Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutHolly_545_PA-TREE-2021-00172CITY OF -ASHLAND November 22, 2021 Notice of Final Decision On November 22, 2021, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA -TREE -2021-00172 Subject Property: 545 Holly St. Applicant: Eric Recors / Quality Tree Service Description: A request to remove one large cottonwood tree at the property located at 545 Holly St. The tree is estimated to be 16 inches DBH and stands 50' tall. The application states that the tree has a significant lean towards the residence. While the property is single family and is small enough to be exempt because the tree is located in an identified Water Resource Protection Zone / Flood Plain Corridor Land a permit is required. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 IE 09 DB; TAX LOT. 8900, The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.ashland.or.us I µ SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.I.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site, If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded, b. Tinze for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content ofNotice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised durbig the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A -- E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tei: 541-488-5305 51 Winburn Way l=ax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 -` www,ashland.onus grata ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -2021-00172 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 545 Holly St. OWNER/APPLICANT: Eric Recors 1 Quality Tree Service DESCRIPTION: A request to remove one large cottonwood tree at the property located at 545 Holly St. The tree is estimated to be 16 inches DBH and stands 50' tall. The application states that the tree has a significant lean towards the residence. Wile the property is single family and is small enough to be exempt because the tree is located in an identified Water Resource Protection Zone / Flood Plain Corridor Land a permit is required. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 1E 09 DB; TAX LOT: 8900 SUBMITTAL DATE: October 22, 2021 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: October 26, 2021 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: November 22, 2021 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): December 6, 2021 FINAL DECISION DATE: December 7, 2021 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: June 7, 2023 DECISION This proposal is to remove one tree from the property that is located at 545 Holly St. The property recently went through a Physical and Environmental Constraints Pennit as well as a Limited Activities and Uses Permit for bank stabilization activities along a Water Resource Protection Zone (WRPZ) (See: PA -T1-2021-00148). Typically, a property of this size and zoning would be exempt from a tree removal permit, however because staff was aware of the WRPZ on this property and the tree met the size threshold a tree removal permit is required. The subject property is accessed off of a flag drive located along the north side of Holly Street, between Idaho and Kearney Streets. The property was partitioned into this configuration with the recording of a county survey #11678 (approved as PA#88-096). The property is 0.25 acers in size and is zoned R-2. The surrounding neighborhood is also R-2 north of Holly St. and west of Harrison Street, to the south is R-1-7.5 zoning. The property contains a two-story, single-family residence and attached carport. A majority of the properties around 545 Holly St. are developed with detached single-family housing. However, adjacent to the subject property to the north and west there is also a 1.4 acre lot with mobile homes. The property has an identified intermittent and ephemeral stream as indicated on the adopted Water Resource Protection Zone map. In a letter from the project engineer on the previous land use action it was described as follows: "The existing drainage path is a unique "island" of open drainage that lies within the "Mountain Creek Basin" (name per the City's Stormwater Master Plan) between existing municipal storm drainage facilities located within both Holly Street and Harrison Street. The TREE -2021-00172 545 Holly St../aa Page 1 Master Plan includes the following excerpt: The small Beach, Mountain, and Clear Creek watersheds have been highly encroached by residential development. Ninety percent of the streams 'lengths have been piped. Little native vegetation exists along the stream reaches. The streams pose little threat to property but they show some signs of erosion. " The tree proposed for removal is identified as a large cottonwood estimated to be 16" DBIH and 50' tall. The application, prepared by an ISA certified arborist and included a completed risk assessment form identifying a significant lean towards the house with the only proposed mitigation option being removal. In accordance with the Land Use Ordinance, Notice of Complete Application (HOCA) was mailed to all surrounding properties within 200' of the subject property as well as a physical notice posted along the frontage. No public comment received either in favor or against. At the November regular meeting of the Tree commission the application was reviewed. Staff presented the application and provided an overview for the reason to request the removal. The Tree Commission, after a brief deliberation, determined that the location of the tree and the damaged being caused consisted a hazard and voted unanimously to approve the application as submitted. To be deemed a "hazard tree" the condition or location of the tree must clearly present a public safety hazard. Or, that there is a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and, that such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation or pruning. Based on the materials provided by the applicant and a site visit by staff, it is reasonable to conclude that the subject tree is indeed posing a hazard to the foundation of the building and therefore ought to be removed. Staff finds that the tree, due to its location and size, poses an unacceptable hazard to the property that cannot be reasonably alleviated by means other than removal and replacement. Staff finds the application has sufficiently demonstrated compliance with all applicable approval criteria. The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.7.040.B as follows: 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Staff finds that Planning Action 4TREE-2021-00172, a request to remove one hazard tree, complies with all applicable city ordinances with the imposition of the conditions attached TREE -2021-00172 545 Holly St../aa Page 2 below. Therefore, Planning Action #TREE -2021-00172 is approved. If any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid, for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 4TREE-2021-00172 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. Bill Molnar, Director Department of Community Development November 22, 2021 Date TREE -2021-00172 545 Holly St../aa Page 3 STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1, I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 11/22/21 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each, person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as, set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -TREE -2021-00172, 545 Signature of Employee Documend I1122021 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB8400 ALLEN DAVID S TRUSTEE ET AL 120N2ND ST 'ASHLAND, OR 97520 a PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB90003 BRADLEY THOMAS —TRUSTEE 4928 SENTINEL DR 1-403 BETHESDA, MD 20816 PA -TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8300 DELUCA REVOCABLE TRUST ET AL 228 MORNINGLIGHT DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DC5701 FRENCH TRUST ET AL 500 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391E09DC4800 GORDON CRAIG 344 IDAHO ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 I PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9300 KERRO MARGARETIROBERT KEANE 1991 DORIS AVE LOS OSOS, CA 93402 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9201 REMINGTON MICHAEL B TRUSTEE E 1645 HOLLY ST ,ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DC3400 1SCHINNERER MARVINIMARY 906 POMONA AVE JALBANY, CA 94706 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9001 STRASSBERG-PH[LL[PS RAJA K TR 1712 SE JACKSON PARK RD ,TROUTDALE, OR 97060 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB8500 ALLEN MICHAEL PAUL 578 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9002 BROWN CHAD M ET AL 550 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB90006 EATINGER A R TRUSTEE ET AL 1361 EVAN LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DC2800 GEARY EDWARD A TRUST ET AL 345 HARRISON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ' PA—TREE-2021-00172 391E09DB9100 GRUD[N MELISSA KAPLAN TRUSTEE 625 HOLLY ST ,ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9501 LIGON WILLIAM C TRUSTEE ET AL 640 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391E09DB90004 ROBINSON ANNA MARIE/ERIK 614 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DC4702 SHANAFELT MICHAEL A TRUSTEE E 572 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DC3200 'SYDORIAK WALTER M TRUSTEE ET 622 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391E09DB9400 ATKINS ASHLEY AIATKINS GWEN K 287 HARRISON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391E09DB90000 CREEKSIDE GLEN LTD 400 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB90005 FISCHER MARK A ET AL 8580 DEAD INDIAN MEMORIAL RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB90002 GOODING MATTHEW KIRIO SHANNON 610 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DC3100 HAJEK PATRICIA 5910 RIVER DR MASON NECK, VA 22079 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391E09DB8900 RECORS ERICK 545 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391E09DB8401 RUTTER TIMOTHY J TRUSTEE ET A 541 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9101 SHUMAN AMY C TRUSTEE ET AL 639 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DC4701 TENNANT BARBARA HINICHOLAS M 582 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB90001 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9500 PA—TREE-2021-00172 391 E09DB9502 VOELLM MONIKA ET AL WINTER THOMAS A TRUSTEE WOOD DAVID WNILMA M SILVA 2100 MOUNT DIABLO SCENIC BLVD 634 IOWA ST 646 IOWA ST DANVILLE, CA 94506 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8800 WOOSNAM DAVID T TRUSTEE 620 IOWA ST 'ASHLAND, OR 97520 - 3 d««3l \ w-� _ � \n% S9: Planning Department, 51 Winbw , i Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY OF 541-488-5305 Fax -541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY:1-800-735-2900 -ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -2021-00172 SUBJECT PROPERTY. 545 Holly St. OWNERJAPPLICANT: Eric Recon / Quality Tree Service DESCRIPTION: A request to remove one large cottonwood tree at the property located at 545 Holly St, The tree is estimated to be 16 inches DDH and stands 50,' tall. The application states that the tree has a significant lean towards the residence, While the property is single family and is small enough to be exempt because the tree is located in an identified Water Resource Protection Zone / Flood Plain Corridor .and a permft is required. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 1E 09 DB; TAX LOT: 8900, NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will review this Planning Action at an electronic pub5c hearing on Thursday, Novernber 4, 2021 at 6:00 PM. See page 2 of this notice for information about participating in the electronic public hearing. . . . ......... LI i �4 F Subject Property LI 17) I. 6,45 Holly St. PA-TREE-2021-00172,— LJ 7, . ..... .... M C.—_J 0, Li Actions\Ms by IREE-2021-00172 110C.docx OVER C; Tree Commission Meetinp Notice is hereby given that the Tree Com/..oslnnwill hold anelectronic public hearing .. the above described planning action mn the meeting date and time shown on Page 1. If you wou|d like to watch and listen to the Tree Commission meeting virtuo|ly, but not participate in any discussion, you can use the Zoom link posted on the City of Ashland calendar website . [)rs| testimony will be taken during the electronic public hearing. If you wish to provide oms| testimony during the e|ootrmnk: meeting, send anemail toPC-pubNu-testimmomy@as,h|umd.mr.us&y Unorder to provide testimony etthe public hearing, please provide the following information: 1)make the subject line nfthe email "Advisory Commission Testimony Request", 2) include your name, 3) specify the date and commission meeting you wish to testify at, 4) specify the agenda item YOU wish to speak to, 5) specify if you will be participating by computer or telephone, and 6) the name you will use if participating by computer or the telephone number you will use if participating by telephone, In compliance with the American with DiaabflUtiaa&ot. lfyou need special assistance to participate in this mnoetinB, please contact the City Administrator's office mt541-488-6OS2(TTY phone number 1-8OD-735-29OO). Notification 72hours prior tothe meeting will enab�e the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibillty to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title 1). The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a compIete application for the property noted onPage 1ofthis noti:ice, Because of the COVID-19 pan:demic, application materials are provided online and comments will be accepted by email. Alternative arrangements for reviewing the appi|cationoraubmittingoomnmemtmmanbemnadebvcontscting(541)488'53Q6 or ,4copy ofthe applica�on, jnclud�ng all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are availabie online at "What's Happening in my City"' at htt s-./"s.ashIand,or.usjft���. Copies of application materials will be provided at reasonable coat, if requested. Under extenuating circumstamoem, application materials may be requested to be reviewed in-person at the Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Bui|d|ng, 51 Wimburm Way, via a pre -arranged appointment bvcalling (541)488-53O5oremai|img Any affected property owner or nem�dent has a right to submit written comments to orh:the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 WinbUrn Way, Ashland,, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadbne date shown on Page I Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for m14-daycomment period. After the comment period and not more than 45days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5days ofdecision. Aoappeal tothe Planning Commission ofthe Planning Division Staff's decision must be, mode in writing huthe Ashland Planning Division with�n 12 days from the date of the ma0lng of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1�050.G) The ordinance criteria oppIiceb|e to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide auffinient specificity to afford the decia�om maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUB/) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance o6behom the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions ofapproval with muffioient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. |fyou have questions orcomments concerning this request, please feel free tocontact Aaron Anderson et(541)552'2O52 or . TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 18.5.7�040.B 1. f��U�TO�LAHozm�T�eRemov�Peomhuh�|bagmn�d�the ap�ovaau�o�yfinds NoUmappcn�nnmea��|c4the 1o|�w�gon�Ua.or can bemade hzconform through the impusi§onoYconditions, a. The applicant must demonstrate that the conditon or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard(ia,likely tofall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or prumng, See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such f-0iQmdon requirements shall bnncondition ofapproval ofthe permit, 2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Remy ' permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be grants the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can L _ Fnade to conform through the imposition of conditioi,. a, The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.10. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. C, Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050, Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 18.3.10.050 An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development, C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. Wcomm-dMplannin.- fanning ActionsTAs by Street\liDfloliylflolly_545UIolly_545_TREE-2021-001721Noticing\Holly_545 TREE-2021-00172_NOC.docx AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 10/27/21 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE -2021-00172, 545 Holly. vA `:�7tA dCL,4, Signature of Employee DocumanQ 1012712021 mom== .. .. - TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8400 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8500 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9400 ALLEN DAVID S TRUSTEE ET AL ALLEN MICHAEL PAUL ATKINS ASHLEY AIATKINS GWEN K 120 N 2ND ST 578 IOWA ST 287 HARRISON ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB90003 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9002 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB90000 BRADLEY THOMAS -TRUSTEE BROWN CHAD M ET AL CREEKSIDE GLEN LTD 4928 SENTINEL DR 1-403 550 HOLLY ST 400 ASHLAND ST BETHESDA, MD 20816 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8300 TREE -2021-00172 391E09DB90006 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB90005 DELUCA REVOCABLE TRUST ET AL EATINGER A R TRUSTEE ET AL FISCHER MARK A ET AL :228 MORNINGLIGHT DR 1361 EVAN LN 8580 DEAD INDIAN MEMORIAL RD (ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 i TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DC5701 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DC2800 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB90002 FRENCH TRUST ET AL GEARY EDWARD A TRUST ET AL GOODING MATTHEW KIRIO SHANNON ;13522 SANDHURST PL 345 HARRISON ST 610 IOWA ST SANTA ANA, CA 92705 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DC4800 'TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9100 'TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DC3100 ;GORDON CRAIG GRUDIN MELISSA KAPLAN TRUSTEE HAJEK PATRICIA TREE -2021-00172 391E09DB9300 iKERRO MARGARET/ROBERT KEANE 1991 DORIS AVE LOS OSOS, CA 93402 'TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9201 REMINGTON MICHAEL B TRUSTEE E 1645 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 !TREE -2021-00172 391E09DC3400 1SCHINNERER MARVINIMARY '906 POMONA AVE ALBANY, CA 94706 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9001 ;STRASSBERG-PHILLIPS DAJA K TR 712 SE JACKSON PARK RD ITROUTDALE, OR 97060 ;TREE -2021-00172 391E09DB90001 jVOELLM MONIKA ET AL '2100 MOUNT DIABLO SCENIC BLVD DANVILLE, CA 94506 TREE -2021-00172 391E09DB9501 LIGON WILLIAM C TRUSTEE ET AL 640 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391E09DB90004 ROBINSON ANNA MARIEIERIK 614 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DC4702 SHANAFELT MICHAEL A TRUSTEE E 572 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DC3200 SYDORIAK WALTER M TRUSTEE ET 622 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9500 WINTER THOMAS A TRUSTEE 634 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8900 RECORS ERICK 545 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8401 RUTTER TIMOTHY J TRUSTEE ET A 541 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9101 SHUMAN AMY C TRUSTEE ET AL 639 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DC4701 TENNANT BARBARA HINICHOLAS M 582 HOLLY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB9502 WOOD DAVID WNILMA M SILVA 646 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 391 E09DB8800 WOOSNAM DAVID T TRUSTEE 620 IOWA ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 TREE -2021-00172 QUALITY TREE SERVICE PO BOX 3486 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 645 Holly NOC 10127/21 32 ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION 91� Planning Division A9c ,r r o F 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 47520 FELE # 1WAND 541488-5305 Fax 541-4$$-6006 DESCRIPTION Ot= PROJECT i�N�v �,4 �-� h� fl US ��iDh �D{a � '�Y�d.. . DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED® Certification?. ❑ YES ❑ NO Street Address —54Y H O I %. Ask I do J 01L ql5 a o Assessor's Map No, 391E 0407 Tax Lot(s) Zoning Camp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name M03-rree 5e _Phone t E-mail I"1d I`�fi . t1 a 1 ee �y ICC Address �b g0� 3V _ C�In�#r� ( li" City Zip rrcurl=rc i t uwnI:rz *�E Name 6 1 C k- P-eC©� Phone���� �� E -Mail Address 545 moi) �t- city&WAJ Zip R, -K 3o SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHtTEa LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Title Name Address Title Name Address Phone City Phone City E -Mail E -Mail Zip Zp I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact; are in all respects, true and correct. i understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full msponslbffity, t further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish. i} that l produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request, 2) that the findings of fact furnished jusWas the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate, and further 4) that all structures or Improvements are pmperfy located on the ground Failure in this regard ►viii result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at ft expense. If f have any doubts, l am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. 10 1� '� { o�p �1 A pfica# Signa re Date As owner of the prope in this request, f have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. Property Owner's Signature (required) Date ©ate Received.._.'' . ` Zoning Permit TYPe. l U vV, �Filing Fee x,( Ii,k-- OVER N O:loommd p6nxhgWorma & llmdoaMoMAH FaWt Applin"doc ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS ❑ APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. ❑ FINDINGS OF FACT — Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre -Application Comment document. ❑ 2 SETS OF SCALED PLANS no larger than 11 "x17". Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape details. (Optional —1 additional large set of plans, 2'x3', to use in meetings) ❑ FEE (Check, Charge or Cash) ❑ LEEDO CERTIFICATION (optional) — Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps: • Hiring and retaining a LEEDO Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and construction of the project; and • The LEED® checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued. NOTE; • Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis. • Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. • All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance with ORS 227.178. • The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. (Planning Commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1:30 pm, or the full Planning Commission, which meets at 7:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St). • A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns. • If applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree and/or Historic Commissions. G:Soumnv�levlp3anningSFunns & flmlonss\Zuning Pe mi[ Applic ivmdm x �" a � � '�f s if P 6 '�� r r t a 5 C� � � � d,T• t 'a - nAy 45�,Tr Ye —50- re, 'y'_5 f Id Ag" iP ;µ 'Ft�S RA ;,� $' �. � �, : C L.� <�• � n + � y,� �a �,:rk.. f �u r f ,F ' . t � � •. 1Df L .. r J r. v iO Az 5 rar §tilt --7-Z y � F L c , z rOzWAS sit e _ �.� FIL�Visebl '- Bonded o Insured CCB# 209208 Quality Tree Service RO. Box 3486 ce"t-uql poilt, #197561 InvoicelProposal/Receipt: 118 29 Phone: 541.821.8594, Email: qualitytreeservice@yahoo.com www.qualitytreeservicemedford.com Family Owned and Operated PHONrE EMAIL ADDRESS JOB hQCATION Tq5' )JAV ALJ ClITY, STATE, AND ZIP A5DATE LE DATE 404, 1 � 10 We hereby submit specifications and estimates for: • All Credit/Debit card charges have a 3% fee, • The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. «, You are authorized to do the work as specified. Any cancellations within 48 hours of scheduled service wHI be charged 30% of total job cost. • Payment due in full at time of completion unless otherwise specified below. • Not responsible for any under ground water lines or any unmarked utilities. Customer Signature Date of Acceptance Target zone Occupancy Target description c & .a rate ~ °.�° a w Target protection 3 _ 1—rare m tox x 2—occasional Q �+ 3—frequent R G N h h 9 4—constant 4. r! aaC `C. 1 2 4 Site- :Factors History of failures Dix. Topography Flat❑ Slope❑ % Aspect Site changes None Grade change❑ Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology Rootcuts❑ Describe Soil conditions Limited volume ❑ Saturated ❑ Shallow Compacted ❑ Pavement over roots ❑ Describe Prevailing wind direction_ ._ Common weather Strongwinds)l Ice[] Snow© Heavy rain EJ Describe Tree Health-and Species Pra'rile Vigor Low 13 Normal High 11 Foliage None (seasonal)❑ None(dead)❑ Normal % Chlorotic % Necrotic % Pests/Biotic Abiotic Species failure profile Branchesm Trunko Rootspl Describe Load Factors Wind exposure Protected E3 Partial Full❑ Wind funneling Relative crown size Small❑ Medium$ Large❑ Crown density Sparse❑ Normalb Dense❑ Interior branches Few[] Normal Dense Vines/Mistletoe/Moss ❑ Recent or expected change in load factors Tree defects an. Condi.#tons Affecting the Likelihood of Failure . Crown and Branches rUnbalanced crown { LCR 10 % Cracks ❑ Lightning damage ❑ ead twigs/branches ❑ % overall Max, dia.Codnminanr ❑ included roken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Over-extended branches ) Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Ne a circ. Pruning history Previous branch failures ❑ S' ' ar branches present ❑ Crown cleaned © Thinned ❑ Raised p Dead/Missing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/B Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion-tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartw decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Condition(s) of concern Part Size Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A ❑ Miner ❑ Moderate ig Significant ❑ Load on ct N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible. Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ Ukelih ad of failure Improbable❑ Possible Cl Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ --Trunk — Roots and Root Collar — FDead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/color ❑ Collar buried/Not visible i Depth r O wi) Stem girdling ❑ nantstems ❑ Included bark ❑ Cracks ❑ Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ d damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls ❑ Sap ooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ % circ. Lightning damage[] Heartwood decay[] Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/N e ++st hole % circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root late liftin ❑ Lean65-- Corrected? �)e p g Soil weakness El Response growth Response growth Condition (s) of concern Afq IgOW .Ur Lr v. -L Condition(s) of concern Part SizW IA Fall Distance s _ Part Size Fall Distance Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significantt Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Likelihood offallure Improbable❑ Possible Probable ❑ Imminent ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable© Possible Probable ❑ Imminent❑ Pace I of 2 Hick Matrix 1. Likelihood matrix Likelihood Very low I�'� loose Imminent Unlikely 11.11MEN Likely Very likely 11■■17no MEMO Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely ��.��� ON Unlikely Unlikely ■�1.1■ Improbable UnEikely MAINE MIMMEMENEMEME MMIMMMEMMEMEM Unlikely so Imonsoon Noun sm NN 111■■11■1■■��0 MENEM MEN FINE NEON son soon EMENMENEENEMOMME 1100 Likelihood of Failure. Very low Likelihood of impact Law Medium high Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Possible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable UnEikely Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely tYiabix.Z. Risk ratine matrbc. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Negligible Consequences of Failure Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely taw Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low1 Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Low Law Noes, explanations, descriptions t �.t t LOA-&. A ik h Mitigation Residual risk iJY Residual risk Residual risk Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low ❑ Moderate a High © Extreme Overall residual risk None6 Low © Moderate © High © Extreme © Recommended inspection interval Data �hkinal © Preliminary Advanced assessment needed [Na ©Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations ©None OVisibility ©Access ©Vines lRoot collar buried Describe Ibis datssheetwas produced by the Ynternadonal Society ofAr'bori4ultnce (1SA) -- 2017 Page 2 of 2