HomeMy WebLinkAboutOak_Knoll_TL_6100_PA_TREE-2021-00144May 27, 2021
Notice of Final Decision,
On May 27, 2021, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following:
Planning Action: TREE -2021-00144
Subject Property: Tax Lot 6100, Oak Knoll Dr
Applicant: Frank & Kathleen Millet
Description: A request for approval to remove two large oak trees and one large pine on
a vacant residential parcel on Oak Knoll Drive. The application includes a site plan showing the
proposed residence and ARIJ location showing that the proposed structures encroach
significantly into the critical root zone of the trees necessitating their removal.
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day
after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all
conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project
completion.
The lie application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available '.for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51
WinbUrn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of
Ashland copy fee schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may
request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO)
18.5.1.050(1) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO
18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached.
The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the
Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305 or Aaron Anda son L)�.,Us 21q11
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winhurn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 91520 TTY: 800-735-2900
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed plfl'Slinant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, aType I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below.
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual OFI-01- OCCUlTed through 110
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the StaffAdvisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days ofinailing the notice ot'decision. The StaffAdvisor shall
decide within three (lays whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that in error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for pill -poses of reconsideration. The StaffAdvisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice ofthe planning action.
4. If the StaffAdvisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
1. Who May Appeal, The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5.1.050.13.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline,
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice oj'llppeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection I 8.5.1.050.G. 1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of
this subsection. 'I'lic fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If all appellant prevails at the
hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded.
b, Tinge far Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the (late the notice of
decision is mailed,
C. Content of Notice oj'Appeal. T'lic notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall
contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A StatColCot explaining the Specific iSSUcs being raised on appeal,
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully inct or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered,
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before
the Planning Commission, The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other
documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other
relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, of argument
concerning any relevant ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing procedure, Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A -- E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City oil an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State I -and Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541A88-5305
51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900
ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION
I�1►111�[ll.���]� 1
PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -2021-00144
SUBJECT PROPERTY: Tax Lot 6100, Oak Knoll Dr.
OWNER/APPLICANT: Frank and Kathleen Millett
DESCRIPTION: A request for approval to remove two large oak trees and one large
pine on a vacant residential parcel on Oak Knoll Drive. The application includes a site plan
showing the proposed residence and ARU location showing that the proposed structures
encroach significantly into the critical root zone of the trees necessitating their removal.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10;
MAP: 39 1 14 AD; TAX LOT: 6100
SUBMITTAL DATE:
January 28, 2021
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE:
February 22, 2021
STAFF DECISION DATE:
May 27, 2021
DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.):
June 8, 2021
FINAL DECISION DATE:
June 9, 2021
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE:
December 9, 2022
DECISION
This proposal was originally to remove two large oak trees and a large pine tree from the
unaddressed and vacant property on Oak Knoll Drive identified as Assessor Map 39-lE-14-AD
tax lot #6100. The subject property is a triangle shaped lot on the west side of Oak Knoll
adjacent from where Oak Knoll splits with Twin Pines Circle. The parcel is 0.24 acre property
and is zoned R-1-10.
The three trees proposed for removal are two very mature oaks and a large Pine. The original
application consisted of nothing more than a conceptual site plan showing the location of a
proposed garage and a future primary residence. The site plan indicated that the two oaks were
26" and 36" DBH and did not list the size of the pine, but staff would estimate that the pine is
between 30-40" DBH, The application included no arborist report, final design for the home, or
any photos of the trees requested to be removed.
In accordance with the land use ordinance once the application was determined to be complete a
notice was mailed to all surrounding properties within a two -hundred foot radius and well a s
physical notice posted at the subject property. During the period of public comment, no input
was received either for or against.
At the March 4th Tree Commission meeting the application was reviewed. Staff presented the
application and stated that this is a little abnormal to request the removal of three large three on a
vacant parcel to allow the development of a single-family home. Commissioner Cates stated that
the black oak is in really good form and appeared very healthy and stated that the white oak is a
beautiful specimen. Commissioner Gould stated that the application clearly makes no attempt to
preserve any of the trees. Ultimately a motion was made to recommend denial of the application
TREE -2021-00144
TL6100 Oak Knoll Dr./aa
Page 1
citing a lack of evidence in the record and that "that the site plan is too hypothetical to approve
the removal of three significant trees" The motion was unanimous 4-0.
Staff contacted the applicant letting them know that the tree commission had recommended
denial of the application and asked if they wanted to accept the denial or submit additional
application materials. The applicant was interested in returning to the tree commission; however,
they were delayed in getting an arborist report. Ultimately the applicant requested an extension
to both the 45 -day limit set in AMC 18.5 and to the 120 -day rule. On March 30" the applicant
provided a signed extension requesting a 90 -day extension to the time limit set forth in AMC
227.178(1).
On April 20'h the applicant provided supplemental materials including a revised site plan which
showed the protection of the large pine tree, a letter from the property owner outlining their
intentions and a brief arborist report prepared by Beaver Tree Service. The report detailed that
the 36" DBH oaks was a White oak (Quercus garryanna) with a height of 45' and a canopy of
50', the 24" DBH oak is identified as a black oak (Quercus kelloggii) with a height of 50' and a
canopy of 40'. The report detailed that the white oak has multiple defects including a large cavity
at the base and a `severe lean'. The report states that the proposed building activity will result in
significant root disruption for both trees potentially leading either death or a destabilizing the tree
thus posing a hazard.
At the May regular meeting of the Tree Commission staff presented the application again this
time with the supplemental application materials. The tree commission had a lengthy
deliberation on the merits of the application. Ultimately, the tree commission felt that they had a
responsibility to accept the professional recommendation of a certified arborist. After a motion
and a second the Tree Commission voted unanimously to recommend approval of the removal.
To be deemed a "hazard tree" the condition or location of the tree must clearly present a public
safety hazard (i. e., that the tree is likely to fall and injure persons or property). Or, that there is a
foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and, that such hazard
or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation or pruning. Based on the
materials provided by the applicant's arborist and a site visit by staff, it is reasonable to conclude
that the subject tree is indeed posing a hazard and therefore ought to be removed.
Staff finds that the tree, due to its location, size, and the arborist report that the two oaks pose an
unacceptable hazard to the property that cannot be reasonably alleviated by means other than
removal and replacement. Upon recognizing the hazard posed to property and taking the Tree
Commission recommendation into consideration, Staff finds the application with attached
conditions has sufficiently demonstrated compliance with all applicable approval criteria.
The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.7.040.113 as
follows:
9. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds
that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the
imposition of conditions.
a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear
TREE -2021-00144
TL6100 Oak Knoll Dr./aa
Page 2
public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable
danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger
cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of
hazard tree in part 18.6.
b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree
pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of
approval of the permit.
Staff finds that Planning Action #TREE -2021-00144, a request to remove two hazard tree,
complies with all applicable city ordinances with the imposition of the conditions attached
below. Therefore, Planning Action 4TREE-2021-00144 is approved in part. If any one or more
of the following conditions are found to be invalid, for any reason whatsoever, then Planning
Action #TREE -2021-00144 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to
the approval:
1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise
specifically modified herein.
2. That only the two oak trees are to be removed.
3. That prior to issuance of a building permit proper tree protection fencing be required for
the large pine and any trees greater than six inches DBH.
4. That two (2) mitigation trees, of an appropriate stature, shall be planted on site within one
(1) year of issuance of this decision.
Bill Molnar, Director
Department of Community Development
May 27, 2021
Date
TREE -202 1-0 0 144
TL6100 Oak Knoll Dr./aa
Page 3
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON
County of Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
On May 27, 2021 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice
to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on
this list under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE -2021-00144, TL 6100,
Oak Knoll.
Signature of Employee
G.ka deNpta*gftnangAcWmTAs Gy$UeenWakKndnOaKKnvs_ri6100_TREE-2021-W144&Wn9%0010akXr4T1.5100TREE-2021-00144-1FFIOAVR OF hWLING.Oxx Sa712021
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
ALMOND RENTALS LLC
18227 HIGHWAY 66
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
FREED JERRY R TRUSTEE ET AL
944 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
HURLIMANN JOHN P/KELLIE C
128 PIONEER DR
FOLSOM, CA 95630
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
NEUFELD GAIL L
760 PEBBLE BEACH DR W
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
RECTO LORENE ADA TRUSTEE ET A
979 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
WALKUP CHRISTOPHER R ET AL
820 E PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
WHITTERS DEBBIE
800 E PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
:. el ...,
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
CAUDLE PETER A/KYRA
780 W PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
FREED LORI
906 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
LAMB WILLIAM D TRUSTEE ET AL
785 W PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
OAK KNOLL MEADOWS
765 W PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
ROCKE HANS J TRUSTEE ET AL
890 TWIN PINES CIR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
WARD JOHN D/PAULA K
885 TWIN PINES CIR
i
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
DAWSON RENEE N TRUSTEE ET AL
480 CARMEN RD
TALENT, OR 97540
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
HOENKE MICHAEL D/JANET M
881 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14A0 6100
MILLETT FRANK/KATHLEEN
PO BOX 523
MEDFORD, OR 97501
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
PERILLAT AARON
765 W PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
RYDBOM BEVERLY A
805 E PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD 6100
WEISINGER ERIC 1/JULIE K
861 TWIN PINES CIR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
TL 6100, Oak Knoll
NOD 5/27/21
19
Select
00
Add re
Site
Forms
Cor
24 ac
Planning Department, 51 Winburn vVay, Ashland, Oregon 8752 � CITY OF
�M�8�sw5 ��wNao�x�0 xww���v�o�o TTY1�0�7��9� ~����X-� U-�
---------- � �—����^m�/��^�u�'
NOTICE DFAPPLICATION
PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -2021-00144
SUBJECT PROPERTY: Tax Lot 81NlOak Knoll Cr.
OWN ERWPPL|CANT: Frank and Kathleen Millett
DESCRIPTION: Amquest for approval toremove two large oak trees and one large pine onuvacant maidenUa|
parcel on Oak Knoll Drive, The application includes a site plan showing the proposed residence and ARIJ location
showing that the proposed structures encroach significantly into the critical root zone of the trees necessitating their
removal, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; MAP: 3Q1E14
AD; TAX LOT: 81OO,
NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will review this Planning Action at anelectronic public hearing onThursday, March 4, 2021 ato:00PM.
See page 2 of this notice for information about participating in the electronic public hearing.
NOTICE OFCOMPLETE APPLICATION: February 26,2021
DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 12,2021
OVER
�
"*.°+^�.��*~* ^�.m^+u°�om* �w����*m~�m.��,"=°.�",�"m° -
Tree Commission Meetings
Notice is hereby given that the Tree Commission will hold an electronic public hearing on the above described planning action on
the meeting date and time shown on Page 1. If you would like to watch and listen to the Tree Commission meeting virtually, but
not participate in any discussion, you can use the Zoorn link posted on the City of Ashland calendar website
https Mww.ashland.or us/calend r,a
L�h
Anyone wishing to submit written comments can do so by sending an e-mail to PC-public-testimony@ashiarid.or.tis with
the subject line "Advisory Commission Hearing Testimony" by 10:00 a.m. on Wednesday, March 3, 2021.
If the applicant wishes to provide a rebuttal to the testimony, they can submit the rebuttal via e-mail to PC-public-
testir-nony@ashiand.or.us with the subject line "Advisory Commission Hearing Testimony" by 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 4,
2021. Written testimony received by these deadlines will be available for Tree Commissioners to review before the hearing and
will be included in the meeting minutes.
Oral testimony will be taken during the electronic public hearing. If you wish to provide oral testimony during the electronic
meeting, send an email to PC-public-testimotiy@ashiand.or.us by 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, March 4, 2021. In order to provide
testimony at the Public hearing, please provide the following information: 1) make the subject line of the email "Advisory
Commission Testimony Request", 2) include your name, 3) specify the date and commission meeting you wish to testify at, 4)
specify the agenda item you wish to speak to, 5) specify if you will be participating by computer or telephone, and 6) the name you
will use if participating by computer or the telephone number you will use if participating by telephone.
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact
the City Administrator's office at 541-488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting
will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102,-35.104 ADA Title 1),
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted on Page 1 of this notice.
Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, application materials are provided online and comments will be accepted by email.
Alternative arrangements for reviewing the application or submitting comments can be made by contacting (541) 488-5305
or plarrnin_q@@ghland.or.us.
A copy of the application, including all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online at "What's
Happening in my City" at httos:/lais.ashland.or.us/developmentproposals/. Copies of application materials will be provided
at reasonable cost, if requested. Under extenuating circumstances, application materials may be requested to be reviewed
in-person at the Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, via a pre -arranged
appointment by calling (541) 488-5305 or emailing plaqniqg(a7ashland�.orus.
Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to planningAashland.or.us or to the City o
Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown on Page
1.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon
determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application
which allows for a 14 -day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being
deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to
the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision
must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC
18.5.1.050.G)
The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an
objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an
opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue.
Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that
criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court.
If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at #541-552-2052 or
Aaron.AndersonAash land, or. us.
Gftcomn"evkpkinningtllatining ActionsTAs by Strw\MGak K,io1hQakKno1I_1I.6100 J REE:-2021-00144\Nloticing\OaLKnolt_ll.O100_PA-'I RIJ?-2021-0014 I_ N'OC.dtcx
TREE REMOVAL PERMIT
18.5.7.040.E
Troo That is Not a Hazard, A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application
.... . . ... . —..-
meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions.
a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and
standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints
in part I&M
b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or
existing windbreaks.
c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the
subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable
alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone.
d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this
determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact
on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance.
e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18,5.7.050. Such mitigation
requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit.
IL6100PA-'ILWE-2021-00144,,NOC.d..,
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON
County of Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department,
2. On 2/26/21 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope
with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each
person listed on the attached mailing list utsuch addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE -2021-00144, TL010\Oak
Sidnature of Employee
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391El4AD5900 PA -TREE -2021-00144 391El4AD6209 PA -TREE -2021-00144 391El4AD5800
ALMOND RENTALS LLC CAUDLE PETER AIKYRA DAWSON RENEE N TRUSTEE ET AL
18227 HIGHWAY 66 780 W PEBBLE BEACH DR 480 CARMEN RD
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD3100
FREED JERRY R TRUSTEE ET AL
944 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 39IE14AD6211
HURLIMANN JOHN PIKELLIE C
128 PIONEER DR
FOLSOM, CA 95630
PA -TREE -2021-00144 39IE14AD6210
NEUFELD GAIL L
760 PEBBLE BEACH DR W
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD6000
RECTO LORENE ADA TRUSTEE ET A
979 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD6204
WALKUP CHRISTOPHER R ET AL
820 E PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 El4AD6205
WHITTERS DEBBIE
800 E PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391E14AD3200
FREED LORI
906 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391El4AD6215
LAMB WILLIAM D TRUSTEE ET AL
785 W PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD6208
OAK KNOLL MEADOWS
765 W PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 El4AD6207
ROCKE HANS J TRUSTEE ET AL
890 TWIN PINES CIR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD3000
WARD JOHN DIPAULA K
885 TWIN PINES CIR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144
ZACH EARLE
3555 W HILLS TERRACE
MEDFORD, OR 97501
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD5700
HOENKE MICHAEL DIJANET M
881 OAK KNOLL DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD6100
MILLETT FRANKIKATHLEEN
PO BOX 523
MEDFORD, OR 97501
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD6214
PERILLAT AARON
765 W PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD6217
RYDBOM BEVERLY A
805 E PEBBLE BEACH DR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA -TREE -2021-00144 391 E14AD2800
WEISINGER ERIC JIJULIE K
861 TWIN PINES CIR
ASHLAND, OR 97520
TL 6100, Oak Knoll Dr
NOC 2126121
20
rpal4al Planning Division
CITY o r 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520
,ASHLAND 541-488-530057 Fax 541-488-6006
DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT 'K P.t�inc
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY ial r� cru/c
Street Address Jar- e!d j/ Pr'
ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION
FILE #
Is 4i_0 /64 07, 6117k 1610U
�»z� �lon<rlleq^
Pursuing tEQ® �rlffication? 11 YES 11 NO
Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E Tax Lotlsl /69
Zoning
Comp Plan Designation
APPLICANT �S
Name n lC /il/l/� a Pho11e r�91/t7- 6:5 T E Mail t fi k�- �U/ � i1Cl.�zcra. C'��Yvr
y� Kailr��'l16l�ttcsgv�Slyo-g5F9
Address _ � /7/110 ��� ,� City 14V1_11� e1r_ Zip
PROPERTY OWNER
�°
Name rr� 2,0k- X&M,�" Phon�>SVO-65,77— E -Mail cfd,, Dee
Address City /Z�za�,,✓r>', _Zip 7S6
S RVEYO ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER 4
Title � \--z ` - Name Z1h ("� Phone �—, 4 ( �1 Ali �7�1E-Mail e- Y' 0 C ( 1 c , Gqr�\
Address � T 1 c -'.t ' City M o_ba r -d ()" Zip c-?
Title Name Phone E -Mail
Address
City
Zip
I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects,
true and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their
location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes tuff responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to
establish:
f) that 1 produced sufficleni factual evidence at the hearing to support this request,
4 that the findings of fact rumished justifies the granting of the request
3J that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate, and further
4) that all structures or improvements are property located on the ground.
Felting in this regard will result most likef m not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to
be re mov my expg s t have d bfs, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance.
//, 3• a0
Applicant's 91r9nature Date
As owner of the operty involved in f 's request,
owner.
Property Owner's Signature (required)
[To be omgk,ed by P:ySlag
read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property
Date Received Zoning Permit
Filing Fee
OVER ►►
a:�<o,„fl,.a�,,r,i,,, ,i�b:r•�m,t s xonaauuaoNng e�m ngplir+iiw,.duc
i3 �BS9ZFLL'WB „ 3Jei301S9N s�MH9A
s61c,
'`�a3.8ix»sX�3uon� :3hN! 1�3(OYd i� 33i31YJ g a35 :t�3(ONd
a�
i
414�
zi
�y c -H V
1� 10—
�r
c