The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2017-03-08 Historic PACKET HISTORIC COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA March 8, 2017 at 6:00 P.M. I. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. SISKIYOU ROOM in the Community Development/Engineering Services Building, located at 51 Winburn Way II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Historic Commission regular meeting of February 8, 2017. III. PUBLIC FORUM: Business from the audience not included on the agenda. (Total time allowed for Public Forum is 15 minutes. Speakers are limited to 5 minutes or less, depending on the number of individuals wishing to speak.) IV. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: V. PLANNING ACTION REVIEW PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00235 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 114 Granite Street APPLICANT/OWNER: Mardi Mastain DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to allow for the onsite relocation of the existing historic dwelling unit and the addition of an accessory residential unit (ARU) to the subject property. The proposal is to relocate the existing dwelling unit to the rear of the property and convert it to a 998 square foot ARU. In addition, the applicant proposes to construct a new 2,462 square foot primary dwelling unit as part of the Site Design Review. A Physical & Environmental Constraints Review permit is also requested for Hillside Lands affected by the proposed primary dwelling unit. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Solar Setback Exception for a Standard B lot to allow a larger shadow to be cast on the property to the north by the new primary dwelling unit/garage. There are 12 trees located on or adjacent to the site and two of these trees are proposed to be removed as part of this application. A Variance to the maximum allowed lot coverage is requested, going from 45 percent to 48 percent, a three percent increase. An Exception to the Site Design and Standards is requested to allow for a reduced landscaping buffer for vehicle parking spaces from eight to six feet from the ARU and from five to three feet to the property line. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; 39 1E 09 BC; TAX LOT: 3401. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00267 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 15-35 South Pioneer Street OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Ashland/Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to construct a trellis structure to provide shade campus at 15-35 South Pioneer Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; 39 1E 09 Tax Lot #100; 39 1E 09BB Tax Lots #14200 and #14300; PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00325 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 746 C Street OWNER / APPLICANT: Philip and Micaila Gahr DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the conversion (and expansion) of an existing garaged into habitable living space to be used as an the future conversion of the newly created living space into a formal second dwelling unit upon the discontinuation of the conditional use. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 391E09AC; TAX LOT: 8700. VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS: VII. COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: VIII. NEW ITEMS: Review board schedule. Project assignments for planning actions. Presentation to the City Council in April. HPW Event schedule & Nominations list review. IX. OLD BUSINESS: X. ADJOURNMENT: ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION DRAFT Meeting Minutes February 8, 2017 Community Development/Engineering Services Building 51 Winburn Way Siskiyou Room CALL TO ORDER: Commission Chair, Shostrom called the meeting to order at 6:02pm in the Siskiyou Room at the Community Development and Engineering Offices located at 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520. Commissioners Present: Council Liaison: Shostrom Not yet assigned Skibby Whitford Staff Present: Emery Mark Schexnayder; Staff Liaison Swink Regan Trapp; Secretary Von Chamier Leonard Giordano Commissioners Absent: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Leonard motioned to approve minutes from January 11, 2017. Whitford seconded. Voice vote; All AYES. Motion passed PUBLIC FORUM: There was no one in the audience wishing to speak. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: A Council Liaison has not been appointed. PLANNING ACTION REVIEW PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-02095 (Continued) SUBJECT PROPERTY: 563 Rock Street APPLICANT: Advantage Building & Design OWNER: Michael & Maxine McNab DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to allow for the construction of a 990 square foot second dwelling unit at 563 Rock Street. The project involves restoring the existing historic contributing residence and the construction of a new second dwelling unit located off of Maple Street. The proposal also requests an Exception to Site Development and Design Standards to allow for a parking buffer less than eight feet from a residential structure. Seven non-hazardous trees are proposed for removal from the subject property as part of the application. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple- Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 39 1E 05 DA; TAX LOT: 5200. Emery and Giordano stated that they have been working with Ms. Gunter on unrelated projects but will not affect their decision on this project. Schexnayder gave the staff report for PA-2016-02095. Shostrom opened the public hearing to the applicants. Amy Gunter, Rogue Planning and Development, 1424 S. Ivy St, Medford, OR and Melanie Smith, Contractor, of Advantage Building and Design, addressed the Commission regarding the project. Shostrom closed the public hearing and opened to the Commission for comments. After a discussion regarding windows, siding, plate heights of the garage, and dormers, the Commission came to an agreement on some recommendations. They expressed their appreciation to the applicants, for the work they have put into the plans and stated that its a great improvement from the previous months application. Shostrom motioned to approve PA-2016-02095 with recommendations. Whitford seconded. Voice vote; All AYES. Motion passed. Recommendations: North Elevation Windows should be single hung with no divided lights. nd East Elevation Double casement windows with 3 inches in between (2 story of house). Single st hung windows (1 floor of house). Lower the garage plate height to 8 feet with a 7 foot garage door (Garage). Single hung windows with 3 inches in between (Garage). Dormer should be setback 3 feet from the exterior garage wall (Garage). Carriage style door should be used (Garage). South Elevation Single hung windows (Garage). All Elevations 4 to 6 inch smooth textured siding should be used for the garage and second dwelling unit. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-02114 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 556 B Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Jamie & David Kaufman DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to allow for the construction of a 485.5 square foot detached accessory resident unit (ARU) on the subject property. The proposed structure will also include a two vehicle garage. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 39 1E 09 AB; TAX LOT: 7500. Skibby stated that he sold the applicants some historic photos. Shostrom stated that he did some design work for the applicants about 14 years ago but will not affect his decision making. Emery stated that he has a conflict of interest as he has been working with the applicants on this project. He recused himself and went to the lobby. Schexnayder gave the staff report for PA-2016-02114 Shostrom opened the public hearing to the applicants. Jamie Kaufman, owner, 556 B Street, and Amy Gunter, applicant representative, 1424 S. Ivy, Medford, OR, addressed the Commission regarding the project. Shostrom closed the public hearing and opened to the Commission for comments. After a brief discussion on the project, the Commission came up with a recommendation for approval. Giordano motioned to approve PA-2016-02114 with recommendation. Von Chamier seconded. Voice vote; All AYES. Motion passed. Recommendations: Elevation # 1 Gable above door and small window with a 3 foot deep porch. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00013 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 15, 35, 44 & 51 South Pioneer Street OWNER/APPLICANT: City of Ashland/Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request to approve a campus signage and way finding plan for the Oregon provisions of AMC 18.4.7.120. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; 39 1E 09 Tax Lot #100; 39 1E 09BB Tax Lots #14200, #14300 & #14700; and 39 1E 09BC Tax Lot #1000 There was no conflict of interest or ex-parte contact indicated by the Commission. Schexnayder gave the staff report for PA-2017-00013. Shostrom opened the public hearing to the applicants. Chelsea McCann, project manager at Walker Macy, 111 SW Oak in Portland, OR and Ted DeLong, manager of OSF at 15 S. Pioneer, Ashland, addressed the Commission regarding the project. Ms. McCann stated they wanted to create a clean and easy to spot comprehensive sign package. Mr. DeLong impressed upon the fact that the Shakespeare Festival is more about the experience than the look and wants to reflect the fact that they are contemporary and diverse. He feels the look is consistent with who they are. Mr. DeLong went on to say that they have a long standing problem with people not being able to find the venues and really needs an effective way to show the correct way to different theaters. Shostrom closed the public hearing and opened to the Commission for comments. After a discussion regarding design, placement of signs, and colors of the project, the Commission agreed that the timber wolf (silver) is too much color for the signs. They would like to see a color that is more muted in tone. Shostrom motioned to PA-2017-00013 as presented. Swink seconded. Voice vote; All AYES. Motion passed. Recommendations: Changing the proposed silver colors to a color that is darker or one that is more muted in tone. DISCUSSION ITEMS: There were no items to discuss. COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: Shostrom discussed the events of the relationship of the Public Arts Commission and the Historic Commission. Shostrom talked about the possibility of a goal setting meeting in April. Schexnayder spoke about the presentation to City Council in April. He encouraged someone new to take the reins and give the presentation to the City Council this year. NEW ITEMS: Review board schedule Project assignments for planning actions HPW Nominations & Schedule of Events. o Historic Pres. Awards to be held on Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at the Community Center. A time of 12 noon was decided for the awards ceremony. Possible dates and times for the Mausoleum tour and walking tours were also discussed but Commissioners needed to get back to Ms. Trapp on specific dates. OLD BUSINESS: There were no items to discuss. Review Board Schedule th February 16 Terry, Bill, Dale February 23rd Terry, Taylor, Sam nd March 2 Terry, Taylor, Piper th March 9 Terry, Keith, Tom Project Assignments for Planning Actions PA-2014-00710 143 Nutley Swink & Whitford PA-2014-02206 485 A Street Whitford PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer Leonard PA-2015-01695 399 Beach Skibby PA-2015-01517 209 Oak Shostrom PA-2016-00387 95 N. Main Shostrom PA-2016-00209 25 N. Main Giordano PA-2016-00818 175 Pioneer Shostrom & Skibby PA-2016-00847 252 B Street Whitford PA-2016-01027 276 B Street Shostrom & Leonard PA-2016-01641 221 Oak Street Shostrom PA-2016-01947 549 Fairview Emery PA-2016-02103 133 Alida Swink PA-2016-02095 563 Rock St. Whitford PA-2016-02114 556 B Von Chamier PA-2017-00013 15, 35, 44 & 51 S. Pioneer Street ALL ANNOUNCEMENTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Next meeting is scheduled March 8, 2017 at 6:00 pm There being no other items to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 8:45pm Respectfully submitted by Regan Trapp Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00235 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 114 Granite OWNER/APPLICANT: Mardi Mastain DESCRIPTION: A request for a Site Design Review to allow for the onsite relocation of the existing historic dwelling unit and the addition of an accessory residential unit (ARU) to the subject property. The proposal is to relocate the existing dwelling unit to the rear of the property and convert it to a 998 square foot ARU. In addition, the applicant proposes to construct a new 2,462 square foot primary dwelling unit as part of the Site Design Review. A Physical & Environmental Constraints Review permit is also requested for Hillside Lands affected by the proposed primary dwelling unit. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Solar Setback Exception for a Standard B lot to allow a larger shadow to be cast on the property to the north by the new primary dwelling unit/garage. There are 12 trees located on or adjacent to the site and two of these trees are proposed to be removed as part of this application. A Variance to the maximum allowed lot coverage is requested, going from 45 percent to 48 percent, a three percent increase. An Exception to the Site Design and Standards is requested to allow for a reduced landscaping buffer for vehicle parking spaces from eight to six feet from the ARU and from five to three feet to the property line. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-Family Residential; ZONING: R-1-7.5; 39 1E 09 BC; TAX LOT: 3401. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday March 8, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, March 9, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: February 28, 2017 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 14, 2017 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. C:\\Users\\trappr\\Desktop\\PA-2017-00235.docx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. PHYSICAL & ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS 18.3.10.050 An application for a Physical Constraints Review Permit is subject to the Type I procedure in section 18.5.1.050 and shall be approved if the proposal meets all of the following criteria. A. Through the application of the development standards of this chapter, the potential impacts to the property and nearby areas have been considered, and adverse impacts have been minimized. B. That the applicant has considered the potential hazards that the development may create and implemented measures to mitigate the potential hazards caused by the development. C. That the applicant has taken all reasonable steps to reduce the adverse impact on the environment. Irreversible actions shall be considered more seriously than reversible actions. The Staff Advisor or Planning Commission shall consider the existing development of the surrounding area, and the maximum development permitted by this ordinance. TREE REMOVAL PERMIT 18.5.7.040.B 1. Hazard Tree. A Hazard Tree Removal Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a.The applicant must demonstrate that the condition or location of the tree presents a clear public safety hazard (i.e., likely to fall and injure persons or property) or a foreseeable danger of property damage to an existing structure or facility, and such hazard or danger cannot reasonably be alleviated by treatment, relocation, or pruning. See definition of hazard tree in part 18.6. b. The City may require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each hazard tree pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. 2. Tree That is Not a Hazard. A Tree Removal Permit for a tree that is not a hazard shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. a.The tree is proposed for removal in order to permit the application to be consistent with other applicable Land Use Ordinance requirements and standards, including but not limited to applicable Site Development and Design Standards in part 18.4 and Physical and Environmental Constraints in part 18.10. b. Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on erosion, soil stability, flow of surface waters, protection of adjacent trees, or existing windbreaks. c.Removal of the tree will not have a significant negative impact on the tree densities, sizes, canopies, and species diversity within 200 feet of the subject property. The City shall grant an exception to this criterion when alternatives to the tree removal have been considered and no reasonable alternative exists to allow the property to be used as permitted in the zone. d. Nothing in this section shall require that the residential density to be reduced below the permitted density allowed by the zone. In making this determination, the City may consider alternative site plans or placement of structures of alternate landscaping designs that would lessen the impact on trees, so long as the alternatives continue to comply with the other provisions of this ordinance. C:\\Users\\trappr\\Desktop\\PA-2017-00235.docx e.The City shall require the applicant to mitigate for the removal of each tree granted approval pursuant to section 18.5.7.050. Such mitigation requirements shall be a condition of approval of the permit. VARIANCE 18.5.5.050 1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination may be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance. 2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site. 3. any negative impacts on the development of the adjacent uses and will further the purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant. EXCEPTION TO THE SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.72.090 An exception to the requirements of this chapter may be granted with respect to the requirements of the Site Design Standards adopted under section 18.72.080 if, on the basis of the application, investigation and evidence submitted, all of the following circumstances are found to exist: A. There is a demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements of the Site Design and Use Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Design and Use Standards; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty; or B. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Design and Use Standards. (Ord 3054, amended 12/16/2011) 18.4.8.020.C Approval Criteria C. Exceptions and Variances. Requests to depart from section 18.4.8.030 Solar Setbacks are subject to 18.4.8.020.C.1 Exception to the Solar Setback, below. Deviations from the standards in section 18.4.8.050 Solar Orientation Standards are subject to subsection 18.5.2.050.E Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. 1. Solar Setback Exception. The approval authority through a Type I review pursuant to section 18.5.1.050 may approve exceptions to the standards in 18.4.8.030 Solar Setbacks if the requirements in subsection a, below, are met and the circumstances in subsection b, below, are found to exist. a.That the owner or owners of all property to be shaded sign, and record with the County Clerk on the affected properties' deed, a release form supplied by the City containing all of the following information. i. The signatures of all owners or registered leaseholders holding an interest in the property in question. ii. A statement that the waiver applies only to the specific building or buildings to which the waiver is granted. iii. A statement that the solar access guaranteed by this section is waived for that particular structure and the City is held harmless for any damages resulting from the waiver. iv. A description and drawing of the shading which would occur. b. The approval authority finds all of the following criteria are met. i. The exception does not preclude the reasonable use of solar energy (i.e., passive and active solar energy systems) on the site by future habitable buildings. ii. The exception does not diminish any substantial solar access which benefits a passive or active solar energy system used by a habitable structure on an adjacent lot. iii. There are unique or unusual circumstances that apply to this site which do not typically apply elsewhere. C:\\Users\\trappr\\Desktop\\PA-2017-00235.docx Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00267 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 15-35 S. Pioneer OWNER/APPLICANT: City Of Ashland/Oregon Shakespeare Festival DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to construct a trellis structure to provide shade and shelter for the Green Show stage on the Bricks area of the Oregon at 15-35 South Pioneer Street. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; 39 1E 09 Tax Lot #100; 39 1E 09BB Tax Lots #14200 and #14300; NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday March 8, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 1, 2017 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 15, 2017 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2017\\PA-2017-00267.docx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2017\\PA-2017-00267.docx Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: PA-2017-00325 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 746 C Street OWNER/APPLICANT: Philip and Micaila Gahr DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to allow for the conversion Accommodation. This request includes Site Design Review for the future conversion of the newly created living space into a formal second dwelling unit upon the discontinuation of the COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Multi-family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 391E09AC; TAX LOT: 8700. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday March 8, 2017 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: March 2, 2017 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: March 16, 2017 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning g of final decision. (AMC 18.5.1.050.G) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2017\\PA-2017-00325.docx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 18.5.4.050.A A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. 1. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare. f.The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use. 4. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. 5. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows. a. WR and RR. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. b. R-1. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. c. R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. d. C-1. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. e. C-1-D. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 1.00 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. f.E-1. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. g. M-1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, complying with all ordinance requirements. h. CM-C1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.50 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. i.CM-OE and CM-MU. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area, complying with all ordinance requirements. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2017\\PA-2017-00325.docx k. CM-NC. The retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. l.HC, NM, and SOU. The permitted uses listed in chapters 18.3.3 Health Care Services, 18.3.5 North Mountain Neighborhood, and 18.3.6 Southern Oregon University District, respectively, complying with all ordinance requirements. 18.2.3.220 onditional Permit under chapter 18.5.4, are subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2, and shall meet the following requirements -6. A. dations shall meet all of the following requirements. 1. An accommodation must meet all applicable building, fire, and related safety codes at all times and must be inspected by the Fire Department before occupancy following approval of a Conditional Use Permit and periodically thereafter pursuant to AMC 15.28. 2. The business- license and pay all transient occupancy tax in accordance with AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04 as required. 3. Advertising for an accommodation must include the City planning action number assigned to the land use approval. 4. Offering the availability of residential property for use as an accommodation without a valid Conditional Use Permit approval, current business license and transient occupancy tax registration is prohibited and shall be subject to enforcement procedures. B. ll meet all of the following requirements. 1. The property is located within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector as identified on the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. 2. ry residence of the business-owner. "Business-owner" shall be defined as a person or persons who own the property and accommodation outright; or who have entered into a lease agreement with the property owner(s) allowing for the operation of the accommodation. Such lease agreement must specifically state that the property owner is not involved in the day-to-day operation or financial management of the accommodation and that the business-owner has actual ownership of the business and is wholly responsible for all operations associated with the accommodation, and has actual ownership of the business. 3. The primary residence use, including expansion of floor area. Additional structures may be allowed to accommodate additional units, but must be in conformance with all setback and lot coverage standards of the underlying zone. a. The total number of units, including the business-owner's unit, shall be determined by dividing the total square footage of the lot by 1,800 square feet. Contiguous lots under the same ownership may be combined to increase lot area and the number of units, but not in excess of the maximum established by this ordinance. The maximum nu designated boulevard, but within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector street, the maximum number of units shall be seven. Street designations shall be as determined by the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. b. Excluding the business-owner's unit and the area of the structure it will occupy, there must be at least 400 square feet of gross interior floor space remaining per unit. 5. Each accommodation must have one off-street parking space and the business- be in conformance with chapter 18.4.3. 6. Only one ground or wall sign, constructed of a non-plastic material, non-interior illuminated, and a maximum of six square feet total surface area is allowed. Any exterior illumination of signage shall be installed such that it does not directly illuminate any residential structures adjacent or nearby odation in accordance with subsection 18.4.4.050.C.1. 7. An annual inspection by the Jackson County Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. 8. Transfer of business- accommodation shall be subject to all requirements of this section and conform with the criteria of this section. Any further modifications beyond the existing approval shall be in conformance with all requirements of this section. C. Accessory Travelers the following requirements. 1. mary residence. The 2. The property is limit with the exception of kitchen cooking facilities for the primary residence. 3. 4. The property must have two off-street parking spaces. The tot must not exceed one. 5. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2017\\PA-2017-00325.docx PROJECT NARRATIVE/FINDINGS 02.22.17 PROJECT NAME: 746 C St TYPE OF PLANNING ACTION: Residential Site Review PROJECT INFORMATION: OWNER: Philip/Micaela Gahr 746 C Street Ashland, OR 97520 ARCHITECT: Christopher Brown 426 A Street Suite 101 Ashland, OR 97520 PROJECT ADDRESS: 746 C Street Ashland, OR 97520 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 39-1E-09 CD Tax lot 8700 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low-Density Multi-Family Residential ZONING DESIGNATION: R-2 SITE DATA: Area of Property: 7,405.2 S.F. (. 17 acres) 100% Proposed Residence Total Area: 500 S.F. 7% Proposed Garage Total Area: 80 S.F. 1% Existing Main House Coverage Area: 1,512 S.F. 20% Existing Pool/Patio Area: 850 S.F. 11% Impervious Surface Area 688 S.F. 9 % Total Lot Coverage: 3,630 S.F. 49% Landscape/Undisturbed Area: 3,775 S.F. 51% 1 PARKING REQUIRED: Total Spaces Required: 3 \[Existing Main House(1.5) + <500 sf Proposed Residential Unit(1) = 2.5 credits\] Total Spaces Required = 3 Spaces PROPOSED PARKING SPACES: Total Spaces Proposed: 3 On-Street Standard 1 Spaces On-Site Standard 1 Spaces Compact 1 Spaces On-Site Total= 3 Spaces proposed street credit off-street parking 2 SITE DESCRIPTION: LAND USE: In the general area of the subject property, the use is low-density multi-family residential (Zoned: R-2). SETBACKS: According to the land use ordinance, the property line is the line that is parallel with the public thth alley (6/7 St) behind C Street. The existing garage to be converted to the proposed residence will remain in the existing location and therefore is not required to meet the setback requirements at - The proposed new addition build-- therefore a non-issue. The setbacks at east/west property lines are both in accordance with current city requirements. - property line between the alley parking space and the adjacent property. The proposed residence has a storage/shop area adjacent to the alley - 1.0 Rear Property Line(Southern/Alley-side) proposed residential fenced trash/recycling - existing shop addition enclosure conversion of existing covered bicycle covered pool existing parking space garage to residence parking equipment PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS: The property located at 746 C Street is approximately 7,405.2 S.F. (.17 acres) in size, and currently has 3,630 S.F lot coverage area, including an existing 1 bedroom residence and pool/patio. 1.01SW Viewto ExistingGarage/Proposed Residence1.02NE View to Existing Garage/Proposed Residence 3 ACCESS TO PROPERTY: th Vehicle and pedestrian driveway access arevia both C Street and between 6/7thSt). The C Street driveway runs 16-center of the lot to C Street and is 8-. driveway --the SW corner of the lot and is 14-There is a walkway at the main entrance of the house that leads to the formal porch from C street. At the proposed residence on the south end of the property, a gated entrance main entrance of the proposed studio unit. 1.03 Access to Property at 746 C Street Vehicle Access Pedestrian Access 4 PROJECT DESCRIPTION: REQUEST: The proposed plan entails the conversion of a 540 sf existing garage unit into a proposed residence of 500 sf(including an addition of 87 sf). 79 sf of the garage will remain to be used as shop/storage. The new addition will create an exterior fenced courtyard at the entrance off of the alley, and allow for an intermediary connection to the shared yard area with the existing residence. LOW-DENSITY MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING COMPLIANCE: The proposed usage complies with the R-2 Zone District (Chapter 18.24) in regard to permitted uses, setbacks, lot coverage, and height. ACCESS/PARKING: AMC 18.2.5.030.A requires 1.5 parking spaces for the primary residence and 1 space for the proposed residential unit, due to the proposed area of the unit being less than or equal to 500 sf. A total of three parking spaces will be required, one of which is proposed to be an on-street (standard) parking credit at - for approximately 33.3% of the required parking per code(<50%). ARKING STUDIES: The request for granting of a parking credit for an on-street parking space is based on a series of photographs by the applicant exhibiting the minimal demand for street parking at the location of the proposed residence. As exhibited by the photographs there is a high availability of parking spaces along thth C street between 6 and 7street, specifically along the South side of C(applicants property). The North side of C street has had higher density street parking due to the construction/restoration of the church th and surrounding properties at the corner of 6/C street. thththththth 1.04 C Street 6/7 12/16 2pm 1.05 C Street 6/7 1/17 11 am 1.06 C Street 6/5 2/15 10 am 5 UTILITIES: Existing water/gas/sewer and storm sewer lines are located to the east of the existing residence and new lines will be installed at existing location and run south-east to the proposed unit. There is currently an existing seperate electrical meter and service installed for the proposed residence and will be metered separately in coordination with Dave Tygerson of City of Ashland. ARCHITECTURE: The applicant has provided a site plan, floor plans for the proposed residential unit, exterior elevations and sections as well as digital renderings. bike parking/trash enclosure 1.07 Proposed Residence Floor Plan proposed residence existing residence 1.08 Proposed Residence Perspective 6 1.09 south elevation 1.10 north elevation 1.11 east elevation 1.12 west elevation proposed residence existing residence 1.13 proposed residence perspective 7 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT (AMC 18.40): The proposed one-story structure is 14-0 --half stories in height as required by the R-2 zone. SOLAR ACCESS(AMC 18.70): The city of Ashland solar ordinance is specifically designed to address solar impact to adjacent properties to the north. The proposed structure will be in conformance with the ordinance, having no impact on neighboring property across C street(north of the lot). L ANDSCAPING AND OPEN SPACE: Total landscaping for the site is 3,775 sf (51%), exceeding the requirement for zone requirements for 35% landscape. All existing landscape is irrigated and has a variation in coverage/height per zoning requirements. ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS: ASHLAND PLANNING: Elements such as exterior lighting, trash and recycling, and bike parking would also need to be shown on the plan and described how they will be integrated into the proposal. All exterior lighting will be down-lighting with motion sensor/timer control, to ensure minimal disturbance to the surrounding neighborhood. Trash, recycling, and bicycles will be inside the fenced yard perimeter and under the shelter of the roof overhang. NEW ELECTRIC SERVICE: ASHLAND PLANNING: The City of Ashland requires that a separate electrical service/meter be installed for each independent living unit. Installation of a new electrical meter/service would also require that a service connection fee be paid to the Electric Department and the meter installed, inspected and approved prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the unit. Staff would suggest contacting Dave Tygerson of the City of Ashland Electric Department to verify service requirements, including meter placement and applicable fees. ALSO this requires that the new unit be assigned a new address. A new electrical service/meter is currently installed on the eastern face of the existing residence. The applicant will pay a connection fee to the Electrical Department and the meter will be inspected and approved prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the unit. NEW ADDRESS: ASHLAND PLANNING: All new Accessory Residential Units require new addresses assigned by the City of Ashland Public Works Department. The applicant intends to take the necessary steps to be assigned a new address for the Accessory Residential Unit by the City of Ashland Public Works Department. TREE PRESERVATION AND PROTECTION: ASHLAND PLANNING: All planning actions are required to include a tree preservation/protection plan in accordance with AMC 18.61; this is intended to ensure that trees are protected during all site disturbance (including demolition, construction, driveway/parking installation, staging of materials, etc. This plan must address all trees on the property over six-inches in diameter at breast height (d.b.h.) and all trees that are located on adjacent properties within 15 feet of the property line as well. The construction of the proposed building will not impact any trees on the property. 8 ENERGY USE APPROXIMATION The project intends to use a electrical ductless mini-split system for the heating and cooling of the proposed residence. It is estimated that an annual energy budget of 5,000 kWh (per energystar website) will be required for use. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT (CHAPTER 18.5.4) In reference to section 18.2.3.220 Travelers Accommodation in R-2 and R-3 zones, the applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit under chapter 18.5.4, subject to Site Design Review under chapter 18.5.2 and meeting the following requirements: 1. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. Confirmed, applicant is in conformance with zoning standards. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. Confirmed, all aforementioned services and access will be provided to subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. Confirmed, as shown in elevations/plans. b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. The applicant anticipates light to moderate usage of the traveler accommodation during the peak spring/summer/fall seasons. The estimated average weekday ITE trip rate for a multifamily unit is 6.47 in comparison the ITE trip rate for a hotel unit 8.7. This disparity in trip rates will most likely be a non-issue as the applicant will be providing bicycles for transportation and the proximity to both the railroad district and downtown will encourage pedestrian/bicycle transit as the preferred means of transportation. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. Confirmed, as shown in photographs/elevations/plans. d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare. f. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use. 4. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. 5. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows. c. R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones: 9 A. accommodation is sited must be the primary residence of the business-owner. "Business-owner" shall be defined as a person or persons who own the property and accommodation outright; or who have entered into a lease agreement with the property owner(s) allowing for the operation of the accommodation. Such lease agreement must specifically state that the property owner is not involved in the day-to-day operation or financial management of the accommodation, and that the business-owner has actual ownership of the business and is wholly responsible for all operations associated with the accommodation, and has actual ownership of the business. B. The property is located within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector as identified on the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. C. The primary residence on the site must be at least 20 years old. The primary residence may be altered and adapted for traveler's accommodation use, including expansion of floor area. Additional structures may be allowed to accommodate additional units, but must be in conformance with all setback and lot coverage standards of the underlying zone. D. mined by the following criteria: 1. The total number of units, including the business-owner's unit, shall be determined by dividing the total square footage of the lot by 1,800 square feet. Contiguous lots under the same ownership may be combined to increase lot area and the number of units, but not in excess of the maximum established by this ordinance. The maximum number of accommodation units ccommodation with primary lot frontage on boulevard, but within 200 feet of a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector street, the maximum number of units shall be seven. Street designations shall be as determined by the Street Dedication Map in the Comprehensive Plan. Distances to the property from a boulevard, avenue, or neighborhood collector shall be measured via a public street or public alley to a lot line. 2. Excluding the business-owner's unit and the area of the structure it will occupy, there must be at least 400 square feet of gross interior floor space remaining per unit. E. Each accommodation must have one off-street parking space and the business- have two parking spaces. All parking spaces shall be in conformance with chapter 18.4.3. F. Only one ground or wall sign, constructed of a non-plastic material, non-interior illuminated, and a maximum of six square feet total surface area is allowed. Any exterior illumination of signage shall be installed such that it does not directly illuminate any residential structures adjacent or nearby the traveler's accommodation in accordance with subsection 18.4.4.050.C.1. G. times and must be inspected by the Fire Department before occupancy following approval of a Conditional Use Permit and periodically thereafter pursuant to AMC 15.28. H. An annual inspection 10 by the Jackson County Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. H. An annual inspection by the Jackson County Health Department shall be conducted as required by the laws of Jackson County or the State of Oregon. I. The business-owner must maintain a city business license and pay all transient occupancy tax in accordance with AMC 4.24 and AMC 6.04 as required. J. Adverti assigned to the land use approval. K. valid Conditional use Permit approval, current business license and Transient Occupancy Tax registration is prohibited and shall be subject to enforcement procedures. L. Transfer of business- of this section and conform with the criteria of this section. Any further modifications beyond the existing approval shall be in conformance with all requirements of this section. The applicant is in agreement with and meets the requirements of the aforementioned conditions for a Conditional Use Permit for Travelers Accommodation in R-2 and R-3 zones. 11 02579 ,ro ,dn alhsa ,.ts c 647 0 arkitek 2_21_17 . 16_037 ecnediser rhag 1 REVISIONS ikhc^\\m3blln^Ð\]Zm^3 sheet:G christopherbrown426 a streetashland, or97520tel.:541.591.9988 02579 ,ro ,dn alhsa ,.ts c 647 1 arkitek 2_21_17 . 16_037 ecnediser rhag 1 REVISIONS ikhc^\\m3blln^Ð\]Zm^3 sheet:A christopherbrown426 a streetashland, or97520tel.:541.591.9988 02579 ,ro ,dn alhsa ,.ts c 647 1 arkitek 2_21_17 . 16_037 ecnediser rhag 2 REVISIONS ikhc^\\m3blln^Ð\]Zm^3 sheet:A christopherbrown426 a streetashland, or97520tel.:541.591.9988 02579 ,ro ,dn alhsa ,.ts c 647 1 arkitek 2_21_17 . 16_037 ecnediser rhag 3 REVISIONS ikhc^\\m3blln^Ð\]Zm^3 sheet:A christopherbrown426 a streetashland, or97520tel.:541.591.9988 02579 ,ro ,dn alhsa ,.ts c 647 2 arkitek 2_21_17 . 16_037 ecnediser rhag 3 REVISIONS ikhc^\\m3blln^Ð\]Zm^3 sheet:A christopherbrown426 a streetashland, or97520tel.:541.591.9988 02579 ,ro ,dn alhsa ,.ts c 647 1 arkitek 2_21_17 . 16_037 ecnediser rhag 8 REVISIONS ikhc^\\m3blln^Ð\]Zm^3 sheet:A christopherbrown426 a streetashland, or97520tel.:541.591.9988 March 2017 Ashland Historic Review Board Schedule Meet at 3:00pm, Lithia Room* Terry, Keith, Tom March 9th March 16th Terry March 23rd Terry March 30th Terry April 6th Terry *Call 541-488-5305 to verify there are items on the agenda to review PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS FOR PLANNING ACTIONS PA-2014-00710 143 Nutley Swink & Whitford PA-2014-02206 485 A Street Whitford PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer Leonard PA-2015-01695 399 Beach Skibby PA-2015-01517 209 Oak Shostrom PA-2016-00387 95 N. Main Shostrom PA-2016-00209 25 N. Main Giordano PA-2016-00818 175 Pioneer Shostrom & Skibby PA-2016-00847 252 B Street Whitford PA-2016-01027 276 B Street Shostrom & Leonard PA-2016-01641 221 Oak Street Shostrom PA-2016-01947 549 Fairview Emery PA-2016-02103 133 Alida Swink PA-2016-02095 563 Rock St. Whitford PA-2016-02114 556 B Von Chamier PA-2017-00013 15, 35, 44 & 51 S. Pioneer Street ALL Memo __________________________________________________________________________________ DATE: March 8, 2017 TO: All Historic Commissioners FROM: Regan Trapp, Clerk RE: Historic Preservation Week activities Commissioners, Please see attached brochure of events for this year. Please let me know if there are any changes that need to be made. Thank you, Regan Trapp Page 1 of 1 Memo to commissioners2017.doc n c ii r 7 o t 1 s i 0 H 2 l k a d e n en o a i W l t h a n s N o A i t e t a av r r e b s e l e e r C P 12/20/2016 Historic Commission Membership_Web.doc \\ @ashland.or.us Packets \\ Historic Commission \\ Mail - EAddress shobro@jeffnet.org kswink@mind.net skwhippet@mind.net terryskibby321@msn.com tomarch@charter.netbill@ashlandhome.nettttaylord1@yahoo.compiper@kencairnlandscape.com mark.schexnayder@ashland.o r.usregan.trapp Commissions & Committees \\ dev - comm 20442233 \\ -- G: WorkPhone 552552 HomePhone Membership List ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Mailing Address City of AshlandPlanning Dept.City of AshlandPlanning Dept. 88887 201201201201201201720192019 -------- 3030303030303030 -------- TermExpiration44444444 hitford NameDale ShostromChairmanKeith SwinkSam WTerry SkibbyTom GiordanoBill EmeryTaylor LeonardPiper Von Chamier Mark SchexnayderRegan TrappAdmin. Staff