HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016-11-02 Historic PACKET
HISTORIC COMMISSION MEETING
AGENDA
November 2, 2016 at 6:00 P.M.
I.REGULAR MEETING - CALL TO ORDER: 6:00 p.m. – SISKIYOU ROOM in the Community
Development/Engineering Services Building, located at 51 Winburn Way
II.APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Historic Commission regular meeting of October 5, 2016.
III.PUBLIC FORUM: Business from the audience not included on the agenda. (Total time allowed for Public
Forum is 15 minutes. Speakers are limited to 5 minutes or less, depending on the number of individuals
wishing to speak.)
IV.COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT: Carol Voisin
V.DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Continued discussion of proposed ordinance amendments for public art installations on historic
contributing buildings.
VI.NEW ITEMS:
Review board schedule
Project assignments for planning actions
thth
Historic Preservation Week: May 14 – 20 2017
VII.OLD BUSINESS:
VIII.COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA:
IX.ADJOURNMENT:
ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
DRAFT Meeting Minutes
October 5, 2016
Community Development/Engineering Services Building 51 Winburn Way Siskiyou Room
CALL TO ORDER:
Commission Chair, Shostrom called the meeting to order at 6:01pm in the Siskiyou Room at the Community
Development and Engineering Offices located at 51 Winburn Way, Ashland OR 97520.
Commissioners Present: Council Liaison:
Giordano Carol Voisin
Skibby
Von Chamier Staff Present:
Whitford Mark Schexnayder; Staff Liaison
Emery Regan Trapp; Secretary - Absent
Swink
Commissioners Absent: Shostrom, Leonard
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
Von Chamier introduced herself as the newest member of the Commission.
Whitford motioned to approve minutes from September 7, 2016. Swink seconded. No one opposed.
PUBLIC FORUM:
There was no one in the audience wishing to speak.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT:
Voisin was not present to give the Council Liaison report.
DISCUSSION ITEMS:
Pioneer Hall Courtyard was discussed and Schexnayder gave the background on the project.
Schexnayder went on to say that Ms. Kathol from Public Works is in charge of the project which includes
tree cleanup and putting in a new courtyard at Pioneer Hall. Ms. Kathol went to Historic Review board a
few weeks ago and ran some ideas by some of the Commissioners. Natural brick was chosen by the
review board as the best replacement for surface material in the courtyard and comments were submitted
to Public Works by Shostrom. Schexnayder stated that he is still waiting to hear back from Ms. Kathol in
regards to the types of the brick or pavers that they decide to go with. According to Ms. Kathol, she made
some calls and there is not enough brick and she is having difficulty finding the quantity that is needed
for the project. Schexnayder stated that pavers are less
slippery and provide a better walking surface. The Commission agreed to continue this until review board,
where materials will be presented by Ms. Kathol.
Proposed changes to AMC
Ms. Harris, Planning Manager for the City of Ashland, addressed the Commission regarding the
proposed changes to the Ashland Municipal Code in regards to public art on historic contributing
structures. The idea is to take the review process out of site design review and move the review
process out of the land use ordinance to each individual Commission. Harris gave a background as to
why the proposed changes are coming about and stated that
fairly complex process and wants to look at the process as a whole. Harris would like the Historic
Commission to put forth some type of motion or recommendation to the City Council so they can move
th
forward with discussion on the ordinance change at the October 18 meeting. Skibby asked if the
decision by the City Council could be appealed once the decision is made and Harris
possible that one could file at the State level to LUBA.
would go from 120 days, to 30 days with no appeal or public input. Skibby stressed that taking this out
After much discussion,
the Commission came up with some viable concerns regarding the proposed changes to the Ashland
Municipal Code.
Whitford motioned to approve staff sending a statement to City Council in regards to changes to the
process for reviewing public art within the Historic District in the Ashland Municipal Code, Chapter 18.
Swink seconded. Voice vote; All AYES. Motion passed
Below is an excerpt taken from the memo drafted by Ms. Harris on October 12, 2016 to the Ashland Mayor
and City Council:
historic contributing or individually listed buildings involving public art installations in the land use
process. The Commission believes that the structure of the land use process works well to protect
application of approval criteria.
review process for public art
installations on historic contributing or individually listed buildings. The Commission suggests the
inclusion of revised approval criteria so that the impact to historic buildings are systematically evaluated
responsibility to protect historic resources of statewide significance are fulfilled. While the
existing process for acquiring public art in AMC 2.29.100 does not currently include a public notice or
explicitly require a public hearing, it does appear the intent of the proposed amendments is to include a
noticing and hearing process similar to a Type 1 land use application review process.
The Historic Commission identified several concerns with the draft amendments included the references
to the land use ordinance in AMC 2.24.060.A and C, the role of the Historic Commission comments in
the decision making process, and the effect of the compression of the decision making process to 30
days.
If a new review process is created outside of the land use ordinance, the Commission suggests locating
the revised evaluation criteria and public involvement process within the new process, rather than
referencing the building design and Type 1 noticing sections of the land use ordinance. This would make
the process more understandable and eliminate any question of whether referencing sections of the land
use ordinance would trigger the land use process.
The Historic Commission is accustomed to advising the decision maker, such as the Staff Advisor,
Planning Commission or City Council, in regards to buildings in the historic districts. The Commission
suggests fashioning the new process so that advisory commissions (i.e., Historic Commission, Public
Arts Commission) make recommendations directly to the City Council.
Finally, the Commission expressed concern about reducing the time frame from a maximum of 120 days
under the land use process to 30 days under the new process. Specifically, the concern was the effect
on public involvement and ability of the average person to learn about and participate in the process in
this time frame. The applications for the murals on the historic contributing buildings located at 27 Second
St. and 5 N. Main St. were processed and approved within the 45-day time period required for Type 1
planning applications.
End of excerpt
NEW ITEMS:
Review board schedule
Project assignments for planning actions
OLD BUSINESS:
COMMISSION ITEMS NOT ON AGENDA:
Review Board Schedule
th
Oct 6 Terry, Keith, Bill
th
Oct 13 Terry, Tom, Bill
th
Oct 20 Terry, Piper, Dale
th
Oct 27 Terry, Sam, Taylor
rd
Nov 3 Terry, Keith, Bill
Project Assignments for Planning Actions
PA-2014-01956 Lithia & First All
PA-2014-00710/711 143/135 Nutley Swink & Whitford
PA-2014-01283 172 Skidmore Shostrom
PA-2014-02206 485 A Street NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2015-00178 156 Van Ness Ave Shostrom
PA -2015-00374 160 Lithia Way Emery
PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2015-01496 35 S. Second-Winchester Inn Shostrom
PA-2015-01695 399 Beach Skibby
PA-2015-01769 860 C NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2015-01517 209 Oak Shostrom
PA-2015-02203 868 A Street Whitford
PA-2016-00073 151 Pioneer Swink
PA-2016-00275 574 Allison Emery
PA-2016-00387 95 N. Main Shostrom
PA-2016-00763 5 N. Main Swink
PA-2016-00209 25 N. Main NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2016-00818 175 Pioneer Shostrom & Skibby
PA-2016-00847 252 B Street Whitford
PA-2016-00587 872 Siskiyou Blvd Skibby
PA-2016-01027 276 B Street Shostrom & Leonard
PA-2016-01641 221 Oak Street Shostrom
ANNOUNCEMENTS & INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
Next meeting is scheduled November 2, 2016 at 6:00 pm
There being no other items to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 7:26pm
Respectfully submitted by Regan Trapp
Memo
DATE: November 2, 2016
TO: Ashland Historic Commission
FROM: Maria Harris, Planning Manager
RE: Continued discussion of ordinance amendments to review process for public art
installations on historic contributing buildings
The City Council delayed the review of the proposed ordinance amendments to the review process for
public art installations on historic contributing buildings from the October 18, 2016 to the November 15,
2016 meeting. Staff recommends the Historic Commission review the attached draft ordinance
amendments and provide comments to the Mayor and City Council for the November 15 meeting.
Please refer to the packet from the October 5 Historic Commission meeting for background information.
The November 15 City Council meeting is for the purpose of preliminary discussion. If the City
Council decides to move forward, the changes to the land use ordinance will require a public hearing
and recommendation by the Planning Commission and a public hearing and final decision by the City
Council.
ATTACHMENTS
Proposed ordinance amendments - AMC 2.29.165
Historic Commission Memo to City Council, October 12, 2016
2.29.165 Review of artwork on Individually Listed and Contributing Structures in Historic
Districts.
A. The Public Art Commission shall seek input from the Historic Commission prior to issuing a
Call for Artist for public art to be sited on structures listed on the National Register of Historic
Places or on contributing properties within a Historic District on the National Register of
Historic Places. Historic Commission recommendations to the Public Art Commission shall be
provided within 45 days of delivery of the Call for Artist to the Community Development
Department. Historic Commission recommendations shall be advisory only.
B. In its review of public art proposed for installation on structures listed on the National
Register of Historic Places or on contributing properties within a Historic District on the
National Register of Historic Places, the Public Art Commission shall apply the following
criteria:
1.Public art shall not be located on a building façade with a public entrance.
2.The number of murals per block face may be limited.
3.Historically significant murals (including historic advertisements) shall not be painted
over, even if faded.
4.Murals shall not be allowed on an unpainted exterior building wall made of stone or brick
without the consent of the City Council.
C. The Historic Commission shall review public art proposed on structures listed on the National
Register of Historic Places and on contributing properties within a Historic District on the
National Register of Historic Places using the following criteria:
1.The scale of the public art should be appropriate to the building and the site.
2.The installation of the public art should complement and enhance the historic nature of
the building and be incorporated architecturally into the building exterior.
3.The location of public art on the building shall not cover or detract from significant or
character-defining architectural features such as such as windows, doors, pilasters,
cornices, windows, doors or other building trim, feature bands, or other recessed or
projecting features.
4.The visual integrity of the building should be maintained after the public art is applied to
the exterior by preserving prominent vertical and horizontal lines created by architectural
features such as columns, posts, piers, windows, doors, lintels, windowsills, feature
bands, the foundation, base or other recessed or projecting features.
5.To the extent practicable, murals shall be applied only to the flat planes of walls.
6.Imitative materials including but not limited to asphalt siding, wood textured aluminum
siding, and artificial stone shall be avoided in public art installations.
7.The number of murals per block face may be limited.
D. Historic Commission input to the Public Art Commission on proposed public shall be
provided within 45 days of delivery of the proposal to the Community Development Department.
In addition to the Public Art Commission, Historic Commission input shall be provided directly
to the City Council.
E. The Community Development Department shall provide notice of Historic Commission
review of proposed public art to owners of record of all properties located within 200 feet of the
perimeter of the subject site. Owners of record shall be determined by the most recent property
tax assessment roll. The notice shall include the street address of the individually listed or
historic contributing building, a summary of the proposal, and the applicable criteria for the
decision in subsections 18.2.29.165. B and C.
F. For public art proposed in a historic district but not attached or applied to a structure listed on
the National Register of Historic Places or on contributing properties within a Historic District,
the Public Art Commission shall provide proposed public art concepts to all City Commissions
for review. A City Commission may review the artist concept using its existing powers and
criteria, and in its advisory role, provide written recommendations to the City Council. City
Commission may not participate in the creative design process.
October 5, 2016
Historic Commission Packet
November 2016
Ashland Historic Review Board Schedule
Meet at 3:00pm, Lithia Room*
Terry
November 3rd
November 10th Terry
November 17th
Terry
December 1st Terry
December 7th Terry
*Call 541-488-5305 to verify there are items on the agenda to review
PROJECT ASSIGNMENTS FOR PLANNING ACTIONS
PA-2014-01956 Lithia & First All
PA-2014-00710/711 143/135 Nutley Swink & Whitford
PA-2014-01283 172 Skidmore Shostrom
PA-2014-02206 485 A Street NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2015-00178 156 Van Ness Ave Shostrom
PA -2015-00374 160 Lithia Way Emery
PA-2015-00878 35 S. Pioneer NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2015-01496 35 S. Second-Winchester Inn Shostrom
PA-2015-01695 399 Beach Skibby
PA-2015-01769 860 C NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2015-01517 209 Oak Shostrom
PA-2015-02203 868 A Street Whitford
PA-2016-00073 151 Pioneer Swink
PA-2016-00275 574 Allison Emery
PA-2016-00387 95 N. Main Shostrom
PA-2016-00763 5 N. Main Swink
PA-2016-00209 25 N. Main NEED ASSIGNED
PA-2016-00818 175 Pioneer Shostrom & Skibby
PA-2016-00847 252 B Street Whitford
PA-2016-00587 872 Siskiyou Blvd Skibby
PA-2016-01027 276 B Street Shostrom & Leonard
PA-2016-01641 221 Oak Street Shostrom
10/26/2016
Historic Commission Membership_Print.doc
\\
@ashland.or.us
Packets
\\
9761)
-
621
Historic Commission
\\
Mail
-
Cell ttaylord1@yahoo.com
EAddress shobro@jeffnet.org(kswink@mind.net skwhippet@mind.net terryskibby321@msn.com tomarch@charter.netbill@ashlandhome.nettpiper@kencairnlandscape.comcarol@council.ashland.or.usmark.schexnayder@as
hland.or.usregan.trapp
Commissions & Committees
2767
\\
-
dev
-
comm
97614375047427158897319420442233
\\
--------
G:
WorkPhone482Fax 488821821 631944 488 552552
9863
-
8737880234502805066017778603559
--------
HomePhone482482482482 488 840503482
Membership List
endower
ASHLAND HISTORIC COMMISSION
Mailing Address309 N Pioneer Street524 Granite St.355 Scenic Drive611 Beach Street495 Chestnut St. #22962 Grizzly Drive1095 Benson Way #10915 GlSt.908 Fox StreetCity of AshlandPlanning
Dept.City of AshlandPlanning Dept.
88887
201201201201201201720192019
--------
3030303030303030
--------
TermExpiration44444444
no
Staff
arol Voisin
NameDale ShostromChairmanKeith SwinkSam WhitfordTerry SkibbyTom GiordaBill EmeryTaylor LeonardPiper Von ChamierCCouncil LiaisonMark SchexnayderRegan TrappAdmin.