Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutWater_5_PA-TREE-2021-00174_PA RecordPlanning Department, 51 Winbum Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 0 F 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,ashiand,or.us TTY' 1-800-735-2900 -ASHLAND PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -2021-00174 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5 Water St, OWN ER/APP LI CANT: City of Ashland / APIC DESCRIPTION: A request to remove one ash tree at Bluebird Park located at 5 Water St. The tree is estimated to be 17 inches DBH and is a few feet from Ashland creek, The application states that the tree recently shed some large branches and has a failure at the union of the two main leaders. The project arborist recommends removal as the only solution. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Downtown; ZONING: C -1-D; MAP: 39 1 E 09 BB; TAX LOT: 9600. NOTE The Ashland Tree Commission will review this Planning Action at an electronic public hearing on Thursday, December 9, 2021 at 6:0�0 PK See page 2 of this notice for information about participating in the electronic public hearing. I I 1:4161" M1011.1kT116-1--jus owaylylaL, lism kyligima &I'ME DIM -4-111 I OVER G:\coiriiii-dev\planiiiii,g\i�lanniiigAction%\PAs by Strec1\N%1\Wate6Water1.5 'fRL,,E-2021-00174WoticiiiLl.AN'Ater 5 TREE 2021-OW74 NOCdocx C; Historic and Tree Commission Meetinio Notice is hereby given that the Tree Comi—osion will hold an electronic public hearing rtthe above described planning action on the meeting date and time shown on Page 1. If you would like to watch and listen to the Tree Commission meeting virtually, but not participate in, any discussion, you can use the Zoom link posted on the City of Ashland calendar website Littq://wv,fw, asl,i la�,-�d. c.r...us/catiend . ... .... . ... .............. ... ........ ... ... p . Oral testimony will be taken during the electronic public hearing. If you wish to provide oral testimony during the electronic meeting, send an email to PC-public-testimony@ashland.or.us by 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, December 9, 2021. In order to provide testimony at the public hearing, please provide the following information: 1) make the subject line of the email "Advisory Commission Testimony Request", 2) include your name, 3) specify the date and commission meeting you wish to testify at, 4) specify the agenda item you wish to speak to, 5) specify if you will be participating by computer or telephone, and 6) the name you will use if participating by computer or the telephone number you will use if participating by telephone. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's office at 541-48,8-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title l). The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted on Page I of this notice. Because of the COVI D-1 9 pandemic, application materials are provided online and comments will be accepted by email. Alternative arrangements for reviewing the application or submitting comments can be made by contacting (541) 488-5305 o rp ku _nJ oa@.ghla.rid - A copy of the application, including all, documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online at "What's Happening in my City" at tLttp§- is,ashland.or. r 0�&!. Copies of application materials will be provided Ling ....... . . . _ . . ....... P�Qp_ at reasonable cost, if requested. Under extenuating circumstances, application materials may be requested to be reviewed: in-person at the Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, via a pre -arranged appointment by calling (541) 488-5305 or emailing ptaftWng@ashLaL1dPr.t!L Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submilt written comments to plan.ninq@La,sh.�and.or,u_s or to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn, Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown on Page, 1. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 2100 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 -day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division, Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18,5.1.050.0) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by Ietter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval, with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at #541-552-2052 Aaron.AnderAon�@ ,ashland.or.1.11S. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (AMC 18.5.7.0402) 1 Hazard Tree, A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a, The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning, See definition of hazard tree in part 18,6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18,53,050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. 2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application 5 TREF.-2021-00174\Nloticing\Watcr 5 7RHE 2021-00174 NOCA10CS meets a!l of the following criteria, or can Wade to conform through the imposition of conditio, a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18,10. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. C. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 18.3.10.050 An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. Mcomin-devlplanningTianning Adions\Ms by Sleeet1LV51i'aierlR`ater_5_TRCE-2021-00374 \ofscing\yl'ater_5 TREE_2021-00174_\oc.docx HE STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 11/30/21 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid,a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE -2021-00174, 5 Water St. Signature of Employee DocumW 1 I13012021 TREE -2021-00174 391E0913139200 BC MTH LLC 175 PIEDMONT DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391E09BB10500 1 CONKLIN JAMES D ET AL E 3120 S STAGE RD MEDFORD, OR 97501 i TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB10100 DELUCA REVOCABLE TRUST ET AL 1228 MORNINGLIGHT DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 i ; TREE -2021-00174 391E091313402 HAINES LLOYD M TRUSTEE ET AL 51 WATER ST 222 ;ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391E09BB11000 LOVETT BRIAN C TRUSTEE ET AL 161 BIRDSONG LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391E09BB400 PLAZA HOSPITALITY LLC PLAZA INN AND SUITES ASHLAND ,108 N WASHINGTON ST 603 SPOKANE, WA 99201 TREE -2021-00174 CITY OF ASHLAND PARKS & REG PETER BAUGHMAN 11195 EAST MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB500 BARD'S INN LIMITED PTNSHIP 1120 PROSPECT ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB9700 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB97000 BLUEBIRD PLAZA LLC BROTHERS BUILDING.CONDOMINIUM 51 WATER ST 222 95 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB8900 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB97002 I DAW RUTH E TRUSTEE DEBOER BRYAN/STEPHANIE E 482 SUTTER AVE 85 WIN BURN WAY I MEDFORD, OR 97504 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-x0174 391E09131397001 DURANT-NEWTON TRUST ET AL 95 N MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB5500 HAINES LLOYD M TRUSTEE ET AL 40 CHURCH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB6000 GRANITE MAIN PROPERTIES LLC LLOYD M HAINES 51 WATER ST 222 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB8800 JENSEN MELISSA 690 S MOUNTAIN AVE ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB11600 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB98000 MAGNOLIA INN VIEW LLC OAK STREET COTTAGES CONDOMINI 55 POMPADOUR DR PO BOX 1169 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 391 E09BB5600 SPRAGUE FAMILY TRUST PO BOX 1258 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00174 CITY OF ASHLAND PARKS & REG SEAN SULLIVAN 1195 EAST MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 5 Water Street 11/30/21 NOC 22 STREET TREE REMOVAL PERMIT Planning Division 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 CITY Q r 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 ASHLAND A tree that is located in any public street right-of-way or other public property may not be removed until a Street Tree Removal Permit has been submitted according to the Application Submission Requirements, below, and reviewed and approved by the City of Ashland. An application for street tree removal must demonstrate that the tree is an emergency, hazard, or dead tree as outlined below in the Application Submission Requirements, Application Submission Requirements. An application for a street tree removal permit shall include all of the following information. I. Application Form and Fee. The application must include the Information requested on the Street Tree Removal Permit form provided by the City of Ashland and the permit application fee. Only those property owners of a lot adjoining the street tree location or homeowners' associations responsible for street trees in their development or subdivision may apply to remove an adjoining street tree. If a tree is located in front of more than one property, each property owner or homeowners' association official must sign the Street Tree Removal Permit form. 2. Site Pian. A site plan of the property drawn to scale containing the following information. The scale of the site plan most be ai least one inch equals 50 feet or larger. a. North arrow and scale. b. Property boundaries including dimensions of all lot lines and driveway locations. c. Location and width of all public streets, planting strips, and sidewalks adjoining the site. d, Size, species, and location of the tree(s) proposed to be removed. 3, Written Statement. A written statement explaining how the proposed street tree removal satisfies one of the following approval criteria. The Community Development director may require additional information to demonstrate that the proposed removal satisfies one of the following approval criteria including: 1) a written statement to be prepared by an arborist licensed by the State of Oregon Landscape Contractors Board of Construction Contractors Board and certified by the International Society of Arboriculture or American Society of Consulting Arborists; and 2) an International Society of Arboriculture (ISA) Basic Tree Risk Assessment Form to be completed by an arborist, Street Tree Removal Approval Criteria a) Emenoy Tree Removal. The tree presents an immediate danger of collapse and represents a clear and present hazard to persons or property. immediate danger of collapse is defined as a tree that may already be leaning, with the surrounding soil heaving, and/or there is a significant likelihood that the tree will topple or otherwise fail and cause damage before a tree removal permit could be obtained through the non -emergency process. b) Hazard Tree Removal. The tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. A hazard tree is a tree that is physically damaged to the degree that it is clear the tree is likely to fall and injure persons or property. A hazard tree may also include a tree that is located within a public right-of-way and is causing damage to existing public or private facilities or services and such facilities or services cannot be relocated. c) Dead Tree, The tree is dead. A dead tree is lifeless. Such evidence of lifelessness may include unseasonable lack of foliage, brittle dry branches, or lack of any growth during the growing season. Replacement and Stump Removal. Applicants for approved Street Tree Removal Permits are required to remove any stumps and replace the tree. Stump removal and replacements for approved street tree removals shall meet the following requirements. 1. Any street tree removed shall be removed at ground level or lower. If a tree is removed below ground level, the surface must be restored to finish grade and any regrowth which occurs shall be promptly removed. 2. All street trees shall be an appropriate species selected from and planted according to the City of Ashland Recommended Street Tree List. 3. The minimum size for a replacement tree is eight feet in height or one inch in caliper measured at 12 inches above the root crown. 4. Applicants for a Street Tree Removal Permit may be required to replace the tree or trees being removed with a tree or trees of comparable value. 5. If a street tree is determined to be dead or dying, then the replacement need be no larger than the minimize size described above. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address Q I -A e b # vJ `� ~ !! V✓`z fir S - Assessor's Map No. 39 9 E Zoning PROPERTY OWNER Name A-$1AIaAd til fK5 Address t It"s C` M ti"1 5t - Name Address Tax Lot(s) Comp Plan Designation Phone 5'f I - OS - .S 3 `f0 E -Mail � e4� >5u 1l � V �'t e ei 5 k L,1d, 0V" q S City AS klemd Zip Phone E -Mail City Zip ,97520 PROFESSIONAL PERFORMING THE TREE REMOVAL (e.g., tree service) Name ciao �A54. Pa m) phone 51ftjq-0-6IF73E-Mail Pett• w1011 5bi1,410rg5 Address 1195 E• M JF,l 57i City -5 4/1 d Zip ARBORIST LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER TiileCed- A,Iv ist Name_ Pete✓ &Q,a"11C,V1 Phone .50, X40.- 61073 E-MailPefer. bavgkm �'4� ¢ gsVa/ij. . .,,,.. OY u( 5 Address 105 F- 6T, City 6A t,(,1d Zip 9752-6 Title Address me Phone City E -Mail Zip As owner of the property involved in this request, t have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property ownert hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application are in all respects, true and correct. l further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden vlill be on me to establish; 9) that t produced sufficient factual evidence to support this request; 2) that the information contained in this application are adequate; and further 3) that all trees, structures, or improvements are properly located on the ground. 1,4: Z - Z,t,— f - /Ve v 151 20 Z I Property Owner's Signature (required) Date STAFF DECISION. /� is Tree Risk Assessment r Client ¢�5h4c; Date 10-A6-91 Time 10:�r1 Address/Tree location B J u e b r J FR , -K - !1 v/,410' fit= Tree no. / Sheet / of Tree species OfQ o l AA (frgx;,l-IS laTifr,1,o dbh !7" Height .SO` Crown spread dia. 361 Assessor(s) fv-tg- Fi rtu f km i ki Timeframe ( mos. Tools used cjimk;� j cit il :.Target Assessment Site Factors History of failures -Q,ft€n da:,I c 61 t? S _ Topography HatE4 SlopeN 30 % Aspect E Site changes None® Grade change© Site clearing© Changed sail hydrology El Root cuts❑ Describe Soilconditions Limitedvolume© Saturated❑ Shallow❑ Compacted❑ Pavement over roots 19 30 % Describe Kto eyrY- dov 5 Prevailing wind direction IVW Common weather Strong winds❑ Ice El Snow Ll heavy rain Describe- Vers-iuhr� Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low ❑ Normal �T High ❑ Foliage None (seasonal)❑ None (dead) ❑ Normal 90 % Chlorotic % Necrotic IO % Pests Nor! e- Aotej Abiotic Species failure profile Brancheslff TrunkEg Roots[] Describe B� Cr.0Cke S i�Icfvy/crf te IK - Load Factors` , Wind exposure Protected PartialDd Full❑ Wind funneling Relative crown size Smalls Medium Large© Crown density Sparser Normal❑ Dense❑ Interior branches Few9Normal❑ Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑ Recent or planned change in load factors Tree Defects and Conditions Affectingthe Likelihood of Failure Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crown 19 LCR % Cracks ❑ ._ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches ❑ % overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ Included bark 01 Broken/hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments © Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Over-extended branches ,l$1 Pruning history Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable © Possible © Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color ❑ Collar buried/Not visible ❑ Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems IN included bark f8� Cracks O Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze ❑ ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ %circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay[] Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean ° Corrected? Response growth Response growth Mainconcern(s) TWO M 11 -510".5 -Pe'om 7ru�K 6�:,7 Mainconcern(s) Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate P0 Significant ❑ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihoo�111� f flLikelihood offailure Improba❑ Prabable')� Imminent ❑ Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable Cl Imminent ❑ Page I of 2 Target zone NOccupancy w i aYi �' — rate 1 -rare o m " r V t� Target description c x F u! 2—aaasional 3—frequent+`+ •p v 'u `i 3 F 4._constant a � H a°Jc ii -r;h Pep ey lu �o �r;l,J „ i/ Z Aft) Al 2 J 3 4 Site Factors History of failures -Q,ft€n da:,I c 61 t? S _ Topography HatE4 SlopeN 30 % Aspect E Site changes None® Grade change© Site clearing© Changed sail hydrology El Root cuts❑ Describe Soilconditions Limitedvolume© Saturated❑ Shallow❑ Compacted❑ Pavement over roots 19 30 % Describe Kto eyrY- dov 5 Prevailing wind direction IVW Common weather Strong winds❑ Ice El Snow Ll heavy rain Describe- Vers-iuhr� Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low ❑ Normal �T High ❑ Foliage None (seasonal)❑ None (dead) ❑ Normal 90 % Chlorotic % Necrotic IO % Pests Nor! e- Aotej Abiotic Species failure profile Brancheslff TrunkEg Roots[] Describe B� Cr.0Cke S i�Icfvy/crf te IK - Load Factors` , Wind exposure Protected PartialDd Full❑ Wind funneling Relative crown size Smalls Medium Large© Crown density Sparser Normal❑ Dense❑ Interior branches Few9Normal❑ Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑ Recent or planned change in load factors Tree Defects and Conditions Affectingthe Likelihood of Failure Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crown 19 LCR % Cracks ❑ ._ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches ❑ % overall Max. dia. Codominant ❑ Included bark 01 Broken/hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments © Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Over-extended branches ,l$1 Pruning history Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised ❑ Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sapwood damage/decay❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Main concern(s) Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable © Possible © Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ —Trunk — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color ❑ Collar buried/Not visible ❑ Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems IN included bark f8� Cracks O Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sap ooze ❑ ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ %circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay[] Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole % circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soil weakness ❑ Lean ° Corrected? Response growth Response growth Mainconcern(s) TWO M 11 -510".5 -Pe'om 7ru�K 6�:,7 Mainconcern(s) Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate P0 Significant ❑ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihoo�111� f flLikelihood offailure Improba❑ Prabable')� Imminent ❑ Improbable❑ Possible ❑ Probable Cl Imminent ❑ Page I of 2 Risk categorization Iw Likelihood: of Impacting Target of Failure -0 Low Likelihood Consequences Failure Impact Failure & Impact Likely Very likely:: Probable UnlikelyUnlikely ar u somewhat likely -' Likely-- " Possible Unlikely (from Matrix 3) Unlikely Sorriewhat likely Improbable .Unlikely ` ; Unlikely Unlikely On c = Risk o N n r + y E m m rating Conditions °' nr, Target o c ° s a T of part U Tree part of concern . a ,� protection ny a a E 3 ° m 2 m— i E ° ao c 5 {from ° Matrix 2) Matrix/. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Likelihood: of Impacting Target of Failure Very low Low Medium :.:High j/ Imminent Unlikely{ Somewhatlllkeiy Likely Very likely:: Probable UnlikelyUnlikely Moderate somewhat likely -' Likely-- " Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Sorriewhat likely Improbable .Unlikely ` ; Unlikely Unlikely On MalrixZ Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of consequences of Failure Failure &Impact Negligible Minor Significant/ :"'-Severe Very likely .Low. Moderate High.. Extreme Likely Law Moderate - High—High Somewhat likely Low Low dderate Moderate . -. Unlikely.. Low Low Low Low 5 4 k North f Notes, explanations, descriptions CoJom;Vt«V!T S'IKM3 i a ;+)<'VAj by/N( and c ac!T du•vrl mgi l .5/eN1 # �c rh 5 l'4t i,rsc! 7a 1�';l ,,✓htf( ;t co,'/J cart5e e/4-1uti` t- p14 ril and 6q;Utig ; .44ej prs j, /C i�t�UrY fina�6�/e ael �urt'� t— Mitigation options P -C MoVol ii 0'1/ V"el o g lig' o - Residual risk Q Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Coverall tree risk rating Low © Moderate ❑ High 1K Extreme 0 Work priority 1 ❑ z ❑ 3 a 4 ❑ overall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High ❑ Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interval �d5 Data ISlFinal © Preliminary Advanced assessment needed lXTNo ©Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations None ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ❑Root collar buried Describe This datasheet was produced by the International Society ofArboricuilure (ISA) -- 2013 . Page 2 of 2 F --o »spa p"'�7 i ti " dw 5 w l a'f s w bi� �w rr w r' "� a. '�/ // I y hs V ip y yw w I y V � r rt%�" p �� ✓ � ,r, �� „y*y ,iy `i� y 3� '�� y'� r �" , l✓ y �° � , xp� Y c y� yV� p�6Appru opt dx r ti� y ��Vi a' a� ir✓ My; •�' S d r n�yL�wx tiZ6I 'i w � 7^:� " #� .�f ✓n �r �^�� ai vat w Mao 6,w.. '*"�r' AS Al Al owl "� a a b �aw ,x;; « � i0 � " � "�. � a y5 � q Nov e" y1 wM E w ✓w3 "7 'G'r %rc� �, / ✓" f F w ` 1110 w "" a ✓ is ,+ ,mnwmr ' ego,i6 ,w I �' �>�7°j / �r� �r���