 VISTA ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09CA8700
SLYT JOHN C TRUSTEE ET AL
385 PEARL ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09CA10502
LE MY T
14300 SADDLE MOUNTAIN DR
LOS ALTOS HILLS, CA 94022
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD13500
LAWRENCE JOHN AJR TRUSTEE ET
307 RAVENWOOD PL
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD14600
KNOPPOW WILLIAM
445 WILSON RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD15300
PATRIDGE ROBERT W/MARY M
5 HILLCREST ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BC8000
PATTON SHIRLEY D TRUSTEE ETA
110 TERRACE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD11500
MURPHREE ROSEMARY F TRUSTEE E
1105 TALBOT AVE
ALBANY, CA 94706
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD13300
ANDERSON LARRY E/ANDERSON E A
311 RAVENWOOD PL
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09BD15000
BARRYTODD S/MARJORIE M
95 MEADE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09CA8701
FEHRER FREDERICK
365 PEARL ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09CA10503
GORDON WADE ET AL
18 HILLCREST ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00099 391E09CA11300 PA-T1-2020-00099 PA-T1-2020-00099
ALLMAN DAVID W TRUSTEE ET AL Meade LLC ROGUE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
134 TERRACE ST 95 MEADE ST 33 N. CENTRAL AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 MEDFORD, OR 97501
PA-T1-2020-00099
VADIM AGAKHANOV 95 Meade
262 6 STREET 31 NOC
ASHLAND, OR 97520 4/13/2020 RMT
�,ti �� �kG°.•�I � g.,,V
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
CITY OF 5
PlanningDivision
1 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 E
ANFIL
SHLA
D 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 #
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Sit_e Design Review for ARI
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Street Address 95 Meade Street
Pursuing LEED@ Cedilication? DYES V NO
Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E 098D Tax Lot(s) 1500
Zoning B-1-7.6 Comp Plan Designation --Single Family Residential
APPLICANT
Name Rogue Planning & Development — Phone 541-951-4020 E4all amygunter,planning@gmaiI.com
Address 33 Central Avenue; Suite 213
PROPERTY OWNER
Name Meade LLC
Address 95 Meade Street
City Medford
one 510-910-1500 E-Mail
SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER
Title Contractor Name Vadirn Agakhanov —Phone
Address 262 B Street
Title Name
Address
Zip 97601
tom@couints.com
City Ashland Z.0 97520
- City Ashland
Phone E-Mail
- City
17. Um
Zip
I hereby cortity that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings affect, are in all respects,
true and correct, I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site Inspection, In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility, / further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request,,
2) that the findings of fact furnishodjusliflos the granting of the request;
3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate, and further
4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground.
Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly In my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be removed at my expense, it I have any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance.
AWU rvjltpj�: March 24, 2020
Api` canit's Signature Date
As owner of the property involved In this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to Rio as a property
owner,
ice-,.
KP"&,_ Mar 24, 2020
Property Owner's Signature (required) Date
[To be completed by Oily Staq
Date Received 3, 3 Cr l- e> Zoning Permit Type _r I . Filing Fee $ ) t D
Qkomm,dev1planningWornss & tIondoulsVoning Panrdt Applicatioll.doc
13ec6ved 03/30/202()
ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL, REQUIREMENTS
0 APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner,
FINDINGS OF FACT -- Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or
findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include
information necessary to address all issues detailed In the Pre -Application Comment document.
❑ 2 SETS OF SCALED PLANS no larger than 11"x17". Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape
details. (Optional —1 additional large set of plans, 2'x3', to use in meetings)
f� FEE (Check, Charge or Cash)
❑ LEEDO CERTIFICATION (optional) -- Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall
provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps:
Hiring and retaining a LEER® Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and
construction of the project; and
• The LEER® checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued.
NOTE:
• Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis.
• Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property
owner(s), all required materials and full payment.
• All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance
with ORS 227.178.
• The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission
meeting. (Planning Commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1:30 pm, or the full Planning Commission, which
meets at 7:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St).
• A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns.
• If applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree and/or Historic Commissions,
G:komm•davlplanninj;Woms & HandoutsVouing Pt"il Application.doe
Received 03/30/2020
ROGUE PLANNING D DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, LLD
Site Design Review for Accessory Residential Unit
95 Meade Street
Received 03/30/2020
March 27, 2020
Site Review approval for an Accessory Residential Unit
Property Address: 95 Meade Street
Property Owners: Meade LLC
95 Meade Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Planning Consultant: Rogue Planning & Development Services, LLC
33 N Central Avenue, Suite 213
Medford, OR 97501
Map & Tax Lots:
Zoning:
Adjacent Zones:
39 1E 09BD; Tax Lot: 15000
R-1-7.5
R-1-7.5
Rest:
The application seeks Site Design Review approval for a 493 square foot accessory residential unit (ARU).
The proposal is to convert the existing, detached garage with living space above into a small, one -
bedroom accessory residential unit.
Site Description:
The subject property is south portion of Lot 3 and Lot
4, Block 48 of the Summit Addition subdivision from
1888. The property is located between Meade Street
on the east side, downhill of the property. On the
uphill side of the property is Hillcrest Street.
The trapezoid shaped lot has 65.4 feet of frontage on
Meade Street, and 73.04 feet of frontage on Hillcrest
Street. The lot is 8,276 square feet in area and
conforms with minimum standards in the R-1-7.5
zone.
5,u1
GLENVIEW DR, O"Ac
16600~
os3 AC
24
I r
C
1
15400uN \��)�
I n.
f ON Ac
I
el�
ono 0 C5 21176
q
u
l i
Nm
12115FO0
659 Aa
I
I�
I WP. I�1f
�OR 2]twa�n
8
is 119 +ro w
�
MAP r\�,I f` t 11000
�) q1
VISTA
2 ste
14900
14600
7a0-14Ac
0.19 At ` V� 46 ACS 6119
`a 1460
Page 1 of 7 Received 03/30/2020
Page 1 of 7 Received 03/30/2020
The property is occupied by a 2,280 square foot, two-story residence that was substantially modified in
2-015. The property is within the Siskiyou-Hargadine Historic District and according to the Historic
Resources Inventory, the structure is the P.S. Provost House. Though substantially altered and updated,
the structure retains its historic volumes and is still considered as a contributing resource to the overall
integrity of the Siskiyou-Hargadine historic district.
Adjacent to the primary residence is a 999.5 square foot, single story, with below grade garage, structure.
This replaced a carport during the home renovations in 2015.
The two -vehicle garage is 451.5 square feet. Above the partially below grade garage is a 493 square foot,
habitable, detached living space. Most recently, the space was a home office. There is a wet bar and a
small bathroom. A previously recorded "no kitchen" agreement is attached to the deed of the property.
The garage structure is attached to the residence via a covered walkway that is a bridge between the
second story of the main residence and the area above the garage.
The property extends between Meade and Hillview Drive. Both are narrow, neighborhood streets.
Proposal:
The proposal is to convert the existing habitable 493-square foot structure above the garage to an
accessory residential unit (ARU). The garage structure with proposed accessory residential unit above
are exempt from the standards for maximum permitted floor area in the historic district.
The entrance of the ARU faces Hillcrest Street. There is a covered walkway between the SFR and the
ARU. An electric meter and addressing for the ARU is necessary. These are the only modifications
necessary on the site to accommodate the ARU.
The conversion of the existing structure and the proposed addition for the ARU is of an architecturally
compatible structure. The roof pitch, height, and materials are compatible with the existing structures
on the property and in the vicinity. The small unit is proposed within a walkable neighborhood that is in
close proximity to the downtown, the bus routes, and other city amenities.
The property has vehicular access from Hillcrest Street. The garage and driveway provides for the
required, two, on -site parking spaces for a single family residence. The addition of the ARU does not
require additional parking spaces. A pathway leads from the property down to Meade Street.
Covered bicycle parking for the ARU will be provided in the garage. The tenant will have access to the
garage for bicycle parking. A screened, trash recycle enclosure area is between the structures and not
visible to the streets.
No changes to the street frontages, driveways or other site modifications are proposed.
Page 2 of 7 Received 03/30/2020
On the following pages, findings of fact add ressingthe criteria from Ashland Municipal Code are provided
on the following pages. For clarity, the criteria are in Times New Roman and the applicant's responses
are in Calibri font.
Criteria from the Ashland Land Use Ordinance for Accessory Residential: Unit
18.5.2.050 Site Design Review
A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone
(part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and
floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards.
Excepting the installation of an electric meter and addressing for the ARU, no modifications are
necessary.
The lot area exceeds the minimum of 7,500 square feet of lot area in the R-1-7.5 zone. The heated,
habitable space above the garage that is proposed to be converted complies with all setbacks. The
structures are six feet away from each other and the garage/ARU structure is not included in the
Maximum Permitted Floor Area standards for the historic district. Density standards do not apply. The
lot coverage is existing and complies with the maximum lot coverage in the zone.
Based on the plans provided, it appears that all construction standards can be met for the conversion of
the space to a dwelling unit.
Addressing as assigned by the city of Ashland will be provided on the Hillcrest fa§ade of the structure.
Standards for Residential Zones:
18.2.3.040 Accessory Residential Unit
Accessory residential units are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, except as
exempted in subsection 18.2.3.040.A, below.
A. Exemptions. Accessory residential units are permitted outright with an approved
building permit, and are allowed without a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2
provided that the accessory residential unit meets all of the following requirements.
1. The accessory residential unit is located in the R-1, R-1-3.5, RR, NN and NM
zones. Accessory residential units in the R-2 and R-3 zones require Site Design
Review under chapter 18.5.2 and are not permitted outright under this subsection.
The property is in the R-1 zone. The unit requires Site Design Review because it is
detached and, in the Siskiyou-Hargadine Historic District.
Page 3 of 7 Received 03/30/2020
2. The accessory residential unit meets all of the requirements of the applicable
zone in subsections 18.2.3.040.B, C, E and F, below, except as otherwise exempted
in subsection 18.2.3.040.A.
The proposed accessory residential unit meets the requirements of the applicable
zone found in subsection 18.2.3.040.B.
3. The size of the accessory residential unit is less than 500 square feet of gross
habitable floor area (GHFA).
The accessory residential unit is proposed to be 493 square feet in area.
4. The accessory residential unit is attached to the primary residence or within an
existing primary residence. Accessory residential units located in the Historic
District overlay and including exterior building changes that require a building
permit, and accessory residential units located in detached structures (i.e., not
attached to the primary residence) require Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2
and are not permitted outright under this subsection.
The accessory residential unit is not considered attached. There is a covered
breezeway and bridge that connect the structures, this does not qualify as
"attached" per city of Ashland since the detachment for purposes of maximum
permitted floor area volumes were utilized. The detached unit is within the
Siskiyou-Hargadine Historic District.
Due to these standards, a Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 is required.
5. The property must have two off-street parking spaces, except that parking spaces,
turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in subsections 1 and
2 of 18.4.3.080.D and paving requirements in subsection 18.4.3.080.E.1.
The property has two off-street parking spaces within the garage that is below the
proposed ARU. Though exempt from paving, the driveway is a semi -solid surface
of paver blocks.
Page 4 of 7 Received 03/30/2020
6. Additional off-street parking is not required for the accessory residential unit if
on -street parking is permitted within 200 feet of the property. Alternatively, one
off-street parking space may be provided on the property in conformance with the
off' -street parking provisions for accessory residential units in section 18.4.3.080.
It is th,e applicant's understanding that the R132001 passed by, the State of Oregon
prevents cities from requiring additional parking for accessory residential units.
This structure falls into this classification and thus additional parking is not
proposed.
B. R-1 Zone, Accessory residential units in the R-1 zone shall meet the following
requirements:
1. One accessory residential Unit is allowed per lot, and the maximum number of
dwelling units shall not exceed two per lot.
The proposal is for one, studio unit, accessory residential unit in addition to the
existing residence.
2. Accessory residential units are not subject to the density or minimum lot area
requirements of the zone.
There are no density standards to be met.
3. The inaxiniurn gross habitable floor area (GHFA) of the accessory residential
unit shall not exceed 50 percent of the GlJFA of the primary residence on the lot,
and shall not exceed 1,000 square feet GHFA.
The GHFA of the accessory residential unit is 493 square feet in area. This is less
than 50 percent of the GHFA of the 2,285 square foot residence on the site.
4. The proposal shall conform to the overall maximum lot coverage and setback
requirements of the underlying zone.
The lot coverage of the proposed and all setbacks are met. No changes are
proposed to the existing site development.
5. Additional parking shall be provided in conformance with the off-street parking
provisions for single-family dwellings in section 18,43 .04-0, except that parking
Page 5 of 7 ReceN&:11 03/30/21020
spaces, turn-arounds, and driveways are exempt from the requirements in
subsections 18AI080A.). 1 and 1 SAIM80,-
1)2 and paving requirements in
_ . . . ....... - - - 11 . .. . ................ ------
subsection 18,43,080EL
It is the applicant's understanding that the HB2001 passed by the State of Oregon
prevents cities from requiring additional parking for accessory residential units,
This structure falls into this classification and thus additional parking is not
proposed.
The existing driveway and turn around area is a semi -solid surface of paver blocks.
B. Overlay Zones. 'Fhc proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3).
The property is within the Siskiyou-Hargadine Historic District, The proposed accessory residential unit
within the existing historically appropriate architecture, detached structure will not have a negative
impact on the historic contributing structure on the property or in the vicinity.
Separate historic district design standards are not addressed in these findings. The AU structure is
oriented towards Hillcrest with a gable roof, a front entry with covered stoop. No exterior modifications
are proposed that alter the orientation or compliance with the historic district design standards.
C. Site Development and Design Standards.
The trash /recycle area will be provided between the buildings and it is not visible to the public street.
Building Materials. Building materials and paint colors should be compatible with the
surrounding area. Very bright primary or neon -type paint colors, which attract attention to the
building or use, are unacceptable.
No changes proposed.
Streetscape. One street tree chosen from the street tree list shall be placed for each 30 feet of
frontage for that portion of the development fronting the street pursuant to subsection 18.4.4.030.E.
There is a well -established "street" trees, on the frontages of the property. There are no parkrows
for new street trees and the established landscaping does not provide adequate area for new
trees.
Landscape / Tree Protection:
Page 6 of 7 F��Zeceived 03/30/2020
The yard area is nicely landscaped with established trees on the site. No site changes that
necessitate tree protection are proposed.
D. City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities,
and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved
access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject
property.
Adequate city facilities exist and presently service the SFR and the ARU. Water, sewer and storm drainage
are already connected to the existing system. A separate electric service and meter for the ARU will be
installed.
Both streets are improved to the maximum extent that their respective right-of-way width, topography,
and improvement widths allow. No changes are requested.
Excerpt ftorn Historic Resources Inventory
P. S PROVOST HOUSE
95 MEADE, ST
STYLE: OTHER: VERNACULAR, COLONIAL REVIVAL ELEMENTS
1904
391E09C-410600
HISTORIC CONTRIB UTING
Pierre Sylvan Provost and This i0fe Lillian purchased this lot from the Carter Laud Company in 1904 and
immediately began construction of this one and one-half story volhune (ICD 51:32). Provost was the riepheu, of
longiirie Ashland bitsinesshhiaii D. B. Provost. IVith this brother J. H. Provost, Pierre purchased their uncle's
lhardivare business and continued its profttable operation. Pierre died in 1942 and the hardware company
eventually changed focus and continued to operate by the family cis Provost Furniture, wail 2001. The family
retained the P. S. Provost House for nearly 50 years, selling it in the late 1940s. P. Al. andAdella King owned the
property in 1949 (JCD 372:41) The Provost House is a gable volume ivith a large shed dormer and inultiple-
vohmte footprint. A large and graceful curved porch dominates the facade, with large Doric -inspired cohrrrhs
that provide a Simple Colonial Revival character. Prominently sited on and large and maturely landscape lot, the
Provost House retains sh ficient integrity to relate its appearance during the period of historic signl f lcance.
Page 7 of 7 Received 03/30/2020
AEVIWONS I UY
IAIAI 1,44 7
82 76 s,5
7:
01
Plan SPA appfoved by CRy rjfAsdand to Mae� neev
cantrudon over Tuage,
..... .. ..
Of $b"It
9' raA Pf'yn
Y)e d
-) J
f,s;, ,6
Gee quefl to conveR W AccLssory Re�ldenlial Unil
. .. . . .........
e15,V', 4 12 'r,
SPA,
ii
1 0,
7— 1--,rf7t
v-0
�k
I MWONS
Jot,
REVISIONS
5' ,,Ar,
F"' I'J "L�l -,,,I —,j -F,� =-
I T
J- 7
1J ALI'Ti
r I
T --- T— T.- t I
T— I I 1� I t I
7 T
-T I
I y
I I T"Pt r I r
-1, 1
-11 , J
7v I
'I r -r- 1
job iX-
sh"t 6-
5
1 Y,
tz
pl
. . ..... .
Q.t* M, ('d ,.f
&Zvi*
va—
Job
thOl
p Virr AM41ft
City of Ashland
Community Development Department
51 Winburn Way
Ashland, OR 97520
Telephone: 541-488-5305
Inspection Line: 541-552-2080
Plan Type: Type I Planning Action
Work Class: Type I Planning Action
-PERMIT NUMBER
PA-T1-2020-00099
,Apply Date: 3/30/2020
Ma &TaxLot.
Pro a Address
391 E09BD15000
95 Meade St
Owner:
Meade LLC
Owner
95 Meade St
Address:
Ashland, OR 97520
Phone:
(510) 910-1500
Applicant: Rogue Planning and Development
Applicant 33 N Central Ave 213
Address: Medford, OR 97501
Phone: (541) 951-4020
Site desion for ARU. Pre-App waive by staff per Derek S I
Pee Description: Amount:
Accessory Residential Unit (Type I ) $710,00
Applicant:
Date:
Total Fees: $710.00
Received 03/30/2020