Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Fourth_440_TREE-2022-00181
March 24, 2022 Notice of Final Decision On March 24, 2022, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: TREE -2022-00181 Subject Property: 260 Fourth St. Applicant: Quality Tree Service for PROVOST PROPERTIES LLC Description: A request to remove one Box Elder at the front of the building at 260 Fourth St. The application includes a letter from Quality Tree Service along with an ISA risk assessment form. The tree has a significant lean as well as rotting at the base. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING: E-1; NIAP: 39 IE 09 AB, TAX LOT: 5800 The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12th day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for, review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winbum Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(0). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Johanna Tuthill in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc. Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNffY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel.- 541A88-5305 61 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552.2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735.2900 priial wwwashhmd,orms pro" Is SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider aType I decision as set forth below. I . Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision., 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter, 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an effOr occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: 1. Who May Appeal, The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property, b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type I decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.8. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.6.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. The fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b, Tinge, or Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed, c. Content ofNotice ofAppeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. i, An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A statement demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period, d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered, 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission, The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments, The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on an appeal of a Type I decision. A decision on an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State Land Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winbum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800.735-2900 www.ashland.0r.LIS ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION PLANNING ACTION: TREE -2022-00181 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 260 Fourth St. OWNERJAPPLICANT: Quality Tree Service for PROVOST PROPERTIES LLC DESCRIPTION: A request to remove one Box Elder at the front of the building at 260 Fourth St. The application includes a letter from Quality Tree Service along with an ISA risk assessment form. The tree has a significant lean as well as rotting at the base. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Employment; ZONING. E-1; MAP: 39 1E 09 AB, TAX LOT: 5 800 SUBMITTAL DATE: February 2, 2022 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: February 25, 2022 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: March 24, 2022 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4.30 p.m.): April 5, 2022 FINAL DECISION DATE: April 6, 2022 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: October 6, 2023 This proposal is to remove one 16" Box Elder tree from the property that is located at 260 Fourth St. The subject property is located on the eastern side of Fourth Street between A & B Streets. The tree is located approximately one foot from the front of the building located on 260 Fourth St.. The property is zoned E-1, and is developed with a commercial building. The code is explicit that a tree removal permit is required of all trees larger than six inches TBH in the E-1 zone. The application includes a letter from Quality Tree Service stating that the tree is a hazard due to the proximity to the foundation, a significant lean to the tree, and an unbalanced crown. The letter recommends removal to mitigate all issues. In accordance with the Land Use Ordinance, Notice of Complete Application (HOCA) was mailed to all surrounding properties within 200' of the subject property as well as a physical notice posted along the frontage. No public comment received either in favor or against. At the March 3`'d meeting of the Tree Commission the application was reviewed. Staff presented the application. Commissioners noted that the proximity to the foundation alone could be enough to approve this request. The Tree Commission voted unanimously to approve the application as submitted. No mitigation is required for the removal of this tree. To be deemed a "hazard tree" the condition or location of the tree must clearly present a public safety hazard. Or, that there is a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and, that such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation or pruning. Based on the materials, provided by the applicant and a site visit by staff, it is reasonable to conclude that the subject tree is indeed posing a hazard to the foundation of the building and therefore ought to be removed. Staff finds that the tree, due to its location and size, TREE -2022-00181 260 Fouilh St/jt Page 1 poses an unacceptable hazard to the property that cannot be reasonably alleviated by means other than removal and replacement. Staff finds the application has sufficiently demonstrated compliance with all applicable approval criteria. The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.7.040.13 as follows: 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazardl Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e,, likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to, mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18,51,050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Staff finds that Planning Action #TREE -2022-00181, a request to remove one hazard tree, complies, with all applicable city ordinances, with the imposition of the conditions attached below. Therefore, Planning Action #TREE -2022-00181 is approved. If any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid, for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #TREE -2021-00181 is denied. March 24, 2022 Bill Molnar, Director Date Department of Community Development TREE -2022-00181 260 Fourth St/jt Page 2 STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2, On March 24, 20221 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Manning Action #PA -TREE -2022-00181, 260 Fourth Street. MchaeCSuC(ivan Signature of Employee Wcown-dovkplanningTlinning AdonsTAs by fteeAffourth SheeCFourth-260TOurdL260-TREE-2Q22-00IBiWoficingglOOToudh-260_TREE-2022-00181_NOD_AffldauilOfMa:lung.doCx 312412022 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5600 2 SIRENS LLC 560 TERRACE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 - :O 660 PRIM r ASHLAND, R 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB9800 GARSON THOMAS LJCYNT'HIA H PO BOX 966 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB8700 JENKS KATHRINE TRUST ET AL 3 RAMONA AVE OAKLAND, CA 94611 1w°. 1 LOMBARDI ROBERT J ET AL 1685 OLD HIGHWAY 99 ASHLAND, OR 9 1 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB8800 OPT 215 LLC 2315 SISKIYOU BLVD ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB9100 PERSEPHONES HOUSE ASHLAND LLC P'O BOX 50220 EUGENE, OR 97405 PA -TREE -24122-00181 391 E09AB5800 PROVOST PROPERTIES LLC 6431 ADAMS RD TALENT, OR 97540 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB9200 TRES STARS LLC PEERLESS HOSPITALITY LLC 265 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 280 Fourth St NI 03/24/22 27 Easy Peel Address Libels a Ger to avery.com � templates �vi�ayTa���rl�lkMlr.' ltiO j Bend alangknnt(,)ox o Pop-tipEckle U a r PA7TREE-2022-00181 391 E09AB6303 AJANI OREGON LLC ET AL 1685 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB9000 FRANTZ LAURA 34 SE 52ND AVE PORTLAND, OR 97215 Iw + 235 w; H ST ASHLAND, + D A! w' 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB9600 JONES LARRY D 1188 TYLER CREEK RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 1685 OLD HIGHWAY 99 ASHLAND, OR 975:20 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5400 PALACE CHOP HOUSE LLC PO BOX 3666 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 ■+ ■ 1 11 :i w 1�+: it POLINDER LISA KAREN 267 MEADE ASHLAND, OR 97520 '+ Im 11 ., .o �.. PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6302 VOLPATTI KELLY JJRICK N 230 FOURTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ■ rs DAVISLA JOLLA, CA 92037 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5801 GARFAS JOSEPH -TRUSTEE 1188 TYLER CREEK RD, ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5000 JACKSON DANIEL D TRUSTEE 1793 ANDERSON CREEK 'RD TALENT, OR 97540 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5200 KLAMATH SISKIYOU WW'ILDLANDS CE. PO BOX 102 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5100 MASSY SYLVIAIJOHNSON CHRIS 564 A STREET ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6100 PEIL THOMAS HANSEN TRUSTEE ET 335 GARFIIELD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -24122-00181 PROVOST GREG 260 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -'TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5900 ROBINSON EDWIN P TRUSTEE 2407 BRENTWOOD RD SACRAMENTO, CA 95825 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6200 WILSON ARTHUR/MARY ELLEN 565 B ST A ASHLAND, OR 97520 t Win Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY OF OFF 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www,.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 ASHLAND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -2021-00181 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 260 Fourth Street OWN E PJAPPLI CANT: Quality Tree Service for PROVOST PROPERTIES LLC DESCRIPTION: A request to remove one Box Elder at the front of the building at 260 Fourth St, The application includes a letter from Quality Tree Service along with an ISA risk assessment form. The tree has a significant lean as well as rotting at the base, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Emiployment;,ZONING: E-1; MAP: 39 1 E 09 AB, TAX LOT. 5800 NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will review this Planning Action at an electronic public hearing on 'Thursday, March 3, 2022 at 6:00 PM. See page 2 of this notice for information about participating in the electronic public hearing. 111:7-11114 ILI 1:3 Wei ;VJ IRNI is] g, to] allyl g 111;4 k, 114141m I i7i I & I &M m is I I IJ Subject Property % N 7' 260 Fourth St. MYS, rfelf"001", SIR PA -THEE -2022-00181 i 1w/1/1//11//1111 1,111, "It ........... /// "011 Z, 'M 14, 1? 011 I'll, 4 N A"NE we /l/ Tree Commission Meeting Notice is hereby given, that the Tree Commission will hold an electronic public hearing on the above described planning action on the meeting date and time shown on Page 1. If you would like to watch and listen to the Tree Commission meeting virtually, but not participate in any discussion, you can use the Zoom: link posted on the City of Ashland calendar website https,:Hwww,asiilaiid.Or.Lls/callendar.,asp_. OVER G koi it i n-dev\pl a it it i i i gkll I anmi ng Ac 1i on 0 Ai; by St re eff Fot i rdi Stree ftF ou ri It 2 6 OW, ou i th 26 DIRE E-2022-001 8 1 Wot i c i ii &\I-ou 16 2 60- TR b. L0 -2 2 2-00 18 1 _NO C, docx C; Oral testimony will be taken during the electronic public hearing. If you wish to provide o, -, testimony during the electronic meeting, send an email to PC-public-testimony@ashiand.or.us by 10:00 am. on'Thursday, March: 3, 2022. In order to provide testimony at the public hearing, please provide the following information: 1) make the subject line of the email "Advisory Commission Testimony Request", 2) include your name, 3) specify the date and commission meeting you wish to testify at, 4) specify the agenda item you wish to speak to, 5) specify if you will be participating by computer or telephone, and 6) the name you will use if participating by computer or the telephone number you will use if participating by telephone. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's office at 541-488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35,104 ADA Title 1). The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted on Page 1 of this notice, Because of the COVED -19 pandemic, application materials are provided online and comments will be accepted by email. Alternative arrangements for reviewing the application or submitting comments can be made by contacting (541) 488-5305 or lannina(d)ashland.or. LIS. A copy of the application, including all documents, evidence and applicable criteria are available online at "What's Happening in my City" at tittps;//gis.ashland.or,Lls/developnientp[gp_qsals/. Copies of application materials will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. Under extenuating circumstances, application materials may be requested to be reviewed in-person at the Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, via a pre -arranged appointment by calling (541) 488-5305 or emailing plan, ning (0).ash land. or. us. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to, submit written comments to lannineg_@ashland.or.us or to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4,30 p.m. on the deadline date shown on Page Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is, complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 -day comment period. After the cornment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division, Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.0) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue:, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Aaron Anderson at 541-522-2052 or aaron.anderson(c-Dashlatid.or.us. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (AMC 18.5.7.040.13 J / laz,,,?rd 7ree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of condifions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a dear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and Such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18,51050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Acticins\Ms by StreeATAF-am Ili Sllreeftlouilli 2601 TREE -2022-00 l8l_N0CAocx STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon, 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On February 25, 2022 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaidl, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this llist under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -TREE -2022- 00181, 260 Fourth Street. 13 Signatu-re of Employee GAcornm-devVannIngTIanWng AdonsTAs by StreeffVoui% SkeetToulth-260TOudhj6OjREE-2022-DOIBIWoUciiigT-oudh-2602REE-2022-00181_NOC�_Affidavit of Mailing.doox 212512022 AE"'1fl` I I PA -TREE -2022.00181 391 E09AB5600 2'SIRENS LLC 560 TERRACE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 ■+ r rr : r.l rill DAVIS, CAROL •" :• rr PRIM ST THOMASASHLAND, OR 9752,0 GARSON . ■• BOX 96: ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB8700 JENKS KATHRINE TRUST ET AL 63 RAMONA AVE OAKLAND, CA 94611 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6301 LOMBARDI ROBERTJ ET AL 1685 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB8'800 OPT 215 LLC 2315 SISKIYOU BLVD ASHLAND, OR 97520 ■i ■ � r rr � r#+�� rr ■• BOX 50220 OR 97405 PROVOST PROPERTIES LLC 6431 ADAMS TALENT, OR r PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB92001 TRES STARS LLC PEERLESS HOSPITALITY LLC 265 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 260 Fourth 5t NOC 02/25/22. 27 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6303 AJANI OREGON LLC ET AL 1685 OLD HIGHWAY 99 S ASHLAND, OR 97524 -+ - r►� rr r• IMM Ierrr FRANTZ LAURA + SE 52ND PORTLAND, OR 97215 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6000 HUTCHINSON MARK F' LIVING TRUS 235 5TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB9600 JONES LARRY D 1188 TYLER CREEK RD ASHLAND, OR 97520 rr :`■r O. i685 OLD HIGHWAY •r OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5400 PALACE CHOP HOUSE LLC PO BOX 3666 CENTRAL POINT, OR 97502 PA -TREE -2.422-00181 391 E09AB5500 POLINDER LISA KAREN'. 267 MEADE ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA-TREE2022-00181 391 E09AB6302 VO,LPATTI KELLY J/RICK N 230 FOURTH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Go to avery.com/ternpla es a 6 Use Avery TomphA425160 I PA -TREE -2022-00'181 391 E09AB9700 BRISCOE JAMES CHRISTOPHER TRU 6625 CAMINITO BLYTH',EFIELD LA JOLLA, CA 92037 PA -TREE -202.2-00181 391 E09AB5'801 GARFAS JOSEPH -TRUSTEE 1188 TYLER CREEK RD ASHLAND„ OR 97520 JACKSON D + ` r TRUSTEE 1793 ANDERSON CREEK RD TALENT, O ■ 97540 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5200 KLAMATH SISKIYOU WILDLANDS CE PO BOX 102 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5100 MASSY SYLVIAPJOHNSON CHRIS 564 A STREET ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6100 PEIL THOMAS HANSEN TRUSTEE ET 335 GARFIELD ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 PROVOST GREG 260 4TH ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB5900 ROBINSON EDWIN' P TRUSTEE 2407 BRENTWOOD RD SACRAMENTO, CA 95825 PA -TREE -2022-00181 391 E09AB6200 WILSON ARTHUR/MARY ELLEN' 565 B ST A ASHLAND, OR 97'520 1 �r f,�� t �� „ R� r„� ;w �,� -, a ,� �' � �MUW oWl� �� ��� i i // fr ,. 4iii� r �'i,� I ,,,,, T ��� � � a iii � �rI/r � i 11 ,'� / / o yy F`� "Pp fid,, l i I „� :% f•� .T,� ri i,� T., "3i w w A 1 F X. F % � � � //� � � � 1” � 1 i � � ee' � r � r ly; l �"�w"^mn t � � �� �� � h� i �... s, , ,�.. . r ;� 1 r...� ;; ZONING PERMIT APPLICAT*N W!r-bux'4 MY, Mhfund OR 97PS,:0, ASHLAND gg§GRt"Oli OF PROJ507 ��8 M Gli n,� elf Jl Vi ZS—Sgk—le,� P,� OF P ROPERTY Nr-,Lle LEN, Cwtffim;i�xi? 0 'IT'S ^ NO Strld �EPIJCAkT jVL 9dpl+ni it-. T ti(e 3 4 6 L LRGPERTY (A --- - ------- zi; Arg, ilc.wmx�`x ,a 23 m !1, I I rr Vlvftf=-g, �t I,,, a ,r n"' o,, —, I ft.v,tc it. rvuw�7�,r ;r'd .;z& L(vc-: Vf_ i,!,� orp fhfr z I 'Az ;,A 1:wz�,A al. VO ulp,�Pmil Ao�, o n,o v,,� ft x, rl V� "aw 4qdmll,:t Applicanes Signature 7r,�p pmr. 3,k Property Ownefs Signatufe LicensedBond A- Insured 916Mnc." Inv ice/P'I"C7�1C►S"a��{�,+�ceipt., Quality Tree Service Phone: 541. 21.t' 594P.l�. B+ox3486 Email: qualitytreeservice@yahoo.com Central Paint, R 97502 wwwqua I tytreeseruicemedford.earn Family O'u h d and Operated: SUBM, rTT . TO PHONE 1' EMA$L r 1 � �5� ja'�J & ADDRESS JOB LOCATION -L66 q CITY, STATE, AND ZIPAR RI DAT ryry SCHEDULE DATE b C.. We hereby submit specifications and estimates for; W ,.T, * All Creditll obit card charges have. a,30/4 fee: * The above prices, specifications and conditions are satisfactory and are hereby accepted. * You are authorized to do the work as specified: Any cancellations within 48 hours of scheduled Customer Signature service will be charged 30% of total jab cost. Payment due in full at time of completion unless otherwise specified below. * Not responsible for any under ground water lines or any unmarked utilities. Crate of Acceptance ISA Basic Tree Risk Assessmek aiForm Client t ki i Date I�Z_ - I I Z - Time Lightning damage 0 Address/Tree location c Tree no. . Sheet of Tree species V�mi 1 0 - _ -r 11, "' dbh - Height -1)6-', Crown spread dia., 'Z,6" Pruninghistory j Assessor(s) Tools used %-4- Timeframe Duad/Missing bark 0 Cankem/Galk/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay E3 Reduced 11 Topped 0 Lion -tailed 13 Conks 0 Heartwood decay 13 Flush cuts 13 other Response growth Condition (s) of concern rI Part Size ..... ..... Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance—, 7 Load on defect N/A 13 Minor 13, Moderat Significanto Target zone Likelih000d of failure improbableO PossibleO Probable Imminent 0 Ukeocincloffailure ImprobableO Possible 11 Probable 11 Imminent El E Roots and Root Collar ss Dead/missing bark El Abnormal bark texture/color 0 Occupancy Codominant stems 0 Included bark 0 Cracks 13 Dead 11 Decay Q Conks/Mushrooms 171 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 • Sap ooze 171 ooze 11 Cavity 0 % circ. Target description Target protection rate Cavity/Nest hole 10 % circ. Depth 12 r Poor taper 13 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness 0 Lean !F-5" - Corrected? , K) 0 Response growth n CL X 2 - omas%onal 3 -frequent Condition (s) of concern cart rr 4-oi,3Cond ition (s) of concern Part Size 16ir — Fall Distance 1 0/1141 Part Size Fall Distance Lead on defect N/A 0 Minor � Moderate Cl SignificantO 4 -constant 0 E = we rL Im History of faiIuresUeo4)4= 'Topography Flat)p sloper, _% Aspect_ Site changes NoneIV Grade changeO Site clearingO Changed soil hydrology.® RootcutsC3 Describe Sohl conditions Limited volume 0 Saturated 171 ShallowO Compactedll Pavement over roots 13 _% Describe Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds, 0 ice 0 Snow 0 Heavy rain 0 Describe Vigor I Low 13 NormalV High Foliage None (seasonalt# None(dead)E] Normal % Chlorotic —% Necrotic Species lailure PrOrfile Branches TrunkO Rootsrl Descri Winclexposure Protected Partial 0, Fullr-I WindfunnelingO Relative crown size SmallIZI Medium Largeo Crown density Sparse[3 Norman Dense13 Interior branches Few O Normal dense© Vines/Mist[etoe/Moss; 0 Recent or expected change In load factors 'D la� gfqds Lik il Crown and Branches Unbalanced crown LCR 6&_I/o Cracks 0 Lightning damage 0 Dead twigs/branches 0 %. overall Max. dia. Codominant 0 Included bark 0 Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia, Over-extended branches Weak attachments 0 Cavity/Nest holeY. drc. Pruninghistory Previous branch failures 0 51milar branches present EJ Crown cleaned 0 Thinned ERaised 3 0 Duad/Missing bark 0 Cankem/Galk/Burls 0 Sapwood damage/decay E3 Reduced 11 Topped 0 Lion -tailed 13 Conks 0 Heartwood decay 13 Flush cuts 13 other Response growth Condition (s) of concern rI Part Size ..... ..... Fall Distance Part Size Fall Distance—, 7 Load on defect N/A 13 Minor 13, Moderat Significanto Load on defect N/A EJ Minor 0 ModerateO SignificantO Likelih000d of failure improbableO PossibleO Probable Imminent 0 Ukeocincloffailure ImprobableO Possible 11 Probable 11 Imminent El —Trunk Roots and Root Collar ss Dead/missing bark El Abnormal bark texture/color 0 Collar buried/Not visible EI Depth Stem girdling O Codominant stems 0 Included bark 0 Cracks 13 Dead 11 Decay Q Conks/Mushrooms 171 Sapwood damage/decay 0 Cankers/Galls/Burls 0 • Sap ooze 171 ooze 11 Cavity 0 % circ. Lightning clamageO Heartwood decay® Conks/Mush rooms 13 Cracks El Cut/Damaged roots 0 Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole 10 % circ. Depth 12 r Poor taper 13 Root plate lifting 0 Soil weakness 0 Lean !F-5" - Corrected? , K) 0 Response growth n Response growth Condition (s) of concern cart rr 4-oi,3Cond ition (s) of concern Part Size 16ir — Fall Distance 1 0/1141 Part Size Fall Distance Lead on defect N/A 0 Minor � Moderate Cl SignificantO Load on defect NIA 13 Minor Cl ModerateD Sign iticant O Likelihorxi raf falluna Improbable Cl Passible Prabakale !=I Imminent F:1 Likellluaod raf allure imprcaba�IeCl Passible Cl Prcabalale C� Imminent []' Pa". I Risk Catpanrbatinn ,Likelihood of Failure Very low Likelihood of Impact LOW Medium Wligh Imminent Likelihood' Somewhat likely . Likely Very likely Target (Target number ordesciiaUon) Tree part Candition(s) of concern T .0 M 2 CL Failure 21 P- A, Impact E E Failure Impact Consequences ,ilure Agilt ct &M matrix J) ff M 0 r , S z 2 U3 Risk rating (fivar Matrlx2) Unlikely Somewhat likely 14 Unlikely -- UnlikelyUnlikely Lorry w Tt T- I. ,Likelihood of Failure Very low Likelihood of Impact LOW Medium Wligh Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely . Likely Very likely Probable unlikely Unlikely- Somewhat likely Likely Possible, Unlikely ' Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable Unlikely Unlikely- UnlikelyUnlikely Lorry w Matrix 2, Risk rating matr!K Likelihood of Failure, & Impact Negligible, Consequencet of Failure Minor significant severe :Verylikely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewha'like' LOW Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely, Low Low. Lorry w Notes,. explanations, des riptions, A , r trot t MitigaticAolptloins 1— Residual risk Oc, 2. Residual risk 3. Residual risk 4. Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low 0 Moderate 171 High Extreme 0 , I . Overall residual risk None K Low 0 Moderate 0 High 0 Extreme E3 Recommended Inspection Interval Data Wnal 13 Preliminary Advanced assessment needed []No ®Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations yNone Ovisibility ElAccess EIVInes Moot collar buried Describe Thos datmheet was produced by the intemgdong Sodety QjArWjjcWwm (jSA) —2017 Page 2 of 2