HomeMy WebLinkAboutWinburn_21_PA-T1-2020-00126CITY OF
-.SHLAND
November 20, 2020
Notice of Final Decision
On November 20, 2020, the Community Development Director approved the request for the
following:
Planning Action: PA-T1-2020-00126
Subject Property: 21 Winbum Way
Applicant: Tom/Lisa Beam
Description: A request for a Site Review for an exterior change to a Historic Contributing
building. Changes include adding a roll up door on the left side of the entrance, and to add a roll
up window with new counter to the right of the entrance. The entrance itself is to remain
unchanged. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial;
ZONING: C-1-D;MAP: 39 1E 09 BB; TAX LOT: 50003
The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 121h day
after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all
conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project
completion.
The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are
available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51
Winburn Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of
Ashland copy fee schedule.
Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may
request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO)
18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO
18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached.
The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals.
If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the
Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305.
cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel, 541-488-5305
51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900OF
,
www.ashland.or.us
SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice)
E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to
subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days aver the City mails the notice of decision.
F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below,
1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action
alter the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no
fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision.
Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence
during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity
to respond to the issue prior to making a decision.
2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of availing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall
decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter.
3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the
decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse
the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any
party entitled to notice of the planning action.
4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the
reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration.
G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following:
I. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision.
a. The applicant or owner of the subject property.
b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection
18.5,1.050.B.
c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the
City by the specified deadline.
2. Appeal Filing Procedure.
a. Notice of Appeal, Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may
appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this
subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community
organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing
or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refianded.
b. Tune for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of
decision is mailed.
C. Content offotice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain.
i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision.
ii, A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal.
iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal.
iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period.
d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a
jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered.
3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the
Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation,
and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and
arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant
ordinance provision.
4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type II public hearing procedures,
pursuant to section 18,5,1.060, subsections A --- E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final
decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the
adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of
Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305
51 Winhurn Way Fax: 541-552-2050
Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 I
'
www.ashland.onus
ASHLLAND PLANNING DIVISION
FINDINGS & ORDERS
PLANNING ACTION: PA-T1-2020-00126
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 21 Winburn Way
APPLICANT/OWNER: Tom Beam
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Review for an exterior change to a Historic
Contributing building. Changes include adding a roll up door on the left side of the entrance, and
to add a roll up window with new counter to the right of the entrance. The entrance itself is to
remain unchanged.
COMPREIIENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial; ZONING: C-1-D;
MAP: 39 IE 09 BB; TAX LOT: 50003
SUBMITTAL DATE:
October 6, 2020
DEEMED COMPLETE DATE:
October 26, 2020
STAFF APPROVAL DATE:
November 20, 2020
DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.):
December 2, 2020
FINAL DECISION DATE:
December 3, 2020
APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE:
,tune 3, 2022
DECISION
The proposal is a request for Site Design Review approval to modify the existing fag.ade to the
building located at 21 Winburn Way. The property is located in the Detail Site Review,
Downtown Design Standards, and Historic District overlays. The proposal includes replacing the
windows on either side of the entrance with roll up door/windows. To the west of the existing
entrance is the proposed roll -up door, to the east of the entrance a new table will be installed
along with new roll -up windows so that patrons sitting at it will look out at Winburn way and
Lithia park beyond.
The subject property is located at the transition of N. Main St. to Winburn Way with the front of
the building facing N. Main St. and the downtown plaza, the side of the building facing Winburn
Way, and the back of the building facing Calle Guanajuato. The subject property and the
surrounding area are zoned Commercial Downtown (C-1-D).
The National Register of Historic Places documentation for the Ashland Downtown District
identifies the building as a historic primary contributing structure. The building opened as
Weitzel's (Parkview) Department Store in 1947 and was designed in the streamlined Modern
style by noted Klamath Falls architect Howard R. Perrin. In the mid seventies the streamlined
exterior was wrapped in the present Tudor -inspired surface detail and the standing seam metal
roof was added. It concludes that although remodeled, the building retains essential integrity to
its 1947 design beneath these alterations to the period of significance.
This structural modification of the facade triggers Site Review approval according to Ashland
Municipal Code 18.5.2.020.A.4. Any exterior change to a structure, which is... a contributing
PA #T1-2020-00126
21 Winburn Way/aa
Page 1
property within a Historic District on the National Register of Historic Places that requires a
building permit. The application is also required to meet Site Design and Use standards for Basic
and Detailed Site Review, additionally the application must comply with the Historic District
Design standards and Downtown Design standards.
The existing entry is recessed in accordance with the Historic District Design and Downtown
Design standards which call for ground level entries to be recessed from the public right-of-way
to create a sense of entry. The entrance is not proposed to be changed. The applicant also
proposes to replace the fixed windows on either side of the entrance with roll up windows (to the
west) and roll up windows (to the east). Inside the roll up windows the applicant proposes to
install a table where patrons will be able to eat while looking out at Lithia Park. When the roll up
door is closed there will be an approximately 12 — 18 inch solid panel to create a `base'. The
proposed base of the doors with the solid panel will add a sense of strength that will be consistent
across the fagade of the building. It is understood that the roll up doors and windows will have
snatching fames of a dark color similar to anodized aluminum or a substantially similar finish.
The Historic Commission was scheduled to review the proposal at their November 4, 2020
meeting, however they failed to have a quorum so there is no formal recommendation. While the
Historic Commission was unable to snake any recommendations the Staff Advisor consulted
closely with the assigned planner to evaluate consistency with the Historic District Design and
the Downtown Design standards. The sole item that was of concern was a horizontal row of
bricks running across the top of the proposed roll up door. Staff feels that this element is
inconsistent with the Horizontal and Vertical rhythms associated with the rest of the fagade. Staff
communicated with the applicant to discuss this element and compared it to the existing
building. It appears that this horizontal row of bricks was added by the draftsman and was not an
intended design element. A condition of approval has been added that this horizontal row of
bricks shall be removed from the final construction drawings, and instead will finish with the
existing horizontal stucco edge where the vertical Tudor -inspired surface detail end.
The proposed exterior modifications as proposed by the applicant with the one modification
added as a condition of approval mentioned above are consistent with the applicable design
standards. The resulting fagade will be consistent with the City's Downtown Design Standards
and reflect Ashland's simple, traditional, minimalist design that is found throughout the Historic
District.
18.5.2.050 Approval Criteria
An application for Site Design Review shall be approved if the proposal meets the criteria in
subsections A, B, C, and D below. The approval authority may, in approving the application,
impose conditions of approval, consistent with the applicable criteria.
A. Underlying Zone. The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the
underlying zone {part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and
dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation,
architecture, and other applicable standards.
B. Overlay Zones. The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part
PA #T1-2020-00126
21 Winburn Way/aa
Page 2
18.3).
C. Site Development and Design Standards. The proposal complies with the applicable Site
Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below.
D. City Facilities. The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public
Facilities, and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm
drainage, paved access to and throughout the property, and adequate transportation can and
will be provided to the subject property.
E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may
approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the
circumstances in either subsection 1, 2, or 3, below, are found to exist.
1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site
Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing
structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially
negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the
stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the
minimum which would alleviate the difficulty;
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting
the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the
Site Development and Design Standards; or
3. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements for a cottage
housing development, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or
better achieves the stated purpose of section 18.2.3.090.
The application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City ordinances.
Because the property is located in the C-1-1) zone there is no parking requirement. The proposal
does nothing to create additional impacts on public utilities or streets because the size of the
restaurant use is unchanged.
Planning Action 2020-00126 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or
more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then
Planning Action 2020-00126 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to .
the approval:
1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise
modified here.
2) That the plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with
those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit
are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an
application to modify this Site Review approval shall be submitted and approved prior to
issuance of a building permit.
PA AT1-2020-00126
21 Winbum Waylaa
Page 3
3) That the following modifications to the proposed plan be made to be consistent with the
Downtown Design Standards:
a) That there be no brick header along the top of the western opening. The horizontal
edge should maintain the stucco finish and be symmetrical on both sides
b) That the lowest panel of the roll up door be a dark color to provide a base to the
building.
c) That the frame of the roll up door be matt anodized black metal or substantially
similar finish.
4) That the structural engineering for the proposed construction shall be submitted with the
building permit application.
6) That the building materials and dimensions, including colors shall be identified in the
building permit submittals. The information shall be consistent with the colors, texture,
dimensions and shape of materials and building details proposed and approved as part of
the land use application. Exterior building colors shall be muted colors, as described in
the application. Bright or neon paint colors shall not be used in accordance with the
Detail Site Review Standards.
7) The windows on the ground floor shall not be tinted so as to prevent views from outside
of the building into the interior of the building
c
November 20, 2020
Bill Molnar, Director Date
Department of Community Development
PA #T1-2020-00126
21 Winbum Way/aa
Page 4
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON
County of Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On November 20, 2020 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed
envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to
each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list
under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-00126, 21 Winburn.
Signa of Employee
Ducumentl 1112012020
PA-T 1 -2020-0012 6 391E09BB70011
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09B B70005
PA-T1-2020-00126 391E09BB7000
15 N MAIN LLC
ASHLAND HOLDINGS LP
DEMELLO ANTHONY TRUSTEE ET AL
PO BOX 306
PO BOX 306
46 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391E09BB8500
PA-T1-2020-00126 391E09BB14900
PA-T1-2020-00126 391E09BB50000
FREY MATTHEW R TRUSTEE/
HARRIS NEIL A TRUSTEE ET AL
KENNEY JEROME TRUSTEE ET AL
106 E RAPP RD
52 GRANITE ST
707 WESTLAKE AVE N
TALENT, OR 97540
ASHLAND, OR 97520
SEATTLE, WA 98109
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB8600
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB8200
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB70000
KIMNIC LLC
PECKHAM BARRY TRUSTEE ET AL
PLAZA CONDOMINIUM UNIT
PO BOX 11274
40 GRANITE ST #5
OWNERS
ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PO BOX 306
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB70002
PA-T1-2020-00126
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB8400
RHANSEN PLAZA CONDO LLC
TOM & LISA BEAM
WONG TUNG BALL TRUSTEE ET AL
25 N MAIN ST #2
1015 MARY JANE
1147 PARK ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB7700 NOD 11.20.20
ZE ASSOCIATES LLC 13
11 N MAIN ST 21 Winburn Way
ASHLAND, OR 97520
i 09 [S OJL JJ duiaj AJOAV asn
sa}eldwal/woD �Caane o� o�
;Mait Planning Department, 51 WinbLo., Ray, Ashland, Oregon 97520 C I T Y 0 F
5 -488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2�050 www,ashland.orms TTY: 1-800-735-2900 41 -ASHLAND
DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Review for an exterior change to a Historic Contributing building. Changes
include adding a roll up door on the left side of the entrance, and to add a roll up window with new counter to the
right of the entrance, The entrance itself is to remain unchanged.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial; ZONING: C-1 -Di; ASSESSOR'S MAP #: 391 E 09 BB;
TAX LOT: 50003
NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will review this Planning Action at an electronic public hearing on Wednesday, November 4, 2020 at
6:00 PM. See page 2 of this notice for information about parficipating in the electronic public hearing.
I I I
plail oil Igg•zw Inj o I m g K*1 allyl :4 1 a a k, gets] m I m 1 :110 1 RMI k1=11 TITMI]WOR11
ONZA&M
AcfiowMs by StTeeAMWin1burnMflhurn_2 Way 21PA-11-2020-00 126,, NOC.docx OVER C;
Historic Commission Meeting
Notice iphereby given that the Historic G, mission will hold an electronic public hea,,.,g on the above described planning
action owthe meeting date and time shown onPage 1.
Anyone wishing to submit written comments can: dosobysending ame-mail tmPC-pub[io-temtimmuny@ash]omd.or.wmwith
the subject 0ne"Advisory Commission Hearing Testimony" by .
If the applicant wishes to provide a rebuttal to the testimony, they can submit the rebuttal via e-mail to PC-public-
testimony@ashland.or.us with the subject line "Advisory Commission Hearing'Testimony" by 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday,
November 3'2020.Written testimony received hythese deadlines will be available for Historic Commissioners tmreview before
the hearing and will beinc8udedinthe meeting minutes.
If you wish to virtuaUly attend or listen to the Historic Commission meetings, send an email to PC-publiG-
testimony@ashland.or.us by In order tovirtually attend or listen to the commission
meeting, please provide the following information: 1)make the subject line ofthe email "Advisory Commission Participant
Request", 2) include your name, 3) specify the date and commission meeting you wish to virtually attend or listen to, 4) specify if
you will be participating by computer or telephone, and 5) the name you will use if participating by computer or the telephone
number you will use if participating by telephone. Please note, participants that sign up to virtually attend or listen to a commission
meeting will not beallowed tospeak during the meeting.
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact
the City Administrator's office ot541-4BB~OOO2(TTYphone number 1-U0D-755-29DO). Notification 72hours prior tothe meeting
will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35,1O2.-35,1O4ADATitle ]).
The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete app�cation for the property noted on Page 1 ofthis notice.
Because of the COVID-19 pandernic, application materials are provided online and comments will be accepted by email.
Alternative arrangements for reviewing the application or submitting comments can be made by contacting (541) 488-5305
o r .
/\ copy ofthe application, including all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online at "What's
Happening inmyCity" at ,Cop�|esmfmpp|�nationmaterials vviUUbeprovided
at reasonable cost, if requested, Under extenuating oiroummtanoem, application materials may he requested to be reviewed
in -person atthe Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services BuiXd[nB, 51 VVinhurn Way, Via a pre -arranged
appointment bycalling (541)4O8-53O5oremaifing
Any affected property owner or res�dent has a right to submit written comments to ortmthe City of
Ashland Planning Division, 51 W�nburn Way, Aoh|ond, Oregon 97520 prior to4:3D p.m. on the deadline date shown on Page
1.
Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if m Land Use epp|ioebom is complete within 30 days of submittal, Upon
determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application
which allows for a 14 day comment pehod. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application be�m0
deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision onthe application. Anotice ofdecision ismailed to
the same properties within 5days ofdecision, Anappeal tothe Planning Commission ufthe Planning Division Staff'sdeoielon
must be made in writing tothe Ashland Planning Division witNm 12 days from the date of the mailing of final deole|Vn (AMC
18.5.1.050.G)
The ordinance criteria appicabUe to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law sbabae that failure to raise an
objection concerning this app[hoedion, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an
opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of/\ppeoUa (LUBA) on that issue.
Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your hBht of appeal to LUB/\ on that
criterion. Failure mfthe applicant to raise constitutional or other issues ra|afing to proposed conditions of approval with
sufficient opeoffidtyto allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court,
If you have questions or comments concerning thiis request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at 541-552-2052 or
2 1»^-TI Way 21J^I'-2020-Oo/26 nocA)cx
SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS
18.52050
The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application:
A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), induding but not limited to: building and
yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architeotunm, and other applicable
standards.
B. Overlay,Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3),
C. She Development and Design Standards: The pmpoaa|uomp||en with the app|ioeb[o Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as
provided bysubsection E.below.
D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities fmrwater,
sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject
property,
E. £xcej4imm to the Site @eve/opnemt and Dam/gm Standards: The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design
Standards ufpart 184iythe circumstances ineither subsection 1nr2.below, are found knexist.
1. There isademonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements ufthe Site Developmentand Design Standards due toaunique munusual owpao
of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will riot Substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and
approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum
which would alleviate the diffinu|ty.;or
2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves
the stated purpose ofthe Site Development and Design Standards.
^muns*x byytre"mmw /-2020o0/26_nncducx
AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING
STATE OF OREGON
County of .Jackson
The undersigned being first duly sworn states that:
1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland,
Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department.
2. On October 26, 2020 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a
sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action
notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set
forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA-T1-2020-
00126, 21 Winburn Way.
Signature of Employee
C:Wserslsr ilhda.AFNNEDesktopVAFFIDAVIT OF WILINGA=1012NO20
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB70012 PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB70003 PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB7000
15 N MAIN LLC ASHLAND HOLDINGS LP DEMELLO ANTHONY TTEE ET AL
PO BOX 306 PO BOX 306 46 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391E09BB8500
EREY MATTHEW R TRUSTEE
106 E RAPP RD
TALENT, OR 97540
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB8600
KIMNIC LLC
PO BOX 11274
ZEPHYR COVE, NV 89448
PA-T1-2020-00126 391E09BB70002
RHANSEN PLAZA CONDO LLC
RON HANSEN
25 N MAIN ST #2
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126
TOM BEAM & LISA BEAM
1015 MARY JANE AVE
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB 14900
HARRIS NEIL A TRUSTEE ET AL
52 GRANITE ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB8200
PECKHAM BARRY TRUSTEE ET AL
40 GRANITE ST #5
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB8400
WONG TUNG BALL TRUSTEE ET AL
1147 PARK ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
10/2612020
21 Winburn Way NOC
13
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB50003
KENNEY JEROME TRUSTEE ET AL
707 WESTLAKE AVE N
SEATTLE, WA 98109
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB70000
PLAZA CONDOMINIUM UNIT OWNERS
ASHLAND HOLDINGS LP
PO BOX 306
ASHLAND, OR 97520
PA-T1-2020-00126 391 E09BB7700
ZE ASSOCIATES LLC
11 N MAIN ST
ASHLAND, OR 97520
I vivi n
WRITTEN FINDINGS
SITE: 21 Winburn Way
October 1, 2020
The property is in the downtown commercial C-1-D zone. The property has been conforming
and operating as a full -service restaurant since 2009. The currently licensed business is in a
mixed -use building and is in compliance with the criteria to operate as such business with a
permitted A-2 occupancy. The business will continue with the same ownership and service level
as it has for the past 12 years, a casual downtown eatery. With the implications of COVID19 and
consumer demands to frequent business with more personal space and outdoor capacity, we
are investing in changes to address those needs and expectations. The planned replacement of
the front windows to roll -up windows will allow for more airflow. The business will continue to
apply for the permitted use of Sidewalk Dining and seating on Calle Guanajuato.
The new roll -up windows/doors will continue to respect downtown design standards and
maintain the same look of by way of black metal framed windows that match the existing
window package. There will be no change to the exterior paint color from the existing SW
Rookwood Terra Cotta. As well, the brick exterior material will match existing facade.
This project will not create any increase in demand to City utilities and/or facilities. Again, this is
a cosmetic enhancement to an existing business. There will not be any negative impacts to
adjacent properties
NPS Form 10-900-A
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet
Section Number; 7 Page; 24
OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86)
Ashland Downtown Historic District, Ashland, OR
Department is a two-story concrete volume that opened in June 1947. Designed in the
streamlined Moderne style by noted Klamath Falls architect Howard R. Perrin and built by
Ashland contractor C.E. Borg, Weitzel's was considered Ashland's first "modern"
department store operation.17 Perrin, born and educated in Rhode Island, graduated from
Brown University and relocated to Klamath Falls in 1922. In Jackson County he designed
the "Yardstick" model home: and the Crater Lake Ford [Winetrout] Building in Medford, a
major addition to Lincoln School in Ashland, and worked on the designs of Camp White.
Responsible for a majority of the commercial buildings in downtown Klamath Palls, his
most notable projects in that county include the Willard Hotel, the Klamath County ,sail
and city halls for Doris and Lakeview. (Who's Who, 1942:331)
Corner show windows are finished in rounded plate glass with tranquil green carrara
glass trim, making display space unique and modernistic... Eleven of the most
modern apartments in Ashland have been constructed in the second floor of
Weitzel's Department store...the entrance at 15 Winburn way is attractively
finished in glass brick with [a] wide green linoleum covered stairway trimmed in
chrome. Rounded corners add a modernistic touch to the hall ways. (Tidings, 26-
June-1947, 3:1-5)
By 1955 the operation was renamed the "Park View Department Store," and remained in
operation, under that name through the late 1970. Converted to office and retail use, the
streamlined exterior was wrapped in the present Tudor -inspired surface detail and the
standing seam metal roof was added. Today two recessed storefronts face the Plaza and an
additional two storefronts are located on the south elevation while second floor remains in
apartment use. Although remodeled, the Weitzel Department Store Building retains
essential integrity to its 1947 design beneath these alterations and so adequately relates its
original development during the WWII portion of the period of significance.
ID# 21.0
CALLE GUANAJUATO, NORTH ENTRY
0 MAIN ST N
No Style
391E09BB 7500
Vacant: Park/Recreation
Historically this tax lot was the site of a masonry building but now is a city -owned property
that provides access the alley between the row of buildings on the west side of the Plaza
and the channel of Ashland Creek. Named "Calle Guanajuato" after Ashland's sister city
in Mexico, this corridor serves as both a service access for these Plaza merchants and as
public park, with regularly scheduled festivals, crafts fairs and similar uses. Calle
Guanajuato terminates at the southern end of the Plaza, joining the bridge over the Creek
at the entrance to Lithia Park on Winburn Way, behind the Weitzel Department Store
Building. (Site 20.0)
17 See Tidings, 26-June-1947.
NPS Form 10-900-A
United States Department of the Interior
National Park Service
National Register of Historic Places
Continuation Sheet
Section Number: 7 Page: 23
OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86)
Ashland Downtown Historic District, Ashland, OR
As originally constructed, the Crocker Building was of exposed brick exterior with an
elaborately detailed cornice. Today, the exposed brick of the east elevation remains,
however the front elevation has been stuccoed, probably as a part of the 1945-46
remodeling. The storefront, while also remodeled and rebuilt with aluminum sash, retains
general compatibility and does not seriously detract from the overall character of the
building. A specific element of note is the painted wall graphic of the east elevation,
"Ashland's Noted Second Hand," probably painted in the late 19`h or very early 201h
century.
Occupied by Brother's Restaurant for more than 20 years, the Josephine Crocker Building
retains high integrity and effectively relates its development history during the period of
significance.
ID# 19.0
SABAT1No'S RESTAURANT BLDG
75 MAIN ST N
Modern Period: Late 20th C Historic Period
1970c
391E09BB 6000
Non -Compatible, Non -Historic, Non -Contributing
Historically this prominent corner site was occupied by a brick building similar to the
Josephine Crocker Building, located to the west.
The two-story brick building at the corner of Granite and N Main St is being
demolished by the owner, Lloyd Selby ... the building known to many Ashlanders as
the "old Dennis McCarthy building" was built in the early 1900s by the first
Southern Pacific engineer to pull a train into Ashland. (Tidings, 17-Aug-1962, 1:5)
This present single story masonry building, designed in a vaguely Pueblo -inspired style with
stepped parapet detailing and projecting "vigas" or rafter tails, was apparently constructed
sometime in the late 1960s or early 1970s. and housed a series of predominately Italian
restaurants, most notably "Sabatino's" along with "The Vintage Inn," a popular folk music
night club in Ashland during the late 1970s and early 1980s. In the 1990s the building was
divided into its present configuration of multiple office and restaurant spaces. Minimally
compatible with its zero setback, the overall design and use of materials of the Sabitino's
Restaurant Building is incompatible with the historic architecture of the downtown
ID# 20.0 s..v.Y#2r2
WiETZEVS 1PARKV1EW1 DEPT STORE
115 MAIN ST N (5 North Main)
Architect: Perrin, Howard R.
Early Modern: Art Moderne/Streamlined
1947
391EO98B 7600
Builder: Borg, C. E.
Primary Contributing
Built on the site of Emil Peil's blacksmith and implement shop and the 1906 addition that
was built in connection with the Bank of Ashland Extension,is the Weitzel/Park View
I6 See Sites 22.0 and 23.0,
� X
a Q o
41
R
O
O
J
ti' I LL O
9'
r-- —..
City of Ashland
Community Development Department
51 Winburn Way
Ashland, OR 97520
Telephone: 541-488-5305
Inspection Line: 541-552-2080
Plan Type: Type I Planning Action
Work Class: Type I Planning Action
PA-T1-2020-00126
Apply Date: 10/6/2020
I 391 E09BB50003 I 21 Winburn Wy I
Owner: Jerome Kenney Trustee Et Al
Owner 707 Westlake Ave N
Address: Seattle, WA 98109
Phone: () -
Applicant: Lisa/Tom Beam
Applicant 1015 Mary Jane Ave
Address: Ashland, OR 97520
Phone: (541) 488-5493
I Site design review for window replacement on Sesame in downtown. I
Fee Description: Amount:
Commercial Site Review (Type 1) $70.00
Other Type I planning review $1,092.00
Applicant:
Date:
e�famee e $1,162.00