Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLogan_218_PA-T1-2021-00170CITY OF ASHLAND February 16, 2022 Notice of Final Decision On February 16, 2022 the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA -T1-2021-00170 Subject Property: 218 Logan Drive Applicant: KenCairn Landscaping for Bonnington Description: A request for a Physical & Environmental (P&E) Constraints Review Permit s the construction of a new home on a previously approved lot, prior to the implementation of the Hillside Standards Ordinance. The base of the house is located on slopes of 35% to 45%, and these steep slopes have determined how the house was designed, which is to minimize disturbance to the greatest extent possible. Due to the steepness of the site, and the intent to minimize disturbance, the project is requesting an exception to the split foundation step back standard identified in the ordinance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; MAP: 39 1 08 AA, TAX LOT: 6913 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12'r' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winbum Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Aaron Anderson in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax; 541-552-2050 Ashiand, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 Nvww.ashland.or.us 9LI-11 SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any parry entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any parry entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Piling Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.G.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Time for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and steal I contain. i. An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type H public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541.488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 =U_ wwiv.ashland.onus ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA -T1-2021-00170 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 218 Logan OWNER/APPLICANT: KenCarin Landscaping for Bonnington DESCRIPTION: A request for a Physical & Environmental (P&E) Constraints Review Permit s the construction of a new home on a previously approved lot, prior to the implementation of the Hillside Standards Ordinance. The base of the house is located on slopes of 35% to 45%, and these steep slopes have determined how the house was designed, which is to minimize disturbance to the greatest extent possible. Due to the steepness of the site, and the intent to minimize disturbance, the project is requesting an exception to the split foundation step back standard identified in the ordinance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; MAP: 39 lE 08 AA, TAX LOT: 6913 SUBMITTAL DATE: November 19, 2021 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: December 22, 2021 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: February 16, 2022 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): February 28, 2022 FINAL DECISION DATE (4:30 p.m.): March 1, 2022 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: September 1, 2023 DECISION The application requests a Physical and Environmental (P&E) Constraints Review Permit to allow the construction of a new Single -Family Residence on Hillside Lands with Severe Constraints for the property at 218 Logan Drive. The application includes requests for Exceptions to the Development Standards for Hillside Development Standards for step back footings as provided at AMC 18.3.10.090.E.2.b. The subject property is located on at the terminus of Logan Drive and was created as Lot -12 of Logan Drive Phase 2 platted in 1991 (CS 13097). The property, and surrounding neighborhood in all directions but the west is zoned R-1-10, to the west is City owned parkland. The subject property has an area of 14,577square feet (or 0.33 acres) and is irregularly shaped and steeply sloped lot (shown at right). The lot has 45 -feet of frontage along the Cul De Sac that ends Logan Drive. The property is presently vacant, with many trees. The property slopes to the east with an average slope of 26 - PA -T1-2021-00170 218 Logan Drive/aha Page 1 percent. The adjacent Logan Drive right-of-way is developed with curb only and has all city utilities. The application describes the proposal as follows: This proposal involves the construction of a new home on a previously approved lot, prior to the implementation of the Hillside Standards Ordinance. The center of the site is primarily over 35% slope, and this is the location of the building envelope. The vehicle access to this lot is predetermined and constrained by easement to enter on slopes under 2501o, to get to the homesite the drive crosses more intense slopes the closer it gets to the home. The base of the house sites on slopes of 35% to 45%, and these steep slopes have determined how the house was designed, which is to minimize disturbance to the greatest extent possible. Due to the steepness of the site, and the intent to minimize disturbance, the project is requesting an exception to the split foundation step back standard identified in the ordinance. There are many mature native trees on site and the location of the home preserves the greatest number possible; there are 10 trees proposed for removal and 14 proposed to be preserved. The project will require an exception to the Hillside Standards for step back footings (split pad foundations (18.3.10.090. E. 2. b) The application includes a geotechnical report prepared by Marques and Associates which includes geotechnical and structural engineering review all of the proposal and recommendations for storm drainage, erosion control and long-term maintenance for the proposed site development. The application also includes written findings addressing the approval criteria for Physical & Environmental Constraints Review Permit for Development of Hillside Lands with Severe Constraints and Exceptions to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands Physical & Environmental Constraints Review Permit for the Development of Hillside Lands The first approval criterion for Hillside Development review is that, "Through the application of the development standards of this chapter (see AMC 18.3.10.080 Development Standards for Hillside Lands, AMC 18.3.10.100 Development Standards for Wildfire Lands and AMC 18.3.10.110 Development Standards for Severe Constraints Lands), the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized." The application explains that the application of the requirements of the Hillside Ordinance, the oversight of a geotechnical expert and structural engineer, and the implementation of the erosion control plan, the potential adverse impacts of the proposal will be minimized. The applicant emphasizes that the development has structural retaining walls to lessen the impact of a structure on the site, and that limited terracing and site disturbance are proposed to minimize the area of disturbance. The application emphasizes that the proposed residence is sited to minimize site disturbance by limiting the footprint and reducing the driveway length and asserts that the proposal complies with lot coverage Iimitations and has little disturbance outside of the footprint of the building. The proposed residence responds to the hillside topography by stepping back reducing the building height and mass, Iimiting visual impacts to the adjacent properties. In considering the lot coverage, staff notes that the allowed lot coverage within the zoning district is 40 percent, the application proposes a total of 37.3 -percent. The second approval criterion is, "That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused PA -T1-2021-00170 218 Logan Drive/aha Page 2 by the development. " The application explains that the entire property has slopes in excess of 25 percent, but based on the findings of the geotechnical expert, the site is stable for construction. The geotechnical report includes a number of recommendations that shall be required to be incorporated into the design. The site, though very steep displays no slipping or slumping. The foundation and structural retaining walls have been engineered, and the geotechnical expert will provide periodic inspections of the site to verify the development recommendations are being complied with. Erosion control measures including a graveled entrance, silt fencing and bio - bags are proposed for erosion control measures. Specific drainage recommendations are provided by the geotechnical expert and will be incorporated into the grading and drainage plans created by the project engineer. All erosion control measures will remain in place throughout the duration of the site work portions of construction. The applicant indicates that with the implementation of erosion control systems utilizing the installation of silt fencing and storm water drainage consistent with the recommendations of the geotechnical report the proposed site development will not create any hazards. The final criterion is, "That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The StaffAdvisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. " The applicant concludes that the design of the engineered single-family residence and associated site development has taken all reasonable steps to reduce adverse impacts to the environment including limiting the building footprint, placing it as near the street as possible to Iimit site disturbance and minimize driveway length, and reducing the area of impervious surfaces and site disturbances. Exceptions to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands The application includes requests for Exceptions to the Development Standards for Hillside Development Standards for step backed foundation. The application explains the need for the exception as follows: This lot was created before the implementation of the Hillside Ordinance and has much steeper slopes than would be allowed under the current ordinance structure. Building to the standards defined in the ordinance would requires the house floors and foundations to be pushed further back into the site. Where this strategy might work well in buildable areas up to 35%, it creates excessive disturbance in steeper lots, creating the need for more grading and terracing into the steep hillsides. This would also have the effect of more tree removal. Allowingfor a more vertical approach to the building will allow for less site disturbance and preservation of frees. The house footings step back where possible, and the proposed home incorporates the front and side step -backs required by the Hillside Design Standards. This exception allows this project to respond more fully to the goals of this chapter. Tree Removal The application states that there are ten trees proposed for removal and that they are all located within the building envelope or the driveway. The application states that "The project was PA -T1-2021-00170 218 Logan Drive/aha Page 3 designed to preserve the greatest number of trees possible." and "Eleven trees are proposed as mitigation and they exceed the required mitigation sizes." Public Input Notice of the planning action was mailed to all properties within 200 feet of the subject property as well as a physical notice posted along the frontage of the property. The notice included a staff contact name and number. In accordance with AMC 18.5.1.050, the Type I procedure for planning applications allows a 14 -day period for the submission of written comments, starting from the date of mailing. No written continent was received by the public, however during the public comment period the assigned staff planner received one inquiry on the phone from an adjacent property owner. The application was discussed, and the property owner was also able to have conversations directly with the applicant and their design team. No written comment was ever submitted. The approval criteria for a Physical Constraints Review Permit are detailed in AMC Chapter 18.3.10.050 as follows: A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter (see AMC 18.3.10.080 Development Standards for Hillside Lands, AMC 18.3.10.100 Development Standards for Wildfire Lands and AMC 18.3.10.110 Development Standards for Severe Constraints Lands), the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. The approval criteria for an Exception to the Development Standard for Hillside Lands are detailed in AMC Chapter 18.3.10.090.H. as follows: Exception to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands. An exception under this section is not subject to the variance requirements of chapter 18.5.5 Variances. An application for an exception is subject to the Type I procedure in section 98.5.9.050 and may be granted with respect to the development standards for Hillside Lands if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. 1. There is demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of this chapter due to a unique or unusual aspect of the site or proposed use of the site. 2. The exception will result in equal or greater protection of the resources protected under this chapter. 3. The exception is the minimum necessary to alleviate the difficulty. 4. The exception is consistent with the stated Purpose and Intent of chapter 18.3. 10 PA -T1-2021-00170 218 Logan Drive/aha Page 4 Physical and Environmental Constraints Overlay chapter and section 18.3.10.090 Development Standards for Hillside Lands. The criteria of approval for a Tree Removal are described in Ashland Municipal Code (AMC) 18.5.7.040.8.2 which require that all of the following criteria are met: a. The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.3.10. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. c. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. The applicants have submitted a complete set of Findings addressing their burden of proof to the Planning Department to demonstrate compliance with the applicable approval standards for the proposed partition and by their reference are incorporated as if set out in full. In staff's assessment, the application with the attached conditions complies with all applicable City Ordinances. Therefore, Planning Action 4PA-T1-2021-00170 is approved with the following conditions. Further, if any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action 4PA-T1-2021-00170 is denied. The following conditions are attached to the approval. 1) That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically modified herein. The plans submitted for the building permit shall be in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application. If the plans submitted for the building permit are not in substantial conformance with those approved as part of this application, an application to modify this Hillside Development approval shall be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a building permit. 2) That all conditions of the original subdivision approval shall remain in effect unless otherwise specifically modified herein. 3) The building permit submittals shall include: PA -T1-2021-00170 218 Logan Drive/aha Page 5 a. Identification of all easements, including but not limited to any public or private utility or drainage easements. b. Foundation plans designed by an engineer or architect with demonstrable geotechnical design experience in accordance with 18.3.10.090.C. C. A storm drainage plan that is designed, constructed and maintained in a manner that will avoid erosion on-site and to adjacent and downstream properties in accordance with 18.3.10.090.C.1. Storm water from all new impervious surfaces and runoff associated with peak rainfalls must be collected on site and channeled to the City storm water collection system (i.e., curb gutter at public street, public storm pipe or public drainage way) or through an approved alternative in accordance with Ashland Building Division policy BD -PP -0029. 4n -site collection systems shall be detailed on the building pennit submittals. The storm drainage plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the Ashland Engineering and Building Divisions with the building permit application. d. Written verification from the project geotechnical experts addressing the consistency of the building permit plan submittals with the geotechnical report recommendations (e.g. grading plan, storm drainage plan, foundation plan, etc.) shall be submitted with the building permit submittals. C. Solar setback calculations demonstrating that the proposed construction complies with the Solar Setback Exception approved herein, including elevations or cross section drawings clearly identifying the highest shadow producing point(s) and their height(s) from the identified natural grade. f. Lot coverage calculations including all building footprints, driveways, parking, and circulation areas. Lot coverage shall be limited to no more than 20 percent of the site are (3,062.6 square feet) as required in AMC 18.2.5.030.C. An additional 200 square feet of porous solid surface meeting the requirements of AMC Table 18.2.5.030.C.2 and 18.6.1.030.P may be exempted from the maximum coverage calculations. This porous solid surface exemption does not apply for driveway or parking areas, but may include pervious asphalt, pervious concrete, grass or permeable pavers, or decks that allow infiltration. In addition, the plans shall include demonstration that at least 5499 percent of the site is retained in a natural state as required in AMC 18.3.10.090.8.3. 4) That prior to the issuance of a building permit: a. That the temporary erosion control measures (i.e. silt fence, hay bales/settling pond, bio -bag curb -inlet protection) shall be installed according to the approved plan, inspected and approved by the Staff Advisor and project geotechnical expert prior to any site work, storage of materials, issuance of an excavation permit and issuance of a building permit. 5) That the General Fuel Modification Area fuel reduction requirements as outlined in 18.3.10.100.B are completed prior to bringing combustible materials onto the property and the Fire Department conducts an inspection to verify fuels reduction is complete. 6) That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy: PA -T1-2021-00170 218 Logan Drivelaba Page 6 a. The landscaping and irrigation for re -vegetation of out/fill slopes and erosion control shall be installed in accordance with the approved plan prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. Vegetation shall be installed in such a manner as to be substantially established within one year of installation. b. Street trees with irrigation shall be planted along the frontage of the property according to the city's Recommended Street Tree Guide. C. New landscaping installed shall comply with the General Fuel Modification Area standards (18.3.10.100.B) and shall not include plants listed on the Prohibited Flammable Plant List per Resolution 2018-028. d. That The Galli Group Engineering Consulting shall inspect all sitework involving earthworks, foundations, and rock placement and compaction as indicated in their Steep Slope and Geotechnical Design Report dated September 25, 2019 and included in the application. Prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy, The Galli Group Engineering Consulting shall provide a final report indicating that the approved grading, drainage and erosion control measures were installed as per the approved plans, and that all scheduled inspections were conducted by the project geotechnical expert periodically throughout the project. e. That prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the frontage improvements shall be completed according to the approved subdivision plan which included curb side sidewalks with street trees behind the sidewalk along the northerly part of the lot, and parkrow with street trees where the curb bulbs out on the southerly 75 feet of the frontage. 7) That all measures installed for the purposes of long-term erosion control, including but not limited to vegetative cover, retaining walls and landscaping shall be maintained in perpetuity on all areas in accordance with 18.3.10.090.B.4 — 6 and the recommendations of the geotechnical report prepared by The Galli Group Engineering Consulting. Bill Molnar, Community Development Director February 15 2022 Date PA -T1-2021-00170 218 Logan Drive/aha Page 7 County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1 Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Manning Action #PA -T1 -2021 - rlrljrlljwg.� P - Signature of Employee G:(comm-deO&nnlnglPlanning AchumTAs by SVeeftLMLoganILogarL_2l8iLogan_218LPA- Tl-2021-001IONA)tcingtiNQDOB-_Logan—PA-Tl-2021-00170_NOD_,Mfldavit of Malling.dau 211612022 PA -T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA6913 BONNINGTON JEFFREY ALANINUZHA 6642 NW MERIDIAN RIDGE DR PORTLAND, OR 97210 PA -T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA7005 JONES DON H JR TRUSTEE ET AL PO BOX 353 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 147 CENTRAL AVENUE ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6917 LONERGAN JAMES H TRUSTEE ETA 4901 WORNALL RD 1003 KANSAS CITY, MO 64112 PA -T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA6915 TAYLOR JEFFREY S & BROOK L RE 204 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 218 LOGAN 02/16122 NOD 15 PA -T1-2021-00170 391E08AA7003 COMTE DONN J TRUSTEE 175 PIEDMONT DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA7004 JONES DON H TRUSTEE JR ET AL 195 PIEDMONT DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA6919 LESLIE SUZANNEITIMOTHY 190 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA6914 PHELPS WILLIAM SABIN TRUSTEE 214 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6918 WOOLF PHILIP MARKIO'SCANNELL 194 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 I PA -T1-2021-00170 ERIC LAURSEN BUILDING AND DESIGN 244 VAN NESS ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 KAMPMAN SHAWN PO BOX 459 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6912 LOGAN DRIVE HOMEOWNERS ASSN 219 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -T1-2021-00170 SWANSON RICK MARQUESS AND ASSOCIATES 1120 E JACKSON MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA -T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA7006 ZAPF STEPHEN EISUZANNE E 602 SUTTON PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 9:7520 CITY OF rp, 541-488-5305 Fax:541-552-2050 www. ash land or.us TTY:1-800-735-2900 -ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION SUBJECT PROPERTY: 218 Logan OWNER/AP PLI CANT: KenCairn Landscaping for Bennington DESCRIPTION: A request for a Physical & Environmental (P&E) Constraints Review Permit for the construction of a new home on a previously approved lot, prior to the implementation of the Hillside Standards Ordinance. The base of the house sites on slopes of 35% to 45%, and these steep slopes have determined how the house was designed, which is to minimize disturbance to the greatest extent possible. Due to the steepness of the site, and the intent to minimize disturbance, the project is requesting an exception to the split foundation step back standard identified in the ordinance. There are many mature native trees on site and the location of the home preserves the greatest number possible; there are 10 trees proposed for removal and 14 proposed to be preserved, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-10; MAP: 39 1E 08 AA, TAX LOT. 6913 NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission wiil review this Planning Action at an electronic public hearing on Thursday, January 6, 2022 at 6:00 PM. See page 2 of this notice for information about participating in the electronic public hearing. I OVER G kanm devlpinnin,\Phnning ActionsTAs by S(reet\L\LoqaTALopn 218kLogan 218 PA-T1-202]-00170\Ncfi6ng%218 Lagan. PA -TI -2021-H170 NOC.dacx Tree Commission Meetings Notice is hereby given that the Tree Commission will hold an electronic public hearing ort Lne above described planning action on the meeting date and time shown on Page 1. If you would like to watch and listen to the Tree Commission meeting virtually, but not participate in any discussion, you can use the Zoom link posted on the City of Ashland calendar website htt is,//www. ash la no. or. u s/cale no ar. asp,. Oral testimony will be taken during the electronic public hearing. If you wish to provide oral testimony during the electronic meeting, send an email to PC-public-testimony@ashiand.or.us by 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, Janna rV 6, 2022. In order to provide testimony at the public hearing, please provide the following information: 1) make the subject line of the email "Advisory Commission Testimony Request", 2) include your name, 3) specify the date and commission meeting you wish to testify at, 4) specify the agenda item you wish to speak to, 5) specify if you will be participating by computer or telephone, and 6) the name you will use if participating by computer or the telephone number you will use if participating by telephone. In compflance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's office at 541-488-60012 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours, prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements, to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title 1). The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted on Page 1 of this notice. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, application materials are provided online and comments will be accepted by email. Alternative arrangements for reviewing the application or submitting comments can be made by contacting (541) 488-5305 or pLanninq@ashland or us. A copy of the application, including all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online at "What's Happening in my City" at httos://ais.asliland.or.us/develoomentproposals/. Copies of application materials will be provided at, reasonable cost, if requested. Under extenuating circumstances, application materials may be, requested to be reviewed in-person at the Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winbuirn Way, via a pre -arranged appointment by calling (541) 488-5305 or emailingplanniiAi Cgshland,or,us. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to lannin e ashland.or.us or to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p,m, on the deadline date shown on Page 1. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.0) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes Your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at 541-552-2052 or aaron . ancle rson @ash land, or. us. PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 18.3.10.050 An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5,1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the folbwing criteria, A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized, B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. Cr�Nconrm-devkplaridiiiig%PlanningActioiis\PAsbyStree7�T-\Logaii\Lub,ati 2"�Logan218rPA-TI-2021-OU17ONNrrtioi,iL.218 Lov,,a6i_PA-TI-202fl-00170_.NOCdocx C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable stel, reduce the adverse impact on the environment. 1! -sible actions shall beconsidered more seriously than reversible actions, The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing utjvelopment of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. EXCEPTION TO THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR HILLSIDE LANDS 18.3.1 0MOM Amexception under this section iumcdaubjec to the variance requirements ofchapter 18.5.5Vehemoes.An application for amexception is subject tothe Type | procedure insection 1B.5.1.OSOand may bagranted with respect tnthe development standards for Hillside Lands if the proposal meets all ofthe following criteria. 1, There is demonstrabie difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of this chapter due to a unique or unusual aspect of the site or proposed use ofthe site. 2 The exception will result inequal orgreater protection nf8mrmv uomspmtentedundertkisvhapter. 3. The exception imthe minimum necessary toalleviate the difficulty. 4. The exception iaconsistent with the stated Purpose and Intent of chapter 18.1 l 0 Physical and Environmental Constraints Overlay chapter and section 1R.110,090Development Standards for Hillside Lands, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (AMC %53.040B) Hazard Tree. AHazard Tree Removal Permit shall begranted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all ofthe following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions, a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i,e,, likely tofall and injure persons or oroforeseeable danger ofproperty damage hnmuexisting structure orfmcH8v and such hazard ordanger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18,6, b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall baacondition ofapproval nfthe permit. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for m tree that in not m hazard shall be granted if the approval authority flnda that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a� The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application h»beconsistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited toapplicable GdeDemelopmem{ondDem[gnStandandoinped18.4endPhyoico|ondEnvinonmanta| Constraints |npart 18jO. b. Rernoval of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow Of Surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, orexisting windbreaks. o. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the, subject property, The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives tothe tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists toallow the property &obaused mspermitted inthe zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density b»be reduced below the permitted density allowed bythe zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. e. The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7,050. Such mitigation requirements shall beacondition nfapproval ufthe permit, STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I arn employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On December 23, 2021 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -T'1-2021-00170, 218 Logan Drive. a.. . •Ime Groomni-dowplanning4PVannin8Aofions4PAsbySg e,et4LwLoganILogaii-21M,Logan 218 -PA TI -2021-0017INcEdngk21:Uogan_PA-TI-2021-C,C 1-10 Affidavit of Malling.dou 12.)23/2021 "'�a tau rv`p PA—T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA6913 PA—T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA7003 PA—T1-2021-00170 BONNINGTON JEFFREY ALANINUZHA COMTE DONN J TRUSTEE ERIC LAURSEN BUILDING AND DESIGN 6642 NW MERIDIAN RIDGE DR 175 PIEDMONT DR 244 VAN NESS PORTLAND, OR 97210 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA7005 JONES DON H JR TRUSTEE ET AL PO BOX 353 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—T1-2021-00170 391E08AA7004 JONES DON H TRUSTEE JR ET AL 195 PIEDMONT DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 -PA-T1-2021-00170 PA—T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6919 KENCAIRN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE LESLIE SUZANNEITIMOTHY 147 CENTRAL AVENUE 190 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ' PA—T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6917 PA—T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6914 LONERGAN JAMES H TRUSTEE ET A PHELPS WILLIAM SABIN TRUSTEE 4901 WORNALL RD 1003 214 LOGAN DR KANSAS CITY, MO 64112 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6915 PA -T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6918 TAYLOR JEFFREY S & BROOK L RE WOOLF PHILIP MARK10'SCANNELL 204 LOGAN DR 194 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 218 LOGAN .12123121 NOC 15 s PA—T1-2021-00170 KAMPMAN SHAWN PO BOX 459 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—T1-2021-00170 391E08AA6912 LOGAN DRIVE HOMEOWNERS ASSN 219 LOGAN DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA—T1-2021-00170 SWANSON RICK MARQUESS AND ASSOCIATES 1120 E JACKSON MEDFORD, OR 97504 PA—T1-2021-00170 391 E08AA7006 ZAPF STEPHEN EISUZANNE E 602 SUTTON PL ASHLAND, OR 97520 6�0 - z 'a 1 7 -M V) Lu WEU® L, i's 'OL R W as Lu 42g Q7 "r Cgi1 IOE 6�0 - z 'a ,aoSaap gr ea�,gay. a aLva anss^� � snip` 11P.�0"i ,Z PtBO.m 'MTZ -ON 801 rm IS w W nasty z w w vO vp NAL ` R 5 z w 4 0 s w p UUOOO R. k ¢W 211 Z2 in",.�.~o O4ll W Q JO J J o W CL 2 KqW, KZ acL__ 00 Q n g u m znO gum cc Open Wyk y�- w 00 V) �W Jti WU I`tU tQ..h ��ti ti s ti�q=�La _ J �G lJwj Q. m� z ZUW I—� q"=w Z WQ W W zx W a -k' w0 Y JwQgoo Q ! '.-I,_ W now ��m gOwVi [r V7U WO "'i"\raiz o (^ 1, O�W<LO� cn QQ D;UpUg�3F=.��sp ycn zo s"_ r_^ Oti Q OW WO`zz O A D;[tW�� T(nQ YINFT-W TOZO2Q La 0 b n 0 e _ W U } h, O O qC[ z WU ° Fx-. Wz o �o �.'2w wO~w O i''JtiQO W j �i Z 4kO p Ow Q Q qW 4 2Q O �UiW Jho=~"�`� ti ozq�121 } ti m cnp ¢ wQi o i' o w� ci �z z� 4p_ ��p6 �U8 s' Q.Oj Z p Z~ �� - -IQW W°WK mO low" (� 2?O D 2� ZqN W ZUC Q �� Vdl ]U ZC !,3. CL W W OUa4O0 V)O comm Qv nw > Q �cQg oq? w a� s ¢J oz 0 1211 tlilOZW '° W° X Z z IW_ C'C�IQ. O JtiwlW- t� Op U� aW� Jdw�l. wd ovs w J p m on; w Q o_� oco Jw o q w o w ° w T Q w r^ `� 4..W wZ O qWQ;. �--4 SX V) �<Y (nW OC7V tn~q xO vl �V W JF= ZOp QW �W q ~ lu p 2WW I,u Up qg 4� pa lZi'.Q CW.7Q-�ZCJcTpW FW -U LLL �WUJ °5 Q� Oz WQ >U �-. 4U g? WJ �%- VCU QW �4,. >q pZ W �� W UOQ O{.-- QQ J UO 4W Qz°W z ZU�CO.7U zW kCj Fw-1K J4. �a (Zj Ute~ CQ U� tm W1n IW -T IO.Q �'�401: Zvi Zvi OQ 2W jO t "Lmin °OLi W q LW a , O°Q m� O 4w( w� �gtiO [r },Z W� �W�UW qj �"-.I z� WO ,aq L. 6, -r,, � mq WD- a''Iz W �WJ O" gxOZ wUJ W W O Q J O O J z 1 cn cn z ti.. U W w Q Z?vlti!i ?tn- QU mtn JZp Z4 ZwOZ JQ QU6 '-� Wx J w J I-- Zq O U �- O�nWt.UjV ZV Wti "t~ Z~ q�cn ik �O Y WWro J�.. L�L,,`IIO 2 ¢W-`'' �-J..I .r?cn� �Oti cW�Wv� � J OZ � (n U71 W W cn 4 Jaz Q --:I m J T Fy W ( ,-L: ciQ ° Q v- G I^-�S h -W U}' WU �w Uv�O I,- OUQ CqO �O� �7a g D;Qa; UC ��KO wO1-wQ AQUI-..0 Qm Q 0.. �O O U op ow iw �cw,a a� meq¢ �> tiz� �W �Qz �� �z�w �=w� �) 4 ct O>- �wy� W q O W 4. 4gz 44 �� W �,Jj I` W �~ jv11 -IU) rrnn 2a p� qQW !�Q i�0 za W� �cnt'nwZT OZ Qln vJ I <"¢W ,--I O� OR WO >`�OC �"� -WW1. tu>C O'=C O.Z O�� 00' OD;Z z= w�O�' O=J� D_(Y_�Q: �Q Oq C-) Q- aU m OR. ®Q ®(nw D_W aUl ®.., o5W aW W>y eV7 SOU ®UI-OQ WZONING PERMIT APPLICATION mil Planning Division CITY Of 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 FILE # ASHLAND 541488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Pursuing LEED@ Certification? 0 YES Cl' NO Street Address 218 LOGAN DRIVE Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E zoning RI -10 ME APPLICANT Name Eric Laursen Name Jeffrey Bonnington and Nushat Ara Tax Lot(s) 6913 Comp Plan Designation Phone 541488 1244 E -Mail ericlau;,rsendesign@gmaii.com Phone 5306675591 E -Mail Address 6642 NW Meridian Tidge DR - at, Portland zip.�721 0 SURVEYOR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECT, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER Tilde Planner -Name Kerry KenCairn Phone 541488-319,4 E -Mail ken-y@kencaJmTandscape.wm Address 147 Central Ave city Ashland zip 9 0 Title -NamePhone E -Mail . ............. Address City Zip I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, live and correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection, In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes to)) responsibility. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufflcient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request; 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are property located on the ground. Failure in this regard joll result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed atmy 49y fiWl am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. ��t t b 2-( Applicant's Siignature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, I have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. �56NN -_t " VG10 P- � I - t85 -09-1 Property Owner's Signature (required) Date rro be Complaled by Cly SW9 Date Received Zoning, Permit Type Filing Fee $ OVER 0 Wcm m. deV p1wrfinSW omis & klwidowskZoning permit Applica 8 omdm ,I Planning Division 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520 C 1 7 y0 r 541-488-5305 Fax 541-488-6006 ASHLAND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT ZONING PERMIT APPLICATION FILE# ,A` T (-10 (Y)IJO DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY street Address 218 LOGAN DRIVE Pursuing LEEDO Certification? ❑ YES ❑ NO Assessor's Map No. 391 E 0811 Tax Lot(s) 6913 Zoning R1-10 Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT Name Eric Laursen Phone 541 488 1244 E -Mail ericlaursendesign@gmail.com Address 244 Van Ness cityAshland Zip 97520 PROPERTY OWNER Name Jeffrey Bonnington and Nushat Ara Phone 8306675591 E -Mail Address 6642 NW Meridian Tidge DR city Portland Zip97210 SURVEYOR ENGINEER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OTHER Title Planner Name Kerry KenCalrn Phone 541488-3194 E -Mail kerry@kencalmlandscape.com Address 147 Central Ave city Ashland Zip 97520 Title dame Phone E -Mail Address City Zip I hereby certify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact are in alt respects, true and correct I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection. In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect, the owner assumes full responsibility. l further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: f) that l produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request - 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request; 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate; and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being set aside, but also possibly in my structures being built in reliance thereon being required to be removed at my expense, if i have any doubts, tam advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. Applicant's Signature Date As owner of the property involved in this request, l have read and understood the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner. Property Owner's Signature (required) Date Un be completed by City Staff) 7 �.� it ( �%i Zoning Date Received -4 � . i g Permit Type ���#1�./� Filing Fee $ OVER N Wcomnrdevlplannm,-loans & HandoutlVoning Permit Applicalion.doc ZONING PERMIT SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Li APPLICATION FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. u PLANNING FEES FORM must be completed and signed by both applicant and property owner. ❑ FINDINGS OF FACT — Respond to the appropriate zoning requirements in the form of factual statements or findings of fact and supported by evidence. List the findings criteria and the evidence that supports it. Include information necessary to address all issues detailed in the Pre -Application Comment document. ❑ TRUE SCALE PDF DRAWINGS — Standard scale and formatted to print no larger than 11 x1 7 inches. Include site plan, building elevations, parking and landscape details. ❑ FEE (Check, Charge or Cash) ❑ LEED® CERTIFICATION (optional) — Applicant's wishing to receive priority planning action processing shall provide the following documentation with the application demonstrating the completion of the following steps: • Hiring and retaining a LEED® Accredited Professional as part of the project team throughout design and construction of the project; and • The LEED® checklist indicating the credits that will be pursued. 1X911_14 • Applications are accepted on a first come, first served basis. • Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) AND property owner(s), all required materials and full payment. • All applications received are reviewed for completeness by staff within 30 days from application date in accordance with ORS 227,178. • The first fifteen COMPLETE applications submitted are processed at the next available Planning Commission meeting. (Planning Commission meetings include the Hearings Board, which meets at 1,33 pm, or the full Planning Commission, which meets at 7:00 pm on the second Tuesday of each month. Meetings are held at the City Council Chambers at 1175 East Main St). • A notice of the project request will be sent to neighboring properties for their comments or concerns. • If applicable, the application will also be reviewed by the Tree and/or Historic Commissions. Mcomm-devlplwining\Fonm & Handcuts\Zoning N—it Application.doc Application Submittal — New Home in Hillside Lands November 19, 2021 Owner Jeffrey Bonnington and Nuzhat Ara 6642 NW Meridian Ridge Drive Portland, Oregon 97210 530.667.5591 Landscape Architect and Planning Kerry KenCairn KenCairn Landscape Architecture 147 Central Avenue Ashland, OR 97520 541488-3194 Building Design Eric Laursen Building and Design 244 Van Ness Ashland, Oregon 97520 541488 1244 Address: 218 Logan Drive, Ashland, Or Zoning Residential 1-10 with P Overlay Tax lot 391E08AA 6913 Geotechnical Engineer Rick Swanson Marquess and Associates 1120 E Jackson Medford, Oregon 97504 541 772 7115 Surveyor Shawn Kampman Polaris Land Surveying PO Box 459 Ashland, Oregon 97520 541482-5009 Building Contractor Eric Laursen Building and Design 244 Van Ness Ashland, Oregon 97520 541488 1244 R Required Code Sections 18.2.4 General Regulations for Base Zones 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones 18.3.10 Physical and Environmental Constraints -Hillside 18.4.5 Tree Preservation and Protection 18.4.8 Solar Access 18.5.7 Tree Removal Permits Bonnington P and E 218 Logan Drive Project Description This proposal involves the construction of a new home on a previously approved lot, prior to the implementation of the Hillside Standards Ordinance. The center of the site is primarily over 35% slope, and this is the location of the building envelope. The vehicle access to this lot is predetermined and constrained by easement to enter on slopes under 25%, to get to the homesite the drive crosses more intense slopes the closer it gets to the home. The base of the house sites on slopes of 35% to 45%, and these steep slopes have determined how the house was designed, which is to minimize disturbance to the greatest extent possible. Due to the steepness of the site, and the intent to minimize disturbance, the project is requesting an exception to the split foundation step back standard identified in the ordinance. There are many mature native trees on site and the location of the home preserves the greatest number possible; there are 10 trees proposed for removal and 14 proposed to be preserved. The project will require an exception to the Hillside Standards for step back footings (split -pad foundations (18.3.10.090.E.2.b) Chapter 18.2.4 GENERAL REGULATIONS FOR BASE ZONES 18.2.4.010 Access and Minimum Street Frontage Complies, this lot abuts a cul-de-sac. Chapter 18.25 STANDARDS FOR RESIDENTIAL ZONES 18.2.5.030 Unified Standards for Residential Zones This property falls into the Rural Residential zone R1-10. The project meets all set back requirements and is a previously approved lot. Please see the Site and Materials Plan in the graphic submittals. Chapter 18.8.10 Physical and Environmental Constraints 18.3.10.060 Land Classifications B. Hillside Lands. This site is predominantly over 25% and is a lot developed prior to the implementation of the Hillside Ordinance; it falls under the Hillside Lands category. C. Wildfire Lands. This project falls with the wildfire lands classification. D. Severe Constraint Lands. This project is considered a sever constraints lands project as most of the slopes are over 35% E. Classifications Cumulative. The whole project needs to be reviewed through all three of the above criteria. 18.3.10.090 Development Standards for Hillside Lands A. General Requirements. The following general requirements shall apply in Hillside Lands: Bonnington P and E 218 Logan Drive 1. Buildable Area. This lot is predominantly over 35% and the proposed structure is in lands over 35% a. the buildable lands for this project are all over 35% and this proposal is for one single family home 2. Building Envelope. All newly created lots either by subdivision or partition shall contain a building envelope with a slope of 35 percent or less. This is pre-existing lot. 3. New Streets and Driveways. New streets, flag drives, and driveways shall be constructed on lands of less than or equal to 35 percent slope with the following exceptions: b. The portion of the street, flag drive, or driveway on land greater than 35 percent slope does not exceed a length of 100 feet. The proposed drive is 80 feet long and the portion that crosses slopes over 35% is approximately half of that length. 4. Geotechnical Studies. For all applications on Hillside Lands involving subdivisions or partitions, the following additional information is required: a geotechnical study prepared by a geotechnical expert indicating that the site is stable for the proposed use and development. The study shall include the following information: A geotechnical study has been provided with this application. B. Hillside Grading and Erosion Control. All development on lands classified as Hillside shall provide plans conforming to the following items: 1. The grades and cuts on this project have been designed by the project Landscape Architect, incorporating the direction and details provided by the project engineers. 2. Timing of Improvements. Grading of this site will begin in May 2022. 3. retention in Natural State. Not applicable, this lot is under one half acre. 4. Gradin —.Cuts. On all cut slopes on areas classified as Hillside Lands, the following standards shall apply: The cut slopes on this project are proposed to be retained with a segmental retaining wall system. The walls with be engineered by the project geotechnical expert. All cuts are terraced and retained. There are some cuts/walls that are proposed to be over 5 feet in height, this has been done to preserve natural state and minimize impact over the site. the project is steep enough that keeping wall at five feet or less tends to create more extensive cuts as it takes more grading for the top of proposed walls to catch existing grade. All terraces are designed to support vegetation, and are therefore over 3 feet in depth. Terrace wall section do not exceed 15 feet as prescribed in the ordinance. The terraces for this project are designed to be revegetated and this proposal includes a graphic planting plan that makes use of appropriate plant materials in all disturbed and terrace locations. Bonnington P and E 218 Logan Drive 5. Grading — Fill. On all fill slopes on lands classified as Hillside Lands, the following standards shall apply: All proposed fill slopes are contained by either segmental retaining walls or in the home entry, concrete retaining walls. The driveway has a portion of fill that is adjacent to the neighboring property to the North and is contained in asphalt drive and retained. There are some fill slopes adjacent to the house that will be completely revegetated. There is no need to have any utilities in the fill slopes other than travelling up the drive, which is the most appropriate location for getting utilities to the homesite. There will be a common trench up the middle of the drive, the utility plan will be developed by the project engineer or other appropriate professional with input from City of Ashland departments. All area of exposed soil will be revegetated and irrigated per the graphic planting plan. 8. Site Grading. The grading of a site on Hillside Lands shall be reviewed considering the following factors: All grading is being performed with the sole intention of getting access to the site by vehicles and pedestrians. 9. Inspections and Final Report. The ^geo-technical expert will write a final report on the progress of this project. C. Surface and Groundwater Drainage. All development on Hillside Lands shall conform to the following standards: Stormwater from this project will be directed to the city of Ashland drainage system in Logan Drive. D. Tree Conservation, Protection and Removal. All development on Hillside Lands shall conform to the following requirements: 1. Inventory of Existing Trees, A graphic tree inventory is included with this project. 2. Evaluation of Suitability for Conservation. The evaluation criteria are included on the graphic inventory. 3. Tree Conservation in Project Design. There is one 12" DBH Oak of being proposed for removal, it is too close the building excavation and could not be preserved. The building envelope and driveway were designed to preserve as many trees as possible. The project is in wildfire lands, and a wildfire plan is included in the graphic documents. Site utilities will utilize the driveway to get access to the site. and therefore, no trees shall be affected by the utility placement. 4. Tree Protection. On all properties where trees are required to be preserved during the course of development, the developer shall follow the following tree protection standards: Please see the tree protection plan submitted with this project. Bonnington P and E 218 Logan Drive 5. Tree Removal. Development shall be designed to preserve the maximum number of trees on a site. The development shall follow the standards for fuel reduction if the development is located in Wildfire Lands. When justified by findings of fact, the hearing authority may approve the removal of trees for one or more of the following conditions: All tree proposed for removal fall with the excavation zone of the drive or the homesite. 6. Tree Replacement. There are ten trees proposed for removal, the project planting plan identifies 11 trees proposed to be planted. E. Building Location and Design Standards. All buildings and buildable areas proposed for Hillside Lands shall be designed and constructed in compliance with the following standards: 1. Building Envelopes. This was a pre-existing lot and does not necessarily comply. 2. Building Design. a. The building height does not exceed 35 feet from natural grade. b. Cut buildings into hillsides to reduce effective visual bulk. See exception request below. d. The design incorporates the following guideline: Continuous horizontal building planes shall not exceed a maximum length of 36 feet. Planes longer than 36 feet shall include a minimum offset of six feet. e. The design incorporates multiple and varied roof pitches. f. The design incorporates the use of roofs as decks. g. The design incorporates the use of natural coloration. F. The foundations have all been designed per geo-technical recommendations by a structural engineer. G. This is a pre-existing lot. H. Exception to the Development Standards for Hillside Lands. This lot was created before the implementation of the Hillside Ordinance and has much steeper slopes than would be allowed under the current ordinance structure. Building to the standards defined in the ordinance would requires the house floors and foundations to be pushed further back into the site. Where this strategy might work well in buildable areas up to 35%, it creates excessive disturbance in steeper lots, creating the need for more grading and terracing into the steep hillsides. This would also have the affect of more tree removal. Allowing for a more vertical approach to the building will allow for less site disturbance and preservation of trees. The house footings step back where possible and the proposed home incorporates the front and side step -backs required by the Hillside Design Standards. This exception allows this project to respond more fully to the goals of this chapter. 18.3.10.100 Development Standards for Wildfire Lands Afire prevention and control plan has been submitted as part of the graphic materials. 18.3.10.110 Development Standards for Severe Constraint Lands Please review geotechnical reports and graphic submittals to determine the response to severe constraints section. Bonnington P and E 218 Logan Drive 18.4.5.030 Tree Protection Please see the tree protection and removal plan submitted with this application. Chapter 18.4.8 SOLAR ACCESS This home has been designed to conform to solar setback A and meets all the required standards for this category. A 20 -foot tall shade producing point requires a 27.3 -foot setback on this property. There is no location where this structure is 20 -feet tall on the north facade. This structure meets the solar ordinance requirements. The highest shade producing points and their setback distances front eh north property line identified below (refer to sheet A3.2 for reference): A 19'-7" above natural grade and 51' from North property line B 6'- 6" above natural grade and 44 feet from North property line Average Slope of the property to North = + .06653 Average North/South lot dimension is 123.16' Shade producing point A 19'-7" — 6'= 13'-7" 13'-7" /5115 = 26' setback complies. Shade producing point B 6'-6"-6'=6" Not going to bother with this one. Chapter 18.5.7 TREE REMOVAL PERMITS A. General Submission Requirements. There are 10 trees proposed for removal on this property. All trees proposed for removal lie within the proposed driveway and/or homesite footprint. Tree removal will most likely occur in February 2022. The project was designed to preserve the greatest number of trees possible. Eleven trees are proposed as mitigation and they exceed the required mitigation sizes. Prior to requesting a verification permit, all trees slated for removal will be tagged with orange survey tape, and all trees on the site are tagged and numbered with aluminum arborist tags. Please see graphic response Sheets L 1.2 Tree Protection and Removal Plan which identifies trees to be removed, and L 2.0 Planting Plan which identifies mitigation trees. 18.5.7.040 Approval Criteria Bonnington P and E 218 Logan Drive B. Tree Removal Permit. All trees proposed for removal are to allow for consistency with the development standards. Removal of these trees will have no effect the stability of the site as their locations will be integrated into the site development construction for this project which in itself will define an upgraded site stability and erosion control. Surface waters will not be greatly disturbed by the placement of the home and driveway, the improvements are all at the bottom of the site. the density and species diversity within 200 feet of the site is predominantly scrub oak, ponderosa pine and incense cedar, the surrounding area is if anything overly forested. This project will not greatly affect canopy density or diversity, and will instead add to both. 18.5.7.050 Mitigation Required A. Replanting On Site. The mitigation trees will be planted on site D. Mitigation Pian. Please see graphic response Sheets L 1.2 Tree Protection and Removal Plan which identifies trees to be removed, and L 2.0 Planting Plan which identifies mitigation trees. Bonnington P and E 218 Logan Drive pwailltj& CITY OF q�0 ASHLAND clTy OF Instructions: Identify imeach section how compliance with �R327'4Wildfire HozardMitigation requirements are achieved (Check and fill in information for aH that applies), Roofing (13327.4j) yNote: There are adcl�onal requirements for preventing intrusion of embers and flames in open spaces between roofing and roof deciding and additional flashing requirements. Rain Gutters (R327.4.3.1) IV I Non-combustible rain gutter with non-combustible corrosion -resistant screening. Vents (Flame and Ember-Resista.nt).: Eave, Soffit, Cornice, and Ceiling <12 fee above grade or surface below (R327.4.4) —7—Location MaterW (Minimum Class 8) Manufacturer Product Nme Flre-RiesJstanee. RatingClas A, or B Cal Metal eemenfiLau- uoaUng over plywood sub-MrWe Innovative Chemical Products Pli-Dek Class A _-Manufacturer Rain Gutters (R327.4.3.1) IV I Non-combustible rain gutter with non-combustible corrosion -resistant screening. Vents (Flame and Ember-Resista.nt).: Eave, Soffit, Cornice, and Ceiling <12 fee above grade or surface below (R327.4.4) —7—Location Manufacturer Product Name Approval Listing # Por h and Roof Overhangs Cal Metal Vulcan Vent ESL -1 299 _-Manufacturer All Other Vents (R327.4.4) V IMat rial Corrosion -resistant with maximum 1/8" non-combustible corrosion -resistant metal mesh Exterior Wall Covering (R327.4.5) Note: There are additional requirements for how wall coverings terminate, For comibustible siding/wall covering., fill out the following table or explain how you will achieve requirements: City ofAshl,and 1 51Winburn Way, Ashland, OR., 97520 l� 541�8-5305 1 ww�.ash1anc1.or.L1S Location Orientation Materia 1 I ProductNamo Approval Listing# _-Manufacturer V One layer of minimum 5/8" exterior grade Type X behind covering or 1 -hour fire -resistive assembly City ofAshl,and 1 51Winburn Way, Ashland, OR., 97520 l� 541�8-5305 1 ww�.ash1anc1.or.L1S Overhanging Prooections, Roof Eaves, Soffits, Cornices,, Patio Porch Ceilings, or, Underfloor Protection of Elevated Structures (111327.4.6.1.4) Note: Gable end overhangs beyond an ext. wall other than at the lower end of rafter tails are exempt. one layer of minimum 5/8" exterior grade Type X behind covering or I-hourfire-resistive assemb I Walking Surfaces (111327.4.71 Note: Fill this in for any combustible surface decking material planned. If none, label N/A. —Ing . . . . pky,w� �nb-- I Innovative Chernk;al Products I Pli-Dek I Class A M�ater , lial All, dual glazing, tempered glass, glass block, or a fire, resistance rating of not less than 20 min. Applicant Name Kerry Kencairn/ Eric Laursen Applicant Signature Date 11/18/2021 City of Asliland 1 51 Winburri Way, Ashland, OR, 97520 l 541-488-5305 1 www.a sh latid.or. LIS d 'All �U Isk c M (Z co 7,10 m 77, �J a qj (TI, I IJ r"I Yet :.D M �z R3 7, 1 Cif c in rr) alu, tz no 0 C, as n n Y) 10 7C o -i- if Ij J !'�— C) 01 t'l I_, 'En 7 u no LI (D I j 0 Qf �j (j r.1 c V V X: (1i vcz, - j Vj (7) I'd 10) Lj 'All �U 0 M (Z co 7,10 m 77, �J a qj (TI, I IJ ul W R3 In E t c ID no > T, as n n Y) 10 o -i- if Ij J !'�— C) C1 ,�j c� I_, 'En 7 u no (D I j 0 Qf �j (j c V X: (1i vcz, - j �U is M (Z co 7,10 �J a qj (TI, I IJ ul A f1 6 In E t c ID no > T, as C Y) 10 o -i- if Ij J !'�— C) C1 ,�j J, I_, 'En tz iz (D I j Q) �j (j E: �j YJ M (Z �J (TI, I IJ c ID J- o -i- C) Q) �j V j (7) I'd Y ci Lj Ili q'i o 0 Gi En I VI Cl I J m M c3 o q) r); uc U IS U c, 1-I - - C M rlO �L, c E: �j YJ M (Z �J (TI, I IJ fj ID J- C C) V j (7) M A A w, S () C I A I E5 Date: August 26, 2021 To: Eric Laursen P 541-772-7115 F5779-4079 1120 1 AST J A( _KN P0 I'M 490 MU �FOR I), OR 97501 E 41 -MAI L: COP11 WOEB: �k vviN 11"IM-C ILI From: Rick Swanson, P.E., G.E. RE: Geotechnical Engineering Design Recommendations Proposed Residence at 218 Logan Drive, Ashland, Oregon MAI Job No. 21-1185 As requested, we have: prepared this letter for the proposed residence at 218 Logan Drive in Ashland, Oregon. As part of the preparation of this letter, we met with you at the property on August 19, 2021, observed the surface conditions, observed the subsurface conditions that were exposed in two exploratory test pit excavations, and discussed the proposed construction. The residence is expected to be a two-story structure over a daylight (basement) garage. Tile structure will be set deeply into the upsloping hillside and it is expected that the garage level will require cuts on the order of 5' and 10' deep, respectively, at the front and at the rear of the proposed residence. Site Conditions The site is vacant, undeveloped, and forested. The property slopes steeply uphill to the west. An irrigation ditch, and the adjacent ditch access road, lie along the western property line. The property is bounded by an existing residence on the east and by undeveloped and forested land on the north and south. No outcrops of granitic bedrock were observed on the site, but outcrops were observed in the irrigation ditch just north of the subject property. No signs of unstable soils or hillside instability were observed. Two exploratory test pits were excavated in the proposed building pad on August 19, 2021, with a small to medium sized trackhoe provided by JM Construction. Test Pit 1, which was located on the uphill side (near the proposed most southerly comer of the building pad), encountered 1.3' of loose, dry silty sand overlying decomposed granodiorite bedrock. Test Pit 2, which was located on the downhill side (near the proposed most easterly comer), encountered l' of loose, dry silty sand overlying decomposed granodiorite bedrock. The granodiorite encountered in Pits I and 2 was dense to very dense and was observed to the depths explored (9' in Pit I and 7' in Pit 2) in the test pits. No groundwater was observed in the test pits during excavation. Eric Laursen August 26, 2021 Page 2 of 3 The geologic map of the area (Beaulieu and Hughes, 1977, Land Use Geology of Central Jackson County, Oregon: DOGAMI Bulletin 94) indicates the site is underlain by diorite and granodiorite. The nearest known active fault (fault displaying movement within the last 10,000 years) system is the Sky Lakes Fault Zone that lies over 30 miles east of the site. Geotechnical Engincerine Design Recommendations We believe the proposed development can be constructed as proposed provided the recommendations contained in this letter are incorporated into the design and construction of the project. • All existing organic -laden soil should be removed from beneath the building pad and from beneath future general fills and site hardscaping. • All soil should be removed from beneath building footings and building slabs. Site excavations for future general fills or hardscaping should be made flat and stairstep up- or down -hill to enable placement of structural fills or general fills on flat subgrade surfaces. • Upon completion of pad excavation work, we should be called out to observe the excavations to check for weak or deleterious materials. • The on-site soils are not suitable for re -use as structural fill beneath the building. The excavated decomposed granodiorite bedrock may be re -used as general fill in landscaping and embankment areas. All fill materials must be compacted to at least 95 percent relative compaction in accordance with ASTM D698 Method A and until hard and stable. All fill should be placed in 8" thick (maximum) loose lifts. The compaction should be verified by either periodic density testing or by proofrolling, where appropriate, with a loaded 10 cy gravel truck. • Finished cutslopes and fillslopes should not exceed 2 horizontal to I vertical. All new slopes should be protected from erosion and sediment loss by installing erosion protection measures (plantings, netting, hydroseeding, mulching, etc.). • Building footings may bear directly on decomposed granodiorite bedrock or on a thin layer of structural fill, such as well -compacted, high quality 3/4"-0 crushed rock, that is underlain by decomposed granodiorite bedrock. Building footings supported in these manners may be designed for an allowable bearing pressure of 3000 psf for dead plus live loadings and this pressure may be increased by one-third for short-term loadings (wind or seismic). Lateral loads can be resisted with a friction coefficient of 0.35 and a passive pressure equal to an equivalent fluid pressure of 300 pef. • All slabs should be underlain by at least 6" of structural fill, such as well -compacted, high quality 3/4"-0 crushed rock, and all weak soil should be removed from beneath slabs. SIab subgrades should be thoroughly hardened by compaction and proofrolled, where possible, with a loaded truck under our observation. • The proposed lower level slab of the residence should be protected from adverse water penetration with an underslab drainage system. This drainage system should include 8" of mechanically tamped, free -draining 3/4" crushed rock (no fines, no round rock) over bedrock or over structural fill underlain by bedrock. Three-inch diameter, perforated, rigid PVC pipes should be placed about 2" above the bottom of the free -draining crushed rock and spaced about 10' apart beneath the slab in an X -Y pattern and starting about 5' inboard of the perimeter retaining wall foundations. The pipes should be connected by a Eric Laursen August 26, 2021 Page 3 of 3 solid pipe sloped at 2% or steeper to some suitable discharge facility downslope of the house. A true waterproofing barrier should also be placed atop the free -draining rock. • Retaining walls should be supported on footings designed in accordance with the criteria stated above. Unrestrained walls with level to gently sloping (less than 25 percent slopes) backslopes should be designed to resist an equivalent fluid pressure of 40 pelf. Where restrained, walls with similar backslope conditions should be designed for 60 pef. Where backslopes exceed 25 percent, but are no steeper than 50 percent, the above equivalent fluid pressures should be increased by 20 pef. Adequate backdrainage must be provided behind all retaining walls, and interior walls should be thoroughly waterproofed. • A foundation drain should be placed adjacent to the perimeter building footings (except where retaining wall backdrains are required) to control moisture beneath the structure. The backdrains should be set as low as possible to enable maximum subdrainage control. Exterior grades around the structure should be sloped away from the structure. • There is a natural swale at the site that will cause slope runoff to drain towards the proposed residence. We suggest that this drainage be diverted around the residence by cutting/filling a new surface drainage facility (rather than a catch basin and underground piping) in the rear and side yard areas. Please call us if you need additional foundation design criteria. This brief letter has been prepared in accordance with generally accepted soil and foundation engineering principles and practices in this area. No other warranty, either expressed or implied, is made. es— ra -9 0 N.9 0 13 g"a �N,0'1`9'NINNOG L10-4 S-7-7VM EINQ:J33NIE3N3 ON/MV128 7VIN3WJ33 I-A o 9m IIE i F Ui J1,1 09 a a 15 O e. ial 01 -------------- S .JECi # G [jif fig IjI- �gl Z/ \ C /§k )/%` R ±/>.0) : \/� z000 /z\3 oE\ > - _\ /� \ - / uo m\ , C r)® R \/ /\ z°�~ /z\3 [ / - /� \ - / m Z U LL] z w0 ------------- Z g r o >Nr co J Q Qr 0 o Q N ?mr� WON CC a' Z $ zU �4Q1 z o zco 0� z U < - o �uU 0?tn W ❑ �Q O w Ua ------------- Z g r zw g°� W o Q Z¢ O LEO Z o Z Iil N n (n ° o ¢macro a o L n d 5 r u) o) AmLD ro U)X N 3 �z 4 ZO' ¢m zom UzO ¢z v 7 g,r N W C�� LL,Na Z n p w �z �o z o g w _O Z W 40 a o L n d a Z zg - UJ = )( �\( » \ G W ® )o 2 \ } ) \z, / / ® O // 7 zu /:& j± : y! ,$e a<° u u3 : = m \\ /§ \ K/»K //\6 / ® : j± / _ u ,! Z Z WN Z a L 0 d U) O 4�O �p]L WAN s o zoq Jam zoo Uzu <Z,. U >I N z ° p t W O N¢ Zd 0 w �zzo z U) o macLcL Z a L 0 d z / .\ /§2 //2 / « z D0) ma/} 0 © . }) Z \<m z(�0 \ \ 00 j® - �\ \ \U �\� < . r(I-2 j/ / « //\\ © ; 4 z(�0 \ j® j \ LLJ :/> ` z \ /�k \\/ u /u \ _\% CO \ \ _ {; 6 9/{/ ol /gf> q2 \7/\77 _ ®E�° /\ 7 _ § OE/7�^ 0 0® E: j® - \ u2 a& , �\ \ \ \\ ol Z U z WN U) O 71 Uz O U �LJJ z� WAN m Q z z00 z W Q O z a J¢m zom U U U Q 7 U o r 0 �w '=n g W 0 NQ � F Ow U) O r - Uz O U z gW m z W Q O z g MO� W � F m Z g .o , R /G /§3 /CO z \ ® z //\ i \/ } O5\ >< E : 7f 3 u m& , , R j/ \/:\ £ (: z(<� o± z \ ® z .- i \ LL } \ »� ° \ / \ z \ > \ } 2 @ ; / / IL 2 \N IL \ \ / ( \ \ \ \ 2 ! 5 3 \ , } )I „za m 'Cl \ %co / 0( j q am:az \ ( \ } \ Nw9NwmB2em:y 2aar \ \ � L ) I-- \ \ \ LL } \ »� ° \ / \ z \ > \ } 2 @ ; / / IL 2 \N IL \ \ / ( \ \ \ \ 2 ! 5 3 \ LU } )I Li\ \ %co / 0( j \ ( \ } \ \ \Lu \ \ � \ ) I-- \ \ \ \ } \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ LL } \ »� ° \ / \ z \ > \ } 2 @ ; / / IL 2 \N IL \ \ / ( \ \ \ \ 2 ! 5 3 H LU } )I \ %co / 0( j \ ( \ } \ : \ \ ) \ ) I-- \ \ \ / \ H � . „z a m eN IHSV S am:6z ;\ LU LU ±w&NmB2Hrzmea Saar � 5 ¢ 0Z9Z6 210'(IWHSV 8lZ NV001C> m v"— 49 ��i S�� NO.LONINN0O iVHznN (INV A32JJJ31' o9a� z 0 OZ9L62J0`aNVIHSV w ED N �4 NVOOI 92 a w i NOiSNINNO81VHznN (INV �13b333 OZ9Z6 JO'ONHIHSH b4NVOOI82 NOiDNINNO8 iVHZ(IN ONy h3'61131' n - � sem. OZ9Z6 JO'ONHIHSH b4NVOOI82 NOiDNINNO8 iVHZ(IN ONy h3'61131' n OZM 210 'aNV-IHSV z Coz 21(1 NV0M 92 a NOiSNINN081VHznN GNV)\JdJH�f ®p - �i� OZM 210 'aNV-IHSV z Coz 21(1 NV0M 92 a NOiSNINN081VHznN GNV)\JdJH�f ®p i r � N916a0'ONVIHSV W �JO NVOM 86Z N010NWN081VHZf1N ONv A32 lr - ®J �a 0 / itAld A4'xv' { j /• � I � i ss F n s a 1 I \ 1 �r 1 1 �- I- U7 t ` 11`1v` vrv:vr 1 1r: XS}>� rt f�rii rtl t �rrl��tr'v t ", yr -' 1 l `t 1 l�.i V,Y i"'i`F � l>a Y, ujt us rr �. ftp ✓ t. 4. Q1�t r >r t,i rra ,�r'tx ' 4 t v ' '� � xet/ ,+'y�rl .Y pru h Fr✓l�"1 rr i 1 ,'.�`i ��r tri ?rl:�tr hr 1r/ ��'� r — Xr18 l ?t x i, r i/ x/vS aid'\ X\I 1dY7r .rr1/ ryC1 r2 �'� Y 1 iS r ,. l71 rr t ✓'i4-r��i,�11/y,a, v: ( C > r4/F- rLt ,� r q t x t z2 J v ���§trtr a n o ,x OZ9L6a0'ONVIHSH �z o ba NHOM 9i,Z a - a y% Nye 3 NOlONINN081h'HZnN UNV A]Ef o N i IN �.r y z w w d � 0 \I b e �k�, 101 o— o� i 0 y v � h I r i i o k ... w ......._.. - OZNM 80 `ONV�HSV yea b4 NV00N 8LZ - o o z o z ----- v n s�� NOiDNINN0G iVHznN 4NV All JJT r w ° - -- 3 jg v Iz w CI> OZ9L6dO'GNVHSV wo z Ha NHJM S6Z w LLzuav w N0IONINN081VHZf1N ONS' 1�3?J��3P � a y w � J CD1 OZ9L62O'GNHIHSH z a w - 214 NVEM 96Z a _ w ��.d jr1 "��. -��� " w N0IJNINN081dHZf1N aNv A32J333f a f' �4.._t L,Aly9 3 fu w e r LL u�� k Y M J l ft i The comments of this pre -application are preliminary in nature and subject to change based upon the submittal ail` additional or different ii!16rniation. The Planning Commission or City Council are the final decision making authority of the City, and are not bound by the comments made by the Staf as part of"this pre -application. ASHLAND PLANNING DEPARTMENT SITE: 218 Logan St. PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE APPLICANT: KenCairn Landscape For Jeffrey COMMENT SHEET May 12, 2021 il:i,wi�I'Ll'IL�IIL�Lci,m]'LTJ6111-01,kllwRI COL.. and Nuzhat Bonnington RE QUEST: Physical & Environrriental Constraints Review Perin ftfear I Tillside Development This pre -application conference is intended to highlight significant issues before the applicant prepares and submits oformol application. The property located at 218 Logan is a steeply sloped lot. Most of the lot is identified as 'severely constrained' (slopes greater than 35%). On the image below (generated by City 61S) the light magenta are slopes greater than 25%, and the dark magenta are slopes greater than 35%. The land use ordinance generally requires all new construction to happen on slopes less than 35%, however AMC 18.3.10.090.A. I a allows for "E'xistingparcels without adequate buildable area less than or equal to 35 percent shall be considered buildable jbr one unit." Because ofsteepness of the property and the presence of slopes greater than 35% a Physical and Environmental Constraints Review Perrrut is required. In general staff is supportive of such an application but does have some concerns with regard to the Hillside Building Design Standards. The application materials submitted for the preapplication are limited. A final application will be required to include: • Details on lot coverage • A slope analysis prepared in accordance with AMC 18.3 ).1 0 040X • Aninventory of existing trees and tree protection plan • Landscape and irrigation plan • Grading and Erosion & Sediment control plan Zoning: The property is zoned R-1-10 which has a maximum lot coverage of 40%. The application materials do not indicate the amount of proposed lot coverage All grading, drainage improvements, or other land disturbances shall only occur from May I to October 31, Excavation shall not occur during the remaining wet months of the year. Erosion control measures shall be installed and functional by October 31. 218 Logan St. May 12, 2021 Pace 1 Water Main: The City GIS shows an existing 8 -in water main that leaves the Ditch Road right-of-way to the west, and travels through this tax lot to the Logan Drive right-of- way. After some quick checking it is not definitive whether there is an casement for this water main so it will need to be determined if there is one or not. This water main serves the length of Logan Drive and as such will need to remain in-plave and undisturbed during and after construction. The depth of flae mainis unknown at this time but public works ought to have the 'as-builts' on file. The applicants engineer should coordinate with public works. Building Envelope: The property is very steep with many areas identified as "Severely constrained land" (slopes greater than 35%). It appears that the proposed building envelope is designed and located to maximize conservation of trees. An inventory of all trees 6"dbh or greater is required with the application -- the inventory must identify species and approximate extent of tree canopy. Portions of the lot or project area not proposed to be disturbed by development need not be included in the inventory. The survey must clearly identify trees to be removed and retained. Because the proposed building encroaches on lands identified as severely constrained a Geotech report Building Design: Staff feel that the cantilevered 2"d story decks are not compatible with the hillside design standards. From AMC 18.3.1 O9O.E,2: The height of all structures shall be measured vertically from the natural grade to the uppermost point of the roof edge or peak, wall, parapet, mansard, or other feature perpendicular to that grade. Maximum hillside building height shall be 35 feet. 0 Cut buildings into hillsides to reduce effective visual bulk. o i. Split pad or stepped footings shall be incorporated into building design to allow the structure to more closely follow the slope. c ui. Reduce building mass by utilizing below grade rooms cut into the natural slope. • A building step -back shall be required on all downhill building walls greater than 20 feet in height, as measured above natural grade. Step -backs shall be a minimum of six feet. Decks projecting out from the buildinq wall and hillside shall not be considered a building step -back. No vertical walls on the downhill elevations of new buildings shall exceed a maximum height of 20 feet above natural grade. • Continuous horizontal building planes shall not exceed a maximum length of 36 feet. Planes longer than 36 feet shall include a minimum offset of six feet. • It is recommended that roof forms and roof lines for new structures be broken into a series of smaller building components to reflect the irregular forms of the surrounding hillside. Long, linear unbroken roof lines are discouraged. Large gable ends on downhill elevations should be avoided; however, smaller gables may be permitted. • It is recommended that roofs of lower floor levels be used to provide deck or outdoor space for upper floor levels, The use of overhanging decks with vertical supports in excess of 12 feet on downhill elevations should be avoided • All structures on Hillside Lands shall have foundations designed by an engineer or architect with demonstrable geotechnical design experience. A designer, as defined, shall not complete working drawings without having foundations designed by an engineer. 218 Logan St. May 12, 2021 Page 2 Additional items to be addressed in a final planning application: A final planning application should address the wildfire fuel modification area and tree protection plan, including all proposed tree removals. The final planning application should address lot coverage including, any proposed walking paths, patios, and landings associated with the proposed house. Parking, Access, & Internal Circulation: Three off-street parking spaces are required for a single- family residential serviced by a driveway more than 50 feet in length. Grading and Erosion Control: A grading plan including the location of all areas of land disturbance, including cuts, fills, driveways, building sites, and other construction areas is required. The total area of disturbance, total percentage of project site proposed for disturbance, and maximum depths and heights of cuts and fill must be included. An erosion control plan must be submitted with the application. The erosion control measures are required to minimize the solids in run off from disturbed area as required Exposed cut slopes, such as those for yard areas, greater than seven feet in height are required to be terraced. Cut faces cannot exceed a maximum height of five feet. Terrace widths shall be a minimum of three feet to allow for the introduction of vegetation for erosion control. Total cut slopes shall not exceed a maximum vertical height of 15 feet. The grading plan, erosion control plan and retaining walls must be designed and stamped by an engineer with experience in geologic hazards evaluation and geotechnical engineering Storm Drainage: Storm drainage plan must be submitted with the application. Storm drainage facilities must direct surface water away from cut faces of fill slopes and be designed to avoid erosion on-site and to adjacent downstream properties. Planting and Irrigation Plan: A planting/irrigation plan is required to demonstrate the manner in which cut slope terraces and fill slopes will be revegetated. The vegetation used for these areas must be native or species similar in resource value, which will survive, help reduce the visual impact of the cut/fill slopes and assist in providing long-term slope stabilization. Tree Inventory & Evaluation: The tree survey must locate all trees greater than six inches d.bh. and identify the species of each tree and approximate extent of the tree canopy. Trees to be removed and in areas that will be disturbed must be clearly identified. The name, signature and address of the person preparing the tree survey must be indicated on the tree survey. The application must also address the suitability of trees for conservation and demonstrate that the trees to be preserved have been incorporated into the design. Trees to be removed, unless diseased, dead or a hazard must be replaced. A tree -replanting plan must be submitted with the application. Inspection Schedule: An inspection schedule for the geotechnical expert must be submitted with the application. The project geotechnical expert must provide a final report indicating that the approved grading, drainage and erosion control measures were installed as per the approved plans and all scheduled inspections were conducted throughout the project. Information on Drive Grade - The maximum grade permitted is 15%. It appears that the drive meets this standard but the final application should indicate the grade on the plans. A completed application will be required to include a geotechnical study with all of the items listed in AMC 18.3.10.110.1) 218 Logan St. May 12, 2021 Page 3 Inspections and Final Report: Prior to the certificate of occupancy for individual structures, the project geotechnical expert shall provide a. final report indicating that the approved grading, drainage, and erosion control measures were installed as per the approved plans, and that all scheduled inspections, as per 18.3.10.090.A.4.j were conducted by the project geotechnical expert periodically throughout the project. Neighborhood Outreach: Staff always recommends that applicants approach the affected neighbors, particularly those who are likely to receive notice of an application, in order to make them aware of the proposal and to try to address any concerns that may arise as early in the process as possible. Notices are typically sent to neighboring property owners within a 200 -foot radius of the perimeter subject property. Written Findings/Burden of Proof: This pre -application conference is intended to highlight significant issues of concern to staff and bring them to the applicant's attention prior to their preparing a formal application submittal. Applicants should be aware that written findings addressing the ordinance and applicable criteria are required, and are heavily depended on when granting approval for a planning action. In addition, the required plans are explained in writing below. The burden of proof is on the applicant(s) to ensure that all applicable criteria are addressed in writing and that all required plans, written findings, and other materials are submitted even if those iterns, were not discussed in specific, itemized detail during this initial pre -application conference. OTHER ORDINANCE REQUIREMENTS: See AMC Table 18.2.5.030.A. — Standards for Urban Residential Zones, The subject property is zoned R-1-1 0, a single family residential zoning with a 10,,00:0 square foot minilnUrn lot size. An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. Inot W/ r&,3.10.090 are lis,ted here indliriduallpl A. General Requirements. The following general requirements shall apply in Hillside Lands, 1. Buildable Area. All development shall occur on lands defined as having buildable area. Slopes greater than 35 percent shall be considered unbuildable except as allowed below. Exceptions may be granted to this requirement only as provided in subsection 1 8..,3,_1 0..,_.0.20,1--I B. Hillside Grading and Erosion Control. All development on lands classified as Hillside shall provide plans conforming to the following items. 218 Logan St. May 12, 2021 Page 4 1. All grading, retainingweN design, drainage, and erosion control plans for development on Hillside Lands shall be designed by u geotechnical expert, All cuts, grading or fills shall conform to the |mternatiuna[ Building Code and heconsistent with the provisions ofthis ordinance. Erosion control measures on the development site shall be required to rnin[rnlze the solids in runoff from disturbed areas. 2. For development other than single family homes on individual lots, all grading, drainage improvements, orother land disturbances shall only occur from Moy 7 to October 37, Excavation shall not occur during the remaining vve1 months of the year. Erosion control measures shall be installed and functional by October 31. Up to 30 day modifications to the October 31 date, and 45 day modification to the May l date may be made by the Planning Director, based upon weather conditions and inconsultation with the project gentechnica|expert.Thernqdificationpf dates sho||be the minimum necessary, based upon evidence provided by the applicant, to accomplish the necessary project goals, A. Severe Constraint Lands are extremely sensitive to development, grading, filIing, or vegetation removal and, whenever possible, alternative development should beconsidered. B. Development offlnodvvays ionot permitted except for bridges and road crossings. Such crossings shall be designed to pass the 100 -year flood w�thout raising the upstream flood height more than six inches. C. Development on lands greater than 35 percent slope 8h@Y| meet all requirements of sec±ioo11��J{��9_} Development Standards for Hillside Lands in addition to the requirements of this section. D. Development of land or approval for a planning action shall be allowed only when the following study has been accomplished, An engineering geologic study approved by the Public Works Director and Planning Director establishes that the site is stable for the proposed use and development. The study shall include the following information. 1, Index map. 2. Project description to include location, topography, drainage, vegetation, discussion of previous work and discussion offield exploration methods. 3. Site geology, based on aoudido| Survey, to include site geologic rnaps, description mfbedrock and surficia| materials, including artificial fill, locations ofany faults, folds, etc, and structural data including bedding, jointingand shear zones, soil depth, and soil structure. 4. Discussion of any off-site geologic conditions that may pose a potential hazard to the site, or that may bcaffected byon-site development. 5. Suitability of site for proposed development from a geologic standpoint. 6. Specific recommendations for cut slope stability, seepage and drainage control, or other design criteria to mitigate geologic hazard'�s. 7. If deemed necessary by the engineer or geologist to establish whether an area to be affected by the proposed development isstable, additional studies and supportive data shall include cross-sections showing subsurface structure, graphic logs with subsurface exploration, results of laboratory test and references. B. Signature and registration number of the engineer and/or geo|ogi'st. 9. Additional information or analyses as necessary to evaluate the site. 2|8Logan St. May 12,2021 BUILDING: No comments at this time. Please contact the Building Division for any building codes - related questions at 541-488-5305. CONSERVATION: For more information on available water conservation programs, including any available appliance rebates or assistance with landscaping and irrigation. system requirements, please contact Water Conservation Specialist Julie Smithernian of Conservation Division at 541-552-2062 or via e-mail to I.wUli snjit e rrraw aslflandof us . For information on any financial or technical assistance available for the construction of Earth Advantage/Energy Star buildings, please contact Conservation Analyst/Inspector Dan Cunningham at 541-552-2063 or via e-mail to dan.cili,mL aul( ENGINEERING: At the end of this document. Please contact Karl Johnson of the Engineering Division for any Public Works/Engineering information at 541-552-2415 or via e-mail to 11" pu)—I I aill ql.() r. us . _t - L FIRE, : At the end ofthis doeument. Please contact Ralph Sartain from the Fire Department for any Fire Department -related information at 541-552-2229 or via e-mail to ..... . ......... .. . ........ .. ­.....­­ ..... .. ........ . . WATER AND SEWER SERVICE: If the pro.ject requires additional water services or upgrades to existing services the Ashland Water Department will excavate and install in the city right of way all water services up to and including the meter on domestic and commercial water lines. If a fire line is required, the water department will also only install a stub out to the location where the double detector check assembly complete with a Badger brand cubic foot bypass meter should be placed in a vault external to the building. 'rhe vault and the DCDA device housed in it are the responsibility of the property owner and should be placed at the property line. Tees for these installations are paid to, the water department and are based on a time and materials quote to the developer or contractor. Meter sizes and fire line diameters will need to be provided to the Water Department at the tirne of quote being requested. Please Contact Steve Walker at 541-552-2326 or '1 any y questions regarding water utilities. ELECTRIC SERVICE: "If existing service needs to be upgraded or existing underground service is not large enough, excavation and conduit may be required from transformer." Please contact Dave Tygerson in the Electric Department for service requirements and connect fee information at (541) 552- 2389 or via e-mail tov,:,'r.od )ash I and.or. Lis. Dave will arrange an on-site meeting, and develop a preliminary electrical service plan for the site. Please allow additional time to accommodate scheduling of this on-site meeting and preparing the preliminary plan. Submittals will not be deemed complete without a preliminary approved plan from the Electric Department 218 Logan St. May, 12, 2021 Page 6 APPICATION REQUIREMENTS The application is required to include all of the following information. a. The information requested on the application form at htt Ij at _W�L V_._ f ­­­ I __[ c. [4d� b, Plans and exhibits required for the specific approvals sought (see below). c. A written statement or letter explaining how the application satisfies each and all of the relevant criteria and standards in sufficient detail (see below). d. Information demonstrating compliance with all prior decision(s) and conditions of approval for the subject site, as applicable, e. The required fee (see below). The Ashland Land Use Ordinance, which is Chapter 18 of the Municipal Code, is available on-line in its entirety at:mm. L�:=rreatl-) ff Written Statements Please provide two copies of a written statements explaining how the application meets the approval criteria from the sections Of the Ashland Municipal Code listed below. These written statements provide the Staff Advisor or Planning Commission with the basis 'or approval of the application: * Physical & Environmental Constraints: 18.3.10.050 * Development Standards for Hillside Lands: 18.3.10.090 * Development Standards for Severe Constraint Lands- 18.3.1�0.1 10 Plans & Exhibits_ Rqqu ired Please provide two sets of exhibits (plans or drawings) addressing the submittal requirements from the sections of the Ashland Municipal Code listed below, These exhibits are used to copy the Planning Commission packets and for notices that are mailed to neighbors. Please provide two copies on paper no larger than 11 -inches by 17 -inches and reproducible copies that are drawn to a standard architect's or engineer's scale. V Ill to PLANNING APPLICATION FEES: P&E Constraints Permit $1,092 NOTE: Applications are accepted on a first come -first served basis. All applications received are reviewed and must be found to be complete before being processed or scheduled at a Planning Commission meeting, Applications will not be accepted without a complete application form signed by the applicant(s) and property owner(s), all required mateTials and full payment. Applications are reviewed for completeness in accordance with ORS 227.I78. For further information, please contact: May 1,2,_2021 Aaron Anderson, Associate Planner Date City of Ashland, Department of Community Development Phone: 541-552-2052 or e -snail: aaroll. Ild I -SO ............................ 21.8 Logaii St. May 12, 2021 Page 7 Fire department comments are based upon the 2019 Oregon Fire Code as adopted by the Ashland Municipal Code, and Ashland Land Use Laws: Addressing - Building numbers or addresses must be at least 4 inches tall, be of a color that is in contrast to its background and shall be plainly visible and legible from the street fronting the property. Additional directional signage may be necessary to guide emergency responders down a driveway, path or through a gate. All premises identification, street signs and building numbers, must be in place with temporary signs when construction begins and permanent signage prior to issuance of any occupancy. OFC 505 Fire Apparatus Access Approach -The angle of approach at the point where the public road transitions to the private fire apparatus access road must meet the City of Ashland Engineering Department specifications. OFC 503.2.8 Fire Apparatus Access -Single Residential Lot-If the furthest point on the structure is greater than 150' from the street, the entire length of the private drive or street must meet fire apparatus access. Fire apparatus access shall be 15 feet clear width, with the center 12 feet being constructed of an all-weather driving surface. Fire apparatus access must support 60,000 pounds, no parking, have a maximum slope of 10 percent, and have vertical clearance of 13'6". With the installation of fire sprinklers, 200' of the driveway is allowed to have an 18 percent slope. Inside turning radius is at least 20 feet and outside turning radius is at least 40 feet and must be indicated on site plans submitted for building permits. Fire apparatus access is required to be signed as "No Parking-Fire Lane". Final plat needs to indicate that the private drive is fire apparatus access and must state that it cannot be modified without approval of Ashland Fire & Rescue. Firefighter Access Pathway An approved footpath around the structure is required so that all exterior portions of the structure can be reached with the fire hose. Any changes in elevation greater than two feet in height (such as retaining walls) require stairs. The stairs shall be an all-weather surface and meet the requirements as specified in the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. OFC 503.1.1. Fire Hydrant Distance to Structures - Hydrant distance is measured from the hydrant, along a driving surface, to the approved fire apparatus operating location. Hydrant distance shall not exceed 300 feet. Hydrant distance can be increased to 600 feet if approved fire sprinkler systems are installed. Fire Hydrants Clearance - Hydrants must have 3 feet of clearance extending from the center nut of the hydrant all the way around. Fences, landscaping and other items may not obstruct the hydrant from clear view. Hydrants must be shown on site plan when submitting for building permits. Fire Sprinkler System — If access to site exceeds 10 % the installation of a residential system will be required. The installation of a fire sprinkler system may be an acceptable means to mitigate deficiencies related to other fire requirements such as fire flow, hose reach, fire lane width, fare apparatus turn-around, distance to fire hydrants, and fire department work areas. OFC 503.1.1 Gates and Fences — Obstructions such as gates, fences, or any other item which would block or reduce the required fire apparatus access width must be shown on the plans and approved by Ashland Fire and Rescue. Wildfire Hazard Areas -- On lands designated in the Wildfire Lands Overlay, a "Fuel Break" as defined in Ashland Municipal Code, section 18.3.10.100 is required. Wildfire Hazard Areas - All structures shall be constructed or re-roofed with Class B or better non-wood roof coverings, as determined by the Oregon Structural Specialty Code. No structure shall be constructed or re-roofed with wooden shingles, shakes, wood-product material or other combustible roofing material, as defined in the City's building code. AMC 18.3.10.100 Vegetation -- existing and intentionally planted vegetation is required to meet AMC 18.3.10.10013(2) General Fuel Modification Area Standards. The Fire Wise landscaping brochure provides diagrams and examples of how to meet these requirements. www.ashiandfirewise.org. Contact Ashland Fire & Rescue Forestry Division for a fuel break inspection. Fire Season — If work will be completed during fire season, check fire season fire prevention requirements found at www.ashland.or.us/fireseason. 218 Logan St. May 12, 2021 Page 8 Final determination of fire hydrant distance, -fire flow, and fire apparatus access requirements will be based upon plans submitted for Building Permit review. Changes frorn plans submitted with this application call result in further requirements. Any future construction rnUSt meet fire code requirements in effect at that time. The fire department contact for this project is Fire Marshal Ralph Sartain. He may be contacted at (541) 552-2229 or Public Works Conditions of Approval 1. Engineered Plans - Where public improvements are required or proposed, the applicant's engineer shall submit design plans for approval of all public improvements identified an the approved plan or as specified in conditions of approval. One set of these civil plans MUST be submitted. DIRECTLY to the Public Works/Engineering Department. All design plans must meet the City of Ashland Public Works Standards, Engineered construction plans and specifications shall be reviewed and signed by the Public Works Director, prior to construction. All public facilities within the development will be designed to the City of Ashland Engineering Design Standards for Public Improvements. The engineered plans shall also conform to the following: 0 If drawings are submitted to the City of Ashland digitally, they shall be true scale PDF drawings. If AutoCAD drawings are also submitted, they shall be compatible with the AutoCAD release being used by the City at that time and shall be located and oriented within the Oregon State Plain Coordinate System (NAD83-89). Drawings sizes shall comply with ANSI -defined standards for page width and height. Review drawings may be submitted in B size (I I x,l 7). Bidding and construction documents may also be printed at B size; however, all final as -constructed drawings must be submitted to scale on D -size (2406) Mylar. Digital files of the as - constructed drawings shall also be submitted. Drawings shall be drawn such that reduction of plans from full size (D sized) to half size (13 sized) can be done to maintain a true scale on the half -sized plans. 2. Street Improvement—No additional street improvements, beyond those necessary to comply with City Street Standards, will be required at this tinle. 3, Right of Way — No additional right of way dedication, beyond that necessary to comply with City Street Standards, will be required at this time, 4, Sanitary Sewer - 'File property is Currently served by a 8 -in sanitary sewer main in Logan Drive. The applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed, approved and permitted by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. 5, Water - The property is currently served by a 8 -in water main in Logan Drive. City of Ashland Water Department shall tap existing water matin and install any new water services and water ureter boxes that are proposed by development. City of Ashland Water Department must be contacted for availability, placement and costs associated with the installation of the new water service. Service & Connection Fees will also be required for any new water services installed as part, of this project. 6. Storm Drainage - The property is currently served by a I O -in Storm sewer main in Logan Drive. City of Ashland Engineering Department must review an engineered storm drainage plan. Storm Water Facility. Design Requirements Applicant MUST follow the guidance and requirements set forth in the cut -rent Rogue Valley Storinwater Quality Design Manual which can be found at the following website: haps://www.rvss.us/pilot.asp?pg=StorniwaterDesign M anti al All stormwater calculations, reports, drawings, etc. shall be Submitted to the City of Ashland. Engineering Department for review. 7. Erosion & Sediment Control - The following requirements shall be met: All ground disturbances exceeding 1,000 square feet shall implement all Erosion and Sediment Control Plan (ESOP). 218 Logan St. May 12,2021 Page 9 • A 1200-C permit will be secured by the developer where required under the rules of the Oregon State DEQ. City of Ashland Engineering Department must receive a copy of this permit before any construction shall begin. • Erosion Prevention and Sediment control measures that meet the minimum standards set forth by the City of Ashland Public Works/Engineering Standard Drawing CD282 must be in place before any construction related to the project begins. means. Pollution, track out, and sediment dumping into storm water are strictly prohibited per AMC 9.08.060. Drainage from automotive use areas shall be limited to oil concentrations of 10 mg/1 by a pre -approved Trash storage areas shall be covered or provide additional storm water treatment by an approved means. • Off street parking areas shall conform to Ashland Municipal Code 18.4.3.080.13.5, including provisions to minimize adverse environmental and microclimatic impacts. 8. Driveway Access — No additional improvements/requirements will be requested at this time, but the applicant proposed improvements must be reviewed and permitted by the City of Ashland Engineering Department. Engineering Department is curious about the placement of what appears to be proposed retaining walls along the driveway that appears to restrict access to neighboring properties. 9. Permits Any construction or closure within the public right of way will require a Public Works permit and before any work in the right of way commences all necessary permits MUST be obtained 10. As-Builts - Where public improvements are required or completed, the developer shall submit to the City of Ashland, reproducible as -built drawings and an electronic file of all public improvements constructed during and in conjunction with this project. Field changes made during construction shall be drafted to the drawings in the same manner as the original plans with clear indication of all modifications (strike out old with new added beside). As -built drawings shall be submitted prior to final acceptance of the construction, initiating the one-year maintenance period. 11. Addresses — Any new addresses must be assigned by City of Ashland Engineering Department. 218 Logan St. May 12, 2021 Page 10 CITY OF Planning Division ,ASHLAND 511x11 AU,kshland, OR 97520 PRE -APPLICATION C("TERENCE APPLICATION DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Description physical Environmental constraints for a new home in hillside lands. APPLICANT Name Kerry Kencairn Phone 541488 3194 E -Mail kerry@kencairnlandcape,com Address 147 Central Avenue City Ashland Zip _97520 PROPERTY OWNER Name Jeffrey and Nuzhat Bonnington Day Time Phone Address 6642 NW MERIDIAN RIDGE DR City_ PORTLAND Zip 972106600 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Street Address 218 LAGAN DREIVE Assessor's Map No. 39 1E 08AA Tax Lot(s) 6913 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS To request a pre -application conference, submit this form with two sets of scalable plans, one large format 24"46" and one no larger than 11"x17". Include the following information plus your submittal fee of $142.25 (check, Visa, MasterCard or cash accepted): 1. Completed Application. 2. Narrative — Provide a written description of proposal and request. (If in Historic District, provide pictures of existing structures, elevations of proposed structures and details of planned exterior design features and materials) 3. Site Plan — The site plan should contain all applicable elements in the Site Plan Checklist (see reverse) plus any other information pertinent to this proposal. The site plan will be checked to insure all applicable information is includ ed at the time the pre -application date is set. 4. Additional information • Provide in the narrative or with the site plan: 1) Number of acres in development 2) Total gross square footage of all structures 3) Number of stories on each structure 4) Indicate number of and square footage of: a) Dwelling Units (include the units by the number of bedrooms in each unit —e,g, 10 1 -bedroom, 25 2 -bedroom, etc) b) Office Spaces c) Retail Units d) Other Spaces 5) Percentage of lot coverage by: a) Structures e) Landscaping b) Streets & Roads f) Number of parking spaces c) Parking Areas/Driveways g) Total square footage of landscaped areas. d) Recreation Areas h) Other pertinent information of the proposed development 5. LEED@ Certification — Indicate whether project will be pursuing LEEDO certification. 6. Submittal Fee Scheduled for 5.J 2.2021 @2PM Pg,3 of G;teemm-danlpfa KngTF s8HardoulslP�Appkabor Intormabon Sheol Suhmitt lkg mments_FY2017-10 APRIL 20, 2021 218 Logan Drive Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit for Hillside Lands in a Wildfire Zone This is a proposal for a single family home on Hillside Lands. Ulm APRIL 20, 2021 218 Logan Drive Physical and Environmental Constraints Permit for Hillside Lands in a Wildfire Zone This is a proposal for a single family home on Hillside Lands. �y ° a ±//\ ma&NmmlHv»Nav2auu2 {: . © ) ( y \ \ - z) \ \ )) J: /\ !` j� \ C) e ©R = J 2 > < . \§ ) ~ (( \/ w\ (� \ _ ( \� % ): \~ �} z : \ \ ) \ \\ \ � \ `� ( \ ( \ G - ( \ \\ \ / / ( (\ U65L0 du UIVv INJv J Jq b4 NVOM R6Z _ w NOiDNINNO91VHznN ONV A3'dJH ' u K �— H le, I jr, OL - --------- IT \ 7 <� � A m �� \ � \ \\ �\ \ \ \ TQ» 2/�2 \ \ � � / > \ \ £\%« Z z Ilktai Z z I I V/ , 1 m 1p 0—,-k1 ON I