Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-06-08 Historic PACKET HISTORIC COMMISSION MEETING AGENDA June 8, 2016 at 6:00 P.M. I. REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. SISKIYOU ROOM in the Community Development/Engineering Services Building, located at 51 Winburn Way II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Historic Commission regular meeting of May 4, 2016 III. PUBLIC FORUM: Business from the audience not included on the agenda. (Total time allowed for Public Forum is 15 minutes. Speakers are limited to 5 minutes or less, depending on the number of individuals wishing to speak.) IV. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: Carol Voisin V. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Possible amendment to Chapter 18 Placement of public art on a historical contributing structure. VI. COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: 165 Water Street-Amy Gunter VII. PLANNING ACTION REVIEW: PLANNING ACTION: 2016-00818 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 163/ 175 N. Pioneer Street OWNERS: Yates APPLICANT: C. Brown DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval to install wooden arbors in the front of both street. The proposed arbors will not be connected and are being reviewed under one application. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial; ZONING: C-1 39 1E-09-BB; TAX LOTS: 12500 and 12600 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00847 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 252-256 B Street OWNERS: Maura & Kathleen Van Heuit APPLICANT: Jerome White of Kistler + Small + White Architects DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and Conditional Use Permit approval to allow a remodel and 1,664 square feet of additions to the three-unit building located at 252-256 B Street. A Conditional Use Permit is required because the proposal exceeds the Maximum Permitted Floor Area in a Historic District by 13.6 percent. The application also includes a request for an Exception to the Site Design and Use façade or on any elevation that is visually prominent from a public right-of-way, and additions that obscure posal will remove the existing decorative gable and rake details on the front street-facing façade and reapply them to a second-story gable on the proposed addition. The gable will be raised approximately eight feet to accommodate the second story. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 39 1E 09BA; TAX LOTS: 5700 PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00587 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 872 Siskiyou Boulevard OWNER: John Shrode APPLICANT: Suncrest Homes, LLC DESCRIPTION: A request for a Variance to allow for the construction of a new driveway at 872 Siskiyou Boulevard. The Variance is required to construct a new driveway that is proposed to be less than 100 feet from an existing driveway on Siskiyou Boulevard. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 39 1E 09DA; TAX LOT #: 6900. VIII. NEW ITEMS: Review board schedule Project assignments for planning actions Historic Preservation Week wrap up IX. OLD BUSINESS: Golden Spike plaque update Pioneer Mike update X. DISCUSSION ITEMS: XI. ADJOURNMENT: ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION DRAFT Meeting Minutes May 4, 2016 Community Development/Engineering Services Building 51 Winburn Way Siskiyou Room CALL TO ORDER: Commission Chair, Shostrom called the meeting to order at 6:01pm in the Siskiyou Room at the Community Development and Engineering Offices located at 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520. Commissioners Present: Council Liaison: Mr. Shostrom Carol Voisin Mr. Skibby Mr. Whitford Staff Present: Mr. Ladygo Mark Schexnayder; Staff Liaison Mr. Swink Regan Trapp; Secretary Mr. Emery Ms. Kencairn Commissioners Absent: Mr. Giordano (E) APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ladygo motioned to approve minutes from April 6, 2016. Swink seconded. Whitford abstained PUBLIC FORUM: There was no one in the audience wishing to speak. COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: Voisin gave the Council Liaison report. Items discussed were: Council added 3 new amendments to ordinances focused on downtown behavior related to non- criminal activity. o Obstructing sidewalks and passageways -6ft of sidewalk must remain clear at all times. o No solicitation of money 20 feet from an ATM or at any outside restaurants. rd o Effective June 3, smoking is prohibited downtown and in public spaces (sidewalks) and 20 feet from any outdoor restaurant city wide. Smoking is allowed in alleys, alleyways and parking lots only. Employee union negotiations are complete. The sewer issue at the Shafer house is still being worked on and is confidential information at this time. The Fire Chief has requested 3 additional firefighters. He is asking for $120,000 over the next 4 years. $315,000 was approved for updating the water master plan. Council will receive a presentation on modern art . Ms. Seltzer, the staff liaison of the Public Arts Commission will notify Historic Commission when this is to be presented. It was suggested that George Kramer give a presentation to Council regarding the national historic districts and if the Council would be open to it. After a brief discussion, the Historic Commission motioned in support of the presentation. Shostrom motioned in support of the presentation. Kencairn seconded. No one opposed. Shostrom read aloud the procedure for public hearings. PLANNING ACTION REVIEW: PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00209 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 25 North Main Street OWNERS: Ashland Holdings, LLC APPLICANT: Allan Sandler DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for a balcony addition for the property located at 25 North Main Street. The application includes a request for two Exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards: 1) to allow a balcony on the front of the building extending into the North Main Street right-of-way where the Downtown Design Standards in AMC 18.4.2.060.C.2 prohibit projecting balconies in a street facing elevation; and 2) to allow an addition on a primary façade or elevation that is visually prominent from a public right-of-way or that obscures character defining features where the Historic District Design Standards in AMC 18.4.2.050.B.12 direct that such additions are to be avoided. The application also proposes to remove and replace the two street trees in front of the building. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; 39 1E 09 BB; TAX LOT: 70000 There was no ex parte contact or conflict of interest indicated by the Commission. Schexnayder gave the staff report for PA-2016-00209. The Commission reviewed the history of the building with Schexnayder. According to SHPO it is individually listed. Shostrom opened the public hearing to the applicant. Allan Sandler, owner of Granite Taphouse, residing at 1260 Prospect St, Ashland, OR addressed the Commission regarding his project. There was some discussion by the Commission in regards to the size of the columns on the outside of the building. Shostrom closed the public hearing to the applicant and opened to the Commission for discussion. Kencairn motioned to approve PA-2016-00209 with conditions below. Ladygo seconded. No one opposed. Emery abstained. Historic Commission would like to review a future revised proposal which would be limited to changing the design of the corbels. The commission suggested that a simplified corbel design would be an appropriate treatment for the subject building. PLANNING ACTION: PA-2016-00763 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 5 North Main Street OWNERS: Parkview Plaza LLC APPLICANT: Barry and Kathleen Thalden DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review approval for the installation of Public Art at 5 North Main Street. The application involves the painting of a mural upon the entirety of the south wall facing Calle Guanajuato. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial Downtown; ZONING: C-1-D; 39 1E 09 BB; TAX LOT: 50003 There was no ex parte contact or conflict of interest indicated by the Commission. Schexnayder gave the staff report for PA-2016-00763. Shostrom opened the public hearing to the applicant. Barry and Kathryn Thalden, 550 Ashland Loop Road, Ashland, OR addressed the Commission regarding their proposal. Ms. Thalden stated that this is a lively space in Ashland with the outdoor restaurants and market and the tourists love to come there. Ms. Thalden went on to say that they would like to celebrate sister city, did find one artist that stood out from the rest and was very capable of taking on this project. This artist captured the spirit of Guanajuato in her paintings. Mr. and Ms. Thalden presented the Commission with photos of the proposed mural and stated that it will not change any of the structural or physical characteristics of the building. Ms. Thalden impressed upon the fact that both the Public Arts Commission and the Parks Commission have approved this design. They spoke about the timeline of the work and stressed that the stth work start on June 1 and be completed for the ribbon cutting ceremony on July 4 for the International be there to give suggestions on paint and UV coating. There will also be 5 assistant artists from SOU helping as well. Bruce Roberts, owner of the building, at 5 N. Main, Ashland, OR addressed the Commission. He is proud to be the recipient of this mural on the Calle and that this is an amazing gift given to The City of Ashland. Mina Turner president of the Amigo Club at SOU addressed the Commission. Ms. Turner gave a brief summary of the relationship between the sister cities. Shostrom asked about where the color from the mural ends and Mr. Thalden stated that the painting ends at the downspouts. awkward surface to paint on and asked if the artist has looked at the wall as of yet. Ms. Thalden stated that Denise Baxter has looked at it and she will be assisting the artist. Allan Sandler, 1260 Prospect, Ashland, OR addressed the Commission. Mr. Sandler stated he likes the design and would like to see some sort of narrative on the mural so when people stop to look at the painting, they can read about it as well. Ann Seltzer, Staff Liaison to the Public Arts Commission, addressed the Commission. Ms. Seltzer spoke about the wall prep and emphasized that th will take to ensure that the palette colors are maintained. She went on to say, that there will be a final clear coat applied at the end as an anti- graffiti protectant and to prevent sun damage. Ladygo asked if the shade protectors will stay and Ms. Thalden stated that yes, they will stay. The artwork that hangs on the walls Ms. Seltzer added that the Parks Commission has agreed to move the gate (entry) altogether and put in a removable ballard at the entrance of the Calle. Shostrom closed the public hearing and opened to the Commission for comments. The Commission was strongly supportive, and thought the location was appropriate given that it was a subordinate façade that lacked any character-defining architectural features. They noted that the surface was not the best for a mural and might need an undercoat to smooth it out, but that overall it was an improvement to the building. They also noted that the art itself and the artist were appropriate of the location for t role in the sister city relationship. Whitford motioned to approve PA-2016-00763 as presented. Kencairn seconded. No one opposed. NEW ITEMS: Review board schedule Project assignments for planning actions Historic Preservation Week OLD BUSINES: There was no old business to discuss. DISCUSSION ITEMS: Theater Corridor Project - RFQ Iron Mike osed Theater Corridor Project. The Commission recommended no changes and thanked the Public Arts Commission for listening to their comments and incorporating them into the RFQ. The Commission briefly discussed their possible involvement in the rededication of Iron Mike but decided to table the issue until next meeting. th Skibby stated that he would like tours of the Railroad district to start on June 17 at 10am and go through the end of September. Trapp will make flyers for distribution to hotels in the area. COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA: There were no items to discuss. Review Board Schedule th May 12 Terry, Kerry, Tom May 19th Terry, Sam, Bill th May 26 Terry, Kerry, Tom nd June 2 Terry, Bill, Andrew th June 9 Terry, Keith, Dale Project Assignments for Planning Actions PA-2014-01956 Lithia & First All PA-2014-00710/711 143/135 Nutley Swink & Whitford PA-2014-01283 172 Skidmore Shostrom PA-2014-02206 485 A Street Ladygo PA-2015-00178 156 Van Ness Ave Kencairn PA -2015-00374 160 Lithia Way Emery PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer Ladygo PA-2015-01496 35 S. Second-Winchester Inn Shostrom PA-2015-01695 399 Beach Skibby PA-2015-01769 860 C Ladygo PA-2015-01517 209 Oak Shostrom PA-2015-02203 868 A Street Whitford PA-2016-00073 151 Pioneer Swink PA-2016-00275 574 Allison Emery PA-2016-00387 95 N. Main Shostrom PA-2016-00763 5 N. Main Swink PA-2016-00209 25 N. Main Kencairn ANNOUNCEMENTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEMS: Next meeting is scheduled June 8, 2016 at 6:00 pm. There being no other items to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 8:15pm Respectfully submitted by Regan Trapp Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 PLANNING ACTION: 2016-00847 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 252-256 B Street OWNER: Maura & Kathleen Van Heuit APPLICANT: Jerome White of Kistler & White Architects DESCRIPTION: A request for Site Design Review and Conditional Use Permit approval to allow a remodel and 1,664 square feet of additions to the three-unit building located at 252-256 B Street. A Conditional Use Permit is required because the proposal exceeds the Maximum Permitted Floor Area in a Historic District by 13.6 percent. The application also includes a request for an Exception to the Site Design and Use Standards’ Historic District Design Standards (18.4.2.050.B.12) which directs that “Additions on the primary façade or on any elevation that is visually prominent from a public right-of-way, and additions that obscure or destroy character defining features” are to be avoided. The proposal will remove the existing decorative gable and rake details on the front street-facing façade and reapply them to a second- story gable on the proposed addition. The gable will be raised approximately eight feet to accommodate the second story. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multi-Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; ASSESSOR’S MAP:39 1E 09BA; TAX LOTS: 5700. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday June 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, June 9, 2016at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING: June 14, 2016 at 7:00 PM, Ashland Civic Center, 1175 East Main Street Notice is hereby given that a PUBLIC HEARING on the following request with respect to the ASHLAND LAND USE ORDINANCE will be held before the ASHLAND PLANNING COMMISSION on meeting date shown above. The meeting will be at the ASHLAND CIVIC CENTER, 1175 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon. The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, either in person or by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Commission to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. A copy of the Staff Report will be available for inspection seven days prior to the hearing and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Department, Community Development and Engineering Services, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. During the Public Hearing, the Chair shall allow testimony from the applicant and those in attendance concerning this request. The Chair shall have the right to limit the length of testimony and require that comments be restricted to the applicable criteria. Unless there is a continuance, if a participant so requests before the conclusion of the hearing, the record shall remain open for at least seven days after the hearing. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the City Administrator’s office at 541-488-6002 (TTY phone number 1-800-735-2900). Notification 72 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to the meeting. (28 CFR 35.102.-35.104 ADA Title I). If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division, 541-488-5305. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2016\\PA-2016-00847.docx SITE DESIGN AND USE STANDARDS 18.5.2.050 The following criteria shall be used to approve or deny an application: A. Underlying Zone: The proposal complies with all of the applicable provisions of the underlying zone (part 18.2), including but not limited to: building and yard setbacks, lot area and dimensions, density and floor area, lot coverage, building height, building orientation, architecture, and other applicable standards. B. Overlay Zones: The proposal complies with applicable overlay zone requirements (part 18.3). C. Site Development and Design Standards: The proposal complies with the applicable Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4, except as provided by subsection E, below. D. City Facilities: The proposal complies with the applicable standards in section 18.4.6 Public Facilities and that adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the property and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. E. Exception to the Site Development and Design Standards. The approval authority may approve exceptions to the Site Development and Design Standards of part 18.4 if the circumstances in either subsection 1 or 2, below, are found to exist. 1. There is a demonstrable difficulty meeting the specific requirements of the Site Development and Design Standards due to a unique or unusual aspect of an existing structure or the proposed use of a site; and approval of the exception will not substantially negatively impact adjacent properties; and approval of the exception is consistent with the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design; and the exception requested is the minimum which would alleviate the difficulty.; or 2. There is no demonstrable difficulty in meeting the specific requirements, but granting the exception will result in a design that equally or better achieves the stated purpose of the Site Development and Design Standards. CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS 18.5.4.050.A A Conditional Use Permit shall be granted if the approval authority finds that the application meets all of the following criteria, or can be made to conform through the imposition of conditions. 1. That the use would be in conformance with all standards within the zoning district in which the use is proposed to be located, and in conformance with relevant Comprehensive plan policies that are not implemented by any City, State, or Federal law or program. 2. That adequate capacity of City facilities for water, sewer, electricity, urban storm drainage, paved access to and throughout the development, and adequate transportation can and will be provided to the subject property. 3. That the conditional use will have no greater adverse material effect on the livability of the impact area when compared to the development of the subject lot with the target use of the zone, pursuant with subsection 18.5.4.050.A.5, below. When evaluating the effect of the proposed use on the impact area, the following factors of livability of the impact area shall be considered in relation to the target use of the zone. a. Similarity in scale, bulk, and coverage. b. Generation of traffic and effects on surrounding streets. Increases in pedestrian, bicycle, and mass transit use are considered beneficial regardless of capacity of facilities. c. Architectural compatibility with the impact area. d. Air quality, including the generation of dust, odors, or other environmental pollutants. e. Generation of noise, light, and glare. f. The development of adjacent properties as envisioned in the Comprehensive Plan. g. Other factors found to be relevant by the approval authority for review of the proposed use. 4. A conditional use permit shall not allow a use that is prohibited or one that is not permitted pursuant to this ordinance. 5. For the purposes of reviewing conditional use permit applications for conformity with the approval criteria of this subsection, the target uses of each zone are as follows. a. WR and RR. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. b. R-1. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. c. R-2 and R-3. Residential use complying with all ordinance requirements, developed at the density permitted by chapter 18.2.5 Standards for Residential Zones. d. C-1. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. e. C-1-D. The general retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 1.00 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. f. E-1. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, developed at an intensity of 0.35 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements; and within the Detailed Site Review overlay, at an intensity of 0.50 floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. g. M-1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.2.2 Base Zones and Allowed Uses, complying with all ordinance requirements. h. CM-C1. The general light industrial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.50 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. i. CM-OE and CM-MU. The general office uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area, complying with all ordinance requirements. k. CM-NC.The retail commercial uses listed in chapter 18.3.2 Croman Mill District, developed at an intensity of 0.60 gross floor to area ratio, complying with all ordinance requirements. l. HC, NM, and SOU. The permitted uses listed in chapters 18.3.3 Health Care Services, 18.3.5 North Mountain Neighborhood, and 18.3.6 Southern Oregon University District, respectively, complying with all ordinance requirements. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2016\\PA-2016-00847.docx Planning Department, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 541-488-5305 Fax: 541-552-2050 www.ashland.or.us TTY: 1-800-735-2900 NOTICE OF APPLICATION PLANNING ACTION: 2016-00587 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 872 Siskiyou Boulevard OWNER: John Shrode APPLICANT: Suncrest Homes, LLC DESCRIPTION: A request for a Variance to allow for the construction of a new driveway at 872 Siskiyou Boulevard. The Variance is required to construct a new driveway that is proposed to be less than 100 feet from an existing driveway on Siskiyou Boulevard. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION: Low Density Multiple Family Residential; ZONING: R-2; 39 1E 09DA; TAX LOT #: 6900. NOTE: The Ashland Historic Commission will also review this Planning Action on Wednesday June 8, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTE: The Ashland Tree Commission will also review this Planning Action on Thursday, June 9, 2016 at 6:00 PM in the Community Development and Engineering Services building (Siskiyou Room), located at 51 Winburn Way. NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPLICATION: June 1, 2016 DEADLINE FOR SUBMISSION OF WRITTEN COMMENTS: June 15, 2016 The Ashland Planning Division Staff has received a complete application for the property noted above. Any affected property owner or resident has a right to submit written comments to the City of Ashland Planning Division, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520 prior to 4:30 p.m. on the deadline date shown above. Ashland Planning Division Staff determine if a Land Use application is complete within 30 days of submittal. Upon determination of completeness, a notice is sent to surrounding properties within 200 feet of the property submitting application which allows for a 14 day comment period. After the comment period and not more than 45 days from the application being deemed complete, the Planning Division Staff shall make a final decision on the application. A notice of decision is mailed to the same properties within 5 days of decision. An appeal to the Planning Commission of the Planning ion must be made in writing to the Ashland Planning Division within 12 days from the date of the mailing of final decision. (AMC 18.108.040) The ordinance criteria applicable to this application are attached to this notice. Oregon law states that failure to raise an objection concerning this application, by letter, or failure to provide sufficient specificity to afford the decision maker an opportunity to respond to the issue, precludes your right of appeal to the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) on that issue. Failure to specify which ordinance criterion the objection is based on also precludes your right of appeal to LUBA on that criterion. Failure of the applicant to raise constitutional or other issues relating to proposed conditions of approval with sufficient specificity to allow this Department to respond to the issue precludes an action for damages in circuit court. A copy of the application, all documents and evidence relied upon by the applicant and applicable criteria are available for inspection at no cost and will be provided at reasonable cost, if requested. All materials are available at the Ashland Planning Division, Community Development & Engineering Services Building, 51 Winburn Way, Ashland, Oregon 97520. If you have questions or comments concerning this request, please feel free to contact the Ashland Planning Division at 541-488-5305. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2016\\PA-2016-00587.docx VARIANCE 18.5.5.050 1. The variance is necessary because the subject code provision does not account for special or unique physical circumstances of the subject site, such as topography, natural features, adjacent development, or similar circumstances. A legal lot determination may be sufficient evidence of a hardship for purposes of approving a variance. 2. The variance is the minimum necessary to address the special or unique physical circumstances related to the subject site. 3. e purpose and intent of this ordinance and the Comprehensive Plan of the City. 4. The need for the variance is not self-imposed by the applicant or property owner. For example, the variance request does not arise as result of a property line adjustment or land division approval previously granted to the applicant. G:\\comm-dev\\planning\\Planning Actions\\Noticing Folder\\Mailed Notices & Signs\\2016\\PA-2016-00587.docx June 2016 Ashland Historic Review Board Schedule Meet at 3:00pm, Lithia Room* June 9th Terry, Keith, Dale June 16th June 23rd June 30th July 7th *Call 541-488-5305 to verify there are items on the agenda to review PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS FOR PLANNING ACTIONS PA-2014-01956 Lithia & First All PA-2014-00710/711 143/135 Nutley Swink & Whitford PA-2014-01283 172 Skidmore Shostrom PA-2014-02206 485 A Street Ladygo PA-2015-00178 156 Van Ness Ave Kencairn PA -2015-00374 160 Lithia Way Emery PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer Ladygo PA-2015-01496 35 S. Second-Winchester Inn Shostrom PA-2015-01695 399 Beach Skibby PA-2015-01769 860 C Ladygo PA-2015-01517 209 Oak Shostrom PA-2015-02203 868 A Street Whitford PA-2016-00073 151 Pioneer Swink PA-2016-00275 574 Allison Emery PA-2016-00387 95 N. Main Shostrom PA-2016-00763 5 N. Main Swink PA-2016-00209 25 N. Main Kencairn @ashland.or.us Mail - EAddressshobro@jeffnet.orgkswink@mind.netskwhippet@mind.netterryskibby321@msn.comtomarch@charter.netbill@ashlandhome.netallad@ashlandhome.netcarol@council.ashland.or.usmark.schexnayder@ashland.or.usr egan.trapp \\Commissions & Committees\\Historic Commission\\Packets\\Historic Commission Membership_Print.doc 5/26/2016 dev \\comm- 20442233 G: -- WorkPhone552552 HomePhone Membership List ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION Mailing AddressCity of AshlandPlanning Dept.City of AshlandPlanning Dept. 88887 20120120120120120172017 ------- 30303030303030 ------- TermExpiration4444444 no arol Voisin NameDale ShostromChairmanKeith SwinkSam WhitfordTerry SkibbyTom GiordaBill EmeryAndrew LadygoCCouncil LiaisonMark SchexnayderRegan TrappAdmin. Staff