HomeMy WebLinkAbout2024-01-09 Planning MIN
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
Note: Anyone wishing to speak at any Planning Commission meeting is encouraged to do so. If you wish to speak, please rise and, after you
have been recognized by the Chair, give your name and complete address for the record. You will then be allowed to speak. Please note the
public testimony may be limited by the Chair.
January 9, 2024
REGULAR MEETING
Minutes
I.CALL TO ORDER:
Chair Verner had a scheduled absence from this meeting. Vice-Chair Knauer called the meeting to
order at 7:00 p.m. at the Civic Center Council Chambers, 1175 E. Main Street.
Commissioners Present: Staff Present:
Doug Knauer Brandon Goldman, Community Development Director
Kerry KenCairn Derek Severson, Planning Manager
Eric Herron Aaron Anderson, Senior Planner
Russell Phillips Michael Sullivan, Executive Assistant
Susan MacCracken Jain
Gregory Perkinson
Absent Members: Council Liaison:
Lisa Verner Paula Hyatt
II.ANNOUNCEMENTS
Community Development Director Brandon Goldman made the following announcement:
The City will hold its annual town hall meeting on January 24, 2024, 5:30-7:30 p.m. at the
Rogue River Room on the SOU campus. The Mayor will give the State of the City address, and
awards will be given to residents for their volunteer work over the past year.
III.CONSENT AGENDA
1.Approval of Minutes
a.December 12, 2023 Regular Meeting
Commissioner MacCracken Jain suggested a non-substantive change to page five of the December
12, 2023 minutes.
Commissioners KenCairn/Perkinson m/s to approve the consent agenda with correction
suggested by Commissioner MacCracken Jain. Voice Vote: All AYES. Motion passed 6-0.
Page 1 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
IV.PUBLIC FORUM
James Jarrard/Mr. Jarrard noted that the Pledge of Allegiance was not made at the onset of the
meeting. Vice-Chair Knauer informed him that it is not common practice for it to be recited during
Commission or Advisory Committee meetings.
public testimony that he had submitted into the
record for the review of PA-T2-2023-00043, 192 N. Mountain Avenue at the November
14, 2023 Regular Meeting. He stated that these letters contained an unintentional clerical error (see
attachment #1). He apologized for this error, and expressed his appreciation for the Commission. He
added that he will be implementing stronger quality control measures to ensure such errors are not
repeated. Mr. Jarrard also submitted a written apology
the record expressing his apologies, and requested that this apology be including in the Public
Record. He also requested that the error be corrected in public documents from past meetings.
V.UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Approval of Findings for PA-T2-2023-00044, 822 Oak Street
Ex Parte Contact
Commissioner Herron disclosed a site visit. No ex parte contact or other site visits were declared.
Deliberation and Decision
Commissioner Phillips inquired if the dates on section 2.2 of the findings were correct. Mr. Anderson
responded that those dates were in error and would be corrected in the final draft of the findings.
Commissioners Perkinson/Phillips m/s to approve the findings as proposed with the correction
noted by Commissioner Phillips. Roll Call Vote: All AYES. Motion passed 6-0.
VI.TYPE II PUBLIC HEARING
A. PLANNING ACTION: PA-T2-2023-00045
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 765 Cambridge Street
APPLICANT/OWNER: Alan and Judith Harper
DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review, Outline, and Final Plan approval
for a four-unit Cottage Housing Development and Performance Standards subdivision.
The application also includes a request for exception to the street standards to not
install sidewalk along Cambridge St. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: R-1-5;
ZONING: Single Family Residential; 39 1E 05 AD; TAX LOT: 101
Page 2 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
Ex Parte Contact
Commissioners KenCairn and MacCracken Jain stated that they have had social engagements with
the applicant through the Rotary Club, but that this project was not discussed. Vice-Chair Knauer
stated that he had conducted a site visit. No other ex parte contact or site visits were declared.
Staff Presentation
Mr. Anderson began by outlining the request from the applicant. He stated that the requested
exception to street standards is likely not warranted and that staff recommended that this portion of
the application be denied. Mr. Anderson noted that the applicant had provided findings formatted
similarly to City findings, which can be found on pages 79-87 of the packet, which reference
approval of the exception to street standards. Mr. Anderson explained that these findings were cited
by staff in their own findings, found on pages 57-73 of the packet, but were amended by staff to
recommend denying the exception to street standards.
Mr. Anderson outlined how the application met density standards for cottage housing, stating that
the City adopted standards that allow such housing in R-1-5 zones. He added that the City had
approved four cottage housing developments since these changes took effect.
Regarding street standards, Mr. Anderson stated that the requested exception to the requirement for
a park row is likely warranted given the width and curb location of the subject right-of-way (ROW).
He added that the development of cottages on this property would allow for the installation of
sidewalks that otherwise might not be installed in the near future. Staff recommended partially
approving the exception to street standards by granting relief from the requirement of a park row,
but requiring a 5ft-wide curb-tight sidewalk. Mr. Anderson noted that the installation of such a
sidewalk would likely impact the fence on the southern edge of the property, but that this
requirement would still be appropriate based on the proposed development (see attachment #2).
Questions of Staff
Vice-Chair Knauer requested clarification regarding the impact on the fence if a sidewalk was
required. Mr. Anderson responded that there is uncertainty where the property line falls, and that the
fence might not need to be removed if it is more than 5ft from the property line.
Commissioner MacCracken Jain noted that the application referred to a proposed sidewalk running
through the site would serve as access to the properties, and asked why this was not deemed to be
sufficient by staff. Mr. Anderson responded that the pedestrian connectivity into the development to
the proposed dwellings is a requirement of site design review, separate from the public facilities.
Therefore, they do not provide the same aspect of a multimodal transport network by having
pedestrian connectivity to Nevada Street. Commissioner KenCairn commented that one of the
long-term goals is to have sidewalks on all streets with park rows. Mr. Goldman added that the
internal sidewalks serving the proposed dwellings would not be publicly accessible, but the street
Page 3 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
sidewalks would be.
Applicant Presentation
Alan Harper stated that his team had been developing this proposal prior to the pandemic. He
welcomed the recent Climate Friendly and Equitable Communities (CFEC) rules that removed the
requirement for applicants to provide parking as part of this development, which could free up
space that could be used for communal amenities. Mr. Harper commented that this project was
problematic to budget for, as dwellings without attached parking spaces are new to Oregon and
makes pricing the dwellings difficult.
Mr. Harper stated that his team had discussed deferring the street standards, similar to a Low Impact
Development (LID). He elaborated that the requested exception to street standards was warranted,
but that his team would be willing to install sidewalks if the Commission required them.
Questions of the Applicant
Commissioner MacCracken Jain asked staff why an LID would not be considered adequate. Mr.
Goldman responded that an LID could be pursued, and it would be incumbent upon the City to
establish an LID, and that 50% of the property owners within that area would need to sign in favor of
the LID before it could be initialized by the City. He stated that there are alternatives available, and
that the Commission could consider them. Mr. Harper discussed signing an LID in lieu of completing
sidewalks along the street frontage.
Vice-Chair Knauer requested clarification over how the two cottages in the back of the development
would be accessed. Mr. Harper responded that those properties would be reached by pedestrian
access from Cambridge Street. Vice-
recommendation for sidewalks to be installed, otherwise residents would be required to walk on the
street to access their homes.
Vice-responded that
the property would be split into five lots, with one lot being a common area.
Vice-Chair Knauer closed the Public Hearing and Public Record at 7:37 p.m.
Deliberation and Decision
Commissioner Herron emphasized the need for pedestrian traffic and street parking to be more
closely considered with the new CFEC rules. He cautioned that more dwellings without off-street
parking would make sidewalks more necessary. Commissioner KenCairn agreed that sidewalks
should be required.
Commissioners Herron/KenCairn m/s to approve the application, excluding the park row
Page 4 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
exception as recommended by staff and approve the draft findings provided by staff. Roll Call
Vote: All AYES. Motion passed 6-0.
B. SUBJECT PROPERTY: Public Right-of-Way adjacent to 391E16AA Tax Lot #9001
OWNER / APPLICANT: City of Ashland Public Works
DESCRIPTION: The Planning Commission will consider a request to vacate a
portion of Fern Street right-of-way North of Map 391E16AA Tax Lot #9001 near 1109 Fern
Street and make a recommendation to the City Council. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
DESIGNATION: Single Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; MAP: 39 1E 16 AA; TAX LOT: 9001
Vice-Chair Knauer noted that the Commission would make a recommendation to the City Council,
which would then make a final decision on this item.
Ex Parte Contact
No ex parte contact was declared. Commissioners KenCairn and MacCracken Jain related their
familiarity with the site, and Vice-Chair Knauer disclosed a site visit.
Staff Presentation
Mr. Severson described the site of the ROW to be vacated, located between South Mountain Avenue
and Elkader Street, and outlined the criteria under which ROW vacations are typically reviewed by
staff. These criteria include street connectivity; maintaining bike and pedestrian access; and
providing any necessary utility easements to serve the future development of the area. Mr. Severson
noted that this ROW vacation was initiated by the Council. He then described how the slopes present
in this ROW exceed the allowed grade for a City street, rendering it unlikely to be developed by the
City for such use in the future. Mr. Severson -block pedestrian
easement would be beneficial for the future walkability of the neighborhood. Staff also
recommended reserving a public utility easement to support future development in the area (see
attachment #3).
Staff recommended that the Commission recommend the Council approve the ROW vacation, with
the requirement for easements for driveways, bike and pedestrian access, and utilities.
Questions of Staff
Vice-Chair Knauer asked what purpose this process serves in general, and how it serves the
residents adjacent to the proposed vacation. Mr. Severson responded that liability is removed from
the City if the vacation takes effect, and that the vacated area would be evenly distributed to
neighboring homeowners, increasing the size of their properties and also resulting in additional
taxable land. Mr. Goldman added that this process was initially begun at the request of a resident to
the City Manager, though the City is the applicant. A property owner also paid for the land to be
Page 5 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
surveyed at this vacation.
Commissioner KenCairn pointed out that the neighbors adjacent to the subject ROW would have
more control over the area if it was vacated and could make improvements that might otherwise
not be possible.
Commissioner Phillips asked if the current 15ft access between the parcels would be connected to
the proposed access easement. Mr. Severson responded that the proposed access easement would
support the existing driveways.
The Commission discussed who had historically paid for the surveys for ROW vacations. Vice-Chair
Knauer asked who would pay for the survey if the applicant had not done so. Mr. Severson
responded that the City had traditionally had a City surveyor to do these surveys, but no longer
employed one. Therefore the homeowners would likely be asked to pay for a survey. Vice-Chair
Knauer expressed concern that the City could be liable for any impairments to neighboring property
values due to a survey that the City did not conduct itself. Mr. Severson remarked that this project
would be subject to a formal hearing with the Council, where any concerns from adjacent property
owners could be raised before the Council and City Attorney.
Commissioner MacCracken Jain asked if there was intent by the City to build a walkway through the
easement, and if the City would be liable for any injuries sustained until a walkway is installed. Mr.
Severson related that there are no current plans for a walkway installation, and the City merely
wants to obtain the easement for that future possibility. He commented that there is currently a case
going before the Oregon Supreme Court regarding recreational immunity for use of trails, so the
issue of liability is yet to be determined. Mr. Goldman stated that the City is revising its Transportation
System Plan and looking at making connections throughout the City, so this could potentially be
added to a short-long term installation plan. He added that there is currently no expectation of a
pedestrian connection to be installed by the City. He elaborated that there is fencing and a retaining
wall that has been installed adjacent to Mountain Street that would likely need to be removed in
order to create access to the existing Fern Street ROW. Mr. Goldman further noted that the public
easement would go across private property, which would differ from pedestrian traffic through a
public ROW.
Public Comments
Art Baden/Mr. Baden declared that not all adjacent property owners requested this ROW vacation,
and that this process was initiated by a property owner, Gil Livni, who applied for a subdivision to
create what is now 619 and 621 Elkader Street and 1101 and 1107 Fern Street.
Mr. Baden expressed concerns that homeowners could become liable for any injuries sustained if the
City vacates the ROW, particularly those adjacent to the proposed access easement. He requested
Page 6 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
that the access easement to South Mountain Avenue be excluded from the plan in order to remove
any liability for adjacent homeowners.
Gil Livni/Mr. Livni expressed support for the ROW vacation, but emphasized that this request came
from the City Manager, not himself. He stated that he is not concerned about the access easement,
and that he does not believe that people would use the connection to access South Mountain
Avenue because the grade is too steep.
Commissioner KenCairn remarked that the public easement would need to be removed if it was not
going to be fully connected, as Mr. Baden suggested by requesting that the South Mountain Avenue
section of the easement be excluded.
Mr. Severson suggested that the Commission could recommend that the Council consider liability
issues when reviewing the easement. Vice-position was that the
pedestrian accessibility was necessary due to the length of the block. Mr. Severson agreed, but
added that staff determined that this accessibility would likely not be imminently available, and so
an easement would not be necessary until the accessibility was there. Commissioner KenCairn
cautioned that the access could be blocked in the interim in the easement is not already in place.
The Commission discussed the question of liability for public easements. KenCairn stated that the
City is responsible for public easements. Commissioner MacCracken Jain asked if a private property
owner could build a fence to block the public easement. Mr. Goldman responded that a public
pedestrian easement would preclude a property owner from building an encroachment across that
access.
Commissioner Herron pointed out that the Commission was tasked with making a recommendation
to Council so it can go to a public hearing, therefore those legal aspects can be worked out at such
a meeting by the Council.
Vice-Chair Knauer closed the Public Hearing and Public Record at 8:18 p.m.
Decision
Commissioners KenCairn/Perkinson m/s to recommend approval of the ROW vacation to Council
as recommended by staff, and that the Council also review the question of liability with the City
Attorney. Roll Call Vote: Commissioners Herron, Phillips, Perkinson, MacCracken Jain, KenCairn;
AYE. Vice-Chair Knauer; NAY. Motion passed 5-1.
C. SUBJECT PROPERTY: Public Right-of-Way adjacent to 39 1E 04AD Tax Lot #233 and #234
Page 7 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
OWNER / APPLICANT: City of Ashland Public Works Department
DESCRIPTION: The Planning Commission will consider a request to vacate a portion of
Mountain Meadows Drive right-of-way near Fair Oaks Avenue and make a recommendation
to the City Council. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Health Care Services District;
ZONING: HC MAP: Adjacent to 39 1E 04AD and 39 1E 04AD; TAX LOT: 233 and 234
Vice-Chair Knauer noted that the map information appeared to be duplicated in the notice, and that
one instance of the text 39 1E 04AD
Ex Parte Contact
Commissioners Herron, KenCairn, and Phillips conducted site visits. Commissioner KenCairn stated
that she had been involved in the Mountain Hills Estate project, which is adjacent to this ROW and
could be impacted by its vacation, and recused herself. No other ex parte contact was declared.
Staff Presentation
Mr. Severson described the location of the proposed ROW vacation as being between Mountain
Meadows ROW and Golden Aspen. Mr. Severson stated that the area to be vacated consists of a
driveway approach where a street had previously be planned, but the adjacent lot has now been
fully developed. He noted that the vacation could have some effect on the platting of the adjacent
Mountain Hill Estates development which was approved by the Commission in 2021.
Mr. Severson reiterated that most ROW vacations are reviewed by staff using the following criteria:
street connectivity; maintaining bike and pedestrian access; and providing any necessary utility
easements to serve the future development of the area. As currently platted in the Mountain Hill
Estates subdivision, there is a 10ft-wide public utility easement along Mountain Meadows Drive that is
bisected by the subject ROW. Staff recommended retaining a public utility easement across the
vacation, making it continuous along the street. Mr. Severson noted that the Mountain Hills Estate
project had an approved sidewalk plan associated with it, and suggested that the sidewalk to the
south be extended to make this a continuous sidewalk, except where the existing driveway access is
located.
Staff recommended that the Commission make a favorable recommendation to Council and
request that sidewalks be provided and that continuous public utility easement be established.
Questions of Staff
Commissioner MacCracken Jain asked staff to clarify if the northern curb was listed as part of the
public ROW, as mentioned in a letter from Farber Consulting contained within the meeting packet.
Mr. Goldman related how the approved planning application for the Mountain Hills Estate identified
the northern curb as being square. It was revealed during the building application process that this
curb was rounded and part of the public ROW, therefore a vacation of it would be necessary for the
Page 8 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).
ˠ˼˱˾˾˹˾˷ ˓˿˽˽˹̃̃˹˿˾˝˹˾̅̄˵̃
development to continue. This vacation was subsequently requested by the applicant.
Vice-Chair Knauer closed the Public Hearing and Public Record at 8:30 p.m.
Decision
Commissioners Perkinson/Phillips m/s to recommendation and forward
this to Council. Commissioner KenCairn recused herself. Roll Call Vote: All AYES. Motion passed 5-
0.
V.OPEN DISCUSSION None
VI.ADJOURNMENT
Meeting adjourned at 8:32 p.m.
Submitted by,
Michael Sullivan, Executive Assistant
Page 9 of 9
In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please email
planning@ashland.or.us. Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to
ensure accessibility to the meeting (28 CFR 35.102-35.104 ADA Title 1).