Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Glendower_AshlandPonds_PA-T1-2020-00107
WA&VIIIII11i "M June 26, 20,20 Notice of Final Decision On June 26, 2020, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: PLANNING ACTION: PA-TI-2020-00107 SIJBJECT PROPERTY: City of Ashland property known as the "Ashland Pond," north of Coventry Pl. and accessed by Glendower St. OWNEIVAPPLICANT: City of Ashland Parks and Recreation DEscitirriON: A request for Limited Activities and IJses Permit to construct a pedestrian boardwaWbridge in a wetland. The Cornmunity Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on. the attached Findings are required to be met prior to proJect completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALTJO sections covering reconsideration and appeal, procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have an)( questions regarding this decision, please contact Maria Harris in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Whburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 07520 TTY: 800-735-2900 SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider aTypc I decision as set forth below, I. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision, The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter, 1 If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, rriodify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action, 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision, A Type 1. decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: I . Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal aType I decision, a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.13. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a, Notice of,,ippeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18,.5,1,050.G.1, above, inay appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals rnade by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be reftinded. b. Time for f7fing. A notice of appeal shall be Filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content oJ , Notice qfAlopeal.The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. L An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be: fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission.'rhe appeal shall not be limited to the application materials,, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the 'type 1 decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1,060, Subsections A - E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the filial decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision.. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00107 SUBJECT PROPERTY: City of Ashland property known as the "Ashland Pond," north of Coventry Pl. and accessed by Glendower St. OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Ashland Parks and Recreation DESCRIPTION: A request for Limited Activities and Uses Permit to construct a pedestrian boardwalk/bridge in a wetland. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single -Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; ASSESSOR'S MAP: 381E33; TAX LOT: 1900 SUBMITTAL DATE: April 24, 2020 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: May 11, 2020 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: June 26, 2020 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): July 8, 2020 FINAL DECISION DATE: July 9, 2020 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: January 9, 2022 DECISION The proposal is a request for a Limited Activities and Uses Permit to construct a slightly elevated boardwalk in a wetland as part of a rerouted trail at the Ashland Pond. The boardwalk is part of a new, rerouted trail that will connect the existing trail access at the northern terminus of Glendower St. to the established bridge at the west end of the wetland, just east of the existing trail around Ashland Pond. From the northern terminus of Glendower St., the new trail will reroute trail users to the northwest across the wetlands. Then the trail will turn to the east, roughly paralleling Ashland Creek before connecting to the existing bridge and trail around the Ashland Pond. The application describes the purpose of the trail as making a full trail connection from Glendower St. to the Ashland Pond for hikers, naturalist, bird watchers, photographs and other members of the community. The existing trail uses an access road north of Coventry Place that immediately veers to the west from the northern terminus of Glendower St. However, the access road has been problematic because of rear property line issues with some of the properties that front on Coventry Place and abut the access road. In addition, the access road does not include a public access easement. The new trail will reroute trail users to the northwest and away from access road and the homes that have rear yards facing the existing access road and trail. The application indicates the new or rerouted trail location was also selected because it creates the least impact on the wetland, the Ashland Creek corridor and banks, and existing tree locations. The subject property is slightly over 22 acres in size and is located in the Single -Family Residential Zone (R-1-7.5). The subject property is located north of Glendower St., Coventry Pl. and Oxford St. The west, north and east property lines are also the location of the Ashland Urban Growth Boundary. The property includes the confluence of Ashland Creek and Bear Creek, the Ashland Pond, a wetland system and an existing trail system. The properties to the west, north and east of the subject property are under Jackson County jurisdiction and zoned Exclusive Farm Use. Also located southeast of the subject PA-T1-2020-00107 Glendower_381E33, tax lot 1900/mh Page 1 property is the Ashland city limits and the City of Ashland wastewater treatment plan. The area south of the subject property is in the Ashland city limits and is commonly referred to as Quiet Village. This area is also zoned single-family residential and is primarily comprised of developed detached single-family homes. The City of Ashland's adopted Wetlands Resources Map identifies a possible wetland on the subject property in the area between the northern terminus of Glendower St. and Ashland Creek. AMC chapter 18.3.11 Water Resources Protection Zones (Overlays) requires a wetland delineation prepared by a qualified wetland specialist to establish the wetland location. The application includes a wetland delineation conducted and prepared by Rabe Consulting, November 2019. The wetland delineation identified a wetland that is long and linear in nature and roughly runs from east to west. The wetland is .12 acres or 5,227 square feet in size. The wetland is heavily dominated with Himalayan blackberries, but other wetland plants were exhibited in the understory including horsetail, sedges, rushes, and poison hemlock. The overstory consists overhanging trees from, adjacent areas including cottonwoods, Oregon ash and alder. The wetland destination describes an existing drainage that enters the subject property. This drainage begins just outside of the subject property from the south and cast where the terminus of the TID ditch allows for tail water to drain toward Ashland Creek. This drain water is not confined in a channel or ditch, but flows through the low portion of the subject property toward the footbridge at the west end of the study area. At the east end of the study area the drainage is less confined by topography and creates a wider wetland area. As the drainage moves to the west the topography narrows the wetland. The Limited Activities and Uses section of the Ashland Municipal Code (AMC) Water Resources Protect Zones (Overlays) 18.3.11 allows new public access and utilities including the location and construction of trails and bridges when deemed necessary to maintain a functional system and upon finding that no other reasonable alternate location outside of the Water Resource Protection Zone exists. AMC 18.3.11.060.A.3.a goes on to say that "this ordinance, the Comprehensive Plan, Transportation System Plan, adopted utility master plans, and other adopted documents shall guide this determination." Since the boardwalk is allowed as Limited Activity and Use, a Limited Activities and Uses Permit is required in accordance with AMC 18.3.11.060.D. The existing trail system to and around Ashland Pond is identified in the 2018 Trails Master Plan. (TMP). The TMP was adopted by the Ashland City Council on January 21, 200 as part of the Ashland Comprehensive Plan. As stated earlier, the need to reroute the trail arouse because of the existing location on the access road does not have a public access easement and there were property line issues with properties that abut the access road. The rerouted trail that will connect to the proposed boardwalk does not need a land use approval or permit because the construction of unpaved trails in a wetland or strearn bank protection zone is an exempt activity within a water resource protection zone in accordance with 18.3.11.050.A.2.b. In public property, the establishment of trails and related education displays is allowed in water resource protection zones. Unpaved trails can be up to 72 inches or six feet in width. The new trail will be unpaved and four to six feet in width. The proposed boardwalk crosses the eastern end of the delineated wetland for approximately 40 feet in length. The boardwalk is four feet in width. The boardwalk is slightly elevated to allow free flow of drainage water beneath it but low enough to the ground surface that it does not require a handrail. The PA-T l-2020-00107 Glendower_381E33, tax lot 19001mh Page 2 application indicates one to two cubic yards of fill material will be placed to transition from the trail surface at grade to the boardwalk. The boardwalk itself is constructed on pilings and the walking surface will be decking boards. The project includes removal of invasive plant species with the project area including existing, non- native blackberries that are described as being over ten feet in height. The blackberries are considered a fire hazard to nearby homes and also choke out and diminish the native vegetation in and around the wetland. The application includes planting of riparian understory shrubs and trees that would occur immediately after trail construction to augment the existing vegetation. The installation of the proposed boardwalk will require the removal of six small trees in the understory. The trees are described as having trunks which are laying horizontal to the ground. The application says the trees will be replaced with healthy upright trees that will provide better shading of the Ashland Creek riparian area. The proposed boardwalk is designed to minimize excavation and grading into the wetland by using pilings to support the boardwalk structure, as well as using a limited amount of fill for the transition from the trail surface to the boardwalk. The pilings will be driven into the soil with a pneumatic handheld driver to reduce the impacts of construction and excavation in the wetland. A boardwalk is proposed rather than an at -grade trail because the boardwalk minimizes disturbance to the wetland ecosystem and native wetland soils and intermittent surface water flow. In contrast, an exempt at -grade trail would compress and compact the sponge like hydrophilic soil and potentially alter the course of surface runoff. The application indicates the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the Oregon Division of State Lands (DSL) will not require permits for the boardwalk. ACOE indicated driving the pilings and constructing the boardwalk does not require a federal permit. Similarly, DSL indicated a state permit for working in a wetland is not required because the fill material to be brought on to the site is less than 50 cubic yards. The application indicates that Ashland Parks and Recreation will perform long-term conservation and management necessary to maintain the project area including the new trail and boardwalk, possible accumulation of silt and debris, regular plan maintains and removal of invasive e species. A condition is added requiring a management plan to be submitted to the Staff Advisor. Four written comments were received regarding the application. Issues that were raised in relation to the planning application for a Limited Activities and Uses Permit to build a boardwalk in the wetland included the length of the 14-day public comment period, impacts generally to streams and wetlands from human activities and uses, disturbance to flora and fauna, impacts from construction equipment, and the cost and necessity of using 4 x 8 decking and the depth of the supporting pylons. The remaining issues are addressed by the application materials, as well as by this report. There were also general issues raised about the new trail project including the cost of the project, potential of new trail to attract mountain bikers and homeless individuals, spending public funds during the pandemic, and health hazards from mosquitos and ticks in the wetland area. As explained earlier, the installation of the trail itself does not require a Limited Activities and Uses Permit or any other planning approval. The selection of the project and the project cost are also not governed by the Ashland Land Use Ordinance, AMC Title 18 Land Use. The criteria for a Limited Activities and Uses Permit are in AMC subsection 18.3.11.060.D as PA-T 1-2020-0010'7 Glendower-3 8 IE33, tax lot 19001mh Page 3 follows, D. Limited Activities and Uses Permit. All Limited Activities and Uses described in section 18.3.11.060 shall be subject to a Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050. An application for a Limited Activities and Uses Permit shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. All activities shall be located as far away from streams and wetlands as practicable, designed to minimize intrusion into the Water Resources Protection Zone and disturb as little of the surface area of the Water Resource Protection Zone as practicable. 2. The proposed activity shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize excavation, grading, area of impervious surfaces, loss of native vegetation, erosion, and other adverse impacts on Water Resources. 3. On stream beds or banks within the bank full stage, in wetlands, and on slopes of 25 percent or greater in a Water Resource Protection Zone, excavation, grading, installation of impervious surfaces, and removal of native vegetation shall be avoided except where no practicable alternative exists, or where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. 4. Water, storm drain, and sewer systems shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid exposure to floodwaters, and to avoid accidental discharges to streams and wetlands. 5. Stream channel repair and enhancement, riparian habitat restoration and enhancement, and wetland restoration and enhancement will be restored through the implementation of a mitigation plan prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements in section 18.3,11.110 Mitigation Requirements. 6. Long term conservation, management and maintenance of the Water Resource Protection Zone shall be ensured through preparation and recordation of a management plan as described in subsection 18.3,11.110.C, except a management plan is not required for residentially zoned lots occupied only by a single-family dwelling and accessory structures. In staff s�assessrnent, the application with the attached conditions complies with applicable ordinances and meets all required criteria. Planning Action 9PA-T1-2020-00107 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #PA-T 1 -2020-00107 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise modified herein. 2) That a management plan meeting the requirements of AMC 18.3.11.060.D.6 for the long-term conservation and maintenance of the project area shall be submitted for review and approval of the Ashland Planning Division prior to the issuance of the building permit. 3) That the use of equipment and machinery for vegetation maintenance, planting and removal within the water resource protection zones (i.e., identified wetland and Ashland Creek) shall meet the requirements of 18.3,11.050. A.I. h. PA-T 1-2020-00107 Glendower_381E33, tax lot 1900/mh Page 4 4) That the vegetation maintenance planting and removal shall meet the requirements of AMC 18.3.11.05 0A.1 including but not limited to removal and mowing of blackberries shall occur before May I or after July 31 to protect nesting birds. L June 26, 2020 Bill Molnar, Community Development Director Date PA-T1-2020.00107 Glendower 381E33, tax lot 1900/mh Page 5 AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On June 26, 2020 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for the Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-00107, Ashland Ponds. . 4 e of Employee C:lUse€slfrappr4Desklop%lemplalesAFFIDAVIT OF MAILING_Regan.dau 6126/2020 PA-T1-2020-00107 381 E33300 ARCHERD EVAN/NANCY WHITE PO BOX 699 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB4600 ENGORN ROB /LOUISE W 345 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391EO5200 BILLINGS MEMORIAL LLC 160 REITEN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA600 EDMONDSON JAMES ET AL 365 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA1201 WARNEKE MARLENE L TRUSTEE ET 395 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 381 E322300 BILLINGS MEMORIAL LLC 160 REITEN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4100 SWANN LISA B TRUSTEE ET AL 3078 BROADWAY *116 SAN DIEGO, CA 92102 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB5100 SNYDER DEREK SIALLISON E 340 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA900 ADAMS ROBERT J ET AL 371 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1203 RICHARDS DAVID STEVENIDRAGONF 391 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Easy feel -Address • Labe s. Bend along . ..- PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB3900 GARRETT KAREN G 950 GLENDOWER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4700 NICHOLS DAVEIDIANE 349 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA400 ADDISON LESTER D/KALIA TERESA 359 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA1101 JAYNES MARK S PO BOX 10937 FAIRBANKS, AK 99710 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1202 KWON HEAKYOUNG 124 NW 7TH ST #303 CORVALLIS, OR 97330 PA-T 1-2020-00107 381 E325700 HODGE DONNA B 1100 EAGLE MILL RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4800 JORGENSEN ROY PO BOX 368 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA700 ELSTER DANIEL WIPATRICIA M 363 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AAI000 MACGOWAN HOLLY TRUSTEE ET AL 375 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1300 LEHNERZ MARISA ET AL 930 CAMBRIDGE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 o avery.com/templates Use AvervTemnlate 515C PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB4500 BROWN JASON ET AL 331 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB5200 BROWN CAROLYN S ET AL 350 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA500 BLACK LESLIE A TRUSTEE ET AL 361 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1200 QUIET CORNER HOMEOWNERS ASN 393 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA2500 JAMES NANCY BIDALMASO ' RICHARD 361 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4000 BOUSE ANN MIJONES MICHAEL K 290 CAMBRIDGE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB4900 GOODALL-WHEELER ANNE A 330 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA800 GREENE DAVID E TRUSTEE 367 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1100 MACLAREN DAVID JIRICE ROSHEL 379 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T 1-2020-00107 391 E05AA 1500 BENDAT KEN TRUSTEE ET AL 360 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 Aliez a avery.ca/gabarits UtNsez le Gabarit Avery 5160 II PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA3900 CARRIER BYRON B 362 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA4200 CRAWFORD KYLE MICONNIE A 375 TUDOR ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 Ashland Parks and Recreation 340 S. Pioneer St. Ashland, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA4000 FIDLER MARK R ET AL 365 TUDOR ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 HORACE QUICK 910 GLENDOWER ASHLAND, OR 97520 • to averyxQmAemplates Ll5e Avery Template •• PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA4100 PUCKETT JOHN R TRUSTEE ET AL 1962 PARK AVE KLAMATH FALLS, OR 97601 PA-T 1-2020-00107 Rabe Consulting 421 Commercial Street Klamath Falls, OR 97601 NOD 37 6.26.2020 PA-T1-2020-00107 May 2020 City of Ashland Planning Divit ion Horace Quick 51 Winburn Way 910 Glendower Ashland OR 97520 re: PA-TI-2020-00107 "Ashland Ponds" "Pedestrian boardwalk/bridge in a wetland" To those responsible for these decisions, Only a few days ago a neighbor brought to my attention that a notice about this project had been posted at the gate to the Ashland Pond access. Officially, only the properties within 200 feet need to be notified, but especially in these difficult times, many people from the Town of Ashland come to the pond and are therefore affected, and the very short 14-day "comment period," while no doubt established by some earlier bureaucratic decision, is absurdly short for any meaningful consideration - even assuming that they happen to notice the sign Apparently, someone in Parks got the idea some time last year to formalize a cut -through path made by walkers, connecting the dead-end spur path from the small foot bridge at the head gate at the bend in Ashland Creek on the East side of Ashland pond. They then hired a wetland consultant and got a contractor design for putting in a 40 foot long bridge. I am perplexed by the elaborate and very heavy (expensive) construction. Even if that long of a boardwalk made sense, (which it certainly does not) I have been on plenty of them and 2x6 decking has been the norm, and quite adequate. The plan calls for 4x8 pressure treated ! Someone is getting rich on this job! And sinking pylons 5 ft down or to "refusal' - presumably hard DG or bedrock? to support a MAXIMUM of 12 inches above the channel, which is a trickle even now with all the rain we have had. It could quite securely simply rest on a few landscape ties. That is of course if the idea made any sense to begin with, which it does not. My objections: 1. The cost should be made a public part of the process, and I wonder what has already been spent. No need to throw more good money after bad, as the saying goes, just because there is momentum, it can still be stopped by sensible people. 2. The "roughly constructed by visitors" existing path is fine, more fun for kids, and less inviting for mountain bikers, who would be tempted to make a loop out of it, speeding through (fun of course) but disturbing nesting birds and other wildlife in the brush there. 3. It would increase access and attractiveness for homeless people looking for a place to set up camp, or people looking for illegal drug exchanges. 4. 1 am not certain, but as the existing path is not official, I would think does not create any additional liability to the town, whereas formalizing it and raising it just a foot or two likely would. Thank you for your re -consideration - Horace Quick Recevied 5.20.2020 Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 0 F wr 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.orms TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-TI-2020-00107 SUBJECT PROPERTY: City of Ashland property known as the "Ashland Ponds," north of Coventry Pl. and accessed by Glendower St. APPLICANT/OWNER: City of Ashland Parks and Recreation DESCRIPTION: A request for Limited Activities and Uses Permit to construct a pedestrian boardwalk/bridge in a wetland. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-Farnily Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 38 1E 33; TAX LOT: 1900 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 430 p,m, on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days Of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows fora 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision, (AMC 18.5.1 .050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, preciudes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes Your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A ropy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Maria Harris at 541-488-5305. G\coniiii-dcv\piniininghPlanni:ng ActionskNoticing, FulderWailed Nofices & Sips\20201PA-1 1-2020-00107 docx 18.3.11.060,D LIMITED ACTIVITIES AND USES' MIT All Limited Activities and Uses described in section i u.311.060 shall be subject to a Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050, An application for a Limited Activities and Uses Permit shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria, 1. All activities shall be located as far away from streams and wetlands as practicable, designed to minimize intrusion into the Water Resources Protection Zone and disturb as little of the surface area of the Water Resource Protection Zone as practicable. 2. The proposed activity shall be designed, located and constructed to minimize excavation, grading, area of impervious surfaces, loss of native vegetation, erasion, and other adverse impacts on Water Resources. 3. On stream beds or banks within the bank full stage, in wetlands, and on slopes of 25 percent or greater in a Water Resource Protection Zone, excavation, grading, installation of impervious surfaces, and removal of native vegetation shall be avoided except where no practicable alternative exists, or where necessary to construct public facilities or to ensure slope stability. 4. Water, storm drain, and sewer systems shall be designed, located and constructed to avoid exposure to floodwaters, and to avoid accidental discharges to streams and wetlands, 5. Stream channel repair and enhancement, riparian habitat restoration and enhancement, and wetland restoration and enhancement will be restored through the implementation of a mitigation plan prepared in accordance with the standards and requirements in section 18.3.11.110 Mitigation Requirements. 6. Long term conservation, management and maintenance of the Water Resource Protection Zone shall be ensured through preparation and recordation of a management plan as described in subsection 18.3.11.110.C, except a management plan is not required for residentially zoned lots occupied only by a single-family dwelling and accessory structures, Wcomm-devlplanninOlanning ActiorelNaticing FolderNailed Notices & Signs1202011'A-71-2020-00107.do" AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2, On May 11, 2020 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for the Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-00107, Ashland Ponds Sig a ure of Employee C:WsersltrappffiesktopHemp€atesUAFFIDAVtT Of MAUNG_Regan.docx 5812020 AVERY, 5160- Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edge- I Use Avery Template 5160 Is PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA900 ADAMS ROBERT J ET AL 371 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1500 BENDAT KEN TRUSTEE ET AL 360 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4000 BOUSE ANN MIJONES MICHAEL K 290 CAMBRIDGE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA3900 CARRIER BYOWN B 362 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA600 EDMONDSON JAMES ET AL 365 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E06AA4000 FIDLER MARK R. ET AL 365 TUDOR ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA800 GREENE DAVID E TRUSTEE 367 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1101 JAYNES MARK S PO BOX 10937 FAIRBANKS, AK 99710 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA1300 LEHNERZ MARISA ET AL 930 CAMBRIDGE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4700 NICHOLS DAVE/DIANE 349 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA400 ADDISON LESTER DIKALIA TERESA 359 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 381 E322300 BILLINGS MEMORIAL LLC 160 REITEN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 �I PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB5200 BROWN CAROLYN S ET AL 350 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97620 PA-T1-2020-00107 381E33400 CITY OF ASHLAND 20 E MAIN ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA700 ELSTER DANIEL W/PATRICIA M 363 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB3900 GARRETT KAREN G 950 GLENDOWER ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 381 E325700 HODGE DONNA B 1100 EAGLE MILL RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4800 JORGENSEN ROY PO BOX 368 ASHLAND, OR 97520 jA-T1-2020-00107 381 E33300 ARCHERD EVAN/NANCY WHITE PO BOX 699 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA500 BLACK LESLIE A TRUSTEE ET AL 361 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4500 BROWN JASON ET AL 331 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA4200 CRAWFORD KYLE M/CONNIE A 375 TUDOR ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB4600 ENGORN ROB /LOUISE W 345 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB4900 GOODALL-WHEELER ANNE A 330 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA2500 JAMES NANCY B/DALMASO RICHARD 361 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AAl202 KWON HEAKYOUNG 124 NW 7TH ST #303 CORVALLIS, OR 97330 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1000 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AAl 100 MACGOWAN HOLLY TRUSTEE ET AL MACLAREN DAVID JIRICE ROSHEL 375 OXFORD ST 379 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA4100 PA-T1-2020-00107 391E05AA1200 PUCKETT JOHN R TRUSTEE ET AL QUIET CORNER HOMEOWNERS ASN 1962 PARK AVE 393 OXFORD ST KLAMATH FALLS, OR 97601 ASHLAND, OR 97520 Etlquettes d'adresse Easy Pee[" j Allez a avery.ca/gabarits Pat: avery.com/patents I Utiiisez le Gabarit Avery 5iS0 I I Repiiez a is hachure afro de reveler le rehord Pop-up" j .• PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1203 RICHARDS DAVID STEVENIDRAGONF 391 OXFORD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Bend along line to expose Pop-up Edg' PA-T1-2020-00107 391E04BB5100 SNYDER DEREK SIALLISON E 340 COVENTRY PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 .._ Use AveryTernplate 5160 f r'A-T1-2020-00107 391 E04BB4100 SWANN LISA B TRUSTEE ET AL 3078 BROADWAY #116 SAN DIEGO, CA 92102 PA-T1-2020-00107 391 E05AA1201 PA-T1-2020-00107 PA-T1-2020-00107 WARNEKE MARLENE L TRUSTEE ET ASHLAND PARKS AND RECREATION Rabe Consulting 395 OXFORD ST 340 S. Pioneer St 421 Commercial Street ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 Klmath Falls, OR 97601 NOC 5/11/2020 36 Glendower -Ashland Ponds AlIez a ave ry. ca/ga ba rits Utilisez le Gaharit Avery 5160 it ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION flag, -00107 v 0 f \f mki n "A x, , Jlkwl� FILE # PA-TI-2020 A S I 11, A N D DESCRIPTION OF PROJECIz DESf,R_(LT!pNAE-P.R0.PKR.T.Y 39 , E ------ "LiL Con rl Pa�� Apl�,J��Nj I 41- PROPERTY OWNER AL zp _NGMEER, ARCH[TECTLAND ,SCAPE ECTIOTHER!ffV, .. ... ......... n e E Ual IJ 4 - /�/ / , f I ,� / I zl�:�'"I �1�11(,J A,/w 11 j j c, I zip !a'' c I uwl� �q W( "!'a fhi, V: qbU 1"C) "a r,W pVle 0 n^, We r,4 , dw.,JVJ f o !rya. InW ihc j V 1, j I ,rjw 1^ (�,d, I Mnr! A , s u �wV ell l/ bfol s S1gn6t6re D "etpes� i Nov(Peay,w,iOl ami IS PW,,Arlv 4,1, o,,vne� (,,f m,,lolverf v, rho, Property Owner's Signature Date 4/24/20 Zonm,,j Perm Fflhm Fee '1, $1092-00 GVER O� R EC E IIVE D 4�240) ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by Moth applicant and property rovrner FINDINGS OF FACT - Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the four of factual staternents or findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it ln,, Iude information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre -Application Comment dowment. 2 SETS OF SCALED PLANS no larger than 11 "xi 7-. Include site plan, building elevat€ons, parking and landscape details (Optional - 1 additional large set of plans. 2'x3 r.to use in meetings) FEE (Check. Charge or Cash'), LEED, - CERTIFICATION (optional _ Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall provide the €ollowing documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps: . Hiring and retaining a LEED< Accredited Prorfessional as part of the project tear?` throughout design and construction of the project. and • The LEEDT, checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued NOTE. • Applications are accepted on a first come, first ser.,ed basis. • Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicants; AND property owner(s)all required materials and full payment. ® Alt applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff vrithin 30 days from application date in accordance with ORS 227 178 • The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Plarnmq Commission meeting- (Pla'nmg Ct?Fivnisstor) ii-o i ear:€ qs Beard, ",hick meek a' I .Y ?m. EP the *lid Pla'iC;, g C;�-t?,igF1SS'o.n 4tt"ch t? i; .rr^it.r:. <''. t;Ei€��S ale Reid at: f,iir arJtl� sC?i =.'ha3i"mz•rs al 1175 Eas! �dtam SO Tt fi:i5 ai 7 �=J orj a° SeCt1rC i1 5 2 f r`' each u • A notice of the project request .fill be seat to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns. m If applicable, the application witl also be reviewed by the Tree ana"'or Flistonc Commissions PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 Ashland Pond Trail and Restoration Proieet Additional Pro'e�rmation: J. McFarland/Ashland Parks and Recreation Commission 3-25-2020 Please include this supplemental project information along with the previously submitted project description and information. Ashland Parks and Recreation Commission (APRC) has contracted with wetland consultant Andrea Rabe, who has completed the original project description, maps, the completed wetland delineation within the project area, and engineered plans for the boardwalk section of the proposed trail (ail have been previously submitted to the Planning Dept.) Andrea informed APRC per phone conversation that she has spoken with representatives from bath the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the Division of State Lands regarding the proposed project. She was told that neither agency would be requiring a permit for this project. Again, the ACOE representative confirmed to her that driving in pilings (with a pneumatic, handheld driver) and constructing the boardwalk section, along with the rest of the trail, does not require a permit from them. Also, she was told by the DSL representative that because the total cut and fill for the project (estimated at 1— 2 cu, yds.) is less than 50 cu. yds., the project also does not require a permit from DSL. The work for the project is designed to be performed during the in -eater work period (normally June 15 — Sept. 15, 2020) with no negative impact, disturbance or rerouting of any water resources in the entire project area including the small delineated wetland area, and in accordance of the project design to fulfill the City"s criteria for a permitted project. Andrea has also informed APRC that because no rerouting of water is required to complete this project, a DEQ drainage plan will not be required for the project. Andrea has submitted a preliminary determination request from the DSL, in order to receive jurisdictional confirmation from then, which they have confirmed receipt of and is currently under their review. She has explained the request is for procedural and confirmation purposes and is not expected to change anything about the agency permits not being required. The proposed trail route was studied by APRC personnel and the wetland consultant and considered to be the best route for the grail, with least amount of impact on the wetland resource area, within the project area, according to the site topography, wetland and creek areas, other existing partial trail (to connect to), and existing tree locations. The estimated total cut and fill for the project is only between one and two cubic yards (needed to make transition at end of boardwalk section). After constructing the boardwalk section of the trail, it would easily connect to an already existing native -soil, chipped trail which connects to the pond trail across an already existing west end crossing, and would make a full recreational trail connection from near the end of Glendower Street to Ashland Pond for trail users, including hikers, naturalists, bird watchers, photographers, and ether members of the community. PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 In addition, no large trees will need to be removed for this project. The only proposed removals for the project are 6 small native trees within the proposed boardwalk corridor. These six small trees are all in the understory. The area has an abundant native understory, and their removal would not create any loss of canopy or shade cover, which comes from the overstory. Also, the planting of native replacement trees is proposed, which can easily be planted onsite to mitigate the removal of the existing small trees, Another benefit to the project would be the significant removal of invasive species within the project area, including existing, non-native blackberries currently over ten feet tall, which are considered a fire hazard to nearby homes, as well as a nuisance because they choke out and diminish the native vegetation. APRC would be committed to perform long terra conservation, management and necessary maintenance within the project area, including the new trail, the constructed boardwalk portion, removal of any downed trees, or possible accumulation of silt or debris, and other regular maintenance needed such as pruning, chipping, etc. APRC would also be committed to maintain the removal of the invasive species in the project area. For years, APRC has already been using staff and volunteers to perform invasive removal in the nearby existing pond -trail area. Jason Minica, APRC Forestry Division Supervisor, has reviewed the project information and has stated that APRC Forestry Staff are confident that they could perform and complete the work for the project during the summer in -water work period. APRC has also conferred with both The Freshwater Trust and City of Ashland Public Works Crept., where preliminary information about the proposed APRC trail project was shared and reviewed with them. APRC received verbal confirmation from each of them that this project would not cause any expected conflict or negative impact on any of their forthcoming planned projects in the Ashland Pond property area. PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVE© 4/24/20 January 20, 2020 RE: Ashbud Poraal Trani and Restordon Project The l"aarks and Rccrealkin Department of tine City of Ashland proposes to construe€ a wVOodchip- surfaac.e trail 4-6 feet in vvidtli along be sowhside of Ashland Creek between the terminus of' Glcndowcr Street artd Ashland Pond. Currently, there is an earthen path aslong, the south side o€` Ashland ('reek, and additional unimproved path through the vegetation n-om the to nninus of Glendower Street north lr: waard Ashland Creek. The existing path is not designawd and is rougMy constructed by vijRws. The pnqumed path %"told desigrase a loewAn Wher From the bank atf the, creek and allow Or vegey6on maintenance along the trail. Moving the trail would allow for as reduction in erosion or We bank into Ashland Creek and additional riparian vcgel ation along the hank to stabilize tyre. hank. The vegetation along the pnlwscd all rot.tte exhibits a few noxious weeds, including dense patches offTirnaalaayar) blackberries, The.other noxious weeds include poison hendock, canary reed grass, and bull thistle, fay constructOg die trail, the Fa.rks and TZecr'eation Department permmllel and volunteers vvould have access to these areas of und"imble vcgaatit-m Access wv€.rMallow for hand pulling and removal ofthese noxious weeds, promoting more cfesirthlc riparian vegetation to be e.sta blishcd. Planting ofriparian understory, shrubs and trees would occur immediately after trail construction to augment the cWting %Tgetation. Lip to 6 small wes would need to be removed to aallow for trail construction. These trees exhibit trunks which are laying horizontal to tfre ground across the path of the trail beRve turning Teir trunks upward toward the sky. The replace °earl of these trees with healthy upright trees would provide better shading oaf the Ashbind ('reek riparian and channel areas. The proposed trail vamid crass a small drainage in two l€>c.alkni The first to€.anion is an established bridge at the west end of the hail, just east of Ashland fond. -The second location is along the eastern portion of the trail for approximaatcly 40 to, This section of trail would be constructed. aas a slightly elevated boardwalk. 'The boardwalk would be love enough to the: grrAind snrfaCC., soas not to require handruilc Or safety, BoardwMk side rails wood he "mstrawted_ Ile hoaardwalk would allow Or lice flow of drainage water be. wmh it aand minimal disturbance to the weOrml area:. This drainage receives tail 4vwr from the ` IT) ditch, which terminates at the end cafCaendowcr Street. The tail water proceeds through the lower topography west toward Ashland Pond and the under the established bridge prior to entering Ashland C'rec:k. PA-T1-2020-OC 107 RECENED 41400 REQU99T EQR COMPS JURISDICTIONAL DETERMINATION JD To: Portland District • I am requesting a JD on property I ocated at: East or Ashland Pond, North of Glendower Street dead end. (Street Address) CitylTownship/Parish: Ashland County; Jackson State, OR Acreage of Parcel/Review Area for JD: 1.67 Section: 33,32 Township: 3es Range_ 1E Latitude (decimal degrees): 42.214461 Longitude (decimal degrees):-12Y.718665 (For linear projects, please include the center point of the proposed alignment.) • Please attach a survey/plat map and vicinity map identifying location and review area for the JD, • 1 currently own this property. I plan to purchase this property, El am an agent/consultant acting on behalf of the requestor- [=Other (please explain): • Reason for request; (check as many as applicable) I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all aquatic resources. 01 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which would be designed to avoid all jurisdictional aquatic resources under Corps authority. =1 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps, and the JD would be used to avoid and minimize impacts to jurisdictional a uatic resources and as an initial step in a future permitting process. [ I intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities on this parcel which may require authorization from the Corps; this request is accompanied by my permit application and the JD is to be used in the permitting process. F71 intend to construct/develop a project or perform activities in a navigable water of the U.S. which is included on the district Section 10 list and/or is subject to the ebb and flow of the tide. =A Corps JD is required in order to obtain my local/state authorization. = I intend to contest jurisdiction over a particular aquatic resource and request the Corps confirm that jurisdiction does/does not exist over the aquatic resource on the parcel. Q I believe that the site may be comprised entirely of dry land. 0 Other: • Type of determination being requested: =I am requesting an approved JD. I am requesting a preliminary JD. I am requesting a "no permit required" letter as I believe my proposed activity is not regulated. I am unclear as to which JD I would like to request and require additional information to inform my decision. By signing below, you are indicating that you have the authority, or are acting as the duly authorized agentof a person or entity with such authority, to and do hereby grant Corps personnel right of entry to legally access the site if needed to perform the JD. Your signature shall be an affirmation that you possess the requisite property rights to request a JD on the subject property. *Signature: l .. -- - Date: 1119r202D • Typed or printed name: Andrea Rabe Company name: Rabe Consulting Address: 421 Commercial Street Ktamath Falls, OR 97601 Daytime phone no.: 541-881-2137 Email address: andrea@rabeconsulting.com "Authorlties: Rivers and Harbors Act, Section 10, 33 USC 403; Clean Water Act, Section 404, 33 USC 1344; Marine Protection, Research, and Sanctuaries Act, Section 103, 33 USC 1413: Regulatory Program of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; Final Rule for 33 CFR Parts 320-332. Principal Purpose: The information that you provide will be used Tn evaluating your request to determine whether ihare are any aquatic resources within the project area subject to federal jurisdOion under the regulatory authorities referenced above. Routine Lases. This information may be shared with the Department of Justice and other federal, state, and local government agencies, and the public, and may be made available as part of a public notice as required by federal law. Your name and property location where federal jurisdiction is to be determined will be included in the approved jurisdictional determination (AJD), which will be made available to the public on the Distrlcrs website and on the Headquarters USAGE website. Disclosure: Submission of requested Wormation is voluntary; however, if information is not provided, the request for an AJD cannot be evaluated nor can an AJD be issued. PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 WETLAND DELINEATION I DETERMINATION REPORT COVER FORM Fully completed and signed report cover forms and applicable fees are required before report review timelines are initiated by the Department of State Lands. Make checks payable to the Oregon Department of State Lands. To pay fees by credit card, go online at: http§:)Iapes orecon.00y/DSl</EPS!p_rogram?key=4, Attach this completed and signed form to the front of an unbound report or include a hard copy with a digital version (single PDF file of the report cover form and report, minimum 300 dpi resolution) and submit to: Oregon Department of State Lands, 775 Summer Street HE, Suite 100, Salem, OR 97301-1279. A single PDF of the completed cover from and report may be e-mailed to: Wetland_Delineation@dsl.state.or.us. For submittal of PDF files larger than 10 Me, e-mail DSL instructions on how to access the file from our ft or other file sharing website `Contact and Adthorization ]information ❑x Applicant Z Owner Name, Firm and Address: Business phone # (541) 601-3926 City of Ashland -Parks and Recreation Mobile phone # (optional) Contact: Jeff McFarland E-mail: jeff.mfarland@ashiand,or.us 3070 Highway 66 Ashland ,OR 97520 ❑ Authorized Legal Agent, Name and Address (if different): Business phone # Mobile phone # (optional) E-mail: I either own the property described below or I have legal authority to allow access to the property. I authorize the Department to access the property for the purpose of confirming the information in the report, after prior notification to the primary contact. Typed/Printed Name: Jeff McFarland Signature: Date: 01 /19/2020 Special instructions regarding site access: Please contact before entering site. Prject and Site Information roject Name: Ashland Pond Trail Project Latitude: 42,214461 Longitude:-122.718624 r decimal degree - centroid of site or start & end points of ]!near project Proposed Use: Tax Map # 1900 Develop a chipped -surface recreational trail. 'fax Lot(s) ---------------------------------------------------____--------------------- Tax Map # Tax Lot(s) ------------- .---------------- ----- - -- --- - Project Street Address (or other descriptive location): East of Ashland Pond, north of Glendower Street dead and. Township 36S Range I Section 32,33 QQ Use separate sheet for additional tax and location information Waterway: Ashland Creek River Mile: City: Ashland County: Jackson Wetland. Delineation Information Wetland Consultant Name, Firm and Address: Phone # (541) 891-2137 Rabe Consulting, Andrea Rabe Mobile phone # (if applicable) 421 Commercial Street E-mail: andrea@rabeconsulting.com Klamath Falls, OR 97601 The information and conclusion�,ott�iaand in the attached report are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Consultant Signature: (y�iy� Date: 01/19/2020 Primary Contact for report review and site access is 19 Consultant ❑ ApplicantlOwner ❑ Authorized Agent Wetland/Waters Present? ® Yes ❑ No Study Area size: 1.57 Total Wetland Acreage: 0.1200 Check Applicable Boxes Below !R-F permit application submitted X❑ Fee payment submitted $ 454 ❑ Mitigation bank site ❑ Resubmittal of rejected report ($100) ❑ EFSCIODOE Proj. Mgr; ❑ Request for Reissuance. See eligibility criteria. (no fee) ❑ Wetland restorationlenhancement project DSL # Expiration date (not mitigation) ❑ Previous delineation/application on parcel ❑ LWI shows wetlands or waters on parcel If known, previous DSL # Wetland ID code For Office Use.Only DSL Reviewer: Fee Paid Date: 11 DSL WD # Oate Delineation Received: — 1 �l � Scanned: ❑ Electronic: ❑ DSL App.# March 2018 t'A-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 FEW', �Wt j Wetland Del.iji.eatioit a Sr. Environmental Consultant 421 Commercial Street Klamath Falls, OR 97601 I "w.-qwqI-AAI (541) 891 - 2137 PA-'f 1:-2020-00107 RECEUED 4/24120 Table of Contents Introduction................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Landscape Setting and Land Use......................................................................................... 2 B. Site Alterations....................................................................................................................... 2 C. Precipitation Data and Analysis........................................................................................... 3 D. Methods.................................................................................................................................. 5 E. Description of All Wetlands and Other Non -Wetland Waters .......................................... 5 F. Deviation from LWI or NWI................................................................................................ 6 G. Mapping Methods.................................................................................................................. 6 H. Results and Conclusion......................................................................................................... 6 1. Disclaimer...............................................................................................................................7 AppendixA.................................................................................................................................... 8 AppendixB.................................................................................................................................... 9 AppendixC.................................................................................................................................. 10 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24120 Introduction Rabe Consulting was contracted by City of Ashland Parks and Recreation Department to perform a wetland investigation and delineation for a trail development along a portion of Ashland Creek upstream of Ashland Pond in Ashland, Oregon. Preliminary pre -field investigation showed that there are NWI and LWI mapped wetlands in the general area (Appendix A: Figure 3). This report presents the results of the Ashland Pond Trail wetland determination, which was conducted by Andrea Rabe of Rabe Consulting on November 1, 2019. The investigation occurred during end of the growing season. Andrea Rabe, a Professional Wetland Scientist, has 21 years of experience conducting wetland delineations. She has been trained in the use of the Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Supplement for conducting wetland delineations. This report documents the investigation, best professional judgment and conclusions of the investigators. It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and used at your own risk until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Oregon Division of State Lands in accordance with OAR 141-090-0005 through 141-090-0055. A. Landscape Setting and Land Use The study area is 1.57 acres in a rural area in Ashland, Oregon in Jackson County (Appendix A: Figure 1, Site Location Map). The legal description of the study area is a portion of tax lot 1900 (T38S RIE Section 32 and 33). The study area is south of Ashland Creek and west of the City of Ashland Wastewater treatment plant (Appendix A: Figure 1). The site is approximately 1840 feet (ft) in elevation. The study area encompasses the project footprint and access area for the portion of the pipeline south of Ashland Creek. The study area is on a terrace north of a paved maintenance road. To the west of the study area, the terrain drops off to Ashland Creek and the outlet of Ashland Pond. The study area is just east of the eastern berm along Ashland Pond. The study area gently slopes to the north toward Ashland Creek. The study area is to the west of the City of Ashland wastewater treatment facility and to the north of a developed residential area. North of the study area is Ashland Creek and open space. B. Site Alterations Through the study area is an existing earthen path. At the west end of the existing earthen path is a wooden foot bridge crossing the existing drainage. To the south of the bridge is the drainage and to the north of the bridge is a forebay (diversion area) for Ashland Pond and Ashland Creek PA-i1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 An existing drainage enters the study are from the east. This drainage begins just outside of the study area south and east where the terminus of the TID ditch allows for tail water to drain toward Ashland Creek. This drain water is not confined in a channel or ditch., but flows through the low portion of the study area toward the footbridge at the west end of the study area. At the east end of the study area the drainage is less confined by topography and creates a wider wetland area. As the drainage moves to the west the topography narrows the wetland. The wetland is vegetated and heavily infested with Himalayan blackberries. C. Precipitation Data and Analysis Ashland weather station is located 3.4 miles southeast of the study area. The weather station at the airport received 0.46 inches total of precipitation from October 16 through October 31, 2019, the 14 days prior to the Celd investigation. Ashland had a relatively normal amount of precipitation at the end of the growing season. The following is based on the WETS Table for Ashland Airport. SU mary of Preci itation between August 1, 2019 and October 31, 2019 Month Total Precipitation (in.) Normal Range WETS Within Normal Range? Monthly Average (in.) Departure From Average August 0.55 0.24-0.64 in. Yes 0.88 -0.33 (48%) September 1.55 0.47-1.02 in. Yes 191 -0.36 (81 %) October 0.86 0.87-1.79 in. No, slightly lower 1.48 -0.62 (58%) PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 WETS Station: ASHLAND, OR Requested years: 1971- 2000 Month Avg Max Temp Avg Min Temp than 30% chance precip more than Avg Mean Temp Avg Precip 30% chance precip less Avg number days precip 0.10 or more Avg Snowfall Jan 47.8 30.4 39.1 2.37 1.40 2.88 6 1.3 Feb 53.2 32.2 42.7 1.91 1.14 2.32 5 0.7 Mar 57.0 33.8 45.4 2.11 1.58 2.46 6 0.4 Apr 62.6 36.6 49.6 1.77 1.26 2.09 6 0.1 May 70.2 41.9 56.1 1.52 0.80 1.86 5 0.0 Jun 78.6 47.4 63.0 0.94 0.43 1.13 3 0.0 Jul 86.9 51.7 69.3 0.49 0.15 0.50 1 0.0 Aug 86.1 51.0 68.6 0.61 0.24 0.64 1 0.0 Sep 79.6 45.2 62.4 0.88 0.47 1.02 3 0.0 Oct 67.4 38.1 52.8 1.48 0.87 1.79 4 0.0 Nov 52.5 33.5 43.0 2.85 1.74 3.46 8 0.1 Dec 46.4 29.8 38.1 2.87 1.52 3.51 7 1.2 Annual: 17.25 22.04 Average 65.7 39.3 52.5 - - - - - Total - - - 19.80 55 3.8 GROWING SEASON DATES Years with missing data:24 deg = 3 28 deg = 3 32 deg = 2 Years with no occurrence: 24 deg = 0 28 deg = 0 32 deg = 0 Data years used: 24 deg = 27 28 deg = 27 32 deg = 28 Probability 24 F or higher 28 F or higher 32 F or higher 50 percent * 3/8 to 11/24: 261 days 4/11 to 11/3: 206 days 5/8 to 10/10: 155 days 70 percent * 3/1 to 12/2: 276 days 4/4 to 11/10: 220 days 5/3 to 10/15: 165 days * Percent chance of the growing season occurring between the Beginning and Ending dates. PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 D. Methods Rabe Consulting conducted a wetland delineation within the study area, which encompasses a portion of tax 1900 (T38S R1 E Section 32 and 33). The methods to delineate the study area were straightforward considering the nature of the parcel. The study area exhibited one wetland which extended to Ashland Creek off site. The delineation was conducted in November at the end of the growing season. Due to the wet winter soil saturation was at its height for the season. The delineation was conducted on November 1, 2019 with a previous site visit on September 26, 2019, using the criteria outlined in the ACOE Manual as supplemented by the Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Regional Supplement. Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region wetland data forms were used to record soils, vegetation, and hydrology data at sample plots within the study area (Appendix I3). Multiple data plots were used to test the study area for wetland presence. Plot locations were chosen based on ArcGIS maps created showing topography, aerial imagery, potential hydrology and observations of potential vegetation and hydrology during the field visit. Photo points were also taken with the plot number and direction of the photo noted. The study area boundary, photo points, and data plots were identified with a sub -meter accuracy MobileMapper 10 Ashtech GPS unit. The data from the GPS unit was post -processed using Mobile Mapping Office software. Real time accuracy was 1-2 meters, with post -processing bringing accuracy to 0.578 m horizontal error (number of satellites 7). E. Description of All Wetlands and Other Nan -Wetland Waters Upland Areas The study area consists of an upland area, as it does not exhibit wetland soils or hydrology. The upland area is elevated above the drainage wetland to the east by 2-4 for feet in elevation. The study area is significantly upslope of the Ashland Creek channel (2-8 ft). The upland area exhibits almost exclusively a grasses and Himalayan blackberry with an overstory of trees including Oregon ash, cottonwood, alder and maple. The upland area exhibits about 80-100% vegetation cover early in the growing season. PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 Wetland I Wetland I is a Palustrine scrub -shrub wetland by the Cowardin classification system and Depressional outflow by the HGM classification system. It is 0.120 acres in size. Although most of it is heavily dominated with Himalayan blackberries, other wetland plants were exhibited in the understory including horsetail, sedges, rushes, and poison hemlock. The overstory consists overhanging trees from adjacent areas including cottonwoods, Oregon ash and alder. F. Deviation from LWI or NWI A review of the National Wetlands Inventory Map (Appendix A - Figure 3) indicates there are wetlands to the west and north of the study area. The area to the west is Ashland Pond. To the north is Ashland Creek. The NWI indicates Ashland Creek extends south into the study area. However, on the ground observation of levees and beaver dams has rerouted the creek slightly to the north (outside of the study area). This determination does deviate from the NWI Maps, as Ashland Creek is outside of the study area and the drainage wetland is not identified on the NWI maps. LW I maps of the study area from 2007 show a hydro area within the study area. This is the riparian area associated with Ashland Creek. This delineation identifies the areas of wetland within the study area portion of the riparian area. The entire riparian area is not considered wetland, as it does not exhibit hydric soils, hydrology and wetland vegetation. LIDAR map of the study area was also viewed (Figure 5b) and did not show Ashland Creek in the study area, but instead showed it to the north of the study area. G. Mapping Methods All data plot and study area boundaries were mapped using a MobileMapper 10 Ashtech GPS unit with sub -meter accuracy. The data from the GPS unit was post -processed using Mobile Mapping Office software. Real time accuracy was 1-2 meters, with post -processing bringing accuracy to 0.578 in horizontal error (number of satellites 7). H. Results and Conclusion Within the1.57 acres of the study area, one 0.120 acre wetland was identified. PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 Ashland Pond 'Frail Wetland Delineation November 2019 1. Disclaimer This report documents the investigation; best professional judgment and conclusions of the investigator. It is correct and complete to the best of my knowledge. It should be considered a Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination and used at your own risk until it has been reviewed and approved in writing by the Oregon Division of State lands in accordance with OAR 141-090-0005 through I4I-090-0055. Respectfully submitted, Andr6a Rabe, PWS Rabe Consulting s�- Rabe Consulting— 421 Klamath Falls, OR 97691 7 PA-T1.2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 Appendix A Maps PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 I � � \� � \ \ / 75 U) u Q) CL 7� -0 C: Do 0 :E U) <1 LL c) memo r.C S�^�.r.::.:. Zux'a 'IAQQG q UCQCCG •j-Z"^��•Q� 21- e f: ilo - ,,,, �� 1 !' _ o$ � �%•orb: � .� Z _ I l gp 4'} z �,,^ I ?� s ".,�.: /• ' a - - - - - - - -' - oe � � •`.. � �� / o f S� fin,, �'� ��� �g ` " ` gg � za � I 00 � -� �.9 o Y =�,W: - �� on.... °j f Asa � ���,. • �aa� \ " 99 MIT LO �k iae 4 xQ _ yitIE -_ ad ;e re L t� �....._ � Igor � II \,1 •\ R� /`./ �:� o I" ___ i __. P it I£ i! Sti dVW NHS 5 LO / 0 x m H m N LL1 U LL grU¢ws9y:�y+V eE£Y�s siozlou>o V1V4 SI`3 eU 9 u � � G3 nvn ry I n hF:il Kt dYNl 3:15 % Er SCOt s 'l�S\ � k U f VJ 9 I 1 _. _ _ _ _ _.:1v\1C11 " ` _ - - s , _ _ - T - _ ._ co w _ _ - -- - _. _ _ � i[ LO u <e � 1 Iwo z❑ O J X N cla Ul tY LL HMa-Wr Wd LS'66-E ZLSLl87J80 V EVQ slo Ashland Pond Trail Figure #3: NWI Created By: M. Solus Created On: Dec. 2019 Mbe CoosulUng 0 37,5 75 150 225 300 Offiff—MEM773MEM MIN= Feet Data Source: National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP), Flown in Summer 2016. GPS plots and polygons accquired using an Ashtech MobileMapper 10 GPS unit with submeter accuracy of.578m Reproduced by Rabe Consulting for the purpose of this document. D 4/24M 0 cn �2 0 < 0 N LU > E '-3 �u Ln 0 w - L, u 00 � r 0 CL o E j-- 0 2 CL uw cn cn .1;� E fy CA < 71 41 Lo 0 <1 LLB u C) Ashland Pond Trail N Figure #4: Soils Created By: M. Solus Created Ow Dec, 2019 0 30 60 120 180 240 Fe Gt Data Source: National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP). Flown in Summer 2016. GPS plots and polygons accquired using an Ashtech MobileMapper 10 GPS unit with suhmeter accuracy of.578m Reproduced by Rabe Consulting for the purpose of this document. RECE]VED 4/24W, 0 A A u a - 0 Q :1- e- E f 0 Ln E CDs m 0 cc ant 771 flw CO c < \ \73 ui IL (1)� � � ° \ � �[� \� \ \ cr C ow \\\\. of g 'aoZ- E 'o < w u c 0) 0 a, s E V� u 0 E < LO ry oj U u 0 m 0 .2 u7 EL 'no a m m(n S� E 2 a- ro a- < A77 M Z, V) (i 0 r) IL 0 u Appendix B Data Forms PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Ashland Pond Trail Nov 1, 2019 t City/County: AshlandlJackson County Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: City of Ashland State: OR Sampling Point: I C., lnvestigator(s): Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range: ^ ��ETZ P--.i„C a' LhI�� 3 Landform (hillslcpe, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave _ Slope (%): 1-4% r Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: qa • cat I Lj � � � Long: �r��,� � �� � Datum: NAD83 SoiAre cmaticlthydrologic conditions on the site typical for L•"" time 'a�� �'���1���,�i(' NWI ckassification: NIA p _� � �- CCtr�a� !1� , ,��)P,v �t yp or this f year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? NO (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. /QM 7- Absolute Dominant indicator Dominance Test worksheet: Tree Stratum (Plot size:. 1 1 % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species 1. _n CAS �,? 1 ®� That Are 08L, FACW. or FAC:_ (A) 2. _ { Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: (13) 4. /} Percent Dominant Species SaplinulShrub Stratum (Plot size: >[1 6 = Total Cover of That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A18) 1. Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. 3 OBL species x i = FACW species— x 2 =_ 4. FAC species x 3 = 5. FACU species x 4 = �"• = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. ) . p UPL species x 5 = Column Totals? 6?D (A) (B) 2. Prevalence Index = B1A = � 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 4. _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 6. 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' 7. 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8, data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' ^_ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'lndioators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. g. 10. 11. = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1 Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation X = Total Cover Present? Yes No — % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 SOIL Sampling Point: I a Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the Indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Go I r moist % Color (moist) % Tyne Lac Texture Texture Remarks �l r lS.L 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coaled Sand Grains. 2Locatiow PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (Al0) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (86) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ ,, Loamy Gieyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophylic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (177) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gieyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators; Primary Indicators minimum of one re aired• check all that a I Secondary Indicators 2 or more re uired _ Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except — Water -Stained Leaves (69) (MLRA 1, 2, _ High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4113) 4A, and 413) Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Water Marks (131) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _,,, Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (62) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (02) _ Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Presence; of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (CB) _ FAC-Neutral Test (135) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes N Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24f20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Ashland Pond Trail Nov 1, 2019 Project/Site: CitylCounty: Ashland/Jackson County Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: City of Ashland State: OR t� Sampling Point: W Envestigator(s): Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range:. t �3 S P- G SC.-0.t- 3S Landform (hlllslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-4% Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lai: Y,� 2 i 4� Long:" , ':�1 bLlf Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: a 39M MU hbZ1F1NWI classification: N/A Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this tiiof year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks,) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances' present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area X( Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes ` ' No Remarks: 4 VEGETATION -- Use scientiK names of plants. Absolute Dominant indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: Lai % Cover Species? Status 1. 2. 3. 4. Total Cover Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 9. 10. 11, = Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: } 2. ram= Total Cover Bare Graund in Herb Stratum �_ Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) tZv Percent of Dominant Species ! That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AIB) Total % Cover of: Multiply b OBL species x t = FACW species x 2 FAC species J x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B!A = 3,0 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation Dominance Test is >50% Prevalence index is 53.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptations` (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 SOIL Sampling Point: I Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Deplh Matrix Redox Features (inches} Color (moist) % fmoiisst)� LTe Loc Texture Remarks 7 7Color 1% r e-.3 Z CIS 4, Lj 3 L J C- d4 t! J a.11 1 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains, 21-ocation: PL=Pare Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Hlstoso€ (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) T Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _,,,,- Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) X— — Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) � Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes _x No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re wired: check all that a 1 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required} Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except , ` Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, igh Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413) �Saturation (A3) T Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) _ Water Marks (31) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) — Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — ShailowAquftard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _.__ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (€nches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): K, Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECFIVFD 4124120 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Nov 1, 2019 Project/Site: Ashland Pond Trail City/County: Ashland/Jackson County Sampling Date: ApplicantlOwner: City of Ashland State: OR Sampling Point:._�C Investigator(s): Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range: T -, S S- ,S P ( f, Sic ct �3 Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (connccjave, convex, none): concave 2-- Slope (%): 1.4% Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: 3 T^ L1o�ng: �J Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: a ��� i � JP to � iy-,n on jas (, n .i4 x U-1% NWI classifcation: NIA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this timeldf year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? Na (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site reap showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes \,Q No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No � within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 2—) % Cover Species? Status 1. a G C J 2. 3. 4. = Total Cover SaNim/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. _ 3. =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size. n r 1 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Remarks: Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species h That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant r Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species �� C That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 FAG species i3 o_ x 3 FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals:_ (A)3 (B) _ D Prevalence Index = B!A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: f - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is a50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and we€land hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 SOIL Sampling Point: C A Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features {inches) Color % Color (moist) % Type' Loci Texture Remarks 1D 4 U 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. xLocation: PL=Pore Linin , M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Hislosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (Sb) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) — Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 31ndicators of hydrophylic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (177) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (Fa) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required: check all that apply) Secondary indicators 12 or more required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except _ Water -Stained Leaves (S9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) _ Saturation (A3) Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) _ Water Marks (B1) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (01) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (133) ^ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) _ Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (B5) _ _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (06) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) — Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Nov 1, 2019 PrajectlSite: Ashland Pond Trail Applicant/Owner: City of Ashland Investigator(s): Andrea Rabe Landform (hillstope, terrace, eta): _ Subregion (LRR): LRRA Soil Map Unit Name:, terrace Let: City/County: Ashland/Jackson County Sampling Date: State: OR Sampling Point: Section, Township, Range: T7�� 1-4 She Q - Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-4% a, al a k Long: 1 a' 5" Datum: NAD83 i! av) classification: NIA Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time df-year? Yes X No- (It no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a wetland? Yes_X_ No Remarks: ` I VEGETATION — Use scientific names of piant's. i Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: 10 % Cover Species? Status �- 1. rU 3. 4, _ = Total Cover SanlinglShrub Stratum (Plot size: } 1. 2. 3. 4. 5, = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. s. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ='fetal Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ► ) 2. _ Total Cover % Bare Ground in HWStratum Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: r (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (8) Percent of Dominant Species That Are 08L, FACW, or FAC: (AfB) Total % Cover of. Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species 10 x 3 = 6o FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = U 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast -Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 SOIL Sampling Point: �b Profile Description: iDescribe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features 0nches Color (moist) % Color !moist) % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks �Z- 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ZLocation: PL=Pore Unin . M=Matrix. Hydric Soff Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (At0) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) — Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetiand hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix ($4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Hydric Soil Present? Ye No Depth (inches): Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Prim Indicators minimum of one re uired- check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) urface Water (Al) T Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA t, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) Saturation (A3) — Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (131) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (813) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) T Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aqutlard (D3) Iron Deposits (85) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) — Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (B7) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland hydrology Present? Yes No includes ca illa frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 PA-T 1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Nov 1,2019 ProjectISIte: Ashland Pond Trail Applicant/Owner. City of Ashland City/County: Ashland/Jackson County Sampling Date: State: OR;S�amplinrg�Point: 3 '6 � V LJ Investigator(s): Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range: t:s C± 3 p -- Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (co cave, convex, none): concave ` r Slope (%): 1-4% Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat;QI LI Long: - 1� o� t� l Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: 2 3 � C a Im ac U ik l.yi-na t- t/ a CroC d i xio-3/Nvvi classification: N/A Are climatic! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation , Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophylic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No X+� within a Weiland? Yes No _.L_�___ Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants, n Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: Viln) %9 Cover Species? Status 2. 3. 4. _ = Total Cover Saplintr/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: l 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) _ 1. tl 1!'1 f Wy'n MCI ud,t(.dU M 2. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum a = Totai Cover = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species j f) Thal Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: ((A18) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 013L species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species _� x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL specks x 5 = Column Totals:[ (A)y (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophyfic Vegetation t2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is s3.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) £indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast - Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24120 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) oust)_ % Color (moist? % pE Lac Texture Remarks )Color ^(m� 'Tye: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted,) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) 2 cm Muck (Atli) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) — Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) — Other (Explain in Remarks) Depleted Below Hark Surface (A11) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) — Redox Dark Surface (176) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicate(minimum of one re uired� check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except — Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 46) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) — Drainage Patterns (610) _ Water Marks (131) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ,,,,,,, Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (65) ^_ _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (136) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (138) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No (includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: �� J US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM —Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Nov 1.2019 ProjecilSlte: Ashland Pond Trail CitylCounty: Ashlandliackson County Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: City of Ashland=SSttatte: OR Sampling Point:,_ lnvestigator(s): Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range: Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-4% Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: J � Long: t' �, t7atum: NAD83 'c NIA Soil Map Unit Name: ���� WI ciassitication: Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yes,,,,,,,,,,_, No Remarks: VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: In l�^1+ Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Dominance Testworksheet: Z, �,Sttattus 5(j Number of Dominant Species 1. That Are 08L, FACW, or FAC: (A} 2. Total Number of Dominant 3. Species Across All Strata: (B) 4, = Total Cover Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, FAC; t� Sa lin /Shrub Stratum (Plot size: J Y!`),2 ) or (AlB) 1 i Prev alence Index worksheets Total % Cover of: Multiply by: 2. OBL species x 1 = 3 FACW species x 2 = 9. FAC species x 3 = 5. FACU species x 4 = Herb Stratum '(Plot size: i q ) = Total Cover UPL species x 5 = 1. txA1Gy\.0 WV� GYCt �S ii 4U Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = t31A = 2• 3. Hydrophytic Vegetation indicators: 4. 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 5. V2 - Dominance Test is -�50% B. 3 - Prevalence Index is 7. 4 - MorphoEogical Adaptations' (Provide supporting 8 _ data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) 8 _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants` _ Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) ' Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must 1Q 1 _= Total Cover be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Woody Vine Stratum (PIo 1 • Hydrophytic 2. Vegetation % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Total Cover Present? Yes No Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 SOIL Sampling Point: - Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist Y _ - Color (moist) % Type Loc Texture Remarks 0-° 9 .T� s Ye-3)2 cqo ds p_� �U ID. d . t arum LZ �� C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL-Pore Lining, MvMatdx. —'Type: Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Sollss: _ Histosol (Al) Sandy Redox (S5) — 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) ^_ _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) 3Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (FS) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators iminimum of one required: check all that I Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) Surface Water (A1) _,,,,, Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except Water -Stained Leaves (89) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 48) Saturation (A3) _-_, Salt Crust (B11) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (131) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (82) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) Algal Mat or Crust (134) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Iron Deposits (135) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (05) _ Surface Soil Cracks (136) _.._ Stunted or Stressed Plants (Di) (LRR A) Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) ^ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes. No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes Na Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes /v No includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), If available: Remarks: LIS Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 WETILAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Nov 1, 2013 ProjectlSite: Ashland Pond Trail CitylCounty. Ashland/Jackson County Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: City of Ashland State: OR Sampling Point: y:--� C Investigator(sy Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range: :1��� Landform (hil€slope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief ((concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-4% Subregion(LRR): LRRA Lat: 14a, � Y`i Long: -y ,. _ (_ Datum: NA083 r-- ' NIA Soil Map Unit Narne:a?j r F �� V ! NWI classification: Are climatic ! hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this tig of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach Site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a wetland? Yes No Remarks: VEGETATION —Ilse scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator Tree Stratum (Plot size: tl 2— ) %%Cover Species? Status 2. l 3. 4. =Total Cover SanlinnplSShrub Stratum (P,lopt size ` ? 2. 3. 4. 5. = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. — 2. 3. 4. 5. — 6. 7. — 8. 9. 1 t7. 11. _ = Total Cover Woody Vine Sir um (Plot size: b 1. 2. = Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum Dom€nanee Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species r/ That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: (A/B) Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = 1=ACW species x 2 = FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totais: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = _ 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation K2 - Dominance Test is 550% _ 3 - Prevalence index is 53.0' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soli and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes _ ___ . No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 SOIL Sampling Point: t Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of Indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moister Vo Color (moist} % Tvoe Loc Texture Remarks �_ _, 5YL312 �� ' i Im 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De ietion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 21-ocation: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (Al0) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) . Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) _ Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophyiic vegetation and _ Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) welland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (178) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks; HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one required: check all that a [ Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except ___, Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (MLRA 1, 2, — High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 48) 4A, and 413) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (Bi 1) _ Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (81) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (132) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (83) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) — Shallow Aquitard (D3) _ Iron Deposits (135) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutral Test (D5) _ Surface Soil Cracks (86) _ Stunted or S€ressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (136) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (07) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BS) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No includes ca illa fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: dim vy�aq-�, A, wW ctkh,�eJ bVA tv V0 (, q 5�0 P� vl 0 a,, � c US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 PA-Ti-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124124 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Project/Site: Ashland Pond Trail Nov 1. 20t8 CitylCounty: Ashland.IJackson County Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner: City of Ashland State: OR Sampling Point: lnvestigator(s): Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range; Landform (hilislope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave f Slope (°%): 1-4% Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lai: u Long:.— " I Q' I &C 'f Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: C L,03T i NWI classification: NIA Are climatic / hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a Wetland? Yea No Remarks: — IL ') r VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. f ' / Tree Stratum (Plot size: ) t. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: I 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Herb Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2.. 3. Absolute Dominant Indicator Dominance Testworicsheet: %ygr„ Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species Total Cover That Are OBL, FACW, or FAG: D V (A/B) = Total Cover Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: i r i ) t, I�ul�s _C�Q�'ictCtt�� 2. yotC3 = Total Cover °� Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 1 Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species x 2 = FAC species f)D x 3 --.at)© FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = J3. Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is 53.0' _ 4 - Morphological Adaptat€ons' (Provide supporting data In Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 6 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24120 SOIL Sampling Point:---4— Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist) % Type Loci Texture Remarks _ n_. Q � -'SVa,"34- Cam 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains, 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) indicators for Problematic Hydric Sails': Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) _ Histic Epipedon (A2) T Stripped Matrix (Ss) Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) _ Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) _ Depleted Dark Surface (177) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (F8) unless disturbed or problematic, Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: " Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Secondary Indicators (2 or more reouired) Surface Water (Al) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except _ Water -Stained Leaves (99) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 413) _ Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (B11) Drainage Patterns (1310) Water Marks (61) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (82) __-. Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) ,,,,,,, Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (134) ^_ _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) iron Deposits (135) — Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) — FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D(5) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) __-- Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (B8) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No Includes ca illa fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: U- q U J cf— US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 PA-T 1-2020-001137 RECEIVED 4124/20 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Nov 1, 2f119 Project/Site: Ashland Pond Trail CitylCouniy: Ashland/Jackson County Sampling Date: Applicant/Owner. City of Ashland OR Sampling Point lnvestigator(s): Andrea Rabe ^Sttate: �j Section, Township, Range: s D S I? i C Se Gf S t Landfonn (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-4% Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: Long: —I cQ Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: r L J t � !A NWi classification: Are climatic I hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this t€tne of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil , or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS -- Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc, Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Soil Present? Yes1k: No is the Sampled Area Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No within a 4Vstland? Yes No Remarks::Sf VEGETATION — Use scientific names of plants. Absolute Dominant Indicator 1 nee Siraium (Plot size: 1 ILA % Cover Species? Status 2. 3. 4. = Total Cover SaptinglShrub Stratum {Plot size: l 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Z = Total Cover Herb_ Stratum (Plat sine: .) 1. 2. ' 3, JJnkCAJA,1V\ 4. IJ 5. 6 7, 8. 9. 10. t1. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: _ —) 1. 2, % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 5Z Remarks: Total Cover = Total Cover Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species [} That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: (AB) Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = FACW species ., x 2 = FAC species :!�:2_U x 3 = O FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) }� (B) Prevalence index = B/A= Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <_3.0' 4 - Morphologicat Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators,) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color (moist} % Type' Loc Texture Remarks _il'0 l cxl,m _31,-+, 100 Sl I I nCi i� 'T e: C=Concenlration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': _ Histosol (Al) _ Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (At 0) _ Histic Fpipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) Black Hrstic (A3) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _ Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) _ _ Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) oamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (Al 1) _ Depleted Matrix (F3) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Redox Dark Surface (F6) 'Indicators of hydrophytic vegetation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (Si) _ Depleted Dark Surface (F7) wetland hydrology must be present, _ Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) Redox Depressions (178) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Present? Yes No. Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Remarks: HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators minimum of one re uired• check all that applyl Secondary. indicators (2 or more required) _ Surface Water (Ai) _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (except Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (1311) _ Drainage Patterns (Bib) Water Marks (Bi) _ Aquatic Invertebrates (613) _ _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Sediment Deposits (82) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (CI) _ Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (B3) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres aiong Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (D2) Algal Mat or Crust (84) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _ Shallow Aquitard (D3) Iron Deposits (85) _ Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) _ FAC-Neutrat Test (135) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (131) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) _ Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (137) Other (Explain in Remarks) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (88) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Weiland Hydrology Present? Yes No Includes capillary fringe) Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: C� V US Array Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast —Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM — Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast Region Nov 1. 2019 Project/Site: Ashland Pond Trail City/County: Ashland/Jackson County Sampling Date: ApplicantlOwner. City of Ashland State: OR Sampling � Point: V� Investigator(s): Andrea Rabe Section, Township, Range: S� cA__S Ail F ai (l � 3� Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc.): terrace Local relief (concave, convex, none): concave Slope (%): 1-4% Subregion (LRR): LRRA Lat: ,�A 3,�'' D Lang:_/ c� Q,_� �� 6)Datum: NAD83 Soil Map Unit Name: I —ic r ' S ? NWl classification: IA Are climatic 1 hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this time of year? Yes X No (if no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology significantly disturbed? No Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No Are Vegetation Soil or Hydrology naturally problematic? No (if needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS — Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transacts, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No Hydric Sail Present? Yes No Is the Sampled Area Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes NoE within a Wetland? Yes No Remarks: r VEGETATIOl'i-Ase scientific names of plants. --j II 4 Tree Stratum (Plot size 1.___1 2. 3. 4. SaplinglShw10 Strat {Pltlt size: ) 1. 2. 9. 4. 5. % Cover Species? Status Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: = Total Cover ( m Z = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: f ) 1. �l lrt.Vk a$/iiid.jl (k.[t. �Qd _ �� 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. ' =Total Cover Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: �t ] 2. Total Cover % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 2 (A) Total Number of Dominant 2 Species Across All Strata: (B) Percent of Dominant Species , j That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: [,Dy _ (A/B) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species x 1 = Y FACW species — x 2 = 120 FAC species x 3 = FACU species x 4 = UPL species x 5 = Column Totals: (A) 7Z� (B) Prevalence index = BlA = !� 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 • Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index is <30' 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting data in Remarks or on a separate sheet) _ 5 - Wetland Non -Vascular Plants' Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No tVUA US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast — Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4l24120 SOIL Sampling Point: Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) % Color moist % TVpe Loc Texture Remarks 5 -3I3 too va3)? too C �Y 'Type: C=Concentration, D=De letion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. ?Location: PL=Pare Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted,) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soils': Histosol (Al) — Sandy Redox (S5) _ 2 cm Muck (A10) Histic Epipedon (A2) _ Stripped Matrix (S6) _ Red Parent Material (TF2) _ Black Histic (A3) _ Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) (except MLRA 1) _,,, Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) — Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) _ Depleted Matrix (173) Thick Dark Surface (Al 2) _ Redox Dark Surface (F6) indicators of hydrophylic vegelation and Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) — Depleted Dark Surface (177) wetland hydrology must be present, Sandy Gleyed Matrix (S4) _ Redox Depressions (178) unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: 11D '\nSl catffs HYDROLOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: .Primary Indicators fminimum of one re aired: check all that a 1 Secondary Indicators (2 or more required) — Surface Water (Al) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) (except _ Water -Stained Leaves (139) (MLRA 1, 2, — High Water Table (A2) MLRA 1, 2, 4A, and 4B) 4A, and 4B) Saturation (A3) _ Salt Crust (811) _ Drainage Patterns (B10) Water Marks (B1) ^ Aquatic Invertebrates (1313) _ Dry -Season Water Table (C2) _ Sediment Deposits (132) _ Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (Cl) — Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) _ Drift Deposits (133) _ Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (C3) _ Geomorphic Position (132) Algal Mat or Crust (64) _ Presence of Reduced Iron (C4) _,_, Shallow Aquilard (D3) _ Iron Deposits (B5) Recent Iron Reduction in Tilled Soils (C6) — FAC-Neutral Test (135) Surface Soil Cracks (96) _ Stunted or Stressed Plants (D1) (LRR A) _ Raised Ant Mounds (D6) (LRR A) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (87) _ Other (Explain in Remarks) _ Frost -Heave Hummocks (07) _ Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (BB) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Water Table Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Saturation Present? Yes No Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No 4— includes ca ilia frin e Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring wets, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Western Mountains, Valleys, and Coast— Version 2.0 PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 Appendix C Ground -Level Color Photographs PA-T1-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4124120 1 0 f C,... (� C'V Cab Cp ,�y. � � (VI a.",�o wY u*4 f.7 IA} � "�' .,.Y,I I— f,...k �� l.�l C3"_` P,- CD 6 10 > 10 01: Appendix D — References Environmental Laboratory. (1987). Technical report Y 87-1 (Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual). Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. Munsell Color Services. (2005). Munsell soil color charts: Revised washable edition. New Windsor, New York: Division of Gretag Macbeth, LLC. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (1992). Clarification and interpretation memorandum of the 1987 manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Government. 4pp. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2010). Regional supplemental to the Corps of Engineers wetland delineation manual: Western mountains, valleys, and coast region (Version 2.0) (Technical Report ERDC/EL TR-10-3. Vicksburg, Mississippi: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. (2016). State of Oregon 2016 wetland plant list. Washington, DC: U.S. Government. 28pp. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. (2012). Climate information -- Wetlands retrieval for Oregon [data file]. Retrieved May 30, 2019 from www.wec.nres . u sd a. gov/ftpref/su pporUcl i mate/wet[ ands/or/41037.txt. PA-T$-2020-00107 RECEIVED 4/24/20 d)U 119 NoiionUISNO, 0-� iON AAAIA�]U XONDOV UO=4 z ra C., U CD z -i _j M 0 < 6 z w LL, o 0 co LIJ LU uj < C) LA < z D < is < U) Lu RE llJ 0, '0 Z ui < LL, 2<0 0 U) fj L�1-1 o 0 z Ile ill t7' cr < 0C, l- U E It I- u. w (.5 N; z > w -, 0- < z 0 0 71 LLI 0 W0 0 z z 0 U1 z LH F o Z z < < I-L 0 uw, L-L, 2 :<z M, r �0= 4 o< I.- _J 0 <z-CL LO W "DL, LU LaL, COL P < z S o Lxu 0 2,, c Z- Z LW c 0) — LU -IzI Z LLJ of F cj IK I 0, '. - ¢ , > 0 Z C) � z Z C �- . , W, LLI ill ": Z" 0 16 - L, 11 al 0 C) C.) Fj W .2 < x 0 ir all LOIJ �,-, �,, tu 01 u 0 W. IT -T. Cc) <� FE ., �-, L� t - d� 0 Cr1 0 to w 12 W. 1101, 111 - - 9 < < . , . - o F- % -Z <n m 0 2 7 'I'Ll > LLI M I(r) (Lin" U, E 0 5 0 10, U) < L21: LU 0 C) C) w (_I, LL�l �n rz F- 0 '1 '<L 0 ,n < C-), ca.toW CD Ca -Y < o o Z LD 10 C 7- 0 LL, 0 < > , M w z 0 5 uj T U o LL, n 0 Z. m . W. 6 E C) U.1 E < z < < E C) 0 LF 6 X 0 < < - n -E w L p -�, 0, E !.12, P w n aaeJ 2) 0, Lou Ll < <w 0 (9 IFI� 02 Z, 0' 01 > <- < uj z) S >J < w J- w z U01 Z, 0 W> rr X F7 0 o "0W. � R, -,,C, n < L < Sbt_y T 0 1=11 w - W w E :g > < Z . . �-z - lrl� 1, W 0 W �- Z 0 LL �� 0 w O�� -,o (Y.7 P: U.. L) CO < < z t6 E < 0 � 2- LIJ, � M?�W�,o Z 0 n, Ul :n tu C) uj F =3 l- z f q W z w uj I w - i W � LL i Z< Ir -:5 �- :5 y a 0 ®- X LLI LL, I ai q 0 F- W 0 J ll LL, (.�o U) LU w ,-a! z -: ul w cr W c w n _, < W C) p Cr C) 0 CL tL 0 W U� < 0 z � WL D � Lli .1 9 z :;,li I UJ M 0 -1 0 z I- LLJ, W LLJ 3 3� 2 Z W w emu.® �4 F- T. 0 F- Ul 0 < L) LIJ! :r� I Lij Zw 00 l- < u C) C) 7 a-. S W. < -I Lrj w ul > < .: C) w � 0 :�-M—ju < w Z, 1 <-2-c x � J 1 - 0 T z LL, w z < < ) i < < T l- < 71 � L<2 W0 w IN0 z rt Ltj z n O LLI Z U) W LL > tz W Lo Do W z 0 n 10 LL z W LLJ vi d 9 w NOiionUiSNO, D-4 ION AIGJADDT AOM:30V UO--1 z 2 oq u z uoj m A U) LLJ 0 rE W LL) op om Z�, > La M F-- F" �3 U�j W Lea> 0- LU z .......... . C) w z z LLJ If 9 co 7 < 0 m I x [� UJ LLI oL o fr 0 w Cf > Li z 0 Lil R Lil cr. —I w z LE a > Q z < u' 10 2 ;7 "0" :5 n LU LLJ 0 LL, z m CD Z- (<0 IC) LLJ U, < < W LLJ uj F- <�c Y L'i o Z zo 'o z2~ W z < ca M. Z. 2 LLI z Ely 0 > LIJ < CL < x ul < 9 Ili L) +1 w Lu CE > < < IL U) Lu < LLJ '40 m Z a] U) uj , (Y) z 0 LLI LU U) 4171 G LUL" a."," 7 11L 0 o 6- 5 Z< F p �2 U, < Ir. Ir 0 1-- w ill Lu < 0 CC A W LIJ Ili 0 00 VL 0. 01- 0 O� O. Z �� tPy It fr m 71 In K Lj > o w C.) 'LLU, Ul 11 ow < �y LL -] 0 UI F- [L U3 tin uj W U. U. CY < CJ -E 311W)5� I'lOJ S-lVnO.J HONI -JNO 1 Noiionuis NOO HOA ION NGIADU AON-10V a0=l .0- J �w ■ zz �O x Em NUv Td ww> SFQ am¢ Avg QLUm 0 v J LL W Lil 'du „9 o ,v �w a and a a U W LL LL V ❑ } � z - ww(n JCL J Lb ---- � o Z o � Q �U- a 11, ❑ II Q N J� I® W J_ LL O J zQLL >LLo �Oz ❑z� woaW Z J F-LL J ❑ Z z Z_ U a h- U = U) W W O 10 Z a w LL = ~p O U F O , O Q w ~ LU a23Z0 UU) LL- > W w U - J U) U F � m 0 } F- z U wa U)a W U aLU a w a m Z J } p J LL_ LL Cl) W Ul O �- z2z wpm J � U) W W L,J 0 < 0:E ° ZF W 2� a pr w 0r w U z of LL wmaw LL C, W W U)o¢LL O� Z O U Z_ - O CC } O ❑ W O ❑ W w❑ J} ❑ � W J W Ur m z ~ O W W Z LL' a LL W LL W W _ z = m ❑ LU 2 Z J Z W a- J J a z Z❑ p O w cr Q a w �Y J F Y Z U Q U O a LL z >-W w¢ m wz� 0 0 �� -'�- o ao �❑ w a z� �� Z z W a J o Z a❑ z m gC)g�¢� U) zr zcw a❑ a > ❑w w 1. a W a OFLL O Jw ¢ LL a. Lw cn� w>C72zin 7 P. z .0 w U C ❑ O U)p H. 0~ S.�rtw a W K m U) 01 W = O 1-co Z O Z zw❑ O �- ui ❑ F. z 25 w LLWz �-C a w� �oLL2 ?(j U)F oz- w �� da a� o U U o, w(9 Qa- ❑05z0 O LL W Z C C7 S z W}= a W m F' W W LL m W LL} N U U >O Z F- ❑z Op m pU cc) OO ❑K ❑w Ja~ mLL,, m w = U) 0❑wo¢wK 0 Q U U a Z F- U �4LL- W a g Z K> O W Q Wp�� 2>❑ SZ ❑ Q� w m UO Z Z W 00,0 a ¢ r=� O�CWw7 am O F�gK ❑ K F LL Qm� ❑ W H �� Z aLLQ❑�>_� vLLia O SD z W Zj WO Z OO a-wa 2�n uwm U ❑ a LL O�❑OZw� a C7 0 CLz � U p� -� W mv>> Q a ❑� a m� V) w wF- U U) O J � w a¢ 0 O W a F- ❑ W w Q U J w m �=wUw W w - C) ❑ 2 �n ZO � EU z O� U) a�aI- J a F- X S wQ w Z U) Z ww a = F' LL- F <F--cn Q Ja m1 �Q� ¢❑ _ Zw Z a wO Uz pa Lou pzy��0 W 6 Lu O OumZp I- -Nz:Of OQwwa t U W J Z O a ❑ O w Z LLZ Z QW a p❑~ OWWC ❑ U Uw) y�- ❑�N❑z aI- Cii 0 = 0U) O-=QW vW cn Z ❑v z -> m U W� V >c Nz> ❑�al zN❑ JUWQn ❑ F" z ❑ p WJ CC-Z a W Q ZW_ O I-- K F- O w W SJUZ W ❑LLJW.T- En w U K zo z= w QZZ� 0 ULwU rL Q O WOU OWNa W zCa) F-0IZ LwO O W 161 J mJJwOwOzmJZJJ2oO QFZZS WJLL �JJ? NwC WcUSn 0❑LLJJ moZ-� aHO WJ_ni � oUazz w� ZwUN m0VOJa.2 =COzLL -❑Za� Z �w�a ���� zW z mw LLw �❑a�w a p ZUWLL J=¢O =OLLo z �0 w wu O af>a 2� ¢ W�w jo w X Ow W UW wroof wa0 CU z _ J0z WaH aU�ae m ofZ ❑Jn Waw W WLLWLLJZ Zw YCD20w0mLL >� a: aUW Z2E 0 0 ZLLQOaaw7a F LLJNO O O l J O ow U� UJUO �Jw J(z� JJHL C F- UaU rC-�UU PZa>azz❑ <0 << <D aaF-<w a2a2F-a LL1 o F- D�-N �(V � mpwZ M IT td� (7 w LL H U) -,IVOS-nnH S-MO3 HONI 3NO i I Z a nm w� H w�CPU- m� U-aO �U- Q J a DOQ z F a w LL Z Z i -x z a vm 0 d ��� �a� m W- w� a r �w a� IL J Q �= iJ a m0 ¢� 0c �w Yg W = N U Jo¢ o Z a a C7 r Z p1K rw m L l �p LoLl _ w _ _ _ U �O mm 2 N U rcn l9 w LLIa l tD � `7a a a J O N V Q. uj Q a w V U z, U ' LU - ,.b J7 = z o a m J a Q: y 10� w r w a a m Z U y z X W P- �\ LO_ r I Q Z W p W z ¢ zwp zQ d OrC K W gw UJ X ( (D r w J Q- ��v �� W p Z 2 r ¢ gr¢ ulp H = MHO � 7 ZYr C`) ujS m Z m G w M� W Q m v NOIIO(1UISNOD UO-J ION M�IIAD J AON3]C)V UOA o ¢ co c ■ Z Q J W W � ¢ w U ro K LU cc. w a a a a W w o a W zm aW zm �¢ am �¢ Z Z z U) 5 d. ¢ g ?a ?a z.a Erw LU > (DOW z zmz �¢zcn r a U O- WJ V < U W Z Z r m Q W OOw> m r p z zZW O 5 p co a O � � U v w ¢ � w U U'cn Z �p� LLJ Y x m pm , LLI � a O II Q Z O V W U) Q W � J uj LU / co pN4-[n p_cn z Z a o ZZr- = 7 W W¢ Q ¢c- Z¢ m p U < d Q r_� ¢ J¢ N Q' W M g W M U) f n (n °'I¢- W a lL LL O wwz N m Wr W p a s O m U U a' p W r a Z -Cn Q- a K K m Z U u Z W> p W U (n 7 Y w C ¢ W J m Q a wU` r w �a (D gci o O r 0- °'r W p rj a�wp wed ?75t= a ¢ p S 3-1V0S ll(ld S-1VnO3 NON] ]NO '�--- I I 2 � 7C3 0 CL 2 70 c m �rz w - aC ������„ �oww�a 'E" -ocD 0 R E 0 C9 E OL 0 FL 5, SOL� 2 45 < mom. ,o 2 C) E o E '6 2 .2 0 E E2 0) 6 2 CL Cl) 0 0 w IL44 co 0 Vu cu CL cu 00— ! 7=,:, 0. E 2 w E 2 0- 00- E -5 0 C) U) C) ME m < ?: Cc 0 m 0,� 0>, CD 4-- 0 LL m 0 tu 0 70 0 0 20 0 E 2E o E 0 ID a) co m co m E u) J�00 �5 2 -U, as 0) CNI, 0 0- U) (D 0 CL 0 rz - 0 - 0 Cu ( �D (1) W < C)