HomeMy WebLinkAbout2023-02-07 Council Mtg MIN
Presentation to City of Ashland City Council
By Acting City Attorney Douglas M. McGeary
& CIS Deputy General Counsel Tamara E. Russell
February 7, 2023
The Eight Habits of
Highly Effective
Councils
Legal Issues re City
Councilors’ “Scope of
Duties”
Social Media: Potential
Legal Pitfalls
Q&A
(a.k.a., “Let’s play Stump
the City Attorney and CIS
Lawyer!”)
Eight Habits of Highly Effective Councils (a.k.a., “teams”)
But first . . . Principles of a Team
Habit #1
Think and act strategically
Understand & Demonstrate Teamwork
Habit #2:
The Three Hallmarks of an
Effective Small Group:
1.Interpersonal Skills
Ability to Work With Others
2.Task Skills
Knowledge to do a Job
3.Rational Skills
Ability to Deal with Issues and
Problems Rationally
Habit #3
Define Roles and
Responsibilities
City Councils -Generally
City Management-Generally
What “rules” apply to a City Council?
Authority given by Charter, Ordinance & Resolution
Authority does not rest with any single elected official but
with the majority of the body
City business is not an elected official’s business
City employees are not elected official’s employees
Elected officials can be held responsible for their actions
toward city employees and third parties
Statements made to the city attorney are not necessarily
confidential
Habit #4
Consistently Evaluate
Policy Implementation
Allocate Time Appropriately
Habit #5:
Habit #6
Follow the Council’s
Rules of Procedures
AMC 2.04 and City of
Ashland Resolution 2020-03
Habit #7
Seek Objective
Assessments
Habit #8
Never Stop Growing or
Learning
(continuing education)
Example:
LOC’s Elected Essentials Training
(available on the LOC website)
Debate vs. Dialogue
Legal Issues re City Councilors’ “Scope of Duties”
Claims Against Public Officials
“\[E\]very public body is subject to civil action for its torts and
those of its officers, employees and agents
acting within the
, . . . arising out of a
scope of their employment or duties
governmental or proprietary function . . . .”
(ORS 30.265)
What isn’t Included?
Malfeasance in office;
Willful or wanton neglect of duty;
Actions outside the scope of duties/employment
Social Media:
Potential Legal Pitfalls
Public Records & Social Media
Oregon’s Public Records law applies to cities in two
ways:
Retention; and
Requests
Public Records & Social Media
What social media content needs to be retained?
At a minimum, any records covered by the general
retention schedule under OAR, Ch. 166, Div. 200.
These regulations do not specify a retention
schedule for social media posts. BUT they do specify
rules for “communications and distributions” and
“complaints” received by the City.
Public Records & Social Media
What social media content can be requested by the
public?
Any content that pertains to “the conduct of the
public’s business”
This would include any content on a City-operated
account because it is a product of City resources.
–Ex. 1: Social media content that is no longer retained, but still
recoverable on the web site.
–Ex. 2: Direct messages or posts made on other user’s pages.
Types of Accounts
For cities, there are two types of social media accounts.
1.City-operated accounts
–A city’s main FB page, a police department’s Twitter account,
etc.
2.Private accounts
–The accounts belonging to city staff and elected officials.
–To what extent are these private accounts subject to
regulation? Answer: Depends on how they are used!
“Private” Accounts
th
Campbell v. Reisch, 986 F3d 822 (8Cir 2021)
(Lawmaker’s Twitter account was found to be a
“private” account –lawmaker protected from liability
for a First Amendment violation)
“Private” Accounts
th
Davison v. Randall, 912 F3d 666 (4Cir 2019)
(County commissioner violated the First Amendment
rights of a County resident by banning the resident
from her Facebook page.)
State of OR Interpretation
“Private” Accounts:
Social media posts are considered public records if:
–Posts are made on an official public agency account or
on a private account that is being used to distribute
information for that agency to the public . . . .
–If a private account is used to conduct government
business\[,\] then it becomes public and is subject to the
Oregon Public Records Law. . . .”
-Oregon State Archives, Record Management Section
Key Takeaways
Have Two Social Media Accounts:
An“official”City Councilor social media page that you
oversee and post to. Use this to inform the public about
the City’s business.
A“personal”social media page. Use this to post stories
and pictures about your family and dog, write restaurant
reviews, and to address non-City issues.
Key Takeaways
(1)CIS recommendation: Implement a Policy
(2)Professionalism matters on both your “official” and
“personal” social media pages.
(3)When conducting the City’s business on social
media, you have no privacy rights.
(4)Visitors to your social media pages have First
Amendment rights. There are legal consequences if
you don’t honor those rights (and may be coverage
issues as well –see next slide).
Liability Coverage for
Claims Against City Councilors
CIS provides coverage for claims against City
Councilors who are “authorized to act on behalf of \[the
City\], all acting within the scope of their employment or
duties. . .”
BUT: No coverage for public records/meeting violations
If no CIS coverage, attorney fees and damages become the
City’s concern and situation
If acting outside the scope, personal liability.
(ORS 30.265)
Questions?
Let’s play “Stump the City
Attorney and CIS Lawyer”!
“... you can either ask
the question
or experience the
answer ...”
-Author unknown
Thank you, City of Ashland City Council!
Douglas M. McGeary
Acting City Attorney
City of Ashland
doug.mcgeary@ashland.or.us
(541)488-2107
Carmel Zahran
Assistant City Attorney
City of Ashland
Carmel.Zahran@ashland.or.us
Tamara E. Russell
Deputy General Counsel
Citycounty Ins. Services
trussell@cisoregon.org
503-763-3845