HomeMy WebLinkAboutTransportation Packet September 2023Note: Anyone wishing to speak at any Transportation Advisory Committee meeting is encouraged to do so.
If you wish to speak, please rise and, after you have been recognized by the Chair, give your name and
complete address for the record. You will then be allowed to speak. Please note the public testimony may
be limited by the Chair.
TTRRAANNSSPPOORRTTAATTIIOONN AADDVVIISSOORRYY CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE
SSeepptteemmbbeerr 2211,, 22002233
AGENDA
I. CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 PM, Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 E. Main Street
II. ANNOUNCEMENTS
III. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Approval of August 17, 2023 Minutes
IV. PUBLIC FORUM (6:05-6:20)
V. REPORTS FROM OTHER CITY COMMITTEES (6:20-6:30)
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. North Mountain Avenue Public Hearing (6:30-8:00, action required, take public input on protected
bike lane improvements and elimination of parking along North Mountain Avenue in order to
make a recommendation to the City Council).
VII. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. None
VIII. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
A. None
IX. AGENDA BUILDING – Future Meetings
X. ADJOURNMENT: 8:00 PM
Next Meeting Date: October 19, 2023
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please email scott.fleury@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the
City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA
Title 1).
ASHLAND TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES August 17, 2023
Transportation Advisory Committee August 18, 2023 Page 1 of 5
CALL TO ORDER: 6:00pm Members Present: Mark Brouillard, Corinne Vièville, Linda Peterson-Adams, Holly Christiansen, Dylan Dahle Staff Present: Scott Fleury Liaison Present: Eric Hansen Guests Present: Edem Gomez, Gary Shaff ANNOUNCEMENTS The Transportation Advisory Committee will be holding a public hearing on September 21 at 6pm at the Council Chambers (1195 E Main St) regarding the design of the N Mountain Ave Rehabilitation Project installation of a protected bike lane. Written comments may also be submitted to the TAC for inclusion via the link on the city’s website, or sent to Eric Hansen at eric@ashland.or.us or dylan.bloom@council.or.us. City Council approved a contract with a company for a more user-friendly website. Congratulations to Nick Davids who will be the newest member of the TAC starting in September. This leaves one position open on the TAC. Applications are available online. CONSENT AGENDA The following corrections for the July 20th minutes were requested: - Under Public Forum in the third paragraph, the comment about Ross Ln being a one-way road should be changed to it’s “basically a one lane road”. - In the discussion about the Bird Scooters, rephrase the sentence where Hansen asks for the timeline. - Also in the discussion about the Bird Scooters, change “her” to “she” regarding Peterson-Adams and making contact with the Chamber of Commerce. Vièville moved to accept the minutes with the corrections. Brouillard and Christiansen seconded. All ayes. PUBLIC FORUM No one was in the audience of the meeting, however several letters and comments have been received regarding the N Mountain Ave Rehabilitation Project. Those that were not included in the packet for this meeting will be included in the packet for the public hearing on September 21st. Peterson-Adams thanked Paul Rostykus for his comments on the work done by ODOT. Brouillard stated that while working on the Bike Rack Inventory Project, out-of-town visitors inquired if there was more bike parking, and requested that bike repair shops be put on the map. Christiansen stated that she saw people on Next Door posting about bicycles on sidewalks downtown, and discussion on what the laws are. She stated that she remembers there being information near the corners of the sidewalks downtown that outlined where bicyclists can and cannot ride that seems to have worn off. She highlighted the importance of maintaining those educational materials. Peterson-Adams stated these things should be included in the Rediscover Downtown project. REPORTS FROM OTHER CITY COMMITTEES Gary Shaff stated that the Climate and Environment Policy Advisory Committee met earlier this month, and most of the discussion focused on reduction of emissions from city operations, and continued efforts to find a way to limit
ASHLAND TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES August 17, 2023
Transportation Advisory Committee August 18, 2023 Page 2 of 5
natural gas use in new residential construction. Shaff had intended to share with the Climate and Environment Policy Advisory Committee the presentation that he gave to the TAC this past February that demonstrated the safety associated with protected bike lanes but was unable to due to time constraints. Since the presentation was delayed until next month, Shaff hopes to get some statistics from Brouillard in the meantime. Edem Gomez looked at the rider-ship last month regarding RVTD’s Route 17. There were over 400 rides in July. Gomez hopes to continue to share rider-ship data with the group. Peterson-Adams requested that the data be compared with the data from the Ashland Connector. Peterson-Adams went to the Planning Commission and spoke with the chair, and they are working on putting together meetings for all the chairpersons of the commissions and committees. NEW BUSINESS Committee Liaisons to Other Committees/Commissions Peterson-Adams inquired about volunteers to attend other committee and commission meetings. The volunteers would need to look at the agendas for meetings and see if there’s anything that may be related to transportation or may be of interest to the TAC, and then attend or watch the meetings. Brouillard volunteered to do the Planning Commission meetings. Vièville volunteered to do the Parks and Recreation Senior Advisory Committee and the regular Parks and Recreation Commission meetings. Dahle volunteered to do the Housing and Human Services Advisory Committee. Christiansen volunteered to do the Social Equity and Racial Justice Committee. Peterson-Adams volunteered to do the Climate and Environment Policy Advisory Committee. The remaining TAC members who do not have a committee or commission assigned to them will be consulted later. Fleury volunteered to give updates to the group regarding RVACT and MPO. Hansen and city council member Dylan Bloom are going to start attending RVTD meetings. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Committee Workplan Christiansen suggested that the Bike Parking Inventory should be under the third category. Brouillard stated that only doing the Bike Parking Inventory downtown is a disservice, as the information for the whole city would be useful. Fleury stated that under the third category there would need to be Bike Parking Inventory and Bike Parking Improvements as well, because the inventory needs to be established first before improvements can be made. Fleury will change the order. Parklet Program Business Outreach Hansen, Fleury, and Peterson-Adams met with the Chamber of Commerce. Hansen stated that the Chamber of Commerce was receptive to doing some of the leg-work if the TAC could create a poll for the businesses. Fleury stated that the Chamber is wanting to do outreach to local businesses about the Rediscover Downtown initiative and the beautification process. Brouillard asked Hansen if the Chamber was going to look at businesses outside of downtown, as businesses outside of the downtown corridor aren’t being heard. Hansen stated that during the discussion that him, Fleury, and Peterson-Adams had with the Chamber, the idea of the parklet program being extended to areas outside the downtown was discussed, as well as the fact that the city is more than just the downtown area. North Mountain Ave Public Hearing Details Public comment letters have been received by Fleury, and they will be presented during the public hearing. Fleury
ASHLAND TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES August 17, 2023
Transportation Advisory Committee August 18, 2023 Page 3 of 5
will talk to Dorinda Cottle about putting something on the website about the meeting. The notification letters will be sent out shortly after Labor Day. Brouillard stated that the Ashland Chronicle has been doing a good job of posting what’s happening in the city, and hopefully Ashland News will do the same. Christiansen pointed out that in the signature section of the draft letter, it says “Ashland Transportation Committee Chair” rather than “Ashland Transportation Advisory Committee Chair”, and it’s like that on the website as well. Fleury will correct it. Bird Next Steps Peterson-Adams stated that the group is still in the investigation stages of whether to continue with the Bird Scooter Program, and she has reached out to the Chamber, the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Senior Advisory Committee, and SOU for further discussion. Brouillard asked Hansen about the wattage of the scooters, and Hansen responded that he thinks it’s 500 but he isn’t sure. Brouillard stated that he spoke with multiple insurance companies in town, and they stated that if the scooters were over one horsepower and could go 20mph then separate insurance would be needed. Brouillard and Hansen will put together a question for Peterson-Adams to ask the Bird representative regarding the insurance/liability situation. Fleury suggested that since the question of liability is coming up that Officer MacLennan would be a good resource regarding the enforcement issues of the scooters. Fleury stated that he had a conversation with Officer MacLennan who told him that he’s been seeing issues with electric bikes and scooters around town, such as speeding. Peterson-Adams let the group know that they could send questions and comments about the program to her directly at lindaforashland@gmail.com. Brouillard commented that on a recent trip to San Francisco, he saw that there are three vendors doing scooter programs, and they require riders to wear a helmet, not ride them on the sidewalks, and lock the scooters up after use to a bike rack. Brouillard is concerned that people will just leave the scooters in the sidewalks causing a trip hazard or take up bike parking which the City of Ashland doesn’t have enough of as is. Brouillard also stated that e-bikes would be a better approach for the city because the Zagster program was successful and most people in town know what the bike laws are. Brouillard stated that doing the scooter program downtown or in the Railroad district is too unsafe, and people don’t know that with a scooter one has to abide by the bike laws. Fleury stated that his worry is that the sidewalks downtown are narrow, there’s no bike facility downtown, and there are multiple safety concerns in terms of obstacles on the sidewalks as is. Fleury stated that before deciding whether to move forward with the Bird program, having a conversation with SOU, the parks department, and the police department about the pros and cons would be beneficial. He also commented that there’s a pilot program that could be utilized. Vièville inquired if there is a way to tell who the last person who rode a scooter was so that warnings or fines could be distributed if a rider leaves their scooter in an inappropriate place. Brouillard stated that Bird does have a way to tell who last rode them, but there’s no way to prove that if it was put away wrong that it was the last rider, because people can physically move them without registering as a rider. The group will continue to investigate the program. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Bike Rack Inventory Project Christiansen noted that the amount of customers for any given business needs to be taken into account when installing bike racks, as she noticed that Ace Hardware for example typically has a lot of bikes parked outside. She also noted that the positioning of the bike racks caused some bikes to overhang onto the sidewalk when parked.
ASHLAND TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES August 17, 2023
Transportation Advisory Committee August 18, 2023 Page 4 of 5
Peterson-Adams inquired if Christiansen and Brouillard found places where more bike parking would be beneficial. Brouillard stated that he found four bike parking spots that were taken out for the new sidewalks and noted that people were locking their bikes to metal street signs. He suggested that a survey be done to see where bike parking was taken away, and then put bike parking back in those spots. He also noted that there’s not enough bike parking at Lithia Park, as the only bike parking is near the kids playground. Hansen mentioned that there’s no central bike parking spot yet either, and that that would be received well if recommended by the group for the Master Plan. Fleury stated that the idea of lockers has also been mentioned before. Brouillard also noted that many people he talked to during the surveying process were unhappy about a lack of a bike lane downtown. He also explained the way that San Francisco does their green striping for bike lanes, and the benefits of the various types of paint. Vièville inquired if bike theft is a prevalent problem in Ashland, and Fleury responded yes, and noted that in the public comment part of the Safe Routes to School program, there were comments about bike theft around the schools. Brouillard inquired if a large camera like the one at Target could be utilized to watch a bike facility. Fleury stated it was plausible, and that city council had approved security cameras in multiple areas. Christiansen stated that people who use their bikes to commute like bike lockers not just for the security but because it helps protect the bike from weather. Also that some bikers may not want to leave their bikes in a central location that may be far walking distance from where they’re going. Grant Support Services Fleury stated he met with Evan Brooks Associates, and they are well equipped to help the city in finding grants for all of the city’s projects. He’s working on putting together the contract and funding portion for it and is hoping to have it done and approved by the city in September, and to get city council’s approval. He stated that Evan Brooks Associates is willing to write the grants if needed, or city staff can. Public Education Materials Fleury informed the group that the materials are already in city staff’s possession so contact Liz Beckerich to obtain them. He would also like to give some of the information to Dorinda Cottle so that she can distribute it in the mailers, newsletters, and the city website. Peterson-Adams asked if Dorinda Cottle could promote the Near Miss Application on the website more, and Fleury said he would talk to her about it. Brouillard requested that the new city website include heat mapping. Hansen suggested that a letter to city council about it would be helpful, as well as emailing Jason Wegner with the city’s IT at Jason.wegner@ashland.or.us. Agenda Building Brouillard mentioned the reports of violence against pedestrians and bikers under the Ashland St overpass and suggested a camera or some sort of security measure. The pros of removing the overpass would be that it would make it easier to evacuate town if needed, would slow traffic, and would make it so there’s a continuous bike lane. Hansen noted that with the new emergency shelter people will be noticing the state of southeast Ashland and the problems that exist near that overpass, but it could be an opportunity to address the issues. ADJOURNMENT: @ 8:00 PM
ASHLAND TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING NOTES August 17, 2023
Transportation Advisory Committee August 18, 2023 Page 5 of 5
Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth Beckerich, Administrative Assistant **Full Video Available by Request**
Memo
Date:
September 13, 2023
From: Scott A. Fleury
To: Transportation Advisory Committee
RE: North Mountain Avenue Rehabilitation Design and Bike Facility Improvements
BACKGROUND:
The Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC) has been discussing the potential for bike
facility improvements associated with major roadway rehabilitation projects, most
recently associated with the Ashland St. project and now with the North Mountain Ave.
project.
As part of this continued discussion the TAC scheduled a public hearing to take public
input regarding the installation of PBLs on North Mountain Avenue. The installation of PBLs
require the removal of streetside/curbside parking to accommodate the improvement
and it is necessary to understand both issues in completely in order for the TAC to make a
recommendation to the City Council on whether or not to move forward with a PBL and
parking reduction. As a reminder only parking that is curbside adjacent to the travel lane
would need to be eliminated to support the PBL. Parking within parking bays would not
need to be eliminated to support the PBL installation.
The TAC approved the notification boundary and staff previously sent notification letters
to all property owners within that boundary making them aware of the meeting and
associated discussion issue.
Staff has included all public comment received to the date of which the meeting packet
was created and posted online (September 14, 2023). Additional public comment
received after the packet posting deadline will be forwarded to the TAC and captured for
the Council packet.
The current Transportation System Plan (TSP) has 4 established goals that align with
providing modal equity and improving bike/pedestrian systems. The mission of the TAC is
also defined as:
"Ashland has a vision - to retain our small-town character even while we grow. To achieve
this vision, we must proactively plan for a transportation system that is integrated into the
community and enhances Ashland's livability, character and natural environment...The focus
must be on people being able to move easily through the city in all modes of travel, Modal
equity then is more than just a phase. It is a planning concept that does not necessarily
imply equal financial commitment or equal percentage use of each mode, but rather
ensures that we will have the opportunity to conveniently and safely use the transportation
mode of our choice, and allow us to move toward a less auto-dependent community."
Goal #1
Create a “green” template for other communities in the state and nation to follow.
• Expand active transportation infrastructure to include features that encourage
non-auto travel. Potential features include bicycle boulevards, bicycle lanes, wider
bicycle trails, and improved lighting for bicycles and pedestrians.
Goal #2
Make safety a priority for all modes of travel.
• Strategically plan for safety and operational improvements for bicyclists and
pedestrians.
Goal #3
Maintain small-town character, support economic prosperity and accommodate future
growth.
• Consider modal equity when integrating land use and transportation to provide
travel options for system users.
Goal #4:
Create a system-wide balance for serving and facilitating pedestrian, bicycle, rail, air, transit,
and vehicular traffic in terms of mobility and access within and through the City of Ashland.
In addition to the TSP goals and mission the Transportation Planning Rule (TPR) was
recently updated to reflect the Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC)
framework.
The CFEC and updated TPR program works to:
• Meet legislative climate policy and goals
• Increase housing and employment options
• Foster vibrant downtowns and centers
• Improve transportation choices
• Promote equitable outcomes
One of the components of the new TPR rule is that parking mandates are no longer
allowed within ½-mile of frequent transit where most CFAs are likely to be located, and
once adopted, parking mandates will not be allowed within ½-mile of CFAs themselves
unless a menu of parking management policies are enacted and parking for multi-family
units is ‘unbundled’.
The Planning Department is developing the CFA areas and updates to the parking code
for adoption by the City Council. Staff has attached the update provided to the TAC at the
March 16th meeting on the TPR/CEFAC requirements.
North Mountain Avenue Project Information:
Dowl Engineering is currently in the design phase for the North Mountain Rehabilitation
Project. They provided an analysis and schematic diagram for changing North Mountain
Avenue from a standard bike lane configuration to a protected bike lane (PBL)
configuration. PBLs are not feasible for the entire length of Mountain Avenue because of
the constrained right of way but are feasible for a large section with the reduction of on
street parking. The installation of PBLs also requires the reduction of the current travel land
width. Staff has attached the drawing provided by Dowl Engineering showing the location
where parking would need to be eliminated. The project also includes sidewalk infill,
pedestrian safety enhancements (RRFBs), striping, signage and overall pavement
rehabilitation.
North Mountain Avenue General Info:
Mountain Avenue classified as an avenue in the TSP.
Mountain Avenue has a 60 foot right of way
Mountain Avenue generally has continuous sidewalk and a bike lane facility in place
Mountain Avenue has sections of on-street parking provided for in bays
P22 Project in the TSP recommends sidewalk infill along North Mountain Avenue
CONCLUSION:
The Committee should discuss the issues, receive public comment, and develop any
recommendations for staff to move forward to the City Council for a final decision. Staff will
coordinate with the City Manager to bring this topic forward to the City Council for another
discussion and final decision.
Attachments: 1. North Mountain Schematic Layout-PBL 2. North Mountain Traffic Count Data
3. North Mountain Bike Count Data
4. P22 Fact Sheet 5. March 16, 2023 CEFAC Presentation Information
PAVILION PL
NMOUNTAINAV
SK
Y
L
ARK
P
L
E
NEVADA
ST
905
950
2,256 ADT
28.6 MPH, avg
32.9 MPH, 85th%12/6/2016
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
PA
V
ILION
P
L
FAIROAKSAVFAIROAKSCT
ST
O
NY PT
NMOUNTAIN
AV
FAIR OAKS
827
654
638
863
853
624
646
829
859
616
838
634
837
852
826
828
612
626
920
836
608
825
656
618
910
930
604
824
830
835
614
636
832
831
823
606
628
855
644
851
691681671621
651 214651 308
651 209
651 307
651
204 651
310
651 309
651 203
651 314
651 303
651 206
651 306
651 211
651 208
651 312
651 311
651 212
651 207
952 ADT
24 MPH, avg
29.6 MPH, 85th%
8/5/2021
726 ADT
20.9 MPH, avg
24.8 MPH, 85th%
8/16/2021
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
N
MOUNTAIN
AV
GRE A T O A KSDR
NEPENTHE RD
780
594
777
769
621 641
103 ADT
19.9 MPH, avg
23.6 MPH, 85th%
10/25/2011
2,213 ADT
27.7 MPH, avg
31.7 MPH, 85th%
7/26/2021
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
N
MOUNTAIN
AV
619
607
625
1,406 ADT
28.4 MPH, avg
33.5 MPH, 85th%
12/6/2016
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
N
MOU
NTAIN
A
V
BRISCOE PL
533
557
509
539
521
551
515
545
2,581 ADT
26.8 MPH, avg
30.7 MPH, 85th%
7/19/2021
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
H
E
M
L
O
C
K
L
N
LAR K SP U R LN
N
M
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
A
V
380
351
500
390
370
360
421
411
381
431
391
361
371
5,973 ADT
28.6 MPH, avg
33.2 MPH, 85th%
10/14/2015
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
N
MOUNTA
IN
AV
CLEAR CREEK DR
167
1090
185
1072
208
192
196
166
3,560 ADT
26.9 MPH, avg
30.3 MPH, 85th%8/30/2021
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
N
MOUNTAIN
AV
B ST
1097
10981096
158
5,568 ADT
16.9 MPH, avg
20.7 MPH, 85th%12/4/2014
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
N
MOUNTA
IN
AV
61
54
45
81
64
90
51
72
57
56
70
58
68
53
6260
59
77
40
74
33
55
78 80
6,463 ADT
22.3 MPH, avg
26.2 MPH, 85th%
12/5/2014
N Mountain Ave
Traffic Count Map
Mapping is schematic only and bears no warranty of accuracy.
All features, structures, facilities, easement or roadway locations
should be independently field verified for existence and/or location.
I
Date: 7/7/2022
0 50 10025
Feet
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Hersey
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Briscoe
:
Site: Eng - 07-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 7/12/2021 3:00 PM -Monday, 7/19/2021 6:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
north-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.13.30.03.412:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.11.70.01.91:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.92.40.03.62:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.30.90.01.33:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.01.45.40.07.14:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.90.03.313.90.018.15:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.20.05.732.00.039.86:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.22.80.28.844.50.257.37:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.50.00.24.50.013.768.30.087.38:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.80.00.24.20.213.376.80.095.79:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.21.00.00.34.80.213.766.50.086.710:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.26.70.216.799.50.2124.011:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.05.30.513.377.20.297.212:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.01.00.00.05.30.315.590.00.3112.51:00 PM
0.00.00.20.00.00.70.00.24.20.317.578.50.0101.52:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.05.10.010.075.10.491.13:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.03.70.012.177.70.094.04:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.12.40.07.760.10.170.95:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.11.70.06.645.30.153.96:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.40.04.939.00.144.67:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.05.628.10.034.38:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.02.315.10.017.99:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.07.70.18.910:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.32.90.03.311:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
1
<6 Axle
Multi
0.2
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.0%
3
5 Axle
Double
0.5
0.6%
45
<5 Axle
Double
7.3
0.0%
0
4 Axle
Single
0.0
0.1%
10
3 Axle
Single
1.6
4.4%
353
2 Axle 6
Tire
56.1
0.1%
11
Buses
1.8
13.8%
1105
2 Axle
Long
174.7
80.7%
6451
Cars &
Trailers
1012.0
0.2%
12
Bike
1.8
7991
Total
1256.1Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
north-bound
N Mountain Ave - Briscoe to Hersey - 07-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:30 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Hersey
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Briscoe
:
Site: Eng - 07-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 7/12/2021 3:00 PM -Monday, 7/19/2021 6:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
south-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.33.30.03.612:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.61.60.02.11:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.00.91.60.02.92:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.92.40.03.43:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.03.010.10.013.64:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.03.70.07.723.00.034.75:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.03.30.37.235.30.046.56:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.54.70.212.751.00.069.07:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.25.70.515.763.00.285.58:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.50.00.06.30.516.072.30.396.39:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.21.00.00.56.00.317.279.50.0104.710:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.30.00.06.50.521.071.00.2100.511:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.80.00.04.50.818.375.30.2100.012:00 PM
0.00.00.00.20.00.30.00.25.30.316.592.80.2115.81:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.50.00.06.50.317.277.20.0101.72:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.05.10.413.770.10.089.73:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.03.60.010.771.90.186.44:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.01.90.111.962.70.076.95:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.70.09.749.10.061.66:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.02.90.08.644.30.156.17:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.02.70.14.330.90.038.18:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.03.018.00.021.79:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.40.01.07.40.19.110:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.73.40.04.111:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
1
>6 Axle
Double
0.2
0.0%
3
5 Axle
Double
0.5
0.5%
42
<5 Axle
Double
6.7
0.0%
0
4 Axle
Single
0.0
0.1%
10
3 Axle
Single
1.6
5.5%
464
2 Axle 6
Tire
73.3
0.3%
28
Buses
4.5
16.4%
1388
2 Axle
Long
218.5
77.0%
6504
Cars &
Trailers
1017.4
0.1%
9
Bike
1.4
8449
Total
1324.1Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Briscoe to Hersey - 07-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:30 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Hersey
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Briscoe
:
Site: Eng - 07-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 7/12/2021 3:00 PM -Monday, 7/19/2021 6:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
Combined
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.46.60.07.012:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.73.30.04.01:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.60.01.74.00.06.42:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.01.13.30.04.73:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.04.415.60.020.74:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.14.60.011.036.90.052.95:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.05.50.312.867.30.086.36:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.77.50.321.595.50.2126.37:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.80.00.310.20.529.3131.30.2172.88:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.51.30.00.210.50.729.3149.20.3192.09:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.32.00.00.810.80.530.8146.00.0191.310:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.02.00.00.213.20.737.7170.50.3224.511:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.50.00.09.81.331.7152.50.3197.212:00 PM
0.00.00.00.20.01.30.00.210.70.732.0182.80.5228.31:00 PM
0.00.00.20.00.01.20.00.210.70.734.7155.70.0203.22:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.010.30.423.7145.30.4180.93:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.07.30.022.9149.60.1180.44:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.14.30.119.6122.90.1147.75:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.14.40.016.394.40.1115.46:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.03.30.013.483.30.3100.77:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.03.30.19.959.00.072.48:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.10.05.333.10.039.69:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.40.02.015.10.318.010:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.01.06.30.07.411:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
1
<6 Axle
Multi
0.2
0.0%
1
>6 Axle
Double
0.2
0.0%
6
5 Axle
Double
1.0
0.5%
87
<5 Axle
Double
14.0
0.0%
0
4 Axle
Single
0.0
0.1%
20
3 Axle
Single
3.2
5.0%
817
2 Axle 6
Tire
129.4
0.2%
39
Buses
6.4
15.2%
2493
2 Axle
Long
393.3
78.8%
12955
Cars &
Trailers
2029.4
0.1%
21
Bike
3.3
16440
Total
2580.3Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
Combined
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
0.0%
1
0.0%
0
0.0%
3
0.0%
3
0.5%
42
0.6%
45
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.1%
10
0.1%
10
5.5%
464
4.4%
353
0.3%
28
0.1%
11
16.4%
1388
13.8%
1105
77.0%
6504
80.7%
6451
0.1%
9
0.2%
12
8449
7991north-bound
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Briscoe to Hersey - 07-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:30 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
R/R Tracks
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Clear Creek
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Wednesday, 8/25/2021 1:00 PM -Monday, 8/30/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
north-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.44.60.05.012:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.00.24.20.04.81:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.00.23.20.03.82:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.21.60.01.83:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.21.60.01.84:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.40.00.64.60.26.05:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.23.20.09.223.80.036.46:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.30.00.32.80.09.837.80.051.07:00 AM
0.30.00.00.00.00.00.00.85.81.314.377.30.399.88:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.34.01.318.581.50.3106.09:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.50.00.85.31.021.0102.80.8132.310:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.30.00.54.80.320.8103.00.5131.011:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.00.00.85.31.519.3108.30.5136.512:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.01.40.00.44.20.616.4108.40.4131.81:00 PM
0.00.00.20.00.00.20.00.67.21.019.2104.00.4132.82:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.04.40.820.4116.21.0143.23:00 PM
0.00.00.20.00.00.60.00.04.61.217.4112.80.6137.44:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.03.40.620.6107.81.2133.85:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.00.416.096.20.2115.86:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.01.20.210.265.20.077.07:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.00.60.24.847.80.253.88:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.02.833.40.036.89:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.02.413.80.016.810:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.213.40.014.611:00 PM
0.0%
1
>6 Axle
Multi
0.3
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
2
<6 Axle
Multi
0.4
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.0%
2
5 Axle
Double
0.5
0.4%
29
<5 Axle
Double
6.5
0.0%
0
4 Axle
Single
0.0
0.3%
23
3 Axle
Single
5.3
3.5%
279
2 Axle 6
Tire
61.4
0.6%
46
Buses
10.3
14.3%
1126
2 Axle
Long
245.9
80.5%
6355
Cars &
Trailers
1373.1
0.4%
30
Bike
6.5
7893
Total
1709.9Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
north-bound
N Mountain Ave - Clear Creek to RR Tracks - 08-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:30 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
R/R Tracks
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Clear Creek
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Wednesday, 8/25/2021 1:00 PM -Monday, 8/30/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
south-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.00.01.44.00.06.412:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.01.40.02.41:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.02.80.03.82:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.02.20.02.43:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.41.60.02.04:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.22.80.05.05:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.01.60.05.417.60.024.86:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.52.50.011.029.80.344.37:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.50.30.34.50.516.052.50.074.58:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.80.30.06.80.316.380.30.0104.89:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.30.50.57.80.023.894.50.3128.510:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.57.50.825.0101.31.0136.311:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.86.30.327.5110.80.5146.312:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.20.80.20.412.40.229.6117.00.8161.61:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.01.00.00.88.80.627.2120.40.4159.22:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.211.20.031.4129.60.4173.43:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.06.00.025.4121.60.4154.04:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.07.20.825.8129.60.0163.85:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.44.00.018.8104.40.2128.06:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.03.40.018.067.40.289.27:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.01.20.08.054.80.064.28:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.60.06.831.60.040.09:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.80.03.819.40.024.010:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.80.01.69.00.011.411:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.0%
2
5 Axle
Double
0.5
0.4%
32
<5 Axle
Double
7.0
0.1%
7
4 Axle
Single
1.7
0.2%
19
3 Axle
Single
4.3
5.1%
442
2 Axle 6
Tire
95.5
0.2%
15
Buses
3.4
17.6%
1517
2 Axle
Long
327.3
76.2%
6562
Cars &
Trailers
1406.2
0.2%
20
Bike
4.4
8616
Total
1850.1Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Clear Creek to RR Tracks - 08-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:30 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
R/R Tracks
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Clear Creek
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Wednesday, 8/25/2021 1:00 PM -Monday, 8/30/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
Combined
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.00.01.88.60.011.412:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.01.25.60.07.21:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.01.26.00.07.62:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.23.80.04.23:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.63.20.03.84:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.40.02.87.40.211.05:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.24.80.014.641.40.061.26:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.50.00.85.30.020.867.50.395.37:00 AM
0.30.00.00.00.00.50.31.010.31.830.3129.80.3174.38:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.31.00.30.310.81.534.8161.80.3210.89:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.31.80.51.313.01.044.8197.31.0260.810:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.30.31.012.31.045.8204.31.5267.311:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.00.31.511.51.846.8219.01.0282.812:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.22.20.20.816.60.846.0225.41.2293.41:00 PM
0.00.00.20.00.01.20.01.416.01.646.4224.40.8292.02:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.01.00.00.215.60.851.8245.81.4316.63:00 PM
0.00.00.20.00.01.20.00.010.61.242.8234.41.0291.44:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.010.61.446.4237.41.2297.65:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.47.00.434.8200.60.4243.86:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.04.60.228.2132.60.2166.27:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.01.80.212.8102.60.2118.08:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.20.09.665.00.076.89:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.40.06.233.20.040.810:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.80.02.822.40.026.011:00 PM
0.0%
1
>6 Axle
Multi
0.3
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
2
<6 Axle
Multi
0.4
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.0%
4
5 Axle
Double
1.0
0.4%
61
<5 Axle
Double
13.4
0.0%
7
4 Axle
Single
1.7
0.3%
42
3 Axle
Single
9.6
4.4%
721
2 Axle 6
Tire
156.8
0.4%
61
Buses
13.6
16.0%
2643
2 Axle
Long
573.2
78.2%
12917
Cars &
Trailers
2779.3
0.3%
50
Bike
10.9
16509
Total
3560.0Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
Combined
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
2
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
2
0.0%
2
0.4%
32
0.4%
29
0.1%
7
0.0%
0
0.2%
19
0.3%
23
5.1%
442
3.5%
279
0.2%
15
0.6%
46
17.6%
1517
14.3%
1126
76.2%
6562
80.5%
6355
0.2%
20
0.4%
30
8616
7893north-bound
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Clear Creek to RR Tracks - 08-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:30 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Mountain Meadows
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Fair Oaks
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 8/9/2021 8:00 AM -Monday, 8/16/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
south-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.73.00.03.912:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.30.00.72.30.03.61:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.90.00.92:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.30.01.33:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.30.00.01.60.02.04:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.01.74.10.06.65:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.31.90.08.614.30.025.36:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.25.00.28.321.30.035.37:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.90.30.13.10.412.027.00.043.98:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.33.10.79.328.40.142.49:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.10.33.90.19.731.90.046.410:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.33.90.39.033.70.147.711:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.30.34.90.68.637.90.052.712:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.40.03.30.411.633.60.349.71:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.43.00.09.141.00.053.62:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.13.10.18.942.10.154.93:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.04.10.110.138.00.052.44:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.01.70.05.739.60.047.15:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.70.07.432.00.041.16:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.04.418.90.023.97:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.60.02.617.00.120.48:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.02.611.60.014.79:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.00.49.70.010.610:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.45.10.05.911:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.1%
3
5 Axle
Double
0.4
0.4%
20
<5 Axle
Double
2.9
0.3%
12
4 Axle
Single
1.7
0.4%
19
3 Axle
Single
2.7
6.7%
320
2 Axle 6
Tire
46.4
0.4%
21
Buses
3.0
19.2%
915
2 Axle
Long
131.9
72.4%
3452
Cars &
Trailers
496.2
0.1%
6
Bike
0.9
4768
Total
686.2Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Fair Oaks to Mountain Meadows - 08-21_a.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:31 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Mountain Meadows
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Fair Oaks
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 8/9/2021 8:00 AM -Monday, 8/16/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
north-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.60.00.01.112:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.30.00.70.10.02.11:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.10.10.10.00.92:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.30.00.00.43:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.30.00.00.94:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.10.31.30.30.04.05:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.03.90.72.92.60.010.46:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.29.82.010.313.20.235.87:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.111.77.013.914.90.148.18:00 AM
0.00.00.00.10.00.40.00.412.06.618.113.60.051.39:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.118.15.620.311.00.156.010:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.30.00.124.68.320.47.30.062.011:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.419.918.616.69.10.065.112:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.018.911.013.68.10.352.01:00 PM
0.00.00.00.10.10.30.00.320.66.310.98.40.047.02:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.020.73.410.18.10.042.43:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.012.64.39.37.60.033.94:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.06.99.310.02.00.028.35:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.011.35.96.00.30.023.66:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.010.01.15.12.10.018.47:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.07.90.45.01.10.014.68:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.90.43.00.30.06.69:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.10.41.40.00.05.010:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.01.10.11.30.00.02.711:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
2
>6 Axle
Double
0.3
0.0%
1
5 Axle
Double
0.1
0.8%
36
<5 Axle
Double
5.2
0.0%
0
4 Axle
Single
0.0
0.3%
12
3 Axle
Single
1.7
36.1%
1537
2 Axle 6
Tire
221.0
15.1%
641
Buses
91.9
29.6%
1260
2 Axle
Long
181.5
17.8%
759
Cars &
Trailers
110.3
0.1%
5
Bike
0.7
4253
Total
612.7Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
north-bound
N Mountain Ave - Fair Oaks to Mountain Meadows - 08-21_a.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:31 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Mountain Meadows
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Fair Oaks
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 8/9/2021 8:00 AM -Monday, 8/16/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
Combined
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.01.33.00.05.012:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.31.60.01.42.40.05.71:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.10.11.00.01.72:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.31.30.01.73:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.90.00.31.60.02.94:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.90.33.04.40.010.65:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.35.70.711.416.90.035.76:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.50.00.314.82.218.734.50.271.27:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.30.30.314.97.425.941.90.192.08:00 AM
0.00.00.00.10.00.60.30.715.17.327.442.00.193.79:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.10.10.422.05.730.042.90.1102.410:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.40.30.428.48.629.441.00.1109.711:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.70.30.724.719.125.147.00.0117.912:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.40.022.111.425.141.70.6101.71:00 PM
0.00.00.00.10.10.30.00.723.66.320.049.40.0100.62:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.123.93.619.050.30.197.33:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.016.74.419.445.60.086.34:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.08.69.315.741.60.075.45:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.013.05.913.432.30.064.76:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.010.61.19.621.00.042.37:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.08.40.47.618.10.135.08:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.40.45.611.90.021.39:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.13.40.41.99.70.015.610:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.01.40.11.75.10.08.611:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
2
>6 Axle
Double
0.3
0.0%
4
5 Axle
Double
0.6
0.6%
56
<5 Axle
Double
8.1
0.1%
12
4 Axle
Single
1.7
0.3%
31
3 Axle
Single
4.5
20.6%
1857
2 Axle 6
Tire
267.4
7.3%
662
Buses
94.9
24.1%
2175
2 Axle
Long
313.4
46.7%
4211
Cars &
Trailers
606.5
0.1%
11
Bike
1.6
9021
Total
1298.9Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
Combined
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
2
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
0.1%
3
0.8%
36
0.4%
20
0.0%
0
0.3%
12
0.3%
12
0.4%
19
36.1%
1537
6.7%
320
15.1%
641
0.4%
21
29.6%
1260
19.2%
915
17.8%
759
72.4%
3452
0.1%
5
0.1%
6
4253
4768south-bound
north-bound
N Mountain Ave - Fair Oaks to Mountain Meadows - 08-21_a.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:31 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Mountain Meadows
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Fiar Oaks
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 8/2/2021 9:00 AM -Monday, 8/9/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
south-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.61.70.02.412:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.00.02.10.02.41:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.40.00.92:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.63:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.31.60.01.94:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.01.00.02.14.10.07.65:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.03.00.07.713.10.024.06:00 AM
0.00.00.00.20.00.30.00.54.30.78.815.30.030.27:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.23.00.36.230.20.240.38:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.10.44.70.39.331.70.046.99:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.00.10.34.00.17.032.00.043.710:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.63.70.19.931.40.046.011:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.32.90.611.036.60.051.712:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.34.30.311.044.10.060.31:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.34.00.19.135.60.049.42:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.03.00.69.939.60.053.33:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.10.12.70.17.442.10.053.14:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.01.70.06.643.70.052.15:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.02.90.06.334.40.043.76:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.04.624.10.029.07:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.02.422.00.024.98:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.11.714.60.016.79:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.01.710.60.012.610:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.94.60.05.611:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
1
>6 Axle
Double
0.2
0.1%
3
5 Axle
Double
0.4
0.4%
17
<5 Axle
Double
2.5
0.2%
9
4 Axle
Single
1.3
0.5%
22
3 Axle
Single
3.2
6.6%
320
2 Axle 6
Tire
46.8
0.5%
23
Buses
3.4
17.8%
859
2 Axle
Long
124.9
74.0%
3569
Cars &
Trailers
516.4
0.0%
1
Bike
0.2
4824
Total
699.2Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Fair Oaks to Mountain Meadows - 08-21_b.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:43 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Mountain Meadows
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Fiar Oaks
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 8/2/2021 9:00 AM -Monday, 8/9/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
north-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.70.11.01.60.03.612:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.90.40.60.10.02.01:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.30.40.30.01.72:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.90.00.00.40.01.33:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.40.40.40.02.04:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.40.61.31.10.05.45:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.35.62.74.92.10.015.76:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.00.20.37.50.86.813.30.229.37:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.00.310.81.012.821.00.046.78:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.70.00.412.61.617.925.40.359.09:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.40.00.410.92.620.322.60.057.310:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.10.414.95.019.622.30.063.011:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.40.10.117.37.421.628.00.076.012:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.11.00.10.617.32.722.027.70.171.71:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.01.10.00.67.01.323.729.90.063.62:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.60.00.011.71.130.026.10.069.63:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.111.40.721.725.90.060.34:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.016.30.125.626.70.069.05:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.116.40.618.718.60.054.76:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.014.30.415.99.70.040.67:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.012.01.09.18.10.030.38:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.05.41.95.64.40.017.39:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.04.11.12.94.30.012.610:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.10.60.40.60.03.711:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.1%
5
5 Axle
Double
0.7
1.0%
57
<5 Axle
Double
8.2
0.1%
4
4 Axle
Single
0.6
0.4%
26
3 Axle
Single
3.8
23.8%
1409
2 Axle 6
Tire
203.9
4.1%
240
Buses
34.5
33.2%
1962
2 Axle
Long
283.1
37.4%
2211
Cars &
Trailers
320.8
0.1%
4
Bike
0.6
5918
Total
856.3Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
north-bound
N Mountain Ave - Fair Oaks to Mountain Meadows - 08-21_b.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:43 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Mountain Meadows
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Fiar Oaks
:
Site: Eng - 08-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 8/2/2021 9:00 AM -Monday, 8/9/2021 7:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
Combined
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.90.11.63.30.06.012:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.90.40.62.30.04.41:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.30.90.70.02.62:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.90.00.01.00.01.93:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.40.72.00.03.94:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.03.40.63.45.30.013.05:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.38.62.712.615.30.039.76:00 AM
0.00.00.00.20.20.30.20.811.81.515.728.70.259.57:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.80.20.513.81.319.051.20.287.08:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.90.10.917.31.927.157.10.3105.99:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.40.10.714.92.727.354.60.0101.010:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.00.11.018.65.129.453.70.0109.011:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.01.60.40.420.18.032.664.60.0127.712:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.11.10.30.921.63.033.071.90.1132.01:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.01.30.10.911.01.432.965.40.0113.02:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.70.10.014.71.739.965.70.0122.93:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.90.10.314.10.929.168.00.0113.44:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.018.00.132.170.40.0121.15:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.40.00.119.30.625.053.00.098.46:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.014.60.420.433.90.069.67:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.012.41.011.630.10.055.18:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.05.72.07.319.00.034.09:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.04.41.14.614.90.025.110:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.30.61.35.10.09.311:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
1
>6 Axle
Double
0.2
0.1%
8
5 Axle
Double
1.2
0.7%
74
<5 Axle
Double
10.7
0.1%
13
4 Axle
Single
1.9
0.4%
48
3 Axle
Single
7.0
16.1%
1729
2 Axle 6
Tire
250.7
2.4%
263
Buses
38.0
26.3%
2821
2 Axle
Long
408.0
53.8%
5780
Cars &
Trailers
837.1
0.0%
5
Bike
0.8
10742
Total
1555.5Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
Combined
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
0.1%
5
0.1%
3
1.0%
57
0.4%
17
0.1%
4
0.2%
9
0.4%
26
0.5%
22
23.8%
1409
6.6%
320
4.1%
240
0.5%
23
33.2%
1962
17.8%
859
37.4%
2211
74.0%
3569
0.1%
4
0.0%
1
5918
4824south-bound
north-bound
N Mountain Ave - Fair Oaks to Mountain Meadows - 08-21_b.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:43 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Nepenthe
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Mountain Meadows
:
Site: Eng - 07-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 7/19/2021 2:00 PM -Monday, 7/26/2021 6:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
north-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.12.30.02.412:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.61.70.02.31:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.70.00.92:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.91.00.02.03:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.30.02.64.00.07.04:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.00.00.00.90.03.012.00.016.05:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.00.00.53.00.07.230.70.041.56:00 AM
0.20.00.00.00.20.30.00.75.00.311.044.30.262.27:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.50.00.04.70.216.066.50.288.08:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.20.24.50.514.072.00.091.59:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.30.00.86.30.212.773.00.393.810:00 AM
0.20.00.00.00.00.50.00.57.00.220.098.50.0126.811:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.80.00.59.20.214.869.80.095.512:00 PM
0.20.00.00.00.01.20.00.26.30.217.374.50.099.81:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.10.60.00.16.40.718.369.60.196.02:00 PM
0.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.05.30.016.765.40.187.73:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.35.70.011.766.10.184.04:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.04.30.09.154.90.068.45:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.60.06.138.90.147.76:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.00.15.431.90.039.47:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.60.06.022.00.129.78:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.02.013.00.015.79:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.01.17.70.09.010:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.72.40.03.311:00 PM
0.0%
3
>6 Axle
Multi
0.5
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
1
<6 Axle
Multi
0.1
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.1%
6
5 Axle
Double
1.0
0.4%
28
<5 Axle
Double
4.5
0.0%
1
4 Axle
Single
0.2
0.3%
25
3 Axle
Single
4.0
6.3%
486
2 Axle 6
Tire
76.0
0.2%
16
Buses
2.5
16.3%
1270
2 Axle
Long
197.6
76.3%
5931
Cars &
Trailers
922.9
0.1%
9
Bike
1.4
7776
Total
1210.7Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
north-bound
N Mountain Ave - Mountain Meadows to Nepenthe - 07-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:43 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Nepenthe
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Mountain Meadows
:
Site: Eng - 07-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 7/19/2021 2:00 PM -Monday, 7/26/2021 6:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
south-bound
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.12.00.02.412:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.10.70.01.01:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.30.01.32:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.61.90.02.63:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.90.02.17.60.010.74:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.02.90.06.113.30.022.45:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.03.70.88.828.50.042.26:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.30.00.72.30.210.343.80.258.07:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.20.23.00.210.058.00.371.88:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.34.30.29.261.20.575.89:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.20.00.23.50.012.057.70.073.510:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.00.00.32.30.211.259.20.273.511:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.00.00.21.70.09.557.50.369.312:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.23.70.39.773.00.387.21:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.30.10.00.14.00.310.760.60.676.72:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.90.19.458.40.171.03:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.00.17.061.00.170.34:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.01.90.08.349.70.060.05:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.90.05.033.30.039.16:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.40.03.030.60.034.07:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.70.02.627.60.030.98:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.60.02.412.90.116.09:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.67.90.08.610:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.13.70.03.911:00 PM
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
<6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.1%
5
5 Axle
Double
0.8
0.1%
7
<5 Axle
Double
1.1
0.0%
3
4 Axle
Single
0.5
0.2%
14
3 Axle
Single
2.3
4.2%
271
2 Axle 6
Tire
42.2
0.2%
15
Buses
2.4
13.8%
892
2 Axle
Long
139.0
81.0%
5239
Cars &
Trailers
811.1
0.3%
18
Bike
2.8
6464
Total
1002.2Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Mountain Meadows to Nepenthe - 07-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:43 AM
City of Ashland
Public Works/Engineering Department
Traffic Study Report
Nepenthe
Classification Grand Totals
N Mountain Ave
Mountain Meadows
:
Site: Eng - 07-2021
: to
: -
Monday, 7/19/2021 2:00 PM -Monday, 7/26/2021 6:00 AM
>6 Axle
Multi
6 Axle
Multi
<6 Axle
Multi
>6 Axle
Double
5 Axle
Double
<5 Axle
Double
4 Axle
Single
3 Axle
Single
2 Axle 6
TireBuses2 Axle
Long
Cars &
TrailersBikeTotal
Combined
Interval Start
Hourly Averages
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.34.30.04.912:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.72.40.03.31:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.12.00.02.12:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.10.01.42.90.04.63:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.31.10.04.711.60.017.74:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.10.10.00.03.70.09.125.30.038.45:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.00.30.56.70.816.059.20.083.76:00 AM
0.20.00.00.00.30.70.01.37.30.521.388.20.3120.27:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.50.20.27.70.326.0124.50.5159.88:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.20.58.80.723.2133.20.5167.39:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.20.50.01.09.80.224.7130.70.3167.310:00 AM
0.20.00.00.00.20.50.00.89.30.331.2157.70.2200.311:00 AM
0.00.00.00.00.30.80.00.710.80.224.3127.30.3164.812:00 PM
0.20.00.00.00.01.20.00.310.00.527.0147.50.3187.01:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.40.70.00.310.41.029.0130.10.7172.72:00 PM
0.00.00.10.00.00.00.00.08.10.126.1123.90.3158.73:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.37.70.118.7127.10.3154.34:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.30.00.06.10.017.4104.60.0128.45:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.03.40.011.172.10.186.96:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.40.18.462.40.073.47:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.02.30.08.649.60.160.68:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.01.30.04.425.90.131.79:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.30.01.715.60.017.610:00 PM
0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.96.10.07.111:00 PM
0.0%
3
>6 Axle
Multi
0.5
0.0%
0
6 Axle
Multi
0.0
0.0%
1
<6 Axle
Multi
0.1
0.0%
0
>6 Axle
Double
0.0
0.1%
11
5 Axle
Double
1.7
0.2%
35
<5 Axle
Double
5.6
0.0%
4
4 Axle
Single
0.7
0.3%
39
3 Axle
Single
6.3
5.3%
757
2 Axle 6
Tire
118.2
0.2%
31
Buses
4.9
15.2%
2162
2 Axle
Long
336.5
78.4%
11170
Cars &
Trailers
1734.0
0.2%
27
Bike
4.2
14240
Total
2212.9Daily Average
Study Grand Totals
Combined
0.0%
0
0.0%
3
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
1
0.0%
0
0.0%
0
0.1%
5
0.1%
6
0.1%
7
0.4%
28
0.0%
3
0.0%
1
0.2%
14
0.3%
25
4.2%
271
6.3%
486
0.2%
15
0.2%
16
13.8%
892
16.3%
1270
81.0%
5239
76.3%
5931
0.3%
18
0.1%
9
6464
7776north-bound
south-bound
N Mountain Ave - Mountain Meadows to Nepenthe - 07-21.rdf Report Date: 5/18/2023 11:43 AM
Memo
Date:
March 6, 2023
From: Scott A. Fleury
To: Transportation Advisory Committee
RE: Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities
BACKGROUND:
At the February 22, 2023 City Council Special Meeting, Planning Staff provided a
presentation on the requirements for implementation of the new rules and associated
timelines.
Staff has included the Council staff report for reference. Planning staff will be attending the
meeting and will provide the Committee with a presentation.
CONCLUSION:
No action required; the information attached is to provide the Committee on an update of the
process to conform with new rules.
Parking Reform Summary
November 16, 2022
Rules Implementing
OAR 660-012-0400 through 0450 (see also definitions in 0005 and deadlines and processes in 0012)
Who do the rules apply to, and when is action needed?
The parking reforms apply to the 48 Oregon cities in Oregon’s eight metropolitan areas (Albany, Bend,
Corvallis, Eugene/Springfield, Grants Pass, Portland Metro, Rogue Valley, Salem/Keizer), and counties in
these areas with more than 5,000 people inside the urban growth boundary but outside city limits with
urban sewer and water services (Clackamas, Marion, Washington).
Some of the rules take effect December 31, 2022; others require action by March 31, 2023 or June 30, 2023.
Why reform costly parking mandates?
Parking mandates, also known as minimum parking requirements, are a one-size-fits-all approach that ends
up hiding the costs of parking in other goods, from housing to business costs to wages. That means the costs
of car ownership and use are subsidized, leading people to own more cars and drive more than they would if
they were aware of the true costs. Providing 300 square-feet of parking lot for each car that wants a parking
spot is a significant cost – in the thousands, and often tens of thousands, of dollars.
Because of the cookie-cutter approach of mandates, parking is often over-built, adding unnecessary costs,
while pushing apart buildings and making areas less walkable. That means more driving, and more pollution.
A better approach, one that has been used by communities around the world for decades, is to let the free
market provide parking where there is demand. Experience shows lenders usually require sufficient off-
street parking, and developers will build it, especially when the on-street parking is properly managed.
How do cities and counties amend their codes to meet the requirements in the rules?
The cleanest path to meet rules requirements is to update local zoning and development codes to meet the
requirements in OAR 660-012-0405 through 0415, and repeal all parking mandates. The provisions of 0425
through 0450 do not apply to communities without parking mandates.
Many of the requirements in 0405 through 0415 may already be in city code, as some of those provisions
have been required by the Transportation Planning Rules for many years.
If a community prefers to keep some mandates, the provisions in 0425 through 0450 reduce the mandates
and the negative impacts of remaining mandates.
Questions?
Evan Manvel
Climate Mitigation Planner
evan.manvel@dlcd.oregon.gov
971-375-5979
Parking A – Reform Near Transit; Certain Uses by December 31, 2022
Apply to development applications submitted after December 31, 2022 (amend code or directly apply these rules)
0430 Cannot mandate more than 1 space/unit for residential developments with more than 1 unit
No mandates for small units, affordable units, child care, facilities for people with disabilities, shelters
0440 No parking mandates allowed within ¾ mile of rail stations or ½ mile of frequent transit corridors
0410 Electric Vehicle Charging *due March 31, 2023
• New private multi-family residential or mixed-use developments install conduit to serve 40% of units
Parking B – More Reform, Choose an Approach by June 30, 2023 or alternative date
0405 Parking Regulation Improvement
• Preferential placement of carpool/vanpool parking
• Allow redevelopment of any portion of a parking lot for bike or transit uses
• Allow and encourage redevelopment of underused parking
• Allow and facilitate shared parking
• New developments with parking lots more than ¼ acre in size must install 50% tree canopy OR solar
panels; requires street trees and street-like facilities along driveways
• Parking maximums in appropriate locations (in existing TPR)
0415 Provisions Specific to More Populous Cities
• Cities >25,000 in metro or >100,000 outside set certain parking maximums in specified areas
(additional provisions for 200,000+ population cities, i.e. Portland, are not listed here)
0420-0450 Three options for parking reform
Option 1 660-012-0420 Options 2 and 3 660-012-0425 through 0450
Reduce parking burdens – reduced mandates based on shared parking, solar panels,
EV charging, car sharing, parking space accessibility, on-street parking, garage
parking. Must unbundle parking for multifamily units near frequent transit. May not
require garages/carports.
Climate-friendly area parking – remove mandates in and near climate-friendly areas or
adopt parking management policies; unbundle parking for multifamily units
Repeal
parking
mandates
Cities pop. 100,000+ adopt on-street parking prices for 5% of on-street parking
spaces by September 30, 2023 and 10% of spaces by September 30, 2025
Option 2
enact at least three of five policies
Option 3
all of the below
1. Unbundle parking for
residential units
2. Unbundle leased commercial
parking
No mandates for a variety of specific uses, small
sites, vacant buildings, studios/one bedrooms,
historic buildings, LEED or Oregon Reach Code
developments, etc.
No additional
action needed 3. Flexible commute benefit for
businesses with more than 50
employees
4. Tax on parking lot revenue
5. No more than ½ parking
space/unit mandated for
multifamily development
No additional parking for changes in use, redevelopments, expansions of over 30%.
Adopt parking maximums.
No mandates within ½ mile walking distance
of Climate-Friendly Areas.
Designate district to manage on-street residential
parking.
8/5/2022 Department of Land Conservation and Development www.oregon.gov/lcd
Transportation Planning Rules
The Climate-Friendly and Equitable Communities rules integrate climate and equity into the rules guiding
transportation and land use planning in Oregon’s eight metropolitan areas.
Meeting Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets for Oregon Metropolitan Areas
Since 1991, the Transportation Planning Rules have set transportation planning requirements for all Oregon cities and counties. These rules are designed to ensure coordinated land use and transportation planning, that plans include all modes of transportation, and in metropolitan areas, that plans increase transportation choices and reduce reliance on the automobile.
It has become clear over the last decade that Oregon’s existing rules are not sufficient to meet our Metropolitan Greenhouse Gas Reduction Targets. To reduce climate pollution, local governments need to improve their plans so different land uses are more connected, encouraging a walkable mix of destinations and accelerating investments in connected and safe networks that allow people to walk, bike, and take transit. To achieve these
objectives, the Land Conservation and Development Commission has updated Oregon’s transportation planning requirements for local transportation plans to deliver additional health, equity, and economic benefits for Oregonians.
Updating land use transportation planning rules to reduce climate pollution The rules will result in updates to state and local plans that meet the state’s greenhouse gas reduction goals. DLCD and other state agency partners including the Oregon Department of
Transportation will provide a range of new and amplified services to local governments to help meet greenhouse gas reduction goals. These services include grants, technical assistance, tools, and publications to help local governments adopt plans that meet or exceed the state’s greenhouse gas reduction goals.
The updated rules require local governments in metropolitan areas to:
• Plan for greater development in transit corridors and downtowns;
• Prioritize system performance measures that achieve community livability goals;
• Prioritize investments for reaching destinations by walking, bicycling, and transit;
• Plan for and manage parking to meet demonstrated demand;
• Plan for needed infrastructure for electric vehicle charging; and
• Regularly monitor and report progress.
The scope and scale of these requirements vary by jurisdiction. The amendments align with other state strategies to reduce transportation related climate pollution. Finally, it is important to note these amendments are intended to align with and support other priorities such as equity, safety, public health, and housing.
Rules Language is available at https://www.oregon.gov/lcd/CL/Pages/CFEC.aspx
Questions? Bill Holmstrom, Land Use and Transportation Coordinator, bill.holmstrom@dlcd.oregon.gov, 971-375-5975
Council Business Meeting
Page 1 of 4
February 22, 2023
Agenda Item Climate Friendly & Equitable Communities Update
From Brandon Goldman
Derek Severson
Title: Interim Community Development Director
Title: Senior Planner
Contact Brandon.goldman@ashland.or.us 541-552-2076
Derek.severson@ashland.or.us 541 552-2040
Item Type Requested by Council ☐ Update ☒ Request for Direction ☐ Presentation ☒
SUMMARY
This item in an informational update on the requirements for cities to comply with the Climate-Friendly and Equitable
Communities rules adopted by the state’s Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) in 2022.
POLICIES, PLANS & GOALS SUPPORTED
• Climate Energy Action Plan (‘Urban Form, Land Use & Transportation’)
• Oregon Administrative Rules 660-012-0320
• Oregon Administrative Rules 660-012-0440
BACKGROUND AND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
In 2007, the Oregon state legislature adopted a goal of reducing Oregon’s greenhouse gas emissions by
75 percent by 2050 as this level of reduction was necessary to avoid catastrophic impacts to our
environment, communities, and economy. Now, 16 years later, Oregon is off track in meeting this goal,
and the state is experiencing wildfires increasing in size, severity and timing, and record heat waves.
Oregon is particularly off-track in reducing pollution from the transportation sector, which is responsible
for at least 38 percent of greenhouse gas emissions. On its current path, Oregon will only reduce
transportation pollution by about 20 percent by 2050. In seeking to avoid more weather events, more
wildfires, more ocean acidification, and more record heat waves, Governor Brown directed state
agencies to initiate a rulemaking effort to promote cleaner vehicles, cleaner fuels, and less driving.
The “Climate Friendly & Equitable Communities” rulemaking which was completed in July of 2022 seeks to
reduce greenhouse gas emissions from automobiles in Oregon’s eight metropolitan areas by reducing
driving and encouraging walking, biking and transit, as well as by supporting greater usage of electric
vehicles. This is to be accomplished through the creation of more pedestrian friendly areas with
compact, mixed-use development to be called “climate friendly areas” or CFAs. The rulemaking includes
changes to parking mandates; prioritizing investments in high quality, connected and safe pedestrian,
bicycle and transit networks; and changing the methodology used in transportation planning including
the standards used to determine the success or failure of a roadway so that automobiles are not the sole
consideration.
Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Study pursuant to OAR 660-012-0315
The rules adopted in 2022 require that cities within Oregon’s eight metropolitan areas identify CFAs which
would accommodate “30 percent of the total identified number of housing units necessary to meet all
Council Business Meeting
Page 2 of 4
current and future housing needs.” CFAs are to have a minimum residential density requirement of 15
dwelling units per net acre with minimum building heights of no less than 50 feet/four stories, or
demonstrate that alternative measures will achieve 20 dwelling units and 20 jobs per net acre; and
include limits on what minimum parking requirements can be applied. Beginning in January, parking
mandates are no longer allowed within ½-mile of frequent transit where most CFAs are likely to be
located, and once adopted, parking mandates will not be allowed within ½-mile of CFAs themselves
unless a menu of parking management policies are enacted and parking for multi-family units is
‘unbundled’.
For the CFA study, underway now, cities are to identify likely CFAs and after analysis to ensure that the
identified areas can accommodate the targeted housing needs, a report of the study’s findings will be
sent to the Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD). Cities and counties are to use
the study process to identify the most promising area or areas to be chosen as CFAs, but are not
required to subsequently adopt and zone every one of those studied areas as a CFA.
To facilitate the CFA study, DLCD has made technical assistance funding available for consultants to
support both the technical analysis necessary in identifying likely CFA’s, and the associated public
engagement process. For Ashland, the Rogue Valley Council of Governments (RVCOG) is conducting the
technical analysis and 3-J Consulting, Inc. will be conducting the public engagement process as well as
a required anti-displacement analysis of the identified CFAs.
Climate Friendly Area (CFA) Codes pursuant to OAR 660-012-0320
Once likely CFAs are identified, which must occur by December 31, 2023, the next step for cities will be to
adopt a Climate Friendly Element to the Comprehensive Plan along with updated Comprehensive Plan
maps to include the identified CFAs and to revise land use codes accordingly. The city will need to
prepare supporting findings as wells as identify on-going and newly added housing production
strategies to promote affordable housing within CFAs. Transportation System Plans will need to be made
consistent with the new rules at their next update. This second step is to be completed by December 31,
2024. (It is anticipated that state funding will again be available to fund consultants for both the
technical work and public outreach process for the map adoption and code amendments.)
Implementation Timeline
The LCDC-adopted timeline for Climate-Friendly & Equitable Communities-related tasks is detailed
below:
Cities are required to eliminate some minimum parking requirements by December 31, 2022
[Requires code changes or implementation directly from rules. Ashland is currently implementing
from the rules.]
Cities to require Electrical Vehicle Conduit in Multifamily Developments > 5 units for 40 percent of
spaces.
[Requirements to implemented through Building Codes beginning March 31, 2023]
Council Business Meeting
Page 3 of 4
Cities required to eliminate all remaining minimum parking requirements by June 30, 2023 or select
from a menu of alternative parking options. [Ashland has requested extension to December 31,
2023.]
Climate Friendly Areas (CFA) Study consultant work through June 30, 2023
[Technical Assistance by Rogue Valley Council of Gov’ts]
CFA Public Engagement and Anti-Displacement Process consultant work through June 30, 2023
[Technical Assistance by 3J Consulting, Inc.]
Final CFA Study report due to DLCD by December 31, 2023
CFA Transportation Modeling by June 30, 2024
CFA Designation, Maps & Code Amendments consultant work through June 30, 2024
[Consultants still to be determined based on available Technical Assistance funds in this phase.]
CFA Designation, Maps and Code Amendments Adoption by 12/31/2024
The Planning Commission was updated on the Climate-Friendly and Equitable Communities rulemaking on
August 9, 2022. A virtual meeting to kick off the regional effort to identify climate friendly areas was held on
February 2, 2023. This meeting was hosted by 3J Consulting, LLC as the public engagement consultant for the
three cities in the southern Rogue Valley (Ashland, Medford and Talent) required to identify climate friendly
areas. This meeting featured a presentation explaining the rulemaking as it relates to climate friendly areas and
a Q&A session with staff from the Department of Land Conservation & Development (DLCD) as well as break-out
rooms for discussions of the specific efforts in each of the three cities. Videos of the main meeting and the
break-out session are available at http://www.ashland.or.us/climatefriendly.
FISCAL IMPACTS
The current phase of rule implementation requires that cities study potential climate friendly areas and
assess the land use code amendments that will be necessary to comply with the rules. A report to the
Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) is required no later than December 31, 2023.
DLCD has provided grants, and is administering them, for cities to utilize consultants for the geo-spatial
analysis and public engagement associated with this first phase work. The subsequent phase will require
that cities amend comprehensive plans, zoning maps and ordinances to formalize their climate friendly
areas by December 31, 2024. There has been some indication that DLCD intends to provide for similar
consultant services arrangements for some or all of this work, but this will be dependent on the state
legislature allocating funding through the budget process. There will be significant staff time involved to
take the consultant information, finalize reports for DLCD, amend development codes, and shepherd
necessary legislative amendments through the local process.
Cities are also required to implement additional changes to parking requirements by June 30, 2023. The
elimination of parking mandates within ½ mile of frequent transit routes is already in effect, however the
City has enlisted the services of 3J Consulting, LLC to conduct a parking code audit and identify
necessary code changes to codify the rules into our local land use ordinance. This work will be
completed under an existing professional services contract already approved under the existing budget.
The city has requested DLCD approve an alternative date of December 31, 2023 for the final adoption of
the requisite changes to Ashland’s parking requirements.
Council Business Meeting
Page 4 of 4
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
This item is provided for informational purposes to keep the Council abreast of the implementation of these state
rules moving forward.
SUGGESTED NEXT STEPS
The City of Ashland has created a website http://www.ashland.or.us/climatefriendly which will be kept up to date
with project updates moving forward.
The project consultants provided by DLCD will be coordinating a series of stakeholder meetings and a public open
house to occur in March and April of this year. A study of the Climate Friendly Areas is expected to be completed in
August 2023.
REFERENCES & ATTACHMENTS
The State of Oregon’s Department of Land Conservation and Development (DLCD) has webpages dedicated to
the rulemaking process (https://www.oregon.gov/lcd/LAR/Pages/CFEC.aspx) and implementation of the rules
(https://www.oregon.gov/lcd/CL/Pages/CFEC.aspx).
City of Ashland TSP Update Project #: 10633
Page 11November 2012
DescƌŝƉƟŽŶ:
WƌŽũect #:P22
CategŽry:
Sidewalk
&ƵŶĐƟŽŶal ClasƐŝĮĐaƟŽŶ:
Avenue
WƌŝŽƌŝƚLJ
High $450,000
WƌŽũect GŽals Met:
Create a Green
Template
Improve Safety Facilitate Economic Growth and Maintain
Small Town Character
Balance Mobility
and Access
dŽƚĂlCŽst:
WƌŽũect LŽcaƟŽŶ:
WƌŽũect Image:
Kittelson & Associates, Inc.
Alta Planning + Design
Portland, Oregon15
Safe Routes to
School
ŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŶĞǁƐŝĚĞǁĂůŬƐĨƌŽŵϭϬϬΖ^sŝůůĂŐĞ'ƌĞĞŶƌƚŽ/ŽǁĂ^ƚƚŽŝŶĮůůŵŝƐƐŝŶŐƐĞĐƟŽŶƐ͘
EDŽƵŶƚĂŝŶǀĞŶƵĞ^ŝĚĞǁĂůŬ/ŶĮůů
E MA
B ST
C ST
IOWA ST
W
Y
MO
R
T
O
N
S
T
TS
D
L
E
I
F
R
A
G
FO
U
R
T
H
S
T
TS
E
C
Y
D
R
O
F
TS
N
L
O
C
N
I
L
ON ST
EIG
H
T
H
S
T
SEV
E
N
T
H
S
T
V
MILL PO
N
D
R
D
TS
K
C
I
R
E
M
E
SH
E
R
M
A
N
S
T
OWA ST
CLEAR CREEK DR
P75
P79
P22
P60
P59
P61 P62
P23
P72
308``
1"3,*/(-"/&
``
53"7&--"/&
``
53"7&--"/&
`
1"3,*/(-"/&
```
4*%&8"-,
``
4*%&8"-,
"WFOVF4USFFU
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
14" PVC
F.L.1876.98'
F.L.1877.28' 12" PVC
F.L.18
77.09'
F.L.1876.72' 24" CONC.F.L.1877.24' 12" PVC
F.L.1877.86' 12" PVC
F.L.187
7
.11' 14" PVC
F.L.1879
.81
' 14
" PVC
F.L.187
9
.82
' 14
" PVC
F.L.18
8
2
.50' 12" PVC
F.L.18
8
2
.15
' 14
" PVC
F.L.1882.30' 14" PVC
1
2" PVC
F.L.188
3
.06'
F.L.1883.51' 14" PVC F.L.1883.51' 14" PVC
F.L.1883.61' 12" PVC
F.L.1883.97' 12" PVC
F.L.1888.92' 14" PVC F.L.1889.00' 14" PVC
F.L.1891.48' 14" PVC
F.L.1891
.55' 12" PVC
14" PVC
F.L.1891.48'
F.L.1892.11' 14" PVCF.L.1892.11'
F.L.18
9
2.31' 12" CMP
J J
J
J
J
J
(36"/4.5")
(36"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
(24"/4.5")
�
5'10'2'10'2'5'
Sidewalk SidewalkTravel LaneTravel LaneBike Lane Bike LaneBufferBuffer
5'5'
1" = 40'EXHIBIT #1: STRIPING OVERVIEW WITH BUFFERED BIKE LANES
2752-80159.01 N. MOUNTAIN OVERLAY
N. MOU
NTA
IN
AV
E
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
N. MOUNTAIN AVE N. MOUNTAIN AVE
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
N. MOUNTAIN AVE N. MOUNTAIN AVE
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
C
LE
A
R
C
R
EE
K
D
R
FAIR O
AKS AVE
E. N EVA D A ST
SKY
LARK PL
M
O
U
N
T
A
IN
M
EA
D
O
W
S
D
R
N
EPEN
T
H
E
R
D
C
LIN
T
O
N
ST
BR
ISC
O
E PL
E
.
H
ER
SEY
S
T
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
LA
R
KSP
UR LN
N. MOUNTAIN AVE
LA
R
KSP
UR LN
VILL
A
G
E
G
R
EE
N
D
R
AN
D
PAC
IFIC
RAILROA
D
C
ENT
RAL O
REGON
B ST
E.
M
A
I
N
S
T
BUFFERED BIKE LANE SECTION
BUFFERED BIKE LANE SECTION
BUFFERED BIKE LANE SECTION
1
0'
BU
FF
ERED BIKE
LAN
E SECT
ION
14
'
14
'
10'
5'
5'
2' BUFFER
1
1
'
5
'
5
'
1
1
'
5
'
1
1
'
1
1
'
5
'
5'
1
0
'
10
'
5
'
2' BUFFER
5'1
0'1
0'5' 2' BUFFER
Buffered Bike Lane Section (Min.)
1
0
'
5
'
2' BUFFER
5
'
10
'
5'
10'
10'5' 2' BUFFER
REMOVE PARKING ROW
REMOVE PARKING ROW
REMOVE PARKING ROW
TO ADD BUFFERED BIKE LANE
ELIMINATE ON-STREET PARKING
TO ADD BUFFERED BIKE LANE
ELIMINATE ON-STREET PARKING
From:Lisa Petrini
To:Scott Fleury
Subject:Streetside Parking Elimination
Date:Tuesday, September 12, 2023 10:00:29 AM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Dear Fleury,
I am writing to you regarding the absurd proposition to eliminate street-side parking on thewest side of Mountain Ave. I am the Owner of 1081/1079 E Main Street. I purchased this
building back in 2017 and have been limited by the city ever since, mostly due to the lack ofparking. When I bought this building there was a dirt field behind the building which was once
its parking. That lot was sold, limiting the use of this building. As it stands right now I onlyhave 4 legal parking spaces, one of which is an ADA-accessible spot for my building. I have
not been able to turn this unit into a vacation rental or long-term rental creating more housingin Ashland because the city requires more parking spots. By eliminating the parking in front of
my building you are directly limiting the use of my building. The main floor is an open hallwhich would be another great gathering space here in Ashland but, I am not permitted to do
anything with it as again I don't have parking.
The City of Ashland already has parking issues. Deleting more parking is not a resolution. Bydoing this my clients, and the entire residence of the condos behind my building will be forced
to park on B Street and Emerik. These streets are extremely narrow and crowded as it is. Ihave been here since 2017 and do not see a need for a bike path. The bike traffic is very
limited.
Furthermore, it is my understanding that the parking spot in front of my building belongs tothe building. I am curious if this does pass what compensation will I be receiving from the
City for loss of use for my building?
I would love to have a further discussion about this with you.
Regards, --
Lisa PetriniOwner
Asurent Property Management
If we have provided excellent service for you today,
please consider leaving a reviewGoogle Review MedfordYelp Review MedfordGoogle Review AshlandYelp Review Ashland
From:Kaye Shauger
To:Scott Fleury
Subject:Protected Bike Lane
Date:Friday, September 08, 2023 6:53:24 PM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
The following is my input regarding a protected bike lane on North Mountain.
Yesterday I turned onto N. Mountain from E. Main and within a block or so (before therailroad tracks) I observed four cars parked on the West side of N. Mountain Avenue. I
recently saw a UPS truck parked on the West side while making a delivery to a house on theEast side.
Several houses on the upper portion of N. Mountain have very limited driveways, as do I.
This prohibits trucks making deliveries from turning around to exit the property. Thealternative the trucks would have on limited driveways would be to back out onto N. Mountain
which is obviously dangerous. Parking on the West side of is the easiest and safestalternatives for delivery vehicles.
The same issue occurs when more than one car is visiting a house with limited driveway
space. Visitors to my house use the West side to park.
Within the Beach Creek development there are well paved, wide roads with little traffic andperfect for cycling. As the development gets further along I think cyclist will see the
advantage to riding through the development. Some of the roads in Beach Creek go all theway through and even down to the Greenway. A safer route than North Mountain.
Obviously I am opposed to a protected bike path on North Mountain and I hope it is given
careful and objective consideration.
Catherine Shauger196 N Mountain
From:Judith Singer
Subject:Bicycle Safety in Asland
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Hello -
We are relatively new to town, having moved here July of 2020, and I'm
loving it... but I have observed a few things while riding my bike around
town that I would like to address with the city regarding my concerns about
the safety of the cyclists in Ashland. I am a retiree and live in Mountain
Meadows. I ride an ebike that has 1360 miles on it.
I ride mostly on the Bear Creek Greenway and the bike path that crosses
North Mountain Ave towards Tolman Creek Road... but by necessity, my
shopping trips also take me on the city streets. Here are some thoughts
that I believe would make things better and safer for me and other cyclists.
1) On North Mountain, when I leave my home, I must ride down a hill at the
very place where the bike lane squeezes into the roadway (effectively
ending onto the road) right at a point where the sightlines are limited by the
hill and traffic is often traveling at speeds in excess of the 25 MPH posted
limit. It is my hope that the planned North Mountain Avenue work will
correct this.
2) On the Bike path crossing Main Street, many drivers are mindful but
PLEASE upgrade the sign and paint the street with the green crossing lane
as I have seen elsewhere about town! The angle of the crossing is weird,
traffic is often traveling at speeds faster than posted limits and visibility is
terrible. I dread this intersection every time I ride in that direction.
3) The intersection of the Bike Path and North Mountain is BLIND due to
the fences on both sides of the bike path. Once again, the place the bikes
are crossing is not painted green... and the bike Xing signs are not very
visible. Since there is a stop sign just before the crossing, cars heading
towards the Nature Center are accelerating, and the bike crossing is
unexpected. Please paint the crossing green and reposition the signs.
4) When Mountain Meadows was built more than 20 years ago, I heard that
there were discussions and a promise to build a bridge at Nevada Street for
bikes and automobiles over Bear Creek which would give us access to the
Ashland Dog Park and Bear Creek Greenway. I understand that the folks
on the other side objected, so the project was scrapped. With the amount
of development going on in Kestrel Park along with the massive number of
homes being built up the hill from us, I believe it is time to revisit the bridge.
Disaster evacuation notwithstanding, I would rather not have to ride down
Oak Street (and refuse to risk my life on Eagle Mill Road) to reach the Bear
Creek Greenway. Minimally, as a matter of safety, emergency vehicles
should be able to reach my neighborhood from more than one road or
direction... I believe that the long-ago promised bridge should be built for
bikes and emergency vehicles, with the option for automobile traffic if
needed in an emergency. It is the right thing to do in light of the increasing
population density in my side of town which will undisputedly increase the
likelihood of traffic congestion. Please, let's prevent car and bike tragedies
instead of waiting until an accident to act.
I urge you to make these upgrades. They will serve to protect residents
from visiting drivers who are not familiar with our streets or locals who are
distracted or speeding. I love riding my bike but want to feel safer than I
currently do.
Thank you for your attention. I will look forward to a safer ride on my future
trips!
Judy Singer
From:linda smith
To:Scott Fleury
Subject:Installation of Protected Bike Lanes
Date:Sunday, September 10, 2023 5:10:32 PM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Scott Fleury - Public Works
Linda Peterson Adams - Ashland Transportation Committee Chair
City Council - council@ashland.or.us
20 East Main Street
Ashland, OR 97520
Scott.fleury@ashland.or.us
Re: Installation of Protected Bike Lanes
Dear Scott and Linda,
I am the home owner at 192 N. Mountain Ave., and I am writing to share my concerns
and objections to eliminate street parking along N. Mountain Ave.
To begin, eliminating street parking will make it impossible for anyone who is visitingto find a place to park. I can fit one car in my driveway safely, leaving them some
space to turn around before going out onto N. Mountain Ave. If a second car pulls in,
they would have to back out onto N. Mountain Ave. due to the allotted turnaround
space being blocked by the first car. There are other factors to consider when itcomes to safety, such as delivery vehicles stopping in the middle of the street
because there’s no parking available on the street.
I pay attention to the cars parked on N. Mountain and there are always plenty of
them. Where will they park if nothing is available? Shoving more cars into driveways(if there's even room) will only create a situation where more people are backing out
onto N. Mountain. I was told when I was renovating my home that the City did not
want this to happen and that I needed a turnaround space.
Across the street from me is the Jewish temple and they have had many large eventsand the street parking is necessary. Further, the two new homes near the railroad
tracks just south of me have five small apartments per building. Those homes may
need to house as many as 10 vehicles or more, surely they will need some parking on
N. Mountain Ave.In general, taking away parking in Ashland is not a good idea, and the lack of spaces
in this particular instance will leave people nowhere to park if the parking were gone.
There are already bike lanes on N. Mountain Ave., and I see no need to eliminate
parking that is desperately needed. I have seen the amount of bikes that use N.Mountain Ave., and it is not that great of a need. Too, it's not like bicycles need to
pay any kind of fees to take priority over vehicles. Further, widening traffic lanes
would only speed up traffic, yet another safety concern.
In summary, I am strongly opposed to eliminating parking on N. Mountain Ave., for allthe reasons stated above. Thank you in advance for considering leaving the street as
is.
Sincerely,
Linda Smith
192 N Mountain Avenue
Ashland, OR 97520
From:Joyce Stanley
To:Scott Fleury
Cc:Richard Stanley
Subject:Dedicated Bike Lane
Date:Monday, July 24, 2023 7:58:44 AM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Hello ScottWe are long time Ashland residents and bike riders - 40 years and counting - and love our town and appreciate all ofthe good work you do!
We are not super active on city issues, but this one seems quite important. We saw that the city is consideringputting in a dedicated bike lane - which we presume would include some sort of concrete barrier - on MountainStreet, eliminating parking on one side of the road.
If this means putting in the type of barriers recently introduced in Talent we are voting NO. Though they are greatfor bikers they are not only an eyesore because Talent can’t afford to maintain the landscaping, but if there is a fire,this escape route is not totally inflexible. They now cannot make the entire road one lane and they lost valuableroad space for evacuations and it cost Talent a lot of money!
So, if the city is considering the Talent type of permanent barriers we vote NO.
If the city is considering removing parking and, with painted lines, creating a dedicated bike lane, we vote YES.
We expect that the latter will be much less expensive and will also allow for traffic flexibility in case of an all cityevacuation.
We will be out of town the night of the meeting, so I hope our letter can be our form of comment.
Thanks again.
Joyce and Richard Stanley44 Scenic DriveAshland OR 97520541 292 3457
From:workmwright@gmail.com
To:Scott Fleury
Cc:info@ashlandclimate.org
Subject:Protected Bike Lanes - North Mountain Avenue
Date:Wednesday, September 13, 2023 4:21:49 PM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Transportation Advisory Committee members:
I support the addition of protected bike lanes on N. Mountain Avenue.
Adding protected bike lanes on N. Mountain and on other major streets in Ashland will give
residents and visitors a safe alternative to the way they get around town. Without protected bike
lanes, bicycling will never be a practical way to make short in-town trips; the risk of serious injury or
death is too high.
I would bike more if I didn’t have to share the road with cars/trucks.
With gratitude,
Mike Wright
111 Montview St.
From:Laz Ayala
To:Scott Fleury
Cc:Mark Knox
Subject:North Mountain Project
Date:Monday, September 11, 2023 2:29:10 PM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Hello Scott,I would like to express my support for the proposed protected bike lane project along North Mountain Avenue. Ibelieve this project will be of much benefit to the community and the immediate neighborhood including futureBeach Creek residents.I kindly ask this letter be added to the record.
Sincerely,
Laz AyalaKDA Homes541-944-9561
Re: Streetside Parking Elimination
If I correctly understand the proposal, I oppose it. There is now a bike lane on the west side of
North Mountain from E. Main to the railroad crossing (the area of my concern). There is also a
bike lane on the east side, although not marked from E Main to approximately 54 N Main.
My understanding is that the area facing units 51-59 was carved out to provide parking when that
development was built. (There is also a carve-out just north of E Main which is claimed as
private property. I have no views on that.) I also concur with not allowing parking on the west
side north of the carved out parking area extending to the railroad tracks. Cars do sometimes
park there, but that is inconsistent with the west side bike lane and no parking signs would be
appropriate.
But the 51-59 carve out should remain as parking. This entire area is very short of parking. (My
development, 58-74 has only two guest spaces and no way to add more. Deliveries often require
unit owner cooperation.
When I have guests, I often suggest that they use the parking lot by the police station on E Main.
But some are elderly (like me) and even a three minute walk on major thoroughfares can be
difficult.
I admit that this is not perfect for the cyclists. On the other hand, there is a very easy work
around for those traveling on N Mountain toward E Main. Turn right on B St and L on Emerick.
Yours.
Mary Coombs
60 N Mountain Ave.
Ashland OR 97520
From:Laura Duncan
To:Scott Fleury
Subject:dedicated bike lines on Mountain
Date:Tuesday, July 25, 2023 12:57:07 PM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
I am a senior citizen writing in support of better bike lanes on Mountain St and, actually, anyplace they can be installed. Biking on that road feels like taking my life into my hands, but it is
often the most direct route to where I am going and just because I am on a bike doesn't meanmy time and effort doesn't matter. Drivers will complain-people hate losing a perceived
privilege-and then they will slow down perhaps even to the posted speed limit and (I hope)pay more attention to other users of our public thoroughfares.
Laura Duncan
481 North Mountain Ave.
Ashland, OR 97520
September 13, 2023
Dear Mr. Fleury,
I am writing to you as an Ashland resident who uses my bicycle for commuting to work and
errands around town, as well as for recreation into areas of Jackson County. I am always in
favor of infrastructure modifications that make cyclists safer and more comfortable, as I feel
that this is the only way to increase the use of bicycles in our community. Having ridden on
protected bike lanes in other cities, I feel that they go a long way towards accomplishing these
goals.
In this specific instance, the number of living units that will have their parking affected
(between Village Green and East Main on the north side of North Mountain) is minimal, and
they are either houses with private driveways or multi-family units with alternate parking in the
alley behind or in garages. The aforementioned section of street is one that is used for cycling
to several local schools and North Mountain Park.
Therefore, I wholeheartedly support this protected bike lane.
Yours Truly,
Martha De Aquino
From:Anna-Rose Mathieson
To:Scott Fleury
Subject:protected bike lanes--North Mountain
Date:Monday, September 04, 2023 1:52:30 PM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
Hi Scott. I’m an Ashland resident, and strongly support protected bike lanes throughout the city. I
have two young kids and would love to take them biking more, and protected lanes would greatly
increase safety. I understand the city is deciding whether to put protected bike lanes in on North
Mountain—please do it! It’s a great investment for a safer, more sustainable, city that encourages
people to get outdoors.
Anna-Rose
Anna-Rose Mathieson ▪ BioComplex Appellate Litigation Group LLPwww.calg.com ▪ (415) 649-6700
Hi,
both of the owners (me and my sister) both commute to work on bikes and we would love more
protected bike lanes in the valley. Ashland is a great place to bike around in but it is intimidating and
dangerous for young and older folks. protected bike lanes are critical for increasing bike use with those
groups. I think North Mountain is a pretty wide road and could easily accommodate bike paths.
thanks,
Chris Uhtoff
and Marie Caballero-Uhtoff
--
Northwest Nature Shop
154 Oak St.
Ashland OR 97520
From:Mary Paschke
To:Scott Fleury
Cc:info@ashlandclimate.org
Subject:Protected bike lanes in Ashland, OR - N Mountain Avenue
Date:Saturday, September 09, 2023 1:36:08 PM
[EXTERNAL SENDER]
To the Transportation Advisory Committee members:
Protected bike lanes are a key element in increasing bicycle ridership in Ashland. Although many
of us would like to cycle for routine trips around town, there are many streets on which we do not
feel safe and which are not served by the central bike path. The addition of protected bike lanes
on Ashland Street is a great start. The addition of protected lanes on North Mountain Avenue
would also be of benefit to many in the community. Please consider this addition.
Thank you,
Mary Paschke
1077 Beswick Way, Ashland, OR