Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTakelma_2676_TREE-2022-00197CITY OF -ASHLAND December 15, 2022 Notice of Final Decision On December 15, 2022, the Community Development Director approved the request for the following: Planning Action: PA -TREE -2022-00197 Subject Property: 2676 Takelma Way Applicant: Clay Creek Gardens HOA Description: A request to remove two alder trees from the Clay Creek Gardens HOA conunon area located along Clay Creek. Both trees are in poor health, with significant dieback. The application includes a letter from Canopy LLC recommending removal of both trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-family residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 IE 14 BB, TAX LOT: 1209. The Community Development Director's decision becomes final and is effective on the 12"' day after the Notice of Final Decision is mailed. Approval is valid for a period of 18 months and all conditions of approval identified on the attached Findings are required to be met prior to project completion. The application, all associated documents and evidence submitted, and the applicable criteria are available for review at the Ashland Community Development Department, located at 51 Winbum Way. Copies of file documents can be requested and are charged based on the City of Ashland copy fee schedule. Prior to the final decision date, anyone who was mailed this Notice of Final Decision may request a reconsideration of the action as set forth in the Ashland Land Use Ordinance (ALUO) 18.5.1.050(F) and/or file an appeal to the Ashland Planning Commission as provided in ALUO 18.5.1.050(G). The ALUO sections covering reconsideration and appeal procedures are attached. The appeal may not be made directly to the Oregon Land Use Board of Appeals. If you have any questions regarding this decision, please contact Johanna Tuthill in the Community Development Department at (541) 488-5305. cc: Parties of record and property owners within 200 ft COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-A88-5305 51 Win bum Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY: 800-735-2900 www.aslyland,or.us I L4�A SECTION 18.5.1.050 Type I Procedure (Administrative Decision with Notice) E. Effective Date of Decision. Unless the conditions of approval specify otherwise or the decision is appealed pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.G, a Type I decision becomes effective 12 days after the City mails the notice of decision. F. Reconsideration. The Staff Advisor may reconsider a Type I decision as set forth below. 1. Any party entitled to notice of the planning action, or any City department may request reconsideration of the action after the decision has been made by providing evidence to the Staff Advisor that a factual error occurred through no fault of the party asking for reconsideration, which in the opinion of the Staff Advisor, might affect the decision. Reconsideration requests are limited to factual errors and not the failure of an issue to be raised by letter or evidence during the opportunity to provide public input on the application sufficient to afford the Staff Advisor an opportunity to respond to the issue prior to making a decision. 2. Reconsideration requests shall be received within five days of mailing the notice of decision. The Staff Advisor shall decide within three days whether to reconsider the matter. 3. If the Staff Advisor is satisfied that an error Occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall withdraw the decision for purposes of reconsideration. The Staff Advisor shall decide within ten days to affirm, modify, or reverse the original decision. The City shall send notice of the reconsideration decision to affirm, modify, or reverse to any party entitled to notice of the planning action. 4. If the Staff Advisor is not satisfied that an error occurred crucial to the decision, the Staff Advisor shall deny the reconsideration request. Notice of denial shall be sent to those parties that requested reconsideration. G. Appeal of Type I Decision. A Type I decision may be appealed to the Planning Commission, pursuant to the following: I . Who May Appeal. The following persons have standing to appeal a Type I decision. a. The applicant or owner of the subject property. b. Any person who is entitled to written notice of the Type 1 decision pursuant to subsection 18.5.1.050.B. c. Any other person who participated in the proceeding by submitting written comments on the application to the City by the specified deadline. 2. Appeal Filing Procedure. a. Notice of Appeal. Any person with standing to appeal, as provided in subsection 18.5.1.050.6.1, above, may appeal a Type I decision by filing a notice of appeal and paying the appeal fee according to the procedures of this subsection. 'Tile fee required in this section shall not apply to appeals made by neighborhood or community organizations recognized by the City and whose boundaries include the site. If an appellant prevails at the hearing or upon subsequent appeal, the fee for the initial hearing shall be refunded. b. Thee for Filing. A notice of appeal shall be filed with the Staff Advisor within 12 days of the date the notice of decision is mailed. c. Content of Notice of Appeal. The notice of appeal shall be accompanied by the required filing fee and shall contain. L An identification of the decision being appealed, including the date of the decision. ii. A statement demonstrating the person filing the notice of appeal has standing to appeal. iii. A statement explaining the specific issues being raised on appeal. iv. A staternent demonstrating that the appeal issues were raised during the public comment period. d. The appeal requirements of this section must be fully met or the appeal will be considered by the City as a jurisdictional defect and will not be heard or considered. 3. Scope of Appeal. Appeal hearings on Type I decisions made by the Staff Advisor shall be de novo hearings before the Planning Commission. The appeal shall not be limited to the application materials, evidence and other documentation, and specific issues raised in the review leading up to the Type I decision, but may include other relevant evidence and arguments. The Commission may allow additional evidence, testimony, or argument concerning any relevant ordinance provision. 4. Appeal Hearing Procedure. Hearings on appeals of Type I decisions follow the Type 11 public hearing procedures, pursuant to section 18.5.1.060, subsections A — E, except that the decision of the Planning Commission is the final decision of the City on all appeal of a Type I decision. A decision or an appeal is final the date the City mails the adopted and signed decision. Appeals of Commission decisions must be filed with the State band Use Board of Appeals, pursuant to ORS 197.805 - 197.860. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Tel: 541-488-5305 51 Winhurn Way Fax: 541-552-2050 Ashland, Oregon 97520 TTY; 800-735-2900 wwiv.ashlaad.or.Lis �� ASHLAND PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS & ORDERS PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -2022-00196 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2676 Takelma Way OWNER/APPLICANT: Clay Creek Gardens HOA DESCRIPTION: A request to remove two alder trees from the Clay Creek Gardens HOA common area located along Clay Creek, Both trees are in poor health, with significant dieback. The application includes a letter from Canopy LLC recommending removal of both trees. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-family residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 1 E 14 BB, TAX LOT: 1209 SUBMITTAL DATE: November 17, 2022 DEEMED COMPLETE DATE: November 29, 2022 STAFF APPROVAL DATE: December 15, 2022 DEADLINE TO APPEAL (4:30 p.m.): December 27, 2022 FINAL DECISION DATE: December 28, 2022 APPROVAL EXPIRATION DATE: June 28, 2024 DECISION This proposal is to remove two hazard trees from the property that is located 2676 Taklema Way. The subject property is located on the southwest corner of Takelma Way. The property is 0.94 acres, is zoned R-1-5, and is a designated open space for the Clay Creek Gardens HOA. Clay Creek runs through this parcel. The trees proposed for removal are both white alder trees. Tree #1 has two 19" DBH codominant stems and is in very poor health as demonstrated by significant dieback, dead limbs, and lean. Tree #2 also measures 19" DBH and shows significant dieback and lean. Both trees are in close proximity to Clay Creek and a neighboring backyard. Due to the state of the trees and the location of the trees, both trees are labeled as of "moderate" risk. "Moderate" risk in this context is defined as the likelihood of failure being somewhat likely within the timeframe and the consequences of failure being severe. The application includes an arborist report indicating that removal is recommended to address these issues In accordance with the Land Use Ordinance, Notice of Complete Application (HOCA) was mailed to all surrounding properties within 200' of the subject property as well as a physical notice posted along the frontage. No public comment received either in favor or against. At the December regular meeting of the Tree commission the application was reviewed. Staff presented the application and provided an overview for the reason to request the removals. The Tree Commission, after a brief deliberation, determined that the hazardous nature of the trees warranted their removal and voted unanimously to approve the application as submitted. Two trees will be required as mitigation plantings. These plantings should be semi -shade tolerant conifers. TRUE -2022-00196 2676 Takelma Way/jt Page I To be deemed a "hazard tree" the condition or location of the tree must clearly present a public safety hazard. Or, that there is a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and, that such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation or pruning. Based on the materials provided by the applicant and a site visit by staff, it is reasonable to conclude that the subject trees are indeed posing a hazard to the neighboring backyard and Clay Creek bed and therefore ought to be removed. Staff finds that the tree, due to its location and size, poses an unacceptable hazard to the property that cannot be reasonably alleviated by means other than removal and replacement. Staff finds the application has sufficiently demonstrated compliance with all applicable approval. criteria. The criteria for a Tree Removal Permit are described in AMC Chapter 18.5.7.040.6 as follows: 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a. The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i,e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 98.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit, Staff finds that Planning Action #TREE -2022.00196, a request to remove one hazard tree, complies with all applicable city ordinances with the imposition of the conditions attached below. Therefore, Planning Action. #TREE -2022-00196 is approved. If any one or more of the following conditions are found to be invalid, for any reason whatsoever, then Planning Action #TREE -2022-00197 is denied. The following are the conditions and they are attached to the approval: 1. That all proposals of the applicant shall be conditions of approval unless otherwise specifically .modified hercin. 2. That the two semi -shade tolerant coniferous mitigation trees be planted on the site at an appropriate location within twelve months of this approval. Ic%,-� r - / z f5 2 2 randon Goldmmn, nterirn Directof• Date Department of Con-annunity Development TREE -2022-00196 2676 Takelina Way/jt Page 2 STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. I am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On 12/151221 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as, set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #TREE -2022-00197, 2676 Takelma. Signature of Employee DocumenI5 12JI&2022 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131214 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E141382300 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14136900 ACTON-STROIA FAMILY TRUST ET ALT MARLENE BEAVER STATE APARTMENTS LLC 30504 GOLF CLUB POINT 671 CLAY ST CHRISMAN DEVELOPMENT & MANAGE EVERGREEN, CO 80439 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PO BOX 490 ENTERPRISE, OR 97828 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1210 BLAZER VALERIE J 2672 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 - PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131224 BROWN MICHAEUMARAYA K 2678 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131225 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1209 CHUNG-MACCOUBREY ALICEIMACCOU CLAY CRK GARDENS HMRS ASSOC 2680 TAKELMA WAY 2689 CLAY CREEK WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1223 COOPER INVESTMENTS LLC 1182 TIMBERLINE TER ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14BB1228 FARRELL PATRICIA L TRUSTEE ET 2690 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14BB2500 HUPP ROBERTA LEEIRONALD J 699 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131233 KLODIN VICTOR M ET AL 706 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BC200 CROSS BETTY SUE CROSS ELIZABETH S 760 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14BB1207 GIES COLEEN/SCOTT 2668 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131401 KAU TERRYIALICIA SISKIYOU PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PO BOX 1797 PHOENIX, OR 97535 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB2100 LEONARDO LISA 1245 MUNSON DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 El4BB2700 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1213 MCCOMMONS WARREN R TRUSTEE ET MCKELVIE KENNETH 633 MORTON ST 2680 CLAY CREEK WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1206 MOEGLEIN LUCINDA MACRORY ET A 2666 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1222 MORELAND JAMES L TRUSTEE ET A 2679 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131220 CALL MICHELLEIDEVON 2689 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E141382701 COHEN MANFRED LILINDA 1 700 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1110 DWYER NATHANIEL ET AL 620 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131211 GROSHONG JAMES SCOTT/DEBORAH 2674 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14BB2200 KENYON PAMELA SU TRUSTEE ET A 524 S GRANADOS AVE SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14BC100 MC NAMARA JAMES A/MARCIA 1007 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB2900 MEBANE RACHEL LEAH FANNING 672 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1100 NELSON SUSAN F TRUSTEE ET AL 117 S LAUREL ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1200 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E148131226 PA -TRITE -2022-00197 391 E14BB2600 OHMER DERIAL L TRUSTEE ET AL RALSTON ANDREW L AND CHARLENE REDDICK SARA/ JEREMIAH JOHN 1840 S PACIFIC HWY 2682 TAKELMA WAY 708 CLAY ST TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1212 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131400 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1402 RICHARD AMY E & PEARSON EDWIN ROBIN JEANNE S REV LIVING TRU ROSSI ANTHONY FIGAIL M 2669 TAKELMA WAY 669 CLAY ST 325 HILTON LN ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ARCATA, CA 95521 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BC4900 SHACKELFORD JIM J ET AL 705 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14BB1107 SOBOTKA FRANCIS E TRUSTEE ET 2664 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E14BB1221 SHOHET CECILE 2683 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1227 STALP MELISSA/SCOTT 2686 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB1300 SISKIYOU SCHOOL 631 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391 E14BB2800 STETSON HILARY G PO BOX 1174 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00197 391E1413131208 PA -TREE -2022-00197 2676 Takelma WETMORE ROBERT JULES TRUSTEE CANOPY LLC 2670 TAKELMA WAY 6065 COLVER RD NOD 12/15/22 ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 41 Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 CITY OF 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-8010-735-2900 ASHLINND NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA -TREE -20,22-00197 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2676Takelnla Way OWNER/APPLICANT: Clay Creek Gardens HOA DESCRIPTION: A request to remove two alder trees from the Clay Creek Gardens HOA common area located along Clay Creek, Both trees are in poor health, with significant dieback. The application includes a letter from Canopy 1..LC recommending removal of both trees, COMPRE HENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-fairifly residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 1E 14 BB, TAX LOT: 1209 NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will review this Planning Action at an electronic public hearing on Thursday, December 8, 2022 at 6:00 PM. See page 2 of this notice for information about participating in the electronic public hearing. . . ........... "Y f ,tn HIM,' . ... .... Ji_ T,'l lk(�. I i ni,1 110/114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . G.\coiiiiii-devYFlariningT]anning AvionslMs by StreciVIll'akcitiia\Takcliiia..2676 PA TREE-2022-00196\N'oticinglTakelmi_2676_,IA-'Tf:l,'Ii-2022-ook96_,N'OCdacx OVER C; rf .... ........... . . ........... "Y f ,tn HIM,' . ... .... Ji_ T,'l lk(�. I i ni,1 110/114 . . . . . . . . . . . . . G.\coiiiiii-devYFlariningT]anning AvionslMs by StreciVIll'akcitiia\Takcliiia..2676 PA TREE-2022-00196\N'oticinglTakelmi_2676_,IA-'Tf:l,'Ii-2022-ook96_,N'OCdacx OVER C; Tree Commission Meeting Notice, is hereby given that the Tree Commission will hold an electronic public hearing on the above descri'lbed planning action on the meeting date and time shown on Page 1. If you would like to watch and listen to the Tree Commission meeting virtually, but not participate in any discussion, you can use the doom link posted on the City of Ashland calendar website https,//www.gsh1and or, us/q,9�endar,asp , Oral testimony will be taken during the electronic public hearing. If you wish to provide oral testimony during the electronic meeting, send an email to PC-public-testimony@ashlandor.us by 10:00 a.m. on Thursday, December 8, 2022. In order to provide testimony at the public hearing, please provide the following information: 1) make the subject line of the email "Advisory Commission Testimony Request", 2) include your name, 3) specify the date and commission meeting you wish to testify at, 4) specify the agenda item you wish to speak to, 5) specify if you will be participating by computer or telephone, and 6) the name you will use if participating by computer or the telephone number you will use if participating by telephone. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator's office at 541-488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title 1). i The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted on, Page 1 of this notice,. Because of the COVI D-1 9 pandemic, application materials are provided online and comments will be accepted by email. Alternative arrangements for reviewing the application or submitting comments can be made by contacting (541) 488-5305 orpLannjo 0,ashland,or.us. A copy of the application, including all documents, evidence and applicable, criteria are available online at "What's Happening in my City" at https://,Q is. ash land. or. us/deveIopM_qntpi(9p qsg eLLsl. Copies of application materials will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. Under extenuating circumstances, application materials may be requested to be reviewed in-person at the Ashland Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winbuirn Way, via a pre -arranged appointment by calling (541) 488-5305 or emailing pjanqja s I @,g h and.or.us. Any affected property, owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to planning_ ashland. or. Lis or to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown on Page 1. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 -day comment period, After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning Division Staff's decision must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1,050,G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached: to this notice, Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact Johanna Tuthill at 541-,552-2045 or Johan na.tuth i 110ash land. or. us, TREE REMOVAL PERMIT (AMC 18.5.7.0403) 1. Hazard Tree, A Hazard Tree Removal Kermit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following, criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. & The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e,, likdy to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5,7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. Ci,\coiiitie-dc%,kpTantiiiiLo,\Pkai,inijig ActionsTAs byr StrevAATakd makTakelina 2676 PA-TRrtP-2022-00196\N'oliciiii,,\fakeinii-2676.,PA-'I RE�L-2022-00 I 96_NOC doc K AFFIDAVIT OF MAILING STATE OF OREGON County of Jackson The undersigned being first duly sworn states that: 1. 1 am employed by the City of Ashland, 20 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520, in the Community Development Department. 2. On November 29, 2022 1 caused to be mailed, by regular mail, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid, a copy of the attached planning action notice to each person listed on the attached mailing list at such addresses as set forth on this list under each person's name for Planning Action #PA -TREE -2022- 00196, 2676 Takelma St. MichaeCSuffivan Signature of Employee G.1comm-deVp1annfng"anr0gAc6o TAs6ySlreeOTtTakeha4Takelma_2676_PA-TREE-2022-OOi9Btnoec'nglTakelma_2676_PA-TREE 2022-00196_K*QAffidavitofP9a'1ng.Cax1112912022 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB1214 ACTON-STROIA FAMILY TRUST ET 30504 GOLF CLUB POINT EVERGREEN, CO 80439 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1210 BLAZER VALERIE J 2672 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 CANOPY LLC 6065 COLVER RD TALENT, OR 97540 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB2701 COHEN MANFRED ULINDA 1 700 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1110 DWYER NATHANIEL ET AL 620 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1211 GROSHONG JAMES SCOTTIDEBORAH 2674 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB2200 KENYON PAMELA SU TRUSTEE ET A 524 S GRANADOS AVE SOLANA BEACH, CA 92075 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BC100 MC NAMARA JAMES A/MARCIA 1007 ASHLAND ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E148B2900 MEBANE RACHEL LEAH FANNING 672 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Easy Peel Address Labels Go to avery.coln/templates Bencl along Anc to expose Pop-up Edge I Usc Avery Terrnplitc 51 GO PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB2300 ALT MARLENE 671 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BBI224 BROWN MICHAEL/MARAYA K 2678 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB900 BEAVER STATE APARTMENTS LLC PO BOX 490 ENTERPRISE, OR 97828 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1220 CALL MICHELLEIDEVON 2689 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1225 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BBI209 CHUNG-MACCOUBREY ALICEIMACCOU CLAY CRK GARDENS HMRS ASSOC 2680 TAKELMA WAY 2689 CLAY CREEK WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14B81223 COOPER INVESTMENTS LLC 1182 TIMBERLINE TER ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1228 FARRELL PATRICIA L TRUSTEE ET 2690 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB2500 HUPP ROBERTA LEE/RONALD J 699 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1233 KLODIN VICTOR M ET AL 706 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BC200 CROSS ET AL 760 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E148131 207 GIES COLEENISCOTT 2668 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1401 KAU TERRY/ALICIA SISKIYOU PROPERTY MANAGEMENT PO BOX 1797 PHOENIX, OR 97535 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB2100 LEONARDO LISA 1245 MUNSON DR ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB2700 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14881213 MCCOMMONS WARREN R TRUSTEE ET MCKELVIE KENNETH 633 MORTON ST 2680 CLAY CREEK WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB1206 MOEGLEIN LUCINDA MACRORY ET A 2666 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1222 MORELAND JAMES L TRUSTEE ET A 2679 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB1100 PA -TREE -2022-00196 39IE14BB1200 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB1226 NELSON SUSAN F TRUSTEE ET AL OHMER DERIAL L TRUSTEE ET AL RALSTON ANDREW L AND CHARLENE 117 S LAUREL ST 1840 S PACIFIC HWY 2682 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 TALENT, OR 97540 ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB2600 REDDICK SARA/ JEREMIAH JOHN 708 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1402 ROSSI ANTHONY F/GAIL M 325 HILTON LN ARCATA, CA 95521 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB1300 SISKIYOU SCHOOL 631 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 Easy Peel' Address Labels k Go to avery.corn/templates c PA- TREE-2022-00196391E14BB1212 PA-TREE-2022-00196391E14BB1400 RICHARD AMY E & PEARSON EDWIN ROBIN JEANNE S REV LIVING TRU 2669 TAKELMA WAY 6006 SW CANBY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PORTLAND, OR 97219 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BC4900 SHACKELFORD JIM J ET AL 705 CLAY ST ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391E14BB1107 SOBOTKA FRANCIS E TRUSTEE ET 2664 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14B81221 SHOHET CECILE 2683 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1227 STALP MELISSA/SCOTT 2686 TAKELMA WAY ASHLAND, OR 97520 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB2800 PA -TREE -2022-00196 391 E14BB1208 2676 Takelma NOC STETSON HILARY G WETMORE ROBERT JULES TRUSTEE 11/29/22 PO BOX 1174 2670 TAKELMA WAY 41 ASHLAND, OR 97520 ASHLAND, OR 97520 `; �� ��•,_. f �t�"f'�% � f�. P. i ,,s r%r_-pftfi!TA`nL1CAT10N, Planning Division 51 Wiiihm-n Way. Ashland OR, 97,20 Asui . LXN'D X41-488-5305 1�'ax 541-488-6006 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT' - 1" 0 f s Pursuing LEEDO Certification? 0 YES El NO Street Address 7-rf_,al,,. ke,hi)d /cp/ Tx 1 Assessor's Map No. 39 1 E Tax Lots,0 Zoning Comp Plan Designation APPLICANT - j f,/,OName fk) Phone Ie e ? -rrj') ", ��) Zip Address W�111 0 city PROPERTY OWNER Narne Address Phone E -Mail City zip q11PVEYQR, ENGINEER, ARCHITECI� LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OTHER ­­ r ,L o,py, 0 & V r _ jr, P1 i e ", (" 4) Title Af r, L�� I—' —Name - (71)r'� Phone 5',/ )E -Ma I Address Title Name Address Phone City City E -Mail sm Zip 'horeby codify that the statements and information contained in this application, including the enclosed drawings and the required findings of fact, are in all respects, true ane correct. I understand that all property pins must be shown on the drawings and visible upon the site inspection, In the event the pins are not shown or their location found to be incorrect. the owner assumes full reSDOI)Sibilify. I further understand that if this request is subsequently contested, the burden will be on me to establish: 1) that I produced sufficient factual evidence at the hearing to support this request: 2) that the findings of fact furnished justifies the granting of the request: 3) that the findings of fact furnished by me are adequate: and further 4) that all structures or improvements are properly located on the ground. Failure in this regard will result most likely in not only the request being -set asidpo hat also paqsihiv in my stniciures hPing hijiff in rP.)lRnrP. 1hp.rpnn hPinn rpmdrod to be remov t my expense. If I h �ve any doubts, I am advised to seek competent professional advice and assistance. AppitcantP 'Siqnature Date A0 vvrlvvi V1 , I , have 1'ecid aildijo U-tv-1,610od the complete application and its consequences to me as a property owner, — - - - - - - - - - [ro be corTMed by Oty Step. Dam f­mkvivtd­ .... ... Zumflq PtI01114 fYI)e rii4iq Fee G Iramin de0planningl"cims & HanduuisVonbig P"init ApplicationAm ou-09'.1142 Exhibit "BIT W'ic ca Lot I I t VAW, 'r! cz <4y MICKELSON WAY Ld 1. WOE 1 leG "Of 12 44 11 WDE U.T. E I&W 1P LOT o CLAY GREEK WAY rTI IIV4 Sit Sam, .-.,As�— 0TV, 90� siv.4wi .1- tour Sq T 10 tot t /NX, 91 55. LOTSIf MiAl F NT q we CL 64� ""VM)w sraac IAKELMA WAY ell Alov 10 WE F p U IF ew 45.,, ii -0) M 14 TUS 1200 & 2600 CAN 0 PY LLC The Care of Trees WWw.CAflD4YX-huMaM,= P.O. Box 263 Talent, OR 97540 (541) 631-8000 CCB 199334 November 17, 2022 City of Ashland Planning Department 51 Winburn Way Ashland, OR 97520 RE: Removal permit, Tikelina I -JOA Per the request of IIOA board member, Amy Richard, I inspected the trees on 11/3/2022. The two trees in question are both white alder, Ants rhombilbli(i.Tree #1 is has two large codoniinate stems, both measuring 19" in diameter at breast height. The tree is in very poor health as shown by approximately 30% of the upper crown dying back. This was obser�,ed both in the autumn and earlier in the growing season when dieback is easier to identify. The large and increasing amount of dead limbs, the codorninate nature of the stems, the ]can of the trunks, location of the stream batik and the proximity to an activity used backyard led me to assign a risk rating of "moderate," Removal of this tree is recommended. Tree #2 also measures 19" DBIJ and is of poor health. This tree also has significant dieback in the upper crown. This coupled with the lack of soil on the strearn side of the trunk and the significant lean towards the backyard and other targets has led to a "moderate" risk rating. Removal of this tree is likewise recommended, Attached are copies of completed risk assessment forms. "Moderate" risk in this context is defined as the likelihood of failure being somewhat likely within the timeframe and the consequences of failure being severe. Feel free to get in touch if there are any questions about these findings, the in ethodo logics used, etc. Sincerely, Christopher John Canopy LLC ISA Board Certified Master Arborist #WE -9504B ISA Basic: Tree Risk Assessment corm Client Date i 3 d Time t I t CL +^-� Address/Tree location 67 y 1< 6LM,')- Tree no. a Sheet �, of� Tree species 0 H 1 TO M-14 EA- dbh t �1 Height 'AT' Crown spread dia. a cp _ Assessor(s) C lfIt A .Jct hY--1 Time frame _4'- yfty Tools used Target Assessment afte tactors History of failures Topography Flat❑ Slope® % Aspect Site changes None Grade change❑ Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology ❑ Root cuts❑ Describe Sallconditions Limited volume M Saturated® Shallow❑ Compacted❑ Pavement over roots ❑ % Describe Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds ® Ice 11 Snow Heavy rain ® Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low ® Normal ❑ High ❑ Foliage None (seasonal)[] None (dead) ❑ Normal, -D % Chlorotic % Necrotic2o % Pests Abigtic Species failure profile Branches❑ Trunk❑ Roots[] Describe Load Factors Windexposure Protected® Partial❑ Full❑ Windfunneling❑ Relative crown size Small❑ MediumM Large❑ Crown density Sparse4 Normal❑ Dense[] interior branches few❑ Normal® Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑ Recent or planned change in load factors Tree refects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crown ❑ LCR 1_5 % Cracks ❑ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches D30 9/. overall Max, dia. V y Codominant ❑ Included baric ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole _%circ. Over-extended branches ❑ Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised 136ead/M15sing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Boris ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Main concerns)Jf J6.M F1 IRi C�i tic- i< Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ® Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable 19 Imminent ❑ —Trunlc — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/calor ❑ Collar buried/Not visible ❑ Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems ❑ included bark ❑ Cracks ❑ Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sapooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ %circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole _% circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soll weakness ffli Lean-EL2 Corrected? N Response growth Response growth c Main concern(s) C ci7nC-TS _ Malnconcern(s) Sar- W `'N 6• r -....._ 6&22,: T0 Z]lce/,,rC Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ® Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate 1p Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure �Likellffiood of failure Improbable❑ Possible M Prob Imminent ❑ ble❑ Possible ❑ ProbaUfe ® Imminent ❑ ua� Target zone Occupancy:11 rate b l0 a d x s h = Target description oX III -ocasieonal 3-frequenG A-cotant E W' a fi2L/27 d ,&C 2 3 4 afte tactors History of failures Topography Flat❑ Slope® % Aspect Site changes None Grade change❑ Site clearing❑ Changed soil hydrology ❑ Root cuts❑ Describe Sallconditions Limited volume M Saturated® Shallow❑ Compacted❑ Pavement over roots ❑ % Describe Prevailing wind direction Common weather Strong winds ® Ice 11 Snow Heavy rain ® Describe Tree Health and Species Profile Vigor Low ® Normal ❑ High ❑ Foliage None (seasonal)[] None (dead) ❑ Normal, -D % Chlorotic % Necrotic2o % Pests Abigtic Species failure profile Branches❑ Trunk❑ Roots[] Describe Load Factors Windexposure Protected® Partial❑ Full❑ Windfunneling❑ Relative crown size Small❑ MediumM Large❑ Crown density Sparse4 Normal❑ Dense[] interior branches few❑ Normal® Dense❑ Vines/Mistletoe/Moss❑ Recent or planned change in load factors Tree refects and Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Failure — Crown and Branches — Unbalanced crown ❑ LCR 1_5 % Cracks ❑ Lightning damage ❑ Dead twigs/branches D30 9/. overall Max, dia. V y Codominant ❑ Included baric ❑ Broken/Hangers Number Max. dia. Weak attachments ❑ Cavity/Nest hole _%circ. Over-extended branches ❑ Previous branch failures ❑ Similar branches present ❑ Pruning history Crown cleaned ❑ Thinned ❑ Raised 136ead/M15sing bark ❑ Cankers/Galls/Boris ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Reduced ❑ Topped ❑ Lion -tailed ❑ Conks ❑ Heartwood decay ❑ Flush cuts ❑ Other Response growth Main concerns)Jf J6.M F1 IRi C�i tic- i< Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate ® Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure Improbable ❑ Possible ❑ Probable 19 Imminent ❑ —Trunlc — — Roots and Root Collar — Dead/Missing bark ❑ Abnormal bark texture/calor ❑ Collar buried/Not visible ❑ Depth Stem girdling ❑ Codominant stems ❑ included bark ❑ Cracks ❑ Dead ❑ Decay ❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Sapwood damage/decay ❑ Cankers/Galls/Burls❑ Sapooze ❑ Ooze ❑ Cavity ❑ %circ. Lightning damage ❑ Heartwood decay❑ Conks/Mushrooms ❑ Cracks ❑ Cut/Damaged roots ❑ Distance from trunk Cavity/Nest hole _% circ. Depth Poor taper ❑ Root plate lifting ❑ Soll weakness ffli Lean-EL2 Corrected? N Response growth Response growth c Main concern(s) C ci7nC-TS _ Malnconcern(s) Sar- W `'N 6• r -....._ 6&22,: T0 Z]lce/,,rC Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ® Moderate ❑ Significant ❑ Load on defect N/A ❑ Minor ❑ Moderate 1p Significant ❑ Likelihood of failure �Likellffiood of failure Improbable❑ Possible M Prob Imminent ❑ ble❑ Possible ❑ ProbaUfe ® Imminent ❑ ua� Pt4I Ti [ : PATI -11l AYSANG CL�S Pathway and clearance requirements • Using the grid below or an attached 8.5 -inch x 1 l -inch or larger paper, provide a simple drawing, indicating the location of the PV system in relation to buildings, structures, property tines, and, as applicable, flood hazard areas. • The drawing must be shown in sufficient detail to assess whether the pathway requirements of Section 31113.4.8 or ff [31 a C"i 0 Risk Categorization Matrix I. Likelihood matrix. Matrix 2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Likelihood Failure & Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe Failure hilpact Failure & Impact Consequences Moderate Target (Target number Tree part Conditlon(s) Low Moderate High ardescriptfon) Somewhat likely ofconcern M E Moderate Risk rating unlikely L7ow—. p CL E Low grana 09 0. .9 2 Mat& 2) Y- cy, Y\ Y . .. . .... Matrix I. Likelihood matrix. Matrix 2. Risk rating matrix. Likelihood of Consequences of Failure Failure & Impact Negligible Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate Nln Extreme Llkel Low Moderate High H Igh Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate unlikely L7ow—. Low Low Notes, explanations, descriptions Mltlgatl n options 1. Residual risk 2. Residual risk 3. Residual risk 4. Residual risk overall tree risk rating Low 11 Moderate 9, High IJ Extreme Overall residuill risk None tg, Low 0 Moderate 0 High 0 Extreme 0 Recommended inspection Interval Data Orfanal 0 Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ONO Oyes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations hNone OVisibility OAccess OVines DRoot collar buried Describe 'Ihls dfulashect was produced by the Intemational Society orArboriculture Q$A) — 2017 Page 2 of 2 Risk Categorization Matrix i. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Of Failure Very tow Conditions of concern N Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely EMMEEMM Likely Passible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable I Unlikely Unlikely I Unlikely Unlikely Matrix i. Likelihood matrix. Likelihood Of Failure Very tow Likel€hood of Impacting Target Low Medium High Imminent Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Very likely Probable Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Likely Passible Unlikely Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat likely Improbable I Unlikely Unlikely I Unlikely Unlikely Matrix2. Risk ratinrz matrix. Likelihood of Failure & Impact Negligible Consequences of Failure Minor Significant Severe Very likely Low Moderate High Extreme Likely Low Moderate High High Somewhat likely Low Low Moderate Moderate Unlikely Low Low Law Law Notes, explanations, descriptions Mitigation options -.a.tdV t-- Residual risk Overall tree risk rating Low ❑ Moderate 0, High ❑ Extreme ❑ Work priority 1 ❑ 2 ❑ 3 ❑ Overall residual risk Low ❑ Moderate ❑ High ❑ Extreme ❑ Recommended inspection interva Data �Flnal ❑ Preliminary Advanced assessment needed ❑No ❑Yes-Type/Reason Inspection limitations, None ❑Visibility ❑Access ❑Vines ©Root collar buried Describe Resldual risk Residual risk Residual risk 4 This datasheel was produced by the Fnteraafianat Society of Arboriculture(ISA) - 2013 Page 2 of 2 M�'b. e 11 � , 4 ��( 1 Y : d� • 'Y � 1�p ! r '� Y «h �k�y'e; ':p � M 1 M1) L 4 ;., �mR1",Y'Y � a '�►. ti • �, • r '!� rs= w m ;,'0� 'P h�9i �l��a,d m � m � ��r >+' 40""�^7 • 9M d'1 w r yn. '� � �Ri � �'tl b� �9��� �° 1�� dM If 7 d�Yl x .a �.w.41r .. a �•• 4ht(YJ dUr� ((yyyp HHe�yy f �, �k awuY��v�mJB. �rr0AWi1"R. IV, V--,& '�, 5- 491019 fe It INA. , fr woo r"K 14 cot , Me t Now, ITT T wMMMEM m v � �/\� � � � � \� ^ �\ �\ �� / y� � / , /\^«� y\\ a